help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2006-0044
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotondi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Romagnani, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotondi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Romagnani, P.
Endocrine Reviews 28 (5): 492-520
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Role of Chemokines in Endocrine Autoimmune Diseases

Mario Rotondi, Luca Chiovato, Sergio Romagnani, Mario Serio and Paola Romagnani

Excellence Center for Research, Transfer and High Education De Novo Therapies (M.R., S.R., M.S., P.R.), University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy; and Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology (M.R., L.C.), Istituto Superiore per la Prevenzione e Sicurezza del Lavoro Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Chair of Endocrinology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mario Rotondi, M.D., Ph.D., Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Istituto Superiore per la Prevenzione e Sicurezza del Lavoro Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100 Pavia, Italy. E-mail: mrotondi{at}fsm.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
Chemokines are a group of peptides of low molecular weight that induce the chemotaxis of different leukocyte subtypes. The major function of chemokines is the recruitment of leukocytes to inflammation sites, but they also play a role in tumoral growth, angiogenesis, and organ sclerosis. In the last few years, experimental evidence accumulated supporting the concept that interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}) inducible chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) and their receptor, CXCR3, play an important role in the initial stage of autoimmune disorders involving endocrine glands. The fact that, after IFN-{gamma} stimulation, endocrine epithelial cells secrete CXCL10, which in turn recruits type 1 T helper lymphocytes expressing CXCR3 and secreting IFN-{gamma}, thus perpetuating autoimmune inflammation, strongly supports the concept that chemokines play an important role in endocrine autoimmunity. This article reviews the recent literature including basic science, animal models, and clinical studies, regarding the role of these chemokines in autoimmune endocrine diseases. The potential clinical applications of assaying the serum levels of CXCL10 and the value of such measurements are reviewed. Clinical studies addressing the issue of a role for serum CXCL10 measurement in Graves’ disease, Graves’ ophthalmopathy, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and Addison’s disease have been considered. The principal aim was to propose that chemokines, and in particular CXCL10, should no longer be considered as belonging exclusively to basic science, but rather should be used for providing new insights in the clinical management of patients with endocrine autoimmune diseases.

I. Introduction
II. The Chemokines
A. Historical notes and nomenclature
B. The CXC chemokine family
C. The IFN-{gamma}-inducible CXC chemokines and their receptor CXCR3

III. Main Biological Actions of CXCR3-Binding Chemokines
A. Chemotaxis and regulation of the immune response
B. Angiogenesis

IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in Healthy Subjects and in Nonendocrine Immune-Mediated Pathological Conditions
A. CXCR3-binding chemokines in healthy subjects
B. CXCR3-binding chemokines in some immune-mediated pathological conditions

V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in Endocrine Autoimmune Diseases
A. Notes on immune effector mechanisms in autoimmune diseases
B. Autoimmune thyroid diseases
C. CXCR3-binding chemokines in type 1 diabetes mellitus
D. CXCR3-binding chemokines in primary adrenal deficiency (Addison disease)

VI. Pharmacological Modulation of Chemokine Secretion and Biological Action
A. PPAR{gamma} agonists in vitro inhibit CXCL10 production induced by proinflammatory cytokines
B. Corticosteroids in vitro inhibit CXCL10 production induced by proinflammatory cytokines

VII. Serum Levels of CXCR3-Binding Chemokines: Potential Applications as Novel Serum Markers in Endocrine Clinical Practice
VIII. Future Perspectives
IX. Conclusions


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, the role of immune responses in the pathogenesis of several human diseases has been demonstrated. Numerous soluble molecules produced by, or active on, the cells of the immune system were initially identified because of their biological activities and then were cloned. These molecules, which have been named as cytokines, act as signaling molecules involved not only in inflammation, but also in cell differentiation and division, fibrosis repair, and many other functions. Cytokines differ from classic hormones because these latter are produced by specialized cells and released into the bloodstream, thus having the possibility to act at a distance from their source in an "endocrine" fashion. By contrast, cytokines are usually produced by different cell types, and they generally act within a short range in a "paracrine" or "autocrine" manner. Because of their many features, cytokines cannot be classified in well-defined families. However, a number of them, despite their heterogenous functional activity, have been grouped together under the name of chemokines, which means chemotactic cytokines. A distinctive property of chemokines is their redundancy, inasmuch as many chemokines may have the same receptor, and a single chemokine may bind to different receptors. Exception to this rule is provided by a small group of interferon (IFN)-{gamma} inducible chemokines, which interact exclusively with the chemokine receptor CXCR3. All chemokines possess the ability to attract and recruit distinct types of cells in different organs or tissues. To exert such a function, many chemokines are released into the bloodstream, where they can be detected and also quantitated. Chemokines exhibit their peculiar function of attraction and recruitment of different cell types during physiological processes of maturation and trafficking of immune cells throughout different lymphoid organs, but they also play an important role in inducing, maintaining, and amplifying the inflammatory reactions. Therefore, the ability of chemokines to attract and recruit different immune cells in inflamed tissues is important for the protection against infectious agents. However, chemokines can also have a dangerous effect for the body by maintaining and amplifying chronic inflammatory reactions, when the invading agent cannot be rapidly removed or neutralized, as well as by sustaining chronic immune responses against self-antigens which are responsible for autoimmune diseases. For this reason, the assessment of chemokines in inflamed tissues may help with understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in these disorders. More importantly, chemokines are produced in the inflamed tissue by both infiltrating and resident cells, with a strict relationship with the phases of inflammation. The enhanced production of chemokines in the inflamed tissue(s) and the relative blood flow of the inflamed district are both responsible for the increased concentrations of the same chemokines in serum and other biological fluids. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that at least in some diseases, the detection and quantitation of chemokines in biological fluids may provide a useful tool for monitoring the phase and the severity of the disease.

This review will be focused on the possible role of the so-called CXCR3-binding chemokines in autoimmune endocrine disorders. The main reason for this choice stems from the fact that recently CXCR3-binding chemokines were extensively investigated and were found to exhibit strong variations both in inflamed tissues and in the serum during the different phases of autoimmune endocrine diseases. This is probably due to the fact that the production of all CXCR3-binding chemokines by resident cells is stimulated by IFN-{gamma}. IFN-{gamma} also induces the local recruitment of inflammatory cells, which express the CXCR3 receptor and are, in turn, able to produce IFN-{gamma}. This sequence of events results in an increased production of the same group of chemokines, thus establishing an important loop for the maintenance and amplification of inflammatory reactions. Therefore, CXCR3-binding chemokines probably play a pathogenic role in autoimmune endocrine disorders by influencing the development and/or by amplifying the inflammatory process responsible of these diseases. Moreover, due to their increase in biological fluids and to the variations of their levels according to the different phase of the disease, the measurement of CXCR3 chemokines in the serum may represent a useful tool for monitoring the activity of the inflammatory process.


    II. The Chemokines
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Historical notes and nomenclature
The first chemokine was identified in 1977 when Walz et al. (1) sequenced native platelet factor 4, a procoagulant and angiostatic factor stored in platelet {alpha}-granules. Subsequently, from 1984 through 1989, cDNAs for structurally related proteins, including IFN-{gamma}-induced protein 10 (IP-10) (2), JE (3), IFN-{gamma}-induced monokine (Mig) (4), regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (5), I-309 (6), KC (7), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} (MIP-1{alpha}) (8), were cloned by investigators looking for cell differentiation- and activation-associated genes. Thus, the existence of a gene family was established before identifying their functions (9, 10, 11). The discovery of the neutrophil-targeted chemokine IL-8 represented a landmark in immunology because it was the first leukocyte subtype-selective chemoattractant to be found (12, 13). The discovery of IL-8 also promoted the search for functions of other chemokines on leukocyte chemotaxis as well as the discovery of new family members. The interest in the field grew with the subsequent reports of macrophage chemotactic protein CCL2, CCL5, and CCL11, the first important chemokines active on monocytes, T cells, and eosinophils, respectively (14, 15, 16, 17). As the number of family members expanded, various short-lived collective terms were used, including "the platelet factor (PF)-4 family" (9), "the small inducible cytokine family" (10), and "the intercrines" (11). Finally, in 1992 at the Third International Symposium on Chemotactic Cytokines in Baden, Germany, the term "chemokine," a short neologism for "chemotactic cytokines," was coined and accepted as standard (18). The nomenclature for chemokines is based on the configuration of a conserved amino-proximal cysteine-containing motif. Based on this system, there are currently four branches of the chemokine family: CXC, CC, CX3C, and C (where X is any amino acid) (Table 1Go) (19, 20). The transmission of chemokine-encoded messages is mediated by specific cell-surface G protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains. At present, the human chemokine receptor system consists of 20 different receptors (Table 1Go). In 2000, a new nomenclature system for chemokines and chemokine receptors was approved by the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Pharmacology (NC-IUPHAR) (Table 1Go) (21).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Family of human chemokines and chemokine receptors

 
The main messages of this section are:
Chemokines are a family of small proinflammatory peptides with high homology, mediating the recruitment of different subsets of peripheral blood leukocytes.
The nomenclature for chemokines is based on the configuration of a conserved amino-proximal cysteine-containing motif. Based on this system, chemokines are classified as CXC, CC, CX3C, and C.
Chemokines were first named on the basis of their properties or on the cell types from which they were isolated. In 2000, a new nomenclature was introduced.

B. The CXC chemokine family
CXC chemokines have four conserved cysteines and are distinguished by the presence of one amino acid between the first and second cysteine. The CXC chemokine subfamily includes 14 different members whose encoding genes are clustered on human chromosome 4, with few exceptions (22). Most members of the CXC chemokine family exhibit chemotactic properties toward neutrophils and lymphocytes, and are unique in that they constitute a family showing positive or negative activity on the control of angiogenesis (23). CXC chemokines can be further divided into two groups (ELR+ and non-ELR) according to the presence or absence of the tripeptide motif glutamic acid-leucine-arginine (ELR) N-terminal to the first cysteine residue. Interestingly, as shown by site-directed mutagenesis, the presence or the absence of an ELR motif in the chemokines-amino acid sequence seems to correlate with their angiogenic or angiostatic activity, respectively (24). Thus, ELR+ CXC chemokines have been linked to angiogenesis (25, 26), whereas the ELR- CXC chemokines, including CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, antagonize angiogenesis (23). Furthermore, ELR-CXC chemokines, such as CXCL13, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, are powerful chemoattractants for lymphocytes. Recently, a novel CXC chemokine receptor with angiogenic potential was identified and named as CXCR7 (27).

Another classification scheme was based on the function of chemokines and their expression pattern. According to these criteria, two groups of chemokines were identified. The first group includes the so-called inflammatory/inducible chemokines, which are regulated by proinflammatory stimuli, such as lipopolysaccharide and primary cytokines (i.e., IL-1 and TNF-{alpha}), and orchestrate innate and adaptive immune responses. Inflammatory chemokines control the recruitment of effector leukocytes in infection and inflammation sites, in tissue injuries, and in tumors.

The second group includes the homeostatic/constitutive chemokines, which are important in lymphocyte and dendritic cell trafficking, and in immune surveillance. Homeostatic chemokines navigate leukocytes during hematopoiesis in the bone marrow and thymus; during initiation of adaptive immune responses in the spleen, lymph nodes, and Peyer’s patches; and during immune surveillance in healthy peripheral tissues (19).

The finding that several chemokines cannot be assigned unambiguously to either one of the two functional categories led to the characterization of a third group of chemokines, which were referred to as "dual-function" chemokines (19, 20). Dual-function chemokines participate in immune defense functions (i.e., are up-regulated under inflammatory conditions) and also target noneffector leukocytes, including precursor and resting mature leukocytes, at sites of leukocyte development and immune surveillance. Many dual-function chemokines are highly selective for lymphocytes and have a role in T cell development in the thymus, as well as in T cell recruitment to inflammatory sites.

Genes encoding for inflammatory CXC chemokines are typically found in a major cluster on human chromosome 4, whereas genes for homeostatic chemokines are located alone or in small clusters on different chromosomes (23).

Studies on the expression of chemokines in different species showed that none of the mammalian CXC chemokines, except CXCL12 and CXCL14, possesses orthologs in any other vertebrate class, including birds. This finding suggests that the fine regulation of inflammatory responses is a recent acquisition in the evolution. Indeed, some orthologs of human CXC chemokines are not represented even in mice (28).

The role of CXC chemokines in several types of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders has been largely investigated and was recently reviewed (20). Converging evidence suggests that a subgroup of CXC chemokines, sharing binding to the same receptor, CXCR3, play a role in the pathogenesis of endocrine autoimmune diseases. Thus, this review will focus mostly on the role of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its binding chemokines in endocrine autoimmune diseases.

The main messages of this section are:

CXC chemokines have four conserved cysteines and are distinguished by the presence of one amino acid between the first and second cysteine. The CXC chemokine subfamily includes 14 different members.
Members of the CXC chemokine family exhibit chemotactic properties toward neutrophils and lymphocytes and are unique in that they constitute a family exhibiting positive or negative activity on the control of angiogenesis.
CXC Chemokines have also been classified as "inflammatory" or "homeostatic" on the basis of their main functions.

C. The IFN-{gamma}-inducible CXC chemokines and their receptor CXCR3
Three CXC chemokines were found to share the property to be induced by IFN-{gamma}. They were initially called "IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein 10" (IP-10) (2), Mig (4), and IFN-{gamma} inducible T cell {alpha} chemoattractant (I-TAC) (29). In the new nomenclature, the three chemokines were named as CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11, respectively (21).

All three chemokines were found to bind a unique receptor named CXCR3, which was discovered in 1995 on a genomic clone isolated by PCR-based homology hybridization. The gene was named GPR9, was originally incorrectly mapped to human chromosome 8p11.2–12 (30), and was later correctly mapped to chromosome Xq13 (31). The rank order of binding affinity is CXCL11 > CXCL10 > CXCL9. Initially, CXCR3 was found to be expressed on a subset of circulating T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, and among T cells, mainly on type 1 T helper (Th1) cells (32, 33). In subsequent studies, it was found that CXCR3 was expressed not only by immune cells, but also by resident cells (34) such as human mesangial cells (35), human liver stellate cells, vascular pericytes (36), and human microvascular endothelial cells (37).

More recently, a distinct, receptor, deriving from an alternative splicing of the CXCR3 gene was identified and named as CXCR3-B (38). CXCR3-B not only binds CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11, but also acts as functional receptor for the orphan CXC-chemokine CXCL4, which exclusively interacts with CXCR3-B. The interaction of chemokines with CXCR3 mediates their chemotactic and immune effects, whereas the binding to the splicing variant CXCR3-B accounts for their angiostatic effect (38). To add to the complexity of CXCR3 biology, another variant of human CXCR3 has been identified, which is generated by posttranscriptional exon skipping. This receptor was named CXCR3-alt and binds CXCL11, but its biological role is still unknown (39). The main aim of this review is to discuss the role of IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) and their classic CXCR3 receptor; therefore, the biological effects resulting from the interaction between the alternative variant of CXCR3 and their ligands will be limited to their angiostatic effects.

The main messages of this section are:

IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC are CXC chemokines sharing the properties to be strongly up-regulated by IFN-{gamma}.
IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC have been named as CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11 following the new nomenclature, which will be used throughout this review.
CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 share binding to a common receptor named CXCR3.
CXCR3 was first identified on activated T cells, and its expression was associated with Th1-mediated immune responses.
CXCR3 is also expressed by cell types different from T cells, such as endothelial cells, vascular pericytes, and epithelial cells.
Two splicing variants of the CXCR3 receptor exist, mediating different biological functions.


    III. Main Biological Actions of CXCR3-Binding Chemokines
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Chemotaxis and regulation of the immune response
All three CXCR3-binding chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) have been shown to play a chemotactic role in different cells types of the immune system. In particular, activated T cells, B cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells have been found to express CXCR3 and can be attracted in inflamed tissues by CXCR3-binding chemokines, thus accounting for the mononuclear cell infiltrate characteristic of inflammatory reactions (40). The molecular mechanisms of the chemokine-driven cell chemotaxis have been reviewed extensively (19).

T cells were originally divided into two main subsets which are named as CD4+ T helper (Th) and of CD8+ cytotoxic T (Tc) cells. Subsequently, two different types of CD4+ Th cells, known as type 1 Th (Th1) and type 2 Th (Th2), were recognized (Fig. 1Go). Th1 cells produce cytokines, such as IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and lymphotoxin-{alpha}, which result in the activation of macrophages, in the production of complement-fixing and -opsonizing antibodies, and also in cytotoxicity (41). By contrast, Th2 cells have been thought to play a regulatory rather than protective role, inasmuch as cytokines produced by these cells (i.e., IL-4 and IL-13) have an inhibitory effect on the production of Th1 cytokines, as well as on several functions of activated macrophages (41). It should be noted, however, that Th1 and Th2 cells do not represent clearly distinct lineages of Th cells, as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but extremely polarized forms of a much more heterogenous Th cell response. Moreover, their phenotype of cytokine production in humans is not always so clearly polarized as in mice.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of Th cell differentiation and regulation. The production of IL-12 promotes the development of Th1 cells producing IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, and TNF-ß, which activate macrophages and are responsible for cell-mediated immunity and phagocyte-dependent protective responses. By contrast, the production of IL-4 favors the development of Th2 cells producing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which are responsible for strong antibody production, eosinophil activation, and inhibition of several macrophage functions, thus providing phagocyte-independent protective responses. Th1 cells mainly develop after infections by intracellular bacteria and some viruses, whereas Th2 cells predominate in response to infestations by gastrointestinal nematodes. The production of TGF-ß and IL-6 promotes the development of Th17 cells, a distinct type of effector T cell that induces tissues damage. Once Th17 cells are established, IL-23 also participates in their maintenance. Treg cells, which inhibit autoimmunity and protect against tissue injury, are induced by TGF-ß in the absence of IL-6. Thus, TGF-ß functions as a regulator of tissue-damaging Th17 cells when collaborating with IL-6 and as an activator of antiinflammatory Treg cells when acting without IL-6. Solid lines indicate up-regulation, whereas dotted lines indicate inhibition. [For reviews on the topic, see S. Romagnani: Clin Exp Allergy 36:1357–1366, 2006 (92 ); and L. Steinman: Nat Med 13:139–145, 2007 (93 ).]

 
With regard to the expression of CXCR3, Th1 cells were initially described as being specifically equipped with this receptor, whereas Th2 cells expressed distinct chemokine receptors, such as CCR3, CCR4, and CCR8 (32, 33). However, this dichotomy in chemokine receptor expression between Th1 and Th2 cells is not so strict as initially thought, the difference being quantitative rather than qualitative (34).

The fact that Th1 cells produce IFN-{gamma}, which induces the production by different cell types of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, and that these chemokines in turn can attract and recruit Th1 cells, suggests the existence of a loop between IFN-{gamma}-producing Th1 cells and resident cells producing CXCR3-binding chemokines (42). Th2 cells express different chemokine receptors, such as CCR4 and CCR8, thus being recruited in target tissues by CCL17, CCL22 (both ligands for CCR4), and CCL1 (ligand of CCR8). Based on these findings, it can be proposed that chemokines interacting with T cells via CXCR3 may induce a recruitment of Th1 cells into the inflamed tissues. On the other hand, chemokines interacting with different chemokine receptors on T cells may recruit Th2 cells, which are responsible for allergic inflammation.

Further studies support the concept that the role of CXCR3-binding chemokines in the regulation of the immune response goes far beyond their powerful chemotactic activity on activated lymphocytes. A large body of experimental evidence emphasizes the role of CXCL10 in the initiation and amplification of host alloresponses (43). CXCL10-deficient mice have impaired T cell responses, impaired contact hypersensitivity, and limited inflammatory cell infiltrates. They are also unable to control viral infections (44). CXCL10 not only mediates leukocyte recruitment, but also drives T cell proliferation to allogenic and antigenic stimulation and IFN-{gamma} secretion in response to antigenic challenge (42). Accordingly, CXCL10 up-regulates the production of Th1 cytokines and down-regulates the production of Th2 cytokines (45). The final result is a strong up-regulation of inflammatory reactions characterized by the production of IFN-{gamma}, thus exerting important protective activity against infections sustained by intracellular bacteria and some viruses, which is provided by Th1 cells (Fig. 2Go). This also results in a down-regulation of allergic inflammation that is provided by Th2 responses.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Role of CXCL10/CXCR3 interactions in the amplification of Th1 immune responses. CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 act as powerful chemotactic factors for the recruitment of Th1 cells in inflamed tissues. Furthermore, they act as selective costimulators of IFN-{gamma} production by T cells in antigen-dependent responses. Because CXCR3 agonists are produced by monocytic, endothelial, and resident epithelial cells in response to IFN-{gamma}, this suggests that CXCR3 ligands and IFN-{gamma} production from CD4+ T cells have the capacity to form a unique cytokine-/chemokine-positive feedback loop to amplify ongoing Th1 immune responses.

 
The main messages of this section are:
CXCR3 preferentially mediates chemotaxis of Th1 cells.
CXCL10 not only mediates leukocyte recruitment, but also drives T cell proliferation to allogenic and antigenic stimulation.
CXCL10 up-regulates the production of Th1 cytokines and down-regulates the production of Th2 cytokines. The final effect is the enhancement of inflammatory reactions characterized by the production of IFN-{gamma}.

B. Angiogenesis
CXCR3-binding chemokines are powerful inhibitors of angiogenesis (23). The major receptor mediating the angiostatic effect of CXC chemokines is CXCR3-B. CXCR3-B is expressed in human microvascular endothelial cells (37, 46) during the late S-phase of the cell cycle on through mitosis, representing the first example of a chemokine receptor expression linked to a particular phase of the cell cycle (37). In vivo, the expression of CXCR3-B in small vessels (37, 47, 48), is higher in inflamed and neoplastic tissues compared with normal tissues (37).

Angiostatic CXC chemokines were shown to inhibit angiogenesis in several experimental models (49, 50, 51) and to participate in the control of angiogenesis during physiological repair of tissue injury (52). CXCL9 and CXCL10 are specifically expressed during the late phase of wound healing repair, to help prevent unlimited vessel growth without blocking other repair processes involved in wound healing (23).

CXCR3-binding chemokines are also involved in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (53). The levels of CXCL10 were found to be significantly higher in vitreous samples from patients with inactive, compared with active, proliferative diabetic retinopathy. This suggests that decreased levels of this angiostatic chemokine might favor retinal angiogenesis during diabetic retinopathy (53).

Overall, the angiostatic effect of CXCR3-binding chemokines is strictly dependent upon the expression of CXCR3-B, the alternatively spliced form of the classic CXCR3 receptor (38). Yet, the expression of CXCR3-B has not been evaluated in either normal or pathological endocrine glands.

The main messages of this section are:

CXCL10, CXCL9, CXCL11, and CXCL4 are powerful angiostatic agents.
The angiostatic effect of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CXCL4 is mediated by their interaction with CXCR3-B.
CXCR3-B is selectively expressed by endothelial cells only when they are activated and has been observed in endothelial cells of inflammatory and neoplastic tissues.


    IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in Healthy Subjects and in Nonendocrine Immune-Mediated Pathological Conditions
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
The measurement of the serum levels of CXCL10 is currently performed by commercial solid phase ELISA. These kits employ the quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. Early studies measured the serum concentrations of CXCL10 by homemade ELISAs. The availability of the human recombinant CXCL10 protein and of specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) warrant accurate estimation. The mean minimum detectable dose in human sera is below 5.0 pg/ml, whereas the mean coefficients of intra- and interassay variations expressed in percentages are below 5.0 and 10.0%, respectively. No significant cross-reactivity with other CXCR3-binding chemokines or IFN-{gamma} is observed. Commercial ELISA kits for the measurements of CXCL9 and CXCL11 are also available.

A. CXCR3-binding chemokines in healthy subjects
The circulating concentrations of CXCR3-binding chemokines in humans have been extensively studied only for CXCL10, both in health and disease, whereas data regarding the serum levels of the other two chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL11) are still limited. Studies performed in large series of healthy adult subjects found mean serum levels of CXCL10 ranging from 70 to 90 pg/ml (54, 55). Variations between healthy subjects may be estimated by SD values of approximately 50 pg/ml (54, 55). These figures are comparable to those reported in the normal subjects used as controls in clinical studies investigating CXCL10 in patients with endocrine and nonendocrine diseases (which will be quoted when discussing the specific disease). Nevertheless, it should be noted that in the latter studies healthy subjects were rarely screened for circulating autoantibodies, and therefore it is not always possible to exclude the presence of subclinical autoimmune disorders which, at least in some cases, might have affected the serum concentrations of CXCL10. It is now known that in euthyroid chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (CAT), the most frequent subclinical autoimmune condition in humans, especially in middle-aged women, the serum levels of CXCL10 are significantly increased compared with healthy controls proven to be negative for thyroglobulin (Tg) and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies (Ab). Euthyroid CAT might represent the most frequently undetected condition biasing the results of CXCL10 in apparently healthy subjects. Many other, less easily detectable abnormalities (e.g., other subclinical autoimmune diseases) may lead to similar problems. The question arises as to how healthy subjects should be selected when comparing their serum CXCL10 levels to those observed in a specific pathological condition. To complicate the issue further, it should be noted that there are currently no data regarding fluctuations of CXCL10 in the serum of individual healthy subjects. As far as our current knowledge permits, we will try to define some physiological variables, which were found to influence the serum levels of CXCL10.

1. The role of gender.
Clinical studies, in which healthy subjects were screened for excluding subclinical thyroid abnormalities by means of thyroid ultrasound (US) and tests for circulating Tg Ab and TPO Ab, found no gender-related differences in circulating concentrations of CXCL10. In the absence of such a screening for subclinical autoimmune conditions, higher serum levels of CXCL10 might be expected in females, due to the well-known greater prevalence of autoimmunity in women than in men. In clinical studies, the potential bias resulting from gender-related differences may be reduced, at least in part, by performing a strict sex-matching between the subjects to be evaluated.

2. The role of age.
An age-related dysregulation of the immune system has been extensively reported by studies performed in humans and experimental animal models of aging (56, 57, 58, 59). The influence of aging on circulating concentrations of CXCL10 was evaluated in two clinical studies (54, 55). Healthy subjects aged from 10 to 80 yr, proven to be negative for circulating thyroid antibodies and with no evidence of other autoimmune diseases, were studied. In a multiple linear regression model including age, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glycemia, total high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, TSH, Tg Ab, and TPO Ab, only age was significantly related to serum levels of CXCL10, a positive correlation being found between the two variables.

3. The role of body weight and BMI.
Although the serum levels of CXCL10 have not been specifically investigated in obesity, studies evaluating healthy subjects reported no change in serum concentrations of CXCL10 in relation to BMI (54). The issue remains open because patients with morbid obesity were not studied.

4. Practical points.
The above-described physiological changes in the serum levels of CXCL10 must be taken into account when this chemokine is measured in different pathological conditions. In diseases such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, or end stage renal diseases, the serum levels of CXCL10 are extremely high; thus, the comparison with healthy subjects might not be biased by gender or age. On the contrary, when studying pathological conditions in which the serum levels of CXCL10 are significantly, but only slightly higher than in healthy controls, such as endocrine autoimmune diseases, the above factors must be considered to reduce potential sources of error. As a consequence, matching patients and controls for gender and age appears critical to avoiding misleading results.

B. CXCR3-binding chemokines in some immune-mediated pathological conditions
In this section, we will briefly review the major findings obtained in nonendocrine diseases, which are either crucial for a better comprehension of the role of chemokines in human pathology or exemplify the applications of their assays in the clinical practice. Consistent with the aim of this review, description of data from basic studies will be limited to essential information, whereas findings obtained in clinical studies will be more extensively described. The latter data support the view that measuring CXCL10 in the serum is useful in several nonendocrine diseases, both autoimmune and nonautoimmune, such as chronic HCV hepatitis. In different clinical settings, the serum levels of CXCL10 proved to be useful as an index predicting the course and severity of the disease, as a marker of its activity, as a predictor of treatment outcome, and as a parameter for choosing the best therapeutic option. The fact that autoimmunity is responsible for most endocrine disease indicates that the results obtained by assaying CXCL10 in autoimmune nonendocrine disorders might be transferred to endocrinopathies. This remains to be done in that, as we will see in the subsequent sections, few clinical studies have been performed so far in endocrine patients.

1. CXCR3-binding chemokines in HCV-induced chronic hepatitis.
The first published clinical study in which the serum levels of CXCL10 were evaluated in human disease is the investigation by Narumi et al. (60), reporting significantly increased circulating concentrations of CXCL10 and CCL2 in patients with HCV compared with healthy subjects. The serum concentrations of both chemokines were found to be significantly higher in patients with chronic active hepatitis C compared with those with chronic persistent hepatitis C. Subsequent studies performed in patients with different types of liver diseases demonstrated that the serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and both hepatitis B virus and HCV chronic hepatitis than in healthy controls (61). Circulating CXCL10 concentrations were found to be significantly correlated with the serum levels of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases. This finding suggested a relationship between the serum levels of CXCL10 and the necroinflammatory activity of hepatitis. Several clinical studies evaluated the changes of serum CXCL10 in patients with HCV hepatitis undergoing IFN-{alpha} therapy (60, 62). In their first report, Narumi et al. (60) had demonstrated that the serum levels of CXCL10 significantly decreased after IFN-{alpha} treatment, but only in cured patients, as assessed by the normalization of serum aminotransferases and by the disappearance of HCV from serum for 6–12 months after stopping therapy (60). In nonresponders to IFN-{alpha}, the basal serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher than in responders to therapy and remained high throughout the treatment (60). A subsequent study reported that the serum levels of CXCL10 and CCL4, but not those of CXCL9, decreased significantly in HCV patients showing a virological response to IFN-{alpha} treatment (63). A recent study simultaneously evaluated the three CXCR3-binding chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) in plasma samples collected at 1 wk before treatment (baseline), 29 d after starting therapy, and 6 months after completion of a course of pegylated IFN, with or without ribavirin (64). The principal interest for this study stems from the fact that it is the only published experience in which the three IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines were assessed simultaneously, thus allowing a comparison of the relative importance of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11. At baseline, the serum concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 were higher in patients with HCV hepatitis compared with healthy controls, the greatest increase being found for CXCL10. After successful antiviral treatment, the serum levels of CXCL10 and CXCL9, but not those of CXCL11, significantly decreased (64). After completion of IFN-{alpha} treatment, sustained responders had circulating levels of CXCL10 similar to healthy subjects, whereas in nonresponders to therapy, the serum levels of CXCL10 remained elevated. Pretreatment levels of CXCL9 did not differ in responders compared with nonresponders and declined during therapy in both groups. No significant association was found between pretreatment levels of CXCL11 or between its changes in serum and the outcome of treatment.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that the circulating levels of each of the three IFN-{gamma}-inducible chemokines are differently regulated during IFN-{alpha} therapy. Of the three chemokines that bind CXCR3, CXCL10 is the one most closely associated with the outcome of treatment with IFN-{alpha} for HCV-related hepatitis, and its pretreatment levels may predict the likelihood of a favorable response (64).

The main messages of this section are:

The serum levels of CXCL10 are related to the activity of HCV hepatitis, showing a significant correlation with the serum concentrations of aminotransferases and with the histological severity of hepatitis.
Successful therapy with IFN-{alpha} in HCV hepatitis results in a long-lasting normalization of circulating CXCL10, which is mainly due to a decreased lymphocytic infiltration of the liver.
Lower pretherapy serum CXCL10 levels can identify those patients who will develop a better response to IFN-{alpha} treatment.
Among the CXCR3-binding chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), CXCL10 is the most helpful and reliable serum marker of the therapeutic outcome in HCV patients.

2. CXCR3-binding chemokines in allograft rejection.
Growing evidence suggests that CXCL10 is critical in promoting and amplifying host alloresponses responsible for acute allograft rejection (65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70). In CXCL10- or CXCR3-gene-deficient mice, cardiac transplants are not acutely rejected and undergo permanent engraftment (43, 65). Accordingly, neutralization of CXCL10 with mAbs prolongs the allograft survival in both cardiac and small bowel models of allograft rejection (65, 66). Furthermore, the intragraft expression of CXCL10 has been reported in association with the rejection of renal (67), lung (68), and cardiac (69, 70) allografts. Thus, the importance of CXCL10–CXCR3 interactions in the pathogenesis of graft failure appears to be clearly demonstrated in multiorgan models.

Recent evidence indicates that CXCR3 and CXCL10 are also highly expressed in conjunction with the development of chronic rejection, also named as chronic allograft vasculopathy (71). Indeed, in addition to its potent effects on immune responses (23, 31, 32, 40, 72, 73, 74, 75), CXCL10 also alters vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell functions (23, 35, 36, 37, 40, 76, 77), thus promoting the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. Pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 were measured in kidney graft recipients to verify its value in predicting the recipient’s risk for graft rejection and transplant failure (78, 79). Patients with normally functioning grafts showed significantly lower pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 compared with patients who experienced graft failure, and lifetime analysis showed significantly lower 5-yr survival rates of the grafts with increasing pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10. Furthermore, frequency of acute rejection episodes in the first month after transplant significantly increased in relation to increasing pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10. In particular, patients with serum CXCL10 levels greater than 150 pg/ml showed a nearly 2-fold greater frequency of rejection. Rejection episodes were not only more frequent, but also more severe in patients showing high pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 (78). Recently, patients developing chronic allograft vasculopathy were also shown to have significantly higher pretransplant serum concentrations of CXCL10 than patients with normally functioning grafts (78, 79). Multivariate analyses indicated that high serum levels of CXCL10 were a significant risk factor for acute graft rejection and graft failure (78). Taken together, these results indicate that high pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 may predict the risk for the development of acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy. Accordingly, the urinary levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 are a sensitive and specific predictor for acute rejection and also mirror the response to antirejection therapy (80, 81). High urinary levels of CXCL10 in the first days after transplant also predict acute rejection, as well as short and long-term graft function (82). Thus, the measurement of CXCR3-binding chemokines in serum or urine may be useful to select those patients requiring more aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

The main messages of this section are:

High pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 identify patients with a higher risk for developing acute rejection, chronic allograft vasculopathy, and subsequent graft failure.
High pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10 are associated with more severe acute rejection, a Th1-mediated reaction.
Pretransplant levels of serum CXCL10 may be used to identify patients requiring more aggressive posttransplant immunosuppression therapy.

3. CXCR3-binding chemokines in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Several chemokine receptors, and among them CXCR3, were shown to be highly expressed in brain samples obtained at autopsy from patients with MS (83, 84, 85), suggesting that CXCR3 might be responsible for the recruitment of autoaggressive T cells. In line with this interpretation, CXCL9 and CXCL10 were found to be significantly elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients, being positively correlated with the CSF cell counts. The relevance of elevated levels of CXCL10 and CXCL9 in the CSF of MS patients was further supported by the uniform detection of CXCR3+ lymphocytes in the perivascular inflammatory cuffs of brain lesions (83, 84, 85). The accumulation of these cells was directly related to the demyelinating process. The demonstration that the chemotactic activity toward CD4+ T cells specific for a myelin basic protein peptide is mediated by CXCL10 (86) and the notion that IFN-{gamma} is a potent inducer both of CXCL10 and of clinical relapses of MS provided evidence for a pathogenetic role of CXCL10 in this disease.

Th1- and Th2-oriented chemokines were sequentially measured in the serum and the CSF of patients with MS. CXCL10 and CCL2 were chosen as prototype chemokines for a Th-1 and a Th-2 phenotype, respectively. The measurement of CXCL10 and CCL2 in the serum and CSF of MS patients showed that these chemokines had a different behavior in relation to the activity of the disease. CXCL10 was higher in the serum and the CSF of patients with acute MS and lower in those with a stable phase of the disease. An opposite pattern characterized the CCL2 secretion profile, with high levels being found in the serum and the CSF during the active phases of MS and with a decline in the stable phase of the disease. These findings indicate an involvement of both chemokines, with reciprocal changes according to the clinical phase of MS (85, 87, 88). Because CXCL10 is mainly related to Th1 responses, the increase of CXCL10 in the serum and the CSF of patients during the acute phases of MS fits with the notion that IFN-{gamma} mediates the immune changes leading to an exacerbation of the disease.

The main messages of this section are:

The simultaneous assessment of chemokines associated with a Th1 or Th2 immune phenotype may constitute a useful approach in autoimmune diseases with a clinical course characterized by active and stable phases (relapsing/remitting).
The serum levels of CXCL10 are higher in the active phase and lower in the stable phase of MS. An opposite behavior characterizes a Th2 chemokine (CCL2).


    V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in Endocrine Autoimmune Diseases
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Notes on immune effector mechanisms in autoimmune diseases
Autoimmune diseases are the consequence of an immune response against self-antigens, due to multiple genetic and environmental factors that result in a failure of the mechanisms devoted to maintaining self-tolerance. The multiple factors involved in the control of reactivity against self-antigens, as well as the mechanisms responsible for their failure, are still partially known and have been widely debated in recent reviews (89). Failure to maintain self-tolerance results in the activation of both self-reactive T and B cells, which produce chronic inflammatory reactions in target tissues. Autoimmune diseases may be organ- or nonorgan-specific. Although the immunopathogenesis of nonorgan-specific autoimmune diseases still remains unclear, the effector mechanisms involved in organ-specific autoimmunity have been mainly related to the activity of CD4+ Th and of CD8+ Tc cells. In particular, for many years the attention was focused on a polarized subset of CD4+ T cells, known as Th1, which are able to produce cytokines, such as IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and lymphotoxin-{alpha}, that result in the activation of macrophages, production of complement-fixing and -opsonizing antibodies, and also cytotoxicity. By contrast, another polarized subset of Th cells, known as Th2, has been thought to play a protective role, inasmuch as cytokines produced by these cells (i.e., IL-4 and IL-13), play an inhibitory effect on the production of Th1 cytokines, as well as on several functions of activated macrophages. Th cells able to produce both Th1 and Th2 cytokines have been named type 0 Th (Th0).

Both Th1 and Th2 cells collaborate with B cells for the production of antibodies. However, Th1-induced antibodies differ from those detectable during Th2 responses because of the different subclasses. In mice, Th1 lymphocytes induce B cells to produce mainly IgG2a, whereas Th2 cells induce the production of IgG1 and IgE. In humans, the situation is less clearly dichotomic, but it is known that Th2 responses are characterized by IgE and IgG4, whereas Th1 responses promote the production of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. IgG1, which represent the major subclass of human IgG in the serum, are complement-fixing and -opsonizing antibodies, and therefore they contribute, together with activated macrophages, to the phagocyte-dependent protection against infectious agents. Usually, IgG1 also represent the major subclass among autoantibodies, and this is the reason why high levels of autoantibodies are commonly observed in patients with diseases characterized by strong Th1 response.

As mentioned in Section III.A, Th1 cells mainly express CXCR3 as a chemokine receptor and can be recruited into target tissues by CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11. Th2 cells express different chemokine receptors, such as CCR4 and CCR8, thus being recruited in target tissues by CCL17, CCL22 (both ligands for CCR4), and CCL1 (ligand of CCR8). The demonstration of IFN-{gamma}-producing T cells and of CXCR3-binding chemokines in target tissues of organ-specific autoimmune disorders, including those affecting the endocrine glands, has suggested the existence of an important pathogenetic loop. The concept is based on the role of these chemokines in recruiting Th1 cells and in maintaining and amplifying chemokine production by Th1 cells through IFN-{gamma} production.

It is worth noting that an impressive series of data obtained both in experimental animal models and in human diseases have shown that when Th1 responses, because of their severity and/or chronicity, become dangerous for the body, they can be shifted to a less polarized profile (Th0) or even to responses characterized by the prevalent production of Th2 cytokines. Likewise, established Th2 responses can be shifted to a less polarized profile or even to a prevalent Th1 profile. This phenomenon is known as immune deviation (90).

In the last few years, a novel subset of Th cells has been discovered and named Th17 or ThIl-17 (Fig. 1Go) (91). These cells appear to be distinct from Th1 and Th2 cells because of peculiar mechanisms of development and possible functions (92, 93). Although Th1 cells mainly develop in response to IL-12 produced by dendritic cells and Th2 cells develop due to the early presence of IL-4, Th17 cells develop in response to the production of IL-23, IL-6, and TGFß1 by dendritic cells. Th17 cells have been recently suggested to play a pathogenic role in autoimmune diseases on the basis of data obtained in animal models, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (which is considered as the equivalent of MS) and collagen-induced arthritis (a model of rheumatoid arthritis). Their role in human endocrine autoimmune diseases remains to be established (94). Thus, in our discussion, we will only take into account the body of experimental evidence suggesting that in these disorders the effector responses are apparently mediated by Th1 cells.

B. Autoimmune thyroid diseases
1. Background.
The thyroid is a major target for autoimmunity. Human autoimmune thyroid disorders (AITD) are characterized by reactivity to self-thyroid antigens, which may be expressed as destructive inflammatory or antireceptor autoimmunity (95) and encompass the clinical spectrum of Graves’ disease and CAT (96, 97, 98). Graves’ disease shares many immunological features with CAT, both diseases being characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the gland, which can result in tissue destruction (99, 100). One of the histopathological hallmarks of thyroid glands affected by AITD is leukocytic infiltration, mainly by mononuclear cells, including T and B lymphocytes and macrophages (95, 101). In AITD, the lymphocytic infiltrate is also an important site of thyroid autoantibody synthesis (95, 102). Lymphocytes mediate important inflammatory effects, such as the release of cytokines (95). The cellular makeup of the infiltrate varies with the type of AITD, the stage of the disease, and the therapy used, but it is also patient-dependent. This cellular infiltrate sometimes organizes itself into germinal centers that share many of the features of lymph node germinal centers (101, 103, 104). Intrathyroidal lymphocytes play a central role in the pathogenesis of AITD, but the mechanisms by which different lymphocytic subsets are recruited and arrested in the thyroid tissue are only partially understood. To the best of our knowledge, the recruitment of lymphocytes in AITD is a multistep process involving adherence and migration across the endothelium, trafficking through the interstitium, and finally moving toward the thyroid follicular cells (105, 106). Leukocyte extravasation involves the combined action of adhesion molecules, such as selectins and integrins, and chemotactic factors, mainly chemokines (107). In AITD, infiltrating lymphocytes and endothelial cells bear an enhanced expression of various adhesion molecules, pointing to lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1/intercellular adhesion molecule-1, very late antigen-4/vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and selectin/selectin ligands adhesion pathways as predominant in lymphocyte migration to the thyroid (108). Studies evaluating cytokines in AITD have demonstrated the production of IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha} by infiltrating T cells and macrophages (109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115). However, the specific role of these molecules in the pathogenesis of AITD is still debated (115). In addition, the thyroid follicular cells themselves produce many cytokines (116, 117, 118, 119, 120).

2. Chemokines in AITD.
In 1992, Weetman et al. (121) first described the production of chemokines by cultured thyroid follicular cells. They demonstrated that thyrocytes stimulated by IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, or IL-1{alpha} produce IL-8, a CXC chemokine (121). A subsequent study showed that human thyrocytes in primary culture, upon stimulation with IL-1{alpha}, TNF-{alpha}, or IFN-{gamma}, produce CCL2 (122). Although the highly organized lymphomononuclear cell infiltration present in AITD suggested an involvement of chemokines in their pathogenesis, several years passed before endocrinologists pointed their attention toward these new molecules. It was not until 2000 that the expression of chemokines in AITD was studied in detail and evidence was provided as to their pathogenetic role, at least in the initial phases of these disorders.

The interest in IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), and their receptor (CXCR3), originated from an investigation aimed at evaluating the antiangiogenetic effects of these molecules. To this purpose, the expression by human endothelial cells of CXCR3 and its ligands was studied in normal tissues and in specimens from diseased organs (37). CXCR3 was detected in a small number of vascular wall cells from normal tissue specimens including thymus, liver, kidney, and gut. Thyroid specimens were obtained from normal tissue and from Graves’ glands. By both immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, a higher signal for the protein and the mRNA of CXCR3 was detected in endothelial cells from Graves’ glands, but not from normal thyroids (37).

In 2001, Garcià-Lòpez et al. (123) first demonstrated the production of CXCR3-binding chemokines by human thyrocytes in primary cultures after stimulation with IFN-{gamma}. In the same culture system, CCL2 and CCL5 were secreted in response to TNF-{alpha}. In basal conditions, CXCL10 and CXCL9 were not detected in the surnatants from thyroid follicular cells, but their secretion was induced by IFN-{gamma} and synergistically increased by TNF-{alpha} addition. As compared with autologous peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), intrathyroidal lymphocytes from AITD patients showed a higher expression of CXCR3 and of the receptors for CCL5 and CCL2, CCR2, and CCR5, respectively. T lymphoblasts expressing CXCR3 showed an increased migration to supernatants of IFN-{gamma} stimulated thyroid follicular cells, which was abolished by neutralizing antibodies directed to CXCL9 and CXCL10, as well as to their receptor, CXCR3. Taken together, these data suggested a role for thyroid follicular cells, through the production of CXCL10, CXCL9, and CCL5, in the recruitment of specific subsets of activated lymphocytes (123).

By using immunohistochemistry, a statistically significant increase of CXCL10 and CXCL9 was found in thyroid tissue specimens obtained from Hashimoto’s glands, compared with normal thyroid tissue (123). By contrast, in patients with Graves’ disease, the intrathyroidal chemokine expression pattern was highly variable, with only a few subjects expressing high levels of CXCL10 and CXCL9, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (123).

A clear-cut demonstration that CXCL9 and CXCL10 were hyperexpressed in Graves’ glands was obtained using combined in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (124). The expression of the mRNAs for CXCL10 and CXCL9 in normal thyroids, as well as in thyroids from patients with autoimmune and nonautoimmune hyperthyroidism (Graves’ disease and toxic adenoma), was assessed by in situ hybridization (Fig. 3Go). The quantitative evaluation of CXCL10 and CXCL9 mRNAs, performed by a computerized video image analysis system, provided evidence that the expression of the mRNAs for the two chemokines was significantly higher in thyroid glands from Graves’ patients compared with normal thyroids or toxic adenoma glands. The wide variability in the expression of chemokines reported by Garcià-Lòpez et al. (123) in Graves’ disease was confirmed and was related to the duration of the disease. A statistically significant increase of CXCL10 expression was found in the thyroid of patients with recent onset (<2 yr) compared with patients with long-standing (>2 yr) disease, in whom the expression of CXCL10 did not differ from that observed in normal thyroid specimens (124).


Figure 3
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Expression of IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10) in Graves’ disease. In situ hybridization was performed on 10-µm frozen sections from normal and Graves’ thyroid glands hybridized with human CXCL10 or CXCL9 antisense mRNA probes (top four panels). Each probe was hybridized for 16 h, washed, then autoradiographed and counterstained with hematoxylin-eosin-phloxine (dark-field original magnifications, x100). Normal and Graves’ thyroid glands showed no signal and high signal, respectively, for the expression level for mRNAs of CXCL10 and CXCL9. The positivity of the signal for the mRNAs encoding both chemokines on thyroid follicular cells, at high-power magnification (dark-field original magnifications, x1000), is shown in the subsequent two panels. The last two panels show the positivity of the signal for the protein of both chemokines on thyroid follicular epithelium from the same Graves’ thyroid. Immunohistochemistry by double-label immunostaining for CXCL10 and CXCL9 (red) and TSH receptor (bluish gray) was performed on 5-µm frozen sections, and the corresponding antibodies were revealed by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex system and counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. No counterstain was applied. Original magnification, x400. [Reprinted from P. Romagnani et al.: Am J Pathol 161:195–206, 2002 (124 ) with permission from the American Society for Investigative Pathology.]

 
The findings obtained by in situ hybridization were confirmed by a quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the mRNAs for IFN-{gamma}, CXCL10, and CXCL9 in the same samples. RT-PCR revealed that the expression of these molecules was highly heterogeneous, being the mRNA levels for CXCL10 and CXCL9 strictly related to those of the IFN-{gamma}. The latter were also higher in patients with recent-onset (<2 yr) Graves’ disease. Multiple double-label immunohistochemistry was used to identify the cellular source of chemokines and showed that CXCL10 and CXCL9 were highly expressed by both thyroid follicular cells and infiltrating mononuclear cells (Fig. 3Go). The CXCR3 receptor was found only in inflammatory and endothelial cells (Fig. 4Go) (124).


Figure 4
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Expression of the IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokine receptor CXCR3 in Graves’ disease. Immunohistochemistry reaction was performed on 5-µm frozen sections of a thyroid tissue specimen obtained from the same Graves’ gland shown in Fig. 3Go. The CXCR3 antibody binding was revealed by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex system, and the slides were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. The high immunoreactivity (red) demonstrates an intense protein expression for CXCR3. Original magnification (top panel), x100. High power magnification on the same section (bottom panel; original magnification, x400) demonstrates CXCR3 expression (red) by infiltrating inflammatory cells. [Reprinted from P. Romagnani et al.: Am J Pathol 161:195–206, 2002 (124 ) with permission from the American Society for Investigative Pathology.]

 
By using flow cytometry, it was demonstrated that the expression of the chemokine receptors on PBL of Graves’ patients did not differ from that of normal controls (125). On the other hand, there was an enrichment of CXCR3+ (the receptor for CXCL10) and CCR5+ (the receptor for CCL2) T cells among thyroid-derived lymphocytes, compared with PBL. These results were confirmed by using RT-PCR and immunohistology. The fact that thyroid-derived lymphocytes showed a different chemokine receptor pattern compared with PBL from the same patient suggested a role for CXCR3 and CCR5 in the recruitment of T cells to the thyroid in Graves’ disease (125).

In summary, these early studies demonstrated a role for CXCR3-binding chemokines and their receptor in AITD by evaluating chemokine expression at the mRNA and at the protein level, both in the thyroid and in primary cultures of thyrocytes (126, 127). The subsequent steps for defining the role played by chemokines in AITD were provided by clinical studies that evaluated the serum levels of CXCL10 in large series of patients with Graves’ disease or CAT (124, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132).

3. CXCR3-binding chemokines in Graves’ disease.
The first observation of increased serum levels of CXCL10 in patients with Graves’ disease was reported in 2002 (124). Serum samples were collected from 50 unselected Graves’ patients with different duration of their disease, as well as from 25 healthy controls. All Graves’ patients had been treated with methimazole (MMI) at variable doses and were euthyroid at the time of serum analysis. Corticosteroid treatment was an exclusion criterion. Mean CXCL10 serum levels were significantly higher in patients with Graves’ disease compared with healthy subjects, even if there was a large overlap of CXCL10 results between the two groups. The serum concentrations of CXCL10 were inversely correlated with the duration of Graves’ disease, the highest levels being found in patients with recent-onset disease. By contrast, no correlation was observed between the serum levels of CXCL10 and other clinical or biochemical parameters such as sex, age, and titers of circulating Tg Ab or TPO Ab. Interestingly, the reduction of CXCL10 serum levels in long-standing (>2 yr) Graves’ disease was associated with a slight increase in the serum concentrations of CCL22, a chemokine associated with Th2 immune responses (133, 134).

The analysis of the CCL22/CXCL10 ratio demonstrated that a longer duration of Graves’ disease was associated with an increase of the CCL22/CXCL10 ratio in the serum of Graves’ patients (124). Thus, in the late phase of Graves’ disease, an increase in the CCL22/CXCL10 ratio, mainly due to a CXCL10 decline, is observed both in the thyroid gland and in the serum. This phenomenon parallels the reduction of intrathyroidal IFN-{gamma} mRNA expression (124).

a. Changes in serum levels of CXCL10 in relation to thyroid function and treatment in Graves’ disease.
Following the observation that the serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in Graves’ disease, several clinical trials were designed with the aim of systematically evaluating the serum chemokine status in Graves’ patients in relation to their thyroid function and treatment (130, 131, 132). The final goal was to relate the findings of circulating CXCL10 to the clinical phenotype and to evaluate possible relations between the serum levels of CXCL10 and the two major therapeutic strategies used in Graves’ disease: medical treatment and thyroid removal. Although high serum levels of CXCL10 are not a specific feature of Graves’ disease, having been reported in several endocrine and nonendocrine autoimmune or even nonautoimmune human diseases, the results provided by the following clinical studies support the view that measuring CXCL10 serum levels in Graves’ patients may be useful.

The first study retrospectively evaluated 103 patients with Graves’ disease but with no clinical signs or symptoms of inflammatory ophthalmopathy (132). Graves’ patients were recruited irrespective of their thyroid function or drug treatment. Thirty of them were hyperthyroid and untreated. Fifty-five patients were on MMI treatment for 1–28 months, and the remaining patients were euthyroid, being in remission after a previous course of MMI. Healthy subjects, patients with euthyroid CAT, patients with nontoxic nodular goiter, and hyperthyroid patients with toxic nodular goiter served as controls.

The mean serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in Graves’ patients than in healthy subjects or patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter, but they did not differ from those found in patients with euthyroid CAT. Among Graves’ patients, the serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in those older than 50 yr, in patients with a hypoechoic pattern of the thyroid at US, and in those with an increased thyroid blood flow. Thyroid volume was unrelated to circulating CXCL10. No significant correlation was observed between the levels of CXCL10 and the titers of Tg Ab, TPO Ab, or TSH-receptor (TR) Ab in serum. However, high serum levels of CXCL10 were mainly observed in Graves’ patients who were strongly positive for TR Ab.

Hyperthyroid patients with Graves’ disease had significantly higher serum CXCL10 levels than those who were euthyroid or hypothyroid. Graves’ patients with untreated hyperthyroidism had significantly higher serum CXCL10 levels than those who were hyperthyroid or euthyroid while taking MMI (166 ± 125, 124 ± 41, and 94 ± 35 pg/ml, respectively). The serum levels of CXCL10 did not significantly differ in hyperthyroid Graves’ patients who were untreated compared with those who relapsed after a previous course of MMI (176 ± 125 and 155 ± 97 pg/ml, respectively). Euthyroid patients on MMI or in remission after medical treatment showed similar serum levels of CXCL10.

This retrospective study confirmed that the serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with Graves’ disease, being strongly associated with the hyperthyroid phase of the disease, and do decrease when euthyroidism is restored by MMI treatment (132). In agreement with these findings, high levels of CXCL10 cosegregated with high TR Ab titers. Furthermore, high serum levels of CXCL10 were found to be strongly associated with a marker of disease activity, such as the increased thyroid blood flow. In this regard, the question might be raised of how the huge blood flow of Graves’ glands would fit with the high expression of an angiostatic chemokine, such as CXCL10. The development of new vessels during an inflammatory process results from a balance between angiogenic and angiostatic factors (23). In Graves’ glands, new vessels develop due to extremely high local concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor produced by thyroid follicular cells in response to thyroid-stimulating antibodies (135). In this setting, the angiostatic effect of CXCL10, which requires binding to the splicing variant B of CXCR3 (see Section III.B), would be easily overcome by the preponderant role of vascular endothelial growth factor, an extremely powerful angiogenetic factor (136).

Patients with Graves’ disease in remission after a previous course of MMI therapy showed serum levels of CXCL10 similar to healthy controls or to euthyroid patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter. The reduction of circulating CXCL10 in patients rendered euthyroid by MMI treatment could be ascribed to the well-known immunomodulatory effect of antithyroid drugs (137). MMI, besides its ability to decrease thyroid hormone production (138), has been shown to interfere with some immunological abnormalities typical of Graves’ hyperthyroidism. The immunosuppressive effect of MMI is highlighted by the reduction of circulating thyroid antibodies, which occurs during medical treatment with this drug, and by the consistent percentage (nearly 30%) of Graves’ patients entering prolonged remission after a course of medical therapy (138, 139). These immunological effects of MMI might be mediated, at least in part, by an action on chemokine production, resulting in a decreased lymphocytic infiltration of the gland. Indeed, a milder lymphocytic infiltration was reported in Graves’ glands after medical treatment (140). Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing hyperthyroidism had comparable serum concentrations of CXCL10. The increase in serum concentrations of CXCL10 during relapses of hyperthyroidism would be in line with a novel activation of the Th1-mediated immune response and might be taken as an index of an impending relapse of hyperthyroidism after MMI treatment. The increase of circulating CXCL10 in the active phases of Graves’ disease is in agreement with findings in MS showing that serum levels of CXCL10 are higher at disease onset and during relapses of the neurological disease (85, 88, 141).

The main results of this study can be summarized as indicating that CXCL10 is associated with the active phase of Graves’ disease, in both newly diagnosed and relapsing hyperthyroid patients, and that the reduction of serum CXCL10 levels in Graves’ patients rendered euthyroid by MMI may be related to an immunomodulatory effect of the drug. A graphic representation of the mean serum levels of CXCL10 at different clinical stages of Graves’ disease (132) is shown in Fig. 5Go.


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism of lymphocyte recruitment by CXCR3-binding chemokines in endocrine autoimmunity. Thyroid follicular cells secrete CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 upon stimulation with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}. Chemokines, in turn, drive chemotaxis from blood vessels of T cells expressing the chemokine receptor CXCR3. This particular subset of T cells shows a prevalent Th1 immune phenotype and produces IFN-{gamma}, thus perpetuating the inflammatory process. This loop of events supports the active role played by thyroid follicular cells and in general by cells of the glandular epithelium (a similar mechanism has been demonstrated for ß-cells and adrenal cells of the zona fasciculata) in determining the specificity of the infiltrating lymphocytes and in maintaining the autoimmune process.

 
The reduction of CXCL10 levels observed in both the thyroid tissue and serum of Graves’ patients could be in line with a progressive switch from a Th1 response to a less polarized immune response during the course of the disease (142). This shift, which probably reflects a counterregulatory mechanism against inflammation, when the Th1 response can become dangerous for the host has been described previously in several experimental animal models of autoimmunity and in chronic inflammatory immune disorders (143, 144, 145, 146, 147). Such a shift was also demonstrated to occur in long-standing Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) (142) by studying the surface markers of orbital T lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Although no direct proof is available, a general shift from a Th1 to a Th2 response might occur in long-standing Graves’ disease in an attempt at dampening the inflammatory Th1 response. This concept would be in line with the observed reduction of intrathyroidal IFN-{gamma} and the increased ratio of CCL22 over CXCL10 in serum. However, given the fact that antithyroid drugs display a well-known immunomodulatory effect, the decrease in CXCL10 levels observed in long-standing Graves’ disease could also be ascribed to the use of antithyroid drugs. Indeed, an immune deviation toward a Th2 phenotype has been observed during pharmacological treatments in graft vs. host disease (148) and MS (149).

b. Serum levels of CXCL10 and hyperthyroidism.
To understand the meaning of circulating CXCL10 in Graves’ disease better, a prospective study addressed the question of whether hyperthyroidism per se was responsible for the high levels of serum CXCL10 (130). To this purpose, hyperthyroid patients with either Graves’ disease or toxic nodular goiter were enrolled in the study. The serum levels of CXCL10 were evaluated in hyperthyroid Graves’ patients at the time of diagnosis and 3 months after starting medical treatment with MMI. Basal serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly lower in patients with toxic nodular goiter than in Graves’ patients, despite an accurate matching for serum free T3 and free T4. A significant reduction in the chemokine serum levels occurred in Graves’ patients after restoration of euthyroidism by MMI. Patients with toxic nodular goiter showed a slight, but not significant, reduction in circulating CXCL10 when rendered euthyroid by MMI. Thus, the significant decrease in circulating concentrations of CXCL10 in Graves’ patients after MMI treatment was interpreted as resulting from an immunomodulatory action of the drug, rather than from the restoration of euthyroidism. Moreover, after accurate sex and age matching, the serum levels of CXCL10 were found to be similar in healthy subjects, in hyperthyroid patients with toxic nodular goiter, and in patients receiving levothyroxine (L-T4) at a TSH-suppressive dose for thyroid cancer. A further confirmation of these data is provided by a recent study demonstrating that Graves’ patients, stratified in relation to circulating thyroid hormone concentrations, showed similar serum levels of CXCL10 (150). Taken together these findings indicate that hyperthyroidism per se does not play a role in determining the increased serum levels of CXCL10 observed in Graves’ disease (130).

c. Site of production of CXCL10 in Graves’ disease.
Another issue to be elucidated was the site where CXCL10 is produced. Cytokine production in Graves’ disease has been variably attributed to thyroid follicular cells (151), to intrathyroidal lymphocytes (112), or to the activation of humoral immune reactions in sites other than the thyroid (152, 153). To address this issue, the serum levels of CXCL10 were evaluated in Graves’ patients submitted to thyroidectomy (131). In a prospective case-control study, 22 Graves’ patients rendered euthyroid by MMI were submitted to thyroidectomy because of a history of relapsing hyperthyroidism and/or for the presence of large goiters. Healthy subjects and patients with CAT were chosen as controls. A further control group included 20 patients with toxic nodular goiter. Blood samples for CXCL10 measurement were collected in hyperthyroid patients at presentation, when reaching euthyroidism on MMI, 3 d after thyroidectomy, and 1 month after surgery. Graves’ patients had significantly higher serum levels of CXCL10 when hyperthyroid than after reaching euthyroidism on MMI treatment. A further and significant reduction in the serum levels of CXCL10 was observed 3 d after thyroidectomy. No further significant decrease in the serum levels of CXCL10 was found at 1 month after thyroidectomy, when the circulating concentrations of CXCL10 were similar to those found in healthy subjects or in patients with toxic nodular goiter, and lower than the concentrations observed in euthyroid patients with CAT (131). Similar findings were obtained after radioiodine treatment of hyperthyroidism (150). Taken together, the results provided by two studies (131, 150) evaluating the effect of the permanent cure of hyperthyroidism on circulating CXCL10 concentrations indicate that both therapeutic strategies are able to lower serum CXCL10 to the levels observed in healthy subjects. The normalization of circulating CXCL10 levels after thyroidectomy or 131I ablation of thyroid tissue can be explained by removal of most intrathyroidal lymphocytes and/or thyrocytes (131, 150). These findings support the view that the thyroid is the main source of circulating CXCL10 in patients with Graves’ disease and most probably also in patients with CAT (129).

The main messages of this section are:

The serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with Graves’ disease.
The active phases of Graves’ disease, as assessed by recent-onset thyrotoxicosis or relapsing hyperthyroidism after medical treatment, are characterized by the highest circulating concentrations of CXCL10.
There is a significant relationship between the serum levels of CXCL10 and US indexes of Graves’ disease activity (hypoechogenicity of the gland at US and increased thyroid blood flow).
The serum levels of CXCL10 are not correlated with the serum titers of Tg Ab, TPO Ab, or TR Ab. However, patients with high serum levels of TR Ab are more likely to show elevated concentrations of CXCL10.
The increased serum levels of CXCL10 in Graves’ disease are not the result of hyperthyroidism per se.
The significant reduction in circulating levels of CXCL10 after restoration of euthyroidism in Graves’ patients treated with MMI can be ascribed to an immunomodulatory action of the drug.
Graves’ patients treated by thyroidectomy or radioiodine ablation have serum levels of CXCL10 similar to healthy subjects, supporting the concept that the thyroid is the main source of circulating CXCL10 in Graves’ disease.

4. CXCR3-binding chemokines in GO.
There is only one published study that evaluated the serum concentrations of CXCL10 in relation to the presence of GO (154). Serum CXCL10 levels were measured in 60 Graves’ patients without GO and in 60 age- and sex-matched patients with GO. The control group included 60 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects. At the time of evaluation, all Graves’ patients with or without GO were clinically and biochemically euthyroid, either on antithyroid drugs or on L-T4 after thyroidectomy, or in remission after medical treatment. In patients with GO, the eye disease activity was assessed by a clinical activity score (155). A score of 5 out of a maximum of 10, including a worsening of ophthalmopathy during the previous 2 months, indicated active GO. Inactive eye disease was defined as no change in eye status over the previous 6 months. A severity eye score was also calculated as the sum of the products of each NOSPECS class by its grade (156). The serum levels of CXCL10 were similar in Graves’ patients with and without ophthalmopathy. Both groups showed significantly higher circulating CXCL10 levels compared with healthy controls. Graves’ patients with active ophthalmopathy (i.e., higher clinical activity scores) had a more severe eye involvement, a shorter duration of the disease, and significantly higher mean serum CXCL10 levels than patients with inactive ophthalmopathy.

The results of this study demonstrated that the circulating levels of CXCL10 are elevated in Graves’ patients with ophthalmopathy when the inflammatory process of the orbit is active. This finding is in agreement with previous data (112, 142, 157, 158, 159) showing that in GO the active phase of the disease is characterized by the presence of proinflammatory Th1-derived cytokines, whereas other cytokines, and among them the Th2-derived ones, do not appear to be associated with a specific phase of the eye disease (160). In this scenario, the higher circulating concentrations of CXCL10 observed in Graves’ patients with active, compared with inactive, ophthalmopathy might be expected.

The above data can be interpreted as indicating that CXCL10 is transiently involved in the active phase of GO, when the inflammatory process is sustained by a Th1-mediated immune response, whereas the serum levels of this chemokine decline in long-standing, inactive GO. In agreement with this interpretation, data from a previous study demonstrate that, within 2 yr after the onset of the eye disease, lymphocytes obtained from the orbital tissue of patients with GO have a prevalent Th1 profile, whereas patients with a disease duration longer than 2 yr show a prevalence of Th2 lymphocytes (142). Similar findings have been reported in MS, indicating that high levels of serum CXCL10 are strongly associated with the activity of the disease, as assessed by clinical pousses of neurological deterioration (85, 88, 141).

Cytokine production in AITD (161) has been variably interpreted as being sustained by thyrocytes (151), intrathyroidal lymphocytes (112), or the activation of immune reactions at sites other than the thyroid (152). Thus, the question may be raised of whether the increased serum levels of CXCL10 in patients with active GO do reflect the immune process involving orbital tissues. In the above-mentioned study (154), all patients with GO had a clinical history of Graves’ hyperthyroidism. However, it is unlikely that the elevation of CXCL10 in their serum resulted from hyperthyroidism because all patients were euthyroid at the time of CXCL10 measurements. Furthermore, the increase in serum concentrations of CXCL10 was more pronounced in GO patients with active inflammatory orbital disease than in those with inactive GO. Thus, the presence of orbital inflammation may be responsible for an increase in circulating concentrations of CXCL10.

A major difference between active and inactive GO is the presence of a lymphocytic infiltrate in orbital tissues (161, 162). Thus, the increased production of CXCL10 might be sustained by orbital lymphocytes. However, in vitro studies demonstrate that in the orbit CXCL10 can also be produced by nonlymphoid cells (154). Both fibroblasts and preadipocytes from patients with GO secreted CXCL10 in response to IFN-{gamma} stimulation, but not after challenge with TNF-{alpha} alone (154). A combination of IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} synergistically increased CXCL10 secretion, similar to observations in human thyrocytes (123) and endothelial cells (163). Interestingly, the response of orbital fibroblasts and preadipocytes was similar to that of fibroblasts and preadipocytes of dermal origin, suggesting that this kind of activation is a general phenomenon. Taken together, the above-described observations support the view that the production of IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} by Th1-activated lymphocytes within the orbit induces CXCL10 secretion by orbital fibroblasts and preadipocytes. In turn, this chemokine favors the migration of Th1 lymphocytes into the orbit, thereby perpetuating the autoimmune cascade.

In conclusion, the serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with GO, showing a significant association with the activity of the eye disease. Retrobulbar cells participate in the self-perpetuation of the inflammatory process by releasing chemokines under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines. The precise role of the increased or rising CXCL10 levels in sera of patients with GO remains to be established. It is worth noting that there are currently no reliable serum markers of activity in GO; thus, it would be useful confirming and extending the data on CXCL10 changes in sera of patients with GO.

The main messages of this section are:

The serum levels of CXCL10 are similar in patients with Graves’ disease regardless of the presence of ophthalmopathy.
Patients with inactive ophthalmopathy show serum levels of CXCL10 similar to Graves’ patients without ophthalmopathy, which however are significantly higher than those found in healthy controls.
Graves’ patients with active ophthalmopathy (as assessed by a higher clinical activity score) have significantly higher serum levels of CXCL10 than patients with inactive ophthalmopathy. The increase in circulating concentrations of CXCL10 is likely to reflect, at least in part, the presence of orbital inflammation.
CXCL10 appears to play a role in the initial phase of GO, when the inflammatory process is sustained by a Th1-mediated immune response and then declines in long-standing GO.
A lymphocytic infiltrate is present in active GO, but not in inactive GO, suggesting that the increased production of CXCL10 in active GO might be sustained by orbital lymphocytes. However, in vitro studies demonstrate that in the orbit CXCL10 can be also produced by nonlymphoid cells, such as fibroblasts and preadipocytes.
The lack of reliable serum parameters reflecting the activity of GO highlights the importance of further studies aimed at evaluating whether the measurement of circulating CXCL10 might serve this purpose.

5. CXCR3-binding chemokines in CAT.
Increased circulating concentrations of CXCL10 were first reported in patients with CAT in 2004 (128). The serum levels of CXCL10 were retrospectively measured in 223 consecutive patients with CAT, 97 euthyroid controls, and 29 patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter. The three groups were similar for gender distribution and age. Twenty-four percent of the CAT patients had subclinical hypothyroidism. The mean serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in CAT patients (157 ± 139 pg/ml) than in controls (79 ± 38 pg/ml) or in patients with multinodular goiter (90 ± 32 pg/ml), although some overlap was evident in the low range of CXCL10 values. In patients with CAT, a hypoechoic pattern of the thyroid at US, an age older than 50 yr, and especially a condition of hypothyroidism were all associated with higher serum levels of CXCL10. The serum levels of this chemokine did not differ in relation to the presence of atrophic or goitrous thyroiditis, TPO Ab or Tg Ab positivity, and the presence or absence of an increased thyroid blood flow. In a multiple linear regression model including age, thyroid volume, hypoechogenicity of the gland at US, increased thyroid blood flow, serum TSH, free T4, and TPO Ab, only age and TSH were significantly related to the concentrations of CXCL10 in serum.

The association of high levels of circulating CXCL10 with a hypoechoic pattern of the thyroid at US can be explained by the presence of a marked lymphocytic infiltration, the histological hallmark of CAT. This interpretation fits with previous observations in hepatitis showing that CXCL10 plays a role in the accumulation of a massive T cell infiltrate in the liver (164). Although a hypoechoic pattern of the thyroid at US is also strongly associated with thyroid dysfunction (165, 166), the serum concentrations of CXCL10 were found to be higher in hypothyroid than euthyroid patients, independent of gland hypoechogenicity. Thus, it is possible that CXCL10 indicates a stronger inflammatory response resulting in more extensive tissue destruction.

The observation that among CAT patients, those with hypothyroidism, compared with the euthyroid ones, showed almost 2-fold higher serum CXCL10 levels and that the circulating concentrations of CXCL10 were significantly correlated with those of TSH gives further support to the hypothesis that elevated serum levels of CXCL10 are not only associated with the autoimmune process itself, but also may be a marker of a more aggressive thyroiditis, eventually leading to the destruction of thyroid cells with the attendant functional impairment.

Recent observations indicate that, in murine models of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis, specific combinations of cytokines convert the inflammatory process from a nondestructive to a destructive one (167, 168). In this regard, it has been suggested that one of the main differences between experimental autoimmune thyroiditis in mice and CAT in humans is the fact that human thyroids display a chronic inflammatory environment, mainly enriched in Th1 cytokines such as IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} (167, 169, 170). This cytokine environment results in an enhanced apoptosis of thyroid cells and severe hypothyroidism (167, 170). In the above-described scenario (167, 168), the CXCL10-induced recruitment of Th1 lymphocytes, which secrete IFN-{gamma} and in turn stimulate chemokine production by follicular cells, would be a critical event for maintaining and expanding the autoimmune process (126, 171) (Fig. 6Go). The fact that endocrine epithelial cells interact with the immune system at several levels and that these interactions contribute to the development and perpetuation of the autoimmune process constitutes a further aspect of the previously described active role played by these cells in autoimmune diseases (172).


Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Graphic representation of the mean serum levels of CXCL10 as measured in patients at different stages of Graves’ disease. Significant changes in the mean serum levels of CXCL10 are observed in relation to the clinical phase of Graves’ disease as reported in a cross-sectional clinical trial (132 ). Notably, the highest serum levels of CXCL10 characterize hyperthyroid Graves’ patients at disease onset and at relapse of hyperthyroidism after antithyroid drug treatment. In general, patients who are in the active phases of the disease show significantly higher serum levels of CXCL10 compared with healthy subjects. *, Statistical significance with regard to serum levels of CXCL10 levels found in healthy subjects (dotted line).

 
a. Serum levels of Th1 and Th2 chemokines in CAT.
The issue of understanding the specific role of CXCL10 in CAT was complicated by the observation that patients with this disease may display increased serum levels of CCL2 (173). CCL2 is a prototype CC chemokine, playing an important role in innate immunity (174, 175, 176, 177). CCL2 is also a crucial factor for the development of adaptive Th2 responses by directing the differentiation of Th0 cells to Th2 in vitro (178). The issue was further complicated by studies demonstrating that the expression of CXCL10 and CCL2 in follicular thyroid cells is stimulated by distinct proinflammatory cytokines: IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}, respectively (122, 123).

To understand the meaning of the elevated serum concentrations of CXCL10 and CCL2, these chemokines were simultaneously measured in 70 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CAT (129). The mean serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in patients with CAT than in healthy subjects or in patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter, used as controls. On the contrary, when the whole group of CAT patients was considered, the serum concentrations of CCL2 were found to be similar to those found in both control groups. Among patients with CAT, the serum concentrations of CXCL10 and CCL2 were significantly higher in hypothyroid subjects than in the euthyroid ones. The serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly increased in hypothyroid patients, irrespective of their age. On the other hand, the serum levels of CCL2 were significantly increased in patients older than 50 yr and only to a lesser degree in those with hypothyroidism (129). No correlation was found between the circulating concentrations of CXCL10 and CCL2. Multivariate analysis showed that the serum levels of CXCL10 were associated with the severity of hypothyroidism, as assessed by the concentrations of TSH in serum, independently from other confounders. The same analysis revealed that the circulating concentrations of CCL2 were significantly associated only with the patients’ age. These findings are in agreement with data on the intrathyroidal expression of the mRNA for CCL2, indicating that the content of this mRNA is not different in glands with CAT compared with multinodular goiters (126, 127). Taken together, these results would not support a pathogenetic role for CCL2 in CAT.

On the basis of such results, the study reporting increased serum levels of CCL2 in patients with CAT compared with healthy controls or patients with nontoxic nodular goiter (173) should be reinterpreted. The discrepant results obtained in the two studies (129, 173) can be explained, at least in part, by taking into account that in the investigation by Kokkotou et al. (173) CAT patients were significantly older than controls. The age factor, as a confounding variable, should be always taken into account when considering the serum levels of chemokines. Indeed, several studies indicate that the serum levels of CCL2 do increase with age, even in normal subjects (59, 179). Moreover, in the study by Antonelli et al. (129) the serum levels of CXCL10 were higher in patients with hypothyroidism and with a hypoechogenic pattern of the thyroid at US, whereas the serum levels of CCL2 were not correlated with thyroid gland echogenicity, again supporting a minor role played by CCL2.

The preponderant role of CXCL10 in the pathogenesis of severe CAT resulting in hypothyroidism is in line with current notions of autoimmunity and with experimental data. CXCL10 is a Th1-oriented chemokine, whereas CCL2 is regulated by IL-4, the cardinal Th2 cytokine, and influences T cells toward a Th2 commitment. In murine models of autoimmune thyroiditis, experiments performed in vitro demonstrated a differential role for CCL5 (a chemokine known to favor the attraction of Th1 cells) and for CCL2 (preferentially active on Th2 cells) during the onset, the course, and the remission of the disease (180). Briefly, these experiments suggest that CCL2 attracts specific immune regulatory cells that down-regulate the autoimmune reaction, as shown by a decrease in the proliferative response to Tg and by a milder degree of lymphocytic infiltration in the thyroid (180). In human CAT, an environment strongly enriched in Th1, due to CXCL10 stimulation associated with an inadequate Th2 response, resulting from a poor effect of CCL2, would lead to a severe nonremitting disease producing hypothyroidism. In this regard, data demonstrating an association between increased serum levels of CXCL10 and a more severe course and aggressiveness of Th1-mediated autoimmune reactions (e.g., acute kidney graft rejections) should be taken into account (78).

b. Serum levels of CXCL10 and hypothyroidism per se.
The differential impact of thyroid autoimmunity and hypothyroidism on circulating concentrations of CXCL10 was investigated by measuring the serum levels of CXCL10 in hypothyroid patients of both autoimmune and nonautoimmune etiology (130). Patients with CAT (50% being euthyroid and 50% hypothyroid) underwent a serum CXCL10 assay at entry. Hypothyroid patients were then given L-T4 substitution therapy to normalize their thyroid function. The serum levels of CXCL10 were reevaluated 3 months later in untreated euthyroid subjects with CAT and in originally hypothyroid patients rendered euthyroid by L-T4. Also included in the study were patients with papillary thyroid cancer who had been treated with total thyroidectomy and 131I ablation of thyroid residues. In 50% of them, the serum levels of CXCL10 were evaluated while hypothyroid, after L-T4 withdrawal for a diagnostic whole body scan. In the remaining thyroid cancer patients, the serum levels of CXCL10 were evaluated on L-T4 therapy after the injection of recombinant human TSH for diagnostic procedures. The mean levels of circulating CXCL10 were significantly higher in CAT patients with hypothyroidism than in those who were euthyroid. No significant change in the serum concentrations of CXCL10 was found in hypothyroid patients rendered euthyroid by a 3-month course of L-T4 or in euthyroid patients with CAT evaluated after a 3-month follow-up period. In cancer patients on L-T4, the serum levels of CXCL10 were not significantly different from healthy controls. Hypothyroidism resulting from L-T4 withdrawal did not induce any significant change in circulating CXCL10. Also, no significant change in the serum levels of CXCL10 was found in cancer patients given recombinant human TSH for diagnostic purposes, suggesting that the rise of CXCL10 does not result from a TSH stimulation (130).

Taken together, the above data demonstrate that hypothyroidism per se does not significantly influence circulating CXCL10 and suggest that the increased serum levels of CXCL10 in CAT are related to the autoimmune process itself (130).

The main messages of this section are:

The serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with CAT, compared with healthy subjects or patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter.
Among patients with CAT, those with impaired thyroid function (overt and subclinical hypothyroidism) show significantly higher serum levels of CXCL10 compared with the euthyroid ones.
Multivariate analysis models demonstrated that the serum levels of CXCL10 in patients with CAT are associated with the severity of hypothyroidism, as assessed by the concentrations of TSH in serum, independently from other confounders. This finding suggests that the elevated serum levels of CXCL10 in CAT may be a marker of a more aggressive clinical course.
In CAT, the serum levels of CXCL10 are significantly related to thyroid hypoechogenicity at US, which may be taken as an index of severe lymphocytic infiltration.
In patients with CAT, the serum levels of CXCL10 are not correlated with the titers of Tg Ab or TPO Ab.
The increased serum levels of CXCL10 in CAT are not the result of hypothyroidism per se. No significant changes in circulating concentrations of CXCL10 are observed after correction of hypothyroidism with L-T4.

C. CXCR3-binding chemokines in type 1 diabetes mellitus
1. Results of basic studies.
Insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is a T cell-driven autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that results in the destruction of the islets of Langerhans in genetically predisposed individuals. The mechanisms by which antigen-specific T cells migrate to the islets, a prerequisite for the specific lysis of ß-cells, is largely unknown. Because the etiological agent of IDDM is still unknown, delineating the process of T cell infiltration would provide a basis for understanding the development of this autoimmune disease. A recent study demonstrated that during insulitis, the ß-cell itself synthesizes and secretes CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are the driving force for the recruitment of CXCR3+ cytotoxic T cells (181). In other words, ß-cells, the target of autoimmunity in IDDM, are largely responsible for attracting islet-specific cytotoxic T cells, thus facilitating their own demise. A high IFN-{gamma} concentration in the islets of Langerhans correlated both with the expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCR3 and with a prominent infiltration by T cells (181). IFN-{gamma} was found to be necessary and sufficient to stimulate CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression by ß-cells. Taken together, these data suggest that the process of islet infiltration by lymphocytes reflects an inflammatory loop caused by T cell-derived IFN-{gamma}. IFN-{gamma} induces the production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 by ß-cells, leading to enhanced immigration of additional IFN-{gamma}-secreting T cells. This process is mediated through the chemokine receptor CXCR3 (171, 181).

2. Virus-induced, immune-mediated autoimmune diabetes.
The role of CXCR3 in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes was demonstrated in a model of virus-induced diabetes by using a transgenic mice model that expresses the glycoprotein (GP) of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in the ß-cells of the islets of Langerhans [rat insulin promotor (RIP)-GP mice] (182, 183). It is known that RIP-GP mice, after LCMV infection, rapidly develop diabetes, as assessed by a blood glucose concentration of greater than 300 mg/dl, a massive T cell infiltration of the islets, and the destruction of ß-cells, resulting in low to absent pancreatic insulin (183, 184). Concurrent with LCMV-mediated immune diabetes is a profound Th1/Tc1-type response characterized by the release of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} in the target organ (185, 186). This event is followed by the destruction of the ß-cells, which is due to CD8+ T lymphocytes specific for LCMV-GP (183, 184).

A recent study demonstrated that LCMV-infected singly transgenic mice, at d 8 after infection, show severe T cell infiltration and ß-cell destruction of the pancreatic islets. In contrast, the islets of transgenic CXCR3-deficient mice were not invaded, although T cells adorned their rim. Monitoring blood glucose levels revealed a significant delay in the occurrence of diabetes in transgenic mice deficient for CXCR3 (181). These observations demonstrated the importance of CXCR3 in the pathogenesis of IDDM, compared with other inflammatory chemokine receptors (CCR5 and CCR2) that were investigated in the same study (181). Among the three CXCR3-binding chemokines, the predominant role in determining insulitis was subsequently ascribed to CXCL10 by another group of investigators (187). Briefly, in RIP-GP mice, the expression of CXCR3-binding chemokines was demonstrated 18–24 h after LCMV injection (187). The analysis of chemokine expression by RNase protection assay revealed that the induction was maximal for CXCL10 (>400-fold vs. uninfected mice). The expression of the mRNAs for CXCL9 and CXCL11 showed only a 30-fold and 3-fold increase, respectively.

The prevalent role of CXCL10 was not merely a question of quantity, as demonstrated by experiments aimed at clarifying the pathogenetic role of CXCR3-binding chemokines in the development of immune IDDM. After the injection of neutralizing mAbs to either CXCL10 or CXCL9 in RIP-GP mice infected with LCMV, the incidence of IDDM was significantly reduced to 31% in mice receiving the anti-CXCL10 mAb compared with control animals, which were injected with a nonspecific isotype-matched hamster mAb (diabetes incidence = 100%) (187). In contrast with CXCL10 neutralization, no significant reduction in the incidence of diabetes or in its onset could be detected in animals treated with the anti-CXCL9 mAb, suggesting distinct roles for CXCL10 and CXCL9 in virus-induced immune-mediated diabetes. Moreover, when the anti-CXCL10 and the anti-CXCL9 mAbs were coinjected, the incidence of diabetes was equivalent to that observed after administration of the anti-CXCL10 mAb alone (187). The above-described data indicate that CXCL10, and not CXCL9, is an essential factor in the initiation of the process that results in virus-induced immune-mediated diabetes. Despite the multiplicity of chemokines and cytokines released during inflammation and the likely redundancy of the system, these experiments demonstrate a unique and nonredundant role for CXCL10, whose neutralization is able to prevent the occurrence of diabetes (187, 188).

The mechanisms by which CXCL10 neutralization abrogates the development of immune IDDM were identified in a decreased lymphocyte infiltration into the islets of Langerhans with consequent preservation of insulin production. This phenomenon resulted from the inhibition of the clonal expansion of Ag-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes and/or of their migration into the pancreas.

When viruses that are tropic for the pancreas and cause diabetes were compared with viruses that are not tropic for the pancreas and do not cause diabetes, the conclusion was drawn that the increased expression of the CXCL10 mRNA in the islets was not a general phenomenon, occurring after any viral infection (187). Indeed, the infection of mice with viruses that are tropic for the pancreas and are known to cause diabetes, such as Coxsackie virus B4 or the encephalomyocarditis virus variant B, resulted in an increased pancreatic expression of CXCL10. In contrast, the infection with Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus, a virus with no pancreatic tropism and not causing diabetes, did not result in the expression of significant levels of CXCL10 in the pancreas (187).

The above-described findings suggest that a viral tropism for the pancreas and the alteration of the pancreatic milieu by induction of selected chemokines, such as CXCL10, may be the initial step that imprints a pattern for the subsequent development of organ-specific autoimmune diseases caused by viruses. The dominant role played by CXCR3-binding chemokines after a viral infection is not unexpected because CXCR3 is expressed predominantly on activated T cells (31, 189), which function to eliminate virus-infected cells and to control viral infections.

CXCL10 may also have a dual effect in IDDM, being involved both in the initiation and maintenance of the autoimmune process, as well as in the abrogation of autoimmunity. The abrogative rather than enhancing effect of CXCL10 is mainly due to its expression outside the pancreas (190). The administration to LCMV-infected mice of an additional virus infection, at the time when the autodestructive process of the ß-cells was already ongoing, caused the recruitment of T lymphocytes away from the islets (190). Thus, the following scenario for disease abrogation can be postulated: autoaggressive lymphocytes follow the highest bidder, which in this case was the pancreatic-draining lymph node, and leave their original target site. Once arrived at the location with the highest CXCL10 concentrations, the already activated lymphocytes encounter an additional activating inflammatory milieu that pushes them over the edge toward activation-induced cell death. This finding does not hamper, but rather reinforces, the role of CXCL10 in the pathogenesis of IDMM, although it suggests that the CXCL10-mediated effects may be a question of time and location of its expression (190).

3. Serum levels of CXCR3-binding chemokines in human type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) was the first endocrine autoimmune condition in which the serum levels of CXCL10 were investigated (191) and were found to be increased compared with healthy subjects. These results were confirmed by another clinical study (192), but not by two subsequent reports (171, 193). Currently, the issue remains somehow controversial, as we will see later in this section.

Shimada et al. (191) measured the serum levels of CXCL10 and the titers of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and IA-2 Ab in 74 patients with T1DM. Patients were divided in two groups according to negative (Ab type 1 group) or positive tests for either or both auto-Ab (Ab+ type 1 group). The latter group also included Ab+ diabetic patients with residual ß-cell function, the so-called latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) (194), or slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes (195). Healthy subjects and patients with Ab type 2 diabetes served as controls. The serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in both Ab+ and Ab type 1 groups, compared with the levels found in healthy controls. However, among T1DM patients, only Ab+ patients, but not the Ab ones, had significantly higher serum levels of CXCL10 than the type 2 diabetic patients. No significant difference in CXCL10 levels was observed between the classical variant of T1DM and the LADA groups.

In the same study, a significant positive correlation was reported between the serum concentrations of CXCL10 and those of IFN-{gamma} (191). A significant positive correlation was also found between the serum levels of CXCL10 and the number of GAD-reactive IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ cells (191). These findings are in line with the fact that CXCL10 is a chemoattractant for Th1 lymphocytes (196) and that IFN-{gamma} is a Th1 type cytokine involved in the destruction of pancreatic ß-cells in vitro (197). The correlation between serum CXCL10 and IFN-{gamma} levels was restricted to Ab+ type 1 patients and was still evident when data from GAD Ab-positive and from IA-2 Ab-positive patients were analyzed separately. No such a relationship was observed in the Ab type 1 group, in the Ab type 2 diabetic patients, and in healthy subjects (191).

In the study by Shimada et al. (191), the serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in recent-onset Ab+ type 1 patients (disease duration < 3 yr) than in patients with long-standing disease (disease duration ≥ 3 yr). A significant negative correlation was found between serum CXCL10 levels and disease duration. Because more severe insulitis is generally expected in younger subjects, the authors also analyzed the relationship between serum levels of CXCL10 and age, demonstrating a significant negative correlation between these two variables. All these relationships were specific for autoimmune diabetes (Ab+ type 1).

The issue of serum chemokine status in prediabetic patients was addressed by another clinical study evaluating the serum levels of IFN-{gamma} and CXCL10 in patients with either newly diagnosed or long-standing T1DM and in their healthy first-degree relatives (192). The latter group was divided into those at "low" and "high" risk for the development of diabetes, depending on whether subjects were negative or positive for islet cell and GAD Ab. The serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly higher in patients with newly diagnosed IDDM and in subjects with a high risk for developing the disease. In the latter group, the serum concentrations of CXCL10 correlated with the levels of IFN-{gamma} (191, 192, 198). The results of this study demonstrated that the serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with T1DM, but only during the early and subclinical stages of the disease.

4. Controversies regarding high serum levels of CXCL10 in T1DM.
Subsequent studies did not confirm the above-described observations (191, 192). Indeed, in two different series of diabetic patients (171, 193) the serum levels of CXCL10 were found to be similar in patients with T1DM and in healthy controls. The few patients showing increased serum levels of CXCL10 were all positive for circulating islet cell Ab (171).

This observation was further extended by evaluating a large series of diabetic patients (193) identified by a regional T1DM registry in central Italy (199). All serum samples were collected within 6 wk after starting insulin therapy. No significant difference in the serum levels of CXCL10 was found between T1DM patients at the clinical onset of their disease and healthy subjects. The serum concentrations of CXCL10 were not related to the patients’ age at clinical diagnosis of T1DM. However, when patients were subdivided in relation to gender, the serum concentrations of CXCL10 were significantly higher in women with T1DM than in healthy control women or males with T1DM. The latter group of patients had serum levels of CXCL10 comparable to those of healthy male subjects (193).

Given the strong evidence provided by basic studies for a physiopathological role for CXCL10 in the pathogenesis of T1DM, the observation that healthy subjects and T1DM patients displayed similar levels of serum CXCL10 was unexpected. To explain this finding, it should be considered that the expression of CXCL10 in the islets of Langerhans during autoimmune diabetes might not be registered when CXCL10 is measured in the serum of patients with T1DM. In line with this hypothesis is the demonstration that in nonobese diabetic mice, the serum levels of CXCL10 did not correlate with its mRNA expression in the pancreas, being rather associated with the expression levels of the mRNAs for CXCL10 and CXCR3 in pancreatic lymph nodes (200). These findings might be explained by the minimal blood flow of the islets of Langerhans, compared with the liver and/or the thyroid. In the latter organs, a high blood flow would account for the relationship between serum levels of CXCL10 and its tissue expression.

The problem remains that in different studies the serum levels of CXCL10 were found to be either increased or normal even in patients with recent-onset T1DM (171, 192, 193). The reason for these discrepant results is still a matter of debate. Besides differences in the assay methods used for CXCL10 measurements, which are unlikely to be the cause of the different results, some considerations may be helpful in identifying possible confounders. The discrepancy may result, at least in part, from the different female/male ratio of the patients investigated in the above-described studies (192, 193). It is well known that the markers of thyroid autoimmunity are 2- to 3-fold more prevalent in women with autoimmune diabetes than in men (201, 202), and that the serum concentrations of CXCL10 are significantly increased in several autoimmune conditions, irrespective of age and gender (124). Furthermore, at the time when these studies were performed, the role of aging in determining increased serum levels of CXCL10 had not been demonstrated yet (54, 55), and strict age matching between patients and controls may not have been performed systematically.

In conclusion, there is currently no definite consensus on the fact that the serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with T1DM. Despite straightforward evidence obtained in basic studies and experimental animal models of IDDM, the results provided by clinical studies remain controversial and in some cases difficult to interpret. In this scenario, future clinical studies aimed at clarifying this issue, should enroll diabetic patients proven to be negative for other autoimmune diseases, known to be associated with increased serum levels of CXCL10. A strict age and sex matching between patients and controls will also be necessary to reach firm conclusions.

The main messages of this section are:

In murine models of insulitis, the ß-cell itself synthesizes and secretes CXCL9 and CXCL10, which drive the accumulation of CXCR3+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
High IFN-{gamma} concentrations in the islets of Langerhans correlate with the expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCR3, and a prominent infiltration by T lymphocytes.
The role of CXCR3 in the pathogenesis of virus-induced immune diabetes was clearly demonstrated in transgenic mice.
Among the three IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines, CXCL10 has a predominant role in the development of virus-induced immune diabetes in mice.
CXCL10 neutralization abrogates the development of virus-induced immune diabetes in mice by decreasing the lymphocyte infiltration into the islets of Langerhans, with consequent preservation of insulin production.
The measurement of CXCL10 in sera of patients with T1DM provided conflicting results. Some studies reported elevated circulating concentrations of CXCL10 in these patients compared with healthy subjects, whereas other studies reported similar serum levels of CXCL10.

D. CXCR3-binding chemokines in primary adrenal deficiency (Addison disease)
Addison disease (AD) can occur as an isolated condition or in association with other endocrine and nonendocrine autoimmune diseases, leading to the clinical picture of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS)-1 and APS-2 (203, 204, 205). Clinical similarities, common human leukocyte antigen association, and high prevalence of thyroid, gastric, and islet cell Ab suggested that the isolated form of AD may be a clinical variant of APS-2 (205). Although high rates of positivity for adrenal cortex autoantibodies (ACA) and 21-hydroxylase autoantibodies have been reported in patients with AD, these antibodies probably play a minor role in tissue damage and more likely reflect the ongoing autoimmune response (205, 206, 207). Consistent with this view, the histological picture of an affected gland shows diffuse cortical atrophy and lymphocytic infiltration, similar to the histological changes commonly observed in other endocrine autoimmune conditions, such as autoimmune thyroiditis (205). Experimental and clinical evidence supports the concept that a cell-mediated immune response may represent the pathogenetic mechanism leading to adrenal destruction (208, 209, 210). Although the autoimmune etiology currently accounts for most of the cases of AD diagnosed in developed countries (203, 204), there is only one published study evaluating chemokines in adrenal autoimmunity (211); thus, conclusions should be drawn with caution.

In the only report concerning the role of serum CXCL10 in AD, 93 patients with overt or subclinical AD were investigated (211). Among them, 64 patients had clinically evident autoimmune primary adrenal insufficiency: 25 with isolated AD, and 39 with APS. Twenty patients had subclinical autoimmune AD (SAD), being identified by screening patients with extraadrenal autoimmune diseases for the presence of adrenal autoantibodies (212, 213, 214). All 20 SAD patients were positive for both 21-hydroxylase Ab and ACA Ab. Nine patients with nonautoimmune adrenal failure served as controls (215). A further control group included 48 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects, proven to be negative for serum thyroid and adrenal Ab.

Compared with healthy subjects and patients with nonautoimmune adrenal failure, the serum levels of CXCL10 were significantly increased in both clinically evident and subclinical AD. No significant difference was found between patients with nonautoimmune AD and controls. The serum levels of CXCL10 were highly variable among both AD and SAD patients and did not show any significant relationship with gender, age, disease duration, or serum titers of 21-hydroxylase Ab and ACA Ab. Patients with isolated AD or APS showed similar median serum levels of CXCL10. Similar serum levels of CXCL10 were found in SAD patients, irrespective of normal or impaired cortisol response to ACTH. No gender-dependent difference in the serum levels of CXCL10 was found in AD. The absence of a gender-related effect in autoimmune AD, either isolated or occurring within APS-2, would suggest that autoimmune adrenalitis by itself is responsible for the high circulating levels of CXCL10 (193).

Contrary to observations in Graves’ disease or type 1 diabetes (124, 191, 192), the serum levels of CXCL10 were not found to be correlated with the time elapsed since the diagnosis of adrenal deficiency. This lack of correlation probably depends upon the peculiar course of AD. Due to the large functional reserve of the adrenal glands, clinical symptoms of adrenal deficiency become manifest only when massive adrenal destruction has occurred (203). It is therefore reasonable to assume that at variance with Graves’ disease, the time since diagnosis does not precisely reflect the duration of the autoimmune process (124, 128, 191).

The main messages of this section are:

The serum levels of CXCL10 are increased in patients with both overt and SAD, compared with healthy subjects or patients with nonautoimmune adrenal failure.
The serum levels of CXCL10 are similar among patients with autoimmune AD, occurring either isolated or as a component of APS.
The serum levels of CXCL10 are similar in patients with overt or SAD. In the latter patients, similar serum levels of CXCL10 were found irrespective of normal or impaired cortisol response to ACTH.


    VI. Pharmacological Modulation of Chemokine Secretion and Biological Action
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
Pharmacological strategies aimed at attenuating inflammation without inducing generalized immunosuppression have focused their attention on chemokines. However, the task of developing drugs that block chemokine activity was hampered by the pleiotropic biological functions displayed by these molecules. For example, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 have the ability of recruiting different leukocyte subsets as well as antitumor effects, which are mediated by their receptor CXCR3 (see Section III). Because of their pleiotropic biological effects, these chemokines have been proposed as possible therapeutic targets in cancer, in allograft rejection, in glomerulonephritis, in diabetes mellitus, in MS, and in autoimmune disorders of the thyroid.

Since the discovery of the chemokine family, the strategy of selectively blocking the leukocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation has been validated by several approaches. Despite the redundancy reported by in vitro studies on ligand-receptor binding and activation, in vivo the system acts through a coordinated and perhaps sequential chain of events, with temporal and spatial control mechanisms coming into play. Thus, interfering with an essential link in the chain, such as CXCR3 in the case of some autoimmune disorders, or organ allograft transplant (65, 216), or diabetes (181) might result in a complete inhibition of the inflammatory process, as demonstrated in CXCR3–/– models (20). In this view, a growing number of antagonists of several chemokine receptors including CXCR3 are being developed (20). Furthermore, the recent discovery of distinct receptors generated by alternative splicing of the CXCR3 gene would allow obtaining selective inhibitors of the two receptors, thus limiting undesired side effects. Otherwise, a combined activation of the two receptors might be useful in some clinical conditions, such as cancer, where both enhancement of the immune response and inhibitory effects on angiogenesis and tumor cell growth are useful. Studies were aimed at evaluating the possibility of mAbs neutralizing chemokines or targeting their receptor and at investigating the possibility to modulate the proinflammatory cytokine-induced chemokine secretion. The first category of studies mainly used animal models, either knockout or wild type, whereas the latter experiences were mainly obtained by using cell cultures in which different agents were tested for their capacity to reduce chemokine secretion. In this review, we will mainly focus on in vitro studies performed in endocrine cells.

A. PPAR{gamma} agonists in vitro inhibit CXCL10 production induced by proinflammatory cytokines
The effect of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) agonists on the secretion of CXCL10 induced by proinflammatory cytokines was investigated in primary cultures of human thyroid follicular cells, fibroblasts, and preadipocytes (154). Cells were stimulated with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} alone or in combination in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of the PPAR{gamma} agonist rosiglitazone (RGZ). In all cell cultures, CXCL10 was undetectable basally. IFN-{gamma} dose-dependently induced CXCL10 release, and the combination of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} had a significant synergistic effect on CXCL10 secretion. TNF-{alpha} alone had no effect. Treatment with RGZ, added concomitantly with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}, dose-dependently inhibited the cytokine-induced secretion of CXCL10. RGZ alone had no effect. Similar results were obtained for different cell cultures. Furthermore, thyrocytes from normal thyroids and from Graves’ glands as well as fibroblasts or preadipocytes, irrespective of their dermal or retrobulbar origin, harbored the same results, suggesting that this kind of activation is a general physiological phenomenon.

PPAR{gamma} has recently been shown to be involved in the modulation of inflammatory responses. Treatment of endothelial cells with PPAR{gamma} activators inhibits the IFN-{gamma}-induced expression of CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11 at the mRNA and protein levels (163). The release of chemotactic activity for CXCR3-transfected lymphocytes was also blocked (163). Thus, PPAR{gamma} activity may be involved in the regulation of IFN-{gamma}-induced chemokine expression in human autoimmunity by attenuating the recruitment of activated T cells at sites of Th1-mediated inflammation (163, 217, 218). In this regard, there is evidence that PPAR{gamma} receptors are present in the thyroid (219) and in orbital tissues from Graves’ patients (220). These findings suggest that PPAR{gamma} agonists might play a role in the treatment of endocrine autoimmune diseases. In line with this hypothesis is the demonstration that PPAR{gamma} agonists (gemfibrozil and fenofibrate) inhibit the clinical signs of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice (221). PPAR{gamma} agonists were also shown to modulate inflammatory responses in endothelial cells (163, 217, 218), by reducing CXCL10 levels in two murine models of colitis (218, 222), and in dendritic cells (217).

At the present state of the art, two mechanisms might be involved in the inhibition of IFN-{gamma}-induced CXCL10 secretion by PPAR{gamma} activators: 1) a decrease of CXCL10 promoter activity, thus inhibiting the protein binding to the two nuclear factor-{kappa}B sites (163); or 2) a reduction of CXCL10 protein levels in a dose-dependent manner up to concentrations that do not affect mRNA levels or nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation (163).

The fact that treatment of thyroid follicular cells, orbital fibroblasts, and preadipocytes with a pure PPAR{gamma} activator, such as RGZ, at near-therapeutic doses significantly inhibits IFN-{gamma}-stimulated CXCL10 secretion suggests that PPAR{gamma} activators might attenuate the recruitment of activated T cells at sites of Th1-mediated inflammation (154).

B. Corticosteroids in vitro inhibit CXCL10 production induced by proinflammatory cytokines
The effect of corticosteroids on cytokine-induced CXCL10 secretions was studied in primary cell cultures of human zona fasciculata cells (hZFC) from normal adrenal glands (211). CXCL10 was undetectable basally, whereas its secretion was significantly induced in hZFC by stimulation with IFN-{gamma} or IFN-{gamma} plus TNF-{alpha} (Fig. 7Go). Stimulation of hZFC with TNF-{alpha} alone was not able to induce chemokine secretion. Nevertheless, TNF-{alpha} had a significant synergic effect with IFN-{gamma} in determining CXCL10 production. Increasing concentrations of hydrocortisone progressively and significantly inhibited IFN-{gamma}-induced and IFN-{gamma}- plus TNF-{alpha}-induced CXCL10 secretion.


Figure 7
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. hZFC in vitro produce CXCL10 after stimulation with IFN-{gamma}. Primary cell cultures of hZFC were cultured for 24 h in the presence of IFN-{gamma} in chamber slides, fixed, and incubated with a rabbit antihuman CXCL10 antibody. To assess simultaneously the epithelial origin of the cells, a double-label immunofluorescence with a monoclonal anticytokeratin Ab was performed. The slides, after a nuclear counterstaining with Topro-3 (blue), were examined by conventional confocal microscopy and showed high immunoreactivity for both CXCL10 (green) and cytokeratin (red). Double-label immunofluorescence analyzed by laser confocal microscopy shows that the signal for the protein of CXCL10 and cytokeratin colocalize, thus demonstrating secretion of the chemokine by adrenal cells of zona fasciculata. (Original magnification, x40). [Reprinted from: M. Rotondi et al.: J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2357–2363, 2005 (211 ), with permission from The Endocrine Society, Copyright 2005.]

 
This study provided evidence that hZFC, when stimulated with proinflammatory cytokines, are able to produce chemokines, as assessed by cell supernatant assay and laser confocal immunofluorescence (211). These results suggest a role for the inflamed glandular epithelium in the recruitment of specific subsets of infiltrating lymphocytes within the adrenal gland (Fig. 7Go).

Increasing concentrations of hydrocortisone significantly inhibited the secretion of CXCL10 induced by IFN-{gamma} or IFN-{gamma} plus TNF-{alpha} in hZFC. This effect of glucocorticoids on chemokine production is in line with their antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive actions (223). Indeed, glucocorticoids are able to suppress the production of several cytokines and chemokines by inhibiting the nuclear factor-{kappa}B and by activating protein-1 transcription factor families (224). Glucocorticoids inhibit the IFN-{gamma}-induced expression of major histocompatibility class II molecules and may also block the expression of IFN-{gamma}-inducible genes, indicating that glucocorticoids can suppress IFN-{gamma} activity (225, 226).

The main messages of this section are:

RGZ, a PPAR{gamma} agonist, dose-dependently inhibits CXCL10 secretion induced by IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} in human primary cultures of thyrocytes, orbital fibroblasts, and preadipocytes.
IFN-{gamma}- and TNF-{alpha}-induced CXCL10 secretion in human adrenal cells is significantly inhibited by hydrocortisone.


    VII. Serum Levels of CXCR3-Binding Chemokines: Potential Applications as Novel Serum Markers in Endocrine Clinical Practice
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
Throughout previous sections, we reviewed the currently available data regarding possible clinical applications of measuring CXCR3-binding chemokines in serum (128, 130, 131, 132, 154, 171, 191, 192, 211). The potential applications of serum CXCL10 assay in the clinical practice stem from the observation that high circulating concentrations of this chemokine are likely to predict a more rapid and aggressive course of the autoimmune inflammatory processes (78). There are currently no reliable parameters to predict the evolution of these endocrine autoimmune disorders, which may remain stable for years or progress to overt hormone insufficiency. In this view, it is reasonable to believe that, among euthyroid patients with CAT, those displaying higher circulating levels of CXCL10 would be more likely to undergo a more rapid functional deterioration and/or a higher rate of progression to hypothyroidism (128). A similar scenario could be hypothesized for other endocrine autoimmune conditions diagnosed at a subclinical stage, such as SAD or prediabetes.

Another interesting field of application for CXCL10 measurement could be represented by Graves’ disease. Previously described studies provided evidence supporting the concept that CXCL10 could be an important factor in mediating or in announcing the relapse of hyperthyroidism after antithyroid drugs (132). Moreover, indirect evidence suggests that the measurement of CXCL10 in serum, at the time when hyperthyroidism is diagnosed, may help to identify more severe and aggressive variants of Graves’ disease, thus supporting a definitive treatment of hyperthyroidism with thyroidectomy or radioiodine (131).

The above-mentioned clinical conditions represent a few examples in which currently available data suggest a clinical application of serum CXCL10 measurements in patients with autoimmune endocrine disorders.

Among the three CXCR3-binding chemokines, only CXCL10 has been extensively studied in human endocrine diseases. The few published studies in which CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 have been evaluated simultaneously (64) indicate that, despite an overall similar behavior, each of the three CXCR3-binding chemokines undergoes specific changes in different clinical settings. Results have been provided by both basic and clinical studies demonstrating that targeting of one or another CXCR3-binding chemokines may produce different biological effects. For this reason, and also in view of the limited information available on CXCL9 and CXCL11 in endocrine diseases, the first step toward a better comprehension of the clinical significance of CXCR3-binding chemokines would be to investigate whether the results obtained by measuring CXCL10 are confirmed, extended, or denied when CXCL9 and CXCL11 are taken into account. The variations in serum chemokine levels between and within healthy subjects are another aspect deserving a more complete elucidation. The currently available data, which suggest a clinical application of measuring serum chemokines are mainly derived from cross-sectional studies. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to reach firm conclusions as well as to establish the sensitivity and specificity values for serum chemokines measurements.

Other aspects deserve clarification, in particular the problem regarding serum levels in patients with T1DM, which have been reported as either elevated (191, 192) or normal (171, 193) in different studies. The issue must be resolved by studying patients selected after an accurate screening for other autoimmune diseases, which might coexist in T1DM patients.

There are also several unexplored fields in which a potential clinical application for the measurements of serum chemokines may be expected. Given the previously described changes of serum CXCR3-binding chemokines in patients with HCV-related hepatitis undergoing therapy with IFN-{alpha} (60) and the involvement of CXCL10 in the pathogenesis of CAT (123, 128), it would be interesting to evaluate the role of CXCL10 in driving the appearance of thyroid autoimmune disorders during IFN-{alpha} treatment (227). Additional studies might address the issue of serum chemokines and thyroid autoimmunity in patients treated with IFN-ß for MS (228). Another clinical condition that might provide a model for a better comprehension of the role of chemokines in endocrine autoimmune diseases is postpartum thyroiditis (229). The evaluation of serum chemokines during IFNs-induced thyroid autoimmunity and in postpartum thyroiditis would represent a unique model for studying the involvement of these molecules in the development of thyroid autoimmunity since its earliest phase, a situation rarely encountered in the clinical practice.


    VIII. Future Perspectives
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
Endocrine autoimmune diseases are the result of the interaction between genetic and environmental factors that are still incompletely understood. Experimental data, primarily based on animal models of human diseases, suggest that autoimmune endocrine diseases result from dysregulated immune responses directed against normal constituents of endocrine glands. The fact that these diseases often follow a progressive course, resulting in complete cellular destruction, reflects the perpetuation of the response by the continued presence of the antigen, the impact of local inflammation, epitope spreading, and genetically predetermined sensitivity to the target tissue. The final result is the failure of physiological mechanisms controlling autoreactive T and B cells, which escape tolerance or ignorance (230). Peripheral events needed for activation of the autoimmune response include costimulatory signals and the action of cytokines and chemokines whose actions in the recruitment, trafficking, and in situ maintenance of specific subsets of activated lymphocytes constitute crucial steps for the initiation and perpetuation of autoimmune inflammation.

The endocrine epithelial cells may interact with the immune system at several levels in the development and perpetuation of the autoimmune process, and many of these interactions appear to exacerbate the disease progression (231). In this review, particular emphasis has been given to the active role played by endocrine epithelial cells, through production of chemokines induced by IFN-{gamma} in the recruitment of specific subsets of lymphocytes to the diseased gland. The understanding of these pathogenetic mechanisms of autoimmune endocrine diseases suggests novel approaches to immunotherapy, directed to targeting lymphocyte trafficking and activation and to inducing lymphocyte anergy.

During the past decade, we have witnessed the development of potent agents to treat inflammation and autoimmune diseases. However, attempts directed to induce sustained reversal of disease by broad immune suppression are not likely to be successful or cost effective, mainly in endocrine autoimmune diseases. Thus, interest has grown in finding a way to interrupt the interactions between chemokines and their receptors as a new therapeutic strategy for inflammation. Despite the difficulties encountered in antagonizing chemokine receptors, which are mainly due to the redundancy of the chemokine/chemokine receptors system, some encouraging results have been reached (20). Given the crucial importance of the movement of leukocytes to inflammatory sites, it seems worth continuing research to address the issue of developing specific chemokine-receptor antagonists. These future fields of research, aimed at developing pharmacological agents for human autoimmune diseases, are a little too far from the aim of this review. We would like to conclude by stressing the concept that although there are currently no new drugs interfering with the function of chemokines in autoimmunity, these molecules should be regarded as a novel marker that could be useful not only for researchers but also for clinicians, and whose fields of potential application have not been fully elucidated.


    IX. Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 
Chemokines are a family of small, structurally related, molecules that regulate cell trafficking of various subsets of leukocytes. Other important functions of chemokines have been discovered, including the regulation immune responses, wound-healing repair, control of angiogenesis, organ sclerosis, and tumor growth and spread. Studies based on targeting of chemokines and their receptors have shown that these molecules are important in different pathological conditions.

In the last few years, experimental evidence accumulated supporting the concept that IFN-{gamma} inducible chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) play an important role in the initial stage of autoimmune disorders involving endocrine glands (193). The fact that, after IFN-{gamma} stimulation, several endocrine cells secrete CXCL10, which in turn recruits Th1 lymphocytes expressing CXCR3 and secreting IFN-{gamma}, strongly supports the concept that chemokines may induce and sustain the autoimmune process in different endocrine glands. The availability of reliable, reproducible, sensible, and inexpensive methods for assessing serum CXCL10 provided the opportunity to perform clinical studies in large series of patients affected by endocrine and nonendocrine autoimmune diseases. The circulating concentrations of CXCL10 have been found to be increased in several endocrine autoimmune diseases, including Graves’ disease, CAT, and AD. Other endocrine diseases could share the same findings. In different clinical settings, including endocrine and nonendocrine diseases, the measurement of the serum levels of CXCL10 may be useful to predict the course and the activity of the disease and the therapeutic outcome, to perform the most appropriate therapeutic choice, to assess the favorable response to treatment, as well as to predict relapses. Of course, the efficacy and usefulness of routine serum CXCL10 measurement may differ in such a wide spectrum of pathological conditions. We do not support the idea that CXCL10 may serve in all patients, but we still think that the currently available results support the concept that CXCL10 may be regarded as a novel serum marker in autoimmune endocrine diseases.


    Footnotes
 
The experiments reported in this paper were supported in part by funds from the Tuscany Region Study on Rosiglitazone (TRESOR) Research Project.

The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online May 2, 2007

Abbreviations: Ab, Antibody or antibodies; ACA, adrenal cortex autoantibodies; AD, Addison disease; AITD, autoimmune thyroid disorders; APS, autoimmune polyglandular syndrome; BMI, body mass index; CAT, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ELR, glutamic acid-leucine-arginine; GAD, glutamic acid decarboxylase; GO, Graves’ ophthalmopathy; GP, glycoprotein; HCV, hepatitis C virus; hZFC, human zona fasciculata cells; IDDM, insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus; IFN, interferon; IP-10, IFN-{gamma}-induced protein 10; I-TAC, IFN-{gamma}-inducible T cell {alpha} chemoattractant; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; L-T4, levothyroxine; mAb, monoclonal Ab; Mig, IFN-{gamma}-induced monokine; MIP-1{alpha}, macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha}; MMI, methimazole; MS, multiple sclerosis; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocytes; PPAR{gamma}, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma}; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; RGZ, rosiglitazone; RIP, rat insulin promotor; SAD, subclinical autoimmune AD; Tc cells, cytotoxic T cells; Tg, thyroglobulin; Th, T helper; Th0, type 0 Th; Th1, type 1 Th; Th2, type 2 Th; TPO, thyroid peroxidase; TR, TSH-receptor; US, ultrasound.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The Chemokines
 III. Main Biological Actions...
 IV. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 V. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines in...
 VI. Pharmacological Modulation...
 VII. Serum Levels of...
 VIII. Future Perspectives
 IX. Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Walz DA, Wu VY, de Lamo R, Dene H, McCoy LE 1977 Primary structure of human platelet factor 4. Thromb Res 11:893–898[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Luster AD, Unkeless JC, Ravetch JV 1985 {gamma}-Interferon transcriptionally regulates an early-response gene containing homology to platelet proteins. Nature 315:672–676[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rollins BJ, Morrison ED, Stiles CD 1988 Cloning and expression of JE, a gene inducible by platelet-derived growth factor and whose product has cytokine-like properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:3738–3742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Farber JM 1990 A macrophage mRNA selectively induced by {gamma}-interferon encodes a member of the platelet factor 4 family of cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5238–5242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schall TJ, Jongstra J, Dyer BJ, Jorgensen J, Clayberger C, Davis MM, Krensky AM 1988 A human T cell-specific molecule is a member of a new gene family. J Immunol 141:1018–1025[Abstract]
  6. Burd PR, Freeman GJ, Wilson SD, Berman M, DeKruyff R, Billings PR, Dorf ME 1987 Cloning and characterization of a novel T cell activation gene. J Immunol 139:3126–3131[Abstract]
  7. Cochran BH, Reffel AC, Stiles CD 1983 Molecular cloning of gene sequences regulated by platelet-derived growth factor. Cell 33:939–947[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Wolpe SD, Davatelis G, Sherry B, Beutler B, Hesse DG, Nguyen HT, Moldawer LL, Nathan CF, Lowry SF, Cerami A 1988 Macrophages secrete a novel heparin-binding protein with inflammatory and neutrophil chemokinetic properties. J Exp Med 167:570–581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wolpe SD, Cerami A 1989 Macrophage inflammatory proteins 1 and 2: members of a novel superfamily of cytokines. FASEB J 3:2565–2573[Abstract]
  10. Schall TJ 1991 Biology of the RANTES/SIS cytokine family. Cytokine 3:165–183[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Oppenheim JJ, Zachariae CO, Mukaida N, Matsushima K 1991 Properties of the novel proinflammatory supergene "intercrine" cytokine family. Annu Rev Immunol 9:617–648[Medline]
  12. Yoshimura T, Matsushima K, Tanaka S, Robinson EA, Appella E, Oppenheim JJ, Leonard EJ 1987 Purification of a human monocyte-derived neutrophil chemotactic factor that has peptide sequence similarity to other host defense cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:9233–9237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Walz A, Peveri P, Aschauer H, Baggiolini M 1987 Purification and amino acid sequencing of NAF, a novel neutrophil-activating factor produced by monocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 149:755–761[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Matsushima K, Larsen CG, DuBois GC, Oppenheim JJ 1989 Purification and characterization of a novel monocyte chemotactic and activating factor produced by a human myelomonocytic cell line. J Exp Med 169:1485–1490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yoshimura T, Yuhki N, Moore SK, Appella E, Lerman MI, Leonard EJ 1989 Human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Full-length cDNA cloning, expression in mitogen-stimulated blood mononuclear leukocytes, and sequence similarity to mouse competence gene JE. FEBS Lett 244:487–493[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Schall TJ, Bacon K, Toy KJ, Goeddel DV 1990 Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature 347:669–671[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Jose PJ, Griffiths-Johnson DA, Collins PD, Walsh DT, Moqbel R, Totty NF, Truong O, Hsuan JJ, Williams TJ 1994 Eotaxin: a potent eosinophil chemoattractant cytokine detected in a guinea pig model of allergic airways inflammation. J Exp Med 179:881–886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lindley IJD, Westwick J, Kunkel SL 1993 Nomenclature announcement: the chemokines. Immunol Today 14:24
  19. Rot A, von Andrian UH 2004 Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 22:891–928[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Charo IF, Ransohoff RM 2006 The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N Engl J Med 354:610–621[Free Full Text]
  21. Zlotnik A, Yoshle O 2000 Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 12:121–127[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Yoshie O, Imai T, Nomiyama H 2001 Chemokines in immunity. Adv Immunol 78:57–110[Medline]
  23. Romagnani P, Lasagni L, Annunziato F, Serio M, Romagnani S 2004 CXC chemokines the regulatory link between inflammation and angiogenesis. Trends Immunol 25:201–209[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Strieter RM, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, Arenberg DA, Burdick MD, Kasper J, Dzuiba J, Van Damme J, Walz A, Marriott D, Chan SY, Roczniak S, Shanafelt AB 1995 The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 270:27348–27357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bikfalvi A 2004 Platelet factor 4: an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Semin Thromb Hemost 30:379–385[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Strieter RM, Belperio JA, Phillips RJ, Keane MP 2004 CXC chemokines in angiogenesis of cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 14:195–200[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Burns JM, Summers BC, Wang Y, Melikian A, Berahovich R, Miao Z, Penfold ME, Sunshine MJ, Littman DR, Kuo CJ, Wei K, McMaster BE, Wright K, Howard MC, Schall TJ 2006 A novel chemokine receptor for SDF-1 and I-TAC involved in cell survival, cell adhesion, and tumor development. J Exp Med 203:2201–2213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Huising MO, Stet RJ, Kruiswijk CP, Savelkoul HF, Lidy Verburg-van Kemenade BM 2003 Molecular evolution of CXC chemokines: extant CXC chemokines originate from the CNS. Trends Immunol 24:307–313[Medline]
  29. Cole KE, Strick CA, Paradis TJ, Ogborne KT, Loetscher M, Gladue RP, Lin W, Boyd JG, Moser B, Wood DE, Sahagan BG, Neote K 1998 Interferon-inducible T cell {alpha} chemoattractant (I-TAC): a novel non-ELR CXC chemokine with potent activity on activated T cells through selective high affinity binding to CXCR3. J Exp Med 187:2009–2021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Marchese A, Heiber M, Nguyen T, Heng HH, Saldivia VR, Cheng R, Murphy PM, Tsui LC, Shi X, Gregor P, George SR, O’Dowd BF, Docherty JM 1995 Cloning and chromosomal mapping of three novel genes, GPR9, GPR10, and GPR14, encoding receptors related to interleukin 8, neuropeptide Y, and somatostatin receptors. Genomics 29:335–344[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Loetscher M, Gerber B, Loetscher P, Jones SA, Piali L, Clark-Lewis I, Baggiolini M, Moser B 1996 Chemokine receptor specific for IP10 and Mig: structure, function, and expression in activated T-lymphocytes. J Exp Med 184:963–969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bonecchi R, Bianchi G, Bordignon PP, D’Ambrosio D, Lang R, Borsatti A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Gray PA, Mantovani A, Sinigaglia F 1998 Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s. J Exp Med 187:129–134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Mackay CR, Lanzavecchia A 1998 Flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression on human polarized T helper 1 and 2 lymphocytes. J Exp Med 187:875–883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Annunziato F, Cosmi L, Galli G, Beltrame C, Romagnani P, Manetti R, Romagnani S, Maggi E 1999 Assessment of chemokine receptor expression by human Th1 and Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo. J Leukoc Biol 65:691–699[Abstract]
  35. Romagnani P, Beltrame C, Annunziato F, Lasagni L, Luconi M, Galli G, Cosmi L, Maggi E, Salvadori M, Pupilli C, Serio M 1999 Role for interactions between IP-10/Mig and their receptor (CXCR3) in proliferative glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:2518–2526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bonacchi A, Romagnani P, Romanelli RG, Efsen E, Annunziato F, Lasagni L, Francalanci M, Serio M, Laffi G, Pinzani M, Gentilini P, Marra F 2001 Signal transduction by the chemokine receptor CXCR3: activation of Ras/ERK Src, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt controls cell migration and proliferation in human vascular pericytes. J Biol Chem 276:9945–9954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Romagnani P, Annunziato F, Lasagni L, Lazzeri E, Beltrame C, Francalanci M, Uguccioni M, Galli G, Cosmi L, Maurenzig L, Baggiolini M, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Serio M 2001 Cell cycle dependent expression of CXC chemokine receptor 3 by endothelial cells mediates angiostatic activity. J Clin Invest 107:53–63[Medline]
  38. Lasagni L, Francalanci M, Annunziato F, Lazzeri E, Giannini S, Cosmi L, Sagrinati C, Mazzinghi B, Orlando C, Maggi E, Marra F, Romagnani S, Serio M, Romagnani P 2003 An alternatively spliced variant of CXCR3 mediates the inhibition of endothelial cell growth induced by IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC, and acts as functional receptor for platelet factor 4. J Exp Med 197:1537–1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ehlert JE, Addison CA, Burdick MD, Kunkel SL, Strieter RM 2004 Identification and partial characterization of a variant of human CXCR3 generated by posttranscriptional exon skipping. J Immunol 173:6234–6240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lazzeri E, Romagnani P 2005 CXCR3-binding chemokines: novel multifunctional therapeutic targets. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5:109–118[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Romagnani S 1997 The Th1/Th2 paradigm. Immunol Today 18:263–266[Medline]
  42. Campbell JD, Gangur V, Simons FE, HayGlass KT 2004 Allergic humans are hyporesponsive to a CXCR3-ligand-mediated Th1 immunity-promoting loop. FASEB J 18:329–331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Hancock WW, Gao W, Csizmadia V, Faia K, Shemmeri N, Luster AD 2001 Donor-derived IP-10 initiates development of acute allograft rejection. J Exp Med 193:975–980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Dufour JH, Dziejman M, Liu MT, Leung JH, Lane TE, Luster AD 2002 IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein 10 (IP-10;CXCL10)-deficient mice reveal a role for IP-10 in effector T cell generation and trafficking. J Immunol 168:3195–3204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Romagnani P, Maggi L, Mazzinghi B, Cosmi L, Lasagni L, Liotta F, Lazzeri E, Angeli R, Rotondi M, Fili L, Parronchi P, Serio M, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Annunziato F 2005 CXCR3-mediated opposite effects of CXCL10 and CXCL4 on Th1 or Th2 cytokine production. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116:1372–1379[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Salcedo R, Resau JH, Halverson D, Hudson EA, Dambach M, Powell D, Wasserman K, Oppenheim JJ 2000 Differential expression and responsiveness of chemokine receptors (CXCR1–3) by human microvascular endothelial cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells. FASEB J 14:2055–2064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Goldberg SH, van der Meer P, Hesselgesser J, Jaffer S, Kolson DL, Albright AV, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Lavi E 2001 CXCR3 expression in human central nervous system diseases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 27:127–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Van Der Meer P, Goldberg SH, Fung KM, Sharer LR, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Lavi E 2001 Expression pattern of CXCR3, CXCR4, and CCR3 chemokine receptors in the developing human brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60:25–32[Medline]
  49. Pan J, Burdick MD, Belperio JA, Xue YY, Gerard C, Sharma S, Dubinett SM, Strieter RM 2006 CXCR3/CXCR3 ligand biological axis impairs RENCA tumor growth by a mechanism of immunoangiostasis. J Immunol 176:1456–1464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Yang J, Richmond A 2004 The angiostatic activity of interferon-inducible protein-10/CXCL10 in human melanoma depends on binding to CXCR3 but not to glycosaminoglycan. Mol Ther 9:846–855[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Shen H, Schuster R, Lu B, Waltz SE, Lentsch AB 2006 Critical and opposing roles of the chemokine receptors CXCR2 and CXCR3 in prostate tumor growth. Prostate 66:1721–1728[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Engelhardt E, Toksoy A, Goebeler M, Debus S, Brocker EB, Gillitzer R 1998 Chemokines IL-8, GRO{alpha}, MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing. Am J Pathol 153:1849–1860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Elner SG, Strieter R, Bian ZM, Kunkel S, Mokhtarzaden L, Johnson M, Lukacs N, Elner VM 1998 Interferon-induced protein 10 and interleukin 8. C-X-C chemokines present in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 116:1597–1601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Romagnani P, Ferrari S, Ferrannini E, Serio M 2005 Age-dependent changes in CXC chemokine ligand 10 serum levels in euthyroid subjects. J Interferon Cytokine Res 25:547–552[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Ferrari SM, Paolicchi A, Romagnani P, Serio M, Ferrannini E 2006 Increase of CXC chemokine CXCL10 and CC chemokine CCL2 serum levels in normal ageing. Cytokine 34:32–38[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Martin GR, Danner DB, Holbrook NJ 1993 Aging: causes and defenses. Annu Rev Med 44:419–429[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Miller RA 1996 The aging immune system: primer and prospectus. Science 273:70–74[Abstract]
  58. Linton PJ, Haynes L, Tsui L, Zhang X, Swain S 1997 From naive to effector-alterations with aging. Immunol Rev 160:9–18[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Pulsatelli L, Meliconi R, Mazzetti I, Dolzani P, Meneghetti A, Neri S, Silvestri T, Ravaglia G, Forti P, Facchini A, Mariani E 2000 Chemokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in elderly subjects. Mech Ageing Dev 121:89–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Narumi S, Tominaga Y, Tamaru M, Shimai S, Okamura H, Nishioji K, Itoh Y, Okanoue T 1997 Expression of IFN-inducible protein-10 in chronic hepatitis. J Immunol 158:5536–5544[Abstract]
  61. Nishioji K, Okanoue T, Itoh Y, Narumi S, Sakamoto M, Nakamura H, Morita A, Kashima K 2001 Increase of chemokine interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) in the serum of patients with autoimmune liver diseases and increase of its mRNA expression in hepatocytes. Clin Exp Immunol 123:271–279[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Itoh Y, Morita A, Nishioji K, Narumi S, Toyama T, Daimon Y, Nakamura H, Kirishima T, Okanoue T 2001 Clinical significance of elevated serum interferon-inducible protein-10 levels in hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal serum transaminase levels. J Viral Hepat 8:341–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Apolinario A, Diago M, Lo Iacono O, Lorente R, Perez C, Majano PL, Clemente G, Garcia-Monzon C 2004 Increased circulating and intrahepatic T-cell-specific chemokines in chronic hepatitis C: relationship with the type of virological response to peginterferon plus ribavirin combination therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19:551–562[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Butera D, Marukian S, Iwamaye AE, Hembrador E, Chambers TJ, Di Bisceglie AM, Charles ED, Talal AH, Jacobson IM, Rice CM, Dustin LB 2005 Plasma chemokine levels correlate with the outcome of antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C. Blood 106:1175–1182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Hancock WW, Lu B, Gao W, Csizmadia V, Faia K, King JA, Smiley ST, Ling M, Gerard NP, Gerard C 2000 Requirement of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 for acute allograft rejection. J Exp Med 192:1515–1519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Zhang Z, Kaptanoglu L, Haddad W, Ivancic D, Alnadjim Z, Hurst S, Tishler D, Luster AD, Barrett TA, Fryer J 2002 Donor T cell activation initiates small bowel allograft rejection through an IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein-10-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 168:3205–3212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Segerer S, Cui Y, Eitner F, Goodpaster T, Hudkins KL, Mack M, Cartron JP, Colin Y, Schlondorff D, Alpers CE 2001 Expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors during human renal transplant rejection. Am J Kidney Dis 37:518–531[Medline]
  68. Agostini C, Calabrese F, Rea F, Facco M, Tosoni A, Loy M, Binotto G, Valente M, Trentin L, Semenzato G 2001 CXCR3 and its ligand CXCL10 are expressed by inflammatory cells infiltrating lung allografts and mediate chemotaxis of T cells at sites of rejection. Am J Pathol 158:1703–1711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Melter M, Exeni A, Reinders ME, Fang JC, McMahon G, Ganz P, Hancock WW, Briscoe DM 2001 Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligand IP-10 during human cardiac allograft rejection. Circulation 104:2558–2564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Fahmy NM, Yamani MH, Starling RC, Ratliff NB, Young JB, McCarthy PM, Feng J, Novick AC, Fairchild RL 2003 Chemokine and chemokine receptor gene expression indicates acute rejection of human cardiac transplants. Transplantation 75:72–78[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Akalin E, Dikman S, Murphy B, Bromberg JS, Hancock WW 2003 Glomerular infiltration by CXCR3+ ICOS+ activated T cells in chronic allograft nephropathy with transplant glomerulopathy. Am J Transplant 3:1116–1120[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Romagnani P, Annunziato F, Lazzeri E, Cosmi L, Beltrame C, Lasagni L, Galli G, Francalanci M, Manetti R, Marra F, Vanini V, Maggi E, Romagnani S 2001 Interferon-inducible protein 10, monokine induced by interferon {gamma}, and interferon-inducible T-cell {alpha} chemoattractant are produced by thymic epithelial cells and attract T-cell receptor (TCR) {alpha}ß+ CD8+ single-positive T cells, TCR{gamma}{delta}+ T cells, and natural killer-type cells in human thymus. Blood 97:601–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Janatpour MJ, Hudak S, Sathe M, Sedgwick JD, McEvoy LM 2001 Tumor necrosis factor-dependent segmental control of MIG expression by high endothelial venules in inflamed lymph nodes regulates monocyte recruitment. J Exp Med 194:1375–1384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Penna G, Sozzani S, Adorini L 2001 Cutting edge: selective usage of chemokine receptors by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol 167:1862–1866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Rossi D, Zlotnik A 2000 The biology of chemokines and their receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 18:217–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Wang X, Yue TL, Ohlstein EH, Sung C, Feuerstein GZ 1996 Interferon-inducible protein-10 involves vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 271:24286–24293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Romagnani P, Lazzeri E, Lasagni L, Mavilia C, Beltrame C, Francalanci M, Rotondi M, Annunziato F, Maurenzig L, Cosmi L, Galli G, Salvadori M, Maggi E, Serio M 2002 IP-10 and Mig production by glomerular cells in human proliferative glomerulonephritis and regulation by nitric oxide. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:53–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Rotondi M, Rosati A, Buonamano A, Lasagni L, Lazzeri E, Pradella F, Fossombroni V, La Villa G, Serio M, Bretoni E, Salvatori M, Romagnani P 2004 High pretransplant serum levels of CXCL10/IP-10 are related to increased risk of allograft failure. Am J Transplant 4:1466–1474[CrossRef][Medline]
  79. Lazzeri E, Rotondi M, Mazzinghi B, Lasagni L, Buonamano A, Rosati A, Pradella F, Fossombroni V, La Villa G, Gacci M, Bertoni E, Serio M, Salvadori M, Romagnani P 2005 High CXCL10 expression in rejected kidneys and predictive role of pretransplant serum CXCL10 for acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation 79:1215–1220[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. Hu H, Aizenstein BD, Puchalski A, Burmania JA, Hamawy MM, Knechtle SJ 2004 Elevation of CXCR3-binding chemokines in urine indicates acute renal-allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant 4:432–437[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Hauser IA, Spiegler S, Kiss E, Gauer S, Sichler O, Scheuermann EH, Ackermann H, Pfeilschifter JM, Geiger H, Grone HJ, Radeke HH 2005 Prediction of acute renal allograft rejection by urinary monokine induced by IFN-{gamma} (MIG). J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1849–1858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Matz M, Beyer J, Wunsch D, Mashreghi MF, Seiler M, Pratschke J, Babel N, Volk HD, Reinke P, Kotsch K 2006 Early post-transplant urinary IP-10 expression after kidney transplantation is predictive of short- and long-term graft function. Kidney Int 69:1683–1690[CrossRef][Medline]
  83. Sorensen T, Trebst C, Kivisakk P, Klaege K, Majmudar A, Ravid R, Lassmann H, Olsen D, Strieter R, Ransohoff R, Sellebjerg F 2002 Multiple sclerosis: a study of CXCL10 and CXCR3 co-localization in the inflamed central nervous system. J Neuroimmunol 127:59–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Balashov KE, Rottman JB, Weiner HL, Hancock WW 1999 CCR5(+) and CXCR3(+) T cells are increased in multiple sclerosis and their ligands MIP-1{alpha} and IP-10 are expressed in demyelinating brain lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6873–6878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Sorensen TL, Tani M, Jensen J, Pierce V, Lucchinetti C, Folcik VA, Qin S, Rottman J, Sellebjerg F, Strieter RM, Frederiksen JL, Ransohoff RM 1999 Expression of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors in the central nervous system of multiple sclerosis patients. J Clin Invest 103:807–815[Medline]
  86. Biddison WE, Cruikshank WW, Center DM, Pelfrey CM, Taub DD, Turner RV 1998 CD8+ myelin peptide-specific T cells can chemoattract CD4+ myelin peptide-specific T cells: importance of IFN-inducible protein 10. J Immunol 160:444–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Sorensen TL, Sellebjerg F, Jensen CV, Strieter RM, Ransohoff RM 2001 Chemokines CXCL10 and CCL2: differential involvement in intrathecal inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 8:665–672[CrossRef][Medline]
  88. Franciotta D, Martino G, Zardini E, Furlan R, Bergamaschi R, Andreoni L, Cosi V 2001 Serum and CSF levels of MCP-1 and IP-10 in multiple sclerosis patients with acute and stable disease and undergoing immunomodulatory therapies. J Neuroimmunol 115:192–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  89. Muller AJ, Scherle PA 2006 Targeting the mechanisms of tumoral immune tolerance with small-molecule inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 6:613–625[CrossRef][Medline]
  90. Romagnani S 2006 Regulatory T cells: which role in the pathogenesis and treatment of allergic disorders? Allergy 61:3–14[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Harrington LE, Mangan PR, Weaver CT 2006 Expanding the effector CD4 T-cell repertoire: the Th17 lineage. Curr Opin Immunol 18:349–356[CrossRef][Medline]
  92. Romagnani S 2006 Regulation of the T cell response. Clin Exp Allergy 36:1357–1366[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Steinman L 2007 A brief history of T(H)17, the first major revision in the T(H)1/T(H)2 hypothesis of T cell-mediated tissue damage. Nat Med 13:139–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Weaver CT, Harrington LE, Mangan PR, Gavrieli M, Murphy KM 2006 Th17: an effector CD4 T cell lineage with regulatory T cell ties. Immunity 24:677–688[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Weetman A, McGregor A 1994 Autoimmune thyroid disease: further developments in our understanding. Endocr Rev 15:788–830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Weetman AP 2000 Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 343:1236–1248[Free Full Text]
  97. Marino M, Chiovato L, Pinchera A 2006 Graves’ disease. In: De Groot LJ, Jameson JL, eds. Endocrinology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 1995–2028
  98. Pearce EN, Farwell AP, Braverman LE 2003 Thyroiditis. N Engl J Med 348:2646–2655[Free Full Text]
  99. Weetman AP 2001 Determinants of autoimmune thyroid disease. Nat Immunol 2:769–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  100. Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 2001 Thyroid autoimmunity. J Clin Invest 108:1253–1259[CrossRef][Medline]
  101. Livolsi VA 1994 The pathology of autoimmune thyroid disease: a review. Thyroid 4:333–339[Medline]
  102. Volpe R 1991 The pathophysiology of autoimmune thyroid disease. Endocr Regul 25:187–192[Medline]
  103. McLachlan SM, Prummel MF, Dallow RL, Wiersinga WM, Rapoport B 1993 Amplification by polymerase chain reaction of immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes from orbital tissue of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 16:149–152[Medline]
  104. Aloisi F, Pujol-Borrell R 2006 Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 6:205–217[CrossRef][Medline]
  105. Adams DH, Shaw S 1998 Leukocyte-endothelial interactions and regulation of leukocyte migration. Lancet 343:831–836[CrossRef]
  106. Springer TA 1994 Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76:301–314[CrossRef][Medline]
  107. Butcher EC, Picker LJ 1996 Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272:60–66[Abstract]
  108. Marazuela M, Postigo AA, Acevedo A, Diaz-Gonzalez F, Sanchez-Madrid F, de Landazuri MO 1994 Adhesion molecules from the LFA-1/ICAM-1,3 and VLA-4/VCAM-1 pathways on T lymphocytes and vascular endothelium in Graves’ and Hashimoto’s thyroid glands. Eur J Immunol 24:2483–2490[Medline]
  109. Margolick JB, Weetman AP, Burman KD 1988 Immunohistochemical analysis of intrathyroidal lymphocytes in Graves’ disease: evidence of activated T cells and production of interferon-{gamma}. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 47:208–218[CrossRef][Medline]
  110. Rutenfranz I, Kruse A, Rink L, Wenzel B, Arnholdt H, Kirchner H 1992 In situ hybridization of the mRNA for interferon-{gamma}, interferon-{alpha}, interferon-ß, interleukin-1ß and interleukin-6 and characterisation of infiltrating cells in thyroid tissues. J Immunol Method 148:233–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  111. Paschke R, Schuppert F, Taton M, Velu T 1994 Intrathyroidal cytokine expression profiles in autoimmune thyroiditis. J Immunol 141:309–315
  112. Watson PF, Pickerill AP, Davies R, Weetman AP 1994 Analysis of cytokine gene expression in Graves’ disease and multinodular goitre. Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:355–360[CrossRef]
  113. Ajjan RA, Watson PF, McIntosh RS, Weetman AP 1996 Intra-thyroidal cytokine gene expression in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clin Exp Immunol 105:523–528[CrossRef][Medline]
  114. Roura-Mir C, Catalfamo M, Sospedra M, Alcalde L, Pujol-Borrell R, Jaraquemada D 1997 Single cell analysis of intra-thyroidal lymphocytes shows differential cytokine expression in Hashimoto’s and Graves’ disease. Eur J Immunol 27:3290–3302[Medline]
  115. Weetman AP, Ajjan RA, Watson PF 1997 Cytokines and Graves’ disease. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab 11:481–497[CrossRef][Medline]
  116. Grubeck-Lobenstein B, Buchan G, Chantry D, Kassal H, Londei K, Pirich K, Barrett K, Turner M, Waldhausl W, Feldmann M 1989 Analysis of intrathyroidal cytokine production in thyroid autoimmune disease: thyroid follicular cells produce interleukin-1{alpha} and interleukin-6. Clin Exp Immunol 77:324–330[Medline]
  117. Miyazaki A, Hanafusa T, Itoh N, Miyagawa J, Kono N, Tarui S, Kiyotaki C, Yoshizaki K 1989 Demonstration of interleukin-1ß on perifollicular endothelial cells in the thyroid cells of patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 69:738–744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  118. Zheng RQH, Abney E, Chu CQ, Field M, Grubeck-Lobenstein B, Maini RN, Feldmann M 1991 Detection of interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 production in human thyroid epithelial cells by non-radioactive in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical methods. Clin Exp Immunol 83:314–319[Medline]
  119. Kayser L, Broholm H, Francis D, Perrild H, Engelbrecht-Olsen B, Bendtzen K, Hoyer PE 1995 Immunocytochemical localisation of interleukin-1{alpha} and interleukin-6 in thyroid tissues from patients with neoplastic or autoimmune thyroid disorders. Autoimmunity 20:75–82[Medline]
  120. Watson PF, Pickerill AP, Davies RW, Weetman AP 1995 Semi-quantitative analysis of interleukin-1{alpha}, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 mRNA expression by human thyrocytes. J Mol Endocrinol 15:11–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  121. Weetman AP, Bennett GL, Wong WLT 1992 Thyroid follicular cells produce interleukin-8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:328–330[Abstract]
  122. Kasai K, Banba N, Motohashi S, Hattori Y, Manaka K, Shimoda S 1996 Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNA and protein in cultured human thyrocytes. FEBS Lett 394:137–140[CrossRef][Medline]
  123. Garcià-Lòpez MA, Sancho D, Sànchez-Madrid F, Marazuela M 2001 Thyrocytes from autoimmune thyroid disorders produce the chemokines IP-10 and Mig and attract CXCR3+ lymphocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5008–5016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  124. Romagnani P, Rotondi M, Lazzeri E, Lasagni L, Francalanci M, Buonamano A, Milani S, Vitti P, Chiovato L, Tonacchera M, Bellastella A, Serio M 2002 Expression of IP-10/CXCL10 and Mig/CXCL9 in the thyroid and increased serum levels of IP-10/CXCL10 in the serum of subjects with recent onset Graves’ disease. Am J Pathol 161:195–206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  125. Aust G, Sittig D, Steinert M, Lamesch P, Lohmann T 2002 Graves’ disease is associated with an altered CXCR3 and CCR5 expression in thyroid-derived compared to peripheral blood lymphocytes. Clin Exp Immunol 127:479–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  126. Kemp EH, Metcalfe RA, Smith KA, Woodroofe MN, Watson PF, Weetman AP 2003 Detection and localization of chemokine gene expression in autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol 59:207–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  127. Ashhab Y, Dominguez O, Sospedra M, Roura-Mir C, Lucas-Martin A, Pujol-Borrell R 1999 A one-tube polymerase chain reaction protocol demonstrates CC chemokine overexpression in Graves’ disease glands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2873–2882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  128. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Romagnani P, Ferrari SM, Buonamano A, Ferrannini E, Serio M 2004 High levels of circulating CXCL10 are associated with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis and hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5496–5499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  129. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Romagnani P, Ferrari S, Paolicchi A, Ferrannini E, Serio M 2005 Increase of interferon-{gamma} inducible {alpha} chemokine CXCL10 but not ß 32 chemokine CCL2 serum levels in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Eur J Endocrinol 152:171–177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  130. Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Rotondi M, Ferrari SM, Romagnani P, Grosso M, Ferrannini E, Serio M 2006 Increased serum CXCL10 in Graves’ disease or autoimmune thyroiditis is not associated with hyper- or hypothyroidism per se, but is specifically sustained by the autoimmune, inflammatory process. Eur J Endocrinol 154:651–658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  131. Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Rotondi M, Galleri D, Ferrari SM, Romagnani P, Serio M, Miccoli P 2006 Increase of interferon-{gamma} inducible {alpha} chemokine CXCL10 serum levels in patients with active Graves’ disease, and modulation by methimazole therapy and thyroidectomy. Br J Surg 93:1226–1231[CrossRef][Medline]
  132. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Romagnani P, Ferrari SM, Barani L, Ferrannini E, Serio M 2006 Increase of interferon-{gamma}-inducible CXC chemokine CXCL10 serum levels in patients with active Graves’ disease, and modulation by methimazole therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 64:189–195[CrossRef][Medline]
  133. Bonecchi R, Sozzani S, Stine JT, Luini W, D’Amico G, Allavena P, Chantry D, Mantovani A 1998 Divergent effects of interleukin-4 and interferon-{gamma} on macrophage-derived chemokine production: an amplification circuit of polarized T helper 2 responses. Blood 92:2668–2671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  134. Galli G, Chantry D, Annunziato F, Romagnani P, Cosmi L, Lazzeri E, Manetti R, Maggi E, Gray PW, Romagnani S 2000 Macrophage-derived chemokine production by activated human T cells in vitro and in vivo: preferential association with the production of type 2 cytokines. Eur J Immunol 30:204–210[CrossRef][Medline]
  135. Sato K, Yamazaki K, Shizume K, Kanaji Y, Obara T, Ohsumi K, Demura H, Yamaguchi S, Shibuya M 1995 Stimulation by thyroid-stimulating hormone and Graves’ immunoglobulin G of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA expression in human thyroid follicles in vitro and flt mRNA expression in the rat thyroid in vivo. J Clin Invest 96:1295–1302[Medline]
  136. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N 1989 Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 246:1306–1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Weetman AP 1994 The immunomodulatory effects of antithyroid drugs. Thyroid 4:145–146[Medline]
  138. Cooper DS 1984 Antithyroid drugs. N Engl J Med 311:1353–1362[Abstract]
  139. Weetman A, McGregor A, Hall R 1984 Evidence for an effect of antithyroid drugs on the natural history of Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 163–172
  140. Weetman A, Tandon N, Morgan B 1992 Anti-thyroid drugs and release of inflammatory mediators by complement-attacked thyroid cells. Lancet 340:633–636[CrossRef][Medline]
  141. Mahad DJ, Howell SJ, Woodroofe MN 2002 Expression of chemokines in the CSF and correlation with clinical disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:498–502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Aniszewski JP, Valyasevi RW, Bahn RS 2000 Relationship between disease duration and predominant orbital T cell subset in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:776–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  143. Delgado M, Abad C, Martinez C, Leceta J, Gomariz RP 2001 Vasoactive intestinal peptide prevents experimental arthritis by downregulating both autoimmune and inflammatory components of the disease. Nat Med 7:563–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  144. Miyamoto K, Miyake S, Yamamura T 2001 A synthetic glycolipid prevents autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inducing TH2 bias of natural killer T cells. Nature 413:531–534[CrossRef][Medline]
  145. Waisman A, Ruiz PJ, Hirschberg DL, Gelman A, Oksenberg JR, Brocke S, Mor F, Cohen IR, Steinman L 1996 Suppressive vaccination with DNA encoding a variable region gene of the T-cell receptor prevents autoimmune encephalomyelitis and activates Th2 immunity. Nat Med 2:899–905[CrossRef][Medline]
  146. Yoh K, Shibuya K, Morito N, Nakano T, Ishizaki K, Shimohata H, Nose M, Izui S, Shibuya A, Koyama A, Engel JD, Yamamoto M, Takahashi S 2003 Transgenic overexpression of GATA-3 in T lymphocytes improves autoimmune glomerulonephritis in mice with a BXSB/MpJ-Yaa genetic background. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2494–2502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  147. Ghoreschi K, Thomas P, Breit S, Dugas M, Mailhammer R, van Eden W, van der Zee R, Biedermann T, Prinz J, Mack M, Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Schlondorff D, Plewig G, Sander CA, Rocken M 2003 Interleukin-4 therapy of psoriasis induces Th2 responses and improves human autoimmune disease. Nat Med 9:40–46[CrossRef][Medline]
  148. Hubbard VM, Eng JM, Ramirez-Montagut T, Tjoe KH, Muriglan SJ, Kochman AA, Terwey TH, Willis LM, Schiro R, Heller G, Murphy GF, Liu C, Alpdogan O, van den Brink MR 2005 Absence of inducible costimulator on alloreactive T cells reduces graft versus host disease and induces Th2 deviation. Blood 106:3285–3292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  149. Ochi H, Feng-Jun M, Osoegawa M, Minohara M, Murai H, Taniwaki T, Kira J 2004 Time-dependent cytokine deviation toward the Th2 side in Japanese multiple sclerosis patients with interferon ß-1b. J Neurol Sci 222:65–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  150. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Fallahi P, Grosso M, Boni G, Ferrari SM, Romagnani P, Serio M, Mariani G, Ferrannini E 2007 Iodine-131 given for therapeutic purposes modulates differently interferon-{gamma} inducible {alpha} chemokine CXCL10 serum levels in patients with active Graves’ disease or with toxic nodular goiter. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1485–1490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  151. Diez JJ, Hernanz A, Medina S, Bayon C, Iglesias P 2002 Serum concentrations of tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and soluble TNF-{alpha} receptor p55 in patients with hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism before and after normalization of thyroid function. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:515–521[CrossRef][Medline]
  152. Salvi M, Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Giuliani N, Minelli R, Wall JR, Roti E 2000 Serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in Graves’ disease: effect of treatment, thyroid function, ophthalmopathy and cigarette smoking. Eur J Endocrinol 143:197–202[Abstract]
  153. Senturk T, Kozaci LD, Kok F, Kadikoylu G, Bolaman Z 2003 Proinflammatory cytokine levels in hyperthyroidism. Clin Invest Med 26:58–63[Medline]
  154. Antonelli A, Rotondi M, Ferrari SM, Fallahi P, Romagnani P, Franceschini SS, Serio M, Ferrannini E 2006 Interferon-{gamma}-inducible {alpha}-chemokine CXCL10 involvement in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: modulation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:614–620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Mourits MP, Koornneef L, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Berghout A, Van der Gaag R 1989 Clinical criteria for the assessment of disease activity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: a novel approach. Br J Ophthalmol 73:639–644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  156. Baschieri L, Antonelli A, Nardi S, Alberti B, Lepri A, Canapicchi R, Fallahi P 1997 Intravenous immunoglobulin versus corticosteroid in treatment of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 7:579–585[Medline]
  157. Mariotti S, Del Prete GF, Mastromauro C, De Carli M, Romagnani S, Ricci M, Pinchera A 1991 The autoimmune infiltrate of Basedow’s disease: analysis of clonal level and comparison with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Exp Clin Endocrinol 97:139–146[Medline]
  158. De Carli M, D’Elios MM, Mariotti S, Marcocci C, Pinchera A, Ricci M, Romagnani S, Del Prete G 1993 Cytolytic T cells with Th1-like cytokine profile predominate in retroorbital lymphocytic infiltrates of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1120–1124[Abstract]
  159. Hiromatsu Y, Yang D, Bednarczuk T, Miyake I, Nonaka K, Inoue Y 2000 Cytokine profiles in eye muscle tissue and orbital fat tissue from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1194–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  160. Wakelkamp IM, Bakker O, Baldeschi L, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF 2003 TSH-R expression and cytokine profile in orbital tissue of active vs. inactive Graves’ ophthalmopathy patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:280–287[CrossRef][Medline]
  161. Wakelkamp IM, Gerding MN, Van Der Meer JW, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM 2000 Both Th1- and Th2-derived cytokines in serum are elevated in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 121:453–457[CrossRef][Medline]
  162. Forster G, Otto E, Hansen C, Ochs K, Kahaly G 1998 Analysis of orbital T cells in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 112:427–434[CrossRef][Medline]
  163. Marx N, Mach F, Sauty A, Leung JH, Sarafi MN, Ransohoff RM, Libby P, Plutzky J, Luster AD 2000 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- activators inhibit IFN-induced expression of the T cell-active CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC in human endothelial cells. J Immunol 164:6503–6508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  164. Lalor PF, Shields P, Grant A, Adams DH 2002 Recruitment of lymphocytes to the human liver. Immunol Cell Biol 80:52–64[CrossRef][Medline]
  165. Marcocci C, Vitti P, Cetani F, Catalano F, Concetti R, Pinchera A 1991 Thyroid ultrasonography helps to identify patients with diffuse lymphocytic thyroiditis who are prone to develop hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:209–213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  166. Vitti P 2000 Grey scale thyroid ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with Graves’ disease. Eur J Endocrinol 142:22–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  167. Wang SH, Bretz JD, Phelps E, Mezosi E, Arscott PL, Utsugi S, Baker JJR 2002 A unique combination of inflammatory cytokines enhances apoptosis of thyroid follicular cells and transform nondestructive to destructive thyroiditis in experimental autoimmune thyroiditis. J Immunol 168:2470–2474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  168. Caturegli P, Hejazi M, Suzuki K, Dohan O, Carrasco N, Kohn LD, Rose NR 2000 Hypothyroidism in transgenic mice expressing IFN-{gamma} in the thyroid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1719–1724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  169. Kimura H, Kimura M, Rose NR, Caturegli P 2004 Early chemokine expression induced by interferon-{gamma} in a murine model of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Exp Mol Pathol 77:161–167[CrossRef][Medline]
  170. Stassi G, De Maria R 2002 Autoimmune thyroid disease: new models of cell death in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2:195–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  171. Rotondi M, Lazzeri E, Romagnani P, Serio M 2003 Role for interferon-{gamma} inducible chemokines in endocrine autoimmunity: an expanding field. J Endocrinol Invest 26:177–180[Medline]
  172. Weetman AP 1994 The potential immunological role of the thyroid cell in autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid 4:493–499[Medline]
  173. Kokkotou E, Marafelia P, Mantzos EI, Tritos NA 2002 Serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is increased in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Metabolism 51:1489–1493[CrossRef][Medline]
  174. Lu B, Rutledge BJ, Gu L, Fiorillo J, Lukacs NW, Kunkel SL, North R, Gerard C, Rollins BJ 1998 Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice. J Exp Med 187:601–608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  175. Maghazachi AA, Al-Aoukaty A, Schall TJ 1994 C-C chemokines induce the chemotaxis of NK and IL-2-activated NK cells. Role for G proteins. J Immunol 153:4969–4977[Abstract]
  176. Maghazachi AA, Al-Aoukaty A, Schall TJ 1996 CC chemokines induce the generation of killer cells from CD56+ cells. Eur J Immunol 26:315–319[Medline]
  177. Taub DD, Sayers TJ, Carter CR, Ortaldo JR 1995 {alpha} And ß chemokines induce NK cell migration and enhance NK-mediated cytolysis. J Immunol 155:3877–3888[Abstract]
  178. Karpus WJ, Lukacs NW, Kennedy KJ, Smith WS, Hurst SD, Barrett TA 1997 Differential CC chemokine-induced enhancement of T helper cell cytokine production. J Immunol 158:4129–4136[Abstract]
  179. Inadera H, Egashira K, Takemoto M, Ouchi Y, Matsushima K 1999 Increase in circulating levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 with aging. J Interferon Cytokine Res 19:1179–1182[CrossRef][Medline]
  180. Goulvestre C, Batteux F, Charreire J 2002 Chemokines modulate experimental autoimmune thyroiditis through attraction of auto-reactive or regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol 32:3435–3442[Medline]
  181. Frigerio S, Junt T, Lu B, Gerard C, Zumsteg U, Hollander GA, Piali L 2002 ß Cells are responsible for CXCR3-mediated T-cell infiltration in insulitis. Nat Med 8:1414–1420[CrossRef][Medline]
  182. Ohashi P, Oehen S, Buerki K, Pircher H, Ohashi C, Odermatt B, Malissen B, Zinkernagel R, Hengartner H 1991 Ablation of tolerance and induction of diabetes by virus infection in viral antigen transgenic mice. Cell 65:305–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  183. Oldstone MBA, Nerenberg M, Southern P, Price J, Lewicki H 1991 Virus infection triggers insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a transgenic model: role of anti-self (virus) immune response. Cell 65:319[CrossRef][Medline]
  184. von Herrath MG, Dockter J, Oldstone MB 1994 How virus induces a rapid or slow onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a transgenic model. Immunity 1:231–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  185. Seewaldt S, Thomas H, Ejrnaes M, Christen U, Wolfe T, Rodrigo E, Coon B, Michelsen B, Kay T, von Herrath MG 2000 Virus-induced autoimmune diabetes: most ß-cells die through inflammatory cytokines and not perforin from autoreactive (anti-viral) CTL. Diabetes 49:1801–1809[Abstract]
  186. Christen U, Wolfe T, Mohrle U, Hughes AC, Rodrigo E, Green EA, Flavell RA, von Herrath MG 2001 A dual role for TNF-{alpha} in type 1 diabetes: islet-specific expression abrogates the ongoing autoimmune process when induced late but not early during pathogenesis. J Immunol 166:7023–7032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  187. Christen U, McGavern DB, Luster AD, von Herrath MG, Oldstone MB 2003 Among CXCR3 chemokines, IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein of 10 kDa (CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 10) but not monokine induced by IFN-{gamma} (CXCL9) imprints a pattern for the subsequent development of autoimmune disease. J Immunol 171:6838–6845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  188. Morimoto J, Yoneyama H, Shimada A, Shigihara T, Yamada S, Oikawa Y, Matsushima K, Saruta T, Narumi S 2004 CXC chemokine ligand 10 neutralization suppresses the occurrence of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice through enhanced ß cell proliferation without affecting insulitis. J Immunol 173:7017–7024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  189. Qin S, Rottman JB, Myers P, Kassam N, Weinblatt M, Loetscher M, Koch A, Moser B, Mackay CR 1998 The chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5 mark subsets of T cells associated with certain inflammatory reactions. J Clin Invest 101:746–754[Medline]
  190. Christen U, Von Herrath MG 2004 IP-10 and type 1 diabetes: a question of time and location. Autoimmunity 37:273–282[CrossRef][Medline]
  191. Shimada A, Morimoto J, Kodama K, Suzuki R, Oikawa Y, Funae O, Kasuga A, Saruta T, Narumi S 2001 Elevated serum IP-10 levels observed in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 24:510–515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  192. Nicoletti F, Conget I, Di Mauro M, Di Marco R, Mazzarino MC, Bendtzen K, Messina A, Gomis R 2002 Serum concentrations of the interferon-{gamma}-inducible chemokine IP-10/CXCL10 are augmented in both newly diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus patients and subjects at risk of developing the disease. Diabetologia 45:1107–1110[CrossRef][Medline]
  193. Rotondi M, Romagnani P, Brozzetti A, Santeusanio F, Serio M, Falorni A 2003 Serum concentrations of the interferon-inducible chemokine IP-10/CXCL10 are augmented in both newly-diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus patients and subjects at risk of developing the disease. Diabetologia 46:1020–1021[CrossRef][Medline]
  194. Tuomi T, Groop L, Zimmet P, Rowley M, Knowles W, Mackay I 1993 Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveal latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults with a non-insulin-dependent onset of disease. Diabetes 42:359–362[Abstract]
  195. Kobayashi T, Tamemoto K, Nakanishi K, Kato N, Okubo M, Kajio H, Sugimoto T, Murase T, Kosaka K 1993 Immunogenetic and clinical characterization of slowly progressive IDDM. Diabetes Care 16:780–788[Abstract]
  196. Gasperini S, Marchi M, Calzetti F, Laudanna C, Vicentini L, Olsen H, Murphy M, Liao F, Farber J, Cassatella MA 1999 Gene expression and production of the monokine induced by IFN-{gamma} (MIG), IFN-inducible T cell chemoattractant (I-TAC), and IFN-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) chemokines by human neutrophils. J Immunol 162:4928–4937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  197. Rabinovitch A, Suarez-Pinzon W 1998 Cytokines and their roles in pancreatic islet ß-cell destruction and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Biochem Pharmacol 55:1139–1149[CrossRef][Medline]
  198. Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Schloot NC, Kappler S, Seissler J, Kolb H 2003 An association of autoantibody status and serum cytokine levels in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 52:1137–1142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  199. Picchio ML, Falorni A, De Giorgi G 1997 Incidence of IDDM in the 0–29 yrs age-group in Umbria, Italy. Diabetes Nutr Metab 10:120–125
  200. Shigihara T, Oikawa Y, Kanazawa Y, Okubo Y, Narumi S, Saruta T, Shimada A 2006 Significance of serum CXCL10/IP-10 level in type 1 diabetes. J Autoimmun 26:66–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  201. Lorini R, d’Annunzio G, Vitali L, Scaramuzza A 1996 IDDM and autoimmune thyroid disease in the paediatric age group. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9:89–94
  202. Gambelunghe G, Forini F, Laureti S, Murdolo G, Toraldo G, Santeusanio F, Brunetti P, Sanjeevi CB, Falorni A 2000 Increased risk for endocrine autoimmunity in Italian type 2 diabetic patients with GAD65 autoantibodies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 52:565–573[CrossRef][Medline]
  203. Ten S, New M, Maclaren N 2001 Clinical review 130: Addison’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2909–2922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  204. Betterle C, Dal Pra C, Mantero F, Zanchetta R 2002 Autoimmune adrenal insufficiency and autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes: autoantibodies, autoantigens, and their applicability in diagnosis and disease prediction. Endocr Rev 23:327–364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  205. Peterson P, Uibo R, Krohn KJ 2000 Adrenal autoimmunity: results and developments. Trends Endocrinol Metab 11:285–290[CrossRef][Medline]
  206. Wardle CA, Weetman AP, Mitchell R, Peers N, Robertson WR 1993 Adrenocorticotropic hormone receptor-blocking immunoglobulins in serum from patients with Addison’s disease: a reexamination. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:750–753[Abstract]
  207. Myhre AG, Undlien DE, Lovas K, Uhlving S, Nedrebo BG, Fougner KJ, Trovik T, Sorheim JI, Husebye ES 2002 Autoimmune adrenocortical failure in Norway autoantibodies and human leukocyte antigen class II associations related to clinical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:618–623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  208. Volpé R 1981 Autoimmune diseases of the adrenals, gonads, and parathyroids: autoimmune polyendocrine disease. In: Volpé R, ed. Autoimmunity in endocrine system. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 149–175
  209. Fujii Y, Kato N, Kito J, Asai J, Yokochi T 1992 Experimental autoimmune adrenalitis: a murine model for Addison’s disease. Autoimmunity 12:47–52[Medline]
  210. Freeman M, Weetman AP 1992 T and B cell reactivity to adrenal antigens in autoimmune Addison’s disease. Clin Exp Immunol 88:275–279[Medline]
  211. Rotondi M, Falorni A, De Bellis A, Laureti S, Ferruzzi P, Romagnani P, Buonamano A, Lazzeri E, Crescioli C, Mannelli M, Santeusanio F, Bellastella A, Serio M 2005 Elevated serum interferon-{gamma}-inducible chemokine-10/CXC chemokine ligand-10 in autoimmune primary adrenal insufficiency and in vitro expression in human adrenal cells primary cultures after stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2357–2363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  212. De Bellis A, Bizzarro A, Rossi R, Paglionico VA, Criscuolo T, Lombardi G, Bellastella A 1993 Remission of subclinical adrenocortical failure in subjects with adrenal autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1002–1007[Abstract]
  213. Laureti S, De Bellis A, Muccitelli VI, Calcinaro F, Bizzarro A, Rossi R, Bellastella A, Santeusanio F, Falorni A 1998 Levels of adrenocortical autoantibodies correlate with the degree of adrenal dysfunction in subjects with preclinical Addison’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3507–3511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  214. Laureti S, Arvat E, Candeloro P, DiVito L, Ghigo E, Santeusanio F, Falorni A 2000 Low dose (1 microg) ACTH test in the evaluation of adrenal dysfunction in pre-clinical Addison’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 53:107–115[CrossRef][Medline]
  215. Falorni A, Laureti S, De Bellis A, Zanchetta R, Tiberti C, Arnaldi G, Bini V, Beck-Peccoz P, Bizzarro A, Dotta F, Mantero F, Bellastella A, Betterle C, Santeusanio F, Group SAS 2004 Italian Addison Network Study: update of diagnostic criteria for the etiological classification of primary adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1598–1604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  216. Hancock W, Wang L, Ye Q, Han R, Lee I 2003 Chemokines and their receptors as markers of allograft rejection and targets for immunosuppression. Curr Opin Immunol 15:479–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  217. Gosset P, Charbonnier AS, Delerive P, Fontaine J, Staels B, Pestel J, Tonnel AB, Trottein F 2001 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators affect the maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 31:2857–2865[CrossRef][Medline]
  218. Schaefer KL, Denevich S, Ma C, Cooley SR, Nakajima A, Wada K, Schlezinger J, Sherr D, Saubermann LJ 2005 Intestinal antiinflammatory effects of thiazolidenedione peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-ligands on T helper type 1 chemokine regulation include nontranscriptional control mechanisms. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:244–252[CrossRef][Medline]
  219. Kasai K, Banba N, Hishinuma A, Matsumura M, Kakishita H, Matsumura M, Motohashi S, Sato N, Hattori Y 2000 15-Deoxy-12,14-prostaglandin J2 facilitates thyroglobulin production by cultured human thyrocytes. Am J Physiol 279:1859–1869
  220. Mimura LY, Villares SM, Monteiro ML, Guazzelli IC, Bloise W 2003 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} gene expression in orbital adipose/connective tissues is increased during the active stage of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 13:845–848[CrossRef][Medline]
  221. Lovett-Racke AE, Hussain RZ, Northrop S, Choy J, Rocchini A, Matthes L, Chavis JA, Diab A, Drew PD, Racke MK 2004 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} agonists as therapy for autoimmune disease. J Immunol 172:5790–5798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  222. Su CG, Wen X, Bailey ST, Jiang W, Rangwala SM, Keilbaugh SA, Flanigan A, Murthy S, Lazar MA, Wu GD 1999 A novel therapy for colitis utilizing PPAR-{gamma} ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response. J Clin Invest 104:383–389[Medline]
  223. Boumpas DT, Chrousos GP, Wilder RL, Cupps TR, Balow JE 1993 Glucocorticoid therapy for immune-mediated diseases: basic and clinical correlates. Ann Intern Med 119:1198–1208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  224. Karin M 1998 New twists in gene regulation by glucocorticoid receptor: is DNA binding dispensable? Cell 93:487–490[CrossRef][Medline]
  225. Franchimont D, Galon J, Gadina M, Visconti R, Zhou Y, Aringer M, Frucht DM, Chrousos GP, O’Shea JJ 2000 Inhibition of Th1 immune response by glucocorticoids: dexamethasone selectively inhibits IL-12-induced Stat4 phosphorylation in T lymphocytes. J Immunol 164:1768–1774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  226. Hu X, Li WP, Meng C, Ivashkiv LB 2003 Inhibition of IFN-{gamma} signaling by glucocorticoids. J Immunol 170:4833–4839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  227. Carella C, Mazziotti G, Amato G, Braverman LE, Roti E 2004 Clinical review 169: interferon-{alpha}-related thyroid disease: pathophysiological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3656–3661[Free Full Text]
  228. Rotondi M, Oliviero A, Profice P, Mone CM, Biondi B, Del Buono A, Mazziotti G, Sinisi AM, Bellastella A, Carella C 1998 Occurrence of thyroid autoimmunity and dysfunction throughout a nine-month follow-up in patients undergoing interferon-ß therapy for multiple sclerosis. J Endocrinol Invest 21:748–752[Medline]
  229. Muller AF, Drexhage HA, Berghout A 2001 Postpartum thyroiditis and autoimmune thyroiditis in women of childbearing age: recent insights and consequences for antenatal and postnatal care. Endocr Rev 22:605–630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  230. Girotra M, Bluestone JA, Herold KC 2006 Immunologic mechanisms causing autoimmune endocrine disease. In: De Groot LJ, Jameson JL, eds. Endocrinology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 769–797
  231. Weetman AP 2006 Autoimmune thyroid disease. In: De Groot LJ, Jameson JL, eds. Endocrinology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 1979–1993



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. de Kruijf, J. van Heteren, H. D. Lim, P. G.M. Conti, M. M. C. van der Lee, L. Bosch, K.-K. Ho, D. Auld, M. Ohlmeyer, M. J. Smit, et al.
Nonpeptidergic Allosteric Antagonists Differentially Bind to the CXCR2 Chemokine Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2009; 329(2): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Kaguelidou, C. Alberti, M. Castanet, M.-A. Guitteny, P. Czernichow, J. Leger, and for the French Childhood Graves' Disease Study Gro
Predictors of Autoimmune Hyperthyroidism Relapse in Children after Discontinuation of Antithyroid Drug Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3817 - 3826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Rotondi, C. Cappelli, B. Pirali, I. Pirola, F. Magri, R. Fonte, M. Castellano, E. A. Rosei, and L. Chiovato
The Effect of Pregnancy on Subsequent Relapse from Graves' Disease after a Successful Course of Antithyroid Drug Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3985 - 3988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Loos, A. Mortier, M. Gouwy, I. Ronsse, W. Put, J.-P. Lenaerts, J. Van Damme, and P. Proost
Citrullination of CXCL10 and CXCL11 by peptidylarginine deiminase: a naturally occurring posttranslational modification of chemokines and new dimension of immunoregulation
Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2648 - 2656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Borgogni, E. Sarchielli, M. Sottili, V. Santarlasci, L. Cosmi, S. Gelmini, A. Lombardi, G. Cantini, G. Perigli, M. Luconi, et al.
Elocalcitol Inhibits Inflammatory Responses in Human Thyroid Cells and T Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3626 - 3634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Lombardi, G. Cantini, E. Piscitelli, S. Gelmini, M. Francalanci, T. Mello, E. Ceni, G. Varano, G. Forti, M. Rotondi, et al.
A New Mechanism Involving ERK Contributes to Rosiglitazone Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Interferon-{gamma} Inflammatory Effects in Human Endothelial Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(4): 718 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
C Crescioli, L Cosmi, E Borgogni, V Santarlasci, S Gelmini, M Sottili, E Sarchielli, B Mazzinghi, M Francalanci, A Pezzatini, et al.
Methimazole inhibits CXC chemokine ligand 10 secretion in human thyrocytes
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotondi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Romagnani, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotondi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Romagnani, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals