help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pacak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. S.
Endocrine Reviews 25 (4): 568-580
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Functional Imaging of Endocrine Tumors: Role of Positron Emission Tomography

Karel Pacak, Graeme Eisenhofer and David S. Goldstein

Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch (K.P.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; and Clinical Neurocardiology Section (D.S.G., G.E.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Karel Pacak, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., Unit on Clinical Neuroendocrinology, Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 9D42, 10 Center Drive MSC-1583, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1583. E-mail: karel{at}mail.nih.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Diagnostic Localization of...
 III. Future Trends
 References
 
This article provides an update on functional imaging approaches for diagnostic localization of endocrine tumors, with emphasis on positron emission tomography (PET). [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning is now a widely accepted imaging approach in clinical oncology. Benefits include improved patient outcome facilitated by staging and monitoring of disease and better treatment planning. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET is also useful in some endocrine tumors, particularly in recurrent or metastatic thyroid cancer where the degree of accumulation of the radionuclide has prognostic value. However, this imaging approach does not take full advantage of the unique characteristics of endocrine tumors. Endocrine tumor cells take up hormone precursors, express receptors and transporters, and synthesize, store, and release hormones. These characteristics offer highly specific targets for PET. Radiopharmaceuticals developed for such approaches include 6-[18F]fluorodopamine, and [11C]hydroxyephedrine for localization of pheochromocytomas, [11C]5-hydroxytryptophan and [11C]L-dihydroxyphenylalanine for carcinoid tumors, and [11C]metomidate for adrenocortical tumors. These functional imaging approaches are not meant to supplant conventional imaging modalities but should be used conjointly to better identify specific characteristics of endocrine tumors. This represents a relatively new and evolving approach to imaging that promises to answer specific questions about the behavior and growth of endocrine tumors, their malignant potential, and responsiveness to different treatment modalities.

I. Introduction
A. PET principles and radiopharmaceuticals
B. Advantages and limitations of PET scanning

II. Diagnostic Localization of Endocrine Tumors
A. Thyroid cancer
B. Adrenocortical tumors
C. Pheochromocytoma
D. Neuroblastoma
E. Carcinoids and pancreatic endocrine tumors
F. Primary hyperparathyroidism
G. Pituitary tumors

III. Future Trends


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Diagnostic Localization of...
 III. Future Trends
 References
 
TUMORS OF ENDOCRINE tissue differ from most other tumors in that their functional characteristics can produce large clinical effects despite small size. Conventional anatomic imaging methods can fail to visualize such tumors or their metastases and do not depict their specific endocrine nature. Endocrine tumor cells take up hormone precursors, express receptors and transporters, and synthesize, store, and release hormones. Novel imaging techniques are now exploiting these characteristics and, with functional information derived from images, helping to define or predict histological features, identify metastases, or guide therapy. Combinations of imaging approaches, especially with data from positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, are providing increasingly accurate diagnosis. Thus, PET scanning is rapidly becoming a valuable diagnostic tool in clinical oncology. Newly developed PET radiopharmaceuticals with specific cellular targets (e.g., receptors, transporters) offer particular promise in endocrine oncology. This review describes this new technology with respect to other modalities used in the clinical evaluation of endocrine tumors.

A. PET principles and radiopharmaceuticals
PET radiopharmaceuticals generate positrons with particular physical characteristics that provide the basis for high-resolution detection and image construction (1, 2). After collision of a positron with an electron, the mass of each is converted to photon energy. Photons, released at 180 degrees from each other, are detected as "coincidences" by detectors in the scanner. The coincidence data are converted into tomographic images, using mathematical reconstruction techniques that correct for attenuation by organs of differing density and for physical decay of the tracer, providing in essence a three-dimensional quantitative map of distribution of the tracer in the body. Two types of scans are generated during a PET imaging session. Emission scans reflect photon emission from inside the body after injection of the imaging agent. Ancillary transmission, or attenuation scans, are like low-resolution computed tomographic scans and are used to correct for photon absorption within organs. Current PET tomographs have a theoretical spatial resolution of 3–4 mm. In clinical practice, this is probably less, i.e., 5–10 mm (3). Lesions smaller than this cannot be imaged confidently.

A PET scanning session can take 20–60 min or more, depending on the number of levels scanned, isotope used, delay between tracer administration and data acquisition, scanner configuration, and nature of data acquisition. Recent developments now offer the ability of blending conventional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), with PET (4). These PET-CT scanners can serve for both attenuation correction and anatomic registration and will likely improve tumor diagnosis and localization.

The specific cellular targeting of PET agents provides the basis for the excellent diagnostic specificity of PET. 18F can usually be incorporated into a molecule with relatively small effects on the ability of the radiopharmaceutical to bind to receptors, undergo metabolism by enzymes, or enter cells via transporters. Other positron-emitting radionuclides, such as 11C, can be incorporated without changing the molecular structure or characteristics. Because of their short physical half-lives, 11C-, 15O-, and 13N-labeled compounds must be synthesized and administered quickly. In contrast, 18F has a longer half-life, not necessarily requiring on-site isotope production (Table 1Go). An advantage of the short half-lives of PET radioisotopes compared with other radiopharmaceuticals is that relatively large radioactive doses can be administered safely to patients. Also, because PET and other radiopharmaceuticals can be synthesized with relatively high specific activity, these compounds can be used at doses that do not produce pharmacological effects.18F-labeled 2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (18FDG) is the most commonly used PET imaging agent (Table 2GoGo) (5, 6). 18FDG undergoes active uptake into cells by glucose transporters and is then phosphorylated, but not metabolized, and becomes "trapped" within cells (Fig. 1AGo). The utility of 18FDG scanning for tumor imaging depends primarily on increased glucose metabolism and, consequently, greater trapping of the agent in the more metabolically active tumor cells than in surrounding tissues. This basis for imaging does not, however, offer high diagnostic specificity. Consequently, interpretation of 18FDG PET images requires experience and skill in recognizing causes of variable physiological uptake, such as may occur with muscle contraction, fasting, inflammation, wound healing, and anatomic or physiological variants (7, 8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Radiotracers used for detection of endocrine tumors

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Value of functional imaging for different types of endocrine tumors

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2A. Continued

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Principles of functional imaging of endocrine tumors. A, 18FDG is taken up into cells via glucose transporters, and after conversion to [18F]deoxyglucose-6-phosphate (18FDG-P), catalyzed by hexokinase (HK), is trapped in the cells, because [18F]deoxyglucose-6-phosphate is not a substrate for glucose-6-phosphatase (G6P). B, 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine (18FDA) is taken up by chromaffin cells via the cell membrane norepinephrine transporter (NET) and translocated into storage vesicles via the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT), before undergoing slow conversion to 6-[18F]fluoronorepinephrine (18FNE) catalyzed by dopamine-ß-hydroxylase (DBH). C, [11C]Metomidate binds to 11ß-hydroxylase (11ßOHase) in adrenocortical cells. D, [11C]Estradiol binds to nuclear receptors and [111In]pentetreotide ([111In]octreotide) to cell membrane somatostatin receptors.

 
Other PET imaging approaches with potential for visualizing tumors are based on pathophysiological features common to most malignancies, such as local blood flow (15O-labeled water, 13N-labeled ammonia), cellular proliferation or DNA synthesis ([11C]choline, [11C]thymidine, [18F]fluorothymidine) (9), protein synthesis ([11C]methionine, [11C]tyrosine) (10, 11), hypoxia ([18F]fluoromisonidazole) (12), angiogenesis ([18F]galacto-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) (13), and apoptosis ([18F]annexin V) (14). None of these approaches exploit the particular functional characteristics of endocrine tumors. In contrast, recently developed techniques for imaging pheochromocytomas and carcinoid tumors take advantage of storage systems and the specific amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation pathways that characterize these tumors (Fig. 1Go, B and C) (15, 16, 17). For instance, 6-[18F]fluorodopamine is taken up into pheochromocytoma cells by cell membrane catecholamine transporters and then concentrated in storage vesicles (15, 16). Similarly, [11C]hydroxytryptophan is taken up by carcinoid tumor cells, decarboxylated, and then stored in vesicles as [11C]serotonin (17).

Another basis for visualization of endocrine tumors by PET scanning is binding to receptors (Fig. 1DGo). Binding of [11C]methylspiperone and [11C]raclopride to dopamine type 2 receptors in pituitary tumors or 68Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor analogs illustrates this type of application (18, 19, 20). Expression of specific nuclear receptors provides another potential target for the development of PET agents.

B. Advantages and limitations of PET scanning
Compared with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET scanning offers the advantage of assessment of physiological and pathophysiological processes—cellular metabolism, tissue perfusion, and DNA and protein synthesis, and, relevant to endocrine oncology, local synthesis, uptake, storage, and receptors for hormones. Functional imaging aids initial preoperative staging, diagnostic evaluation of suspicious lesions, and identification of metastatic or recurrent tumors; in addition, it helps to refine prognosis and to select and predict responses to therapy.

PET scanning offers better resolution than single-photon emission CT due to the relatively intense radioactivity and coincidence detection, which increases signal to noise ratios. The duration of scanning is also relatively short. Thus, PET enables quantitative assessments of amounts of radioactivity in different tissues over time (time-activity curves).

These advantages come with several limitations. First is the cost and limited availability of the technology. Now that health programs have begun to approve reimbursement for PET scanning in cancer diagnosis, the availability of PET scanning is increasing and costs may decline accordingly (21). Medicare now covers 18FDG scanning for many cancers (lung, colorectal, lymphoma, melanoma, esophageal, head and neck, breast), including, most recently, thyroid cancer. A second limitation is the requirement for nearby radioisotope production. The short physical half-lives of PET radioisotopes (Table 1Go) minimize challenges related to handling of radioactive waste, but geographical and radiation-regulatory issues remain considerations. A third limitation is the theoretical limit of spatial resolution, which is poorer than that of CT or MRI.


    II. Diagnostic Localization of Endocrine Tumors
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Diagnostic Localization of...
 III. Future Trends
 References
 
A. Thyroid cancer
Scintigraphy using 131I or 123I remains the mainstay for diagnostic localization of residual, recurrent, and metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancers. Although 18FDG PET scanning can also localize these cancers (22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 35A ), CT, MRI, ultrasound, and radioiodine scanning are currently the preferred first-line imaging modalities.

In patients with known thyroid cancer following thyroidectomy, serum thyroglobulin levels, at baseline or after administration of recombinant human TSH, provide useful diagnostic information for detecting recurrence or metastases (36, 37). Some patients with metastatic thyroid cancer have undetectable or uninterpretable thyroglobulin levels, due to circulating thyroglobulin antibodies or minimal thyroglobulin secretion (37). In this setting, radioiodine whole-body scanning and other radiological imaging studies are appropriate.

About 20% of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer have postoperative recurrence or cervical metastases. Radioiodine scanning fails to detect one third to one half of such cases due to poor iodine uptake or small tumor size (37, 38). Neck ultrasound (often followed by ultrasound guided biopsy) is therefore usually recommended when a cytological diagnosis is important. Anatomic distortion by prior surgery may obfuscate interpretation of CT and MRI imaging results. If elevated thyroglobulin levels lead to suspicion of recurrence or metastasis, then 18FDG scanning is useful. Given the approximately 90% negative predictive value of thyroglobulin testing in eliminating presence of thyroid cancer, some investigators believe that patients with baseline and TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin levels less than 2 ng/ml need not undergo further scanning, beyond whole-body radioiodine imaging (39). These patients can be followed by serial clinical examination, thyroglobulin levels, and neck ultrasound.

In patients with negative radioiodine scans after thyroidectomy, but with serum thyroglobulin levels above 2 ng/ml, 18FDG scanning can detect metastases in cervical lymph nodes not evident by CT or MRI (22, 24, 40). Thus, thyroid imaging using 18FDG should be restricted to postoperative thyroidectomy patients (Fig. 2AGo); in such patients, the sensitivity and specificity of 18FDG scanning for detecting residual tumor, recurrence, or metastases are 82–95% and 83–95%, respectively, depending on the site of metastasis (22, 25, 40, 41). 18FDG scanning may also enable detection of Hurthle cell carcinoma, which radioiodine usually fails to visualize (42).



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Coronal PET images of metastatic thyroid cancer (panel A) and metastatic pheochromocytoma (panel B). Color bar scales reflect the amount of radioactivity in a lesion (e.g., white color/thyroid cancer/ or red color/pheochromocytoma indicate the highest level of radioactivity). A, 18FDG scanning detected recurrent cancer in the left lobe of the thyroid (R) and adjacent cervical region and metastatic lesions in both lungs (arrows). CT and MRI visualized the neck lesions and lesions in the right, but not in the left, lung. All lesions were negative by [131I]scintigraphy (images of metastatic thyroid cancer were kindly provided by Dr. Nicholas Sarlis, NIH, with permission). L. kidney, Left kidney. B, 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine scanning depicted metastatic pheochromocytomas in the porta hepatis, liver, and left rib cage (arrows). The lesions were not evident on [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. High plasma free metanephrine levels indicated metastatic pheochromocytoma. Subsequent [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy detected the same lesions. The patient subsequently underwent [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine radiation therapy and responded well. GB, Gall bladder; L. kidney, left kidney; R. kidney, right kidney.

 
In some patients with metastatic thyroid cancer, the distribution and extent of uptake of 18FDG can be increased relative to that of radioiodine and more accurately indicate reduced survival (26, 29, 41, 43). Prognosis is particularly poor for tumors with high metabolic activity, i.e., a total volume of 18FDG uptake higher than 125 ml (obtained using a three-dimensional dosimetry software package) is a strong predictor of mortality (29). Conversely, thyroid cancers that remit or stabilize after radioiodine treatment tend to have decreased 18FDG uptake compared with those that remain refractory (44). Thus, higher relative uptake of 18FDG than of radioiodine may carry a poor prognosis, due to the indication of more dedifferentiated and more aggressive and metabolically active tumor cells.

Other issues relevant to imaging of metastatic thyroid cancer concern the hormone status of the patient. In particular, uptake of 18FDG and image quality may vary with thyroid hormone replacement therapy or TSH suppression therapy. Whether 18FDG uptake is improved when TSH is elevated compared with suppressed is unclear (27, 28, 42, 43, 45). Recombinant TSH-stimulated 18FDG uptake is a new approach to localization and therapy of metastatic thyroid cancer (35A ). Recombinant TSH improves the detectability of occult thyroid metastases using 18FDG PET.

Medullary thyroid cancer is often invasive and progressive over years, with a high potential for metastasis. Because of their hypermetabolic state, 18FDG scanning offers a potential approach to detect such lesions and improve identification of involved lymph nodes, surgical resection of which can result in complete or prolonged remission (46, 47).

Inflamed lymph nodes, thyroiditis, thyroid nodules, brown fat, or physiologically contracted neck muscles can be associated with increased 18FDG uptake (8, 41, 43, 48). Moreover, focal uptake of 18FDG does not reliably distinguish primary thyroid or metastatic cancer from uptake by other nearby tissues. Thyroid "incidentalomas" found on 18FDG scanning appear to have a high rate of malignancy (49) and should be assessed by fine-needle aspiration.

In summary, radioiodine scintigraphy should be used for diagnostic localization of residual, or recurrent well-differentiated cancers of the thyroid gland. 18FDG PET scanning has established its value for detecting recurrence of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer, but this is limited to patients with increased thyroglobulin levels and negative radioiodine scanning. High uptake of 18FDG carries a poor prognosis. PET scanning may also be useful in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer. Whether 18FDG PET should be performed in patients with elevated TSH levels, during T4 withdrawal, or after TSH administration requires clarification. The role of 18FDG scanning in patients without high thyroglobulin levels but with strongly suspected recurrent or metastatic cancer also requires further study.

PET scanning is likely to be useful in patients with primary or recurrent anaplastic thyroid cancer, although further preliminary studies are warranted. 18FDG scanning also offers a potential imaging approach to detect recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer.

B. Adrenocortical tumors
Most adrenocortical tumors are discovered as benign incidentalomas, during abdominal imaging, such as CT, done for other reasons. The adrenal gland is also a common site for metastatic spread of many other cancers (50). In the evaluation of adrenocortical tumors, CT and MRI always precede functional imaging.

CT densitometry, computer-generated measurements of the physical density of a tissue, is useful for initial differentiation of adrenal adenomas from metastases (51, 52, 53). A density measurement of less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU) in a homogenous mass by unenhanced CT indicates a lipid-rich adenoma (53). If the mass is inhomogenous or has a density of 10 HU or more, the diagnosis is uncertain. An adenoma remains the most common possibility, but a metastasis or other tumors should be considered. In such situations, if clinical and biochemical information is unrevealing, the next step is to assess washout of contrast material over time from the adrenal gland to distinguish adenomas from other tumors (52, 54). Briefly, standard contrast-enhanced CT images of the adrenal gland are obtained about 60 sec after the injection of contrast material. Adenomas lose enhancement more rapidly than nonadenomas. Thus, in 15 min after injection of contrast material, adrenal masses with an attenuation value of less than 30–40 HU on a contrast-enhanced CT scan or with more than 60% (40% if no unenhanced CT has been performed) of washout of initial enhancement represent adenomas (52, 53, 54).

Chemical-shift MRI can also distinguish adrenal adenomas from metastases (55). This method is based on the detection of different signal intensity for hydrogen atoms in water and lipid molecules. Thus, signal intensity is decreased for tissues containing both water and lipids in comparison with tissue containing no lipids (52, 54). The chemical shift can be detected either visually or by quantitative methods in comparison with reference tissue. MRI is preferable in children or in pregnancy because there is no radiation exposure, but ultrasound may occasionally be considered.

After malignancies are excluded, the clinician should determine the functional characteristics of the adrenal mass. This is most commonly done by biochemical testing. Thereafter, PET scanning and other imaging modalities can be particularly useful for identifying the origin and characterizing the behavior of adrenal lesions. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals are available that can detect increased cellular activity in adrenal hyperfunctional states more specifically than conventional imaging. Independent of secretory activity, PET imaging agents can also target specific adrenal gland enzymes expressed in tumor cells. An example is [11C]metomidate, which binds specifically to 11ß-hydroxylase (Fig. 1CGo). Additionally, PET scanning can be used to distinguish benign from malignant adrenocortical lesions. 18FDG scanning is remarkably effective in differentiating benign from malignant lesions with high accuracy (56, 57, 58).

[131I]6ß-Iodomethylnorcholesterol (NP-59) scintigraphy is useful for detecting adrenocortical tumor tissue. The agent is specifically bound to low-density lipoproteins and after receptor-mediated uptake, and it is stored in the adrenocortical intracellular lipid droplets. [131I]6ß-Iodomethylnorcholesterol scintigraphy has high specificity (100%) and reasonable sensitivity (~70%) for distinguishing benign functioning adrenal adenomas from other space-occupying adrenal lesions (59, 60). The positive predictive value of [131I]6ß-iodomethylnorcholesterol in differentiating functioning adenomas from other tumors is 100% for lesions at least 2 cm in diameter. The method shows promise for evaluating patients with an incidentally discovered, nonhypersecretory, unilateral adrenal mass (59), but further larger studies are required to confirm this utility. The main limitations of [131I]6ß-iodomethylnorcholesterol scanning are long waiting periods (usually 4–7 d) before attaining optimal tissue-to-background ratios. Other problems are its limited availability, suboptimal image quality, and intestinal secretion that may obscure tumor visualization.

[111In]Octreotide has high sensitivity for detection of adrenal adenomas causing Cushing syndrome (61). High-dose [111In]octreotide scintigraphy may also be useful in localization of tumors causing ectopic ACTH production, when conventional imaging studies prove negative (our unpublished observations). Whether [111In]octreotide scintigraphy or PET scanning is useful for localization of aldosteronomas is unknown, but their small size makes the probability of usefulness of these imaging modalities very low.

[11C]Etomidate and [11C]metomidate represent two PET agents that can be used to distinguish adrenocortical tumor from metastatic cancer based on targeting of specific enzymes expressed in adrenocortical tumors (Fig. 1CGo) (62, 63). Both bind to 11ß-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in cortisol and aldosterone synthesis. This offers specificity for identifying adrenocortical cells but does not allow differentiation of benign from malignant adrenocortical lesions. The latter can be performed using 18FDG PET scanning, with more than 95% accuracy (57, 58, 64) for distinguishing benign from malignant adrenocortical lesions including secondary adrenocortical tumors.

Adrenocortical cancer carries a poor prognosis due to tumor dissemination in about 80% of cases. Therefore, early diagnosis and localization of metastases are critical (65). Postsurgical changes (e.g., the presence of adhesions, surgical clips, anatomical distortions) in patients with recurrent adrenocortical cancer can occasionally compromise interpretation of anatomic imaging studies. In this setting, 18FDG may identify only hypermetabolic lesions, but studies to date have involved only small numbers of patients. However, virtually all studies show 18FDG scanning to be useful in detection of primary adrenocortical cancer and metastatic lesions (66, 67).

In summary, CT provides the most appropriate initial imaging method to detect a suspected adrenocortical tumor in patients without a history of cancer. CT (using a density measurement or washout technique) can distinguish benign from malignant adrenal lesions. MRI (using a chemical-shift method) is a reasonable alternative in patients with biochemical findings consistent with a benign tumor despite high clinical suspicion of a functioning adenoma or cancer. When results of these imaging studies point to a functioning adenoma or adrenocortical carcinoma, appropriate biochemical assays (e.g., the measurement of cortisol, aldosterone, testosterone) should be done to identify adrenal hyperfunction. Functional imaging using either [131I]6ß-iodomethylnorcholesterol or 18FDG PET may be appropriate to detect malignant adrenal lesions, especially when CT and MRI or biochemical tests do not provide sufficient diagnostic information. If hypersecretion is not found, imaging studies in tumors less than 4–5 cm in diameter should be repeated after 3–6 months to document tumor growth. In patients with no malignancy or lipid-rich adenomas (<10 HU) on CT, no further follow-up is needed.

C. Pheochromocytoma
Pheochromocytomas are chromaffin cell tumors usually arising in the adrenal gland. Those at extraadrenal sites are also called paragangliomas. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is usually based on the presence of symptoms and signs of catecholamine excess. CT and MRI are generally accepted for initial localization of these tumors. Sensitivities vary between 75 and 100% depending on location at adrenal or extraadrenal sites and whether the tumor is primary, recurrent, or metastatic (16, 68). Both imaging methods have poor specificity (68). However, MRI is more sensitive than CT in detecting extraadrenal pheochromocytomas (paragangliomas).

Expression of tumor-specific catecholamine transport and storage mechanisms by pheochromocytoma tumor cells provides the basis for [131I]- and [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Several PET agents, including [11C]hydroxyephedrine, [11C]epinephrine, [11C]phenylephrine, and 6-[18F]fluorodopamine take advantage of the same functional characteristics (15, 69, 70, 71). After cellular uptake, the radiopharmaceuticals are concentrated within storage granules (Fig. 1BGo). Nevertheless, uptake of these radiopharmaceuticals by other cell types, such as salivary glands, heart, liver, pancreas, spleen, gall and urinary bladder, and kidney, may cause difficulties in tumor visualization.

[131I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy has good specificity but limited sensitivity and spatial resolution (72). Single-photon emission scanning with [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine improves both sensitivity and spatial resolution (72).

Loss of metaiodobenzylguanidine-derived radioactivity from nonadrenergic organs declines slowly, and imaging requires scanning for up to 48 h (69). Metaiodobenzylguanidine does not bind to postsynaptic adrenergic receptors and therefore can be given safely at relatively high doses. Malignant pheochromocytomas take up metaiodobenzylguanidine less avidly than benign tumors, possibly because of decreased expression of norepinephrine transporters by less well-differentiated cells (70). However, less specific [111In]octreotide or 18FDG scanning may improve tumor detection (73). Pentetreotide, as an analog of somatostatin, binds to cell membrane somatostatin receptors, which endocrine tumor cells commonly express. The density of these receptors therefore determines the efficacy of Octreoscan imaging.

PET scanning after injection of [11C]hydroxyephedrine, [11C]epinephrine, 6-[18F]fluorodopamine, or [18F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine offers advantages over other nuclear scanning modalities, because tumor visualization can be accomplished within minutes of injection of the imaging agent, and spatial resolution is excellent (15, 16, 69, 70, 74).

In a recent study, all patients with known pheochromocytoma had positive 6-[18F]fluorodopamine PET scanning results that correctly localized tumors (Fig. 2BGo) (15). Some of these patients had negative [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scans. The spatial and temporal resolution of [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is inferior to PET scanning. Preparation of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine is, however, currently labor intensive, and has limited availability. The efficacy of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine PET scanning has not yet been compared with that of [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine single-photon emission CT.

Because tumor visualization using these PET scanning agents for imaging depends on expression of catecholamine uptake and storage systems, it is possible that dedifferentiated tumor cells that lack these systems may not be detected by these techniques. In these cases, [18F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine or 18FDG PET scanning may provide alternatives (70, 74, 75). The sensitivity of 18FDG scanning is about 70% for solitary benign or malignant pheochromocytoma (75), and that of [18F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine about 100% for detecting solitary tumors (74). The latter reports involved only a small group of patients, none of whom had metastatic pheochromocytoma.

In summary, patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and positive biochemical results should undergo CT or MRI and then functional imaging (e.g., [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine) to confirm that a tumor is indeed a pheochromocytoma and to rule out metastatic disease before any surgical procedure is considered. Functional imaging is not necessary for epinephrine-secreting small (<5 cm) adrenal tumors. In centers where PET scanning is available, these modalities can offer improved functional imaging. If this fails to visualize a pheochromocytoma but the tumor is still suspected, then 18FDG PET or [111]Inoctreotide scintigraphy may be appropriate (70).

D. Neuroblastoma
Neuroblastomas are tumors derived from neural crest cells of the sympatho-adrenal system. They are the most common solid extracranial tumor in children and are found most often in the abdomen. Early detection of metastatic neuroblastoma by sufficiently specific and sensitive scanning may reveal otherwise unsuspected and still resectable tumors, facilitating staging and prognosis (76). MRI and CT are appropriate for initial localization of neuroblastoma. At present, metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is considered the most useful functional imaging modality. This is because most primary and metastatic neuroblastomas express tumorspecific catecholamine uptake and storage mechanisms that also rationalize [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment (77). Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy has a sensitivity of about 90% for localizing neuroblastoma (77); 18FDG scanning has overall similar sensitivity but may be superior to metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for locating neuroblastoma in certain tissues or when a tumor becomes less differentiated or loses the noradrenergic transporter system (78, 79). [11C]Hydroxyephedrine represents another PET imaging agent for localization of neuroblastoma (80). Overall, PET scanning should be reserved for situations in which there is high suspicion of neuroblastoma and when metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is negative.

In summary, MRI and CT remain first-line imaging modalities for diagnostic localization of neuroblastoma. Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy remains the major functional imaging modality because of the tumor-specific expression of catecholamine uptake and storage mechanisms. The latter rationalizes use of [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine for treatment of neuroblastoma. PET scanning should be reserved for situations in which there is high suspicion of neuroblastoma but metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is negative. Accurate tumor staging is crucial for correct medical and surgical treatment decisions.

E. Carcinoids and pancreatic endocrine tumors
Carcinoids are tumors of enterochromaffin cells but can also arise in parenchymal organs outside the gastrointestinal tract. Carcinoid tumors have unique functional characteristics related to synthesis, storage, and release of specific peptides and amines; however, about one third of the tumors are nonfunctional. In patients with metastatic disease, the 5-yr survival is less than 50%.

These tumors often pose a difficult diagnostic challenge because of their small size and multiplicity. Endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography provide sensitive tools for visualizing gastric and intestinal carcinoids (81). MRI and CT provide important means to localize thoracic carcinoids or metastases (82, 83).

Pancreatic endocrine tumors include insulinomas (islet cell tumors), gastrinomas, glucagonomas, and somatostatinomas. For localization of pancreatic islet cell tumors, MRI, CT, ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound have less than optimal sensitivity (83, 84, 85). Probably the most effective strategy to detect small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is intraoperative palpation and intraoperative ultrasound (86).

More than 70% of carcinoids or pancreatic endocrine tumors express somatostatin receptors. Imaging agents for somatostatin receptors, such as [111In]octreotide, provide first-line tests to localize these tumors; diagnostic sensitivity exceeds that of MRI or CT. Many tumors, however, are too small to be detected, and some (especially metastatic lesions) do not express somatostatin receptors (17, 87, 88). One can also attempt using a hand-held intraoperative {gamma}-detecting probe after [111In]octreotide injection to detect very small or even microscopic occult primary tumors or metastases or assess completeness of resection (89). However, use of the {gamma}-probe is confounded by the high-background uptake of a radiopharmaceutical by the liver, kidney, and spleen.

Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for carcinoid tumors has less sensitivity (50%) than does [111In]octreotide scintigraphy (67%), and for pancreatic endocrine tumors also has less sensitivity (9%) than [111In]octreotide scanning (91%) (83). Thus, metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy should be used when other imaging methods fail to localize a tumor, or in patients in whom [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine is being considered for treatment (83, 90).

Carcinoids characteristically synthesize serotonin. Thus, administration of radioactive serotonin precursors provides an alternative and specific method of tumor visualization. [11C]-5-hydroxytryptophan seems an excellent compound for this purpose—especially in the midgut—with sensitivity exceeding that of CT (17, 91, 92). [18F]Fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine, another amine precursor, can be used to visualize carcinoids (93); its sensitivity exceeds that of 18FDG scanning for primary tumors and lymph node metastases. [11C]Dihydroxyphenylalanine has also successfully localized carcinoids (94).

The above specific, functional approaches may yield false-negative results in detecting undifferentiated carcinoids. Poorly differentiated carcinoids with high proliferative activity usually take up 18FDG; however, 18FDG PET scanning often fails to visualize more common differentiated carcinoids (17, 95, 96). For metastatic carcinoid, 18FDG PET scanning offers little advantage over [111In]octreotide scintigraphy (97, 98).

In summary, the initial approach to hormonally apparent carcinoid is MRI or CT. If these prove negative, both endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography are recommended for diagnosing intraluminal tumors; [111In]octreotide scanning is recommended to detect tumors outside the lumen, if endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography prove negative. For an insulinoma, intraoperative palpation with intraoperative ultrasound is also very sensitive. For carcinoids not localized by conventional imaging or [111In]octreotide scanning, [123I]- or [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scanning or [11C]-5-hydroxytryptophan PET scanning may be helpful. [123I]- or [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine scanning is also appropriate for patients being considered for [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment. 18FDG scanning should be reserved for visualizing poorly differentiated tumors not detected by the above methods.

F. Primary hyperparathyroidism
About 90% of primary nonfamilial hyperparathyroidism results from a solitary parathyroid adenoma (99). Less common causes include multiple parathyroid gland disease (hyperplasia or adenoma), seen especially in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and 2A.

In patients without previous neck surgery, identification of parathyroid adenoma by surgical exploration has a sensitivity of about 95% (100). There is increasing interest in less invasive and less expensive procedures, such as unilateral neck exploration or various combinations termed minimally invasive surgery (101). This can be achieved by imaging modalities including preoperative ultrasound, which has the lowest cost and a sensitivity of more than 75% or by CT or MRI with a sensitivity of about 70% (102, 103). Preoperative imaging for localization also decreases surgery and anesthesia time, incision size, tissue trauma, or postoperative scarring and improves detection of parathyroid adenoma in patients with coexisting multinodular goiter or ectopic tumor tissue (103).

Among scintigraphic methods for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenoma, [99mTc]sestamibi is most widely used (101, 104) with sensitivity ranging from 25–98%. The accumulation of [99mTc]sestamibi in parathyroid adenoma is based on both blood flow and its sequestration within the cytoplasm and mitochondria. Because parathyroid adenomas contain a large number of mitochondria in their cells, [99mTc]sestamibi is taken up more avidly in adenomatous tissue than the surrounding thyroid gland (104). Ultrasound combined with [99mTc]sestamibi scanning improves localization of parathyroid adenoma (105).

Radioguided surgery also decreases the extent of neck exploration for single parathyroid adenoma (106). A few hours after [99mTc]sestamibi scintigraphy, the intraoperative {gamma}-probe technique is used to detect adenoma during surgery. Adding ultrasound to this approach reduces a number of false-positive results, because thyroid nodules can avidly take up [99mTc]sestamibi. In multiple gland disease, [99mTc]-sestamibi scintigraphy rarely identifies all of the tumors (107). The procedure requires an experienced nuclear medicine physician on site to perform the study and for accurate interpretation of the results. Intraoperative PTH monitoring coupled with radioguided surgery is very useful to determine the completeness of this approach.

PET scanning is not currently an established method for detecting and localizing primary parathyroid adenomas (108, 109). [11C]Methionine is a potential PET agent for this purpose (110), with high specificity, but prospective studies are needed.

[99mTc]Sestamibi is the best imaging agent to detect adenoma before surgical reexploration in patients in whom previous surgery failed to locate a parathyroid adenoma. In persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism after neck exploration, where various imaging modalities are negative or inconclusive, 18FDG or [11C]methionine PET scanning may be useful (110, 111, 112, 113). Because a combination of ultrasound and [99mTc]sestamibi single-photon emission tomography can usually localize a recurrent parathyroid adenoma, the cost effectiveness of PET for this application seems limited. When results of noninvasive imaging are inconclusive, selective angiography and venous sampling for PTH assay should be considered (114).

In summary, to determine whether a patient with sporadic hyperparathyroidism, who has not had previous neck surgery, is a candidate for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, [99mTc]sestamibi is the imaging method of choice, followed by ultrasound, CT, or MRI. If preoperative imaging indicates more than one abnormal parathyroid gland, or if there is coexisting thyroid disease, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is not advised. Intraoperative PTH monitoring can be used to determine the completeness of excision of adenomatous or hyperplastic parathyroid tissue, especially in patients undergoing neck reexploration for recurrent or persistent hyperparathyroidism. Intraoperative parathormone monitoring is also recommended for patients with secondary, tertiary, or familial hyperparathyroidism. In patients with persistent or recurrent sporadic hyperparathyroidism after neck exploration, imaging techniques such as [99mTc]sestamibi scanning can be used to locate parathyroid adenomas; however, none has adequate sensitivity. When conventional imaging techniques fail to localize parathyroid adenomas, PET scanning using 18FDG or [11C]methionine may be attempted before reoperation. Studies comparing these agents with [99mTc]sestamibi are needed. No studies to date have evaluated PET scanning in multipleparathyroid gland disease.

In parathyroid cancer, anecdotal reports have noted positive 18FDG PET scans (101, 115) not detected by other techniques. This very aggressive endocrine tumor with a high metabolic rate traps 18FDG avidly, revealing lesions not detected by other techniques (W. F. Simmonds and S. J. Marx, personal communication).

G. Pituitary tumors
Conventional imaging methods and petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing syndrome remain the tests of choice for localization of pituitary adenomas.

PET ligands used to detect pituitary adenomas include 18FDG for imaging based on glucose metabolism, [11C]methionine and [11C]tyrosine for imaging based on protein synthesis, and [11C]deprenyl, [11C]raclopride, [11C]methylspiperone, and [18F]fluoroethylspiperone for imaging based on expression of receptors (18, 116, 117, 118). Such ligands have been used to visualize different types of pituitary adenomas, differentiate viable neoplastic tissue from fibrosis, necrosis, bleeding, or cystic degeneration, distinguish recurrent tumors from postoperative changes, identify nonfunctioning sellar and parasellar tumors, and assess responses to treatment. None of these approaches, however, has yet had widespread clinical use. MRI remains the method of choice for evaluation of pituitary tumors.

Nevertheless, there are several situations in which PET scanning has the potential to provide valuable clinical information in the assessment of pituitary tumors. One would be to monitor efficacy of treatment in patients with pituitary adenomas, particularly when tumor size seems unchanged or there is a need to decide on the course of a drug regimen. PET ligands targeting specific hormone receptors or intracellular proteins related to hormone synthesis might fulfill these requirements. PET scanning may also prove useful in distinguishing nonfunctioning sellar from parasellar tumors such as craniopharyngiomas.


    III. Future Trends
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Diagnostic Localization of...
 III. Future Trends
 References
 
More than 500 private insurance companies now provide reimbursement for 18FDG scanning of various cancers (1). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved 18FDG scanning for all cancers. The Society of Nuclear Medicine supports such scanning for detecting unknown primary tumors, differentiating malignant from benign tumors, staging, detecting recurrence, differentiating recurrence from postsurgical changes, and monitoring responses to treatment.

We predict that such coverage will soon extend to endocrine tumors. Already, Medicare covers 18FDG scanning for thyroid cancer under specific circumstances. Cost-benefit analyses of the various applications for endocrine tumors should be performed, as has been done already for PET imaging of other forms of cancer (119). Costs may decrease, based on economies and competition. Reimbursement amounts for 18FDG scanning have already begun to decrease (120). Essential for such analyses will be prospective, controlled studies comparing PET imaging with other techniques for localizing endocrine tumors.

Future applications will increasingly exploit cell type-specific functional characteristics of endocrine tumor cells, to visualize transporters, cell membrane and nuclear receptors, enzymes, and even gene expression. The availability of functionally specific PET agents is presently limited, and most remain investigational. This limited availability largely reflects the more specific clinical applications of these agents, compared with the broader clinical uses of 18FDG. The functionally specific approach is a real, but as yet largely unexploited, strength of PET imaging, which has the potential for localizing endocrine tumors and for characterizing them in terms of cell type, likelihood of recurrence or metastasis, and for planning treatment.

Eventually, PET scanning may also involve "molecular imaging," to visualize gene therapy by identifying and enabling targeting of tumor cells expressing particular mRNAs. In contrast to conventional imaging methods, PET imaging also offers an opportunity to obtain quantitative information in vivo about gene delivery, vector kinetics, gene expression, and efficiency and duration of therapeutic effects (121, 122, 123). A PET reporter probe has already been developed to image herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase expression in tumors (124). Recently, PET imaging of the transcriptional activation of tumor suppressor p53-dependent genes has also been introduced (125).

In summary, functional imaging of endocrine tumors is showing increasing promise. For some tumors, such as thyroid cancer, this approach already is established for diagnostic localization. For others, such as pheochromocytoma and carcinoid, specific PET imaging agents offer excellent visualization, but prospective studies have not yet verified diagnostic efficacy. Finally, for tumors such as parathyroid or pituitary, the diagnostic value of functional imaging remains unproven.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge the assistance of Drs. Kenneth D. Burman, Steve J. Marx, and Peter Herscovitch for valuable comments in the preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: CT, Computed tomography; 18FDG, 18F-labeled 2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose; HU, Hounsfield units; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Diagnostic Localization of...
 III. Future Trends
 References
 

  1. Czernin J, Phelps ME 2002 Positron emission tomography scanning: current and future applications. Annu Rev Med 53:89–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bomanji JB, Costa DC, Ell PJ 2001 Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2:157–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Mankoff DA, Bellon JR 2001 Positron-emission tomographic imaging of cancer: glucose metabolism and beyond. Semin Radiat Oncol 11:16–27[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Blodgett TM 2002 Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. Q J Nucl Med 46:24–34[Medline]
  5. Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, Silverman DH, Coleman RE, Phelps ME 2001 A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med 42:1S–93S[Free Full Text]
  6. Larson SM, Robbins R 2002 Positron emission tomography in thyroid cancer management. Semin Roentgenol 37:169–174[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Cook GJ, Maisey MN, Fogelman I 1999 Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine. Eur J Nucl Med 26:1363–1378[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL 1999 Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics 19:61–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Grierson JR, Shields AF 2000 Radiosynthesis of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine: [18F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivo. Nucl Med Biol 27:143–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Vaalburg W, Coenen HH, Crouzel C, Elsinga PH, Langstrom B, Lemaire C, Meyer GJ 1992 Amino acids for the measurement of protein synthesis in vivo by PET. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 19:227–237[Medline]
  11. Willemsen AT, van Waarde A, Paans AM, Pruim J, Luurtsema G, Go KG, Vaalburg W 1995 In vivo protein synthesis rate determination in primary or recurrent brain tumors using L-[1–11C]tyrosine and PET. J Nucl Med 36:411–419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lewis JS, Welch MJ 2001 PET imaging of hypoxia. Q J Nucl Med 45:183–188[Medline]
  13. Haubner R, Wester HJ, Weber WA, Mang C, Ziegler SI, Goodman SL, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, Kessler H, Schwaiger M 2001 Noninvasive imaging of {alpha}(v)ß3 integrin expression using 18Flabeled RGD-containing glycopeptide and positron emission tomography. Cancer Res 61:1781–1785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Blankenberg FG, Tait J, Ohtsuki K, Strauss HW 2000 Apoptosis: the importance of nuclear medicine. Nucl Med Commun 21:241–250[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Li ST, Goldstein DS 2001 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning for diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension 38:6–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pacak K, Linehan WM, Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Goldstein DS 2001 Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med 134:315–329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Eriksson B, Bergström M, Orleförs H, Sundin A, Oberg K, Langström B 2000 Use of PET in neuroendocrine tumors. In vivo applications and in vitro studies. Q J Nucl Med 44:68–76[Medline]
  18. Muhr C, Bergström M 1991 Positron emission tomography applied in the study of pituitary adenomas. J Endocrinol Invest 14:509–528[Medline]
  19. Ugur O, Kothari PJ, Finn RD, Zanzonico P, Ruan S, Guenther I, Maecke HR, Larson SM 2002 Ga-66 labeled somatostatin analogue DOTA-DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotide as a potential agent for positron emission tomography imaging and receptor mediated internal radiotherapy of somatostatin receptor positive tumors. Nucl Med Biol 29:147–157[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Hofmann M, Maecke H, Borner R, Weckesser E, Schoffski P, Oei L, Schumacher J, Henze M, Heppeler A, Meyer J, Knapp H 2001 Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68Ga-DOTATOC: preliminary data. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1751–1757[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Shagam JY 2001 Positron emission tomography. Radiol Technol 72:551–569; quiz 570–572[Medline]
  22. Chung JK, So Y, Lee JS, Choi CW, Lim SM, Lee DS, Hong SW, Youn YK, Lee MC, Cho BY 1999 Value of FDG PET in papillary thyroid carcinoma with negative 131I whole-body scan. J Nucl Med 40:986–992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Diehl M, Risse JH, Brandt-Mainz K, Dietlein M, Bohuslavizki KH, Matheja P, Lange H, Bredow J, Korber C, Grunwald F 2001 Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in medullary thyroid cancer: results of a multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1671–1676[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Frilling A, Tecklenborg K, Gorges R, Weber F, Clausen M, Broelsch EC 2001 Preoperative diagnostic value of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with radioiodine-negative recurrent well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 234:804–811[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Grünwald F, Kalicke T, Feine U, Lietzenmayer R, Scheidhauer K, Dietlein M, Schober O, Lerch H, Brandt-Mainz K, Burchert W, Hiltermann G, Cremerius U, Biersack HJ 1999 Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in thyroid cancer: results of a multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 26:1547–1552[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Schluter B, Bohuslavizki KH, Beyer W, Plotkin M, Buchert R, Clausen M 2001 Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. J Nucl Med 42:71–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sisson JC, Ackermann RJ, Meyer MA, Wahl RL 1993 Uptake of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose by thyroid cancer: implications for diagnosis and therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1090–1094[Abstract]
  28. Wang W, Macapinlac H, Larson SM, Yeh SD, Akhurst T, Finn RD, Rosai J, Robbins RJ 1999 [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography localizes residual thyroid cancer in patients with negative diagnostic 131I whole body scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2291–2302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wang W, Larson SM, Fazzari M, Tickoo SK, Kolbert K, Sgouros G, Yeung H, Macapinlac H, Rosai J, Robbins RJ 2000 Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1107–1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yeo JS, Chung JK, So Y, Kim S, Lee E, Lee DS, Youn YK, Hong SJ, Ahn IM, Lee MC, Cho BY 2001 F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a presurgical evaluation modality for I-131 scan-negative thyroid carcinoma patients with local recurrence in cervical lymph nodes. Head Neck 23:94–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Hooft L, Hoekstra OS, Deville W, Lips P, Teule GJ, Boers M, van Tulder MW 2001 Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the follow-up of papillary or follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3779–3786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Robbins R, Drucker W, Hann L, Tuttle RM 2001 Advances in the detection of residual thyroid carcinoma. Adv Intern Med 46:277–294[Medline]
  33. Stokkel MP, de Klerk JH, Zelissen PM, Koppeschaar HP, van Rijk PP 1999 Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography in the detection of recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med 26:1606–1609[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Feine U, Lietzenmayer R, Hanke JP, Held J, Wohrle H, Muller-Schauenburg W 1996 Fluorine-18-FDG and iodine-131-iodide uptake in thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 37:1468–1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Helal BO, Merlet P, Toubert ME, Franc B, Schvartz C, Gauthier-Koelesnikov H, Prigent A, Syrota A 2001 Clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET in thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated thyroglobulin levels and negative 131I scanning results after therapy. J Nucl Med 42:1464–1469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chin BB, Patel P, Cohade C, Ewertz M, Wahl R, Ladenson P2004 Recombinant human thyrotropin stimulation of fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography uptake in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:91–95
  37. Ladenson PW, Ewertz ME, Dickey RA 2001 Practical application of recombinant thyrotropin testing in clinical practice. Endocr Pract 7:195–201[Medline]
  38. Robbins RJ, Chon JT, Fleisher M, Larson SM, Tuttle RM 2002 Is the serum thyroglobulin response to recombinant human thyrotropin sufficient, by itself, to monitor for residual thyroid carcinoma? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3242–3247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Robbins RJ, Tuttle RM, Sharaf RN, Larson SM, Robbins HK, Ghossein RA, Smith A, Drucker WD 2001 Preparation by recombinant human thyrotropin or thyroid hormone withdrawal are comparable for the detection of residual differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:619–625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wartofsky L 2002 Using baseline and recombinant human TSH-stimulated Tg measurements to manage thyroid cancer without diagnostic 131I scanning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1486–1489[Free Full Text]
  41. Dietlein M, Scheidhauer K, Voth E, Theissen P, Schicha H 1997 Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and iodine-131 whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 24:1342–1348[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Feine U 1998 Fluor-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol 138:492–496[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Grünwald F, Menzel C, Bender H, Palmedo H, Willkomm P, Ruhlmann J, Franckson T, Biersack HJ 1997 Comparison of 18FDG-PET with 131iodine and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy in differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 7:327–335[Medline]
  44. McDougall IR, Davidson J, Segall GM 2001 Positron emission tomography of the thyroid, with an emphasis on thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun 22:485–492[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Boerner R, Petrich T, Weckesser E, Fricke H, Hofmann M, Otto D, Weckesser M, Langen KJ, Knapp WH 2002 Monitoring isotretinoin therapy in thyroid cancer using 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med 29:231–236
  46. Moog F, Linke R, Manthey N, Tiling R, Knesewitsch P, Tatsch K, Hahn K 2000 Influence of thyroid-stimulating hormone levels on uptake of FDG in recurrent and metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 41:1989–1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Brandt-Mainz K, Muller SP, Gorges R, Saller B, Bockisch A 2000 The value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 27:490–496[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Szakall Jr S, Esik O, Bajzik G, Repa I, Dabasi G, Sinkovics I, Agoston P, Tron L 2002 18F-FDG PET detection of lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 43:66–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Voth E, Borner AR, Theissen P, Schicha H 1994 Positron emission tomography (PET) in benign thyroid diseases. Exp Clin Endocrinol 102:71–74
  50. Van den Bruel A, Maes A, De Potter T, Mortelmans L, Drijkoningen M, Van Damme B, Delaere P, Bouillon R 2002 Clinical relevance of thyroid fluorodeoxyglucose-whole body positron emission tomography incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1517–1520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kloos RT, Gross MD, Francis IR, Korobkin M, Shapiro B 1995 Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 16:460–484[Abstract]
  52. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR 1998 Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:201–204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Dunnick NR, Korobkin M 2002 Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: current status. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:559–568[Free Full Text]
  54. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Yutzy GG, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Kazerooni EA 1996 Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:531–536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Platt JF, Dunnick NR, Raghupathi KI 2002 Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 222:629–633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Petersen RO, Miettinen MM 1992 Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 185:345–351[Abstract]
  57. Boland GW, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dixon J, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR 1995 Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: evaluation at PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 194:131–134[Abstract]
  58. Maurea S, Klain M, Mainolfi C, Ziviello M, Salvatore M 2001 The diagnostic role of radionuclide imaging in evaluation of patients with nonhypersecreting adrenal masses. J Nucl Med 42:884–892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Yun M, Kim W, Alnafisi N, Lacorte L, Jang S, Alavi A 2001 18F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. J Nucl Med 42:1795–1799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Dwamena BA, Kloos RT, Fendrick AM, Gross MD, Francis IR, Korobkin MT, Shapiro B 1998 Diagnostic evaluation of the adrenal incidentaloma: decision and cost-effectiveness analyses. J Nucl Med 39:707–712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Gross MD, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Glazer GM, Bree RL, Arcomano MA, Schteingart DE, McLeod MK, Sanfield JA, Thompson NW 1994 Scintigraphic evaluation of clinically silent adrenal masses. J Nucl Med 35:1145–1152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Lumachi F, Zucchetta P, Marzola MC, Bui F, Casarrubea G, Angelini F, Favia G 2002 Usefulness of CT scan, MRI and radiocholesterol scintigraphy for adrenal imaging in Cushing’s syndrome. Nucl Med Commun 23:469–473[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Bergström M, Juhlin C, Bonasera TA, Sundin A, Rastad J, Akerstrom G, Langstrom B 2000 PET imaging of adrenal cortical tumors with the 11ß-hydroxylase tracer 11C-metomidate. J Nucl Med 41:275–282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Bergström M, Bonasera TA, Lu L, Bergstrom E, Backlin C, Juhlin C, Langstrom B 1998 In vitro and in vivo primate evaluation of carbon-11-etomidate and carbon-11-metomidate as potential tracers for PET imaging of the adrenal cortex and its tumors. J Nucl Med 39:982–989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Erasmus JJ, Patz Jr EF, McAdams HP, Murray JG, Herndon J, Coleman RE, Goodman PC 1997 Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1357–1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Ng L, Libertino JM 2003 Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. J Urol 169:5–11[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Becherer A, Vierhapper H, Potzi C, Karanikas G, Kurtaran A, Schmaljohann J, Staudenherz A, Dudczak R, Kletter K 2001 FDG-PET in adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 16:289–295[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Khan TS, Sundin A, Juhlin C, Langstrom B, Bergstrom M, Eriksson B 2003 11C-Metomidate PET imaging of adrenocortical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:403–410[Medline]
  69. Maurea S, Cuocolo A, Reynolds JC, Tumeh SS, Begley MG, Linehan WM, Norton JA, Walther MM, Keiser HR, Neumann RD 1993 Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in preoperative and postoperative evaluation of paragangliomas: comparison with CT and MRI. J Nucl Med 34:173–179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Shulkin BL, Wieland DM, Schwaiger M, Thompson NW, Francis IR, Haka MS, Rosenspire KC, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Kuhl DE 1992 PET scanning with hydroxyephedrine: an approach to the localization of pheochromocytoma. J Nucl Med 33:1125–1131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Shapiro B, Gross MD, Shulkin B 2001 Radioisotope diagnosis and therapy of malignant pheochromocytoma. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12:469–475[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Eisenhofer G 2001 The role of neuronal and extraneuronal plasma membrane transporters in the inactivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol Ther 91:35–62[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Furuta N, Kiyota H, Yoshigoe F, Hasegawa N, Ohishi Y 1999 Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma using [123I]-compared with [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Int J Urol 6:119–124[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. van der Harst E, de Herder WW, Bruining HA, Bonjer HJ, de Krijger RR, Lamberts SW, van de Meiracker AH, Boomsma F, Stijnen T, Krenning EP, Bosman FT, Kwekkeboom DJ 2001 [123I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine and [111In]octreotide uptake in benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:685–693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Hoegerle S, Nitzsche E, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Manz T, Brink I, Reincke M, Moser E, Neumann HP 2002 Pheochromocytomas: detection with 18F DOPA whole-body PET—initial results. Radiology 222:507–512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC 1999 Pheochromocytomas: imaging with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Radiology 212:35–41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Sisson JC, Shulkin BL 1999 Nuclear medicine imaging of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. Q J Nucl Med 43:217–223[Medline]
  78. Shulkin BL, Shapiro B 1998 Current concepts on the diagnostic use of MIBG in children. J Nucl Med 39:679–688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Kushner BH, Yeung HW, Larson SM, Kramer K, Cheung NK 2001 Extending positron emission tomography scan utility to high-risk neuroblastoma: fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as sole imaging modality in follow-up of patients. J Clin Oncol 19:3397–3405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Shulkin BL, Hutchinson RJ, Castle VP, Yanik GA, Shapiro B, Sisson JC 1996 Neuroblastoma: positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose compared with metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Radiology 199:743–750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Shulkin BL, Wieland DM, Baro ME, Ungar DR, Mitchell DS, Dole MG, Rawwas JB, Castle VP, Sisson JC, Hutchinson RJ 1996 PET hydroxyephedrine imaging of neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med 37:16–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Caplin ME, Buscombe JR, Hilson AJ, Jones AL, Watkinson AF, Burroughs AK 1998 Carcinoid tumour. Lancet 352:799–805[CrossRef][Medline]
  83. Vincent JM, Trainer PJ, Reznek RH, Marcus AJ, Dacie JE, Armstrong P, Besser GM 1993 The radiological investigation of occult ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Radiol 48:11–17[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Kaltsas G, Korbonits M, Heintz E, Mukherjee JJ, Jenkins PJ, Chew SL, Reznek R, Monson JP, Besser GM, Foley R, Britton KE, Grossman AB 2001 Compari