help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.
Endocrine Reviews 24 (6): 802-835
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Current Perspective on the Pathogenesis of Graves’ Disease and Ophthalmopathy

Bellur S. Prabhakar, Rebecca S. Bahn and Terry J. Smith

Department of Microbiology and Immunology (B.S.P.), College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7344; Division of Endocrinology (R.S.B.), Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901; Division of Molecular Medicine (T.J.S.), Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, and the David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Torrance, California 90822; and Long Beach Veterans Administration Healthcare System (T.J.S.), Long Beach, California 90822

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Bellur S. Prabhakar, Ph.D., Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology and Immunology (MC790), College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 South Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: Bprabhak{at}uic.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
Graves’ disease (GD) is a very common autoimmune disorder of the thyroid in which stimulatory antibodies bind to the thyrotropin receptor and activate glandular function, resulting in hyperthyroidism. In addition, some patients with GD develop localized manifestations including ophthalmopathy (GO) and dermopathy. Since the cloning of the receptor cDNA, significant progress has been made in understanding the structure-function relationship of the receptor, which has been discussed in a number of earlier reviews. In this paper, we have focused our discussion on studies related to the molecular mechanisms of the disease pathogenesis and the development of animal models for GD. It has become apparent that multiple factors contribute to the etiology of GD, including host genetic as well as environmental factors. Studies in experimental animals indicate that GD is a slowly progressing disease that involves activation and recruitment of thyrotropin receptor-specific T and B cells. This activation eventually results in the production of stimulatory antibodies that can cause hyperthyroidism. Similarly, significant new insights have been gained in our understanding of GO that occurs in a subset of patients with GD. As in GD, both environmental and genetic factors play important roles in the development of GO. Although a number of putative ocular autoantigens have been identified, their role in the pathogenesis of GO awaits confirmation. Extensive analyses of orbital tissues obtained from patients with GO have provided a clearer understanding of the roles of T and B cells, cytokines and chemokines, and various ocular tissues including ocular muscles and fibroblasts. Equally impressive is the progress made in understanding why connective tissues of the orbit and the skin in GO are singled out for activation and undergo extensive remodeling. Results to date indicate that fibroblasts can act as sentinel cells and initiate lymphocyte recruitment and tissue remodeling. Moreover, these fibroblasts can be readily activated by Ig in the sera of patients with GD, suggesting a central role for them in the pathogenesis. Collectively, recent studies have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of GD and GO and have opened up potential new avenues for developing novel treatments for GD and GO.

I. Introduction
II. Risk Factors for Developing Graves’ Disease (GD)
A. Genetic factors
B. Environmental factors
C. Y. enterocolitica and GD
D. Cross-reactivity of Y. enterocolitica proteins with TSHR

III. Immunological Basis for GD
IV. Autoimmune Responses to Thyroid Autoantigens
V. TSH Receptor as an Autoantigen
VI. Evolution of Autoimmune Response to TSHR
A. Early studies on pathogenesis of experimental GD
B. Recent studies on the pathogenesis of experimental GD

VII. Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
A. Clinical features
B. Pathological findings

VIII. Genetic and Environmental Contributions to GO Pathogenesis
A. Genetic contributions
B. Smoking
C. Radioiodine treatment for GD

IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
A. Immunohistochemical studies of orbital tissues
B. Orbital T cell repertoire
C. Cytokine production in the orbit
D. Cytokine effects in the orbit

X. Orbital Autoantigens
A. Target cells and candidate autoantigens
B. TSHR
C. Orbital T cell reactivity

XI. Role of Orbital Connective Tissue in GO
A. Orbital connective tissue is targeted by the immune system in GD

XII. Role of GAGs in GO
A. GAGs accumulate in GO and dermopathy
B. Orbital fat expansion and muscle enlargement can contribute substantially to tissue remodeling in GO

XIII. Role of Orbital Fibroblasts in GO
A. The putative role of orbital fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of GO
B. Orbital fibroblasts are different from many other types of fibroblasts
C. Orbital fibroblasts express high levels of inducible cyclooxygenase and produce extremely high levels of PGE2 when activated by proinflammatory cytokines
D. Fibroblasts are sentinel cells capable of initiating lymphocyte recruitment and tissue remodeling
E. Fibroblasts from the orbit synthesize high levels of hyaluronan
F. Orbital fibroblasts display high levels of CD40, an important activation molecule
G. Do GD-specific IgGs activate fibroblasts?

XIV. Future Perspective


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
GRAVES’ DISEASE (GD) is a well-characterized disease that is often diagnosed on the basis of clinical impression. Laboratory and pathological findings often provide important confirmatory information. GD is thought to represent an autoimmune process of the thyroid gland in which stimulatory autoantibodies bind to the TSH receptor (TSHR) and activate gland function leading to hyperthyroidism, often accompanied by thyromegaly. The disease is accompanied by a number of symptoms directly referable to thyroid hormone excess. In addition, some patients with GD develop manifestations in localized regions of the connective tissue system, including Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) and dermopathy. It is currently believed that the connective tissue manifestations of GD are not a direct consequence of alterations in thyroid function but more likely reflect the underlying autoimmune processes. Many patients have antibodies against the TSHR and thyroid peroxidase, and about 50% of the patients have antibodies against the thyroglobulin.

Pathological findings in the thyroid reflect the hyperthyroidism associated with GD. A salient feature of thyroid pathology is hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the parenchyma. A change in the thyroid epithelium is a common finding, with the appearance changing from cuboidal to columnar with papillary infoldings. In addition, these cells demonstrate enlarged Golgi, increased numbers of mitochondria, and vacuolation of the colloid. These changes in the thyroid are often accompanied by a diffuse cellular infiltration consisting of lymphocytes and plasma cells. Occasionally, the infiltration can be more focal and resemble changes seen in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.


    II. Risk Factors for Developing Graves’ Disease (GD)
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
It is well known that most autoimmune diseases are more prevalent in females than in males. This is true for GD as well, and the disease is six to eight times more common in females than in males. The disease most often occurs between 30 and 50 yr of age, suggesting that yet unidentified age-related factors and/or hormonal changes may contribute to enhanced susceptibility. The molecular mechanism that underlies the gender preference noted in GD, as in many other autoimmune diseases, needs to be elucidated.

A. Genetic factors
Increased incidence of GD among members of a family indicates that genetic factors might play an important role in determining susceptibility to GD (1, 2). Studies involving twins indicate a higher degree of concordance, suggesting that the genetic factors might be a major contributor (3). Earlier studies have shown that patients with GD express human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B8 more often than the control subjects without the disease (4). Other studies have shown that the risk of developing the disease is higher among individuals with an MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class-II haplotype of HLA-DR3 (5, 6) or with DQA1*0501 haplotype (7, 8). In contrast, the expression of HLA DR ß1*07 appears to confer protection (9). However, there is racial variation in the association of MHC haplotypes with increased risk for the development of GD (9). Two recent reviews on genetic susceptibility to GD have summarized a large number of studies to date (10, 11). The general conclusions one can draw from studies to date are that multiple genetic factors appear to contribute to the risk of developing GD and the penetrance of the disease is about 30% in monozygotic twins. Some of the susceptibility genes are involved in the generation of immune responses and/or associated with X chromosome, whereas others appear to be specific to GD (e.g., GD-1, -2, and -3).

How could these gene products play a role in protecting against or enhancing the risk for the development of the disease? Hyperthyroidism in GD is mediated by autoantibodies to TSHR protein, and the protein antigens are T cell-dependent antigens. Therefore, CD4+ T cells, most likely, play an important role because they provide the necessary help for autoantibody production. If this were true, then the most effective antigen presentation would be in the context of MHC class-II molecules, and thus they may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of GD. MHC class-II molecules form peptide binding grooves, the specificity of which is determined by their amino acid sequence. This allows binding of antigenic peptides of a certain length and with specific sequences. T cells, bearing cognate receptors, in turn recognize these MHC-peptide complexes and undergo activation. Thus, MHC molecules play a very critical role in the antigen presentation and thus in the T cell repertoire generation.

Early in the thymocyte development, immature T cells migrate from bone marrow into the thymus where they undergo maturation and selection. Although T cells that react with self-antigens expressed on the thymic epithelium are deleted, some self-reactive T cells escape negative selection because many tissue-specific antigens may not be expressed on the thymic epithelium. However, cells capable of interacting with exogenous antigens and some cells that can interact with self-antigens are positively selected and migrate to the periphery (12). Because a given MHC molecule can bind only a limited number of peptides with certain sequences, they largely determine the repertoire of T cells that are either eliminated in the thymus (negative selection) or allowed to migrate to the periphery (positive selection). Because individuals expressing HLA DR3 and DQA1*0501 haplotypes have an increased risk of developing the disease, it is possible that they might fail to present certain tissue-specific pathogenic peptides in their peptide binding groove and thus prevent negative selection of self-reactive T cells that express the cognate T cell receptor (TCR) on their surface. These self-reactive T cells could encounter the antigen in the periphery and undergo activation. In contrast, HLA DR ß1*07, which confers protection, might bind pathogenic peptides and facilitate negative selection of self-reactive T cells, expressing cognate TCRs, in the thymus and prevent an autoimmune response. Thus, MHC gene products can differentially affect both the repertoire selection in the thymus and subsequent autoimmune responses in the periphery.

More recently, a number of reports have suggested an association between cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4) and GD. The CTLA4 protein exists in multiple isoforms due to genetic polymorphism in the first exon (13). This is often linked with another polymorphism of AT dimers at the 3'-untranslated region of the third exon, which is thought to be associated with increased risk of GD (14, 15). Similarly, other associations with genetic polymorphism in CTLA4 have been reported (16, 17, 18). How could this molecule be linked with increased susceptibility to GD? T Lymphocytes constitutively express a costimulatory molecule called CD28 on their surface. During the initiation of an immune response, the T cells receive their first signal through their TCR interaction with the MHC-peptide complexes on the antigen-presenting cells (APCs). However, naive lymphocytes require a second signal to undergo activation that is delivered through CD28 upon its interaction with specific ligands, B7.1 and B7.2 (i.e., CD80 and CD86, respectively), expressed on the surface of APCs. Subsequent to activation, T cells up-regulate CTLA4 expression on their surface. The CTLA4, which is structurally related to CD28, not only interacts with CD80 and CD86, but does so with a 100-fold higher affinity. Because of higher affinity, CTLA4 competes with CD28 for binding to CD80 and CD86 and causes down-modulation of T cell responses due to negative signaling and/or lack of continued positive signaling because of competition with CD28 for ligand binding. A defective interaction of CTLA4 with its ligands could result in a generalized defect in the down-modulation of immune responses. Therefore, although the observations on CTLA4 polymorphism are of considerable interest, at this time it is not clear how a defect in this gene could specifically enhance immune response to TSHR and susceptibility to GD.

B. Environmental factors
Factors such as genetic background, age, and gender partially account for the development of GD. As with other autoimmune diseases, an environmental factor has long been suspected in the etiology of GD. If environmental factors such as bacteria are involved, how would such an agent initiate an autoimmune response to a specific self-antigen? Cells other than APCs do not express MHC class-II and thus are not capable of presenting antigens to CD4+ T cells. Similarly, most cells show either little or no expression of costimulatory molecules and thus fail to provide the second signal to antigen-specific T cells, which results in either a failure to activate T cells or induction of anergy. There are a number of potential mechanisms by which an environmental agent could trigger an autoimmune response. These include induction of an inflammatory response leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines that can cause enhanced/aberrant expression of MHC class-II and costimulatory molecules. This could lead to an otherwise innocuous presentation of self-peptide by MHC molecules into an effective antigen presentation and cause activation of antigen-specific T cells. Thus, cytokine production and/or an imbalance in cytokines caused by infection could lead to the initiation of an autoimmune response. The role of cytokines in GD has been discussed in a recent review (19), and the role of cytokines as it relates to GO will be discussed later. Microbial infections can also cause overexpression (e.g., heat shock proteins) and/or altered expression of certain self-proteins (altered self), which will either provide the necessary strength of signal or be perceived as foreign (20).

Many microbial products can act as either B cell or T cell mitogens and cause nonspecific activation of lymphocytes, including self-reactive lymphocytes. Once self-reactive lymphocytes are activated, they can continue to persist and expand through antigenic stimulation from self-antigens. This is because the strength of antigen presentation required to sustain an anti-self response is lower than that required to initiate an anti-self immune response. A number of bacteria-derived proteins have now been identified as superantigens and linked to Kawasaki disease (21), rheumatoid arthritis (22), and other autoimmune diseases (23). Although the exact mechanism of their action is not known, superantigens have been postulated to facilitate development of autoimmune diseases by: 1) activation of a diverse population of T cells with different fine specificities, including self-reactive T cells; and/or 2) polyclonal activation of B cells, including those that produce autoantibodies. Polyclonal activation of B cells resulting in production of antibody has been shown for Mycoplasma arthriditis mitogen (24) and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (25). Production of autoantibodies is thought to be mediated by bridging of superantigen to CD4+ T cells and B cells. Superantigens have been identified from culture supernatants from Yersinia enterocolitica (26) and Y. pseudotuberculosis (27), and these infections have been linked to Reiter’s syndrome, reactive arthritis, GD, and ankylosing spondylitis (28). Although we have a much better understanding of superantigens and the mechanisms by which they activate lymphocytes, we know very little about the role of Yersinia or Yersinia-derived superantigens and/or mitogens in different disease states including GD. It is possible that Yersinia-derived T cell superantigens and B cell mitogens might act independently or in combination to activate T cells and/or B cells, resulting in preferential expansion of B cells recognizing cross-reactive epitopes on TSHR and Yersinia. Such B cells will not only produce autoantibodies reactive with TSHR, but could also serve as efficient APCs that could present TSHR peptides to self-reactive T cells and perpetuate anti-TSHR responses.

Molecular mimicry is one of the most commonly invoked and studied mechanisms for the induction of autoimmunity. A finite probability exists for two proteins sharing common epitopes formed either by a primary sequence of identical amino acids or by noncontiguous amino acids adjacent by virtue of three-dimensional conformation, and resulting in molecular mimicry. After infection, the host mounts a brisk response against the microbe, and this response might become directed against a self-antigen that can be sustained even after the clearance of the microbial agent due to continued antigenic stimulation by the endogenous host protein. This response then can expand due to epitope spreading and eventually cause the disease. Molecular mimicry has been insinuated in other examples of autoimmunity including HLA-B27 and Klebsiella in ankylosing spondylitis (29), myelin basic protein, and mouse hepatitis virus in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (30), cardiac myosin, and coxsackie virus B4 in myocarditis (31, 32) and others (33). Primary amino acid sequence homology between self-peptides and the foreign antigens as well as conformational similarities have been demonstrated (30, 32, 33).

C. Y. enterocolitica and GD
Due to seasonal trends and geographic variations in the incidence of GD (34, 35), it has been suggested that infectious agents might be involved in triggering the breakdown of tolerance to TSHR in patients with GD. In addition to the reports of increased susceptibility to infections in individuals who fail to secrete certain ABO blood group antigens into the saliva (36, 37), serological evidence for a recent bacterial or viral infection has been reported in a high number of newly diagnosed patients with GD (38).

Y. enterocolitica has been postulated to play a role in the induction of GD via molecular mimicry (39, 40, 41). This speculation is supported by studies reporting the presence of antibodies against Y. enterocolitica in a high proportion of patients (i.e., 72–81%) with autoimmune thyroid disease (42, 43, 44, 45). In addition, Y. enterocolitica has been shown to have binding sites for TSH (46), and antibodies isolated from GD patients could inhibit TSH binding to Yersinia (47) and react with a 64-kDa protein, which was thought to be the bacterial protein to which TSH binds (47). Moreover, antibodies raised against thyroid membranes have been shown to bind Y. enterocolitica (48), and outer membrane proteins (YOPs) encoded by a virulence plasmid of Yersinia have also been linked to the induction of GD (49). Wenzel et al. (50) reported that 72% of patients with GD and 81% of patients with recurrent GD had antibodies to YOPs, whereas only 35% of unmatched controls had such antibodies, and YOPs could induce antibodies in rabbits that recognized components of thyroid epithelial cells. However, data reported by Arscott et al. (51) suggested that there was no unique serological reactivity against YOPs or other Yersinia membrane antigens and that any causal relationship between Yersinia infection and GD may be related to activation of cross-reactive T cells leading to breakdown of self-tolerance to TSHR. Furthermore, Ebner et al. (52) reported that rats immunized with Y. enterocolitica-purified YOPs developed thyroiditis. In this regard, T cell-mediated immunity toward Y. enterocolitica has also been reported in patients with GD (53). Burman et al. (54) reported that TSHR-specific cDNA probe could hybridize to DNA from Y. enterocolitica under low stringency conditions, indicating that they may share stretches of common sequences. However, to date, a causal relationship between Yersinia infection and the development of GD has not been fully established (41, 42).

D. Cross-reactivity of Y. enterocolitica proteins with TSHR
Several years ago, Seetharamaiah et al. (55, 56) expressed the extracellular domain of human TSHR (ETSHR) using a baculovirus expression system. ETSHR protein was purified to homogeneity using HPLC, and upon refolding it could bind TSH (55) and anti-TSHR antibodies in patient sera (56). Mice immunized with ETSHR developed some clinical features characteristic of GD, including high levels of antibodies to the TSHR, with a concomitant elevation in T4 levels (57).

Using this recombinant ETSHR, cross-reactivity of Y. enterocolitica with ETSHR was explored. Initial studies showed that antibodies produced in rabbits and mice to purified ETSHR reacted with envelope preparations from Y. enterocolitica. This cross-reactivity was specifically blocked by purified ETSHR or an envelope preparation of Y. enterocolitica. Moreover, antibodies reactive with ETSHR were readily induced in mice by immunizing with Y. enterocolitica, but not with other Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria. These studies provided the first direct evidence that immunization with Y. enterocolitica can lead to the production of antibodies capable of reacting with TSHR (39).

Subsequently, the envelope protein(s) responsible for cross-reactivity to ETSHR was identified using anti-Yersinia antibodies that specifically bound to the ETSHR protein (50-kDa band) on a Western blot. The two low-molecular weight Yersinia envelope proteins (5.5 kDa and 8 kDa) that cross-reacted with the ETSHR, TSHR-cross-reactive protein (TSHR-CRP), were gel purified (40) and used for immunizing CBA/J, C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. Sera obtained from these mice recognized both ETSHR protein and TSHR-CRP in an ELISA and Western blot (58). Subsequently, it was shown that TSHR-CRP was mitogenic for spleen cells (58) from C3H/HeJ mice, which are lipopolysaccharide nonresponders, and was pronase-sensitive (58). Cell proliferation studies using B cell- and T cell-enriched populations showed that these protein(s) are mitogenic to B cells, and not to T cells, and could induce production of high levels of IL-6 and significant amounts of IgG and IgM by B cells. These results indicate that TSHR-CRPs, which contain epitopes that cross-react with TSHR, represent highly effective B cell mitogens, and the mitogenic activity was not due to lipopolysaccharide contamination. Alignment of peptide sequences showed that TSHR-CRP is homologous to bacterial lipoproteins (LP). Although, all Gram-negative bacteria produce LP, cross-reactivity of Y. enterocolitica LP with TSHR was unique (59). Moreover, LP was capable of inducing high levels of IL-6 and IL-8 production by human B cells. These observations have significant implications for understanding the role of molecular mimicry in the breakdown of self-tolerance and generating autoimmunity to TSHR (59).

In a recent review, Benoist and Mathis (60) raise some important issues to consider with regard to the role of microbial agents in promoting T cell-mediated autoimmunity. Although a number of animal models have provided convincing evidence that a given autoimmune disease can be induced by a particular microbe, they argue that many of the associations are less convincing based upon five different criteria they propose for "air-tight" cases (which are modifications of previously presented concepts). Although they raise some important points with regard to the role of molecular mimicry for us to consider, their perspective is restricted to issues involving T cell epitope recognition and diseases in which T cells, and not B cells, act as effector cells. Moreover, it should be noted that molecular mimicry is only one of several potential mechanisms that a microbe can use to induce autoimmunity. As discussed in Section II.B, microbial agents can cause immunological perturbations through their mitogenic activity, ability to alter self-proteins and/or induce proinflammatory cytokines, and direct up-regulation of MHC gene products and costimulatory molecules (bystander effects). Needless to say, as in all other diseases, including metabolic disorders, cancer, etc., it is not easy to directly demonstrate the role of environmental factors in autoimmunity. As argued by Benoist and Mathis (60), more experimental evidence is needed to fully establish the role of a given microbial agent in the initiation of autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases. With the availability of an animal model, now it might be feasible to investigate the potential immunomodulatory effects of Y. enterocolitica and/or the consequence of molecular mimicry that it exhibits with TSHR on the development of GD.


    III. Immunological Basis for GD
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
GD is one of the most common endocrine disorders. Although the etiology of GD is not known, it is widely accepted to be an autoimmune disease. Patients with GD have circulating autoantibodies directed against the TSHR, and there is overwhelming evidence that hypersecretion of thyroid hormones is mediated by binding of anti-TSHR autoantibodies to the TSHR on thyroid membranes (61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67). In addition to stimulatory TSHR-antibodies (TSHR-Abs), antibodies that inhibit either basal adenylate cyclase activity (68, 69, 70) or TSH-mediated production of cAMP (blocking TSHR-Abs) have also been described in patients with GD (71). Antibodies with these different biological properties can be detected in an in vitro assay using cells expressing TSHR. Increased cAMP production by TSHR-expressing cells when cultured with Igs from patients with GD would indicate the presence of stimulatory antibodies, whereas inhibition of TSH-mediated increase in cAMP production would indicate the presence of blocking TSHR-Abs (72). Earlier studies have shown that the stimulatory TSHR-Abs are restricted to the IgG1 subclass (73, 74), but blocking TSHR-Abs or antibodies directed against other thyroid antigens (e.g., thyroid peroxidase) are not restricted and might arise secondary to thyroid tissue damage (75, 76). Some patients may have both stimulatory and blocking TSHR-Abs, and the net biological effect of the serum might be influenced by the relative concentrations of these antibodies (73, 77). Although, in general, patients with more severe disease have the highest levels of stimulatory TSHR-Abs, it is not necessarily true in all cases (78).

Although, imbalances in T cell ratios have been proposed for the regulation of anti-TSHR antibody production (79, 80), other studies have reported contradicting results (81, 82, 83). Because of the unavailability of purified TSHR, the antigen specificity of T cells could not be determined, and thus it is difficult to assess the significance of changes in the total T cell ratios. More recent studies have analyzed the TCR gene utilization in lymphocytes infiltrating the thyroid gland (84, 85). The rationale for these studies was that cells infiltrating the thyroid gland are likely to be thyroid antigen-specific and that utilization of a restricted number of TCR genes by these infiltrating T cells would suggest that a limited number of T cell epitopes are involved. Data from these studies showed that early after onset of GD there is preferential usage of certain TCR variable (V){alpha} genes (84). However, this study and others also showed that there was considerable variation in TCR usage among different patients (84, 86). This is not surprising, considering the fact that T cells recognize antigens in the context of MHC molecules. Because different patients might have different HLAs, they need different TCRs to recognize the antigenic peptide (87). The HLA variation, coupled with the lack of information on antigen specificity of infiltrating cells, makes the interpretation of these data difficult. A putative role for T cells in GO will be discussed later.

Passive transfer of Igs from GD patients to experimental animals causes increased thyroid hormone production (88). However, efforts to induce anti-TSHR antibody response using thyroid membranes have largely failed (89). Because of the low abundance of TSHR on thyroid cells (103 to 104 receptors per cell) (90) as well as instability of the TSHR protein (91), it has been very difficult to purify the TSHR from thyroid membranes. Thus, to date, it has not been feasible to fully evaluate the importance of the idiotypic network for the regulation of TSHR-specific antibody production. Based on studies published thus far, there exists little or no evidence to suggest that an idiotypic network plays a critical role in the regulation of immune responses to TSHR.

Recently, considerable efforts have been made to understand the role of apoptosis in both Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and GD. It appears that thyroid-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with Hashimito’s thyroiditis express little or no Fas but exhibit high levels of Bcl-2, whereas their thyrocytes show decreased Bcl-2 and increased Fas as well as Fas ligand. This would render thyrocytes susceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis and facilitate thyroid destruction. However, in contrast, patients with GD show increased Bcl-2 and decreased Fas expression on their thyrocytes, while exhibiting increased Fas and decreased Bcl-2 on their lymphocytes. This would lead to apoptotic death of infiltrating lymphocytes and sparing of thyroid from the effects of inflammatory responses. Recent papers (92, 93, 94) on this topic have discussed the role of apoptosis in thyroid autoimmunity; therefore, we will refrain from a detailed discussion here.


    IV. Autoimmune Responses to Thyroid Autoantigens
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
Antibodies to TSHR either exhibit no functional effect on the thyroid or can stimulate or block TSH-mediated activation of the thyroid. Depending upon the relative levels of blocking and stimulatory antibodies, the disease can manifest itself as either hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Although most cases of hypothyroidism are due to thyroid destruction, either due to apoptosis or direct T cell-mediated damage, seen in Hashimoto’s disease, some cases of hypothyroidism are due to high levels of thyroid stimulation blocking antibodies (TSBAbs). TSBAbs can either block TSH binding or affect a step subsequent to TSH binding and prevent thyroid activation. In contrast, most cases of GD are characterized by the presence of stimulatory antibodies. This observation was based upon early studies that demonstrated the presence of long-acting thyroid stimulators in the sera of patients with GD, which were subsequently shown to be present in the Ig fractions. These studies clearly established that GD is an autoimmune disease and that antibodies against TSHR are the cause. Based on these very early observations, various assays to detect autoantibodies to TSHR were developed and have been used for the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism associated with GD.

In 1989, a cDNA-encoding dog TSHR was cloned (95) followed by cloning of human and rat cDNAs (96, 97, 98). This resulted in numerous studies aimed at understanding the structure-function relationship of the protein aimed at the determination of various binding sites for TSH as well as functionally different antibodies (99, 100, 101, 102, 103). Many initial studies used synthetic peptides that were derived from the protein sequence predicted from the cDNA sequence and provided some insights into the potential antibody binding epitopes (99, 100, 101, 102, 103). Initial efforts to express the protein in bacteria resulted in limited yields of protein that was not folded properly. Subsequent studies using an insect cell expression system resulted in higher yields of both glycosylated and nonglycosylated proteins representing the ETSHR. Studies utilizing these protein preparations clearly showed that the ETSHR was sufficient for the TSH and patient autoantibody binding, and that glycosylation was required for autoantibody recognition (104, 105). Although a small fraction of the protein produced in insect cells acquired appropriate conformation, as indicated by TSH and autoantibody binding, this expression system was unsuitable for the production of TSHR with native conformation because the protein remained largely aggregated. Therefore, many studies, aimed at determining the functionally relevant epitopes on TSHR were conducted using two major approaches involving transfection of mammalian cells with various cDNA constructs. One involved construction of TSHR/LH/choriogonadotropin receptor chimeras in which select segments of TSHR were replaced with the corresponding segments from the LH/choriogonadotropin receptor. Studies from this approach resulted in the identification of regions of TSHR that are critical for TSH and blocking and stimulatory antibody binding. Another approach has been to use deletion mutants and/or site-directed mutagenesis to identify the functionally relevant regions of TSHR. These studies revealed that certain glycosylation sites and cysteine residues are absolutely essential for proper folding of the receptor. Because of limitations associated with each of the approaches mentioned above, no single approach has yielded conclusive results on the overall structure-function relationship of the TSHR. However, collectively, these studies have led to several important conclusions. Both TSH and autoantibodies can primarily bind to the ETSHR, and the TSH binding epitope consists of discontinuous amino acids that come together due to protein folding. Antibodies against one or more epitopes can inhibit TSH binding or TSH-mediated activation of cells by affecting a step subsequent to TSH binding. The stimulatory autoantibody binding sites reside predominantly at the N terminus of the protein, whereas the blocking antibodies bind primarily to the C terminus. Glycosylation of the receptor is important for proper folding of the receptor and autoantibody binding. However, it is not clear whether autoantibodies directly interact with the sugar moieties or with epitopes that are formed as a result of proper glycosylation of the receptor protein. A number of excellent reviews (99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 106) have dealt with the structure-function relationship of TSHR; therefore, we will not discuss this issue any further in this paper.


    V. TSH Receptor as an Autoantigen
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
The TSHR belongs to a family of G protein-coupled receptors and is structurally very similar to other polypeptide hormone receptors including for FSH and chorionic gonadotropin/LH. Despite their structural similarity, it appears that only TSHR can serve as an effective autoantigen. This has raised the question as to whether unique features of the TSHR might render the protein a ready target for autoimmune attack. TSHR undergoes posttranslational cleavage and forms a two-subunit structure (107, 108), and this could result in the generation of self-antigens (109). If the A subunit is cleaved and is picked up by APCs, it is conceivable that TSHR peptides can then be presented in the context of MHC class-II molecules. This could lead to the activation of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells that have escaped negative selection in the thymus and are in the periphery. Such activation could result in breakdown of self-tolerance to TSHR and result in the eventual production of stimulatory antibodies.

In addition to the subunit structure of TSHR, other important immunological factors must be required to induce an autoimmune response. Although self-reactive T cells might escape negative selection in the thymus, they can be kept in an inactive state through a number of different peripheral tolerance mechanisms (12). For an effective antigen presentation, not only does the antigenic peptide have to be presented by the MHC molecule, but the strength of signal is also very important. This is referred to as the first checkpoint, is demonstrated in animal models of diabetes, and is a consequence of suboptimal presentation of antigens (110, 111). Even if an appropriate signal is delivered, it has to be accompanied by a second signal to activate naive T cells. It is generally accepted that self-peptides do not efficiently activate APCs (i.e., lack of costimulation) and thus can induce T cell anergy rather than activation (111, 112). An even more important mechanism is the engagement of CTLA4, which down-modulates the immune response (113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118). More recently, another molecule called PD1 (programmed cell death) has been shown to suppress cytokine production through cell cycle arrest and induce T cell anergy (119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124). Yet another mechanism that can help maintain tolerance in the face of appropriate antigen presentation is phenotypic skewing of helper T cells (125, 126, 127, 128). There are two types of helper T cells, namely Th1 and Th2. Cytokines produced by Th2 cells play a more important role in antibody production than the cytokines produced by Th1 cells. Therefore, if Th1 cells instead of Th2 cells are activated, it is unlikely that it will result in a pathogenic antibody response against the TSHR. If appropriate self-reactive T cells are activated, still they can be deleted by activation-induced cell death (129, 130, 131, 132, 133). Self-antigens are not readily cleared, and therefore they can provide repetitive and continuous stimulation to T cells, causing them to undergo activation-induced cell death through Fas ligation by Fas ligand. Therefore, yet unknown perturbations in the immunoregulatory mechanisms of the host might contribute to the pathogenesis of GD.


    VI. Evolution of Autoimmune Response to TSHR
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
Unlike immune responses against exogenous antigens, which can be readily monitored, evolution of immune responses, from the initiation to the clinical onset of the disease, against self-antigens is impossible to monitor in humans. Therefore, our current understanding of the pathogenesis of most human autoimmune diseases is based on studies from experimental animal models. There is no appropriate animal model in which autoimmune GD develops spontaneously. In the past, efforts to develop an animal model have not been successful because of the difficulty in purifying TSHR from thyroid membranes in sufficient quantities required for the induction and characterization of experimental autoimmune GD. Since cloning of the receptor, many investigators have tried to establish an animal model for GD, and they have met with varying success. The earliest studies used synthetic peptides and various bacterial and insect cell-derived proteins to immunize mice. In all cases, the animals responded with antibody production against the immunizing antigen and in some cases against the native TSHR as detected by the appearance of the TSH-binding inhibitor Igs (TBII) and/or blocking antibody activity. Some of these studies reported production of stimulatory antibodies; however, those reports could not be independently confirmed by others.

TSHR is a member of the large family of guanine-nucleotide binding (G) protein-coupled receptors. The full-length TSHR cDNA consists of an open reading frame encoding 764 amino acids, including a 21-amino acid signal peptide, a large extracellular domain, seven transmembrane domains, and a short cytoplasmic tail (95, 96, 97, 98). The ETSHR forms the binding site for TSH on the outside surface of the thyroid cell membrane, and the cytoplasmic domain interacts with the regulatory subunits of adenylate cyclase. Initially, high levels of the nonglycosylated ETSHR were produced using a baculovirus expression system (55). This protein was purified to homogeneity using reversed phase HPLC. The purified ETSHR protein was refolded and shown to specifically bind 125I TSH in a dose-dependent manner (56).

A. Early studies on pathogenesis of experimental GD
The insect cell-derived protein was used to successfully produce antibodies capable of blocking TSH binding to native TSHR (55). These studies suggested that the ectodomain was sufficient for TSH binding, albeit at a lower affinity, and for the induction of TSHR-specific antibodies. To identify a strain of mice susceptible to the development of hyperthyroxinemia, C57Bl/6J, BALB/CJ, B10BR/SgSnJ, and SJL/J mice were immunized with ETSHR (57). Sera obtained after five immunizations from different strains of mice were TBII-positive, albeit at different levels of significance (57), whereas only sera collected on d 55 from BALB/CJ mice showed significant elevation in T4 hormone compared with sera obtained from the corresponding control mice. However, the T4 elevation was transient and indicated that immunization with ETSHR had failed to break tolerance to self-TSHR and that immunization using TSHR with native conformation may be required.

To address this, BALB/CJ mice were primed with the ETSHR and then challenged with solubilized thyroid membrane. Relative to controls, immunized mice showed high levels of TBII activity and significantly elevated T4 (57). The [131I] uptake by thyroid glands of test mice was found to be higher than in control mice, suggesting that the elevations in free T4 were not a consequence of gland destruction. Histopathological examination of thyroid glands from hyperthyroid mice showed morphological alterations characteristic of hyperactive glands, including hydropic and subnuclear vacuolar changes, as well as focal scalloping of the colloid within isolated acini. No inflammatory activity, interstitial fibrosis, acinar atrophy, or glandular destruction was found, and this further suggested that the elevated T4 levels were due to hypersecretion. These results showed that ETSHR can prime the animal and allow development of antibodies that can cause hyperthyroidism. The limitation of this study was that the mice became euthyroid within weeks after cessation of TSHR injection, again indicating failure to break tolerance to self-TSHR.

In an attempt to develop an animal model for GD, Marion et al. (134) used affinity-purified human TSHR from a human thyroid cell clone designated GEJ to immunize B10S (H-2s), B10 (H-2b), B10G (H-2q), B10 D2 (H-2d), and B10BR (H-2k) male and female mice. The male and female H-2s, male H-2b, and female H-2q mice exhibited lymphocytic infiltration in their thyroid glands. Immunized mice showed transient marginal elevation in T3. Because no data on serum TBII, TSBAb, and thyroid-stimulating antibody (TSAb) activities were provided, it was not possible to conclude whether these mice developed hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.

Other investigators have attempted to develop an animal model for autoimmune GD (hyperthyroidism) and thyroiditis (hypothyroidism) using recombinant TSHR. Costagliola et al. (135) used a fusion protein consisting of ETSHR and maltose binding protein (MBP-ECD). Sera or IgG from immunized mice did not show any thyroid-stimulating activity (TSAb), but showed significant TBII and TSBAb activity and lower serum T4 levels compared with mice immunized with MBP alone. Histological examination of thyroids revealed extensive vascularization and an atypical lymphoblastoid infiltration. In a subsequent study, they extended these observations to male and female mice (136). In another study, they immunized female NOD (H2g), CBA (H2k), and C57BL (H2b) mice with MBP-ECD (137). No significant serum TBII, TSAb, and TSBAb were detected in any of the strains of mice. Although there was no lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid glands of CBA or C57BL mice, all NOD mice had severe thyroiditis. Based on these studies, the authors concluded that H2d mice develop thyroiditis and TBII/TSBAb, H2g mice develop thyroiditis in the absence of functional TSHR antibodies, whereas H2b and H2k mice are resistant. Furthermore, they showed the ability of TSHR-primed splenocytes to transfer thyroiditis to naive recipients (138). However, neither the antibody properties nor the hormonal perturbations were consistent with findings in GD. In many of these studies, although immunization with MBP alone had no significant effect, the influence of the MBP component of MBP-ECD on the induction of thyroiditis was not evaluated. One possible explanation is that because more recent studies have shown that glycosylated ETSHR is required for stimulatory antibody recognition (and presumably for its induction), antibodies raised against the nonglycosylated ECD produced in bacteria might not have been sufficient to cause GD.

Both BALB/c and NOD mice were immunized with MBP-ECD, and unfractionated T cells or CD4+-enriched cells obtained from these mice were stimulated in vitro with the MBP-ECD protein and then adoptively transferred to the corresponding strain of naive recipients. The recipients showed TBII activity in their sera that persisted for 12 wk. NOD mice showed marginal hypothyroidism, whereas most BALB/c mice were euthyroid with few showing some elevation in T4 levels (138). Approximately two thirds of BALB/c mice showed accumulation of adipose tissue and infiltration of mast cells in the orbital tissue. Collectively, these studies showed that multiple factors determine the outcome of immunization with TSHR, and suggested the polygenic nature of the disease (139).

It is apparent that an effective antibody response (i.e., IgG) against the TSHR protein would require help from T cells that have the same antigen specificity (140, 141, 142). This phenomenon is called linked recognition and would require antigen presentation by professional APCs and activation of antigen-specific T cells before autoantibody production by B cells with specificity for the same antigen. However, it is interesting to note that the epitopes recognized by T cells and B cells need not be part of the same protein but have to be physically linked (140, 141, 142). This is important for subsequent antigen presentation by B cells because these cells will internalize the antigen through receptor-mediated endocytosis, process the antigen, and present specific peptides on their surface leading to subsequent antigen-specific T cell activation. This principle has been exploited in the development of an effective vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type B. The protective antibodies against this bacterial infection are directed against the bacterial polysaccharides. Adults readily produce such protective antibodies, whereas infants are not as efficient. Therefore, the bacterial polysaccharide is linked to the tetanus toxoid against which the infants mount an effective response. In this case, B cells that bind to the polysaccharides can readily produce antibodies with help from T cells specific for peptides from tetanus toxoid because of the linked recognition. In light of this, what is the consequence of using a self-antigen (TSHR) that is fused to a foreign antigen (MBP) to elicit a response against the self-antigen? It is well known that a foreign antigen is likely to be more immunogenic than a self-antigen such as TSHR. If this were the case, it is likely that the immune response will be largely directed against the MBP. In the absence of a clear demonstration of TSHR specificity of the T cells in MBP-TSHR immunized mice, the possibility of MBP-specific T cells providing help to TSHR-specific B cells, through linked recognition, cannot be ruled out.

Carayanniotis et al. (143) attempted to develop an animal model by immunizing C57Bl/10, B10.BR/SgSn, C3H/He, SJL, DBA/I, and BALB/c mice with an ETSHR protein produced in insect cells. All strains of mice showed strong specific T cell proliferative responses. Sera from SJL and BALB/c mice showed good TBII activity. However, there were no significant changes in serum TSH, T4, and iodine uptake. Authors suggested that their inability to induce hyperthyroidism is most likely due to the inappropriate folding of the ETSHR protein. Vlase et al. (144) immunized female BALB/c and CBA mice with human TSHR-ECD produced in Escherichia coli and in insect cells, respectively. Similar to Carayanniotis et al. (143), these investigators failed to induce either hyperthyroidism or thyroiditis. Subsequently, studies from a number of laboratories have shown that insect cells are not capable of removing the human signal sequence from the protein. Because the cDNA used for protein expression in these two studies encodes for a human signal peptide consisting of 21 largely hydrophobic amino acids at the N terminus, it likely affected the conformation of the protein that may be needed for pathogenic antibody production. In another study, Vlase et al. (145) used refolded ectodomain of mouse TSHR produced in insect cells to immunize BALB/c mice. Immunized mice developed considerable TBII and TSBAb activities and exhibited lower levels of T3, but not T4, and higher levels of TSH.

B. Recent studies on the pathogenesis of experimental GD
Shimojo et al. (146) immunized female AKR/N (H-2K) mice with fibroblasts expressing both MHC class-II and a full-length human TSHR. Most of these mice exhibited good serum TBII activity. About 20% of these mice developed hyperthyroidism as evidenced by significantly elevated serum T4 levels. This was similar to earlier findings of severe hyperthyroidism when BALB/c mice were inoculated with ETSHR followed by thyroid membrane preparations (57). Based on these and other results (146, 147, 148), the authors have suggested that expression of MHC class-II on cells that express TSHR can result in the induction of stimulatory anti-TSHR antibodies in a small proportion of animals. The data presented in this study and an earlier study (57) may also suggest that some of the pathogenic epitopes might be present on the native TSHR. A similar study from another group (149) confirmed these observations by showing that approximately 25% of the immunized animals developed hyperthyroidism and one mouse developed hypothyroidism with elevated TSH levels. Mice with hyperthyroidism showed thyroid hypertrophy without lymphocytic infiltration. When mice were immunized with cells expressing TSHR and MHC class-II along with alum as an adjuvant, they showed increased prevalence of the disease (approximately 45%), with a shorter duration required for the onset. However, when TSHR along with complete Freund’s adjuvant was used, approximately 30% of the animals developed the disease with a slower onset. In this study, no apparent difference was found between male and female mice (149).

Additional studies showed that several different strains of mice with different non-MHC background but expressing H-2K haplotype were able to produce TBII antibodies upon immunization with cells expressing class-II and TSHR proteins (148). Unlike the earlier report with AKR mice (147), these studies showed that TBII activity could be induced in CBA and C3H mice using fibroblasts expressing TSHR without the class-II protein. A subsequent study showed that the N-terminal half of the ectodomain might be sufficient to induce TBII activity in AKR mice, but the entire ectodomain was needed to induce TSAb activity in approximately 20% of the animals. To carry out systematic studies on the molecular mechanisms, a higher proportion of animals need to develop the disease, and that may require a more susceptible strain of mice, different antigen preparation, and/or immunization schedule (150, 151).

Results from studies using fibroblasts stably transfected with human TSHR and MHC class-II have been used to argue that aberrant class-II expression is required for disease induction (146). Although this might be correct, there are no conclusive data to support this conclusion. The contention that aberrant expression of class-II is necessary has been based largely on finding that MHC class-II is expressed in both thyroid and islets of affected patients (152). Subsequent studies showed that expression of class-II molecules or exogenous antigens on ß-islet cells using a rat insulin promoter can result in varying outcomes, including development of spontaneous diabetes, and thus lent support for the initial observation (153). This seems reasonable in a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the target tissue because the effector T cells need to recognize the self-peptide/MHC complex on the target tissue. It is unlikely that such an aberrant expression of class-II is required for the induction of an autoantibody response. This proposition is based on the current understanding of T cell and B cell interactions required for an effective antibody production (Fig. 1Go). The initial step in an immune response against a T cell-dependent antigen is phagocytosis of the antigen in the periphery by professional APCs, most likely dendritic cells (DCs). Once they pick up the antigen, DCs migrate and begin processing the antigen in the T cell zone of the regional lymph node. Here, antigen-specific T cells, which enter the lymph node through the afferent lymphatics, are trapped by the DCs with relevant peptide-MHC class-II on their surface. Subsequently, as they circulate through the lymph nodes, antigen-specific B cells are trapped where they are activated by antigen-specific T cells to produce antibodies. Antibodies enter the circulation and react with the TSHR, causing hyperthyroidism. In this scenario, it is likely that the availability of appropriately folded protein to B cells might be more important than the expression of class-II molecules on the cells used for immunization. Moreover, a large number of studies have clearly shown that there is little or no priming of naive T cells in the absence of costimulation. Because these RT cells most likely lacked both adhesion and costimulatory molecules (i.e., B7.2), it is not apparent how these cells could have served as efficient APCs to prime naive T cells required for optimal anti-TSHR responses.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Antigen-processing pathway that might be required for autoantibody production against the TSHR. Note the consequence of antigen processing by both the endogenous and exogenous pathways. Even when the antigen is exogenously processed, activation of Th2 cells might be required for an optimal antibody production.

 
Some studies have shown that certain fibroblasts, including RT cells, can express B7.1. Cells expressing B7.1 molecules are most likely to elicit Th1 rather than Th2 type of response. This assertion is based on recent findings which show that B7.1 and B7.2 preferentially activate Th1 and Th2 type of responses, respectively (154). Because it is generally believed that Th2 type of cytokines play an important role in GD, it is unlikely that B7.1 expression on RT cells could facilitate such a response. MHC class-II molecule is a heterodimer made up of an {alpha}-chain and a ß-chain. Each of the chains consists of two domains. RT cells constitutively do not express class-II molecules and are transfected with a cDNA that can encode a chimeric class-II molecule. The {alpha}-1 and -2 and ß-2 domains of this chimeric class-II were derived from H-2K haplotype, and the ß-1 domain was derived from H-2D (155). These cells were originally constructed to identify peptide binding sites on class-II and were used in vitro as APCs to test for proliferative responses of T cells primed in vivo by direct antigen inoculation. However, it is not clear whether the chimeric class-II molecule expressed on RT cells could have served as an alloantigen (due to ß-1 domain derived from H-2d) in AKR mice (H-2 k haplotype) leading to activation of alloreactive T cells rather than TSHR-specific T cells, that can provide nonspecific help. This might explain a lack of T cell infiltration in thyroids of mice with severe hyperthyroidism. Nevertheless, these studies are very important because they clearly showed that hyperthyroidism can be induced in experimental animals using a recombinant TSHR. Moreover, they showed that the nature of immune response is directly dependent on the antigen and/or the adjuvant used for inoculation. Thus, immunization using TSHR with native conformation might result in the production of stimulatory antibodies that could then cause hyperthyroidism.

Other studies have reported using cDNA vaccination to induce pathogenic antibodies against the TSHR. These studies yielded somewhat contradictory results depending upon the strain of mice used for immunization. BALB/c mice immunized with the cDNA developed antibodies to TSHR (156). Only one mouse contained TSAb, but all mice, irrespective of their autoantibody status, were euthyroid. Examination of the thyroid glands from these mice revealed nondestructive thyroiditis, with B cell infiltration. When a similar experiment was carried out using NMR outbred mice, all mice developed antibodies to TSHR detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (157). Nine of 30 males showed mild hypothyroidism with TSBAb and lower T4, whereas four of 30 females showed signs of hyperthyroidism with elevated T3 and T4 levels and TSAb activity with a concomitant decline in TSH levels. Another study showed a heterogeneous response upon vaccination of wild-type and interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}) -/- BALB/c mice with TSHR cDNA (158). Further refinement of this approach and the use of female mice might lead to the development of an animal model in which a higher proportion of mice develop GD.

In a more recent study (159), different strains of mice were immunized with adenovirus expressing either TSHR or ß-galactosidase three times at 3-wk intervals, and mice were observed for 8 wk after the third immunization. Fifty-five percent of female and 33% of male BALB/c mice and 25% of female C57BL/6 mice developed hyperthyroidism characterized by the presence of TBII and TSAb activity and elevated T4 levels in the sera. Thyroid glands of affected mice showed hypertrophy with no cellular infiltration, and the extraocular muscles were normal.

Another study reported successful induction of Graves’-like disease in nearly 100% of female BALB/c mice using either mouse or human TSHR proteins (160). BALB/c mice, known to generate Th2-type responses, were used because antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases are currently thought to be driven by Th2 helper T cells. Female BALB/c mice were used because of their expected enhanced susceptibility to GD. The protein was either expressed on the surface of syngeneic or xenogeneic cells or produced in a soluble form. Irrespective of the antigen used for immunization, nearly 100% of the mice developed hyperthyroidism characterized by the presence of high levels of TBII, TSAb, T4, and T3. This study was the first to use mouse TSHR to induce the disease in mice. Mice were equally susceptible to immunization with either a full-length human TSHR expressed on 293 human cells (xenogeneic cells that are histoincompatible) or purified ectodomain of the human TSHR. This showed that the cells expressing the TSHR need not act as APCs and that all necessary T and B cell epitopes are present on the ectodomain. Similarly, mice immunized with m12 cells (a B lymphoblastoid cell line with H-2D MHC haplotype, same as that of BALB/c mice) and expressing either mouse or human TSHR developed the disease with a similar time of onset, frequency, and severity. In addition, some groups of mice showed a reduction in body weight and thyroid infiltration of lymphocyte. In this model, development of the disease is a slow and progressive process with antibodies against TSHR that can be detected only by ELISA, appearing at approximately 4–6 wk after initiation of antigen administration. This is followed by the appearance of TBII activity by d 60–80 and TSAb by d 150, with clinical onset of the disease by d 250 or later.

Why do the pathogenic antibodies (i.e., TSAbs) develop late in the immune response and result in a delay in the onset of the disease? Although the answer remains uncertain, it is most likely due to the time required for affinity maturation and/or repertoire spreading eventually leading to the production of pathogenic antibodies. Although the reasons for the delay are not known, we speculate that TSAbs might have to interact with TSHR with a relatively higher affinity, and/or with specific epitopes to mediate their TSH agonist activity. It is well known that affinity maturation is largely dependent upon somatic hypermutation of the Ig genes, which in turn is dependent on DNA replication and cell division. This would imply slow and continuous evolution of anti-TSHR antibody responses toward the production of higher affinity antibodies. Alternatively, these results suggest that antibody specificity might gradually spread from one that is restricted against immunodominant epitopes to include cryptic epitopes. This later phenomenon of epitope spreading has been clearly shown in other autoimmune diseases (161, 162, 163, 164). In this scenario, the initial immune response against a self-antigen is mostly directed against the dominant epitopes (operationally defined) and is not pathogenic. However, as the immune response evolves, it may become directed against pathogenic cryptic epitopes. Should immunodominant epitopes become pathogenic, deleterious consequencess would be anticipated. Therefore, for the survival of the species, it is imperative that the pathogenic epitopes remain cryptic. Efforts are under way to use a receptor preparation that has the stimulatory antibody binding sites but is devoid of the immunodominant regions of the receptor, which are irrelevant for TSAb binding or induction, to determine whether the disease can be induced within a shorter duration. Our unpublished studies suggest repertoire spreading as indicated by the change in the TCR Vß and the TSHR peptide specificity of TSHR reactive T cells during the evolution of the immune response. Further studies are required to determine whether both B cell repertoire spreading and somatic hypermutation contribute to the evolving immune response against the TSHR.


    VII. Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. Clinical features
In addition to hyperthyroidism, over 25–50% of individuals with GD have clinical involvement of the eyes known as thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) or GO (Fig. 2Go; Ref. 165). Although some patients experience only mild ocular discomfort, 3–5% of patients suffer from intense pain and inflammation with double vision or even loss of vision. In addition, a small percentage of patients with GD have clinically apparent pretibial dermopathy, a diffuse or nodular thickening of the skin on the anterior lower leg (Fig. 3Go). These skin changes occasionally occur on other parts of the body, often after local trauma. Although eye and pretibial skin changes are clinically obvious in the minority of patients with GD, subtle eye and skin changes can be detected using orbital or dermal ultrasonography, or other sensitive detection techniques, in the majority of patients (166, 167). Conversely, although approximately 10% of patients with GO do not have hyperthyroidism, the majority have laboratory evidence of thyroid autoimmune disease, including the presence of antibodies directed against thyroid antigens such as TSHR or thyroid peroxidase (168). Regardless of whether hyperthyroidism occurs first, the signs and symptoms of GO become manifest in 85% of patients within 18 months (169).



