| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
School of Medicine, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7QB, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: R. N. Clayton, M.D., Ph.D., School of Medicine, Keele University, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, United Kingdom. E-mail: r.n.clayton{at}keele.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| I. IntroductionIncreased Mortality in Acromegaly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main causes of the increased mortality are vascular and respiratory diseases, with cancer deaths, perhaps surprisingly, not increased (Table 1
). There is considerable heterogeneity between reports with respect to gender differences and distinction between cardio- and cerebrovascular deaths. Moreover, these data are only as accurate as the death certification coding and registration in each country. Notwithstanding these issues, the conclusion of overall significantly increased rate of vascular deaths is substantiated. Survival in the acromegalic population is predicted to be about 10 yr less than in the general population (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). When considering what might predict this increased mortality, Rajasoorya et al. (9) and Orme et al. (8) have shown that the duration of disease and serum GH level are independent predictors of overall mortality, especially the product of the GH level and estimated duration of acromegaly (9). One study (11) defined remission after transsphenoidal surgery on the basis of serum IGF-I levels. In those in whom this biochemical index was normalized, the mortality was no different from that of the general population, whereas, in those in whom IGF-I remained elevated, the standarized mortality rate was 1.8. However, a more recent larger prospective study from the United Kingdom (12) failed to demonstrate an independent predictive value of serum IGF-I on mortality, although serum GH level was a good predictor. In this context, not all actions of GH are IGF-I dependent, as direct GH effects have been demonstrated in many tissues (e.g., bone and gonads). For example, a recent in vitro study demonstrated GH effects on myocyte hypertrophy and altered cellular metabolism in cultured myocytes in the absence of any change in IGF-I mRNA, implying an IGF-I-independent action of GH (13).
|
2 ng/ml) was not increased, whereas those with GH levels over this value still had increased mortality, there has been considerable debate on the absolute level of serum GH that might be considered safe and for which treatment should aim. This cut-off value was subsequently confirmed by Rajasoorya et al. (9) and Orme et al. (8) and most recently again by Ayuk et al. (12). There have been two consensus statements on this issue that broadly agree with this conclusion, although a post-glucose-suppressed GH level of less than 1 ng/ml was used as the criterion for safe GH levels (14, 15). In these retrospective studies, it is important to remember that serum GH was measured by classical RIA using polyclonal antibodies and various GH standards. For those studies originating from the United Kingdom, however, at least the standard was equivalent, as it was provided by the Medical Research Council. However, antibodies may well have been different across the United Kingdom and almost certainly in other regions of the world. With current two-site immunoradiometric analysis assays, both sensitivity and specificity of GH measurements are different from those previously considered (16). Accordingly, in future determination of absolute cut-off values for safe GH levels, these analytical issues will need to be considered and the criteria redefined. How, therefore, is the increase in GH and IGF-I responsible for the increased mortality, and what, if any, is the link between this and increased cardiovascular mortality? It has long been recognized that there is an increased prevalence of cardiovascular mortality risk factors in acromegaly including hypertension, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), dyslipidemia, abdominal adiposity, and peripheral insulin resistance (all features of the metabolic syndrome). More recently, endothelial dysfunction with impaired flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and increased intima media thickness (IMT) has been demonstrated (see Section V). Both of these indices are now recognized surrogate markers of early vascular disease and predictors of ischemic heart disease (reviewed in Ref. 17). Moreover, lowering of serum GH significantly improves many of the aforementioned risk factors. But is there a specific effect of GH/IGF-I on the heart and cardiac function, in addition to the above-mentioned risk factors, that might contribute to morbidity and mortality in acromegaly?
This brief review will consider the specific effects of GH/IGF-I on cardiac structure and function and emerging evidence for endothelial dysfunction in acromegaly.
| II. Cardiomyopathy in Acromegaly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Is there a specific pathological entity in acromegaly unrelated to hypertension/NIDDM/dyslipidemia? The answer appears to be yes. The ventricular walls are concentrically thickened due to a relative increase in myocyte size without enlargement of cardiac chambers. Moreover, biopsy and autopsy studies indicate that interstitial fibrosis (up to 8-fold higher than in biopsies from myocardium in mitral stenosis) is the main histological feature that gradually impairs architecture and function (20). The pattern of mononuclear cell infiltration resembles multifocal myocarditis without necrosis. It has been suggested that this results from a marked (
450-fold) increase in apoptosis of myocytes (20). Myocyte apoptosis was positively related to duration of disease and inversely with ejection fraction (20). However, in adult rats, administration of exogenous GH and IGF-I induces cardiac hypertrophy without concomitant fibrosis (21). The absence of fibrosis in the animal experiment may be a feature of the relatively short-term exposure to high GH compared with the years of exposure often experienced by the heart in humans with acromegaly.
Clinically, cardiac hypertrophy involves both the left and right ventricles in 90% of older patients with long duration of disease (22, 23). But recent reports suggest that about 20% of young (<30 yr old) normotensive acromegalics have cardiac hypertrophy (24) and that structural changes can occur after short-term exposure to GH (25). Thus, in patients under 40 yr old with active acromegaly of 37 yr duration, 54% had echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy, with this figure rising to 72% in patients 4160 yr old with disease duration of 515 yr (19). Thus, cardiac hypertrophy, without ventricular dilatation, is a common early feature of the disease. Generally, angiography does not reveal defects of the coronary vessels (20).
The question is thencan this be reversed by successful treatment? The answer appears to be, emphatically, yes. Structural changes in the heart are observed with successful lowering of GH/IGF-I levels, as reviewed by Colao et al. (19). Most of these studies were of short duration (212 months) and used somatostatin analogs. Nevertheless, echocardiography revealed a reduction in the increased left ventricular mass index (LVMi) in nearly all studies, although whether these values reached those of normal controls is unclear from the data presented. What is interesting is that the cardiac remodeling seems to occur quite quickly, in 3 months in some reports. Colao et al. (19) report that the reduction in LVMi occurs in patients of all ages, and that 50% of patients with cardiac hypertrophy regained normal LVMi, although the authors do not present the data. Furthermore, the same conclusion was reached in the longer follow-up study of Vianna et al. (26). The practical consequence of these observations is that restoring cardiac structure and function (see below) becomes an objective of treatment, along with the other classical indications.
| III. Functional Changes in the Acromegalic Heart |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a recent report, clinical symptoms and signs of heart failure were found in about 10% of newly diagnosed acromegalics (10 of 102 subjects). This was characterized by near-normal left ventricular systolic function and increased cardiac index, implying high output failure (27). In an older study (28), 7 of 256 patients had clinical evidence of heart failure, although overt left ventricular failure was only apparent in 2 patients (<1%). It is interesting that there are very limited prevalence data on clinically evident heart failure, although echocardiographic studies are more common. Most echocardiographic studies show normal left ventricular systolic function but impaired diastolic function as an early finding in acromegalic cardiomyopathy (reviewed in Ref. 19), which leads to impaired left ventricular filling. The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is approximately 30% in untreated subjects (29). The consequences of this are not so much at rest but on exercise, during which the ejection fraction is reduced, leading to reduced exercise tolerance. Using more sensitive equilibrium radionuclide angiography, impairment of ejection fraction after exercise was observed in 73% of patients (30) and in 40% of subjects under the age of 40 yr (31). Using the sensitive techniques of tissue Doppler imaging and TEI-index for assessment of global cardiac function, Herrmann et al. (32) demonstrated significant left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in active acromegaly with normal left ventricular mass. Moreover, diastolic dysfunction was related to disease activity in that the active group showed significantly impaired function compared with controls, whereas the well-controlled group (according to the criteria of Guistina et al., Ref. 14) were the same as controls. Importantly, these abnormalities were apparently correlated with disease duration, although the data in support of this statement are not shown. These results imply that early diastolic changes are reversible with successful treatment, but with the caveat that this was a cohort, not longitudinal, study. As in previous reports, there were no changes in parameters of left ventricular systolic function.
The next issue is whether cardiac function can be improved/restored to normal by effective lowering of GH/IGF-I in acromegaly. There have been several echocardiographic studies but with relatively small numbers of patients and short duration of treatment (212 months) (Ref. 19). Many of these studies used a somatostatin analog as the main treatment modality. The consensus seems to be clear: diastolic filling is improved, but the effect on ejection fraction and exercise tolerance is more variable. It is evident that improvement only occurs in those patients in whom the acromegaly is controlled. However, the definition of control varies somewhat between the studies, making true comparisons difficult. Moreover, selection bias could well confound some of the data interpretation, and a genuine randomized, controlled trial on the basis of intention to treat has never been performed. In the aforementioned studies, it is difficult to discern whether cardiac function returns to sex- and age-matched control values because of the short duration of some studies. In the most recent study addressing this question (26), 15 patients whose glucose tolerance test suppressed GH level was less than 2 ng/ml and who achieved normal or near-normal IGF-I values were assessed before and at a mean of 3.6 yr (range 16 yr) after pituitary surgery with or without radiotherapy. An advantage of this study was that none of the subjects had received a somatostatin analog, thereby eliminating any possibility of a confounding direct effect of these agents on the myocardium. Moreover, these patients were young, (mean age of 33 yr, range 1955 yr), had no signs or symptoms of heart failure, and were neither hypertensive nor diabetic. As a group, diastolic function was reduced compared with controls and improved after successful treatment. However, it is not possible from the statistical analysis presented to be certain whether the posttreatment values were normal, although, for certain indices, this looks to be the case. Finally, in all the studies reviewed, there are little or no data on exercise tolerance before vs. after treatment, which is what matters to the patient.
| IV. Cardiac Dysrhythmias in Acromegaly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another study investigated late potentials in a signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a predictor of ventricular dysrhythmias (35). These late potentials are frequently seen in patients after myocardial infarction and are predictors of arrhythmic events (36). Disorganized and asynchronous electrical activity is thought to arise from areas of surviving muscle at the border of the infarct. Such areas are separated from each other by fibrous tissue, thereby creating a disorganized and disconnected network of myofibrils. This architecture is not dissimilar from that observed histologically in the acromegalic heart, in which there are areas of hypertrophied myocytes separated by fibrosis and cellular infiltration. In the study by Herrmann et al. (35), late potentials were detected in 9 of 16 (56%) patients with active acromegaly vs. 2 of 32 (6%) well-controlled patients (P = 0.001; the IGF-I level normal for age and glucose-suppressed GH is <1 ng/ml). When active and well-controlled acromegalics together were compared with controls, 26% vs. 0% had late potentials, but there was no separate statistical analysis of the well-controlled acromegalics vs. controls. Inspection of their data, however, would seem to indicate no difference, implying that well-controlled acromegalics were normal with respect to these variables. No association was found between presence of late potentials and LVMi. None of the acromegalics studied had clinical symptoms or signs of coronary artery disease when studied. On exercise electrocardiogram, 3 of 16 in the active acromegaly group and 4 of 32 in the well-controlled group had complex ventricular dysrhythmias (probability values were not significant) (Ref. 35), and these did not correlate with late potentials, perhaps questioning the pathological relevance of the latter. None had significant ST-segment changes on exercise electrocardiogram. Based on the aforementioned results, the authors (35) speculate that presence of late potentials may be a sensitive and early indicator of myocardial remodeling in acromegaly.
In neither of these two studies were any longitudinal within-patient data obtained to determine whether treatment changed the electrophysiological abnormalities. If these are related to altered left ventricular structure/histology, as surmised in the reports, the extent to which the changes are reversible would depend upon how the myocardial architecture changes with treatment. However, earlier studies (28, 33) showed that arrhythmias were as frequent before as after treatment of acromegaly, implying that fibrous tissue infiltration had resulted in permanent irreversible scarring. However, the extent of reduction in GH/IGF-I in these studies is unclear and probably did not meet modern criteria for safe levels. Thus, it seems prudent to include noninvasive electrocardiographic monitoring in longitudinal prospective studies of treatment outcomes.
| V. The Endothelium in Acromegaly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obesity and insulin resistance are associated with blunted endothelium-dependent, but not endothelium-independent, vasodilation (41), with failure of hyperinsulinemia to augment endothelium-dependent vasodilation (42). This indicates that obesity is associated with endothelial dysfunction and endothelial resistance to the enhancing effect of insulin on endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Endothelial dysfunction might therefore contribute to the increased risk of atherosclerosis in obese insulin-resistant subjects, such as those with acromegaly. Insulin resistance has been proposed as a central metabolic basis for the clustering of risk factors in the multiple cardiovascular risk syndrome (syndrome X). However, Pinkney et al. (43) have argued that the central problem may be endothelial dysfunction rather than insulin resistance. In resistance vessels, the endothelium regulates blood flow and blood pressure through the production of powerful vasoactive substances such as NO, endothelin-1, and thromboxane A2 (44).
Studies of endothelial function in acromegaly are scarce, although there are several reports of hemodynamic abnormalities and disordered cardiovascular function in acromegaly. Chanson et al. (45) demonstrated reduced brachial artery blood flow with significantly higher forearm vascular resistance in acromegalic patients compared with matched control subjects. This is in contrast to the previously reported increased renal blood flow and glomerular hyperfiltration (46) and increased functional liver plasma flow (47) and could imply heterogeneity in the distribution of cardiac output in acromegaly (48). Defective brachial artery dilation in response to increased blood flow might account for the increased forearm vascular resistance and might represent underlying endothelial dysfunction.
Recently, Maison et al. (49) reported impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in acromegalic patients together with exaggerated sympathetic-mediated vasoconstrictor response. To what extent the peripheral insulin resistance of acromegaly contributes to this and what contribution is made by high GH/IGF-I levels is unclear. FMD of the brachial artery was significantly lower in acromegalics than in healthy and risk-factor-matched controls (by 64% and 47%, respectively) (Ref. 50). However, in cured acromegalics, FMD was significantly higher than in noncured acromegalics, although it was still lower than in the healthy and risk-factor-matched controls. Non-endothelium-dependent brachial artery dilatation was similar in all groups. These results suggest a partially reversible effect of GH/IGF-I on this important aspect of endothelial function. A prospective within-subject study is essential to confirm this conclusion. If confirmed, this would be an important additional consideration for advocating aggressive lowering of GH/IGF-I levels to reduce the risk of CVD morbidity/mortality. To date, there are no studies on soluble endothelial cell markers in acromegaly. Thus, additional studies are needed that directly investigate endothelial function in acromegaly.
With respect to possible endothelium-dependent structural changes in acromegaly, two studies (50, 51) have shown increased IMT in the carotid arteries. In performing comparisons between acromegalics and controls, it is important to match the controls for similar vascular risk factors. Thus, when Brevetti et al. (50) compared IMT in the common carotid artery with healthy controls, they showed a similar increase that disappeared when matched to a control population with similar vascular risk factors. Furthermore, cured acromegalics did not show a lower IMT than noncured acromegalics, although this was a cohort comparison rather than a within-subject longitudinal comparison of pre- and posttreatment measures. In a subsequent study, Colao et al. (52) suggested a trend toward decrease in IMT after disease control for 6 months with a somatostatin analog. In contrast, Otsuki et al. (53) found that IMT was lower in acromegalic than nonacromegalic controls matched for risk factors. These studies would, therefore, suggest that any IMT change in acromegaly is more likely secondary to the increased prevalence of CVD risk factors (hypertension/NIDDM/dyslipidemia) rather than GH/IGF-I excess per se. Nevertheless, the evidence, albeit indirect, indicates that GH status in acromegaly does influence the endothelium either directly via endothelial IGF-I receptors, or indirectly through effects on hypertension, body composition, and lipid metabolism.
| VI. Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L Ronchi, E. Rizzo, A. G Lania, R. Pivonello, S. Grottoli, A. Colao, E. Ghigo, A. Spada, M. Arosio, and P. Beck-Peccoz Preliminary data on biochemical remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogs withdrawal Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Dekkers, N. R. Biermasz, A. M. Pereira, J. A. Romijn, and J. P. Vandenbroucke Mortality in Acromegaly: A Metaanalysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bogazzi, L. Battolla, C. Spinelli, G. Rossi, S. Gavioli, V. Di Bello, C. Cosci, C. Sardella, D. Volterrani, E. Talini, et al. Risk Factors for Development of Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Acromegaly: A Five-Year Prospective Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4271 - 4277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Maison, A.-I. Tropeano, I. Macquin-Mavier, A. Giustina, and P. Chanson Impact of Somatostatin Analogs on the Heart in Acromegaly: A Metaanalysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1743 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pivonello, M. Galderisi, R. S. Auriemma, M. C. De Martino, M. Galdiero, A. Ciccarelli, A. D'Errico, I. Kourides, P. Burman, G. Lombardi, et al. Treatment with Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist in Acromegaly: Effect on Cardiac Structure and Performance J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 476 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Melmed Acromegaly N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2558 - 2573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Schwarz, P. Jammula, R. Gupta, and S. Rosanio A Case and Review of Acromegaly-Induced Cardiomyopathy and the Relationship Between Growth Hormone and Heart Failure: Cause or Cure or Neither or Both? Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2006; 11(4): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Paisley, C. J. O'Callaghan, K. C. Lewandowski, C. Parkinson, M. E. Roberts, W. M. Drake, J. P. Monson, P. J. Trainer, and H. S. Randeva Reductions of Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels after Treatment with Pegvisomant in Subjects with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4635 - 4640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cannavo, B. Almoto, G. Cavalli, S. Squadrito, G. Romanello, M. T. Vigo, F. Fiumara, S. Benvenga, and F. Trimarchi Acromegaly and Coronary Disease: An Integrated Evaluation of Conventional Coronary Risk Factors and Coronary Calcifications Detected by Computed Tomography J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3766 - 3772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Resmini, M. Casu, V. Patrone, G. Murialdo, F. Bianchi, M. Giusti, D. Ferone, and F. Minuto Sympathovagal Imbalance in Acromegalic Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 115 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Ronchi, V. Varca, P. Beck-Peccoz, E. Orsi, F. Donadio, A. Baccarelli, C. Giavoli, E. Ferrante, A. Lania, A. Spada, et al. Comparison between Six-Year Therapy with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs and Successful Surgery in Acromegaly: Effects on Cardiovascular Risk Factors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 121 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Ayuk and M C Sheppard Growth hormone and its disorders Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2006; 82(963): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Minniti, V. Esposito, M. Piccirilli, A. Fratticci, A. Santoro, and M.-L. Jaffrain-Rea Diagnosis and management of pituitary tumours in the elderly: a review based on personal experience and evidence of literature Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 153(6): 723 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H T Smith, R U. Nair, D. Adamson, M. T Kearney, S. G Ball, and A. J Balmforth Somatostatin receptor subtype expression in the human heart: differential expression by myocytes and fibroblasts J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 187(3): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S W van Thiel, J J Bax, N R Biermasz, E R Holman, D Poldermans, F Roelfsema, H J Lamb, E E van der Wall, J W A Smit, J A Romijn, et al. Persistent diastolic dysfunction despite successful long-term octreotide treatment in acromegaly Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 231 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. E. Walenkamp, M. Karperien, A. M. Pereira, Y. Hilhorst-Hofstee, J. van Doorn, J. W. Chen, S. Mohan, A. Denley, B. Forbes, H. A. van Duyvenvoorde, et al. Homozygous and Heterozygous Expression of a Novel Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Mutation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2855 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Puder, S. Nilavar, K. D. Post, and P. U. Freda Relationship between Disease-Related Morbidity and Biochemical Markers of Activity in Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1972 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Sakharova, E. V. Dimaraki, W. F. Chandler, and A. L. Barkan Clinically Silent Somatotropinomas May Be Biochemically Active J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2117 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-i. Kawachi, N. Takeda, A. Sasaki, Y. Kokubo, K. Takami, H. Sarui, M. Hayashi, N. Yamakita, and K. Yasuda Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Are Associated With Early Carotid Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2005; 25(3): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Cao, K. Murao, H. Imachi, X. Yu, H. Dobashi, K. Yoshida, T. Muraoka, N. Kotsuna, S. Nagao, N. C. W. Wong, et al. Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Regulation of Hepatic Scavenger Receptor Class BI Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5540 - 5547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Biermasz, F. W. Dekker, A. M. Pereira, S. W. van Thiel, P. J. Schutte, H. van Dulken, J. A. Romijn, and F. Roelfsema Determinants of Survival in Treated Acromegaly in a Single Center: Predictive Value of Serial Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Measurements J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2789 - 2796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, D. Ferone, P. Marzullo, and G. Lombardi Systemic Complications of Acromegaly: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Management Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 102 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||