help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published online on April 24, 2008
Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2007-0041
Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2007-0041
Endocrine Reviews 0 (2008): 200700411-
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/4/465    most recent
Author Manuscript
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, W. J.

Submitted on November 26, 2007
Accepted on February 26, 2008

Advances in Male Contraception

Stephanie T. Page*, John K. Amory, and William J. Bremner

Center for Research in Reproduction and Contraception, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: page{at}u.washington.edu.

Despite significant advances in contraceptive options for women over the last 50 years, world population continues to grow rapidly. Scientists and activists alike point to the devastating environmental impacts that population pressures have caused including global warming from the developed world and hunger and disease in less developed areas. Moreover, almost of half of all pregnancies are still unwanted or unplanned. Clearly, there is a need for expanded, reversible, contraceptive options. Multicultural surveys demonstrate men's willingness to participate in contraception and their female partners to trust them to do so. Notwithstanding their paucity of options, male methods including vasectomy and condoms account for almost a third of contraceptive use in the United States and other countries. Recent, international, clinical research efforts have demonstrated high efficacy rates (90–95%) for hormonally-based male contraceptives. Current barriers to expanded use include limited delivery methods and perceived regulatory obstacles, stymieing introduction to the marketplace. However, advances in oral and injectable androgen delivery are cause for optimism that these hurdles may be overcome. Non-hormonal methods, such as compounds that target sperm motility, are attractive in their theoretical promise of specificity for the reproductive tract. Gene and protein array technologies continue to identify potential targets for this approach. Such non-hormonal agents will likely reach clinical trials in the near future. Great strides have been made in understanding male reproductive physiology; the combined efforts of scientists, clinicians, industry and governmental funding agencies could make an effective, reversible, male contraceptive an option for family planning over the next decade.


Key words: male fertility • progesterone • spermatogenesis • testosterone







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society