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Patient with severe GO. Proptosis, lid retraction, conjunctival erythema, and periorbital edema are evident.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Histological examination of orbital tissues from a patient with GO. A mononuclear-cell infiltration is seen within the adipose and connective tissue compartments. Magnification, x250.

 
Symptoms described by patients with GO include a gritty sensation in the eyes, sensitivity to light, increased tearing, double vision, blurring of vision, and feeling a pressure sensation behind the eyes (165). On physical examination, extraocular muscle dysfunction, proptosis (forward protrusion of the eyes), periorbital and eyelid edema, conjunctival chemosis (swelling) and injection (redness), lid lag and retraction (or stare), or exposure keratitis (corneal injury due to dryness) may be detected. Most patients experience only the minor congestive signs of GO (chemosis, injection, lid edema), with improvement in several months without treatment. In a minority of patients, however, the disease progresses, and one or more of the components (proptosis, extraocular muscle dysfunction, and periorbital edema) may be severe and symptomatic for several years. In rare instances, patients develop compressive optic neuropathy with decreased visual acuity, dulling of color perception, visual field defects, and rarely, blindness.

B. Pathological findings
Many of the clinical symptoms and signs of GO can be explained on a mechanical basis by an increase in the volume of both the orbital fatty connective tissues and the extraocular muscle bodies (170). This expanded tissue volume within the orbit in GO can be measured in computed tomography scans taken of GO patients’ orbits (171). Some patients appear to have enlargement of extraocular muscles as the predominant anatomical change. Others exhibit little eye muscle involvement but show significantly increased orbital adipose tissue volume. Histological examination of extraocular muscles reveals intact muscle fibers that are widely separated by edematous connective tissues (172). These perimysial tissues contain excess glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) that appear composed predominately of hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate (173). A similar accumulation of GAGs, with more profound adipose tissue expansion, is apparent in the fatty connective tissue compartments of the posterior orbit (Fig. 4Go; Ref. 174). It remains likely that both the accumulation of GAGs and the expansion of the adipose tissues contribute to the increase in orbital tissue volume characteristic of GO. However, further quantitative studies are needed to reliably partition the net effects imposed by hyaluronan accumulation and de novo adipogenesis in GO.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Lower extremities of a patient with severe pretibial dermopathy.

 
Proptosis, the forward displacement of the globe, stems from the increase in tissue volume within the unyielding confines of the bony orbit. Chemosis and periorbital edema are caused primarily by decreased venous drainage from the orbit, secondary to venous compression (170). Extraocular muscle enlargement and dysfunction may result from GAG accumulation, edema, and inflammation in the endomysial connective tissues and could lead to compressive optic neuropathy and visual loss. In late stages of the disease, the extraocular muscles are sometimes fibrotic and atrophic, presumably as a result of chronic compression of muscle fibers.


    VIII. Genetic and Environmental Contributions to GO Pathogenesis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. Genetic contributions
GD is a complex, multigenic condition for which many of the genetic contributions remain elusive. This disease appears to develop as a result of many interactions between relatively weak susceptibility genes and environmental triggers. Particular genes, including HLA (175, 176, 177, 178), CTLA4 (179), TCR ß-chain (TCR-ß; Ref. 180), and Ig heavy chain have been shown in association studies to confer susceptibility to GD, but at small relative risk. A few studies specifically examined genetic differences between GD patients with GO and GD patients having no apparent eye disease. However, these did not yield any confirmed susceptibility loci for GO because the various polymorphisms offering susceptibility to GD were found in equal proportion in Graves’ patients with and without eye disease (181, 182, 183, 184). More recent whole genome linkage studies suggested that three interacting loci, found on different chromosomes, induce genetic susceptibility to GD (185). These data did not, however, support a major role for additional familial factors in the development of severe GO in patients with GD (186). These investigators tested four candidate genes, including HLA, TNF-ß, CTLA4, and TSHR, and found none to be specifically associated with GO. Thus, it appears that environmental factors, rather than major genes, are likely to be the primary predisposing factors to the development of GO.

B. Smoking
Although the prevalence of smokers among patients with GD is higher than in controls, the relative risk of developing GD in relation to smoking is quite small (odds ratio, 1.9; Ref. 187). However, the association between smoking and GO has been shown to be much stronger, representing the strongest risk factor known for this condition. The odds ratio, relative to controls, has been reported to be as high as 20.2 for current smokers and 8.9 for current and ex-smokers, suggesting a direct and immediate effect of smoking (188, 189). In addition, other studies have shown that among patients with GO, smokers have more severe eye disease than do nonsmokers (190).

The mechanisms involved in the association between smoking and GO are unclear. That smoking has been linked to other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (191) and Crohn’s disease (192), suggests that there may be a generalized stimulation of autoimmune processes in smokers. However, it is doubtful that changes in serum levels of cytokines are responsible, because concentrations do not differ in smokers and nonsmokers, except that smokers do tend to have higher IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) levels (193). In addition, although patients with hyperthyroidism and GO have higher levels of IL-6R receptor than those with hyperthyroidism alone (192, 194), IL-6R does not appear to differ between smoking and nonsmoking GO patients (193). These results would seem to suggest that elevated IL-6R reflects, rather than causes, orbital disease. Thyroid hormone excess per se is unlikely to contribute to the association because other causes of hyperthyroidism or goiter, including toxic nodular goiter, sporadic nontoxic goiter, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, are not associated with smoking. Studies in vitro have demonstrated increased GAG production when orbital fibroblasts were cultured under hypoxic conditions (195). In addition, tobacco products enhanced IL-1 secretion by these cells, which in turn has been shown to increase GAG production.

C. Radioiodine treatment for GD
Recent interest has surfaced concerning whether the choice of therapy for hyperthyroidism in GD (131I ablation, surgery, or antithyroid drugs) has an effect on the development or progression of GO. A causal relation between radioiodine treatment and the development of GO is plausible. Such treatment could cause thyroid follicular disruption with the release or new exposure of thyroid autoantigens, especially TSHR, although this has never been shown directly. Indirect evidence of this phenomenon occurring after radioiodine treatment includes T cell activation, prolonged elevation of TSHR antibodies (196), and a transient increase in serum pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines (197).

Several large prospective clinical trials have suggested a direct relationship between 131I treatment and the development or progression of GO (198, 199). The best designed of these studies examined hyperthyroid patients with mild or no GO who were initially treated with a 3- to 4-month course of methimazole (200). Patients were then randomly assigned to receive radioiodine therapy, radioiodine plus prednisone, or continued methimazole therapy. Among the 150 patients treated with radioiodine, ophthalmopathy developed or worsened in 23 (15%) between 2 and 6 months after treatment and improved in none. The worsened eye disease was transient and very mild in 15 of these patients and persistent in eight, seven of whom had evidence of GO before radioiodine treatment. Among the 145 patients treated with radioiodine and prednisone, 67% had improvement, and none worsened. Of the 148 patients treated with methimazole, four patients (3%) had worsening, whereas three patients improved. Although the frequency of worsened GO was significantly higher at 6 months after treatment in the radioiodine group than in either of the two other groups (P < 0.001), this effect was very mild and was not present at 1 yr. The authors concluded that worsening of GO after radioiodine therapy is often transient (and mild) and can be prevented by the concurrent administration of prednisone to selected, high-risk patients. Patients who might benefit from this duo-treatment include those with preexistent GO, smokers, and those having no significant contraindications to corticosteroid therapy (201).


    IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. Immunohistochemical studies of orbital tissues
A diffuse infiltration of lymphocytes, with sparse lymphoid aggregates, is present in the extraocular muscle interstitial tissue and in the orbital fatty connective tissues of patients with GO (202). The majority of these cells are T lymphocytes (CD2+/CD3+) and macrophages, with sparse B lymphocytes (Leu-26+). Both helper/inducer (CD4+) and suppressor/cytotoxic (CD8+) T lymphocytes are present, with a slight predominance of the latter (203). A substantial proportion of the T cells, frequently adjacent to blood vessels, are activated memory cells (CD3+/CD45RO+).

Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated the presence of several cytokines, including IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-1{alpha}, within the retroocular tissues of patients with severe GO (204). Immunoreactivity for these cytokines was noted both in the cytoplasm of infiltrating mononuclear cells and in the adjacent connective tissue. The preferential expression of these compounds in areas adjacent to mononuclear cell aggregates suggests that these cells are an important source of orbital cytokines. However, in the case of IL-1{alpha}, marked immunoreactivity was also found in the fatty connective tissues remote from mononuclear cell infiltrates. Thus, it is possible that IL-1{alpha} is produced by infiltrating cells and fibroblasts residing within the orbit.

B. Orbital T cell repertoire
A central role for T cells in GD and GO was suggested by several studies demonstrating restriction of TCR V region gene usage in Graves’ thyroid tissue or in orbital connective/fatty tissues and pretibial tissue of patients with active, inflammatory GO (84, 85). The later study also found that orbital tissues of patients with long-standing, inactive GO or with unrelated orbital conditions showed minor or no restriction of TCR V gene usage (205).

Recruitment of T cells with a wide range of specificity (i.e., more divergent sets of expressed TCR genes) appears to follow tissue destruction and cytokine-induced antigen expression occurring later in the disease (206). In this study, comparison of TCR V gene usage between patients showed clear heterogeneity. However, a few striking interpatient similarities in V{alpha} and Vß gene family usage were noted, especially in Vß2 and Vß6 TCR genes. Taken together, these observations indicate that a limited degree of clonality exists among certain populations of thyroidal, orbital, and pretibial lymphocytes. These findings suggest that the antigen-driven T cell response might be focused during the earlier stages of the immune response in GO. However, later during the disease they exhibit heterogeneity in TCR gene usage. It may be that the important antigen-specific T cells within the orbit undergo activation-induced apoptosis upon contact with the relevant autoantigen and that the T cells remaining in the orbit are nonspecific bystanders.

C. Cytokine production in the orbit
Most cytokines of pathological relevance in disease are produced within the involved tissues. Therefore, measurement of serum cytokine levels may prove irrelevant in GO. Several studies have attempted to characterize the profile of cytokines secreted by orbital-infiltrating T helper (CD4+) cells in GO to determine whether these cells are involved primarily in a cell-mediated (Th1) or a humoral-mediated (Th2) immune response. Two groups of investigators reported that the majority of orbital T cell clones in GD produce Th1-type cytokines IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha}, but not IL-4 or IL-5 (207, 208). A third group detected the presence of mRNA encoding a Th2 dominant profile IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 (209), whereas another group of investigators identified clones secreting cytokines characteristic of subtypes IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10 (210). These studies suggested that T helper cells of both subtypes may be represented in the retroocular infiltrates in GO, perhaps at different times during the course of the disease. This shift in T cell repertoire could result from epitope spreading within the same target antigen or involvement of different antigens. In the absence of information on the antigen specificity of infiltrating T cells, it is very difficult to fully evaluate the relevance of these findings to GO.

In another study, a total of 117 T cell clones were established from orbital adipose/connective tissues of six GO patients, and cytokine production was measured in 57 CD3+CD4+ clones (211). Th1-Type clones were found to predominate in cultures from patients with recent onset (<2 yr) of hyperthyroidism (Th1/Th0/Th2 = 57/29/14%) or GO (Th1/Th0/Th2 = 47/30/23%). In contrast, Th2-type clones predominated in cultures from patients with more remote onset (>2 yr) of hyperthyroidism (Th1/Th0/Th2 = 0/31/69%) or GO (n = 4; Th1/Th0/Th2 = 0/25/75%). Although the CD3+CD4+ clones characterized were not necessarily tissue-antigen-specific, these findings suggest that cell-mediated (Th1-type) immune reactions may predominate in the orbit in early, inflammatory stages of the disease. The proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, and TNF-{alpha}) produced by these cells, along with IL-1 derived primarily from macrophages and fibroblasts, may prove responsible for stimulation of GAG synthesis in orbital fibroblasts and might function as mediators of inflammation in early disease. In addition, the CD40/CD154 could serve as an important activational bridge between T cells and orbital fibroblasts. These same cytokines stimulate the expression of immunomodulatory molecules (HLA-DR, ICAM-1, and HSP-72) on orbital fibroblasts, potentially enhancing the propagation of autoimmune responses within the orbit (166). In the recovery phase of GO, T helper type 2 lymphocytes (producing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) could play an important role and may mediate the late-stage fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (212).

D. Cytokine effects in the orbit
Cytokines (213, 214) and chemokines (210) are capable of inducing the expression of immunomodulatory proteins in orbital fibroblasts and could contribute to the propagation of the disease process. In addition, regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES), IL-16, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 may be important in triggering T cell migration across activated microvascular endothelium into the orbit. IL-1{alpha}, TGF-ß, IGF-I, IFN-{gamma}, leukoregulin, and coculture with mast cells have been shown to stimulate accumulation of GAGs in orbital fibroblast cultures (213, 214, 215, 216, 217). Preliminary studies suggest that some cytokines can either inhibit (TGF-ß, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha}) or stimulate (IL-6) adipogenesis in cultures of orbital fibroblasts (218, 219). As will be discussed later in this review, enhanced expression of the TSHR within the orbit may play a role in the initiation or propagation of the autoimmune response in GO.

Cytokines are also capable of inducing the expression of several proteins in orbital fibroblasts, including HLA-DR, intracellular adhesion molecule-1, and heat shock protein-72 (166). If reflective of events occurring in vivo, their enhanced expression in inflammatory states within the orbit would be expected to influence the ongoing autoimmune response. Another effect of cytokines relevant to GO is their ability to stimulate the proliferation of orbital fibroblasts. Significantly increased proliferation was observed after treatment with IL-1{alpha}, IL-4, IGF-I, and TGF-ß, but not with IL-2 or IL-6 (220). This effect of cytokines on orbital fibroblasts may be contributory in the later stages of GO when fibrosis of the extraocular muscles may result in debilitating double vision.


    X. Orbital Autoantigens
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
The close clinical associations and temporal features shared by Graves’ hyperthyroidism and GO are reviewed above. These observations led to the hypothesis that GO is the result of an autoimmune response directed against one or more orbital autoantigens that are also present within the thyroid. Such cross-reactivity might be a T cell function involving recognition of antigenic epitopes that have been processed by APCs within the orbit. Alternately, the cross-reactivity could be primarily at the B cell level. In this case, antibodies produced by activated B cells residing in the thyroid, and likely also within the orbit, would specifically target intact orbital cell-surface antigen. However, in contrast to the well-documented occurrence of neonatal thyrotoxicosis due to transplacental transfer of anti-TSHR antibodies, the lack of any convincing reports of neonatal GO argues against the importance of orbital antibodies in pathogenesis.

A. Target cells and candidate autoantigens
Much effort has been directed at identifying target cells and mapping the critical epitope on autoantigens they display. The presence of gross muscle enlargement had led early investigators to use eye muscle. In these studies, sera from GO patients were used as probes in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (221, 222, 223). These studies involved crude preparations of soluble nonhuman eye muscle as the source of antigen, due to difficulties inherent in culturing muscle cells and a lack of available human eye tissue. Although the presence of circulating antibodies directed against various eye muscle preparations was reported, the findings were not confirmed by other investigators or the antibodies were subsequently found to be nonspecific (224). Immunoblots demonstrated serum reactivity against a 64-kDa eye muscle membrane antigen (225, 226) and a 23-kDa orbital fibroblast antigen (227). The eye muscle membrane antigen was recognized by approximately 70% of GO sera, especially those sera from patients with active or recent disease, and appeared to react with a protein in the thyroid but not in skeletal muscle. The 23-kDa protein was found to be cytosolic, detected in cultured orbital fibroblasts from patients with GO; it was recognized by 56% of IgG class antibodies in sera from patients with GD, but with no distinct bias in favor of the subgroup with GO, compared with 15% of controls. Because neither the eye muscle membrane antigen nor the orbital fibroblast antigen was found to be restricted to orbital tissue and the antibodies were detected frequently in normal individuals, it is not likely that these antibodies are directly involved in GO pathogenesis.

The screening of a {lambda}gt11 human thyroid cDNA library with a pool of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis sera led to the isolation of a clone termed D1, encoding a 97-amino acid peptide (228). The full-length cDNA was found to encode a 63- to 64-kDa protein that was thought to be the same antigen as identified in earlier immunoblotting studies (229). However, this could not be confirmed with peptide sequencing or an analysis of amino acid composition. This protein was expressed in thyroid and extraocular muscle, but not in skeletal muscle. However, later studies, from a different group of investigators demonstrated the presence of the D1 antigen mRNA in a wide variety of tissues including uterus, spleen, and parathyroid (230). Furthermore, antibodies to D1 were found frequently in the sera of normal individuals, and their presence was not correlated with the presence of clinical GO in Graves’ patients. Attempts to identify this antigen using gel separation and microsequencing suggested that it might be either calsequestrin, a calcium-binding protein in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of striated muscle (231), or the flavoprotein subunit of mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase (232). In subsequent studies by the same investigators, a novel protein, termed G2 s, was cloned from an eye muscle {lambda}gt11 library using an affinity-purified anti-55-kDa protein antibody from a patient with GO (233). However, due in part to very low titers of relevant serum antibodies it proved very difficult to clone and identify a cDNA encoding this protein. Other investigators have concluded that these antigens represent widely expressed cytoskeletal proteins. The inflammatory process occurring within the orbital tissues in GO would lead to tissue destruction with release of these sequestered proteins. Serum antibodies directed against these antigens would be unlikely to play a primary role in GO pathogenesis.

Other candidate autoantigens studied in relation to GO include acetylcholine receptor and thyroglobulin. The former was found in extraocular muscle membrane preparations to be recognized by antibodies from GO patients (234). Subsequent studies, in which a human thyroid cDNA library was screened with polyclonal acetylcholinesterase antibodies, led to the isolation of two thyroglobulin segments having close homology with acetylcholinesterase (235). These findings were especially interesting in light of earlier studies in which thyroglobulin or a related protein was detected in the orbit by immunohistochemistry, and possible connections between the thyroid and orbit were shown using radioisotope-based lymphography (236). Investigators hypothesized that these connections might allow transfer of thyroglobulin into orbital tissues (237). However, the potential significance of this finding is unclear, especially because patients with GO don’t have particularly elevated antithyroglobulin antibodies, and patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis generally don’t have evidence of GO. Weightman et al. (238) showed that 125I-IGF-I binding to the surface of orbital fibroblasts was displaced by IgG from patients with GD, suggesting that antibodies directed against the IGF-I receptor or IGF-I binding proteins might be present in the serum.

B. TSHR
As discussed elsewhere in this review, the autoantigen involved in the hyperthyroidism of GD is the TSHR. The close clinical relationships between GD, GO, and pretibial dermopathy make this protein a good candidate autoantigen for involvement in the orbital and dermal manifestations of the disease. Several studies have examined the correlation between the presence or level of TSHR antibodies and the severity of GO with conflicting results. The most carefully designed of these studies found both thyroid stimulatory Igs (TSI) and TBII to be closely correlated with a GO clinical activity score (239). Weaker but significant correlation was also noted between antibody levels and proptosis. Several studies, with conflicting results, have examined the relationship between TSHR antibody titer and severity of GO. In GD, stimulatory TSHR antibodies cause hyperthyroidism. The titers of these antibodies may reflect the severity of thyrotoxicosis and degree of TSHR-specific lymphocytic activation (240). Similarly, because levels of TSHR antibodies may reflect GO clinical activity, it may follow that infiltrating T cells found within the orbit in GO specifically recognize TSHR expressed in those tissues. The TSHR-directed antibodies produced subsequently, either locally or in the peripheral lymphatic tissues (i.e., lymph nodes and spleen), however, may not have a direct pathogenic role within the orbit in GO but may rather reflect the intensity of the orbital autoimmune response. However, whether TSHR or autoantibodies directed against it are involved in pathogenesis remains uncertain.

Studies aimed at determining whether TSHR is present in normal or GO orbital tissues or cell cultures led to reports by several laboratories identifying TSHR mRNA, or a variant TSHR transcript, in various orbital preparations using the RT-PCR (241, 242, 243). However, RNA transcripts detected only by PCR-based amplification of cDNA may have little physiological relevance. To clarify this issue, further studies were performed using a ribonuclease protection assay for semiquantitative detection of this low abundance mRNA (244), Northern blotting (245) for mRNA detection, or immunohistochemistry (246) for TSHR protein detection. These studies documented the presence of mRNA and protein in GO orbital adipose/connective tissue specimens. In contrast, TSHR either was not detected or was found to be expressed at low levels in normal orbital fatty connective tissue samples and derivative cultures. However, these studies failed to examine samples of disease-derived and control tissues from a large number of different donors under standardized conditions and therefore were probably not quantitative. In addition, it should be noted that TSHR mRNA has subsequently been detected in a number of different tissues, including those not ordinarily involved in GD. Thus, additional studies will be necessary to confirm that TSHR is a target autoantigen expressed at higher levels in orbital tissues.

It is possible that TSHR is constitutively expressed at very low levels in extrathyroidal tissues in normal individuals, including orbital tissues, skin, and other areas not usually clinically involved in GD. This expression may be increased in GD after stimulation by unknown factors, including particular inflammatory cytokines. Alternately, orbital TSHR expression may be enhanced secondarily as a consequence of orbital adipogenesis, which is increased in GO. In any event, increased local TSHR expression could make the receptor available to act as an autoantigen within the orbit, the pretibial skin, or other anatomic regions occasionally involved in the disease. The presence of systemic subclinical connective tissue inflammation in GD, as has been suggested, might predispose to this series of events. Additionally, local factors, such as gravitational dependency, trauma, cigarette smoking, or anatomic constraint of the bony orbit, may lead to clinical disease involvement at specific extrathyroidal sites (247).

Evidence that orbital adipogenesis, with accompanying TSHR expression, may be involved in GO has been generated from cell culture studies of orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts (248, 249). These results obtained using human orbital fibroblasts are consistent with observations made in rodent fibroblasts (250, 251, 252). Preadipocytes are cells of the fibroblast lineage that can, under certain culture conditions, differentiate into adipocytes. Sorisky et al. (248) demonstrated that orbital fibroblasts contain a subpopulation of cells that behave like preadipocytes when incubated with cAMP-enhancing compounds and prostacyclin. Initial studies disclosed that 5–10% of the cells from a typical parental strain of orbital fibroblasts undergo differentiation (248). Subsequent studies from this same group have demonstrated that approximately 50% of the cells undergo this differentiation when subjected to medium-containing ligands of the adipogenic trigger, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR-{gamma}) (249). Moreover, the adipocytes fail to express surface Thy-1. Very recent studies suggest that the subsets delineated in orbital fibroblasts by display of Thy-1 define discrete functional populations of cells. Thy-1+ cells fail to differentiate into lipid-bearing adipocytes but when treated with TGF-ß develop into myofibroblasts and express relatively high levels of smooth muscle-specific actin (Koumas, L., T. J. Smith, and R. P. Phipps, unpublished observations). In addition to undergoing adipogenesis, orbital cells show enhanced TSHR expression when cultured under these conditions (249). These findings suggest that there may be a humoral stimulus for adipogenesis and TSHR expression present either systemically or within the orbit in GO. The cytokine IL-6 has been shown to enhance adipogenesis and TSHR expression in cultured orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts (219). The cytokine has been shown to be elevated in the sera of patients with GD and GO (253, 254). The cellular source of IL-6 is uncertain. But it is of potential interest that IL-6 is expressed by orbital fibroblasts and thyrocytes challenged with cytokines such as CD40 ligand (255, 256, 257). It is possible that IL-6 serves as an important mediator of these changes occurring within the orbit in GO.

Studies concerning the pathogenesis of GD have long been hampered by the lack of a useful animal model. Recently, a novel animal model was developed in which thyroiditis was transferred to naive BALB/c mice with splenocytes that were primed with either TSHR fusion protein (136) or the cDNA for the human TSHR (258). Thyroiditis was induced in the majority of these animals and was associated with the production of low-titer TSHR antibodies, although the majority of antibodies were TSH binding inhibiting, rather than stimulatory, Igs. Examination of the orbits in 17 of 25 of these animals revealed lymphocytic and mast cell infiltration, accumulation of adipose tissue and edema with material staining with PAS, dissociation of muscle fibers, and evidence of TSHR immunoreactivity (257). Whether this particular animal model accurately reflects the autoimmune processes involved in the development of GD is unclear. In fact, in another study, vaccination with the naked TSHR elicited a Th1 T cell response in which IFN-{gamma}, rather than autoantibody, production dominated the immune response (258). Although falling short of clearly exhibiting the spectrum of fully developed GD or demonstrating a primary role for TSHR as an orbital target antigen, these models potentially "open the door" for more robust models of the disease.

C. Orbital T cell reactivity
Direct evidence that any particular candidate antigen or orbital cell type is an autoimmune target in GO has been difficult to obtain, largely due to difficulties in obtaining orbital lymphocytes and autologous orbital tissues from GO patients. However, several studies have examined reactivity of orbital T cell lines against various purified antigens or orbital tissue preparations. In one report, CD8+ T cell lines recognized autologous cultures of orbital fibroblasts in an MHC class I-restricted manner (259). These T cells also proliferated in response to thyroid membrane preparations and purified TSHR. No proliferation in response to crude eye muscle extract, autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells, allogeneic fibroblasts, or purified protein derivative of mycobacterium tuberculosis was noted. Another group of investigators found that orbital and peripheral T cell lines from patients with GO proliferated in response to autologous orbital fibroblast-derived proteins in the 6- to 10-kDa and 19- to 26-kDa range but did not recognize proteins derived from autologous orbital myoblasts or abdominal adipose or muscle tissue (260). Candidate antigens, including recombinant D1 and thyroglobulin, were tested in another set of experiments (261). Although no T cell responses to these antigens were observed, cells from some patients exhibited weak response to eye muscle proteins between 25 and 50 kDa. In contrast, orbital fibroblasts induced striking proliferation of circulating T cells from some patients.

The interpretation of these studies is limited, in part, by their reliance on peripheral T cells or on orbital T cell lines, rather than cloned T cells derived from affected orbits. In addition, the use of whole or fractionated cells, rather than recombinant proteins, as the antigens precluded precise antigen identification. Studies of endogenously processed and presented antigens would be particularly useful in this regard. Such studies would no doubt facilitate an understanding of immune responses involved in the development of GO.


    XI. Role of Orbital Connective Tissue in GO
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. Orbital connective tissue is targeted by the immune system in GD
Why the connective tissue of the orbit and skin should be singled out for activation in GD is uncertain. One explanation concerns possible intrinsic differences in the residential orbital and leg cells as setting up these regions for disease involvement. Another concerns the potential for differences in neurovascular investments, embryological derivation, and tissue architecture, promoting peculiar immunological reactivity. The impact of different local factors in sites of disease involvement (247) cannot be excluded. Clearly, the vulnerability to disease manifestations most likely reflects the highly specialized function of the tissues. It is uncertain as to why only a small subset of patients with GD develop GO and an even more limited population manifests clinically important localized dermopathy, most typically in the skin of the anterior shin. A cell type common to both the orbit and shin is, among others, the fibroblast, a fundamental cellular building block of connective tissues. Fibroblasts represent the most abundant cell type in these tissues, and their shared attributes could potentially tie together the two regions. These cells represent the precursor from which other, more specialized cells develop (chondrocytes, adipocytes, and myofibroblasts are examples). It thus seems reasonable to focus inquiry on the peculiarities of the fibroblast phenotype as underlying the characteristic tissue remodeling found in GD. Indeed, a number of studies have appeared in the literature over the past few decades examining the behavior of orbital and pretibial fibroblasts in culture and, in some cases, contrasting them with those harvested from other anatomic regions. These fibroblasts exhibit potentially important differences in their phenotypes that we believe account for the susceptibility of the orbit and lower leg to manifestations of GD. The complex interplay between immunocompetent cells and fibroblasts is summarized in the schematic contained in Fig. 5Go.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of a proposed model for interactions between orbital fibroblasts and immunocompetent cells. The complex molecular events are currently thought to drive cell activation and tissue remodeling. PLC, Phospholipase C; PKC, protein kinase C; TRE, thyroid hormone response elements; G, G protein; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; TSI, thyroid stimulatory Igs; HA, hyaluronan; EP2, PGE-2 receptor type 2. [Adapted from T. J. Smith: Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 9:393–400, 2002 (345 ).]

 
The early molecular and cellular events associated with GO and localized dermopathy are uncertain but presumed to be proximately related. This assumption derives from the fact that virtually all patients who develop dermopathy also have severe GO. Thus, dermopathic patients essentially represent a subset of those with orbital manifestations. Because the vast majority of patients with GO fail to manifest clinically important skin disease, an additional provoking factor might be necessary for the latter to appear. The tissue remodeling associated with both processes seems, at least superficially, to be related. As will be discussed, accumulation of the abundant GAG hyaluronan features prominently in the tissues affected by both processes.


    XII. Role of GAGs in GO
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. GAGs accumulate in GO and dermopathy
Orbital and dermal lesions from patients with GD have accumulations of material that assumes a metachromatic quality when stained with either alcian blue or toluidine blue (262). In 1942, this material was characterized by Trotter and Eden (263) who found that the accumulation of mucin was common to both generalized (hypothyroid) and localized myxedema associated with GD. The substance has proved at least partially susceptible to digestion with testicular hyaluronidase, suggesting that it is largely comprised of hyaluronan. In dermopathic lesions, it would appear that chondroitin sulfate levels may be decreased and those of dermatan sulfate unchanged. On the other hand, Watson and Pearce (264) found that both hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate content were increased substantially. The early, pioneering work of Smelser, Asboe-Hanson, and others (265, 266) provided the first insights into the chemical nature of tissue remodeling in GD. It became apparent quite early that the water-binding properties of orbital tissues change as a consequence of GO (267). Moreover, the changes were similar to those found in generalized myxedema associated with hypothyroidism (263). Asboe-Hansen and Iversen (268) and Ludwig et al. (269) demonstrated that ground substance accumulation was increased in experimentally induced GO in guinea pig and that it comprised, in large part, hyaluronan. Wegelius et al. (266) reported one of the earliest analyses of human orbital contents in GO. They found that numerous well-granulated mast cells and lymphocytes populated the tissues, which appeared metachromatic when stained with toluidine blue. This material was present in both connective tissues and in the muscle. It proved on further inspection to represent mucopolysaccharides, a previously used term for GAGs.

Hyaluronan is a high molecular weight molecule and is a member of a group of complex carbohydrate molecules called GAGs (262). GAGs are linear polymers with characteristic physicochemical properties. They are large, bulky, polyanionic compounds composed of repeating disaccharides, each of which comprises an amino sugar and a uronic acid residue. One molecule of hyaluronan with a molecular weight of 106 Da possesses a spherical diameter of 4,000 Å and a volume of 330,000 x 10-19 ml. An equivalent weight of hyaluronan occupies a volume that is 75,000 times greater than that of collagen. When covalently linked to core proteins, complexes of GAG are known as proteoglycans. Among the distinct molecular characteristics displayed by GAGs are rheological properties that underlie their extremely hydrophilic nature and their viscosity in solution. Hyaluronan differs from the other abundant GAGs in that it does not contain a core protein and it is not sulfated, unlike chondroitin, dermatan, and heparan sulfates. It would appear that of these molecules, hyaluronan is accumulating predominately in connective tissue lesions of GD. It is composed of alternating residues of N-acetylglucosamine and D-glucuronic acid (262). The repeating sugars form a basic disaccharide organization with alternating linkages. Hyaluronan synthesis occurs at the plasma membrane where the alternating sugar residues are transferred sequentially from their respective uridine diphosphate (UDP) donors by hyaluronate synthases (270) (Fig. 6Go). This enzyme activity localizes to the membrane fraction of disrupted oligodendroglioma cells in culture. Great progress in defining the molecular biology of hyaluronan synthesis has been made over the past few years. A family consisting of three hyaluronan synthase (HAS) isoforms has been identified recently, and all members have been cloned (271, 272, 273). The tissue distribution of the HAS enzymes appears to differ, as does the putative role that each might play in normal development and in the pathogenesis of human disease. The expression of all three HAS transcripts has been shown to be up-regulated by IL-1ß in cultured human orbital fibroblasts (219). In addition, the enzyme immediately upstream from the HAS enzymes, termed UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (UDP-GD), has also been characterized (274). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of UDP-glucose to UDP-glucuronate. UDP-GD is induced substantially by proinflammatory cytokines in orbital fibroblasts, and this induction can be attenuated by physiologically relevant concentrations of glucocorticoids (274). It is unclear whether, in the case of GD, hyaluronan synthesis is accelerated or whether macromolecular disposal might be delayed. Hyaluronan degradation is catalyzed by a group of enzymes called hyaluronidases. Depending on their tissues of origin, they exhibit distinct profiles of substrate specificity. Bacterial hyaluronidases, such as those expressed by Streptomyces, are extremely specific for hyaluronan (275). They are therefore particularly important tools for the biochemical analysis of GAGs. Whereas animal fibroblasts express hyaluronidases, those from human skin and orbit fail to produce hyaluronan degrading enzymes (276, 277). These differences in hyaluronidase expression found in fibroblasts from different sources may reflect interspecies variations or may indicate loss of a particular phenotypic attribute in human fibroblasts. Although GAGs function in the extracellular compartment, they may need to be transported into lysosomes for complete degradation. Human skin fibroblasts are incapable of internalization of hyaluronan (278), unlike other cell types, and this may explain their inability to degrade the macromolecule completely. Because human fibroblasts do not appear capable of degrading hyaluronan, it is essential that other cell types might express hyaluronidases in vivo, the human orbit. Alternatively, hyaluronan disposal could occur through relatively nonspecific pathways.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. The biosynthesis of the GAG, hyaluronan involves multiple enzymes.

 
Whereas the disordered accumulation of GAGs in some tissues might fail to provoke serious tissue dysfunction, in the orbit, such an infiltration of hydrophilic macromolecules is frequently associated with profound mechanical consequences. This results from the tight and unforgiving spatial constraints imposed by the bony walls of the orbit. The increase in soft tissue volume associated with GO can result in the partial expulsion of the globe, a condition termed proptosis. Depending on the magnitude of this tissue expansion and the degree of eye displacement, neurovascular embarrassment and vision loss might occur. In addition, the inability to fully close the eyelids could lead to severe and sight-threatening ulceration of the cornea.

Many of the consequences of hyaluronan accumulation in the orbit result from material bulk. In addition, low molecular weight hyaluronan has been shown to influence gene expression of cells exposed to the complex carbohydrate (279). In particular, the potential for hyaluronan to induce proinflammatory genes in immunocompetent cells could lead to substantial amplification of the inflammatory response. Many of the actions of hyaluronan on target cells are mediated through its binding to CD44, which is displayed on the cell surface and is competent to signal downstream events through the activation of kinase cascades (280). Another hyaluronan binding protein/receptor of potential importance is RHAMM (281). This protein, first described by Turley and colleagues (281), binds with high affinity to hyaluronan. That group contends that hyaluronan binds to RHAMM and in so doing stimulates cell locomotion. Moreover, this effect may be mediated through rapid and transient protein tyrosine kinase signaling (281). Although the function of this second receptor is less well-defined than that of CD44, binding of hyaluronan to target cells through RHAMM may lead to changes in cell biology and gene expression (282). Emerging as an important direction for future investigation is a clearer definition of the molecular events underlying hyaluronan accumulation and the biological consequences of a disordered economy of the complex sugar in GO.

B. Orbital fat expansion and muscle enlargement can contribute substantially to tissue remodeling in GO
Although most individuals with GO present with evidence of both muscle enlargement and increased volume of the fatty depot in the orbit, some patients appear to exhibit a predominance of either (283). Those individuals younger than 40 yr are considerably more likely to manifest orbital fat expansion-related proptosis in the absence of muscle infiltration (283), whereas older patients, more than 70 yr old, can develop severe, isolated muscle enlargement associated with compressive optic neuropathy (284). This presentation can be attributed to fusiform enlargement of the extraocular muscles. When assessed early in the course of the disease, the contractile elements of the muscle remain intact in those few patients in whom such an examination has been possible. It would appear that the connective tissue investments surrounding the muscle itself are altered (285). Specifically, there is accumulation of GAGs and infiltration of the perimysium with mononuclear cells, including T lymphocytes and mast cells.

Orbital fat has been the topic of investigation for many years. The elegant, pioneering work of Smelser examined the fat of animals in which experimental ophthalmopathy had been induced by first thyroidectomizing guinea pigs and then injecting the animals with extract of the anterior pituitary (265). The pituitary extract produced a 35% increase in the weight of the orbital contents. Only the ventral lacrimal gland was spared. The fat of the orbit nearly doubled in weight and acquired a different appearance; it became gelatinous and translucent rather than opaque as in the control animals. Edematous fluid appeared to have infiltrated between fat cells. The edematous material stained strongly with aniline blue or eosin but failed to stain like amyloid or mucoid material.

Orbital fat has been examined in the context of GO using multiple imaging modalities. Measurement abnormalities were found in 87% of patients with GD with clinically detectable GO. In contrast, 70% of hyperthyroid patients without clinical signs were found to have abnormal pixel-calibrated volume measurements of muscle and fat by CT scans in a study involving 72 subjects (171). Enlargement of fat in addition to muscle was documented in 46% of patients and isolated volume expansion of fat in 8%. In another study, 15 patients presenting with proptosis but without masses or muscle enlargement were studied, and four were found to have GO (285).

The mechanism involved in fat enlargement in GO is not understood but may reflect a shift in the levels and local impact of adipogenic factors to which the orbital tissue is exposed. In general, it has become evident that adipogenesis is a tightly regulated process and that key molecules initiate the differentiation of preadipocytes to mature fat cells. Candidate molecules include natural ligands of PPAR-{gamma} (286, 287). The best characterized of these are prostaglandins (PGs) of the PGJ2 series and related prostanoids. Unfortunately, no information currently exists concerning PG production or tissue levels in orbital tissue in situ. Moreover, whether GO is accompanied at least in some patients with a shift in the homeostatic mechanism governing orbital fat mass is not known. Of potential relevance to the issue of enhanced adipogenic differentiation in GO is the finding of fatty infiltration in extraocular muscle (280). Although no stringent quantitative analysis of hyaluronan content in orbital tissues currently exists, several qualitative observations suggest that the GAGs accumulate in both muscle and connective tissues. Thus, the increase in fat cell number and or size may contribute to fat expansion in GO (288). But the contribution of infiltrating GAGs to this process has not been quantified.

Much of the insight into cellular infiltration of the orbital tissues in GO derives from histological examination relatively late in the course of the disease. The paucity of information causing early GO results from a lack of access to tissues before the end stages of the disease. There exist few indications for surgical intervention during the active phases. Consequently, we do not know the identity of the initial immunocompetent cell types recruited to the orbit that share proximate responsibility for the earliest processes. These cells orchestrate the inflammatory response and initiate tissue remodeling. Rather, the relatively few reports concerning infiltrating cells in GO appear to define the reactive components of the disease. Although T cells dominate the histological picture of late GO, their prominence in many examples of dermopathic skin is less obvious. In addition to lymphocytes, mast cells are often abundant (174). This may have substantial importance because of the role that these cells play in the genesis of fibrosis. Both T cell phenotypes are present in orbital lesions late in the disease (258, 289, 290), but whether CD4+ or CD8+ cells are dominant early remains controversial. A number of cytokines have been detected in the orbital tissues in GO. Among these are TNF-{alpha}, IL-1{alpha}, IFN-{gamma}, and TGF-ß (207). These studies have relied largely on RT-PCR-based assays attempting to quantify cytokine mRNAs, or they used immunostaining. Although the reports have provided the first approximation of the cytokine milieu found in GO, they are neither specific nor quantitative. Moreover, important and direct comparisons between the cytokine profiles found in GO and other types of orbital inflammatory diseases have yet to be conducted. These and more quantitative studies will be necessary to define those molecular triggers present in the earliest stages of pathology that might distinguish GO from other forms of orbital inflammation. The lack of robust animal models for GO has also proven an important limitation in defining the cellular and biochemical events that provoke initiating events. The orbital manifestations contained in most reports of experimentally induced rodent disease have been disappointing (257, 291).


    XIII. Role of Orbital Fibroblasts in GO
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A. The putative role of orbital fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of GO
Human fibroblasts were once viewed as relatively inert, nonreactive cells engaged almost exclusively in housekeeping structural activities. They were thought to participate mainly in the elaboration and organization of extracellular matrix (ECM), participating in its disposal and directing the assembly of the pericellular microenvironment in which more specialized cells might function. This perception has begun to change, and we now more fully appreciate the complex array of activities in which fibroblasts appear to participate (292, 293). They both respond to and produce numerous molecular signals that serve to activate and modulate the behavior of bone marrow cells and provoke their migration toward sites of inflammation (294). Thus, fibroblasts may initiate some of the very earliest events that lead to an inflammatory response. Moreover, they synchronize the evolution of tissue remodeling and, when chronically activated, direct the process of fibrosis. In this regard, they may function as sentinels involved in transducing danger signals and allowing them to culminate in mature immune responses. Fibroblasts are capable of "sounding an alarm" to alert the "cellular neighborhood" of stressful tissue events. By virtue of their elaboration of chemoattractant molecules such as chemokines, they provoke the trafficking of bone marrow-derived cells to sites of inflammation (294). The profile of small molecules emanating from activated fibroblasts is believed to exert a substantial bias concerning the phenotypes of bone marrow-derived cells that infiltrate tissues during the initial stages of inflammation. The remaining question concerning which attributes define unique fibroblast properties has not been answered. Fibroblasts exhibit a distinctive morphology. To date, no universally accepted marker has been shown definitively specific to fibroblasts, and the identification of fibroblasts rests largely on exclusionary criteria. Cells recognized as fibroblasts are generally described as stellate to angular with several cytoplasmic processes. They are known to migrate on substratum and can become deformed when subjected to osmotic stress. Moreover, they may be thought of as precursor cells that give rise to more specialized components of connective tissue, including exhibiting the contractile properties of myofibroblasts and undergoing adipogenesis.

Recent evidence has been advanced to support the concept of fibroblast diversity. Fibroblasts from certain anatomic regions appear to differ from those found elsewhere in the human body. Moreover, within certain tissues, subpopulations of cells can be identified. Discrete subsets of fibroblasts can now be identified on the basis of expression of cellular markers such as surface proteins, carbohydrates, and gangliosides. Some of those subpopulations appear to represent functional subsets. Identification of cells within a tissue that behave differently suggests that the physiological roles of subsets in health and disease may diverge. This phenomenon may resemble the situation concerning lymphocytes, where cells are distinguished on the basis of surface determinants and marked functional differences among them have emerged. Thus, the realization that discrete fibroblast subsets populate some tissues represents an important insight into the complexity of tissue organization. The pioneering observations concerning fibroblast subsets within a tissue were made by Phipps and his colleagues (293). They discovered that some fibroblasts from the murine lung fail to express and display surface Thy-1. This determinant represents a surface glycoprotein, the natural ligand of which has yet to be identified (294). Thy-1 has been shown recently to bind integrin ß3 on astrocytes and, in so doing, to trigger the tyrosine phosphorylation of focal contacts (295). Phipps et al. (296) determined that the surface display of Thy-1 by murine lung fibroblasts defined cells with several phenotypic attributes that appeared divergent. For instance, only Thy-1- fibroblasts display class II major histocompatibility complex antigens after stimulation with IFN-{gamma} (296). When activated with TNF{alpha}, only the Thy-1- fibroblast subset expresses IL-1{alpha} (297). In contrast, Thy-1- fibroblasts failed to express either IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß. Thy-1+ fibroblast subsets produce substantially more collagen in vitro, suggesting that these cells might have particular importance in the pathogenesis of fibrosis (298). On the other hand, IL-6 appears to be expressed in both Thy-1+ and Thy-1- subsets (299). Moreover, the expression of immunologically important molecules, such as PGs, appears to differ in the two fibroblast subsets. Thus, precedent exists for subsets exhibiting very distinct phenotypic characteristics that would be potentially important for how they might participate in inflammatory responses and fibrosis. Korn and his colleagues (300, 301, 302) have demonstrated substantial clonal variations with regard to PGE2 synthesis among synovial fibroblasts. These differences among subsets were stably expressed through many population doublings and substantial time in culture. Moreover, they were not restricted to a particular stimulus. If the pattern of fibroblast behavior in synovial cultures is relevant to those from orbit, one would expect similar profiles of PGE2 production in those cells.

B. Orbital fibroblasts are different from many other types of fibroblasts
Human fibroblasts have been examined rather extensively in culture in an effort to understand their potential role in the pathogenesis of GD. In particular, cultures derived from the skin of the anterior leg and the orbits have gained substantial attention, largely because the lesions affecting connective tissue in GD occur most frequently in those areas. Among the first studies involving cultured orbital fibroblasts were those of Sisson and colleagues (303, 304, 305). Sisson characterized the GAG synthesis in orbital fibroblast cultures derived from the connective tissues. Those studies revealed that orbital fibroblasts exhibited a substantial response to lymphocytes with regard to hyaluronan synthesis glucose utilization (304). Sisson and Vanderburg reported that glucocorticoids failed to inhibit basal hyaluronan synthesis in orbital fibroblasts but could block lymphocyte-provoked GAG synthesis in those same cells (305). A more recent report demonstrated a similar relative insensitivity of hyaluronan synthesis in orbital fibroblasts to the actions of T3 and dexamethasone (277). Hyaluronan synthesis in dermal fibroblasts has been shown to be inhibited substantially by physiological concentrations of glucocorticoids (306) and thyroid hormones (307). Whether orbital fibroblasts are insensitive to these hormones as a consequence of differences in receptor complement or postreceptor signaling is uncertain.

Orbital fibroblasts, like those derived from certain other anatomic regions, exhibit phenotypic attributes that set them apart. They have a distinct morphology in vitro (277). Orbital fibroblast cultures contain both angular (stellate-shaped with three or more cytoplasmic processes) and fusiform (spindle-shaped with two or three dendritic processes) cells (277). The perinuclear cytoplasm contains prominent granular features. Dermal fibroblasts examined at the same time contain predominantly angular cells with a more homogeneous and less granular cytoplasm. In contrast, the ultrastructure of orbital and nonorbital fibroblasts is remarkably similar, as determined by transmission electron microscopy (308). Orbital fibroblasts display receptors (309) and gangliosides (310) and generate macromolecular components of the ECM differently than do other fibroblasts (214, 311). Using two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis, Young et al. (312) have systematically compared the basal and cytokine-provoked protein expression in orbital fibroblasts and compared this profile with those of the pretibial and abdominal wall fibroblasts. Notable in these studies was their use of multiple strains from a single donor. They found that, although the vast majority of protein spots were expressed at similar levels of abundance in all three sites and responded the same way to cytokine treatment, a limited number of protein inductions and repressions were restricted to orbital and/or pretibial fibroblast strains (312). The substantial differences between orbital and nonorbital fibroblasts suggest that the former may play unusual if not unique roles in the normal function of the orbit. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 is a key regulator of the pericellular proteolytic environment. When orbital fibroblasts are treated with IFN-{gamma} (313) or leukoregulin (314), plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 is dramatically induced. In contrast, expression in dermal fibroblasts is either down-regulated or modestly enhanced. This suggests that in the context of an inflammatory response, orbital fibroblasts exhibit a differentially attenuated proteolytic environment that would favor the accumulation of ECM macromolecules. This difference may underlie some of the qualitative tissue differences found in GO.

It would appear that the population of orbital fibroblasts can be further separated on the basis of specific phenotypic attributes. For instance, approximately 50% of parental strains of orbital fibroblasts display Thy-1 on their cell surfaces (315). Smith et al. (316) reported that separating cells into pure Thy-1+ and Thy-1- cultures led to subsets that faithfully maintained their status over many population doublings and passages in vitro. When segregated, Thy-1+ cells produce more PGE2 and express higher levels of PG endoperoxide H synthase (PGHS)-2 upon treatment with IL-1 or CD154 (317). On the other hand, Thy-1- fibroblasts express much higher levels of IL-8 when activated with proinflammatory cytokines (317). Parental strains of orbital fibroblasts contain preadipocytes that, when subjected to a differentiation protocol, undergo terminal differentiation into fat cells (248). The medium prompting adipogenesis contained cPGI2, insulin, dexamethasone, TSH, and isobutylmethylxanthone (312). Approximately 5% of the cells differentiate into cells that accumulate inclusions staining positively with Oil Red O. It was subsequently demonstrated that Thy-1- subset exhibits substantial adipogenic potential and can differentiate in vitro into mature adipocytes when incubated with ligands of PPAR-{gamma} (316). Such an adipogenic differentiation in orbital fibroblast cultures has been associated with increases in the levels of expression of the TSHR (249). Unfortunately, those reports contained data that were not convincing. The magnitude of the effects ascribed to differentiation with regard to TSH-provoked cAMP generation was inconsistent, and the usual indications of result variability were missing in several studies. Thy-1+ cultures may not possess the potential to differentiate into fat cells. The demonstration of adipogenic potential in orbital fibroblasts has substantial implications concerning the pathogenesis of GO. Expansion of orbital fat is a prominent feature of the disease associated in some patients with GO (284). Clearly, the full spectrum of cellular differences imposed by the bimodal distribution of Thy-1 on orbital fibroblasts from connective/adipose tissue has yet to be appreciated but could define discrete functional characteristics of each subset. In contrast, fibroblasts associated with and derived from the extraocular muscles display Thy-1 uniformly (317). Like dermal fibroblasts, those from the perimysial connective tissue are resistant to these differentiation protocols (317). This raises the possibility that Thy-1+ fibroblasts can be terminally differentiated into other types of cells such as myofibroblasts. A number of reports have appeared to suggest that fibroblasts exposed to TGF-ß can be induced to differentiate into cells possessing a phenotype associated with myofibroblasts. These cells express high levels of smooth muscle-specific actin. In this regard, fibroblasts lacking adipogenic potential could represent the cells involved in fibrosis and respond to Th2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. These cytokines are associated with robust fibrotic tissue responses. The increases in muscle and fat volumes associated with GO could, at least in part, result as a consequence of tissue expansion from additional muscle and adipocytes differentiating from the respective fibroblast compartments. These apparent differences between fibroblasts from the muscle and fat depots might help explain the diverging clinical presentation seen in old and young patients with GO (318).

C. Orbital fibroblasts express high levels of inducible cyclooxygenase and produce extremely high levels of PGE2 when activated by proinflammatory cytokines
Orbital fibroblasts exhibit exaggerated responses to proinflammatory signals such as those conveyed by cytokines. For instance, leukoregulin, a T cell-derived cytokine, and IL-1 dramatically up-regulate several genes that are relevant to inflammation. These include PGHS-2 (EC 1.14.99.1), the inflammatory cyclooxygenase (319, 320). When PGHS-2 is induced in orbital fibroblasts derived from either normal or GO connective tissue, a dramatic increase in PGE2 synthesis occurs (319). The magnitude of this increase, provoked by a number of cytokines, is considerably greater than that observed in dermal fibroblasts (319, 320). The disparity in levels of PGHS-2 induction may relate to the relatively modest levels of IL-1 receptor antagonist expression observed in cytokine-activated orbital fibroblasts (320). The levels of PGHS-2 mRNA and protein achieved after cytokine treatment are proportionately greater than those in other fibroblasts, and the vast majority of the increased PGE2 production observed is inhibited by PGHS-2 selective inhibitors such as SC58125 (319). This finding suggests that PGHS-2 selective inhibitors, now in the marketplace, might represent effective and safe alternative therapeutics for acute orbital inflammation in GO.

The induction of PGHS-2 requires the activation of the MAPK pathways, including both ERK 1/2 and p38 (321). Moreover, nuclear factor (NF)-{kappa}B, a centrally important transcription factor in inflammation-related gene induction, appears critical to the activation of the PGHS-2 promoter in orbital fibroblasts (320). Thus, it would appear that the exaggerated induction of PGHS-2 in orbital fibroblasts helps define the inflammatory phenotype of these cells. In contrast, PGHS-1 are a constitutively expressed enzyme that is abundant in unprovoked fibroblasts (319). Moreover, leukoregulin and IL-1 fail to alter the levels of PGHS-1 mRNA or protein. Although the expression and cytokine induction of PGHS-2 are completely attenuated by physiological concentrations of glucocorticoids, PGHS-1 levels are unaltered by the steroids.

Another enzyme in the PGE2 pathway is also induced by proinflammatory cytokines in orbital fibroblasts (321). Microsomal PGE2 synthase (mPGES; EC 5.3.99.3) is the terminal catalytic determinant in the synthetic cascade for PGE2. mPGES is a glutathione-dependent enzyme that is usually expressed at low levels under unstressed cellular conditions. mPGES is substantially induced by IL-1ß in these cells in a well-coordinated manner with PGHS-2. Induction of the two enzymes by IL-1 shares utilization of the MAPK pathways and involves the modest up-regulation of respective gene promoter activities. PGHS-2 mRNA is extraordinarily labile under basal culture conditions in human orbital fibroblasts due to the presence of at least 22 AUUUA instability elements in its 3' untranslated region. When cells are treated with IL-1ß, the stability of PGHS-2 mRNA is dramatically enhanced. The half-life increases from 1 h to greater than 5 h. This augmentation in the half-life of the PGHS-2 transcript is critical to the up-regulation of the expression of the enzymes. In contrast, mPGES mRNA is extremely long-lived under basal conditions, and IL-1ß does not influence its survival appreciably (321). We hypothesize that the capacity of orbital fibroblasts to produce PGE2 is the basis, at least in part, for the susceptibility of the orbit to inflammatory processes and the tissue remodeling seen in GO. PGE2 exerts an important influence on the nature of immune responses. For instance, the prostanoid biases the commitment of naive T cells Th0 away from the Th1 phenotype and toward that of the Th2 (322). PGE2 plays an important role in the behavior and apoptosis of B lymphocytes (323) and influences mast cell function (324). Thus, the finding that orbital fibroblasts generate particularly high levels of PGE2 when activated suggests the potential of those cells in defining the quality of tissue remodeling found in inflammatory disease of the orbit, such as occurs in GO. The result of this bias can substantially skew the cytokine microenvironment toward profibrotic factors and away from those associated with acute inflammation (325).

D. Fibroblasts are sentinel cells capable of initiating lymphocyte recruitment and tissue remodeling
Fibroblasts from a wide array of human tissues have been shown to express chemoattractant activities when activated by cytokines. The role of recruiting leukocytes to areas of inflammation and tissue damage falls, in some measure, to a family of cytokines called chemokines. These are small polypeptides that range in size from 7 to 10 kDa and comprise different families, depending on their amino acid sequences. They are designated according to the cysteine residue signatures they contain and are divided into three families. Chemokines bind to high-affinity receptors expressed on the surfaces of target cells. The various members of the three families exhibit diverse specificity with regard to the receptors they utilize and the target cells they activate. In addition to chemokines, fibroblasts express other small molecules that lack requisite cysteine signatures but possess activities that prompt leukocytes to infiltrate areas of tissue damage. IL-16 is such a chemoattractant molecule. It binds exclusively to CD4 and therefore only influences the migration of cells displaying CD4 on their surface (326). IL-16 is synthesized as a 69-kDa precursor molecule and is secreted as a 56-kDa protein composed of four identical subunits. The release of IL-16 protein from CD8+ T cells and fibroblasts is dependent on the activity of caspase-3, a cysteine protease (327). At the cell target, IL-16 induces the expression of IL-2 receptors and influences IL-2-dependent cell activation. IL-16 has been implicated in a number of human autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (328), inflammatory bowel disease (329), and lupus erythematosis (330). The other abundant chemoattractant synthesized by cytokine-activated fibroblasts is RANTES, a c-c type chemokine (331). Induction of RANTES usually occurs at a pretranslational level. In T cells, RANTES engagement of the cytokine receptor CCR5 results in Janus kinase kinase and p38 MAPK activation, which in turn leads to downstream target gene activity (332). RANTES has also been implicated in human autoimmunity. Moreover, it has been detected in the thyroid gland of patients with GD (333).

The mechanisms through which chemokines and related molecules alter the migration of immunocompetent cells remain uncertain but probably relate to complex interactions with these cells. The notion that lymphocytes and other target cells might discriminate a concentration gradient across their diameters and adjust their movement toward higher concentrations is probably incorrect. But regardless of the mechanisms involved in their actions, these small molecules are of substantial importance in defining cell movements and infiltration of tissues, such as those targeted in GD.

Human fibroblasts express high levels of IL-16 mRNA under basal conditions but not pro-IL-16 or mature IL-16 protein. In contrast, RANTES mRNA is undetectable in these cells under control conditions. When the fibroblasts are treated with proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, or leukoregulin, they express high levels of mature IL-16 and RANTES proteins that are released from the cell layers. Moreover, both proteins are active and competent to initiate T cell migration (334). Inhibitors of caspase-3 activity block the release of IL-16 from fibroblasts but fail to influence RANTES expression. Glucocorticoids block the expression of both molecules. Greater than 90% of the T cell migratory activity generated by cytokine-treated fibroblasts can be attributed to IL-16 or RANTES, suggesting that these two chemoattractants represent predominant molecular triggers, emanating from fibroblasts that orchestrate lymphocytic infiltration at sites of tissue injury and repair.

If cytokine-activated fibroblasts from many tissues express high levels of IL-16, RANTES, and other important chemoattractant molecules, it is unclear why the manifestations of GD are not more generalized. One possible explanation concerns a global infiltration of immunocompetent cells to many tissues and the differential impact those cells might have on the infiltrated tissues. That model would be consistent with lymphocyte-derived activating molecules exerting site-dependent effects on fibroblasts and other residential cells in a particular anatomic region. From the body of evidence thus far advanced, it would appear that orbital fibroblasts are more susceptible to activation by certain proinflammatory cytokines such as leukoregulin, IL-1, and CD154. Thus, in the context of orbital tissues being infiltrated with lymphocytes and other bone marrow-derived cells, the fibroblasts in residence appear to respond more robustly to cytokines and other factors produced by the immune competent cells than are other types of fibroblasts. Unfortunately, the vast majority of evidence supporting this hypothesis has been generated from cells in culture. Although these findings tend to depict orbital fibroblasts as exhibiting certain behavior, conclusive proof awaits results of studies conducted in vivo in either human beings or animal models.

E. Fibroblasts from the orbit synthesize high levels of hyaluronan
A hallmark feature of the connective tissue remodeling encountered in GO and dermopathy is the accumulation of the linear polymer, hyaluronan (262). The enormous water binding capacity of hyaluronan attracts hydration of connective tissue and accounts at least in part for the expansion of tissues and the expulsion of the eye beyond the normal boundaries of the bony orbit. The fibroblast is an important source of hyaluronan and the other abundant GAGs such as heparin, chondroitin sulfate, and dermatan sulfate (262). Although these cells produce substantial amounts of sulfated GAG under most culture conditions, the role of these complex sugars in the pathogenesis of GO is uncertain. Moreover, the most important impact of cytokine action on orbital fibroblast GAG synthesis relates to changes in hyaluronan production levels (214, 311). Unfortunately, no stringent and quantitative analysis of the GAG content in the orbital connective tissues affected by GO currently exists. Most evidence for disruption of the normal profile of complex carbohydrates in GO rests on rather old reports utilizing nonspecific and highly subjective methodologies. Thus, studies involving assessment of biosynthetic profiles found in cultured orbital fibroblasts provide the best clues concerning the net contribution of this cell type to the changes seen in tissue economy relevant to GO. Extrapolations made to in vivo disease processes might be misleading. Clearly, a careful analysis of GAG content in involved orbital tissues would provide important insights. Moreover, the contribution to net GAG synthesis of other cell types residing in the orbit, such as the cells of the extraocular muscles and the endothelium, need be assessed. In addition, the potential roles for these and other cells, such as those derived from the bone narrow, in degrading GAG needs to be defined because alterations in disposal could account for the accumulation seen in GO.

When orbital fibroblasts are treated with proinflammatory cytokines, they synthesize high levels of hyaluronan. The levels of production are considerably higher than those found in dermal fibroblasts. When orbital fibroblasts are exposed to IFN-{gamma}, the increase in hyaluronan accumulation is approximately 50%, whereas the effect is absent in dermal cultures (311). Leukoregulin on the other hand increases hyaluronan synthesis by up to 15-fold (214). The induction is dependent on de novo protein synthesis and can be attenuated with dexamethasone. Moreover, hyaluronan production is not influenced when cells are treated with inhibitors of PG synthesis (214). Pulse-chase studies reveal that hyaluronan decay is nil in these cultures, indicating that net synthesis is increased under cytokine-induced conditions.

The mechanisms involved in hyaluronan synthesis have been elucidated recently with the identification and cloning of three members of the HAS family, designated HAS1, 2, and 3 (271, 272, 273). These proteins are thought to catalyze the same rate-limiting and terminal reactions leading to the initiation and chain elongation of mature hyaluronan molecules. In orbital fibroblasts, the most abundant HAS mRNA is that encoding HAS2 (217). Although the levels of the respective mRNAs are quite low in unprovoked fibroblasts, IL-1 and leukoregulin up-regulate all three transcripts severalfold above basal abundance. The effect of IL-1 was transient, with the peak increase in mRNAs occurring 6–12 h after addition of the cytokine into the culture medium. Moreover, the state of cell confluence appeared to influence the magnitude of response to IL-1ß. A substantial induction of HAS2 also occurred after treatment with epidermal growth factor-1 (216). Glucocorticoids, which attenuate cytokine-dependent hyaluronan synthesis in orbital fibroblasts, can block the induction of HAS by IL-1 and leukoregulin. It is of potential importance that human fibroblasts express substantial levels of all three transcripts. The substrate requirements for each enzyme appear to be similar, although the profile of hyaluronan chain lengths from each isoform may differ. Why the same cells should express multiple similar enzymes is uncertain but could relate to their potentially differing roles in development or response to molecular signals. The enzyme immediately upstream from the HAS proteins, UDP-GD, is critical to the synthesis of hyaluronan, chondroitin sulfate, and heparan sulfate. It has recently been cloned and found to be inducible by cytokines in orbital fibroblasts (274). That induction is also time-dependent. Moreover, cycloheximide could induce the transcript after 6 h of treatment, suggesting that the UDP-GD acts as an immediate early gene in orbital fibroblasts. Whether this enzyme might ultimately prove rate-limiting under at least some tissue conditions is not currently known. Moreover, the cell signaling upstream from either HAS or UDP-GD in fibroblasts has not been identified. These cascades might prove important targets for the therapeutic intervention in GO and other conditions in which hyaluronan accumulation becomes disordered.

Another important factor governing the accumulation of ECM components in GO relates to the degradation of GAGs. Orbital fibroblasts do not express hyaluronidase in culture (277), a characteristic of other human fibroblasts (216, 269, 276). When fibroblast monolayers are incubated with medium containing radiolabeled hyaluronan, the molecule remains intact for many days with no evidence of degradation, regardless of the treatment. Whether these cells express hyaluronidases in situ but lose their ability to degrade the GAGs in culture is uncertain. Alternatively, other cells, either residential or those trafficked to the orbit during inflammation or fibrosis, are involved in hyaluronan turnover. The net increase in hyaluronan associated with the pathogenesis of GO is clearly of considerable importance in disrupting the spatial relationships ordinarily maintained between orbital contents.

F. Orbital fibroblasts display high levels of CD40, an important activation molecule
CD40 is a cell-surface glycoprotein receptor first found displayed on B cells (335). It is a member of the TNF-{alpha} receptor superfamily and has subsequently been identified on other cell types including dendritic, epithelial, and mast cells, and T lymphocytes. CD40 has an important role when displayed on B cells in that lymphocyte activation is initiated through its ligation with CD154, also known as CD40 ligand (336). CD154 is expressed on T cells, mast cells, and some tumor cells. The CD40/CD154 activation bridge is thought to represent a critically important mechanism through which T lymphocytes are believed to activate B cells. More recently, fibroblasts from synovium, lung, and orbital connective tissue have been shown to express high levels of CD40. When CD40 is ligated with CD154, fibroblasts from the lung (337) and orbit (338) express high levels of PGHS-2 and generate extraordinary amounts of PGE2. The induction of PGHS-2 by CD154 is susceptible to glucocorticoids, and these steroids completely abolish the increase in gene expression. Moreover, this induction is mediated through the MAPK pathway in orbital fibroblasts (338). It would appear that the intermediate induction of IL-1{alpha} is critical to the up-regulation of PGHS-2. Although IL-1{alpha} is induced in a time-dependent manner, IL-1ß is not expressed after CD40 engagement. This selective utilization of IL-1 gene usage in the CD40-activated orbital fibroblast is of substantial mechanistic importance in that IL-1ß can be induced when these cells are treated with IL-1{alpha} or leukoregulin. A number of other genes of potential relevance to GO are also up-regulated as a consequence of CD40 ligation in orbital fibroblasts. These include IL-6 and IL-8 (339). IL-6 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of the thyroid glandular components of GD. IL-8 is a C-X-C chemokine that is expressed and released by hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells at sites of tissue injury and chronic inflammation. IL-8 also possesses powerful neutrophil and lymphocyte chemoattraction activities. Thus, the selective expression and display of CD40 by fibroblasts from certain tissues and anatomic regions suggests that these cells might respond differently to signals emanating from T cells, and this could represent the basis for anatomic site-selective disease manifestations.

G. Do GD-specific IgGs activate fibroblasts?
Fibroblasts from patients with GD have been examined extensively in culture for their potential to respond to specific IgGs generated in the disease. An early study of Rotella et al. (340) revealed that IgGs from a number of patients with GO could enhance collagen synthesis in normal human fibroblasts derived from the skin of the arm. The increase was seen with some but not all monoclonal antibodies generated from human/mouse hybridomas. More recently, Heufelder and Bahn (341) reported that IgGs from patients with GO could increase intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in orbital fibroblasts from patients with GD but not in cultures derived from donors without known thyroid disease. That report suggested that certain cytokines could also induce ICAM-1 expression in orbital fibroblasts and that the induction of this molecule was accompanied by important functional events related to cell adhesion. The study focused on the IgG and sera from patients with GO. The question of whether patients with GD but without orbital manifestations could also induce ICAM-1 expression was left unexplored. Also absent was an assessment of whether nonorbital fibroblasts from patients with GD could respond to GD-derived IgG. Thus, it is possible that GD-specific IgGs might activate fibroblasts from patients with the disease, regardless of whether they derived from anatomic regions manifesting the disease.

A recent report from Pritchard et al. (342) indicates that sera and IgGs from patients with GD can provoke the expression of T cell chemoattractant activity. When the fibroblasts are exposed to GD-IgG and the resulting conditioned medium is then used to treat target T cells, substantial lymphocyte migration occurs. The vast majority of this activity can be attributed to IL-16 and RANTES. GD-IgG activate the fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase/mammalian target of rapamycin/p70s6 k pathway in fibroblasts from patients with GD (342). In so doing, the expression of IL-16 is dramatically increased. IL-16 mRNA is abundant in untreated human fibroblasts, but the transcript is not translated until the cells are activated (334). The steady-state levels of IL-16 mRNA fail to increase after GD-IgG activation and may decrease several hours later. Specific inhibitors of the FRAP/mTOR/p70s6 k pathway such as rapamycin block the induction of IL-16 in the fibroblasts (342). In contrast, the induction of RANTES appears to be mediated through the activation of another pathway and results in the up-regulation of its mRNA. Rapamycin fails to block the induction of RANTES. Importantly fibroblasts from several anatomic areas of patients with GD are activated to express T cell chemotaxis activity, including areas not usually manifesting clinical disease. Thus, these results suggest that fibroblast activation in GD may be global. Implicit in the findings to date is the possibility that lymphocytes are trafficked to most if not all tissues in GD and that other aspects of the fibroblast phenotype vary between different tissues. Although IL-16 and RANTES have yet to be directly implicated in GD, the finding that both can be selectively induced by disease-specific IgG suggests that such a mechanism might play some role in T cell infiltration in vivo. Those factors relating to the tissue-specific targeting of the orbit may relate to the finding that proinflammatory cytokines and the activated CD40/CD154 bridge elicit responses that differ in magnitude and qualitatively in orbital and nonorbital fibroblasts.


    XIV. Future Perspective
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 
A number of treatments currently are available for the effective treatment of hyperthyroidism associated with GD. However, in most patients, the thyroid gland is eventually destroyed due to radioiodine ablation, surgery, or as a consequence of the underlying inflammatory processes. Thus, patients are subjected to lifelong thyroid hormone replacement. A more desirable therapy would be to treat the disease, leaving a functional thyroid intact. This appears feasible in GD because the initial perturbation is primarily due to TSH agonist activity of stimulatory antibodies with no apparent glandular destruction. This is unlike other well-characterized autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis—a mouse model for multiple sclerosis), Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and type-1 diabetes, where either severe target organ damage precedes the clinical onset of these diseases or the target organs have very little or no regenerative capacity. Although these diseases can be treated to either slow or stop further progression, they might be more difficult to cure. In contrast, if GD can be diagnosed early, then it might be possible to reverse the disease using a number of different immune therapy approaches. Because not all autoantibodies to TSHR are pathogenic, we might be able to use antigen-specific therapies to deviate the response away from the production of pathogenic stimulatory antibodies. Alternatively, we might be able to use novel therapeutics or induce antibodies that can antagonize the effects of stimulatory antibodies. Recent crystal structure of rhodopsin (343), a protein that is structurally similar to TSHR, gives us cause for optimism in resolving the three-dimensional structure of the TSHR. Availability of the three-dimensional structure will allow us to identify TSH as well as autoantibody binding sites that will provide us with a rational basis for developing novel therapeutics to effectively treat GD. Over the past several years, oral tolerance against a number of experimental autoimmune diseases has been induced. However, early clinical trials have been disappointing. Another approach that has received considerable attention is to induce CTLA4-mediated suppression of the disease. This appears to be a reasonable approach to skew ongoing immune responses away from the production of pathogenic antibodies. In this regard, a recent study by Dogan et al. (344) showed that mere skewing of early immune responses against TSHR, in favor either of Th1 or Th2, through differential activation of subsets of DCs, is not sufficient to alter the course of the disease. In contrast, these studies showed that mice deficient in IL-4 (IL-4 -/- mice) are totally resistant, whereas IFN -/- and wild-type BALB/c mice are completely susceptible to the induction of experimental GD. These results represent the first direct evidence of the importance of IL-4, a Th2 cytokine, in the pathogenesis of experimental GD, and further suggest that a persistent suppression of IL-4 might be beneficial.

The absence of effective and safe therapy for GO is a consequence of poor understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms. It is likely that we will gain better insights through the application of advanced technologies of molecular and cell biology. Clearly, a better definition of T cell/fibroblast interactions should help in the identification of therapeutic targets. The biosynthetic repertoire of orbital fibroblasts appears central to GO. Thus, we might ultimately define ways of specifically targeting hyaluronan and lipid mediator expression in those cells. At an even more fundamental level, characterization of the immunity associated with GD itself might shed needed light on the processes occurring in the orbit. It is likely that the glandular and orbital diseases will ultimately prove to share important common pathogenic mechanisms.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK4741705, DK057938, DK 044972 (to B.S.P.), EY08819 (to R.S.B.), EY8976, and EY11708 (to T.J.S.), and a Merit Review award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (to T.J.S.).

Abbreviations: APC, Antigen-presenting cell; CRP, cross-reactive protein; CTLA4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4; DC, dendritic cell; ECM, extracellular matrix; ETSHR, extracellular domain of human TSHR; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; GD, Graves’ disease; GO, Graves’ ophthalmopathy; HAS, hyaluronan synthase; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IFN-{gamma}, interferon-{gamma}; IL-6R, IL-6 receptor; LP, lipoproteins; MBP-ECD, maltose binding protein extracellular domain; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; mPGES, microsomal PGE2 synthase; NF, nuclear factor; PG, prostaglandin; PGHS, PG endoperoxide H synthase; PPAR-{gamma}, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma}; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted; TAO, thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy; TBII, TSH-binding inhibitor Ig; TCR, T cell receptor; TSAb, thyroid-stimulating antibody; TSBAbs, thyroid stimulation blocking antibodies; TSHR, TSH receptor; TSHR-Abs, TSHR-antibodies; UDP, uridine diphosphate; UDP-GD, UDP-glucose dehydrogenase; V, variable; YOP, Yersinia outer membrane protein.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Risk Factors for...
 III. Immunological Basis for...
 IV. Autoimmune Responses to...
 V. TSH Receptor as...
 VI. Evolution of Autoimmune...
 VII. Graves’...
 VIII. Genetic and Environmental...
 IX. Orbital Autoimmunity
 X. Orbital Autoantigens
 XI. Role of Orbital...
 XII. Role of GAGs...
 XIII. Role of Orbital...
 XIV. Future Perspective
 References
 

  1. Bartels ED 1941 Heredity in Graves’ disease. Copenhagen: Enjnar Munksgaards Forlag
  2. Brix TH, Christensen K, Holm NV, Harvald B, Hegedus L 1998 A population-based study of Graves’ disease in Danish twins. Clin Endocrinol 48:397–400[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedus L 2001 Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves’ disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:930–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Grumet FC, Payne RO, Konishi J, Kriss JP 1974 HLA antigens as markers for disease susceptibility and autoimmunity in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 39:1115–1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Farid NR, Stone E, Johnson G 1980 Graves’ disease and HLA: clinical and epidemiologic associations. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 13:535–544[Medline]
  6. Mangklabruks A, Cox N, DeGroot LJ 1991 Genetic factors in autoimmune thyroid disease analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms of candidate genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:236–244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, Chang Y-B, Okamoto Y, Fisfalen M-E, Curran PG, DeGroot LJ 1993 Human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DQA1*0501 allele associated with genetic susceptibility to Graves’ disease in a Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1569–1574[Abstract]
  8. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, DeGroot LJ 1994 Strong association between HLA-DQA1*0501 and Graves’ disease in a male Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:227–229[Abstract]
  9. Chen Q-Y, Huang W, She J-X, Baxter F, Volpe R, MacLaren NK 1999 HLA-DRB1*08, DRB1*03/DRB3*0101, and DRB3*0202 are susceptibility genes for Graves’ disease in North American Caucasians, whereas DRB1*07 is protective. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3182–3186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tomer Y, Davies TF 2000 The genetics of familial and non-familial hyperthyroid Graves’ disease. In: Rapoport B, McLachlan SM, eds. Graves’ disease: pathogenesis and treatment. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 19–41
  11. Tomer Y, Davies TF 2002 Genetic factors relating to the thyroid with emphasis on complex diseases. In: Waas JAH, Shalet SM, eds. Oxford textbook of endocrinology and diabetes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 351–366
  12. Walker LSK, Abbas AK 2002 The enemy within: keeping self-reactive T cells at bay in the periphery. Nat Rev Immunol 2:11–19[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Donner H, Rau H, Walfish PG, Braun J, Siegmund T, Finke R, Herwig J, Usadel KH, Badenhoop K 1997 CTLA4 alanine-17 confers genetic susceptibility to Graves’ disease and to type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:143–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yanagawa T, Hidaka Y, Guimaraes V, Soliman M, DeGroot LJ 1995 CTLA-4 gene polymorphism associated with Graves’ disease in a Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:41–45[Abstract]
  15. Yanagawa T, Taniyama M, Enomoto S, Gomi K, Maruyama H, Ban Y, Saruta T 1997 CTLA4 gene polymorphism confers susceptibility to Graves’ disease in Japanese. Thyroid 7:843–846[Medline]
  16. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Armitage M, Hattersley A, Dodson PM, Macleod K, Carr-Smith J, Daykin J, Daly A, Sheppard MC, Holder RL, Barnett AH, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1999 The development of Graves’ disease and the CTLA-4 gene on chromosome 2q33. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2398–2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, Large DM, Toft AD, McCarthy MI, Kendall-Taylor P, Pearce SH 1999 The cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 is a major Graves’ disease locus. Hum Mol Genet 8:1195–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kouki T, Sawai Y, Gardine C, Fisfalen M-E, Alegre M-L, DeGroot LJ 2000 CTLA-4 gene polymorphism at position 49 in exon 1 reduces the inhibitory function of CTLA-4 and contributes to the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease. J Immunol 165:6606–6611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Weetman AP, Ajjan RA, Watson PF 1997 Cytokines and Graves’ disease. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 11:481–497[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Notkins AL, Onodera T, Prabhakar BS 1984 Virus-induced autoimmunity. In: Notkins AL, Oldstone MBA, eds. Concepts in viral pathogenesis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 210–215
  21. Abe J, Kotzin BL, Jujo K, Melish ME, Glode MP, Leung DYM 1992 Selective expansion of T cells expressing Vß2 and Vß8 in Kawasaki disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4066–4070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Paliard X, West SG, Lafferty JA, Clements JR, Kappler JW, Marrack P, Kotzin BL 1991 Evidence for the effects of a superantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Science 253:325–329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tomai MA, Beachey EH, Majumdar G, Kotb M 1992 Metabolically active antigen presenting cells are required for human T cell proliferation in response to the superantigen streptococcal M protein. FEMS Microbiol Immunol 89:155–164[CrossRef]
  24. Tumang JR, Posnett DN, Cole BC, Crow M, Friedman SM 1990 Helper T cell dependent human B cell differentiation mediated by a mycoplasmal superantigen bridge. J Exp Med 171:2153–2158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mourad W, Scholl P, Diaz A, Geha R, Chatila T 1989 The TSST-1 triggers B cell proliferation and differentiation via major histocompatibility complex unrestricted cognate T/B cell interaction. J Exp Med 170:2011–2022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Stuart PM, Woodward JG 1992 Yersinia enterocolitica produces superantigenic activity. J Immunol 148:225–233[Abstract]
  27. Uchiyama T, Miyoshi-Akiyoma T, Kato H, Fijimaki W, Yan X 1993 Superantigenic properties of a novel mitogenic substance produced by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from patients manifesting acute and systemic symptoms. J Immunol 151:4407–4413[Abstract]
  28. Sheldon P 1985 Specific cell-mediated responses to bacterial antigens and clinical correlations in reactive arthritis, Reiter’s syndrome and ankylosing spondylitis. Immunol Rev 86:5–25[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Lahesmaa R, Shurnik M, Vaara M, Leirisalo-Repo M, Nissila M, Gransfors K, Toivanen P 1991 Molecular mimicry between HLA B27 and Yersinia, Salmonella, Shigella and Klebsiella with the same region of HLA a1-helix. Clin Exp Immunol 86:399–405[Medline]
  30. Fujinami RS, Oldstone, MBA 1985 Amino acid homology between the enchalitogenic site of myelin basic protein and virus: mechanism for autoimmunity. Science 230:1043–1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Saegusa J, Prabhakar BS, Essani K, McClintock PR, Notkins AL 1986 Monoclonal antibody to Coxsackie virus B4 reacts with myocardium. J Infect Dis 153:372–378[Medline]
  32. Fujinami RS, Nelson JA, Walker L, Oldstone MBA 1988 Sequence homology and immunologic cross-reactivity of human cytomegalovirus with HLA-DR ßa chain: a means for graft rejection and immunosuppression. J Virol 62:100–105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Beisel KW, Srinivasappa J, Prabhakar BS 1991 Identification of a putative shared epitope between Coxsackie virus B4 and {alpha} cardiac myosin heavy chain. Clin Exp Immunol 86:49–57[Medline]
  34. Cox SP, Phillips DI, Osmond C 1989 Does infection indicate Graves’ disease? A population based 10 year study. Autoimmunity 4:43–49[Medline]
  35. Phillips DI, Barker DJ, Smith BR, Didcote S, Morgan D 1985 The geographical distribution of thyrotoxicosis in England according to the presence or absence of TSH-receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 23:283–287[Medline]
  36. Toft AD, Blackwell CC, Saadi AT, Wu P, Lymberi P, Soudjidelli M, Weir DM 1990 Secretor status and infection in patients with Graves’ disease. Autoimmunity 7:279–289[Medline]
  37. Collier A, Patrick AW, Toft AD, Blackwell CC, James VS, Weir DM 1988 Increased prevalence of non-secretors in patients with Graves’ disease-evidence for an infective aetiology? Br Med J 296:1162–1165
  38. Valtonen VV, Ruutu P, Varis K, Ranki M, Malkamaki M, Makela PH 1986 Serological evidence for the role of bacterial infections in the pathogenesis of thyroid diseases. Acta Med Scand 219:105–111[Medline]
  39. Luo G, Fan JL, Seetharamaiah GS, Desai RK, Dallas JS, Wagle NM, Doan R, Niesel DW, Klimpel GR, Prabhakar BS 1993 Immunization of mice with Yersinia enterocolitica leads to the induction of antithyrotropin receptor antibodies. J Immunol 151:922–928[Abstract]
  40. Luo G, Seetharamaiah GS, Niesel DW, Peterson JW, Prabhakar BS, Klimpel GR 1994 Purification and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica envelope proteins that induce antibodies which react with the human thyrotropin receptor. J Immunol 152:2555–2561[Abstract]
  41. Tomer Y, Davies TF 1993 Infection, thyroid disease and autoimmunity. Endocr Rev 14:107–120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Bech K, Larsen JH, Hansen JM, Nerup J 1974 Yersinia enterocolitica infection and thyroid disorder. Lancet 2:91–95
  43. Weiss M, Rubinstein E, Bottone EJ, Shenkman L, Bank H 1979 Yersinia enterocolitica antibodies in thyroid disorder. Isr J Med Sci 15:553–555[Medline]
  44. Shenkman L, Bottone EJ 1981 Antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica in thyroid disease. Ann Intern Med 85:735–739
  45. Shenkman L, Bottone EJ 1981 The occurrence of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica in thyroid disease. In: Bottone EJ, ed. Yersinia enterocolitica. Chap 13. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 135–144
  46. Weiss P, Ingbar SH, Winblad S, Kasper DL 1983 Demonstration of a saturable binding site for thyrotrophin in Yersinia enterocolitica. Science 219:1331–1333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Heyman P, Harrison LC, Robins-Browne R 1986 Thyrotropin (TSH) binding sites on Yersinia enterocolitica recognized by immunoglobulins from humans with Graves’ disease. Clin Exp Immunol 64:249–254[Medline]
  48. Franke TF, Wenzel BE 1991 A molecular basis for antigen homologies of thyroid epithelial cells and plasmid-encoded proteins of enteropathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib Microbiol Immunol 12:89–92[Medline]
  49. Wenzel BE, Heesemann J, Wenzel KW, Scriba PC 1988 Antibodies to plasmid-encoded proteins of enteropathogenic Yersinia in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Lancet 1:56[Medline]
  50. Wenzel BE, Heesemann J, Wenzel KW, Scriba PC 1988 Patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases have antibodies to plasmid encoded proteins of enteropathogeinc Yersinia. J Endocrinol Invest 11:139–141[Medline]
  51. Arscott P, Rosen ED, Konig RJ, Kaplan M, Ellis T, Baker Jr JE 1992 Immunoreactivity to Yersinia enterocolitica antigens in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:295–300[Abstract]
  52. Ebner S, Alex S, Klugman T, Appel M, Heesemann J, Wenzel B 1991 Immunization with Yersinia enterocolitica purified outer membrane protein induces lymphocytic thyroiditis in the BB/WOR rat. Thyroid 1(Suppl 1):S28 (Abstract)
  53. Bech K, Clemmensen O, Larsen JH, Bendixen G 1977 Thyroid disease and Yersinia. Lancet 1:1060–1061
  54. Burman KD, Lukes YG, Gemiski P 1991 Molecular homology between the human TSH receptor and Yersinia enterocolitica. Thyroid 1(Suppl 1):S62 (Abstract)
  55. Seetharamaiah GS, Desai RK, Dallas JS, Tahara K, Kohn LD, Prabhakar BS 1993 Induction of TSH binding inbibitory immunoglobulins with the extracellular domain of human thyrotropin receptor produced using a baculovirus vector. Autoimmunity 14:315–320[Medline]
  56. Seetharamaiah GS, Kurosky A, Desai RK, Dallas JS, Prabhakar BS 1994 A recombinant extracellular domain of the thyrotropin receptor binds thyrotropin in the absence of membranes. Endocrinology 134:549–554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Wagle NM, Dallas JS, Seetharamaiah GS, Fan JL, Desai RK, Memar O, Rajaraman S, Prabhakar BS 1994 Induction of hyperthyroxinemia in BALB/c but not in other strains of mice. Autoimmunity 18:103–112[Medline]
  58. Zhang H, Kaur I, Niesel DW, Seetharamaiah GS, Peterson JW, Justement LB, Prabhakar BS, Klimpel GR 1996 Yersinia enterocolitica envelope proteins that are cross-reactive with the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) also have B-cell mitogenic activity. J Autoimmun 9:509–516[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Zhang H, Kaur I, Niesel DW, Seetharamaiah GS, Peterson JW, Prabhakar BS, Klimpel GR 1997 Lipoprotein from Yersinia enterocolitica contains epitopes that crossreact with the human thyrotropin receptor. J Immunol 158:1976–1983[Abstract]
  60. Benoist C, Mathis D 2001 Autoimmunity provoked by infection: how good is the case for T cell epitope mimicry? Nat Immunol 2:797–801[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Adams DD, Purves HD 1956 Abnormal responses in the assay of thyrotropin. Proc Univ Otago Med Sch 34:11–12
  62. McKenzie JM 1958 The bioassay of thyrotropin in serum. Endocrinology 63:372–382
  63. McKenzie JM 1962 Fractionation of plasma containing the long-acting thyroid stimulator. J Biol Chem 237:3571–3572
  64. Kriss JP 1968 Inactivation of long-acting thyroid stimulator (LATS) by anti-{kappa} and anti-{lambda} antisera. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:1440–1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Smith BR, Dorrington KJ, Munro DS 1969 The distribution of the long-acting thyroid stimulator among {gamma} G immunoglobulins. Biochem Biophys Acta 188:89–100[Medline]
  66. Manley SW, Bourke JR, Hawker RW 1974 The thyrotropin receptor in guinea pig thyroid homogenate: interaction with the long-acting thyroid stimulator. J Endocrinol 61:437–445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Adams DD, Kennedy TH 1967 Occurrence in thyrotoxicosis of a {gamma} globulin which protects LATS from neutralization by an extract of thyroid gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 27:173–177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Kraiem Z, Lahat N, Glaser B, Baron E, Sadoh O, Sheinfeld M 1987 Thyrotropin receptor blocking antibodies: incidence, characterization and in vitro synthesis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 27:409–421[Medline]
  69. Kohn LD, Valente WA, Laccetti P, Cohen JL, Aloj SM, Grollman EF 1983 Multicompetent structure of the thyrotropin receptor: relationship to Graves’ disease. Life Sci 32:15–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Martino E, Pinchera A, Capiferri R, Macchia E, Sardano G, Bartalena L, Mazzanti F, Baschieri L 1976 Dissociation of responsiveness in thyrotropin-releasing hormone and thyroid suppressibility following antithyroid drug therapy in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43:543–549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Drexhage H, Bottazzo G, Doniach D, Bitensky L, Chayen J 1980 Evidence for thyroid-growth-stimulating immunoglobulins in some goitrous thyroid diseases. Lancet ii:287–292
  72. Orgiazzi J, Williams DE, Chopra IJ, Solomon DH 1976 Human thyroid adenyl cyclase-stimulating activity in immunoglobulin G of patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 42:341–354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Kraiem Z, Baron E, Kahana L, Sadeh O, Sheinfeld M 1992 Changes in the stimulating and blocking TSH receptor antibodies in a patient undergoing three cycles of transition from hypo to hyper-thyroidism and back to hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 36:211–214[Medline]
  74. Weetman AP, Yatenman ME, Ealey PA, Black CM, Reimer CB, Williams Jr RC, Shine B, Marshall MJ 1990 Thyroid-stimulating antibody activity between different immunoglobulin G subclasses. J Clin Invest 86:723–727
  75. Davies TF, Weber CM, Wallack P, Platzer M 1986 Restricted heterogeneity and T cell dependence of human thyroid autoantibody immunoglobulin G subclasses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 62:945–949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Parks VA, McLachlan SM, Bird P, Rees Smith B 1984 Distribution of microsomal antibody and thyroglobulin antibody activity amongst IgG subclasses. Clin Exp Immunol 57:239–243[Medline]
  77. McKenzie JM 1958 Delayed thyroid response to serum from thyrotoxic patients. Endocrinology 62:865–868
  78. Adams DD 1958 The presence of an abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone in the serum of some thyrotoxic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 18:699–712
  79. Strakosch CR, Wenzel BE, Row VV, Volpe R 1982 Immunology of autoimmune thyroid disease. N Engl J Med 307:1499–1507[Medline]
  80. Volpe R 1988 The immunoregulatory disturbance in autoimmune thyroid disease. Autoimmunity 2:55–72[Medline]
  81. Iwatani Y, Amino N, Mori H, Asari S, Izumiguchi Y, Kumahara Y, Miyai K 1983 T lymphocyte subsets in autoimmune thyroid diseases and subacute thyroiditis detected with monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:251–254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Wall J, Baur R, Schleusener H, Bandy-Defoe P 1983 Peripheral blood and intrathyroidal mononuclear cell populations in patients with autoimmune thyroid disorders enumerated using monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:164–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Jackson RA, Haynes BF, Burch WM, Shimizu K, Bowring MA, Eisenbarth GS 1984 Ia+ T cells in new onset Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59:187–190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Davies TF, Martin A, Conception ES, Graves P, Cohen L, Ben-Nun A 1991 Evidence of limited variability of antigen receptors on intrathyroidal T cells in autoimmune thyroid disease. N Engl J Med 325:238–244[Abstract]
  85. Davies TF, Martin A, Conception ES, Graves P, Lahat N, Cohen WL, Ben-Nun A 1992 Widespread V ß and preferential V {alpha} T cell receptor gene utilization by intrathyroidal T cells in human autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Invest 89:157–162
  86. Dayan CM, Londei M, Corcoran AE, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, James RFL, Rapoport B, Feldman M 1991 Autoantigen recognition by thyroid infiltrating T cells in Graves’ disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7415–7419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Gulwani-Akolkar B, Posnett DN, Janson CH, Grunewald J, Wigzel H, Akolar P, Gregersen APK, Silver J 1991 T cell receptor V gene segment frequencies in peripheral blood T cells correlate with human leukocyte antigen type. J Exp Med 174:1139–1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. McKenzie JM 1968 Humoral factors in the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease. Physiol Rev 48:252–309[Free Full Text]
  89. Rose NR 1988 Autoimmunity: a personal memoir. Autoimmunity 1:15–21[Medline]
  90. Weetman AP, McGregor AM 1994 Autoimmune thyroid disease: further developments in our understanding. Endocr Rev 15:788–830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Akamizu T, Mori T, Ishii H, Yotota T, Nakamura H, Imura H 1988 Purification of TSH receptor from porcine thyroid membrane and effect of various protease inhibitors on receptor stability. Endocrinol Jpn 35:275–283[Medline]
  92. Giordano C, Richiusa P, Bagnasco M, Pizzolanti G, Di Biasi F, Sbriglia MS, Mattina A, Pesce G, Montagna P, Capone F, Misiano G, Scorsone A, Pugliese A, Galluzo A 2001 Differential regulation of Fas-mediated apoptosis in both thyrocyte and lymphocyte cellular compartments correlates with opposite phenotypic manifestations of autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid 11:233–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Baker Jr JR 2001 The nature of apoptosis in the thyroid and the role it may play in autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid 11:245–247[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Stassi G, De Maria R 2002 Autoimmune thyroid disease: new models of cell death in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2:195–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Parmentier M, Libert F, Maenhut C, Lefort A, Gerard C, Perret J, Van Sande J, Dumont JE, Vassart G 1989 Molecular cloning of the thyrotropin receptor. Science 246:1620–1622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Nagayama Y, Kaufman DD, Seto P, Rapoport B 1989 Molecular cloning, sequence, and functional expression of the cDNA for the human thyrotropin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 165:1184–1190[CrossRef][Medline]
  97. Libert F, Lefort A, Gerard C, Parmentier M, Perret J, Ludgate M, Dumont JE, Vassart G 1989 Cloning sequencing and expression of the human thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: evidence for binding of autoantibodies. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 165:1250–1255[CrossRef][Medline]
  98. Misrahi M, Loosflet H, Atger M, Sar S, Guiochon-Mante, A, Milgrom E 1990 Cloning, sequencing and expression of human TSH receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 166:394–403[CrossRef][Medline]
  99. Nagayama Y, Rapoport B 1992 The thyrotropin receptor 25 years after its discovery: new insight after its molecular cloning. Mol Endocrinol 6:145–156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  100. Vassart G, Dumont J 1992 The thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. Endocr Rev 13:596–611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Kohn LD, Kosugi S, Ban T, Saji M, Ikuyama S, Giuliani C, Hidaka A, Shimura H, Akamizu T, Tahara K 1992 Molecular basis for the autoreactivity against thyroid stimulating hormone receptor. Int Rev Immunol 9:135–165[Medline]
  102. Prabhakar BS, Seetharamaiah GS, Fan J-L 1997 Thyrotropin receptor mediated diseases—a paradigm for receptor autoimmunity. Immunol Today 18:437–442[CrossRef][Medline]
  103. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan, SM 1998 The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 19:678–716
  104. Chazenbalk GD, Rapoport B 1995 Expression of the extracellular domain of the thyrotropin receptor in the baculovirus system using a promoter active earlier than the polyhedrin promoter: implications for the expression of functional, highly glycosylated proteins. J Biol Chem 270:1543–1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Seetharamaiah GS, Dallas JS, Patibandla SA, Thotakara RN, Prabhakar BS 1997 Requirement of glycosylation of the human thyrotropin receptor ectodomain for its reactivity with autoantibodies in patients’ sera. J Immunol 158:2798–2804[Abstract]
  106. Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 2001 Thyroid autoimmunity. J Clin Invest 108:1253–1259[CrossRef][Medline]
  107. Kajita Y, Rickards CR, Buckland PR, Howells RD, Rees Smith B 1985 Analysis of thyrotropin receptors by photoaffinity labeling. Orientation of receptor subunits in the cell membrane. Biochem J 227:413–420[Medline]
  108. Loosfelt H, Pichon C, Jolivet A, Misrahi M, Caillou B, Jamous M, Vannier B, Milgrom E 1992 Two-subunit structure of the human thyrotropin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:3765–3769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  109. Chazenbalk GD, Pichurin P, Chen CR, Latrofa F, Johnstone AP, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2002 Thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies in Graves’ disease preferentially recognize the free A subunit, not the thyrotropin holoreceptor. J Clin Invest 110:161–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  110. Hoglund P, Mintern J, Waltzinger C, Heath W, Benoist C, Mathis D 1999 Initiation of autoimmune diabetes by developmentally regulated presentation of islet cell antigens in the pancreatic lymph nodes. J Exp Med 189:331–339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Andre I, Gonzalez A, Wang B, Katz J, Benoist C, Mathis D 1996 Checkpoints in the progression of autoimmune disease: lessons from diabetes models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2260–2263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Jenkins MK, Schwartz RH 1987 Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med 165:302–319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Lane P, Haller C, McConnell F 1996 Evidence that induction of tolerance in vivo involves active signaling via a B7 ligand-dependent mechanism: CTLA4-Ig protects Vß8+ T cells from tolerance induction by the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Eur J Immunol 26:858–862[Medline]
  114. Krummel MF, Allison JP 1995 CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med 182:459–465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  115. Walunas TL, Bakker CY, Bluestone JA 1996 CTLA-4 ligation blocks CD28-dependent T cell activation. J Exp Med 183:2541–2550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. Perez VL, Van Parijs L, Biuckians A, Zheng XX, Strom TB, Abbas AK 1997 Induction of peripheral T cell tolerance in vivo requires CTLA-4 engagement. Immunity 6:411–417[CrossRef][Medline]
  117. Walunas TL, Bluestone JA 1998 CTLA-4 regulates tolerance induction and T cell differentiation in vivo. J Immunol 160:3855–3860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  118. Tivol EA, Borriello F, Schweitzer AN, Lynch WP, Bluestone JA, Sharpe AH 1995 Loss of CTLA-4 leads to massive lymphoproliferation and fatal multiorgan tissue destruction, revealing a critical negative regulatory role of CTLA-4. Immunity 3:541–547[CrossRef][Medline]
  119. Waterhouse P, Penninger JM, Timms E, Wakeham A, Shahinian A, Lee KP, Thompson CB, Griesser H, Mak TW 1995 Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in Ctla-4. Science 270:985–988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  120. Lechner O, Lauber J, Franzke A, Sarukhan A, von Boehmer H, Buer J 2001 Fingerprints of anergic T cells. Curr Biol 11:587–595[CrossRef][Medline]
  121. Nishimura H, Nose M, Hiai H, Minato N, Honjo T 1999 Development of lupus-like autoimmune diseases by disruption of the PD-1 gene encoding an ITIM motif-carrying immunoreceptor. Immunity 11:141–151[CrossRef][Medline]
  122. Nishimura H, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, Nakatani K, Hara M, Matsumori A, Sasayama S, Mizoguchi A, Hiai H, Minato N, Honjo 2001 Autoimmune dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1 receptor-deficient mice. Science 291:319–322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  123. Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, Fitz LJ, Malenkovich N, Okazaki T, Byrne MC, Horton HF, Fouser L, Carter L, Ling V, Bowman MR, Carreno BM, Collins M, Wood CR, Honjo T 2000 Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 192:1027–1034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  124. Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T, Chaudhary D, Borde M, Chernova I, Iwai Y, Long AJ, Brown JA, Nunes R, Greenfield EA, Bourque K, Boussiotis VA, Carter LL, Carreno BM, Malenkovich N, Nishimura H, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ 2001 PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-I and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol 2:261–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  125. Chambers CA 2001 The expanding world of co-stimulation: the two-signal model revisited. Trends Immunol 22:217–223[CrossRef][Medline]
  126. Young DA, Lowe LD, Booth SS, Whitters MJ, Nicholson L, Kuchroo VK, Collins M 2000 IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and TGF-ß from an altered peptide ligand-specific TH2 cell clone down-regulate adoptive transfer of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 164:3563–3572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  127. Bradley LM, Asensio VC, Schioetz LK, Harbertson J, Krahl T, Patstone G, Woolf N, Campbell IL, Sarvetnick N 1999 Islet-specific TH1, but not TH2, cells secrete multiple chemokines and promote rapid induction of autoimmune diabetes. J Immunol 162:2511–2520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  128. Pakala SV, Kurrer MO, Katz JD 1997 T helper 2 (TH2) T cells induce acute pancreatitis and diabetes in immune-compromised nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J Exp Med 186:299–306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  129. Charles PC, Weber KS, Cipriani B, Brosnan CF 1999 Cytokine, chemokine and chemokine receptor mRNA expression in different strains of normal mice: implications for establishment of a TH1/TH2 bias. J Neuroimmunol 100:64–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  130. Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan CI, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Nagata S 1992 Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 356:314–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  131. Sobel ES, Kakkanaiah VN, Cohen PL, Eisenberg RA 1993 Correction of gld autoimmunity by co-infusion of normal bone marrow suggests that gld is a mutation of the Fas ligand gene. Int Immunol 5:1275–1278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  132. Suda T, Takahashi T, Golstein P, Nagata S 1993 Molecular cloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor family. Cell 75:1169–1178[CrossRef][Medline]
  133. Fisher GH, Rosenberg FJ, Straus SE, Dale JK, Middleton LA, Lin AY, Strober W, Lenardo MJ, Puck JM 1995 Dominant interfering Fas gene mutations impair apoptosis in a human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Cell 81:935–946[CrossRef][Medline]
  134. Marion S, Braun JM, Ropars A, Kohn LD, Charreire, J 1994 Induction of autoimmunity by immunization of mice with human thyrotropin receptor. Cell Immunol 158:329–341[CrossRef][Medline]
  135. Costagliola S, Alcalde L, Tonacchera M, Ruf J, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1994 Induction of thyrotropin receptor (TSH-R) autoantibodies and thyroiditis in mice immunized with the recombinant TSH-R. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 199:1027–1034[CrossRef][Medline]
  136. Costagliola S, Many MC, Stalmans-Falys M, Tonacchera M, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1994 Recombinant thyrotropin receptor and the induction of autoimmune thyroid disease in BALB/c mice: a new animal model. Endocrinology 135:2150–2159[Abstract]
  137. Costagliola S, Many MC, Stalmans-Falys M, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1995 The autoimmune response induced by immunizing female mice with recombinant human thyrotropin receptor varies with the genetic background. Mol Cell Endocrinol 115:199–206[CrossRef][Medline]
  138. Costagliola S, Many MC, Stalmans-Falys M, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1996 Transfer of thyroiditis with syngeneic spleen cells sensitized with the human thyrotropin receptor, to naive BALB/c and NOD mice. Endocrinology 137:4637–4639[Abstract]
  139. Ludgate M 2000 Animal models of Graves’ disease. Eur J Endocrinol 142:1–8[Abstract]
  140. Lanzaveccha A 1990 Receptor-mediated antigen uptake and its effect on antigen presentation to class II-restricted T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 8:773–793[Medline]
  141. MacLennan ICM, Gulbranson-Judge A, Toellner KM, Casamayor-Palleja M, Chan E, Sze DMY, Luther SA, Orbea HA 1997 The changing preference of T and B cells for partners as T-dependent antibody responses develop. Immunol Rev 156:53–56[CrossRef][Medline]
  142. Parker DC 1993 T cell-dependent B-cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 11:331–340[Medline]
  143. Carayanniotis G, Huang GC, Nicholson LB, Scott T, Allain P, McGregor AM, Banga JP 1995 Unaltered thyroid function in mice responding to a highly immunogenic thyrotropin receptor: implications for the establishment of a mouse model for Graves’ disease. Clin Exp Immunol 99:294–302[Medline]
  144. Vlase H, Nakashima M, Graves PN, Tomer Y, Morris JC, Davies TF 1995 Defining the major antibody epitopes on the human thyrotropin receptor in immunized mice: evidence for intramolecular epitope spreading. Endocrinology 136:4415–4419[Abstract]
  145. Vlase H, Weiss M, Graves PN, Davies TF 1998 Characterization of the murine immune response to the murine TSH receptor ectodomain: induction of hypothyroidism and TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 113:111–118[CrossRef][Medline]
  146. Shimojo N, Kohno Y, Yamaguchi KK, Kikuoka SI, Hoshioka A, Miimi H, Hirai A, Tamura Y, Saito Y, Kohn LD, Tahara K 1996 Induction of Grave’s-like disease in mice by immunization with fibroblasts transfected with the thyrotropin receptor and a class II molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11074–11079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  147. Kikuoka SI, Shimojo N, Yamaguchi KK, Watanabe Y, Hoshioka A, Hirai A, Saito Y, Tahara K, Kohn LD, Maruyama N, Kohno Y, Niimi H 1998 The formation of thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) antibodies in a Graves’ animal model requires the N-terminal segment of the TSHR extracellular domain. Endocrinology 139:1891–1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  148. Yamaguchi KK, Shimojo N, Kikuoka SI, Hoshioka A, Hirai A, Tahara K, Kohn LD, Kohno Y, Niimi H 1997 Genetic control of anti-thyrotropin receptor antibody generation in H-2K mice immunized with thyrotropin receptor-transfected fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:4266–4269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  149. Kita M, Ahmad L, Marians RC, Vlase H, Unger P, Graves PN, Davies TF 1999 Regulation and transfer of a murine model of thyrotropin receptor antibody. Endocrinology 140:1392–1398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  150. Patibandla SA, Wagle NM, Seetharamaiah GS, Fan JL, Dallas JS, Prabhakar BS 1996 Experimental autoimmunity to thyrotropin receptor. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 104 (Suppl 3):28–32
  151. Saipatibandla A, Prabhakar BS 1997 Autoimmunity to thyrotropin receptor. In: Klein JR, ed. Advances in neuroimmunology. Vol 6. London: Elsevier Science, Ltd.; 347–357
  152. Bottazzo GG, Todd I, Mirakian R, Belfiore A, Pujol-Borrell R 1986 Organ-specific autoimmunity: a 1986 overview. Immunol Rev 94:137–169[CrossRef][Medline]
  153. Suri A, Katz JD 1999 Dissecting the role of CD4+ T cells in autoimmune diabetes through the use of TCR transgenic mice. Immunol Rev 169:55–65[CrossRef][Medline]
  154. O’Garra A, Arai N 2000 The molecular basis of T helper 1 and T helper 2 cell differentiation. Trends Cell Biol 10:542–550[CrossRef][Medline]
  155. Germain RN, Ashwell DJ, Lechler RI, Margulies DH, Nickerson KM, Suzuki G, Tou JYL 1985 "Exon-shuffling" maps control of antibody-and T-cell-recognition sites to the NH2-terminal domain of the class II major histocompatibility polypeptide A ß. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:2940–2944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  156. Costagliola S, Rodien P, Many MC, Ludgate M, Vassart G 1998 Genetic immunization against the human thyrotropin receptor causes thyroiditis and allows production of monoclonal antibodies recognizing the native receptor. J Immunol 160:1458–1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  157. Costagliola S, Pohlenz J, Refetoff S, Vassart G 1998 Generation of a murine model of Graves’ disease by genetic immunization of outbred mice with human TSH receptor. J Endocrinol Invest 21:S4
  158. Pichurin P, Pichurina O, Chazenbalk D, Paras C, Chen CR, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 2002 Immune deviation away from Th1 in interferon-{gamma} knockout mice does not enhance TSH receptor antibody production after naked DNA vaccination. Endocrinology 143:1182–1189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  159. Nagayama Y, Kita-Furuyama M, Ando T, Nakao K, Mizuguchi H, Hayakawa T, Eguchi K, Niwa M 2002 A novel murine model of Graves’ hyperthyroidism with intramuscular injection of adenovirus expressing the thyrotropin receptor. J Immunol 168:2789–2794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  160. Kaithamana S, Fan JL, Osuga Y, Shan-Guang L, Prabhakar BS 1999 Induction of experimental autoimmune Graves’ disease in BALB/c mice. J Immunol 163:5157–5164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  161. James JA, Harley JB 1998 B-cell epitope spreading in autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 164:185–200[CrossRef][Medline]
  162. McCluskey J, Farris DA, Keech CL, Purcell AW, Rischmueller M, Kinoshita G, Reynolds P, Gordon TP 1998 Determinant spreading: lessons from animal models and human disease. Immunol Rev 164:209–229[CrossRef][Medline]
  163. Vincent A, Willcox N, Hill M, Curnow J, MacLennan C, Beeson D 1998 Determinant spreading and immune responses to acetylcholine receptors in myasthenia gravis. Immunol Rev 164:157–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  164. Singh RR, Hahn BH 1998 Reciprocal T-B determinant spreading develops spontaneously in murine lupus: implications for pathogenesis. Immunol Rev 164:201–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  165. Bahn RS 1995 Assessment and management of the patient with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Endocr Pract 1:172–178
  166. Werner SC, Coleman DJ, Fravzen LA 1974 Ultrasonographic evidence of a consistent orbital involvement in Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 290:1447–1450
  167. Salvi M, De Chiara F, Gardini E, Minelli R, Bianconi L, Alinovi A, Ricci R, Neri F, Tosi C, Roti E 1994 Echographic diagnosis of pretibial myxedema in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol 131:113–119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  168. Salvi M, Zhang Z-G, Haegert D, Woo M, Liberman A, Cadarso L, Wall JR 1990 Patients with endocrine ophthalmopathy not associated with overt thyroid disease have multiple thyroid immunological abnormalities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:89–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  169. Marcocci C, Bartelena L, Bogazzi FM, Panicucci M, Pinchera A 1989 Studies on the occurrence of ophthalmopathy in Graves’ disease. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 120:473–478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  170. Bahn RS, Heufelder AE 1993 Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 329:1468–1475[Free Full Text]
  171. Forbes G, Gorman CA, Brennan MD, Gehring DG, Ilstrup DM, Earnest F 1986 Ophthalmopathy of Graves’ disease: computerized volume measurements of the orbital fat and muscle. AJNR 7:651–656[Abstract]
  172. Tallstedt L, Norberg R 1988 Immunohistochemical staining of normal and Graves’ extraocular muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:175–184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  173. Kahaly G, Forester G, Hansen C 1998 Glycosaminoglycans in thyroid eye disease. Thyroid 8:429–432[Medline]
  174. Hufnagel TJ, Hickey WF, Cobbs WH, Jakobiec FA, Iwamoto T, Eagle RC 1984 Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies on the exenterated orbital tissues of a patient with Graves’ disease. Ophthalmology 91:1411–1419[Medline]
  175. Inoue D, Sato K, Maeda M, Inoko H, Tsuji K, Mori T, Imura H 1991 Genetic differences shown by HLA typing among Japanese patients with euthyroid Graves’ ophthalmopathy, Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: genetic characteristics of euthyroid Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 34:57–62[Medline]
  176. Frecker M, Stenszky V, Balazs C, Kozma L, Kraszits E, Faria NR 1986 Genetic factors in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 25:479–485[Medline]
  177. Weetman AP, Zhang L, Webb S, Shine B 1990 Analysis of HLA-DQB and HLA-DPB alleles in Graves’ disease by oligonucleotide probing of enzymatically amplified DNA. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 33:65–71[Medline]
  178. Frecker M, Mercer G, Skanes VM, Farid NR 1988 Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) factors predisposing to and protecting against Graves’ eye disease. Autoimmunity 1:307–315[Medline]
  179. Payami H, Joe S, Farid NR, Stenszky V, Chan SH, Yeo PP, Cheah JS, Thomson G 1989 Relative predispositional effects (RPEs) of marker allele with disease: HLA-DR alleles and Graves’ disease. Am J Hum Genet 45:541–546[Medline]
  180. Weetman AP, So AK, Warner CA, Foroni L, Fells P, Shine B 1988 Immunogenetics of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 28:619–628[Medline]
  181. Blakemore AIF, Watson PF, Weetman AP, Duff SW 1995 Association of Graves’ disease with an allele of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:111–115[Abstract]
  182. Cuddihy RM, Bahn RS 1996 Lack of an association between alleles of interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist genes and Graves’ disease in a North American Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4476–4478[Abstract]
  183. Mühlberg T, Kirchberger M, Spitzweg C, Herrmann F, Heberling H-J, Heufelder AH 1998 Lack of association of Graves’ disease with the A2 allele of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene in a white European population. Eur J Endocrinol 38:686–690
  184. Siegmond T, Usadel KH, Donner H, Braun J, Walfish PG, Badenhoop K 1998 Interferon-{gamma} gene microsatellite polymorphisms in patients with Graves’ disease. Thyroid 8:1013–1017[Medline]
  185. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Davies TF 1999 Mapping the major susceptibility loci for familial Graves’ and Hashimoto’s diseases: evidence for genetic heterogeneity and gene interactions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4656–4664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  186. Villanueva R, Inzerillo AM, Tomer Y, Barnesino G, Miltzer M, Concepcion ES, Greenberg DA, MacLaren N, Sun ZS, Zhang DM, Tucci S, Davies TF 2000 Limited genetic susceptibility to severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy: no role for CTLA-4 but evidence for an environmental etiology. Thyroid 10:791–798[Medline]
  187. Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM 1993 Smoking and risk of Graves’ disease. JAMA 269:479–482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  188. Hagg E, Asplund K 1987 Is endocrine ophthalmopathy related to smoking? Br Med J 295:634–635
  189. Pfeilschifter J, Ziegler R 1996 Smoking and endocrine ophthalmopathy: impact of smoking severity and current vs. lifetime cigarette consumption. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:477–481[CrossRef][Medline]
  190. Shine B, Fells P, Edwards OM, Weetman AP 1990 Association between Graves’ ophthalmopathy and smoking. Lancet 335:1261–1263[CrossRef][Medline]
  191. Silman AJ 1993 Smoking and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 20:1815–1816[Medline]
  192. Clakins BM 1989 A meta-analysis of the role of smoking in inflammatory bowel disease. Diag Dis Sci 34:1841–1854
  193. Wakelkamp IM, Gerding MN, Van Der Meer JW, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM 2000 Both Th1 and Th2 derived cytokines in serum are elevated in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 121:453–457[CrossRef][Medline]
  194. Salvi M, Girasole G, Pedrazzoni M, Passeri M, Giuliani N, Minelli R, Braverman LE, Roti E 1996 Increased serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 in patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2976–2979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  195. Metcalfe RA, Weetman AP 1994 Stimulation of extraocular muscle fibroblasts by cytokines and hypoxia; possible role in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 40:67–72[Medline]
  196. Torring O, Tallstedt L, Wallin G, Lundell G, Ljunggren JG, Taube A, Saaf M, Hamberger B 1996 Graves’ hyperthyroidism: treatment with anti-thyroid drugs, surgery, or radioiodine—a prospective, randomized study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2986–2993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  197. Jones BM, Kwok CCH, Kung AWC 1999 Effect of radioactive iodine therapy on cytokine production in Graves’ disease: transient increases in interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, with longer-term increases in interferon-{gamma} production. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4106–4110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  198. Tallstedt L, Lundell G, Torring O, Wallin G, Ljunggren JG, Blomgren H, Taube A 1992 Occurrence of ophthalmopathy after treatment for Graves’ hyperthyroidism. N Engl J Med 326:1733–1738[Abstract]
  199. Kung AWC, Ysu CC, Cheng A 1994 The incidence of ophthalmopathy after radioiodine therapy for Graves’ disease: prognostic factors and the role of methimazole. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:542–546[Abstract]
  200. Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Bogazzi F, Manetti L, Tanda ML, Dell’Unto E, Bruno-Bossio G, Nardi M, Bartolomei MP, Lepri A, Rossi G, Martino E, Pinchera A 1998 Relation between therapy for hyperthyroidism and the course of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 338:73–78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  201. Wiersinga WM 1998 Preventing Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 338: 121–122
  202. Weetman AP, Cohen S, Gatter KC, Fells P, Shine B 1989 Immunohistochemical analysis of the retrobulbar tissues in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 75:222–227[Medline]
  203. Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1993 Elevated expression in situ of selectin and immunoglobulin superfamily adhesion molecules in retroocular connective tissues from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 91:381–389[Medline]
  204. Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1993 Detection and localization of cytokine immunoreactivity in retroocular connective tissue in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Eur J Clin Invest 23:10–17[Medline]
  205. Heufelder AE, Herterich S, Ernst G, Bahn RS, Scriba PC 1995 Analysis of retroorbital T cell antigen receptor variable region gene usage in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Eur J Endocrinol 132:266–277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  206. Heufelder AE, Wenzel BE, Scriba PC 1996 Antigen receptor variable region repertoires expressed by T cells infiltrating thyroid, retroorbital and pretibial tissue in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3733–3739[Abstract]
  207. de Carli M, D’Elios M, Mariotti S, Marcocci C, Pinchera A, Ricci M, Romagnani S, del Prete G 1993 Cytolytic T cells with Th-1 like cytokine profile predominate in retroorbital lymphocytic infiltrates of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1120–1124[Abstract]
  208. Hiromatsu Y, Yang D, Bednarczuk T, Miyake I, Nonaka K, Inoue Y 2000 Cytokine profiles in eye muscle tissue and orbital fat tissue from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1194–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  209. McLachlan SM, Prummel MF, Rapoport B 1994 Cell-mediated or humoral immunity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy? Profiles of T-cell cytokines amplified by polymerase chain reaction from orbital tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1070–1074[Abstract]
  210. Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Trieb K, Sztankay A, Holter W, Anderl H, Wick G 1994 Retrobulbar T cells from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy are CD8+ and specifically recognize autologous fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 93:2738–2743
  211. Aniszewski JP, Valyasevi RW, Bahn RS 2000 Relationship between disease duration and predominant orbital T cell subset in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:776–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  212. Natt N, Bahn RS 1997 Cytokines in the evolution of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 26:129–136[Medline]
  213. Heufelder AE 1997 Retro-orbital autoimmunity. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 11:499–520[CrossRef][Medline]
  214. Smith TJ, Wang HS, Evans CH 1995 Leukoregulin is a potent inducer of hyaluronan synthesis in cultured human orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol 268:C382–C388
  215. Korducki JM, Loftus SJ, Bahn RS 1992 Stimulation of glycosaminoglycan production in cultured human retroocular fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33: 2037–2042
  216. Kaback LA, Smith TJ 1999 Expression of hyaluronan synthase messenger ribonucleic acids and their induction of interleukin-1ß in human orbital fibroblasts: potential insight into the molecular pathogenesis of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4079–4084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  217. Smith TJ, Parikh SJ 1999 HMC-1 mast cells activate human orbital fibroblasts in coculture: evidence for up-regulation of prostaglandin E2 and hyaluronan synthesis. Endocrinology 140:3518–3525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  218. Valyasevi RW, Jyonouchi SC, Dutton CM, Munsakul N, Bahn RS 2001 Effect of TNF-{alpha}, IFN-{gamma}, TGF-ß on adipogenesis and expression of TSH receptor in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:903–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  219. Jyonouchi S, Valyasevi R, Harteneck DA, Dutton CM, Bahn RS 2001 Interleukin-6 stimulates thyrotropin receptor expression in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 11:929–934[CrossRef][Medline]
  220. Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1994 Modulation of Graves’ orbital fibroblast proliferation by cytokines and glucocorticoid receptor agonists. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:120–127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  221. Ahmann A, Baker JR, Weetman AP, Wartofsky L, Nutman TB, Burman KD 1987 Antibodies to porcine eye muscle in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy: identification of serum immunoglobulin directed against unique determinants by immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:454–460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  222. Miller A, Sikorska H, Salvi M, Wall JR 1986 Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of autoantibodies against eye muscle antigens in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Acta Endocrinol 113:514–522
  223. Weetman AP, Fells P, Shine B 1989 T and B cell reactivity to extraocular and skeletal muscle in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 73:323–327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  224. Kadlubowski M, Irvine WJ, Rowland CA 1986 The lack of specificity of ophthalmic immunoglobulins in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 63:990–995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  225. Salvi M, Hiromatsu Y, Bernard N, How J, Wall JR 1988 Human orbital tissue and thyroid membrane express a 64 kDa protein which is recognized by autoantibodies in serum of patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. FEBS Lett 232:125–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  226. Salvi M, Bernard N, Miller A, Zhang ZG, Gardini E, Wall JR 1991 Prevalence of antibodies reactive with a 64 kDa eye muscle membrane antigen in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 1:207–213[Medline]
  227. Bahn RS, Gorman CA, Johnson CM, Smith TJ 1989 Presence of antibodies in the sera of patients with Graves’ disease recognizing a 23 kilodalton fibroblast protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 69:622–628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  228. Dong Q, Ludgate M, Vassart G 1991 Cloning and sequencing of a novel 64-kDa autoantigen recognized by patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1375–1381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  229. Zhang Z-G, Dong Q, Rodien P, Alcalde L, Bernard N, Boucher A, Salvi M, Arthurs B, Vassart GM, Ludgate M, Wall JR 1992 Antibodies in the serum of patients with autoimmune thyroid disorders react with a recombinant 98 amino acid fragment of a full length 64 kDa eye muscle membrane protein which is also expressed in the thyroid. Autoimmunity 13:151–157[Medline]
  230. Ross PV, Koenig RJ, Arscott P, Ludgate M, Waier M, Nelson CC, Kaplan MM, Baker Jr JR 1993 Tissue specificity and serologic reactivity of an autoantigen associated with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:433–438[Abstract]
  231. Kubota S, Gunji K, Stolarski C, Kennerdell JS, Wall J 1998 Re-evaluation of the prevalences of serum autoantibodies reactive with "64-kd eye muscle proteins" in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 8:175–179[Medline]
  232. Kubota S, Gunj K, Ackrell BAC, Cochran G, Stolarski C, Wengrowicz S, Kennerdell JS, Hiromatsu Y, Wall J 1998 The 64-kilodalton eye muscle protein is the flavoprotein subunit of mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase: the corresponding serum antibodies are good markers of an immune-mediated damage to the eye muscle in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:443–447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  233. Gunji K, De Bellis A, Li AW, Yamada M, Kubota S, Ackrell G, Wengrowicz S, Bellastella A, Bizzarro A, Sinisi A, Wall JR 2000 Cloning and characterization of the novel thyroid and eye muscle shared protein G2s: autoantibodies against G2s are closely associated with ophthalmopathy in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1641–1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Kadluboswki M, Irvine WJ, Rowland AC 1987 Anti-muscle antibodies in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Lab Immunol 24:105–111[Medline]
  235. Ludgate M, Dong Q, Dreyfus PA, Zakut H, Taylor P, Vassart G, Soreq H 1989 Definition, at the molecular level, of a thyroglobulin-acetylcholinesterase shared epitope: study of its pathophysiological significance in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 3:167–176[Medline]
  236. Konishi J, Herman MM, Kriss JP 1974 Binding of thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin-antithyroglobulin immune complex to extraocular muscle membrane. Endocrinology 95:434–446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  237. Marino M, Lisi S, Pinchera A, Mazzi B, Latrofa F, Sellari-Franceschini S, McCluskey RT, Chiovato L 2001 Identification of thyroglobulin in orbital tissues of patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 11:177–185[CrossRef][Medline]
  238. Weightman DR, Oerros P, Sherif IH, Kendall-Taylor P 1993 Autoantibodies to IGF-1 binding sites in the thyroid associated ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 16:251–257[Medline]
  239. Gerding MN, van der Meer JW, Broenink M, Bakker O, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF 2000 Association of thyrotrophin receptor antibodies with the clinical features of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 52:267–271[CrossRef][Medline]
  240. McLachlan SM, Pegg CA, Atherton MC, Middleton SL, Dickinson A, Clark F, Proctor SJ, Proud G, Rees Smith B 1986 Subpopulations of thyroid autoantibody secreting lymphocytes in Graves’ and Hashimoto thyroid glands. Clin Exp Immunol 65:319–328[Medline]
  241. Heufelder AE, Dutton CM, Sarkar G, Donovan KA, Bahn RS 1993 Detection of TSH receptor RNA in cultured fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy and pretibial dermopathy. Thyroid 3:297–300[Medline]
  242. Feliciello A, Porcellini A, Ciullo I, Bonavolonta G, Avvedimento EV, Fenzi G 1993 Expression of thyrotropin-receptor mRNA in healthy and Graves’ retro-orbital tissue. Lancet 342:337–338[CrossRef][Medline]
  243. Mengistu M, Lukes YG, Nagy EV, Burch HB, Carr FE, Lahiri S, Burman KD 1994 TSH receptor gene expression in retroocular fibroblasts. J Endocrinol Invest 17:437–441[Medline]
  244. Bahn RS, Dutton CM, Natt N, Joba W, Spitzweg C, Heufelder AE 1998 Thyrotropin receptor expression in Graves’ orbital adipose/connective tissues: potential autoantigen in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:998–1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  245. Crisp MS, Lane C, Halliwell M, Wynford-Thomas D, Ludgate M 1997 Thyrotropin receptor transcripts in human adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2003–2005
  246. Spitzweg C, Joba W, Hunt N, Heufelder AE 1997 Analysis of human thyrotropin receptor gene expression and immunoreactivity in human orbital tissue. Eur J Endocrinol 136:599–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  247. Rapoport B, Alsabeth R, Aftergood D, McLachlan SM 2000 Elephantiasic pretibial myxedema: insight into and a hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of the extrathyroidal manifestations of Graves’ disease. Thyroid 10:685–692[CrossRef][Medline]
  248. Sorisky A, Pardasani D, Gagnon A, Smith TJ 1996 Evidence of adipocyte differentiation in human orbital fibroblasts in primary culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3428–3431[Abstract]
  249. Valyasevi RW, Erickson DZ, Harteneck DA, Dutton CM, Heufelder AE, Jyonouchi SC, Bahn RS 1999 Differentiation of human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts induces expression of functional thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2557–2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  250. Salvi M, Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Giuliana N, Minelli R, Wall JR, Roti E 2000 Serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in Graves’ disease: effect of treatment, thyroid function, ophthalmopathy and cigarette smoking. Eur J Endocrinol 143:197–202[Abstract]
  251. Burnstine MA, Elner SG, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, Elner VM 1999 Orbital fibroblast interleukin-6 gene expression and immunomodulation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15:306–311[Medline]
  252. Watson PF, Pickerill AP, Davies R, Weetman AP 1995 Semi-quantitative analysis of interleukin-1 {alpha}, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 mRNA expression by human thyrocytes. J Mol Endocrinol 15:11–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  253. Haraguchi K, Shimura H, Ikeda M, Endo T, Onaya T 1998 Effects of cytokines on expression of thyrotropin receptor mRNA in rat preadipocytes. Thyroid 8:687–692[Medline]
  254. Shimura H, Miyazaki A, Haraguchi K, Endo T, Onaya T 1998 Analysis of differentiation-induced expression mechanisms of thyrotropin receptor gene in adipocytes. Mol Endocrinol 12:1473–1486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  255. Haraguchi K, Shimura H, Lin L, Endo T, Onaya T 1996 Differentiation of rat adipocytes is accompanied by expression of thyrotropin receptors. Endocrinology 137:3200–3205[Abstract]
  256. Sempowski GD, Rozenblit J, Smith TJ, Phipps RP 1998 Human orbital fibroblasts are activated through CD40 to induce proinflammatory cytokine production. Am J Physiol 274:C707–C714
  257. Many MC, Costagliola S, Detrait M, Denef JF, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1999 Development of an animal model of autoimmune thyroid eye disease. J Immunol 162:4966–4974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  258. Pichurin P, Yan XM, Farilla L, Guo J, Chazenbalk GD, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 2001 Naked TSH receptor DNA vaccination: a Th1 T cell response in which interferon-{gamma} production, rather than antibody, dominates the immune response in mice. Endocrinology 142:3530–3536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  259. Deleted in proof.
  260. Otto EA, Ochs K, Hansen C, Wall JR, Kahaly GJ 1996 Orbital tissue-derived T lymphocytes from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy recognize autologous orbital antigens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3045–3050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  261. Arnold K, Tandon N, McIntosh RS, Elisei R, Ludgate M, Weetman AP 1994 T cell responses to orbital antigens in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 96:329–334[Medline]
  262. Smith TJ, Bahn RS, Gorman CA 1989 Connective tissue, glycosaminoglycans, and diseases of the thyroid. Endocr Rev 10:366–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  263. Trotter WR, Eden KC 1942 Localized pretibial myxoedema in association with toxic goitre. Q J Med 11:229–240
  264. Watson EM, Pearce RH 1947 The mucopolysaccharide content of the skin in localized (pretibial) myxedema. Am J Clin Pathol 17:507–512
  265. Smelser GK 1939 The histology of orbital and other fat tissue deposits in animals with experimentally produced exophthalmos. Am J Pathol 15:341–351
  266. Wegelius O, Asboe-Hansen G, Lamberg B-A 1957 Retrobulbar connective tissue changes in malignant exophthalmos. Acta Endocrinologica 25:452–456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  267. Paulson DL 1937 Experimental exophthalmos in the guinea pig. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 36:604–609[CrossRef]
  268. Asboe-Hansen G, Iversen K 1951 Influence of thyrotrophic hormone on connective tissue. Pathogenetic significance of mucopolysaccharides in experimental exophthalmos. Acta Endocrinol 8:90–96
  269. Ludwig AW, Boas NF, Soffer LI 1950 Role of mucopolysaccharides in pathogenesis of experimental exophthalmos. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 73:137–146
  270. Philipson LH, Schwartz NB 1984 Subcellular localization of hyaluronate synthetase in oligodendroglioma cells. J Biol Chem 259:5017–5023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  271. Shyjan AM, Heldin P, Butcher EC, Yoshino T, Briskin MJ 1996 Functional cloning of the cDNA for a human hyaluronan synthase. J Biol Chem 271:23395–23399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  272. Watanabe K, Yamaguchi Y 1996 Molecular identification of a putative human hyaluronan synthase. J Biol Chem 271:22945–22948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  273. Spicer AP, Olson JS, McDonald JA 1997 Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding the third putative mammalian hyaluronan synthase. J Biol Chem 272:8957–8961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  274. Spicer AP, Kaback LA, Smith TJ, Seldin MF 1998 Molecular cloning and characterization of the human and mouse UDP-glucose dehydrogenase genes. J Biol Chem 273:25117–25124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  275. Meyer K, Chaffee E, Hobby GL, Dawson MH 1941 Hyaluronidases of bacterial and animal origin. J Exp Med 73:309–326[Abstract]
  276. Arbogast B, Hopwood JJ, Dorfman A 1975 Absence of hyaluronidase in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 67:376–382[CrossRef][Medline]
  277. Smith TJ, Bahn RS, Gorman CA 1989 Hormonal regulation of hyaluronate synthesis in cultured human fibroblasts: evidence for differences between retroocular and dermal fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 69:1019–1023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  278. Truppe W, Brasner R, von Figura K, Kresse H 1977 Uptake of hyaluronate by cultured cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 78:713–719[CrossRef][Medline]
  279. Noble PW, McKee CM, Cowman M, Shin HS 1996 Hyaluronan fragments activate an NF-{kappa} B/I-{kappa}B {alpha} autoregulatory loop in murine macrophages. J Exp Med 183:2373–2378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  280. Stamenkovic I, Amiot M, Pesando JM, Seed B 1989 A lymphocyte molecule implicated in lymph node homing is a member of the cartilage link protein family. Cell 56:1057–1062[CrossRef][Medline]
  281. Hall CL, Wang C, Lange LA, Turley EA 1994 Hyaluronan and the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM promote focal adhesion turnover and transient tyrosine kinase activity. J Cell Biol 126:575–588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  282. Brecht M, Mayer U, Schlosser E, Prehm P 1986 Increased hyaluronate synthesis is required for fibroblast detachment and mitosis. Biochem J 239:445–450[Medline]
  283. Anderson RL, Tweeten JP, Patrinely JR, Garland PE, Thiese SM 1989 Dysthyroid optic neuropathy without extraocular muscle involvement. Ophthalmic Surg 20:568–574[Medline]
  284. Kazim M, Goldberg RA, Smith TJ 2002 Insights into the pathogenesis of thyroid associated orbitopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 120:380–386[Free Full Text]
  285. Peyster RG, Ginsberg F, Silber JH, Adler LP 1986 Exophthalmos caused by excessive fat: CT volumetric analysis and differential diagnosis. AJNR 146:459–464
  286. Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, Evans RM 1995 15-Deoxy-{delta} 12 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR {gamma}. Cell 83:803–812[CrossRef][Medline]
  287. Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, Lehmann JM 1995 A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813–819[CrossRef][Medline]
  288. Kemp EG, Rootman J 1989 Lipid deposition within the extra-ocular muscles of a patient with dysthyroid ophthalmopathy. Orbit 8:45–48
  289. Forster G, Otto E, Hansen C, Ochs K, Kahaly G 1998 Analysis of orbital T cells in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 112:427–434[CrossRef][Medline]
  290. Pappa A, Calder V, Ajjan R, Fells P, Ludgate M, Weetman AP, Lightman S 1997 Analysis of extraocular muscle-infiltrating T cells in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). Clin Exp Immunol 109:362–369[CrossRef][Medline]
  291. Costagliola S, Many MC, Denef J-F, Pohlenz B, Reffetoff S, Vassart G 2000 Genetic immunization of outbred mice with thyrotropin receptor cDNA provides a model of Graves’ disease. J Clin Invest 105:803–811[Medline]
  292. Smith RS, Smith TJ, Blieden TM, Phipps RP 1997 Fibroblasts as sentinel cells: synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol 151:317–322[Abstract]
  293. Fries KM, Blieden T, Looney RJ, Sempowski GD, Silvera MR, Willis RA, Phipps RP 1994 Evidence of fibroblast heterogeneity and the role of fibroblast subpopulations in fibrosis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 72:283–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  294. Morris RJ, Ritter MA 1980 Association of Thy-1 cell surface differentiation antigen with certain connective tissues in vivo. Cell Tissue Res 206:459–475[Medline]
  295. Leyton L, Schneider P, Labra CV, Ruegg C, Hetz CA, Quest AFG, Bron C 2001 Thy-1 binds to integrin ß3 on astrocytes and triggers formation of focal contact sites. Curr Biol 11:1028–1038[CrossRef][Medline]
  296. Phipps RP, Penney DP, Keng P, Quill H, Paxhia A, Derdak S, Felch ME 1989 Characterization of two major populations of lung fibroblasts: distinguishing morphology and discordant display of Thy 1 and class II MHC. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1:65–74
  297. Phipps RP, Baecher C, Frelinger JG, Penney DP, Keng P, Brown D 1990 Differential expression of interleukin 1{alpha} by Thy-1+ and Thy-1- lung fibroblast subpopulations: enhancement of interleukin 1{alpha} production by tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. Eur J Immunol 20:1723–1727[Medline]
  298. Derdak S, Penney DP, Keng P, Felch ME, Brown D, Phipps RP 1992 Differential collagen and fibronectin production by Thy-1+ and Thy-1- lung fibroblast subpopulations. Am J Physiol 263:L283–L290
  299. Fries KM, Felch ME, Phipps RP 1994 Interleukin-6 is an autocrine growth factor for murine lung fibroblast subsets. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 11:552–560[Abstract]
  300. Korn JH 1985 Substrain heterogeneity in prostaglandin E2 synthesis of human orbital fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum 28:315–322[Medline]
  301. Korn JH, Brinckerhoff CE, Edwards RL 1985 Synthesis of PGE2, collagenase and tissue factor substrains: substrains are differentially activated for different metabolic products. Coll Relat Res 5:437–447[Medline]
  302. Korn JH 1983 Fibroblast prostaglandin E2 synthesis. J Clin Invest 71:1240–1246
  303. Sisson JC, Spaugh BI, Vanderburg JA 1970 Functional aspects of fibroblasts derived from the retrobular tissue of man. Exp Eye Res 10:201–206[CrossRef][Medline]
  304. Sisson JC 1971 Stimulation of glucose utilization and glycosaminoglycans production by fibroblast derived from retrobulbar tissue. Exp Eye Res 12:285–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  305. Sisson JC, Vanderburg JA 1972 Lymphocyte-retrobulbar fibroblast interaction: mechanisms by which stimulation occurs and inhibition of stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol 11:15–20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  306. Smith TJ 1984 Dexamethasone regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in cultured human skin fibroblasts: similar effects of glucocorticoid and thyroid hormones. J Clin Invest 74:2157–2163
  307. Smith TJ, Murata Y, Horwitz AL, Philipson L, Refetoff S 1982 Regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis by thyroid hormone in vitro. J Clin Invest 70:1066–1073
  308. Henrikson RC, Smith TJ 1994 Ultrastructure of cultured human orbital fibroblasts. Cell Tissue Res 278:629–631[Medline]
  309. Smith TJ, Kottke RJ, Lum H, Andersen TT 1993 Human orbital fibroblasts in culture bind and respond to endothelin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 265:C138–C142
  310. Berenson CS, Smith TJ 1995 Human orbital fibroblasts in culture express ganglioside profiles distinct from those in dermal fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2668–2674[Abstract]
  311. Smith TJ, Bahn RS, Gorman CA, Cheavens M 1991 Stimulation of glycosaminoglycan accumulation by interferon {gamma} in cultured human retroocular fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1169–1171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  312. Young DA, Evans CH, Smith TJ 1998 Leukoregulin induction of protein expression in human orbital fibroblasts: evidence for anatomical site-restricted cytokine-target cell interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8904–8909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  313. Smith TJ, Ahmed A, Hogg MG, Higgins PJ 1992 Interferon {gamma} is an inducer of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in human orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 263:C24–C29
  314. Hogg MG, Evans CH, Smith TJ 1995 Leukoregulin induces plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in human orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol 269:C359–C366
  315. Smith TJ, Sempowski GD, Wang HS, Del Vecchio PJ, Lippe SD, Phipps RP 1985 Evidence for cellular heterogeneity in primary cultures of human orbital fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2620–2625
  316. Smith TJ, Koumas L, Gagnow AM, Bell A, Sempowski GD, Phipps RP, Sorisky A 2002 Orbital fibroblast heterogeneity may determine the clinical presentation of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:385–392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  317. Koumas L, Phipps RP, Smith TJ 2002 Fibroblast subsets in the human orbit: Thy1+ and Thy1- subpopulations exhibit distinct phenotypes. Eur J Immunol 32:477–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  318. Uretsky SH, Kennerdell JS, Gutai JP 1980 Graves’ ophthalmopathy in childhood and adolescence. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1963–1964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  319. Wang HS, Cao HJ, Winn VD, Rezanka LJ, Frobert Y, Evans CH, Sciaky D, Young DA, Smith TJ 1996 Leukoregulin induction of prostaglandin-endoperoxide H synthase-2 in human orbital fibroblasts. An in vitro model for connective tissue inflammation. J Biol Chem 271:22718–22728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  320. Cao HJ, Smith TJ 1999 Leukoregulin upregulation of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2 expression in human orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol 277:C1075–C1085
  321. Han R, Tsui S, Smith TJ 2002 Up-regulation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis by interleukin-1ß in human orbital fibroblasts involves coordinate induction of prostaglandin-endoperoxide H synthase-2 and glutathione-dependent PGE2 synthase expression. J Biol Chem 277:16355–16364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  322. Fox BS, Li T-K 1993 The effect of PGE2 on murine helper-T-cell lymphokines. Immunomethods 2:255–260[CrossRef]
  323. Brown DM, Warner GL, Ales-Martinez JE, Scott DW, Phipps RP 1992 Prostaglandin E2 induces apoptosis in immature normal and malignant B lymphocytes. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 63:221–229[CrossRef][Medline]
  324. Hu ZQ, Asano K, Seki H, Shimamura T 1995 An essential role of prostaglandin E on mouse mast cell induction. J Immunol 155:2134–2142[Abstract]
  325. Roper R, Phipps RP 1994 Regulation of the immune response by prostaglandin E2. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot Res 22:101–112[Medline]
  326. Cruikshank WW, Center DM, Nisar N, Wu M, Natke B, Theodore AC, Kornfeld H 1994 Molecular and functional analysis of a lymphocyte chemoattractant factor: association of biologic function with CD4 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5109–5113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  327. Zhang Y, Center DM, Wu DMH, Cruikshank WW, Yuan J, Andrews DW, Kornfeld H 1998 Processing and activation of pro-interleukin-16 by caspace-3. J Biol Chem 273:1144–1149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  328. Klimink PA, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM 1999 IL-16 as an anti-inflammatory cytokine in rheumatoid synovitis. J Immunol 162:4293–4299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  329. Keates AC, Castagliuolo I, Cruikshank WW, Oui B, Arseneau KO, Brazer W, Kelly CP 2000 Interleukin 16 is up-regulated in Crohn’s disease and participates in TNBS colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 119:972–982[CrossRef][Medline]
  330. Sekigawa I, Matsushita M, Lee S, Maeda N, Ogasawara H, Kaneko H, Iida N, Hashimoto H 2001 A possible pathogenic role of CD8+ T cells and their derived cytokine, IL-16 in SLE. Autoimmunity 33:37–44
  331. Schall TB, Bacon K, Toy KJ, Goeddel DV 1990 Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature 347:669–671[CrossRef][Medline]
  332. Wong M, Uddin S, Majchrzak B, Huynh T, Proudfoot AEI, Platanias LC, Fish EN 2001 RANTES activates Jak2 and Jak3 to regulate engagement of multiple signaling pathways in T cells. J Biol Chem 276:11427–11431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  333. Simchen C, Lelumann I, Sittig D, Steiner M, Aust G 2000 Expression and regulation of regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted in thyroid tissue of patients with Graves’ disease and thyroid autonomy and in thyroid-derived cell populations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4758–4762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  334. Sciaky D, Brazer W, Center DM, Crukshank WW, Smith TJ 2000 Cultured human fibroblast express constitutive IL-16 mRNA: cytokine induction of active IL-16 protein synthesis through a caspace-3-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 164:3806–3814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  335. Banchereau J, Bazan F, Blanchard D, Briere F, Galizzi JP, van Kooten C, Liu YJ, Rousset F, Saeland S 1994 The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu Rev Immunol 12:881–922[CrossRef][Medline]
  336. Noelle RJ, Roy M, Shepherd DM, Stamenkovic I, Ledbetter JA, Aruffo A 1992 A 39-kDa protein on activated helper T cells binds CD40 and transduces the signal for cognate activation of B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:6550–6554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  337. Zhang Y, Cao HJ, Graf B, Meekins H, Smith TJ, Phipps RP 1998 Cutting edge: CD40 engagement up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in human lung fibroblasts. J Immunol 160:1053–1057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  338. Cao HJ, Wang HS, Zhang Y, Lin HY, Phipps RP, Smith TJ 1998 Activation of human orbital fibroblasts through CD40 engagement results in a dramatic induction of hyaluronan synthesis and prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2 expression: insights into potential pathogenic mechanisms of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Biol Chem 273:29615–29625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  339. Semposki GD, Rozenblit J, Samith TJ, Phipps RP 1998 Human orbital fibroblasts are activated through CD40 to induce proinflammatory cytokine production. Am J Physiol 274:C707–C714
  340. Rotella CM, Zonefrati R, Toccafondi R, Valente WA, Kohn LD 1986 Ability to monoclonal antibodies to the thyrotropin receptor to increase collagen synthesis in human fibroblasts: an assay which appears to measure exophthalmogenic immunoglobulins in Graves’ sera. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 62:357–367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  341. Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1992 Graves’ immunoglobulins and cytokines stimulate the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in cultured Graves’ orbital fibroblasts. Eur J Clin Invest 22:529–537[Medline]
  342. Pritchard J, Horst N, Cruikshank W, Smith TJ 2002 Igs from patients with Graves’ disease induce the expression of T cell chemoattractants in their fibroblasts. J Immunol 168:942–950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  343. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, Fox BA, Le Trong I, Teller DC, Okada T, Stenkamp RE, Yamamoto M, Miyano M 2000 Crystal structure of rhodopsin: AG protein-coupled receptor. Science 289:733–734[Free Full Text]
  344. Dogan RE, Chenthamarakshan V, Holterman MJ, Prabhakar BS 2003 Absence of IL-4, and not suppression of Th2 response, prevents development of experimental autoimmune Graves’ disease. J Immunol 170:2195–2204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  345. Smith TJ 2002 Fibroblast biology in thyroid diseases. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 9:393–400[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. van Steensel, D. Paridaens, B. Schrijver, G. M. Dingjan, P. L. A. van Daele, P. M. van Hagen, W. A. van den Bosch, H. A. Drexhage, H. Hooijkaas, and W. A. Dik
Imatinib Mesylate and AMN107 Inhibit PDGF-Signaling in Orbital Fibroblasts: A Potential Treatment for Graves' Ophthalmopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 3091 - 3098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. S. Postler, M. T. Budak, T. S. Khurana, and N. A. Rubinstein
Influence of hyperthyroid conditions on gene expression in extraocular muscles of rats
Physiol Genomics, May 13, 2009; 37(3): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Douglas, T. H. Brix, C. J. Hwang, L. Hegedus, and T. J. Smith
Divergent Frequencies of IGF-I Receptor-Expressing Blood Lymphocytes in Monozygotic Twin Pairs Discordant for Graves' Disease: Evidence for a Phenotypic Signature Ascribable to Nongenetic Factors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1797 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Perros, C. Neoh, and J. Dickinson
Thyroid eye disease
BMJ, March 6, 2009; 338(mar06_1): b560 - b560.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. Bartalena and M. L. Tanda
Graves' Ophthalmopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., March 5, 2009; 360(10): 994 - 1001.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. S. Douglas, V. Naik, C. J. Hwang, N. F. Afifiyan, A. G. Gianoukakis, D. Sand, S. Kamat, and T. J. Smith
B Cells from Patients with Graves' Disease Aberrantly Express the IGF-1 Receptor: Implications for Disease Pathogenesis
J. Immunol., October 15, 2008; 181(8): 5768 - 5774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N Lois, E Abdelkader, K Reglitz, C Garden, and J G Ayres
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and eye disease
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2008; 92(10): 1304 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
K. K. L. Chong, S. W. Y. Chiang, G. W. K. Wong, P. O. S. Tam, T.-K. Ng, Y.-J. Hu, G. H. F. Yam, D. S. C. Lam, and C.-P. Pang
Association of CTLA-4 and IL-13 Gene Polymorphisms with Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy in Chinese Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2409 - 2415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
A. D. Azezli, T. Bayraktaroglu, and Y. Orhan
The Use of Konjac Glucomannan to Lower Serum Thyroid Hormones in Hyperthyroidism
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2007; 26(6): 663 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
C.-C. Tsai, S.-C. Kao, C.-Y. Cheng, H.-C. Kau, W.-M. Hsu, C.-F. Lee, and Y.-H. Wei
Oxidative Stress Change by Systemic Corticosteroid Treatment Among Patients Having Active Graves Ophthalmopathy
Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2007; 125(12): 1652 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. Cozma, L. Zhang, J. Uddin, C. Lane, A. Rees, and M. Ludgate
Modulation of expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in Graves' ophthalmopathy orbits: relevance to novel analogs
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1630 - E1635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. Kurne, O. F. Aydin, and R. Karabudak
White Matter Alteration in a Patient With Graves' Disease
J Child Neurol, September 1, 2007; 22(9): 1128 - 1131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Jones, N. Horwood, A. Cope, and F. Dazzi
The Antiproliferative Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Is a Fundamental Property Shared by All Stromal Cells
J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2824 - 2831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Menconi, M. Marino, A. Pinchera, R. Rocchi, B. Mazzi, M. Nardi, L. Bartalena, and C. Marcocci
Effects of Total Thyroid Ablation Versus Near-Total Thyroidectomy Alone on Mild to Moderate Graves' Orbitopathy Treated with Intravenous Glucocorticoids
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1653 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
T. Taylor and C. Czarnowski
Asymmetric ophthalmopathy in a hypothyroid patient
Can Fam Physician, April 1, 2007; 53(4): 635 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. S. Douglas, A. G. Gianoukakis, S. Kamat, and T. J. Smith
Aberrant Expression of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor by T Cells from Patients with Graves' Disease May Carry Functional Consequences for Disease Pathogenesis
J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 3281 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
I. J Bujalska, O. M Durrani, J. Abbott, C. U Onyimba, P. Khosla, A. H Moosavi, T. T Q Reuser, P. M Stewart, J. W Tomlinson, E. A Walker, et al.
Characterisation of 11{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 in human orbital adipose tissue: a comparison with subcutaneous and omental fat
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 192(2): 279 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. J. Cawood, P. Moriarty, C. O'Farrelly, and D. O'Shea
Smoking and Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: A Novel Explanation of the Biological Link
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 59 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
E B. Y. Konuk, O. Konuk, M. Misirlioglu, A. Menevse, and M. Unal
Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in orbital fibroadipose connective tissues of Graves' ophthalmopathy patients.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(5): 681 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. E. Feldon, C. W. O'Loughlin, D. M. Ray, S. Landskroner-Eiger, K. E. Seweryniak, and R. P. Phipps
Activated Human T Lymphocytes Express Cyclooxygenase-2 and Produce Proadipogenic Prostaglandins that Drive Human Orbital Fibroblast Differentiation to Adipocytes
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 169(4): 1183 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
T J Cawood, P Moriarty, C O'Farrelly, and D O'Shea
The effects of tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} and interleukin1 on an in vitro model of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy; contrasting effects on adipogenesis
Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 155(3): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Conte, A. Arcaro, D. D'Angelo, A. Gnata, G. Mamone, P. Ferranti, S. Formisano, and F. Gentile
A Single Chondroitin 6-Sulfate Oligosaccharide Unit at Ser-2730 of Human Thyroglobulin Enhances Hormone Formation and Limits Proteolytic Accessibility at the Carboxyl Terminus: POTENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO THYROID HOMEOSTASIS AND AUTOIMMUNITY
J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 2006; 281(31): 22200 - 22211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
O. F. Lai, N. Zaiden, S. S. Goh, N.-E. Mohamed, L. L. Seah, K. S. Fong, V. Estienne, P. Carayon, S. C. Ho, and D. H C Khoo
Detection of thyroid peroxidase mRNA and protein in orbital tissue.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 213 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Chen, S. Tsui, W. E. Boeglin, R. S. Douglas, A. R. Brash, and T. J. Smith
Interleukin-4 Induces 15-Lipoxygenase-1 Expression in Human Orbital Fibroblasts from Patients with Graves Disease: EVIDENCE FOR ANATOMIC SITE-SELECTIVE ACTIONS OF Th2 CYTOKINES
J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18296 - 18306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
D. El Fassi, C. H Nielsen, H. C Hasselbalch, and L. Hegedus
The rationale for B lymphocyte depletion in Graves' disease. Monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy as a novel treatment option.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 154(5): 623 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. A. Gilbert, A. G. Gianoukakis, S. Salehi, J. Moorhead, P. V. Rao, M. Z. Khan, A. M. McGregor, T. J. Smith, and J. P. Banga
Monoclonal pathogenic antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor in Graves' disease with potent thyroid-stimulating activity but differential blocking activity activate multiple signaling pathways.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 5084 - 5092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. Land, P. Gudapati, M. H. Kaplan, and G. S. Seetharamaiah
Differential Requirement of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-4 (Stat4) and Stat6 in a Thyrotropin Receptor-289-Adenovirus-Induced Model of Graves' Hyperthyroidism
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. E. Feldon, D. J. J. Park, C. W. O'Loughlin, V. T. Nguyen, S. Landskroner-Eiger, D. Chang, T. H. Thatcher, and R. P. Phipps
Autologous T-Lymphocytes Stimulate Proliferation of Orbital Fibroblasts Derived from Patients with Graves' Ophthalmopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 3913 - 3921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. McLachlan, Y. Nagayama, and B. Rapoport
Insight into Graves' Hyperthyroidism from Animal Models
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 800 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. J. Kahaly, S. Pitz, G. Hommel, and M. Dittmar
Randomized, Single Blind Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Steroid Monotherapy in Graves' Orbitopathy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5234 - 5240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Lantz, T. Vondrichova, H. Parikh, C. Frenander, M. Ridderstrale, P. Asman, M. Aberg, L. Groop, and B. Hallengren
Overexpression of Immediate Early Genes in Active Graves' Ophthalmopathy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4784 - 4791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. N. Cunningham and R. J. Quigg
Contrasting Roles of Complement Activation and Its Regulation in Membranous Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2005; 16(5): 1214 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Han and T. J. Smith
Induction by IL-1{beta} of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 in Human Orbital Fibroblasts: Modulation of Gene Promoter Activity by IL-4 and IFN-{gamma}
J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 3072 - 3079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. L. Wemeau, P. Caron, A. Beckers, V. Rohmer, J. Orgiazzi, F. Borson-Chazot, M. Nocaudie, P. Perimenis, S. Bisot-Locard, I. Bourdeix, et al.
Octreotide (Long-Acting Release Formulation) Treatment in Patients with Graves' Orbitopathy: Clinical Results of a Four-Month, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 841 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Baker, G. Mazziotti, C. von Ruhland, and M. Ludgate
Reevaluating Thyrotropin Receptor-Induced Mouse Models of Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Costagliola, M. Bonomi, N. G. Morgenthaler, J. Van Durme, V. Panneels, S. Refetoff, and G. Vassart
Delineation of the Discontinuous-Conformational Epitope of a Monoclonal Antibody Displaying Full in Vitro and in Vivo Thyrotropin Activity
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 18(12): 3020 - 3034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C.-R. Chen, H. Aliesky, P. N. Pichurin, Y. Nagayama, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Susceptibility Rather than Resistance to Hyperthyroidism Is Dominant in a Thyrotropin Receptor Adenovirus-Induced Animal Model of Graves' Disease as Revealed by BALB/c-C57BL/6 Hybrid Mice
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 4927 - 4933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Pritchard, S. Tsui, N. Horst, W. W. Cruikshank, and T. J. Smith
Synovial Fibroblasts from Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Like Fibroblasts from Graves' Disease, Express High Levels of IL-16 When Treated with Igs against Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor
J. Immunol., September 1, 2004; 173(5): 3564 - 3569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. Cawood, P. Moriarty, and D. O'Shea
Recent developments in thyroid eye disease
BMJ, August 14, 2004; 329(7462): 385 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals