This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stocco, C. Articles by Gibori, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stocco, C. Articles by Gibori, G.

The Molecular Control of Corpus Luteum Formation, Function, and Regression

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science (C.S.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510; Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences (C.T.), Sanford School of Medicine of the University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069; and Department of Physiology and Biophysics (G.G.), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Geula Gibori, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 835 South Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: ggibori{at}uic.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
The corpus luteum (CL) is one of the few endocrine glands that forms from the remains of another organ and whose function and survival are limited in scope and time. The CL is the site of rapid remodeling, growth, differentiation, and death of cells originating from granulosa, theca, capillaries, and fibroblasts. The apparent raison d’etre of the CL is the production of progesterone, and all the structural and functional features of this gland are geared toward this end. Because of its unique importance for successful pregnancies, the mammals have evolved a complex series of checks and balances that maintains progesterone at appropriate levels throughout gestation. The formation, maintenance, regression, and steroidogenesis of the CL are among the most significant and closely regulated events in mammalian reproduction. During pregnancy, the fate of the CL depends on the interplay of ovarian, pituitary, and placental regulators. At the end of its life span, the CL undergoes a process of regression leading to its disappearance from the ovary and allowing the initiation of a new cycle. The generation of transgenic, knockout and knockin mice and the development of innovative technologies have revealed a novel role of several molecules in the reprogramming of granulosa cells into luteal cells and in the hormonal and molecular control of the function and demise of the CL. The current review highlights our knowledge on these key molecular events in rodents.

I. Introduction

II. Formation of the Corpus Luteum: Reprogramming of Follicular Cells

A. Exit from the cell cycle

B. Key molecules involved in luteinization

C. Changes in the expression of receptors

D. Activation of signaling pathways

III. Genesis of a New Gland: Structural Changes from the Remnants of the Ovulated Follicle

A. Luteal cell types

B. Tissue remodeling

C. Vascularization

IV. Function of the Corpus Luteum

A. Luteal steroidogenesis

B. Hormonal regulation

V. Regression of the Corpus Luteum: Involution to Resume Cyclicity

A. Functional luteal regression

B. Structural luteal regression

VI. Concluding Remarks

	I. Introduction

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
THE CORPUS LUTEUM (CL) plays a central role in the regulation of the estrous cycle and in the maintenance of pregnancy. This function is carried out largely by progesterone, which is the main steroid synthesized by this transient endocrine gland. If the oocyte is not fertilized, the CL regresses, allowing a new cycle to begin. Implantation, mating, or even cervical stimulation in some mammals initiates a complex mechanism geared to maintain CL function, ensuring a continuous supply of progesterone needed for fetal survival.

Four types of CL differing in their life span and steroidogenic output can be found in mammals, i.e., the CL of: 1) the cycle, 2) pseudopregnancy, 3) pregnancy, and 4) lactation. Only the CL of pregnancy is present in all mammalian species, whereas all four types can be found in rodents. The CL of the cycle does not exist in induced ovulators, and the CL of pseudopregnancy does not form in primates, whereas the CL of lactation is seen only in species that ovulate after parturition.

Reviews covering several aspects of the physiology of the primate CL, such as luteal steroidogenesis (1, 2), the process of luteal regression and remodeling (3), and the molecular mechanisms triggered by LH (4) have been published. The mechanism controlling luteal function, principally in ruminants, also has been reviewed by various investigators (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). In addition, an extensive analysis of the role of immune cells and cytokines as mediators of luteal formation and regression has being published recently (7, 13, 14). Other aspects of luteal function such as angiogenesis and overall role of the luteal microvasculature have been also revisited (15, 16, 17). The clinical aspect of the CL function in assisted reproduction has also been discussed (18). Finally, an overview of the contribution of mutant mouse models to the knowledge of luteal development, function, and regression has been reported (19, 20). The present review focuses on the molecular, cellular, and physiological mechanisms underlying the processes of formation, regulation, and regression of the CL, with a particular emphasis on rodent species.

	II. Formation of the Corpus Luteum: Reprogramming of Follicular Cells

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
Activation of the LH receptor (LH-R) in follicular cells by the preovulatory LH surge causes ovulation and rapidly initiates a program of terminal differentiation of the ovulated follicle into a CL through a process termed luteinization. Remarkably, transformation of granulosa cells into luteal cells occurs within a few hours (21). There are structural and genomics changes that lead to the terminal differentiation of follicular cells into nondividing progesterone-producing luteal cells. Cells undergoing luteinization must stop dividing and begin expressing a new set of molecules that will allow luteal cells to survive in a different hormonal environment. Thus, the final luteal cell phenotype depends on a specific combination of genes encoding for regulatory proteins such as receptors, transcription factors, and signaling proteins, which ensures the expression of only those genes necessary for luteal cell function. This reprogramming of follicular cells into luteal cells is irreversible and requires first the exit from the cell cycle.

A. Exit from the cell cycle
LH terminates follicular growth by causing granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles to exit the cell cycle. Luteal steroidogenic cells are found arrested predominantly at the G₀/G₁ phase of the cell cycle (22). Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and several proteins that either stimulate or inhibit their activities regulate the G₁ phase of the cell cycle, governing the transition between proliferation and quiescence (23). Progression through G₁ is controlled largely by Cdks 4/6 and 2 in association with cyclins D and E, respectively. Entry of cells into S-phase involves the cooperation of Cdk 4/6 and D-type cyclins, D1, D2, and D3 with Cdk2/cyclin E. These kinases phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) on multiple sites. Once phosphorylated, pRb frees transcription factor E2 (E2F) that, in turn, activates diverse genes required for S-phase entry and progression (24, 25). Initiation of cell cycle arrest involves the induction of endogenous Cdk inhibitors (e.g., p21^cip1 and p27^kip1), which bind to cyclin/Cdk complexes to inhibit their activity (25). Thus, phosphorylation of pRb does not take place, allowing hypophosphorylated pRb to repress the activity of E2F leading to G₁ cell cycle arrest (reviewed in Ref. 26). Accordingly, in mice (27) and human (22) luteal cells, only unphosphorylated pRb is found and, consistent with this, they contain the Cdk inhibitor protein, p27^Kip1, but not E2F-1, which is normally expressed only in proliferating cells. More recently, the deletion of cyclin D2, p21^cip, p27^kip1, and Cdk4 genes has allowed investigators to clarify the mechanisms by which follicular cells cease to divide. Deletion of the cyclin D2 gene impairs granulosa cell proliferation and prevents follicular development. Follicles remain small, and ovulation does not occur (28). Because cyclin D2 promotes G₁ progression by activating Cdk4, a cyclin D2/Cdk4 complex was thought to be required for proliferation of follicular cells. However, Cdk4-null mice demonstrated intact follicular maturation and revealed no intrinsic irregularities in the exit from the cell cycle of follicular cells after ovulation (29, 30). Deletion of Cdk4 caused rather a rapid demise of the CL due to a profound decrease in the number of pituitary lactotropes, leading to reduced secretion of prolactin (PRL). Thus, restoring serum PRL levels is sufficient to rescue normal formation of the CL in Cdk4-null mice. The selective effect of Cdk4 deficiency on the pituitary but not the ovary suggests that other factors may compensate for its absence in the ovary. Normal cell growth in the ovary of Cdk4-null mice may depend on Cdk6 that is normally coexpressed with Cdk4 in most tissues (31) and has cyclin D-dependent kinase activity in vitro indistinguishable from that of Cdk4 (32).

Cessation of cell proliferation during luteinization is associated with a progressive loss of positive cell cycle regulators, including cyclins and Cdk2, and with increased expression of the Cdk inhibitors p21^cip1 and p27^kip1 (27, 33). Richards et al. (34) have elegantly shown that the LH surge silences, within 2 to 4 h, the expression of cyclin D2 mRNA and protein and induces that of the Cdk inhibitors p21^cip1 and p27^kip1. The expression of p21^cip1 is rapidly induced by LH; however, p27^kip1 stimulation is seen only after 12 to 24 h of treatment; this led the authors to conclude that p27^kip1 may not affect the immediate exit of granulosa cells from the cell cycle but rather contributes to the maintenance of cell cycle arrest. Deletion of p21^cip1 caused no detectable effect on proliferation of luteinized cells and fertility, whereas p27^kip1-null ovaries showed hyperproliferation of granulosa cells during luteinization, which appears to be, at least in part, the cause of the sterility seen in these mice (35). These observations suggest that p27^kip1 is a major limiting factor for successful exit of granulosa cells from the cell cycle during luteinization. The recent generation of p27^kip1, p21^cip1 double knockout (35) revealed that these two Cdk inhibitors play a cooperative role in exit of the cell cycle of granulosa cells. The absence of the two Cdk inhibitors resulted in prolonged proliferative life span of luteinized cells in vivo. This implies that exit from the cell cycle is not an obligatory step for the differentiation of granulosa cells into luteal cells. This possibility is further substantiated by the finding that granulosa cells isolated from mice lacking both Cdk inhibitors have remarkably prolonged proliferation in culture, they continue expressing granulosa cell-specific genes, yet they differentiate into luteal cells after several passages in culture despite their p27^kip1 and p21^cip1 deficiency (35). Interestingly, these cells are neither immortal nor transformed as they undergo senescence and finally die by apoptotic programmed cell death.

B. Key molecules involved in luteinization
Several genes that are rapidly and transiently induced by the LH surge are thought to be involved in ovulation and induction of luteinization. Between the transiently induced genes after the LH surge are progesterone receptor (PR) (36, 37), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) (38), CATT/enhancer binding protein ß (C/EBPß) (39), early growth response protein-1 (Egr-1) (40), and Nur77 (41). Whereas Nur77-null mice are fertile, mice deficient in PR, C/EBPß, or COX-2 are infertile. This latter group of mice develops preovulatory follicles but fails to ovulate. COX-2 and PR knockout female mice do not ovulate even in response to exogenous hormones but form CL containing trapped oocytes, suggesting that luteinization can occur in the absence of these molecules (38, 42). In contrast, C/EBPß-null mice ovulate fertilizable eggs in response to gonadotropin stimulation, yet luteinization does not take place, and the CL are not formed even when the ovaries are transplanted into normal hosts (39). These data indicate that this phenotype is caused by intrinsic ovarian defect(s) and demonstrate a key role for C/EBPß in the process of luteinization. The C/EBPß transcription factor, which belongs to the basic leucine zipper class of DNA binding proteins, is rapidly induced in vivo by LH in granulosa cells (39, 43). The C/EBPß promoter contains two cAMP response elements (CREs) that may be essential for LH-stimulated C/EBPß transcription. This is because LH-R signaling is known to increase intracellular cAMP (37), which activates the CRE binding protein (CREB). The genes targeted by C/EBPß that are specifically involved in follicular cell luteinization are not yet known. Some intriguing findings were obtained with the C/EBPß-null mice, suggesting that this transcription factor does not necessarily mediate stimulation of gene expression by LH during luteinization, but rather may be responsible for silencing the expression of genes after their prior induction by LH. In wild-type mice and rats, P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage (P450scc), P450 aromatase (P450arom), and COX-2 expressions were stimulated by LH (37, 39). However, whereas P450scc remained highly expressed long after luteinization began, both COX-2 and P450arom expressions declined several hours after LH/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. This decrease does not occur in ovaries of C/EBPß-null mice, suggesting that a product of the C/EBPß gene could be responsible for this phenomenon. The C/EBPß gene is transcribed into a single RNA that gives rise to four C/EBPß isoforms: two full-length liver-enriched activator protein (LAP) isoforms (38 and 34 kDa), one truncated 21-kDa liver-enriched inhibitory protein (LIP) isoform, and a second truncated 14-kDa isoform. LIP C/EBPß isoforms function as dominant negative inhibitors of the full-length C/EBPß LAP isoform (reviewed in Ref. 44). Thus, functioning as a transcriptional repressor in luteinized cells, LIP may repress the expression of COX-2 and P450arom. Once luteinization occurs, C/EBPß is no longer expressed in the CL (39), suggesting that the role of this transcription factor is limited to the process of luteinization and is not involved in the maintenance of luteal function.

Other transcription factors such as Egr-1 (also named NGFI-A) and Nur77 (NGFI-B) are also stimulated by LH (40, 41, 45, 46). Both factors are encoded by immediate early genes and are capable of binding regions rich in guanine and cytosine (GC-rich) within the promoter of numerous genes. Egr-1 has been shown to be induced by LH/hCG in granulosa cells of ovulating follicles (40). Egr-1 expression in response to LH is rapid, transient, and dependent on the activation of at least two cellular signaling pathways, protein kinase A (PKA) and MAPK (46). GC-rich enhancer elements that potentially bind Egr-1 are present in many LH-regulated genes, and Egr-1 often binds overlapping sequences with Sp1, an important transcription factor controlling several ovarian-expressed genes. Based in this fact, Russell et al. (46) proposed that Egr-1 can exert either positive or negative transcriptional events by acting on Sp1 sites. Disruption of Egr-1 expression led to fertility problems due to a diminished or complete lack of expression of LHß (47). However, development of a second mutant mouse, in which the lacZ gene was introduced into the Egr-1 locus, showed that infertility results from abnormal function of both the anterior pituitary and the ovary (48). An ovarian defect is supported by the lack of ovulation and formation of CL on Egr-1 knockout mice treated with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and hCG (48). Egr-1 knockout animals subjected to a superovulation protocol showed, however, an increase in size of both the uterus and antral follicles. These enlarged follicles lacked signs of luteinization or cumulus cells expansion; instead, the follicles appeared highly hemorrhagic. These abnormalities indicate a severe defect in the receptivity of follicular cells to LH. Accordingly, the authors demonstrated a reduction of LH-R expression in the ovary of Egr-1 knockout mice (48), suggesting that Egr-1 controls not only the expression of LHß in the pituitary but also the capacity of granulosa cells to respond to this hormone.

Classified as an orphan nuclear receptor, Nur77 displays the tripartite domain structure of members of the steroid receptor family yet does not bind any known ligand. Nur77 was shown to regulate the transcriptional activity of steroidogenic genes (49, 50, 51) and has been implicated in the regulation of apoptosis in nonovarian cell types (52, 53). Nur77 is a homolog of steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), which is constitutively active in many steroidogenic tissues and binds to an element similar yet distinct from Nur77 (54). In contrast to SF-1, Nur77 is present at low levels in preovulatory granulosa cells under basal conditions, but it becomes rapidly and highly expressed in response to hCG/LH stimuli both in vivo and in vitro (45). However, mice deficient in Nur77 have no apparent aberrant phenotype (reproductive or other), suggesting that biological alternative pathways may compensate for the loss of Nur77 (55). Transcription factor Nurr1 may have this function. As Nur77, Nurr1 is also an immediate-early gene with DNA and ligand-binding domains similar to that of Nur77 (56). Whether Nurr1 is expressed in the ovary in the absence of Nur77 remains to be determined.

Several members of the activator protein-1 (AP1) family of transcription factors, such as Fra2 and JunD, are stimulated during luteinization induced by LH (57), suggesting that AP1 signaling may be an important downstream target for LH. JunB, JunD, and Fra2 expression rapidly increases in response to hCG, appearing first in theca cells and thereafter in granulosa cells. JunD and Fra2, but not JunB, persist in the nucleus of luteal cells, suggesting that these factors are selectively associated with terminal differentiation of the granulosa cells (57).

C. Changes in the expression of receptors
One of the most important changes during luteinization is the alteration in the cellular responsiveness to external signals allowing luteal cells to respond to a new set of hormones. The most studied receptors are those for FSH, LH, PRL, estrogen, and progesterone. The LH surge causes the silencing of the FSH receptor (FSH-R), a transient decline in the LH-R, and a sustained stimulation of the PRL receptor (PRL-R). It also induces a rapid yet short-lived increase in PR expression and a shift in the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) from the predominance of ERß to that of ER.

1. FSH-R.
This receptor plays an essential role during follicular development but becomes unnecessary once follicular cells differentiate. Its expression declines after the LH surge during the process of luteinization (58). This down-regulation appears to be solely due to LH because its administration to rats possessing large preovulatory follicles is sufficient to cause luteinization of granulosa cells and a marked decline in FSH-R content (59). In addition, treatment of granulosa cells with hCG completely abolished FSH-R expression (60). Once the expression of this receptor is inhibited, it does not recover and it is not expressed in the CL (60). The molecular mechanism by which LH silences the expression of the FSH-R gene is unclear, although recent investigations suggest that retinoic acid is involved in this process (61, 62). Retinoic acid, which is stimulated by LH (63), represses the FSH-R gene (62). The finding that the activity of the FSH-R promoter is repressed by retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and stimulated by SF-1, and that RAR and SF-1 bind to overlapping response elements, led Xing and Sairam (62) to propose a model for the mechanism whereby RAR and SF-1 control the overall expression of the FSH-R gene. Upon LH stimulation, RAR may displace SF-1 from the FSH-R promoter and recruit corepressors to inhibit transcription. Therefore, LH stimulation of retinoic acid may be a key step in the suppression of FSH-R during luteinization and throughout the life span of the CL. Recent findings revealed that binding of octamer transcription factor 1 to exon 1 of the FSH-R gene is required for silencing of this gene and that in Sertoli cells GATA-1 binding to the same region attenuates octamer transcription factor 1 repression (64).

2. LH-R.
The preovulatory LH surge causes first activation and thereafter desensitization of the LH-R in luteinized cells. A model for such desensitization involving ADP ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) and arrestin 2 was recently proposed by Hunzicker-Dunn et al. (65) and shown in Fig. 1. In this model, the switch of the LH-R from an actively signaling module to one uncoupled from Gs is considered to be intimately associated with the formation of larger protein aggregates containing self-associated LH-Rs (66). A marked down-regulation of cell surface LH-R and its cognate mRNA follows desensitization (67, 68, 69). The down-regulation of LH-R mRNA that occurs under these conditions is not due to decreased transcription of the LH-R gene, but rather to increased degradation of LH-R mRNA (70). Menon and colleagues have identified and purified (71, 72) a rat ovarian protein, designated LH-R binding protein, that binds to a region of the open reading frame of the rat LH-R mRNA and enhances its degradation. In contrast to the FSH-R, the expression of the LH-R increases after luteinization and becomes highly abundant in the CL. This up-regulation of LH-R during CL formation has been shown to be due to PRL both in vivo (68, 73) and in vitro (74). However, whereas extensive investigations have defined the mechanism of LH-R down-regulation at the promoter and receptor levels (reviewed in Ref. 75), no information defining the molecular mechanism of PRL-mediated stimulation of LH-R is available to date.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Model of LH-R desensitization. Shown in the top panel is the docking of arrestin 2 at a membrane location distinct from the inactive LH-R and in association with inactive ARF6 GDP. Activation of LH-R upon binding to LH, as shown in the middle panel, promotes not only activation of Gs and consequently AC activation, but also activation of ARF6 and liberation of arrestin 2. Arrestin 2 binding to the third intracellular loop of the active LH/CG-R, shown in the bottom panel, mediates desensitization by interfering with the ability of the agonist-activated receptor to activate Gs. [Adapted by permission of Federation of the European Biochemical Societies from M. Hunzicker-Dunn et al.: FEBS Letters 521:3–8, 2002 (65 ). Copyright 2002.]

The up-regulation of PRL-R during luteinization in rodents appears to depend on LH. A study reported differential stimulation of both PRL-R variants during luteinization because treatment of granulosa cells with hCG caused a 4-fold stimulation of PRL-RL and 10-fold stimulation of PRL-RS (79). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of mRNA obtained from whole ovaries (79) revealed that levels of PRL-RL mRNA in proestrous ovaries were twice those of PRL-RS, whereas both receptor mRNAs were equally expressed in ovaries at diestrus, which contain newly formed CL. This finding supports the concept that during luteinization PRL-RS is stimulated more than PRL-RL. The molecular mechanism that leads to the increased level of one receptor mRNA over the other is not clear.

Although CL are observed in the ovaries of both wild-type and PRL-R knockout mice (80), their morphology is dramatically different. Two days after mating, wild-type mice had large CL with classical morphology, whereas PRL-R knockout mice exhibited CL undergoing regression displaying strong DNA cleavage associated with extremely low indications of vascularization. Interestingly, 1 d after ovulation, these animals have CL expressing p27^kip1 and steroidogenic enzymes at levels that are not different from the wild-type animals. The major defect seen in the CL of the PRL-R-knockout mice is the premature expression of the 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (20HSD) enzyme that is present as early as the first day of pregnancy. This enzyme is known to catabolize progesterone to 20-dihydroprogesterone (20DHP), and its expression may be in large part responsible for the lack of implantation observed in the PRL-R knockout mice. Two days after ovulation, the CL of these animals shows an elevated degree of apoptosis together with decreased levels of p27^kip1 and steroidogenic enzymes (80). These data support the importance of PRL and progesterone as antiapoptotic hormones needed for luteal survival.

4. ER.
In rodents, the ovary expresses both ER and ERß genes as single (6.5 kb) and multiple transcripts (ranging from 1.0 kb to approximately 10 kb), respectively (81, 82). Whereas ERß is abundantly expressed in the follicle, especially in the granulosa cell layer (81, 82), ER is the major receptor found in the CL (83) at levels 10-fold higher than that of ERß (Fig. 2). In granulosa cells, a large decline in ERß expression occurs during proestrous. This down-regulation is clearly associated with the LH surge and can be mimicked in vivo and in vitro by hCG stimulation (81, 84). Moreover, agents stimulating LH/hCG receptor-associated intracellular signaling pathways (e.g., forskolin and a phorbol ester) readily mimic the effect of hCG in down-regulating ERß mRNA in cultured granulosa cells (81). LH-induced down-regulation of ERß mRNA levels is not due to an effect on transcription, but rather on mRNA stability. This LH-induced destabilization of the ERß mRNA requires ongoing protein synthesis (85). Although the molecular mechanisms involved in LH-induced destabilization of ERß mRNA await further studies, it may be attributable to the blockade of translation elongation of ERß transcripts themselves or to the interaction between LH-induced new protein(s) and the ERß mRNA, as suggested by Park-Sarge and co-workers (85). These LH-induced protein(s) may alter the tertiary folding of the ERß transcripts, rendering them easy targets for ribonucleases. It is not yet known, however, whether the decrease in ERß during luteinization is essential for the normal development of the CL. It has been shown that ERß can act as ER-dominant negative and repress its transcriptional activity, leading to an overall decrease in the cellular sensitivity to estradiol (86). Because both ER and ERß remain expressed throughout the life span of the CL of the pregnant rodent, mainly because of PRL stimulation (82, 83), a function for both luteal ERs throughout pregnancy remains a possibility.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Expression of ER and ERß mRNAs in the pregnant rat ovary as shown by in situ hybridization. Left panel shows abundant expression of ERß mRNA mainly at the small growing follicles, whereas the right panel shows abundant expression of ER mRNA mainly in the CL of pregnancy. The ovaries were from d 17 pregnant rats. [Adapted from C. M. Telleria et al.: Endocrinology 139:2432–2442, 1998 (82 ). Copyright The Endocrine Society.]

D. Activation of signaling pathways
Differentiation to a luteal phenotype also implies numerous changes in the intracellular signaling network activated upon receptor occupancy. Several signaling pathways participate in the profound changes that take place during luteinization and CL formation. See Fig. 3 for a scheme of the multiple factors affected by the surge of LH and their participation in the different processes induced by this hormone.

View larger version (58K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Transient and permanent effects of LH on key follicular genes leading to luteinization. See text for details.

MAPKs have been implicated in the phosphorylation of CREB. MAPKs comprise a superfamily of kinases (99) that have been identified in the CL of several species. ERK1 and ERK2 are expressed in porcine, bovine, rat, and human CL (100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105), and p38/MAPK has been shown to be expressed in the CL of rat and cow (101, 106), whereas Jun N-terminal kinase has been studied mostly in bovine CL (106, 107). Hunzicker-Dunn and colleagues (101) have elegantly demonstrated that activation of LH-R leads to phosphorylation of p38/MAPK and its upstream activator MAPK kinase 6 but has no effect on either MAPK kinase 3 or ERK1/2. The p38/MAPK downstream protein kinase target termed MAPK-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPKAPK3) is induced at both mRNA and protein levels during luteal formation, whereas mRNA and protein expression of the closely related MAPKAPK2 is diminished. MAPKAPK3, activated during luteinization in vivo, readily catalyzed CREB phosphorylation in immune complex kinase assays, and phosphorylation of CREB was shown to depend on an intact p38/MAPK signaling pathway in a cellular model of luteinization. Thus, activation of the MAPKAPK3 seems to be crucial to maintain CREB phosphorylation during luteinization (101). Whether LH activation of this MAPK system is mediated by the increase on cAMP or by growth factors such as IGF-I or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) needs to be investigated.

2. LH/PLC/PKC.
The LH surge not only generates high levels of intracellular cAMP in granulosa cells, but also activates phospholipase C (PLC), leading to the increase in intracellular calcium (108, 109, 110). The actions of ovulatory concentrations of LH can be mimicked by subovulatory doses of LH/hCG plus a protein kinase C (PKC) activator in primary granulosa cell cultures (111, 112), suggesting that the effects of LH are mediated by more than one kinase. However, despite the ability of the LH-R to activate PLC under experimental conditions and the ability of PKC activators to synergize with hCG, the responses to LH appear to be independent from the activation of PKC (113).

3. LH/Wnts/Frizzled.
Wnt proteins are secreted extracellular signaling molecules that act locally to control diverse developmental processes such as proliferation and differentiation. Wnts transduce their signals by binding to G protein-coupled receptors of the Frizzled (Fzd) family (for review, see Ref. 114). In the rodent’s ovary, Wnt-4 performs critical functions during early ovarian development (115). Wnt-4 and Wnt-2 mRNA are expressed in granulosa cells (116, 117). Wnt-4 expression increases after hCG treatment and remains elevated in the CL during pregnancy (117). Luteal cells express Disheveled 1 (Dvl-1) and ß-catenin (117), which are components of Wnt-4 intracellular signaling pathway. Expression of Fzd1 and Fzd4 is also stimulated by LH-R activation. Although the role of both Wnt-4 and Fzd4 in luteinization is not yet clear, the results obtained to date suggest that Wnt-4 may be a ligand for Fzd4 and that Wnt-4/Fzd4 signaling is important for the regulation of luteal cell formation and function. The recent deletion of the Fzd4 gene has revealed that the null mice fail to form functional CL despite normal follicular development and ovulation of fertilizable oocytes. Fzd4–/– ovaries exhibit CL of altered appearance and reduced expression of genes known to be associated with luteinization (118). Because these genes are regulated by PRL and because the phenotype of the Fzd4–/– null mice is similar to that of PRL-R–/– mice, Hsieh et al. (118) speculate that PRL signaling might be defective in the newly formed CL of Fzd4–/– mice.

4. PRL/Jak/Stat.
This pathway, formed by the Janus kinase (Jak) and the signal transducers and activators of transcription (Stat) proteins, is activated after ovulation mainly by PRL. PRL binding to the long form of its cognate receptor (PRL-RL) was thought to induce receptor homodimerization, which leads to immediate transphosphorylation of the associated tyrosine kinase Jak2, followed by phosphorylation of Stat transcription factors Stat5a and Stat5b (119). Recent data indicate, however, ligand-independent dimerization of the PRL-R (120). The increase in PRL-R expression observed during luteinization is accompanied by changes in the activation of the intracellular signaling transduction pathway of PRL (34, 121, 122). The activity of Stat5a and Stat5b is nondetectable in preovulatory follicles (79), but it is induced by PRL after the LH surge (121). PRL activates Stat5b as well as Stat5a; however, Stat5b is the predominant isoform in luteal cells (79). Recent investigations have revealed that there is a difference in the mechanism by which PRL activates Stat5a and Stat5b (123). Whereas PRL activation of Jak2 leads to phosphorylation and activation of Stat5a, Jak2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat5b can be separated from Stat5b transcriptional activity. PRL appears to activate a second tyrosine kinase that can phosphorylate Stat5b at a place that does not lead to Stat5b transcriptional activity. The high sequence similarity between Stat5a and Stat5b (96%) suggests that there may be redundancy in their signaling pathways, whereas differences in their tissue distribution may lead to distinct functions. Mice knockout for Stat5a do not have major reproductive defects; they suffer only from impaired mammary gland development (124). Stat5b, on the other hand, seems to be essential for luteal function and survival because Stat5b-deficient mice abort beyond d 7 of pregnancy, a phenomenon that could be partially prevented by treatment with progesterone (125). Because abortion occurs after d 7 of pregnancy, it appears that the major role of Stat5b is not in luteinization, but rather in CL maintenance and production of progesterone. Interestingly, only the double knockout Stat5a/b female mice, but not the Stat5a or Stat5b mutants, are totally infertile, demonstrating a functional redundancy of the Stat5 proteins (126). Stat5a/b double mutant mice have normal developing follicles and ovulation, yet few CL are evident in their ovaries, indicating that Stat5 molecules may play a crucial role in the development and survival of the gland (126). However, because the luteal phenotype of Stat5a/b null mice has not been investigated with sufficient detail, it is not clear whether CL formation and luteinization, which occur rapidly after ovulation, are affected by the lack of the Stats. As in the case of the PRL-R null mice, disruption of the Stat5a/b genes results in low levels of p27^kip1, leading to the speculation that the Stat5 proteins control luteal p27^kip1 expression and that this expression is critical for inducing differentiation of follicular cells into luteal cells. Of great interest is the finding that Stat5a/b deletion leads to extensive expression of the progesterone metabolizing enzyme 20HSD in their CL (126), thus explaining the low circulating levels of progesterone found in these animals (see Section IV). As mentioned earlier, lack of Stat5b is associated with early abortions that are due to reduced progesterone levels during midgestation (125). This deficiency is partially corrected in the double knockout for 20HSD and Stat5b (127), supporting the concept that activation of Stat5b is important in suppressing 20HSD gene expression.

Deactivation of the Jak/Stat signaling pathway plays an important role in establishing and maintaining tissue responsiveness to PRL. Negative regulation of cytokine signaling downstream of Stat activation occurs through several families of modulators. Two Src-homology domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatases (SHP-1 and SHP-2) have been shown to modulate PRL-induced Stat responses. SHP-2 is a substrate for Jak2 and is obligatory for PRL/Stat5 induction of ß-casein (128). On the other hand, SHP-1 binds activated Stat5b, catalyzing its rapid dephosphorylation, leading to the transient activation pattern that is characteristic of this family of transcription factors (129). SHP-1 expression (mRNA and protein) is undetectable in preovulatory follicles, but it is maximally expressed in the nuclei of luteal cells throughout gestation (79), suggesting acquisition of PRL responsiveness and activation of Stat5b. The presence of SHP-1 in the nucleus of luteal cells explains the transient Stat5b activation in PRL-treated CL during early gestation. These results led Russell and Richards (79) to postulate that, at least in rodents, SHP-1 may continuously dephosphorylate activated Stat5b, resulting in a transient activation profile during pulsatile PRL exposure early in pregnancy.

5. PI3K/Sgk/Foxo.
The forkhead family of transcription factors, FKHR (Foxo1), FKHRL1 (Foxo3), and AFX (Foxo4) are regulated by a pathway involving phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt). Direct phosphorylation by PKB or by the PKB-related kinase, serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase (Sgk), results in translocation to the cytoplasm and inactivation of the forkhead transcription factors (for review, see Ref. 130). As granulosa cells luteinize, they gain increased levels of Sgk, Foxo4, and Foxo3, whereas at the same time, Foxo1 expression declines, possibly affecting the expression of p27^kip1 and p21^cip1 (131). Deletion of Foxo3a led to premature ovarian failure (132), therefore establishing a key role for this transcription factor in the survival of granulosa cells and oocytes.

6. Oocyte/TGFß pathway.
It has long been believed that oocyte-derived regulatory molecules act within the follicle to inhibit premature luteinization and limit progesterone biosynthesis (133). In vitro studies have demonstrated that members of the TGFß superfamily mediate the antiluteinizing effect of the oocyte (134, 135). The TGFß superfamily includes TGFß, activins and inhibins, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), growth/differentiation factors (GDFs), and anti-Müllerian hormone (136). BMP-15 (134) and GDF-9 (135), both produced by the oocyte, have been proposed as luteinization inhibitors. TGFß-related proteins signal through a serine–threonine kinase cascade that results in the cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of intracellular effector proteins termed "mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (SMADs)." TGFß and activin signal through SMAD2 and SMAD3, whereas the BMPs and GDFs mediate their signals through SMAD1, SMAD5, and SMAD8 (for review, see Ref. 137). In addition, the capacity for the TGFß-related ligands to signal is thought to require SMAD4, the common SMAD that partners with the receptor regulated-SMADs to form the core of a transcriptional complex (138). SMAD4, therefore, is a central component of the TGFß superfamily signaling pathway. Recent generation of SMAD4 and activin granulosa cells conditional knockout resulted in premature luteinization and ovaries full of CL, respectively. This provides clear in vivo evidence that activin prevents premature luteinization of granulosa cells during follicle development (139). Interestingly, these changes are accompanied by a significant increase in serum progesterone levels (139) and high levels of luteal markers such as P450scc, 17ßHSD-7, and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR).

	III. Genesis of a New Gland: Structural Changes from the Remnants of the Ovulated Follicle

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
The formation of the CL not only involves changes in the expression of genes implicated in the cell cycle and signaling in theca and granulosa cells but also the breakdown of the follicular basal membrane necessary for rapid migration of endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and theca cells into the previously avascular granulosa layer. The CL is therefore the product of luteinization of follicular cells, endothelial cell invasion, and tissue remodeling.

A. Luteal cell types
The CL is a heterogeneous gland composed of small and large steroidogenic luteal cells, fibroblasts, endothelial, pericytes, and immune cells. These cells have different morphological, endocrine, and biochemical features. Interactions between these various cell types is essential in maintaining the health and steroidogenic function of the CL (16, 140, 141, 142). Once luteinization takes place, a defined cell population undergoes extensive hypertrophy and differentiates into large steroidogenic luteal cells, whereas another cell population remains much smaller and comprises small steroidogenic luteal cells. In ruminants and rodents, small and large luteal cells differ in their basal rates of progesterone secretion, with the large cells producing 2- to 40-fold more progesterone than the small cells. These two luteal cell types, however, differ in their response to different hormonal and/or second messenger stimuli (140). It is widely believed that the origin of the large luteal cells is the granulosa cells, whereas the theca cells differentiate into small luteal cells; however, although this hypothesis is well supported in domestic animals (for review, see Ref. 6), there is no evidence indicating these cellular origins in rodents (140, 143). In most species there is considerable mixing of large and small cell types during the reorganization of the follicle into the CL leading to a close contact between the two cell types. Primates are an exception, with the two cell populations remaining relatively separate, and therefore are generally called granulosa-lutein cells and theca-lutein cells, respectively (6). These two cell populations can be distinguished in tissue sections by their location; furthermore, whereas theca-lutein cells do not hypertrophy during the luteal phase, the granulosa-lutein cells undergo considerable hypertrophy that significantly contributes to the growth of the CL (144, 145). Additionally in primates, theca-luteal cells are the primary source of androgens (146), whereas granulosa-luteal cells are the site for estrogen synthesis (147), indicating that the two-cells model of estrogen biosynthesis invoked to explain follicular estrogen production is preserved in the CL of primates.

In contrast to the primate CL, rodent’s small and large luteal cells are intermingled within the CL and do not appear to differentiate from the theca and granulosa cell, respectively. The protein profile of both cell types is largely similar (Fig. 4) with the only major difference being the abundant expression of a 32-kDa protein known as PRAP (for PRL-R associated protein) (148, 149). PRAP is found solely in large luteal cells and is an excellent marker for them. Yet in the follicle, it is the theca cell layer and not the granulosa cell layer that expresses this protein (see Section IV and Fig. 8). This, added to the finding that both the large and small luteal cells express P450 17-hydroxylase/C17–20-lyase and cytochrome P450 aromatase (140, 148, 150) and produce both androgen and estrogen, casts serious doubt to the dual origin of both luteal cell types.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Expression of PRAP in large luteal cells. Large and small luteal cells were isolated from rat CL, and proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis. [Adapted from M. P. McLean et al.: Endocrinology 126:1796–1805, 1990 (148 ). Copyright The Endocrine Society.]

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 8. Expression of 17ßHSD-1 and 17ßHSD-7 in ovaries of pregnant rats and the reactions that they catalyze in the rat CL. 17ßHSD-1 (white signal) is expressed only in granulosa cells (from Ref. 274 ). In contrast, 17ßHSD-7 (red staining) is expressed in the CL and the theca (T) and interstitial (I) cells, but not at all in the granulosa cells (C. T. Albarracin and G. Gibori, unpublished observations). Lower left panel, In the follicle, 17ßHSD-1 has dual activity and can convert androstenedione to testosterone as well as estrone to estradiol. Lower right panel, After the LH surge, 17ßHSD-1 is no longer found in the CL, which expresses instead PRAP/17ßHSD-7, an enzyme that only converts estrone to estradiol.

C. Vascularization
The development of capillaries from preexisting blood vessels is essential for the formation and function of the CL (15, 161). Each luteal cell is in direct contact with several capillaries, giving the CL one of the highest rates of blood flow in the organism. The development of a new microcirculatory bed involves ECM degradation, endothelial cell proliferation, expansion of the capillaries, and development of capillary lumen (maturation). The dense capillary network that is formed efficiently supplies nutrients, hormones, and lipoprotein-bound cholesterol to the luteal cells and provides a mechanism for speedy and efficient output of progesterone from the CL. Soon after the LH surge and ovulation, pericytes derived from the theca compartment are the first vascular cells to invade the developing luteal parenchyma. These pericytes rapidly proliferate and populate a large percentage of vessels in the mature CL (162). In the rat CL, collagen type IV and laminin are detected in the granulosa layer approximately 6 h after ovulation, whereas within 16 h, new complete capillaries can be found (163, 164). The molecular regulation of angiogenesis in the CL is complex, with a growing list of regulators including VEGF that are essential for CL angiogenesis (165), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), the newly discovered endocrine gland-derived VEGF (EG-VEGF) (166), and angiopoietins (Ang). LH /hCG appears to stimulate the expression of VEGF, EG-VEGF, Ang, and their receptor and to affect profoundly vascularization of the CL during luteinization (167) (see Fig. 5).

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Stages of luteal vascularization and their control by LH. See text for details.

Recently, a novel regulator of ovarian angiogenesis, EG-VEGF or Prokineticin-1 (PK-1), was identified in the ovary and has been proposed as a steroidogenic gland-specific angiogenic regulator. In contrast to VEGF, in human and nonhuman primates, EG-VEGF expression is largely restricted to the steroidogenic glands such as the ovary, testis, adrenal cortex, and placenta (179). Consistent with such an expression pattern, the human EG-VEGF gene promoter has a potential binding site for SF-1, a pivotal element for steroidogenic-specific transcription. Although structurally different, EG-VEGF and VEGF have similar functions; both promote proliferation, survival, and chemotaxis of endothelial cells isolated from steroidogenic tissues (166, 180). G protein-coupled receptors of the neuropeptide Y receptor class have been identified in endothelial cells as the cognate receptors for EG-VEGF (181). The mitogenic and prosurvival activities of EG-VEGF correlate with the ability of this peptide to induce phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt (181). In humans, peak VEGF expression is found in early luteal phase, associated with the initial development of a capillary plexus within the CL, whereas EG-VEGF is low in early stage of the CL but is up-regulated during midluteal to late luteal phase at a time when VEGF expression is considerably reduced (167). When delivered by adenovirus in mouse, EG-VEGF induced extensive angiogenesis in the ovary but not in other tissues (179). Because EG-VEGF and VEGF have an additive response in vitro (166), they may also cooperate in vivo to induce the fenestrated phenotype and to promote angiogenesis, especially because both molecules are produced in the CL in a complementary and coordinated fashion. Taken together, these observations support the notion that VEGF activity is rate limiting for the creation of the capillary plexus within the CL, whereas EG-VEGF may stimulate, together with VEGF, the angiogenesis that accompanies early-to-mid CL development.

The first angiogenic factor identified in the ovary was bFGF, (182) which is produced by steroidogenic and endothelial cells of rat (183), human (184), and ruminant CL (185). bFGFs have been found to stimulate proliferation and motility of luteal endothelial cells (185, 186, 187), and treatment with antibodies to bFGF suppressed approximately 80% of endothelial cell proliferative activity in extracts of CL from cows, sheep, and pigs (185). Surprisingly, however, deletion of the bFGF gene in mice did not result in developmental disruption or loss of fertility (188), raising doubts as to how crucial bFGF is for luteal angiogenesis.

Ang belong to a family of growth factors that appear to be also critical for angiogenesis and vessel integrity. They have been implicated in the regulation of vascular development and regression. Ang-1 and Ang-2 bind the Tie-2 receptor; however, whereas Ang-1 stimulates sprouting and maturation of blood vessels, Ang-2 inhibits this effect, acting as a competitive inhibitor by binding the Tie-2 receptor without activating intracellular signaling pathways (for review, see Ref. 189). Tie-2 or Ang-1 knockout mice are embryonic lethal, with the most prominent defects involving the vasculature (190, 191). Ultrastructural analysis of the blood vessels in these animals reveals defects in endothelial cell interactions with their basement membranes and a marked decrease in the number of periendothelial support cells. Little information on Ang and their receptors is available in the CL despite the specificity of the site of their expression in rodents and primates and their apparent regulation by LH/hCG (192, 193). Ang-2 transcripts were found in close association with blood vessels in the theca interna of the preovulatory follicle and in the front of vessels invading the developing CL. Ang-1 transcripts were also associated with blood vessels but appeared to follow rather than to precede vessel ingrowth into the early CL. These expression patterns have led Maisonpierre et al. (192) to suggest that Ang-2 may collaborate with VEGF at the front of invading vascular sprouts by blocking the function of Ang-1, whereas Ang-1 may have a later role than VEGF in angiogenesis involving vessel maturation and/or stabilization.

	IV. Function of the Corpus Luteum

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
A. Luteal steroidogenesis
Severe changes in the expression of steroidogenic enzymes and in the type of steroid produced occur during and after luteinization. In rodents, luteal cells continue to synthesize androstenedione and estradiol, but become a substantial site of progesterone biosynthesis. This is in contrast to the follicle, where progesterone mainly serves as substrate for estradiol production. The CL expresses high levels of key proteins involved in the uptake, synthesis, and transport of cholesterol, and in the processing of cholesterol to progesterone, androgens, as well as estrogens. These proteins are the sites of regulation by tropic hormones such as PRL, LH, and estradiol (see Fig. 6 for summary).

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6. Diagram depicting genes involved in synthesis of progesterone, 20-dh-progesterone (20-DHP), and estradiol and their regulation by different tropic hormones. +, Stimulatory effect; –, inhibitory effect.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7. Oil-red staining of lipids in ovaries from SR-BI+/+ or SR-BI–/– mice. [Adapted from B. Trigatti et al.: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9322–9327, 1999 (213 ).]

Once cholesterol reaches the outer mitochondrial membrane, it is transported to the inner mitochondrial membrane through the aqueous intermembrane space. This step involves several proteins, including the StAR (for review, see Refs. 224 and 225), peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) (226, 227), and possibly hormone-sensitive lipase (228). The role of StAR in the ovary was further substantiated by the phenotype of the StAR-null mice (229). Immediately after birth, the ovaries of these mice appear normal. After puberty, however, lipid accumulation occurs, and this is accompanied by incomplete follicular maturation that ultimately ends in premature ovarian failure. In contrast to the StAR-null ovaries, no detectable lipid deposits were present in the interstitial and theca cells of double StAR- and gonadotropin-knockout mice, suggesting that gonadotropin stimulation is essential for lipid accumulation in the ovaries of StAR-deficient mice (230). The impaired ovulation of the double StAR/gonadotropin-null mice cannot be reversed with exogenous progesterone and gonadotropin, suggesting that the compromised steroidogenesis of the StAR-deficient ovaries makes ovulation impossible. The mechanism whereby StAR facilitates cholesterol transport has been under intense investigation. It was originally thought that StAR might act as an intermitochondrial shuttle. However, restriction of StAR to the cytoplasm does not inhibit its activity, whereas importation of StAR into the mitochondria causes its degradation (231), suggesting that StAR acts on the outer surface of the mitochondria.

The expression of StAR in the CL was shown to be up-regulated by LH/cAMP (232) and to be repressed by prostaglandin F2 (PGF2) (233). Transcriptional regulation of the StAR gene is the primary mechanism of control of steroidogenesis and has been the focus of many studies. Comparison of StAR promoters across species indicates that the first 250 bases of the proximal promoter are critical for basal and hormone-stimulated StAR transcription and that the transcription factor response elements are highly conserved in this region (234). Several transcription factors, including SF-1, C/EBPß, SREBP-1a, cFos, GATA-4, Sp-1, and CREB family members have been implicated in the transcriptional stimulation of the StAR gene (for review, see Ref. 235). Conversely, dosage-sensitive sex reversal-adrenal hypoplasia congenital critical region on the X chromosome gene 1 (DAX-1) and forkhead box protein L2 (FOXL2) were shown to play key roles on its repression (236).

The PBR, on the other hand, is a high-affinity, cholesterol-binding protein found in between outer and inner mitochondrial membranes (237). In this location, PBR could function as a pore, allowing for the translocation of cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane (238). PBR is closely associated with StAR at the outer mitochondrial membrane (239) and appears to be a promising partner for it. The importance of these two proteins in luteal steroidogenesis is suggested from the studies of Sridaran et al. (240, 241). These investigators have demonstrated that PBR and StAR are coexpressed in the pregnant rat CL and that their coordinated suppression by GnRH agonists leads to reduced progesterone production followed by luteal cell death (242). Recently, the hormone-sensitive lipase that is responsible for the neutral cholesteryl ester hydrolase activity in steroidogenic tissues was shown to interact with StAR and to facilitate cholesterol movement from lipid droplets to the mitochondria for steroidogenesis (228).

3. Biosynthesis of progesterone by the CL.
Once cholesterol reaches the inner mitochondrial membrane, its transformation into steroid hormones begins. The capacity to transform cholesterol to progesterone is a universal characteristic of the CL and involves the mitochondrial P450scc and one of the six isoforms of the 3ßHSD, 3ßHSD type II (3ßHSD-II), which is located in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (243). Formation of the CL is accompanied by a dramatic increase in the expression of both enzymes (214, 244, 245) and in the organelles that house them (246, 247), allowing the CL to synthesize large amounts of progesterone. Both enzymes remain highly expressed in the CL throughout pregnancy and are considered to be constitutively expressed (245, 248), yet various investigators have shown that they can be regulated by PRL and gonadotropin (245, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253). In the case of 3ßHSD-II, PRL stimulation is at the level of transcription and is mediated by transcription factor Stat5 (254).

The level of progesterone secreted by the CL in rodents depends not only on the amount of progesterone synthesized by the luteal cells but also on the expression of the enzyme 20HSD that catabolizes progesterone into the inactive progestin, 20-DHP. Once 20HSD becomes expressed in the CL, progesterone secretion drops and 20-DHP becomes the major steroid secreted by luteal cells (255, 256). Due to the detrimental effect of 20HSD on luteal progesterone secretion, its pattern of expression/activity greatly contributes to the changes in the circulating levels of progesterone during gestation, ultimately controlling the progression of pregnancy. Indeed, it has been known for years that little, if any, 20HSD activity is found in the rat CL throughout pregnancy; however, elevated activity is found just before parturition concomitant with the rapid decrease in the concentration of progesterone in serum. In rodents, this decrease in serum progesterone is essential for parturition to take place. Accordingly, mice deficient for 20HSD sustain high progesterone levels and display a delay in parturition for several days (127). The development of a specific antibody against rat 20HSD (257) and the cloning of its gene (258, 259) led to the demonstration that the lack of enzyme activity throughout pregnancy and its appearance just before parturition are not due to activation/deactivation of an already present enzyme but rather to changes in gene expression (255, 257, 260). The crystalline structures of human and rabbit 20HSD have been recently obtained (261). Although 20HSD is one of the most important players in the regulation of luteal progesterone secretion in rodents, the role of this enzyme in the control of progesterone production and/or action in other species needs further investigation.

Two other enzymes have been implicated in the reduction of progesterone secretion by the CL at the end of pregnancy. P450c26, which catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to 26-hydroxycholesterol, also rises at the end of pregnancy and could reduce progesterone secretion by limiting substrate availability (262). Luteal 5-reductase, which converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT), has also been implicated in the functional demise of the CL. This is supported by the secretion of DHT from the rat CL at the end of pregnancy and by the fact that exogenous DHT can decrease progesterone biosynthesis (263, 264). However, although deletion of the 5-reductase type I gene impairs cervical ripening, causing parturition defects, it does not affect the decline in serum progesterone concentration at the end of pregnancy (265), raising doubts about the physiological role of DHT during luteal regression in rodents.

4. Biosynthesis of androgen and estradiol by the CL.
In rodents as in humans, the CL also produces androgens and estrogens in addition to progesterone. The major androgen produced by the ovary is the weak androgen, androstenedione (266). Conversion of progesterone to androstenedione is mediated by the enzyme P45017-hydroxylase/C17–20 lyase (P450c17 or CYP17). In preovulatory follicles, P450c17 is expressed in the theca interna and interstitial cells but not in granulosa cells (267), whereas in the CL both luteal cell types express P450c17 (140) and synthesize aromatizable androgens (268, 269, 270). Khan et al. (271) have demonstrated that LH stimulation of estradiol biosynthesis by luteal cells is the consequence of selective stimulation of P450c17. However, LH-mediated stimulation of this enzyme plays a key role only during the first half of pregnancy in the CL of the rat. After midpregnancy, luteal P450c17 expression drops as consequence of the fall in circulating levels of LH. At this stage, the rodent’s placenta starts secreting very high levels of androstenedione, which serves as substrate for estradiol biosynthesis (for review, see Ref. 272). In the follicle, androstenedione produced by the theca cells is converted to estrone in the granulosa cells upon the action of the cytochrome P450 aromatase (P450arom or CYP19), and thereafter to estradiol by 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17ßHSD-1) (273). 17ßHSD-1 also catalyzes the conversion of androstenedione to testosterone (274), which can be aromatized to estradiol directly. In the CL, high levels of P450arom expression were reported years ago (252); yet the luteal 17ßHSD responsible for converting estrone to estradiol and/or androstenedione to testosterone remained totally unknown. Serendipitously, we discovered in the rat CL a protein that was several years later identified as being a 17ßHSD enzyme. We originally identified a 32-kDa protein abundantly expressed in large luteal cells and absent in small luteal cells (148). Subsequently, we cloned the cDNA (149), developed specific antibody against this protein (275), and isolated and characterized the promoter region of this gene (276). Most interestingly, this protein was found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine and to associate with the intracellular domain of the short form of the PRL-R (PRL-RS), but not with the long form of the PRL-R (PRL-RL) (149). Originally, the protein was named PRAP (for prolactin receptor-associated protein). It was thereafter established that PRAP was a novel 17ßHSD (276, 277) that was consequently renamed PRAP/17ßHSD-7. This enzyme is a potent converter of estrone to estradiol but does not convert androstenedione to testosterone (Fig. 8). Several 17ßHSD enzymes have been cloned; however only 17ßHSD-1 and PRAP/17ßHSD-7 are capable of converting estrone, a weak estrogen, to estradiol. 17ßHSD-1 is specific to the granulosa cells (274, 278, 279) and disappears after luteinization, whereas PRAP/17ßHSD-7 is highly specific to the CL and is found at low levels in theca/interstitial cells (see Fig. 8 and Ref. 148). Interestingly, the transcription of 17ßHSD-1 and PRAP/17ßHSD-7 is regulated by LH in opposite manners; LH stimulates 17ßHSD-1 (279) and inhibits PRAP/17ßHSD-7 (276). During pregnancy, PRAP/17ßHSD-7 becomes highly expressed only when circulating LH levels drop to nadir. The opposite effect of LH on the follicular 17ßHSD-1 and on the luteal PRAP/17ßHSD-7 most probably prevents the production of high levels of estradiol in early pregnancy, which in rodents can induce termination of pregnancy. In the CL, the expression of 17ßHSD-7 is inhibited by LH but markedly stimulated by estradiol (275, 280). PRAP/17ßHSD-7 has been found in the CL of every species investigated to date, including ruminants and humans (275), revealing the possibility that the CL has a universal capacity to convert estrone to estradiol.

B. Hormonal regulation
The CL is not an autonomous organ; in contrast, its function is controlled by the interaction of several tropic hormones secreted by the pituitary, the decidua, and the placenta. The key factors are PRL (or PRL-related proteins) and estradiol. The source of PRL/PRL-related protein stimulation changes from the pituitary to the decidua first, and thereafter to the trophoblast as pregnancy progresses. Similarly, the source of androgen substrates for estradiol biosynthesis switches over time from the ovary itself to the trophoblast. In addition to the direct regulatory control elicited by PRL and estradiol, new data support the contribution of androgens and progesterone as autocrine regulatory hormones within the rodent CL. Finally, LH also plays a role in the regulation of CL function in rodents, although this hormone does not have the same central role that it has in other mammalian species (see Fig. 9 for a scheme of the tropic hormones, their signaling mechanism, and the genes they control).

View larger version (86K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 9. Hormones controlling luteal function: their signaling mechanisms and targets genes. See text for details.

Although PRL support is essential for normal CL function throughout pregnancy, PRL is secreted from the pituitary until midpregnancy only (reviewed in Ref. 283). Moreover, inhibition of pituitary PRL secretion after d 6 of pregnancy has no deleterious effect on progesterone production by the CL (284). This is most probably because in rodents (285), as in humans (286, 287), the decidua expresses the PRL gene and secretes sufficient PRL to sustain CL function for a few additional days until the trophoblast begin producing PRL-like hormones.

The physiological role of decidual PRL in the normal function of the CL during pregnancy is not clear because at the time pituitary PRL ceases to be secreted the placenta starts outpouring placental lactogen (PL) I and II. These PRL-related hormones are secreted by the trophoblast sequentially and in large amounts. Both PL-I and PL-II bind to the PRL-R and sustain CL function until parturition (for review, see Ref. 288). Although a tropic action for PL-I secreted at midpregnancy was widely accepted, it was not until recently that PL-II secreted later during pregnancy was shown to have identical actions to PRL (289, 290) and to be responsible for the maintenance of the CL of late pregnancy.

PRL enhances progesterone production by luteal cells in a wide variety of species (reviewed in Ref. 283). Its main role in rodents is to prevent the catabolism of progesterone in luteal cells by repressing the expression of the 20HSD gene, leading to the virtual disappearance of this enzyme from the CL (257, 291, 292). The 20HSD promoter has several putative binding sites for the transcription factor Stat5 (293), and deletion of either the PRL-R (80) or the Stat5a/b genes (126) causes premature expression of this enzyme in the CL, supporting the involvement of the Jak2/Stat5 pathway in the PRL-mediated inhibition of 20HSD. The 5' flanking region of the 20HSD gene also has several response elements for nuclear factor-B (NFB) (293). The recent finding that PRL activates this transcription factor and that overexpression of NFB in luteal cells suppresses both 20HSD promoter activity and the levels of its endogenous mRNA (294) suggests a role for NFB in the suppression of 20HSD triggered by PRL.

Although the main action of PRL in the CL is to prevent the transformation of progesterone into an inactive metabolite, there are several other sites of PRL action. This hormone was identified early on as a factor that could elevate luteal stores of cholesterol (295, 296, 297). Subsequently, PRL was shown to increase the number of lipoprotein binding sites (298), to enhance cholesterol uptake by luteal cells (299), and to activate cholesteryl ester hydrolase (300, 301, 302). Microarray analysis has recently revealed that many of these effects of PRL, including the increase in the abundance of HDL receptor (SR-BI), hormone-sensitive lipase, and SCP-2 are at the level of transcription (253). PRL also has been shown to up-regulate the expression of P450scc and 3ßHSD (250, 251, 252).

Recent investigations showed that, in addition to its essential role in progesterone production, PRL plays an important role in the production and action of estrogen by the CL. PRL enhances the level of expression of the two enzymes involved in estradiol biosynthesis, P450arom (252, 303, 304) and PRAP/17ßHSD-7 (305). In contrast to its effect on P450arom, PRL treatment enhances PRAP/17ßHSD-7 protein without affecting its mRNA levels (305). The finding that PRAP/17ßHSD-7 associates specifically with PRL-RS and becomes phosphorylated on tyrosine residues (149) led to the suggestion that PRL may cause the phosphorylation and stabilization of this enzyme. To our knowledge, PRAP/17ßHSD-7 is the first steroidogenic enzyme known to associate with a membrane-bound receptor and to be phosphorylated on tyrosine. This may represent a novel mechanism whereby a membrane-bound receptor affects the cellular levels of a steroidogenic enzyme.

The ability of the rat CL to respond to estrogen formed locally also requires PRL, which stimulates the expression of the ERs (for review, see Ref. 123). Transcription of the genes encoding both ER and ERß is stimulated by PRL through the Jak2-Stat5 pathway and Stat5 response elements that are located within each one of the ER promoters (306). A single nucleotide difference between Stat5 response elements located on the ER and ERß promoters is responsible for the observation that either Stat5a or Stat5b can stimulate ER transcription, whereas only Stat5b can activate transcription of ERß (83). The tyrosine kinase Jak2 is required for PRL activation of ER promoter activity; however, additional pathways, downstream of PI3K, are involved in PRL-induced Stat5b phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding (306).

PRL may have a protective role on the CL through stimulation of superoxide dismutases, enzymes that scavenge free radicals (253, 307), and inhibition of annexin 5 expression (253, 308), a protein that may play a role in luteal cell death. In addition, PRL has been implicated in the vascularization of the CL. However, although full length and proteolytically cleaved PRL has direct angiogenic effects in some tissues (for review, see Ref. 309), in the CL, the action of PRL on vascular development is most likely mediated by estradiol. PRL also stimulates the production of the broad-spectrum protease inhibitor 2M (310), which may play a role in regulating angiogenesis by inactivating proteases or by binding antiangiogenic factor(s) (311). cDNA microarray studies have revealed that PRL affects the expression of several additional genes. It down-regulates ADP-ribosylation factor 3 and c-Jun and stimulates TIMP2, cytochrome oxidase IV, cathepsin H and L, heat shock protein (HSP) 60, and mitochondrial ATP synthase (253). The particular role of each one of these genes, as well as how critical is their regulation by PRL in the correct functioning of the CL, remains unknown.

2. Estradiol.
In rodents, estradiol produced locally by luteal cells is a potent tropic hormone that stimulates progesterone biosynthesis, vascularization, and hypertrophy of the CL (reviewed in Ref. 272). Both ER and ERß are expressed in the rat CL throughout pregnancy (82), although ER is expressed at much higher levels (83). Generation of mice lacking one or the other of these receptors has indicated that whereas estrogen is critical for CL formation and maintenance, it can act through either receptor to carry out its actions (312). Estradiol enhances cholesterol supply in luteal cells by stimulating cholesterol synthesis (313, 314, 315), uptake of cholesterol from circulation (211), and intracellular cholesterol mobilization (217). Recent investigations have revealed that these effects of estradiol are due, at least in part, to transcriptional stimulation of the SR-BI gene (212). In rabbits, estradiol has also been linked with elevated production of StAR (316) and with greater cholesterol accumulation in mitochondria (317).

One critical action of estradiol in the rodent’s CL is the stimulation of vascularization, particularly at midpregnancy (318). In these species, increased angiogenic activity occurs at two stages during pregnancy: the first during luteinization, and the second at midpregnancy in coincidence with a rapid increase in the size and in the progesterone producing capacity of the CL (272). At midpregnancy, estradiol induces a remarkable proliferation of vascular endothelial cells (318), apparently because of the stimulation of VEGF and VEGF receptor expression (169). Estradiol also mediates luteal cell hypertrophy, contributing to the increase in the size of the CL that occurs at midpregnancy (reviewed in Ref. 319). Estradiol elicits this action by stimulating overall protein synthesis (280) through a mechanism that involves an increase in the levels of elongation factor-2, a protein that is an essential component of the protein synthesis machinery (320).

3. Androgens.
There is evidence that androgens play an important role in CL function both as substrates for estrogen synthesis and as direct stimulators of progesterone production. The rodents CL express androgen receptors (321, 322, 323), and treatment of either mouse (289) or rat (324) luteal cells with both aromatizable and nonaromatizable androgens leads to an increase in progesterone synthesis. The finding that an aromatase inhibitor did not prevent this androgen-mediated stimulation of progesterone (289) supports the contention of a direct action of androgens independently from their conversion to estradiol. In vivo experiments provide further evidence for a luteotropic function of androgens. DHT administration at the end of pseudopregnancy prevents the drop in progesterone that normally occurs at this stage in rodent (325), whereas intraovarian administration of androstenedione raises serum levels of progesterone (324). Moreover, androstenedione can prevent the decline in serum progesterone and the loss of luteal weight induced by the antiprogesterone mifepristone despite the presence of an aromatase inhibitor or a specific estrogen-receptor blocker (326). In addition to the stimulation of progesterone production, androstenedione has a direct antiapoptotic effect in the rat CL (323). However, the molecular mechanism mediating the action of androgens in the CL and the genes that they regulate remains unknown.

4. Progesterone.
The possibility that progesterone produced in the CL may act locally to sustain luteal cell function in all mammalian species was originally proposed by Rothchild (327). Investigations from several laboratories have provided evidence in support of this hypothesis and have shown that progesterone can stimulate its own secretion and protect the CL from cell death. Intraovarian administration of either a progesterone antibody or a PR antagonist inhibited luteal progesterone production in pregnant rats (328), whereas luteal cells cultured in the presence of the synthetic progesterone R5020 secrete more progesterone than do cells cultured in the presence of vehicle control (91). In rodents, the main site of action for progesterone appears to be its ability to down-regulate the basal (329, 330) as well as the LH (331) and PGF2-stimulated (91) expression of 20HSD. Progesterone also inhibits the expression of IL-6, a cytokine detrimental to steroidogenesis (332), and protects the CL from cell death (333) most probably by suppressing Fas expression (334). Despite all the evidence supporting a local effect of progesterone, the cognate PR is not expressed in the CL of rodents (90, 91), being only transiently expressed in the follicle just before ovulation (37). Therefore, the molecular mechanism by which progesterone affects luteal function remains largely unknown. Because glucocorticoids mimicked progesterone inhibition of 20HSD in a luteal cell line that does not express the PR but expresses the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and considering the relatively high affinity of progesterone for the GR, Sugino et al. (329) suggested that progesterone could act through a GR-mediated mechanism. The reported ability of mifepristone to inhibit the action of progesterone in the CL could also be due to its role as GR antagonist (335). Recently, Cai and Stocco (92) established the expression of membrane PR in the rat CL. The authors demonstrated that rat luteal membranes contain proteins that bind progesterone with high affinity and specificity and that these proteins localize exclusively on luteal microsomal fractions. Another important finding presented in this report is that these genes are differentially expressed during pregnancy and that their expression is regulated by PRL. Nevertheless, despite these findings, the specific role of these membrane PRs on luteal cells is still unknown.

5. LH.
In several species, LH is essential and sufficient for the stimulation and maintenance of progesterone production by the CL. In rodents, there is no question that LH acutely enhances progesterone synthesis. It is also clear, however, that the sustained effect of LH in pregnant rodents: 1) is not sufficient by itself to sustain steroidogenesis and is dependent on previous exposure of the CL to PRL or PRL-related hormones; 2) is not necessary throughout pregnancy; and 3) is mediated by estradiol. The acute effect of LH appears to involve cAMP/PKA-dependent and cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factors PKA-independent (336) pathways, as well as the PLC pathway (337). LH action is directed primarily at the delivery of cholesterol to the mitochondrial cholesterol side-chain cleavage system, mediated principally by StAR (338). The molecular mechanism whereby LH/CG stimulates StAR transcriptional activity has been the subject of extensive investigations (233, 339). Although regulating StAR is probably the most critical function of LH, this hormone has also been shown to increase SR-BI and HDL uptake (207, 338). In contrast to the short-term actions, the sustained effect of LH on luteal progesterone synthesis in the pregnant rat appears to be due to its effect on yet another site in the steroidogenic pathway, the P450c17. By enhancing the expression/activity of this enzyme, LH stimulates the synthesis of androgens, which are converted readily to estradiol by the active luteal P450arom enzyme. The synthesis of luteal estradiol, however, is not completely regulated by LH throughout gestation. Thus, after midgestation, LH levels decrease markedly (340), and the placenta begins to express P450c17 and secrete androgens to circulation which are used by the CL for estradiol biosynthesis (reviewed in Ref. 319).

	V. Regression of the Corpus Luteum: Involution to Resume Cyclicity

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 
The CL must be regularly eliminated from the body to allow normal reproductive function. In rodents, regression of the CL occurs in two phases, the first of which is known as functional regression and is associated with marked decrease in progesterone production. The second phase, termed structural regression, occurs after the initial decline in progesterone output. It is during this phase that the luteal cells die through programmed cell death. During the process of luteal regression as during luteinization, the CL undergoes substantial changes in its steroidogenic capacity, vascularization, and remodeling, resulting in a gland formed principally by connective tissue and known as corpus albicans.

A. Functional luteal regression
Functional regression of the CL occurs before discernible morphological changes in luteal cell integrity are observed. There is evidence indicating that during functional regression the luteal cells are still steroidogenically active, although the principal steroid secreted during this period is not progesterone, but rather a metabolite of progesterone (see below in this section). In rodents, as in many other species, the decline in progesterone secretion at the end of pregnancy takes an even more important role in view of the fact that levels of circulating progesterone must fall to allow parturition to occur. Several factors including PGF2 and LH have been implicated in shutting off luteal progesterone production.

1. PGF2 role in functional regression.
Early on it became clear that administration of PGF2 can induce a fall in levels of circulating progesterone and abortion in rodents (341, 342). The finding that inhibition of PGF2 synthesis at the end of pregnancy delays both the fall in circulating progesterone and parturition (343, 344) has led to the conclusion that PGF2 is essential for the inhibition of progesterone synthesis in the CL. The generation of mice lacking the PGF2 receptor brought support to this hypothesis. Indeed, progesterone levels do not decline in PGF2 null mice, and parturition does not take place unless the ovaries are removed (345). The role of PGF2 in the curtailment of progesterone before parturition is further supported by the phenotype observed in mice defective in enzymes involved in prostaglandin biosynthesis such as cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), which catalyzes the formation of arachidonic acid from membrane glycerophospholipids, and COX-1, which allows conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. cPLA2-null females failed to undergo labor at term (i.e., 18.5 to 20.5 d), instead delivering at 21.5–22.5 d and with the majority of offspring being dead (346). Viable neonates were obtained, however, only by administering a PR antagonist (347). Similarly to the cPLA2-null mice, progesterone levels did not decrease in COX-1-null mice at the end of pregnancy, and a delay in the initiation of labor was observed (348). Administration of PGF2 to COX-1-null mice reduced circulating progesterone concentration and restored parturition. From the reproductive performance of cPLA2- and COX-1-null mice, it is apparent that cPLA2 couples with COX-1 to synthesize PGF2, which in turn induces functional regression of the CL.

The uterus seems to be the main producer of PGF2 in a large number of species including rodents, where the removal of the uterus leads to prolonged secretion of progesterone by the CL (for review, see Refs. 5, 6, 8 , and 13). The role of COX-1, COX-2, and cPLA2 in the production of uterine PGF2 has been extensively investigated. In rodents, COX-1 is expressed in the endometrial epithelium, myometrium, and decidua in late pregnancy (349, 350, 351), whereas COX-2 expression is low in intrauterine tissues throughout pregnancy and becomes highly expressed on d 20, the day of parturition (349). This rise in uterine COX-2 expression depends on the physiological drop of serum progesterone levels that precede parturition (349), suggesting that COX-2 does not play a role in the luteolytic process. Interestingly, no changes in cPLA2 mRNA expression, protein levels, or activity were observed during gestation in mice uterus (352), suggesting that whereas constant levels of cPLA2 are essential, it is the rise in COX-1 expression that leads to the higher uterine PGF2 production seen before parturition.

Although the uterus is a source of PGF2, there is solid information indicating that the CL itself also produces PGF2 (353, 354, 355). Both cPLA2 activity and PGF2 content within the CL increase remarkably at the end of pregnancy (331, 353, 356, 357, 358) and without any change in COX-1 expression. This suggests that, in the mouse ovary, the rise in luteal cPLA2 activity at the end of pregnancy liberates the substrates necessary for PGF2 synthesis. In the bovine, injection of PGF2 induces a rapid and transient increase in luteal COX-2 (355, 359) and PGF2 content (355). This effect is well supported by an increase in the cox-2 mRNA (355, 359). These results suggest that in the ovary, most probably COX-2, but not COX-1, is involved in luteal PGF2 synthesis. Considering that PGF2 stimulates its own synthesis in the CL, it is possible to hypothesize that the pulsatile release of PGF2 from the uterus increases luteal PGF2 synthesis, leading to an amplification of the luteolytic process.

2. Effect of PGF2 on luteal steroidogenesis.
In luteal cells, PGF2 signals through a Gq-coupled receptor that has been detected in the CL of multiple mammalian species (for review, see Ref. 13). Activation of this receptor causes PLC-mediated generation of inositol triphosphate and diacylglycerol (360), followed by increased free intracellular calcium and PKC activity (361, 362). In addition to PLC, there is evidence that in luteal cells PGF2 activates 1) the phospholipase D pathway, producing phosphatidic acid in addition to diacylglycerol (363); and 2) the MAPK signaling cascade (103, 105, 364). It has been shown in rat luteinized cells that activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway by PGF2 is mediated by an increase in free intracellular calcium in a calmodulin-dependent manner (105). In rats, the PGF2- and calcium-dependent ERK1/2 activation results in phosphorylation of the transcription factor JunD (105), which is constitutively expressed in luteal cells (57).

Extensive investigations have been performed to determine the mechanism by which PGF2 reduces the level of progesterone secreted by the CL. It is clear that in rodents PGF2 does not inhibit the synthesis of progesterone, but instead causes its metabolism to 20DHP. Consequently, at the end of pregnancy, the CL secretes principally 20DHP instead of progesterone. That PGF2 stimulates the activity of the 20HSD enzyme was known for years (365, 366, 367). Once the 20HSD gene was cloned (258, 259) and its promoter isolated (293), it became apparent that PGF2 does not activate the enzyme already present in the CL, but causes a remarkable increase in the expression of the 20HSD mRNA. Using mice lacking PGF2 receptor and pregnant rats, Stocco et al. (255) demonstrated that PGF2 is responsible for the rapid and massive expression of the 20HSD gene at the end of pregnancy. This group explored the molecular mechanism underlying PGF2-induced 20HSD gene expression and presented evidence that PGF2 enhances the activity of the 20HSD promoter. They have determined the upstream region in the 20HSD promoter that confers regulation by PGF2 in primary ovarian cells. This region encompasses a unique transcription factor-binding site with a sequence of a Nur77 response element. Deletion of this motif or overexpression of a Nur77 dominant negative protein caused a complete loss of 20HSD promoter activation by PGF2. Nur77 also transactivated the 20HSD promoter in transient transfection experiments using a luteal cell line. This induction required the Nur77-transactivating domain. Stocco et al. (255) have shown that PGF2 induces a very rapid expression of Nur77 that binds to a distal response element but does not interact with another proximal putative Nur77 response element located downstream in the promoter. A rapid increase in Nur77 mRNA was observed in mice CL just before parturition at a time when 20HSD becomes expressed. This increase in the expression of both genes was not seen in PGF2 receptor knockout mice. It was also shown that inhibition of Nur77 DNA binding in vivo prevents PGF2 from inducing the expression of the 20HSD gene in the CL. Taken together, these results demonstrate that in the CL, PGF2 induces the expression of the nuclear orphan receptor and transcription factor Nur77, which in turn leads to the transcriptional stimulation of 20HSD, triggering the decrease in serum progesterone essential for inducing parturition. Furthermore, the induction of Nur77 expression by PGF2 in luteal cells was shown to be mediated by JunD, a member of the AP1 family of transcription factors (105).

PGF2 was also shown to reduce cholesterol transport in the rat ovary by decreasing SCP-2 (368) and StAR expression (233, 369, 370). Inhibition of StAR by PGF2 has been associated with increased expression of DAX-1 (233), c-Fos (371), and ying yang 1 (372) transcription factors. Administration of PGF2 on d 19 of pregnancy was also reported to reduce luteal 3ßHSD activity (91). However, this inhibitory effect of PGF2 does not appear to be at the level of gene expression (253). The physiological significance of the down-regulation of protein involved in cholesterol transport and processing is not clear because the drop in progesterone secretion at the end of pregnancy in rodents is not due to the decrease in progesterone biosynthesis but rather to the catabolism of progesterone (255, 373).

3. Anti-LH effect of PGF2.
Original work by Behrman et al. demonstrated that PGF2 may prevent both LH and PRL stimulation of progesterone biosynthesis (374). The anti-LH action of PGF2 (reviewed in Ref. 5) was shown to involve two interrelated actions, the blockage of LH-induced cAMP accumulation and the inhibition of the response of the luteal cells to cAMP (374, 375). Activation of PKC and rise in intracellular calcium were suggested to play a role in the anti-LH effect of PGF2 (221, 376); however, neither the blockage of the PGF2-induced increase in intracellular calcium (377, 378, 379, 380) nor the treatment with PKC inhibitors had any effect on the antigonadotropic action of PGF2 (381). A more recent study presented interesting evidence of a possible mechanism of interaction between PGF2 and LH signaling pathways, merging at the level of the StAR gene and involving DAX-1 transcription factor. Sandhoff and McLean (233) demonstrated that PGF2 inhibits StAR expression by activating DAX-1, which in turn reduces the responsiveness of the StAR promoter to cAMP. Thus, by reducing StAR expression, PGF2 may prevent LH from stimulating progesterone biosynthesis. Taken together, all these results indicate that PGF2 prevents LH signaling in the CL. However, because LH is neither secreted nor does it have tropic action after midpregnancy in rodents, a physiological role for such a mechanism in the normal induction of luteal regression by PGF2 at the end of pregnancy appears remote.

4. Anti-PRL effect of PGF2.
There are contradictions in the early literature as to the anti-PRL effect of PGF2 in the rodent CL. PRL was shown either to reverse (374) or to have no effect on the PGF2-mediated decrease in both progesterone and LH-R expression (382). There has also been a report suggesting that the antisteroidogenic effect of PGF2 depends on PRL (383). However, more recent investigations have shown clearly that PGF2 and PRL act in opposite manner to regulate the expression of key luteal genes (see Fig. 10 and Ref. 253). Moreover, PGF2 inhibits the expression of the PRL-R and curtails PRL signaling through the Jak/Stat pathway (384, 385). Using PGF2-R knockout mice, as well as pregnant rats and luteal cell culture, Stocco et al. (384) found that PGF2 rapidly inhibits the expression of both forms of the PRL-R and that the physiological drop in PRL-R expression seen at the end of pregnancy is caused by PGF2. PGF2 was also shown to stimulate the expression of suppressors of cytokine signaling-3 that inhibits the Jak/Stat signaling pathway and prevents PRL-induced Stat5 activation (385).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 10. Effect of PGF2 and PRL on luteal gene expressions. The scale indicates the values of expression as a ratio between PGF2/control or PRL/control for positive values (stimulation) or –1 x control/PGF2 or control/PRL for negatives values (inhibition). The bars represent the average of three different experiments ± SEM. Open bars, PGF2; closed bars, PRL. [Adapted from C. Stocco et al.: Endocrinology 142:4158–4161, 2001 (253 ). Copyright The Endocrine Society.]

5. Antiestradiol effect of PGF2.

6. Effect of PGF2 on oxidative stress.
PGF2-induced and naturally occurring functional luteal regression is associated with accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and/or with decrease in protective enzymes, antioxidant vitamins, and radical scavengers. The role of ROS in the ovary has been reviewed recently (387). PGF2 treatment rapidly depletes luteal antioxidants such as ascorbic acid (388), increases superoxide radicals (389, 390, 391), and down-regulates genes involved in the elimination of free radicals (392). In the CL, generation of ROS causes invasion of leukocytes (391) and stimulation of ROS scavengers, such as superoxide dismutase and catalase, and prevents the invasion of leukocytes and the decrease in serum progesterone induced by PGF2 (391). The precise source of ROS within the CL remains unclear. There is, however, evidence to support three possible sources: 1) steroidogenic cells; 2) phagocytic leukocytes; and 3) endothelial cells of the microvasculature. PGF2 has been shown to stimulate production of ROS by rat luteal cells in vitro (393) and to cause an increase in hydrogen peroxide in regressing rat CL in vivo (394). Nonsteroidogenic cells of luteinized ovaries were also shown to produce ROS in response to PGF2 via a PKC-activated pathway (389). The authors further suggested that most likely the nonluteal cells producing ROS are phagocytic leukocytes. Finally, ROS generation by endothelial cells can be induced by the ischemia/reperfusion process (395), resulting in neutrophile activation and adhesion. However, induction of luteal regression by PGF2 in rodents does not alter the hemodynamics of the microvasculature (391), suggesting that most likely microvascular endothelial cells are not the major source of ROS in the CL. Luteal blood flow is also not affected by PGF2 (396, 397). The finding that pretreatment with either superoxide dismutase or catalase, which are large molecules that do not easily penetrate cell membranes, prevents luteal regression triggered by PGF2 suggests the possibility that neutrophiles are the major source of ROS during functional luteal regression (391).

Nitric oxide and HSP70 have also been implicated in PGF2 action (398, 399). Nitric oxide appears to have a protective effect on CL function or to mimic the regressive effect induced by PGF2 depending on the developmental status of the CL (400). As for HSP70, it has been shown to increase in rat luteal cells in response to PGF2 in coincidence with the inhibition of progesterone synthesis (399). PGF2 induction of HSP70 is preceded by a rapid activation of the heat shock transcription factor, which binds to its transcriptional control element in target genes (401). The mechanism of heat shock transcription factor activation by PGF2, however, remains largely unknown. The suggestion that HSP70 might have an important role in mediating PGF2 inhibition of steroidogenesis during luteal regression is based on the fact that, resembling PGF2, heat shock causes complete abrogation of LH-sensitive progesterone production and blocks steroidogenesis in response to 8-bromo-cAMP and forskolin (402). Moreover, antisense oligodeoxynucleotide against HSP70 partially reversed heat stress- and PGF2-induced inhibition of LH-stimulated steroidogenesis and cAMP accumulation (399, 401).

7. LH role in functional regression.
Despite the well-known tropic effect of LH, evidence has been accumulated for many years indicating that LH may have a deleterious effect in the rat CL. LH can curtail luteal function in rats during the estrous cycle (403), at the end of pregnancy (404, 405), and during lactation (406). LH levels rise at the end of pregnancy (340), and their neutralization with a blocking antibody prevents serum progesterone levels from dropping (405). Intraovarian administration of LH to d 19 pregnant rats induces a premature down-regulation of luteal 3ßHSD activity and mRNA expression (330). LH was also shown to inhibit the conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone in cultured luteal cells obtained from d 19 pregnant rats (407) and to stimulate 20HSD activity (405) and mRNA expression (330). Interestingly, the fall in progesterone synthesis induced by LH occurs several hours before any change in the activity/expression of the 20HSD enzyme is detected (330, 405). This is in contrast to the luteolytic events induced by PGF2, characterized by an abrupt increase in 20HSD expression (255). It has been postulated that a progressive decline in 3ßHSD activity and the consequent decrease in progesterone production may trigger the synthesis of prostaglandins and subsequent increase in luteal 20HSD activity to accelerate luteal regression (331). Indeed, intraovarian administration of progesterone prevented the LH-mediated increase in luteal PGF2 content as well as that of 20HSD, whereas administration of an inhibitor of the synthesis of prostaglandin prevented only 20HSD activity (331). This series of experiments allows us to conclude that: 1) LH favors luteal regression at the end of pregnancy in rats; 2) LH-induced luteal regression has a different dynamics compared with that induced by PGF2; and 3) locally produced progesterone may act as a "buffer" to allow a controlled regression of the CL.

B. Structural luteal regression
The structural regression of the CL is grossly characterized by a decrease in size and weight of the gland, which eventually becomes a scar within the ovarian stroma known as corpus albicans. The involution of the CL is due not only to luteal cell death but also to the replacement of the vascular supply and supporting connective tissue with bundles of collagen fibers, scattered fibroblasts, and macrophages. Most corpora albicans are eventually reabsorbed and replaced by ovarian stroma.

1. Programmed cell death.
The major event that causes the regression of the CL is death by apoptosis of luteal and vascular cells. In the CL of pregnancy, this process is lengthy and takes place several days after the initial decrease in progesterone production (functional regression). The involution or reduction in the size of the gland (structural regression) takes place only after parturition in the rodent (333). Several signals have been implicated in the induction of cell death including PRL, PGF2, TNF, and Fas ligand (FasL).

It is by now well established that there are two major apoptotic signaling pathways: the death receptor mediated or extrinsic pathway and the mitochondrial or intrinsic pathway (reviewed in Refs. 408 and 409). In the extrinsic pathway, the signal is provided by the interaction between a ligand and "death receptors" including Fas and TNF receptor (TNFR-3, -4, and -5). The ligand for Fas, FasL, initiates the activation of initiator caspases (e.g., caspase-8). The intrinsic apoptotic signaling cascade, on the other hand, is activated by stress stimuli that change the mitochondrial permeability leading to the release of cytochrome c, which binds to apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 and procaspase-9 to form a complex named apoptosome leading to caspase-9 activation. Both pathways lead to activation of the final effectors of the system or executioner caspases such as caspase-3, -6, and -7. These caspases cleave a variety of intracellular polypeptides including major structural elements of the cytoplasm such as actin, components of the DNA repair machinery such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, a number of protein kinases, and the inhibitor of caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (ICAD) among others (reviewed in Ref. 410).

Apoptosis is tightly regulated by members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, which can either block (e.g., Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1) or promote (e.g., Bad, Bax, Bak, Bid, Puma) cell death mainly by regulating the permeability of the mitochondria (reviewed in Ref. 411). The participation of the mitochondria in the process of cell death in the ovary was reported by several groups. Human luteinized cells treated with the protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine showed reduced levels of mitochondrial cardiolipin, cleavage of procaspase-9, and activation of caspase-3 (412). Another group (242) showed a drop in mitochondrial levels of protective Bcl-xL associated with increased mitochondrial damaging Bax, as well as DNA fragmentation in luteal cells exposed to a GnRH agonist. In a model of luteal cells induced to die by microgravity, a loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential was observed in parallel with features of apoptosis (413). Finally, using rat luteal cells in culture, apoptotic programmed death was shown to be associated with cleavage of Bid and caspase-9, confirming the involvement of the mitochondria in luteal cell death (414).

Caspase-3 has been localized in the CL of rat (415, 416) and mice (417). The importance of caspase-3 as mediator of apoptosis in luteal regression has been further demonstrated by studies performed with caspase-3 null mice. The CL obtained from these animals showed attenuated rates of apoptosis and delay in the process of involution (417); yet the CL of caspase-3 null mice finally involutes, indicating that caspase-3 is not the sole factor leading to cell death in this gland.

Aside from apoptotic cell death, other means of cell death have been described in the CL. Gaytan et al. (418) showed that apoptosis of luteal endothelial cells was followed by necrosis of luteal steroidogenic cells. These investigators suggested that the structural regression of the CL in cycling rats may begin with apoptosis of endothelial cells that surround blood vessels leading to secondary ischemia of the CL followed by necrosis of the steroidogenic luteal cells. Other evidence showing luteal cell death other than apoptosis arises from studies in primates (419). Morphometric studies conducted in CL, in which regression was induced by either a PGF2 analog or a GnRH antagonist, revealed that apoptosis of luteal cells was associated with autophagocytosis, a form of programmed cell death characterized by formation of cytoplasmic vacuoles (419). Likewise, degenerative changes that were not in accord with the morphological features of apoptosis were observed during luteal regression of the cyclic human CL (420). Further studies are needed to understand these nonapoptotic forms of cell death in the CL. It was recently suggested (13) that various forms of programmed cell death (i.e. apoptotic, necrotic, autophagic) may be triggered in the regressing CL depending upon the mammalian specie, the physiological or pathological condition evaluated, and/or the nature of the luteolytic trigger.

It is important to mention that most of the data on luteal cell death in rodents were obtained from models that are not representative of the physiological luteolytic process that takes place at the end of pregnancy in rats and mice. For instance, most in vivo models use superovulated rats; in this model the CL has not been exposed to the luteotropic effect of PLs that profoundly alter luteal function, as well as the response of luteal cells to luteolytic factors. Studies oriented to examine the apoptotic pathways during the physiological luteolytic process that take place at the end of pregnancy and after parturition in rodents should be conducted to establish the molecular events that lead to apoptosis of luteal cells at this time.

2. Role of PGF2 in structural luteolysis.
Fas and FasL have been described in the rat CL during luteal regression (421, 422). Administration of either a Fas-activating antibody or PGF2 after ovulation in mice induced activation of caspase-8 and caspase-3 together with DNA fragmentation in the CL. Interestingly, these changes were completely absent in caspase-3-deficient mice (423). Because the receptor for PGF2 has not been shown to be directly coupled to caspase-8 recruitment and activation, the authors hypothesized that PGF2 initiates luteal regression in vivo, at least in part, by increasing the bioactivity or bioavailability of cytokines such as FasL, which activates caspase-3-driven apoptosis. Indeed, FasL has been shown to be highly expressed in the regressing postpartum CL of rats (421). Recently Yadav et al. (424) investigated the relative contribution of the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic signaling cascades in PGF2-induced luteal apoptosis in pseudopregnant rats and demonstrated that it was associated with an up-regulation in the activities of caspases-9, -8, and -3 as well as an increase in the expression of Bax and FasL. When a caspase-8 inhibitor was used before the administration of PGF2, the activation of caspase-3 induced by PGF2 was completely blocked, whereas the inhibition was only partial when a caspase-9 inhibitor was used. This suggests a greater importance of the extrinsic pathway in mediating PGF2-induced apoptosis of luteal cells. Finally, another condition associated with structural regression of the CL that has been attributed to PGF2 is the degradation of ECM mediated by MMPs (155, 425).

3. The role of PRL in structural luteolysis of the CL of the cycle.
Early studies by Malven and Sawyer (426) identified PRL as an important physiological molecule involved in the induction of structural luteal regression. The authors described a marked reduction in ovarian weight, a rise in the total number of connective tissue or stromal elements in the "corpus" and a decrease in "recognizable lutein cells." It was also recognized early that regression of the CL of the previous cycle in rats is induced by the proestrous preovulatory PRL surge (427, 428) and that hypophysectomy after CL formation, or blockage of the preovulatory surge of PRL with a dopaminergic agonist, maintains the structure of the CL intact for more than 1 month (426, 429, 430). These animals secrete predominantly 20-DHP instead of progesterone from their CL (431), and if treated with PRL their CL undergo rapid structural regression (427, 431). In rats, the PRL-induced structural regression of the CL of the cycle seems to be due to an apoptotic process (432). From these findings, it appears clear that PRL administration can cause structural luteal regression only in CL that were not previously exposed to PRL for at least 2 d and are producing 20-DHP. Because PRL is an antiapoptotic agent in many tissues (433), including functional CL (434, 435), it is perplexing as to why it acts in the opposite manner in functionally regressed CL. Several investigations indicate that the apoptotic effect of PRL appears not to be direct on luteal cells but to involve the participation of other cell types, namely cells of the immune system that are known to express the PRL-R (436). One cell type identified as a potential regulator is the monocyte/macrophage. These cells are normal components of cell-mediated immunity and are capable of inducing apoptosis through a number of mechanisms. Monocytes/macrophages have been associated with luteal involution in a wide variety of species (437, 438, 439), and in the rat CL this invasion has been shown to be initiated by PRL (427, 440).

In addition to chemoattraction, the migration of monocytes into tissues also requires the vascular endothelial bed of the destination tissue to express the proper adhesion proteins. One such protein is the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) that is expressed mainly on endothelial cells, facilitating the recruitment and migration of monocytes/macrophages to sites of inflammation (441, 442). Because ICAM-1 is stimulated by PRL in regressing CL of hypophysectomized rats (441), it is tempting to suggest that PRL may facilitate recruitment and binding of monocytes/macrophages to luteal endothelial cells inducing monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and ICAM-1.

Other cells of the immune system that may be involved in mediating luteal regression are the lymphocytes. Although these cells are capable of inducing apoptosis through a number of mechanisms, investigations in the CL have been focused on Fas-mediated apoptosis. Expression of FasL is enhanced by PRL, whereas treatment with a blocking anti-FasL antibody inhibits the ability of PRL to induce apoptosis in culture (422). Participation of immune cells in Fas/FasL-induced luteal apoptosis is supported by the fact that Fas is expressed only in luteal steroidogenic cells, whereas FasL is expressed only in nonsteroidogenic CD3-positive luteal immunocytes (443). Moreover, the removal of immune cells inhibits PRL-induced luteal cell apoptosis, indicating that FasL-expressing immunocytes mediate, at least in part, the effect of PRL. Taken together, these findings suggest that PRL stimulates FasL in immune cells and that FasL interacts with its cognate receptor expressed in luteal cells leading to cell death. The mechanism by which PRL induces FasL in luteal immunocytes is not yet understood and needs further investigation.

A number of other changes have been shown to occur during PRL-induced luteal regression. Studies have demonstrated increased MMP-1 and MMP-2 activity during PRL-induced luteal regression (444, 445, 446), which may mediate some of the structural changes by regulating collagen synthesis and degradation. Another factor associated with luteal regression is the formation of oxygen radicals. In a functional CL, ROS formed are scavenged most probably by ascorbic acid, which is very abundant in this gland (388). Interestingly, PRL has been shown to induce depletion of ascorbic acid in regressing CL (444), therefore favoring ROS-mediated luteal damage.

Although several lines of evidence demonstrated that PRL plays a role in the removal of the CL of the cycle, whether this hormone also participates in the luteolytic process at the end of pregnancy remains a subject of investigation.

4. Progesterone and structural luteolysis.
Progesterone plays a protective role against apoptosis is the CL of rodents. This steroid has been shown to suppress apoptosis induced by PRL in luteal cells (334). In another study, exogenous administration of progesterone was capable of preventing the decline in CL weight postpartum and to decrease the number of cells undergoing apoptosis (333). Furthermore, in vivo administration of progesterone delayed the occurrence of DNA fragmentation in CL incubated in serum-free conditions (333). Because progesterone can suppress Fas expression in a large variety of cells, including rodent’s luteal cells, Takahashi and collaborators (443) proposed that progesterone may suppress PRL-induced luteal cell apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of Fas in the functional CL.

Although the chain of events that lead to luteal cell apoptosis is not totally understood, the current data suggest that PGF2 induces 20HSD expression directly by activation of the 20HSD promoter and indirectly by inhibiting PRL signaling. Once luteal cells express 20HSD, they lose their capacity to secrete progesterone, facilitating the expression of Fas on their surface and the invasion of the CL by immune cells. In turn, binding of FasL expressed by immune cells to the Fas receptor present on luteal cells results in the activation of the initiator caspase-8/9 and executioner caspase-3. Caspase-3 then cleaves ICAD, releasing of CAD, which translocates to the nucleus where it proceeds to fragment the DNA (Fig. 11).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 11. An integrative model for luteal regression. Based on the findings from many laboratories, we propose a model of apoptotic signaling pathways in the rodent CL. In this model, PGF2-induced apoptosis involves stimulation of both 20HSD and Fas in luteal cells. PGF2 inhibits PRL-R expression (1), preventing PRL’s repression of 20HSD (2), and stimulates the transcriptional activity of the 20HSD gene (3) leading to a decline in progesterone production (4). This allows a rise in Fas expression (5) and invasion of immune cells that were under repressive control by progesterone. FasL stimulated by PRL in immune cells binds to Fas receptor on luteal cells (6), resulting in activation of the initiator caspase-8 (7) and executioner caspase-3 (8). Caspase-3 then cleaves ICAD, resulting in the release of CAD and its translocation to the nucleus where it proceeds to fragment the DNA. These apoptotic luteal cells are then recognized and cleared by immune cells that infiltrate the CL during luteolysis. Numerals in parentheses refer to numerals on figure.

	VI. Concluding Remarks

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD11119 (to G.G.).

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online October 31, 2006

¹ C.S. and C.T. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: AC, Adenylyl cyclase; Ang, angiopoietins; AP1, activator protein-1; ARF6, ADP ribosylation factor 6; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; C/EBP, CATT/enhancer binding protein; CL, corpus luteum; COX, cyclooxygenase; cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2; CRE, cAMP response element; CREB, CRE binding protein; DAX-1, dosage-sensitive sex reversal-adrenal hypoplasia congenital critical region on the X chromosome gene; 20DHP, 20-dihydroprogesterone; DHT, dihydrotestosterone; E2F, transcription factor E2; ECM, extracellular matrix; Egr-1, early growth response protein-1; EG-VEGF, endocrine gland-derived VEGF; ER, estrogen receptor; FasL, Fas ligand; FSH-R, FSH receptor; Fzd, Frizzled; GATA-1, GATA-binding factor 1; GDF, growth/differentiation factor; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HSD, hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; 17ßHSD-1, 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; HSP, heat shock protein; ICAD, inhibitor of caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease; ICAM-1, intracellular adhesion molecule-1; Jak, Janus kinase; LAP, liver-enriched activator protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LH-R, LH receptor; LIP, liver-enriched inhibitory protein; 2M, 2-macroglobulin; MAPKAPK, MAPK-activated protein kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; NFB, nuclear factor-B; P450arom, P450 aromatase; P450scc, P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage; PBR, peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor; PGF2, prostaglandin F2; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKB, protein kinase B; PKC, protein kinase C; PL, placental lactogen; PLC, phospholipase C; PR, progesterone receptor; PRAP, PRL-R associated protein; pRb, retinoblastoma; PRL, prolactin; PRL-R, PRL receptor; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SCP-2, sterol carrier protein-2; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; Sgk, serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase; SHP, Src-homology domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase; SMADs, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type I; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; Stat, signal transduction and activation of transcription; TIMP, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

	References

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Formation of the... III. Genesis of a... IV. Function of the... V. Regression of the... VI. Concluding Remarks References

 

1. Devoto L, Kohen P, Vega M, Castro O, Gonzalez RR, Retamales I, Carvallo P, Christenson LK, Strauss JF 2002 Control of human luteal steroidogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186:137–141[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Christenson LK, Devoto L 2003 Cholesterol transport and steroidogenesis by the corpus luteum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:90[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Duncan WC 2000 The human corpus luteum: remodelling during luteolysis and maternal recognition of pregnancy. Rev Reprod 5:12–17[Abstract]
4. Zeleznik AJ, Somers JP 1999 Regulation of the primate corpus luteum: cellular and molecular perspectives. Trends Endocrinol Metab 10:189–193[CrossRef][Medline]
5. McCracken JA, Custer EE, Lamsa JC 1999 Luteolysis: a neuroendocrine-mediated event. Physiol Rev 79:263–323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Niswender GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW 2000 Mechanisms controlling the function and life span of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 80:1–29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Pate JL, Landis Keyes P 2001 Immune cells in the corpus luteum: friends or foes? Reproduction 122:665–676[Abstract]
8. Diaz FJ, Anderson LE, Wu YL, Rabot A, Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC 2002 Regulation of progesterone and prostaglandin F2 production in the CL. Mol Cell Endocrinol 191:65–80[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Niswender GD 2002 Molecular control of luteal secretion of progesterone. Reproduction 123:333–339[Abstract]
10. Webb R, Woad KJ, Armstrong DG 2002 Corpus luteum (CL) function: local control mechanisms. Domest Anim Endocrinol 23:277–285[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Skarzynski DJ, Jaroszewski JJ, Okuda K 2005 Role of tumor necrosis factor- and nitric oxide in luteolysis in cattle. Domest Anim Endocrinol 29:340–346[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Schams D, Berisha B 2004 Regulation of corpus luteum function in cattle–an overview. Reprod Domest Anim 39:241–251[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Davis JS, Rueda BR 2002 The corpus luteum: an ovarian structure with maternal instincts and suicidal tendencies. Front Biosci 7:d1949—d1978
14. Cannon MJ, Pate JL 2003 The role of major histocompatibility complex molecules in luteal function. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:93[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Reynolds LP, Grazul-Bilska AT, Redmer DA 2000 Angiogenesis in the corpus luteum. Endocrine 12:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Davis JS, Rueda BR, Spanel-Borowski K 2003 Microvascular endothelial cells of the corpus luteum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:89[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Tamanini C, De Ambrogi M 2004 Angiogenesis in developing follicle and corpus luteum. Reprod Domest Anim 39:206–216[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Pabuccu R, Akar ME 2005 Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:277–281[Medline]
19. Henkes LE, Davis JS, Rueda BR 2003 Mutant mouse models and their contribution to our knowledge of corpus luteum development, function and regression. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:87[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Bachelot A, Binart N 2005 Corpus luteum development: lessons from genetic models in mice. Curr Top Dev Biol 68:49–84[Medline]
21. Richards JS, Russell DL, Ochsner S, Espey LL 2002 Ovulation: new dimensions and new regulators of the inflammatory-like response. Annu Rev Physiol 64:69–92[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Green C, Chatterjee R, McGarrigle HH, Ahmed F, Thomas NS 2000 p107 is active in the nucleolus in non-dividing human granulosa lutein cells. J Mol Endocrinol 25:275–286[Abstract]
23. Morgan DO 1995 Principles of CDK regulation. Nature 374:131–134[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Stevaux O, Dyson NJ 2002 A revised picture of the E2F transcriptional network and RB function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14:684–691[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM 1999 CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev 13:1501–1512[Free Full Text]
26. Sanchez I, Dynlacht BD 2005 New insights into cyclins, CDKs, and cell cycle control. Semin Cell Dev Biol 16:311–321[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Hampl A, Pachernik J, Dvorak P 2000 Levels and interactions of p27, cyclin D3, and CDK4 during the formation and maintenance of the corpus luteum in mice. Biol Reprod 62:1393–1401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Sicinski P, Donaher JL, Geng Y, Parker SB, Gardner H, Park MY, Robker RL, Richards JS, McGinnis LK, Biggers JD, Eppig JJ, Bronson RT, Elledge SJ, Weinberg RA 1996 Cyclin D2 is an FSH-responsive gene involved in gonadal cell proliferation and oncogenesis. Nature 384:470–474[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Moons DS, Jirawatnotai S, Parlow AF, Gibori G, Kineman RD, Kiyokawa H 2002 Pituitary hypoplasia and lactotroph dysfunction in mice deficient for cyclin-dependent kinase-4. Endocrinology 143:3001–3008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Moons DS, Jirawatnotai S, Tsutsui T, Franks R, Parlow AF, Hales DB, Gibori G, Fazleabas AT, Kiyokawa H 2002 Intact follicular maturation and defective luteal function in mice deficient for cyclin-dependent kinase-4. Endocrinology 143:647–654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Tsutsui T, Hesabi B, Moons DS, Pandolfi PP, Hansel KS, Koff A, Kiyokawa H 1999 Targeted disruption of CDK4 delays cell cycle entry with enhanced p27(Kip1) activity. Mol Cell Biol 19:7011–7019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Meyerson M, Harlow E 1994 Identification of G1 kinase activity for cdk6, a novel cyclin D partner. Mol Cell Biol 14:2077–2086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Robker RL, Richards JS 1998 Hormone-induced proliferation and differentiation of granulosa cells: a coordinated balance of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D2 and p27Kip1. Mol Endocrinol 12:924–940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Richards JS, Russell DL, Robker RL, Dajee M, Alliston TN 1998 Molecular mechanisms of ovulation and luteinization. Mol Cell Endocrinol 145:47–54[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Jirawatnotai S, Moons DS, Stocco CO, Franks R, Hales DB, Gibori G, Kiyokawa H 2003 The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 cooperate to restrict proliferative life span in differentiating ovarian cells. J Biol Chem 278:17021–17027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Park OK, Mayo KE 1991 Transient expression of progesterone receptor messenger RNA in ovarian granulosa cells after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Mol Endocrinol 5:967–978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Natraj U, Richards JS 1993 Hormonal regulation, localization, and functional activity of the progesterone receptor in granulosa cells of rat preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 133:761–769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK 1997 Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell 91:197–208[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Sterneck E, Tessarollo L, Johnson PF 1997 An essential role for C/EBPß in female reproduction. Genes Dev 11:2153–2162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Espey LL, Ujioka T, Russell DL, Skelsey M, Vladu B, Robker RL, Okamura H, Richards JS 2000 Induction of early growth response protein-1 gene expression in the rat ovary in response to an ovulatory dose of human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology 141:2385–2391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Park JI, Park HJ, Choi HS, Lee K, Lee WK, Chun SY 2001 Gonadotropin regulation of NGFI-B messenger ribonucleic acid expression during ovarian follicle development in the rat. Endocrinology 142:3051–3059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Conneely OM, O’Malley BW 1996 Reproductive phenotypes of the progesterone receptor null mutant mouse. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 56:67–77[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Sirois J, Richards JS 1993 Transcriptional regulation of the rat prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 gene in granulosa cells. Evidence for the role of a cis-acting C/EBPß promoter element. J Biol Chem 268:21931–21938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Ramji DP, Foka P 2002 CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins: structure, function and regulation. Biochem J 365:561–575[Medline]
45. Park JI, Park HJ, Lee YI, Seo YM, Chun SY 2003 Regulation of NGFI-B expression during the ovulatory process. Mol Cell Endocrinol 202:25–29[Medline]
46. Russell DL, Doyle KM, Gonzales-Robayna I, Pipaon C, Richards JS 2003 Egr-1 induction in rat granulosa cells by follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone: combinatorial regulation by transcription factors cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate regulatory element binding protein, serum response factor, sp1, and early growth response factor-1. Mol Endocrinol 17:520–533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Lee SL, Sadovsky Y, Swirnoff AH, Polish JA, Goda P, Gavrilina G, Milbrandt J 1996 Luteinizing hormone deficiency and female infertility in mice lacking the transcription factor NGFI-A (Egr-1). Science 273:1219–1221[Abstract]
48. Topilko P, Schneider-Maunoury S, Levi G, Trembleau A, Gourdji D, Driancourt MA, Rao CV, Charnay P 1998 Multiple pituitary and ovarian defects in Krox-24 (NGFI-A, Egr-1)-targeted mice. Mol Endocrinol 12:107–122
49. Wilson TE, Mouw AR, Weaver CA, Milbrandt J, Parker KL 1993 The orphan nuclear receptor NGFI-B regulates expression of the gene encoding steroid 21-hydroxylase. Mol Cell Biol 13:861–868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Chang SF, Chung BC 1995 Difference in transcriptional activity of two homologous CYP21A genes. Mol Endocrinol 9:1330–1336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Zhang P, Mellon SH 1997 Multiple orphan nuclear receptors converge to regulate rat P450c17 gene transcription: novel mechanisms for orphan nuclear receptor action. Mol Endocrinol 11:891–904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Woronicz JD, Calnan B, Ngo V, Winoto A 1994 Requirement for the orphan steroid receptor Nur77 in apoptosis of T-cell hybridomas. Nature 367:277–281[CrossRef][Medline]
53. Liu ZG, Smith SW, McLaughlin KA, Schwartz LM, Osborne BA 1994 Apoptotic signals delivered through the T-cell receptor of a T-cell hybrid require the immediate-early gene nur77. Nature 367:281–284[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Wilson TE, Fahrner TJ, Milbrandt J 1993 The orphan receptors NGFI-B and steroidogenic factor 1 establish monomer binding as a third paradigm of nuclear receptor-DNA interaction. Mol Cell Biol 13:5794–5804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Crawford PA, Sadovsky Y, Woodson K, Lee SL, Milbrandt J 1995 Adrenocortical function and regulation of the steroid 21-hydroxylase gene in NGFI-B-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol 15:4331–4336[Abstract]
56. Scearce LM, Laz TM, Hazel TG, Lau LF, Taub R 1993 RNR-1, a nuclear receptor in the NGFI-B/Nur77 family that is rapidly induced in regenerating liver. J Biol Chem 268:8855–8861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Sharma SC, Richards JS 2000 Regulation of AP1 (Jun/Fos) factor expression and activation in ovarian granulosa cells. Relation of JunD and Fra2 to terminal differentiation. J Biol Chem 275:33718–33728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Camp TA, Rahal JO, Mayo KE 1991 Cellular localization and hormonal regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger RNAs in the rat ovary. Mol Endocrinol 5:1405–1417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Richards JS, Ireland JJ, Rao MC, Bernath GA, Midgley Jr AR, Reichert Jr LE 1976 Ovarian follicular development in the rat: hormone receptor regulation by estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 99:1562–1570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Nakamura K, Minegishi T, Takakura Y, Miyamoto K, Hasegawa Y, Ibuki Y, Igarashi M 1991 Hormonal regulation of gonadotropin receptor mRNA in rat ovary during follicular growth and luteinization. Mol Cell Endocrinol 82:259–263[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Minegishi T, Hirakawa T, Kishi H, Abe K, Tano M, Abe Y, Miyamoto K 2000 The mechanisms of retinoic acid-induced regulation on the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in rat granulosa cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1495:203–211[Medline]
62. Xing W, Sairam MR 2002 Retinoic acid mediates transcriptional repression of ovine follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene via a pleiotropic nuclear receptor response element. Biol Reprod 67:204–211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Zheng WL, Bucco RA, Sierra-Rievera E, Osteen KG, Melner MH, Ong DE 1999 Synthesis of retinoic acid by rat ovarian cells that express cellular retinoic acid-binding protein-II. Biol Reprod 60:110–114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Hermann BP, Heckert LL 2005 Silencing of Fshr occurs through a conserved, hypersensitive site in the first intron. Mol Endocrinol 19:2112–2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Hunzicker-Dunn M, Gurevich VV, Casanova JE, Mukherjee S 2002 ARF6: a newly appreciated player in G protein-coupled receptor desensitization. FEBS Lett 521:3–8[CrossRef][Medline]
66. Hunzicker-Dunn M, Barisas G, Song J, Roess DA 2003 Membrane organization of luteinizing hormone receptors differs between actively signaling and desensitized receptors. J Biol Chem 278:42744–42749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. LaPolt PS, Oikawa M, Jia XC, Dargan C, Hsueh AJ 1990 Gonadotropin-induced up- and down-regulation of rat ovarian LH receptor message levels during follicular growth, ovulation and luteinization. Endocrinology 126:3277–3279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Segaloff DL, Wang HY, Richards JS 1990 Hormonal regulation of luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor mRNA in rat ovarian cells during follicular development and luteinization. Mol Endocrinol 4:1856–1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Peegel H, Randolph Jr J, Midgley AR, Menon KM 1994 In situ hybridization of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid during hormone-induced down-regulation and the subsequent recovery in rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 135:1044–1051[Abstract]
70. Lu DL, Peegel H, Mosier SM, Menon KM 1993 Loss of lutropin/human choriogonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid during ligand-induced down-regulation occurs post transcriptionally. Endocrinology 132:235–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Nair AK, Kash JC, Peegel H, Menon KM 2002 Post-transcriptional regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA in the ovary by a novel mRNA-binding protein. J Biol Chem 277:21468–21473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Nair AK, Menon KM 2004 Isolation and characterization of a novel trans-factor for luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA from ovary. J Biol Chem 279:14937–14944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73. Bjurulf E, Selstam G, Olofsson JI 1994 Increased LH receptor mRNA and extended corpus luteum function induced by prolactin and indomethacin treatment in vivo in hysterectomized pseudopregnant rats. J Reprod Fertil 102:139–145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
74. Piquette GN, LaPolt PS, Oikawa M, Hsueh AJ 1991 Regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels by gonadotropins, growth factors, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 128:2449–2456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
75. Ascoli M, Fanelli F, Segaloff DL 2002 The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocr Rev 23:141–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
76. Goffin V, Binart N, Touraine P, Kelly PA 2002 Prolactin: the new biology of an old hormone. Annu Rev Physiol 64:47–67[CrossRef][Medline]
77. Clarke DL, Arey BJ, Linzer DI 1993 Prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the ovary during the rat estrous cycle. Endocrinology 133:2594–2603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78. Clarke DL, Linzer DI 1993 Changes in prolactin receptor expression during pregnancy in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 133:224–232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Russell DL, Richards JS 1999 Differentiation-dependent prolactin responsiveness and stat (signal transducers and activators of transcription) signaling in rat ovarian cells. Mol Endocrinol 13:2049–2064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
80. Grosdemouge I, Bachelot A, Lucas A, Baran N, Kelly PA, Binart N 2003 Effects of deletion of the prolactin receptor on ovarian gene expression. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:12[CrossRef][Medline]
81. Byers M, Kuiper GG, Gustafsson JA, Park-Sarge OK 1997 Estrogen receptor-ß mRNA expression in rat ovary: down-regulation by gonadotropins. Mol Endocrinol 11:172–182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
82. Telleria CM, Zhong L, Deb S, Srivastava RK, Park KS, Sugino N, Park-Sarge OK, Gibori G 1998 Differential expression of the estrogen receptors and ß in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: regulation by prolactin and placental lactogens. Endocrinology 139:2432–2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Frasor J, Park K, Byers M, Telleria C, Kitamura T, Yu-Lee LY, Djiane J, Park-Sarge OK, Gibori G 2001 Differential roles for signal transducers and activators of transcription 5a and 5b in PRL stimulation of ER and ERß transcription. Mol Endocrinol 15:2172–2181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
84. Fitzpatrick SL, Funkhouser JM, Sindoni DM, Stevis PE, Deecher DC, Bapat AR, Merchenthaler I, Frail DE 1999 Expression of estrogen receptor-ß protein in rodent ovary. Endocrinology 140:2581–2591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
85. Guo C, Savage L, Sarge KD, Park-Sarge OK 2001 Gonadotropins decrease estrogen receptor-ß messenger ribonucleic acid stability in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 142:2230–2237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
86. Hall JM, McDonnell DP 1999 The estrogen receptor ß-isoform (ERß) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ER transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 140:5566–5578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
87. Iwai T, Fujii S, Nanbu Y, Nonogaki H, Konishi I, Mori T, Okamura H 1991 Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on the expression of progesterone receptors and estrogen receptors in rabbit ovarian granulosa cells and the uterus. Endocrinology 129:1840–1848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
88. Slomczynska M, Krok M, Pierscinski A 2000 Localization of the progesterone receptor in the porcine ovary. Acta Histochem 102:183–191[CrossRef][Medline]
89. Sriraman V, Sharma SC, Richards JS 2003 Transactivation of the progesterone receptor gene in granulosa cells: evidence that Sp1/Sp3 binding sites in the proximal promoter play a key role in luteinizing hormone inducibility. Mol Endocrinol 17:436–449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Park-Sarge OK, Parmer TG, Gu Y, Gibori G 1995 Does the rat corpus luteum express the progesterone receptor gene? Endocrinology 136:1537–1543[Abstract]
91. Telleria CM, Stocco CO, Stati AO, Deis RP 1999 Progesterone receptor is not required for progesterone action in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy. Steroids 64:760–766[CrossRef][Medline]
92. Cai Z, Stocco C 2005 Expression and regulation of progestin membrane receptors in the rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 146:5522–5532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
93. Ashley RL, Clay CM, Farmerie TA, Niswender GD, Nett TM 2006 Cloning and characterization of an ovine intracellular seven transmembrane receptor for progesterone that mediates calcium mobilization. Endocrinology 147:4151–4159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
94. Richards JS 2001 New signaling pathways for hormones and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate action in endocrine cells. Mol Endocrinol 15:209–218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
95. Yazawa T, Mizutani T, Yamada K, Kawata H, Sekiguchi T, Yoshino M, Kajitani T, Shou Z, Miyamoto K 2003 Involvement of cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein, steroidogenic factor 1, and Dax-1 in the regulation of gonadotropin-inducible ovarian transcription factor 1 gene expression by follicle-stimulating hormone in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 144:1920–1930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
96. Mukherjee A, Park-Sarge OK, Mayo KE 1996 Gonadotropins induce rapid phosphorylation of the 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 137:3234–3245[Abstract]
97. Gonzalez-Robayna IJ, Alliston TN, Buse P, Firestone GL, Richards JS 1999 Functional and subcellular changes in the A-kinase-signaling pathway: relation to aromatase and Sgk expression during the transition of granulosa cells to luteal cells. Mol Endocrinol 13:1318–1337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
98. Alliston TN, Gonzalez-Robayna IJ, Buse P, Firestone GL, Richards JS 2000 Expression and localization of serum/glucocorticoid-induced kinase in the rat ovary: relation to follicular growth and differentiation. Endocrinology 141:385–395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
99. Hazzalin CA, Mahadevan LC 2002 MAPK-regulated transcription: a continuously variable gene switch? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:30–40[CrossRef][Medline]
100. Sekar N, Veldhuis JD 2001 Concerted transcriptional activation of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene by insulin and luteinizing hormone in cultured porcine granulosa-luteal cells: possible convergence of protein kinase A, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Endocrinology 142:2921–2928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
101. Maizels ET, Mukherjee A, Sithanandam G, Peters CA, Cottom J, Mayo KE, Hunzicker-Dunn M 2001 Developmental regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated kinases-2 and -3 (MAPKAPK-2/-3) in vivo during corpus luteum formation in the rat. Mol Endocrinol 15:716–733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
102. Tai CJ, Kang SK, Tzeng CR, Leung PC 2001 Adenosine triphosphate activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in human granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 142:1554–1560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
103. Chen D, Fong HW, Davis JS 2001 Induction of c-fos and c-jun messenger ribonucleic acid expression by prostaglandin F2 is mediated by a protein kinase C-dependent extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in bovine luteal cells. Endocrinology 142:887–895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
104. Dewi DA, Abayasekara DR, Wheeler-Jones CP 2002 Requirement for ERK1/2 activation in the regulation of progesterone production in human granulosa-lutein cells is stimulus specific. Endocrinology 143:877–888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
105. Stocco CO, Lau LF, Gibori G 2002 A calcium/calmodulin-dependent activation of ERK1/2 mediates JunD phosphorylation and induction of nur77 and 20-hsd genes by prostaglandin F2 in ovarian cells. J Biol Chem 277:3293–3302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
106. Pru JK, Hendry IR, Davis JS, Rueda BR 2002 Soluble Fas ligand activates the sphingomyelin pathway and induces apoptosis in luteal steroidogenic cells independently of stress-activated p38(MAPK). Endocrinology 143:4350–4357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
107. Yadav VK, Sudhagar RR, Medhamurthy R 2002 Apoptosis during spontaneous and prostaglandin F(2)-induced luteal regression in the buffalo cow (Bubalus bubalis): involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Biol Reprod 67:752–759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
108. Flores JA, Aguirre C, Sharma OP, Veldhuis JD 1998 Luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulates both intracellular calcium ion ([Ca2+]i) mobilization and transmembrane cation influx in single ovarian (granulosa) cells: recruitment as a cellular mechanism of LH-[Ca2+]i dose response. Endocrinology 139:3606–3612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
109. Gudermann T, Birnbaumer M, Birnbaumer L 1992 Evidence for dual coupling of the murine luteinizing hormone receptor to adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositide breakdown and Ca2+ mobilization. Studies with the cloned murine luteinizing hormone receptor expressed in L cells. J Biol Chem 267:4479–4488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
110. Lee PS, Buchan AM, Hsueh AJ, Yuen BH, Leung PC 2002 Intracellular calcium mobilization in response to the activation of human wild-type and chimeric gonadotropin receptors. Endocrinology 143:1732–1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
111. Morris JK, Richards JS 1995 Luteinizing hormone induces prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 and luteinization in vitro by A-kinase and C-kinase pathways. Endocrinology 136:1549–1558[Abstract]
112. Morris JK, Richards JS 1993 Hormone induction of luteinization and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 involves multiple cellular signaling pathways. Endocrinology 133:770–779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
113. Salvador LM, Maizels E, Hales DB, Miyamoto E, Yamamoto H, Hunzicker-Dunn M 2002 Acute signaling by the LH receptor is independent of protein kinase C activation. Endocrinology 143:2986–2994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
114. Nelson WJ, Nusse R 2004 Convergence of Wnt, ß-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science 303:1483–1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
115. Vainio S, Heikkila M, Kispert A, Chin N, McMahon AP 1999 Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt-4 signalling. Nature 397:405–409[CrossRef][Medline]
116. Ricken A, Lochhead P, Kontogiannea M, Farookhi R 2002 Wnt signaling in the ovary: identification and compartmentalized expression of wnt-2, wnt-2b, and frizzled-4 mRNAs. Endocrinology 143:2741–2749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
117. Hsieh M, Johnson MA, Greenberg NM, Richards JS 2002 Regulated expression of Wnts and Frizzleds at specific stages of follicular development in the rodent ovary. Endocrinology 143:898–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
118. Hsieh M, Boerboom D, Shimada M, Lo Y, Parlow AF, Luhmann UF, Berger W, Richards JS 2005 Mice null for Frizzled4 (Fzd4–/–) are infertile and exhibit impaired corpora lutea formation and function. Biol Reprod 73:1135–1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
119. Levy DE, Darnell Jr JE 2002 Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:651–662[CrossRef][Medline]
120. Gadd SL, Clevenger CV 2006 Ligand-independent dimerization of the human prolactin receptor isoforms: functional implications. Mol Endocrinol 20:2734–2746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
121. Ruff SJ, Leers-Sucheta S, Melner MH, Cohen S 1996 Induction and activation of Stat 5 in the ovaries of pseudopregnant rats. Endocrinology 137:4095–4099[Abstract]
122. Dajee M, Fey GH, Richards JS 1998 Stat 5b and the orphan nuclear receptors regulate expression of the 2-macroglobulin (2M) gene in rat ovarian granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 12:1393–1409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
123. Frasor J, Gibori G 2003 Prolactin regulation of estrogen receptor expression. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14:118–123[CrossRef][Medline]
124. Liu X, Robinson GW, Wagner KU, Garrett L, Wynshaw-Boris A, Hennighausen L 1997 Stat5a is mandatory for adult mammary gland development and lactogenesis. Genes Dev 11:179–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
125. Udy GB, Towers RP, Snell RG, Wilkins RJ, Park SH, Ram PA, Waxman DJ, Davey HW 1997 Requirement of STAT5b for sexual dimorphism of body growth rates and liver gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7239–7244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
126. Teglund S, McKay C, Schuetz E, van Deursen JM, Stravopodis D, Wang D, Brown M, Bodner S, Grosveld G, Ihle JN 1998 Stat5a and Stat5b proteins have essential and nonessential, or redundant, roles in cytokine responses. Cell 93:841–850[CrossRef][Medline]
127. Piekorz RP, Gingras S, Hoffmeyer A, Ihle JN, Weinstein Y 2005 Regulation of progesterone levels during pregnancy and parturition by signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Mol Endocrinol 19:431–440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
128. Ali S 1998 Prolactin receptor regulates Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation by two separate pathways. J Biol Chem 273:7709–7716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
129. Ram PA, Waxman DJ 1997 Interaction of growth hormone-activated STATs with SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and nuclear JAK2 tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 272:17694–17702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
130. Jonsson H, Peng SL 2005 Forkhead transcription factors in immunology. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:397–409[CrossRef][Medline]
131. Richards JS, Sharma SC, Falender AE, Lo YH 2002 Expression of FKHR, FKHRL1, and AFX genes in the rodent ovary: evidence for regulation by IGF-I, estrogen, and the gonadotropins. Mol Endocrinol 16:580–599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
132. Castrillon DH, Miao L, Kollipara R, Horner JW, DePinho RA 2003 Suppression of ovarian follicle activation in mice by the transcription factor Foxo3a. Science 301:215–218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
133. el-Fouly MA, Cook B, Nekola M, Nalbandov AV 1970 Role of the ovum in follicular luteinization. Endocrinology 87:286–293[Medline]
134. Otsuka F, Yamamoto S, Erickson GF, Shimasaki S 2001 Bone morphogenetic protein-15 inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action by suppressing FSH receptor expression. J Biol Chem 276:11387–11392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
135. Vitt UA, Hayashi M, Klein C, Hsueh AJ 2000 Growth differentiation factor-9 stimulates proliferation but suppresses the follicle-stimulating hormone-induced differentiation of cultured granulosa cells from small antral and preovulatory rat follicles. Biol Reprod 62:370–377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
136. Miyazawa K, Shinozaki M, Hara T, Furuya T, Miyazono K 2002 Two major Smad pathways in TGF-ß superfamily signalling. Genes Cells 7:1191–1204[Abstract]
137. Pangas SA, Matzuk MM 2004 Genetic models for transforming growth factor ß superfamily signaling in ovarian follicle development. Mol Cell Endocrinol 225:83–91[CrossRef][Medline]
138. Attisano L, Wrana JL 2000 Smads as transcriptional co-modulators. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:235–243[CrossRef][Medline]
139. Pangas SA, Li X, Robertson EJ, Matzuk MM 2006 Premature luteinization and cumulus cell defects in ovarian-specific Smad4 knockout mice. Mol Endocrinol 20:1406–1422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
140. Nelson SE, McLean MP, Jayatilak PG, Gibori G 1992 Isolation, characterization, and culture of cell subpopulations forming the pregnant rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 130:954–966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
141. Girsh E, Greber Y, Meidan R 1995 Luteotrophic and luteolytic interactions between bovine small and large luteal-like cells and endothelial cells. Biol Reprod 52:954–962[Abstract]
142. Townson DH, Liptak AR 2003 Chemokines in the corpus luteum: implications of leukocyte chemotaxis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:94[CrossRef][Medline]
143. Nelson SE, Gibori G, Hunzicker-Dunn M 1992 The cAMP-dependent signalling cascade in the two luteal cell types of the pregnant rat corpus luteum. Mol Cell Endocrinol 85:195–203[CrossRef][Medline]
144. Gillim SW, Christensen AK, McLennan CE 1969 Fine structure of the human menstrual corpus luteum at its stage of maximum secretory activity. Am J Anat 126:409–427[CrossRef][Medline]
145. Wulff C, Dickson SE, Duncan WC, Fraser HM 2001 Angiogenesis in the human corpus luteum: simulated early pregnancy by HCG treatment is associated with both angiogenesis and vessel stabilization. Hum Reprod 16:2515–2524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
146. Sanders SL, Stouffer RL, Brannian JD 1996 Androgen production by monkey luteal cell subpopulations at different stages of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:591–596[Abstract]
147. Ohara A, Mori T, Taii S, Ban C, Narimoto K 1987 Functional differentiation in steroidogenesis of two types of luteal cells isolated from mature human corpora lutea of menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:1192–1200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
148. McLean MP, Nelson S, Parmer T, Khan I, Steinschneider A, Puryear T, Gibori G 1990 Identification and characterization of an abundant phosphoprotein specific to the large luteal cell. Endocrinology 126:1796–1805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
149. Duan WR, Linzer DI, Gibori G 1996 Cloning and characterization of an ovarian-specific protein that associates with the short form of the prolactin receptor. J Biol Chem 271:15602–15607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
150. McLean MP, Nelson SE, Billheimer JT, Gibori G 1992 Differential capacity for cholesterol transport and processing in large and small rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 131:2203–2212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
151. Irving-Rodgers HF, Rodgers RJ 2005 Extracellular matrix in ovarian follicular development and disease. Cell Tissue Res 322:89–98[CrossRef][Medline]
152. Luck MR, Zhao Y 1993 Identification and measurement of collagen in the bovine corpus luteum and its relationship with ascorbic acid and tissue development. J Reprod Fertil 99:647–652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
153. Curry Jr TE, Song L, Wheeler SE 2001 Cellular localization of gelatinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases during follicular growth, ovulation, and early luteal formation in the rat. Biol Reprod 65:855–865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
154. Bagavandoss P 1998 Differential distribution of gelatinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the rat ovary. J Endocrinol 158:221–228[Abstract]
155. Liu K, Olofsson JI, Wahlberg P, Ny T 1999 Distinct expression of gelatinase A [matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2], collagenase-3 (MMP-13), membrane type MMP 1 (MMP-14), and tissue inhibitor of MMPs type 1 mediated by physiological signals during formation and regression of the rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 140:5330–5338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
156. Curry Jr TE, Osteen KG 2003 The matrix metalloproteinase system: changes, regulation, and impact throughout the ovarian and uterine reproductive cycle. Endocr Rev 24:428–465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
157. Dajee M, Kazansky AV, Raught B, Hocke GM, Fey GH, Richards JS 1996 Prolactin induction of the 2-macroglobulin gene in rat ovarian granulosa cells: stat 5 activation and binding to the interleukin-6 response element. Mol Endocrinol 10:171–184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
158. Yeow KM, Phillips BW, Beaudry PP, Leco KJ, Murphy G, Edwards DR 2001 Expression of MMPs and TIMPs in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol 151:181–189[Medline]
159. Umans L, Serneels L, Overbergh L, Lorent K, Van Leuven F, Van den Berghe H 1995 Targeted inactivation of the mouse 2-macroglobulin gene. J Biol Chem 270:19778–19785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
160. Aten RF, Kolodecik TR, Behrman HR 1995 A cell adhesion receptor antiserum abolishes, whereas laminin and fibronectin glycoprotein components of extracellular matrix promote, luteinization of cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 136:1753–1758[Abstract]
161. Fraser HM, Dickson SE, Lunn SF, Wulff C, Morris KD, Carroll VA, Bicknell R 2000 Suppression of luteal angiogenesis in the primate after neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrinology 141:995–1000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
162. Goede V, Schmidt T, Kimmina S, Kozian D, Augustin HG 1998 Analysis of blood vessel maturation processes during cyclic ovarian angiogenesis. Lab Invest 78:1385–1394[Medline]
163. Matsushima T, Fukuda Y, Tsukada K, Yamanaka N 1996 The extracellular matrices and vascularization of the developing corpus luteum in rats. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 28:441–455[Medline]
164. Tsukada K, Matsushima T, Yamanaka N 1996 Neovascularization of the corpus luteum of rats during the estrus cycle. Pathol Int 46:408–416[Medline]
165. Ferrara N, Chen H, Davis-Smyth T, Gerber HP, Nguyen TN, Peers D, Chisholm V, Hillan KJ, Schwall RH 1998 Vascular endothelial growth factor is essential for corpus luteum angiogenesis. Nat Med 4:336–340[CrossRef][Medline]
166. LeCouter J, Lin R, Ferrara N 2002 Endocrine gland-derived VEGF and the emerging hypothesis of organ-specific regulation of angiogenesis. Nat Med 8:913–917[CrossRef][Medline]
167. Fraser HM, Bell J, Wilson H, Taylor PD, Morgan K, Anderson RA, Duncan WC 2005 Localization and quantification of cyclic changes in the expression of endocrine gland vascular endothelial growth factor in the human corpus luteum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:427–434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
168. Cebe-Suarez S, Zehnder-Fjallman A, Ballmer-Hofer K 2006 The role of VEGF receptors in angiogenesis; complex partnerships. Cell Mol Life Sci 63:601–615[CrossRef][Medline]
169. Kashida S, Sugino N, Takiguchi S, Karube A, Takayama H, Yamagata Y, Nakamura Y, Kato H 2001 Regulation and role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the corpus luteum during mid-pregnancy in rats. Biol Reprod 64:317–323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
170. Wulff C, Wilson H, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Lunn SF, Fraser HM 2001 Luteal angiogenesis: prevention and intervention by treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor trap(A40). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3377–3386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
171. Zimmermann RC, Hartman T, Bohlen P, Sauer MV, Kitajewski J 2001 Preovulatory treatment of mice with anti-VEGF receptor 2 antibody inhibits angiogenesis in corpora lutea. Microvasc Res 62:15–25[CrossRef][Medline]
172. Pauli SA, Tang H, Wang J, Bohlen P, Posser R, Hartman T, Sauer MV, Kitajewski J, Zimmermann RC 2005 The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor 2 pathway is critical for blood vessel survival in corpora lutea of pregnancy in the rodent. Endocrinology 146:1301–1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
173. Gerber HP, Hillan KJ, Ryan AM, Kowalski J, Keller GA, Rangell L, Wright BD, Radtke F, Aguet M, Ferrara N 1999 VEGF is required for growth and survival in neonatal mice. Development 126:1149–1159[Abstract]
174. Hazzard TM, Rohan RM, Molskness TA, Fanton JW, D’Amato RJ, Stouffer RL 2002 Injection of antiangiogenic agents into the macaque preovulatory follicle: disruption of corpus luteum development and function. Endocrine 17:199–206[CrossRef][Medline]
175. Phillips HS, Hains J, Leung DW, Ferrara N 1990 Vascular endothelial growth factor is expressed in rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 127:965–967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
176. Schams D, Kosmann M, Berisha B, Amselgruber WM, Miyamoto A 2001 Stimulatory and synergistic effects of luteinising hormone and insulin like growth factor 1 on the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and progesterone of cultured bovine granulosa cells. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 109:155–162[CrossRef][Medline]
177. Martinez-Chequer JC, Stouffer RL, Hazzard TM, Patton PE, Molskness TA 2003 Insulin-like growth factors-1 and -2, but not hypoxia, synergize with gonadotropin hormone to promote vascular endothelial growth factor-A secretion by monkey granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles. Biol Reprod 68:1112–1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
178. Zachary I 2003 VEGF signalling: integration and multi-tasking in endothelial cell biology. Biochem Soc Trans 31:1171–1177[Medline]
179. LeCouter J, Kowalski J, Foster J, Hass P, Zhang Z, Dillard-Telm L, Frantz G, Rangell L, DeGuzman L, Keller GA, Peale F, Gurney A, Hillan KJ, Ferrara N 2001 Identification of an angiogenic mitogen selective for endocrine gland endothelium. Nature 412:877–884[CrossRef][Medline]
180. Ferrara N, LeCouter J, Lin R, Peale F 2004 EG-VEGF and Bv8: a novel family of tissue-restricted angiogenic factors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1654:69–78[Medline]
181. Lin R, LeCouter J, Kowalski J, Ferrara N 2002 Characterization of endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in adrenal cortex capillary endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 277:8724–8729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
182. Gospodarowicz D, Cheng J, Lui GM, Baird A, Esch F, Bohlen P 1985 Corpus luteum angiogenic factor is related to fibroblast growth factor. Endocrinology 117:2383–2391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
183. Guthridge M, Bertolini J, Cowling J, Hearn MT 1992 Localization of bFGF mRNA in cyclic rat ovary, diethylstilbesterol primed rat ovary, and cultured rat granulosa cells. Growth Factors 7:15–25[Medline]
184. Yamamoto S, Konishi I, Nanbu K, Komatsu T, Mandai M, Kuroda H, Matsushita K, Mori T 1997 Immunohistochemical localization of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) during folliculogenesis in the human ovary. Gynecol Endocrinol 11:223–230[Medline]
185. Reynolds LP, Redmer DA 1999 Growth and development of the corpus luteum. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 54:181–191[Medline]
186. Gospodarowicz D, Massoglia S, Cheng J, Fujii DK 1986 Effect of fibroblast growth factor and lipoproteins on the proliferation of endothelial cells derived from bovine adrenal cortex, brain cortex, and corpus luteum capillaries. J Cell Physiol 127:121–136[CrossRef][Medline]
187. Grazul-Bilska AT, Redmer DA, Jablonka-Shariff A, Biondini ME, Reynolds LP 1995 Proliferation and progesterone production of ovine luteal cells from several stages of the estrous cycle: effects of fibroblast growth factors and luteinizing hormone. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:491–500[Medline]
188. Ortega S, Ittmann M, Tsang SH, Ehrlich M, Basilico C 1998 Neuronal defects and delayed wound healing in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5672–5677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
189. Peters KG, Kontos CD, Lin PC, Wong AL, Rao P, Huang L, Dewhirst MW, Sankar S 2004 Functional significance of Tie2 signaling in the adult vasculature. Recent Prog Horm Res 59:51–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
190. Sato TN, Tozawa Y, Deutsch U, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Fujiwara Y, Gendron-Maguire M, Gridley T, Wolburg H, Risau W, Qin Y 1995 Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 376:70–74[CrossRef][Medline]
191. Dumont DJ, Gradwohl G, Fong GH, Puri MC, Gertsenstein M, Auerbach A, Breitman ML 1994 Dominant-negative and targeted null mutations in the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase, tek, reveal a critical role in vasculogenesis of the embryo. Genes Dev 8:1897–1909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
192. Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Aldrich TH, Papadopoulos N, Daly TJ, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD 1997 Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 277:55–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
193. Wulff C, Wilson H, Largue P, Duncan WC, Armstrong DG, Fraser HM 2000 Angiogenesis in the human corpus luteum: localization and changes in angiopoietins, tie-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4302–4309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
194. Azhar S, Reaven E 2002 Scavenger receptor class BI and selective cholesteryl ester uptake: partners in the regulation of steroidogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 195:1–26[CrossRef][Medline]
195. Azhar S, Menon KM 1981 Receptor-mediated gonadotropin action in the ovary. Rat luteal cells preferentially utilize and are acutely dependent upon the plasma lipoprotein-supplied sterols in gonadotropin-stimulated steroid production. J Biol Chem 256:6548–6555[Free Full Text]
196. McNamara BC, Booth R, Stansfield DA 1981 Evidence for an essential role for high-density lipoprotein in progesterone synthesis by rat corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 134:79–82[CrossRef][Medline]
197. Carr BR, Sadler RK, Rochelle DB, Stalmach MA, MacDonald PC, Simpson ER 1981 Plasma lipoprotein regulation of progesterone biosynthesis by human corpus luteum tissue in organ culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 52:875–881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
198. Tureck RW, Strauss 3rd JF 1982 Progesterone synthesis by luteinized human granulosa cells in culture: the role of de novo sterol synthesis and lipoprotein-carried sterol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:367–373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
199. Christie MH, Gwynne JT, Strauss 3rd JF 1981 Binding of human high density lipoproteins to membranes of luteinized rat ovaries. J Steroid Biochem 14:671–678[CrossRef][Medline]
200. Azhar S, Menon KM 1982 Receptor mediated gonadotropin action in gonadal tissues: relationship between blood cholesterol levels and gonadotropin stimulated steroidogenesis in isolated rat Leydig and luteal cells. J Steroid Biochem 16:175–184[CrossRef][Medline]
201. Bruot BC, Wiest WG, Collins DC 1982 Effect of low density and high density lipoproteins on progesterone secretion by dispersed corpora luteal cells from rats treated with aminopyrazolo-(3,4-d)pyrimidine. Endocrinology 110:1572–1578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
202. Schuler LA, Langenberg KK, Gwynne JT, Strauss 3rd JF 1981 High density lipoprotein utilization by dispersed rat luteal cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 664:583–601[Medline]
203. Acton S, Rigotti A, Landschulz KT, Xu S, Hobbs HH, Krieger M 1996 Identification of scavenger receptor SR-BI as a high density lipoprotein receptor. Science 271:518–520[Abstract]
204. Connelly MA, Williams DL 2004 SR-BI and HDL cholesteryl ester metabolism. Endocr Res 30:697–703[CrossRef][Medline]
205. Rajapaksha WR, McBride M, Robertson L, O’Shaughnessy PJ 1997 Sequence of the bovine HDL-receptor (SR-BI) cDNA and changes in receptor mRNA expression during granulosa cell luteinization in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol 134:59–67[CrossRef][Medline]
206. Li X, Peegel H, Menon KM 1998 In situ hybridization of high density lipoprotein (scavenger, type 1) receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) during folliculogenesis and luteinization: evidence for mRNA expression and induction by human chorionic gonadotropin specifically in cell types that use cholesterol for steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 139:3043–3049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
207. McLean MP, Sandhoff TW 1998 Expression and hormonal regulation of the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) receptor scavenger receptor class B type I messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat ovary. Endocrine 9:243–252[CrossRef][Medline]
208. Landschulz KT, Pathak RK, Rigotti A, Krieger M, Hobbs HH 1996 Regulation of scavenger receptor, class B, type I, a high density lipoprotein receptor, in liver and steroidogenic tissues of the rat. J Clin Invest 98:984–995[Medline]
209. Azhar S, Cooper A, Tsai L, Maffe W, Reaven E 1988 Characterization of apoB, E receptor function in the luteinized ovary. J Lipid Res 29:869–882[Abstract]
210. Azhar S, Khan I, Puryear T, Chen YD, Gibori G 1988 Luteal cell 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase activity and cholesterol metabolism throughout pregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology 123:1495–1503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
211. Gibori G, Chen YD, Khan I, Azhar S, Reaven GM 1984 Regulation of luteal cell lipoprotein receptors, sterol contents, and steroidogenesis by estradiol in the pregnant rat. Endocrinology 114:609–617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
212. Lopez D, Sanchez MD, Shea-Eaton W, McLean MP 2002 Estrogen activates the high-density lipoprotein receptor gene via binding to estrogen response elements and interaction with sterol regulatory element binding protein-1A. Endocrinology 143:2155–2168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
213. Trigatti B, Rayburn H, Vinals M, Braun A, Miettinen H, Penman M, Hertz M, Schrenzel M, Amigo L, Rigotti A, Krieger M 1999 Influence of the high density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI on reproductive and cardiovascular pathophysiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9322–9327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
214. Hedin L, Rodgers RJ, Simpson ER, Richards JS 1987 Changes in content of cytochrome P450(17), cytochrome P450scc, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase in developing rat ovarian follicles and corpora lutea: correlation with theca cell steroidogenesis. Biol Reprod 37:211–223[Abstract]
215. Wade RL, Van Andel RA, Rice SG, Banka CL, Dyer CA 2002 Hepatic lipase deficiency attenuates mouse ovarian progesterone production leading to decreased ovulation and reduced litter size. Biol Reprod 66:1076–1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
216. Seedorf U, Ellinghaus P, Roch Nofer J 2000 Sterol carrier protein-2. Biochim Biophys Acta 1486:45–54[Medline]
217. McLean MP, Puryear TK, Khan I, Azhar S, Billheimer JT, Orly J, Gibori G 1989 Estradiol regulation of sterol carrier protein-2 independent of cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage expression in the rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 125:1337–1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
218. Rennert H, Amsterdam A, Billheimer JT, Strauss 3rd JF 1991 Regulated expression of sterol carrier protein 2 in the ovary: a key role for cyclic AMP. Biochemistry 30:11280–11285[CrossRef][Medline]
219. Tanaka T, Billheimer JT, Strauss 3rd JF 1984 Luteinized rat ovaries contain a sterol carrier protein. Endocrinology 114:533–540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
220. Steinschneider A, McLean MP, Billheimer JT, Azhar S, Gibori G 1989 Protein kinase C catalyzed phosphorylation of sterol carrier protein 2. Endocrinology 125:569–571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
221. Baum MS, Rosberg S 1987 A phorbol ester, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and a calcium ionophore, A23187, can mimic the luteolytic effect of prostaglandin F2 in isolated rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 120:1019–1026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
222. Wiltbank MC, Knickerbocker JJ, Niswender GD 1989 Regulation of the corpus luteum by protein kinase C. I. Phosphorylation activity and steroidogenic action in large and small ovine luteal cells. Biol Reprod 40:1194–1200[Abstract]
223. Leung PC, Minegishi T, Wang J 1988 Inhibition of follicle-stimulating hormone- and adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-induced progesterone production by calcium and protein kinase C in the rat ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:350–356[Medline]
224. Stocco DM 2001 StAR protein and the regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis. Annu Rev Physiol 63:193–213[CrossRef][Medline]
225. Stocco DM 1997 A StAR search: implications in controlling steroidogenesis. Biol Reprod 56:328–336[Abstract]
226. Papadopoulos V, Amri H, Li H, Boujrad N, Vidic B, Garnier M 1997 Targeted disruption of the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor gene inhibits steroidogenesis in the R2C Leydig tumor cell line. J Biol Chem 272:32129–32135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
227. Papadopoulos V, Amri H, Boujrad N, Cascio C, Culty M, Garnier M, Hardwick M, Li H, Vidic B, Brown AS, Reversa JL, Bernassau JM, Drieu K 1997 Peripheral benzodiazepine receptor in cholesterol transport and steroidogenesis. Steroids 62:21–28[CrossRef][Medline]
228. Shen WJ, Patel S, Natu V, Hong R, Wang J, Azhar S, Kraemer FB 2003 Interaction of hormone-sensitive lipase with steroidogenic acute regulatory protein: facilitation of cholesterol transfer in adrenal. J Biol Chem 278:43870–43876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
229. Hasegawa T, Zhao L, Caron KM, Majdic G, Suzuki T, Shizawa S, Sasano H, Parker KL 2000 Developmental roles of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) as revealed by StAR knockout mice. Mol Endocrinol 14:1462–1471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
230. Ishii T, Hasegawa T, Pai CI, Yvgi-Ohana N, Timberg R, Zhao L, Majdic G, Chung BC, Orly J, Parker KL 2002 The roles of circulating high-density lipoproteins and trophic hormones in the phenotype of knockout mice lacking the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 16:2297–2309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
231. Bose HS, Lingappa VR, Miller WL 2002 The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR, works only at the outer mitochondrial membrane. Endocr Res 28:295–308[CrossRef][Medline]
232. Sandhoff TW, Hales DB, Hales KH, McLean MP 1998 Transcriptional regulation of the rat steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene by steroidogenic factor 1. Endocrinology 139:4820–4831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
233. Sandhoff TW, McLean MP 1999 Repression of the rat steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein gene by PGF2 is modulated by the negative transcription factor DAX-1. Endocrine 10:83–91[CrossRef][Medline]
234. Manna PR, Eubank DW, Lalli E, Sassone-Corsi P, Stocco DM 2003 Transcriptional regulation of the mouse steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene by the cAMP response-element binding protein and steroidogenic factor 1. J Mol Endocrinol 30:381–397[Abstract]
235. Manna PR, Wang XJ, Stocco DM 2003 Involvement of multiple transcription factors in the regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression. Steroids 68:1125–1134[CrossRef][Medline]
236. Pisarska MD, Bae J, Klein C, Hsueh AJ 2004 Forkhead l2 is expressed in the ovary and represses the promoter activity of the steroidogenic acute regulatory gene. Endocrinology 145:3424–3433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
237. Li H, Yao Z, Degenhardt B, Teper G, Papadopoulos V 2001 Cholesterol binding at the cholesterol recognition/ interaction amino acid consensus (CRAC) of the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor and inhibition of steroidogenesis by an HIV TAT-CRAC peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1267–1272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
238. Culty M, Li H, Boujrad N, Amri H, Vidic B, Bernassau JM, Reversat JL, Papadopoulos V 1999 In vitro studies on the role of the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor in steroidogenesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 69:123–130[CrossRef][Medline]
239. West LA, Horvat RD, Roess DA, Barisas BG, Juengel JL, Niswender GD 2001 Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein and peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor associate at the mitochondrial membrane. Endocrinology 142:502–505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
240. Sridaran R, Philip GH, Li H, Culty M, Liu Z, Stocco DM, Papadopoulos V 1999 GnRH agonist treatment decreases progesterone synthesis, luteal peripheral benzodiazepine receptor mRNA, ligand binding and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression during pregnancy. J Mol Endocrinol 22:45–54[Abstract]
241. Sridaran R, Lee MA, Haynes L, Srivastava RK, Ghose M, Sridaran G, Smith CJ 1999 GnRH action on luteal steroidogenesis during pregnancy. Steroids 64:618–623[CrossRef][Medline]
242. Papadopoulos V, Dharmarajan AM, Li H, Culty M, Lemay M, Sridaran R 1999 Mitochondrial peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor expression. Correlation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-induced apoptosis in the corpus luteum. Biochem Pharmacol 58:1389–1393[CrossRef][Medline]
243. Peng L, Arensburg J, Orly J, Payne AH 2002 The murine 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) gene family: a postulated role for 3ß-HSD VI during early pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 187:213–221[CrossRef][Medline]
244. Oonk RB, Krasnow JS, Beattie WG, Richards JS 1989 Cyclic AMP-dependent and -independent regulation of cholesterol side chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 (P-450scc) in rat ovarian granulosa cells and corpora lutea. cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence of rat P-450scc. J Biol Chem 264:21934–21942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
245. Kaynard AH, Periman LM, Simard J, Melner MH 1992 Ovarian 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and sulfated glycoprotein-2 gene expression are differentially regulated by the induction of ovulation, pseudopregnancy, and luteolysis in the immature rat. Endocrinology 130:2192–2200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
246. Enders AC 1973 Cytology of the corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 8:158–182[Medline]
247. Okamura H, Yang SL, Wright KH, Wallach EE 1972 The effect of prostaglandin F2 on the corpus luteum of the pregnant rat. An ultrastructural study. Fertil Steril 23:475–483[Medline]
248. Goldring NB, Durica JM, Lifka J, Hedin L, Ratoosh SL, Miller WL, Orly J, Richards JS 1987 Cholesterol side-chain cleavage P450 messenger ribonucleic acid: evidence for hormonal regulation in rat ovarian follicles and constitutive expression in corpora lutea. Endocrinology 120:1942–1950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
249. Martel C, Labrie C, Dupont E, Couet J, Trudel C, Rheaume E, Simard J, Luu-The V, Pelletier G, Labrie F 1990 Regulation of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/⁵-⁴ isomerase expression and activity in the hypophysectomized rat ovary: interactions between the stimulatory effect of human chorionic gonadotropin and the luteolytic effect of prolactin. Endocrinology 127:2726–2737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
250. Martel C, Gagne D, Couet J, Labrie Y, Simard J, Labrie F 1994 Rapid modulation of ovarian 3 ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/⁵-⁴ isomerase gene expression by prolactin and human chorionic gonadotropin in the hypophysectomized rat. Mol Cell Endocrinol 99:63–71[CrossRef][Medline]
251. Jones PB, Valk CA, Hsueh AJ 1983 Regulation of progestin biosynthetic enzymes in cultured rat granulosa cells: effects of prolactin, ß2-adrenergic agonist, human chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropin releasing hormone. Biol Reprod 29:572–585[Abstract]
252. Hickey GJ, Oonk RB, Hall PF, Richards JS 1989 Aromatase cytochrome P450 and cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 in corpora lutea of pregnant rats: diverse regulation by peptide and steroid hormones. Endocrinology 125:1673–1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
253. Stocco C, Callegari E, Gibori G 2001 Opposite effect of prolactin and prostaglandin F(2) on the expression of luteal genes as revealed by rat cDNA expression array. Endocrinology 142:4158–4161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
254. Feltus FA, Groner B, Melner MH 1999 Stat5-mediated regulation of the human type II 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/⁵-⁴ isomerase gene: activation by prolactin. Mol Endocrinol 13:1084–1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
255. Stocco CO, Zhong L, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Lau LF, Gibori G 2000 Prostaglandin F2-induced expression of 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase involves the transcription factor NUR77. J Biol Chem 275:37202–37211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
256. Wiest WG, Kidwell WR, Balogh Jr K 1968 Progesterone catabolism in the rat ovary: a regulatory mechanism for progestational potency during pregnancy. Endocrinology 82:844–859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
257. Albarracin CT, Gibori G 1991 Prolactin action on luteal protein expression in the corpus luteum. Endocrinology 129:1821–1830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
258. Mao J, Duan WR, Albarracin CT, Parmer TG, Gibori G 1994 Isolation and characterization of a rat luteal cDNA encoding 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201:1289–1295[CrossRef][Medline]
259. Miura R, Shiota K, Noda K, Yagi S, Ogawa T, Takahashi M 1994 Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat ovarian 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD1). Biochem J 299:561–567
260. Mao J, Duan RW, Zhong L, Gibori G, Azhar S 1997 Expression, purification and characterization of the rat luteal 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Endocrinology 138:182–190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
261. Couture JF, Cantin L, Legrand P, Luu-The V, Labrie F, Breton R 2002 Expression, crystallization and preliminary x-ray analysis of human and rabbit 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in complex with NADP(H) and various steroid substrates. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58:135–139[CrossRef][Medline]
262. Yoshida S, Kubota K, Sasaki H, Hasegawa T, Nishihara M, Terada M, Takahashi M 1999 26-Cholesterol hydroxylase in rat corpora lutea: a negative regulator of progesterone secretion. Biol Reprod 61:557–562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
263. Sridaran R, Gibori G 1986 Effects of dihydrotestosterone on progesterone secretion in pseudopregnant rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 183:328–332[CrossRef][Medline]
264. Sridaran R, Gibori G 1981 Induction of luteolysis by dihydrotestosterone in the pregnant rat. Am J Physiol 241:E444–E448
265. Mahendroo MS, Porter A, Russell DW, Word RA 1999 The parturition defect in steroid 5-reductase type 1 knockout mice is due to impaired cervical ripening. Mol Endocrinol 13:981–992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
266. McNatty KP, Makris A, DeGrazia C, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ 1979 The production of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens by granulosa cells, thecal tissue, and stromal tissue from human ovaries in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 49:687–699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
267. Pelletier G, Li S, Luu-The V, Tremblay Y, Belanger A, Labrie F 2001 Immunoelectron microscopic localization of three key steroidogenic enzymes (cytochrome P450(scc), 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450(c17)) in rat adrenal cortex and gonads. J Endocrinol 171:373–383[Abstract]
268. Taya K, Greenwald GS 1981 In vivo and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod 25:683–691[Abstract]
269. Sridaran R, Gibori G 1983 Intraovarian localization of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation of testosterone and estradiol synthesis in the pregnant rat. Endocrinology 112:1770–1776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
270. Warshaw ML, Johnson DC, Azhar S, Gibori G 1987 Opposite effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on placental and ovarian synthesis of androstenedione. Endocrinology 120:2003–2010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
271. Khan I, Sridaran R, Johnson DC, Gibori G 1987 Selective stimulation of luteal androgen biosynthesis by luteinizing hormone: comparison of hormonal regulation of P45017 activity in corpora lutea and follicles. Endocrinology 121:1312–1319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
272. Gibori G, Khan I, Warshaw ML, McLean MP, Puryear TK, Nelson S, Durkee TJ, Azhar S, Steinschneider A, Rao MC 1988 Placental-derived regulators and the complex control of luteal cell function. Recent Prog Horm Res 44:377–429[Medline]
273. Akinola LA, Poutanen M, Peltoketo H, Vihko R, Vihko P 1998 Characterization of rat 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 gene and mRNA transcripts. Gene 208:229–238[CrossRef][Medline]
274. Ghersevich S, Nokelainen P, Poutanen M, Orava M, Autio-Harmainen H, Rajaniemi H, Vihko R 1994 Rat 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: primary structure and regulation of enzyme expression in rat ovary by diethylstilbestrol and gonadotropins in vivo. Endocrinology 135:1477–1487[Abstract]
275. Parmer TG, McLean MP, Duan WR, Nelson SE, Albarracin CT, Khan I, Gibori G 1992 Hormonal and immunological characterization of the 32 kilodalton ovarian-specific protein. Endocrinology 131:2213–2221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
276. Risk M, Shehu A, Mao J, Stocco CO, Goldsmith LT, Bowen-Shauver JM, Gibori G 2005 Cloning and characterization of a 5' regulatory region of the prolactin receptor-associated protein/17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 7 gene. Endocrinology 146:2807–2816[CrossRef][Medline]
277. Nokelainen P, Peltoketo H, Vihko R, Vihko P 1998 Expression cloning of a novel estrogenic mouse 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/17-ketosteroid reductase (m17HSD7), previously described as a prolactin receptor-associated protein (PRAP) in rat. Mol Endocrinol 12:1048–1059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
278. Ghersevich S, Poutanen M, Tapanainen J, Vihko R 1994 Hormonal regulation of rat 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in cultured rat granulosa cells: effects of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, estrogens, androgens, and epidermal growth factor. Endocrinology 135:1963–1971[Abstract]
279. Ghersevich SA, Poutanen MH, Rajaniemi HJ, Vihko RK 1994 Expression of 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the rat ovary during follicular development and luteinization induced with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and human chorionic gonadotrophin. J Endocrinol 140:409–417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
280. McLean MP, Khan I, Puryear TK, Gibori G 1990 Induction and repression of specific estradiol sensitive proteins in the rat corpus luteum. Chin J Physiol 33:353–366[Medline]
281. Horseman ND, Zhao W, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Tanaka M, Nakashima K, Engle SJ, Smith F, Markoff E, Dorshkind K 1997 Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. EMBO J 16:6926–6935[CrossRef][Medline]
282. Ormandy CJ, Naylor M, Harris J, Robertson F, Horseman ND, Lindeman GJ, Visvader J, Kelly PA 2003 Investigation of the transcriptional changes underlying functional defects in the mammary glands of prolactin receptor knockout mice. Recent Prog Horm Res 58:297–323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
283. Risk M, Gibori G 2001 Mechanisms of luteal cell regulation by prolactin. In: Horseman ND, ed. Prolactin. New York: Kluwer Academic; 265–295
284. Morishige WK, Rothchild I 1974 Temporal aspects of the regulation of corpus luteum function by luteinizing hormone, prolactin and placental luteotrophin during the first half of pregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology 95:260–274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
285. Prigent-Tessier A, Tessier C, Hirosawa-Takamori M, Boyer C, Ferguson-Gottschall S, Gibori G 1999 Rat decidual prolactin. Identification, molecular cloning, and characterization. J Biol Chem 274:37982–37989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
286. Luciano AA, Maslar IA, Kusmik WF, Riddick DH 1980 Stimulatory activity of serum on prolactin production by human decidua. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:665–669[Medline]
287. Golander A, Hurley T, Barrett J, Hizi A, Handwerger S 1978 Prolactin synthesis by human chorion-decidual tissue: a possible source of prolactin in the amniotic fluid. Science 202:311–313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
288. Linzer DI, Fisher SJ 1999 The placenta and the prolactin family of hormones: regulation of the physiology of pregnancy. Mol Endocrinol 13:837–840[Free Full Text]
289. Thordarson G, Galosy S, Gudmundsson GO, Newcomer B, Sridaran R, Talamantes F 1997 Interaction of mouse placental lactogens and androgens in regulating progesterone release in cultured mouse luteal cells. Endocrinology 138:3236–3241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
290. Galosy SS, Talamantes F 1995 Luteotropic actions of placental lactogens at midpregnancy in the mouse. Endocrinology 136:3993–4003[Abstract]
291. Zhong L, Parmer TG, Robertson MC, Gibori G 1997 Prolactin-mediated inhibition of 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene expression and the tyrosine kinase system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 235:587–592[CrossRef][Medline]
292. Albarracin CT, Parmer TG, Duan WR, Nelson SE, Gibori G 1994 Identification of a major prolactin-regulated protein as 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: coordinate regulation of its activity, protein content, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression. Endocrinology 134:2453–2460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
293. Zhong L, Ou J, Barkai U, Mao JF, Frasor J, Gibori G 1998 Molecular cloning and characterization of the rat ovarian 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 249:797–803[CrossRef][Medline]
294. Telleria CM, Goyeneche AA, Stocco CO, Gibori G 2004 Involvement of nuclear factor B in the regulation of rat luteal function: potential roles as survival factor and inhibitor of 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. J Mol Endocrinol 32:365–383[Abstract]
295. Armstrong DT, Miller LV, Knudsen KA 1969 Regulation of lipid metabolism and progesterone production in rat corpora lutea and ovarian interstitial elements by prolactin and luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 85:393–401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
296. Zarrow MX, Clark JH 1969 Gonadotropin regulation of ovarian cholesterol levels in the rat. Endocrinology 84:340–346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
297. Armstrong DT, Knudsen KA, Miller LS 1970 Effects of prolactin upon cholesterol metabolism and progesterone biosynthesis in corpora lutea of rats hypophysectomized during pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology 86:634–641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
298. Rajkumar K, Couture RL, Murphy BD 1985 Binding of high-density lipoproteins to luteal membranes: the role of prolactin, luteinizing hormone, and circulating lipoproteins. Biol Reprod 32:546–555[Abstract]
299. Menon M, Peegel H, Menon KM 1985 Lipoprotein augmentation of human chorionic gonadotropin and prolactin stimulated progesterone synthesis by rat luteal cells. J Steroid Biochem 22:79–84[CrossRef][Medline]
300. Behrman HR, Amstrong DT 1969 Cholesterol esterase stimulation by luteinizing hormone in luteinized rat ovaries. Endocrinology 85:474–480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
301. Klemcke HG, Brinkley HJ 1980 Effects of bromocriptine and PRL on luteal and adrenal cholesterol ester hydrolase and serum progesterone concentrations in mature pseudopregnant rats. Biol Reprod 22:1029–1039[Abstract]
302. Aten RF, Kolodecik TR, Macdonald GJ, Behrman HR 1995 Modulation of cholesteryl ester hydrolase messenger ribonucleic acid levels, protein levels, and activity in the rat corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 53:1110–1117[Abstract]
303. Gibori G, Sridaran R, Basuray R 1982 Control of aromatase activity in luteal and ovarian nonluteal tissue of pregnant rats. Endocrinology 111:781–788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
304. Krasnow JS, Hickey GJ, Richards JS 1990 Regulation of aromatase mRNA and estradiol biosynthesis in rat ovarian granulosa and luteal cells by prolactin. Mol Endocrinol 4:13–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
305. Duan WR, Parmer TG, Albarracin CT, Zhong L, Gibori G 1997 PRAP, a prolactin receptor associated protein: its gene expression and regulation in the corpus luteum. Endocrinology 138:3216–3221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
306. Frasor J, Barkai U, Zhong L, Fazleabas AT, Gibori G 2001 PRL-induced ER gene expression is mediated by Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) while signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b (Stat5b) phosphorylation involves Jak2 and a second tyrosine kinase. Mol Endocrinol 15:1941–1952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
307. Sugino N, Hirosawa-Takamori M, Zhong L, Telleria CM, Shiota K, Gibori G 1998 Hormonal regulation of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and manganese superoxide dismutase messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat corpus luteum: induction by prolactin and placental lactogens. Biol Reprod 59:599–605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
308. Kawaminami M, Shibata Y, Yaji A, Kurusu S, Hashimoto I 2003 Prolactin inhibits annexin 5 expression and apoptosis in the corpus luteum of pseudopregnant rats: involvement of local gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 144:3625–3631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
309. Corbacho AM, Martinez De La Escalera G, Clapp C 2002 Roles of prolactin and related members of the prolactin/growth hormone/placental lactogen family in angiogenesis. J Endocrinol 173:219–238[Abstract]
310. Gaddy-Kurten D, Richards JS 1991 Regulation of 2-macroglobulin by luteinizing hormone and prolactin during cell differentiation in the rat ovary. Mol Endocrinol 5:1280–1291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
311. Dennis PA, Saksela O, Harpel P, Rifkin DB 1989 2-Macroglobulin is a binding protein for basic fibroblast growth factor. J Biol Chem 264:7210–7216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
312. Rosenfeld CS, Wagner JS, Roberts RM, Lubahn DB 2001 Intraovarian actions of oestrogen. Reproduction 122:215–226[Abstract]
313. Khan I, Belanger A, Chen YD, Gibori G 1985 Influence of high-density lipoprotein on estradiol stimulation of luteal steroidogenesis. Biol Reprod 32:96–104[Abstract]
314. Azhar S, Khan I, Chen YD, Reaven GM, Gibori G 1985 Regulation of luteal cell 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity by estradiol. Biol Reprod 32:333–341[Abstract]
315. Puryear TK, McLean MP, Khan I, Gibori G 1990 Mechanism for control of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and cytochrome P-450 side chain cleavage message and enzyme in the corpus luteum. Endocrinology 126:2910–2918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
316. Townson DH, Wang XJ, Keyes PL, Kostyo JL, Stocco DM 1996 Expression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in the corpus luteum of the rabbit: dependence upon the luteotropic hormone, estradiol-17ß. Biol Reprod 55:868–874[Abstract]
317. Cok SJ, Hay RV, Holt JA 1997 Estrogen-mediated mitochondrial cholesterol transport and metabolism to pregnenolone in the rabbit luteinized ovary. Biol Reprod 57:360–366[Abstract]
318. Tamura H, Greenwald GS 1987 Angiogenesis and its hormonal control in the corpus luteum of the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod 36:1149–1154[Abstract]
319. Bowen-Shauver JM, Gibori G 2003 The corpus luteum of pregnancy. In: Leung PCK, Adashi EY, eds. The ovary. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 201–230
320. Albarracin CT, Palfrey HC, Duan WR, Rao MC, Gibori G 1994 Prolactin regulation of the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase III elongation factor-2 system in the rat corpus luteum. J Biol Chem 269:7772–7776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
321. Takeda H, Chodak G, Mutchnik S, Nakamoto T, Chang C 1990 Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors with mono- and polyclonal antibodies to androgen receptor. J Endocrinol 126:17–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
322. Tetsuka M, Whitelaw PF, Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Smyth CD, Hillier SG 1995 Developmental regulation of androgen receptor in rat ovary. J Endocrinol 145:535–543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
323. Goyeneche AA, Calvo V, Gibori G, Telleria CM 2002 Androstenedione interferes in luteal regression by inhibiting apoptosis and stimulating progesterone production. Biol Reprod 66:1540–1547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
324. Carrizo DG, Rastrilla AM, Telleria CM, Aguado LI 1994 Androstenedione stimulates progesterone production in corpora lutea of pregnant rats: an effect not mediated by oestrogen. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 51:191–197[CrossRef][Medline]
325. Takiguchi S, Sugino N, Kashida S, Yamagata Y, Nakamura Y, Kato H 2000 Rescue of the corpus luteum and an increase in luteal superoxide dismutase expression induced by placental luteotropins in the rat: action of testosterone without conversion to estrogen. Biol Reprod 62:398–403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
326. Telleria CM, Stocco CO, Stati AO, Rastrilla AM, Carrizo DG, Aguado LI, Deis RP 1995 Dual regulation of luteal progesterone production by androstenedione during spontaneous and RU486-induced luteolysis in pregnant rats. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 55:385–393[CrossRef][Medline]
327. Rothchild I 1981 The regulation of the mammalian corpus luteum. Recent Prog Horm Res 37:183–298[Medline]
328. Telleria CM, Deis RP 1994 Effect of RU486 on ovarian progesterone production at pro-oestrus and during pregnancy: a possible dual regulation of the biosynthesis of progesterone. J Reprod Fertil 102:379–384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
329. Sugino N, Telleria CM, Gibori G 1997 Progesterone inhibits 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in the rat corpus luteum through the glucocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 138:4497–4500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
330. Stocco CO, Chedrese J, Deis RP 2001 Luteal expression of cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase genes in late pregnant rats: effect of luteinizing hormone and RU486. Biol Reprod 65:1114–1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
331. Stocco CO, Deis RP 1998 Participation of intraluteal progesterone and prostaglandin F2 in LH-induced luteolysis in pregnant rat. J Endocrinol 156:253–259[Abstract]
332. Telleria CM, Ou J, Sugino N, Ferguson S, Gibori G 1998 The expression of interleukin-6 in the pregnant rat corpus luteum and its regulation by progesterone and glucocorticoid. Endocrinology 139:3597–3605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
333. Goyeneche AA, Deis RP, Gibori G, Telleria CM 2003 Progesterone promotes survival of the rat corpus luteum in the absence of cognate receptors. Biol Reprod 68:151–158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
334. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Hirabayashi K, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M 2000 Progesterone is a cell death suppressor that downregulates Fas expression in rat corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 466:279–282[CrossRef][Medline]
335. Fryer CJ, Kinyamu HK, Rogatsky I, Garabedian MJ, Archer TK 2000 Selective activation of the glucocorticoid receptor by steroid antagonists in human breast cancer and osteosarcoma cells. J Biol Chem 275:17771–17777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
336. Chin EC, Harris TE, Abayasekara DR 2004 Changes in cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and progesterone secretion in luteinizing human granulosa cells. J Endocrinol 183:39–50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
337. Nishimura R, Shibaya M, Skarzynski DJ, Okuda K 2004 Progesterone stimulation by LH involves the phospholipase-C pathway in bovine luteal cells. J Reprod Dev 50:257–261[CrossRef][Medline]
338. Chen Z, Menon KM 1994 Expression of high density lipoprotein-binding protein messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat ovary and its regulation by gonadotropin. Endocrinology 134:2360–2366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
339. Reinhart AJ, Williams SC, Stocco DM 1999 Transcriptional regulation of the StAR gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 151:161–169[CrossRef][Medline]
340. Morishige WK, Pepe GJ, Rothchild I 1973 Serum luteinizing hormone, prolactin and progesterone levels during pregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology 92:1527–1530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
341. Pharriss BB, Wyngarden LJ 1969 The effect of prostaglandin F2 on the progestogen content of ovaries from pseudopregnant rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 130:92–94[CrossRef][Medline]
342. Gutknecht GD, Cornette JC, Pharriss BB 1969 Antifertility properties of prostaglandin F2. Biol Reprod 1:367–371[Abstract]
343. Strauss 3rd JF, Sokoloski J, Caploe P, Duffy P, Mintz G, Stambaugh RL 1975 On the role of prostaglandins in parturition in the rat. Endocrinology 96:1040–1043[Abstract/Free Full Text]
344. Fuchs AR, Smitasiri Y, Chantharaksri U 1976 The effect of indomethacin on uterine contractility and luteal regression in pregnant rats at term. J Reprod Fertil 48:331–340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
345. Sugimoto Y, Yamasaki A, Segi E, Tsuboi K, Aze Y, Nishimura T, Oida H, Yoshida N, Tanaka T, Katsuyama M, Hasumoto K, Murata T, Hirata M, Ushikubi F, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S 1997 Failure of parturition in mice lacking the prostaglandin F receptor. Science 277:681–683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
346. Bonventre JV, Huang Z, Taheri MR, O’Leary E, Li E, Moskowitz MA, Sapirstein A 1997 Reduced fertility and postischaemic brain injury in mice deficient in cytosolic phospholipase A2. Nature 390:622–625[CrossRef][Medline]
347. Uozumi N, Kume K, Nagase T, Nakatani N, Ishii S, Tashiro F, Komagata Y, Maki K, Ikuta K, Ouchi Y, Miyazaki J, Shimizu T 1997 Role of cytosolic phospholipase A2 in allergic response and parturition. Nature 390:618–622[CrossRef][Medline]
348. Reese J, Paria BC, Brown N, Zhao X, Morrow JD, Dey SK 2000 Coordinated regulation of fetal and maternal prostaglandins directs successful birth and postnatal adaptation in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9759–9764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
349. Tsuboi K, Sugimoto Y, Iwane A, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto S, Ichikawa A 2000 Uterine expression of prostaglandin H2 synthase in late pregnancy and during parturition in prostaglandin F receptor-deficient mice. Endocrinology 141:315–324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
350. Gross GA, Imamura T, Luedke C, Vogt SK, Olson LM, Nelson DM, Sadovsky Y, Muglia LJ 1998 Opposing actions of prostaglandins and oxytocin determine the onset of murine labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11875–11879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
351. Reese J, Binart N, Brown N, Ma WG, Paria BC, Das SK, Kelly PA, Dey SK 2000 Implantation and decidualization defects in prolactin receptor (PRLR)-deficient mice are mediated by ovarian but not uterine PRLR. Endocrinology 141:1872–1881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
352. Winchester SK, Imamura T, Gross GA, Muglia LM, Vogt SK, Wright J, Watanabe K, Tai HH, Muglia LJ 2002 Coordinate regulation of prostaglandin metabolism for induction of parturition in mice. Endocrinology 143:2593–2598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
353. Olofsson J, Norjavaara E, Selstam G 1990 In vivo levels of prostaglandin F2, E2 and prostacyclin in the corpus luteum of pregnant and pseudopregnant rats. Biol Reprod 42:792–800[CrossRef][Medline]
354. Arosh JA, Banu SK, Chapdelaine P, Madore E, Sirois J, Fortier MA 2004 Prostaglandin biosynthesis, transport, and signaling in corpus luteum: a basis for autoregulation of luteal function. Endocrinology 145:2551–2560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
355. Hayashi K, Acosta TJ, Berisha B, Kobayashi S, Ohtani M, Schams D, Miyamoto A 2003 Changes in prostaglandin secretion by the regressing bovine corpus luteum. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 70:339–349[CrossRef][Medline]
356. Kurusu S, Kaizo K, Ibashi M, Kawaminami M, Hashimoto I 1999 Luteal phospholipase A2 activity increases during functional and structural luteolysis in pregnant rats. FEBS Lett 454:225–228[CrossRef][Medline]
357. Kurusu S, Sakaguchi S, Kawaminami M, Hashimoto I 2001 Sustained activity of luteal cytosolic phospholipase A2 during luteolysis in pseudopregnant rats: its possible implication in tissue involution. Endocrine 14:337–342[CrossRef][Medline]
358. Cao L, Chan WY 1993 Effects of oxytocin and uterine and luteal prostaglandins on the functional regression of the corpus luteum in pseudopregnant rats. J Reprod Fertil 99:181–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
359. Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC 1997 Prostaglandin F2 induces expression of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 in the ovine corpus luteum: a potential positive feedback loop during luteolysis. Biol Reprod 57:1016–1022[Abstract]
360. Davis JS, Weakland LL, Weiland DA, Farese RV, West LA 1987 Prostaglandin F2 stimulates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis and mobilizes intracellular Ca2+ in bovine luteal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3728–3732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
361. Currie WD, Li W, Baimbridge KG, Yuen BH, Leung PC 1992 Cytosolic free calcium increased by prostaglandin F2 (PGF2), gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and angiotensin II in rat granulosa cells and PGF2 in human granulosa cells. Endocrinology 130:1837–1843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
362. Rodway MR, Steele GL, Baimbridge KG, Leung PC 1992 Prostaglandin F2 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone increase intracellular free calcium in rat granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 84:137–143[CrossRef][Medline]
363. Yamamoto H, Endo T, Kiya T, Goto T, Sagae S, Ito E, Watanabe H, Kudo R 1995 Activation of phospholipase D by prostaglandin F2 in rat luteal cells and effects of inhibitors of arachidonic acid metabolism. Prostaglandins 50:201–211[CrossRef][Medline]
364. Tai CJ, Kang SK, Choi KC, Tzeng CR, Leung PC 2001 Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase in prostaglandin F(2) action in human granulosa-luteal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:375–380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
365. Strauss 3rd JF, Stambaugh RL 1974 Induction of 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in rat corpora lutea of pregnancy by prostaglandin F2. Prostaglandins 5:73–85[Medline]
366. Kawano T, Okamura H, Tajima C, Fukuma K, Katabuchi H 1988 Effect of RU 486 on luteal function in the early pregnant rat. J Reprod Fertil 83:279–285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
367. Bussmann LE, Deis RP 1979 Studies concerning the hormonal induction of lactogenesis by prostaglandin F2 in pregnant rats. J Steroid Biochem 11:1485–1489[CrossRef][Medline]
368. Colles SM, Woodford JK, Moncecchi D, Myers-Payne SC, McLean LR, Billheimer JT, Schroeder F 1995 Cholesterol interaction with recombinant human sterol carrier protein-2. Lipids 30:795–803[Medline]
369. Nackley AC, Shea-Eaton W, Lopez D, McLean MP 2002 Repression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory gene by the multifunctional transcription factor Yin Yang 1. Endocrinology 143:1085–1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
370. Sandhoff TW, McLean MP 1996 Prostaglandin F2a reduces steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the rat ovary. Endocrine 5:183–190[CrossRef]
371. Shea-Eaton W, Sandhoff TW, Lopez D, Hales DB, McLean MP 2002 Transcriptional repression of the rat steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein gene by the AP-1 family member c-Fos. Mol Cell Endocrinol 188:161–170[CrossRef][Medline]
372. Shea-Eaton W, Lopez D, McLean MP 2001 Yin yang 1 protein negatively regulates high-density lipoprotein receptor gene transcription by disrupting binding of sterol regulatory element binding protein to the sterol regulatory element. Endocrinology 142:49–58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
373. Telleria CM, Parmer TG, Zhong L, Clarke DL, Albarracin CT, Duan WR, Linzer DI, Gibori G 1997 The different forms of the prolactin receptor in the rat corpus luteum: developmental expression and hormonal regulation in pregnancy. Endocrinology 138:4812–4820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
374. Behrman HR, Grinwich DL, Hichens M 1976 Studies on the mechanism of PGF2 and gonadotropin interactions on LH receptor function in corpora lutea during luteolysis. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res 2:655–666[Medline]
375. Dorflinger LJ, Luborsky JL, Gore SD, Behrman HR 1983 Inhibitory characteristics of prostaglandin F2 in the rat luteal cell. Mol Cell Endocrinol 33:225–241[CrossRef][Medline]
376. Dorflinger LJ, Albert PJ, Williams AT, Behrman HR 1984 Calcium is an inhibitor of luteinizing hormone-sensitive adenylate cyclase in the luteal cell. Endocrinology 114:1208–1215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
377. Lahav M, Rennert H, Sabag K, Barzilai D 1987 Calmodulin inhibitors and 8-(N,N-diethylamino)-octyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate do not prevent the inhibitory effect of prostaglandin F2 on cyclic AMP production in isolated rat corpora lutea. J Endocrinol 113:205–212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
378. Lahav M, Shariki-Sabag K, Rennert H 1989 Lack of effect by prostaglandin F2 and verapamil on calcium uptake by isolated corpora lutea from pseudopregnant rats. Biochem Pharmacol 38:546–548[CrossRef][Medline]
379. Lahav M, Davis JS, Rennert H 1989 Mechanism of the luteolytic action of prostaglandin F2 in the rat. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 37:233–240[Medline]
380. Pepperell JR, Preston SL, Behrman HR 1989 The antigonadotropic action of prostaglandin F2 is not mediated by elevated cytosolic calcium levels in rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 125:144–151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
381. Musicki B, Aten RF, Behrman HR 1990 The antigonadotropic actions of prostaglandin F2 and phorbol ester are mediated by separate processes in rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 126:1388–1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
382. Bjurulf E, Toffia O, Selstam G, Olofsson JI 1998 Luteolysis induced by a prostaglandin F2 analogue occurs independently of prolactin in the rat. Biol Reprod 59:17–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
383. Zetser A, Kisliouk T, Ivakin E, Lahav M 2001 Dependence on prolactin of the luteolytic effect of prostaglandin F2 in rat luteal cell cultures. Biol Reprod 65:1082–1091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
384. Stocco C, Djiane J, Gibori G 2003 Prostaglandin (PG) F2 and prolactin signaling: PGF2-mediated inhibition of prolactin receptor expression in the corpus luteum. Endocrinology 144:3301–3305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
385. Curlewis JD, Tam SP, Lau P, Kusters DH, Barclay JL, Anderson ST, Waters MJ 2002 A prostaglandin F2 analog induces suppressors of cytokine signaling-3 expression in the corpus luteum of the pregnant rat: a potential new mechanism in luteolysis. Endocrinology 143:3984–3993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
386. Stocco C 2004 In vivo and in vitro inhibition of cyp19 gene expression by prostaglandin F2 in murine luteal cells: implication of GATA-4. Endocrinology 145:4957–4966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
387. Behrman HR, Kodaman PH, Preston SL, Gao S 2001 Oxidative stress and the ovary. J Soc Gynecol Investig 8:S40–S42
388. Musicki B, Kodaman PH, Aten RF, Behrman HR 1996 Endocrine regulation of ascorbic acid transport and secretion in luteal cells. Biol Reprod 54:399–406[Abstract]
389. Aten RF, Kolodecik TR, Rossi MJ, Debusscher C, Behrman HR 1998 Prostaglandin F2 treatment in vivo, but not in vitro, stimulates protein kinase C-activated superoxide production by nonsteroidogenic cells of the rat corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 59:1069–1076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
390. Sawada M, Carlson JC 1991 Rapid plasma membrane changes in superoxide radical formation, fluidity, and phospholipase A2 activity in the corpus luteum of the rat during induction of luteolysis. Endocrinology 128:2992–2998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
391. Minegishi K, Tanaka M, Nishimura O, Tanigaki S, Miyakoshi K, Ishimoto H, Yoshimura Y 2002 Reactive oxygen species mediate leukocyte-endothelium interactions in prostaglandin F2 -induced luteolysis in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283:E1308–E1315
392. Foyouzi N, Cai Z, Sugimoto Y, Stocco C 2005 Changes in the expression of steroidogenic and antioxidant genes in the mouse corpus luteum during luteolysis. Biol Reprod 72:1134–1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
393. Tanaka M, Miyazaki T, Tanigaki S, Kasai K, Minegishi K, Miyakoshi K, Ishimoto H, Yoshimura Y 2000 Participation of reactive oxygen species in PGF2-induced apoptosis in rat luteal cells. J Reprod Fertil 120:239–245[Abstract]
394. Riley JC, Behrman HR 1991 In vivo generation of hydrogen peroxide in the rat corpus luteum during luteolysis. Endocrinology 128:1749–1753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
395. Binda MM, Molinas CR, Koninckx PR 2003 Reactive oxygen species and adhesion formation: clinical implications in adhesion prevention. Hum Reprod 18:2503–2507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
396. Pang CY, Behrman HR 1981 Acute effects of prostaglandin F2 an ovarian and luteal blood flow, luteal gonadotropin uptake in vivo, and gonadotropin binding in vitro. Endocrinology 108:2239–2244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
397. Janson O, Albrecht I, Ahren K 1975 Effects of prostaglandin F2 on ovarian blood flow and vascular resistance in the pseudopregnant rabbit. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 79:337–350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
398. Motta AB, Estevez A, de Gimeno MF 1999 The involvement of nitric oxide in corpus luteum regression in the rat: feedback mechanism between prostaglandin F2 and nitric oxide. Mol Hum Reprod 5:1011–1016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
399. Khanna A, Aten RF, Behrman HR 1995 Heat shock protein-70 induction mediates luteal regression in the rat. Mol Endocrinol 9:1431–1440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
400. Motta AB, Estevez A, Tognetti T, Gimeno MA, Franchi AM 2001 Dual effects of nitric oxide in functional and regressing rat corpus luteum. Mol Hum Reprod 7:43–47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
401. Khanna A, Aten RF, Behrman HR 1995 Physiological and pharmacological inhibitors of luteinizing hormone-dependent steroidogenesis induce heat shock protein-70 in rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 136:1775–1781[Abstract]
402. Khanna A, Aten RF, Behrman HR 1994 Heat shock protein induction blocks hormone-sensitive steroidogenesis in rat luteal cells. Steroids 59:4–9[CrossRef][Medline]
403. Plas-Roser S, Muller B, Aron C 1988 Estradiol involvement in the luteolytic action of LH during the estrous cycle in the rat. Exp Clin Endocrinol 92:145–153[Medline]
404. Gordon WL, Sherwood OD 1982 Evidence that luteinizing hormone from the maternal pituitary gland may promote antepartum release of relaxin, luteolysis, and birth in rats. Endocrinology 111:1299–1310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
405. Stocco CO, Deis RP 1996 Luteolytic effect of LH: inhibition of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and stimulation of 20-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase luteal activities in late pregnant rats. J Endocrinol 150:423–429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
406. Yoshinaga K 1974 Ovarian progestin secretion in lactating rats: effect of intrabursal injection of prolactin antiserum, prolactin and LH. Endocrinology 94:829–834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
407. Stocco CO, Deis RP 1999 Luteinizing hormone inhibits conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone in luteal cells from rats on day 19 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 60:729–732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
408. Gupta S 2003 Molecular signaling in death receptor and mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis (review). Int J Oncol 22:15–20[Medline]
409. Sartorius U, Schmitz I, Krammer PH 2001 Molecular mechanisms of death-receptor-mediated apoptosis. Chembiochem 2:20–29[Medline]
410. Earnshaw WC, Martins LM, Kaufmann SH 1999 Mammalian caspases: structure, activation, substrates, and functions during apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem 68:383–424[CrossRef][Medline]
411. Borner C 2003 The Bcl-2 protein family: sensors and checkpoints for life-or-death decisions. Mol Immunol 39:615–647[CrossRef][Medline]
412. Khan SM, Dauffenbach LM, Yeh J 2000 Mitochondria and caspases in induced apoptosis in human luteinized granulosa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 269:542–545[CrossRef][Medline]
413. Yang H, Bhat GK, Sridaran R 2002 Clinostat rotation induces apoptosis in luteal cells of the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod 66:770–777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
414. Goyeneche AA, Harmon JM, Telleria CM 2006 Cell death induced by serum deprivation in luteal cells involves the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Reproduction 131:103–111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
415. Boone DL, Tsang BK 1998 Caspase-3 in the rat ovary: localization and possible role in follicular atresia and luteal regression. Biol Reprod 58:1533–1539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
416. Slot KA, Voorendt M, de Boer-Brouwer M, van Vugt HH, Teerds KJ 2006 Estrous cycle dependent changes in expression and distribution of Fas, Fas ligand, Bcl-2, Bax, and pro- and active caspase-3 in the rat ovary. J Endocrinol 188:179–192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
417. Carambula SF, Matikainen T, Lynch MP, Flavell RA, Goncalves PB, Tilly JL, Rueda BR 2002 Caspase-3 is a pivotal mediator of apoptosis during regression of the ovarian corpus luteum. Endocrinology 143:1495–1501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
418. Gaytan F, Morales C, Bellido C, Sanchez-Criado JE 2002 Selective apoptosis of luteal endothelial cells in dexamethasone-treated rats leads to ischemic necrosis of luteal tissue. Biol Reprod 66:232–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
419. Fraser HM, Lunn SF, Harrison DJ, Kerr JB 1999 Luteal regression in the primate: different forms of cell death during natural and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist or prostaglandin analogue-induced luteolysis. Biol Reprod 61:1468–1479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
420. Morales C, Garcia-Pardo L, Reymundo C, Bellido C, Sanchez-Criado JE, Gaytan F 2000 Different patterns of structural luteolysis in the human corpus luteum of menstruation. Hum Reprod 15:2119–2128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
421. Roughton SA, Lareu RR, Bittles AH, Dharmarajan AM 1999 Fas and Fas ligand messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression in the rat corpus luteum during apoptosis-mediated luteolysis. Biol Reprod 60:797–804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
422. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Bannai M, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M 1999 Fas/Fas ligand system in prolactin-induced apoptosis in rat corpus luteum: possible role of luteal immune cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 260:167–173[CrossRef][Medline]
423. Carambula SF, Pru JK, Lynch MP, Matikainen T, Goncalves PB, Flavell RA, Tilly JL, Rueda BR 2003 Prostaglandin F2- and FAS-activating antibody-induced regression of the corpus luteum involves caspase-8 and is defective in caspase-3 deficient mice. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:15[CrossRef][Medline]
424. Yadav VK, Lakshmi G, Medhamurthy R 2005 Prostaglandin F2-mediated activation of apoptotic signaling cascades in the corpus luteum during apoptosis: involvement of caspase-activated DNase. J Biol Chem 280:10357–10367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
425. Ricke WA, Smith GW, McIntush EW, Smith MF 2002 Analysis of luteal tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, -2, and -3 during prostaglandin F(2)-induced luteolysis. Biol Reprod 66:1387–1394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
426. Malven PV, Sawyer CH 1966 A luteolytic action of prolactin in hypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology 79:268–274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
427. Bowen JM, Keyes PL, Warren JS, Townson DH 1996 Prolactin-induced regression of the rat corpus luteum: expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and invasion of macrophages. Biol Reprod 54:1120–1127[Abstract]
428. Gaytan F, Morales C, Bellido C, Aguilar R, Millan Y, Martin De Las Mulas J, Sanchez-Criado JE 2000 Progesterone on an oestrogen background enhances prolactin-induced apoptosis in regressing corpora lutea in the cyclic rat: possible involvement of luteal endothelial cell progesterone receptors. J Endocrinol 165:715–724[Abstract]
429. Malven PV, Cousar GJ, Row EH 1969 Structural luteolysis in hypophysectomized rats. Am J Physiol 216:421–424[Free Full Text]
430. Malven PV 1969 Luteotrophic and luteolytic responses to prolactin in hypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology 84:1224–1229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
431. Taya K, Greenwald GS 1982 In vivo and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in the long term hypophysectomized rat. Endocrinology 110:390–397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
432. Matsuyama S, Chang KT, Kanuka H, Ohnishi M, Ikeda A, Nishihara M, Takahashi M 1996 Occurrence of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation during prolactin-induced structural luteolysis in cycling rats. Biol Reprod 54:1245–1251[Abstract]
433. Bole-Feysot C, Goffin V, Edery M, Binart N, Kelly PA 1998 Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev 19:225–268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
434. Kanuka H, Matsuyama S, Ohnishi M, Matsumoto Y, Nishihara M, Takahashi M 1997 Prolactin expresses differential effects on apoptotic cell death of luteal cells in vivo and in vitro. Endocr J 44:11–22[Medline]
435. Goyeneche AA, Martinez IL, Deis RP, Gibori G, Telleria CM 2003 In vivo hormonal environment leads to differential susceptibility of the corpus luteum to apoptosis in vitro. Biol Reprod 68:2322–2330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
436. Clevenger CV, Freier DO, Kline JB 1998 Prolactin receptor signal transduction in cells of the immune system. J Endocrinol 157:187–197[CrossRef][Medline]
437. Brannstrom M, Giesecke L, Moore IC, van den Heuvel CJ, Robertson SA 1994 Leukocyte subpopulations in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and pseudopregnancy. Biol Reprod 50:1161–1167[Abstract]
438. Hehnke KE, Christenson LK, Ford SP, Taylor M 1994 Macrophage infiltration into the porcine corpus luteum during prostaglandin F2-induced luteolysis. Biol Reprod 50:10–15[Abstract]
439. Suzuki T, Sasano H, Takaya R, Fukaya T, Yajima A, Date F, Nagura H 1998 Leukocytes in normal-cycling human ovaries: immunohistochemical distribution and characterization. Hum Reprod 13:2186–2191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
440. Gaytan F, Morales C, Bellido C, Aguilar E, Sanchez-Criado JE 1997 Role of prolactin in the regulation of macrophages and in the proliferative activity of vascular cells in newly formed and regressing rat corpora lutea. Biol Reprod 57:478–486[Abstract]
441. Olson KK, Townson DH 2000 Prolactin-induced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and the accumulation of monocytes/macrophages during regression of the rat corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 62:1571–1578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
442. Olson KK, Anderson LE, Wiltbank MC, Townson DH 2001 Actions of prostaglandin F2 and prolactin on intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression and monocyte/macrophage accumulation in the rat corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 64:890–897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
443. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Furuhata Y, Yonezawa T, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M 2000 Requirement of the Fas ligand-expressing luteal immune cells for regression of corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 472:137–142[CrossRef][Medline]
444. Endo T, Aten RF, Wang F, Behrman HR 1993 Coordinate induction and activation of metalloproteinase and ascorbate depletion in structural luteolysis. Endocrinology 133:690–698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
445. Endo T, Kiya T, Kitajima Y, Honnma H, Chida M, Hayashi T, Henmi H, Yamazaki K, Hayashi T, Manase K, Kudo R 2005 Identical changes in Bax expression, but not Fas ligand expression, occur in structural luteolysis in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist- and prolactin-treated superovulated rats. Life Sci 76:2159–2169[CrossRef][Medline]
446. Goto T, Endo T, Henmi H, Kitajima Y, Kiya T, Nishikawa A, Manase K, Sato H, Kudo R 1999 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist has the ability to induce increased matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and membrane type 1-MMP expression in corpora lutea, and structural luteolysis in rats. J Endocrinol 161:393–402[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R S Robinson, K J Woad, A J Hammond, M Laird, M G Hunter, and G E Mann Angiogenesis and vascular function in the ovary Reproduction, December 1, 2009; 138(6): 869 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Edson, A. K. Nagaraja, and M. M. Matzuk The Mammalian Ovary from Genesis to Revelation Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2009; 30(6): 624 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Clapp, S. Thebault, M. C. Jeziorski, and G. Martinez De La Escalera Peptide Hormone Regulation of Angiogenesis Physiol Rev, October 1, 2009; 89(4): 1177 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T Anderson, N. N M Isa, J. L Barclay, M. J Waters, and J. D Curlewis Maximal expression of suppressors of cytokine signaling in the rat ovary occurs in late pregnancy Reproduction, September 1, 2009; 138(3): 537 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bachelot, J. Beaufaron, N. Servel, C. Kedzia, P. Monget, P. A. Kelly, G. Gibori, and N. Binart Prolactin independent rescue of mouse corpus luteum life span: identification of prolactin and luteinizing hormone target genes Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2009; 297(3): E676 - E684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. S. Devi, A. Shehu, C. Stocco, J. Halperin, J. Le, A. M. Seibold, M. Lahav, N. Binart, and G. Gibori Regulation of Transcription Factors and Repression of Sp1 by Prolactin Signaling Through the Short Isoform of Its Cognate Receptor Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3327 - 3335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Peters, D. D. Seachrist, R. A. Keri, and G. C. Sen The double-stranded RNA-binding protein, PACT, is required for postnatal anterior pituitary proliferation PNAS, June 30, 2009; 106(26): 10696 - 10701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Jimenez-Krassel, J.K. Folger, J.L.H. Ireland, G.W. Smith, X. Hou, J.S. Davis, P. Lonergan, A.C.O. Evans, and J.J. Ireland Evidence That High Variation in Ovarian Reserves of Healthy Young Adults Has a Negative Impact on the Corpus Luteum and Endometrium During Estrous Cycles in Cattle Biol Reprod, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 1272 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Gaytan, M. Gaytan, J. M. Castellano, M. Romero, J. Roa, B. Aparicio, N. Garrido, J. E. Sanchez-Criado, R. P. Millar, A. Pellicer, et al. KiSS-1 in the mammalian ovary: distribution of kisspeptin in human and marmoset and alterations in KiSS-1 mRNA levels in a rat model of ovulatory dysfunction Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2009; 296(3): E520 - E531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Li, F. Jimenez-Krassel, J. J Ireland, and G. W Smith Gene expression profiling of bovine preovulatory follicles: gonadotropin surge and prostanoid-dependent up-regulation of genes potentially linked to the ovulatory process Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Ben-Ami, L. Armon, S. Freimann, D. Strassburger, R. Ron-El, and A. Amsterdam EGF-like growth factors as LH mediators in the human corpus luteum Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 176 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Myers, S. van den Driesche, A. S McNeilly, and W C. Duncan Activin A reduces luteinisation of human luteinised granulosa cells and has opposing effects to human chorionic gonadotropin in vitro J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 199(2): 201 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-Y. Fan, Z. Liu, N. Cahill, and J. S. Richards Targeted Disruption of Pten in Ovarian Granulosa Cells Enhances Ovulation and Extends the Life Span of Luteal Cells Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 22(9): 2128 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Anupriwan, M. Schenk, K. Kongmanas, R. Vanichviriyakit, D. Costa Santos, A. Yaghoubian, F. Liu, A. Wu, T. Berger, K. F. Faull, et al. Presence of Arylsulfatase A and Sulfogalactosylglycerolipid in Mouse Ovaries: Localization to the Corpus Luteum Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 3942 - 3951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gonzalez-Fernandez, E. Martinez-Galisteo, F. Gaytan, J. A. Barcena, and J. E. Sanchez-Criado Changes in the Proteome of Functional and Regressing Corpus Luteum During Pregnancy and Lactation in the Rat Biol Reprod, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 100 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Zhao, A. De, Z. Hu, J. Li, S. M. Mulders, M. D. Sollewijn Gelpke, E.-K. Duan, and A. J. W. Hsueh Gonadotropin Stimulation of Ovarian Fractalkine Expression and Fractalkine Augmentation of Progesterone Biosynthesis by Luteinizing Granulosa Cells Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 2782 - 2789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.-S. Park, S. Choi, K. N. Muse, T. E. Curry Jr., and M. Jo Response Gene to Complement 32 Expression Is Induced by the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Surge and Regulated by LH-Induced Mediators in the Rodent Ovary Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 3025 - 3036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-U. Chen, C.-H. Chou, H. Lee, C.-H. Ho, C.-W. Lin, and Y.-S. Yang Lysophosphatidic Acid Up-Regulates Expression of Interleukin-8 and -6 in Granulosa-Lutein Cells through Its Receptors and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Dependent Pathways: Implications for Angiogenesis of Corpus Luteum and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 935 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans? Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Hou, E. W. Arvisais, C. Jiang, D.-b. Chen, S. K. Roy, J. L. Pate, T. R. Hansen, B. R. Rueda, and J. S. Davis Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Stimulates the Expression and Secretion of Transforming Growth Factor B1 Via Induction of the Early Growth Response 1 Gene (EGR1) in the Bovine Corpus Luteum Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 403 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Del Canto, W. Sierralta, P. Kohen, A. Munoz, J. F. Strauss III, and L. Devoto Features of Natural and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist-Induced Corpus Luteum Regression and Effects of in Vivo Human Chorionic Gonadotropin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4436 - 4443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Peluffo, R. L. Stouffer, and M. Tesone Activity and expression of different members of the caspase family in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and postpartum Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1215 - E1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Stocco, J. Kwintkiewicz, and Z. Cai Identification of regulatory elements in the Cyp19 proximal promoter in rat luteal cells J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 39(4): 211 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Miranda-Jimenez and B. D. Murphy Lipoprotein receptor expression during luteinization of the ovarian follicle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2007; 293(4): E1053 - E1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stocco, C. Articles by Gibori, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stocco, C. Articles by Gibori, G.