help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints, Permissions and Rights
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmondson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wraight, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edmondson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wraight, C. J.
Endocrine Reviews 24 (6): 737-764
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Epidermal Homeostasis: The Role of the Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Systems

Stephanie R. Edmondson, Susan P. Thumiger, George A. Werther and Christopher J. Wraight

Centre for Hormone Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Stephanie Edmondson, Center for Hormone Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052. E-mail: stephanie.edmondson{at}mcri.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
GH and IGF-I and -II were first identified by their endocrine activity. Specifically, IGF-I was found to mediate the linear growth-promoting actions of GH. It is now evident that these two growth factor systems also exert widespread activity throughout the body and that their actions are not always interconnected. The literature highlights the importance of the GH and IGF systems in normal skin homeostasis, including dermal/epidermal cross-talk. GH activity, sometimes mediated via IGF-I, is primarily evident in the dermis, particularly affecting collagen synthesis. In contrast, IGF action is an important feature of the dermal and epidermal compartments, predominantly enhancing cell proliferation, survival, and migration. The locally expressed IGF binding proteins play significant and complex roles, primarily via modulation of IGF actions. Disturbances in GH and IGF signaling pathways are implicated in the pathophysiology of several skin perturbations, particularly those exhibiting epidermal hyperplasia (e.g., psoriasis, carcinomas). Additionally, many studies emphasize the potential use of both growth factors in the treatment of skin wounds; for example, burn patients. This overview concerns the role and mechanisms of action of the GH and IGF systems in skin and maintenance of epidermal integrity in both health and disease.

I. Introduction
II. The GH System
A. GH and GHR/GHBP
B. GH physiology

III. IGF System
A. IGFs and IGF receptors
B. IGF physiology
C. IGFBPs

IV. Skin Structure and Function
A. Layers, cell types, and appendages
B. Epidermal growth and differentiation

V. GH and the IGF System in the Dermis
A. Expression and actions of components of the GH system
B. Expression and actions of components of the IGF system

VI. GH and the IGF System in the Epidermis
A. Expression and action of components of the GH system
B. Expression and actions of components of the IGF system

VII. Epidermal Dysplasia: Involvement of GH and the IGF System
A. Psoriasis
B. Papillomas and IGFBP-3
C. Melanocytic lesions: from benign to malignant
D. Transgenic mouse models: multistage carcinogenesis

VIII. Wound Healing
A. GH: natural and therapeutic effects
B. IGFs: natural and therapeutic effects
C. IGFBPs: regulation and usefulness in wound healing
D. Gene therapy: a novel avenue for treatment of wounds

IX. Summary and Discussion


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
A ROLE FOR the GH and IGF systems in skin homeostasis is evidenced by an ever-increasing number of studies, from clinical observations to analyses in animal models and at the molecular level. Investigations have focused on how the GH and IGF systems could impact on normal skin growth and development and skin perturbations, including wound healing. Analysis of the GH and IGF systems in skin growth, development, maintenance, and repair has arisen from: 1) the clinical observation that an excess or absence of serum GH correlates with phenotypic changes in the skin (1, 2); 2) the knowledge that IGF-I can mediate some of the actions of GH, combined with the observation that components of the GH and IGF systems exhibit widespread tissue distribution and thus presumably regulate cellular function (3, 4, 5, 6); 3) the accumulating evidence that constitutive IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling is a feature of many neoplasms (7, 8); 4) the motivation to improve the treatment of perturbed skin growth, including benign (e.g., psoriatic) and malignant (basal and squamous cell carcinomas) epidermal hyperplasias as well as conditions of wound healing (9, 10, 11, 12); and 5) the desire to clarify the mechanisms of action of GH and IGFs at the cellular and tissue level (13).

The following review concerns the role of both the GH and IGF systems in skin. More specifically, a primary aim of this review is to summarize the advances in our understanding of how the GH and IGF systems impact on the growth, differentiation, and maintenance of two major cell types of the epidermis: keratinocytes and melanocytes. Although particular emphasis is given to human skin, relevant animal models are also discussed. The role of the GH and IGF systems in the growth and development of skin appendages, including hair, is not covered in this precis but is covered by several recent reviews (5, 14, 15, 16). The review is divided into three broad areas: 1) brief background concerning the GH and IGF systems; 2) the actions of GH and IGFs in the dermis; and 3) the role of GH and IGFs in epidermal homeostasis.


    II. The GH System
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
The GH system comprises the ligand (GH), the GH receptor (GHR), and the GH binding protein (GHBP). GH was first recognized by its endocrine activity and the critical role it plays in postnatal linear growth in mammals (17). The "Somatomedin hypothesis" arose from the observation that growth was stimulated by pituitary-derived GH and was mediated by IGF-I (18). In particular, the hypothesis suggested that endocrine GH targeted liver GHRs, stimulated the production of IGF-I and then endocrine IGF-I targeted organs, including growth plate cartilage, and growth resulted. The Somatomedin hypothesis has been modified (19) because it is now apparent that 1) GH acts via GHRs expressed by a range of cells besides the liver (20, 21, 22, 23); 2) GH mRNA and protein are expressed in extrapituitary sites and close to GHR expression (suggesting paracrine/autocrine action) (23, 24, 25, 26); 3) GH does not solely rely on IGF-I to mediate its action (27, 28, 29); 4) IGF-I exhibits widespread tissue expression (including skin) and is not always reliant on GH for expression (22); and 5) not all circulating IGF-I is derived from the liver (19, 30, 31). Nonetheless, a recent study provides compelling evidence that normal bone growth and density require a threshold level of circulating IGF-I, presumably via pituitary-derived GH stimulation (32).

A. GH and GHR/GHBP
Pituitary GH secretion occurs in a pulsatile fashion and is modulated by multiple factors including GH-releasing hormone, somatostatin, ghrelin, glucocorticoids, sex hormones, age, body composition, nutritional status, and diabetes (33, 34, 35, 36, 37).

The human GHR gene codes for a transmembrane receptor and a truncated form (GHRtr) lacking most of the cytoplasmic domain (38, 39, 40, 41, 42). The GHBP, which corresponds to the extracellular portion of the GHR, regulates plasma GH abundance, and at the cellular level GHBP (and GHRtr) can act in a dominant-negative manner with GHR by blocking the binding of free GH (39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46).

GH signal transduction involves GHR dimerization, activation of JAK-2 (janus kinase), and JAK-2 phosphorylation of multiple intracellular GHR tyrosine residues (reviewed in Refs. 47, 48, 49). Several different signaling pathways may then be triggered, including signal transducers and activators of transcription, MAP (mitogen-activated protein), and PI-3 (phophatidyl-inositol-3') kinase (50). The PI-3 kinase pathway requires IRS (insulin receptor substrate) and may therefore explain the ability of GH to exhibit insulin-like activity (51, 52, 53).

B. GH physiology
At the cellular level, the growth-promoting actions of GH are due to stimulation of proliferation and/or differentiation in a range of cells or tissues including skin (54, 55, 56, 57). Direct GH-stimulated differentiation, via GHRs, has been observed in a rat preadipocyte cell line (27, 58) and growth plate chondrocytes (59, 60). The metabolic actions of GH are numerous, affect almost every tissue, and may also be mediated by local or circulating IGF-I (61). For example, GH can exhibit chronic antiinsulin-like actions both in vitro and in vivo and acute insulin-like effects, demonstrated in vitro in adipocytes and in an animal model (50, 62, 63, 64). GH excess leads to overgrowth of various organs including skin (65), whereas GH deficiency (or GHR loss) results in short stature and other phenotypic disturbances (66, 67). GH-deficient adults before and after GH treatment also reveal the importance of GH in a range of tissues or body compartments including muscle, bone, heart, and the vascular system (61).


    III. IGF System
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
The IGF system is comprised of two ligands (IGF-I and -II), the IGF receptors (types I and II), six IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), and a range of IGFBP proteases. Each component of the IGF system is subject to temporal and tissue-specific regulation in response to numerous factors including hormones, growth factors, developmental status, and physiological condition, including nutrition, injury, and disease (13, 68). Although the IGFs were originally identified as endocrine factors, the juxtaposition of the various proteins of the IGF system in tissues enables IGFs to act in an autocrine and/or paracrine manner (13, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73). The skin provides an excellent example in which exquisite regulation of components of the IGF system contribute to tissue homeostasis (refer to Sections V.B and VI.B). Numerous reviews describe in detail various aspects of the IGF system (e.g., Refs. 13 and 74, 75, 76).

A. IGFs and IGF receptors
IGFs were first identified in serum by their ability to mediate the actions of GH (77) and then by their nonsuppressible insulin-like activity (78). IGF-I and IGF-II are 60% homologous at the amino acid level and exhibit significant homology to insulin (79, 80, 81, 82, 83). Unlike IGF-I, IGF-II is generally not under the control of GH (84).

The biological activity of IGFs is transduced by the IGF-IR, a member of the family of transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors (85, 86, 87, 88). IGF-I exhibits a 2- to 15-fold greater affinity than IGF-II for the IGF-IR (74). The IGF ligands and insulin have weak affinities and actions for each other’s receptors (13, 87, 89, 90, 91). After ligand binding and IGF-IR autophosphorylation, adaptor molecules (including IRS-1 or IRS-2) utilize one of several pathways, including PI-3 kinase and/or MAPK to transmit a signal to the cell nucleus (reviewed in Refs. 76 and 92, 93, 94, 95, 96). Although the IGF-IR signaling pathways converge with the insulin receptor (IR) and other growth factor-initiated signaling pathways (including GHR), receptor-specific features ensure distinct responses (76, 92, 97, 98).

The IGF-IIR, which is identical to the mannose-6-phosphate receptor (M-6-PR), binds IGF-II with much greater affinity than IGF-I but does not play a direct role in IGF signaling (99). Although the major role of this receptor is to traffic lysosomal enzymes that contain M-6-P residues, it may regulate IGF-II availability (100, 101, 102).

B. IGF physiology
Transgenic mice in which specific components of the IGF system are ablated confirm the role of IGFs in somatic growth, specific tissue/organ development and indicate that each peptide exerts its growth-promoting actions at distinct developmental stages (102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108). IGF-IR null mice are severely growth retarded, die perinatally, and exhibit a perturbed epidermis (discussed in Section VI.B) (103). The growth-promoting actions of IGFs are attributed to their potent mitogenic action (74, 109, 110, 111). Prodifferentiation effects are evidenced in many cell types including those of hemopoetic origin, myoblasts, adipocytes, osteoblasts, and cells of the central nervous system (74). IGFs also exhibit strong antiapoptotic activity (112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117). Aberrant expression of components of the IGF system has been described in a range of malignant tumors and cell lines, thus implicating this system in the tumorigenic phenotype (112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118).

IGFs stimulate several cellular functions associated with a differentiated phenotype including hormone secretion, extracellular matrix (ECM) expression, chemotaxis, and cell recognition (74, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125). The major insulin-like effects of IGF-I include glucose uptake, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis but not glucose oxidation (126). Acute hypoglycemic effects are reduced by IGFs being bound to IGFBPs in serum (127).

C. IGFBPs
The family of structurally-related IGFBPs (-1 to -6) bind IGFs with high (but varying) affinity; exhibit widespread serum, tissue, and extravascular fluid distribution (13, 75, 128, 129), and thus: 1) regulate ligand availability and half-life in the serum and interstitial compartment (130, 131); 2) modulate the IGF/IGF-IR interaction (132); 3) augment or inhibit IGF action (133, 134); and 4) exhibit IGF-independent activity (135). Hence, IGFBPs are multifunctional. Consequently, IGFBPs provide another level of complexity by modulating all aspects of endocrine-, paracrine-, and autocrine-specific cellular IGF activity (13, 75, 129).

IGFBP-specific actions, both IGF-dependent and -independent, are attributed to several distinct structural features (e.g., heparin binding motifs) and posttranslational modifications (e.g., glycosylation, phosphorylation) that are not necessarily mutually exclusive (136). Every IGFBP may be subject to distinct proteolytic cleavage that alters IGF affinity and/or association with cell membranes or ECM proteins and ultimately modulates targeting of IGF with cell membrane-bound receptors (137). Generally, proteolysis of an IGFBP results in reduced ligand affinity, increased stimulation of IGF-IRs, and enhancement of IGF action (129, 137). Cleavage of IGFBPs also results in specific fragments that can exhibit IGF-independent cellular activity (discussed in Section III.C).

IGFBPs may mediate or augment apoptotic activity induced by many growth factors, hormones, or cellular stressors (e.g., TNF{alpha}; Ref. 138), TGFß (139), UV irradiation, and serum starvation (140, 141, 142, 143). IGFBP-3 is a transcriptional target of the proapoptotic, tumor suppressor protein p53 (140). Apoptosis involving IGFBP-3, however, is not always reliant on p53 activity and vice versa (144). The proapoptotic activity of IGFBPs is primarily attributed to sequestering antiapoptotic IGFs (141).

The IGF-independent activities of IGFBPs include cellular migration, stimulation or inhibition of proliferation, and proapoptotic activity (129, 135, 145). IGFBP-1 directly interacts with {alpha}5ß1 integrin and stimulates human trophoblast migration (146). IGFBP-3 can stimulate apoptosis in IGF-IR null fibroblasts (144). Proteolytically derived IGFBP-3 or -5 fragments, in the absence of IGFs, can inhibit or stimulate cellular proliferation (147, 148, 149, 150, 151).

Although IGFBPs display IGF-independent activity, a definitive membrane-associated receptor that may signal such action remains elusive (144, 152). IGFBP-3 can, however, interact with the type V TGFß receptor and prevent TGFß interaction in mink lung epithelial cells (153, 154). Recent analyses in breast cancer cells further implicate the TGFßR family in IGFBP-3 cell signaling. Specifically, IGFBP-3 required TGF-ßRII to stimulate phosphorylation of TGF-ßRI and the signaling proteins Smad2 and Smad3, to ultimately modulate gene transcription and elicit an inhibitory growth response (155).

A nuclear role for IGFBPs has also been postulated (156). IGFBP-3 was localized to the nucleus of several cultured cell lines, including epidermal keratinocytes (157, 158, 159). Nuclear uptake of IGFBP-3 and -5 requires a nuclear localization sequence (156, 160). Subsequent yeast-two hybrid analyses revealed that IGFBP-3 associated with the nuclear receptor retinoid-X-receptor {alpha} (RXR-{alpha}; Ref. 161) and the nucleolar localized E7 oncoprotein derived from the human type 16 papillomavirus (162, 163) (further discussed in Sections VI.BandVII.B).


    IV. Skin Structure and Function
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
A. Layers, cell types, and appendages
Skin is comprised of three broad layers: the epidermis, the dermis, and the hypodermis (subcutis) (Fig. 1Go). The epidermis is a stratified and dynamic structure, comprised primarily (95%) of many layers of differentiating keratinocytes. Nonkeratinocyte cell types found within the epidermis are melanocytes, Langerhans cells, and Merkel cells. Langerhans cells have an immunological function, and Merkle cells may play a role in sensory perception (164). Melanocytes, specialized neural crest-derived cells, are located between keratinocytes in the basal layer of the epidermis and provide protection against UV irradiation-induced sunburn, photocarcinogenesis, and photoaging. Melanin is produced in cytoplasmic organelles (melanosomes) and is transferred via dendritic projections of the melanocytes to keratinocytes (165). Melanin pigment protects the nuclei of dividing cells from the DNA-damaging effects of UV radiation, results in the tanning of skin, and is also responsible for "basal" skin color (see Ref. 166 for a review of melanocytes). Anatomically, the ratio of melanocytes to keratinocytes is approximately 1:36, and this arrangement is termed the epidermal/melanin unit (167). Multiple long dendritic projections enable single melanocytes to contact approximately 36 basal and suprabasal keratinocytes and thus allow for the widespread distribution of melanin pigment (168). The juxtaposition of melanocytes and keratinocytes is critical, rather like a symbiotic relationship.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of skin structure. Skin is divided into three major layers: the outer epidermis, inner dermis, and hypodermis (subcutis). The epidermis is comprised of several layers of morphologically distinct keratinocytes and sits on a basement membrane of ECM proteins. Melanocytes are located between keratinocytes of the basal layer of the epidermis. Dermal appendages include hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and sweat glands. Fibroblasts, nerve cells, and a vascular network are located in the dermis. The hypodermis is primarily comprised of adipocytes.

 
A basement membrane, rich in ECM proteins (including collagen type IV, epiligrin, laminin, fibronectin, nidogen, and heparin sulfate proteoglycans), separates the epidermis and the dermis and facilitates diffusion of nutrients and growth factors between the two layers (169). The basement membrane also ensures attachment of basal keratinocytes and is a critical regulator of keratinocyte differentiation (170).

The dermis provides a supporting matrix, which includes collagen and elastin, for extensive vascular and nerve networks. Fibroblasts are the predominant cells in the dermis along with endothelial cells and mast cells. Under conditions that may involve the immune system (such as wound healing and psoriasis), macrophages, lymphocytes, and leukocytes are also found in the dermis (164, 171). The hypodermis (subcutis) underlies the dermal layer and is comprised of adipocytes (fat cells) that are essential for energy storage and metabolism while contributing to insulation and protection against injury (164). Several appendages, comprised of both dermal and epidermal components, provide various functions including thermal control and protective covering. These include hair, sweat glands (apocrine and eccrine), and sebaceous glands (164).

B. Epidermal growth and differentiation
Keratinocyte differentiation involves a continuous and complex, but exquisitely choreographed, series of biochemical and morphological transformations that lead to terminally differentiated corneocytes that are eventually shed from the skin surface (172). Epidermal differentiation is associated with a cessation of proliferation, the induction of cellular migration, and ultimately cell death, and is thus considered a form of apoptosis. The process of keratinocyte differentiation takes 2–4 wk in humans (173) and is essential for maintaining the epidermal barrier. Each stage of keratinocyte differentiation is represented by a specific layer of the epidermis: basal, suprabasal/spinous, granular, transit, and cornified (Fig. 2Go). Because keratinocyte differentiation is a carefully ordered process, specific gene products (e.g., structural proteins, growth factors, and enzymes) are expressed in a temporal and cell-specific manner and therefore reflect a distinct stage.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes. Keratinocyte differentiation begins in the basal layer where selected daughters of SC become TA cells. After a finite number of cell divisions, TA cells withdraw from the cell cycle and commit to the process of terminal differentiation. PMD cells eventually detach from the basement membrane and move to the suprabasal layer where they continue to metamorphose as they migrate upward through the layers of the epidermis (basal, spinous, granular, cornified). Many local factors modulate keratinocyte differentiation, including an increasing calcium gradient. BM, Basement membrane (refer to Section IV.B). Circular green arrow on SC indicates that keratinocyte SC undergo self-renewal through cell division. Green arrows indicate progression of keratinocytes.

 
The process of keratinocyte differentiation begins in the basal layer and involves cross-talk between cells of the dermis and epidermis via growth factors [including the epidermal growth factors (EGFs) (174) and TGFs (175)], the vitamin-D receptor system (176), retinoid nuclear hormone receptor system (including RXR{alpha} and RAR{gamma}) (177) and ECM proteins (including integrins) (178, 179). Calcium (Ca2+) is another important regulator of keratinocyte differentiation. A steep intra- and intercellular Ca2+ gradient exists within the epidermis (180, 181, 182). More specifically, in murine epidermis basal and spinous keratinocytes are situated in an environment in which the extracellular Ca2+ is significantly lower than that of serum. Furthermore, low levels of intracellular Ca2+ are detected in these keratinocyte subtypes. In contrast, the granular and transit layer cells exhibit high extracellular and intracellular Ca2+ reservoirs. The cornified exhibits low intra- and extracellular Ca2+ levels. In corroboration with these studies, human and murine keratinocytes grown in low Ca2+ medium (0.05–0.1 mM) exhibit a proliferative response, but when the Ca2+ is increased to above 1 mM proliferation decreases and stratification or cornification of keratinocytes is induced (183, 184, 185, 186).

Several groups have confirmed that three keratinocyte cell subtypes exist in the basal layer: stem cells (SC), transit-amplifying (TA) cells, and postmitotic differentiating (PMD) cells; a model of keratinocyte differentiation has been used for some years (Fig. 2Go) (170, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191). Epidermal SC provide a reservoir of keratinocytes that are capable of self-renewal with a high proliferative potential and are therefore critical for the continued growth and maintenance of the epidermal integument (189, 190, 191, 192, 193). With the induction of keratinocyte differentiation, selected progeny of SC become TA cells. After a finite number of cell divisions, TA cells withdraw from the cell cycle and commit to the process of terminal differentiation. Committed cells (PMD cells) eventually detach from the basement membrane and move to the suprabasal layer where they continue to metamorphose as they migrate upward through the layers of the epidermis. Thus, proliferative keratinocytes are found only in the basal layer.


    V. GH and the IGF System in the Dermis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
Clinical observations (Section V.A.2) combined with the accessibility and ease of culturing dermal fibroblasts from a range of species has led to their widespread use as model cells for understanding the expression and mechanisms of action of both the GH and IGF systems. The next section focuses on and summarizes the studies that highlight the expression, regulation, and mechanisms of action of GH and IGFs by dermal fibroblasts (including human, murine, and bovine).

A. Expression and actions of components of the GH system
1. Expression.
Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization analyses indicate that GHR/GHBP protein and mRNA expression exhibit ontogenic regulation in the skin of a number of species. Initial immunohistochemical analysis, utilizing an antibody that recognizes both GHR and GHBP protein, in neonatal and adult skin from humans, rats, and rabbits revealed GHR/GHBP-positive staining in a range of dermal structures including fibroblasts, dermal papillae of hair follicles, Schwann cells of peripheral nerve fascicles, skeletal muscle cells, adipocytes, medial smooth muscle, and endothelial cells of arteries. Subsequent studies using a GHBP-specific antibody indicated that GHBP and GHR distribution correlated in rat skin (194). Lincoln et al. (195) published a more thorough analysis of GHR/GHBP immunoreactivity in normal and neoplastic tissue and cells from humans, confirming the presence of GHR/BP in the dermal cells.

A role for GH in dermal growth during fetal development is supported by the temporal and tissue-specific expression of GHR/BP protein and mRNAs in both humans and rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of human tissue indicates that GHR/BP protein is present in dermal fibroblasts as early as 8.5 wk gestation and remains present at 15–20 wk (21, 196). In situ hybridization analysis of fetal and adult rats indicates GHR/BP gene expression in cells of the dermis as early as embryonic d 16.5 (22, 197, 198). In adult male rats, GHR and GHBP distinct mRNA species were also localized to fibroblasts, adipocytes, and skeletal muscle cells (197).

Cultured adult and fetal human dermal fibroblasts express GHR/BP mRNA and protein, providing further evidence for skin as a direct GH target (21, 57, 199, 200). GH mRNA has also been detected via RT-PCR in cultured human fibroblasts (201).

2. Actions of GH.
A role for GH in skin growth and development is strongly supported by clinical states of GH excess. Acromegalic patients exhibit increased GH levels; thickened, coarse, and oily skin; skin tags; and acanthosis nigricans (1). Normalization of GH levels in acromegalics leads to a decrease in skin thickness and thus indicates that the effects of GH in the skin are reversible (202). In contrast, patients lacking GHR activity (Laron syndrome) and those with GH deficiency display thin skin and/or reduced elasticity due to a reduction in dermal thickness (2, 66, 203, 204).

Further clinical evidence for GH action on skin has been demonstrated by the advent of GH therapy. Patients with GH deficiency or low IGF-I plasma levels exhibit an increase in skin thickness (affecting dermis) and stiffness after GH treatment (205, 206). Treatment of GH-deficient men revealed that GH could augment the androgenic effects on pubic hair development in the skin (207). In further support, male GH-transgenic mice exhibit a greater increase in skin thickness and skin surface area when compared with their female counterparts (208). Castration of these mice prevents the increase in skin thickness and thus confirms a role for synergy between GH and androgens in skin growth. The observed effects of GH on skin thickness, and in some cases mechanical strength, are primarily due to an increase in collagen content in the dermis and are not due to epidermal expansion (208, 209, 210). More controversial is the nonlicensed use of GH as an antiaging treatment regime for rejuvenating skin (often advertised via the Internet). Although GH treatment may enhance dermal collagen content, and thus increase skin thickness, there is no scientific evidence to support the use of this hormone for esthetic improvement of skin.

GH can bind to cultured human fibroblasts (211), via GHRs, and elicit a proliferative response (55, 57, 200, 212). Akin to liver tissue, GH up-regulates IGF-I mRNA and IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein expression of cultured human fibroblasts (200, 213). Studies of GH action on avian fibroblasts revealed that GH alone can stimulate the production of collagen (214). In addition, IGF-I can synergize with GH and increase collagen production to levels greater than that achieved by either growth factor alone and provides further explanation for the increase in dermal thickness seen in conditions of GH excess (1).

B. Expression and actions of components of the IGF system
1. Expression of IGF system components.
All components of the IGF system are produced by dermal fibroblasts. Cultured fetal and postnatal human dermal fibroblasts produce IGFs (I and II), particularly in response to numerous factors including GH (213, 215). In addition, IGF-I mRNA and protein are expressed by dermal fibroblasts in human skin sections (216). Both the IGF-IR and IGF-IIR are expressed by cultured human fetal and postnatal dermal fibroblasts (217, 218, 219). IGF-IR has been detected by immunohistochemical technology in dermal fibroblasts of infant and adult human skin (220).

In situ hybridization analyses by our group localized IGFBP-4 and -5 mRNAs to dermal fibroblasts in adult human skin (221). In contrast, cultured human fibroblasts express IGFBP-3, -4, -5, and -6 (222, 223, 224). The discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro fibroblast-derived IGFBP profiles could be due to the limitations in the sensitivity of in situ hybridization or may be a reflection of factors that are present or absent in the culture medium. Interstitial fluid, derived from artificially raised blisters, contains IGFBP-1, -2, -3, and -4 (225). IGFBP-3 is predominantly present as a proteolytically cleaved fragment of 29 kDa (225, 226, 227). The origin of IGFBPs in blister fluid is not known and may include serum or dermal and epidermal cells.

In vitro, the expression profile of fibroblast-derived IGFBPs is differentially regulated by a wide range of local or systemic factors, including IGFs (228, 229), GH (200, 213), TGFß1 (224), estradiol (213), testosterone (230), and glucocorticoids (231).

Aging affects the biological functioning of fibroblasts both in vivo and in vitro, and this difference may be in part due to changes in IGF responsiveness. Although similar levels of IGF-IRs are expressed, only young, and not senescent, human fibroblasts proliferate in response to IGF-I stimulation in vitro (232). In addition, senescent fibroblasts fail to express IGF-I mRNA, thus indicating that potential autocrine IGF-I action is ablated (233). Late passage adult fibroblasts, those derived from Werner syndrome patients (who exhibit premature aging), and senescent fibroblasts express higher levels of IGFBP-3 when compared with fetal or younger fibroblasts (234, 235, 236, 237). Furthermore, elevated IGFBP-3 expression by senescent fibroblasts in vitro significantly reduces IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis via sequestration of the ligand and thus highlights another potential mechanism for ablation of paracrine IGF-I action in vivo (237).

2. Actions of IGF.
IGF actions on fibroblasts may include proliferation (238), survival (239), migration (240), and production of growth factors including TGFß1 (241) that may act locally or exert paracrine effects in the epidermis. Fibroblast-derived ECM components are regulated by IGF-I. For example, IGF-I stimulates collagen and inhibits collagenase production (124, 125, 242). Numerous locally and systemically derived factors regulate IGF-I action on fibroblasts. For example, IGF-I can synergize with platelet-derived growth factor (74) or glucocorticoids (231) to enhance proliferation or the production of specific factors in vitro.

The IGF-II/M-6-PR may also play a role in fibroblast proliferation via TGFß1 activation (243). Latent TGFß1 is activated by binding to IGF-II/M-6-PR and undergoing a conformational change. Although produced by dermal fibroblasts, TGFß1 may also be derived from the epidermis (244, 245, 246). Thus, epidermal-to-dermal interaction (247) may be regulated via fibroblast IGF-II/M-6-PR levels.

Fibroblasts have been used extensively as a model cell for elucidating the mechanisms of IGFBP action, often using proliferation or DNA synthesis as an end-point of cellular function (13). Such analyses indicate that depending upon the experimental parameters, IGFBPs can augment or inhibit IGF-I-stimulated proliferation. For example, IGFBP-3 inhibits IGF-stimulated proliferation via sequestration of the ligand from IGF-IRs (133). In contrast, pretreatment of fibroblasts with IGFBP-3 leads to cell membrane association and proteolysis of IGFBP-3, a reduction in affinity for IGF-I, and ultimately potentiation of IGF-I-stimulated proliferation via modulation of PI-3 kinase activation (133, 134, 248). IGFBP-3, via cell membrane association, can modulate the fibroblast IGF-I/IGF-IR interaction independent of its ability to sequester the ligand (149). Whether IGFBP-3 directly interacts with the IGF-IR to inhibit or displace ligand binding remains to be determined. It is also possible that IGFBP-3 may affect fibroblast IGF-IR signaling via interaction with a putative IGFBP cell membrane receptor (152, 249) (Section III.C). The ECM surrounding fibroblasts also affects IGFBP activity. When fibroblast-derived, phosphorylated IGFBP-5 associates with the ECM, it has a lowered affinity for IGF-I that leads to potentiation of IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis (250).

Proteases and protease inhibitors are involved in the complicated cross-talk between components of the IGF system in modulating fibroblast IGF activity (228, 251, 253). An IGF-II-dependent protease (pregnancy-associated plasma protein) that cleaves IGFBP-4, and thus enhances IGF-I-stimulated proliferation, has been identified and characterized in human fibroblast cultures (253, 254, 255). It is also possible that local IGFBP-3, via binding of IGF-II, may play a role in modulating the activity of fibroblast-derived, IGF-II-dependent IGFBP-4 protease (256). Local proteolytic fragments of IGFBPs may also alter fibroblast proliferation. Proteolytic fragments of IGFBP-3 may exert an antiproliferative effect by different mechanisms and, in specific instances, exhibit activity that is not evident with the intact IGFBP. Plasmin can cleave nonglycosylated, recombinant human IGFBP-3 into specific N-terminal fragments of 22–25 kDa and 16 kDa representing residues 1–160 and 1–95, respectively (257). The 22- to 25-kDa fragment exhibits greatly reduced affinities for IGF-I and -II but can still inhibit IGF-I-stimulated proliferation of chick embryo fibroblasts, albeit by only 50% of that seen with intact IGFBP-3. In contrast, the 16-kDa fragment, shown to lack affinity with IGFs by several techniques, was a potent inhibitor of IGF-I, and insulin stimulated cellular proliferation. Furthermore, the 16-kDa fragment was as potent as intact IGFBP-3 in preventing IGF-I stimulated proliferation. These IGFBP fragments thus provide a further level of cellular regulation.

Many of the IGF-independent actions of IGFBPs, particularly IGFBP-3, have been dissected in IGF-IR null fibroblasts. Fibroblast proliferation, in the absence of IGF activity, may be inhibited by both proteolyzed fragments of IGFBP-3 or intact IGFBP-3 (144, 149, 257, 258). In mouse embryo fibroblasts, a 16-kDa IGFBP-3 fragment, generated by plasmin digestion, can prevent signaling through FGF receptors in the absence of IGF-IR stimulation (149).

Exposure of cultured human fibroblasts to UV irradiation stimulates IGFBP-3 mRNA abundance, thus suggesting that IGFBP-3 may modulate cell survival and/or apoptosis in these cells (140). In addition, in mouse embryo fibroblasts the UV-stimulated increase of IGFBP-3 mRNA is dependent upon the tumor suppressor p53, presumably via transcriptional regulation (140).

In summary, fibroblasts clearly provide a potential reservoir of IGF ligands and IGFBPs that may exert autocrine or paracrine action in the dermis and the epidermis. The role of dermally located IGFBPs in the transport of IGFs from the dermal compartment, including those derived from serum, to the epidermis remains unknown. Nonetheless, analyses in cultured fibroblasts, in particular, indicate that IGFBPs may utilize a range of mechanisms (e.g., cell or ECM association) to target IGFs to IGF-IRs located on dermal or epidermal cells. Furthermore, the dermal fibroblasts can also add to the reservoir of IGFBPs that could also exert their IGF-independent actions in all compartments of skin.


    VI. GH and the IGF System in the Epidermis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
A. Expression and action of components of the GH system
1. Expression
a. Keratinocytes.
Immunohistochemical analysis of neonatal and adult skin from humans, rats, and rabbits revealed GHR/BP-positive staining localized to all layers of the epidermis (basal, spinous, and granular) and epidermal layers of skin appendages including sweat glands, secretory ducts, and hair follicles (199, 259).

Like dermal cells, a role for GH in epidermal growth and differentiation during fetal development is supported by the temporal and tissue-specific expression of GHR/BP protein and mRNAs in both humans and rats. In humans, the germinal layer of the epidermis also exhibits weak immunostaining at 13–14 wk but is most intense at 19–20 wk gestation (21, 196, 260). Epithelial cells of hair follicles and sebaceous glands showed weak GHR staining at 13–14 wk and most intense staining at 19–20 wk gestation (260). GHR/BP mRNA expression is detected in epidermal cells of fetal (as early as embryonic d 16.5) and adult rats (22, 197, 198). In adult male rats, GHR- and GHBP-distinct mRNA species are coexpressed in the basal, suprabasal, and granular layers of the epidermis, sebaceous glands, and epithelial-derived cells of the follicular sheath (197).

In contrast to cultured fibroblasts and immunohistochemical analyses of skin sections, cultured adult keratinocytes do not express GHR/BP mRNA (57). Such a discrepancy may be due to differences in culturing conditions and/or detection methodology.

b. Melanocytes.
The role of the GH system in melanocyte growth and function is less well understood, probably due to the relatively low abundance of melanocytes in normal epidermis (1:36, melanocytes to keratinocytes). Nonetheless, GHR mRNA is expressed by cultured human melanocytes (57). In addition, low levels of GHR/BP have been detected by immunohistochemistry in the cytoplasm and nucleus of normal melanocytes located in human skin samples (195).

2. Actions of GH
a. Keratinocytes.
As previously discussed (Section V.A.2), GH excess or treatment leads to an increase in skin thickness, primarily via an increase in dermal collagen (208, 209, 210). Thus, in the majority of examples of GH excess, either pathological or via exogenous administration, an increase in skin thickness was not associated with an expansion of the epidermal compartment via stimulation of keratinocyte proliferation and/or maturation. One recent study, however, revealed that a cohort of GH-deficient patients exhibited thin epidermis and showed that GH treatment did not fully reverse the epidermal deficiency (2). The mechanisms of GH action on the epidermis were not explored, and therefore the possibility of IGF-I-mediating GH action cannot be ruled out. In a human skin xenograft model, GH treatment of the host mouse led to increased epidermal proliferation and thickness (261). Intradermal administration of anti-IGF-I antibody ablated the proliferative response and indicated that IGF-I was acting as a mediator of GH action in the epidermis. This study is the sole example in the literature that confirms that IGF-I can act as a mediator of GH action in the epidermis.

Thus, although immunohistochemical analyses of human skin sections indicate that epidermal keratinocytes express GHR/BP protein (Section VI.A.1), a clear functional role is yet to be elucidated. Limited functional analyses indicate that the addition of GH to the growth medium does not induce primary human keratinocytes to proliferate, but this is expected given an observed absence (or loss) of GHR mRNA (57). It remains possible that GHR activation in the epidermis is a requirement of cellular activity not yet explored, including specific metabolic activity, or occurs in response to stressful conditions (e.g., infection). Alternatively, the immunoreactivity may represent GHRtr and/or GHBP, and thus GH activity would not be expected. It also remains possible that GH action on the epidermis is mediated via IGF-I (261). Hence, the direct effects of GH, via GHR signaling, on the epidermis remain unclear.

b. Melanocytes.
In comparison to the IGF system, the role of the GH system in melanocyte growth and function is less well understood. The majority of published data provide circumstantial evidence for a role of GH action in melanocyte biology, particularly melanocytic lesions (refer to Section VII.C.1). Our recent studies, however, provide the first evidence that GH can stimulate the proliferation of primary human melanocytes only in the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) or IGF-I (262). Thus, it seems that the GHR mRNA expressed by cultured human melanocytes produces functional GHRs (57).

B. Expression and actions of components of the IGF system
1. Expression
a. Keratinocytes.
IGF-IR expression in the epidermis generally correlates with proliferating keratinocytes. IGF-IRs are localized to the basal layer of the epidermis of normal human skin and undifferentiated epithelial cells of skin appendages (263). However, one study provides conflicting data because it describes the localization of IGF-IR mRNA and protein to all layers of the epidermis and thus to quiescent, proliferating, and differentiating cells (216). The qualitative differences between these studies may be due to differences in IGF-IR epitope recognition by each antibody or the sensitivity of each in situ hybridization analysis. Our in vitro analyses, however, indicate that IGF-IR mRNA and protein are not reduced by the calcium-induced differentiation of the human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT (264), and is in agreement with studies in murine-cultured keratinocytes (265). These two in vitro analyses support the observation of IGF-IR in many layers of the epidermis (216).

The cellular derivation of IGFs in skin is also controversial. Some studies indicate that cultured primary human keratinocytes do not produce IGFs (57, 266), and the necessity to include IGF-I (or supraphysiological levels of insulin) in primary keratinocyte culture medium correlates with a lack of autocrine stimulation. Furthermore, irradiated fibroblasts, via production of IGF-I and IGF-II, maintain keratinocyte growth and proliferation (215, 266, 267). Thus, in vitro dermally derived IGFs act in a paracrine manner to stimulate keratinocyte IGF-IRs. These observations, combined with the knowledge that IGFs are expressed by dermal fibroblasts (266), led to the general conclusion that IGF-IR ligands originated primarily from the dermis. This conclusion agrees with the general observation that IGFs are usually produced by cells of mesenchymal origin (22). In contrast, however, the HaCaT cell line can produce IGF-II mRNA and protein (268), and primary human keratinocytes in a cultured skin substitute produce IGF-I (269).

Moreover, there are several examples showing that IGFs are expressed by epidermal keratinocytes. Rudman et al. (216) demonstrated the expression of IGF-I mRNA and protein in the epidermis of human skin sections. In particular, IGF-I was localized to the epidermal granulosum layer and differentiating, epidermally derived cells of the hair follicle. Wound healing studies indicate that IGF-I and IGF-II mRNAs are expressed by keratinocytes during skin repair (263, 270, 271). More recently, IGF-I and IGF-II immunoreactivity was localized throughout the epidermis of normal human skin (272). IGF-II has also been localized to the epidermis of the human fetus (12 wk gestation) (273). In contrast, IGF-I mRNA is absent in the epidermis of fetal rats and thus suggests species variation (22). In addition, Rho et al. (274) suggest that IGF-I mRNA expression is low to nondetectable in murine epidermis. The discrepancy between cultured keratinocytes and those in vivo may be a reflection of keratinocyte differentiation status, the growth medium, or a restriction in rodents. It therefore seems reasonable to conclude that keratinocytes in vivo produce IGFs under specific conditions, including fetal growth and wound healing. Hence, it is possible that IGF-I, and even IGF-II, may operate via an autocrine or paracrine manner within the epidermis. Epidermal paracrine activity may also be possible because melanocytes produce IGF-I (57).

Knowledge of the expression, regulation, and potential role of IGFBPs in modulating IGF action in the epidermis has been primarily provided by studies in our laboratory. We found specific IGFBP expression profiles in human epidermis and cultured human keratinocytes (221, 275, 276). In adult human skin, only IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein are produced by selected basal keratinocytes (221, 277). In contrast, IGFBP-1, -3, -4, and -6 mRNAs were found in human fetal epidermis (278), suggesting different control of the IGF system in the fetus when compared with adult human epidermis. Akin to our in vivo analyses, IGFBP-3 is the major IGFBP produced by cultured primary human keratinocytes (under basal growth conditions) and an immortalized human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) (275, 276). IGFBP-2, -4, and -6 were also detected in primary human keratinocyte-conditioned medium in the presence of EGF and bovine pituitary extract (275), thus indicating that local skin factors may regulate the expression of keratinocyte-derived IGFBPs.

Our regulation studies revealed that IGFBP-3 expression (mRNA and protein) is reduced by EGF, TGFß, and calcium-induced (i.e., elevation of CaCl2 from 0.09 to 1.2 mM) differentiation of normal and/or a human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT (264, 279, 280). The differentiation status of HaCaT keratinocytes has been associated with the presence of IGFBP-6 expression. In particular, Kato et al. (245) and Marinaro et al. (268) describe the presence of IGFBP-6 in HaCaT conditioned medium when cells were grown in the absence of serum and high calcium (DMEM, 1.8 mM CaCl2), conditions that would induce differentiation. Our study of HaCaT keratinocyte differentiation failed to demonstrate the induction of secreted IGFBP-6 by an increase in the calcium level in the medium (keratinocyte growth medium, 1.2 mM; our unpublished data and Ref. 264). It remains possible that the lack of IGFBP-6 expression in that study is related to differences between culture media including calcium concentration. It should also be noted that although elevated calcium levels are frequently used to induce differentiation of monolayers, keratinocytes exhibit a more complete differentiation program in the presence of mesenchymal support (e.g., organotypic cultures or when xenografted onto athymic mice) (281). Our findings are however consistent with in vivo studies showing a lack of IGFBP-1, -2, -4, -5, and -6 in adult human epidermis, except in specialized sebaceous glands and sweat glands (221). The suppression of keratinocyte-derived IGFBP-3 expression by factors that affect the proliferation and differentiation status of keratinocytes may reflect the mechanisms that regulate IGFBP-3 distribution in the epidermis (refer to Section IX and see Fig. 5Go for a thorough discussion).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Model of IGF action in the epidermis. A, Normal skin: IGF-I, produced by dermal fibroblasts (elongated orange/brown cells) and epidermal melanocytes (dendritic-like, red cell situated between keratinocytes), acts in a paracrine fashion on basal keratinocytes. As indicated, IGFBP-3, produced by SC and TA, may modulate keratinocyte proliferation in the basal layer via a range of mechanisms. Specifically IGFBP-3 may sequester IGF-I from basal keratinocytes [1], target IGF-I to basal cells without [2] or with [3] cell surface association, and potentially via IGF-I independent mechanisms when intact [4] or proteolyzed [5] (further described in the text, Section IX). Finally, IGFBP-3 expression by PMD and upper epidermal keratinocytes may be suppressed by local expression of TGFß, TGF{alpha}, or increasing calcium concentration (right side of panel A). Green arrows indicate progression of basal keratinocytes. Circular green arrow on SC indicates that keratinocytes SC undergo self-renewal through cell division. Scissors, IGFBP protease. B, Psoriatic skin: IGF-I, produced by dermal fibroblasts (elongated orange/brown cells), inflammatory cells (rounder red/brown cells), and melanocytes (not drawn), acts in a paracrine fashion on basal and suprabasal keratinocytes. In this model, IGFBP-3 is only produced by keratinocyte SC and is absent from most TA and all PMD cells. The absence of IGFBP-3 produced by most TA cells results in their excess proliferation in response to IGF-I in synergy with TGF{alpha} (EGFR ligand). In addition, excess proliferation of TA cells may also be as a result of a loss of IGFBP-3 (intact or proteolyzed fragments) acting on these cells in an IGF-I-independent manner (as described in Fig. 5AGo and in the text, Section IX). Thus, in the regions above the TA cells that have lost IGFBP-3 expression, the psoriatic epidermis exhibits hyperplasia (proliferating cells in the suprabasal layer) and abnormal differentiation (including the presence of nucleated cells in the outer layers). Relatively normal epidermal differentiation is seen in the right column of cells (refer to Section IX for a more thorough description).

 
Skin interstitial fluid contains proteolyzed IGFBP-3, which suggests that epidermal IGFBP-3 immunoreactivity may also include cleaved forms (226, 227, 277, 282). Thus, it remains possible that keratinocyte-derived IGFBP-3 is primarily present as the cleaved form as a result of local proteases. In support of this postulate, plasminogen-treated HaCaT keratinocytes produce a protease which is similar to that found in skin interstitial fluid and which cleaves IGFBP-3 (227).

A possible nuclear role of IGFBP-3 in keratinocyte biology is indicated by our confocal microscopic analyses that revealed IGFBP-3 immunoreactivity in the nucleus of dividing HaCaT keratinocytes (159). Although IGFBP-3 has also been localized to the nucleus of other cell types (Section III.C), the significance remains elusive. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that IGFBP-3 can associate with RXR{alpha} in HeLa cell nuclear extracts (161). The same study showed that the antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of IGFBP-3 also required a functional RXR{alpha} system (161). It remains possible that epidermal IGFBP-3, via an interaction with RXR{alpha}, may modulate RXR{alpha} activity in the epidermis, including keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation (177).

b. Melanocytes.
Primary human melanocytes express IGF-I mRNA, and our recent studies indicate that they express IGFBP-4 in minimal amounts (262). IGF-IR must also be expressed by melanocytes as they respond to IGF-I (262, 283).

2. Actions of the IGF system.
Unequivocal evidence for the critical role of the IGF system in epidermal homeostasis, at least during fetal development, is provided by IGF-IR knockout mice, which present with thin, transparent skin lacking a spinous layer and a reduction in hair follicle number and size (103). Unfortunately, postnatal mortality of these mice abrogates the opportunity to further dissect the functional role of IGF-IR signaling in normal and disturbed postnatal epidermal development. Thus, in the absence of IGF-IR gene-targeted deletion, the mechanisms of IGF action in keratinocyte biology must be inferred from conventional in vivo and in vitro investigations.

a. Keratinocyte proliferation.
Similar to many cultured cells, supraphysiological levels of insulin (5 µg/ml) stimulate keratinocyte growth (284, 285). The ability to substitute insulin with lower levels of IGF-I indicated that insulin was operating via IGF-IRs. Other studies reveal that activation of the IR plays a distinct role in keratinocyte proliferation. Firstly, ablation of keratinocyte IGF-IR signaling, by inclusion of an anti-IGF-IR antibody ({alpha}IR3), confirms the mechanism by which IGF-I, IGF-II, and insulin stimulate proliferation (285). The ability of {alpha}IR3 to only partially block insulin-stimulated keratinocyte growth supported a role for IRs in epidermal homeostasis. Recent analysis of IR-null mice confirmed the role of the IR in keratinocyte proliferation and revealed that both insulin and IGF-I stimulate intracellular IRS-1 phosphorylation (286). Subsequent studies revealed, however, that combined IGF-I and insulin stimulate murine-cultured keratinocyte proliferation in an additive fashion and utilize distinct intracellular pathways (287). More specifically, insulin but not IGF-I, signaling was mediated by protein kinase C {delta} via activation of {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 Na+/K+ pump subunit isoforms. In addition, PI-3 kinase activity was not required for insulin-induced proliferation. The intracellular effectors downstream of IRS-1 that are used by the IGF-IR in keratinocyte proliferation, however, remain to be elucidated.

IGF-II can also stimulate human keratinocyte proliferation, but IGF-I is more potent (288) and may reflect the higher affinity of IGF-I for IGF-IRs (74). We have demonstrated that IGF-I also stimulates HaCaT keratinocyte proliferation (264, 276), and a reduction of IGF-IR mRNA and IGF-IR abundance via antisense oligonucleotide methodology significantly repressed cell growth (12). Finally, IGF-stimulated murine primary keratinocyte proliferation is impaired in the presence of high glucose levels (20 mmol/liter) and thus correlates with impaired wound healing of diabetic subjects (289).

IGF-I (or insulin) combined with EGF in low calcium culture medium stimulates keratinocyte growth to a much greater level than that achieved by either growth factor alone (290, 291, 292). Such synergistic activity appears to involve cross-talk between the two systems. IGF-I stimulates an autocrine loop via activation of EGF receptors (EGFRs) and up-regulation of EGFR ligands [TGF{alpha}, amphiregulin, and a heparin-binding EGF-like protein (293, 294, 295)]. The addition of an EGFR antibody abrogates IGF-I stimulated keratinocyte proliferation (296). However, because EGF alone cannot stimulate keratinocyte cell number to that seen with both growth factors, it seems clear that other factors or signaling systems are involved. For example, IGF-I also synergizes with bFGF to enhance keratinocyte proliferation in vitro (290).

Endogenous IGFBP-3 inhibits IGF-I-stimulated proliferation of the human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT, and therefore suggests that this IGFBP may regulate IGF-stimulated keratinocyte growth in vivo (276). The colocalization of IGFBP-3 and IGF-IR (216, 263, 297) in the basal layer of the epidermis supports such a role (220, 277). The addition of exogenous IGFBP-3 to HaCaT keratinocytes can either stimulate or inhibit IGF-I-induced proliferation, but the response depends upon whether IGFBP-3 is coincubated or preincubated with the cells (227). The differing effects of IGFBP-3 on IGF-I-stimulated keratinocyte proliferation mimic those described in cultured human dermal fibroblasts (133, 134) and are yet to be clarified in vivo.

b. Keratinocyte differentiation.
The incomplete or thin epidermis of the IGF-IR knockout mouse suggests that IGF-IR signaling may also be important for keratinocyte differentiation/stratification (103). In addition, IGF-I can induce stratification/differentiation of an SV40 transformed keratinocyte cell line (298). Rudman et al. (216) suggest that IGF-IR immunoreactivity in the suprabasal layers of the epidermis indicates that IGFs also regulate keratinocyte differentiation. In contrast, however, calcium-induced differentiation of cultured murine keratinocytes leads to the ablation of IGF-IR signaling but no change in the cellular distribution of IGF-IR (265). In further support, we found that calcium-induced differentiation of HaCaT keratinocytes did not alter the IGF-I-stimulated proliferative response, although IGF-IR abundance remained the same and IGFBP-3 abundance was reduced (264), thus suggesting that postreceptor signaling mechanisms are likely to play a more important role. It is also important to note that although keratinocytes express both IGF-IRs and IRs, they exhibit different mechanisms of action during calcium-induced differentiation and perhaps indicate that specific signaling pathways are involved in epidermal differentiation (265). Specifically, differentiation of keratinocytes is associated with a reduction and loss of phosphorylation of IR and IGF-IRs, respectively.

Because IGFBP-3 is expressed by specific basal keratinocytes and is reduced upon induction of differentiation, it is also possible that IGFBP-3 modulates epidermal differentiation via both IGF-dependent and/or IGF-independent mechanisms (129, 221, 264, 277). In particular, the distribution of IGFBP-3 in the basal layer indicates that it may play a role in modulating the early stages of keratinocyte differentiation, specifically the evolution from keratinocyte SC to TA cell and then PMD cells. This postulate is discussed further in Section IX and Fig. 5Go.

c. Keratinocyte motility.
Keratinocyte motility is essential for normal differentiation and wound-healing conditions. Monolayer and coculturing models indicate that human keratinocytes migrate in response to IGF-I (119, 120, 121, 122, 123). Thus, the expression of IGF-I and IGF-II by migrating keratinocytes during wound healing may reflect the actions of each ligand on keratinocyte migration in vitro (270, 271).

d. Keratinocyte apoptosis.
Ultraviolet B (UVB) absorption by keratinocytes is a major cause of genomic DNA damage and thus a major contributor to the development of epidermal skin cancers. Epidermal keratinocytes appear to use two mechanisms to abrogate the effects of UVB radiation: 1) DNA repair during cell cycle arrest with subsequent resumption of normal cell division, or 2) apoptosis (299). Although Hansson et al. (300) described the transient induction of IGF-I in mouse skin after UV stimulation, two recent studies support a role for the IGF system in keratinocyte cell survival and protection from apoptosis after UVB irradiation. In the first study, exogenous IGF-I, via IGF-IR activation, protects cultured human keratinocytes from UVB-induced apoptosis by promoting cell survival in preference to proliferation (301). Furthermore, IGF-IR activation, via PI-3 and MAPK signaling pathways, combined with UVB irradiation induce keratinocytes to become postmitotic. In the second study, transgenic mice that overexpress IGF-I in the basal layer of the epidermis exhibited suppression of UVB-induced apoptosis (302).

e. Keratinocytes: glucose transport.
In cultured murine keratinocytes, IGF-IR activation increases glucose transport via glucose transporters 2 and 3, and this is in contrast to insulin-stimulated glucose uptake via glucose transporters 1 and 5 (303). Thus, the IGF system regulates keratinocyte glucose metabolism in a different manner to the insulin system.

f. Melanocytes.
Evidence for IGF-I as a stimulator of melanocyte growth was indicated by the necessity to include supraphysiological levels of insulin (5 µg/ml) in culture medium (304). The ability to replace insulin with lower levels of IGF-I confirmed that the IGF-IR was the primary signaling process for these factors (283).

Low levels of melanocyte-derived IGFBP-4 enhance IGF action in vitro (262). The role of melanocyte-derived IGFBPs in modulating IGF action in vivo remains uncertain because adjacent basal keratinocytes produce abundant amounts of IGFBP-3 (221, 277). Specifically, the juxtaposition of melanocytes with basal keratinocytes suggests that IGFBP-3 may also significantly modulate IGF-I interaction with melanocyte IGF-IRs.


    VII. Epidermal Dysplasia: Involvement of GH and the IGF System
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
A. Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a nonmalignant, autoimmune skin condition that is characterized by epidermal hyperproliferation and abnormal differentiation of keratinocytes overlying a dermal inflammatory reaction (171). The etiology of psoriasis is not clearly understood but appears to be multifactorial; both genetic and environmental factors seem to contribute to manifestation of the skin lesions (305). Psoriatic skin lesions appear as red, scaly patches that can cover all parts of the body.

1. Psoriasis and GH.
The role of GH in psoriasis is controversial. Weber et al. (306) were the first to report elevated circulating GH levels in psoriatic patients. Subsequently, two patients with pituitary hyperplasia and increased GH levels exhibited psoriatic lesions (307), and GH treatment of a psoriatic patient correlated with lesional relapses (308). In contrast, elevated serum levels of neither GH nor IGF-I could be substantiated in other cohorts of psoriatic patients (309, 310, 311, 312), and the literature does not report an increased incidence of psoriasis in acromegalic patients. Moreover, the use of somatostatin in the treatment of psoriatic patients did not lead to the regression of psoriatic lesions and therefore provides more conflicting data (313, 314). Bjorntorp et al. (312) concluded that the GH/IGF-I axis was not involved in psoriasis because they found that urinary levels of GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 in psoriatic patients were not different from those of nonpsoriatic patients. Furthermore, GHR abundance in psoriatic lesions was not different from normal skin, nor did GHBP levels in serum differ. Although lymphocytes (315) and fibroblasts (201) potentially express GH, they found no evidence of GH mRNA in the psoriatic lesion. Thus, on balance, it seems that the majority of evidence does not support a role for GH in psoriasis.

2. Psoriasis and IGFs.
Several lines of evidence implicate local perturbations at all levels of the IGF system in the hyperproliferative psoriatic epidermis. Blister fluid from psoriatic lesions contains higher levels of IGF-II, but not IGF-I (226). Keratinocytes from psoriatic patients, even from uninvolved regions, demonstrate a greater proliferative response to IGF-I when compared with keratinocytes from an unaffected individual (316). IGF-I and EGF exhibit greater proliferative synergy in psoriatic keratinocytes (317). In psoriasis, IGF-IR expression in the epidermis is more widespread (basal and suprabasal layers) and correlates with the expanded proliferative compartment (263). Furthermore, IGF-IRs of psoriatic lesions exhibit up-regulated tyrosine kinase activity (297). Our recent studies, however, have provided conclusive evidence for the importance of IGF-IR signaling in the etiology of the psoriatic lesion. More specifically, down-regulation of the IGF-IR mRNA, via antisense oligonucleotide technology, led to normalization of the hyperplastic epidermis of psoriatic skin grafted onto athymic mice (Fig. 3Go) (12).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. IGF-IR antisense oligonucleotide treatment normalizes the hyperplastic epidermis of human psoriatic skin xenografts. Psoriatic skin biopsies were grafted onto athymic and subjected to intradermal injections of IGF-IR-specific antisense oligonucleotides (AON), a random-sequence ODN in PBS or with PBS alone, every 2 d for 20 d. Grafts were then analyzed histologically. A, Donor A graft treated with AON no. 50 showing epidermal thinning compared with pregraft and control (PBS)-treated graft. Donor B graft treated with AON no. 27 showing epidermal thinning compared with pregraft and control (R451)-treated graft. E, Epidermis. Scale bar, 400 µm. B, Mean epidermal cross-sectional area over the full width of grafts was determined by digital image analysis. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. Shaded bars, Control treatments (R451, random ODN sequence); black bars, treatments with IGF-IR AON. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the vehicle-treated graft (P < 0.01); ++ indicates a significant difference from R451-treated grafts (P < 0.01). C, In situ hybridization analysis of IGF-IR mRNA in psoriatic skin before and after grafted and ODN. IGF-IR mRNA is seen as black grains that are almost absent from the lesion treated with IGF-IR AON (no. 27). Arrowheads indicate the basal layer of the epidermis. Scale bar, 50 µm. [Adapted with permission from Wraight et al.: Nat Biotechnol 18:521–526, 2000 (12 ). © Nature Publishing Group.]

 
The potential role of IGFBPs in psoriatic skin lesions has also been investigated. Xu et al. (226) reported that blister fluid from psoriatic lesions exhibited an increase in intact IGFBP-3 abundance attributable to a reduction in IGFBP-3 proteolytic activity due to the presence of a specific protease inhibitor. The derivation of IGFBP-3 in interstitial fluid has not been determined but could be serum, dermal, and/or epidermal. Our analyses reveal disturbances in the distribution and abundance of IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein in the psoriatic epidermis (Fig. 4Go) (277). Although strictly localized to basal keratinocytes, as in normal epidermis, high levels of IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein are tightly associated with relatively quiescent (Ki-67-negative) cells. It should be noted, however, that our analyses of psoriatic and normal skin used an anti-IGFBP-3 antibody that does not distinguish between intact and proteolyzed forms. Therefore, the identity of IGFBP-3 immunoreactivity in the epidermis remains to be determined.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein are localized to the basal epidermal layer in normal and psoriatic human skin. IGFBP-3 mRNA, detected by in situ hybridization, is seen as black grains over selected keratinocytes of the basal layer of the epidermis in normal (panel A; scale bar, 100 µm) and psoriatic (panel C; scale bar, 50 µm) skin. IGFBP-3 protein, detected by immunohistochemistry, is seen as brown staining over selected basal keratinocytes in normal (panel B; scale bar, 50 µm) and psoriatic (panels D and E; scale bars, 250 and 50 µm, respectively) skin. As indicated, IGFBP-3 exhibits disturbed and elevated expression in the suprapapillary epidermis of the psoriatic lesion when compared with normal skin. [Adapted from Wraight et al.: J Invest Dermatol 108:452–456, 1997 (277 ). © Blackwell Publishing.]

 
The above-mentioned studies provide potential insights into the mechanisms of IGF action in the epidermis. In psoriatic skin, an increase of intact IGFBP-3 abundance could lead to the observed elevation in the local IGF pool, via protection of the ligand from degradation (129). Thus, an increase of IGF ligand in the extracellular milieu may lead to excess IGF-IR stimulation and ultimately epidermal hyperproliferation. If IGFBP-3 in normal skin is usually present in the proteolyzed form, then, taking into consideration the above-mentioned psoriatic skin data, IGFBP-3 fragments may exert antiproliferative effects on keratinocytes via mechanisms similar to that described in cultured chick fibroblasts, i.e., via inhibition of IGF-stimulated proliferation (149) (Section V.B.2). Furthermore, it is possible that IGFBP-3 fragments could inhibit excess keratinocyte proliferation via IGF-independent mechanisms (148, 149, 150). Hence, the observed absence of IGFBP-3 in selected psoriatic basal keratinocytes correlates with their increased proliferative (Ki-67-positive) activity (277). Alternatively, if epidermal IGFBP-3 is usually intact, it may modulate basal keratinocyte proliferation by simply sequestering IGFs and preventing IGF/IGF-IR interaction (131, 132) or via IGF-independent mechanisms observed in other cells types (144, 149, 257, 258) (Section III.C). These data are further discussed in a model describing the putative actions of the IGF system in modulating epidermal homeostasis (Section IX and Fig. 5Go).

B. Papillomas and IGFBP-3
Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are responsible for benign skin lesions that exhibit epidermal hyperproliferation in humans (318). Furthermore, the HPV gene E7 is partially responsible for the immortalization of epidermal keratinocytes (319). Observation of E7/IGFBP-3 interaction led to the discovery that keratinocyte-derived IGFBP-3 is degraded by E7-expressing keratinocytes (162). Thus, a loss of intact IGFBP-3, via E7-induced degradation, may be an important feature of the immortalization and may ultimately involve the increased exposure of keratinocytes to the potent mitogen IGF-I.

C. Melanocytic lesions: from benign to malignant
The transition of melanocytes to melanomas is not clearly understood and does not always follow a distinct program of phenotypic changes (320). Abnormal growth of melanocytes, however, includes benign melanocytic lesions and primary melanomas that are contained within the epidermis, primary melanomas that have invaded into the dermis, and metastatic melanomas that are distributed in the dermis and elsewhere in the body. Both the GH and IGF systems have been implicated in the etiology of melanocytic lesions.

1. GH action.
Bourguignon and colleagues (321, 322) have published several studies concluding that GH treatment of numerous patients (children), including those with Turner’s syndrome and hypopituitarism, increased the number and growth rate of melanocytic naevi, together with phenotypic changes. Several studies by another research group (323, 324) refute the findings of Bourguignon and colleagues. In particular, GH treatment of children, including those with Turner’s syndrome, did not result in an increase in the number or size of melanocytic naevi. In support of these findings, it is argued that acromegalic patients do not exhibit an increased frequency of melanocytic lesions. A recent report, however, described the presence of benign and malignant melanomas in the eyes of two acromegalic patients (325).

Evidence for indicating that GH may act directly in melanocytic lesions including melanomas has been provided by the immunohistochemical localization of GHR/GHBP (195). Low levels of GHR/GHBP were detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus of benign melanocytic lesions such as compound naevi. Moreover, intense GHR/GHBP levels were localized to malignant melanomas, with greater abundance in the cytoplasm than in the nuclei. Three melanoma cell lines exhibited scant levels of GHR/GHBP immunoreactivity in the nucleus with high levels in the cytoplasm and golgi.

Thus, all of the evidence to link the GH system with the growth and development of melanocytic skin lesions remains circumstantial, and therefore the functional role of GH remains to be clarified.

2. IGF action.
The recognition that the IGF system could play a role in the pathophysiology of tumor cell growth led to the characterization of this system in melanocytic lesions, especially melanomas. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analyses provide circumstantial evidence that changes in the expression of components of the IGF system may be involved in the evolution and/or maintenance of melanomas. Fleming et al. (326), using melanocytic lesions grouped according to the Clark scale, showed that IGF-I mRNA levels exhibited progression-associated expression. In particular, the highest levels of IGF-I mRNA were seen in dysplastic naevi and primary melanomas. However, advanced and metastatic melanomas had the lowest levels of IGF-I mRNA and were comparable to common naevi (the most basic of melanocytic lesions).

An analysis of IGF-IR protein levels in congenital pigmented naevi indicated widespread IGF-IR expression that was not necessarily elevated in proliferating cells (Ki-67-positive) (327). However, recently a study showed increasing IGF-IR protein levels associated with progression from benign naevi to metastatic melanomas and correlation with an increased rate of cellular proliferation (118).

Numerous studies on cultured melanocytic cells, from primary cells through to melanoma cell lines, further underscore the importance of the IGF system in their growth. Initial studies indicated that exogenous IGF-I or insulin was the primary growth stimulator of several metastatic melanoma cell lines, and inclusion of antibodies to the IGF-IR blocked this action (328). Consistent with these analyses, although IGF-I mRNA has been detected in cultured melanocytes (57), primary melanocytes and naevus cells require IGF-I (or insulin) and other growth factors for maximum growth in vitro (304). Two studies showed that primary melanocyte cell cultures grow efficiently in the presence of IGF-I (or insulin), bFGF, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), and {alpha}-melanocyte stimulating hormone, whereas naevus cells were less dependent on bFGF and TPA (329, 330). In contrast, IGF-I or insulin were the only exogenous growth factors required by primary melanomas, and metastatic melanomas grew in the absence of any exogenous growth factors. This suggests that an enhanced autocrine growth factor system enabled metastatic melanoma growth.

Blockade of IGF-IR signaling using antisense cDNA plasmid constructs or oligonucleotides, antibodies, or inhibitors of glycosylation results in growth inhibition of many metastatic melanoma cell lines and in xenotransplants in athymic mice (11, 331, 332, 333, 334). IGF-IR abundance, and thus activity, may also reflect the status of the tumor suppressor p53 in some melanoma cells because p53 modulates IGF-IR gene transcription (335). In particular, ablation of mutant p53, via antisense oligonucleotide treatment, led to a drastic down-regulation of IGF-IR abundance, IGF-IR tyrosine phosphorylation, DNA and cell replication, and an increase in apoptosis in three melanoma cell lines (336). This study indicates that mutant p53, although relatively rare in melanomas (337), may stimulate IGF-IR gene transcription, and this is in contrast to the repression of IGF-IR gene transcription by wild-type p53 (335). Furthermore, this study confirms the role of the IGF-IR in melanoma growth and survival.

A study by Resnicoff et al. (333) suggests that in one human melanoma cell line (FO-1) IGF-I signaling may be more important for the transformed phenotype rather than mitogenesis. In particular, FO-1 cells stably transfected with antisense IGF-IR cDNA plasmid constructs or treated with antisense IGF-IR oligonucleotides were only growth inhibited in xenotransplants and soft agar assays and not when grown in monolayer cultures.

The IGF system may also play an important role in the metastatic nature of advanced melanomas. Two early reports attest to the ability of IGF-I and -II to act as chemotactic agents for a melanoma cell line (A2058). Inhibition of motility was achieved by blockade of the IGF-IR with an antibody (338, 339).

It should be noted that the IGF system might not be the only mechanism of growth by metastatic melanomas. Specifically, Furlanetto et al. (11) described the lack of growth inhibition by anti-IGF-IR antibody in two metastatic cell lines both in vitro and in athymic mice. The lack of inhibition is perhaps reflective of the genotypic and phenotypic differences between each melanoma. This observation also correlates with two studies in which constitutive IGF-I or -II mRNA was not detected in a panel of metastatic melanomas (340, 341).

Two studies suggest that alterations in IGFBP expression profile may contribute to the etiology of melanomas. Stracke et al. (339) detected a cell surface-associated IGFBP of 38 kDa (potentially IGFBP-3) in the melanoma cell line A2958. Olney et al. (341) described the production and regulation of IGFBP mRNAs in another melanoma cell line (HT-144). mRNAs for IGFBP-2, -3, and -5 were present, but only IGFBP-2 and -3 were increased with IGF-I stimulation. These IGFBP profiles differ from cultured human melanocytes that display only low levels of IGFBP-4 (262).

D. Transgenic mouse models: multistage carcinogenesis
Several lines of evidence indicate that keratinocyte dysplasias (benign and malignant) involve perturbations of the IGF system.

Three transgenic mouse models in which IGF expression was specifically targeted to keratinocytes confirm a role for the IGF system in epidermal hyperplasia (302, 342, 343). Targeted overexpression of IGF-I or IGF-II to the suprabasal (via a human keratin 1 or bovine keratin 10 promoter, respectively) or basal (via a human keratin 5 promoter) layer induced a hyperplastic and hyperkeratotic epidermis. Each transgenic animal model exhibited dermal and hypodermal thickening, thus indicating epithelial to mesenchymal cross-talk. In contrast to these studies, several transgenic mouse models overexpressing IGF-I (under the control of ubiquitous promoters) have been described, a significant change in skin phenotype was not reported, but the possibility of a lack of elevated IGF-I in the epidermis was not clarified (105). Another study by Eming et al. (344) described the production of primary human keratinocytes that overexpressed IGF-I. When grafted onto athymic mice, these transgenic cells produced stratified epidermis that was morphologically comparable to control grafts. Although markers of proliferation or regenerative epithelium (Ki-67 and K16 immunostaining) were enhanced in the epidermis formed from modified keratinocytes, the authors noted that terminal differentiation was unaffected. More specifically, Eming et al. (344) concluded that overexpression of IGF-I could not induce the gross phenotypic changes seen in the hyperplastic epidermis of psoriatic skin lesions. It is, perhaps, not surprising that altered expression of one ligand can induce the severe morphological changes seen in such a complicated skin lesion. Nonetheless, it is also possible that IGF-IR abundance, and thus signaling, may be a rate-limiting step in controlling the hyperplastic epidermis in psoriatic skin. This possibility is supported by the observation that the proliferative (and transformation) capacity of cells is modulated by IGF-IR abundance (number/cell) (345). In further support of this postulate (Section VII.A), psoriatic epidermis exhibits elevated levels of IGF-IR (263), and down-regulation of IGF-IR mRNA can result in regression of the grossly altered and expanded epidermal compartment (12). Alternatively, local IGFBPs may have modulated the activity of transgene-derived IGF-I (221).

Multistage carcinogenesis mouse models have been used to dissect the correlation between IGF-IR signaling and epidermal tumor development. In mice, topical application of TPA did not alter IGF-I and IGF-IR mRNA levels. In contrast, elevated levels of IGF-I mRNA were found in epidermal tumors (squamous cell carcinomas), and an up-regulation of IGF-IR mRNA occurred in some papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas. These initial studies therefore suggested that alteration in the IGF system may be coincident but not necessarily causative of epidermal tumors (274).

Transgenic mouse models provide further confirmation for the essential role of IGF-IR signaling in epidermal tumor promotion. Mice overexpressing IGF-I in the basal (HK5/IGF-I) or suprabasal (HK1/IGF-I) layer exhibit enhanced tumor formation after an initiation-promotion protocol (7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, then TPA, chrysarobin, okadaic acid, or benzoyl peroxide treatment) (302, 343, 346). Moreover, treatment with TPA only led to an enhanced incidence of papillomas and tumors in these mouse models. Thus, IGF-I overexpression may substitute for an initiating event in tumor formation. Overexpression of IGF-I in the basal layer of the epidermis (HK5/IGF-I) was also associated with increased spontaneous tumor formation (302).


    VIII. Wound Healing
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
The healing of skin is a multifaceted and complex process involving epidermal and dermal cellular cross-talk requiring cytokines, growth factors, and ECM modulation (347, 348). The process of wound healing is, for clarity, often considered to involve three major stages: 1) the inflammatory reaction, 2) granulation tissue formation, and 3) scar tissue remodeling. During inflammation, blood clots form, and inflammatory cells move into the wound area. The process of reepithelialization also begins during this phase as keratinocytes begin to migrate across the wound surface. The second stage involves cellular proliferation and tissue formation to restore the functional skin barrier. Keratinocytes within the wound and those at the edge begin to proliferate and thus contribute to the migrating population and ultimately reepithelialization (348). Dermal matrix restoration (fibroplasia) and angiogenesis also occur during this phase. Finally, scar tissue matrix remodeling is accompanied by vascular regression and a reduction in dermal cell density. Wound healing has been assessed in a broad range of conditions, from simple cuts through large-scale burns and recalcitrant wounds of diabetic patients. Clinical studies along with animal models, including human skin grafts, cultured cells, and organotypic-/coculture systems, have been used to dissect the finely tuned process of wound healing. The GH and IGF systems, due to their anabolic actions, have been analyzed for their role and potential therapeutic value in wound healing. Such studies provide further evidence that the GH and IGF systems are an essential feature of epidermal/dermal cellular cross-talk in normal and perturbed skin states.

A. GH: natural and therapeutic effects
In the majority of studies, systemic therapy has been used to investigate the effects of GH on skin wound healing. Collectively, these studies indicate that GH treatment can significantly improve wound-healing rates. Elevation of serum GH in burn patients can lead to enhanced wound healing as evidenced by improved reepithelialization, increased granulation tissue, increased coverage by basal lamina, and a decrease in healing time (9, 349). GH treatment also accelerates the healing of skin graft donor sites in severely burned children and adults (9, 350). Animal models reveal that GH therapy also improves healing time and increases collagen content, granulation tissue, and thus the tensile strength of skin (209, 351, 352, 353, 354). Interestingly, systemic administration of GH does not enhance tensile strength of wounds in old rats (355) and could be due to alterations in expression of components of the IGF system and/or responsive to IGFs by aged fibroblasts (232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237).

GH treatment corrects the reduction in serum IGF-I levels induced by serious thermal injury and stimulates hepatic IGF-I mRNA transcription and IGF-IRs at the wound site (9, 356, 357, 358, 359). Combined systemic GH/IGF-I treatment synergistically improves reepithelialization of the wound when compared with either hormone alone in a skin burn rat model (360). In another wounded rat model, systemic GH treatment combined with locally applied IGF-I significantly improved reepithelialization rates when compared with either hormone alone or no treatment (361).

B. IGFs: natural and therapeutic effects
The IGF system appears to be essential for wound healing, even in the absence of GH treatment. Local IGF-I and IGF-II mRNAs and protein abundance are modulated during the wound-healing process. Generally, maximum IGF ligand expression in wound fluid or tissue is seen during the early hours and/or days post wounding and particularly correlates with cellular proliferation and migration (270, 295, 362). IGF-I levels in human wound fluid are at maximum levels 24 h post injury, then return to baseline at the completion of healing (362). In a pig model, IGF-I abundance was elevated in wound fluid for the first 6 d post wounding and was then undetectable, correlating with complete reepithelialization (295). The derivation of IGFs in wound fluid may include migrating keratinocytes, epithelial cells of adjacent hair follicles, granulation tissue fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, and serum (270, 271). Retarded wound healing may be partially due to alterations in the IGF system. For example, wounds of diabetic rats exhibit a delay in IGF-I and IGF-II expression (271). A human study by Blakytny et al. (272) revealed that IGF-I is reduced or absent in the epidermis and dermal fibroblasts of diabetic skin and recalcitrant wounds. In humans, chronic skin wounds exhibit up-regulation of IGF-IR expression in the epidermis, which correlates with an expanded proliferative compartment (263). The role of the IGF system in wound healing correlates with IGF activity in cultured keratinocytes. As previously discussed (Section VI.B.2), under culture conditions IGF-I is essential for maximum keratinocyte proliferation and also stimulates keratinocyte migration (123, 285), two features that are critical to complete reepithelialization in wounds.

Hypertrophic and keloid scars, which display an abnormal dermal fibroproliferative reaction and excess collagen deposition, also exhibit alterations in the IGF system (240, 363). Deep dermal fibroblasts of hypertrophic scars express higher levels of IGFBP-3 that, unlike normal fibroblasts, are not down-regulated by TGFß (363). Keloid fibroblasts overexpress IGF-IRs, and their invasive capacity is increased by IGF-I stimulation (240).

Although the application of IGF-I (or GH) via systemic means can lead to improved wound healing in several instances, the problem of adverse side effects, including hypoglycemia, electrolyte imbalance, and edema, cannot be ignored (361). Furthermore, transfer to the extravascular space may compromise the effectiveness of systemic IGF-I treatment. Thus, investigations have also addressed the efficacy of locally administered IGF-I. Application of IGF-I to the wound site results in an increase in reepithelialization (364), angiogenesis (365), dermal collagen deposition (366), and improved wound-healing rates. Local IGF-I treatment can also ameliorate impaired wound healing associated with diabetes (367) or corticosteroid treatment (368).

C. IGFBPs: regulation and usefulness in wound healing
The efficacy of systemic and locally expressed IGFs may be modulated by changes in local and systemic IGFBP expression. Thus, the involvement of IGFBPs and their proteases in regulating IGF action in skin wound healing has been investigated both in serum and at the tissue level.

Severely burned patients exhibit a reduction in serum IGFBP-3 levels, which correlates with decreased serum IGF-I, for at least 20 d post burn (369). Furthermore, while IGFBP-1 levels remain relatively constant, serum IGFBP-2 and -4 are raised. The changes in serum IGFBP abundance may affect the transfer of IGF-I or IGF-II to extravascular sites in the wound tissue and thus impair or enhance the repair mechanism (370).

IGFBP-3 and -1, in conjunction with IGF-I, are initially up-regulated and then return to baseline levels in human wound fluid (362). In a Hunt-Schilling rat wound chamber model, IGFBP profiles of wound fluid were similar to that seen in serum except that IGFBP-3 levels were reduced by the presence of protease activity (371). A similar IGFBP profile and protease activity have been described for human interstitial fluid (225, 371). Again, the cellular derivation of IGFBPs in wound fluid is not clear but may be a reflection of both serum and/or tissue derivation (134, 221).

The efficacy of systemic GH and IGF-I treatment in wound healing may also be determined by regulation of IGFBP production at the tissue level. Interestingly, a recent study showed that systemic administration of GH and IGF-I up-regulates IGFBP-3 mRNA and protein in whole skin samples (372). Although the precise cellular source was not clarified, it is apparent that serum GH and IGF-I levels can regulate local expression of IGFBP-3 mRNA.

The knowledge that IGFBPs can enhance IGF action has also provided the impetus for assessing the therapeutic advantages of delivering IGF-I in combination with selected IGFBPs at wound sites. Topical IGF-I is a more potent stimulator of wound healing, via reepithelialization and granulation tissue deposition, when coadministered with either dephosphorylated IGFBP-1 or IGFBP-3 (373, 374). Furthermore, complexed IGF-I/IGFBP-1 also enhances collagen contraction (375). The augmentation of IGF-I bioactivity by IGFBP-1 involves the interaction of IGFBP-1, via an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence, with the {alpha}5ß1 integrin receptor (376). The stimulatory effect of dephosphorylated IGFBP-1 also correlates with a reduced affinity for IGF-I (377). Because IGFBP-3 does not contain an RGD sequence, the mechanism of enhanced IGF-I action is not clear. It is possible that IGFBP-3 may extend IGF-I activity by protection from local proteases or by targeting of IGF-I to cell membrane IGF-IRs.

D. Gene therapy: a novel avenue for treatment of wounds
Gene therapy has provided another avenue with which to explore the therapeutic value of IGF-I or GH in wound healing. Moreover, the targeted expression of cDNA constructs in skin cells ameliorates the potentially deleterious side effects of systemic cytokine administration (refer to Section VIII.B). In rats, intradermal injected or liposome encapsulated application of IGF-I cDNA plasmid constructs to thermal burns increased local IGF-I mRNA and protein abundance, stimulated keratinocyte proliferation, and accelerated reepitheialization (10, 378, 379, 380). In addition, the improvement of burn wounds by the IGF-I cDNA application correlated with a reduction of IL-1ß and TNF{alpha} mRNA expression and therefore a possible reduction in prolonged local inflammation (381).

Keratinocytes transfected with GH cDNA constructs and transplanted onto full-thickness wounds of pigs secreted GH into the wound fluid for 10 d but did not result in a greater healing rate when compared with transplanted, nontransfected keratinocytes (382). The lack of a GH effect on wound healing is in contrast to that seen in burns patients (as discussed in Section VIII.A). These data therefore suggest that the concentration of GH in the transgenic wound fluid was not enough to enhance healing. These data also suggest that GH derived from the transgene could not directly stimulate keratinocyte proliferation and support the general observation that GH does not stimulate proliferation of keratinocytes even if GHRs are expressed by keratinocytes (as discussed in Section VI.A.2.a). Furthermore, the study suggests that GH did not utilize IGF-I as a mediator of its actions as previously discussed (261). Finally, the loss of local GH expression may have been due to the loss of transfected keratinocytes through the process of differentiation and perhaps led to the lack of a significant improvement in wound-healing rates. This study potentially highlights the importance of isolating and targeting keratinocyte SC if a transgene is required permanently in the epidermis (383).


    IX. Summary and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 
The widespread distribution of components of both the GH and IGF systems is perhaps a reflection of the importance of the ligands throughout the whole organism, and this review clearly indicates that the skin is no exception. Collectively, the literature points to the significance of the GH and IGF systems in normal skin growth and suggests that disturbances in these pathways are involved in the pathophysiology of distinct skin perturbation, including psoriasis and a range of epidermal carcinomas. Indeed, the majority of studies implicate the direct actions of the IGF system in modulating epidermal homeostasis. More specifically, IGF-I acts on epidermal keratinocytes and melanocytes to modulate several functions including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival. In contrast, it seems that GH primarily ensures normal skin growth and development by direct stimulation of GHRs located on dermal cells, particularly fibroblasts, and then appears to use IGF-I as a mediator of its actions in the dermis and epidermis. It also seems likely that IGF-I can modulate epidermal homeostasis without needing to be a mediator of GH action. Although GHRs on keratinocytes have been detected by immunohistochemical methodology, the direct actions of GH in these cells remains unknown. In vitro analysis, however, suggests that GH may directly regulate melanocyte proliferation, but this role remains to be clarified in skin.

The current literature, primarily emanating from our laboratory, implicates IGFBP-3 in regulating epidermal homeostasis, possibly via regulation of the initial stages of keratinocyte terminal differentiation (221, 226, 227, 264, 276, 277, 279, 280). Figure 5AGo is a very simplified model of IGF action in the epidermis of normal skin, including the potential mechanisms of IGFBP-3 activity. Paracrine IGFs (particularly IGF-I, derived from dermal fibroblasts; orange cells) (266), serum, epidermal melanocytes (red cell) (57), and perhaps suprabasal keratinocytes (216), cross the ECM milieu to stimulate IGF-IRs expressed by basal keratinocytes (263, 297). IGF-IR stimulation ensures keratinocyte proliferation (285), particularly in TA cells, and cell survival (103, 384). In this hypothetical model, IGFBP-3 is expressed by SC and TA keratinocytes and is absent in PMD cells. Such distribution correlates with our observations that IGFBP-3 is strictly localized to selected basal keratinocytes (221, 277), is not present in the upper epidermal layers (suprabasal, granular, corneocytes), and is lost with the induction of calcium-induced differentiation of a keratinocyte cell line (264). Because IGFBP-3 colocalizes with IGF-IRs (297), it would control the IGF-stimulated proliferative response of basal keratinocytes, predominantly the TA cells, and ensure that the cells are not overstimulated by local IGFs. Specifically, IGFBP-3 would regulate IGF-IR stimulation by inhibiting or augmenting IGF/IGF-IR interaction, with the emphasis on inhibition. Appropriate IGFBP-3 modulated IGF-IR stimulation could be achieved by two mechanisms. Firstly, IGF/IGFBP-3 complexes may associate with cell surfaces or ECM, leading to IGFBP-3 proteolytic cleavage, a concomitant reduction in IGF affinity and ultimately IGF-IR activation (133, 134, 248). Secondly, proteases could also produce fragments of IGFBP-3 that inhibit IGF-I-stimulated proliferation of keratinocytes, akin to the unknown mechanism(s) described in fibroblasts (148). Finally, IGFBP-3 may also inhibit keratinocyte proliferation irrespective of IGF-IR activity, possibly via its own unidentified cell surface receptor (144, 149, 257, 258).

Several studies, particularly those of psoriatic skin (Section VII.A.2), support the above-mentioned model and thus a primarily inhibitory role for IGFBP-3 in the epidermis. IGFBP-3 inhibits IGF-I-stimulated proliferation of keratinocytes (276) and is present in quiescent and absent from proliferative basal keratinocytes in the hyperplastic epidermis of psoriatic skin lesions (277). Additionally, blister fluid from psoriatic skin exhibits elevated levels of intact IGFBP-3, suggesting that in normal skin proteolytic fragments of IGFBP-3 may modulate epidermal proliferation via IGF-dependent and IGF-independent actions (previously discussed in Section VII.A.2) (132, 385). Our observation that keratinocyte-derived IGFBP-3 is profoundly down-regulated by high levels of EGF (5–50 ng/ml) (279, 280) also correlates with perturbations in the EGF system in psoriatic skin. Specifically, TGF{alpha} (an alternative ligand for the EGFR) and EGFRs are overexpressed in the psoriatic epidermis (386, 387, 388, 389) and could thus aid suppression of normal IGFBP-3 expression in the basal layer (particularly TA cells). The inhibition of IGFBP-3 could then further contribute to the observed greater IGF-I/EGF proliferative synergy in psoriatic keratinocytes (293, 294, 295). Figure 5BGo highlights these putative mechanisms of IGF-I/EGF action in psoriasis and particularly emphasizes how the loss of IGFBP-3 in TA cells of the basal layer would contribute to the grossly disturbed and hyperplastic epidermis.

In the current model of normal skin (Fig. 5AGo), IGFBP-3 modulates the early stages of keratinocyte terminal differentiation, i.e., the transition from keratinocyte SC to TA cells. An absence of IGFBP-3 in the upper layers of the epidermis also supports the postulate that IGFBP-3 primarily acts as an inhibitor of keratinocyte proliferation. Specifically, under normal circumstances, proliferative keratinocytes are present only in the basal layer of the epidermis (170, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191). The loss and continued suppression of IGFBP-3 expression in the upper epidermal layers may be partially supported by TGFß1 (280), expressed by suprabasal keratinocytes (246), EGFR stimulation (317, 386, 390), and the increasing calcium concentration (another essential requirement for differentiation) (180, 264, 391, 392).

The juxtaposition of melanocytes (red cell, Fig. 5AGo) with basal keratinocytes may aid the suppression of melanocyte proliferation and thus maintenance of the epidermal melanocyte unit (i.e., the ratio of 1:36, melanocytes to keratinocytes; Ref. 167). In particular, because epidermal keratinocytes require the IGF system for growth and maturation, it is possible that melanocytes would also be exposed to IGF-I in the ECM milieu. Because IGF-I is a primary regulator of melanocyte proliferation (304), the ability to blunt IGF-I action seems imperative. It therefore seems possible that keratinocyte-derived IGFBP-3 and melanocyte-derived IGFBP-4 (262) would play an important role in modulating melanocyte IGF-I action, with local IGF-I being derived from dermal fibroblasts or melanocytes themselves.

Future analyses should continue to dissect the functional role of GH and IGFs in ensuring normal skin growth and development, particularly the epidermis. More specifically, in vivo functional analyses are required to further elucidate the mechanism by which IGFBP-3 modulates epidermal homeostasis. It is interesting to note, however, that in psoriatic lesions (277) and a range of skin perturbations exhibiting a hyperplastic epidermis (i.e., dermatofibroma, seborrheic keratosis, squamous keratosis; S. R. Edmondson, G. A. Werther, and C. J. Wright, unpublished observations), IGFBP-3 mRNA is absent in the basal layer. This observation alone strongly implicates IGFBP-3 in the protection of keratinocytes from overexposure to paracrine IGF-I.

Many perturbations of the epidermis, both benign (e.g., psoriasis) and malignant (e.g., melanomas), exhibit altered IGF signaling. Indeed, our recent success at blocking epidermal IGF-IR activity, via antisense oligonucleotide therapy, and normalizing epidermal thickness in psoriatic skin provides an excitingly strong basis for the development of novel drugs to alleviate the debilitating effects of epidermal overgrowth (12). Thus, the future may see a new suite of drugs that specifically modulate the activity of the IGF system and ultimately lead to normalization of hyperplastic skin lesions.

Finally, the advent of gene therapy has thrown the epidermis into the spotlight (393). The accessibility, ability to culture keratinocytes and melanocytes, ability to insert genes of interest, and regrafting procedures mean that keratinocytes and melanocytes are attractive commodities. Current literature strongly indicates that GH and IGF cDNAs will provide the basis for gene therapy regimes designed to accelerate the repair of severely damaged skin or recalcitrant wounds.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, and the Royal Children’s Hospital Research Institute.

Abbreviations: bFGF, Basic fibroblast growth factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; GHBP, GH binding protein; GHR, GH receptor; GHRtr, truncated GHR; HaCaT, human keratinocyte cell line; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; IGF-IR, IGF-I receptor; IR, insulin receptor; IRS, IR substrate; M-6-PR, mannose-6-phosphate receptor; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PI-3, phophatidyl-inositol-3'; PMD, postmitotic differentiating; RXR-{alpha}, retinoid-X-receptor {alpha}; SC, stem cell(s); TA, transit amplifying; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. The GH System
 III. IGF System
 IV. Skin Structure and...
 V. GH and the...
 VI. GH and the...
 VII. Epidermal Dysplasia:...
 VIII. Wound Healing
 IX. Summary and Discussion
 References
 

  1. Nabarro JD 1987 Acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 26:481–512[Medline]
  2. Lange M, Thulesen J, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Skakkebaek NE, Vahl N, Jorgensen JO, Christiansen JS, Poulsen SS, Sneppen SB, Juul A 2001 Skin morphological changes in growth hormone deficiency and acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 145:147–153[Abstract]
  3. Wabitsch M, Hauner H, Heinze E, Teller WM 1995 The role of growth hormone/insulin-like growth factors in adipocyte differentiation. Metabolism 44:45–49[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Feld S, Hirschberg R 1996 Growth hormone, the insulin-like growth factor system, and the kidney. Endocr Rev 17:423–480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Su HY, Hickford JG, Bickerstaffe R, Palmer BR 1999 Insulin-like growth factor 1 and hair growth. Dermatol Online J 5:1
  6. Robson H, Siebler T, Shalet SM, Williams GR 2002 Interactions between GH, IGF-I, glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormones during skeletal growth. Pediatr Res 52:137–147[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Baserga R 1999 The IGF-I receptor in cancer research. Exp Cell Res 253:1–6[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Baserga R 2000 The contradictions of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Oncogene 19:5574–5581[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Herndon DN, Hawkins HK, Nguyen TT, Pierre E, Cox R, Barrow RE 1995 Characterization of growth hormone enhanced donor site healing in patients with large cutaneous burns. Ann Surg 221:649–656[Medline]
  10. Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Hawkins HK, Yang K, Hayes RL, Lichtenbelt BJ, Perez-Polo JR, Herndon DN 1999 IGF-I gene transfer in thermally injured rats. Gene Ther 6:1015–1020[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Furlanetto RW, Harwell SE, Baggs RB 1993 Effects of insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibition on human melanomas in culture and in athymic mice. Cancer Res 53:2522–2526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wraight CJ, White PJ, McKean SC, Fogarty RD, Venables DJ, Liepe IJ, Edmondson SR, Werther GA 2000 Reversal of epidermal hyperproliferation in psoriasis by insulin-like growth factor I receptor antisense oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol 18:521–526[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT 1999 The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology, and clinical applications. 1st ed. Totawa, NJ: Humana Press
  14. Philpott MP, Sanders D, Westgate GE, Kealey T 1994 Human hair growth in vitro: a model for the study of hair follicle biology. J Dermatol Sci 7(Suppl):S55–S72
  15. Peus D, Pittelkow MR 1996 Growth factors in hair organ development and the hair growth cycle. Dermatol Clin 14:559–572[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Deplewski D, Rosenfield RL 2000 Role of hormones in pilosebaceous unit development. Endocr Rev 21:363–392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Daughaday WH, Salmon Jr WD 1999 The origins and development of the somatomedin hypothesis. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1–18
  18. Daughaday WH 1972 Somatomedin: proposed designation for sulphation factor. Nature 235:107[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Le Roith D, Bondy C, Yakar S, Liu JL, Butler A 2001 The somatomedin hypothesis: 2001. Endocr Rev 22:53–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Barnard R, Bundesen PG, Rylatt DB, Waters MJ 1984 Monoclonal antibodies to the rabbit liver growth hormone receptor: production and characterization. Endocrinology 115:1805–1813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Werther GA, Haynes K, Waters MJ 1993 Growth hormone (GH) receptors are expressed on human fetal mesenchymal tissues–identification of messenger ribonucleic acid and GH-binding protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1638–1646[Abstract]
  22. Edmondson SR, Werther GA, Russell A, Le Roith D, Roberts Jr CT, Beck F 1995 Localization of growth hormone receptor/binding protein messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) during rat fetal development: relationship to insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA. Endocrinology 136:4602–4609[Abstract]
  23. Pantaleon M, Whiteside EJ, Harvey MB, Barnard RT, Waters MJ, Kaye PL 1997 Functional growth hormone (GH) receptors and GH are expressed by preimplantation mouse embryos: a role for GH in early embryogenesis? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5125–5130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Weigent DA, Blalock JE 1991 The production of growth hormone by subpopulations of rat mononuclear leukocytes. Cell Immunol 135:55–65[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Lobie PE, Garcia-Aragon J, Lincoln DT, Barnard R, Wilcox JN, Waters MJ 1993 Localization and ontogeny of growth hormone receptor gene expression in the central nervous system. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 74:225–233[Medline]
  26. Harvey S, Johnson CD, Sharma P, Sanders EJ, Hull KL 1998 Growth hormone: a paracrine growth factor in embryonic development? Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 119:305–315[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Zezulak KM, Green H 1986 The generation of insulin-like growth factor-1: sensitive cells by growth hormone action. Science 233:551–553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Slootweg MC, van Buul-Offers SC, Herrmann-Erlee MP, Duursma SA 1988 Direct stimulatory effect of growth hormone on DNA synthesis of fetal chicken osteoblasts in culture. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 118:294–300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ohlsson C, Bengtsson BA, Isaksson OG, Andreassen TT, Slootweg MC 1998 Growth hormone and bone. Endocr Rev 19:55–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yakar S, Liu JL, Le Roith D 2000 The growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I system: implications for organ growth and development. Pediatr Nephrol 14:544–549[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Butler AA, LeRoith D 2001 Minireview: tissue-specific vs. generalized gene targeting of the IGF1 and IGF1R genes and their roles in insulin-like growth factor physiology. Endocrinology 142:1685–1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yakar S, Rosen CJ, Beamer WG, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Wu Y, Liu JL, Ooi GT, Setser J, Frystyk J, Boisclair YR, LeRoith D 2002 Circulating levels of IGF-1 directly regulate bone growth and density. J Clin Invest 110:771–781[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Jansson JO, Eden S, Isaksson O 1985 Sexual dimorphism in the control of growth hormone secretion. Endocr Rev 6:128–150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bertherat J, Bluet-Pajot MT, Epelbaum J 1995 Neuroendocrine regulation of growth hormone. Eur J Endocrinol 132:12–24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Casanueva FF, Dieguez C 1998 Interaction between body composition, leptin and growth hormone status. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 12:297–314[Medline]
  36. Wang G, Lee HM, Englander E, Greeley Jr GH 2002 Ghrelin–not just another stomach hormone. Regul Pept 105:75–81[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Takaya K, Ariyasu H, Kanamoto N, Iwakura H, Yoshimoto A, Harada M, Mori K, Komatsu Y, Usui T, Shimatsu A, Ogawa Y, Hosoda K, Akamizu T, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Nakao K 2000 Ghrelin strongly stimulates growth hormone release in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4908–4911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Pekhletsky RI, Chernov BK, Rubtsov PM 1992 Variants of the 5'-untranslated sequence of human growth hormone receptor mRNA. Mol Cell Endocrinol 90:103–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Dastot F, Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Duriez B, Goossens M, Amselem S 1996 Alternatively spliced forms in the cytoplasmic domain of the human growth hormone (GH) receptor regulate its ability to generate a soluble GH-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10723–10728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Ross RJ, Esposito N, Shen XY, Von Laue S, Chew SL, Dobson PR, Postel-Vinay MC, Finidori J 1997 A short isoform of the human growth hormone receptor functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length receptor and generates large amounts of binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 11:265–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Edens A, Talamantes F 1998 Alternative processing of growth hormone receptor transcripts. Endocr Rev 19:559–582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Fisker S, Kristensen K, Rosenfalck AM, Pedersen SB, Ebdrup L, Richelsen B, Hilsted J, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO 2001 Gene expression of a truncated and the full-length growth hormone (GH) receptor in subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle in GH-deficient adults: impact of GH treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:792–796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sotiropoulos A, Goujon L, Simonin G, Kelly PA, Postel-Vinay MC, Finidori J 1993 Evidence for generation of the growth hormone-binding protein through proteolysis of the growth hormone membrane receptor. Endocrinology 132:1863–1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Lim L, Spencer SA, McKay P, Waters MJ 1990 Regulation of growth hormone (GH) bioactivity by a recombinant human GH-binding protein. Endocrinology 127:1287–1291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Baumann G 1991 Growth hormone heterogeneity: genes, isohormones, variants, and binding proteins. Endocr Rev 12:424–449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Alele J, Jiang J, Goldsmith JF, Yang X, Maheshwari HG, Black RA, Baumann G, Frank SJ 1998 Blockade of growth hormone receptor shedding by a metalloprotease inhibitor. Endocrinology 139:1927–1935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Cunningham BC, Ultsch M, de Vos AM, Mulkerrin MG, Clauser KR, Wells JA 1991 Dimerization of the extracellular domain of the human growth hormone receptor by a single hormone molecule. Science 254:821–825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. de Vos AM, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff AA 1992 Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. Science 255:306–312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Frank SJ 2001 Growth hormone signalling and its regulation: preventing too much of a good thing. Growth Horm IGF Res 11:201–212[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Herrington J, Carter-Su C 2001 Signaling pathways activated by the growth hormone receptor. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12:252–257[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Argetsinger LS, Hsu GW, Myers Jr MG, Billestrup N, White MF, Carter-Su C 1995 Growth hormone, interferon-{gamma}, and leukemia inhibitory factor promoted tyrosyl phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1. J Biol Chem 270:14685–14692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Argetsinger LS, Norstedt G, Billestrup N, White MF, Carter-Su C 1996 Growth hormone, interferon-{gamma}, and leukemia inhibitory factor utilize insulin receptor substrate-2 in intracellular signaling. J Biol Chem 271:29415–29421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Ridderstrale M, Tornqvist H 1996 Effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on tyrosine phosphorylations and the insulin-like effects in response to human growth hormone in isolated rat adipocytes. Endocrinology 137:4650–4656[Abstract]
  54. Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson OG, Lindahl A, Isgaard J 1994 Hormonal regulation of longitudinal bone growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 48(Suppl 1):S150–S158
  55. Cook JJ, Haynes KM, Werther GA 1988 Mitogenic effects of growth hormone in cultured human fibroblasts. Evidence for action via local insulin-like growth factor I production. J Clin Invest 81:206–212
  56. Jux C, Leiber K, Hugel U, Blum W, Ohlsson C, Klaus G, Mehls O 1998 Dexamethasone impairs growth hormone (GH)-stimulated growth by suppression of local insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I production and expression of GH- and IGF-I-receptor in cultured rat chondrocytes. Endocrinology 139:3296–3305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Tavakkol A, Elder JT, Griffiths CE, Cooper KD, Talwar H, Fisher GJ, Keane KM, Foltin SK, Voorhees JJ 1992 Expression of growth hormone receptor, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and IGF-1 receptor mRNA and proteins in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 99:343–349[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Herington AC, Stevenson JL, Andrew I 1985 Demonstration of in vitro actions of growth hormone on isolated rat adipocytes. Horm Metab Res 17:16–19[Medline]
  59. Isaksson OG, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Isgaard J 1987 Mechanism of the stimulatory effect of growth hormone on longitudinal bone growth. Endocr Rev 8:426–438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Lindahl A, Isgaard J, Isaksson OG 1987 Growth hormone in vivo potentiates the stimulatory effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 in vitro on colony formation of epiphyseal chondrocytes isolated from hypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology 121:1070–1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Waters M, Thompson B 1999 Growth hormone: new insights into a multi-talented hormone. Today’s Life Science (Nov/Dec) 32–38
  62. Carter-Su C, Schwartz J, Smit LS 1996 Molecular mechanism of growth hormone action. Annu Rev Physiol 58:187–207[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Eriksson H, Ridderstrale M, Tornqvist H 1995 Tyrosine phosphorylation of the growth hormone (GH) receptor and Janus tyrosine kinase-2 is involved in the insulin-like actions of GH in primary rat adipocytes. Endocrinology 136:5093–5101[Abstract]
  64. Kopchick JJ, Bellush LL, Coschigano KT 1999 Transgenic models of growth hormone action. Annu Rev Nutr 19:437–461[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Melmed S 1990 Acromegaly. N Engl J Med 322:966–977[Medline]
  66. Rosenfeld RG, Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J 1994 Growth hormone (GH) insensitivity due to primary GH receptor deficiency. Endocr Rev 15:369–390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Maheshwari HG, Silverman BL, Dupuis J, Baumann G 1998 Phenotype and genetic analysis of a syndrome caused by an inactivating mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor: dwarfism of Sindh. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:4065–4074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Rajaram S, Baylink DJ, Mohan S 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in serum and other biological fluids: regulation and functions. Endocr Rev 18:801–831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Price GJ, Berka JL, Edmondson SR, Werther GA, Bach LA 1995 Localization of mRNAs for insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 1 to 6 in rat kidney. Kidney Int 48:402–411[Medline]
  70. Batch JA, Mercuri FA, Werther GA 1996 Identification and localization of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) messenger RNAs in human hair follicle dermal papilla. J Invest Dermatol 106:471–475[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Burren CP, Berka JA, Edmondson SR, Werther GA, Batch JA 1996 Localization of mRNAs for insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF-I receptor and IGF binding proteins in rat eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:1459–1468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Werther GA, Russo V, Baker N, Butler G 1998 The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in the developing brain. Horm Res 49(Suppl 1):37–40
  73. Dean R, Edmondson SR, Burrell LM, Bach LA 1999 Localization of the insulin-like growth factor system in a rat model of heart failure induced by myocardial infarction. J Histochem Cytochem 47:649–660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Jones JI, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Collett-Solberg PF, Cohen P 2000 Genetics, chemistry, and function of the IGF/IGFBP system. Endocrine 12:121–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Adams TE, Epa VC, Garrett TP, Ward CW 2000 Structure and function of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cell Mol Life Sci 57:1050–1093[CrossRef][Medline]
  77. Salmon WDJ, Daughaday W 1957 A hormonally controlled serum factor which stimulates sulfate incorporation by cartilage in vitro. J Lab Clin Med 49:825–836[Medline]
  78. Rinderknecht E, Humbel RE 1976 Polypeptides with nonsuppressible insulin-like and cell-growth promoting activities in human serum: isolation, chemical characterization, and some biological properties of forms I and II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2365–2369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Rinderknecht E, Humbel RE 1978 The amino acid sequence of human insulin-like growth factor I and its structural homology with proinsulin. J Biol Chem 253:2769–2776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Rinderknecht E, Humbel RE 1978 Primary structure of human insulin-like growth factor II. FEBS Lett 89:283–286[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Klapper DG, Svoboda ME, Van Wyk JJ 1983 Sequence analysis of somatomedin-C: confirmation of identity with insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology 112:2215–2217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Rotwein P 1999 Molecular biology of IGF-I and IGF-II. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications, 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 19–36
  83. Holthuizen PE, Steenbergh PH, Sussenbach JS 1999 Regulation of IGF gene expression. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 37–62
  84. Hynes MA, Van Wyk JJ, Brooks PJ, D’Ercole AJ, Jansen M, Lund PK 1987 Growth hormone dependence of somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-II messenger ribonucleic acids. Mol Endocrinol 1:233–242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Ullrich A, Gray A, Tam AW, Yang-Feng T, Tsubokawa M, Collins C, Henzel W, Le Bon T, Kathuria S, Chen E 1986 Insulin-like growth factor I receptor primary structure: comparison with insulin receptor suggests structural determinants that define functional specificity. EMBO J 5:2503–2512[Medline]
  86. Schumacher R, Mosthaf L, Schlessinger J, Brandenburg D, Ullrich A 1991 Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 binding specificity is determined by distinct regions of their cognate receptors. J Biol Chem 266:19288–19295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Kjeldsen T, Andersen AS, Wiberg FC, Rasmussen JS, Schaffer L, Balschmidt P, Moller KB, Moller NP 1991 The ligand specificities of the insulin receptor and the insulin-like growth factor I receptor reside in different regions of a common binding site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4404–4408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Zhang B, Roth RA 1991 Binding properties of chimeric insulin receptors containing the cysteine-rich domain of either the insulin-like growth factor I receptor or the insulin receptor related receptor. Biochemistry 30:5113–5117[CrossRef][Medline]
  89. Werner H 1999 Molecular biology of the type 1 IGF receptor. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 63–88
  90. Braulke T 1999 Type-2 IGF receptor: a multi-ligand binding protein. Horm Metab Res 31:242–246[Medline]
  91. Forbes BE, Hartfield PJ, McNeil KA, Surinya KH, Milner SJ, Cosgrove LJ, Wallace JC 2002 Characteristics of binding of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-II analogues to the type 1 IGF receptor determined by BIAcore analysis. Eur J Biochem 269:961–968[Medline]
  92. Blakesley VA, Scrimgeour A, Esposito D, Le Roith D 1996 Signaling via the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor: does it differ from insulin receptor signaling? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 7:153–159[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Butler AA, Yakar S, Gewolb IH, Karas M, Okubo Y, LeRoith D 1998 Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signal transduction: at the interface between physiology and cell biology. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 121:19–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Sepp-Lorenzino L 1998 Structure and function of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 47:235–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Petley T, Graff K, Jiang W, Yang H, Florini J 1999 Variation among cell types in the signaling pathways by which IGF-I stimulates specific cellular responses. Horm Metab Res 31:70–76[Medline]
  96. Blakesley VA, Butler AA, Koval AP, Okubo Y, LeRoith D 1999 IGF-I receptor function: transducing the IGF-I signal into intracellular events. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 143–164
  97. Esposito DL, Blakesley VA, Koval AP, Scrimgeour AG, LeRoith D 1997 Tyrosine residues in the C-terminal domain of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor mediate mitogenic and tumorigenic signals. Endocrinology 138:2979–2988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  98. Dupont J, LeRoith D 2001 Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I receptors: similarities and differences in signal transduction. Horm Res 55(Suppl 2):22–26
  99. Keiss W 1999 Molecular biology of the IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 89–110
  100. Clairmont KB, Czech MP 1991 Extracellular release as the major degradative pathway of the insulin-like growth factor II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor. J Biol Chem 266:12131–12134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Bobek G, Scott CD, Baxter RC 1992 Radioimmunoassay of soluble insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor: developmental regulation of receptor release by rat tissues in culture. Endocrinology 130:3387–3394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Baker J, Liu JP, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A 1993 Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell 75:73–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  103. Liu JP, Baker J, Perkins AS, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A 1993 Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r). Cell 75:59–72[Medline]
  104. Wood TL 1995 Gene-targeting and transgenic approaches to IGF and IGF binding protein function. Am J Physiol 269:E613–E622
  105. D’Ercole AJ 1999 Actions of IGF system proteins from studies of transgenic and gene knockout models. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 545–574
  106. Yakar S, Liu JL, Stannard B, Butler A, Accili D, Sauer B, LeRoith D 1999 Normal growth and development in the absence of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7324–7329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  107. Liu JL, LeRoith D 1999 Insulin-like growth factor I is essential for postnatal growth in response to growth hormone. Endocrinology 140:5178–5184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. Ohlsson C, Sjogren K, Jansson JO, Isaksson OG 2000 The relative importance of endocrine vs. autocrine/paracrine insulin-like growth factor-I in the regulation of body growth. Pediatr Nephrol 14:541–543[CrossRef][Medline]
  109. Stiles CD, Capone GT, Scher CD, Antoniades HN, Van Wyk JJ, Pledger WJ 1979 Dual control of cell growth by somatomedins and platelet-derived growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1279–1283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  110. Campisi J, Pardee AB 1984 Post-transcriptional control of the onset of DNA synthesis by an insulin-like growth factor. Mol Cell Biol 4:1807–1814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Adesanya OO, Zhou J, Samathanam C, Powell-Braxton L, Bondy CA 1999 Insulin-like growth factor 1 is required for G2 progression in the estradiol-induced mitotic cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3287–3291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Resnicoff M, Burgaud JL, Rotman HL, Abraham D, Baserga R 1995 Correlation between apoptosis, tumorigenesis, and levels of insulin-like growth factor I receptors. Cancer Res 55:3739–3741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. D’Ambrosio C, Ferber A, Resnicoff M, Baserga R 1996 A soluble insulin-like growth factor I receptor that induces apoptosis of tumor cells in vivo and inhibits tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 56:4013–4020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  114. Resnicoff M, Abraham D, Yutanawiboonchai W, Rotman HL, Kajstura J, Rubin R, Zoltick P, Baserga R 1995 The insulin-like growth factor I receptor protects tumor cells from apoptosis in vivo. Cancer Res 55:2463–2469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  115. D’Ambrosio C, Valentinis B, Prisco M, Reiss K, Rubini M, Baserga R 1997 Protective effect of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor on apoptosis induced by okadaic acid. Cancer Res 57:3264–3271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. Dews M, Nishimoto I, Baserga R 1997 IGF-I receptor protection from apoptosis in cells lacking the IRS proteins. Recept Signal Transduct 7:231–240[Medline]
  117. Prisco M, Hongo A, Rizzo MG, Sacchi A, Baserga R 1997 The insulin-like growth factor I receptor as a physiologically relevant target of p53 in apoptosis caused by interleukin-3 withdrawal. Mol Cell Biol 17:1084–1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  118. Kanter-Lewensohn L, Dricu A, Girnita L, Wejde J, Larsson O 2000 Expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and p27Kip1 in melanocytic tumors: a potential regulatory role of IGF-1 pathway in distribution of p27Kip1 between different cyclins. Growth Factors 17:193–202[Medline]
  119. Tsuboi R, Sato C, Shi CM, Ogawa H 1992 Stimulation of keratinocyte migration by growth factors. J Dermatol 19:652–653[Medline]
  120. Ando Y, Jensen PJ 1993 Epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor I enhance keratinocyte migration. J Invest Dermatol 100:633–639[CrossRef][Medline]
  121. Zeigler ME, Krause S, Karmiol S, Varani J 1996 Growth factor-induced epidermal invasion of the dermis in human skin organ culture: dermal invasion correlated with epithelial cell motility. Invasion Metastasis 16:3–10[Medline]
  122. Andresen JL, Ledet T, Ehlers N 1997 Keratocyte migration and peptide growth factors: the effect of PDGF, bFGF, EGF, IGF-I, aFGF and TGF-ß on human keratocyte migration in a collagen gel. Curr Eye Res 16:605–613[CrossRef][Medline]
  123. Andresen JL, Ehlers N 1998 Chemotaxis of human keratocytes is increased by platelet-derived growth factor-BB, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-{alpha}, acidic fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and transforming growth factor-ß. Curr Eye Res 17:79–87[CrossRef][Medline]
  124. Ghahary A, Shen YJ, Nedelec B, Scott PG, Tredget EE 1995 Enhanced expression of mRNA for insulin-like growth factor-1 in post-burn hypertrophic scar tissue and its fibrogenic role by dermal fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biochem 148:25–32[CrossRef][Medline]
  125. Telasky C, Tredget EE, Shen Q, Khorramizadeh MR, Iwashina T, Scott PG, Ghahary A 1998 IFN-{alpha}2b suppresses the fibrogenic effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 in dermal fibroblasts. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18:571–577[Medline]
  126. Dimitriadis G, Parry-Billings M, Bevan S, Dunger D, Piva T, Krause U, Wegener G, Newsholme EA 1992 Effects of insulin-like growth factor I on the rates of glucose transport and utilization in rat skeletal muscle in vitro. Biochem J 285:269–274
  127. Firth SM, McDougall F, McLachlan AJ, Baxter RC 2002 Impaired blockade of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)-induced hypoglycemia by IGF binding protein-3 analog with reduced ternary complex-forming ability. Endocrinology 143:1669–1676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  128. Zapf J, Waldvogel M, Froesch ER 1975 Binding of nonsuppressible insulinlike activity to human serum. Evidence for a carrier protein. Arch Biochem Biophys 168:638–645[CrossRef][Medline]
  129. Baxter RC 2000 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278:E967–E976
  130. Baxter RC 1994 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the human circulation: a review. Horm Res 42:140–144[Medline]
  131. Boisclair YR, Rhoads RP, Ueki I, Wang J, Ooi GT 2001 The acid-labile subunit (ALS) of the 150 kDa IGF-binding protein complex: an important but forgotten component of the circulating IGF system. J Endocrinol 170:63–70[Abstract]
  132. Martin JL, Baxter RC 1999 IGF binding protein as modulators of IGF action. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. 17th ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 227–255
  133. DeMellow JSM, Baxter RC 1988 Growth hormone dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein both inhibits and potentiates IGF-I stimulated DNA synthesis in skin fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 156:199–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  134. Conover CA 1992 Potentiation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) action by IGF binding protein-3: studies of underlying mechanism. Endocrinology 130:3191–3199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Mohan S, Baylink DJ 2002 IGF-binding proteins are multifunctional and act via IGF-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Endocrinol 175:19–31[Abstract]
  136. Clemmons DR 2001 Use of mutagenesis to probe IGF-binding protein structure/function relationships. Endocr Rev 22:800–817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Maile LA, Holly JM 1999 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) proteolysis: occurrence, identification, role and regulation. Growth Horm IGF Res 9:85–95[Medline]
  138. Rajah R, Lee KW, Cohen P 2002 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 mediates tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-induced apoptosis: role of Bcl-2 phosphorylation. Cell Growth Differ 13:163–171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  139. Oh Y, Müller HL, Ng L, Rosenfeld RG 1995 Transforming growth factor-ß-induced cell growth inhibition in human breast cancer cells is mediated through insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 action. J Biol Chem 270:13589–13592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  140. Buckbinder L, Talbott R, Velasco-Miguel S, Takenaka I, Faha B, Seizinger BR, Kley N 1995 Induction of the growth inhibitor IGF-binding protein 3 by p53. Nature 377:646–649[CrossRef][Medline]
  141. Butt AJ, Firth SM, Baxter RC 1999 The IGF axis and programmed cell death. Immunol Cell Biol 77:256–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  142. Hollowood AD, Lai T, Perks CM, Newcomb PV, Alderson D, Holly JM 2000 IGFBP-3 prolongs the p53 response and enhances apoptosis following UV irradiation. Int J Cancer 88:336–341[CrossRef][Medline]
  143. Grimberg A, Liu B, Bannerman P, El-Deiry WS, Cohen P 2002 IGFBP-3 mediates p53-induced apoptosis during serum starvation. Int J Oncol 21:327–335[Medline]
  144. Rajah R, Valentinis B, Cohen P 1997 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 induces apoptosis and mediates the effects of transforming growth factor-ß1 on programmed cell death through a p53- and IGF-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 272:12181–12188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  145. Schedlich LJ, Graham LD 2002 Role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in breast cancer cell growth. Microsc Res Tech 59:12–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  146. Jones JI, Gockerman A, Busby Jr WH, Wright G, Clemmons DR 1993 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 stimulates cell migration and binds to the {alpha}5ß1 integrin by means of its Arg-Gly-Asp sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10553–10557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  147. Andress DL, Birnbaum RS 1992 Human osteoblast-derived insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 stimulates osteoblast mitogenesis and potentiates IGF action. J Biol Chem 267:22467–22472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  148. Lalou C, Lassarre C, Binoux M 1996 A proteolytic fragment of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 that fails to bind IGFs inhibits the mitogenic effects of IGF-I and insulin. Endocrinology 137:3206–3212[Abstract]
  149. Zadeh SM, Binoux M 1997 The 16-kDa proteolytic fragment of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 inhibits the mitogenic action of fibroblast growth factor on mouse fibroblasts with a targeted disruption of the type 1 IGF receptor gene. Endocrinology 138:3069–3072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  150. Yamanaka Y, Wilson EM, Rosenfeld RG, Oh Y 1997 Inhibition of insulin receptor activation by insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. J Biol Chem 272:30729–30734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  151. Vorwerk P, Yamanaka Y, Spagnoli A, Oh Y, Rosenfeld RG 1998 Insulin and IGF binding by IGFBP-3 fragments derived from proteolysis, baculovirus expression and normal human urine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1392–1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  152. Oh Y, Muller HL, Pham H, Rosenfeld RG 1993 Demonstration of receptors for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 on Hs578T human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 268:26045–26048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  153. Leal SM, Liu Q, Huang SS, Huang JS 1997 The type V transforming growth factor ß receptor is the putative insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 receptor. J Biol Chem 272:20572–20576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  154. Leal SM, Huang SS, Huang JS 1999 Interactions of high affinity insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins with the type V transforming growth factor-ß receptor in mink lung epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 274:6711–6717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Fanayan S, Firth SM, Baxter RC 2002 Signaling through the Smad pathway by insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in breast cancer cells. Relationship to transforming growth factor-ß 1 signaling. J Biol Chem 277:7255–7261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  156. Radulescu RT 1994 Nuclear localization signal in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein type 3. Trends Biochem Sci 19:278[CrossRef][Medline]
  157. Jaques G, Noll K, Wegmann B, Witten S, Kogan E, Radulescu RT, Havemann K 1997 Nuclear localization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 in a lung cancer cell line. Endocrinology 138:1767–1770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  158. Li W, Fawcett J, Widmer HR, Fielder PJ, Rabkin R, Keller GA 1997 Nuclear transport of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in opossum kidney cells. Endocrinology 138:1763–1766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  159. Wraight CJ, Liepe IJ, White PJ, Hibbs AR, Werther GA 1998 Intranuclear localization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) during cell division in human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 111:239–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  160. Schedlich LJ, Young TF, Firth SM, Baxter RC 1998 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and IGFBP-5 share a common nuclear transport pathway in T47D human breast carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 273:18347–18352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  161. Liu B, Lee HY, Weinzimer SA, Powell DR, Clifford JL, Kurie JM, Cohen P 2000 Direct functional interactions between insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 and retinoid X receptor-{alpha} regulate transcriptional signaling and apoptosis. J Biol Chem 275:33607–33613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  162. Mannhardt B, Weinzimer SA, Wagner M, Fiedler M, Cohen P, Jansen-Durr P, Zwerschke W 2000 Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein binds and inactivates growth-inhibitory insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3. Mol Cell Biol 20:6483–6495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  163. Zatsepina O, Braspenning J, Robberson D, Hajibagheri MA, Blight KJ, Ely S, Hibma M, Spitkovsky D, Trendelenburg M, Crawford L, Tommasino M 1997 The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein is associated with the nucleolus in mammalian and yeast cells. Oncogene 14:1137–1145[CrossRef][Medline]
  164. Schaefer H, Redelmeier TE 1996 Structure and dynamics of the skin barrier. In: Skin barrier: principles of percutaneous absorption. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1–42
  165. Seiberg M 2001 Keratinocyte-melanocyte interactions during melanosome transfer. Pigment Cell Res 14:236–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  166. Yaar M, Gilchrest BA 1991 Human melanocyte growth and differentiation: a decade of new data. J Invest Dermatol 97:611–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  167. Gordon PR, Mansur CP, Gilchrest BA 1989 Regulation of human melanocyte growth, dendricitiy, and melanization by keratinocyte derived factors. J Invest Dermatol 92:565–572[CrossRef][Medline]
  168. Scott GA, Haake AR 1991 Keratinocytes regulate melanocyte number in human fetal and neonatal skin equivalents. J Invest Dermatol 97:776–781[CrossRef][Medline]
  169. Fine JD 2000 Basement membrane proteins. In: Leigh IM, Birgitte Lane E, Watt FM, eds. The keratinocyte handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 181–199
  170. Watt FM 1998 Epidermal stem cells: markers, patterning and the control of stem cell fate. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:831–837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  171. Ortonne JP 1996 Aetiology and pathogenesis of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 135(Suppl 49):1–5
  172. Eckert RL, Crish JF, Robinson NA 1997 The epidermal keratinocyte as a model for the study of gene regulation and cell differentiation. Physiol Rev 77:397–424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  173. Fuchs E, Byrne C 1994 The epidermis: rising to the surface. Curr Opin Genet Dev 4:725–736[CrossRef][Medline]
  174. Piepkorn M, Pittelkow MR, Cook PW 1998 Autocrine regulation of keratinocytes: the emerging role of heparin-binding, epidermal growth factor-related growth factors. J Invest Dermatol 111:715–721[CrossRef][Medline]
  175. Letterio JJ, Bottinger EP 1998 TGF-ß knockout and dominant-negative receptor transgenic mice. Miner Electrolyte Metab 24:161–167[CrossRef][Medline]
  176. Bikle DD 1997 Vitamin D: a calciotropic hormone regulating calcium-induced keratinocyte differentiation. J Am Acad Dermatol 37:S42–S52
  177. Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ 1996 Molecular mechanisms of retinoid actions in skin. FASEB J 10:1002–1013[Abstract]
  178. Cotsarelis G, Kaur P, Dhouailly D, Hengge U, Bickenbach J 1999 Epithelial stem cells in the skin: definition, markers, localization and functions. Exp Dermatol 8:80–88[Medline]
  179. Levy L, Broad S, Diekmann D, Evans RD, Watt FM 2000 ß1 Integrins regulate keratinocyte adhesion and differentiation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Biol Cell 11:453–466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  180. Menon GK, Grayson S, Elias PM 1985 Ionic calcium reservoirs in mammalian epidermis: ultrastructural localization by ion-capture cytochemistry. J Invest Dermatol 84:508–512[CrossRef][Medline]
  181. Mauro T, Bench G, Sidderas-Haddad E, Feingold K, Elias P, Cullander C 1998 Acute barrier perturbation abolishes the Ca2+ and K+ gradients in murine epidermis: quantitative measurement using PIXE. J Invest Dermatol 111:1198–1201[CrossRef][Medline]
  182. Bikle DD, Ng D, Tu CL, Oda Y, Xie Z 2001 Calcium- and vitamin D-regulated keratinocyte differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 177:161–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  183. Dykes PJ, Jenner LA, Marks R 1982 The effect of calcium on the initiation and growth of human epidermal cells. Arch Dermatol Res 273:225–231[CrossRef][Medline]
  184. Boyce ST, Ham RG 1983 Calcium-regulated differentiation of normal human epidermal keratinocytes in chemically defined clonal culture and serum-free serial culture. J Invest Dermatol 81(Suppl):33s–40s
  185. Hennings H, Michael D, Cheng C, Steinert P, Holbrook K, Yuspa SH 1980 Calcium regulation of growth and differentiation of mouse epidermal cells in culture. Cell 19:245–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  186. Gibson DF, Ratnam AV, Bikle DD 1996 Evidence for separate control mechanisms at the message, protein, and enzyme activation levels for transglutaminase during calcium-induced differentiation of normal and transformed human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 106:154–161[CrossRef][Medline]
  187. Lavker RM, Sun TT 1982 Heterogeneity in epidermal basal keratinocytes: morphological and functional correlations. Science 215:1239–1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  188. Potten CS, Morris RJ 1988 Epithelial stem cells in vivo. J Cell Sci Suppl 10:45–62[Medline]
  189. Kaur P, Li A 2000 Adhesive properties of human basal epidermal cells: an analysis of keratinocyte stem cells, transit amplifying cells, and postmitotic differentiating cells. J Invest Dermatol 114:413–420[CrossRef][Medline]
  190. Janes SM, Lowell S, Hutter C 2002 Epidermal stem cells. J Pathol 197:479–491[CrossRef][Medline]
  191. Potten CS, Booth C 2002 Keratinocyte stem cells: a commentary. J Invest Dermatol 119:888–899[CrossRef][Medline]
  192. Barrandon Y, Green H 1987 Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2302–2306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  193. Jensen UB, Lowell S, Watt FM 1999 The spatial relationship between stem cells and their progeny in the basal layer of human epidermis: a new view based on whole-mount labelling and lineage analysis. Development 126:2409–2418[Abstract]
  194. Lobie PE, Garcia-Aragon J, Wang BS, Baumbach WR, Waters MJ 1992 Cellular localization of the growth hormone binding protein in the rat. Endocrinology 130:3057–3065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  195. Lincoln DT, Sinowatz F, Temmim-Baker L, Baker HI, Kolle S, Waters MJ 1998 Growth hormone receptor expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm of normal and neoplastic cells. Histochem Cell Biol 109:141–159[CrossRef][Medline]
  196. Hill DJ, Riley SC, Bassett NS, Waters MJ 1992 Localization of the growth hormone receptor, identified by immunocytochemistry, in second trimester human fetal tissues and in placenta throughout gestation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:646–650[Abstract]
  197. Mertani HC, Morel G 1995 In situ gene expression of growth hormone (GH) receptor and GH binding protein in adult male rat tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 109:47–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  198. Zogopoulos G, Figueiredo R, Jenab A, Ali Z, Lefebvre Y, Goodyer CG 1996 Expression of exon 3-retaining and -deleted human growth hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid isoforms during development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:775–782[Abstract]
  199. Oakes SR, Haynes KM, Waters MJ, Herington AC, Werther GA 1992 Demonstration and localization of growth hormone receptor in human skin and skin fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1368–1373[Abstract]
  200. Freeth JS, Ayling RM, Whatmore AJ, Towner P, Price DA, Norman MR, Clayton PE 1997 Human skin fibroblasts as a model of growth hormone (GH) action in GH receptor-positive Laron’s syndrome. Endocrinology 138:55–61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  201. Palmetshofer A, Zechner D, Luger TA, Barta A 1995 Splicing variants of the human growth hormone mRNA: detection in pituitary, mononuclear cells and dermal fibroblasts. Mol Cell Endocrinol 113:225–234[CrossRef][Medline]
  202. Thorner MO, Vance ML, Horvath E, Kovacs K 1992 The anterior pituitary. In: Wilson JD, Fodter DW, eds. Textbook of endocrinology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 234
  203. Carroll PV, Christ ER, Bengtsson BA, Carlsson L, Christiansen JS, Clemmons D, Hintz R, Ho K, Laron Z, Sizonenko P, Sonksen PH, Tanaka T, Thorne M 1998 Growth hormone deficiency in adulthood and the effects of growth hormone replacement: a review. Growth Hormone Research Society Scientific Committee. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:382–395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  204. Conte F, Diridollou S, Jouret B, Turlier V, Charveron M, Gall Y, Rochiccioli P, Bieth E, Tauber M 2000 Evaluation of cutaneous modifications in seventy-seven growth hormone-deficient children. Horm Res 54:92–97[CrossRef][Medline]
  205. Rudman D, Feller AG, Nagraj HS, Gergans GA, Lalitha PY, Goldberg AF, Schlenker RA, Cohn L, Rudman IW, Mattson DE 1990 Effects of human growth hormone in men over 60 years old. N Engl J Med 323:1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  206. Lonn L, Johansson G, Sjostrom L, Kvist H, Oden A, Bengtsson BA 1996 Body composition and tissue distributions in growth hormone deficient adults before and after growth hormone treatment. Obes Res 4:45–54[Medline]
  207. Blok GJ, de Boer H, Gooren LJ, van der Veen EA 1997 Growth hormone substitution in adult growth hormone-deficient men augments androgen effects on the skin. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47:29–36[CrossRef][Medline]
  208. Wanke R, Milz S, Rieger N, Ogiolda L, Renner-Muller I, Brem G, Hermanns W, Wolf E 1999 Overgrowth of skin in growth hormone transgenic mice depends on the presence of male gonads. J Invest Dermatol 113:967–971[CrossRef][Medline]
  209. Jorgensen PH, Andreassen TT, Jorgensen KD 1989 Growth hormone influences collagen deposition and mechanical strength of intact rat skin. A dose-response study. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 120:767–772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  210. Prahalada S, Stabinski LG, Chen HY, Morrissey RE, De Burlet G, Holder D, Patrick DH, Peter CP, van Zwieten MJ 1998 Pharmacological and toxicological effects of chronic porcine growth hormone administration in dogs. Toxicol Pathol 26:185–200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  211. Murphy LJ, Vrhovsek E, Lazarus L 1983 Identification and characterization of specific growth hormone receptors in cultured human fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 57:1117–1124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  212. Freeth JS, Silva CM, Whatmore AJ, Clayton PE 1998 Activation of the signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling pathway by growth hormone (GH) in skin fibroblasts from normal and GH binding protein-positive Laron Syndrome children. Endocrinology 139:20–28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  213. Barreca A, Larizza D, Damonte G, Arvigo M, Ponzani P, Cesarone A, Lo Curto F, Severi F, Giordano G, Minuto F 1997 Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) and IGF-binding protein-3 production by fibroblasts of patients with Turner’s syndrome in culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1041–1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  214. Granot I, Halevy O, Hurwitz S, Pines M 1991 Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I regulate collagen gene expression and extracellular collagen in cultures of avian skin fibroblasts. Mol Cell Endocrinol 80:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  215. Tavakkol A, Varani J, Elder JT, Zouboulis CC 1999 Maintenance of human skin in organ culture: role for insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor. Arch Dermatol Res 291:643–651[CrossRef][Medline]
  216. Rudman SM, Philpott MP, Thomas GA, Kealey T 1997 The role of IGF-I in human skin and its appendages: morphogen as well as mitogen? J Invest Dermatol 109:770–777[CrossRef][Medline]
  217. Nissley SP, Rechler MM 1984 Somatomedin/insulin-like growth factor tissue receptors. Clin Endocrinol Metab 13:43–67[CrossRef][Medline]
  218. Thorsson AV, Hintz RL, Enberg G, Hall K 1985 Characterization of insulin-like growth factor II binding to human fibroblast monolayer cultures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:387–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  219. Conover CA, Hintz RL, Rosenfeld RG 1987 Impaired synergism between somatomedin C/insulin-like growth factor I and dexamethasone in the growth of fibroblasts from a patient with insulin resistance. Pediatric Res 22:188–191[Medline]
  220. Desnoyers L, Simonette RA, Vandlen RL, Fendly BM 2001 Novel non-isotopic method for the localization of receptors in tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 49:1509–1518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  221. Batch JA, Mercuri FA, Edmondson SR, Werther GA 1994 Localization of messenger ribonucleic acid for insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in human skin by in situ hybridization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1444–1449[Abstract]
  222. Martin JL, Baxter RC 1988 Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGF-BPs) produced by human skin fibroblasts: immunological relationship to other human IGF-BPs. Endocrinology 123:1907–1915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  223. Arai T, Arai A, Busby Jr WH, Clemmons DR 1994 Glycosaminoglycans inhibit degradation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5. Endocrinology 135:2358–2363[Abstract]
  224. Martin JL, Coverley JA, Baxter RC 1994 Regulation of immunoreactive insulin-like growth factor binding protein-6 in normal and transformed human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 269:11470–11477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  225. Xu S, Cwyfan-Hughes SC, van der Stappen JW, Sansom J, Burton JL, Donnelly M, Holly JM 1995 Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins in human skin interstitial fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2940–2945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  226. Xu S, Cwyfan-Hughes SC, van der Stappen JW, Sansom J, Burton JL, Donnelly M, Holly JM 1996 Altered insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) level and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) protease activity in interstitial fluid taken from the skin lesion of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 106:109–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  227. Xu S, Savage P, Burton JL, Sansom J, Holly JM 1997 Proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 by human skin keratinocytes in culture in comparison to that in skin interstitial fluid: the role and regulation of components of the plasmin system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1863–1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  228. Conover CA, Durham SK, Zapf J, Masiarz FR, Kiefer MC 1995 Cleavage analysis of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF-binding protein-4 proteolysis and expression of protease-resistant IGF-binding protein-4 mutants. J Biol Chem 270:4395–4400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  229. Martin JL, Baxter RC 1990 Production of an insulin-like growth factor (IGF-) inducible IGF-binding protein by human skin fibroblasts. Endocrinology 127:781–788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  230. Yoshizawa A, Clemmons DR 2000 Testosterone and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I interact in controlling IGF-binding protein production in androgen-responsive foreskin fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1627–1633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  231. Conover CA, Clarkson JT, Bale LK 1995 Effect of glucocorticoid on insulin-like growth factor (IGF) regulation of IGF-binding protein expression in fibroblasts. Endocrinology 136:1403–1410[Abstract]
  232. Sell C, Ptasznik A, Chang CD, Swantek J, Cristofalo VJ, Baserga R 1993 IGF-1 receptor levels and the proliferation of young and senescent human fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 194:259–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  233. Ferber A, Chang C, Sell C, Ptasznik A, Cristofalo VJ, Hubbard K, Ozer HL, Adamo M, Roberts Jr CT, LeRoith D 1993 Failure of senescent human fibroblasts to express the insulin-like growth factor-1 gene. J Biol Chem 268:17883–17888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Moerman EJ, Thweatt R, Moerman AM, Jones RA, Goldstein S 1993 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 is overexpressed in senescent and quiescent human fibroblasts. Exp Gerontol 28:361–370[CrossRef][Medline]
  235. Goldstein S, Moerman EJ, Jones RA, Baxter RC 1991 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 accumulates to high levels in culture medium of senescent and quiescent human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9680–9684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  236. Goldstein S, Moerman EJ, Baxter RC 1993 Accumulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in conditioned medium of human fibroblasts increases with chronologic age of donor and senescence in vitro. J Cell Physiol 156:294–302[CrossRef][Medline]
  237. Grigoriev VG, Moerman EJ, Goldstein S 1995 Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 by senescent human fibroblasts: attenuation of the mitogenic response to IGF-I. Exp Cell Res 219:315–321[CrossRef][Medline]
  238. Conover CA, Rosenfeld RG, Hintz RL 1986 Hormonal control of the replication of human fetal fibroblasts: role of somatomedin C/insulin-like growth factor I. J Cell Physiol 128:47–54[CrossRef][Medline]
  239. Tamm I, Kikuchi T 1991 Activation of signal transduction pathways protects quiescent Balb/c-3T3 fibroblasts against death due to serum deprivation. J Cell Physiol 148:85–95[CrossRef][Medline]
  240. Yoshimoto H, Ishihara H, Ohtsuru A, Akino K, Murakami R, Kuroda H, Namba H, Ito M, Fujii T, Yamashita S 1999 Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) receptor and the invasiveness of cultured keloid fibroblasts. Am J Pathol 154:883–889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  241. Ghahary A, Shen Q, Shen YJ, Scott PG, Tredget EE 1998 Induction of transforming growth factor ß 1 by insulin-like growth factor-1 in dermal fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol 174:301–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  242. Gillery P, Leperre A, Maquart FX, Borel JP 1992 Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) stimulates protein synthesis and collagen gene expression in monolayer and lattice cultures of fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol 152:389–396[CrossRef][Medline]
  243. Ghahary A, Tredget EE, Mi L, Yang L 1999 Cellular response to latent TGF-ß1 is facilitated by insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptors on MS-9 cells. Exp Cell Res 251:111–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  244. Glick AB, Danielpour D, Morgan D, Sporn MB, Yuspa SH 1990 Induction and autocrine receptor binding of transforming growth factor-ß 2 during terminal differentiation of primary mouse keratinocytes. Mol Endocrinol 4:46–52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  245. Kato M, Ishizaki A, Hellman U, Wernstedt C, Kyogoleu M, Miyazono K, Heldon CH, Funa K 1995 A human keratinocyte cell line produces two autocrine growth inhibitors, transforming growth factor-ß and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-6, in a calcium and cell density-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 270:12373–12379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  246. Kane CJ, Knapp AM, Mansbridge JN, Hanawalt PC 1990 Transforming growth factor-ß 1 localization in normal and psoriatic epidermal keratinocytes in situ. J Cell Physiol 144:144–150[CrossRef][Medline]
  247. Kratz G, Haegerstrand A, Dalsgaard CJ 1991 Conditioned medium from cultured human keratinocytes has growth stimulatory properties on different human cell types. J Invest Dermatol 97:1039–1043[CrossRef][Medline]
  248. Conover CA, Bale LK, Durham SK, Powell DR 2000 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 potentiation of IGF action is mediated through the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway and is associated with alteration in protein kinase B/AKT sensitivity. Endocrinology 141:3098–3103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  249. Firth SM, Baxter RC 2002 Cellular actions of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Endocr Rev 23:824–854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  250. Jones JI, Gockerman A, Busby Jr WH, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR 1993 Extracellular matrix contains insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5: potentiation of the effects of IGF-I. J Cell Biol 121:679–687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  251. Fowlkes JL 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein proteolysis: an emerging paradigm in insulin-like growth factor physiology. Trends Endocrinol Metab 8:299–306[CrossRef][Medline]
  252. Nam TJ, Busby Jr WH, Clemmons DR 1996 Characterization and determination of the relative abundance of two types of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 proteases that are secreted by human fibroblasts. Endocrinology 137:5530–5536[Abstract]
  253. Conover CA, Kiefer MC, Zapf J 1993 Posttranslational regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 in normal and transformed human fibroblasts: insulin-like growth factor dependence and biological studies. J Clin Invest 91:1129–1137
  254. Conover CA, De Leon DD 1994 Acid-activated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 proteolysis in normal and transformed cells. Role of cathepsin D. J Biol Chem 269:7076–7080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  255. Lawrence JB, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Sottrup-Jensen L, Gleich GJ, Hays LG, Yates 3rd JR, Conover CA 1999 The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF binding protein-4 protease secreted by human fibroblasts is pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3149–3153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  256. Fowlkes JL, Serra DM, Rosenberg CK, Thrailkill KM 1995 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) functions as an IGF-reversible inhibitor of IGFBP-4 proteolysis. J Biol Chem 270:27481–27488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  257. Lalou C, Lassarre C, Binoux M 1995 A proteolytic fragment of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 that fails to bind IGF is a cell growth inhibitor. Prog Growth Factor Res 6:311–316[CrossRef][Medline]
  258. Valentinis B, Bhala A, DeAngelis T, Baserga R, Cohen P 1995 The human insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 inhibits the growth of fibroblasts with a targeted disruption of the IGF-I receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 9:361–367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  259. Lobie PE, Breipohl W, Lincoln DT, Garcia-Aragon J, Waters MJ 1990 Localization of the growth hormone receptor/binding protein in skin. J Endocrinol 126:467–471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  260. Simard M, Manthos H, Giaid A, Lefebvre Y, Goodyer CG 1996 Ontogeny of growth hormone receptors in human tissues: an immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3097–3102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  261. Gilhar A, Ish-Shalom S, Pillar T, Etzioni A, Silbermann M 1994 Effect of antiinsulin-like growth factor 1 on epidermal proliferation of human skin transplanted onto nude mice treated with growth hormone. Endocrinology 134:229–232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  262. Edmondson SR, Russo VC, McFarlane AC, Wraight CJ, Werther GA 1999 Interactions between growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, and basic fibroblast growth factor in melanocyte growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1638–1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  263. Hodak E, Gottlieb AB, Anzilotti M, Krueger JG 1996 The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor is expressed by epithelial cells with proliferative potential in human epidermis and skin appendages: correlation of increased expression with epidermal hyperplasia. J Invest Dermatol 106:564–570[CrossRef][Medline]
  264. Edmondson SR, Werther GA, Wraight CJ 2001 Calcium regulates the expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 by the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. J Invest Dermatol 116:491–497[CrossRef][Medline]
  265. Wertheimer E, Trebicz M, Eldar T, Gartsbein M, Nofeh-Moses S, Tennenbaum T 2000 Differential roles of insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in differentiation of murine skin keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 115:24–29[CrossRef][Medline]
  266. Barreca A, DeLuca M, Del Monte P, Bondanza S, Damonte G, Cariola G, DiMarco E, Giordano G, Cancedda R, Minuto F 1992 In vitro paracrine regulation of human keratinocyte growth by fibroblast-derived insulin-like growth factors. J Cell Physiol 151:262–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  267. Rheinwald JG, Green H 1975 Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 6:331–343[CrossRef][Medline]
  268. Marinaro JA, Hendrich EC, Leeding KS, Bach LA 1999 HaCaT human keratinocytes express IGF-II, IGFBP-6, and an acid-activated protease with activity against IGFBP-6. Am J Physiol 276:E536–E542
  269. Swope VB, Supp AP, Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD, Boyce ST 2001 Expression of insulin-like growth factor I by cultured skin substitutes does not replace the physiologic requirement for insulin in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 116:650–657[CrossRef][Medline]
  270. Gartner MH, Benson JD, Caldwell MD 1992 Insulin-like growth factors I and II expression in the healing wound. J Surg Res 52:389–394[CrossRef][Medline]
  271. Brown DL, Kane CD, Chernausek SD, Greenhalgh DG 1997 Differential expression and localization of insulin-like growth factors I and II in cutaneous wounds of diabetic and nondiabetic mice. Am J Pathol 151:715–724[Abstract]
  272. Blakytny R, Jude EB, Martin Gibson J, Boulton AJ, Ferguson MW 2000 Lack of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) in the basal keratinocyte layer of diabetic skin and diabetic foot ulcers. J Pathol 589–594
  273. Braulke T, Gotz W, Claussen M 1996 Immunohistochemical localization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, -3 and -4 in human fetal tissues and their analysis in media from fetal tissue explants. Growth Regul 6:55–65[Medline]
  274. Rho O, Bol DK, You J, Beltran L, Rupp T, DiGiovanni J 1996 Altered expression of insulin-like growth factor I and its receptor during multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. Mol Carcinog 17:62–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  275. Murashita MM, Russo VC, Edmondson SR, Wraight CJ, Werther GA 1995 Identification of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins from cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. J Cell Physiol 163:339–345[CrossRef][Medline]
  276. Wraight CJ, Murashita MM, Russo VC, Werther GA 1994 A keratinocyte cell line synthesizes a predominant insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP-3) that modulates insulin-like growth factor-I action. J Invest Dermatol 103:627–631[CrossRef][Medline]
  277. Wraight CJ, Edmondson SR, Fortune DW, Varigos G, Werther GA 1997 Expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in the psoriatic lesion. J Invest Dermatol 108:452–456[CrossRef][Medline]
  278. Delhanty PJ, Hill DJ, Shimasaki S, Han VK 1993 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4, -5 and -6 mRNAs in the human fetus: localization to sites of growth and differentiation? Growth Regul 3:8–11[Medline]
  279. Wraight CJ, Werther GA 1995 Insulin-like growth factor-I and epidermal growth factor regulate insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. J Invest Dermatol 105:602–607[CrossRef][Medline]
  280. Edmondson SR, Murashita MM, Russo VC, Wraight CJ, Werther GA 1999 Expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in human keratinocytes is regulated by EGF and TGFß1. J Cell Physiol 179:201–207[CrossRef][Medline]
  281. Boukamp P, Popp S, Altmeyer S, Hulsen A, Fasching C, Cremer T, Fusenig NE 1997 Sustained nontumorigenic phenotype correlates with a largely stable chromosome content during long-term culture of the human keratinocyte line HaCaT. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 19:201–214[CrossRef][Medline]
  282. Hughes SC, Xu S, Fernihough J, Hampton A, Mason HD, Franks S, van der Stappen J, Donnelly MJ, Holly JM 1995 Tissue IGFBP-3 proteolysis: contrasting pathophysiology to that in the circulation. Prog Growth Factor Res 6:293–299[CrossRef][Medline]
  283. Herlyn M, Mancianti ML, Jambrosic J, Bolen JB, Koprowski H 1988 Regulatory factors that determine growth and phenotype of normal human melanocytes. Exp Cell Res 179:322–331[CrossRef][Medline]
  284. Zendegui JG, Inman WH, Carpenter G 1988 Modulation of the mitogenic response of an epidermal growth factor-dependent keratinocyte cell line by dexamethasone, insulin, and transforming growth factor-ß. J Cell Physiol 136:257–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  285. Neely EK, Morhenn VB, Hintz RH, Wilson DM, Rosenfeld RG 1991 Insulin-like growth factors are mitogenic for human keratinocytes and a squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 96:104–110[CrossRef][Medline]
  286. Wertheimer E, Spravchikov N, Trebicz M, Gartsbein M, Accili D, Avinoah I, Nofeh-Moses S, Sizyakov G, Tennenbaum T 2001 The regulation of skin proliferation and differentiation in the IR null mouse: implications for skin complications of diabetes. Endocrinology 142:1234–1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  287. Shen S, Alt A, Wertheimer E, Gartsbein M, Kuroki T, Ohba M, Braiman L, Sampson SR, Tennenbaum T 2001 PKC {delta} activation: a divergence point in the signaling of insulin and IGF-1-induced proliferation of skin keratinocytes. Diabetes 50:255–264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  288. DeLapp NW, Dieckman DK 1990 Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and insulin-like growth factors type I (IGF-I) and type II (IGF-II) on adult human keratinocyte growth and fibronectin secretion. J Invest Dermatol 94:777–780[CrossRef][Medline]
  289. Spravchikov N, Sizyakov G, Gartsbein M, Accili D, Tennenbaum T, Wertheimer E 2001 Glucose effects on skin keratinocytes: implications for diabetes skin complications. Diabetes 50:1627–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  290. Ristow HJ, Messmer TO 1988 Basic fibroblast growth factor and insulin-like growth factor I are strong mitogens for cultured mouse keratinocytes. J Cell Physiol 137:277–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  291. O’Keefe EJ, Chiu ML 1988 Stimulation of thymidine incorporation in keratinocytes by insulin, epidermal growth factor and placental extract: comparison with cell number to assess growth. J Invest Dermatol 90:2–7[CrossRef][Medline]
  292. Cook PW, Pittelkow MR, Shipley GD 1991 Growth factor-independent proliferation of normal human neonatal keratinocytes: production of autocrine- and paracrine-acting mitogenic factors. J Cell Physiol 146:277–289[CrossRef][Medline]
  293. Krane JF, Murphy DP, Carter DM, Krueger JG 1991 Synergistic effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor I/somatomedin C (IGF-I) on keratinocyte proliferation may be mediated by IGF-I transmodulation of the EGF receptor. J Invest Dermatol 96:419–424[CrossRef][Medline]
  294. Vardy DA, Kari C, Lazarus GS, Jensen PJ, Zilberstein A, Plowman GD, Rodeck U 1995 Induction of autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor ligands in human keratinocytes by insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1. J Cell Physiol 163:257–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  295. Marikovsky M, Vogt P, Eriksson E, Rubin JS, Taylor WG, Joachim S, Klagsbrun M 1996 Wound fluid-derived heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) is synergistic with insulin-like growth factor-I for Balb/MK keratinocyte proliferation. J Invest Dermatol 106:616–621[CrossRef][Medline]
  296. Ristow HJ 1996 Studies on stimulation of DNA synthesis with epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I in cultured human keratinocytes. Growth Regul 6:96–109[Medline]
  297. Krane JF, Gottlieb AB, Carter DM, Krueger JG 1992 The insulin-like growth factor I receptor is overexpressed in psoriatic epidermis, but is differentially regulated from the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Exp Med 175:1081–1090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  298. Kamalati T, Howard M, Brooks RF 1989 IGF-I induces differentiation in a transformed human keratinocyte line. Development 106:283–293[Abstract]
  299. Tron VA, Trotter MJ, Tang L, Krajewska M, Reed JC, Ho VC, Li G 1998 p53-regulated apoptosis is differentiation dependent in ultraviolet B-irradiated mouse keratinocytes. Am J Pathol 153:579–585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  300. Hansson HA, Jonsson R, Petruson K 1988 Transiently increased insulin-like growth factor. I. Immunoreactivity in UVB-irradiated mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 91:328–332[CrossRef][Medline]
  301. Kuhn C, Hurwitz SA, Kumar MG, Cotton J, Spandau DF 1999 Activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor promotes the survival of human keratinocytes following ultraviolet B irradiation. Int J Cancer 80:431–438[CrossRef][Medline]
  302. DiGiovanni J, Bol DK, Wilker E, Beltran L, Carbajal S, Moats S, Ramirez A, Jorcano J, Kiguchi K 2000 Constitutive expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 in epidermal basal cells of transgenic mice leads to spontaneous tumor promotion. Cancer Res 60:1561–1570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  303. Shen S, Wertheimer E, Sampson SR, Tennenbaum T 2000 Characterization of glucose transport system in keratinocytes: insulin and IGF-1 differentially affect specific transporters. J Invest Dermatol 115:949–954[CrossRef][Medline]
  304. Pittelkow MR, Shipley GD 1989 Serum-free culture of normal human melanocytes: growth kinetics and growth factor requirements. J Cell Physiol 140:565–576[CrossRef][Medline]
  305. Nickoloff BJ 1999 The immunologic and genetic basis of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 135:1104–1110[Free Full Text]
  306. Weber G, Neidhardt M, Schmidt A, Geiger A 1981 Correlation of growth hormone and aetiology of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 270:129–140[CrossRef][Medline]
  307. Weber G, Pliess G, Heitz U 1985 Growth hormone producing hyperplasia of pituitary gland in psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 277:345[CrossRef][Medline]
  308. Maghnie M, Borroni G, Larizza D, Lorini R, Girani MA, Rabbiosi G, Severi F 1990 Relapsing eruptive psoriasis and immunological changes triggered by growth hormone therapy in a growth hormone-deficient girl. Dermatologica 181:139–141[Medline]
  309. MacKie RM, Beastall GM, Thomson JA 1983 Growth hormone levels in psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 275:207[CrossRef][Medline]
  310. Priestley GC, Gawkrodger DJ, Seth J, Going SM, Hunter JA 1984 Growth hormone levels in psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 276:147–150[CrossRef][Medline]
  311. Nickoloff BJ, Misra P, Morhenn VB, Hintz RL, Rosenfeld RG 1987 Plasma somatomedin-C levels in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 116:15–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  312. Bjorntorp E, Wickelgren R, Bjarnason R, Swanbeck G, Carlsson LM, Lindahl A 1997 No evidence for involvement of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 109:661–665[CrossRef][Medline]
  313. Guilhou JJ, Boulanger A, Barneon G, Vic P, Meynadier J, Tardieu JC, Clot J 1982 Somatostatin treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 274:249–257[CrossRef][Medline]
  314. Weber G, Klughardt G, Neidhardt M, Galle K, Frey H, Geiger A 1982 Treatment of psoriasis with somatostatin. Arch Dermatol Res 272:31–36[CrossRef][Medline]
  315. Hattori N, Shimatsu A, Sugita M, Kumagai S, Imura H 1990 Immunoreactive growth hormone (GH) secretion by human lymphocytes: augmented release by exogenous GH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 168:396–401[CrossRef][Medline]
  316. Ristow HJ 1993 Effect of insulin-like growth factor-I/somatomedin C on thymidine incorporation in cultured psoriatic keratinocytes after growth arrest in growth factor-free medium. Growth Regul 3:129–137[Medline]
  317. Ristow HJ 1997 Increased synergistic effect of EGF and IGF-I on DNA synthesis of cultured psoriatic keratinocytes. Dermatology 195:213–219[Medline]
  318. Swygart C 1997 Human papillomavirus: disease and laboratory diagnosis. Br J Biomed Sci 54:299–303[Medline]
  319. Munger K, Werness BA, Dyson N, Phelps WC, Harlow E, Howley PM 1989 Complex formation of human papillomavirus E7 proteins with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product. EMBO J 8:4099–4105[Medline]
  320. Lang PG 2002 Current concepts in the management of patients with melanoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:401–426[CrossRef][Medline]
  321. Bourguignon JP, Pierard GE, Ernould C, Heinrichs C, Craen M, Rochiccioli P, Arrese JE, Franchimont C 1993 Effects of human growth hormone therapy on melanocytic naevi. Lancet 341:1505–1506[CrossRef][Medline]
  322. Pierard GE, Pierard-Franchimont C, Nikkels A, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, Arrese JE, Bourguignon JP 1996 Naevocyte triggering by recombinant human growth hormone. J Pathol 180:74–79[CrossRef][Medline]
  323. Zvulunov A, Wyatt DT, Laud PW, Esterly NB 1997 Lack of effect of growth hormone therapy on the count and density of melanocytic naevi in children. Br J Dermatol 137:545–548[CrossRef][Medline]
  324. Wyatt D 1999 Melanocytic nevi in children treated with growth hormone. Pediatrics 104:1045–1050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  325. Corcuff JB, Ogor C, Kerlan V, Rougier MB, Bercovichi M, Roger P 1997 Ocular naevus and melanoma in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47:119–121[CrossRef][Medline]
  326. Fleming MG, Howe SF, Graf Jr LH 1994 Expression of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in nevi and melanomas. Am J Dermatopathol 16:383–391[Medline]
  327. Hodak E, Gottlieb AB, Colen S, Anzilotti M, Krueger JG 1996 In vivo expression of the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor in congenital pigmented nevi. J Cutan Pathol 23:19–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  328. Rodeck U, Herlyn M, Koprowski H 1987 Interactions between growth factor receptors and corresponding monoclonal antibodies in human tumors. J Cell Biochem 35:315–320[CrossRef][Medline]
  329. Herlyn M, Kath R, Williams N, Valyi-Nagy I, Rodeck U 1990 Growth-regulatory factors for normal, premalignant, and malignant human cells in vitro. Adv Cancer Res 54:213–234[Medline]
  330. Graeven U, Herlyn M 1992 In vitro growth patterns of normal human melanocytes and melanocytes from different stages of melanoma progression. J Immunother 12:199–202
  331. Graeven U, Rodeck U, Weinmann R, Herlyn M 1992 Stable transfection of human malignant melanoma cells with basic fibroblast growth factor antisense cDNA. Ann NY Acad Sci 660:293–294[CrossRef][Medline]
  332. Becker D, Lee PL, Rodeck U, Herlyn M 1992 Inhibition of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR-1) gene in human melanocytes and malignant melanomas leads to inhibition of proliferation and signs indicative of differentiation. Oncogene 7:2303–2313[Medline]
  333. Resnicoff M, Coppola D, Sell C, Rubin R, Ferrone S, Baserga R 1994 Growth inhibition of human melanoma cells in nude mice by antisense strategies to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 54:4848–4850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  334. Wang Y, Becker D 1997 Antisense targeting of basic fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 in human melanomas blocks intratumoral angiogenesis and tumor growth. Nat Med 3:887–893[CrossRef][Medline]
  335. Werner H, Karnieli E, Rauscher FJ, LeRoith D 1996 Wild-type and mutant p53 differentially regulate transcription of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8318–8323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  336. Girnita L, Girnita A, Brodin B, Xie Y, Nilsson G, Dricu A, Lundeberg J, Wejde J, Bartolazzi A, Wiman KG, Larsson O 2000 Increased expression of insulin-like growth factor I receptor in malignant cells expressing aberrant p53: functional impact. Cancer Res 60:5278–5283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  337. Harris CC 1996 p53: At the crossroads of molecular carcinogenesis and molecular epidemiology. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 1:115–118[Medline]
  338. Stracke ML, Kohn EC, Aznavoorian SA, Wilson LL, Salomon D, Krutzsch HC, Liotta LA, Schiffmann E 1988 Insulin-like growth factors stimulate chemotaxis in human melanoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 153:1076–1083[CrossRef][Medline]
  339. Stracke ML, Engel JD, Wilson LW, Rechler MM, Liotta LA, Schiffmann E 1989 The type I insulin-like growth factor receptor is a motility receptor in human melanoma cells. J Biol Chem 264:21544–21549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  340. Rodeck U, Melber K, Kath R, Menssen HD, Varello M, Atkinson B, Herlyn M 1991 Constitutive expression of multiple growth factor genes by melanoma cells but not normal melanocytes. J Invest Dermatol 97:20–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  341. Olney RC, Anhalt H, Neely EK, Wilson DM 1995 A quantitative assay for IGF-I and IGF binding protein mRNAs: expression in malignant melanoma cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 110:213–223[CrossRef][Medline]
  342. Ward A, Bates P, Fisher R, Richardson L, Graham CF 1994 Disproportionate growth in mice with IGF-2 transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10365–10369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  343. Bol DK, Kiguchi K, Gimenez-Conti I, Rupp T, DiGiovanni J 1997 Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 induces hyperplasia, dermal abnormalities, and spontaneous tumor formation in transgenic mice. Oncogene 14:1725–1734[CrossRef][Medline]
  344. Eming SA, Snow RG, Yarmush ML, Morgan JR 1996 Targeted expression of insulin-like growth factor to human keratinocytes: modification of the autocrine control of keratinocyte proliferation. J Invest Dermatol 107:113–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  345. Rubini M, Hongo A, D’Ambrosio C, Baserga R 1997 The IGF-I receptor in mitogenesis and transformation of mouse embryo cells: role of receptor number. Exp Cell Res 230:284–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  346. Wilker E, Bol D, Kiguchi K, Rupp T, Beltran L, DiGiovanni J 1999 Enhancement of susceptibility to diverse skin tumor promoters by activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in the epidermis of transgenic mice. Mol Carcinog 25:122–131[CrossRef][Medline]
  347. Harding KG, Morris HL, Patel GK 2002 Science, medicine and the future: healing chronic wounds. BMJ 324:160–163[Free Full Text]
  348. Falabella AF, Falanga V 2001 Wound healing. In: Freinkel RK, Woodley DT, eds. The biology of the skin. 1st ed. Pearl River, NY: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 281–297
  349. Rasmussen LH, Garbarsch C, Schuppan D, Moe D, Horslev-Pedersen K, Gottrup F, Steenfos H 1995 Dose response profiles of human growth hormone in subcutaneous wound chambers in rats. Eur J Surg 161:157–162[Medline]
  350. Gilpin DA, Barrow RE, Rutan RL, Broemeling L, Herndon DN 1994 Recombinant human growth hormone accelerates wound healing in children with large cutaneous burns. Ann Surg 220:19–24[Medline]
  351. Ghofrani A, Holler D, Schuhmann K, Saldern S, Messmer BJ 1999 The influence of systemic growth hormone administration on the healing time of skin graft donor sites in a pig model. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:470–475[Medline]
  352. Jorgensen PH, Andreassen TT 1987 A dose-response study of the effects of biosynthetic human growth hormone on formation and strength of granulation tissue. Endocrinology 121:1637–1641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  353. Jorgensen PH, Andreassen TT 1988 The influence of biosynthetic human growth hormone on biomechanical properties and collagen formation in granulation tissue. Horm Metab Res 20:490–493[Medline]
  354. Jorgensen PH, Bang C, Andreassen TT, Flyvbjerg A, Orskov H 1995 Dose-response study of the effect of growth hormone on mechanical properties of skin graft wounds. J Surg Res 58:295–301[CrossRef][Medline]
  355. Seyer-Hansen M, Andreassen TT, Oxlund H 1999 Strength of colonic anastomoses and skin incisional wounds in old rats—influence by diabetes and growth hormone. Growth Horm IGF Res 9:254–261[CrossRef][Medline]
  356. Herndon DN, Barrow RE, Kunkel KR, Broemeling L, Rutan RL 1990 Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on donor-site healing in severely burned children. Ann Surg 212:424–429[Medline]
  357. Moller S, Jensen M, Svensson P, Skakkebaek NE 1991 Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in burn patients. Burns 17:279–281[CrossRef][Medline]
  358. Singh KP, Prasad R, Chari PS, Dash RJ 1998 Effect of growth hormone therapy in burn patients on conservative treatment. Burns 24:733–738[CrossRef][Medline]
  359. Jeschke MG, Chrysopoulo MT, Herndon DN, Wolf SE 1999 Increased expression of insulin-like growth factor-I in serum and liver after recombinant human growth hormone administration in thermally injured rats. J Surg Res 85:171–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  360. Meyer NA, Barrow RE, Herndon DN 1996 Combined insulin-like growth factor-1 and growth hormone improves weight loss and wound healing in burned rats. J Trauma 41:1008–1012[Medline]
  361. Pierre EJ, Perez-Polo JR, Mitchell AT, Matin S, Foyt HL, Herndon DN 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-I liposomal gene transfer and systemic growth hormone stimulate wound healing. J Burn Care Rehabil 18:287–291[CrossRef][Medline]
  362. Vogt PM, Lehnhardt M, Wagner D, Jansen V, Krieg M, Steinau HU 1998 Determination of endogenous growth factors in human wound fluid: temporal presence and profiles of secretion. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:117–123[Medline]
  363. Hathaway CL, Arnold AM, Rand RP, Engrav LH, Quinn LS 1996 Differential expression of IGFBPs by normal and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. J Surg Res 60:156–162[CrossRef][Medline]
  364. Bhora FY, Dunkin BJ, Batzri S, Aly HM, Bass BL, Sidawy AN, Harmon JW 1995 Effect of growth factors on cell proliferation and epithelialization in human skin. J Surg Res 59:236–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  365. Roesel JF, Nanney LB 1995 Assessment of differential cytokine effects on angiogenesis using an in vivo model of cutaneous wound repair. J Surg Res 58:449–459[CrossRef][Medline]
  366. Ghahary A, Tredget EE, Shen Q 1999 Insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose 6 phosphate receptors facilitate the matrix effects of latent transforming growth factor-ß1 released from genetically modified keratinocytes in a fibroblast/keratinocyte co-culture system. J Cell Physiol 180:61–70[CrossRef][Medline]
  367. Bitar MS, Pilcher CW, Khan I, Waldbillig RJ 1997 Diabetes-induced suppression of IGF-1 and its receptor mRNA levels in rat superior cervical ganglia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 38:73–80[CrossRef][Medline]
  368. Suh DY, Hunt TK, Spencer EM 1992 Insulin-like growth factor-I reverses the impairment of wound healing induced by corticosteroids in rats. Endocrinology 131:2399–2403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  369. Ghahary A, Fu S, Shen YJ, Shankowsky HA, Tredget EE 1994 Differential effects of thermal injury on circulating insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in burn patients. Mol Cell Biochem 135:171–180[CrossRef][Medline]
  370. Bastian SE, Walton PE, Belford DA 2000 Transport of circulating IGF-I and LR3IGF-I from blood to extracellular wound fluid sites in rats. J Endocrinol 164:77–86[Abstract]
  371. Robertson JG, Pickering KJ, Belford DA 1996 Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding proteins in rat wound fluid. Endocrinology 137:2774–2781[Abstract]
  372. Lemmey AB, Glassford J, Flick-Smith HC, Holly JM, Pell JM 1997 Differential regulation of tissue insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, IGF-I and IGF type 1 receptor mRNA levels, and serum IGF-I and IGFBP concentrations by growth hormone and IGF-I. J Endocrinol 154:319–328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  373. Hamon GA, Hunt TK, Spencer EM 1993 In vivo effects of systemic insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 on corticosteroid suppressed wounds. Growth Regul 3:53–56[Medline]
  374. Jyung RW, Mustoe JA, Busby WH, Clemmons DR 1994 Increased wound-breaking strength induced by insulin-like growth factor I in combination with insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Surgery 115:233–239[Medline]
  375. Lee YR, Oshita Y, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H 1996 Combination of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-1 promotes fibroblast-embedded collagen gel contraction. Endocrinology 137:5278–5283[Abstract]
  376. Galiano RD, Zhao LL, Clemmons DR, Roth SI, Lin X, Mustoe TA 1996 Interaction between the insulin-like growth factor family and the integrin receptor family in tissue repair processes. Evidence in a rabbit ear dermal ulcer model. J Clin Invest 98:2462–2468[Medline]
  377. Jones JI, D’Ercole AJ, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR 1991 Phosphorylation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein 1 in cell culture and in vivo: effects on affinity for IGF-I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7481–7485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  378. Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Hawkins HK, Chrysopoulo MT, Perez-Polo JR, Herndon DN 1999 Effect of multiple gene transfers of insulin-like growth factor I complementary DNA gene constructs in rats after thermal injury. Arch Surg 134:1137–1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  379. Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Hawkins HK, Tao Z, Perez-Polo JR, Herndon DN 2000 Biodistribution and feasibility of non-viral IGF-I gene transfers in thermally injured skin. Lab Invest 80:151–158[Medline]
  380. Jeschke MG, Richter G, Herndon DN, Geissler EK, Hartl M, Hofstatter F, Jauch KW, Perez-Polo JR 2001 Therapeutic success and efficacy of nonviral liposomal cDNA gene transfer to the skin in vivo is dose dependent. Gene Ther 8:1777–1784[CrossRef][Medline]
  381. Spies M, Nesic O, Barrow RE, Perez-Polo JR, Herndon DN 2001 Liposomal IGF-1 gene transfer modulates pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in the burn wound. Gene Ther 8:1409–1415[CrossRef][Medline]
  382. Vogt PM, Thompson S, Andree C, Liu P, Breuing K, Hatzis D, Brown H, Mulligan RC, Eriksson E 1994 Genetically modified keratinocytes transplanted to wounds reconstitute the epidermis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9307–9311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  383. De Luca M, Pellegrini G 1997 The importance of epidermal stem cells in keratinocyte-mediated gene therapy. Gene Ther 4:381–383[CrossRef][Medline]
  384. Dews M, Prisco M, Peruzzi F, Romano G, Morrione A, Baserga R 2000 Domains of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor required for the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Endocrinology 141:1289–1300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  385. Butt AJ, Williams AC 2001 IGFBP-3 and apoptosis–a license to kill? Apoptosis 6:199–205[CrossRef][Medline]
  386. Amagai M, Ozawa S, Ueda M, Nishikawa T, Abe O, Shimizu N 1988 Distribution of EGF receptor expressing and DNA replicating epidermal cells in psoriasis vulgaris and Bowen’s disease. Br J Dermatol 119:661–668[CrossRef][Medline]
  387. Gottlieb AB, Khandke L, Krane JF, Staiano-Coico L, Ashinoff R, Krueger JG 1992 Anthralin decreases keratinocyte TGF-{alpha} expression and EGF-receptor binding in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 98:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  388. Watts P, Stables GS, Akhurst RJ, Mackie RM 1994 Localization of transforming growth factor-{alpha} RNA and protein in the skin of psoriatic patients receiving therapy. Br J Dermatol 131:64–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  389. Sergi C, Kahl P, Otto HF 2000 Immunohistochemical localization of transforming growth factor-{alpha} and epithelial growth factor receptor in human fetal developing skin, psoriasis and restrictive dermopathy. Pathol Oncol Res 6:250–255[Medline]
  390. Sakai Y, Nelson KG, Snedeker S, Bossert NL, Walker MP, McLachlan J, DiAugustine RP 1994 Expression of epidermal growth factor in suprabasal cells of stratified squamous epithelia: implications for a role in differentiation. Cell Growth Differ 5:527–535[Abstract]
  391. Breitkreutz D, Stark HJ, Plein P, Baur M, Fusenig NE 1993 Differential modulation of epidermal keratinization in immortalized (HaCaT) and tumorigenic human skin keratinocytes (HaCaT-ras) by retinoic acid and extracellular Ca2+. Differentiation 54:201–217[CrossRef][Medline]
  392. Denning MF, Guy SG, Ellerbroek SM, Norvell SM, Kowalczyk AP, Green KJ 1998 The expression of desmoglein isoforms in cultured human keratinocytes is regulated by calcium, serum, and protein kinase C. Exp Cell Res 239:50–59[CrossRef][Medline]
  393. Watt FM, Hogan BL 2000 Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. Science 287:1427–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JEMHome page
A. Toulon, L. Breton, K. R. Taylor, M. Tenenhaus, D. Bhavsar, C. Lanigan, R. Rudolph, J. Jameson, and W. L. Havran
A role for human skin-resident T cells in wound healing
J. Exp. Med., April 13, 2009; 206(4): 743 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
E. Semenova, H. Koegel, S. Hasse, J. E. Klatte, E. Slonimsky, D. Bilbao, R. Paus, S. Werner, and N. Rosenthal
Overexpression of mIGF-1 in Keratinocytes Improves Wound Healing and Accelerates Hair Follicle Formation and Cycling in Mice
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 173(5): 1295 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
N. E. Banziger-Tobler, C. Halin, K. Kajiya, and M. Detmar
Growth Hormone Promotes Lymphangiogenesis
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2008; 173(2): 586 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Lee, J. M. Basak, S. Demehri, and R. Kopan
Bi-compartmental communication contributes to the opposite proliferative behavior of Notch1-deficient hair follicle and epidermal keratinocytes
Development, August 1, 2007; 134(15): 2795 - 2806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. N. McDougal and C. M. Garrett
Gene Expression and Target Tissue Dose in the Rat Epidermis after Brief JP-8 and JP-8 Aromatic and Aliphatic Component Exposures
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2007; 97(2): 569 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. Zaldivar, J. Wang-Rodriguez, D. Nemet, C. Schwindt, P. Galassetti, P. J. Mills, L. D. Wilson, and D. M. Cooper
Constitutive pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine and growth factor response to exercise in leukocytes
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2006; 100(4): 1124 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints, Permissions and Rights
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmondson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wraight, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edmondson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wraight, C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals