This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mansmann, G. Articles by Bornstein, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mansmann, G. Articles by Bornstein, S. R.

The Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass: Update in Diagnosis and Management

Department of Endocrinology (G.M., S.R.B.), Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; New England Medical Center (J.L., E.B.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111; Baystate Medical Center (M.R.), Springfield, Massachusetts 01107; and First Department of Medicine (Y.M.), Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo 143-0015, Japan

Correspondence: Address all correspondence to: Georg Mansmann, M.D., Heinrich-Heine-University, Department of Endocrinology, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: mansmann{at}med.uni-duesseldorf.de

	Abstract

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
Clinically inapparent adrenal masses are incidentally detected after imaging studies conducted for reasons other than the evaluation of the adrenal glands. They have frequently been referred to as adrenal incidentalomas. In preparation for a National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference on this topic, extensive literature research, including Medline, BIOSIS, and Embase between 1966 and July 2002, as well as references of published metaanalyses and selected review articles identified more than 5400 citations. Based on 699 articles that were retrieved for further examination, we provide a comprehensive update of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches focusing on endocrine and radiological features as well as surgical options. In addition, we present recent developments in the discovery of tumor markers, endocrine testing for subclinical disease including autonomous glucocorticoid hypersecretion and silent pheochromocytoma, novel imaging techniques, and minimally invasive surgery. Based on the statements of the conference, the available literature, and ongoing studies, our aim is to provide practical recommendations for the management of this common entity and to highlight areas for future studies and research.

I. Introduction

II. Causes and Prevalence

A. Benign adrenocortical masses

B. Pheochromocytoma

C. Adrenocortical carcinoma

D. Metastases

E. Other entities

III. Diagnostic Strategies

A. Endocrine evaluation

B. Imaging studies

C. Molecular markers

D. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA)

IV. Treatment

A. Surgical procedures

B. Surgery vs. nonsurgery management

C. Follow-up

V. Conclusion

VI. Perspectives

	I. Introduction

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
CLINICALLY INAPPARENT ADRENAL masses detected through imaging for nonadrenal disease, often referred to as adrenal incidentalomas, were first described about 20 yr ago (1, 2). However, their impact on health outcomes is now better appreciated and gaining broader attention (3, 4). Despite the rarity of primary endocrine cancers of the adrenal, adrenal masses are one of the most prevalent of all human tumors. The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma approaches 3% in middle age, and increases to as much as 10% in the elderly (5). Consequently, as our population ages, the management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses is becoming an increasingly important aspect of health care. Moreover, advances in imaging and the availability of imaging technology may reveal an even higher incidence, making the management of incidentaloma a challenge for modern medicine.

Algorithms for endocrine testing and imaging procedures are currently available for investigating the underlying causes of adrenal masses, including primary hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, and Cushing’s syndrome (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Because even subclinical hormone overproduction by incidentalomas left untreated may be associated with increased morbidity, the threshold for treating this condition has been lowered during the last decade. Differentiating between malignant and benign masses is an essential part of diagnosis because metastases in the adrenals are common. Adrenal cortical carcinoma, on the other hand, is a rare condition, but remains a focus of clinical concern due to its high mortality rate (11, 12).

Improved computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), scintigraphy techniques, and selective catheterization studies are proving useful in localizing adrenal tumors and distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions or functional and nonfunctional masses. Refinements in the field of minimally invasive general surgery have made laparoscopic adrenalectomy an attractive method for removing adrenal tumors; this type of surgery allows shorter hospital stays, lower rates of morbidity, and faster recovery times.

Several of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in adrenal cell regulation and tumorigenesis have begun to be unraveled in recent years (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). As a result, alterations in intercellular communication through gap junctions, local production of growth factors and cytokines, and aberrant expression of ectopic receptors on adrenal tumor cells have all been implicated in adrenal cell growth, hyperplasia, tumor formation, and autonomous hormone production (13, 17, 18). In addition to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities involving several chromosomal loci and the genes encoding the p53 tumor suppressor family, other chromosomal markers have been associated with a number of familial syndromes associated with adrenal tumors such as menin [responsible for multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type I] and the hybrid gene that causes glucocorticoid remediable hyperaldosteronism (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).

In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview and update on the management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses. This overview is based partly on an evidence report prepared for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Conference, the conclusions of the Conference, and also recent research findings (19, 20).

Studies for the evidence report were identified by a literature search of English-language communications published between 1966 and 2001. References of published metaanalyses and selected review articles were also included to identify additional studies. Searches on the following databases were conducted in March 2001: Medline, PreMedline, BIOSIS, and Embase. An updated search for surgical series was conducted in October 2001. A combination of search terms was used to map to the subject heading, publication title, or publication abstract, yielding a total of 5427 independent citations. The abstracts were screened manually, and 602 articles were retrieved for further assessment. The literature search was updated in September 2003, and an additional 97 articles were used for a supplementary examination. Reports that had only been published as letters or abstracts in proceedings were excluded. In general, all studies with at least 10 human subjects were included. The methodological quality of the studies summarized in the evidence report was graded using study design, conduct, and reporting of the clinical study as a basis (20).

	II. Causes and Prevalence

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
Clinically inapparent adrenal masses are not a single pathological entity; they may be benign or malignant. The prevalence of adrenal masses varies according to the inclusion criteria of the study and the circumstances under which patient data are collected. Varying definitions in the literature could lead to different interpretations of the data, depending on the criteria for patient selection. So will studies including patients with symptoms or signs retrospectively attributable to an adrenal tumor increase the proportion of large masses, which are more likely to be cancerous. Conversely, studies that exclude patients with signs or symptoms will find a greater proportion of small masses and biochemically silent tumors. A detailed review on the etiological classification of adrenal masses and their relative frequency has been published (5).

In autopsy series, the prevalence of previously undiagnosed adrenal masses ranges between 1.4 and 2.9% (5, 21, 22, 23, 24). Hedeland et al. (25) found adrenal masses in 8.7% of all autopsies in a study that included nodules above 2 mm. Of over 40,000 healthy subjects screened by routine transabdominal ultrasonography (US) during a general health examination, only 43 patients (0.1%) had abnormal findings in the adrenal gland or retroperitoneal space (26). Of 28 of these patients who had CT, the diagnosis of an adrenal mass was confirmed in 12. In 1,500 hypertensive patients screened with ultrasound, a higher prevalence of 0.5% was reported with detection of adrenal masses, most of which were hormonally inactive (27). Because of their technical superiority, CT and MRI identify clinically inapparent adrenal masses more often than US. In large CT studies, the prevalence of unexpected adrenal masses ranges from 0.6–1.9% (2, 21, 28, 29, 30). Other estimates range from 0.42% among non-cancer patients evaluated for nonendocrine complaints to 4.4% among patients with a previous diagnosis of cancer (31, 32). In lung cancer patients, adrenal masses were detected in 4.0%; a quarter of these corresponded to benign adenomas, whereas the rest were metastases (33).

There are over 44 reports from various countries describing the causes and prevalence of pathologies found in adrenal incidentalomas (21, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69). Table 1 gives an overview of studies including 20 patients or more (31, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71). Combining the studies that used the broadest definitions of incidentaloma and those that reported descriptions of individual cases (35, 40, 41, 47, 53, 55, 72, 73, 74), the etiology of incidentalomas was as follows: adenoma 41%, metastases 19%, adrenocortical carcinoma 10%, myelolipoma 9%, pheochromocytoma 8%, with other, mostly benign lesions such as adrenal cysts comprising the remainder (Fig. 1A). This distribution is similar to that reported in the largest study published so far, which included 1004 patients (60), except that this study found more adenomas and fewer metastases (Fig. 1B). Rather than being a function of size, the prevalence of metastases depends primarily on the incidentaloma definition. Accordingly, studies excluding patients with known malignancies revealed a much lower rate of metastases than others.

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Top, Distribution of diagnosis by tumor size. Data from eight studies with 103 diagnoses determined by histology (35 40 41 47 53 55 72 73 ). Bottom, Distribution of 380 clinically inapparent adrenal masses by histological confirmed diagnosis. [Reproduced with permission from F. Mantero et al.: J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:637–644, 2000 (60 ). © The Endocrine Society.]

A. Benign adrenocortical masses
Adenomas comprise the vast majority of incidental asymptomatic adrenal masses. Adenomas are benign; there is no evidence that they degenerate into malignant lesions (76). The true incidence of adrenal adenomas is difficult to determine. Several large autopsy series reports have found adrenal adenomas greater than 2–5 mm in 1.5 to 5.7% of the population, and the incidence appears to increase with age (22, 23, 24, 77, 78). Because most masses are small, a distinction between true adenomas (Figs. 2C and 3B), focal hyperplasia (Fig. 2B), and accessory cortical nodules is difficult (5). Among patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, a high incidence of adrenal adenomas has been found: 82% in homozygous and 45% in heterozygous patients (79). In patients with suspected adrenal disease, the size of adenomas ranged from 1.4–9 cm with a mean of 3.3 cm (80). These data correspond to results of the Italian Study Group, which found a median diameter of 3.5 cm (range, 1.0–15.0 cm) in clinically inapparent adenomas (60). In populations with no prior history of cancer, two thirds of all clinically inapparent adrenal masses are labeled as benign tumors corresponding mostly to adenomas, irrespective of changes in their endocrine output (60). Although most adrenocortical masses are nonhypersecretory adenomas, 5–47% secrete cortisol and 1.6–3.3% mineralocorticoids (29, 44, 60, 62, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85). Benign masses secreting androgens or estrogens are extremely rare.

View larger version (135K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Histological panel. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of normal human adrenal (A), adrenocortical hyperplasia (B), adrenocortical adenoma (C), and adrenocortical carcinoma (D). Magnification, x60. cap, Capsule; zg, zona glomerulosa; zf, zona fasciculata; zr, zona reticularis.

View larger version (109K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Histological panel. A, Normal adrenal with cortex (co) and medulla (me), staining with antibodies to MHC class II antigens (304 ). B, Adenoma, hematoxylin-eosin staining. C, Pheochromocytoma, staining with antichromogranin A monoclonal antibody. D, Mixed adenoma-pheochromocytoma (ad, ph), staining with anti-chromogranin A monoclonal antibody. E, Hematoxylin-eosin stained mixed myelolipoma-adenoma (my, ad). F, Synaptophysin immunoreactivity in primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD). Staining of normal adrenal cortex (co), medulla (me), and adrenocortical nodules caused by PPNAD (p) (137 ). G, Adenoma, synaptophysin immunoreactivity. H, Adrenocortical carcinoma, immunostaining with an antibody against 17 -hydroxylase cytochrome P450 enzyme (473 474 ).

Histologically, pheochromocytoma is composed of large pleiomorphic chromaffin cells (Fig. 3C). Between 10 and 13% of pheochromocytomas are malignant (88, 92), but no widely accepted pathological criteria exist for differentiating between benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. Thus, metastatic disease remains the only irrefutable proof of malignancy. Ninety percent of pheochromocytomas are located in the adrenal glands, and the remaining 10% are located in the paraaortic sympathetic chain, aortic bifurcation, and urinary bladder (93). Bilateral tumors occur in approximately 10% of patients, and are much more common in familial pheochromocytoma often found in association with the familial MEN syndromes (MEN IIA and IIB). These autosomally inherited disorders are associated with mutations of the RET protooncogene, which encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor involved in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation (94). The neuroectodermal disorders von-Hippel Lindau syndrome (VHL) and neurofibromatosis type 1 are associated with pheochromocytoma to a much lesser extent.

C. Adrenocortical carcinoma
Adrenocortical carcinoma (Figs. 2D and 3H) is rare, with an estimated incidence ranging from 0.6 to 2 cases per million in the normal population (11, 12, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99). Overall, this neoplasia accounts for 0.02 to 0.2% of all cancer-related deaths. There is a bimodal age distribution with peak incidence in the first and fifth decades of life (100). In some reports investigating clinically inapparent adrenal masses, the high prevalence of adrenocortical carcinoma is certainly an effect of overreporting due to admission and inclusion criteria and selection for surgery (Table 1).

Adrenocortical carcinoma can be functional or nonfunctional with regard to hormone synthesis and clinical features. Some authors require a clinically apparent endocrine syndrome to classify a tumor as functional, whereas others accept biochemical activity alone as demonstrated by excessive amounts of hormones or hormonal precursors. Using the clinical definition, functional tumors accounted for 26–94% of adrenocortical carcinomas (100, 101, 102). Although virilization by androgen-secreting tumors is a common phenomenon in children, its rate is much lower in adults (102, 103, 104). Estrogen-secreting tumors, which can cause feminization, are rare. Hypercortisolism, which can lead to Cushing’s syndrome or a mixed Cushing-virilizing syndrome, is more common. Isolated primary mineralocortisolism has rarely been described (105). The female predominance among adrenocortical cancer patients that has been noted in many studies could be related to a higher prevalence of nonfunctioning tumors in males (97, 98, 100, 102, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116).

The prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma is generally poor, with a median survival of 18 months. Survival is clearly related to the extent of disease (12, 101, 102). The majority of authors agree that neither sex nor functional status are predictors of survival (102, 110, 112, 114, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120). Besides hypertension, a common feature in adrenocortical carcinomas, symptoms include weight loss, weakness, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, severe abdominal gas, and myalgia (96, 102, 112). Abdominal pain accompanied by a palpable tumor often indicates advanced disease. Fever may signify tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, or opportunistic infection.

D. Metastases
The adrenal glands are frequent sites for metastases from many cancers. Virtually any primary malignancy can spread to the adrenals (121). Lymphoma and carcinoma of the lung and breast account for a large proportion of adrenal metastases. Other primary cancers include melanoma, leukemia, and kidney and ovarian carcinoma. In a review of 1000 consecutive autopsies of patients with carcinoma, the adrenal glands were involved in 27% of the cases (122). The incidence of adrenal metastases in patients with breast and lung cancer is approximately 39 and 35%, respectively (122, 123). Among cancer patients, 50–75% of clinically inapparent adrenal masses are metastases (28, 33, 124). Usually, either a primary site is obvious, or widespread disease is apparent. Occasionally, an adrenal mass may present as a metastatic cancer of unknown primary. These tumors generally do not respond to surgical removal and should be treated with systemic therapy based on the origin of the primary cancer.

E. Other entities
Adrenal myelolipoma (Fig. 3E) is a benign neoplasm of the adrenal cortex composed of mature fat and hematopoietic tissue in varying proportions (125, 126). Most myelolipomas are functionally inactive and are detected incidentally. Patients are usually asymptomatic, although larger lesions can cause pain or may manifest themselves with retroperitoneal hemorrhaging. Myelolipomas are slow growing, usually not exceeding 5 cm in size, but giant forms weighing over 5.5 kg have been reported. Generally, myelolipomas and adrenal cysts are benign lesions that require no therapy. Larger, symptomatic or rapidly growing tumors are treated with surgery, which is usually curative.

Other pathologies for incidentally detected adrenal masses comprise ganglioneuromas, adrenal hyperplasia, hematomas, and rare entities such as angiomyelolipoma, malignant epithelial carcinoma, epithelioid angiosarcoma, and neurinoma (5, 127, 128, 129). Rarely, extraadrenal pathologies, e.g., regenerative hepatic nodule or angiomyolipoma of the kidney, might feign an adrenal mass. Fewer than 80 cases of primary adrenal lymphoma have been reported in the medical literature (130, 131). Nevertheless, recognition of this uncommon entity is important, because lymphoma is a potentially curable disease. Infections, especially tuberculosis and histoplasmosis, can also manifest themselves as an adrenal mass (132, 133). Composite adrenal tumors are rare, consisting of coexisting histological variant tumors of the same embryological origin and mixed adrenal tumors, typically mixtures of pheochromocytoma, spindle-cell sarcoma, and adrenocortical carcinoma (134). Contrasting findings between the clinical presentation that suggested adrenocortical tumor and the pathology that revealed an adrenomedullary tumor (as well as vice versa) led to the discovery of hybrid tumors (135, 136). This rare entity consists of hybrid corticochromaffin cells. Interestingly, even normal adrenocortical cells can exhibit properties of neuroendocrine cells, whereas various adrenocortical tumors aberrantly express neuroendocrine markers or receptors, neuropeptides, and cytokines (136, 137). Single cases of extremely uncommon causes of adrenal masses such as extramedullary hematopoiesis have been reported (138).

	III. Diagnostic Strategies

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
A. Endocrine evaluation
Recent evidence demonstrates that the presence of an inapparent adrenal mass does not mean absence of endocrine activity. The patient with an adrenal mass requires a complete history and physical examination, biochemical evaluation of all pertinent hormones, and possibly additional radiological studies.

Special attention should be given to a history or episodes of high blood pressure, tachycardia, profuse sweating, and to findings such as hirsutism, striae, central obesity, or gynecomastia. Diagnostic testing should exclude clinically silent pheochromocytoma, hypercortisolism, and primary aldosteronism. If the diagnosis of overt endocrine disease such as Cushing’s syndrome, Conn’s syndrome, pheochromocytoma, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia are each suspected during an adrenal mass evaluation, the established diagnostic algorithm for the confirmation and differential diagnosis of these hypersecretory states applies. Excellent overviews have been published for these adrenal disorders and will not be discussed in detail in this review (13, 86, 94, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149). The following focuses on the diagnostic approach for incidentalomas to exclude manifest or subclinical endocrine disease.

1. Cortisol-secreting masses.
The prevalence of hypercortisolism in clinically inapparent adrenal masses has been reported to range from 5 to 47% across different studies with varying study protocols and diagnostic criteria (53, 58, 60, 67, 70, 74, 81, 82, 83, 84, 150, 151, 152, 153). Cushing’s syndrome does occur in these patients, for example when complications such as abdominal sepsis of a previously undiagnosed disease lead to detection of an adrenal mass (21). Because most of these patients do not show a clinical pattern of manifest hypercortisolism but only an abnormal regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the term subclinical Cushing’s syndrome has been widely used. There is a further differentiation between subclinical Cushing’s syndrome, which refers to a biochemical abnormality that never becomes clinically manifest, and preclinical Cushing’s syndrome, which refers to an early stage in the development of patent Cushing’s syndrome (154). This distinction can be made only retrospectively after long-term follow-up and does not appear to be helpful regarding clinically inapparent adrenal masses. Furthermore, it has been concluded as unlikely that subclinical hypercortisolism is a preclinical state of a patent glucocorticoid excess, because the prevalence data of Cushing’s syndrome caused by adrenal adenoma (1.4 per million, with a mean preclinical phase of 5 yr) and disturbed HPA axis in clinically inapparent adrenal masses (0.028%) greatly differ (154).

A recently proposed term is subclinical autonomous glucocorticoid hypersecretion (SAGH) to define an autonomous cortisol secretion by an adrenal adenoma in patients without symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome. Many symptoms of hypercortisolism, especially hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, are not specific; the degree of its clinical appearance varies with the extent of hormone overproduction. Therefore, the prevalence of SAGH depends largely on its definition, the testing methods used, and the selection criteria for patients with clinically inapparent adrenal masses.

The overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test has been widely used as a screening test with asymptomatic adrenal incidentalomas, but whether its specificity and sensitivity are superior to a 2- or 3-mg suppression test is still unclear. The low-dose sensitivity of the dexamethasone suppression test has been reported as 98.1% for overt Cushing’s disease, whereas its specificity ranges between 80.5 and 98.9%, depending on subject selection criteria (155). False-positive results may occur in patients receiving drugs that accelerate dexamethasone metabolism or increase corticosteroid-binding globulin, or in patients with endogenous depression (156). To prevent false-positive results, some authors have reported preferring a higher dexamethasone dose using 3 mg for the suppression test in clinically inapparent adrenal masses (153). To provide a standard, the NIH State-of-Science Conference panel recommended the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test in all patients with incidentally detected adrenal masses (19). Generally, a serum or plasma cortisol at 0800 h of less than 5 µg/dl (<138 nmol/liter) is considered negative. Values greater than 10 µg/dl are suggestive of Cushing’s syndrome, whereas levels in between are equivocal and can be found in SAGH. Salivary cortisol has not yet been adopted into routine clinical practice, although salivary cortisol levels reflect plasma free cortisol levels better than total plasma cortisol levels (142, 157).

A positive suppression test should be confirmed by other tests, but the appropriate biochemical evaluation of SAGH is controversial (158). There is little evidence regarding biochemical tests in this setting, and the definition of a gold standard for diagnosis of SAGH is still a major problem. High-dose dexamethasone suppression test (8 mg), 24-h urinary free cortisol, and dynamic testing with CRH have all been proposed, but the biochemical findings in SAGH vary with a broad spectrum (29, 60, 152, 159). The circadian rhythm of cortisol may be altered, which would result in high midnight cortisol levels. Morning ACTH levels may be normal or suppressed (82) but should only be measured at the same time as cortisol levels. The urinary free cortisol excretion may be normal or slightly elevated, and the response to CRH administration blunted with lower peak levels of ACTH.

Unfortunately, SAGH has not been adequately characterized, and the natural course of this syndrome is unknown. Rarely, SAGH may progress to overt Cushing’s syndrome (151). It is unclear whether or not SAGH patients are prone to the classic long-term complications of full-blown Cushing’s syndrome (152, 160). An increased prevalence of hypertension, central obesity, diabetes, and metabolic conditions such as hyperlipoproteinemia and impaired glucose tolerance has been reported in patients with SAGH (67, 69, 75, 152, 158, 161, 162). A recently published study found an increased cardiovascular profile risk, determined by the presence of atherosclerotic plaques and the metabolic syndrome, in patients with incidentally detected adrenal masses and SAGH in comparison to an age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched control group (163). Interestingly, a high prevalence of disturbed glucose tolerance (61%) has also been found in patients with nonfunctional adrenal incidentaloma, that is, patients without abnormal low-dose suppression test (164). The authors speculated that compensatory hyperinsulinemia after development of insulin resistance would lead to an overstimulation of the adrenal cortex via a constantly or intermittently increased circulating ACTH, and then to adrenal adenomas. Conflicting data have been published in regard to bone mass in clinically inapparent adrenal masses and SAGH. Most studies suggest that patients with SAGH might have an increased risk of osteoporosis (165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171), although one group rejected an increased risk, because no difference in lumbar and femoral bone mineral density compared with healthy controls had been determined (172).

Little in the way of data have been published concerning a benefit of surgery in SAGH, so hypertension, obesity, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and other risk factors for cardiovascular events were irregularly improved in some patients (67, 70, 81, 163, 173). With regard to the inconsistent data, it is not yet established whether patients with an adrenal mass and SAGH do actually profit from adrenalectomy. Therefore, further studies are clearly needed to define the role of SAGH in morbidity and mortality. Finally, it has to be mentioned that hypercortisolism to any extent, including SAGH, might be caused by adrenocortical carcinoma (58).

2. Mineralocorticoid-secreting masses.
The prevalence of aldosteronoma in clinically inapparent masses has been reported as approximately 1.6–3.8% (29, 44, 60, 62, 174). Apart from aldosterone-producing adenoma, other forms of primary aldosteronism exist as idiopathic hyperaldosteronism and primary adrenal hyperplasia. Additional mineralocorticoid excess syndromes include inherited enzyme deficiencies, licorice ingestion, use of chewing tobacco, and glucocorticoid-remediable hyperaldosteronism, an autosomal dominant form of hyperaldosteronism in which aldosterone synthesis is regulated by ACTH (175, 176). In general, no adrenal mass is present in these causes of hyperaldosteronism. Historically, spontaneous hypokalemia (3.5 mmol/liter) was considered to be the hallmark of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients, but normokalemic primary aldosteronism appears at a frequency that is 7–38% higher than previously thought (141, 177, 178). Of 90 normokalemic patients with clinically inapparent adrenal masses and hypertension, at least 5.5% were found to suffer from primary aldosteronism (85), so screening all hypertensive patients with an adrenal mass for primary hyperaldosteronism is advisable.

The plasma aldosterone concentration (ALD)/plasma renin activity (PRA) ratio was found to be a sensitive and specific tool for diagnosis of disorders of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (149, 179, 180). A ratio greater than 30 (ALD expressed in nanograms per deciliter, PRA in nanograms per milliliter per hour) is highly suggestive of autonomous aldosterone production, and additional testing for further evaluation is also recommended (141). A cut-off ratio of 50 was found to clearly distinguish primary aldosteronism from other forms of essential hypertension. However, a low renin level can result in an elevated ratio, even when aldosterone is in the low normal range, so use of the ALD/PRA ratio should be discouraged in this setting. Special attention should be given to kidney failure and concomitant medications such as beta-blockers and antisympathetic agents that may lead to false-positive test results by reducing PRA values. Calcium-channel blockers may increase PRA and reduce ALD to normal values in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism.

Additional testing using the 25-mg captopril test, salt-loading tests, or fludrocortisone suppression test can confirm the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism by demonstrating the presence of insuppressible aldosterone. In addition, the urinary excretion of methyloxygenated cortisol metabolites, i.e., 18-hydroxycortisol and 18-oxo-cortisol, will usually be elevated. If the diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism has been made, an adrenal vein sampling or a scintigraphy with ¹³¹I-iodocholesterol can be helpful in confirming lateralization of aldosterone production that is consistent with the presence of a mineralocorticoid-secreting adrenal mass. Here, the major concern is to differentiate aldosterone-producing adenoma from bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, because the detection of an adrenal mass does not necessarily prove its functional status (181). Although rare, the possibility of a malignant mineralocorticoid-secreting tumor has to be considered, especially when the tumor is large or radiological signs suggest malignancy (105).

3. Pheochromocytoma.
Endocrine testing should exclude pheochromocytoma in all patients, including normotensive patients, with clinically inapparent adrenal masses because this is a frequent cause of clinically silent adrenal masses. Adequate biochemical testing will identify most pheochromocytomas. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is established by the demonstration of elevated 24-h urinary excretion of free catecholamines (norepinephrine and epinephrine) or catecholamine metabolites [vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) and total metanephrines]. The measurement of plasma catecholamines is not recommended, because this method has poor sensitivity and specificity often leading to false-positive results. Plasma free metanephrines, normetanephrine and metanephrine, have been reported to be more sensitive than other tests, including measurement of catecholamines in 24-h urine for diagnosis of sporadic pheochromocytoma (Table 2) (182, 183, 184, 185). Although urine metanephrines and VMA have a higher specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed a better test performance for plasma metanephrines than other biochemical tests (185). Special attention should be given to acetaminophen use, which interferes with assays of plasma free metanephrines and is a source of false-positive testing.

Although chromogranin A is not specific for pheochromocytoma and might be elevated in other neuroendocrine tumors, its evaluation can be useful. The level of chromogranin A correlates with tumor mass. Thus, small masses can go undetected by chromogranin A (188). However, postoperative levels have been reported to be a good index for a successful outcome of surgery or relapse, and levels within the normal range are highly predictive of negative findings in metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. Moreover, chromogranin A is poorly influenced by drugs commonly used in the diagnosis or treatment of pheochromocytoma such as phentolamine and clonidine (189). The production of calcitonin, opioid peptides, somatostatin, ACTH, and vasoactive intestinal peptide has been also described in pheochromocytoma. Another possible pheochromocytoma indicator is hyperglycemia, which occurs in about one third of all patients with clinically suspected pheochromocytoma, but is infrequently found in clinically inapparent adrenal masses.

4. Sex hormone-secreting masses.
Most commonly, androgen- or other sex hormone-secreting masses represent adrenocortical carcinomas. If clinically inapparent at first diagnosis, signs of virilization or feminization may appear over time. Benign adenomas only rarely secrete sex hormones, so routine evaluation of testosterone and estradiol is not recommended in patients with adrenal masses (190). An exception should be made in patients with clinically suspected virilizing or feminizing tumor or if adrenocortical carcinoma is supposed on the basis of radiological studies and the patient’s history.

Standard evaluation of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), a marker of adrenal androgen excess, has been suggested (5), but there is still controversy over its value. Based on age- and gender-specific thresholds, Terzolo et al. (191) assessed the performance of 0800 h DHEAS levels to differentiate malignant from benign adrenal masses. DHEAS was significantly higher in patients with primary adrenal carcinoma. However, at 100% sensitivity and 41% specificity, the diagnostic accuracy of low DHEAS levels in identifying a benign lesion was only 47% among the subjects analyzed. Other studies found no convincing data that DHEAS is helpful in discriminating malignant from benign masses (52, 59, 192, 193). In fact, results of a multivariate analysis indicate that DHEAS might be a function of tumor size (191). So, low to below-normal DHEAS levels in patients with (smaller) benign masses are explained by a negative feedback of autonomously cortisol-producing adenomas on the ACTH axis with suppressed DHEAS expression in the adjacent adrenal cortex (58, 74, 194). In conclusion, DHEAS does not appear to offer relevant information regarding the dignity of a mass.

B. Imaging studies
1. CT.
CT is an accurate tool for detecting the presence of adrenal masses. Using a fast scanner and 1-m scanning intervals, both adrenals can be identified in 97–99% of patients. Numerous comprehensive reviews on the topic of radioimaging have been published describing the most common adrenal gland pathologies (195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200).

Using CT, adrenal adenomas are generally small, homogeneous, well-defined lesions with clear margins. Most adenomas remain constant in size on serial CT scans (37, 57, 63, 201, 202). Calcification, necrosis, and hemorrhage are uncommon. However, these features are nonspecific.

Most lesions smaller than 4 cm appear to be benign, but malignancy cannot be excluded by small size alone. Smaller size thresholds corresponded to higher sensitivity to diagnose malignancy and lower specificity, and vice versa (37, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207). No size threshold has yielded both high sensitivity and specificity. With the exception of one study finding attenuation values on unenhanced CT and mass size to be equally useful in diagnosing adrenal malignancy (205), attenuation thresholds have shown a better performance to diagnose adrenal malignancy and nonadenomas than size or subjective criteria (203, 206, 207, 208).

Frequently, adrenal adenomas contain a large amount of intracytoplasmic lipid, which allows a quantitative evaluation by measurement of the attenuation value of the lesions, conventionally expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) (203, 204, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213). Adenomas usually have attenuation values less than 18 HU on unenhanced CT. Perfect specificity with moderate sensitivity (68 and 89%) was achieved at higher density thresholds (20 and 21 HU) on unenhanced CT (203, 204, 206, 207, 208). Thresholds of 16.5 and 18 HU attained both high sensitivity and specificity (85–95% and 93–100%, respectively). Accordingly, it was concluded that further work-up is unnecessary when the lesion has an attenuation of less than 10 HU suggesting lipid-rich adrenal adenoma (203, 204, 208, 210, 211, 212, 213). However, lipid-poor adenomas represent 10–40% of all adenomas (214, 215). These masses have a substantially higher mean attenuation value than lipid-rich adenomas. Thus, not all adenomas can be characterized using unenhanced CT alone.

On the other hand, adenomas are generally characterized by rapid washout of iv contrast. Although CT scans immediately after iv contrast have poor specificity to diagnose malignancy (66, 205, 210), enhanced CT test performance is excellent if the CT scan is delayed for 30–75 min and a threshold of 30–40 HU is used (204, 210). A 3-min delayed enhanced CT yielded good to excellent test performance using thresholds between 64 and 70 HU to differentiate nonadenomas from adenomas (204). Another advantage to delayed enhanced CT is the fact that lipid-poor adenomas show enhancement and washout features similar to lipid-rich adenomas, allowing a distinction from metastasis (214, 215, 216). Using a 10- to 15-min delayed enhanced CT, a threshold value of 50–60% of the initial enhancement is used to distinguish adenoma from nonadenoma (198, 211, 217). Without performing unenhanced CT beforehand, the relative enhancement washout is calculated as demonstrated in Fig. 4, A and B. Using this method, a relative washout of more than 40–50% is highly suggestive of a benign mass with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100%, whereas lower relative washout percentages strongly suggest a metastasis (196, 215, 218).

View larger version (139K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Radiological panel of an adrenal cortical adenoma. Findings in a 66-yr-old woman with a history of breast cancer. Panels A and B demonstrate the use of CT for calculation of the relative enhancement washout. A, The contrast-enhanced CT shows a left-sided 1.5-cm adrenal mass (arrow) with a mean attenuation of 32.9 HU. B, On the 12-min delayed image, the attenuation of the left adrenal (arrow) is 12.9 HU. The relative enhancement washout is calculated using the following equation: percentage of relative enhancement washout = (1 – delayed enhanced HU value/initial enhanced HU value) x 100. With a relative washout of (1 – 12.9 /32.9) x 100 = 61%, the delayed enhanced CT is indicative of an adrenal adenoma (196 215 ). Panels C and D depict the decrease in signal intensity in adrenal cortical adenoma using chemical-shift MRI. C, In the T1-weighted in-phase image, the signal intensity (SI) of the adrenal mass (arrow, SI = 131) is relatively isointense to the liver (L) and of slightly higher intensity than the spleen (S; SI = 93). D, The T1-weighted opposed-phase MRI shows a signal drop in the adrenal mass (arrow, SI = 39) relative to the spleen (S; SI = 110). The adrenal-spleen-ratio (ASR) is calculated by the following formula (Refs. 238 and 239 ): ASR = [(SI adrenal mass/SI spleen)opposed-phase/(SI adrenal mass /SI spleen)in-phase] x 100. The diagnosis of an adenoma is confirmed by an ASR of [(39 /110)/(131 /93)] x 100 = 25.2.

Adrenocortical carcinomas are usually large, dense, irregular, heterogeneous, enhancing lesions that may invade other structures (37, 213, 220). Calcification and necrosis are common. Malignant tumors less than 6 cm in maximum diameter are often homogeneous and may resemble adenomas, so that in small masses morphological criteria are a poor predictor of diagnosis (201, 220, 221).

The morphological CT imaging features of metastases are nonspecific. Size varies from microscopic disease undetectable on imaging studies to extensively large masses. Small deposits tend to be homogeneous, but less well-defined than adenomas. Larger lesions may have irregular cystic areas as a result of hemorrhage or central necrosis. Calcification is rarely seen, suggesting previous hemorrhaging. Attenuation values on unenhanced CT images are generally higher than those measured in patients with adenomas, although a certain overlap has been observed in daily clinical practice (204, 211). Contrast enhancement can be homogeneous in smaller lesions and inhomogeneous in larger lesions. More recently, several studies have demonstrated a significantly delayed contrast material washout in metastases compared with adenomas (204, 210, 211, 212, 217).

Pheochromocytomas usually appear as rounded or oval masses with a similar density to the liver on unenhanced CT. Larger lesions may show a cystic component due to central necrosis or hemorrhage. Calcification is present in approximately 10% of cases. Owing to their hypervascularization, pheochromocytomas usually exhibit intense enhancement. With reported sensitivities ranging from 93–100%, CT is very accurate in the detection of adrenal pheochromocytomas (211, 213, 222, 223, 224). However, nearly one third of all cases show a nonspecific appearance that may overlap with the appearance of adrenocortical carcinoma.

The diagnosis of myelolipoma is made by demonstrating the presence of fat within an adrenal mass and can be easily accomplished with either CT or MRI (225, 226, 227). The mass typically has an attenuation ranging from –30 to –120 HU (228). Even if the tumor consists of small amounts of fat, it can be detected with narrow collimation. Diagnosis may be complicated by hemorrhage, with imaging findings of acute, subacute, or chronic hemorrhage that are superimposed over the lesion.

2. MRI.
Both T1 and T2 relaxation times have been studied in MRI to differentiate between adenomas, metastases, and pheochromocytomas. In general, malignant masses are denser than benign masses, due to their higher fluid content, and therefore appear brighter on T2-weighted images (132, 229, 230). Metastases are usually hypointense compared with liver on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. After injection of paramagnetic contrast, metastases typically demonstrate strong contrast enhancement with delayed washout. Hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images and avid enhancement with delayed washout are features often shared by adrenocortical carcinomas, which usually contain less lipid than adenomas. However, multiple exceptions to these general rules have been described (such as fat-containing metastases from carcinomas and lipid-poor adenomas) (196, 209, 231).

MRI is also a useful tool in staging adrenal carcinomas. Sagittal and coronal magnetic resonance sequences allow a better identification of invasion into adjacent organs than do axial CT scans. In particular, the extent of infiltration into the inferior vena cava is best determined with MRI.

Pheochromocytomas are generally characterized by low T1 and bright T2 signal intensities, but exceptions to this rule have been published (232). Central necrosis is frequently observed. Because pheochromocytomas do not contain intracellular lipids, there are no signal changes from out-of-phase to in-phase images.

Fat-containing areas in myelolipoma are indistinguishable in signal intensity from sc and retroperitoneal fat in all sequences, but fat-saturated MRI can be performed to test for fatty content and facilitate diagnosis (226, 227).

Which MRI technique for accurate diagnosis of adrenal masses works best is still a matter of controversy. Chemical-shift MRI, based on the principle of different resonance frequency rates of protons in fat and water, has been proposed to differentiate between adenomas and metastases (198). Like the low attenuation seen with adenomas on unenhanced CT, the presence of lipids in many adenomas causes a loss in signal intensity on chemical-shift MRI (209, 233). In contrast, adrenal masses lacking cytoplasmic lipids do not have a significant loss of signal intensity on out-of-phase images, and appear brighter than lipid-rich adenomas. Generally, the ratio between the signal drop-off from T1-weighted in-phase to opposed-phase images of the adrenal mass and various organs including spleen, fat, liver, and muscle has been tested to distinguish between benign and malignant masses (50, 206, 207, 229, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237). If the adrenal mass-reference organ-ratio, the ratio between signal intensities of the adrenal mass and the internal standard (such as the spleen) is less than 70, the lesion is regarded as benign (238, 239). An example is given in Fig. 4, C and D. When the mass-to-spleen ratio was used, masses were differentiated with a sensitivity of 84–100% and a specificity of 78–94% (206, 234, 235, 236).

Two studies found similar results with mass-to-liver and mass-to-fat ratios where high sensitivity was only achieved with poorer specificity, and vice versa (207, 229). Because of frequent intrinsic liver disease such as steatosis causing variable signal intensity, it has been discussed that liver might be a less reliable internal standard. Nevertheless, other authors have found better test performance using liver as the standard (232, 237, 240). With an overall accuracy of 94% (89% sensitivity and 99% specificity), MRI findings have been found to correlate closely with histopathological results using liver in T1- and T2-weighted images for unenhanced chemical-shift MRI and enhanced gadolinium series for washout characterization of 229 adrenal masses (232). These results were confirmed by a second study, with an analogous approach revealing a 100% sensitivity and specificity (240).

Trials comparing unenhanced MRI to combined unenhanced and enhanced CT found superior, similar, and inferior MRI test performance, depending on just which technique was used (206, 207, 219, 241). From qualitative comparison of test accuracy, the conclusion was that combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI was superior to both combined unenhanced and enhanced CT and unenhanced MRI alone (219). The combination of unenhanced CT with a threshold density of 0 HU and MRI with a mass-to-spleen signal intensity ratio of 0.70 resulted in perfect sensitivity and 94% specificity to diagnose metastases in cancer work-up patients (206). T2-spin measurements on MRI were an inferior parameter in diagnosing nonadenomas compared with attenuation values on CT (207). None of these studies was performed before the development of delayed enhanced CT for characterizing lipid-poor adenomas. In addition, there are no reported studies that compare unenhanced CT, delayed enhanced CT, and chemical-shift MRI for characterizing adrenal masses as adenomas vs. metastasis.

Preliminary data indicate that the use of double-echo chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging with a fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence can characterize adrenal adenomas without overlap in signal intensity with other masses (242, 243). Because an internal standard with a reference tissue is not needed for double-echo FLASH MRI, a better performance of MR imaging might be demonstrated in the future.

3. US.
US depends to a large extent on operator skills. Furthermore, obesity and overlying gas are obstacles for the visualization of the adrenal glands (Fig. 5) (244). Not surprisingly, US does not detect adrenal masses with the same sensitivity as CT or MRI (245, 246). In a series of 61 patients with adrenal masses, US correctly identified all adrenal tumors over 3 cm in diameter, whereas only 65% of masses less than 3 cm were detected compared with 100% using CT or MRI (245). US (66, 247), color Doppler US, and power-flow imaging (248) each showed poor test performance for distinguishing between benign and malignant masses, so their use is not recommended for this purpose. However, US can be a simple and effective follow-up method with benign lesions. The diameter of adrenal masses as measured by US correlates highly with mass diameter measured by CT (66, 249). Endoscopic US of the adrenal is a novel technique that has been recently performed in a few centers with promising results (250). Even small lesions of 1–2 cm could be detected reliably using this technique.

View larger version (115K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Abdominal ultrasound. Incidentally discovered adrenal mass (arrow) in a 55-yr-old female. L, Liver; K, kidney.

View larger version (148K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6. Scintigraphy of an aldosterone-secreting adenoma. Posterior abdominal NP-59 scintigraphy in a 63-yr-old woman with bilateral incidentaloma, endocrine testing revealed primary hyperaldosteronism. Imaging 72 h after administration of 37 MBq NP-59 demonstrates a focal enhancement of the right adrenal (arrow) with minimal visualization of the contralateral gland and normal background activity of the liver (L) and colon (C) after dexamethasone suppression (0.5 mg three times daily for 3 wk). A right-sided laparoscopic adrenalectomy resulted in postoperative normalization of ALD and ALD/PRA. The histopathological diagnosis confirmed the presence of a 2.3-cm aldosterone-producing adenoma.

For the localization and identification of pheochromocytomas and other sympathomedullary diseases, the radiopharmaceuticals ¹²³I-MIBG and ¹³¹I-MIBG and ¹¹¹In-octreotide have been most commonly used (252). Any focal uptake 24–72 h after administration of ¹³¹I-MIBG should be suspected of pheochromocytoma. The sensitivity of MIBG for detecting pheochromocytoma ranges between 80 and 90%, with a specificity of 90–100% (264, 265, 266). The synthetic somatostatin analog ¹¹¹In-octreotide seems less sensitive but is able to visualize tumors that are undetected by MIBG scan (267). In the diagnostic algorithm of clinically inapparent adrenal masses, the application of these radiotracers should be limited to cases in which malignant or bilateral pheochromocytoma is suspected (268).

5. Positron emission tomography (PET).
Most malignant tumors show an enhanced glycolytic metabolism with increased uptake of deoxyglucose that can be visualized by PET using ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose (FDG). FDG-PET has been suggested for the characterization of adrenal masses in patients with either clinically inapparent adrenal masses or cancer work-up. Using a positive test definition of an increased uptake by the adrenal mass, one study found perfect test performance in differentiating malignant from benign adrenal masses (51). Other studies confirmed these results, so this technique may be of value if CT or MRI imaging is equivocal in the work-up of cancer patients with adrenal masses (269, 270, 271, 272). In 10 patients with adrenocortical cancer, FDG-PET revealed three previously unknown lesions, but this study was too small to evaluate FDG-PET for staging and follow-up (273). A recent development in identifying adrenocortical tissue is the 11-ß-hydroxylase radiotracer ¹¹C-metomidate, which discriminates lesions of adrenal cortical origin from other lesions; however, it does not distinguish between adrenal adenomas and carcinomas (274, 275). PET using ¹⁸F-6-fluorodopamine has been found to be a promising tool for identifying pheochromocytomas (276). To date, there are insufficient data to justify the use of PET to diagnose clinically inapparent masses outside clinical studies.

C. Molecular markers
The histopathological distinction between malignant and benign tumors is often difficult to make early in the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal diseases. Various criteria, immunological and cytoskeletal markers, DNA ploidy, cell phase markers, and oncogenic probes have been proposed for the differentiation of adrenocortical and medullary masses, but have so far yielded inconsistent results. An overview is given in Table 3 (137, 188, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311).

Analysis of cellular markers might be helpful in reaching a differential diagnosis of adrenal masses, particularly if only small tumor specimens are available. An example is the transcription factor adrenal 4-binding protein, also known as steroidogenic factor-1, which is primarily expressed in steroidogenic cells and regulates the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes (292). Expression of ₁ connexin 43, a gap-junction protein, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II is diminished in adrenocortical carcinomas as a sign of dedifferentiation and loss of normal zonation. It is abundantly expressed in the zona reticularis and fasciculata in normal adrenal tissue (Fig. 3A) as well as in most benign cortical tumors (296, 304). Mutations in genes such as IGF-II and p53 with subsequent overexpression and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosomal loci are thought to be involved in tumorigenesis, and have been found in sporadic adrenocortical carcinoma with varying frequency (13, 102, 277, 280, 282). Consequently, their absence does not prove the presence of an adrenal adenoma. Routine assessment of genetic alterations has been proposed as a guide for follow-up and management of adrenocortical carcinoma, because LOH at the 17p13 locus was found to be a strong predictor of disease-free survival after curative surgery (279).

Diagnosis of malignant pheochromocytoma is generally considered impossible without any documented metastasis formation. No markers so far allow a confident characterization of dignity. Microscopic evidence for local invasion of tissue or blood vessels, however, suggests malignancy (316). Although not always reliable predictors of biological behavior criteria based on tumor size, mitotic index and DNA ploidy have been reported as helpful (317, 318, 319). More recently, a scoring system based on a variety of histological features has been proposed to distinguish malignant from benign disease (320). A number of immunohistochemical markers are specific for neuroendocrine tumors and are strongly positive in tumors of adrenomedullary origin. Chromogranin A (Fig. 3, C and D) and synaptophysin (Fig. 3, F and G) have been widely used. However, recent data have demonstrated a positive staining for synaptophysin in adrenocortical tumors as well, reducing the value of this marker (136, 137, 307). Survivin, an apoptosis inhibitor, is a novel neuroendocrine marker for chromaffin cell tumors, but does not reliably distinguish benign from malignant tumors (308). Besides the well-described mutations of the RET protooncogene and the tumor-suppressor gene VHL, which are associated with familial and syndromic disease (MEN II and VHL), mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase subunit D (SDHD) and subunit B (SDHB) have recently been demonstrated in pheochromocytoma (94, 284). Interestingly, Neumann et al. (284) found mutations of RET, VHL, SDHD, and SDHB in one fourth of more than 270 patients with sporadic pheochromocytoma.

D. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA)
Transcutaneous needle biopsy or FNA of adrenal mass has been advocated for the investigation of incidentally discovered adrenal masses (321). The biopsy is generally performed under either CT or US guidance. The literature on FNA is problematic in that many studies investigating the test performance for FNA to diagnose adrenal masses either did not clearly define the reference standard or, in part, used FNA as both test under investigation and reference standard. Nevertheless, excluding biopsies that were inconclusive, eight studies showed that sensitivity for all patients (or masses) to diagnose malignancy ranged from 81–100% and specificity ranged from 83–100%, whereas one reported only that accuracy was 91% (322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327). Between 6 and 50% of biopsies were reported to be inconclusive.

Test performance based on mass size and needle size was analyzed in one study (328). The authors found higher sensitivity and accuracy in masses larger than 3 cm and when 19-gauge or larger needles were used. Another study reported that accuracy depended on the size of the needle used to perform the biopsy but not on the size of the lesion (326). However, the evidence is too sparse to draw conclusions about the test performance of different methods of adrenal biopsy (such as FNA vs. coring biopsy).

The risk of complications due to FNA has primarily been reported in retrospective studies (36, 235, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333). Only two studies found explicitly reported data on metastatic spread of cancer along the needle tract (326, 333). In a 1-yr follow-up of 277 adrenal biopsies in 270 patients, none of the patients developed metastases along the needle tract (326). With a 7-month follow-up in 78 patients, one needle-track lung tumor metastasis was detected in the liver of a patient who had had two passes using the supine transhepatic approach (333). Neither paper provided data on the number of subjects with adrenal carcinoma, so no conclusions can be offered about the risk of needle-track metastases from FNA biopsy of adrenal carcinoma. In total, 36 complications (4%) have been reported on 888 adrenal mass biopsies, including 26 complications that were potentially serious and nine patients (1%) requiring in-hospital treatment. Because of the wide variety of biopsy techniques, generally unclear or incomplete reporting, and small study sizes, no reliable estimates can be made about the relative safety of different biopsy techniques.

Because a benign cytological diagnosis from FNA does not exclude malignancy, FNA cannot be recommended as a standard procedure in the diagnostic work-up. However, FNA may be helpful in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with a history of malignancy and those with a suspicious adrenal mass on imaging (334, 335). Importantly, to prevent a potentially life-threatening hypertensive crisis, FNA should not be attempted before exclusion of pheochromocytoma by endocrine testing.

	IV. Treatment

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
A. Surgical procedures
Initially, all adrenalectomies were performed via the transabdominal route. In the 1980s, the posterior approach was adopted by the majority of surgeons due to a perceived decrease in surgical morbidity. The posterior approach was first used for small tumors and later for large tumors, pheochromocytomas, and metastases.

In the early 1990s, Gagner et al. (336) applied the laparoscopic technique to the transperitoneal approach. As with the posterior approach, initial indications were limited due to concerns about bleeding, the safety of removing pheochromocytomas (especially under carbon dioxide insufflation, which might theoretically trigger a hypertensive crisis), the inability to perform en bloc resections of invasive tumors, and the fear that removing cancers laparoscopically could result in metastatic seeding along the trocar port. As surgeons gained experience, indications for laparoscopic adrenalectomy expanded to include large tumors, pheochromocytomas, and metastases. Similar to other procedures, a significant reduction of mean operative time and mean blood loss due to learning curves has been reported for laparoscopic adrenalectomies (337, 338, 339, 340).

Other surgical techniques have been recently developed, including retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy, needlescopic surgery using laparoscopic instruments with a diameter of no more than 3 mm, interstitial adrenal cryoablation, and robotic telepresent adrenalectomy (341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349). The techniques of open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy have been covered elsewhere (350, 351).

There are a number of surgical series reports on either individual experiences with a given adrenalectomy technique or technique comparisons. Many studies, however, have overlapping data, because authors presented their initial experience with the procedure, then included those same cases in larger (accrued) case series or regional experience reports. A summary of surgical approaches is given in Table 4 (337, 338, 339, 344, 345, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431).

Although most studies reported all complications, only five of them applied statistical methods for comparison of the complication rates. Sprung et al. (414) reported a higher rate of hypotension with anterior open adrenalectomy (AA) compared with the transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA) for pheochromocytoma. Jacobs et al. (404) found fewer major complications from TLA compared with a mixture of open approaches. Bonjer et al. (395) found fewer overall complications from retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) than from the posterior open approach (PA). Vargas et al. (418) also reported fewer complications from TLA than from open procedures, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Finally, Thompson et al. (416) found a comparable rate of early complications between TLA and PA, but an increased rate of late complications with PA, specifically muscle weakness and pain at the incision site. In two studies, AA and TLA each resulted in one death, neither of which was considered by the authors to be related to the surgery; there were no deaths from PA or RLA (397, 398).

PA was significantly quicker than TLA in most studies and quicker than RLA in one of two studies (395, 396, 397, 401, 403, 409, 416, 417, 431). However, TLA resulted in less blood loss and a shorter length of stay (395, 397, 401, 404, 406, 409, 416, 417, 431). The remaining studies did not find any significant differences between specific techniques. Studies comparing mixed open approaches or mixed laparoscopic techniques showed similar findings; laparoscopy usually took longer, but resulted in less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay (404, 405, 407, 410, 411, 413, 415, 418, 419, 420).

In a cost-effectiveness analysis, costs of hospital admission for laparoscopy (TLA) were significantly reduced by 38% in comparison to open adrenalectomy (AA and PA), mostly due to a reduced postoperative stay (3.7 vs. 5.8 d) (421). These data are consistent with results from other retrospective cost analyses of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy (399, 411). Because there was no difference in the overall costs per patient, the authors concluded that from the economic perspective, greater savings must come from a reduction in the presurgical diagnostic process, which constituted the lion’s share of the total costs (421).

Ten studies comparing different laparoscopic approaches, which included 1014 patients (338, 344, 345, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 429), as well as two studies that compared surgery for large and small tumors using TLA (428, 430), were generally of better quality than earlier series comparing laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy. There is even one small, prospective, randomized controlled trial (370). A few studies collected data prospectively, but because the surgeon still dictated the choice of approach, it is possible that bias may have been introduced. Patients were generally well-matched by tumor size and type. Most studies found no significant difference in operating time or blood loss, although one study found RLA to be quicker than TLA (423) and another found that lateral TLA was quicker than either anterior TLA or RLA (427). None of the studies demonstrated any difference in length of stay, and none applied statistical methods to complication rates. One study comparing needlescopic surgery to traditional TLA demonstrated that the needlescopic group had shorter operating time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization, although tumors removed needlescopically both were larger and contained a higher percentage of pheochromocytomas (344). There were also fewer complications in the needlescopic group, but due to the small sample size, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

In a study that compared surgery for large (mean, 5.2 cm) and small (mean, 2.1 cm) tumors using TLA in 150 patients, the authors found no difference in operating time, length of stay, or complication rate (428). A subsequent study investigating TLA in 53 patients with large (median, 8.0 cm) or small (median, 2.5 cm) adrenal tumors reported successful completion of all procedures without any differences in outcome or complication rate (430). Finally, transperitoneal needlescopic adrenalectomy may offer the least morbid procedure, with the least blood loss, the shortest hospital stay, and a low complication rate. However, given that only a small number of these procedures have actually been reported, it would be premature to assign needlescopic surgery any role in adrenalectomy (344, 345).

Despite the large number of studies involving thousands of patients, the quality of the evidence comparing surgical techniques is poor. Randomized, controlled trials are lacking, and nonrandomized series risk a significant selection bias because surgeons routinely assign more difficult cases, larger tumors, and invasive cancers to the control group. Nevertheless, the evidence consistently points in the same direction for small, nonmalignant tumors, and possibly for large tumors as well. The PA appears to offer an advantage over the AA in terms of surgical morbidity, as measured by postoperative hospital stay and perhaps in terms of operating time and blood loss as well (361, 362, 363, 364). Similarly, both laparoscopic techniques, the RLA and TLA, result in shorter hospital stays than open surgery. TLA and RLA result in less blood loss and probably fewer major complications, but PA is quicker. When performing laparoscopic adrenalectomy, lateral TLA may be quicker and cause less blood loss than either RLA or anterior TLA, but in terms of hospital stay and complication rates, no approach appears to be superior to the others. Although randomized, controlled trials would offer the best measure of the safety of laparoscopy vs. open surgery, it is unlikely that such trials will be conducted given the ostensible benefit seen in the nonrandomized trials and the current prevailing thought among surgeons.

For invasive carcinomas and very large tumors, the best approach has yet to be determined. Few reports have examined these specific indications, and many authors consider them contraindications to laparoscopy (433, 434). Others, however, have challenged these limitations, operating on large tumors and potential carcinomas, although the latter are usually converted to open procedures once they are definitively identified (435, 436). Especially in these areas still open to debate, randomized controlled trials are most needed and most appropriate.

B. Surgery vs. nonsurgery management
Surgery should be considered in all patients with functional, clinically apparent cortical tumors, whereas treatment strategies for patients with asymptomatic adrenal hormone excess are not always straightforward.

Prompt surgical resection is the standard curative modality for all patients with pheochromocytoma because of the risk of hypertensive crisis and its complications (86, 94). For patients with benign pheochromocytoma localized to the adrenal gland, survival after adrenalectomy is similar to that of the normal age-matched population. For patients with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic disease, long-term survival is possible with an overall 5-yr survival of less than 60% (437, 438). Pharmacological treatment of the catecholamine excess is mandatory, and surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy may provide some palliative benefit.

If primary aldosteronism can be attributed to an adrenal mass, surgical resection is the treatment of choice (439). Prolonged hypertension, however, may not resolve with excision (353, 355). If surgery is contraindicated, long-term medical therapy consists of potassium-sparing diuretics. The aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, often corrects the hypertension; in most patients, hypokalemia can be controlled (439). A disadvantage of long-term use is the antiandrogenic side effects of spironolactone, which often result in impotence and gynecomastia.

SAGH presents a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. Both adrenalectomy and careful observation have been proposed as alternative treatment options (153). Although adrenalectomy has been shown to correct the biochemical abnormalities associated with this condition, its effect on prognosis and quality of life is unknown (67, 70, 81, 162). Some preliminary results suggest that after surgery, hypertension, obesity, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus may improve, but data are still inconsistent (67, 70, 81, 173). After adrenalectomy for SAGH, adrenocortical insufficiency is a major risk (81). Patients undergoing mass excision for SAGH should receive perioperative glucocorticoids and should be monitored for HPA axis recovery and clinical improvement (440). Guidelines for follow-up of patients who do not undergo resection have yet to be defined.

In patients with nonfunctioning incidentally discovered adrenal masses, management begins after distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors. Size has traditionally been the major predictor of malignancy. Benign adenomas account for more than 60% of masses under 4 cm in diameter, but less than 15% of those over 6 cm. The risk of primary adrenal carcinoma, on the other hand, is less than 2% in inapparent adrenal masses under 4 cm, but rises to 25% in lesions greater than 6 cm according to surgical series reports. Therefore, the general practice is to excise lesions larger than 6 cm. Lesions smaller than 4 cm, defined as low risk by imaging criteria, are unlikely to be malignant and are generally not resected. For intermediate lesions between 4 and 6 cm, either adrenalectomy or close follow-up is reasonable. If the findings from imaging studies, growth rate, decreased lipid content, and other features suggest that the lesion is not an adenoma, adrenalectomy should be strongly considered. Importantly, various size criteria are to some degree arbitrary and should not be the sole basis for treatment decisions (203, 207, 441, 442).

Early detection of adrenocortical carcinoma is crucial, because surgical resection of localized carcinoma (stage I and II) offers the only prospect for cure. At more advanced stages, surgical debulking may increase the efficacy of adjuvant therapy if total or near-total excision can be achieved (102, 114, 437), although published data on this approach have been conflicting (109, 118, 119, 443). Table 5 presents an overview of the outcomes of adrenocortical carcinoma after surgical excision (97, 98, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458). Most of these studies are retrospective, with wide variations in the quality and quantity of reported information about tumor size, patient characteristics, surgical approaches, and outcomes. Eighteen studies reported 5-yr survival data that ranged from 19–62%, with a median of 35% (weighted average, 34%). In cases where total surgical extirpation was not possible, the 5-yr survival rates were 10–30%. Although overall survival rates are comparable in earlier and more recent series, the studies included patients from a wide range of years, making it difficult to discern any temporal trend. Neither age nor tumor size appears to influence prognosis after surgery.

C. Follow-up
There have so far been few studies with prespecified protocols that have prospectively investigated changes in tumor size or the development of hormone overproduction in untreated adrenal masses (45, 202, 463). Most data originate from studies with variable stringency, so the limited and incomplete evidence available precludes making any specific recommendations for follow-up (30, 54, 57, 63, 201, 464, 465, 466, 467).

Long-term follow-up studies suggest that the large majority of adrenal lesions remain stable, whereas 3–20% enlarge and 3–4% may decrease in size (57, 63, 202, 467). For those patients whose lesions have not been excised, a CT study repeated within 6–12 months of the first imaging is reasonable. For lesions that do not increase in size, there are no data to support continued radiological evaluation. This observation is based on longitudinal studies of up to 10 yr reporting that the risk of developing adrenal cortical carcinoma remains extremely low (63, 202). However, small changes of size may apparently reflect a more aggressive growth rate. When a mass increases in diameter by one fourth, its volume approximately doubles.

Endocrine hyperactivity may develop in up to 20% of patients during follow-up, but is unlikely in lesions smaller than 3 cm. Cortisol hypersecretion is the most common disorder to develop. Progression to overt Cushing’s syndrome may occur, but this is rare (202). At variance with previous reports, Barzon et al. (151) have recently reported that SAGH carries an estimated cumulative risk of 12.5% of developing Cushing’s syndrome after 1 yr. Prevalence data, though, have found that the vast majority (99.7%) of patients with SAGH do not progress to overt Cushing’s syndrome (154). The onset of catecholamine overproduction or hyperaldosteronism during long-term follow up is very rare (202). To rule out new endocrine activity, an overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test and urine catecholamines/metabolites at yearly intervals may be reasonable. The risk of tumor hyperfunction appears to plateau after 3–4 yr. However, the limited and incomplete evidence available precludes any specific recommendations.

	V. Conclusion

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
Clinically inapparent adrenal masses are neither a single pathological entity nor a disease. Overall, sparse data exist that might help guide their management. Most of the available studies are either too low in numbers to provide meaningful results, or they suffer from methodological problems. A strict definition of clinical inapparent adrenal masses would help in the interpretation of results from clinical studies; however, it will not be sufficient to address the diverse manifestations of this condition that are also clinically relevant. The prevalence of incidentally discovered adrenal masses and the likelihood of underlying pathologies vary according to the defining criteria. In studies of general population, adenoma is generally the most common cause of clinically inapparent adrenal masses, whereas metastases are most common in studies with cancer work-up patients. Many studies assumed that the major purpose of the further evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is the detection of adrenal carcinomas. Given the rarity of this tumor and the lack of effective therapy in the later stages, the overall benefit of detection is small. In contrast, biochemically active, subclinical adenomas are common. Given the high prevalence of this condition and the significance of hypertension and diabetes as causes of cardiovascular diseases, the detection of these tumors and the expected health benefits from optimal management may become the prime reason for aggressive intervention with clinically inapparent adrenal masses. A better understanding is needed of the prevalence and long-term clinical outcomes of this condition.

Recently, the NIH State-of-the-Science Conference proposed a minimal standard evaluation based on the prevalence of hypersecretory adrenal masses, cost-effectiveness analysis, and good evidence for testing of clinically suspected adrenal diseases (Fig. 7) (19, 20). Accordingly, pheochromocytomas should be ruled out in all patients. Emerging data suggest that plasma free metanephrines can be measured with high diagnostic accuracy and may replace or complement the measurement of urine metanephrines and catecholamines. An overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test should be performed in all patients to detect SAGH, even if the link between this disorder and long-term morbidity is still controversial or if treatment to reverse subtle glucocorticoid excess is beneficial. In all patients suffering from hypertension, serum potassium and ALD/PRA ratios should also be determined to evaluate potential cases of primary aldosteronism. Exceptions to these recommendations would include patients with myelolipoma imaging characteristics or adrenal cysts. Given the rarity of sex hormone-secreting incidentalomas, evaluation of these parameters should be restricted to patients in which hypersecretion is suspected, such as in cases of suspected adrenocortical carcinoma. There are insufficient data to support biochemical testing for the diagnosis of malignant tumors.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7. Recommendations for practical management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses as proposed by the NIH State-of-the-Science Conference (19 ). pheo, Pheochromocytoma.

There is little in the way of substantial data regarding the utility of FNA in patients with an incidentally detected adrenal mass, but without a history of malignancy. There are also no reliable tumor markers yet that can differentiate between benign and malignant adrenocortical or adrenomedullary tumors. Thus, FNA cannot be recommended as a standard procedure in these patients’ diagnostic work-up. FNA may be helpful in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with a history of cancer (particularly lung, breast, and kidney), but without any other outward clinical signs of metastasis and a heterogeneous adrenal mass with a high attenuation value on unenhanced CT (>20 HU). It is important to note that a benign cytological diagnosis on FNA does not totally exclude malignancy. If FNA is attempted, pheochromocytoma should always be excluded to avoid hypertensive crisis.

Surgery should be considered in all patients with functional cortical tumors associated with clinical symptoms and is strongly recommended for pheochromocytomas. Whether or not patients with subclinical hypersecretory adrenocortical masses profit from surgery is still unclear. The generally accepted recommendation regarding nonfunctional masses is to excise lesions larger than 6 cm, whereas masses less than 4 cm without suspect imaging are not generally resected. For lesions between 4 and 6 cm, either close follow-up or adrenalectomy is considered a reasonable approach. The high growth rate (or short doubling time) and extremely low incidence of adrenocortical carcinomas suggest that a judicious follow-up strategy is sufficient to reassure incidentaloma patients. A reasonable approach for unresected masses includes a CT study repeated 6–12 months after the initial imaging and periodic hormonal testing at annual intervals (or earlier if clinically indicated) for 3–4 yr. However, the clinical condition and personal concerns of an individual patient should be taken into account when making treatment and follow-up recommendations.

If resection of the mass is warranted, open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy are both acceptable procedures. Whereas in most specialist centers laparoscopic adrenalectomy is currently the procedure of choice, there are no prospective, randomized trials comparing open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The laparoscopic approach may have advantages over the open approach when performed by a surgical team experienced in advanced laparoscopic techniques, including decreased postoperative pain, reduced time to return of bowel function, decreased length of hospital stay, and the potential for earlier return to work. Operative mortality associated with adrenalectomy is less than 2%, and for many indications less than 0.5%. There are no studies that demonstrate a consistent benefit of one laparoscopic approach over another. At present, relative contraindications to laparoscopic adrenalectomy are a definitive or presumed diagnosis of invasive adrenocortical carcinoma or circumstances, such as large tumors, that make a minimally invasive approach technically difficult.

	VI. Perspectives

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 
Management of adrenal masses will remain a complex decision-making process involving a range of possible diagnoses for consideration, choosing additional diagnostic tests and interpreting their results, understanding the natural history of various adrenal pathologies, estimating the benefits and risks of interventions, and customizing the therapy based on patient age and lesion size. Besides endocrine testing to reveal hormone-producing masses, imaging studies play a fundamental role in the diagnosis of an adrenal mass. The use of advanced radiological techniques can rule out malignancies with high confidence. Still, treatment outcomes for advanced adrenocortical carcinomas are poor. Gene therapy has been recently proposed for adrenal tumors, but all of these studies are still at the preclinical stage (468, 469, 470). Although treatment strategies for hormonally active tumors are widely accepted, the impact of subclinical Cushing/SAGH on morbidity and mortality is unclear. Because clinical signs of manifest Cushing’s syndrome are not necessarily present and many of its symptoms are nonspecific, future studies prospectively investigating SAGH should clarify which signs and symptoms may be missing in SAGH and specify the threshold of clinical abnormality (such as obesity, diabetes, or hypertension). As a perspective, the question of treatment for mild hypercortisolism may be readdressed by the development of novel CRH antagonists (471, 472). Recent workshops, national networks, interest groups, and international consortia for both adrenocortical and adrenomedullary tumor will facilitate the formation of registries, tissue banks, and multicenter studies needed in the field.

Future efforts should be directed toward obtaining a larger database to define the true natural history of clinically inapparent adrenal masses as a function of size and biochemical behavior with prospective clinical studies as a basis. Individual studies should apply rigorous inclusion criteria for each scenario or provide careful analyses of defined subgroups. To conclude, well-designed, prospective clinical trials are needed to provide the most reliable evidence regarding the management of patients with clinically inapparent adrenal masses. In addition, the creation of an international registry of patients with well-documented adrenal incidentalomas using standardized definitions and inclusion criteria would be extremely valuable.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Panel and committee members, conference sponsors, conference cosponsors, and in particular Dr. D. Alexander, Dr. J. Whalen (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development), and Dr. B. Kramer (Office of Medical Applications of Research, NIH, Bethesda, MD) for helpful discussions. In addition we are grateful to Dr. Y. Rado (Department of Radiology) for providing CT and MR images, and to Dr. B. Schommartz (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany) for providing scintigraphic pictures.

	Footnotes

 
Address reprint requests to: Stefan R. Bornstein, M.D., Ph.D., Heinrich-Heine-University, Department of Endocrinology, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: stefan.bornstein{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

This manuscript is based partly on the work performed by the New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, contracted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (contract no. 290-97-0019). Recommendations expressed in this article are strictly the opinions of the authors.

Abbreviations: AA, Anterior open adrenalectomy; ALD, aldosterone concentration; CT, computed tomography; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; FDG, ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; HU, Hounsfield units; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MEN, multiple endocrine neoplasia; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MIBG, metaiodobenzylguanidine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NP-59, ¹³¹I-6-ß-iodomethyl-norcholesterol; PA, posterior open adrenalectomy; PET, positron emission tomography; PRA, plasma renin activity; RLA, retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy; SAGH, subclinical autonomous glucocorticoid hypersecretion; SDHD, succinate dehydrogenase subunit D; TLA, transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy; US, ultrasonography; VHL, von-Hippel Lindau syndrome; VMA, vanillylmandelic acid.

	References

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Causes and Prevalence III. Diagnostic Strategies IV. Treatment V. Conclusion VI. Perspectives References

 

1. Geelhoed GW, Druy EM 1982 Management of the adrenal "incidentaloma." Surgery 92:866–874[Medline]
2. Prinz RA, Brooks MH, Churchill R, Graner JL, Lawrence AM, Paloyan E, Sparagana M 1982 Incidental asymptomatic adrenal masses detected by computed tomographic scanning. Is operation required? JAMA 248:701–704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Aron DC 2001 The adrenal incidentaloma: disease of modern technology and public health problem. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2:335–342[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Thompson GB, Young Jr WF 2003 Adrenal incidentaloma. Curr Opin Oncol 15:84–90[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Kloos RT, Gross MD, Francis IR, Korobkin M, Shapiro B 1995 Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 16:460–484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Copeland PM 1983 The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Ann Intern Med 98:940–945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kievit J, Haak HR 2000 Diagnosis and treatment of adrenal incidentaloma. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:69–90, viii-ix[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Ross NS, Aron DC 1990 Hormonal evaluation of the patient with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med 323:1401–1405[Medline]
9. Schteingart DE 2000 Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Ann Arbor, Michigan. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:127–139, ix-x[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Young Jr WF 2000 Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Rochester, Minnesota. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:159–185, x[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Latronico AC, Chrousos GP 1997 Extensive personal experience: adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1317–1324[Free Full Text]
12. Stratakis CA, Chrousos GP 2000 Adrenal cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:15–25, vii-viii[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Bornstein SR, Stratakis CA, Chrousos GP 1999 Adrenocortical tumors: recent advances in basic concepts and clinical management. Ann Intern Med 130:759–771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Gicquel C, Bertherat J, Le Bouc Y, Bertagna X 2000 Pathogenesis of adrenocortical incidentalomas and genetic syndromes associated with adrenocortical neoplasms. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:1–13, vii[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Stowasser M, Gunasekera TG, Gordon RD 2001 Familial varieties of primary aldosteronism. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28:1087–1090[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Stratakis CA 2001 Clinical genetics of multiple endocrine neoplasias, Carney complex and related syndromes. J Endocrinol Invest 24:370–383[Medline]
17. Lacroix A, Ndiaye N, Tremblay J, Hamet P 2001 Ectopic and abnormal hormone receptors in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. Endocr Rev 22:75–110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Marx C, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Scherbaum WA, Bornstein SR 1998 Regulation of adrenocortical function by cytokines–relevance for immune-endocrine interaction. Horm Metab Res 30:416–420[Medline]
19. Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD, Campbell KK, Carney JA, Godley PA, Harris EL, Lee JK, Oertel YC, Posner MC, Schlechte JA, Wieand HS 2003 Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma"). Ann Intern Med 138:424–429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Lau J, Balk E, Rothberg M, Ioannidis JPA, De Vine D, Chew P, Kupelnik B, Miller K 2002 Management of clinically inapparent adrenal mass. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 56. Prepared by New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-97-0019, AHRQ pub. no. 02-E014. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
21. Abecassis M, McLoughlin MJ, Langer B, Kudlow JE 1985 Serendipitous adrenal masses: prevalence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 149:783–788[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Commons RR, Callaway CP 1948 Adenomas of the adrenal cortex. Arch Intern Med 81:37–141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Russi S, Blumenthal HT, Gray SH 1945 Small adenomas of the adrenal cortex in hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 76:284–291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Kokko JP, Brown TC, Berman MM 1967 Adrenal adenoma and hypertension. Lancet 1:468–470[Medline]
25. Hedeland H, Ostberg G, Hokfelt B 1968 On the prevalence of adrenocortical adenomas in an autopsy material in relation to hypertension and diabetes. Acta Med Scand 184:211–214[Medline]
26. Masumori N, Adachi H, Noda Y, Tsukamoto T 1998 Detection of adrenal and retroperitoneal masses in a general health examination system. Urology 52:572–576[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Kluglich M, Duelli R, Zoller WG, Middeke M 1993 [Ultrasound of incidental tumors of the adrenal gland and endocrine hypertension]. Bildgebung 60:144–146[Medline]
28. Belldegrun A, Hussain S, Seltzer SE, Loughlin KR, Gittes RF, Richie JP 1986 Incidentally discovered mass of the adrenal gland. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163:203–208[Medline]
29. Caplan RH, Strutt PJ, Wickus GG 1994 Subclinical hormone secretion by incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Arch Surg 129:291–296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Glazer HS, Weyman PJ, Sagel SS, Levitt RG, McClennan BL 1982 Nonfunctioning adrenal masses: incidental discovery on computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139:81–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Herrera MF, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Sheedy PF, Ilstrup DM 1991 Incidentally discovered adrenal tumors: an institutional perspective. Surgery 110:1014–1021[Medline]
32. Kley HK, Wagner H, Jaresch S, Jungblut R, Schlaghecke R 1990 Endokrin inaktive Nebennierentumoren. In: Allolio B, Schulte HM, eds. Moderne diagnostik und therapeutische strategien bei nebennierenerkrankungen. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 189–197
33. Gillams A, Roberts CM, Shaw P, Spiro SG, Goldstraw P 1992 The value of CT scanning and percutaneous fine needle aspiration of adrenal masses in biopsy-proven lung cancer. Clin Radiol 46:18–22[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Pagani JJ, Bernardino ME 1982 Incidence and significance of serendipitous CT findings in the oncologic patient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:268–275[Medline]
35. Guerrero LA 1985 Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to incidental adrenal mass. Urology 26:435–440[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Bernardino ME, Walther MM, Phillips VM, Graham Jr SD, Sewell CW, Gedgaudas-McClees K, Baumgartner BR, Torres WE, Erwin BC1985 CT-guided adrenal biopsy: accuracy, safety, and indications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:67–69
37. Hussain S, Belldegrun A, Seltzer SE, Richie JP, Abrams HL 1986 CT diagnosis of adrenal abnormalities in patients with primary non-adrenal malignancies. Eur J Radiol 6:127–131[Medline]
38. Francis IR, Smid A, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Naylor B, Glazer GM 1988 Adrenal masses in oncologic patients: functional and morphologic evaluation. Radiology 166:353–356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Chang SY, Lee SS, Ma CP, Lee SK 1989 Non-functioning tumours of the adrenal cortex. Br J Urol 63:462–464[Medline]
40. Virkkala A, Valimaki M, Pelkonen R, Huikuri K, Kahri A, Kivisaari L, Korhonen T, Salmi J, Seppala P 1989 Endocrine abnormalities in patients with adrenal tumours incidentally discovered on computed tomography. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 121:67–72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Gaboardi F, Carbone M, Bozzola A, Galli L 1991 Adrenal incidentalomas: what is the role of fine needle biopsy? Int Urol Nephrol 23:197–207[Medline]
42. Caplan RH, Kisken WA, Huiras CM 1991 Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Minn Med 74:23–26[Medline]
43. Chapuis Y 1991 [Adrenal surgery in 1990]. Ann Chir 45:5–7[Medline]
44. Aso Y, Homma Y 1992 A survey on incidental adrenal tumors in Japan. J Urol 147:1478–1481[Medline]
45. Jockenhovel F, Kuck W, Hauffa B, Reinhardt W, Benker G, Lederbogen S, Olbricht T, Reinwein D 1992 Conservative and surgical management of incidentally discovered adrenal tumors (incidentalomas). J Endocrinol Invest 15:331–337[Medline]
46. Turton DB, O’Brian JT, Shakir KM 1992 Incidental adrenal nodules: association with exaggerated 17-hydroxyprogesterone response to adrenocorticotropic hormone. J Endocrinol Invest 15:789–796[Medline]
47. Corsello SM, Della Casa S, Bollanti L, Rufini V, Rota CA, Danza F, Colasanti S, Vellante C, Troncone L, Barbarino A 1993 Incidentally discovered adrenal masses: a functional and morphological study. Exp Clin Endocrinol 101:131–137[Medline]
48. Kobayashi S, Seki T, Nonomura K, Gotoh T, Togashi M, Koyanagi T 1993 Clinical experience of incidentally discovered adrenal tumor with particular reference to cortical function. J Urol 150:8–12[Medline]
49. Nakajo M, Nakabeppu Y, Yonekura R, Iwashita S, Goto T 1993 The role of adrenocortical scintigraphy in the evaluation of unilateral incidentally discovered adrenal and juxtaadrenal masses. Ann Nucl Med 7:157–166[Medline]
50. Burt M, Heelan RT, Coit D, McCormack PM, Bains MS, Martini N, Rusch V, Ginsberg RJ 1994 Prospective evaluation of unilateral adrenal masses in patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer. Impact of magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107:584–588; discussion 588–589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Boland GW, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dixon J, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR 1995 Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: evaluation at PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 194:131–134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Flecchia D, Mazza E, Carlini M, Blatto A, Olivieri F, Serra G, Camanni F, Messina M 1995 Reduced serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in adrenal incidentalomas: a marker of adrenocortical tumour. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 42:129–134[Medline]
53. Ambrosi B, Peverelli S, Passini E, Re T, Ferrario R, Colombo P, Sartorio A, Faglia G 1995 Abnormalities of endocrine function in patients with clinically "silent" adrenal masses. Eur J Endocrinol 132:422–428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Bencsik Z, Szabolcs I, Goth M, Voros A, Kaszas I, Gonczi J, Kovacs L, Dohan O, Szilagyi G 1995 Incidentally detected adrenal tumours (incidentalomas): histological heterogeneity and differentiated therapeutic approach. J Intern Med 237:585–589[Medline]
55. Terzolo M, Osella G, Ali A, Reimondo G, Borretta G, Magro GP, Luceri S, Paccotti P, Angeli A 1995 Adrenal incidentaloma, a five year experience. Minerva Endocrinol 20:69–78[Medline]
56. Aydintug S, Kocak S, Eraslan S 1996 Primary non-functioning tumours of the adrenal cortex: an eight-year experience in Turkey. Eur J Surg 162:275–278[Medline]
57. Bastounis EA, Karayiannakis AJ, Anapliotou ML, Nakopoulou L, Makri GG, Papalambros EL 1997 Incidentalomas of the adrenal gland: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Am Surg 63:356–360[Medline]
58. Bondanelli M, Campo M, Trasforini G, Ambrosio MR, Zatelli MC, Franceschetti P, Valentini A, Pansini R, degli Uberti EC 1997 Evaluation of hormonal function in a series of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Metabolism 46:107–113[CrossRef][Medline]
59. Mantero F, Masini AM, Opocher G, Giovagnetti M, Arnaldi G 1997 Adrenal incidentaloma: an overview of hormonal data from the National Italian Study Group. Horm Res 47:284–289[Medline]
60. Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, Osella G, Masini AM, Ali A, Giovagnetti M, Opocher G, Angeli A 2000 A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:637–644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Kasperlik-Zeluska AA, Roslonowska E, Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Migdalska B, Jeske W, Makowska A, Snochowska H 1997 Incidentally discovered adrenal mass (incidentaloma): investigation and management of 208 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:29–37[CrossRef][Medline]
62. Barzon L, Scaroni C, Sonino N, Fallo F, Gregianin M, Macri C, Boscaro M 1998 Incidentally discovered adrenal tumors: endocrine and scintigraphic correlates. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:55–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Barry MK, van Heerden JA, Farley DR, Grant CS, Thompson GB, Ilstrup DM 1998 Can adrenal incidentalomas be safely observed? World J Surg 22:599–603; discussion 603–604[CrossRef][Medline]
64. Xiao XR, Ye LY, Shi LX, Cheng GF, Li YT, Zhou BM 1998 Diagnosis and treatment of adrenal tumours: a review of 35 years’ experience. Br J Urol 82:199–205[CrossRef][Medline]
65. Tutuncu NB, Gedik O 1999 Adrenal incidentaloma: report of 33 cases. J Surg Oncol 70:247–250[CrossRef][Medline]
66. Fontana D, Porpiglia F, Destefanis P, Fiori C, Ali A, Terzolo M, Osella G, Angeli A 1999 What is the role of ultrasonography in the follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas? The Gruppo Piemontese Incidentalomi Surrenalici. Urology 54:612–616[CrossRef][Medline]
67. Rossi R, Tauchmanova L, Luciano A, Di Martino M, Battista C, Del Viscovo L, Nuzzo V, Lombardi G 2000 Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: clinical and biochemical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1440–1448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Luton JP, Martinez M, Coste J, Bertherat J 2000 Outcome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma selected for surgery: an analysis of 88 cases investigated in a single clinical center. Eur J Endocrinol 143:111–117[Abstract]
69. Hashimoto S, Midorikawa S, Sanada H, Watanabe T 2000 SSPG titer is a diagnostic marker for adrenocortical adenoma in patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentaloma. Biomed Pharmacother 54(Suppl 1):175S–177S
70. Seppel T, Schlaghecke R 1996 [Subclinical hypercortisolism in incidentally detected adrenal adenoma]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 121:503–507; discussion 508[Medline]
71. Bülow B, Ahren B 2002 Adrenal incidentaloma–experience of a standardized diagnostic programme in the Swedish prospective study. J Intern Med 252:239–246[CrossRef][Medline]
72. Andreis M, Avataneo T 1985 [Computed tomography of non-functioning adrenal masses]. Radiol Med (Torino) 71:206–210
73. Pfister B, Henry JF, Conte-Devolx B, Lantieri O, Codaccioni JL 1987 [Adrenal tumors of fortuitous discovery. 13 cases]. Presse Med 16:1075–1078[Medline]
74. Osella G, Terzolo M, Borretta G, Magro G, Ali A, Piovesan A, Paccotti P, Angeli A 1994 Endocrine evaluation of incidentally discovered adrenal masses (incidentalomas). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1532–1539[Abstract]
75. Vierhapper H, Heinze G, Gessl A, Exner M 2003 Adrenocortical tumors: prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and of "Paradoxical Rise" of cortisol during an oral glucose tolerance test. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 111:415–420[CrossRef][Medline]
76. Kjellman M, Larsson C, Backdahl M 2001 Genetic background of adrenocortical tumor development. World J Surg 25:948–956[CrossRef][Medline]
77. Granger P, Genest J 1970 Autopsy study of adrenals in unselected normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can Med Assoc J 103:34–36[Medline]
78. Russell RP, Masi AT, Richter ED 1972 Adrenal cortical adenomas and hypertension. A clinical pathologic analysis of 690 cases with matched controls and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 51:211–225[CrossRef][Medline]
79. Jaresch S, Kornely E, Kley HK, Schlaghecke R 1992 Adrenal incidentaloma and patients with homozygous or heterozygous congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:685–689[Abstract]
80. Adams JE, Johnson RJ, Rickards D, Isherwood I 1983 Computed tomography in adrenal disease. Clin Radiol 34:39–49[CrossRef][Medline]
81. Reincke M, Nieke J, Krestin GP, Saeger W, Allolio B, Winkelmann W 1992 Preclinical Cushing’s syndrome in adrenal "incidentalomas": comparison with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:826–832[Abstract]
82. Tanabe A, Naruse M, Nishikawa T, Yoshimoto T, Shimizu T, Seki T, Takagi S, Imaki T, Takano K 2001 Autonomy of cortisol secretion in clinically silent adrenal incidentaloma. Horm Metab Res 33:444–450[CrossRef][Medline]
83. Terzolo M, Osella G, Ali A, Borretta G, Cesario F, Paccotti P, Angeli A 1998 Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in adrenal incidentaloma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:89–97[CrossRef][Medline]
84. Valli N, Catargi B, Ronci N, Vergnot V, Leccia F, Ferriere JM, Chene G, Grenier N, Laurent F, Tabarin A 2001 Biochemical screening for subclinical cortisol-secreting adenomas amongst adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 144:401–408[Abstract]
85. Bernini G, Moretti A, Argenio G, Salvetti A 2002 Primary aldosteronism in normokalemic patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 146:523–529[Abstract]
86. Bravo EL 2002 Pheochromocytoma. Cardiol Rev 10:44–50[CrossRef][Medline]
87. Young Jr WF 1997 Pheochromocytoma: issues in diagnosis, treatment. Compr Ther 23:319–326[Medline]
88. Sutton MG, Sheps SG, Lie JT 1981 Prevalence of clinically unsuspected pheochromocytoma. Review of a 50-year autopsy series. Mayo Clin Proc 56:354–360[Medline]
89. Anderson Jr GH, Blakeman N, Streeten DH 1994 The effect of age on prevalence of secondary forms of hypertension in 4429 consecutively referred patients. J Hypertens 12:609–615[Medline]
90. Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G 1977 Prevalence of primary and secondary hypertension. Am Heart J 94:543–546[CrossRef][Medline]
91. Mannelli M, Ianni L, Cilotti A, Conti A 1999 Pheochromocytoma in Italy: a multicentric retrospective study. Eur J Endocrinol 141:619–624[Abstract]
92. Remine WH, Chong GC, Van Heerden JA, Sheps SG, Harrison Jr EG 1974 Current management of pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg 179:740–748[Medline]
93. Whalen RK, Althausen AF, Daniels GH 1992 Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. J Urol 147:1–10[Medline]
94. Pacak K, Linehan WM, Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Goldstein DS 2001 Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med 134:315–329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
95. 1975 Third national cancer survey: incidence data. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr: i-x, 1–454
96. Hutter Jr AM, Kayhoe DE 1966 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Clinical features of 138 patients. Am J Med 41:572–580[CrossRef][Medline]
97. Nader S, Hickey RC, Sellin RV, Samaan NA 1983 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. A study of 77 cases. Cancer 52:707–711[CrossRef][Medline]
98. Soreide JA, Brabrand K, Thoresen SO 1992 Adrenal cortical carcinoma in Norway, 1970–1984. World J Surg 16:663–667; discussion 668[CrossRef][Medline]
99. Ng L, Libertino JM 2003 Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. J Urol 169:5–11[CrossRef][Medline]
100. Wooten MD, King DK 1993 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Epidemiology and treatment with mitotane and a review of the literature. Cancer 72:3145–3155[CrossRef][Medline]
101. Crucitti F, Bellantone R, Ferrante A, Boscherini M, Crucitti P 1996 The Italian Registry for Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma: analysis of a multiinstitutional series of 129 patients. The ACC Italian Registry Study Group. Surgery 119:161–170[CrossRef][Medline]
102. Wajchenberg BL, Albergaria Pereira MA, Medonca BB, Latronico AC, Campos Carneiro P, Alves VA, Zerbini MC, Liberman B, Carlos Gomes G, Kirschner MA 2000 Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical and laboratory observations. Cancer 88:711–736[CrossRef][Medline]
103. Del Gaudio AD, Del Gaudio GA 1993 Virilizing adrenocortical tumors in adult women. Report of 10 patients, 2 of whom each had a tumor secreting only testosterone. Cancer 72:1997–2003[CrossRef][Medline]
104. Patil KK, Ransley PG, McCullagh M, Malone M, Spitz L 2002 Functioning adrenocortical neoplasms in children. BJU Int 89:562–565[CrossRef][Medline]
105. Weingartner K, Gerharz EW, Bittinger A, Rosai J, Leppek R, Riedmiller H 1995 Isolated clinical syndrome of primary aldosteronism in a patient with adrenocortical carcinoma. Case report and review of the literature. Urol Int 55:232–235[Medline]
106. Barzon L, Fallo F, Sonino N, Daniele O, Boscaro M 1997 Adrenocortical carcinoma: experience in 45 patients. Oncology 54:490–496[Medline]
107. Boscaro M, Fallo F, Barzon L, Daniele O, Sonino N 1995 Adrenocortical carcinoma: epidemiology and natural history. Minerva Endocrinol 20:89–94[Medline]
108. Didolkar MS, Bescher RA, Elias EG, Moore RH 1981 Natural history of adrenal cortical carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 42 patients. Cancer 47:2153–2161[CrossRef][Medline]
109. Grondal S, Cedermark B, Eriksson B, Grimelius L, Harach R, Kristoffersson A, Rastad J, Uden P, Akerstrom G 1990 Adrenocortical carcinoma. A retrospective study of a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 16:500–506[Medline]
110. Icard P, Chapuis Y, Andreassian B, Bernard A, Proye C 1992 Adrenocortical carcinoma in surgically treated patients: a retrospective study on 156 cases by the French Association of Endocrine Surgery. Surgery 112:972–979; discussion 979–980[Medline]
111. Kasperlik-Zaluska AA, Migdalska BM, Zgliczynski S, Makowska AM 1995 Adrenocortical carcinoma. A clinical study and treatment results of 52 patients. Cancer 75:2587–2591[CrossRef][Medline]
112. Luton JP, Cerdas S, Billaud L, Thomas G, Guilhaume B, Bertagna X, Laudat MH, Louvel A, Chapuis Y, Blondeau P, Bonnin A, Bricaire H 1990 Clinical features of adrenocortical carcinoma, prognostic factors, and the effect of mitotane therapy. N Engl J Med 322:1195–1201[Abstract]
113. Nakano M 1988 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 91 autopsy cases. Acta Pathol Jpn 38:163–180[Medline]
114. Pommier RF, Brennan MF 1992 An eleven-year experience with adrenocortical carcinoma. Surgery 112:963–970; discussion 970–971[Medline]
115. Tritos NA, Cushing GW, Heatley G, Libertino JA 2000 Clinical features and prognostic factors associated with adrenocortical carcinoma: Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience. Am Surg 66:73–79[Medline]
116. Venkatesh S, Hickey RC, Sellin RV, Fernandez JF, Samaan NA 1989 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Cancer 64:765–769[CrossRef][Medline]
117. Favia G, Lumachi F, D’Amico DF 2001 Adrenocortical carcinoma: is prognosis different in nonfunctioning tumors? Results of surgical treatment in 31 patients. World J Surg 25:735–738[CrossRef][Medline]
118. Henley DJ, van Heerden JA, Grant CS, Carney JA, Carpenter PC 1983 Adrenal cortical carcinoma—a continuing challenge. Surgery 94:926–931[Medline]
119. Hogan TF, Gilchrist KW, Westring DW, Citrin DL 1980 A clinical and pathological study of adrenocortical carcinoma: therapeutic implications. Cancer 45:2880–2883[CrossRef][Medline]
120. Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Schultz PN 2001 Adrenocortical carcinoma. Clinical outcome at the end of the 20th century. Cancer 92:1113–1121[CrossRef][Medline]
121. Lam KY, Lo CY 2002 Metastatic tumours of the adrenal glands: a 30-year experience in a teaching hospital. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56:95–101[CrossRef][Medline]
122. Abrams HL, Siro R, Goldstein N 1950 Metastases in carcinoma: analysis of 1,000 autopsied cases. Cancer 3:74–85[CrossRef][Medline]
123. Lumb G, Mackenzie DH 1959 The incidence of metastases in adrenal glands and ovaries removed for carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 12:521–526[CrossRef][Medline]
124. Lenert JT, Barnett Jr CC, Kudelka AP, Sellin RV, Gagel RF, Prieto VG, Skibber JM, Ross MI, Pisters PW, Curley SA, Evans DB, Lee JE 2001 Evaluation and surgical resection of adrenal masses in patients with a history of extra-adrenal malignancy. Surgery 130:1060–1067[CrossRef][Medline]
125. Han M, Burnett AL, Fishman EK, Marshall FF 1997 The natural history and treatment of adrenal myelolipoma. J Urol 157:1213–1216[CrossRef][Medline]
126. Yildiz L, Akpolat I, Erzurumlu K, Aydin O, Kandemir B 2000 Giant adrenal myelolipoma: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int 50:502–504[CrossRef][Medline]
127. Chen CL, Huang ST, Chang PL, Ng KF 2000 Adrenal ganglioneuroma: report of five cases. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 23:550–554[Medline]
128. Bellantone R, Ferrante A, Raffaelli M, Boscherini M, Lombardi CP, Crucitti F 1998 Adrenal cystic lesions: report of 12 surgically treated cases and review of the literature. J Endocrinol Invest 21:109–114[Medline]
129. Wenig BM, Abbondanzo SL, Heffess CS 1994 Epithelioid angiosarcoma of the adrenal glands. A clinicopathologic study of nine cases with a discussion of the implications of finding "epithelial-specific" markers. Am J Surg Pathol 18:62–73[Medline]
130. Wang J, Sun NC, Renslo R, Chuang CC, Tabbarah HJ, Barajas L, French SW 1998 Clinically silent primary adrenal lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Hematol 58:130–136[CrossRef][Medline]
131. Mermershtain W, Liel Y, Zirkin HJ, Lupu L, Lantsberg S, Cohen Y 2001 Primary bilateral adrenal lymphoma relapsing as a solid cerebral mass after complete clinical remission: a case report. Am J Clin Oncol 24:583–585[CrossRef][Medline]
132. Baker ME, Spritzer C, Blinder R, Herfkens RJ, Leight GS, Dunnick NR 1987 Benign adrenal lesions mimicking malignancy on MR imaging: report of two cases. Radiology 163:669–671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
133. Lio S, Cibin M, Marcello R, Viviani MA, Ajello L 2000 Adrenal bilateral incidentaloma by reactivated histoplasmosis. J Endocrinol Invest 23:476–479[Medline]
134. Lam KY, Lo CY 1999 Composite pheochromocytoma-ganglioneuroma of the adrenal gland: an uncommon entity with distinctive clinicopathologic features. Endocr Pathol 10:343–352[Medline]
135. Bornstein SR, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Scherbaum WA 1991 Ultrastructural evidence for cortico-chromaffin hybrid cells in rat adrenals? Endocrinology 129:1113–1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
136. Miettinen M 1992 Neuroendocrine differentiation in adrenocortical carcinoma. New immunohistochemical findings supported by electron microscopy. Lab Invest 66:169–174[Medline]
137. Stratakis CA, Carney JA, Kirschner LS, Willenberg HS, Brauer S, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Bornstein SR 1999 Synaptophysin immunoreactivity in primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease: neuroendocrine properties of tumors associated with Carney complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1122–1128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
138. Calhoun SK, Murphy RC, Shariati N, Jacir N, Bergman K 2001 Extramedullary hematopoiesis in a child with hereditary spherocytosis: an uncommon cause of an adrenal mass. Pediatr Radiol 31:879–881[CrossRef][Medline]
139. Boscaro M, Barzon L, Fallo F, Sonino N 2001 Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 357:783–791[CrossRef][Medline]
140. Bravo EL 1994 Evolving concepts in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Endocr Rev 15:356–368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
141. Bravo EL 1994 Primary aldosteronism. Issues in diagnosis and management. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 23:271–283[Medline]
142. Findling JW, Raff H 2001 Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30:729–747[CrossRef][Medline]
143. Flack MR, Oldfield EH, Cutler Jr GB, Zweig MH, Malley JD, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Nieman LK 1992 Urine free cortisol in the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for the differential diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med 116:211–217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
144. Meier CA, Biller BM 1997 Clinical and biochemical evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 26:741–762[CrossRef][Medline]
145. Newell-Price J, Grossman A 2002 Biochemical and imaging evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome. Minerva Endocrinol 27:95–118[Medline]
146. Nieman LK 1997 Cushing’s syndrome. Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab 6:161–164[Medline]
147. Torpy DJ, Stratakis CA, Chrousos GP 1999 Hyper- and hypoaldosteronism. Vitam Horm 57:177–216[Medline]
148. Tsigos C, Chrousos GP 1996 Differential diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome. Annu Rev Med 47:443–461[CrossRef][Medline]
149. Young Jr WF, Hogan MJ, Klee GG, Grant CS, van Heerden JA 1990 Primary aldosteronism: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 65:96–110[Medline]
150. Barzon L, Boscaro M 2000 Diagnosis and management of adrenal incidentalomas. J Urol 163:398–407[CrossRef][Medline]
151. Barzon L, Fallo F, Sonino N, Boscaro M 2002 Development of overt Cushing’s syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 146:61–66[Abstract]
152. Terzolo M, Pia A, Ali A, Osella G, Reimondo G, Bovio S, Daffara F, Procopio M, Paccotti P, Borretta G, Angeli A 2002 Adrenal incidentaloma: a new cause of the metabolic syndrome? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:998–1003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
153. Reincke M 2000 Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:43–56[CrossRef][Medline]
154. Ross NS 1994 Epidemiology of Cushing’s syndrome and subclinical disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 23:539–546[Medline]
155. Crapo L 1979 Cushing’s syndrome: a review of diagnostic tests. Metabolism 28:955–977[CrossRef][Medline]
156. Aron DC, Tyrrell JB, Fitzgerald PA, Findling JW, Forsham PH 1981 Cushing’s syndrome: problems in diagnosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 60:25–35[CrossRef][Medline]
157. Raff H, Raff JL, Findling JW 1998 Late-night salivary cortisol as a screening test for Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2681–2686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
158. Tsagarakis S, Kokkoris P, Roboti C, Malagari C, Kaskarelis J, Vlassopoulou V, Alevizaki C, Thalassinos N 1998 The low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in patients with adrenal incidentalomas: comparisons with clinically euadrenal subjects and patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:627–633[CrossRef][Medline]
159. Terzolo M, Osella G, Ali A, Borretta G, Magro GP, Termine A, Paccotti P, Angeli A 1996 Different patterns of steroid secretion in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:740–744[Abstract]
160. Charbonnel B, Chatal JF, Ozanne P 1981 Does the corticoadrenal adenoma with "pre-Cushing’s syndrome" exist? J Nucl Med 22:1059–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
161. Garrapa GG, Pantanetti P, Arnaldi G, Mantero F, Faloia E 2001 Body composition and metabolic features in women with adrenal incidentaloma or Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5301–5306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
162. Midorikawa S, Sanada H, Hashimoto S, Suzuki T, Watanabe T 2001 The improvement of insulin resistance in patients with adrenal incidentaloma by surgical resection. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54:797–804[CrossRef][Medline]
163. Tauchmanova L, Rossi R, Biondi B, Pulcrano M, Nuzzo V, Palmieri EA, Fazio S, Lombardi G 2002 Patients with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome due to adrenal adenoma have increased cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4872–4878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
164. Fernandez-Real JM, Engel WR, Simo R, Salinas I, Webb SM 1998 Study of glucose tolerance in consecutive patients harbouring incidental adrenal tumours. Study Group of Incidental Adrenal Adenoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49:53–61[CrossRef][Medline]
165. Francucci CM, Pantanetti P, Garrapa GG, Massi F, Arnaldi G, Mantero F 2002 Bone metabolism and mass in women with Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal incidentaloma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:587–593[CrossRef][Medline]
166. Bardet S, Rohmer V, Boux de Casson F, Coffin C, Ronci N, Sabatier JP, Lecomte P, Audran M, Henry-Amar M, Tabarin A 2002 [Bone mineral density and biological markers of bone repair in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: effect of subclinical hypercortisolism]. Rev Med Interne 23:508–517[Medline]
167. Chiodini I, Torlontano M, Carnevale V, Guglielmi G, Cammisa M, Trischitta V, Scillitani A 2001 Bone loss rate in adrenal incidentalomas: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5337–5341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
168. Sartorio A, Conti A, Ferrero S, Giambona S, Re T, Passini E, Ambrosi B 1998 Evaluation of markers of bone and collagen turnover in patients with active and preclinical Cushing’s syndrome and in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 138:146–152[Abstract]
169. Tauchmanova L, Rossi R, Nuzzo V, del Puente A, Esposito-del Puente A, Pizzi C, Fonderico F, Lupoli G, Lombardi G 2001 Bone loss determined by quantitative ultrasonometry correlates inversely with disease activity in patients with endogenous glucocorticoid excess due to adrenal mass. Eur J Endocrinol 145:241–247[Abstract]
170. Torlontano M, Chiodini I, Pileri M, Guglielmi G, Cammisa M, Modoni S, Carnevale V, Trischitta V, Scillitani A 1999 Altered bone mass and turnover in female patients with adrenal incidentaloma: the effect of subclinical hypercortisolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2381–2385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
171. Hadjidakis D, Tsagarakis S, Roboti C, Sfakianakis M, Iconomidou V, Raptis SA, Thalassinos N 2003 Does subclinical hypercortisolism adversely affect the bone mineral density of patients with adrenal incidentalomas? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58:72–77[CrossRef][Medline]
172. Osella G, Reimondo G, Peretti P, Ali A, Paccotti P, Angeli A, Terzolo M 2001 The patients with incidentally discovered adrenal adenoma (incidentaloma) are not at increased risk of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:604–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
173. Bernini G, Moretti A, Iacconi P, Miccoli P, Nami R, Lucani B, Salvetti A 2003 Anthropometric, haemodynamic, humoral and hormonal evaluation in patients with incidental adrenocortical adenomas before and after surgery. Eur J Endocrinol 148:213–219[Abstract]
174. Murai M, Baba S, Nakashima J, Tachibana M 1999 Management of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. World J Urol 17:9–14[CrossRef][Medline]
175. Lifton RP, Dluhy RG, Powers M, Rich GM, Cook S, Ulick S, Lalouel JM 1992 A chimaeric 11 ß-hydroxylase/aldosterone synthase gene causes glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism and human hypertension. Nature 355:262–265[CrossRef][Medline]
176. Litchfield WR, New MI, Coolidge C, Lifton RP, Dluhy RG 1997 Evaluation of the dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnosis of glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3570–3573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
177. Stowasser M 2001 Primary aldosteronism: revival of a syndrome. J Hypertens 19:363–366[CrossRef][Medline]
178. Stowasser M, Gordon RD, Gunasekera TG, Cowley DC, Ward G, Archibald C, Smithers BM 2003 High rate of detection of primary aldosteronism, including surgically treatable forms, after ‘nonselective’ screening of hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 21:2149–2157[CrossRef][Medline]
179. McKenna TJ, Sequeira SJ, Heffernan A, Chambers J, Cunningham S 1991 Diagnosis under random conditions of all disorders of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, including primary hyperaldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:952–957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
180. Weinberger MH, Fineberg NS 1993 The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism and separation of two major subtypes. Arch Intern Med 153:2125–2129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
181. Stowasser M, Gordon RD, Rutherford JC, Nikwan NZ, Daunt N, Slater GJ 2001 Diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2:156–169[Free Full Text]
182. Eisenhofer G, Keiser H, Friberg P, Mezey E, Huynh TT, Hiremagalur B, Ellingson T, Duddempudi S, Eijsbouts A, Lenders JW 1998 Plasma metanephrines are markers of pheochromocytoma produced by catechol-O-methyltransferase within tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2175–2185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
183. Eisenhofer G, Walther M, Keiser HR, Lenders JW, Friberg P, Pacak K 2000 Plasma metanephrines: a novel and cost-effective test for pheochromocytoma. Braz J Med Biol Res 33:1157–1169[Medline]
184. Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Huynh TT, Li ST, Bornstein SR, Vortmeyer A, Mannelli M, Goldstein DS, Linehan WM, Lenders JW, Pacak K 2001 Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1999–2008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
185. Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, Linehan WM, Mannelli M, Friberg P, Keiser HR, Goldstein DS, Eisenhofer G 2002 Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA 287:1427–1434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
186. Sjoberg RJ, Simcic KJ, Kidd GS 1992 The clonidine suppression test for pheochromocytoma. A review of its utility and pitfalls. Arch Intern Med 152:1193–1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
187. Keiser HR 2001 Pheochromocytoma and related tumors. In: DeGroot LJ, Jameson JB, eds. Endocrinology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1862–1883
188. d’Herbomez M, Gouze V, Huglo D, Nocaudie M, Pattou F, Proye C, Wemeau JL, Marchandise X 2001 Chromogranin A assay and (131)I-MIBG scintigraphy for diagnosis and follow-up of pheochromocytoma. J Nucl Med 42:993–997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
189. Hsiao RJ, Parmer RJ, Takiyyuddin MA, O’Connor DT 1991 Chromogranin A storage and secretion: sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 70:33–45[Medline]
190. Cordera F, Grant C, Van Heerden J, Thompson G, Young W 2003 Androgen-secreting adrenal tumors. Surgery 134:874–880[CrossRef][Medline]
191. Terzolo M, Ali A, Osella G, Reimondo G, Pia A, Peretti P, Paccotti P, Angeli A 2000 The value of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate measurement in the differentiation between benign and malignant adrenal masses. Eur J Endocrinol 142:611–617[Abstract]
192. Bencsik Z, Szabolcs I, Kovacs Z, Ferencz A, Voros A, Kaszas I, Bor K, Gonczi J, Goth M, Kovacs L, Dohan O, Szilagyi G 1996 Low dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) level is not a good predictor of hormonal activity in nonselected patients with incidentally detected adrenal tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1726–1729[Abstract]
193. Bernini GP, Argenio GF, Vivaldi MS, Moretti A, Miccoli P, Iacconi P, Magagna A, Salvetti A 1998 Utility of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate determination in adrenal incidentalomas. J Endocrinol Invest 21:365–371[Medline]
194. Morio H, Terano T, Yamamoto K, Tomizuka T, Oeda T, Saito Y, Tamura Y, Sasano H 1996 Serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in patients with asymptomatic cortisol producing adrenal adenoma: comparison with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome and non-functional adrenal tumor. Endocr J 43:387–396[Medline]
195. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR 1998 Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:201–204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
196. Dunnick NR, Korobkin M 2002 Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: current status. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:559–568[Free Full Text]
197. Korobkin M 2000 CT characterization of adrenal masses: the time has come. Radiology 217:629–632[Free Full Text]
198. Mayo-Smith WW, Boland GW, Noto RB, Lee MJ 2001 State-of-the-art adrenal imaging. Radiographics 21:995–1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
199. Peppercorn PD, Grossman AB, Reznek RH 1998 Imaging of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:379–388[CrossRef][Medline]
200. Udelsman R, Fishman EK 2000 Radiology of the adrenal. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:27–42, viii[CrossRef][Medline]
201. Mitnick JS, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Naidich DP 1983 Non-functioning adrenal adenomas discovered incidentally on computed tomography. Radiology 148:495–499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
202. Barzon L, Scaroni C, Sonino N, Fallo F, Paoletta A, Boscaro M 1999 Risk factors and long-term follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:520–526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
203. Lee MJ, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou N, Egglin TK, Saini S, Mueller PR, Simeone JF 1991 Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis. Radiology 179:415–418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
204. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F 1997 Quantitative CT evaluation of adrenal gland masses: a step forward in the differentiation between adenomas and nonadenomas? Radiology 202:517–521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
205. Singer AA, Obuchowski NA, Einstein DM, Paushter DM 1994 Metastasis or adenoma? Computed tomographic evaluation of the adrenal mass. Cleve Clin J Med 61:200–205[Medline]
206. McNicholas MM, Lee MJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Mueller PR 1995 An imaging algorithm for the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1453–1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
207. van Erkel AR, van Gils AP, Lequin M, Kruitwagen C, Bloem JL, Falke TH 1994 CT and MR distinction of adenomas and nonadenomas of the adrenal gland. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:432–438[Medline]
208. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Yutzy GG, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Kazerooni EA 1996 Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:531–536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
209. Korobkin M, Giordano T, Brodeur F, Francis IR, Siegelman ES, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Heiken JP, Wang HH 1996 Adrenal adenomas: relationship between histologic lipid and CT and MR findings. Radiology 200:743–747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
210. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Goodsitt M 1996 Delayed enhanced CT for differentiation of benign from malignant adrenal masses. Radiology 200:737–742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
211. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber FH 1998 Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 207:369–375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
212. Boland GW, Hahn PF, Pena C, Mueller PR 1997 Adrenal masses: characterization with delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 202:693–696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
213. Cirillo Jr RL, Bennett WF, Vitellas KM, Poulos AG, Bova JG 1998 Pathology of the adrenal gland: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:429–435[Free Full Text]
214. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR 2000 Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1411–1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
215. Pena CS, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR 2000 Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 217:798–802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
216. Kebapci M, Kaya T, Gurbuz E, Adapinar B, Kebapci N, Demirustu C 2003 Differentiation of adrenal adenomas (lipid rich and lipid poor) from nonadenomas by use of washout characteristics on delayed enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 28:709–715[CrossRef][Medline]
217. Korobkin M, Brodeur F, Francis I, Quint L, Dunnick N, Londy F 1998 CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. Am J Roentgenol 170:747–752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
218. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Platt JF, Dunnick NR, Raghupathi KI 2002 Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 222:629–633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
219. Krestin GP, Freidmann G, Fishbach R, Neufang KF, Allolio B 1991 Evaluation of adrenal masses in oncologic patients: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR vs. CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:104–110[Medline]
220. Fishman EK, Deutch BM, Hartman DS, Goldman SM, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS 1987 Primary adrenocortical carcinoma: CT evaluation with clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148:531–535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
221. Hussain S, Belldegrun A, Seltzer SE, Richie JP, Gittes RF, Abrams HL 1985 Differentiation of malignant from benign adrenal masses: predictive indices on computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:61–65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
222. Francis IR, Korobkin M 1996 Pheochromocytoma. Radiol Clin North Am 34:1101–1112[Medline]
223. Welch TJ, Sheedy 2nd PF, van Heerden JA, Sheps SG, Hattery RR, Stephens DH 1983 Pheochromocytoma: value of computed tomography. Radiology 148:501–503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
224. Velchik MG, Alavi A, Kressel HY, Engelman K 1989 Localization of pheochromocytoma: MIGB, CT, and MRI correlation. J Nucl Med 30:328–336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
225. Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Rao P, Heffess CS 1998 Myelolipoma: CT and pathologic features. Radiology 208:87–95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
226. Otal P, Escourrou G, Mazerolles C, Janne d’Othee B, Mezghani S, Musso S, Colombier D, Rousseau H, Joffre F 1999 Imaging features of uncommon adrenal masses with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics 19:569–581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
227. Rao P, Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Davidson AJ 1997 Imaging and pathologic features of myelolipoma. Radiographics 17:1373–1385[Abstract]
228. Cyran KM, Kenney PJ, Memel DS, Yacoub I 1996 Adrenal myelolipoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:395–400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
229. Chezmar JL, Robbins SM, Nelson RC, Steinberg HV, Torres WE, Bernardino ME 1988 Adrenal masses: characterization with T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 166:357–359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
230. Reinig JW, Doppman JL, Dwyer AJ, Frank J 1986 MRI of indeterminate adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:493–496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
231. Tsushima Y 1994 Different lipid contents between aldosterone-producing and nonhyperfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas: in vivo measurement using chemical-shift magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1759–1762[Abstract]
232. Hönigschnabl S, Gallo S, Niederle B, Prager G, Kaserer K, Lechner G, Heinz-Peer G 2002 How accurate is MR imaging in characterisation of adrenal masses: update of a long-term study. Eur J Radiol 41:113–122[CrossRef][Medline]
233. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Huang AB, Birnbaum BA 1996 Adrenal masses: correlation between CT attenuation value and chemical shift ratio at MR imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences. Radiology 200:749–752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
234. Bilbey JH, McLoughlin RF, Kurkjian PS, Wilkins GE, Chan NH, Schmidt N, Singer J 1995 MR imaging of adrenal masses: value of chemical-shift imaging for distinguishing adenomas from other tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:637–642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
235. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Doyle MV, Ginsberg MS, Herman SK, Koutcher JA, Brown KT, Getrajdman GI, Burt M 1997 Comparison of two algorithms and their associated charges when evaluating adrenal masses in patients with malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1575–1578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
236. Mayo-Smith WW, Lee MJ, McNicholas MM, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Saini S 1995 Characterization of adrenal masses (<5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging: observer performance versus quantitative measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:91–95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
237. Krestin GP, Steinbrich W, Friedmann G 1989 Adrenal masses: evaluation with fast gradient-echo MR imaging and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic studies. Radiology 171:675–680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
238. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Petersen RO, Miettinen MM 1992 Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 185:345–351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
239. Tsushima Y, Ishizaka H, Matsumoto M 1993 Adrenal masses: differentiation with chemical shift, fast low-angle shot MR imaging. Radiology 186:705–709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
240. Slapa RZ, Jakubowski W, Januszewicz A, Kasperlik-Zaluska AA, Dabrowska E, Fijuth J, Feltynowski T, Tarnawski R, Krolicki L 2000 Discriminatory power of MRI for differentiation of adrenal non-adenomas vs. adenomas evaluated by means of ROC analysis: can biopsy be obviated? Eur Radiol 10:95–104[CrossRef][Medline]
241. Schwartz LH, Ginsberg MS, Burt ME, Brown KT, Getrajdman GI, Panicek DM 1998 MRI as an alternative to CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses in patients with lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 65:193–197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
242. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Nakayama Y, Makita O, Kadota M, Takahashi M 2001 Adrenal masses: quantification of fat content with double-echo chemical shift in-phase and opposed-phase FLASH MR images for differentiation of adrenal adenomas. Radiology 218:642–646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
243. Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S 2003 Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1649–1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
244. Yeh HC 1980 Sonography of the adrenal glands: normal glands and small masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 135:1167–1177[Abstract]
245. Suzuki K, Fujita K, Ushiyama T, Mugiya S, Kageyama S, Ishikawa A 1995 Efficacy of an ultrasonic surgical system for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 154:484–486[CrossRef][Medline]
246. Abrams HL, Siegelman SS, Adams DF, Sanders R, Finberg HJ, Hessel SJ, McNeil BJ 1982 Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: a prospective study. Radiology 143:121–128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
247. Paivansalo M, Merikanto J, Kallioinen M, McAnsh G 1988 Ultrasound in the detection of adrenal tumours. Eur J Radiol 8:183–187[Medline]
248. Ghiatas AA, Chopra S, Schnitker JB 1996 Is sonographic flow imaging useful in the differential diagnosis of adrenal masses? Br J Radiol 69:1005–1008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
249. Goerg C, Schwerk WB, Wolf M, Havemann K 1992 Adrenal masses in lung cancer: sonographic diagnosis and follow-up. Eur J Cancer 28A:1400–1403
250. Kann P, Hengstermann C, Heussel CP, Bittinger F, Engelbach M, Beyer J 1998 Endosonography of the adrenal glands: normal size–pathological findings. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 106:123–129[Medline]
251. Gross MD, Rubello D, Shapiro B 2002 Is there a future for adrenal scintigraphy? Nucl Med Commun 23:197–202[CrossRef][Medline]
252. Rubello D, Bui C, Casara D, Gross MD, Fig LM, Shapiro B 2002 Functional scintigraphy of the adrenal gland. Eur J Endocrinol 147:13–28[Abstract]
253. Carey JE, Thrall JH, Freitas JE, Beierwaltes WH 1979 Absorbed dose to the human adrenals from lodomethylnorcholesterol (I-131) "NP-59": concise communication. J Nucl Med 20:60–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
254. Kloos RT, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Korobkin M, Thompson NW 1997 Diagnostic dilemma of small incidentally discovered adrenal masses: role for 131I-6ß-iodomethyl-norcholesterol scintigraphy. World J Surg 21:36–40[CrossRef][Medline]
255. Lumachi F, Marzola MC, Zucchetta P, Tregnaghi A, Cecchin D, Favia G, Bui F 2003 Non-invasive adrenal imaging in primary aldosteronism. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of radiocholesterol scintigraphy, CT scan and MRI. Nucl Med Commun 24:683–688[CrossRef][Medline]
256. Gross MD, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Glazer GM, Bree RL, Arcomano MA, Schteingart DE, McLeod MK, Sanfield JA, Thompson NW 1994 Scintigraphic evaluation of clinically silent adrenal masses. J Nucl Med 35:1145–1152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
257. Gross MD, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Bree RL, Korobkin M, McLeod MK, Thompson NW, Sanfield JA 1995 Scintigraphy of incidentally discovered bilateral adrenal masses. Eur J Nucl Med 22:315–321[CrossRef][Medline]
258. Dominguez-Gadea L, Diez L, Bas C, Crespo A 1994 Differential diagnosis of solid adrenal masses using adrenocortical scintigraphy. Clin Radiol 49:796–799[CrossRef][Medline]
259. Barzon L, Zucchetta P, Boscaro M, Marzola MC, Bui F, Fallo F 2001 Scintigraphic patterns of adrenocortical carcinoma: morphofunctional correlates. Eur J Endocrinol 145:743–748[Abstract]
260. Maurea S, Klain M, Mainolfi C, Ziviello M, Salvatore M 2001 The diagnostic role of radionuclide imaging in evaluation of patients with nonhypersecreting adrenal masses. J Nucl Med 42:884–892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
261. Bardet S, Rohmer V, Murat A, Guillemot C, Marechaud R, Chupin M, Lecomte P, Simon D, Delemer B, Schneebelli S, Beutter D, Jacquin V, Peltier P, Charbonnel B 1996 131I-6 ß-iodomethylnorcholesterol scintigraphy: an assessment of its role in the investigation of adrenocortical incidentalomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 44:587–596[CrossRef][Medline]
262. La Cava G, Imperiale A, Olianti C, Gheri GR, Ladu C, Mannelli M, Pupi A 2003 SPECT semiquantitative analysis of adrenocortical (131)I-6 ß iodomethyl-norcholesterol uptake to discriminate subclinical and preclinical functioning adrenal incidentaloma. J Nucl Med 44:1057–1064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
263. Dominguez-Gadea L, Diez L, Piedrola-Maroto G, Crespo A 1996 Scintigraphic diagnosis of subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Nucl Med Commun 17:29–32[Medline]
264. Mozley PD, Kim CK, Mohsin J, Jatlow A, Gosfield 3rd E, Alavi A 1994 The efficacy of iodine-123-MIBG as a screening test for pheochromocytoma. J Nucl Med 35:1138–1144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
265. Shapiro B, Copp JE, Sisson JC, Eyre PL, Wallis J, Beierwaltes WH 1985 Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine for the locating of suspected pheochromocytoma: experience in 400 cases. J Nucl Med 26:576–585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
266. Zhu RS, Ma JX, Xu JQ 1988 Imaging of adrenal medulla with I-131-mIBG. Clinical experience in 208 cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 101:513–516
267. Tenenbaum F, Lumbroso J, Schlumberger M, Mure A, Plouin PF, Caillou B, Parmentier C 1995 Comparison of radiolabeled octreotide and meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy in malignant pheochromocytoma. J Nucl Med 36:1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
268. Miskulin J, Shulkin BL, Doherty GM, Sisson JC, Burney RE, Gauger PG 2003 Is preoperative iodine 123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy routinely necessary before initial adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma? Surgery 134:918–922[CrossRef][Medline]
269. Erasmus JJ, Patz Jr EF, McAdams HP, Murray JG, Herndon J, Coleman RE, Goodman PC 1997 Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1357–1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
270. Maurea S, Mainolfi C, Bazzicalupo L, Panico MR, Imparato C, Alfano B, Ziviello M, Salvatore M 1999 Imaging of adrenal tumors using FDG PET: comparison of benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:25–29[Abstract/Free Full Text]
271. Yun M, Kim W, Alnafisi N, Lacorte L, Jang S, Alavi A 2001 18F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. J Nucl Med 42:1795–1799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
272. Zubeldia J, Abou-Zied M, Nabi H 2000 Patterns of adrenal gland involvement from lung cancer shown by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Positron Imaging 3:166[CrossRef][Medline]
273. Becherer A, Vierhapper H, Potzi C, Karanikas G, Kurtaran A, Schmaljohann J, Staudenherz A, Dudczak R, Kletter K 2001 FDG-PET in adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 16:289–295[CrossRef][Medline]
274. Bergstrom M, Juhlin C, Bonasera TA, Sundin A, Rastad J, Akerstrom G, Langstrom B 2000 PET imaging of adrenal cortical tumors with the 11ß-hydroxylase tracer 11C-metomidate. J Nucl Med 41:275–282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
275. Khan TS, Sundin A, Juhlin C, Langstrom B, Bergstrom M, Eriksson B 2003 11C-Metomidate PET imaging of adrenocortical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:403–410[Medline]
276. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Li ST, Goldstein DS 2001 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning for diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension 38:6–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
277. Arola J, Salmenkivi K, Liu J, Kahri AI, Heikkila P 2000 p53 and Ki67 in adrenocortical tumors. Endocr Res 26:861–865[Medline]
278. Reincke M, Karl M, Travis WH, Mastorakos G, Allolio B, Linehan HM, Chrousos GP 1994 p53 Mutations in human adrenocortical neoplasms: immunohistochemical and molecular studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:790–794[Abstract]
279. Gicquel C, Bertagna X, Gaston V, Coste J, Louvel A, Baudin E, Bertherat J, Chapuis Y, Duclos JM, Schlumberger M, Plouin PF, Luton JP, Le Bouc Y 2001 Molecular markers and long-term recurrences in a large cohort of patients with sporadic adrenocortical tumors. Cancer Res 61:6762–6767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
280. Heppner C, Reincke M, Agarwal SK, Mora P, Allolio B, Burns AL, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ 1999 MEN1 gene analysis in sporadic adrenocortical neoplasms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:216–219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
281. Gicquel C, Bertagna X, Schneid H, Francillard-Leblond M, Luton JP, Girard F, Le Bouc Y 1994 Rearrangements at the 11p15 locus and overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-II gene in sporadic adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1444–1453[Abstract]
282. Ilvesmaki V, Kahri AI, Miettinen PJ, Voutilainen R 1993 Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and their receptors in adrenal tumors: high IGF-II expression in functional adrenocortical carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:852–858[Abstract]
283. Bourcigaux N, Gaston V, Logie A, Bertagna X, Le Bouc Y, Gicquel C 2000 High expression of cyclin E and G1 CDK and loss of function of p57KIP2 are involved in proliferation of malignant sporadic adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:322–330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
284. Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, Bender BU, Gimm O, Franke G, Schipper J, Klisch J, Altehoefer C, Zerres K, Januszewicz A, Eng C, Smith WM, Munk R, Manz T, Glaesker S, Apel TW, Treier M, Reineke M, Walz MK, Hoang-Vu C, Brauckhoff M, Klein-Franke A, Klose P, Schmidt H, Maier-Woelfle M, Peczkowska M, Szmigielski C, Eng C; Freiburg-Warsaw-Columbus Pheochromocytoma Study Group 2002 Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 346:1459–1466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
285. de Krijger RR, van der Harst E, van der Ham F, Stijnen T, Dinjens WN, Koper JW, Bruining HA, Lamberts SW, Bosman FT 1999 Prognostic value of p53, bcl-2, and c-erbB-2 protein expression in phaeochromocytomas. J Pathol 188:51–55[CrossRef][Medline]
286. Arnaldi G, Freddi S, Mancini T, Kola B, Mantero F 2000 Transforming growth factor ß1: implications in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Endocr Res 26:905–910[Medline]
287. Orlando C, Gelmini S 2001 Telomerase in endocrine and endocrine-dependent tumors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 78:201–214[CrossRef][Medline]
288. Mannelli M, Gelmini S, Arnaldi G, Becherini L, Bemporad D, Crescioli C, Pazzagli M, Mantero F, Serio M, Orlando C 2000 Telomerase activity is significantly enhanced in malignant adrenocortical tumors in comparison to benign adrenocortical adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:468–470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
289. Kubota Y, Nakada T, Sasagawa I, Yanai H, Itoh K 1998 Elevated levels of telomerase activity in malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer 82:176–179[CrossRef][Medline]
290. Held EL, Gal AA, DeRose PB, Cohen C 1997 Image cytometric nuclear DNA quantitation of paragangliomas in tissue sections. Prognostic significance. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 19:501–506[Medline]
291. Tormey WP, Fitzgerald RJ, Thomas G, Kay EW, Leader MB 2000 Catecholamine secretion and ploidy in phaeochromocytoma. Int J Clin Pract 54:520–523[Medline]
292. Sasano H, Shizawa S, Suzuki T, Takayama K, Fukaya T, Morohashi K, Nagura H 1995 Transcription factor adrenal 4 binding protein as a marker of adrenocortical malignancy. Hum Pathol 26:1154–1156[CrossRef][Medline]
293. Moreno AM, Castilla-Guerra L, Martinez-Torres MC, TorresOlivera F, Fernandez E, Galera-Davidson H 1999 Expression of neuropeptides and other neuroendocrine markers in human phaeochromocytomas. Neuropeptides 33:159–163[CrossRef][Medline]
294. Bernini GP, Moretti A, Ferdeghini M, Ricci S, Letizia C, D’Erasmo E, Argenio GF, Salvetti A 2001 A new human chromogranin ‘A’ immunoradiometric assay for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer 84:636–642[CrossRef][Medline]
295. Eriksson B, Arnberg H, Oberg K, Hellman U, Lundqvist G, Wernstedt C, Wilander E 1989 Chromogranins–new sensitive markers for neuroendocrine tumors. Acta Oncol 28:325–329[Medline]
296. Murray SA, Davis K, Fishman LM, Bornstein SR 2000 1 Connexin 43 gap junctions are decreased in human adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:890–895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
297. Salmenkivi K, Haglund C, Ristimaki A, Arola J, Heikkila P 2001 Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in malignant pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5615–5619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
298. Grouzmann E, Gicquel C, Plouin PF, Schlumberger M, Comoy E, Bohuon C 1990 Neuropeptide Y and neuron-specific enolase levels in benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. Cancer 66:1833–1835[CrossRef][Medline]
299. Oishi S, Sato T 1988 Elevated serum neuron-specific enolase in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer 61:1167–1170[CrossRef][Medline]
300. Terzolo M, Boccuzzi A, Bovio S, Cappia S, De Giuli P, Ali A, Paccotti P, Porpiglia F, Fontana D, Angeli A 2001 Immunohistochemical assessment of Ki-67 in the differential diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors. Urology 57:176–182[CrossRef][Medline]
301. Wachenfeld C, Beuschlein F, Zwermann O, Mora P, Fassnacht M, Allolio B, Reincke M 2001 Discerning malignancy in adrenocortical tumors: are molecular markers useful? Eur J Endocrinol 145:335–341[Abstract]
302. Brown HM, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Demeure MJ, Zhu YR 1999 Predicting metastasis of pheochromocytomas using DNA flow cytometry and immunohistochemical markers of cell proliferation: a positive correlation between MIB-1 staining and malignant tumor behavior. Cancer 86:1583–1589[CrossRef][Medline]
303. Ohji H, Sasagawa I, Iciyanagi O, Suzuki Y, Nakada T 2001 Tumour angiogenesis and Ki-67 expression in phaeochromocytoma. BJU Int 87:381–385[CrossRef][Medline]
304. Marx C, Wolkersdorfer GW, Brown JW, Scherbaum WA, Bornstein SR 1996 MHC class II expression–a new tool to assess dignity in adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4488–4491[Abstract]
305. Tartour E, Caillou B, Tenenbaum F, Schroder S, Luciani S, Talbot M, Schlumberger M 1993 Immunohistochemical study of adrenocortical carcinoma. Predictive value of the D11 monoclonal antibody. Cancer 72:3296–3303[CrossRef][Medline]
306. Schroder S, Niendorf A, Achilles E, Dietel M, Padberg BC, Beisiegel U, Dralle H, Bressel M, Kloppel G 1990 Immunocytochemical differential diagnosis of adrenocortical neoplasms using the monoclonal antibody D11. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 417:89–96[CrossRef][Medline]
307. Komminoth P, Roth J, Schroder S, Saremaslani P, Heitz PU 1995 Overlapping expression of immunohistochemical markers and synaptophysin mRNA in pheochromocytomas and adrenocortical carcinomas. Implications for the differential diagnosis of adrenal gland tumors. Lab Invest 72:424–431[Medline]
308. Koch CA, Vortmeyer AO, Diallo R, Poremba C, Giordano TJ, Sanders D, Bornstein SR, Chrousos GP, Pacak K 2002 Survivin: a novel neuroendocrine marker for pheochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol 146:381–388[Abstract]
309. Salmenkivi K, Haglund C, Arola J, Heikkila P 2001 Increased expression of tenascin in pheochromocytomas correlates with malignancy. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1419–1423[CrossRef][Medline]
310. Salmenkivi K, Arola J, Voutilainen R, Ilvesmaki V, Haglund C, Kahri AI, Heikkila P, Liu J 2001 Inhibin/activin ßB-subunit expression in pheochromocytomas favors benign diagnosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2231–2235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
311. Wiedenmann B, Franke WW 1985 Identification and localization of synaptophysin, an integral membrane glycoprotein of Mr 38,000 characteristic of presynaptic vesicles. Cell 41:1017–1028[CrossRef][Medline]
312. Weiss LM, Medeiros LJ, Vickery Jr AL 1989 Pathologic features of prognostic significance in adrenocortical carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13:202–206[Medline]
313. Weiss LM 1984 Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 8:163–169[Medline]
314. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C 1982 Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6:655–663[Medline]
315. Stojadinovic A, Ghossein RA, Hoos A, Nissan A, Marshall D, Dudas M, Cordon-Cardo C, Jaques DP, Brennan MF 2002 Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical, morphologic, and molecular characterization. J Clin Oncol 20:941–950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
316. Manger WM, Gifford RW 1996 Clinical and experimental pheochromocytoma. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK; Blackwell
317. Amberson JB, Vaughan Jr ED, Gray GF, Naus GJ 1987 Flow cytometric determination of nuclear DNA content in benign adrenal pheochromocytomas. Urology 30:102–104[CrossRef][Medline]
318. Hosaka Y, Rainwater LM, Grant CS, Farrow GM, van Heerden JA, Lieber MM 1986 Pheochromocytoma: nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid patterns studied by flow cytometry. Surgery 100:1003–1010[Medline]
319. Capella C, Riva C, Cornaggia M, Chiaravalli AM, Frigerio B, Solcia E 1988 Histopathology, cytology and cytochemistry of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas including chemodectomas. Pathol Res Pract 183:176–187[Medline]
320. Thompson LD 2002 Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score (PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 26:551–566[CrossRef][Medline]
321. Bernardino ME 1988 Management of the asymptomatic patient with a unilateral adrenal mass. Radiology 166:121–123[Free Full Text]
322. Berkman WA, Bernardino ME, Sewell CW, Price RB, Sones Jr PJ 1984 The computed tomography-guided adrenal biopsy. An alternative to surgery in adrenal mass diagnosis. Cancer 53:2098–2103[CrossRef][Medline]
323. Heaston DK, Handel DB, Ashton PR, Korobkin M 1982 Narrow gauge needle aspiration of solid adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:1143–1148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
324. Montali G, Solbiati L, Bossi MC, De Pra L, Di Donna A, Ravetto C 1984 Sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:1081–1084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
325. Katz RL, Patel S, Mackay B, Zornoza J 1984 Fine needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Acta Cytol 28:269–282[Medline]
326. Welch TJ, Sheedy 2nd PF, Stephens DH, Johnson CM, Swensen SJ 1994 Percutaneous adrenal biopsy: review of a 10-year experience. Radiology 193:341–344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
327. Saeger W, Fassnacht M, Chita R, Prager G, Nies C, Lorenz K, Barlehner E, Simon D, Niederle B, Beuschlein F, Allolio B, Reincke M 2003 High diagnostic accuracy of adrenal core biopsy: results of the German and Austrian adrenal network multicenter trial in 220 consecutive patients. Hum Pathol 34:180–186[CrossRef][Medline]
328. Silverman SG, Mueller PR, Pinkney LP, Koenker RM, Seltzer SE 1993 Predictive value of image-guided adrenal biopsy: analysis of results of 101 biopsies. Radiology 187:715–718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
329. de Agustin P, Lopez-Rios F, Alberti N, Perez-Barrios A 1999 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: a ten-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol 21:92–97[CrossRef][Medline]
330. Kane NM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Quint LE, Cascade PN 1991 Percutaneous biopsy of left adrenal masses: prevalence of pancreatitis after anterior approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:777–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
331. Karstrup S, Torp-Pedersen S, Nolsoe C, Horn T, Hegedus L 1991 Ultrasonically guided fine-needle biopsies from adrenal tumors. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 137:31–34[Medline]
332. Lumachi F, Borsato S, Brandes AA, Boccagni P, Tregnaghi A, Angelini F, Favia G 2001 Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses in noncancer patients: clinicoradiologic and histologic correlations in functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Cancer 93:323–329[CrossRef][Medline]
333. Mody MK, Kazerooni EA, Korobkin M 1995 Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses: immediate and delayed complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:434–439[Medline]
334. Saboorian MH, Katz RL, Charnsangavej C 1995 Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary and metastatic lesions of the adrenal gland. A series of 188 biopsies with radiologic correlation. Acta Cytol 39:843–851[Medline]
335. Wu HH, Cramer HM, Kho J, Elsheikh TM 1998 Fine needle aspiration cytology of benign adrenal cortical nodules. A comparison of cytologic findings with those of primary and metastatic adrenal malignancies. Acta Cytol 42:1352–1358[Medline]
336. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Prinz RA, Bolte E, Albala D, Potvin C, Hamet P, Kuchel O, Querin S, Pomp A 1993 Early experience with laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy. Surgery 114:1120–1124; discussion 1124–1125[Medline]
337. Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Bocciardi A, Da Pozzo L, Rigatti P, Lanzi R, Pontiroli A 1995 Transperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for benign hyperfunctioning adrenal tumors: a comparative study. J Urol 153:1597–1600[CrossRef][Medline]
338. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Perretta S, Baldarelli M, Bonjer J, Miccoli P 2002 Anterior, lateral, and posterior retroperitoneal approaches in endoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 16:96–99[CrossRef][Medline]
339. Terachi T, Matsuda T, Terai A, Ogawa O, Kakehi Y, Kawakita M, Shichiri Y, Mikami O, Takeuchi H, Okada Y, Yoshida O 1997 Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 100 patients. J Endourol 11:361–365[Medline]
340. Valeri A, Borrelli A, Presenti L, Lucchese M, Manca G, Tonelli P, Bergamini C, Borrelli D, Palli M, Saieva C 2002 The influence of new technologies on laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1274–1279[CrossRef][Medline]
341. Brunt LM, Molmenti EP, Kerbl K, Soper NJ, Stone AM, Clayman RV 1993 Retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy: an experimental study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:300–306[Medline]
342. de Canniere L, Lorge F, Rosiere A, Joucken K, Michel LA 1995 From laparoscopic training on an animal model to retroperitoneoscopic or coelioscopic adrenal and renal surgery in human. Surg Endosc 9:699–701[Medline]
343. Whittle DE, Schroeder D, Purchas SH, Sivakumaran P, Conaglen JV 1994 Laparoscopic retroperitoneal left adrenalectomy in a patient with Cushing’s syndrome. Aust N Z J Surg 64:375–376[Medline]
344. Gill IS, Soble JJ, Sung GT, Winfield HN, Bravo EL, Novick AC 1998 Needlescopic adrenalectomy–the initial series: comparison with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 52:180–186[CrossRef][Medline]
345. Chueh SC, Chen J, Chen SC, Liao CH, Lai MK 2002 Clipless laparoscopic adrenalectomy with needlescopic instruments. J Urol 167:39–42; discussion 42–43[CrossRef][Medline]
346. Schulsinger DA, Sosa RE, Perlmutter AP, Vaughan Jr ED 1999 Acute and chronic interstitial cryotherapy of the adrenal as a treatment modality. World J Urol 17:59–64[CrossRef][Medline]
347. Gill IS, Sung GT, Hsu TH, Meraney AM 2000 Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience. J Urol 164:2082–2085[CrossRef][Medline]
348. Young JA, Chapman 3rd WH, Kim VB, Albrecht RJ, Ng PC, Nifong LW, Chitwood Jr WR 2002 Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma: case and review of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:126–130[CrossRef][Medline]
349. Munver R, Del Pizzo JJ, Sosa RE 2003 Adrenal-preserving minimally invasive surgery: the role of laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy, cryosurgery, and radiofrequency ablation of the adrenal gland. Curr Urol Rep 4:87–92[Medline]
350. Gill IS 2001 The case for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 166:429–436[CrossRef][Medline]
351. Vaughan Jr ED 1999 Surgical options for open adrenalectomy. World J Urol 17:40–47[CrossRef][Medline]
352. Malmaeus J, Markaes A, Oberg K, el-Sherief MA, Johansson H, Rastad J, Wilander E, Akerstrom G 1986 Adrenal gland surgery. Preoperative location of lesions, histologic findings and outcome of surgery. Acta Chir Scand 152:577–581[Medline]
353. Favia G, Lumachi F, Scarpa V, D’Amico DF 1992 Adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: a long-term follow-up study in 52 patients. World J Surg 16:680–683; discussion 683–684[CrossRef][Medline]
354. Proye CA, Huart JY, Cuvillier XD, Assez NM, Gambardella B, Carnaille BM 1993 Safety of the posterior approach in adrenal surgery: experience in 105 cases. Surgery 114:1126–1131[Medline]
355. Weigel RJ, Wells SA, Gunnells JC, Leight GS 1994 Surgical treatment of primary hyperaldosteronism. Ann Surg 219:347–352[Medline]
356. Fahey 3rd TJ, Reeve TS, Delbridge L 1994 Adrenalectomy: expanded indications for the extraperitoneal approach. Aust N Z J Surg 64:494–497[Medline]
357. van Heerden JA, Young Jr WF, Grant CS, Carpenter PC 1995 Adrenal surgery for hypercortisolism–surgical aspects. Surgery 117:466–472[CrossRef][Medline]
358. Nash PA, Leibovitch I, Donohue JP 1995 Adrenalectomy via the dorsal approach: a benchmark for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 154:1652–1654[CrossRef][Medline]
359. Sand J, Saaristo J, Nordback I, Auvinen O 1997 Posterior approach for adrenal surgery: experiences with 59 patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86:234–237[Medline]
360. Kolomecki K, Pomorski L, Kuzdak K, Narebski J, Wichman R 1999 The surgical treatment of adrenal gland tumors–incidentaloma. Neoplasma 46:124–127[Medline]
361. Russell CF, Hamberger B, van Heerden JA, Edis AJ, Ilstrup DM 1982 Adrenalectomy: anterior or posterior approach? Am J Surg 144:322–324[CrossRef][Medline]
362. Bruining HA, Lamberts SW, Ong EG, van Seyen AJ 1984 Results of adrenalectomy with various surgical approaches in the treatment of different diseases of the adrenal glands. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158:367–369[Medline]
363. Irvin 3rd GL, Fishman LM, Sher JA, Yeung LK, Irani H 1989 Pheochromocytoma. Lateral versus anterior operative approach. Ann Surg 209:774–778[Medline]
364. Nagesser SK, Kievit J, Hermans J, Krans HM, van de Velde CJ 2000 The surgical approach to the adrenal gland: a comparison of the retroperitoneal and the transabdominal routes in 326 operations on 284 patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 30:68–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
365. Takeda M, Go H, Imai T, Komeyama T 1994 Experience with 17 cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: use of ultrasonic aspirator and argon beam coagulator. J Urol 152:902–905[Medline]
366. Rutherford JC, Gordon RD, Stowasser M, Tunny TJ, Klemm SA 1995 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours causing hypertension and for ‘incidentalomas’ of the adrenal on computerized tomography scanning. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 22:490–492[Medline]
367. Janetschek G, Altarac S, Finkenstedt G, Gasser R, Bartsch G 1996 Technique and results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Eur Urol 30:475–479[Medline]
368. Marescaux J, Mutter D, Wheeler MH 1996 Laparoscopic right and left adrenalectomies. Surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 10:912–915[CrossRef][Medline]
369. Walmsley D, McIntyre R, Sawers HA, Shaw JA, Webster J, Krukowski ZH, Bevan JS 1996 Laparoscopic trans-peritoneal adrenalectomy: a preliminary report of 14 adrenalectomies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:141–145[CrossRef][Medline]
370. Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Benarroch G, Astudillo E, Taura P, Sabater L 1996 Laparoscopic unilateral and bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s syndrome. Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Ann Surg 224:727–734; discussion 734–736[CrossRef][Medline]
371. de Canniere L, Michel L, Hamoir E, Hubens G, Meurisse M, Squifflet JP, Urban P, Vereecken L 1996 Videoendoscopic adrenalectomy: multicentric study from the Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (BGES). Int Surg 81:6–8[Medline]
372. Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, Pharand D, Lacroix A 1997 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 226:238–246; discussion 246–247[CrossRef][Medline]
373. Horgan S, Sinanan M, Helton WS, Pellegrini CA 1997 Use of laparoscopic techniques improves outcome from adrenalectomy. Am J Surg 173:371–374[CrossRef][Medline]
374. Shichman SJ, Herndon CD, Sosa RE, Whalen GF, MacGillivray DC, Malchoff CD, Vaughan ED 1999 Lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. World J Urol 17:48–53[CrossRef][Medline]
375. Pujol J, Viladrich M, Rafecas A, Llado L, Garcia-Barrasa A, Figueras J, Jaurrieta E 1999 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A review of 30 initial cases. Surg Endosc 13:488–492[CrossRef][Medline]
376. Lucas SW, Spitz JD, Arregui ME 1999 The use of intraoperative ultrasound in laparoscopic adrenal surgery: the Saint Vincent experience. Surg Endosc 13:1093–1098[CrossRef][Medline]
377. Henry JF, Defechereux T, Raffaelli M, Lubrano D, Gramatica L 2000 Complications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of 169 consecutive procedures. World J Surg 24:1342–1346[CrossRef][Medline]
378. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, Feliciotti F, Zenobi P, Antognini F, Mantero F 2000 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by the anterior transperitoneal approach: results of 108 operations in unselected cases. Surg Endosc 14:920–925[CrossRef][Medline]
379. Ishikawa T, Inaba M, Nishiguchi Y, Ishibashi R, Ogisawa K, Yukimoto K, Ogawa Y, Onoda N, Hirakawa K, Chung YS 2000 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign adrenal tumors. Biomed Pharmacother 54(Suppl 1):183s–186s
380. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Montorsi F, Lanzi R, Nava L, Centemero A, Rigatti P 2001 Eight-year experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenal surgery. J Urol 166:820–824[CrossRef][Medline]
381. Pisanu A, Jafari M, Pattou F, Carnaille B, Proye C 2001 Indications for adrenalectomy in the laparoscopic era. G Chir 22:101–106[Medline]
382. Porpiglia F, Garrone C, Giraudo G, Destefanis P, Fontana D, Morino M 2001 Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 72 procedures. J Endourol 15:275–279[CrossRef][Medline]
383. Valeri A, Borrelli A, Presenti L, Lucchese M, Manca G, Bergamini C, Reddavide S, Borrelli D 2001 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Personal experience in 78 patients. G Chir 22:185–189[Medline]
384. Takeda M, Go H, Watanabe R, Kurumada S, Obara K, Takahashi E, Komeyama T, Imai T, Takahashi K 1997 Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for functioning adrenal tumors: comparison with conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 157:19–23[CrossRef][Medline]
385. Gasman D, Droupy S, Koutani A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Chassagnon J, Chopin DK, Abbou CC 1998 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 159:1816–1820[CrossRef][Medline]
386. Baba S, Ito K, Yanaihara H, Nagata H, Murai M, Iwamura M 1999 Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy by a lumbodorsal approach: clinical experience with solo surgery. World J Urol 17:54–58[CrossRef][Medline]
387. Fazeli-Matin S, Gill IS, Hsu TH, Sung GT, Novick AC 1999 Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in obese patients: comparison to open surgery. J Urol 162:665–669[CrossRef][Medline]
388. Lee WC, Hsieh HH 2000 Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: experience with thirty cases. Formosan J Surg 33:3–7
389. Subramaniam R, Pandit B, Sadhasivam S, Sridevi KB, Kaul HL 2000 Retroperitoneoscopic excision of phaeochromocytoma–haemodynamic events, complications and outcome. Anaesth Intensive Care 28:49–53[Medline]
390. Tanaka M, Tokuda N, Koga H, Kimoto Y, Naito S 2000 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: comparison with open adrenalectomy and comparison of laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytoma versus other adrenal tumors. J Endourol 14:427–431[Medline]
391. Bonjer HJ, Sorm V, Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Steyerberg EW, de Herder WW, Bruining HA 2000 Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 111 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 232:796–803[CrossRef][Medline]
392. Salomon L, Soulie M, Mouly P, Saint F, Cicco A, Olsson E, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Plante P, Abbou CC 2001 Experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 115 procedures. J Urol 166:38–41[CrossRef][Medline]
393. Walz MK, Peitgen K, Walz MV, Hoermann R, Saller B, Giebler RM, Jockenhovel F, Philipp T, Broelsch CE, Eigler FW, Mann K 2001 Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned within five years. World J Surg 25:728–734[CrossRef][Medline]
394. Aldrighetti L, Giacomelli M, Calori G, Paganelli M, Ferla G 1997 Impact of minimally invasive surgery on adrenalectomy for incidental tumors: comparison with laparotomic technique. Int Surg 82:160–164[Medline]
395. Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Kazemier G, de Herder WW, Steyerberg EW, Bruining HA 1997 Comparison of three techniques for adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 84:679–682[CrossRef][Medline]
396. Bonjer HJ, van der Harst E, Steyerberg EW, de Herder WW, Kazemier G, Mohammedamin RS, Bruining HA 1998 Retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: open or endoscopic? World J Surg 22:1246–1249[CrossRef][Medline]
397. Brunt LM, Doherty GM, Norton JA, Soper NJ, Quasebarth MA, Moley JF 1996 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg 183:1–10[Medline]
398. Dudley NE, Harrison BJ 1999 Comparison of open posterior versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 86:656–660[CrossRef][Medline]
399. Hobart MG, Gill IS, Schweizer D, Bravo EL 1999 Financial analysis of needlescopic versus open adrenalectomy. J Urol 162:1264–1267[CrossRef][Medline]
400. Hobart MG, Gill IS, Schweizer D, Sung GT, Bravo EL 2000 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large-volume (> or = 5 cm) adrenal masses. J Endourol 14:149–154[Medline]
401. Imai T, Kikumori T, Ohiwa M, Mase T, Funahashi H 1999 A case-controlled study of laparoscopic compared with open lateral adrenalectomy. Am J Surg 178:50–53; discussion 54[CrossRef][Medline]
402. Inabnet WB, Pitre J, Bernard D, Chapuis Y 2000 Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. World J Surg 24:574–578[CrossRef][Medline]
403. Ishikawa T, Sowa M, Nagayama M, Nishiguchi Y, Yoshikawa K 1997 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison with the conventional approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:275–280[CrossRef][Medline]
404. Jacobs JK, Goldstein RE, Geer RJ 1997 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A new standard of care. Ann Surg 225:495–501; discussion 501–502[CrossRef][Medline]
405. Korman JE, Ho T, Hiatt JR, Phillips EH 1997 Comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy. Am Surg 63:908–912[Medline]
406. Linos DA, Stylopoulos N, Boukis M, Souvatzoglou A, Raptis S, Papadimitriou J 1997 Anterior, posterior, or laparoscopic approach for the management of adrenal diseases? Am J Surg 173:120–125[CrossRef][Medline]
407. MacGillivray DC, Shichman SJ, Ferrer FA, Malchoff CD 1996 A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 10:987–990[CrossRef][Medline]
408. Mugiya S, Suzuki K, Masuda H, Ushiyama T, Hata M, Fujita K 1996 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for nonfunctioning adrenal tumors. J Endourol 10:539–541; discussion 541–543[Medline]
409. Prinz RA 1995 A comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies. Arch Surg 130:489–492; discussion 492–494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
410. Rayan SS, Hodin RA 2000 Short-stay laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 14:568–572[CrossRef][Medline]
411. Schell SR, Talamini MA, Udelsman R 1999 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for nonmalignant disease: improved safety, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc 13:30–34[CrossRef][Medline]
412. Shen WT, Lim RC, Siperstein AE, Clark OH, Schecter WP, Hunt TK, Horn JK, Duh QY 1999 Laparoscopic vs. open adrenalectomy for the treatment of primary hyperaldosteronism. Arch Surg 134:628–631; discussion 631–632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
413. Soares Jr RL, Monchik J, Migliori SJ, Amaral JF 1999 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 13:40–42[CrossRef][Medline]
414. Sprung J, O’Hara Jr JF, Gill IS, Abdelmalak B, Sarnaik A, Bravo EL 2000 Anesthetic aspects of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Urology 55:339–343[CrossRef][Medline]
415. Staren ED, Prinz RA 1996 Adrenalectomy in the era of laparoscopy. Surgery 120:706–709; discussion 710–711[CrossRef][Medline]
416. Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Schlinkert RT, Young Jr WF, Farley DR, Ilstrup DM 1997 Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: a case-control study of 100 patients. Surgery 122:1132–1136[CrossRef][Medline]
417. Ting AC, Lo CY, Lo CM 1998 Posterior or laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy. Am J Surg 175:488–490[CrossRef][Medline]
418. Vargas HI, Kavoussi LR, Bartlett DL, Wagner JR, Venzon DJ, Fraker DL, Alexander HR, Linehan WM, Walther MM 1997 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a new standard of care. Urology 49:673–678[CrossRef][Medline]
419. Winfield HN, Hamilton BD, Bravo EL, Novick AC 1998 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the preferred choice? A comparison to open adrenalectomy. J Urol 160:325–329[CrossRef][Medline]
420. Yoshimura K, Yoshioka T, Miyake O, Matsumiya K, Miki T, Okuyama A 1998 Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional open adrenalectomy. J Endourol 12:555–559[Medline]
421. Ortega J, Sala C, Garcia S, Lledo S 2002 Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic vs. open adrenalectomy: small savings in an expensive process. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:1–5[CrossRef][Medline]
422. Duh QY, Siperstein AE, Clark OH, Schecter WP, Horn JK, Harrison MR, Hunt TK, Way LW 1996 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comparison of the lateral and posterior approaches. Arch Surg 131:870–875; discussion 875–876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
423. Miyake O, Yoshimura K, Yoshioka T, Honda M, Kokado Y, Miki T, Okuyama A 1998 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach. Eur Urol 33:303–307[CrossRef][Medline]
424. Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Taura P, Benarroch G, Astudillo E, Sabater L 1999 Retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: is it advantageous? Surg Endosc 13:86–90[CrossRef][Medline]
425. Terachi T, Yoshida O, Matsuda T, Orikasa S, Chiba Y, Takahashi K, Takeda M, Higashihara E, Murai M, Baba S, Fujita K, Suzuki K, Ohshima S, Ono Y, Kumazawa J, Naito S 2000 Complications of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies in 370 cases in Japan: a multi-institutional study. Biomed Pharmacother 54(Suppl 1):211s–214s
426. Takeda M 2000 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal approaches. Biomed Pharmacother 54(Suppl 1):207s–210s
427. Suzuki K, Kageyama S, Hirano Y, Ushiyama T, Rajamahanty S, Fujita K 2001 Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis. J Urol 166:437–443[CrossRef][Medline]
428. Henry JF, Defechereux T, Gramatica L, Raffaelli M 1999 Should laparoscopic approach be proposed for large and/or potentially malignant adrenal tumors? Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:366–369[CrossRef][Medline]
429. Naya Y, Nagata M, Ichikawa T, Amakasu M, Omura M, Nishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Ito H 2002 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. BJU Int 90:199–204[CrossRef][Medline]
430. MacGillivray DC, Whalen GF, Malchoff CD, Oppenheim DS, Shichman SJ 2002 Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 9:480–485[CrossRef][Medline]
431. Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T, Trupka A, Hohenbleicher F, Schmidbauer S 2003 Laparoscopic lateral adrenalectomy versus open posterior adrenalectomy for the treatment of benign adrenal tumors. Surg Endosc 17:264–267[CrossRef][Medline]
432. Barreca M, Presenti L, Renzi C, Cavallaro G, Borrelli A, Stipa F, Valeri A 2003 Expectations and outcomes when moving from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: multivariate analysis. World J Surg 27:223–228[Medline]
433. Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Clark OH, Duh QY 2002 Results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for suspected and unsuspected malignant adrenal neoplasms. Arch Surg 137:948–953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
434. Sarela AI, Murphy I, Coit DG, Conlon KC 2003 Metastasis to the adrenal gland: the emerging role of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1191–1196[CrossRef][Medline]
435. Kercher KW, Park A, Matthews BD, Rolband G, Sing RF, Heniford BT 2002 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Surg Endosc 16:100–102[CrossRef][Medline]
436. Gotoh M, Ono Y, Hattori R, Kinukawa T, Ohshima S 2002 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: morbidity compared with adrenalectomy for tumors of other pathology. J Endourol 16:245–249; discussion 249–250[CrossRef][Medline]
437. Kopf D, Goretzki PE, Lehnert H 2001 Clinical management of malignant adrenal tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:143–155[CrossRef][Medline]
438. Pommier RF, Vetto JT, Billingsly K, Woltering EA, Brennan MF 1993 Comparison of adrenal and extraadrenal pheochromocytomas. Surgery 114:1160–1165; discussion 1165–1166[Medline]
439. Bravo EL 2001 Medical management of primary hyperaldosteronism. Curr Hypertens Rep 3:406–409[Medline]
440. Emral R, Uysal AR, Asik M, Gullu S, Corapcioglu D, Tonyukuk V, Erdogan G 2003 Prevalence of subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in 70 patients with adrenal incidentaloma: clinical, biochemical and surgical outcomes. Endocr J 50:399–408[CrossRef][Medline]
441. Barnett Jr CC, Varma DG, El-Naggar AK, Dackiw AP, Porter GA, Pearson AS, Kudelka AP, Gagel RF, Evans DB, Lee JE 2000 Limitations of size as a criterion in the evaluation of adrenal tumors. Surgery 128:973–982; discussion 982–983[CrossRef][Medline]
442. Favia G, Lumachi F, Basso S, D’Amico DF 2000 Management of incidentally discovered adrenal masses and risk of malignancy. Surgery 128:918–924[CrossRef][Medline]
443. Bodie B, Novick AC, Pontes JE, Straffon RA, Montie JE, Babiak T, Sheeler L, Schumacher P 1989 The Cleveland Clinic experience with adrenal cortical carcinoma. J Urol 141:257–260[Medline]
444. Sullivan M, Boileau M, Hodges CV 1978 Adrenal cortical carcinoma. J Urol 120:660–665[Medline]
445. King DR, Lack EE 1979 Adrenal cortical carcinoma: a clinical and pathologic study of 49 cases. Cancer 44:239–244[CrossRef][Medline]
446. Lefevre WC, Gerard-Marchant R, Gubler JP, Chaussain JL, Lemerle J 1983 Adrenal cortical carcinoma in children: 42 patients treated from 1958 to 1980 at Villejuif. In: Humphrey G, ed. Adrenal and endocrine tumors in children. Boston: Nijhoff
447. Watson RG, van Heerden JA, Northcutt RC, Grant CS, Ilstrup DM 1986 Results of adrenal surgery for Cushing’s syndrome: 10 years’ experience. World J Surg 10:531–538[CrossRef][Medline]
448. Ribeiro RC, Sandrini Neto RS, Schell MJ, Lacerda L, Sambaio GA, Cat I 1990 Adrenocortical carcinoma in children: a study of 40 cases. J Clin Oncol 8:67–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
449. Sabbaga CC, Avilla SG, Schulz C, Garbers JC, Blucher D 1993 Adrenocortical carcinoma in children: clinical aspects and prognosis. J Pediatr Surg 28:841–843[CrossRef][Medline]
450. Zografos GC, Driscoll DL, Karakousis CP, Huben RP 1994 Adrenal adenocarcinoma: a review of 53 cases. J Surg Oncol 55:160–164[Medline]
451. Lee JE, Berger DH, el-Naggar AK, Hickey RC, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Gagel RF, Burgess MA, Evans DB 1995 Surgical management, DNA content, and patient survival in adrenal cortical carcinoma. Surgery 118:1090–1098[CrossRef][Medline]
452. Evans HL, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R 1996 Adrenal cortical neoplasms. A study of 56 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 105:76–86[Medline]
453. Sandrini R, Ribeiro RC, DeLacerda L 1997 Childhood adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2027–2031[Free Full Text]
454. Michalkiewicz EL, Sandrini R, Bugg MF, Cristofani L, Caran E, Cardoso AM, de Lacerda L, Ribeiro RC 1997 Clinical characteristics of small functioning adrenocortical tumors in children. Med Pediatr Oncol 28:175–178[CrossRef][Medline]
455. Khorram-Manesh A, Ahlman H, Jansson S, Wangberg B, Nilsson O, Jakobsson CE, Eliasson B, Lindstedt S, Tisell LE 1998 Adrenocortical carcinoma: surgery and mitotane for treatment and steroid profiles for follow-up. World J Surg 22:605–611; discussion 611–612[CrossRef][Medline]
456. Teinturier C, Pauchard MS, Brugieres L, Landais P, Chaussain JL, Bougneres PF 1999 Clinical and prognostic aspects of adrenocortical neoplasms in childhood. Med Pediatr Oncol 32:106–111[Medline]
457. Harrison LE, Gaudin PB, Brennan MF 1999 Pathologic features of prognostic significance for adrenocortical carcinoma after curative resection. Arch Surg 134:181–185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
458. Kendrick ML, Lloyd R, Erickson L, Farley DR, Grant CS, Thompson GB, Rowland C, Young Jr WF, van Heerden JA 2001 Adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical progress or status quo? Arch Surg 136:543–549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
459. Porte H, Siat J, Guibert B, Lepimpec-Barthes F, Jancovici R, Bernard A, Foucart A, Wurtz A 2001 Resection of adrenal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg 71:981–985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
460. Paul CA, Virgo KS, Wade TP, Audisio RA, Johnson FE 2000 Adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastases from non-adrenal cancer. Int J Oncol 17:181–187[Medline]
461. Beitler AL, Urschel JD, Velagapudi SR, Takita H 1998 Surgical management of adrenal metastases from lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 69:54–57[CrossRef][Medline]
462. Kim SH, Brennan MF, Russo P, Burt ME, Coit DG 1998 The role of surgery in the treatment of clinically isolated adrenal metastasis. Cancer 82:389–394[CrossRef][Medline]
463. Siren J, Tervahartiala P, Sivula A, Haapiainen R 2000 Natural course of adrenal incidentalomas: seven-year follow-up study. World J Surg 24:579–582[CrossRef][Medline]
464. Kologlu S, Akyar S, Baskal N, Berk U 1988 Asymptomatic-nonfunctional adrenal masses detected by CT. Endocrinologie 26:173–178[Medline]
465. Reincke M, Winkelmann W, Jaursch-Hancke C, Kaulen D, Nieke J, Ollenschlager G, Allolio B 1989 [Diagnosis and therapy of asymptomatic adrenal tumors]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 114:861–865[Medline]
466. Grossrubatscher E, Vignati F, Possa M, Lohi P 2001 The natural history of incidentally discovered adrenocortical adenomas: a retrospective evaluation. J Endocrinol Invest 24:846–855[Medline]
467. Libe R, Dall’Asta C, Barbetta L, Baccarelli A, Beck-Peccoz P, Ambrosi B 2002 Long-term follow-up study of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 147:489–494[Abstract]
468. Chuman Y, Zhan Z, Fojo T 2000 Construction of gene therapy vectors targeting adrenocortical cells: enhancement of activity and specificity with agents modulating the cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate pathway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:253–262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
469. Tajima T, Okada T, Ma XM, Ramsey W, Bornstein S, Aguilera G 1999 Restoration of adrenal steroidogenesis by adenovirusmediated transfer of human cytochrome P450 21-hydroxylase into the adrenal gland of 21-hydroxylase-deficient mice. Gene Ther 6:1898–1903[CrossRef][Medline]
470. Wolkersdorfer GW, Bornstein SR, Higginbotham JN, Hiroi N, Vaquero JJ, Green MV, Blaese RM, Aguilera G, Chrousos GP, Ramsey WJ 2002 A novel approach using transcomplementing adenoviral vectors for gene therapy of adrenocortical cancer. Horm Metab Res 34:279–287[CrossRef][Medline]
471. Bornstein SR, Webster EL, Torpy DJ, Richman SJ, Mitsiades N, Igel M, Lewis DB, Rice KC, Joost HG, Tsokos M, Chrousos GP 1998 Chronic effects of a nonpeptide corticotropin-releasing hormone type I receptor antagonist on pituitary-adrenal function, body weight, and metabolic regulation. Endocrinology 139:1546–1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
472. Willenberg HS, Bornstein SR, Hiroi N, Path G, Goretzki PE, Scherbaum WA, Chrousos GP 2000 Effects of a novel corticotropin-releasing-hormone receptor type I antagonist on human adrenal function. Mol Psychiatry 5:137–141[CrossRef][Medline]
473. Bornstein SR, Gonzalez-Hernandez JA, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Adler G, Scherbaum WA 1994 Intimate contact of chromaffin and cortical cells within the human adrenal gland forms the cellular basis for important intraadrenal interactions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:225–232[Abstract]
474. Willenberg HS, Stratakis CA, Marx C, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Chrousos GP, Bornstein SR 1998 Aberrant interleukin-1 receptors in a cortisol-secreting adrenal adenoma causing Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 339:27–31[Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Deutschbein, N. Unger, J. Hinrichs, M. K Walz, K. Mann, and S. Petersenn Late-night and low-dose dexamethasone-suppressed cortisol in saliva and serum for the diagnosis of cortisol-secreting adrenal adenomas Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 161(5): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Else Telomeres and telomerase in adrenocortical tissue maintenance, carcinogenesis, and aging J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 43(4): 131 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T J Cawood, P J Hunt, D O'Shea, D Cole, and S Soule Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink? Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 161(4): 513 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Terzolo, G. Reimondo, and A. Angeli Definition of an optimal strategy to evaluate and follow-up adrenal incidentalomas: time for further research Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 161(4): 529 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E BERRY Adrenal Gland Disorders Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2009; 81(1): 57 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Anagnostis, V. G. Athyros, K. Tziomalos, A. Karagiannis, and D. P. Mikhailidis The Pathogenetic Role of Cortisol in the Metabolic Syndrome: A Hypothesis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2009; 94(8): 2692 - 2701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Routhier, C. A. Woodfield, and W. W. Mayo-Smith AJR teaching file: fat-containing retroperitoneal mass presenting with acute flank pain. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6 Suppl): S122 - S124. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Mazzaglia and J. M. Monchik Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience Arch Surg, May 1, 2009; 144(5): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, N. S. Holalkere, and P. F. Hahn PET/CT for the Characterization of Adrenal Masses in Patients with Cancer: Qualitative Versus Quantitative Accuracy in 150 Consecutive Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 956 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Fagour, S. Bardet, V. Rohmer, Y. Arimone, P. Lecomte, N. Valli, and A. Tabarin Usefulness of adrenal scintigraphy in the follow-up of adrenocortical incidentalomas: a prospective multicenter study Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 160(2): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J C Miller, M A Blake, and G W L Boland Definitive characterisation of adrenal lesions BMJ, January 19, 2009; 338(jan19_1): a3092 - a3092. [Full Text]

				G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P K Singh and H N Buch Adrenal incidentaloma: evaluation and management J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1168 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hahner, A. Stuermer, M. Kreissl, C. Reiners, M. Fassnacht, H. Haenscheid, F. Beuschlein, M. Zink, K. Lang, B. Allolio, et al. [123I]Iodometomidate for Molecular Imaging of Adrenocortical Cytochrome P450 Family 11B Enzymes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2358 - 2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Song, F. S. Chaudhry, and W. W. Mayo-Smith The Incidental Adrenal Mass on CT: Prevalence of Adrenal Disease in 1,049 Consecutive Adrenal Masses in Patients with No Known Malignancy Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1163 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Else, T. J. Giordano, and G. D. Hammer Evaluation of Telomere Length Maintenance Mechanisms in Adrenocortical Carcinoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1442 - 1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L Rosas, A. A Kasperlik-Zaluska, L. Papierska, B. L. Bass, K. Pacak, and G. Eisenhofer Pheochromocytoma crisis induced by glucocorticoids: a report of four cases and review of the literature Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 423 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. d'Herbomez, G. Forzy, C. Bauters, C. Tierny, P. Pigny, B. Carnaille, F. Pattou, J.-L. Wemeau, and N. Rouaix An analysis of the biochemical diagnosis of 66 pheochromocytomas Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 156(5): 569 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. F. Young Jr. The Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass N. Engl. J. Med., February 8, 2007; 356(6): 601 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Allolio and M. Fassnacht Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2027 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hennings, O. Lindhe, M. Bergstrom, B. Langstrom, A. Sundin, and P. Hellman [11C]Metomidate Positron Emission Tomography of Adrenocortical Tumors in Correlation with Histopathological Findings J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1410 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Bulow, S. Jansson, C. Juhlin, L. Steen, M. Thoren, H. Wahrenberg, S. Valdemarsson, B. Wangberg, B. Ahreen, and on behalf of the Swedish Research Council Study Gr Adrenal incidentaloma - follow-up results from a Swedish prospective study. Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 419 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Metser, E. Miller, H. Lerman, G. Lievshitz, S. Avital, and E. Even-Sapir 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adrenal Masses J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 32 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Nawar and D Aron Adrenal incidentalomas -- a continuing management dilemma Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 585 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Terzolo, S. Bovio, A. Pia, P. A. Conton, G. Reimondo, C. Dall'Asta, D. Bemporad, A. Angeli, G. Opocher, M. Mannelli, et al. Midnight serum cortisol as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with a clinically inapparent adrenal adenoma Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 307 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Thorin-Savoure, F. Tissier-Rible, L. Guignat, A. Pellerin, X. Bertagna, J. Bertherat, and H. Lefebvre Collision/Composite Tumors of the Adrenal Gland: A Pitfall of Scintigraphy Imaging and Hormone Assays in the Detection of Adrenal Metastasis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4924 - 4929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Bornstein and P. J. Hornsby What Can We Learn from Gene Expression Profiling for Adrenal Tumor Management? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1900 - 1902. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. de Fraipont, M. El Atifi, N. Cherradi, G. Le Moigne, G. Defaye, R. Houlgatte, J. Bertherat, X. Bertagna, P.-F. Plouin, E. Baudin, et al. Gene Expression Profiling of Human Adrenocortical Tumors Using Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Microarrays Identifies Several Candidate Genes as Markers of Malignancy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1819 - 1829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mansmann, G. Articles by Bornstein, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mansmann, G. Articles by Bornstein, S. R.