help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2005-0018
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Endocrine Reviews 27 (4): 331-355
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes

Gaurang S. Daftary and Hugh S. Taylor

Yale University School of Medicine, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Hugh S. Taylor, Yale University School of Medicine, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208063, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063. E-mail: hugh.taylor{at}yale.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
Hox genes have a well-characterized role in embryonic development, where they determine identity along the anteroposterior body axis. Hox genes are expressed not only during embryogenesis but also in the adult, where they are necessary for functional differentiation. Despite the known function of these genes as transcription factors, few regulatory mechanisms that drive Hox expression are known. Recently, several hormones and their cognate receptors have been shown to regulate Hox gene expression and thereby mediate development in the embryo as well as functional differentiation in the adult organism. Estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, retinoic acid, and vitamin D have been shown to regulate Hox gene expression. In the embryo, the endocrine system directs axial Hox gene expression; aberrant Hox gene expression due to exposure to endocrine disruptors contributes to the teratogenicity of these compounds. In the adult, endocrine regulation of Hox genes is necessary to enable such diverse functions as hematopoiesis and reproduction; endocrinopathies can result in dysregulated HOX gene expression affecting physiology. By regulating HOX genes, hormonal signals utilize a conserved mechanism that allows generation of structural and functional diversity in both developing and adult tissues. This review discusses endocrine Hox regulation and its impact on physiology and human pathology.

I. Introduction
II. HOX Gene Structure and Function
A. Structural organization
B. Developmental function
C. Adult function

III. Regulation of HOX Gene Expression in Development
A. Retinoic acid
B. Estrogen
C. Vitamin D

IV. Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes in the Adult Reproductive Tract
A. Estrogen
B. Progesterone
C. Testosterone
D. Vitamin D

V. Endocrine Disruption of HOX Gene Expression in Development
A. Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
B. Methoxychlor
C. Bisphenol A
D. Phytoestrogens

VI. Targets of HOX Gene Transcriptional Regulation
A. EMX2
B. ß3 Integrin
C. IGFBP-1
D. EP3 and EP4

VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional Cofactors
VIII. Conclusion


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
HOMEOBOX (Hox) GENES ARE evolutionarily conserved and necessary for body axis patterning during embryogenesis. In the developing embryo, the anteroposterior expression of the homeobox genes along the body axis parallels their chromosomal 3' to 5' alignment (1, 2). The expression of a particular set of Hox genes regulates development in a segment-specific pattern. In the adult, many organ systems retain developmental plasticity, displaying ongoing proliferation, differentiation, and degeneration of multiple cell types. Hox genes are expressed in such adult tissues, where they likely mediate differentiation, necessary for the functional capability of these tissues.

Although Hox genes have a well-characterized role in cell fate specification, little is known about their regulation or mechanism of action. Recently, members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and their cognate ligands have been shown to regulate Hox gene expression in both embryonic and adult tissues. Endocrine regulation of Hox genes during embryogenesis determines the axial expression of various homeobox genes, necessary for body axis formation. In the adult, endocrine-regulated Hox gene expression is necessary for functional differentiation.

Hox genes are ubiquitously expressed and likely regulate many developmental programs. This review discusses the role of hormone-driven Hox signal transduction pathways during both embryonic and adult development, as well as the consequences of disrupted endocrine signaling. Although homeobox genes likely activate a plethora of target genes, only those Hox targets that serve as effectors in well-defined endocrine-Hox gene signaling pathways are specifically discussed here. An understanding of the developmental roles of Hox genes, their endocrine regulation, and consequent effects on pathophysiology offers potential for development of novel targeted therapies.


    II. HOX Gene Structure and Function
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
A. Structural organization
Homeobox genes are a highly evolutionarily conserved set of genes that arose from a single ancestral cluster by duplication (3). First described in Drosophila melanogaster, these genes provide developmental identity to all of the various body segments of the fly. Drosophila has eight homeobox genes clustered in one region of its genome, referred to collectively as the homeotic complex, HOM-C (4). Vertebrate genomes also contain clustered homeobox genes, termed Hox genes in nonhuman vertebrates and HOX genes in humans. There are at least 39 Hox/HOX genes. In the mouse and human, they occur in four separate clusters: A, B, C, and D. These are located on chromosomes 6, 11, 15, and 2, respectively, in mice and 7, 17, 12, and 2, respectively, in humans (2). Each cluster is composed of 9–13 genes.

Their nomenclature derives from a shared, highly conserved 183-bp sequence known as the homeobox, which encodes a 61-amino acid domain, termed the homeodomain. Structurally the homeodomain comprises a helix-turn-helix motif that binds target gene enhancers using binding sites containing the consensus core sequence 5'-TAAT-3' (5, 6). Because HOX genes encode transcription factors, such binding results in target gene activation or repression. There is a high degree of homology between vertebrate Hox genes and Drosophila homeobox genes that is based mainly on sequence similarity in the homeodomain, although many Hox genes have conserved sequences outside this region (7).

The genes of the HOM-C are organized along the chromosome in an order that parallels their expression along the anterior-posterior body axis; this relationship is known as colinearity (8). (Fig. 1Go). Genes expressed at the 3' end of the cluster are expressed earlier during embryogenesis and in more rostral body segments compared with genes at the 5' end, which are expressed later and in more caudal body segments. For example, the most 3' gene in the HOM-C, labial, is expressed most anteriorly in the developing head, mainly in the hypopharyngeal organ and the mandibular lobe. It is also expressed earliest during development (9). It is likely that the clustered arrangement of Hox genes directs temporal and spatial expression and also serves as a mechanism enabling homeobox genes to convey regional body patterning.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the genomic organization of the mammalian HOX clusters and their embryonic expression pattern. Although more 3' HOX genes are expressed in the rostral and anterior regions of the body axis, the more 5' HOX genes are expressed caudally and in more posterior regions. For each HOX domain of expression, the colored fields represent the characteristically well-defined anteriormost limits of expression. Posteriorly in each domain the HOX expression levels fade so that the boundaries of each expression domain overlap in more caudal regions. The anterior limit of the next most 5' located HOX gene therefore overlaps the fading posterior expression of its immediate 3' precedent. Several of the posterior HOXA and HOXD genes are also expressed in the limb primordia.

 
Each vertebrate Hox gene cluster comprises up to 13 genes, numbered 1 through 13 according to their chromosomal 3' to 5' order of alignment. As in Drosophila, the genes in each of the vertebrate clusters demonstrate a similar spatial and temporal colinearity (1, 10). For example, the Hox/HOX gene homologs of the 5' Drosophila Abdominal B (Abd-B) gene are likewise expressed in the posterior and distal segments of the body. Whereas the term orthologous refers to homologs across various species, vertebrate Hox genes that are homologous to the same Drosophila gene (and therefore to each other) are known as paralogous genes or paralogs. In vertebrate Hox gene nomenclature, numerically corresponding genes from each of the four clusters are considered paralogs and are expressed in parallel and overlapping expression domains. Unlike Drosophila, which has a single Hox cluster, the presence of paralogous genes in vertebrates confers the potential for genetic redundancy.

HOX genes act as selector genes in that their expression within a certain body segment determines one particular pathway of development over another (3). The identity of an individual body segment is largely determined by the combination of HOX genes expressed. The segment-specific combination of HOX genes is known as the HOX code, and it is the genetic basis that determines the phenotype of nascent tissues. When a homeobox gene is mutated, the body segment where it is normally expressed typically develops characteristics of the segment immediately anterior to it, an effect known as anterior transformation. Although the anterior limit of expression of each Hox gene is clearly demarcated, posteriorly the expression levels gradually decline. The anterior limit of expression of the adjacent 5' Hox gene overlaps this fading posterior expression of its 3' precedent (Fig. 1Go). When a Hox gene is mutated, the trailing expression gradient of the adjacent 3' Hox gene influences differentiation within the domain of the mutant gene so that the phenotype resembles that determined by the expressed immediately anterior 3' gene. The end result is a shift in phenotype toward an anterior structure. Occasionally, the gene posterior to the mutated gene dominates function, resulting in a posterior transformation.

In contrast to Drosophila, where mutation of a single homeotic gene results in a dramatic phenotypic transformation, in vertebrates targeted mutation in a single Hox gene, usually causes only a subtle transformation to resemble more anterior tissues (10, 11). This is because, compared with the eight genes of the Drosophila HOM-C complex, the 39 mammalian homeotic genes confer genetic duplication. Loss of function of a single mutated gene may be compensated for by a paralog (12). Functional redundancy also occurs between genes that are adjacent to each other in the same cluster and therefore have overlapping domains of expression (13). Therefore, in mammals, double and triple mutants of paralogous genes result in more severe transformation or absence of a structure normally present within the expression domain of the paralogous genes (14, 15).

B. Developmental function
Although there is a relative lack of naturally occurring murine and human Hox gene mutations, targeted disruption of HOX gene loci have revealed a consistent role in development and patterning of the body axis during embryogenesis. In Drosophila, for example, loss of function of the 3' HOM-C gene labial results in a failure of embryonic head involution, manifest as disorganization of such cranial structures as the salivary glands and the cephalopharyngeal apparatus. In adults, a posterior transformation of the dorsal head to a more thoracic identity is observed (16). Similarly, in Xenopus, misexpression of a posteriorly expressed homeobox gene (XIHbox 6) caused respecification of anteroposterior identity, by transforming head mesoderm into tail-inducing mesoderm (17). Developmental transformations are also seen in mice after targeted disruption of a Hox gene.

The endocrine regulation of HOX gene expression is best characterized in the reproductive tract, and this review will focus primarily on those tissues. The differentiation of the embryonic anlagen of the male and female reproductive tracts is gender-specific. In the male, the presence of a Y chromosome is associated with the expression of testicular determinant factors such as the sex-determining region Y gene (SRY), which directs differentiation of the fetal gonads into testes; absence of testicular-determining factors results in ovarian differentiation (18). In turn, the fetal testes secrete a Müllerian-inhibiting substance to suppress development of female internal genitalia and testosterone, which directs mesonephric duct differentiation into male genital structures such as the epididymis, vas deferens, and seminal vesicles (19). In the female, in the absence of testicular testosterone and Müllerian-inhibiting substance, the paramesonephric duct differentiates into the fallopian tube, uterus, cervix, and upper vagina. Evidence for the role of HOX genes in reproductive tract development is apparent in the phenotypes of mice deficient for the caudally expressed Hox genes Hoxa10 or Hoxa11 (20, 21).

In wild-type male mice, the epididymis is a single, coiled tubule comprised of three regions craniocaudally: the caput, corpora, and cauda. The ductus deferens arises from the cauda as a wide, straight tubule. In Hoxa10(–/–) mice, anterior transformation is manifest as cranialization of the corpora to a more caput-like phenotype, as well as of the proximal ductus deferens to a more caudal-like phenotype (22). A similar phenotype is also seen in Hoxa11 (–/–) male mice (21). Likewise, in female Hoxa10 (–/–) mice, the proximal portion of the uterus is transformed into a narrower tubular structure that morphologically resembles and transitions into the adjacent oviduct (22). As expected, deficient expression of a single mammalian Hox gene results in subtler developmental defects than are seen in Drosophila (22, 23). As discussed above, this is likely due to genetic redundancy from expression of paralogous Hox genes within the same domains of expression. However, as discussed above, in keeping with their collinear pattern of expression, the observed phenotypic defects in mice are nevertheless suggestive of anterior transformation, as seen in Drosophila.

The linear pattern of expression of the Abd-B orthologous Hox genes along the murine paramesonephric duct changes temporally with differentiation of the female reproductive tract. On embryonic d 15.5 through 19, the paramesonephric duct is morphologically undifferentiated and homogenous in appearance. Corresponding to this undifferentiated state, a uniform pattern of Hox gene expression is observed along the length of the paramesonephric duct, including the genes Hoxa9, Hoxa10, Hoxa11, and Hoxa13 (24, 25). In contrast, at postnatal wk 2 of age, corresponding to the time of maximal differentiation of the female reproductive tract, the previously uniform Hox gene expression becomes spatially restricted along the length of the paramesonephric duct. As expected, the spatial domain of expression of each of the Hox genes in this group corresponds craniocaudally with their chromosomal 3' to 5' order.

Accordingly, Hoxa9 is expressed in the rostral oviducts, but not in the more caudally differentiating uterus, cervix, or vagina. Hoxa10 is expressed in the relatively more caudal uterine epithelium, stroma, and muscle. Hoxa11 is expressed in the uterus as well as extending further caudally in the cervical glands and squamous epithelium, whereas Hoxa13 expression is caudally primarily restricted to vaginal epithelium (24).

C. Adult function
1. Endometrial receptivity.
Although the HOX genes have a well-characterized role in embryogenesis and anteroposterior axis specification, the function of their expression in the adult is still the subject of active investigation. We have proposed that HOX genes enable the retention of developmental plasticity in certain tissues that continue to undergo rapid developmental changes in the adult. The cells of adult tissues such as the female reproductive tract and hematopoietic system exhibit a cyclic turnover, where regenerating stem cells progressively achieve functional capability through terminal differentiation. In contrast to cell replacement and repair that commonly occur in many adult cell types, cyclic uterine endometrial regeneration involves simultaneous proliferation and differentiation of multiple cell lineages such as epithelium, stroma, and endothelium. Such coordinated development among the constituent cell types results in a tissue that is functionally capable of allowing embryo implantation during the narrow window of receptivity; failure of implantation results in apoptosis and degeneration, followed by another cycle of programmed development. In tissues such as the endometrium, the process of terminal differentiation is similar to cell fate specification during embryogenesis, wherein structurally and functionally independent tissues arise from undifferentiated cells. Hox genes have a well-characterized role in cell fate specification; commensurate with this property, these genes likely regulate adult functional differentiation through similar mechanisms as used in development (26, 27, 28, 29). Furthermore, in adult tissues, as in embryogenesis, HOX genes are regulated by several hormones acting via their cognate receptors. Here, we consider the function of HOX genes in the hematopoietic and female reproductive systems wherein they function as part of endocrine signal transduction pathways, mediating functional differentiation.

In the adult female reproductive tract, Hoxa10 and Hoxa11 have evolved a unique temporal pattern of expression consistent with their role in functional differentiation of the endometrium. Their temporal and spatial expression patterns in the adult are distinct from those during paramesonephric tract differentiation, discussed in the previous section (20, 22, 28). During each reproductive cycle, adult tissues such as the uterine epithelium and stroma display a well-defined pattern of functional differentiation that is necessary for successful pregnancy. Initial proliferation is followed by differentiation leading to a receptive state for embryo implantation. In the absence of implantation, however, apoptosis and degeneration of the uterine endometrium is observed, followed by the onset of a new reproductive cycle. From the phenotype of animals with sex steroid receptor loss of function mutations, it is evident that both estrogen and progesterone signaling is necessary for the physiology of the reproductive cycle (30, 31). Hox genes mediate some functions of sex steroids during each reproductive cycle.

HOXA10 and HOXA11 demonstrate a dynamic temporal pattern of expression in adult uterine epithelium through the reproductive cycle (28, 29). HOXA10 and HOXA11 mRNA are each expressed in human endometrial epithelium as well as stroma, throughout the menstrual cycle, with significantly higher levels of expression in the mid- and late secretory phases (28, 29, 32). The midsecretory phase coincides with the time of embryo implantation, histological peak differentiation, and high systemic levels of estrogen and progesterone. Elevated endometrial levels of expression of HOXA10 and HOXA11 therefore correspond with peak functional differentiation in this tissue. In the absence of pregnancy, endometrial senescence and breakdown follow this phase, accompanied by a decline in estrogen and progesterone levels, resulting in menstruation and the onset of a new reproductive cycle.

In the event of a successful pregnancy, the decidua of early pregnancy continues to express high levels of HOXA10 and HOXA11 mRNA (28, 29). Likewise, in pregnant mice, Hoxa10 mRNA expression is first detected in the endometrial epithelium on d 0.5 post coitum (p.c.). Although the initial site of endometrial Hoxa10 expression is limited to the epithelial layer, stromal expression appears on d 2.5 p.c., and by d 3.5 p.c. expression is limited to the stroma (20). As observed in humans, persistent high levels of expression of Hoxa10 mRNA are detected in the decidua. A dynamic temporal and spatial pattern of Hox/HOX gene expression in adult reproductive tissues likely parallels ongoing functional differentiation and appears to be evolutionarily conserved across vertebrate species (20, 28).

A functional consequence of aberrant adult endometrial Hoxa10 expression is evident as defective implantation, seen in Hoxa10 (–/–) mice. Female Hoxa10 (–/–) mice demonstrate uterine factor infertility due to preimplantation and implantation defects (20). Implantation site defects are common and frequently consist of hemorrhage within the site itself, as well as in the adjacent uterine lumen. Also observed are small implantation sites with disorganized embryos and empty decidua suggestive of early degeneration of a postimplantation embryo. Furthermore, the size of the decidual swellings is reduced compared with wild-type uteri (22). These implantation defects are implicit to Hoxa10 (–/–) females irrespective of the genotype of the embryo. Similar implantation defects with deficient endometrial stromal, glandular, and decidual cell development in early gestation are also seen in Hoxa11 (–/–) female mice (32).

Hox genes interact with other key developmental signaling molecules during development of reproductive competence. Recently, cross talk has been demonstrated between Wnt signaling and Hoxa10 in the adult endometrium during the peri-implantation period (33). Wnt7a has a role in anteroposterior delineation of the female reproductive axis during development (34). It is likely that combined signaling of a uterine domain-specific morphogen such as Hoxa10 with signaling molecules necessary for boundary determination such as the Wnt proteins may be necessary to modulate embryo-decidual interactions during implantation. In murine reproduction, implantation commences at the antimesometrial pole and proceeds toward the mesometrial end. Hox-Wnt signaling has been proposed to be necessary in establishing an antimesometrial-mesometrial orientation of the implantation chamber (33). In turn, these interactive pathways recruit other genes that may be necessary for implantation, such as Msx-1 (33).

As discussed previously, expression of Hox genes is necessary for normal embryonic development. Mice with targeted disruptions in these genes have embryonic developmental defects and manifest reproductive anomalies. However, the role of Hox genes in adult tissue differentiation is difficult to discern in these mutant animals because the preexisting embryonic developmental defect would override and prohibit analysis of the role of these genes in adult terminal differentiation. To determine the necessity of Hoxa10 expression in adult uterine function, uteri of wild-type mice were transfected in the peri-implantation period with constructs that altered Hoxa10 expression levels (35). Sequence homology between murine Hoxa10 and human HOXA10 permitted the use of constructs containing the human ortholog in murine transfections. In vivo uterine transfection with a HOXA10 antisense construct was used to decrease endometrial Hoxa10 expression levels, whereas a full-length HOXA10 cDNA construct was used to increase Hoxa10 expression. A significant reduction in litter size in antisense transfected mice (mean number of pups = 6.5) compared with controls (mean = 13.3) was observed. In contrast, mice transfected with HOXA10 cDNA consistently delivered large litters (11–14 pups) compared with controls (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). A clear role for Hox genes in both embryonic development and adult tissue plasticity was established.

Although the functional implications of deficiency or overexpression of endometrial HOXA10 are clear, the histological appearance of the endometrium in both cases is relatively unchanged. A difference in ultrastructural morphology is, however, evident in Hoxa10-sufficient compared with Hoxa10-deficient mice (36). Pinopods are endometrial epithelial surface projections that are markers of the window of endometrial receptivity (37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44). HOXA10 antisense treatment diminishes pinopod number, whereas an increase is observed when uterine HOXA10 expression is up-regulated. Similar changes are noted in the epithelial microvilli. The direction of alteration in pinopod and microvilli number therefore parallels that of HOXA10 expression levels and correlates with implantation efficiency. Pinopod and microvilli development may therefore represent a subcellular morphological feature of HOXA10-induced endometrial functional differentiation. Although striking functional phenotypes may be observed after targeted disruption of Hox genes, the mechanism may be apparent only at the subcellular level.

Several human diseases affecting the female reproductive tract lead to increased infertility, implantation defects, and reproductive wastage (45). Deficient endometrial HOXA10 expression has been demonstrated in these conditions and may be a common mechanism resulting in the implantation defect phenotype (46, 47, 48). The correlation between tissue HOXA10 expression levels and implantation is further evident in ectopic pregnancies where aberrant high levels of HOXA10 mRNA are evident in the tubal mucosa of ectopic gestations, specifically at the implantation site (49). There is a common molecular mechanism involving Hox genes that results in embryo implantation.

Human infertility in some instances may be due to defective endometrial receptivity. Most cases of infertility suspected to be due to defective endometrial development do not show histological abnormalities; it is likely that subcellular and molecular defects are responsible for these conditions. Few genes are known to be necessary for endometrial receptivity. A better understanding of these genes may elucidate the mechanisms of some forms of human infertility.

Hoxa10/HOXA10 and Hoxa11/HOXA11 expression is regulated by endogenous estrogen and progesterone in the reproductive tract. As discussed later, these Hox genes act downstream of estrogen and progesterone to regulate endometrial function; consequently, aberrant expression of either sex steroids or HOX genes, as observed in several diseases affecting the reproductive tract, is likely associated with endometrial functional deficiency manifest clinically as implantation defects.

The paralogs HOXC10, HOXC11, HOXD10, and HOXD11 are also expressed in the endometrium, overlapping the spatial domain of expression of the genes HOXA10 and HOXA11. However, the expression is limited to stromal cells, and is not responsive to sex steroids (50). Furthermore, as described in other cell lines, the paralog HOXC10 is likely more closely associated with proliferation than differentiation in the endometrium (51, 52, 53). In keeping with its mitogenic role, endometrial expression levels are higher in the proliferative phase than in the secretory phase of the reproductive cycle (50).

2. Pregnancy.
In addition to their well-characterized role in functional differentiation of the adult endometrium and embryo implantation, endocrine–Hox gene signaling has recently been implicated in pregnancy as well. We have previously described adult endometrial HOXA10 expression and its regulation by estradiol as well as progesterone. It is the combined action of both estradiol and progesterone that results in high HOXA10 mRNA levels in the late secretory phase of the menstrual cycle (28). In the event of a successful pregnancy, persistent high HOXA10 mRNA expression levels are observed in the decidua (28).

Pregnancy is characterized by high systemic progesterone levels, which likely mediates uterine quiescence and prevents the premature onset of labor. Not surprisingly, the progesterone-HOXA10 relationship endures beyond the phase of endometrial receptivity, embryo implantation, and early pregnancy associated with prevalent high systemic sex steroid levels. HOXA10 and HOXA11 are expressed in term human decidua (54). It is therefore likely that the HOX genes subserve a role of progesterone for the duration of gestation.

A well-characterized role of progesterone is its ability to prevent premature onset uterine contractions and thereby allow pregnancies to reach term. The initiation of labor in many vertebrate animal species occurs as a result of progesterone withdrawal (55, 56, 57). Overt progesterone withdrawal, however, has not been demonstrated to signal the onset of labor in humans.

Intraamniotic infection (chorioamnionitis) and placental abruption frequently underlie preterm uterine contractions and often result in preterm delivery. Chorioamnionitis is accompanied by inflammation at the maternal-fetal interface, resulting in increased decidual and fetal membrane expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1ß (58). Placental abruption is associated with enhanced decidual thrombin generation (59). As at term, systemic progesterone levels remain unchanged in the setting of early onset uterine contractions. In the absence of decreased systemic progesterone levels, IL-1ß and thrombin directly decrease the endometrial expression of HOXA10. Treatment with thrombin and IL-1ß resulted in 86 and 72% decreases, respectively, in HOXA10 expression levels.

HOXA10 is associated with the development and maintenance of the decidua, which in turn supports the developing embryo. Until fetal development is completed at term, the progesterone-HOXA10 axis is necessary for the prolongation of pregnancy. Although in other species progesterone withdrawal signals the onset of labor, in humans HOXA10 down-regulation may transform the uterine environment into one characterized by progesterone resistance, in effect mimicking the progesterone withdrawal seen in other species and thereby leading to the onset of labor.

In keeping with this hypothesis, Hoxa10 (–/–) mice demonstrate progesterone resistance, demonstrating inappropriate regulation of such progesterone-regulated genes as the prostaglandin E receptors EP3 and EP4, as discussed above (60). The dramatic decrease of HOXA10 in response to IL-1ß or thrombin, with consequent activation of downstream endocrine signal transduction pathways such as those involving prostaglandins, has implications for the onset of labor.

3. Hematopoiesis.
As in the female reproductive tract, Hox genes function in endocrine-driven developmental pathways in the adult hematopoietic system as well. The different cell types constituting the hematopoietic system also undergo constant turnover in the adult organism analogous to that observed in the endometrium. Bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells undergo proliferation and differentiation along several distinct lines to constitute the mixed population of cells found in human blood. HOX genes have well-characterized expression patterns in this system as well (26, 27).

In the hematopoietic system, which lacks a spatial orientation, it is likely that spatial domain-specific expression of HOX genes is instead manifest as lineage-specific HOX expression. Hematopoietic lines each express a distinct set of HOX genes. For example, whereas genes of the HOXA and HOXB cluster are expressed in CD34+ cells, CD34– cells lack expression of genes from these clusters (61). Similarly, HOXC4 demonstrates a lymphoid-specific pattern of expression and has been observed in both T and B lymphocyte cell lines in the bone marrow as well as in peripheral blood. It is, however, not seen in myeloid cells such as granulocytes and monocytes. Likewise, HOXA10 is expressed in megakaryocytes and myeloid precursor cells such as promyelocytes (26, 62).

Specific HOX gene expression correlates not only with specific lineages within the hematopoietic system but also with specific stages of differentiation. The temporal expression pattern of the clustered HOX genes also depends upon their genomic topography. In the hematopoietic system, 3' Hox genes are activated earlier and in more primitive hematopoietic precursor cells than genes located progressively toward the 5' end. Differential patterns of HOX gene expression therefore correspond to cells representing various stages of hematopoietic differentiation. For example, the 3' gene HOXB2 is expressed in the pluripotent progenitor cell, whereas the more 5' gene HOXB7 is not. The opposite expression pattern is however, observed in more committed cells (63, 64). Likewise, HOXB4 is also expressed by the most primitive CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, being absent from more mature committed progenitor cells (61). HOXB4 induces proliferation and self-renewal capacity of bone marrow stem cells and also the differentiation of downstream progenitor cells along the erythroid pathway (65, 66). Likewise, HOXA10, which is positioned more toward the 5' end of the HOXA cluster, is expressed in later stages of myeloid differentiation such as in promyelocytes, but is absent in more primitive precursors as well as in mature neutrophils and monocytes (67). Interestingly, in acute myeloid leukemia, increased numbers of HOXA10-expressing cells correlate with the increased number of blasts in circulation in this disease.

Undifferentiated cells must maintain a pluri- or totipotent phenotype by suppressing the expression of genes that modulate differentiation. The Polycombs genes regulate formation of chromatin complexes that repress gene transcription. Specifically, members of the Drosophila Polycombs complex and their mammalian orthologs have been found to transcriptionally silence the expression of multiple homeotic genes (68). Transcriptional repression of Hox gene expression is one mechanism by which embryonic stem cells do not initiate homeotic gene-regulated segmental differentiation, but instead retain pluripotency (69). Polycomb gene-mediated repression may also underlie mammalian female X chromosome inactivation (70).

Hox genes are cell fate determinants; differentiation stage-specific expression of each Hox gene programs the cell to appropriate cell development before advancing to the next stage of differentiation. In the myeloid cell line, one mechanism by which differentiation occurs is through sequential expression of previously unexpressed differentiation stage-specific genes and their cognate proteins. Two components of the phagocyte respiratory burst oxidase enzyme, CYBB and NCF2, are transcriptionally repressed by HOXA10 during the earlier stages of myelopoiesis (71). Expression of these two genes is up-regulated later in the development of these cells when HOXA10 expression diminishes. It is likely that the expression of these genes is necessary for functional capability in the differentiated cell.

We have previously described the role of the homeobox gene HOXA9, which is necessary for oviduct development and is also expressed in the adult human fallopian tube. In the hematopoietic system, like the other 5'-located HOX genes, it is also expressed in intermediate and later stages of myeloid differentiation such as in promyelocytes. Up-regulating its expression in these blast cells results in proliferation and leukemogenesis. Interestingly, HOXA9 is also expressed in endothelial cell progenitors as well as in mature endothelial cells and is necessary for their migration as well in tubular structure formation as a precursor to angiogenesis. It does so via regulation of a novel target gene EphB4 receptor (72). Consistent with its role in endothelial cell differentiation and function, Hoxa9 (–/–) mice demonstrate fewer endothelial cells and defects in neovascularization (73). It is likely that HOXA9 plays an analogous role in the female reproductive tract during normal development of the oviduct or in teratogenesis when uterine fundal overexpression of HOXA9 in diethylstilbestrol (DES)-exposed uteri transforms the region into a tubular structure. Like HOXA9, HOXA10 is also expressed in the uterus (with roles in uterine development and embryo implantation) as well as in myeloid progenitor cells (where it regulates the expression of respiratory burst enzymes). In the case of both HOXA9 and HOXA10, their apparently divergent roles in different tissues may be reconciled by the fact that Hox genes are a common mechanism for transmitting both spatial and temporal instructions to developing or maturing cells.

In summary, the adult expression of homeobox genes in certain organ systems permits the retention of developmental plasticity. These systems display ongoing cycles of differentiation that are more complex than simple cell turnover and replacement that is commonly seen in many adult cell types. The complex adult developmental pattern in such tissues as the hematopoietic system and female reproductive tract is necessary for their function. As selectors, HOX genes likely regulate differentiation in adult tissues through molecular mechanisms analogous to those used in embryogenesis. This includes imparting developmental spatial and temporal cues to specific cell types. The clustered genomic organization of HOX genes is designed to allow serial, nested expression that then relays graded spatial and temporal information. As in embryonic development, adult HOX expression is translated into functional signals that direct the ordered progression of differentiation along complex pathways as seen in the hematological and reproductive cells. As discussed further below, the endocrine regulation of homeobox genes also contributes to this control of embryonic as well as adult development.


    III. Regulation of HOX Gene Expression in Development
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
During embryogenesis, homeobox genes are necessary for anteroposterior axis determination in the developing embryo. Colinearity is a faithfully conserved property of the homeobox genes; however, the mechanisms by which it is regulated are not well characterized (2). Such collinear expression in embryonic axes confers the capability to generate regional identities using common molecular pathways (2). Endocrine regulation may refine HOX gene patterning, defining regional developmental identity. Members of ligand-activated nuclear receptor superfamily have been shown to regulate Hox gene expression. Like Hox genes, these are also members of an evolutionarily conserved group of transcription factors with a high degree of structural homology (74, 75). Ligand binding is usually followed by trans-activation or repression of a target gene through binding to specific DNA sites known as response elements (76). The activity of a ligand-receptor complex is influenced by phosphorylation and cofactor binding (77, 78). The regulation of embryonic homeobox gene expression by retinoic acid, estrogen, progesterone, and 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol has recently been described.

A. Retinoic acid
Retinoic acid has a well-characterized role in the development of the central nervous system during early embryogenesis, wherein it regulates the expression of 3' Hox paralogs. Although Hox genes themselves have no ascribed role in early zygotic cleavage, after differentiation of the three germ layers (gastrulation), anteroposterior axis determination is initiated, with concurrent Hox gene expression. According to the proposed activation-transformation model for early embryogenesis, the embryo is initially programmed for development of anterior structures (79). Initial anterior differentiation of early embryonic cells is followed by transformation of certain cells toward more posterior fates, likely mediated by a signal originating in the posterior mesoderm.

This process can be followed in the murine embryo, by sequential expression of various developmental genes that initiate the formation of the early anteroposterior body axis. Accordingly, in the early murine embryo, the nonclustered homeobox gene Otx2 (murine ortholog of Drosophila orthodenticle), is ubiquitously expressed. With further development, Otx2 expression becomes restricted to the most anterior segment that is associated with future forebrain development. The paralogous Hox genes, Hoxa1 and Hoxb1, are expressed more posteriorly in the region associated with midbrain and hindbrain development (80, 81, 82, 83). Each embryonic segment thus differentiates into unique adult structures; it is likely that discrepant, but domain-restricted expression of specific developmental genes is necessary for normal segmental differentiation. Not only is the segmental expression of specific developmental genes necessary for the development of various organ systems; in addition, the boundaries between each segment need to be accurately defined so as to allow coordinated axial development. One mechanism by which this occurs is through endocrine regulation of developmental gene expression. In the example discussed here, retinoic acid suppresses the expression of Otx2 (84). Additionally, retinoic acid treatment also up-regulates expression of Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 (85). The net effect of retinoic acid treatment therefore recapitulates the differential Hox gene expression pattern seen in early embryogenesis and likely represents the posterior transformation signal in early central nervous system development. This phenomenon is not just limited to murine species, because Xenopus embryos treated with retinoic acid also preferentially initiate the development of more posterior structures manifested by a reduction in forebrain volume, accompanied by a compensatory increase in hindbrain volume (84).

Retinoic acid acts via its cognate receptors to directly activate target genes. The retinoic acid receptors comprise two families, RAR and RXR, both of which are members of the ligand-activated nuclear receptor superfamily. Retinoic acid binds both types of receptors. Each receptor family is further divided into {alpha}-, ß-, and {gamma}-isoforms. The receptors interact to form RAR-RAR or RAR-RXR homo- or heterodimers, respectively. The RAR complex regulates target gene binding to enhancer RARE or RXRE (retinoic acid response element). RAREs have been found in the 5' regulatory regions of three Hox genes (Hoxa1, Hoxb1, and Hoxd4), suggesting that their expression may be responsive to retinoic acid signaling (86, 87, 88, 89, 90). In fact, as discussed above, retinoic acid directly regulates Hoxb1 expression in the posterior region of the embryo (88, 89, 91). Although the expression domain of retinoic acid is relatively posterior in early embryonic development, with further caudal growth of the embryo, these expression domains subsequently localize to a predominantly rostral region in the developed organism. Therefore, during embryonic development retinoic acid predominantly regulates axial expression of 3' Hox genes in rostral embryonic domains where they are necessary for central nervous system development.

Further evidence of a common pathway involving retinoic acid and Hox genes in early anteroposterior axis determination comes from colocalization of expression of Hox genes and RARs, as well as phenotypic similarities observed in animals with targeted mutations in either. retinoic acid-responsive transgene constructs colocalize within the domains of expression of the paralogs Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 in the early developing embryo, which is consistent with their regulatory relationship (92, 93, 94). Because retinoic acid regulates the 3' Hox paralogs via RAR-mediated mechanisms, there are similarities in the observed phenotypes of homozygous retinoic acid receptor mutants as well as loss-of-function Hox gene mutants (2, 95). In both instances, anterior transformations of the cervical vertebrae are seen. The specificity of the retinoic acid-Hox regulatory relationship is further established when either retinoic acid administration or constitutive Hox gene expression also results in a similar phenotype. However, as opposed to the anterior transformation associated with loss of retinoic acid-Hox signaling, augmented signaling of either results in a posterior transformation phenotype.

Retinoic acid regulation of Hox genes is limited to chromosomal 3'-located Hox paralogs that are expressed early in embryogenesis. As discussed previously, the 3' Hox paralogs are expressed early in embryogenesis in relatively anterior regions of the body, such as the head and cervical region. It is therefore likely that retinoic acid is necessary for determination of early anterior-posterior boundaries that are subsequently further subdivided with progressive growth of the embryo (96, 97, 98, 99). With further caudal embryonic growth, the early posterior boundaries defined by retinoic acid-mediated Hox gene regulation become confined to the rostral regions of the embryo. Retinoic acid, however, does not regulate the expression of more 5'-located, posteriorly, and later expressed Hox genes at subsequent phases of embryonic development.

The regulatory relationship between retinoic acid-RAR and Hox genes is dynamic and involves feedback regulation. Retinoic acid induces RARß expression in the presegmented embryo, which in turn induces the expression of specific Hox genes. Interestingly, the homeobox genes Hoxb4 and Hoxd4 that are induced via such retinoic acid-RARß interactions further modulate RARß expression by restricting it to a more posterior location (100). By continuous modulation of the temporal and spatial expression of the nuclear receptor, it is likely that a more graded expression of target Hox genes is achieved. Depending on the expression levels of RAR and its target Hox genes, the location of a definitive segmental boundary may therefore be temporally and spatially coordinated to the overall concomitant development in the region. Coordinated, continuous feedback between Hox genes and RARs is likely essential for axial development.

In addition to its role in central nervous system development, through a process that involves the up-regulation of multiple homeobox genes, retinoic acid also induces differentiation of murine embryonic F9 teratocarcinoma cells into extraembryonic endoderm. In F9 cells mutant for RAR{alpha}, Hoxb1 expression is not up-regulated, whereas in RAR{gamma} (–/–) F9 cells Hoxa1 and Hoxa3 are transcriptionally repressed (101, 102). This suggests that multiple Hox genes are differentially regulated by specific RARs in early embryogenesis.

B. Estrogen
Estrogens are necessary for embryonic development of the female reproductive tract. ER{alpha}-deficient mice have morphologically normal appearing, although hypoplastic, uteri that are unresponsive to estradiol (103, 104). In these ER{alpha} (–/–) mice, a lack of response to estradiol results in inability to functionally differentiate adult endometrium, causing sterility. The reproductive tracts of ERß mice appear morphologically normal and also have normal responses to estradiol, although females are subfertile (31).

As discussed previously, the paramesonephric ducts in the female embryo differentiate into adult reproductive tract structures. Terminal differentiation of the paramesonephric duct is accompanied by spatially restricted expression of the Hox genes orthologous to Drosophila Abd-B. Consequently, Hoxa9 is expressed in the developing oviduct, Hoxa10 in the uterine anlage, Hoxa11 in the uterine and cervical anlagen, and Hoxa13 in the developing vagina (24). Altered estrogen signaling resulting from exposure of animals to the synthetic nonsteroidal estrogen DES results in developmental anomalies of the reproductive tract. Estrogens may have a role analogous to that of retinoic acid in mediating segmental Hox gene expression.

The reproductive tracts of adult female offspring exposed in utero to DES on d 9 through 16 of pregnancy exhibit abnormal Hox gene spatial expression profiles. A posterior shift in the spatial domains of expression of Hoxa9, Hoxa10, and Hoxa11 is seen throughout the developing female reproductive tract (Fig. 2Go). Hoxa9 is expressed in the uterus, but not in the oviduct where it is normally expressed. Likewise, a caudal shift in the Hoxa10 expression domain is also observed. The cranial part of the uterus, normally exhibiting robust Hoxa10 expression, shows greatly diminished Hoxa10 expression; it is, however, normally expressed in the caudal part of the uterus. Additionally, Hoxa11 expression is diminished throughout the uterus compared with that observed in untreated wild-type animals. The expression domain and mRNA levels of the most caudal Hox gene, Hoxa13 is apparently unaffected, consistent with its lack of regulation by the sex steroids in vivo (25, 105). Given that the estrogens regulate expression of the 5' Hox paralogs such as Hoxa9, Hoza10, and Hoxa11, which are expressed in posterior and distal domains of the body axis, it may be postulated that by mediating homeobox gene expression in posterior structures, the estrogens function in determining caudal differentiation (105).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Schematic representation of the spatial domains of expression of the homeobox gene orthologs HOXA9, HOXA10, HOXA11, and HOXA13 in the developing human paramesonephric duct. In keeping with the property of collinearity, the most 3' ortholog HOXA9 is expressed rostrally in the developing oviduct, whereas the most 5' ortholog HOXA13 is expressed in the developing vagina. The ortholog HOXA10 is associated with the uterine anlage, and HOXA11 is expressed in both the uterine and cervical anlagen. In utero exposure to the endocrine disruptor DES results in a posterior shift in the spatial domains of expression of these HOX orthologs. Consequently, in DES-exposed animals, HOXA9 is expressed in the uterine anlage, HOXA10 is expressed in the caudal uterine and cervical anlagen, and HOXA11 is confined to the developing cervix. The spatial domain of expression of HOXA13 remains unaffected. A shift in the spatial domains of expression of the various HOX genes may be one mechanism for DES-related teratogenicity.

 
As discussed later, DES is teratogenic in mice as well as humans. In utero exposure of human female embryos to DES results in reproductive tract anomalies. The abnormal human reproductive tract phenotypes could be explained by this posterior shift in the spatial domain of expression of the Abd-B orthologous Hox genes. For example, a posterior shift in spatial expression of HOXA9 may underlie the "T" shaped uterus found in women exposed to DES in utero; the cranial part of affected uteri is narrow and branched, resembling a more oviduct-like structure. Likewise caudally displaced HOXA10 and HOXA11 expression may explain the occurrence of vaginal adenosis, where glandular tissue normally present in the uterus and cervix is observed in the vagina. It is therefore likely that estrogen-Hox signaling has a role in posterior axis determination during embryogenesis that is analogous to retinoic acid-Hox gene signaling in the rostral part of the embryo.

Estrogen-Hox gene signaling operative in reproductive tract development is ligand-specific. For example, DES, but not 17ß estradiol, causes a perturbation in the domain of expression of each Hox gene, resulting in reproductive tract developmental anomalies. The crystallographic structure of the DES-ER ligand-receptor complex is different from that of 17ß estradiol bound to ER. It is likely that this difference in structure causes differential cofactor recruitment to the complex, thereby resulting in distinct DES-related effects on target tissues (105, 106, 107). Interestingly, in contrast to the decreased uterine Hoxa10 expression seen in DES-treated wild-type mice, uterine Hoxa10 expression is unaffected in DES-treated ER{alpha} (–/–) mice (108). Furthermore, when exposed to DES, these ER{alpha} (–/–) mice do not manifest reproductive tract anomalies, indicating that during embryonic development, DES signals through the ER{alpha} receptor (108). The endocrine regulation of the Abd-B orthologous Hox genes by the estrogens during embryogenesis is necessary for posterior patterning; however, as discussed later, homeobox gene regulation by estrogens likely mediates not only organogenic but also subsequent functional differentiation in the adult reproductive tract.

C. Vitamin D
Vitamin D has a well-characterized role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. It also has a role in reproductive tract and hematopoietic development. Vitamin D is converted in vivo into its active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, which binds the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and regulates target genes via ligand-receptor binding to specific vitamin D response elements (VDREs) located in the enhancers of various target gene.

Familial VDR deficiency results in type II rickets. When homozygous VDR (–/–) mice were generated by targeted disruption of the murine VDR locus, the mice not only displayed phenotypic features characteristic of VDR deficiency rickets but also manifested uterine hypoplasia as well as infertility (109). In addition, vitamin D deficiency in the adult results in impaired functional endometrial differentiation with lack of decidualization and consequent implantation defects. As expected, these defects are reversible when the vitamin D signaling pathway is activated through 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol treatment, resulting in increased uterine weight and endometrial decidualization (110).

Uterine hypoplasia during embryogenesis generated by VDR mutation and implantation defects observed in adults with deficient vitamin D signaling are similar to the phenotypes observed in loss of function mutations of the homeobox genes Hoxa10 and Hoxa11, raising the possibility of a regulatory relationship. The regulatory region of HOXA10 contains a VDRE and has been shown to be regulated by 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol in both hematopoietic and endometrial cells (111).

Hormone-entrained cyclic functional differentiation is implicit to female reproductive physiology. Adult functional differentiation recapitulates embryonic developmental processes. As discussed earlier, expression of developmental genes such as the Hox genes confers a developmental plasticity, enabling reactivation of programmed differentiation in select adult organ systems where it is physiologically necessary. Endocrine regulation of Hox gene expression is operative during both fetal and adult life; hormonal signaling in both of these developmental periods is essential for reproductive capability. It is likely that endocrine-Hox signaling represents a conserved molecular mechanism by which developmental plasticity is retained in the adult. The significance of hormone-regulated homeobox gene expression in the adult is reviewed below.


    IV. Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes in the Adult Reproductive Tract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
As discussed above, in several adult organ systems, there is ongoing tissue regeneration involving proliferation and differentiation followed by degeneration. These processes in many ways recapitulate embryogenesis, and it is not surprising, therefore, that Hox gene-mediated developmental programs operative during embryogenesis are active in these adult tissues as well. Interestingly, hormones, particularly the sex steroids and their cognate receptors from the nuclear receptor superfamily, also regulate adult Hox gene expression as they do during embryonic development. In this section, we focus on two organ systems, the female reproductive tract and the hematopoietic system, wherein the endocrine regulation of Hox genes in adult developmental processes has been well characterized. Unlike in the embryo, so far retinoic acid has not been shown to regulate adult Hox gene expression.

A. Estrogen
In the previous section, we described the necessity of estradiol for functional differentiation of adult endometrium. ER{alpha} (–/–) mice are sterile and do not undergo the endometrial differentiation that is essential for embryo implantation (103, 104). We have previously also seen that Hoxa10 (–/–) and Hoxa11 (–/–) mice exhibit aberrant endometrial functional differentiation resulting in infertility (20, 21).

Evidence for estradiol-mediated endometrial HOXA10 expression initially came from observations in adult endometrial cells (28). Primary endometrial cell lines obtained from human subjects were established and treated with varying doses of 17ß estradiol ranging from subphysiological to supraphysiological concentrations. Compared with untreated controls, a significant increase in HOXA10 mRNA expression levels is observed in response to estradiol (28). A dose-dependent increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels is seen across the physiological range of 17ß estradiol concentrations (10–6 to 10–10 M) with no further increase at supraphysiological concentrations. The effect of estrogen on endometrial epithelial cells was evaluated by treating Ishikawa cells with 17ß estradiol in an analogous manner (28). Ishikawa cells are a well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, which is known to express the estrogen and progesterone receptors and serves as a model of endometrial epithelium (112, 113, 114). Up-regulation of HOXA10 mRNA levels is also observed in this epithelial cell line, which is consistent with that seen in estrogen-treated primary endometrial stromal cells. 17ß estradiol is therefore associated with up-regulation of HOXA10 expression in both adult endometrial epithelium and stroma. Consistent with this regulatory relationship, these findings observed in vitro in endometrial cells were also corroborated in vivo, where the endometrial expression of Hoxa10 parallels rising estradiol concentrations. High endometrial levels of expression of HOXA10 in the latter half of the menstrual cycle coincide with coincident high systemic estradiol concentrations (28).

Pretreatment with cycloheximide did not abrogate the increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels in response to treatment with 17ß estradiol either in vitro in endometrial cells or in vivo within the murine uterus (25, 28). Cycloheximide inhibits new protein synthesis; 17ß estradiol therefore likely directly regulates endometrial HOXA10 expression without requiring an intermediate protein. In fact, estradiol regulates HOXA10 through ER binding. Sequence analysis of the 5' regulatory region of HOXA10 revealed the presence of two putative estrogen response elements (EREs) (115). Both elements show partial sequence homology to the consensus ERE and bind the estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß. Although both of these elements demonstrate estrogen-responsive up-regulation of reporter gene expression, the response mediated by one of the elements (ERE1), heretofore referred to as HOXA10-ERE, is more robust (115). Regulation of HOXA10 expression by estradiol in the endometrium is therefore ER dependent.

Another interesting aspect of the molecular mechanism involved in estrogen-Hox signaling is that it is ligand specific. As described above, during embryonic development DES, but not 17ß estradiol causes a posterior shift in expression of the genes Hoxa9, Hoxa10, and Hoxa11 (25, 105). DES not only alters the spatial domains of expression of Hox genes in the reproductive tract, but additionally elicits significantly lower reporter gene expression mediated by the HOXA10-ERE compared with treatment with 17ß estradiol (115). Reporter gene expression is differential in magnitude in response to treatment with the cognate ligand 17ß estradiol compared with DES. In addition to posterior displacement of the spatial domains of expression of the Abd-B orthologs, decreased Hox gene expression levels may be another mechanism by which DES causes reproductive tract developmental anomalies (105, 115).

Estrogen-Hox signaling is likely to have clinical implications in assisted reproductive technology (ART), where controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is frequently used to induce oocyte growth in infertile patients. Treatment protocols are commonly based on the use of recombinant FSH. As opposed to natural reproductive cycles, treatment cycles typically are associated with multiple folliculogenesis and consequent high serum estradiol levels. ART cycles are also associated with a high rate of multiple gestation (116, 117). The cause of multiple pregnancies is likely related to spontaneous multiple ovulation and/or multiple embryo transfer (118, 119). It is also possible that elevated 17ß estradiol in such cycles could potentially up-regulate HOXA10 expression. As seen previously, high endometrial HOXA10 expression levels in mice resulted in consistently large litter sizes possibly due to increased implantation efficiency (35). However, no difference in secretory phase endometrial HOXA10 mRNA levels is seen in ART cycles compared with those seen in endometrium obtained from untreated subjects (120). It is therefore unlikely that multiple pregnancies associated with ART are due to increased endometrial receptivity from elevated HOXA10 expression; instead they are simply due to the generation of multiple embryos.

To synchronize follicular growth and prevent a premature LH surge in ART cycles, treatment regimens frequently involve the use of GnRH agonists or antagonists. Because GnRH receptors are found in endometrium, these agents may have direct and likely adverse effects on endometrial receptivity (121). When Ishikawa cells are treated with either a GnRH agonist or antagonist at comparable doses to those used for ART, no difference in HOXA10 mRNA levels is observed. It is therefore unlikely that GnRH agonist or antagonist therapy, as is currently used for ART, can iatrogenically decrease endometrial receptivity (120). Rather, diminished pregnancy rates seen with the use of GnRH antagonists likely are the result of diminished LH production. In contrast, the use of depot GnRH analog, accompanied by profound suppression of endogenous estrogens and pseudomenopausal amenorrhea, is associated with suppressed HOXA10 mRNA levels (28).

Another area where endocrine-Hox signaling is likely to be operative in the adult is in oncology. One molecular mechanism underlying the development of cancer likely involves dysregulation of developmental processes resulting in aberrant growth and differentiation of affected tissues. As described earlier, HOX genes have been associated with leukemogenesis (67). Both 17ß estradiol and Hox genes have been implicated in multiple cancers. Estrogen-Hox signaling is therefore likely to have implications in cancer biology and therapeutics. A recent large randomized clinical trial has associated conjugated equine estrogens and a progestin with increased occurrence of breast cancer (122, 123). The expression of certain HOX genes is associated with antiproliferative effects in human breast cancer. For example, HOXA5 directly up-regulates expression of the tumor suppressor gene p53, leading to apoptosis; loss of expression of HOXA5 as well as p53 is associated with cancer progression (124). Finally, in the ER+ human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines (MCF-7), estradiol up-regulates HOXA10 expression. HOXA10 in turn up-regulates p53 expression. In contrast, the ER(–) breast cancer cell line (BT-20), derived from highly invasive cancers, does not endogenously express HOXA10. When these cells are transfected with HOXA10, increased p53 expression is observed as well as decreased invasion (125). Estradiol treatment of BT20 cells, in the absence of HOXA10, does not increase p53. In sex steroid-responsive tissues such as the breast, a complex interplay between estradiol and progesterone and the expression levels of various HOX genes may be involved in tumorigenesis. Overexpression of such HOX genes as HOXA5 and HOXA10 has been associated with increased tumor suppressor expression and possibly decreased invasion. It is likely that, as in the endometrium, HOXA10 mediates terminal differentiation in other tissues as well. The terminally differentiated state cannot coexist with neoplasia, which may explain the antineoplastic effects of HOXA10 in breast tissue.

As discussed earlier, estrogen-Hox signaling is effected by multiple estrogenic ligands. In ER+ breast cancer cells, the selective ER modulator (SERM) tamoxifen also up-regulates HOXA10 and thereby increases p53. Tamoxifen may therefore mediate HOX gene-induced differentiation in breast cancer. Such a molecular mechanism may contribute to the successful clinical use of tamoxifen (125, 126, 127) .

It is well known, that the SERMs have tissue-specific effects; whereas tamoxifen has antineoplastic effects in breast cancer, it is proneoplastic in the endometrium, and it has been associated with endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma (128). Another SERM, raloxifene, exhibits antiproliferative effects in the breast without increasing the incidence of endometrial cancer (129, 130, 131). Because HOX genes are regulated by estrogens, it is likely that they are differentially regulated by individual SERMs as well. Understanding the molecular interactions between the SERMs and the Hox genes is likely to have significant therapeutic implications.

B. Progesterone
Progesterone secreted by the corpus luteum programs the endometrium to undergo terminal differentiation, necessary for embryo receptivity (132). Progesterone receptor A knockout mice are infertile and demonstrate failed implantation of artificially transferred blastocysts (132). Additionally in these mice, administration of progesterone results in inflammation and proliferation rather than differentiation during the secretory phase (132). Endogenous progesterone, like estradiol, also regulates adult endometrial Hox gene expression during the reproductive cycle, and this signaling pathway is likely to modulate endometrial functional differentiation (25, 28).

As with 17ß estradiol, the levels of HOXA10 mRNA in primary endometrial stromal cells are also increased in response to treatment with the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels however, is greater in response to MPA than to 17ß estradiol, increasing 25-fold when the concentration of MPA is increased from 10–9 to 10–6 M (28). Furthermore, in cells treated with combined 17ß estradiol and MPA, HOXA10 expression levels are higher compared with those obtained after treatment with either hormone alone. This latter experimental condition recapitulates the hormonal milieu prevalent in the mid- and late secretory phase of the menstrual cycle (Fig. 3Go). As with 17 ß estradiol, the linear increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels with rising progestin concentrations plateaus at high physiological and supraphysiological dosage levels (28).


Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Diagrammatic representation showing the temporal profile of systemic 17ß estradiol and progesterone levels as well as endometrial HOXA10 and HOXA11 expression levels during a human menstrual cycle. Estradiol and progesterone, bound to their respective receptors, transcriptionally activate endometrial HOXA10/HOXA11 expression. Elevated levels of both HOXA10 and HOXA11 are obtained in the mid- and late secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. High endometrial HOXA10 and HOXA11 expression levels temporally coincide with high 17ß estradiol and progesterone levels. Endocrine-Hox signaling pathways mediate functional differentiation of the adult endometrium, enabling receptivity for embryo implantation.

 
These in vitro findings in endometrial cells further corroborate the in vivo findings described earlier, where highest levels of HOXA10 mRNA are observed in endometrial samples obtained from women during the mid- and late secretory phases of the menstrual cycle, compared with those obtained in the early secretory or proliferative phases. After ovulation progesterone secretion increases progressively and peaks in the mid- and late secretory phase, high systemic progesterone levels coincide with the endometrial window of receptivity to embryo implantation as well as with high endometrial HOXA10 expression. It is likely that in vivo endometrial HOXA10 concentrations increase progressively and parallel the rising systemic progesterone levels during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. Progestational regulation of HOXA10 occurs via the progesterone receptor and therefore is blocked by RU486, an effect that is consistent in vitro in primary endometrial stromal cells as well as in vivo in murine uteri (25, 28). Progesterone complexed to its cognate receptor therefore directly up-regulates endometrial HOXA10 expression to high levels at the time of peak endometrial functional differentiation during each reproductive cycle.

Some of the physiological events that accompany terminal differentiation in secretory phase endometrium include calcitonin secretion by endometrial epithelial cells and prolactin expression by stromal cells. Terminal differentiation in the endometrium is also accompanied by leukocyte infiltration. Cytokines elaborated by the leukocytes are necessary for critical mitogenic and immunological processes that occur at the time of embryo implantation (45, 133, 134, 135, 136). In murine uteri, whereas progesterone and HOXA10 result in concordant epithelial cell calcitonin and stromal cell prolactin expression, discordant effects are seen with respect to leukocyte infiltration. HOXA10, but not progesterone induces uterine eosinophil infiltration and degranulation (137). Endometrial eosinophil infiltration is a well-characterized estrogenic response. Typically, Hoxa10 mediates progesterone action; however, in some cases it may limit the effects of progesterone, allowing continued estrogenic effects. Because estradiol, progesterone, and their target HOXA10 are each necessary for embryo implantation, it is likely that differential spatiotemporal activation of this gene by estradiol and progesterone in the endometrium may be necessary to achieve distinct stages of functional development to support nidation.

HOXA10 expression is not confined to the endometrium; it has been demonstrated in the uterine myometrium as well. As in the endometrium, myometrial HOXA10 expression is dynamic and subject to progestational regulation. In contrast to the endometrium, however, HOXA10 is expressed at low levels in the human myometrium in the midsecretory phase of the human reproductive cycle (138). In vitro MPA down-regulates HOXA10 mRNA expression levels in myometrial cells. It is likely that the down-regulation of this HOX gene in myometrium by progesterone is necessary to prevent terminal differentiation, allowing the myocytes to retain proliferative capability necessary to accommodate fetoplacental growth during pregnancy (138). Although HOXA10 expression levels in myocytes are low during pregnancy, in labor the expression is up-regulated (139). At term gestation, increased HOXA10 likely enables functional development of myocytes necessary for myometrial contractility during labor.

Although progesterone-mediated up-regulation of HOXA10 in endometrium during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle is necessary for embryo implantation and hence fertility, the opposite response is seen with the use of contraceptive progestin formulations. The progestin depot MPA is a commonly used contraceptive agent that acts primarily via suppression of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis, resulting in anovulation. Depot MPA also has additional effects on the endometrium, attenuating endometrial thickness and possibly functional differentiation, thereby making it unfavorable for embryo implantation. Long-term treatment of endometrial cells with this contraceptive also results in suppression of HOXA10 mRNA expression levels, which may be one of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the efficacy of this agent (28). The effects of sex steroids on endometrial HOX gene expression are both dose and time dependent.

Progesterone regulates not only uterine HOXA10 expression but also HOXA11. We have seen earlier that HOXA11 regulation by estradiol and progesterone is similar to that of HOXA10 throughout the estrus/menstrual cycle. However, in contrast to HOXA10, under physiological conditions both sense and antisense transcripts of Hoxa11/HOXA11 are synthesized (21, 140). Endometrial HOXA11 sense mRNA levels vary inversely with antisense mRNA levels. It is therefore likely that the translation of HOXA11 is regulated by the balance in levels of these two types of transcripts.

In primary endometrial stromal cells, progesterone is found to alter this balance, resulting in increased sense mRNA and decreased antisense mRNA transcript levels (140). Although it seems intuitive that the sense and antisense transcripts combine to form a duplex and thereby repress HOXA11 bioavailability, this mechanism is not observed when murine uteri are transfected with HOXA11 antisense. The litter size in antisense transfected uteri is unchanged from controls (140). It is therefore likely that the mechanism of action of HOXA11 antisense involves transcriptional interference. At any given time, transcription proceeds in only one direction on a single gene, resulting in either sense or antisense transcription; the relative amount of sense transcript determines HOXA11 bioavailability. By promoting sense over antisense transcription, progesterone augments endometrial HOXA11 expression levels. In addition to nuclear receptor-mediated transactivation, transcriptional interference is a novel molecular mechanism of endocrine regulation of HOX gene expression.

Progesterone is the major stimulus for cyclic endometrial terminal differentiation and is necessary for embryo implantation and fertility. Not unexpectedly, this functional differentiation is accompanied by high endometrial expression levels of the homeotic genes Hoxa10 and Hoxa11, driven by progesterone. Both progesterone and Hoxa10 induce similar phenotypic effects characteristic of terminal differentiation in endometrial epithelial as well as stromal cells. It is therefore likely that these homeotic genes function downstream of progesterone to mediate cyclic endometrial functional differentiation. Differing HOX gene expression in response to changing endocrine signals is a mechanism by which hormones can alter developmental identity.

C. Testosterone
Testosterone is necessary for mesonephric duct differentiation in male embryos; lack of androgen signaling results in anomalous development of the male reproductive tract (141, 142, 143, 144). Analogous to their role in paramesonephric duct differentiation, the Abd-B orthologous Hox genes are likely necessary for male genital tract development as well. The phenotype of Hoxa10 (–/–) male mice is characterized by anterior transformation of mesonephric derivatives; additionally Hoxa10 mutations are associated with cryptorchidism secondary to a lack of shortening of the gubernaculum in both mice and humans (20, 22, 145). The anterior transformation seen in Hoxa10 (–/–) male mice suggests that, as in the female, HOX genes are also expressed axially in male reproductive anlagen during embryogenesis; it is likely that testosterone regulates spatial expression of the individual Hox genes in a role analogous to that of estrogen in female reproductive organogenesis.

In the adult female, coordinated expression of estradiol and progesterone is sufficient for ovulation and menstrual cyclicity, and both hormones differentially regulate endometrial HOX gene expression throughout the reproductive cycle. Although androgens have physiological roles in adult females, abnormally increased androgen secretion is seen in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (146). Hyperandrogenemia is likely driven by insulin resistance and concomitant hyperinsulinemia in many of these patients (147, 148). Aberrant androgen secretion results in anovulation, menstrual anomalies, and hirsutism. Patients with PCOS often experience infertility and, despite successful ovulation induction, demonstrate high rates of implantation failure and early reproductive wastage. Human endometrium expresses the androgen receptor; it is likely that hyperandrogenemia interferes with cyclic endometrial functional differentiation (149, 150). In contrast to normal women, significantly lower levels of HOXA10 mRNA are seen in secretory phase endometrium from patients with PCOS. Low levels of expression of HOXA10 in peri-implantation endometrium may result in defective implantation and reproductive wastage that are commonly seen in these women.

In vitro, in Ishikawa cells dose-responsive decreases in HOXA10 mRNA are seen in response to physiological or supraphysiological concentrations (10–4 to 10–7 M) of testosterone. As discussed previously, Ishikawa cells are an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line that expresses the estrogen and progesterone receptors. This cell line also expresses the androgen receptor (46). As with estradiol and progesterone, the testosterone regulates HOXA10 through an androgen receptor-mediated mechanism that is readily blocked by the androgen receptor antagonist, flutamide.

PCOS is a heterogeneous clinical entity that is associated with elevated circulating levels of multiple androgens. Not all of the circulating androgens, however, repress endometrial HOXA10 expression. In fact only, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, but not dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, decrease HOXA10 mRNA levels. Interestingly, testosterone blocks estradiol, progesterone, or combined estradiol and progesterone-mediated up-regulation of HOXA10 mRNA in vitro in Ishikawa cells. During the mid- and late secretory phase, high systemic estradiol and progesterone levels are associated with peak endometrial functional differentiation, high HOXA10 expression levels, and embryo receptivity. As discussed above, in patients with PCOS, hyperandrogenemia suppresses endometrial HOXA10 expression in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, overriding the stimulatory effects of estradiol and progesterone in the luteal phase. Such aberrant endocrine regulation of HOXA10 by testosterone may interfere with endometrial functional differentiation, resulting in inefficient reproductive capability seen clinically in patients with hyperandrogenemia.

When treated with the biguanide metformin, women with PCOS demonstrate amelioration in hyperandrogenemia (151). Additionally, the incidence of reproductive wastage from defective implantation and spontaneous abortion is diminished in these patients (152, 153). It is likely that metformin augments endometrial receptivity by lowering testosterone levels. Lowered testosterone levels in turn result in higher endometrial HOXA10 expression levels and increased receptivity to embryo implantation (35). Aberrant endocrine signaling can unfavorably alter HOX gene-mediated developmental programs.

D. Vitamin D
As it does during uterine development, vitamin D also regulates HOXA10 expression in the adult reproductive tract with implications for fertility. In vivo vitamin D is converted to its active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol by the enzyme 1{alpha} hydroxylase; in turn the active metabolite binds the VDR. The ligand-bound receptor binds target gene VDREs to regulate transcription.

The adult reproductive tract expresses the essential components of the vitamin D-VDR pathway and therefore is capable of responding to vitamin D signaling. For example, human endometrial stromal and decidual cells express 1{alpha} hydroxylase and synthesize the active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; the VDR is ubiquitously expressed in reproductive tissues such as the ovaries, oviducts, endometrial stroma, placenta, and fetal membranes (154, 155, 156, 157). Interestingly, the expression of these VDR signaling pathway components is dynamic and increases in parallel with increasing functional differentiation in the endometrium. Compared with endometrium in the nonpregnant state, the expression of VDR and 1{alpha} hydroxylase increases in decidua and then increases further in the first and second trimesters (158). The dynamic expression pattern with increasing endometrial functional differentiation suggests a role for vitamin D in this process. Rats administered 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol by intraluminal injection into the uterus on d 5 of pseudopregnancy demonstrate a significant increase in uterine weight and induction of the decidual reaction (110, 159). Vitamin D-mediated decidualization has implications for fertility because vitamin D deficiency results in diminished mating success and a 75% reduction in fertility (160). Additionally, mice with targeted deficiencies in the vitamin D signaling pathway components such as 1{alpha} hydroxylase and VDR are also infertile (109, 161, 162).

HOXA10, a mediator of endometrial functional differentiation and decidualization, is coexpressed temporally and spatially in the uterine endometrium with components of the vitamin D signaling pathway. In vitro, vitamin D directly activates HOXA10 expression in a human endometrial stromal cell line (111). Vitamin D-mediated decidualization occurs, at least in part, through its regulation of endometrial HOXA10 expression. In fact, a regulatory element (VDRE) located in the region –385 to –343 bp upstream of the HOXA10 transcription start site directly binds the 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol-VDR complex. Such binding results in target gene activation as seen by the enhanced expression of a HOXA10 enhancer-reporter construct. Vitamin D, VDR, and HOXA10 function in a common reproductive signaling pathway to effect functional differentiation.

Endocrine regulation by vitamin D is not limited to differentiation in the female reproductive tract. Vitamin D treatment also induces myeloid differentiation in the human hematopoietic cell lines HL-60 and U937 and is further necessary for differentiation of monocytes/macrophages into phagocytic osteoclasts (163, 164, 165, 166, 167). 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol-treated murine M1 leukemia cells terminally differentiate into macrophages and acquire lysosomal, locomotive, and phagocytic abilities (168, 169, 170). Such differentiation alters their malignant potential, as is evident from the prolonged survival of mice injected with M1 leukemia cells and then treated with vitamin D (171). The mechanism by which vitamin D signaling regulates differentiation in hematopoietic cells also involves the homeobox gene HOXA10, as in reproductive tissues. In the human myelomonocyte cell line (U-937), HOXA10 is up-regulated in the presence of vitamin D (111, 172). This relationship persists in cells pretreated with cycloheximide, indicating the likelihood of a direct effect (172). Furthermore, HOXA10 overexpression in the U-937 cells also results in differentiation into a monocyte/macrophage phenotype, an effect that is consistent with that obtained with vitamin D3. Vitamin D signaling via HOXA10 is therefore necessary for differentiation, a role well characterized for the homeobox genes. This developmental pathway functions in diverse processes such as decidualization in the endometrium, necessary for embryo receptivity, and myeloid leukocyte differentiation.

Surprisingly, a large number of endocrine inputs determine the expression of HOX genes in the adult as in the embryo. As HOX genes impart spatial and temporal identity to the embryo, they also convey this information in the adult. Endocrine regulations of complex developmental and maturation pathways are evident in hematopoiesis and reproduction. Endocrine regulation of HOX expression likely evolved to provide a mechanism by which hormones are able to direct complex multistep pathways in a precise ordered fashion. HOX genes provide this platform during development and were adapted during the evolution of the specialized hematopoietic and reproductive systems. Hormonal regulation of HOX gene expression allows adjustment of these developmental pathways to physiological and environmental signals.


    V. Endocrine Disruption of HOX Gene Expression in Development
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
Endocrine disruptors are exogenous substances that alter endocrine function and consequently cause adverse health effects in an intact organism, its progeny, or subpopulations (173). They may do so by interfering with the production, release, transport, metabolism, binding, action, or elimination of natural hormones responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis and the regulation of developmental processes. Just as a targeted mutation would in most cases provide direct evidence of the functional role of a gene, endocrine disruption provides insight into endocrine-regulated physiology. The consequences of dysregulated HOX gene expression in the female reproductive tract resulting from exposure to endocrine disruptors further elucidate the critical role of hormonal regulation of the homeobox genes. In this section, we discuss the effects of the known xenoestrogen endocrine disruptors DES, methoxychlor (MXC), bisphenol A (BPA), and phytoestrogens on HOXA10 expression.

A. Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
In humans as in mice, gestational exposure to the synthetic nonsteroidal estrogen DES causes reproductive tract teratogenesis in female offspring (174, 175, 176, 177). Exposed offspring also experience a high incidence of pregnancy wastage and preterm labor. It is likely that similar DES-induced posterior shifts in reproductive tract HOX expression domains occur in humans, as seen in the murine model, and may underlie the observed teratogenic defects (105).

DES induces altered HOX gene expression in human uterine endometrial and cervical cells resulting in robust HOXA9 mRNA expression in uterine endometrial cells and HOXA10 in uterine cervical cells. Because HOXA9 is normally expressed in the oviduct and HOXA10 in the uterus, these in vitro findings parallel the observed in vivo posterior shift in the domains of expression of the corresponding orthologs in the murine reproductive tract in response to DES exposure.

In humans, affected subjects manifest anomalies such as an abnormal T-shaped uterine cavity, possibly due to a partial transformation toward the identity of the more anteriorly located fallopian tube (174, 175, 176, 178). It is likely that a DES-induced posterior shift in the spatial domain of HOXA9 and HOXA10 allows unopposed ectopic HOXA9 expression in the upper part of the uterus, with a consequent anterior transformation in its identity toward that of the more rostral fallopian tube. Likewise, spatially altered domains of expression of the HOX genes may also result in ectopic presence of glandular tissue in the vagina (vaginal adenosis), normally present in the uterus and cervix, predisposing such patients to the development of clear cell adenocarcinoma (179, 180)

DES binds the ER, and the resultant ligand receptor complex regulates target gene expression through ERE binding (115). Although, the HOXA10-ERE binds both ER{alpha} and ERß, there is differential ligand-dependent target gene activation. DES elicits significantly lower levels of HOXA10 mRNA expression compared with 17ß estradiol (115).

During murine development, low levels of Hoxa10 mRNA detected in the midparamesonephric duct harvested from embryonic in utero DES-exposed d 16.5 animals may reflect aberrant DES-mediated Hoxa10 expression (25).

An interesting aspect of DES-Hoxa10 regulation is that it appears to be both qualitatively (as defined by the characteristic posterior shift in Hox spatial domains) and quantitatively (lower levels of expression) conserved in murine and human species (22, 25, 105). The pattern of HOX gene expression in the developing reproductive tract is highly conserved between species (181). Although the effects of DES are well described in humans and mice, it is likely that the same endocrine regulatory mechanisms are also conserved in other species; perhaps endocrine disruptors present in the environment may lead to altered Hox gene expression in a variety of wildlife. Interference of endocrine-Hox signaling may be a common mechanism of diminished reproductive success.

B. Methoxychlor
MXC (1,1'-(2,2,2-trichloroethylidene) bis [4-methoxybenzene]) is an organochlorine DDT derivative that has been used extensively to control pests in household as well as agricultural settings. MXC has deleterious effects on fertility in murine species, including the ability to block implantation, inhibit estrogen binding to the ER, inhibit decidualization of the endometrium, and decrease serum progesterone (182, 183, 184, 185, 186). It also affects maternal weight gain and increases the incidence of skeletal abnormalities in fetal rats (187). These effects have been attributed to the ability of MXC and its metabolites to bind the ER and function as endocrine disruptors.

One mechanism by which MXC results in adverse reproductive outcomes is by diminishing uterine decidual development (188, 189, 190). When mice are treated with MXC, their uteri demonstrate only a mild uterotropic response and diminished HOXA10 protein expression. Additionally, HOXA10 mRNA expression levels in Ishikawa cells treated with MXC are attenuated compared with those obtained after treatment with estradiol (191). Interestingly, addition of MXC disrupts the 17ß estradiol-ER-HOXA10-ERE complex, allowing only weak binding of the 17ß estradiol-ER complex to the HOXA10-ERE. MXC therefore functions as an endocrine disruptor affecting 17ß estradiol signaling in endometrial cells. This finding in endometrial cells corresponds to the decreased HOXA10 mRNA levels observed in MXC-treated Ishikawa cells in vitro and diminished uterine HOXA10 expression in MXC-treated mice in vivo. Interestingly, MXC-mediated disruption of Hoxa10 expression is not only immediate, resulting in suppression and cellular restriction of Hoxa10 expression, but there is also a permanent generalized decrease in expression that persists in adult mice that were exposed to MXC during the neonatal period (191). In the absence of obvious anatomic developmental defects, adverse reproductive phenotypes may be a function of permanently altered endocrine-Hox signaling in exposed animals. The mechanism of diminished HOX gene expression despite lack of continued endocrine disruptor exposure is not yet known; one possible mechanism by which endocrine-disrupting chemicals produce lasting reproductive tract defects is through epigenetic modification of developmental gene expression. In fact, methylation of uterine Hox gene expression has been demonstrated in humans and is associated with reproductive disease (192).

In contrast to MXC and polychlorinated biphenyls, certain pesticides such as kepone likely activate target genes through nonreceptor-mediated mechanisms; it is not surprising therefore that chlordecone (kepone) has no effect on endometrial HOXA10 levels (54, 193). Identification of pesticides in common use that are endocrine disruptors, as well as understanding their mechanisms of action is necessary to prevent inadvertent exposure.

C. Bisphenol A
BPA is a xenoestrogen commonly used in food storage plastics, polycarbonate bottles, and dental composites. Recent studies have shown that it can leach out of certain products, including the plastic lining of cans used for food, polycarbonate babies’ bottles, and tableware as well as from composite dental fillings and sealants. Like MXC, BPA is also an endocrine disruptor that affects estrogen signaling (194). In utero exposure has been associated with increased size of the prostate gland and oligospermia in males and premature onset of puberty in females (195, 196). BPA exposure is also associated with increased height of luminal endometrial epithelial cells as well as overall increased uterine weight (197). BPA exposure likely enhances estrogen signaling in estrogen-responsive target tissues. A dose-response increase in HOXA10 mRNA expression with up to a 15-fold increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels is seen in the human Ishikawa cell line treated with BPA

In mice, in utero BPA exposure affects embryonic HOXA10 expression. In 2-wk-old female offspring exposed to BPA via maternal treatment on d 9–16 of pregnancy, increased HOXA10 expression levels are seen in uterine endometrial stromal cells. The average increase in HOXA10 mRNA levels is 10-fold in exposed offspring (54). Altered embryonic HOX gene expression can potentially affect uterine organogenesis. BPA also regulates HOXA10 expression via ER recruitment and HOXA10-ERE binding.

BPA disrupts estrogen signaling, which may underlie such phenotypes as early age onset of ovulation, precocious puberty, and mammary epithelial proliferation seen in in utero BPA-exposed female mice (195, 197, 198). Although, BPA up-regulates HOXA10 expression, high embryonic HOXA10 levels do not result in obvious morphological developmental anomalies; it will be interesting to study the effect on adult endometrial functional differentiation, which may have potential implications for fertility.

D. Phytoestrogens
Isoflavones are a group of estrogen-like compounds of plant origin. Presumed health benefits of such naturally occurring substances have recently led to increased consumption. These compounds are structurally related to estrogen, and recent evidence indicates their potential as endocrine disruptors. Proposed mechanisms of action for isoflavones include diminished serum protein binding with consequent increased bioavailability, as well as modified ligand-ER signaling (199, 200, 201). Isoflavone exposure has also been linked to adverse reproductive outcomes, such as oligospermia in the male and uterine cancer in the female (202, 203). Two commonly consumed isoflavone compounds, genistein and daidzein, are found in soy-based food products such as nutritional supplements and infant formula. Vegetarian diets inclusive of soy products also result in greater exposure to these substances.

Although, adult female mice treated with genistein manifest increased uterine HOXA10 mRNA and protein expression levels in vivo, neither genistein nor daidzein affects HOXA10 expression in the uteri of female offspring exposed to these isoflavones in utero. Furthermore, in vitro, in Ishikawa cells, genistein increases HOXA10 mRNA and protein expression even at very low concentrations of 10–10 M and above. In contrast, daidzein does not have any effect at doses reflective of typical consumption exposure. As with the other endocrine disruptors, regulation of HOXA10 by genistein is also ER dependent. Unlike MXC discussed previously, neither isoflavone has been shown to disrupt either ER{alpha} or ERß binding to the HOXA10-ERE.

Although embryonic Hoxa10 expression is not affected by exposure to either compound in utero, adult human exposure to genistein at typical levels may potentially impact fertility. Recent evidence has linked phytoestrogens to developmental anomalies of the reproductive tract as well as to endometrial adenocarcinoma (202, 204). It is possible that isoflavones may affect the expression of other endocrine-regulated Hox genes or alternatively other estrogenic target genes and thereby disrupt endocrine signaling in the uterus.

Exposure to endocrine disruptors can result in inappropriate quantitative as well as spatial endocrine signaling. We have reviewed the effect of endocrine disruptors resulting in insufficient or alternatively excessive estrogen signaling on the uterine expression of the homeobox gene HOXA10. The consequences of disrupted endocrine signaling during fetal and neonatal periods can lead to organogenic defects. Adult exposure can result in physiological defects including infertility from aberrant endometrial functional differentiation.


    VI. Targets of HOX Gene Transcriptional Regulation
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
The Hox/HOX genes are ubiquitously expressed, and their role in cell fate specification and tissue differentiation has been well characterized. The diversity of phenotypes generated by Hox gene activity makes it highly likely that they regulate numerous target genes in multiple pathways. In this section, we discuss those Hox target genes that are known to be operative downstream in endocrine hormone-regulated Hox gene pathways.

A. EMX2
Mammalian Emx2/EMX2 is a nonparalogous homeobox gene that is orthologous to the Drosophila empty spiracles (ems) gene (205, 206, 207). Emx2/EMX2 is necessary for development of the dorsal telencephalon and is also expressed in the epithelial components of the developing urogenital system (208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213). Emx2 is necessary for female reproductive tract development because loss of function Emx2 mutant mice exhibit agenesis of the paramesonephric duct and die in utero from renal anomalies (214). The female reproductive tract undergoes embryonic organogenic differentiation and adult cyclic functional differentiation; as described above, conserved developmental programs such as estrogen-progesterone-Hox gene signaling are operative at both times. Similarly, Emx2/EMX2, which is necessary for reproductive tract organogenesis, is also expressed in endometrial cells in both the adult murine and human reproductive tract, wherein it also displays a dynamic expression pattern (215).

Abd-B, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian Hoxa10/HOXA10, directly regulates ems (216, 217). As expected, HOXA10 directly binds a regulatory element in the EMX2 enhancer and transcriptionally represses gene expression. The sex steroids estradiol and progesterone up-regulate HOXA10, which in turn represses EMX2 expression in endometrial cells. HOXA10-mediated EMX2 repression results in lowest EMX2 mRNA levels in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, coincident with high estradiol, progesterone, and HOXA10 levels (215). In contrast to Drosophila, where Abd-B positively regulates ems, the direction of regulation is reversed in human endometrium. This may represent an evolutionary adaptation necessary to generate diversity in reproductive systems across species.

The negative regulatory relationship between HOXA10 and EMX2 is further demonstrated in patients with endometriosis. Such patients have implantation defects and demonstrate diminished levels of endometrial HOXA10 expression in the secretory phase (48). Diminished HOXA10 expression derepresses EMX2 repression, which is manifest as simultaneously elevated levels of endometrial EMX2 mRNA (218). Consistent with the fact that high peri-implantation endometrial EMX2 levels are associated with a defective implantation phenotype in patients with endometriosis, there is a significant 40% decrease in the litter size of mice transfected with EMX2 cDNA in the peri-implantation period (219).

Although the precise role of EMX2 in embryonic and adult endometrial development has not yet been defined, the dynamic expression of this gene varies with that of HOXA10, which in turn is dependant on the systemic levels of estradiol and progesterone. EMX2, therefore, functions in a common sex steroid-driven, homeobox gene-regulated developmental pathway in the reproductive tract.

B. ß3 Integrin
The integrins are cell adhesion molecules that mediate cell-substratum interactions. ß3 integrin is a subunit of the vitronectin receptor {alpha}vß3 (220, 221). Osteopontin, a ligand of the vitronectin receptor, is abundant in the endometrium and has been proposed as a bridging molecule between the endometrium and trophoblast, thereby constituting an early link between the maternal and fetal tissues (222, 223, 224). Although the {alpha}v subunit is expressed in the endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle, the ß3 subunit is expressed on endometrial epithelial cells during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle after cycle d 20, around the time of embryo implantation. Temporally, this period is associated with high levels of expression of progesterone and its target HOXA10 (28). In turn, progesterone signaling through HOXA10 mediates endometrial functional differentiation necessary for embryo implantation. Consequently, this period is also known as the window of receptivity (225, 226).

Endometrial ß3 integrin expression also coincides with peak systemic progesterone and high endometrial HOXA10 levels in the midsecretory phase of the menstrual cycle. During endometrial functional differentiation, the epithelial expression of ß3 integrin likely indicates the onset of endometrial receptivity. In fact, implantation in mice is attenuated by in utero exposure to ß3 integrin monoclonal antibodies indicating its association with this process (227).

HOXA10 has been shown to directly regulate the expression of ß3 integrin through a consensus Abd-B type HOX binding site located 5' of the ß3 integrin gene within its regulatory region (228). In the endometrium, HOXA10, acting downstream of sex steroids, regulates ß3 integrin expression (225). In turn, ß3 integrin expression by endometrial epithelial cells may be suggestive of terminal differentiation in this cell type in preparation for embryo implantation. Further evidence that HOXA10 and ß3 integrin function in a common pathway is seen in diseases with implantation defects such as endometriosis, where simultaneous dysregulation of both HOXA10 and ß3 integrin has been demonstrated (48, 229, 230, 231).

Hox gene-mediated regulation of ß3 integrin is also seen in the hematopoietic system where ß3 integrin is a transcriptional target of HOXD3 in erythroleukemic cells (232). Whereas HOXA10 increases ß3 integrin expression in the endometrium, in these leukemic cells HOXD3 directly up-regulates expression of the integrin. Interestingly, up-regulation of ß3 integrin is associated with increased adhesiveness in the leukemic cells. In the endometrium too, this integrin has been proposed to mediate initial adhesion between the maternal and fetal organisms, before actual implantation. It is likely that, by facilitating adhesive interactions between different cell types through modulation of integrin expression, the Hox genes not only direct organic development (involving the adhesion of multiple cell types into a functional unit), but also have implications in physiology, such as embryo implantation and invasiveness in cancer cells. In the hematopoietic system, as discussed above, there is hierarchical expression of the various Hox genes, with 3' paralogs being expressed in less differentiated cells and 5' paralogs in more differentiated cells. Nevertheless, it is likely that the predominantly expressed paralog in each stage continues to regulate conserved pathways, resulting in characteristic shared phenotypes, such as cell adhesion through modulation of integrin expression.

C. IGFBP-1
IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) was the first characterized member of a family of structurally related soluble proteins that modulate the bioavailability of the IGF-I and IGF-II. Given the diversity of IGF action, it is not surprising that IGFBPs are associated with such varied biological processes as apoptosis, metabolism, and development. The homeobox gene Hoxa5 is known to cooperatively regulate the expression of IGFBP-1 along with the Forkhead receptor (FKHR) transcription factor in liver cells (233).

Human decidualized endometrial stromal cells express IGFBP-1 (234). It has been hypothesized that a paracrine interaction at the maternal-fetal interface occurs between decidual IGFBP-1 and fetal trophoblast-expressed IGF-II that is necessary for embryo implantation. IGFBP-1 has been hypothesized to provide a mechanism of maternal restraint to trophoblast invasion (235).

In baboon and human endometrial stromal cells, HOXA10 interacts with the FOXO transcription factor FKHR, and together this heterodimer up-regulates IGFBP-1 expression (233, 236). The cooperative up-regulation appears much greater than that expected due to the additive effects of individually mediated up-regulation of IGFBP1 by either HOXA10 or FKHR (237).

D. EP3 and EP4
Like other prostaglandins, PGE2 and PGI2 regulate mitogenic and vasogenic processes and have been implicated in both endometrial decidualization and embryo implantation (238). Likewise, the cyclooxygenase isoform COX-2 that generates these prostaglandin molecules also has a role in endometrial functional differentiation and early pregnancy (238).

Hoxa10 (–/–) mice not only demonstrate endometrial stromal proliferation defects but also exhibit diminished proliferation in response to treatment with progesterone compared with wild-type mice. Altered endometrial prostaglandin signaling in Hoxa10 (–/–) mice may be responsible in part for these phenotypic attributes. PGE2 activates a distinct set of cell-surface receptors (EP1–4), of which two subtypes, EP3 and EP4, are aberrantly expressed in the uterine stroma in Hoxa10 (–/–) mice (60). Endometrial stromal EP3 and EP4 expression is diminished in response to treatment with progesterone in the absence of Hoxa10, suggesting that Hoxa10 specifically mediates progesterone regulation of EP3 and EP4 in the uterine stroma and therefore is an intermediary in progesterone-driven prostaglandin signaling pathways.

In general, the effect of HOX genes on a developmental pathway depends on where in that pathway they act. If they act very far downstream in the hierarchy of a signaling pathway, then the output is subtle, with Hox genes acting as cell type switches rather than as major developmental pathway switches. If they are acting higher in the hierarchy, then the fate switch is more dramatic, often producing major morphological derangements. At different times in development, HOX genes may act as determinants of cell fate at influencing the cells that make up an entire organ, or later in development influencing more subtle cell phenotype changes. Either may be altered by hormonal regulation of HOX genes.


    VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional Cofactors
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
The thirty-nine paralogous HOX genes determine the anteroposterior body plan. The diversity of differentiated phenotypes attributable to HOX gene activity likely entails their regulation of a plethora of target genes. So far, the mechanisms that dictate the specificity of HOX gene activity are unclear. The canonical HOX-DNA binding site "TNAT" is ubiquitous in the genome and does not account for selectivity of HOX gene binding (239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245). Although the more 3' and anteriorly expressed HOX genes tend to recognize and bind TAAT elements in target gene enhancers, the posterior or 5' HOX genes preferentially recognize and bind the elements comprised of the nucleotides TTAT (239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245). However, these subtle differences in binding site nucleotide sequence are insufficient to explain HOX gene target specificity. Cofactor binding is one mechanism that confers HOX gene target specificity.

Members of the TALE (three-amino acid loop extension) group of homeodomain proteins function as cofactors that provide target gene specificity to HOX transcription factors (246, 247, 248). This family includes Pbx (mammalian ortholog of Drosophila extradenticle) and Meis, which have been shown to interact directly with HOX proteins in several systems. Although dimerization with Pbx has been demonstrated across diverse paralogous HOX proteins (groups 1–13), only groups 9 and 10 have been shown to interact with Meis (242, 245). In the hematopoietic system, HOXA9, HOXB8, and HOXA10 interact with Pbx1 and Meis1 resulting in immortalization and differentiation of myeloid progenitors (71, 249, 250, 251). Interestingly, interaction of Hoxa9 with Meis-1a but not Pbx 1b resulted in the transformation of primary bone marrow cells (252). Target gene specificity conferred by cofactor binding dictates the profile of expression of HOX-activated or HOX-repressed target genes in any given cell (71, 249, 250, 253). The expressed target genes can at times radically alter cellular physiology, resulting in transformation.

As discussed earlier, Hoxa9 and Hoxa10 have each been shown to complex Pbx1a and oppositely regulate the respiratory burst oxidases CYBB1 and NCF2 (71, 254). Expression of Pbx2 and Meis1 has also been demonstrated in adult human endometrium (255). Stromal coexpression of these proteins along with HOXA10 and HOXA11 results in their inclusion in heterotrimeric complexes necessary for the regulation of specific target genes.

Interactions between transcription factors such as HOXA10 and FOXO, described above, permits modulation of a greater number of target genes with more precise regulatory control than regulation by each transcription factor independently. Combinatorial transcription factor regulation of target genes may be a mechanism that allows fine control of tissue-specific terminally differentiated phenotypes.


    VIII. Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 
Hox genes play a major role in the morphological diversification of the anteroposterior body axis of animal embryos by switching the fates of segments between alternative developmental pathways. With this power to shape morphology, HOX genes are extraordinary regulators of tissue identity. HOX genes allow the generation of structural and functional diversity in both developing and adult tissues. The clustered arrangement and interconnected regulatory regions provide a mechanism by which HOX proteins can cause organized and graded transition from one cell type to another. This may take the form of a spatial axis in a developing organism, a temporal axis during development, or adult cellular maturation. Here, we propose that a differential response to fluctuating hormone signals is a mechanism of HOX gene regulation. By regulating HOX genes, hormonal signals have made use of an ancient and highly conserved mechanism of regulating graded developmental changes. This is a mechanism by which hormonal signals can function to relay more than binary information and regulate complex developmental pathways.

In this review, we have discussed the well-characterized roles of the homeobox genes in embryogenesis as well as adult functional differentiation. Several hormones and their cognate receptors belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily regulate homeobox genes and thereby mediate these developmental processes. During embryogenesis, sequential Hox gene expression in specific temporal and spatial domains is necessary for the determination of the anteroposterior body axis. Although regulation of Hox gene expression in general is poorly characterized, endocrine regulation is clearly necessary for both rostral and caudal segmental Hox gene expression. Although retinoic acid regulates the more 3', anterior, and earlier expressed HOX genes, the sex steroids estradiol and progesterone regulate more 5', posterior, and later expressed HOX genes (Fig. 4Go). Aberrations in endocrine control mechanisms lead to developmental anomalies.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Endocrine regulation of HOX genes is necessary for axial patterning during embryogenesis. Retinoic acid predominantly regulates the expression of 3' HOX paralogous genes. In keeping with the rule of collinearity, these 3' HOX paralogs are expressed early in embryogenesis in the rostral region of the developing embryo. In contrast, the estrogens influence axial patterning in the caudal region of the developing embryo through Abd-B orthologous homeobox genes. Additionally in the adult, the sex steroid progesterone regulates the Abd-B orthologs to drive functional differentiation of the adult reproductive tract, whereas 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, the active metabolite of vitamin D, drives HOXA10 expression with reproductive and hematopoietic effects.

 
For functionality, many adult organ systems retain developmental plasticity. Interestingly, Hox gene expression in these adult tissues is necessary for differentiation. These organ systems are targets of endocrine regulation. Several hormones regulate physiological processes in these adult tissues by regulating adult Hox gene expression.

Given the ubiquitous developmental processes that are regulated by Hox genes during embryogenesis and in the adult, it is likely that this conserved set of transcription factors mediates a crucial developmental tenet. The expression of Hox genes in a given target tissue enables functionality of a plethora of developmental pathways and target genes that in turn are responsible for diverse structural and functional phenotypes. Expanding knowledge of target genes that are directly regulated by HOX proteins delineates the signal transduction pathways by which hormones influence these developmental pathways. Importantly, the expression of Hox genes in a target tissue also enables responsiveness to several regulatory signals such as hormones that regulate Hox genes. Episodic secretion of hormones, either in physiological cycles or in pathological disease states, may affect Hox gene expression. Understanding these pathways has relevance to physiology as well as human disease and environmental insults.

Further elucidation of endocrine hormone-mediated Hox gene developmental pathways offers the potential for novel mechanisms of targeted therapy. By selectively modulating the activity of specific endocrine target genes, specific therapeutic effects may be obtained. For example, the efficiency of implantation is augmented by selectively up-regulating Hoxa10 expression in murine uteri (35). The human uterus is also amenable to gene therapy and in the future could be targeted using this therapeutic modality (256).

Likewise, endocrine-Hox signaling may have implications in stem cell biology. Recently, it has been demonstrated that bone marrow-derived stem cells have the ability to transdifferentiate into multiple nonhematopoietic cell lineages. Furthermore, they have been shown to engraft the uterus, contributing to cyclic adult endometrial regeneration (257). As discussed earlier, these bone marrow-derived stem cells express specific HOX genes that determine cell fate. It is likely that differential expression of HOX genes by bone marrow-derived stem cells may similarly drive their transdifferentiation to endometrial cells. Potential genetic alteration in bone marrow-derived stem cells by endocrine hormone treatment or HOX gene transfection may alter the fate of targeted cells with tremendous therapeutic implications, particularly in disorders of development, senescence, and oncology.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank José Pastor Pareja, Ph.D., for assistance with figures.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants ES10610 and HD36887.

First Published Online April 21, 2006

Abbreviations: Abd-B, Abdominal B; ART, assisted reproductive technology; BPA, bisphenol A; DES, diethylstilbestrol; ems, empty spiracles gene; EP, prostaglandin E receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; HOM-C, homeotic complex; Hox or HOX, homeobox; IGFBP-1, IGF binding protein-1; MPA, medroxyprogesterone acetate; MXC, methoxychlor; p.c., post coitum; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PG, prostaglandin; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RARE, retinoic acid response element SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator; VDR, vitamin D receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. HOX Gene Structure...
 III. Regulation of HOX...
 IV. Endocrine Regulation of...
 V. Endocrine Disruption of...
 VI. Targets of HOX...
 VII. HOXA10 Transcriptional...
 VIII. Conclusion
 References
 

  1. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R 1992 Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283–302[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Krumlauf R 1994 Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78:191–201[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kappen C, Schughart K, Ruddle FH 1993 Early evolutionary origin of major homeodomain sequence classes. Genomics 18:54–70[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Akam M 1989 Hox and HOM: homologous gene clusters in insects and vertebrates. Cell 57:347–349[Medline]
  5. Affolter M, Percival-Smith A, Muller M, Leupin W, Gehring WJ 1990 DNA binding properties of the purified Antennapedia homeodomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4093–4097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ekker SC, Young KE, von Kessler DP, Beachy PA 1991 Optimal DNA sequence recognition by the Ultrabithorax homeodomain of Drosophila. EMBO J 10:1179–1186[Medline]
  7. Graham A, Papalopulu N, Lorimer J, McVey JH, Tuddenham EG, Krumlauf R 1988 Characterization of a murine homeobox gene, Hox-2.6, related to the Drosophila Deformed gene. Genes Dev 2:1424–1438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lewis EB 1978 A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565–570[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Mlodzik M, Fjose A, Gehring WJ 1988 Molecular structure and spatial expression of a homeobox gene from the labial region of the Antennapedia-complex. EMBO J 7:2569–2578[Medline]
  10. Krumlauf R 1993 Mouse Hox genetic functions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:621–625[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Balling R, Mutter G, Gruss P, Kessel M 1989 Craniofacial abnormalities induced by ectopic expression of the homeobox gene Hox-1.1 in transgenic mice. Cell 58:337–347[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hunt P, Gulisano M, Cook M, Sham MH, Faiella A, Wilkinson D, Boncinelli E, Krumlauf R 1991 A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353:861–864[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Favier B, Dolle P 1997 Developmental functions of mammalian Hox genes. Mol Hum Reprod 3:115–131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Davis AP, Witte DP, Hsieh-Li HM, Potter SS, Capecchi MR 1995 Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature 375:791–795[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Horan GS, Ramirez-Solis R, Featherstone MS, Wolgemuth DJ, Bradley A, Behringer RR 1995 Compound mutants for the paralogous hoxa-4, hoxb-4, and hoxd-4 genes show more complete homeotic transformations and a dose-dependent increase in the number of vertebrae transformed. Genes Dev 9:1667–1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Merrill VK, Diederich RJ, Turner FR, Kaufman TC 1989 A genetic and developmental analysis of mutations in labial, a gene necessary for proper head formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 135:376–391[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cho KW, Morita EA, Wright CV, De Robertis EM 1991 Overexpression of a homeodomain protein confers axis-forming activity to uncommitted Xenopus embryonic cells. Cell 65:55–64[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, Foster JW, Frischauf AM, Lovell-Badge R, Goodfellow PN 1990 A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature 346:240–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Lee MM, Donahoe PK 1993 Mullerian-inhibiting substance: a gonadal hormone with multiple functions. Endocr Rev 14:152–164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Satokata I, Benson G, Maas R 1995 Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10-deficient mice. Nature 374:460–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M, Branford W, Li H, Small K, Potter SS 1995 Hoxa 11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development 121:1373–1385[Abstract]
  22. Benson GV, Lim H, Paria BC, Satokata I, Dey SK, Maas RL 1996 Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression. Development 122:2687–2696[Abstract]
  23. Favier B, Le Meur M, Chambon P, Dolle P 1995 Axial skeleton homeosis and forelimb malformations in Hoxd-11 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:310–314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB, Igarashi P 1997 A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod 57:1338–1345[Abstract]
  25. Ma L, Benson GV, Lim H, Dey SK, Maas RL 1998 Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev Biol 197:141–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Magli MC, Largman C, Lawrence HJ 1997 Effects of HOX homeobox genes in blood cell differentiation. J Cell Physiol 173:168–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Magli MC, Barba P, Celetti A, De Vita G, Cillo C, Boncinelli E 1991 Coordinate regulation of HOX genes in human hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:6348–6352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P 1998 HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest 101:1379–1384[Medline]
  29. Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, Arici A 1999 Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1129–1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Korach KS 1994 Insights from the study of animals lacking functional estrogen receptor. Science 266:1524–1527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hewitt SC, Harrell JC, Korach KS 2005 Lessons in estrogen biology from knockout and transgenic animals. Annu Rev Physiol 67:285–308[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Gendron RL, Paradis H, Hsieh-Li HM, Lee DW, Potter SS, Markoff E 1997 Abnormal uterine stromal and glandular function associated with maternal reproductive defects in Hoxa-11 null mice. Biol Reprod 56:1097–1105[Abstract]
  33. Daikoku T, Song H, Guo Y, Riesewijk A, Mosselman S, Das SK, Dey SK 2004 Uterine Msx-1 and Wnt4 signaling becomes aberrant in mice with the loss of leukemia inhibitory factor or Hoxa-10: evidence for a novel cytokine-homeobox-Wnt signaling in implantation. Mol Endocrinol 18:1238–1250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Miller C, Sassoon DA 1998 Wnt-7a maintains appropriate uterine patterning during the development of the mouse female reproductive tract. Development 125:3201–3211[Abstract]
  35. Bagot CN, Troy PJ, Taylor HS 2000 Alteration of maternal Hoxa10 expression by in vivo gene transfection affects implantation. Gene Ther 7:1378–1384[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Bagot CN, Kliman HJ, Taylor HS 2001 Maternal Hoxa10 is required for pinopod formation in the development of mouse uterine receptivity to embryo implantation. Dev Dyn 222:538–544[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Guillomot M, Betteridge KJ, Harvey D, Goff AK 1986 Endocytotic activity in the endometrium during conceptus attachment in the cow. J Reprod Fertil 78:27–36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Edwards RG 1994 Implantation, interception and contraception. Hum Reprod 9:985–995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Nikas G, Drakakis P, Loutradis D, Mara-Skoufari C, Koumantakis E, Michalas S, Psychoyos A 1995 Uterine pinopodes as markers of the ‘nidation window’ in cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Hum Reprod 10:1208–1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Singh MM, Chauhan SC, Trivedi RN, Maitra SC, Kamboj VP 1996 Correlation of pinopod development on uterine luminal epithelial surface with hormonal events and endometrial sensitivity in rat. Eur J Endocrinol 135:107–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kolb BA, Najmabadi S, Paulson RJ 1997 Ultrastructural characteristics of the luteal phase endometrium in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 67:625–630[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Bansode FW, Chauhan SC, Makker A, Singh MM 1998 Uterine luminal epithelial alkaline phosphatase activity and pinopod development in relation to endometrial sensitivity in the rat. Contraception 58:61–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Psychoyos A, Mandon P 1971 Scanning electron microscopy of the surface of the rat uterine epithelium during delayed implantation. J Reprod Fertil 26:137–138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Psychoyos A, Mandon P 1971 [Study of the surface of the uterine epithelium by scanning electron microscope. Observations in the rat at the 4th and 5th day of pregnancy.] C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D 272:2723–2725[Medline]
  45. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2001 Molecular markers of implantation: clinical implications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13:269–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Cermik D, Selam B, Taylor HS 2003 Regulation of HOXA-10 expression by testosterone in vitro and in the endometrium of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:238–243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2002 Hydrosalpinx fluid diminishes endometrial cell HOXA10 expression. Fertil Steril 78:577–580[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Taylor HS, Bagot C, Kardana A, Olive D, Arici A 1999 HOX gene expression is altered in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 14:1328–1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Salih SM, Taylor HS 2004 HOXA10 gene expression in human fallopian tube and ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1404–1406[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Akbas GE, Taylor HS 2004 HOXC and HOXD gene expression in human endometrium: lack of redundancy with HOXA paralogs. Biol Reprod 70:39–45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. de Stanchina E, Gabellini D, Norio P, Giacca M, Peverali FA, Riva S, Falaschi A, Biamonti G 2000 Selection of homeotic proteins for binding to a human DNA replication origin. J Mol Biol 299:667–680[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Kumar S, Giacca M, Norio P, Biamonti G, Riva S, Falaschi A 1996 Utilization of the same DNA replication origin by human cells of different derivation. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3289–3294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Gabellini D, Colaluca IN, Vodermaier HC, Biamonti G, Giacca M, Falaschi A, Riva S, Peverali FA 2003 Early mitotic degradation of the homeoprotein HOXC10 is potentially linked to cell cycle progression. EMBO J 22:3715–3724[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Sarno JL, Schatz F, Lockwood CJ, Huang STJ, Taylor HS 2006 Thrombin and interleukin-1ß regulate HOXA10 expression in human term decidual cells: implications for preterm labor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2366–2372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. McDonald TJ, Nathanielsz PW 1991 Bilateral destruction of the fetal paraventricular nuclei prolongs gestation in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:764–770[Medline]
  56. Liggins GC, Fairclough RJ, Grieves SA, Kendall JZ, Knox BS 1973 The mechanism of initiation of parturition in the ewe. Recent Prog Horm Res 29:111–159[Medline]
  57. Liggins GC, Kennedy PC, Holm LW 1967 Failure of initiation of parturition after electrocoagulation of the pituitary of the fetal lamb. Am J Obstet Gynecol 98:1080–1086[Medline]
  58. Romero R, Mazor M, Brandt F, Sepulveda W, Avila C, Cotton DB, Dinarello CA 1992 Interleukin-1{alpha} and interleukin-1ß in preterm and term human parturition. Am J Reprod Immunol 27:117–123[Medline]
  59. Rosen T, Schatz F, Kuczynski E, Lam H, Koo AB, Lockwood CJ 2002 Thrombin-enhanced matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression: a mechanism linking placental abruption with premature rupture of the membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 11:11–17[Medline]
  60. Lim H, Ma L, Ma WG, Maas RL, Dey SK 1999 Hoxa-10 regulates uterine stromal cell responsiveness to progesterone during implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol 13:1005–1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Sauvageau G, Lansdorp PM, Eaves CJ, Hogge DE, Dragowska WH, Reid DS, Largman C, Lawrence HJ, Humphries RK 1994 Differential expression of homeobox genes in functionally distinct CD34+ subpopulations of human bone marrow cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:12223–12227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Lawrence HJ, Stage KM, Mathews CH, Detmer K, Scibienski R, MacKenzie M, Migliaccio E, Boncinelli E, Largman C 1993 Expression of HOX C homeobox genes in lymphoid cells. Cell Growth Differ 4:665–669[Abstract]
  63. Brady G, Barbara M, Iscove NN 1990 Representative in vitro cDNA amplification from individual hemopoietic cells and colonies. Methods Mol Cell Biol 2:17–25
  64. Celetti A, Barba P, Cillo C, Rotoli B, Boncinelli E, Magli MC 1993 Characteristic patterns of HOX gene expression in different types of human leukemia. Int J Cancer 53:237–244[Medline]
  65. Sauvageau G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Eaves CJ, Lawrence HJ, Largman C, Lansdorp PM, Humphries RK 1995 Overexpression of HOXB4 in hematopoietic cells causes the selective expansion of more primitive populations in vitro and in vivo. Genes Dev 9:1753–1765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Keller G, Kennedy M, Papayannopoulou T, Wiles MV 1993 Hematopoietic commitment during embryonic stem cell differentiation in culture. Mol Cell Biol 13:473–486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Lawrence HJ, Sauvageau G, Ahmadi N, Lopez AR, LeBeau MM, Link M, Humphries K, Largman C 1995 Stage- and lineage-specific expression of the HOXA10 homeobox gene in normal and leukemic hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol 23:1160–1166[Medline]
  68. Francis NJ, Kingston RE, Woodcock CL 2004 Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science 306:1574–1577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Valk-Lingbeek ME, Bruggeman SW, van Lohuizen M 2004 Stem cells and cancer; the polycomb connection. Cell 118:409–418[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. de Napoles M, Mermoud JE, Wakao R, Tang YA, Endoh M, Appanah R, Nesterova TB, Silva J, Otte AP, Vidal M, Koseki H, Brockdorff N 2004 Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev Cell 7:663–676[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Eklund EA, Jalava A, Kakar R 2000 Tyrosine phosphorylation of HoxA10 decreases DNA binding and transcriptional repression during interferon {gamma}-induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cell lines. J Biol Chem 275:20117–20126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Bruhl T, Urbich C, Aicher D, Acker-Palmer A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S 2004 Homeobox A9 transcriptionally regulates the EphB4 receptor to modulate endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Circ Res 94:743–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Rossig L, Urbich C, Bruhl T, Dernbach E, Heeschen C, Chavakis E, Sasaki K, Aicher D, Diehl F, Seeger F, Potente M, Aicher A, Zanetta L, Dejana E, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S 2005 Histone deacetylase activity is essential for the expression of HoxA9 and for endothelial commitment of progenitor cells. J Exp Med 201:1825–1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Green S, Chambon P 1986 A superfamily of potentially oncogenic hormone receptors. Nature 324:615–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Wahli W, Martinez E 1991 Superfamily of steroid nuclear receptors: positive and negative regulators of gene expression. FASEB J 5:2243–2249[Abstract]
  76. Gronemeyer H 1992 Control of transcription activation by steroid hormone receptors. FASEB J 6:2524–2529[Abstract]
  77. Denner LA, Weigel NL, Maxwell BL, Schrader WT, O’Malley BW 1990 Regulation of progesterone receptor-mediated transcription by phosphorylation. Science 250:1740–1743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Perissi V, Rosenfeld MG 2005 Controlling nuclear receptors: the circular logic of cofactor cycles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:542–554[CrossRef][Medline]
  79. Nieuwkoop PD 1955 Independent and dependent development in the formation of the central nervous system in amphibians; a review of experimental analysis. Exp Cell Res:262–273
  80. Frohman MA, Boyle M, Martin GR 1990 Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene: analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110:589–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Murphy P, Hill RE 1991 Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111:61–74[Abstract]
  82. Zhang M, Kim HJ, Marshall H, Gendron-Maguire M, Lucas DA, Baron A, Gudas LJ, Gridley T, Krumlauf R, Grippo JF 1994 Ectopic Hoxa-1 induces rhombomere transformation in mouse hindbrain. Development 120:2431–2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Ang SL, Conlon RA, Jin O, Rossant J 1994 Positive and negative signals from mesoderm regulate the expression of mouse Otx2 in ectoderm explants. Development 120:2979–2989[Abstract]
  84. Durston AJ, Timmermans JP, Hage WJ, Hendriks HF, de Vries NJ, Heideveld M, Nieuwkoop PD 1989 Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature 340:140–144[CrossRef][Medline]
  85. Conlon RA, Rossant J 1992 Exogenous retinoic acid rapidly induces anterior ectopic expression of murine Hox-2 genes in vivo. Development 116:357–368[Medline]
  86. Marshall H, Studer M, Popperl H, Aparicio S, Kuroiwa A, Brenner S, Krumlauf R 1994 A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1. Nature 370:567–571[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Popperl H, Featherstone MS 1993 Identification of a retinoic acid response element upstream of the murine Hox-4.2 gene. Mol Cell Biol 13:257–265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Ogura T, Evans RM 1995 Evidence for two distinct retinoic acid response pathways for HOXB1 gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:392–396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Ogura T, Evans RM 1995 A retinoic acid-triggered cascade of HOXB1 gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:387–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Langston AW, Gudas LJ 1992 Identification of a retinoic acid responsive enhancer 3' of the murine homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Mech Dev 38:217–227[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Sirbu IO, Gresh L, Barra J, Duester G 2005 Shifting boundaries of retinoic acid activity control hindbrain segmental gene expression. Development 132:2611–2622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Rossant J, Zirngibl R, Cado D, Shago M, Giguere V 1991 Expression of a retinoic acid response element-hsplacZ transgene defines specific domains of transcriptional activity during mouse embryogenesis. Genes Dev 5:1333–1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Mendelsohn C, Ruberte E, LeMeur M, Morriss-Kay G, Chambon P 1991 Developmental analysis of the retinoic acid-inducible RAR-ß 2 promoter in transgenic animals. Development 113:723–734[Abstract]
  94. Reynolds K, Mezey E, Zimmer A 1991 Activity of the ß-retinoic acid receptor promoter in transgenic mice. Mech Dev 36:15–29[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Lohnes D, Mark M, Mendelsohn C, Dolle P, Dierich A, Gorry P, Gansmuller A, Chambon P 1994 Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (I). Craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities in RAR double mutants. Development 120:2723–2748[Abstract]
  96. Sive HL, Draper BW, Harland RM, Weintraub H 1990 Identification of a retinoic acid-sensitive period during primary axis formation in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev 4:932–942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  97. Morriss-Kay GM, Murphy P, Hill RE, Davidson DR 1991 Effects of retinoic acid excess on expression of Hox-2.9 and Krox-20 and on morphological segmentation in the hindbrain of mouse embryos. EMBO J 10:2985–2995[Medline]
  98. Ruiz i Altaba A, Jessell TM 1991 Retinoic acid modifies the pattern of cell differentiation in the central nervous system of neurula stage Xenopus embryos. Development 112:945–958[Abstract]
  99. Ruiz i Altaba A, Jessell T 1991 Retinoic acid modifies mesodermal patterning in early Xenopus embryos. Genes Dev 5:175–187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  100. Serpente P, Tumpel S, Ghyselinck NB, Niederreither K, Wiedemann LM, Dolle P, Chambon P, Krumlauf R, Gould AP 2005 Direct crossregulation between retinoic acid receptor ß and Hox genes during hindbrain segmentation. Development 132:503–513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Boylan JF, Lufkin T, Achkar CC, Taneja R, Chambon P, Gudas LJ 1995 Targeted disruption of retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (RAR {alpha}) and RAR {gamma} results in receptor-specific alterations in retinoic acid-mediated differentiation and retinoic acid metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 15:843–851[Abstract]
  102. Boylan JF, Lohnes D, Taneja R, Chambon P, Gudas LJ 1993 Loss of retinoic acid receptor {gamma} function in F9 cells by gene disruption results in aberrant Hoxa-1 expression and differentiation upon retinoic acid treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:9601–9605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  103. Couse JF, Korach KS 1999 Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev 20:358–417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O 1993 Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11162–11166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Block K, Kardana A, Igarashi P, Taylor HS 2000 In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure alters Hox gene expression in the developing mullerian system. FASEB J 14:1101–1108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  106. Tanenbaum DM, Wang Y, Williams SP, Sigler PB 1998 Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor’s ligand binding domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5998–6003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  107. Shiau AK, Barstad D, Loria PM, Cheng L, Kushner PJ, Agard DA, Greene GL 1998 The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 95:927–937[CrossRef][Medline]
  108. Couse JF, Dixon D, Yates M, Moore AB, Ma L, Maas R, Korach KS 2001 Estrogen receptor-{alpha} knockout mice exhibit resistance to the developmental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure on the female reproductive tract. Dev Biol 238:224–238[CrossRef][Medline]
  109. Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, Takeda S, Sekine K, Yoshihara Y, Kawakami T, Arioka K, Sato H, Uchiyama Y, Masushige S, Fukamizu A, Matsumoto T, Kato S 1997 Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exhibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning. Nat Genet 16:391–396[CrossRef][Medline]
  110. Halhali A, Acker GM, Garabedian M 1991 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces in vivo the decidualization of rat endometrial cells. J Reprod Fertil 91:59–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Du H, Daftary GS, Lalwani SI, Taylor HS 2005 Direct regulation of HOXA10 by 1,25-(OH)2D3 in human myelomonocytic cells and human endometrial stromal cells. Mol Endocrinol 19:2222–2233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Hata H, Kuramoto H 1992 Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors in human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells (Ishikawa cells). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 42:201–210[CrossRef][Medline]
  113. Lessey BA, Ilesanmi AO, Castelbaum AJ, Yuan L, Somkuti SG, Chwalisz K, Satyaswaroop PG 1996 Characterization of the functional progesterone receptor in an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line (Ishikawa): progesterone-induced expression of the {alpha}1 integrin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol [Erratum (1997) 60:161] 59:31–39
  114. Nishida M, Kasahara K, Kaneko M, Iwasaki H, Hayashi K 1985 [Establishment of a new human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, Ishikawa cells, containing estrogen and progesterone receptors]. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 37:1103–1111[Medline]
  115. Akbas GE, Song J, Taylor HS 2004 A HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) is differentially regulated by 17 ß-estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES). J Mol Biol 340:1013–1023[CrossRef][Medline]
  116. Land JA, Evers JL 2003 Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod 18:455–457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. 2000 Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higher-order multiple births–United States, 1980–1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:535–538
  118. Gerris J, Van Royen E 2000 Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: a plea for single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 15:1884–1888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  119. Olivennes F 2000 Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART. Double trouble: yes a twin pregnancy is an adverse outcome. Hum Reprod 15:1663–1665[Free Full Text]
  120. Taylor HS, Daftary GS, Selam B 2003 Endometrial HOXA10 expression after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril 80(Suppl 2):839–843
  121. Murdoch WJ 1995 Immunolocalization of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor site in murine endometrium that mediates apoptosis. Cell Tissue Res 282:527–529[Medline]
  122. Anderson GL, Judd HL, Kaunitz AM, Barad DH, Beresford SA, Pettinger M, Liu J, McNeeley SG, Lopez AM 2003 Effects of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and associated diagnostic procedures: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 290:1739–1748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  123. Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, Stefanick ML, Gass M, Lane D, Rodabough RJ, Gilligan MA, Cyr MG, Thomson CA, Khandekar J, Petrovitch H, McTiernan A 2003 Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 289:3243–3253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  124. Raman V, Martensen SA, Reisman D, Evron E, Odenwald WF, Jaffee E, Marks J, Sukumar S 2000 Compromised HOXA5 function can limit p53 expression in human breast tumours. Nature 405:974–978[CrossRef][Medline]
  125. Chu MC, Selam FB, Taylor HS 2004 HOXA10 regulates p53 expression and matrigel invasion in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther 3:568–572[Medline]
  126. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N 1998 Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  127. Rutqvist LE, Johansson H, Signomklao T, Johansson U, Fornander T, Wilking N 1995 Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for early stage breast cancer and second primary malignancies. Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:645–651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  128. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Redmond CK, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM 1994 Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-14. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:527–537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  129. Martino S, Cauley JA, Barrett-Connor E, Powles TJ, Mershon J, Disch D, Secrest RJ, Cummings SR 2004 Continuing outcomes relevant to Evista: breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a randomized trial of raloxifene. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1751–1761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  130. Martino S, Costantino J, McNabb M, Mershon J, Bryant K, Powles T, Secrest RJ 2004 The role of selective estrogen receptor modulators in the prevention of breast cancer: comparison of the clinical trials. Oncologist 9:116–125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  131. Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, Grady D, Powles TJ, Cauley JA, Norton L, Nickelsen T, Bjarnason NH, Morrow M, Lippman ME, Black D, Glusman JE, Costa A, Jordan VC 1999 The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation. JAMA 281:2189–2197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  132. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery Jr CA, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O’Malley BW 1995 Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 9:2266–2278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  133. Dominguez F, Pellicer A, Simon C 2003 The chemokine connection: hormonal and embryonic regulation at the human maternal-embryonic interface–a review. Placenta 24(Suppl B):S48–S55
  134. Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, Wang H 2004 Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev 25:341–373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Escary JL, Perreau J, Dumenil D, Ezine S, Brulet P 1993 Leukaemia inhibitory factor is necessary for maintenance of haematopoietic stem cells and thymocyte stimulation. Nature 363:361–364[CrossRef][Medline]
  136. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2000 Implantation in the human: the role of HOX genes. Semin Reprod Med 18:311–320[CrossRef][Medline]
  137. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2004 Pleiotropic effects of Hoxa10 on the functional development of peri-implantation endometrium. Mol Reprod Dev 67:8–14[CrossRef][Medline]
  138. Cermik D, Karaca M, Taylor HS 2001 HOXA10 expression is repressed by progesterone in the myometrium: differential tissue-specific regulation of HOX gene expression in the reproductive tract. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3387–3392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  139. Mesiano S, Chan EC, Fitter JT, Kwek K, Yeo G, Smith R 2002 Progesterone withdrawal and estrogen activation in human parturition are coordinated by progesterone receptor A expression in the myometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2924–2930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  140. Chau YM, Pando S, Taylor HS 2002 HOXA11 silencing and endogenous HOXA11 antisense ribonucleic acid in the uterine endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2674–2680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  141. Klinefelter HF, Reifenstein EC, Albright E 1942 Syndrome characterized by gynecomastia, aspermatogenesis without a-leydigism and increased excretion of follicle-stimulating hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2:615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Bose HS, Sugawara T, Strauss 3rd JF, Miller WL 1996 The pathophysiology and genetics of congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. International Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia Consortium. N Engl J Med 335:1870–1878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  143. Walsh PC, Madden JD, Harrod MJ, Goldstein JL, MacDonald PC, Wilson JD 1974 Familial incomplete male pseudohermaphroditism, type 2. Decreased dihydrotestosterone formation in pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias. N Engl J Med 291:944–949[Medline]
  144. Griffin JE, Wilson JD 1980 The syndromes of androgen resistance. N Engl J Med 302:198–209[Medline]
  145. Kolon TF, Wiener JS, Lewitton M, Roth DR, Gonzales Jr ET, Lamb DJ 1999 Analysis of homeobox gene HOXA10 mutations in cryptorchidism. J Urol 161:275–280[CrossRef][Medline]
  146. Dunaif A, Thomas A 2001 Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Annu Rev Med 52:401–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  147. Dunaif A, Xia J, Book CB, Schenker E, Tang Z 1995 Excessive insulin receptor serine phosphorylation in cultured fibroblasts and in skeletal muscle. A potential mechanism for insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Invest 96:801–810[Medline]
  148. Dunaif A 1997 Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev 18:774–800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  149. Horie K, Takakura K, Imai K, Liao S, Mori T 1992 Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the human endometrium, decidua, placenta and pathological conditions of the endometrium. Hum Reprod 7:1461–1466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  150. Okon MA, Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Li TC 1998 Serum androgen levels in women who have recurrent miscarriages and their correlation with markers of endometrial function. Fertil Steril 69:682–690[CrossRef][Medline]
  151. Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ 1996 Decreases in ovarian cytochrome P450c17 {alpha} activity and serum free testosterone after reduction of insulin secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 335:617–623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  152. Jakubowicz DJ, Iuorno MJ, Jakubowicz S, Roberts KA, Nestler JE 2002 Effects of metformin on early pregnancy loss in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:524–529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  153. Glueck CJ, Wang P, Goldenberg N, Sieve-Smith L 2002 Pregnancy outcomes among women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with metformin. Hum Reprod 17:2858–2864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  154. Hollis BW, Iskersky VN, Chang MK 1989 In vitro metabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by human trophoblastic homogenates, mitochondria, and microsomes: lack of evidence for the presence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3–1{alpha}- and 24R-hydroxylases. Endocrinology 125:1224–1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Evans KN, Bulmer JN, Kilby MD, Hewison M 2004 Vitamin D and placental-decidual function. J Soc Gynecol Investig 11:263–271[Medline]
  156. Kachkache M, Rebut-Bonneton C, Demignon J, Cynober E, Garabedian M 1993 Uterine cells other than stromal decidual cells are required for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 production during early human pregnancy. FEBS Lett 333:83–88[CrossRef][Medline]
  157. Glorieux FH, Arabian A, Delvin EE 1995 Pseudo-vitamin D deficiency: absence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1 {alpha}-hydroxylase activity in human placenta decidual cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2255–2258[Abstract]
  158. Whitsett JA, Ho M, Tsang RC, Norman EJ, Adams KG 1981 Synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by human placenta in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:484–488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  159. Kwiecinski GG, Petrie GI, DeLuca HF 1989 Vitamin D is necessary for reproductive functions of the male rat. J Nutr 119:741–744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  160. Halloran BP, DeLuca HF 1980 Effect of vitamin D deficiency on fertility and reproductive capacity in the female rat. J Nutr 110:1573–1580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  161. Panda DK, Miao D, Tremblay ML, Sirois J, Farookhi R, Hendy GN, Goltzman D 2001 Targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1{alpha}-hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7498–7503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  162. Dardenne O, Prud’homme J, Arabian A, Glorieux FH, St-Arnaud R 2001 Targeted inactivation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3)-1({alpha})-hydroxylase gene (CYP27B1) creates an animal model of pseudovitamin D-deficiency rickets. Endocrinology 142:3135–3141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  163. Kahn AJ, Simmons DJ 1975 Investigation of cell lineage in bone using a chimaera of chick and quail embryonic tissue. Nature 258:325–327[CrossRef][Medline]
  164. Bar-Shavit Z, Teitelbaum SL, Reitsma P, Hall A, Pegg LE, Trial J, Kahn AJ 1983 Induction of monocytic differentiation and bone resorption by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5907–5911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  165. Mangelsdorf DJ, Koeffler HP, Donaldson CA, Pike JW, Haussler MR 1984 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation in a human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60): receptor-mediated maturation to macrophage-like cells. J Cell Biol 98:391–398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  166. Munker R, Norman A, Koeffler HP 1986 Vitamin D compounds. Effect on clonal proliferation and differentiation of human myeloid cells. J Clin Invest 78:424–430[Medline]
  167. Olsson I, Gullberg U, Ivhed I, Nilsson K 1983 Induction of differentiation of the human histiocytic lymphoma cell line U-937 by 1 {alpha},25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. Cancer Res 43:5862–5867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  168. Abe E, Miyaura C, Sakagami H, Takeda M, Konno K, Yamazaki T, Yoshiki S, Suda T 1981 Differentiation of mouse myeloid leukemia cells induced by 1 {alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4990–4994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  169. Miyaura C, Abe E, Suda T, Kuroki T 1985 Alternative differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) induced selectively by retinoic acid and 1 {alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cancer Res 45:4244–4248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  170. Murao S, Gemmell MA, Callaham MF, Anderson NL, Huberman E 1983 Control of macrophage cell differentiation in human promyelocytic HL-60 leukemia cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate. Cancer Res 43:4989–4996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  171. Honma Y, Hozumi M, Abe E, Konno K, Fukushima M, Hata S, Nishii Y, DeLuca HF, Suda T 1983 1 {alpha},25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 1 {alpha}-hydroxyvitamin D3 prolong survival time of mice inoculated with myeloid leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:201–204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  172. Rots NY, Liu M, Anderson EC, Freedman LP 1998 A differential screen for ligand-regulated genes: identification of HoxA10 as a target of vitamin D3 induction in myeloid leukemic cells. Mol Cell Biol 18:1911–1918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  173. Fisher JS 2004 Are all EDC effects mediated via steroid hormone receptors? Toxicology 205:33–41[CrossRef][Medline]
  174. Haney AF, Hammond CB, Soules MR, Creasman WT 1979 Diethylstilbestrol-induced upper genital tract abnormalities. Fertil Steril 31:142–146[Medline]
  175. Haney AF, Newbold RR, Fetter BF, McLachlan JA 1986 Paraovarian cysts associated with prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure. Comparison of the human with a mouse model. Am J Pathol 124:405–411[Abstract]
  176. Kaufman RH, Adam E, Binder GL, Gerthoffer E 1980 Upper genital tract changes and pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:299–308[Medline]
  177. Mittendorf R 1995 Teratogen update: carcinogenesis and teratogenesis associated with exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) in utero. Teratology 51:435–445[CrossRef][Medline]
  178. DeCherney AH, Cholst I, Naftolin F 1981 Structure and function of the fallopian tubes following exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) during gestation. Fertil Steril 36:741–745[Medline]
  179. Greenwald P, Barlow JJ, Nasca PC, Burnett WS 1971 Vaginal cancer after maternal treatment with synthetic estrogens. N Engl J Med 285:390–392[Medline]
  180. Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC 1971 Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. N Engl J Med 284:878–881[Medline]
  181. Chiu CH, Amemiya C, Dewar K, Kim CB, Ruddle FH, Wagner GP 2002 Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5492–5497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  182. Amstislavsky SY, Kizilova EA, Eroschenko VP 2003 Preimplantation mouse embryo development as a target of the pesticide methoxychlor. Reprod Toxicol 17:79–86[CrossRef][Medline]
  183. Amstislavsky SY, Kizilova EA, Golubitsa AN, Vasilkova AA, Eroschenko VP 2004 Preimplantation exposures of murine embryos to estradiol or methoxychlor change postnatal development. Reprod Toxicol 18:103–108[CrossRef][Medline]
  184. Borgeest C, Miller KP, Gupta R, Greenfeld C, Hruska KS, Hoyer P, Flaws JA 2004 Methoxychlor-induced atresia in the mouse involves Bcl-2 family members, but not gonadotropins or estradiol. Biol Reprod 70:1828–1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  185. Hall DL, Payne LA, Putnam JM, Huet-Hudson YM 1997 Effect of methoxychlor on implantation and embryo development in the mouse. Reprod Toxicol 11:703–708[CrossRef][Medline]
  186. Miller KP, Borgeest C, Greenfeld C, Tomic D, Flaws JA 2004 In utero effects of chemicals on reproductive tissues in females. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198:111–131[CrossRef][Medline]
  187. Khera KS, Whalen C, Trivett G 1978 Teratogenicity studies on linuron, malathion, and methoxychlor in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 45:435–444[CrossRef][Medline]
  188. Cummings AM, Gray Jr LE 1987 Methoxychlor affects the decidual cell response of the uterus but not other progestational parameters in female rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90:330–336[CrossRef][Medline]
  189. Cummings AM 1993 Replacement of estrogen by methoxychlor in the artificially-induced decidual cell response in the rat. Life Sci 52:347–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  190. Cummings AM, Laskey J 1993 Effect of methoxychlor on ovarian steroidogenesis: role in early pregnancy loss. Reprod Toxicol 7:17–23[Medline]
  191. Fei X, Chung H, Taylor HS 2005 Methoxychlor disrupts uterine Hoxa10 gene expression. Endocrinology 146:3445–3451[CrossRef][Medline]
  192. Wu Y, Halverson G, Basir Z, Strawn E, Yan P, Guo SW 2005 Aberrant methylation at HOXA10 may be responsible for its aberrant expression in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:371–380[CrossRef][Medline]
  193. Das SK, Taylor JA, Korach KS, Paria BC, Dey SK, Lubahn DB 1997 Estrogenic responses in estrogen receptor-{alpha} deficient mice reveal a distinct estrogen signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12786–12791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  194. Safe S 2000 Bisphenol A and related endocrine disruptors. Toxicol Sci 56:251–252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  195. vom Saal FS, Timms BG, Montano MM, Palanza P, Thayer KA, Nagel SC, Dhar MD, Ganjam VK, Parmigiani S, Welshons WV 1997 Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2056–2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  196. Nagel SC, vom Saal FS, Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M, Welshons WV 1997 Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ Health Perspect 105:70–76[Medline]
  197. Markey CM, Michaelson CL, Veson EC, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM 2001 The mouse uterotrophic assay: a reevaluation of its validity in assessing the estrogenicity of bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 109:55–60[Medline]
  198. Colerangle JB, Roy D 1997 Profound effects of the weak environmental estrogen-like chemical bisphenol A on the growth of the mammary gland of Noble rats. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 60:153–160[CrossRef][Medline]
  199. Arnold SF, Robinson MK, Notides AC, Guillette Jr LJ, McLachlan JA 1996 A yeast estrogen screen for examining the relative exposure of cells to natural and xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 104:544–548[Medline]
  200. Arnold SF, Collins BM, Robinson MK, Guillette Jr LJ, McLachlan JA 1996 Differential interaction of natural and synthetic estrogens with extracellular binding proteins in a yeast estrogen screen. Steroids 61:642–646[CrossRef][Medline]
  201. Klotz DM, Beckman BS, Hill SM, McLachlan JA, Walters MR, Arnold SF 1996 Identification of environmental chemicals with estrogenic activity using a combination of in vitro assays. Environ Health Perspect 104:1084–1089[Medline]
  202. Newbold RR, Banks EP, Bullock B, Jefferson WN 2001 Uterine adenocarcinoma in mice treated neonatally with genistein. Cancer Res 61:4325–4328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  203. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette Jr LJ, Jegou B, Jensen TK, Jouannet P, Keiding N, Leffers H, McLachlan JA, Meyer O, Muller J, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Scheike T, Sharpe R, Sumpter J, Skakkebaek NE 1996 Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 4):741–803
  204. North K, Golding J 2000 A maternal vegetarian diet in pregnancy is associated with hypospadias. The ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. BJU Int 85:107–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  205. Kastury K, Druck T, Huebner K, Barletta C, Acampora D, Simeone A, Faiella A, Boncinelli E 1994 Chromosome locations of human EMX and OTX genes. Genomics 22:41–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  206. Grossniklaus U, Cadigan KM, Gehring WJ 1994 Three maternal coordinate systems cooperate in the patterning of the Drosophila head. Development 120:3155–3171[Abstract]
  207. Dalton D, Chadwick R, McGinnis W 1989 Expression and embryonic function of empty spiracles: a Drosophila homeo box gene with two patterning functions on the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. Genes Dev 3:1940–1956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  208. Boncinelli E, Gulisano M, Broccoli V 1993 Emx and Otx homeobox genes in the developing mouse brain. J Neurobiol 24:1356–1366[CrossRef][Medline]
  209. Walldorf U, Gehring WJ 1992 Empty spiracles, a gap gene containing a homeobox involved in Drosophila head development. EMBO J 11:2247–2259[Medline]
  210. Pellegrini M, Mansouri A, Simeone A, Boncinelli E, Gruss P 1996 Dentate gyrus formation requires Emx2. Development 122:3893–3898[Abstract]
  211. Yoshida M, Suda Y, Matsuo I, Miyamoto N, Takeda N, Kuratani S, Aizawa S 1997 Emx1 and Emx2 functions in development of dorsal telencephalon. Development 124:101–111[Abstract]
  212. Simeone A, Gulisano M, Acampora D, Stornaiuolo A, Rambaldi M, Boncinelli E 1992 Two vertebrate homeobox genes related to the Drosophila empty spiracles gene are expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex. EMBO J 11:2541–2550[Medline]
  213. Simeone A, Acampora D, Gulisano M, Stornaiuolo A, Boncinelli E 1992 Nested expression domains of four homeobox genes in developing rostral brain. Nature 358:687–690[CrossRef][Medline]
  214. Miyamoto N, Yoshida M, Kuratani S, Matsuo I, Aizawa S 1997 Defects of urogenital development in mice lacking Emx2. Development 124:1653–1664[Abstract]
  215. Troy PJ, Daftary GS, Bagot CN, Taylor HS 2003 Transcriptional repression of peri-implantation EMX2 expression in mammalian reproduction by HOXA10. Mol Cell Biol 23:1–13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  216. Jones B, McGinnis W 1993 The regulation of empty spiracles by Abdominal-B mediates an abdominal segment identity function. Genes Dev 7:229–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  217. Taylor HS 1998 A regulatory element of the empty spiracles homeobox gene is composed of three distinct conserved regions that bind regulatory proteins. Mol Reprod Dev 49:246–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  218. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2004 EMX2 gene expression in the female reproductive tract and aberrant expression in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2390–2396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  219. Taylor HS, Fei X 2005 EMX2 regulates mammalian reproduction by altering endometrial cell proliferation. Mol Endocrinol 19:2839–2846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  220. Lawler J, Weinstein R, Hynes RO 1988 Cell attachment to thrombospondin: the role of ARG-GLY-ASP, calcium, and integrin receptors. J Cell Biol 107:2351–2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  221. Suehiro K, Smith JW, Plow EF 1996 The ligand recognition specificity of ß3 integrins. J Biol Chem 271:10365–10371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  222. Sueoka K, Shiokawa S, Miyazaki T, Kuji N, Tanaka M, Yoshimura Y 1997 Integrins and reproductive physiology: expression and modulation in fertilization, embryogenesis, and implantation. Fertil Steril 67:799–811[CrossRef][Medline]
  223. Kiefer MC, Bauer DM, Barr PJ 1989 The cDNA and derived amino acid sequence for human osteopontin. Nucleic Acids Res 17:3306[Free Full Text]
  224. van Dijk S, D’Errico JA, Somerman MJ, Farach-Carson MC, Butler WT 1993 Evidence that a non-RGD domain in rat osteopontin is involved in cell attachment. J Bone Miner Res 8:1499–1506[Medline]
  225. Lessey BA, Damjanovich L, Coutifaris C, Castelbaum A, Albelda SM, Buck CA 1992 Integrin adhesion molecules in the human endometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormal menstrual cycle. J Clin Invest 90:188–195[Medline]
  226. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Buck CA, Lei Y, Yowell CW, Sun J 1994 Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 62:497–506[Medline]
  227. Illera MJ, Cullinan E, Gui Y, Yuan L, Beyler SA, Lessey BA 2000 Blockade of the {alpha} (v)ß(3) integrin adversely affects implantation in the mouse. Biol Reprod 62:1285–1290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  228. Daftary GS, Troy PJ, Bagot CN, Young SL, Taylor HS 2002 Direct regulation of ß3-integrin subunit gene expression by HOXA10 in endometrial cells. Mol Endocrinol 16:571–579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  229. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ 1995 Integrins in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:347–348[Medline]
  230. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SW, Buck CA, Schinnar R, Bilker W, Strom BL 1994 Aberrant integrin expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:643–649[Abstract]
  231. Illera MJ, Juan L, Stewart CL, Cullinan E, Ruman J, Lessey BA 2000 Effect of peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis on implantation in the mouse model. Fertil Steril 74:41–48[CrossRef][Medline]
  232. Taniguchi Y, Komatsu N, Moriuchi T 1995 Overexpression of the HOX4A (HOXD3) homeobox gene in human erythroleukemia HEL cells results in altered adhesive properties. Blood 85:2786–2794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  233. Foucher I, Volovitch M, Frain M, Kim JJ, Souberbielle JC, Gan L, Unterman TG, Prochiantz A, Trembleau A 2002 Hoxa5 overexpression correlates with IGFBP1 upregulation and postnatal dwarfism: evidence for an interaction between Hoxa5 and Forkhead box transcription factors. Development 129:4065–4074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Hustin J, Philippe E, Teisner B, Grudzinskas JG 1994 Immunohistochemical localization of two endometrial proteins in the early days of human pregnancy. Placenta 15:701–708[Medline]
  235. Irwin JC, Suen LF, Faessen GH, Popovici RM, Giudice LC 2001 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II inhibition of endometrial stromal cell tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 and IGF-binding protein-1 suggests paracrine interactions at the decidua:trophoblast interface during human implantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2060–2064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  236. Kim JJ, Jaffe RC, Fazleabas AT 1999 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 expression in baboon endometrial stromal cells: regulation by filamentous actin and requirement for de novo protein synthesis. Endocrinology 140:997–1004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  237. Kim JJ, Taylor HS, Akbas GE, Foucher I, Trembleau A, Jaffe RC, Fazleabas AT, Unterman TG 2003 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 promoter activity by FKHR and HOXA10 in primate endometrial cells. Biol Reprod 68:24–30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  238. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK 1997 Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell 91:197–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  239. Graba Y, Aragnol D, Pradel J 1997 Drosophila Hox complex downstream targets and the function of homeotic genes. Bioessays 19:379–388[CrossRef][Medline]
  240. Hayashi S, Scott MP 1990 What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins? Cell 63:883–894[CrossRef][Medline]
  241. LaRonde-LeBlanc NA, Wolberger C 2003 Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior. Genes Dev 17:2060–2072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  242. Chang CP, Jacobs Y, Nakamura T, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Cleary ML 1997 Meis proteins are major in vivo DNA binding partners for wild-type but not chimeric Pbx proteins. Mol Cell Biol 17:5679–5687[Abstract]
  243. Chang CP, Brocchieri L, Shen WF, Largman C, Cleary ML 1996 Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus. Mol Cell Biol 16:1734–1745[Abstract]
  244. Shen WF, Montgomery JC, Rozenfeld S, Moskow JJ, Lawrence HJ, Buchberg AM, Largman C 1997 AbdB-like Hox proteins stabilize DNA binding by the Meis1 homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol 17:6448–6458[Abstract]
  245. Shen WF, Rozenfeld S, Kwong A, Kom ves LG, Lawrence HJ, Largman C 1999 HOXA9 forms triple complexes with PBX2 and MEIS1 in myeloid cells. Mol Cell Biol 19:3051–3061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  246. Monica K, Galili N, Nourse J, Saltman D, Cleary ML 1991 PBX2 and PBX3, new homeobox genes with extensive homology to the human proto-oncogene PBX1. Mol Cell Biol 11:6149–6157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  247. Mann RS, Chan SK 1996 Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet 12:258–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  248. Wilson DS, Desplan C 1995 Homeodomain proteins. Cooperating to be different. Curr Biol 5:32–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  249. Bromleigh VC, Freedman LP 2000 p21 is a transcriptional target of HOXA10 in differentiating myelomonocytic cells. Genes Dev 14:2581–2586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  250. Fujino T, Yamazaki Y, Largaespada DA, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Hirokawa K, Nakamura T 2001 Inhibition of myeloid differentiation by Hoxa9, Hoxb8, and Meis homeobox genes. Exp Hematol 29:856–863[CrossRef][Medline]
  251. Schnabel CA, Jacobs Y, Cleary ML 2000 HoxA9-mediated immortalization of myeloid progenitors requires functional interactions with TALE cofactors Pbx and Meis. Oncogene 19:608–616[CrossRef][Medline]
  252. Kroon E, Krosl J, Thorsteinsdottir U, Baban S, Buchberg AM, Sauvageau G 1998 Hoxa9 transforms primary bone marrow cells through specific collaboration with Meis1a but not Pbx1b. EMBO J 17:3714–3725[CrossRef][Medline]
  253. Swift GH, Liu Y, Rose SD, Bischof LJ, Steelman S, Buchberg AM, Wright CV, MacDonald RJ 1998 An endocrine-exocrine switch in the activity of the pancreatic homeodomain protein PDX1 through formation of a trimeric complex with PBX1b and MRG1 (MEIS2). Mol Cell Biol 18:5109–5120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  254. Bei L, Lu Y, Eklund EA 2005 HOXA9 activates transcription of the gene encoding gp91Phox during myeloid differentiation. J Biol Chem 280:12359–12370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  255. Sarno JL, Kliman HJ, Taylor HS 2005 HOXA10, Pbx2, and Meis1 protein expression in the human endometrium: formation of multimeric complexes on HOXA10 target genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:522–528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  256. Daftary GS, Taylor HS 2001 Efficient liposome-mediated gene transfection and expression in the intact human uterus. Hum Gene Ther 12:2121–2127[CrossRef][Medline]
  257. Taylor HS 2004 Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients. JAMA 292:81–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
E. Winterhager, R. Grummer, P.A. Mavrogianis, C.J.P. Jones, J.M. Hastings, and A.T. Fazleabas
Connexin expression pattern in the endometrium of baboons is influenced by hormonal changes and the presence of endometriotic lesions
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2009; 15(10): 645 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. Sarno, F. Schatz, S. J. Huang, C. Lockwood, and H. S. Taylor
Thrombin and interleukin-1{beta} decrease HOX gene expression in human first trimester decidual cells: implications for pregnancy loss
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 15(7): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gen Biol EvolHome page
W. Otto, P. F. Stadler, F. Lopez-Giraldez, J. P. Townsend, V. J. Lynch, and G. P. Wagner
Measuring Transcription Factor-Binding Site Turnover: A Maximum Likelihood Approach Using Phylogenies
Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 85 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
G. Weiss, L. T. Goldsmith, R. N. Taylor, D. Bellet, and H. S. Taylor
Inflammation in Reproductive Disorders
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2009; 16(2): 216 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Borghese, F. Mondon, J.-C. Noel, I. Fayt, T.-M. Mignot, D. Vaiman, and C. Chapron
Research Resource: Gene Expression Profile for Ectopic Versus Eutopic Endometrium Provides New Insights into Endometriosis Oncogenic Potential
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 22(11): 2557 - 2562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Gemelli, C. Orlandi, T. Z. Marani, A. Martello, T. Vignudelli, F. Ferrari, M. Montanari, S. Parenti, A. Testa, A. Grande, et al.
The Vitamin D3/Hox-A10 Pathway Supports MafB Function during the Monocyte Differentiation of Human CD34+ Hemopoietic Progenitors
J. Immunol., October 15, 2008; 181(8): 5660 - 5672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. Szumska, G. Pieles, R. Essalmani, M. Bilski, D. Mesnard, K. Kaur, A. Franklyn, K. El Omari, J. Jefferis, J. Bentham, et al.
VACTERL/caudal regression/Currarino syndrome-like malformations in mice with mutation in the proprotein convertase Pcsk5
Genes & Dev., June 1, 2008; 22(11): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Myrthue, B. L.S. Rademacher, J. Pittsenbarger, B. Kutyba-Brooks, M. Gantner, D. Z. Qian, and T. M. Beer
The Iroquois Homeobox Gene 5 Is Regulated by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Human Prostate Cancer and Regulates Apoptosis and the Cell Cycle in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3562 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Cohen, M. Shmoish, L. Levi, U. Cheruti, B. Levavi-Sivan, and E. Lubzens
Alterations in Micro-Ribonucleic Acid Expression Profiles Reveal a Novel Pathway for Estrogen Regulation
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1687 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. M. Bodnar, J. M. Catov, J. M. Roberts, and H. N. Simhan
Prepregnancy Obesity Predicts Poor Vitamin D Status in Mothers and Their Neonates
J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2437 - 2442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Miao, Z. Wang, H. Provencher, B. Muir, S. Dahiya, E. Carney, C.-O. Leong, D. C. Sgroi, and S. Orsulic
HOXB13 promotes ovarian cancer progression
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17093 - 17098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G B Godbole, D N Modi, and C P Puri
Regulation of homeobox A10 expression in the primate endometrium by progesterone and embryonic stimuli
Reproduction, September 1, 2007; 134(3): 513 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. M. Bodnar, J. M. Catov, H. N. Simhan, M. F. Holick, R. W. Powers, and J. M. Roberts
Maternal Vitamin D Deficiency Increases the Risk of Preeclampsia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3517 - 3522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Q. Hassan, R. Tare, S. H. Lee, M. Mandeville, B. Weiner, M. Montecino, A. J. van Wijnen, J. L. Stein, G. S. Stein, and J. B. Lian
HOXA10 Controls Osteoblastogenesis by Directly Activating Bone Regulatory and Phenotypic Genes
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(9): 3337 - 3352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Martin, M. B. Taylor, G. Krikun, C. Lockwood, G. E. Akbas, and H. S. Taylor
Differential Cell-Specific Modulation of HOXA10 by Estrogen and Specificity Protein 1 Response Elements
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1920 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. Suzuki, H. Urushitani, T. Sato, T. Kobayashi, H. Watanabe, Y. Ohta, and T. Iguchi
Gene Expression Change in the Mullerian Duct of the Mouse Fetus Exposed to Diethylstilbestrol In Utero
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2007; 232(4): 503 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
J. A. Costoya
Functional analysis of the role of POK transcriptional repressors
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, March 24, 2007; (2007) elm002v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Huang, Y. Pu, D. Hepps, D. Danielpour, and G. S. Prins
Posterior Hox Gene Expression and Differential Androgen Regulation in the Developing and Adult Rat Prostate Lobes
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1235 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals