This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lou, H. Articles by Gagel, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lou, H. Articles by Gagel, R. F.

Alternative Ribonucleic Acid Processing in Endocrine Systems

Department of Genetics and the Ireland Cancer Center (H.L.), Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955; and Department of Medical Specialties (R.F.G.), Section of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormone Disorders, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

	Abstract

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
Alternative RNA processing is a mechanism for creation of protein diversity through selective inclusion or exclusion of RNA sequence during posttranscriptional processing. More than one-third of human pre-mRNAs undergo alternative RNA processing modification, making this a ubiquitous biological process. The protein isoforms produced have distinct and sometimes opposite functions, underscoring the importance of this process. This review focuses on important endocrine genes regulated by alternative RNA processing. We discuss how diverse events such as spermatogenesis or GH action are regulated by this process. We focus on several endocrine (calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide) and nonendocrine (Drosophila doublesex and P-element and mouse c-src) examples to highlight recent progress in the elucidation of molecular mechanisms regulating this process. Finally, we outline methods (model systems and techniques) used by investigators in this field to study processing of individual pre-mRNAs.

I. Introduction

II. Splicing Mechanism and Types of Alternative Splicing

A. Splicing mechanism

B. Types of alternative splicing

III. Alternative RNA Processing in pre-mRNAs of Endocrine-Related Genes

A. Alternatively spliced exons

B. Alternative usage of splice sites

IV. Strategies to Study Alternative RNA Processing

A. Development of model systems

B. Identification of cis-acting sequence elements

C. Identification of trans-acting protein components regulating alternative splicing

V. Mechanisms Controlling Alternative RNA Processing

A. Drosophila doublesex (dsx)

B. Drosophila P-element

C. Mouse c-src

D. Human calcitonin/CGRP

VI. Future Perspectives

	I. Introduction

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
ALTERNATIVE splicing is an important molecular mechanism that increases the protein diversity derived from a single gene. Through alternative splicing, multiple forms of mRNA can be produced from one pre-mRNA molecule. There are examples in which thousands of different mRNA molecules are produced from a single pre-mRNA molecule. One example is neurexin, a neuronal cell surface protein that is expressed in at least 1,000 isoforms. These isoforms display differential specificity for various ligands and may function as cell recognition molecules (1). In a study by Hanke et al. (2), the authors aligned 475 human proteins against human expressed sequence tags and estimated that alternative splicing occurs in pre-mRNAs of 34% of human genes. The nature of this study further suggested that 34% might be a significant underestimate. Therefore, Hanke and colleagues implied that alternative splicing is more the rule than the exception for RNA processing of human genes. This study, combined with a few other bioinformatic studies (3, 4), is changing our current understanding of alternative splicing.

The most common type of alternative splicing is inclusion or exclusion of one or more exons from a pre-mRNA molecule in the final mRNA product (1, 5, 6). Such differential usage of exons may have several consequences regarding the function of the gene product. First, polypeptides having distinct structures and functions can be produced by using mutually exclusive exons [calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)](7, 8). Second, expression of a functional protein can be switched off by incorporating an in-frame stop codon as a result of inclusion of an alternative exon [cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)] (9). Third, a transcription repressor can be converted to an activator by inclusion of an exon that changes the nature of a transcription factor [cAMP-responsive element modulator (CREM)] (10). Fourth, deletion of an exon or exons encoding one or more modular domains of a polypeptide may lead to production of a dominant negative form of the protein [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)] (11). Finally, insertion or deletion of a few amino acids by including or excluding an internal exon can lead to production of multiple highly related polypeptides that are involved in fine tuning the function of a specific protein (neurexin) (1). More examples will be discussed in great detail in Section III.

Alternative splicing can be regulated in a tissue- or developmental stage-specific manner (12, 13) and/or by extracellular signaling cues. These cues include growth factors (14, 15, 16, 17), dexamethasone (16, 18), insulin (19), cytokines (20, 21, 22), extracellular pH (23), or ions (24) and may regulate splicing through Ras (25) or other intracellular signaling pathways.

Alternative splicing occurs in genes involved in almost every aspect of cellular processes. The present review provides an overview of alternative splicing with an emphasis on endocrine-related genes. Because of the increasing number of genes whose pre-mRNAs have been identified to undergo alternative splicing, it is impossible to provide a complete list of such genes. Instead, we will discuss a subset of endocrine genes, alternative splicing of which is well characterized and/or of significant biological relevance. This will be followed by discussions of general strategies of studying the molecular mechanisms that regulate alternative splicing. Finally, we will discuss the mechanisms that control alternative splicing in general, with emphasis on several thoroughly characterized model systems involving both Drosophila and mammalian genes.

	II. Splicing Mechanism and Types of Alternative Splicing

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
A. Splicing mechanism
When splicing was discovered in 1977, investigators named the coding sequences "exons" because they are expressed sequences and named the noncoding sequences "introns" because they are intervening sequences that disrupt coding sequences and are removed during splicing. They also defined the 5'- and 3'-splice sites relative to an intron (Fig. 1). In vertebrates, small exons having an average size of 137 nucleotides are buried in introns as large as 100,000 nucleotides (26). Many vertebrate genes are very large, spanning hundreds of thousands of nucleotides on a chromosome and containing numerous exons. In order to produce a functional protein, splicing must be an accurate mechanism by which all of the exons in the primary RNA transcript are joined precisely.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. A, Diagram showing factors involved in the recognition of an internal exon and 5'- and 3'-terminal exons. The U1 and U2 snRNPs and SR proteins define the internal exon. U1 snRNP and the cap-binding proteins (CBP80 and CBP20) define the 5'-terminal exon, while U2 snRNP, SR proteins, and polyadenylation factors [cleavage/polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF), cleavage stimulation factor (CstF), cleavage factor (CF), and poly(A) polymerase (PAP)] (141 ) define the 3'-terminal exon. Interaction of the internal and terminal exon defining complexes across the intron leads to efficient splicing and polyadenylation. Abbreviations: U1, U1 snRNP; U2, U2 snRNP; U4/U5/U6, U4/U5/U6 tri-snRNP; U2AF, U2 auxiliary factor; ESE, exon splicing enhancer; ISE, intron splicing enhancer. B, Consensus sequences of 5'- and 3'-splice sites and polyadenylation site.

Splicing occurs in a macromolecular complex termed the spliceosome. Nuclear components included in the spliceosome can be divided into three classes: snRNA-containing small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complexes, arginine/serine-rich (SR) RNA-binding proteins, and other non-SR protein splicing factors, including heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP), RNA helicases, kinases, and other enzymes. During initial formation of a smaller prespliceosome complex, U1 snRNP, along with SR proteins, recognizes and forms base pairs with the 5'-splice site sequence, and U2 snRNP forms base pairs with the branchpoint sequence stabilized by U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF) bound to the polypyrimidine-tract sequence. Subsequently, U4/U5/U6 tri-snRNPs and other splicing factors are recruited to the complex to form the larger spliceosome complex in which the chemistry of splicing occurs. A detailed review of the splicing mechanism was described by Burge et al. (27).

How does the vertebrate RNA processing machinery distinguish the short exons from the large introns? An "exon definition model" pioneered and experimentally tested by Berget (28) makes a compelling argument that it is the smaller exon structure which is first recognized and defined as the newly synthesized transcript leaves the RNA Pol II complex. This model suggests that the ends of an exon are delineated by the interaction of splicing factors with their cognate 3'- and 5'-splice sites (Fig. 1). Communication between the factors across the exon results in recognition and permits precise joining of widely separated exons (29). The first and last exons are defined by interactions between the cap-binding complex and factors binding at the first 5'-splice site, and between factors binding at the last 3'-splice site and the polyadenylation complex, respectively.

Splicing does not occur as an isolated event; it interacts dynamically with both the transcription process and other RNA processing events such as capping and polyadenylation (30, 31). McCracken et al. vividly described an mRNA "factory" that carries out coupled transcription, splicing, and polyadenylation of mRNA precursors (32). The interactions between factors involved in these processes have been demonstrated. The carboxyterminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II plays a critical role in such interactions. CTD interacts with splicing and polyadenylation factors to increase the efficiency of both processes (32, 33, 34, 35). Intriguingly, one study showed that alternative splicing of the fibronectin EIIIA exon was differentially modulated by the promoters used to drive the transcription unit, implicating an intimate cross-talk between transcription and splicing machinery (36).

B. Types of alternative splicing
There are several types of alternative RNA processing (Fig. 2). The most common is the inclusion or exclusion of one or more entire exons, a reflection of the modular genomic structure of many genes (see Section III). When the alternatively spliced exon is the 5'-terminal exon, alternative splicing is often coupled with alternative usage of promoters. Likewise, when a 3'-terminal exon is alternatively spliced, alternative polyadenylation is always involved. Like exons, introns can be alternatively spliced, generating transcripts with intron sequences either removed or retained. A relatively less frequent alternative splicing event is the alternative usage of splice sites. More complicated types of alternative splicing can occur using different combinations of these basic types.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Diagram showing patterns of alternative RNA processing. Arrows indicate transcription start sites.

	III. Alternative RNA Processing in pre-mRNAs of Endocrine-Related Genes

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

A number of endocrine-related genes whose pre-mRNAs undergo alternative splicing are listed in Table 1. Examples were chosen because the alternative splicing patterns of these genes have been well established, and these examples represent a wide range of types of alternative splicing. In the following section, we will focus on a few of these genes and discuss the role of alternative splicing in regulating their protein functions. It is important that readers understand that the individual examples will be grouped by "alternative splicing type," but not by genes. Therefore a single gene, such as the LH or FSH receptor that has more than one different "splicing event," will be presented in different sections. It is also important that readers understand that there is little known about either regulatory sequences or trans-acting factors that regulate alternative splicing of endocrine genes. In fact, the only genes for which there is information on both cis- elements and trans-acting factors are the calcitonin/CGRP, GH, and fibronectin genes. The importance of the alternative products to be described in the following sections suggests that there are important regulating pathways remaining to be discovered.

CREB and CREM share a remarkable genomic structure, in which exons are organized as modules of functional domains of the proteins (Fig. 3). The two genes may have arisen from gene duplication from an ancestral gene and have diverged to encode transcriptional activators and repressors of the cAMP signal transduction pathway. The common exons shared by the two genes include exons A–C and E–I, which contain activation domains and basic-domain-leucine-zipper (bZip) DNA-binding domains. The activation domain is divided into two regions. The first region, the phosphorylation box (P-box) encoded by exons E and F, contains a cluster of phosphorylation sites that can be regulated by various kinases. The second region contains two glutamine-rich domains encoded by exons C and G that are hypothesized to function as surfaces for interactions with basal transcription factors.

View larger version (49K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Functions of CREM and CREB are determined largely by alternative splicing. The top line in each panel represents the genomic DNA structure with the exon names shown on top of the diagram. The promoters are indicated by arrows. The modular domains of the polypeptides are indicated above or below the exons. The mRNA products resulting from various alternative splicing pathways are diagrammed below the DNA structure. Functions of protein isoforms encoded by these mRNAs are shown on the left, and the nomenclature for the isoforms is shown on the right. A, CREM. CREM has two promoters: the upstream promoter directs the transcription of the full-length pre-mRNA, while the downstream promoter directs the transcription of a truncated pre-mRNA encoding the ICER isoforms. Abbreviation: ICER, inducible cAMP early repressor. B, CREB. CREB isoforms are generated by four different posttranscriptional modifications, which are indicated in the column on the right of panel B (a, alternative cassette exon inclusion; b, alternative 3'-splice site usage; c, alternative 3'-terminal exon usage; d, alternative translation start site usage). The "X" in exons indicates presence of an in-frame stop codon, and "AUG" marks the translation reinitiation site. The black exons indicate that these exons contain noncoding sequences because of the incorporation of the stop codon upstream of these exons. Diagrams boxed within the rectangles represent polypeptide products generated by the primary RNA sequence shown immediately above each box.

The CREM gene contains the common exons A–C and E–I (Fig. 3A), some of which are selectively included to produce both transcription repressors and activators. The three basic forms of CREM proteins—CREM, CREMß, and CREM—lack the two glutamine-rich exons C and G and include one of the two mutually exclusive exons Ia or Ib, which encodes DNA-binding domains (Fig. 3A). These isoforms can form homodimers or heterodimers with CREB, which bind to CRE with the same efficiency and specificity as that of CREB (37). Amazingly, these CREM isoforms block transcription activation by antagonizing the CREB activator (37). This negative effect on transcription can be explained by one of two models: CREM forms either a homodimer occupying the CRE site or a nonfunctional heterodimer with CREB titrating out the CREB activators.

Remarkably, expression of the CREM gene is regulated in a cell-specific manner to generate isoforms that activate cAMP-dependent transcription. During pubertal development and the initiation of spermatogenesis, CREM expression changes abruptly and is characterized by three features. First, CREM becomes highly abundant in adult testis, while it is expressed at very low levels in prepubertal animals. This change results from alternative polyadenylation that eliminates a destabilizing element present in the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) (38). Second, the form of CREM expressed is almost exclusively an activator, an abrupt change from the predominant repressor form found in prepubertal testis. This pattern of expression results from the generation of CREM isoforms that include at least one of the two glutamine-rich exons C and G (Fig. 3A) (10). Finally, the pattern of CREM expression is regulated by the increase of FSH at puberty, an effect that occurs at the level of both transcript abundance and protein activity (38). The developmental switch of the alternative splicing pathway changes the CREM function from a transcription antagonist to an activator that is required for transcription activation of several postmeiotic genes whose promoters contain CRE motifs. Most of these genes encode structural proteins required for differentiation of spermatozoa (39).

Another group of isoforms, the inducible cAMP early repressors (ICERs), are produced by transcription using an alternative promoter in the intron downstream of exon G (Fig. 3A). ICER isoforms contain only the DNA-binding domain of CREM and function as powerful repressors of cAMP-induced transcription. ICER is expressed in a circadian manner in the pineal gland and controls the oscillation in the hormonal synthesis of melatonin (40).

The three basic forms of CREB—CREB, CREB, and CREBß—contain both activation and DNA-binding domains and function predominantly as positive modulators of CRE-containing genes (Fig. 3B). These isoforms are uniformly and ubiquitously expressed in a wide range of tissues and cell lines (9, 41). However, the expression of CREB is also differentially regulated during spermatogenesis. In testis, alternative splicing results in the expression of repressor CREB isoforms (42, 43). Exons , Y, W, Z (human-specific), and are testis-specific and are mostly included in CREB mRNA in germ cells (9, 42, 44). Alternative splicing of some of these exons is regulated cyclically during the 12-day cycle of spermatogenesis (45). Exons , Y, and W contain in-frame stop codons that terminate translation prematurely, generating shorter CREB isoforms. Exon is an alternative 3'-terminal exon, the inclusion of which excludes exon I from the pre-mRNA molecule, therefore producing a similarly short isoform.

These testis-specific CREB isoforms lack the DNA-binding domain and nuclear translocation signal and are distributed in the cytoplasm. Although the exact function of these isoforms per se is unknown, they provide a mechanism of down-regulating the expression of CREB activators by generating the repressor isoform, I-CREB. When exon W is included in the CREB mRNA, translation reinitiates downstream from the stop codon, generating several I-CREB isoforms that contain only the DNA-binding domain of CREB (Fig. 3B). These I-CREB isoforms function as dominant negative repressors to inhibit production of CREB activators by competing with full-length CREB for the CRE elements present in the CREB promoter. Therefore, the majority of cAMP regulation in spermatocytes is most likely controlled by CREB:I-CREB ratios as the CREM activators are not detected until later stages of germ cell differentiation (43).

b. PPAR.
PPARs, including PPAR, PPARß, and PPAR, belong to the superfamily of nuclear receptors that are ligand-activated transcription factors. A heterodimeric complex forms between an activated PPAR and the retinoic X receptor (RXR) and subsequently binds to the peroxisome proliferator response element of target promoters to activate transcription. PPARs play an important role in lipid metabolism.

The PPAR gene was first cloned in mice, and it contains eight exons (46). A screen for PPAR variants using RT-PCR led to the identification of one human variant that lacks exon 6 in its mRNA (11). This variant transcript is widely expressed in a number of cell lines and tissues, and the ratio of the two transcript levels varies between individuals and tissues. A shorter polypeptide is produced as a result of the introduction of a premature stop codon by the alternative splicing of exons 5 and 7. This truncated protein, PPAR_tr, has the DNA-binding domain but lacks the entire ligand-binding domain. Western blot analysis indicated the presence of this protein in human hepatocytes.

Functional studies (11) of PPAR_tr have demonstrated that it interferes with the PPAR transactivation function. When a PPAR_tr cDNA was transfected in CV-1 cells, PPAR_tr was localized predominantly in the cytoplasm. When cells were cultured in the media containing a different batch of FBS, PPAR_tr could be induced to enter the nucleus, where it repressed the transcription activity of the wild-type PPAR. It appears that this negative effect of PPAR_tr resulted from competition between PPAR_tr and PPAR for essential transcription coactivators because cotransfection of the coactivator CREB-binding protein relieved the repression (11). Presumably, factors that alter the ratio of PPAR to PPAR_tr can change the signaling pathway triggered by PPAR.

c. Fibronectin.
Fibronectins are glycoproteins that play critical roles in cellular processes such as adhesion, migration, differentiation, and proliferation. Fibronectins form dimers, and each chain contains a polypeptide having a molecular mass of approximately 250 kDa. A fibronectin polypeptide consists of three types of repeating units and exists in multiple forms (20 isoforms in humans) as a result of alternative splicing. Alternative splicing occurs in three regions within the type III repeats of fibronectin: EIIIA, EIIIB, and a variable region (V) (Fig. 4) (47). EIIIA and EIIIB are single exons and can be either included in (EIIIA+ or EIIIB+) or excluded from (EIIIA- or EIIIB-) the fibronectin mRNA; V contains multiple exons and can be spliced in a number of ways to produce five potential variants.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Alternative splicing of the fibronectin pre-mRNA. The top line in this figure represents the genomic DNA structure of fibronectin. The three types of repeat sequences are represented by different shapes of exons as indicated. Exons of type III repeats are numbered from 1–15. Alternatively spliced exons are present between type III exons, and shown as hatched boxes. Potential products of alternative splicing are diagrammed below the fibronectin genomic structure in shaded areas, showing inclusion/exclusion of the alternatively spliced exons with their two immediate flanking exons. Abbreviations: cFN, cellular fibronectin; pFN, plasma fibronectin.

Perhaps consistent with this notion, there is evidence that alternative splicing of EIIIA is regulated during ovarian follicular development. Colman-Lerner et al. (48) demonstrated that EIIIA+ fibronectin is expressed at much higher levels in the follicular fluid of follicles smaller than 8 mm where granulosa cells proliferate actively than in follicles larger than 8 mm. Furthermore, EIIIA splicing is up-regulated by cAMP and transforming growth factor-ß in primary cultures of bovine granulosa cells (BGCs).

There is experimental evidence that EIIIA+ fibronectin is a growth-regulatory factor. A synthetic EIIIA+ peptide as well as the conditioned medium of BGCs (containing predominantly EIIIA+ fibronectin) showed mitogenic activity, but the EIIIA- plasma fibronectin did not. After the immunodepletion of fibronectin, the BGC conditioned medium lost its mitogenic activity (48).

d. Insulin receptor (IR).
The IR is a different type of cell-surface glycoprotein receptor. The dimerized IR consists of two extracellular -subunits and two transmembrane ßsubunits. The -subunit contains the insulin-binding domain, and the ß-subunit contains the tyrosine kinase and phosphorylation sites. Binding of insulin to the IR activates tyrosine kinase to phosphorylate the IR and other intracellular substrates.

The IR is encoded by a single gene comprising 22 exons. The first 11 exons code for the -subunit, while the remaining 11 exons code for the ß-subunit (49). The preproreceptor undergoes a posttranslational proteolytic process to generate the - and ß-subunits. The -subunit exists in two isoforms resulting from alternative splicing of the 36-nucleotide exon 11, which is differentially regulated in a tissue-specific fashion (50). The A isoform (IR-A) lacks exon 11, is expressed ubiquitously, and is the only isoform in lymphocytes, brain, and spleen. The B isoform (IR-B) contains exon 11 and is expressed predominantly in liver, muscle, adipocytes, and kidney.

Several lines of evidence suggest that the production of IR-A is associated with the differentiation stage of the cells. First, IR-A is preferentially expressed in fetal cells such as fetal fibroblasts and muscle and liver cells under normal physiological conditions (51). Second, IR-A expression is up-regulated in a number of tumors, including breast and colon cancer cells (51). Third, splicing of exon 11 has been shifted to produce more IR-B mRNA when HepG2 hepatoma cells were cultured in a differentiation medium containing dexamethasone (18). Interestingly, the ratio of IR-A to IR-B in insulin-sensitive cells could be changed by insulin, suggesting that alternative splicing can be regulated by changes in signal transduction pathways (52).

IR-A and IR-B differ by 12 amino acids at the carboxy terminus of their -subunits and exhibit clearly different functions. Although IR-A has a higher affinity for insulin (53), IR-B autoregulates itself to a greater extent than IR-A and has increased kinase activity toward the IR substrate I in vitro (54). Additional phosphorylation sites on IR-B have also been detected. On the other hand, pp120-regulated insulin endocytosis and degradation occurred when NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected with pp120, which is one of the IR substrates in liver, and IR-A but not IR-B (55). In addition to insulin, insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) can bind IR-A with an affinity close to that of insulin (51). There is experimental evidence that this may have relevance for breast cancer where IR-A is preferentially overexpressed, leading to IGF-II-mediated growth (56).

e. Gonadotropin receptors.
FSH and LH belong to a family of glycoprotein hormones generated in the pituitary and regulate reproduction. FSH and LH stimulate target cells by binding specifically to membrane receptors (FSHR and LHR, respectively) and activating a cascade of biochemical reactions triggered by the G protein-signaling pathway. FSHR and LHR proteins have a common structure, consisting of an extracellular domain, membrane-spanning domain, and intracellular domain.

FSHR and LHR have been cloned from many species, including human, rat, mouse, sheep, pig, chicken, and turkey. RNA transcripts for both genes undergo extensive alternative splicing, generating numerous variants. Some of the variants are species specific; most are shared by a wide range of species. The function of most of these isoforms remains largely unknown. However, given the large number of these variants and, in some cases, the tissue-specific distribution of the variants, it is almost impossible to ignore their existence.

The structure and organization of the FSHR and LHR genes are very similar. For example, they are both large genes (FHSR, 54 kb; LHR, 70 kb). Also, exons 1–9 in FSHR and 1–10 in LHR encode the large extracellular domain, while exon 10 in FSHR and exon 11 in LHR encode the transmembrane and short cytoplasmic domains (Fig. 5) (57). In addition, the pre-mRNA of both FSHR and LHR undergoes many different types of alternative splicing; the most common type is the skipping or inclusion of one or more internal exons and is discussed here, while other types will be discussed in other sections.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Alternative splicing of gonadotropin receptor pre-mRNAs. The top line in each panel represents the genomic DNA structure. The domain structure of the polypeptides are indicated above the exons. The exon size is indicated in nucleotides above each exon. The mRNA products resulting from various alternative splicing pathways are diagrammed below the DNA structure. The types of alternative splicing are shown on the left. The "X" in exons indicates the presence of an in-frame stop codon; the black exons indicate that these exons contain noncoding sequences because of the incorporation of the stop codon upstream of these exons. Panel A, FSHR. Panel B, LHR.

Some gonadotropin receptor variants originate from the inclusion of an extra exon. For example, in rat testis, FSHR mRNAs have been identified that contain either exon 4A between exons 4 and 5 or exon 9A between exons 9 and 10 (Fig. 5) (61). Both mRNAs encode truncated FSHR proteins consisting of the entire extracellular domain or the amino-terminal half of the extracellular domain. The two variants appeared to be nonfunctional.

f. GH receptor (GHR).
Similar to FSHR and LHR, GHR is a polypeptide hormone receptor located on the membrane of target cells. GHR consists of a large hormone-binding extracellular domain (245 amino acids) and, unlike FSHR and LHR, a short transmembrane domain (24 amino acids) and large intracellular domain (350 amino acids) (62).

A soluble GH-binding protein (GHBP) that shares sequences with GHR has been detected in a number of species. GHBP is generated by at least three different, species-specific mechanisms. In rabbits and humans, GHBP is generated by proteolytic cleavage of the GHR hormone-binding domain (63). Interestingly, this proteolytic process is enhanced by alternative splicing in humans. Two truncated GHR variants, GHR1–279 and GHR1–277, have been identified that lack part of the intracellular domain of GHR. These two variants are generated through two different alternative splicing events. GHR1–277 is encoded by an mRNA that lacks the entire exon 9 (Fig. 6A) (64, 65). The mechanism that generates GHR1–279 will be discussed later.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. GH-binding protein (GHBP) is generated by different alternative splicing event in mouse, human, and chicken. The domain structure of GHR, which is similar in various species, is indicated on top of the human GHR DNA. The alternatively spliced exons and their splicing pathways are depicted in shaded areas. A, In humans, alternative 3'-splice site usage or selective exclusion of exon 9 leads to the production of GHR1–279 and GHR1–277, respectively, which encode shorter polypeptides because of the presence of in-frame stop codons. B, In mice, GHBP is produced by selective usage of a 3'-terminal exon, 8A. C, In chickens, GHBP is produced by an mRNA molecule that undergoes alternative 3'-splice site usage that leads to the incorporation of a premature stop codon.

The genomic structure of the calcitonin/CGRP gene is relatively simple. The gene spans 8 kb of DNA containing six exons. One unique feature is that it has two 3'-terminal exons, designated 4 and 6 (Fig. 7). In addition, the pre-mRNA of the calcitonin/CGRP gene is processed to generate two distinct peptide hormones—calcitonin and CGRP—through mutually exclusive usage of exon 4 and exons 5 and 6, respectively. Also, the coding sequences for calcitonin and CGRP are on exon 4 and exon 5, respectively, while exons 2 and 3 encode the signal peptide (Fig. 7).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Schematic representation of alternative RNA processing of calcitonin/CGRP. Coding regions for calcitonin or CGRP peptide are located in exons 4 or 5. Two polyadenylation sites are present in exons 4 and 6. Processing of the calcitonin/CGRP pre-mRNA produces calcitonin mRNA in thyroid C cells by joining exons 1–4 and CGRP mRNA in neuronal cells by joining exons 1–3 and 5–6.

Alternative splicing of the calcitonin/CGRP gene has been studied extensively by several groups. These studies have led to the identification of multiple sequence elements and protein factors involved in this regulated alternative splicing event. These results will be summarized in Section V.

b. Gonadotropin receptors.
The LH and FSH receptors (LHR, FSHR) are examples of genes with a second type of alternative splicing pattern. A second mechanism (the first is described in an earlier section) that generates truncated FSHR and LHR variants is the selective usage of an alternative 3'-terminal exon that contains a different polyadenylation site. As shown in Fig. 5, at least three FSHR and two LHR isoforms are generated by this mechanism (57, 66, 67). Additionally, one LHR isoform is generated by using an alternative polyadenylation site located in intron 10 (Fig. 5) (68). The mRNAs that contain altered 3'-terminal sequences lead to the production of truncated proteins lacking various amounts of the full-length protein.

The functions of the truncated FSHR proteins have been determined in previous studies. The isoform generated from exons 1–8 was efficiently expressed on the cell surface, presumably using other compensating motifs for membrane insertion, and displayed high affinity and specificity for FSH binding (66). More dramatically, the FSHR isoform that changes the carboxy-terminal intracellular domain from 65 to 40 amino acids (the last one listed for FSHR in Fig. 5) functions as a dominant negative receptor (69, 70). By itself, this isoform was incapable of activating adenylate cyclase, although it was present on the plasma membrane and exhibited specific FSH-binding activity. Coexpression of this isoform with the active FSHR full-length receptor resulted in a dramatic loss of cAMP accumulation after FSH induction (69, 70).

c. GHR.
As discussed earlier, GHBP is generated by different species-specific mechanisms. In mice and rats, GHBP is generated by alternative inclusion of exon 8A between exon 7 encoding the 3'-end of the extracellular domain and exon 8 encoding the transmembrane domain (Fig. 6B) (71). When exon 8A is included, polyadenylation occurs at the end of this exon, and the downstream exon 8 will not be included.

B. Alternative usage of splice sites
1. CREB. Two isoforms of CREB—CREB-35 and CREB-14—have been identified at low levels in brain, thymus, and testis (72). The two alternative 3'-splice sites in exons F and G are used to produce shorter CREB mRNAs (Fig. 3B), which in turn leads to incorporation of in-frame stop codons. The function of these two short isoforms is not clear.

2. Gonadotropin receptors. Recently, an LHR mRNA was identified in turkeys and chickens in which an intron was partially included in the final mRNA through alternative 3'-splice site usage (Fig. 5B) (68). This intron-containing mRNA encodes a truncated protein variant containing only the extracellular domain. The function of this LHR isoform was not investigated.

3. GHR. The third mechanism that generates soluble GHBP is usage of an alternative 3'-splice site. In chickens, a 17-nucleotide intron 6 is inserted in the final mRNA through usage of an alternative 3' splice site at the end of intron 6 to produce the truncated GHR (Fig. 6C) (73). In humans, a 26-nucleotide sequence of exon 9 is deleted by selective usage of a 3'-splice site located in exon 9 (GHR1–279, Fig. 6A). This mRNA generates a smaller protein because of the incorporation of an in-frame stop codon. Through an unknown mechanism, the media of 293 cells transfected with GHR1–279 contained 20-fold more GHBP than that found in the media of cells transfected with the GHR full-length protein (65). More interestingly, although inactive by itself, GHR1–279 can form heterodimers with the full-length GHR and acts as a negative regulator of the full-length receptor (65).

In addition to the splicing variants discussed above, GHR transcripts undergo more alternative RNA processing at the 5'-UTR and the region encoding the extracellular hormone-binding domain. Generation of these variants is summarized in an elegant review by Eden and Talamantes (62).

4. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor R1 (FLT-1). Angiogenesis plays a significant role in mammalian reproduction and is controlled by a balance of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. Members of the VEGF family are among the proangiogenic factors expressed in the placenta, which stimulate vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in early pregnancy. The balance between these angiogenic inducers and inhibitors regulates the net angiogenic effect.

One of the VEGF receptors, VEGFR1 (FLT-1), is expressed as a cell surface receptor in the spongiotrophoblast layer of the placenta and is a potent stimulator of angiogenesis. Recently, a soluble form of this receptor, sFLT-1, was identified, and its cDNA was cloned from mice (74). sFLT-1 is shorter than FLT-1 and has a different C-terminal amino acid sequence containing the ligand-binding domain but not the transmembrane domain. sFLT-1 is produced from the FLT-1 gene by alternative splicing; this mechanism is evolutionarily conserved because a corresponding sequence of human sFLT-1 was also identified. Although the nature of this alternative splicing event is unknown at present, the sequence at the site of the divergence of FLT-1 and sFLT-1 suggests that differential 5'-splice site usage is involved.

He et al. (74) also demonstrated that sFLT-1 is expressed in vivo and functions as a potent antagonist to VEGF. The expression of FLT-1 and sFLT-1 in placental spongiotrophoblast cells is regulated in pregnant mice. The sFLT-1 transcripts were undetectable at day 11 and increased between days 13 and 17, while the FLT-1 transcripts were detected at days 11, 13, and 15, but disappeared at day 17. In addition, the ligand-binding domain on sFLT-1 enabled it to bind VEGF in serum, which resulted in the inhibition of the binding of VEGF to the cell surface receptor, FLT-1. Therefore, the ratio of FLT-1 to sFLT-1, regulated by alternative splicing, may be an important determinant for placental angiogenesis in pregnant mice.

	IV. Strategies to Study Alternative RNA Processing

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
With the discovery of an increasing number of genes that undergo alternative splicing, it is obvious that this mechanism plays a very significant role in gene expression and warrants extensive studies. However, splicing is such a specialized field that investigators whose primary focus is not RNA often find it difficult to begin their studies on the mechanism of alternative splicing. This section is intended to provide a general outline for how to study the molecular mechanisms regulating alternative splicing. It will describe the routine methods and techniques used in these studies. It will also discuss the concerns and potential problems with each method.

A study of the mechanism controlling any alternative splicing event may be divided into three phases that can overlap one another. In phase I, one develops a model system for the in vivo and in vitro studies. In the splicing field, an in vivo study denotes a study performed in whole cells, not necessarily in whole animals, while an in vitro study means a study performed using extracts prepared from cells. In phase II, one determines the cis-acting sequence requirement for each splicing pathway. In phase III, one determines the trans-acting protein components involved in each pathway.

A. Development of model systems
As a first step to study the mechanism controlling an alternative splicing event, one must develop a model system that contains two components: cell lines or tissues that duplicate the two splicing patterns in whole animals and a minigene construct that contains all of the necessary sequence information for each splicing pathway.

1. Cell models. When cell models are being developed, it is important to understand the concept of the "default" pathway of an alternative splicing event. The default pathway is generally defined as the pathway that is not regulated, meaning that only the constitutive splicing factors are required for it to happen. In most cases, the default pathway is also the one that occurs in most of the tissues or cells that express the gene of interest, while the regulated pathway is the one that occurs in only one or a few tissues. In contrast to differentially spliced exons, exons that are included in all cells at all times are termed constitutively spliced exons.

Cell models can be developed from either primary cultures of specific tissue types or established cell lines. The advantage of using primary cultures is obvious: the cultures represent the actual cellular environment where the alternative splicing occurs, so the factors identified in these cells are likely true players. Additionally, primary cultures of specific tissue types may be the only available model if there are no cell lines available for the appropriate splicing phenotype. There are several practical disadvantages of primary cultures as well. First, cells in some tissues cannot be adapted to grow in primary cultures. In some cases, it takes a great deal of time to develop a method to culture certain types of cells. Second, cells that do grow in primary cultures may exhibit extremely low efficiency for transfection, a critical methodology for studying the sequence requirement. Third, it is often difficult to grow cells in primary cultures in the large quantities required for preparing nuclear extracts for in vitro studies.

The alternative to using primary cultures is to test a battery of established cell lines and choose the two cell lines that show opposite splicing phenotypes. Unless the gene of interest is endogenously expressed in a number of cell lines, this process usually involves transfection of cells with a model construct containing the DNA sequence of interest (see below) followed by RNA analysis, such as RT-PCR, RNase protection assay (RPA), or primer extension, to determine the splicing phenotype. For example, HeLa cells have been commonly used for the default splicing pathways for many genes. In addition, cell lines have been widely used to study a large number of alternative splicing events because they are relatively easy to maintain, transfect, and grow in large quantities. However, the caveat of using cell lines for studying alternative splicing of a gene that is not normally expressed in those cells is the potential of studying an artifact; namely, the cultured cells give a specific splicing choice for a completely different reason.

The ideal cell model system may involve the following components. To study the sequence requirements, HeLa cells are used for the default pathway, and a primary culture or different cell line is used for the regulated splicing pathway. To study the trans-acting protein components, there is a growing trend of using the real tissues where the gene of interest undergoes regulated alternative splicing for preparing nuclear extracts (75).

2. Minigene construct. The second component of a model system is a minigene construct used for transfection of the cell lines. The reason for creating a minigene construct is a practical one: simplification of the cloning process for DNA sequence manipulations. Vertebrate genes are usually very large, containing small exons having an average size of 137 bp and introns as large as tens of thousands of base pairs. Eliminating the unnecessary sequences from the minigene construct at this stage significantly speeds up the mutational analysis that defines the cis-acting sequence elements required for a splicing pathway.

The minigene construct usually contains the exon that is differentially included, two exons flanking the alternative exon, and minimal intron sequences between these exons. This usually indicates a large deletion of intron sequences from the wild-type gene. While the deletions simplify the minigene construct, there is danger associated with doing so for two reasons. First, so many splicing elements have been identified in intron sequences that there is probably a better chance of finding an element in an intron than in an exon. Discovery of these intron elements has actually changed our understanding of the function of intron sequences: they are not merely junk sequences to be spliced out during splicing. Second, multiple splicing elements, including sometimes redundant positive and negative elements, have been found to be associated with a single alternative splicing event. The examples include c-src (76), the GABA^A -subunit (77), FGFR1 (78, 79), -tropomyosin (80), cardiac troponin T (81), CD44 (25), and many other genes. Removal of intron sequence may result in removal of one or more of these multiple elements, thereby confusing results. In some cases, the intron size is also important (82). Therefore, it may be difficult to decide which sequences to delete.

Although there is an example of splicing elements located throughout the length of introns (83), in most cases, the intron elements are located close to the exon that is alternatively spliced. It is therefore reasonable to include intron sequences of up to 2 kb that flank the alternatively included exon in the minigene construct. To test whether a minigene construct contains all of the necessary sequences for the alternative splicing event, transfection experiments should be performed using the two cell types that process the pre-mRNA through two opposite splicing pathways. If correct splicing phenotypes are observed, it is reasonable to use the minigene construct to carry out further experiments.

After initial characterization of the sequence elements, it is sometimes necessary to create a smaller minigene construct, further eliminating sequences in the original construct. One of the reasons for doing so is that the elements are sometimes too complicated, containing multiple sequence motifs; it also makes it easier to separate the motifs and analyze them individually (84).

B. Identification of cis-acting sequence elements
During the creation of the minigene construct, one may gain insight as to which sequences are important for either splicing pathway. For example, deletion of intron sequence in the minigene construct may change the alternative splicing phenotype, indicating the deleted sequence is important. The next step is the detailed sequence analysis to determine the critical sequence motifs. Traditionally, this process involves two types of sequence manipulation. The first is generation of deletion mutants based on the minigene construct followed by transfection/RNA analysis using the two cell types that show opposite splicing phenotypes. A heterologous sequence having a similar size with that of the deleted sequence is often used to substitute the deleted sequence to ensure that the effect observed with the deletion constructs is not a distance effect. However, the substituted sequence may introduce unknown elements, complicating the result. Inclusion of multiple heterologous sequences generally reduces this possibility. The second type of sequence manipulation is the generation of point mutations. Technically, both types of sequence manipulation can be achieved by combining old-fashioned, restriction enzyme-directed mutagenesis and modern, PCR-directed mutagenesis.

Recently, investigators have taken advantage of the power of evolution to identify splicing elements. The rationale is the belief that sequences important for any molecular steps of gene expression should be conserved among different species during evolution. The method involves DNA cloning and sequencing regions that flank and/or are located in the alternatively spliced exon from several different species in which there is conservation of the alternative splicing event. Alignment of the sequences obtained from a number of species will indicate the conserved sequences, which are potentially important for a specific alternative splicing event.

The method described above is extremely powerful in identifying intronic elements because nonfunctional intron sequences are usually not conserved during evolution. Using this phylogenetic analysis, a number of intronic splicing elements have been identified from genes such as c-src (85, 86), calcitonin/CGRP (87), cardiac troponin T (81), Drosophila transformer-2 (88), FGFR1 (W. Jin, personal communication), fibronectin (89), and hnRNP A1 (90), just to name a few.

Splicing elements can also be identified by searching for recognizable sequence motifs in the sequence of interest. For example, exon splicing enhancers that are either rich in purine or in cytosine/adenosine (91) and intronic splicing repressors that are rich in cytosine/uridine have been found in many genes (92). In addition, splicing signals (5'- and 3'-splice site sequences) have also been found to act as regulators when they are located in exons or introns (87, 93). Table 2 provides a list of exon and intron elements that have been shown to be important in alternative splicing.

A complicated picture often emerges following this phase of a study because of the identification of multiple, sometimes even redundant, elements. Both positive (enhancer) and negative (repressor or silencer) elements can be associated with a single alternative splicing event (Table 2). There is emerging evidence that the combinatorial effects of multiple elements control the fate of an exon (94). Some are required for exclusion of an exon, while others are required for inclusion. This complex picture reflects the increasingly accepted notion that alternatively spliced exons have evolved to contain suboptimal splicing signals and/or repressor elements, perhaps to ensure that the exons are not constitutively included in all cells. Alternatively spliced exons therefore need enhancer sequences and cell-specific trans-acting factors to make them visible to the splicing machinery. Splicing decisions are frequently found to be regulated by multiple splicing elements. It is not surprising that point mutations of several different elements may modify the splicing phenotypes. This type of result is to be expected, and the relative importance of each element may not be fully understood until all of the relevant trans-acting factors are identified. A corollary is that identification of a single element that can alter splicing phenotype does not mean that it is the regulatory element controlling the cell-specific alternative splicing.

After identifying the splicing elements, one must decide which elements to analyze further. These elements can be categorized as elements required for the default splicing pathway or the regulated splicing pathway. In general, investigators pay more attention to the elements involved in the regulated splicing pathway because the ultimate question is how the alternative splicing event is regulated.

C. Identification of trans-acting protein components regulating alternative splicing
Perhaps the most difficult and time-consuming phase is the identification of protein components that interact with the splicing elements. Isolation of protein factors involved in a regulated alternative splicing event requires an in vitro RNA processing system.

Nuclear extracts can be prepared from the two cell lines that represent each splicing pathway observed for the gene. In an ideal situation, proteins that interact with a splicing element can be isolated using one of several biochemical approaches and tested for their function by manipulating the nuclear extract. One of the common manipulations is the depletion of a specific protein from the nuclear extract followed by supplementation of a recombinant protein. If a protein is required for a splicing pathway, depleting the protein should abolish splicing or switch splicing pathways; supplementation of the recombinant protein should rescue splicing or switch back to the original splicing pathway.

Splicing-competent nuclear extracts can be easily prepared from HeLa cells (95), but it can be difficult and in some cases impossible to obtain such extracts from other types of cells. The latter extracts are defined as splicing-incompetent extracts and can still be used for characterizing protein components that interact with a specific sequence element. The difficult task, i.e., finding a functional test for the proteins identified from these extracts, will come later.

Proteins that regulate a splicing element can be divided into two classes: ones that bind to RNA and ones that interact with other proteins in a complex. During purification of protein factors, proteins that bind to RNA can be monitored by UV cross-linking assays (96), while proteins that do not bind to RNA can be monitored by RNA gel-shift analyses (97). Characterization of a number of splicing elements suggests that complexes formed on sequence elements are composed of proteins that interact directly with RNA and others that interact with those proteins. A general strategy is to initially focus on purifying the RNA-binding proteins and subsequently characterize the protein complex using the identified RNA-binding protein as a tool.

The conventional method of protein purification involves a series of chromatography columns, the last of which is usually an RNA affinity column. This approach is labor intensive and time consuming, yet it remains a powerful tool. Several new techniques that have potential for purifying factors that interact with RNA sequences have been developed recently. Two of these methods will be discussed in the following section.

A yeast three-hybrid genetic screening method has been successfully used to clone two RNA-binding proteins from cDNA libraries (98, 99, 100). This screen is similar in principle to that of the two-hybrid screen except that an additional hybrid RNA molecule is included for isolation of RNA-binding proteins (Fig. 8). The two proteins cloned using this technique are stem-loop binding protein, which binds the 3'-end of histone mRNA, and fem-3 binding factor, which binds to the 3'-UTR of fem-3 mRNA. To date, no splicing factors have been isolated using this method. One potential caveat originates from the fact that RNA-binding proteins tend to form a complex that has a greater RNA affinity than do any of the individual proteins (97).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 8. Diagram showing the principle of a yeast three-hybrid screen, a selection approach used to identify RNA-binding proteins. The three-hybrid screen is modified from the yeast two-hybrid screen and involves three hybrid molecules. Hybrid protein 1 contains the LexA DNA binding domain fused to the MS2 coat protein. Hybrid protein 2 consists of the Gal4 activation domain linked to the RNA-binding domain Y of any RNA-binding protein. The hybrid RNA consists of a MS2 binding site and the RNA sequence, X, to be screened with. As in a two-hybrid system, the Hybrid 2 is made from a cDNA library, and the reporter genes are His and LacZ. The reporter genes can only be activated by binding of the fusion protein containing the Gal4 activation domain to the RNA sequence X through interactions between the RNA sequence and its binding protein.

To purify proteins that are involved in a complex but do not bind RNA, several strategies can be adopted. The well known yeast two-hybrid approach is highly effective if one of the RNA-binding proteins has been identified from the experiments discussed above. Another strategy is to initially isolate and purify the complex that forms on the RNA target using methods such as StreptoTag. In a second step, the protein components involved in the complex can be identified using mass spectrometry, a sensitive technique for analyzing minute quantities of proteins that has made quantum leaps in recent years and has been used to identify proteins formed in spliceosomes (102).

	V. Mechanisms Controlling Alternative RNA Processing

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
A. Drosophila doublesex (dsx)
Somatic sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster involves a hierarchy of regulated alternative RNA processing. The pre-mRNA of dsx, the final gene in this hierarchy, undergoes sex-specific alternative splicing to produce male- and female-specific dsx proteins that have sex-specific regulatory functions. Male and female dsx mRNAs share the first three exons but have different 3'-exons and polyadenylation sites (Fig. 9A). In female dsx mRNA, the three common exons are spliced to exon 4, while in male dsx mRNA, they are spliced to exons 5 and 6.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 9. Mechanism controlling alternative splicing of the Drosophila doublesex (dsx) pre-mRNA. A, Diagram showing the sex-specific alternative splicing pathways of the dsx pre-mRNA. Inclusion of exon 4 is female specific and exclusion of exon 4 is male specific. B, cis-Acting element. The dsx repeat element (dsxRE) sequences are represented by black squares. Sequences of dsxRE, PRE, and 3'-SS are shown. Abbreviations: DsxRE, dsx repeat element; PRE, purine-rich element; 3'- SS, 3'-splice site. C, trans-Acting factors. The dsx repeat and PRE sequences are capable of binding to tra-2, tra, and one of the SR family proteins. Small rectangular box, tra-2; small oval, tra; small circle, one of the SR proteins.

Dsx exon 4 splicing is an excellent example of a concept alluded to earlier in this communication—the selective strengthening of an alternatively spliced exon with weak splice sites. In this case the 3'-splice site for exon 4 is particularly weak. A variety of intact cell and in vitro cell-free experiments have further characterized the exon 4 elements that are used to selectively strengthen this exon. Three hundred nucleotides downstream of the 3'-splice site of exon 4 is a 270-nucleotide (nt) element named the dsx repeat element (dsxRE, Fig. 9B). This element contains six copies of a 13-nucleotide repeat sequence and a purine-rich element (PRE) between repeats 5 and 6. The 13-nucleotide repeat sequence in dsxRE is nearly identical in distantly related D. melanogaster (6 copies) and D. virilis (4 copies); dsxREs from the 2 species are interchangeable in an in vitro splicing assay (105). DsxRE functions to activate the 3'-splice site of exon 4, which consists of a poor polypyrimidine tract (106, 107). The sequence of this suboptimal polypyrimidine tract is also highly conserved evolutionarily (108).

Each 13-nucleotide repeat sequence forms a binding site for tra, tra-2, and another RNA-binding protein (RBP1) (108, 109). The PRE sequence binds to tra and tra-2 and one of the SR proteins, dSRp30 or B52/dSRp55 (109). All of these proteins belong to the SR family of splicing factors, characterized by the presence of at least one RNA-binding domain and an SR domain. In the absence of tra and tra-2, RBP1, dSRp30, or B52/dSRp55 binds to dsxRE with low affinities. Tra and tra-2 stabilize the complex formed between RBP1, dSRp30, or B52/dSRp55 and the splicing enhancer. This complex promotes binding of the constitutive splicing factor U2AF65 to the poor polypyrimidine tract at the 3'-splice site. U2AF65 binding is facilitated by the bridging factor U2AF35 (Fig. 9C) (110). In addition, RBP1 has been shown to activate female-specific splicing by binding to its target sequence at the 3'-splice site of exon 4 (108).

One copy of the 13-nucleotide repeat sequence was capable of forming a complex and activating tra- and tra-2dependent female-specific splicing, albeit at low efficiency. The splicing efficiency increased linearly rather than synergistically when the number of repeats was increased (111). This experiment indicates that the function of multisite enhancer elements is to increase the probability of an interaction between the enhancer complex and splicing machinery rather than to promote functional synergy (111).

B. Drosophila P-element
In D. melanogaster, the P-element transposition is restricted to the germline. The molecular mechanism controlling this phenomenon involves alternative intron retention of the third intron (IVS3) of the P-element pre-mRNA. In germ cells, IVS3 is removed to generate an active transposase. However, in somatic cells, splicing of IVS3 is inhibited, leading to production of a shorter protein that can function as a negative regulator of transposition (Fig. 10A) (112).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 10. Mechanism controlling alternative splicing of the Drosophila P-element pre-mRNA. A, Diagram showing that intron 3 (IVS3) of the P-element pre-mRNA is selectively included in somatic tissues. B, Sequences involved in P-element alternative splicing are shown. Exon 3 sequence is shown in the bracket, and the actual 5'-splice site sequence is underlined. The two pseudo 5'-splice sites are indicated. C, Factors involved in the P-element alternative splicing.

The sequences responsible for somatic repression of IVS3 splicing are located in the 5'-exon of this intron. As shown in Fig. 10B, the inhibitory element contains two pseudo 5'-splice sites (F1 and F2) that are 20 nucleotides upstream of the accurate 5'-splice site (112, 113, 114). F1 and F2 are called pseudo 5'-splice sites because they are not used as real 5'-splice sites. These pseudo 5'-splice sites shift U1 snRNP binding from the accurate 5'-splice site to the inactive pseudo 5'-splice sites in Drosophila but not in HeLa cells. In addition, mutations of F1 and F2 increase U1 snRNP binding to the real 5'-splice site and activate IVS3 splicing (113).

It has been found that a complex containing U1 snRNP and at least four proteins forms on the 5'-exon sequence element. Biochemical purification identified two of these proteins: the 97-kDa P-element somatic inhibitor (PSI) and 50-kDa hrp48 (Fig. 10C) (96). PSI appears to bind to sequences outside the F1/F2 motif, while hrp48 binds to the pseudo-5'-splice sites (96). Antibodies specific to PSI have reversed the inhibition of IVS3 splicing in somatic extracts. Genetic mutations in the hrp48 gene have partially relieved this inhibition as well (115). These experiments established the direct involvement of PSI and hrp48 in the somatic repression of IVS3 splicing.

PSI, which was initially identified as a novel alternative splicing factor, is expressed at a significantly higher level in soma than in germ cells. However, ectopic expression of PSI in the female germ line is sufficient to repress splicing of an IVS3 reporter transgene. Additionally, IVS3 splicing in somatic embryonic cells was activated by an antisense PSI ribozyme in a previous study (116). These in vivo experiments provide definitive evidence that PSI is the tissue-specific regulator of P-element somatic repression.

Hrp48 is an hnRNP protein and likely the functional homolog of hnRNP A1 in mammalian cells. No tissue specificity has been found for any of the hnRNP proteins. However, involvement of hrp48 in somatic repression of P-element IVS3 splicing suggests that constitutive and tissue-specific splicing factors function together to confer a tissue-specific alternative splicing event.

C. Mouse c-src
The protooncogene c-src encodes a protein tyrosine kinase that exists in two major forms differing by only six amino acids. The neuron-specific form n-src contains the extra six amino acids encoded by neuron-specific exon N1, which is excluded from tissues of nonneuronal origin (117). This exon is inserted between exons 3 and 4 through alternative splicing (Fig. 11A). Insertion of the N1 exon disrupts the SH3 domain of the src protein and alters the ability of the protein to interact with other proteins (118).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 11. Mechanism controlling alternative splicing of the src pre-mRNA. A, Diagram showing the genomic DNA structure surrounding the alternative exon N1. The minigene construct was created to simplify the studies of this alternative splicing event. B, Exon N1 and its surrounding sequences are shown. The underlined sequence motifs have been shown to be important for the alternative splicing of N1. Abbreviation: DCS, downstream control sequence. C, Factors binding to the repressor and DCS sequences. KSRP, KH-type splicing regulatory protein; F, hnRNP F; H, hnRNP H; PTB, polypyrimidine-tract binding protein.

1. Model system. Skipping of the N1 exon occurs in nonneuronal cells and seems to be the default splicing pathway, while inclusion of N1 is only activated in neuronal cells and is therefore the regulated pathway. To study this regulated event, a minigene construct was generated that contained the N1 exon, its flanking cDNA sequence (exons 2 and 3 and exons 4–13), the intact upstream intron, and a shortened downstream intron in which the sequences 600 nucleotides downstream of the N1 exon were largely deleted (Fig. 11A) (119). In more recent experiments, an even simpler minigene construct containing only the immediate flanking exons 3 and 4 has been used (86).

When transfected with the minigene construct, HeLa and HEK293 cells process the c-src primary transcript to skip the N1 exon, while Weri-1 retinoblastoma and LA-N-5 neuroblastoma cells process the c-src primary transcript to include the N1 exon. These splicing phenotypes have been duplicated in vitro using the nuclear extract prepared from the two types of cell lines (119).

2. Sequence requirement. Like many other alternatively spliced exons, N1 is an exon that contains suboptimal splice sites and is usually ignored by the splicing machinery. The suboptimal features include a nonconsensus 3'-splice site (120), the small size of exon N1 (119), and the existence of repressor sequences upstream of the N1 exon (86). Exon N1 recognition is facilitated by the combination of at least two activator sequences: a purine-rich exonic element on N1 and, more importantly, a downstream control sequence (DCS) that showed the strongest effect in neuronal cells (Fig. 11B). Modafferi and Black (76, 120) demonstrated that recognition of N1 is controlled by a variety of regulatory elements; correct tissue specificity of splicing occurs only when each of these regulatory elements is recognized by appropriate transacting factors.

Both intronic elements of N1—the upstream repressor and the DCS—are conserved across species (85, 86). Specifically, mutagenesis analysis of the repressor sequence identified conserved CUCUCU elements (86). In addition, a DCS was found to contain an array of smaller elements, including the sequences GGGGCUG, UGCAUG, and GGUAGAG (Fig. 11B) (76, 85). The DCS also promoted inclusion of a heterologous exon, ß-globin exon 2, when inserted downstream of this exon. This latter effect was observed to be stronger but not exclusive in neuronal cells (76). Analysis of individual motifs in the DCS suggests that these motifs must act in combination to promote inclusion of the exon. Of the several DCS motifs, UGCAUG exhibited the strongest neuron specificity when three copies of it were used, although a single copy had no effect (76). This observation suggests other unidentified sequence motifs may exist that function cooperatively with the identified elements to provide the neuron-specific inclusion of N1.

3. Protein components. Several proteins that interact with these sequence elements have been identified. These proteins fall into two classes: ones involved in enhancing inclusion of N1 in neuronal cells and ones involved in repressing N1 in nonneuronal cells.

In a previous study, a complex formed specifically on a DCS (containing the sequences 38–70 nucleotides downstream of N1) when a nuclear extract from Weri-1 cells but not HeLa cells was incubated with it (121). Competition experiments showed that binding of this complex is required for N1 inclusion in vitro. UV cross-linking analysis identified at least six proteins in the complex: p28, p43, p53, p58, p75, and p91. Three of these proteins—the 53-kDa hnRNP F, the 58-kDa hnRNP H, and the 75-kDa KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP)—have been identified using biochemical approaches (Fig. 11C). Antibody inhibition and/or immunodepletion followed by supplementation of recombinant proteins demonstrated that all three proteins are functionally involved in regulating N1 inclusion (97, 121, 122).

It is perhaps not surprising that hnRNP F and hnRNP H bind a DCS because DCS contains a G-rich sequence, which is the preferred sequence for these two proteins. HnRNP proteins are expressed ubiquitously and are unlikely to be the tissue-specific factors. However, KSRP was identified as a novel splicing factor that contains K-homology RNA-binding domains. KSRP is expressed in both neuronal and nonneuronal cell lines, although it is enriched in neuronal cells. It remains to be seen whether any neuron-specific proteins exist in the DCS complex or complexes assembled on other sequence motifs surrounding N1. It appears that the combination of both constitutive and tissue-specific proteins controls the fate of N1.

The CUCUCU sequences located in introns upstream and downstream of the N1 exon inhibit inclusion of N1 in nonneuronal cells (123, 124). This sequence contains two copies of CUCUCU and binds polypyrimidine-tract binding protein (PTB) (123). PTB is also an hnRNP protein and is generally considered a negative splicing regulator. PTB inhibits splicing by competing with the essential factor U2AF for the polypyrimidine-tract at a 3'-splice site (92). PTB binding on the repressor sequence at the 3'-splice site of N1 functions in a unique way: it inhibits splicing of the intron between N1 and the downstream exon 4 instead of the intron where it binds. PTB binding probably disrupts the spliceosome formation between the 5'-splice site of N1 and the 3'-splice site of exon 4 (Fig. 11C) (123).

Recently, a neuron-specific homolog of PTB, nPTB, was identified (125). nPTB is enriched in the brain and in some neural cell lines. nPTB binds DCS with higher affinity than PTB, yet it is a weaker repressor. nPTB also facilitates binding of KSRP and hnRNP H to the DCS (125). Therefore, the neuron-specific N1 inclusion may result from formation of a nPTB-induced hnRNP complex on the DCS RNA in neuronal cells.

D. Human calcitonin/CGRP
As discussed in Section III and shown in Fig. 7, the pre-mRNA of the calcitonin/CGRP gene contains six exons, including two alternative 3'-terminal exons, 4 and 6. Inclusion of these two exons is mutually exclusive.

Work performed during the past 10 yr has elucidated several important characteristics of this alternative RNA processing event. First, processing to include calcitonin exon 4 is the predominant phenotype seen in most cell types when the calcitonin/CGRP gene is constitutively expressed in transgenic mice. However, exclusion of exon 4 is observed in only a subset of neuronal cells (126). Second, the RNA processing signals surrounding exon 4 are suboptimal. These signals include a short polypyrimidine tract and a noncanonical branchpoint for the 3'-splice site, and a weak poly(A) signal characterized by a poor G/U-rich sequence downstream of the cleavage site (127, 128). Third, a considerable amount of evidence has accumulated showing that the major regulatory events involve exon 4 and its flanking intron sequences (128, 129, 130, 131). Finally, several sequence elements have been identified within or adjacent to exon 4 (Fig. 12) (87, 128, 129, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 12. Mechanism controlling alternative splicing of the calcitonin/CGRP pre-mRNA. A, Diagram showing the genomic DNA structure of calcitonin/CGRP gene. The sequence elements that have been shown to be involved in this alternative splicing choice are located on exon 4 and its surrounding sequences. A minigene construct containing exon 4 and its flanking intron sequences inserted into the human metallothionein gene is illustrated. B, Diagram showing the downstream intron sequence element and sequence of the core element containing a 5'-splice site-like and a pyrimidine-rich sequence. C, Factors identified to be bound to the core element. Binding of these factors facilitates the polyadenylation of exon 4. X’s represent additional, unidentified proteins.

Our group, in collaboration with Dr. Susan Berget, has identified and characterized the 127-nucleotide intron element beginning 153 nucleotides downstream of exon 4 (Fig. 12B). This intron element is 63% identical between humans, mice, and rats, indicative of its biological significance. An interesting feature of this element is the presence of two splicing signals buried in the middle of an intron: a perfect 5'-splice site sequence and a pyrimidine-rich sequence that immediately precedes the 5'-splice site sequence (Fig. 12B). The two splicing signal motifs constituting 24 of 127 nucleotides has been named "the core sequence" (Fig. 12B).

The 127-nucleotide intron element was identified and further characterized using cell transfection model system in which HeLa cells were used to mimic exon 4 inclusion, and human T98G glioblastoma cells were used for the exon 4 exclusion pathway (131). Traditional deletion and point mutagenesis experiments established that the core sequence, consisting of both the 5'-splice site-like and pyrimidine motifs, is required for the exon 4 inclusion pathway (87). Furthermore, we demonstrated using a HeLa cell-free nuclear extract, that this intron element is a polyadenylation enhancer for exon 4 (138). This is the first example of an intron element regulating polyadenylation and suggests that regulation of exon 4 polyadenylation is at least one component in the regulation of this alternative splicing event.

Using the in vitro nuclear extract system, we have further demonstrated that a complex forms on this 127-nucleotide polyadenylation enhancer element. UV cross-linking analysis indicated that this complex consists of several known splicing factors. These include: U1 snRNP, two members of the SR protein family (ASF/SF2 and SRp20), and PTB (Fig. 12C). Of these factors, U1 snRNP, SRp20, and PTB positively regulate exon 4 inclusion by enhancing polyadenylation at this exon (138, 139, 140).

Whether the intron element is involved in the exon 4 exclusion pathway remains to be determined. We hypothesize that this intron element may be regulated in neurons to promote exon 4 exclusion. One clue comes from the mutational analysis of the intron enhancer that identified other sequence motifs in addition to the core sequence. One motif is an additional 5'-splice site sequence located upstream of the core sequence. Disruption of this sequence has resulted in increased inclusion of exon 4 in both HeLa and T98G cells (87). It appears that the two 5'-splice site sequences antagonize each other, a feature reminiscent of the Drosophila P-element regulation.

We propose that two sets of factors assemble on the intron element: one complex promotes exon 4 inclusion, while the other complex, which is neuron-specific, promotes exon 4 exclusion. The two complexes probably share a number of constitutive splicing factors and differ only in one or a few factors that are tissue-specific regulators, similar to the P-element and src genes. We do not rule out the possibility that one of the other sequence elements located in or around exon 4 also plays a role in this regulatory event. A few years ago, Roesser et al. (134) identified an activity in a rat brain cell nuclear extract that binds to a region immediately upstream of the 3'-splice site branchpoint sequence of calcitonin exon 4. The authors hypothesized that such binding inhibited splicing from exon 3 to exon 4 in rats (134).

	VI. Future Perspectives

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 
In recent years, an increasing number of mammalian genes have been found to undergo alternative splicing. Indeed, the recent discovery that the complex organization of D. melanogaster is dictated by a core of less than 15,000 genes argues for the importance of posttranscriptional modification as a method for regulating development. Investigators are facing the challenge of understanding the function and regulation of alternative splicing, and its role in controlling gene expression. In the case of genes in which a large number of protein variants are produced (e.g., FSHR and LHR), is production of these variants a tightly controlled process or are these variants merely a result of splicing mistakes? Do all of the variants have specific functions? Do cell-specific regulators exist to control cell-specific alternative splicing or does the ratio of constitutive splicing factors change in different tissues to cause the change in splicing pathways? If cell-specific regulators do exist, do they regulate individual genes or a subset of genes? The recent completion of the human genome sequence will undoubtedly lead to the identification of many additional RNA-binding proteins. The next biggest challenge will be to determine the function of these proteins and how they regulate RNA processing. We predict that humans, like flies, will utilize the temporal and cell-specific expression of a finite number of RNA-binding proteins to orchestrate the production of the complex protein forms necessary for human development. The combination of mouse genetics (gene targeting and transgenic mice) and traditional biochemical approaches will greatly extend our understanding of RNA-binding proteins and alternative splicing. In addition, new techniques (e.g., microarray and chip technology and high-resolution mass spectrometry) will prove to be crucial to the future studies.

	Footnotes

 
Address reprint requests to: Hua Lou, Ph.D., Department of Genetics and the Ireland Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955. E-mail: hxl47{at}po.cwru.edu

¹ Supported by an American Cancer Society grant to Susan M. Berget.

² Supported by USPHS grants (RO1-DK38146 to R.F.G. and 2P30-CA16672 to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center).

	References

Top Abstract I. Introduction II. Splicing Mechanism and... III. Alternative RNA Processing... IV. Strategies to Study... V. Mechanisms Controlling... VI. Future Perspectives References

 

1. Missler M, Sudhof TC 1998 Neurexins: three genes and 1001 products. Trends Genet 14:20–26[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Hanke J, Brett D, Zastrow I, Aydin A, Delbruck S, Lehmann G, Luft F, Reich J, Bork P 1999 Alternative splicing of human genes: more the rule than the exception? Trends Genet 15:389–390[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Thanaraj TA 1999 A clean dataset of EST-confirmed splice sites from Homo sapiens and standards for clean-up procedures. Nucleic Acids Res 27:2627–2637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Croft L, Schandorff S, Clark F, Burrage K, Arctander P, Mattick JS 2000 ISIS, the intron information system, reveals the high frequency of alternative splicing in the human genome. Nat Genet 24:340–341[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Smith CW, Patton JG, Nadal-Ginard B 1989 Alternative splicing in the control of gene expression. Annu Rev Genet 23:527–577[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Black D 1998 Splicing in the inner ear: a familiar tune, but what are the instruments? Neuron 20:165–168[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Amara SG, Jonas V, Rosenfeld MG, Ong ES, Evans RM 1982 Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs encoding different polypeptide products. Nature 298:240–244[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Rosenfeld MG, Amara SG, Evans RM 1984 Alternative RNA processing: determining neuronal phenotype. Science 225:1315–1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Ruppert S, Cole TJ, Boshart M, Schmid E, Schutz G 1992 Multiple mRNA isoforms of the transcription activator protein CREB: generation by alternative splicing and specific expression in primary spermatocytes. EMBO J 11:1503–1512[Medline]
10. Foulkes NS, Mellstrom B, Benusiglio E, Sassone-Corsi P 1992 Developmental switch of CREM function during spermatogenesis: from antagonist to activator. Nature 355:80–84[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Gervois P, Torra IP, Chinetti G, Grotzinger T, Dubois G, Fruchart JC, Fruchart-Najib J, Leitersdorf E, Staels B 1999 A truncated human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor splice variant with dominant negative activity. Mol Endocrinol 13:1535–1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Wang J, Manley JL 1997 Regulation of pre-mRNA splicing in metazoa. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7:205–211[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Rio DC 1993 Splicing of pre-mRNA: mechanism, regulation and role in development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:574–584[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Wang A, Cohen DS, Palmer E, Sheppard D 1991 Polarized regulation of fibronectin secretion and alternative splicing by transforming growth factor. J Biol Chem 266:15598–15601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Shifrin VI, Neel BG 1993 Growth factor-inducible alternative splicing of nontransmembrane phosphotyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B pre-mRNA. J Biol Chem 268:25376–25384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Metheny LJ, Skuse GR 1996 NF1 mRNA isoform expression in PC12 cells: modulation by extrinsic factors. Exp Cell Res 228:44–49[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Fichter M, Hinrichs R, Eissner G, Scheffer B, Classen S, Ueffing M 1997 Expression of CD44 isoforms in neuroblastoma cells is regulated by PI 3-kinase and protein kinase C. Oncogene 14:2817–2824[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Kosaki A, Webster NJ 1993 Effect of dexamethasone on the alternative splicing of the insulin receptor mRNA and insulin action in HepG2 hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem 268:21990–21996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Chalfant CE, Mischak H, Watson JE, Winkler BC, Goodnight J, Farese RV, Cooper DR 1995 Regulation of alternative splicing of protein kinase C ß by insulin. J Biol Chem 270:13326–13332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Mackay CR, Terpe HJ, Stauder R, Marston WL, Stark H, Günthert U 1994 Expression and modulation of CD44 variant isoforms in humans. J Cell Biol 124:71–82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. McKay NG, Hunter DJ, Haites NE, Power DA 1994 Regulation of alternative splicing of the fibronectin IIICS domain by cytokines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 199:1005–1011[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Eissa NT, Strauss AJ, Haggerty CM, Choo EK, Chu SC, Moss J 1996 Alternative splicing of human inducible nitric-oxide synthase mRNA. Tissue-specific regulation and induction by cytokines. J Biol Chem 271:27184–27187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Borsi L, Balza E, Gaggero B, Allemanni G, Zardi L 1995 The alternative splicing pattern of the tenascin-C pre-mRNA is controlled by the extracellular pH. J Biol Chem 270:6243–6245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Zacharias DA, Strehler EE 1996 Change in plasma membrane Ca2(+)-ATPase splice-variant expression in response to a rise in intracellular Ca2+. Curr Biol 6:1642–1652[CrossRef][Medline]
25. König H, Ponta H, Herrlich P 1998 Coupling of signal transduction to alternative pre-mRNA splicing by a composite splice regulator. EMBO J 17:2904–2913[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Hawkins JD 1988 A survey on intron and exon lengths. Nucleic Acids Res 16:9893–9908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Burge CB, Tuschl T, Sharp PA 1999 Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosomes. In: Gesteland RF, Cech TR, Atkins JF (eds) The RNA World. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY, pp 525–560
28. Berget SM 1995 Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing. J Biol Chem 270:2411–24146[Free Full Text]
29. Robberson BL, Cote GJ, Berget SM 1990 Exon definition may facilitate splice site selection in RNAs with multiple exons. Mol Cell Biol 10:84–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Neugabauer KM, Roth MB 1997 Transcription units as RNA processing units. Genes Dev 11:3279–3285[Free Full Text]
31. Hirose Y, Manley JL 2000 RNA polymerase II and integration of nuclear events. Genes Dev 14:1415–1429[Free Full Text]
32. McCracken S, Fong N, Yankulov K, Ballantyne S, Pan G, Greenblatt J, Patterson SD, Wickens M, Bentley DL 1997 The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II couples mRNA processing to transcription. Nature 385:357–361[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Yuryev A, Patturajan M, Litingtung Y, Joshi RV, Gentile C, Gebara M, Corden JL 1996 The C-terminal domain of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II interacts with a novel set of serine/arginine-rich proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6975–6980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Hirose Y, Tacke R, Manley JL 1999 Phosphorylated RNA polymerase II stimulates pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev 13:1234–1239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Hirose Y, Manley JL 1998 RNA polymerase II is an essential mRNA polyadenylation factor. Nature 395:93–96[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Cramer P, Caceres JF, Cazalla D, Kadener S, Muro AF, Baralle FE, Kornblihtt AR 1999 Coupling of transcription with alternative splicing: RNA pol II promoters modulate SF2/ASF and 9G8 effects on an exonic splicing enhancer. Mol Cell 4:251–258[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Foulkes NS, Borrelli E, Sassone-Corsi P 1991 CREM gene: use of alternative DNA-binding domains generates multiple antagonists of cAMP-induced transcription. Cell 64:739–749[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Foulkes NS, Schlotter F, Pevet P, Sassone-Corsi P 1993 Pituitary hormone FSH directs the CREM functional switch during spermatogenesis. Nature 362:264–267[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Sassone-Corsi P 1998 CREM: a master-switch governing male germ cell differentiation and apoptosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 9:475–482[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Foulkes NS, Borjigin J, Snyder SH, Sassone-Corsi P 1996 Transcriptional control of circadian hormone synthesis via the CREM feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14140–14145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Blendy JA, Kaestner KH, Schmid W, Gass P, Schutz G 1996 Targeting of the CREB gene leads to up-regulation of a novel CREB mRNA isoform. EMBO J 15:1098–1106[Medline]
42. Girardet C, Walker WH, Habener JF 1996 An alternatively spliced polycistronic mRNA encoding cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-responsive transcription factor CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) in human testis extinguishes expression of an internally translated inhibitor CREB isoform. Mol Endocrinol 10:879–891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Walker WH, Girardet C, Habener JF 1996 Alternative exon splicing controls a translational switch from activator to repressor isoforms of transcription factor CREB during spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem 271:20145–21050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Waeber G, Meyer TE, LeSieur M, Hermann HL, Gerard N, Habener JF 1991 Developmental stage-specific expression of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein CREB during spermatogenesis involves alternative exon splicing [published erratum appears in Mol Endocrinol 1993 Nov;7(11):1501]. Mol Endocrinol 5:1418–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Daniel PB, Habener JF 1998 Cyclical alternative exon splicing of transcription factor cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (CREB) messenger ribonucleic acid during rat spermatogenesis. Endocrinology 139:3721–3729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Gearing KL, Crickmore A, Gustafsson JA 1994 Structure of the mouse peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 199:255–263[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Romberger DJ 1997 Fibronectin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29:939–943[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Colman-Lerner A, Fischman ML, Lanuza GM, Bissell DM, Kornblihtt AR, Baranao JL 1999 Evidence for a role of the alternatively spliced ED-I sequence of fibronectin during ovarian follicular development. Endocrinology 140:2541–2548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Seino S, Seino M, Nishi S, Bell GI 1989 Structure of the human insulin receptor gene and characterization of its promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:114–118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Seino S, Bell GI 1989 Alternative splicing of human insulin receptor messenger RNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159:312–316[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, Goldfine ID, Belfiore A, Vigneri R 1999 Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol 19:3278–3288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Sell SM, Reese D, Ossowski VM 1994 Insulin-inducible changes in insulin receptor mRNA splice variants. J Biol Chem 269:30769–30772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Mosthaf L, Grako K, Dull TJ, Coussens L, Ullrich A, McClain DA 1990 Functionally distinct insulin receptors generated by tissue-specific alternative splicing. EMBO J 9:2409–2413[Medline]
54. Kosaki A, Pillay TS, Xu L, Webster NJ 1995 The B isoform of the insulin receptor signals more efficiently than the A isoform in HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem 270:20816–20823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Li Calzi S, Choice CV, Najjar SM 1997 Differential effect of pp120 on insulin endocytosis by two variant insulin receptor isoforms. Am J Physiol 273:E801–808
56. Sciacca L, Costantino A, Pandini G, Mineo R, Frasca F, Scalia P, Sbraccia P, Goldfine ID, Vigneri R, Belfiore A 1999 Insulin receptor activation by IGF-II in breast cancers: evidence for a new autocrine/paracrine mechanism. Oncogene 18:2471–2479[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Themmen AP, Kraaij R, Grootegoed JA 1994 Regulation of gonadotropin receptor gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 100:15–19[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Tena-Sempere M, Manna PR, Huhtaniemi I 1999 Molecular cloning of the mouse follicle-stimulating hormone receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid: functional expression of alternatively spliced variants and receptor inactivation by a C566T transition in exon 7 of the coding sequence. Biol Reprod 60:1515–1527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Gromoll J, Gudermann T, Nieschlag E 1992 Molecular cloning of a truncated isoform of the human follicle stimulating hormone receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 188:1077–1083[CrossRef][Medline]
60. Aatsinki JT, Pietila EM, Lakkakorpi JT, Rajaniemi HJ 1992 Expression of the LH/CG receptor gene in rat ovarian tissue is regulated by an extensive alternative splicing of the primary transcript. Mol Cell Endocrinol 84:127–135[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Kraaij R, Verhoef-Post M, Grootegoed JA, Themmen AP 1998 Alternative splicing of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor pre-mRNA: cloning and characterization of two alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts. J Endocrinol 158:127–136[Abstract]
62. Edens A, Talamantes F 1998 Alternative processing of growth hormone receptor transcripts. Endocr Rev 19:559–582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Baumann G 1994 Growth hormone-binding proteins: state of the art. J Endocrinol 141:1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Dastot F, Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Duriez B, Goossens M, Amselem S 1996 Alternatively spliced forms in the cytoplasmic domain of the human growth hormone (GH) receptor regulate its ability to generate a soluble GH-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10723–10728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Ross RJ, Esposito N, Shen XY, Von Laue S, Chew SL, Dobson PR, Postel-Vinay MC, Finidori J 1997 A short isoform of the human growth hormone receptor functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length receptor and generates large amounts of binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 11:265–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Sairam MR, Jiang LG, Yarney TA, Khan H 1997 Alternative splicing converts the G-protein coupled follitropin receptor gene into a growth factor type I receptor: implications for pleiotropic actions of the hormone. Mol Reprod Dev 48:471–479[CrossRef][Medline]
67. Khan H, Yarney TA, Sairam MR 1993 Cloning of alternately spliced mRNA transcripts coding for variants of ovine testicular follitropin receptor lacking the G protein coupling domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 190:888–894[CrossRef][Medline]
68. You S, Kim H, Hsu CC, El Halawani ME, Foster DN 2000 Three different turkey luteinizing hormone receptor (tLH-R) isoforms. I. Characterization of alternatively spliced tLH-R isoforms and their regulated expression in diverse tissues. Biol Reprod 62:108–116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Yarney TA, Jiang L, Khan H, MacDonald EA, Laird DW, Sairam MR 1997 Molecular cloning, structure, and expression of a testicular follitropin receptor with selective alteration in the carboxy terminus that affects signaling function. Mol Reprod Dev 48:458–470[CrossRef][Medline]
70. Sairam MR, Jiang LG, Yarney TA, Khan H 1996 Follitropin signal transduction: alternative splicing of the FSH receptor gene produces a dominant negative form of receptor which inhibits hormone action. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 226:717–722[CrossRef][Medline]
71. Edens A, Southard JN, Talamantes F 1994 Mouse growth hormone-binding protein and growth hormone receptor transcripts are produced from a single gene by alternative splicing. Endocrinology 135:2802–2805[Abstract]
72. Sakai N, Tolbert LM, Duman RS 1999 Identification and functional analysis of novel cAMP response element binding protein splice variants lacking the basic/leucine zipper domain. Mol Pharmacol 56:917–925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73. Bingham B, Oldham ER, Baumbach WR 1994 Regulation of growth hormone receptor and binding protein expression in domestic species. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 206:195–199[CrossRef][Medline]
74. He Y, Smith SK, Day KA, Clark DE, Licence DR, Charnock-Jones DS 1999 Alternative splicing of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-R1 (FLT-1) pre-mRNA is important for the regulation of VEGF activity. Mol Endocrinol 13:537–545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
75. Zhang L, Liu W, Grabowski PJ 1999 Coordinate repression of a trio of neuron-specific splicing events by the splicing regulator PTB. RNA 5:117–130[Abstract]
76. Modafferi EF, Black DL 1997 A complex intronic splicing enhancer from the c-src pre-mRNA activates inclusion of a heterologous exon. Mol Cell Biol 17:6537–6545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
77. Ashiya M, Zhang L, Grabowski PJ 1995 Regulated splicing of 2 pre-messenger RNA in neuronal cells. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 33:215–216
78. Jin W, Huang ES, Bi W, Cote GJ 1999 Redundant intronic repressors function to inhibit fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 -exon recognition in glioblastoma cells. J Biol Chem 274:28035–28041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Jin W, Bi W, Huang ES, Cote GJ 1999 Glioblastoma cell-specific expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1beta requires an intronic repressor of RNA splicing. Cancer Res 59:316–319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
80. Gooding C, Roberts GC, Smith CW 1998 Role of an inhibitory pyrimidine element and polypyrimidine tract binding protein in repression of a regulated -tropomyosin exon. RNA 4:85–100[Abstract]
81. Ryan KJ, Cooper TA 1996 Muscle-specific splicing enhancers regulate inclusion of the cardiac troponin T alternative exon in embryonic skeletal muscle. Mol Cell Biol 16:4014–4023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
82. Cote GJ, Huang ES, Jin W, Morrison RS 1997 Sequence requirements for regulated RNA splicing of the human fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 exon. J Biol Chem 272:1054–1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Huh GS, Hynes RO 1994 Regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by a novel repeated hexanucleotide element. Genes Dev 8:1561–1574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
84. Zhang L, Ashiya M, Sherman TG, Grabowski PJ 1996 Essential nucleotides direct neuron-specific splicing of 2 pre-mRNA. RNA 2:682–698[Abstract]
85. Black DL 1992 Activation of c-src neuron-specific splicing by an unusual RNA element in vivo and in vitro. Cell 69:795–807[CrossRef][Medline]
86. Chan RC, Black DL 1995 Conserved intron elements repress splicing of a neuron-specific c-src exon in vitro [published erratum appears in Mol Cell Biol 1997 May;17(5):2970]. Mol Cell Biol 15:6377–6385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
87. Lou H, Yang Y, Cote GJ, Berget SM, Gagel RF 1995 An intron enhancer containing a 5' splice site sequence in the human calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide gene. Mol Cell Biol 15:7135–7142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
88. Chandler D, McGuffin ME, Piskur J, Yao J, Baker BS, Mattox W 1997 Evolutionary conservation of regulatory strategies for the sex determination factor transformer-2. Mol Cell Biol 17:2908–2919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
89. Lim LP, Sharp PA 1998 Alternative splicing of the fibronectin EIIIB exon depends on specific TGCATG repeats. Mol Cell Biol 18:3900–3906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Chabot B, Blanchette M, Lapierre I, La Branche H 1997 An intron element modulating 5' splice site selection in the hnRNP A1 pre-mRNA interacts with hnRNP A1. Mol Cell Biol 17:1776–1786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
91. Cooper TA, Mattox W 1997 The regulation of splice-site selection, and its role in human disease. Am J Hum Genet 61:259–266[Medline]
92. Valcarcel J, Gebauer F 1997 Post-transcriptional regulation: the dawn of PTB. Curr Biol 7:R705–708
93. Gontarek RR, McNally MT, Beemon K 1993 Mutation of an RSV intronic element abolishes both U11/U12 snRNP binding and negative regulation of splicing. Genes Dev 7:1926–1936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
94. Smith CW, Valcarcel J 2000 Alternative pre-mRNA splicing: the logic of combinatorial control. Trends Biochem Sci 25:381–388[CrossRef][Medline]
95. Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM, Roeder RG 1983 Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 11:1475–1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
96. Siebel CW, Kanaar R, Rio DC 1994 Regulation of tissue-specific P-element pre-mRNA splicing requires the RNA-binding protein PSI. Genes Dev 8:1713–1725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
97. Min H, Turck CW, Nikolic JM, Black DL 1997 A new regulatory protein, KSRP, mediates exon inclusion through an intronic splicing enhancer. Genes Dev 11:1023–1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
98. Zhang B, Gallegos M, Puoti A, Durkin E, Fields S, Kimble J, Wickens MP 1997 A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390:477–484[CrossRef][Medline]
99. SenGupta DJ, Zhang B, Kraemer B, Pochart P, Fields S, Wickens M 1996 A three-hybrid system to detect RNA-protein interactions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8496–8501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
100. Wang ZF, Whitfield ML, Ingledue III TC, Dominski Z, Marzluff WF 1996 The protein that binds the 3' end of histone mRNA: a novel RNA-binding protein required for histone pre-mRNA processing. Genes Dev 10:3028–3040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
101. Bachler M, Schroeder R, von Ahsen U 1999 StreptoTag: a novel method for the isolation of RNA-binding proteins. RNA 5:1509–1516[Abstract]
102. Neubauer G, King A, Rappsilber J, Calvio C, Watson M, Ajuh P, Sleeman J, Lamond A, Mann M 1998 Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multiprotein spliceosome complex. Nat Genet 20:46–50[CrossRef][Medline]
103. Burtis KC, Baker BS 1989 Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell 56:997–1010[CrossRef][Medline]
104. Nagoshi RN, McKeown M, Burtis KC, Belote JM, Baker BS 1988 The control of alternative splicing at genes regulating sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster. Cell 53:229–236[CrossRef][Medline]
105. Hertel KJ, Lynch KW, Hsiao EC, Liu EH, Maniatis T 1996 Structural and functional conservation of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer repeat elements. RNA 2:969–981[Abstract]
106. Ryner LC, Baker BS 1991 Regulation of doublesex pre-mRNA processing occurs by 3'-splice site activation. Genes Dev 5:2071–2085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
107. Hedley ML, Maniatis T 1991 Sex-specific splicing and polyadenylation of dsx pre-mRNA requires a sequence that binds specifically to tra-2 protein in vitro. Cell 65:579–586[CrossRef][Medline]
108. Heinrichs V, Baker BS 1995 The Drosophila SR protein RBP1 contributes to the regulation of doublesex alternative splicing by recognizing RBP1 RNA target sequences. EMBO J 14:3987–4000[Medline]
109. Lynch KW, Maniatis T 1996 Assembly of specific SR protein complexes on distinct regulatory elements of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer. Genes Dev 10:2089–2101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
110. Zuo P, Maniatis T 1996 The splicing factor U2AF35 mediates critical protein-protein interactions in constitutive and enhancerdependent splicing. Genes Dev 10:1356–1368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
111. Hertel KJ, Maniatis T 1998 The function of multisite splicing enhancers. Mol Cell 1:449–455[CrossRef][Medline]
112. Siebel CW, Rio DC 1990 Regulated splicing of the Drosophila P transposable element third intron in vitro: somatic repression. Science 248:1200–1208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
113. Siebel CW, Fresco LD, Rio DC 1992 The mechanism of somatic inhibition of Drosophila P-element pre-mRNA splicing: multiprotein complexes at an exon pseudo-5' splice site control U1 snRNP binding. Genes Dev 6:1386–1401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
114. Chain AC, Zollman S, Tseng JC, Laski FA 1991 Identification of a cis-acting sequence required for germ line-specific splicing of the P element ORF2-ORF3 intron. Mol Cell Biol 11:1538–1546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
115. Hammond LE, Rudner DZ, Kanaar R, Rio DC 1997 Mutations in the hrp48 gene, which encodes a Drosophila heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle protein, cause lethality and developmental defects and affect P-element third-intron splicing in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 17:7260–7267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
116. Adams MD, Tarng RS, Rio DC 1997 The alternative splicing factor PSI regulates P-element third intron splicing in vivo. Genes Dev 11:129–138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
117. Martinez R, Mathey-Prevot B, Bernards A, Baltimore D 1987 Neuronal pp60c-src contains a six-amino acid insertion relative to its non-neuronal counterpart. Science 237:411–415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
118. Foster-Barber A, Bishop JM 1998 Src interacts with dynamin and synapsin in neuronal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4673–4677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
119. Black DL 1991 Does steric interference between splice sites block the splicing of a short c-src neuron-specific exon in non-neuronal cells? Genes Dev 5:389–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
120. Modafferi EF, Black DL 1999 Combinatorial control of a neuron-specific exon. RNA 5:687–706[Abstract]
121. Min H, Chan RC, Black DL 1995 The generally expressed hnRNP F is involved in a neural-specific pre- mRNA splicing event. Genes Dev 9:2659–2671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
122. Chou MY, Rooke N, Turck CW, Black DL 1999 hnRNP H is a component of a splicing enhancer complex that activates a c-src alternative exon in neuronal cells. Mol Cell Biol 19:69–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
123. Chan RC, Black DL 1997 The polypyrimidine tract binding protein binds upstream of neural cell- specific c-src exon N1 to repress the splicing of the intron downstream. Mol Cell Biol 17:4667–4676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
124. Chou MY, Underwood JG, Nikolic J, Luu MH, Black DL 2000 Multisite RNA binding and release of polypyrimidine tract binding protein during the regulation of c-src neural-specific splicing. Mol Cell 5:949–957[CrossRef][Medline]
125. Markovtsov V, Nikolic JM, Goldman JA, Turck CW, Chou MY, Black DL 2000 Cooperative assembly of an hnRNP complex induced by a tissue-specific homolog of polypyrimidine tract binding protein. Mol Cell Biol 20:7463–7479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
126. Crenshaw EBd Russo AF, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG 1987 Neuron-specific alternative RNA processing in transgenic mice expressing a metallothionein-calcitonin fusion gene. Cell 49:389–398[CrossRef][Medline]
127. van Oers CC, Bakker L, Baas PD 1994 The exon 4 poly(A) site of the human calcitonin/CGRP-I pre-mRNA is a weak site in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 1218:55–63[Medline]
128. Bennett MM, Amara SG 1992 Molecular mechanisms of cellspecific and regulated expression of the calcitonin/-CGRP and ß-CGRP genes. Ann NY Acad Sci 657:36–49[Medline]
129. Adema GJ, van Hulst KL, Baas PD 1990 Uridine branch acceptor is a cis-acting element involved in regulation of the alternative processing of calcitonin/CGRP-l pre-mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5365–5373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
130. Yeakley JM, Hedjran F, Morfin JP, Merillat N, Rosenfeld MG, Emeson RB 1993 Control of calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide pre-mRNA processing by constitutive intron and exon elements. Mol Cell Biol 13:5999–6011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
131. Lou H, Cote GJ, Gagel RF 1994 The calcitonin exon and its flanking intronic sequences are sufficient for the regulation of human calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide alternative RNA splicing. Mol Endocrinol 8:1618–1626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
132. Emeson RB, Hedjran F, Yeakley JM, Guise JW, Rosenfeld MG 1989 Alternative production of calcitonin and CGRP mRNA is regulated at the calcitonin-specific splice acceptor. Nature 341:76–80[CrossRef][Medline]
133. Cote GJ, Stolow DT, Peleg S, Berget SM, Gagel RF 1992 Identification of exon sequences and an exon binding protein involved in alternative RNA splicing of calcitonin/CGRP. Nucleic Acids Res 20:2361–2366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
134. Roesser JR, Liittschwager K, Leff SE 1993 Regulation of tissue-specific splicing of the calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide gene by RNA-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 268:8366–8375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
135. van Oers CC, Adema GJ, Zandberg H, Moen TC, Baas PD 1994 Two different sequence elements within exon 4 are necessary for calcitonin-specific splicing of the human calcitonin/calcitonin gene- related peptide I pre-mRNA. Mol Cell Biol 14:951–960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
136. Hedjran F, Yeakley JM, Huh GS, Hynes RO, Rosenfeld MG 1997 Control of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by distributed pentameric repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12343–12347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
137. Coleman TP, Roesser JR 1998 RNA secondary structure: an important cis-element in rat calcitonin/CGRP pre-messenger RNA splicing. Biochemistry 37:15941–15950[CrossRef][Medline]
138. Lou H, Gagel RF, Berget SM 1996 An intron enhancer recognized by splicing factors activates polyadenylation. Genes Dev 10:208–219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
139. Lou H, Neugebauer KM, Gagel RF, Berget SM 1998 Regulation of alternative polyadenylation by U1 snRNPs and SRp20. Mol Cell Biol 18:4977–4985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
140. Lou H, Helfman DM, Gagel RF, Berget SM 1999 Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein positively regulates inclusion of an alternative 3'-terminal exon. Mol Cell Biol 19:78–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
141. Colgan DF, Manley JL 1997 Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation. Genes Dev 11:2755–2766[Free Full Text]
142. Campos RV, Zhang L, Drucker DJ 1994 Differential expression of RNA transcripts encoding unique carboxy- terminal sequences of human parathyroid hormone-related peptide. Mol Endocrinol 8:1656–1666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
143. Flouriot G, Griffin C, Kenealy M, Sonntag-Buck V, Gannon F 1998 Diffferentially expressed messenger RNA isoforms of the human estrogen receptor- gene are generated by alternative splicing and promoter usage. Mol Endocrinol 12:1939–1954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
144. Hanstein B, Liu H, Yancisin MC, Brown M 1999 Functional analysis of a novel estrogen receptor-ß isoform. Mol Endocrinol 13:129–137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
145. DeNoto FM, Moore DD, Goodman HM 1981 Human growth hormone DNA sequence and mRNA structure: possible alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 9:3719–3730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
146. Hampson RK, Rottman FM 1987 Alternative processing of bovine growth hormone mRNA: nonsplicing of the final intron predicts a high molecular weight variant of bovine growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2673–2677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
147. Chua Jr SC, Koutras IK, Han L, Liu SM, Kay J, Young SJ, Chung WK, Leibel RL 1997 Fine structure of the murine leptin receptor gene: splice site suppression is required to form two alternatively spliced transcripts. Genomics 45:264–270[CrossRef][Medline]
148. Ivanchuk SM, Myers SM, Mulligan LM 1998 Expression of RET 3' splicing variants during human kidney development. Oncogene 16:991–996[CrossRef][Medline]
149. Novotny J, Svoboda P 1998 The long (Gs(alpha)-L) and short (Gs(alpha)-S) variants of the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein. Do they behave in an identical way? J Mol Endocrinol 20:163–173[Abstract]
150. Wei N, Lin CQ, Modafferi EF, Gomes WA, Black DL 1997 A unique intronic splicing enhancer controls the inclusion of the agrin Y exon. RNA 3:1275–1288[Abstract]
151. Humphrey MB, Bryan J, Cooper TA, Berget SM 1995 A 32nucleotide exon-splicing enhancer regulates usage of competing 5' splice sites in a differential internal exon. Mol Cell Biol 15:3979–3988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
152. Chew SL, Baginsky L, Eperon IC 2000 An exonic splicing silencer in the testes-specific DNA ligase III ß exon. Nucleic Acids Res 28:402–410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
153. Jin W, Huang ES, Bi W, Cote GJ 1998 Exon sequence is required for regulated RNA splicing of the human fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 -exon. J Biol Chem 273:16170–16176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
154. Carstens RP, McKeehan WL, Garcia-Blanco MA 1998 An intronic sequence element mediates both activation and repression of rat fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell Biol 18:2205–2217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
155. Lavigueur A, La Branche H, Kornblihtt AR, Chabot B 1993 A splicing enhancer in the human fibronectin alternate ED1 exon interacts with SR proteins and stimulates U2 snRNP binding. Genes Dev 7:2405–2417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
156. Caputi M, Casari G, Guenzi S, Tagliabue R, Sidoli A, Melo CA, Baralle FE 1994 A novel bipartite splicing enhancer modulates the differential processing of the human fibronectin EDA exon. Nucleic Acids Res 22:1018–1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
157. Staffa A, Acheson NH, Cochrane A 1997 Novel exonic elements that modulate splicing of the human fibronectin EDA exon. J Biol Chem 272:33394–33401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
158. Uporova TM, Norton PA, Tuan RS, Bennett VD 1999 Alternative splicing during chondrogenesis: cis and trans factors involved in splicing of fibronectin exon EIIIA. J Cell Biochem 76:341–351[CrossRef][Medline]
159. Sun Q, Hampson RK, Rottman FM 1993 In vitro analysis of bovine growth hormone pre-mRNA alternative splicing. Involvement of exon sequences and trans-acting factor(s). J Biol Chem 268:15659–15666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
160. Watakabe A, Tanaka K, Shimura Y 1993 The role of exon sequences in splice site selection. Genes Dev 7:407–418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
161. Kan JL, Green MR 1999 Pre-mRNA splicing of IgM exons M1 and M2 is directed by a juxtaposed splicing enhancer and inhibitor. Genes Dev 13:462–471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
162. Kosaki A, Nelson J, Webster NJ 1998 Identification of intron and exon sequences involved in alternative splicing of insulin receptor pre-mRNA. J Biol Chem 273:10331–10337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
163. Dye BT, Buvoli M, Mayer SA, Lin CH, Patton JG 1998 Enhancer elements activate the weak 3' splice site of -tropomyosin exon 2. RNA 4:1523–1536[Abstract]
164. Gooding C, Roberts GC, Moreau G, Nadal-Ginard B, Smith CW 1994 Smooth muscle-specific switching of -tropomyosin mutually exclusive exon selection by specific inhibition of the strong default exon. EMBO J 13:3861–3872[Medline]
165. Graham IR, Hamshere M, Eperon IC 1992 Alternative splicing of a human -tropomyosin muscle-specific exon: identification of determining sequences. Mol Cell Biol 12:3872–3882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
166. Sirand-Pugnet P, Durosay P, Brody E, Marie J 1995 An intronic (A/U)GGG repeat enhances the splicing of an alternative intron of the chicken ß-tropomyosin pre-mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 23:3501–3507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
167. Clouet d’Orval B, d’Aubenton Carafa Y, Sirand-Pugnet P, Gallego M, Brody E, Marie J 1991 RNA secondary structure repression of a muscle-specific exon in HeLa cell nuclear extracts. Science 252:1823–1828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
168. Libri D, Piseri A, Fiszman MY 1991 Tissue-specific splicing in vivo of the ß-tropomyosin gene: dependence on an RNA secondary structure. Science 252:1842–1845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
169. Chen CD, Kobayashi R, Helfman DM 1999 Binding of hnRNP H to an exonic splicing silencer is involved in the regulation of alternative splicing of the rat ß-tropomyosin gene. Genes Dev 13:593–606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
170. Xu R, Teng J, Cooper TA 1993 The cardiac troponin T alternative exon contains a novel purine-rich positive splicing element. Mol Cell Biol 13:3660–3674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
171. Philips AV, Timchenko LT, Cooper TA 1998 Disruption of splicing regulated by a CUG-binding protein in myotonic dystrophy. Science 280:737–741[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Gromoll, L. Lahrmann, M. Godmann, T. Muller, C. Michel, S. Stamm, and M. Simoni Genomic Checkpoints for Exon 10 Usage in the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Type 1 and Type 2 Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 21(8): 1984 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zhu, H.-L. Zhou, R. A. Hasman, and H. Lou Hu Proteins Regulate Polyadenylation by Blocking Sites Containing U-rich Sequences J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2007; 282(4): 2203 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Zhou, Z. Liu, J. Wu, J.-h. Liu, S. M. Hyder, E. Antoniou, and D. B. Lubahn Identification and Characterization of Two Novel Splicing Isoforms of Human Estrogen-Related Receptor {beta} J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 569 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Huang, J. Li, L. Lu, M. Xu, J. Xiao, L. Yin, H. Zhu, Z. Zhou, and J. Sha Novel Development-Related Alternative Splices in Human Testis Identified by cDNA Microarrays J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 189 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Minn, H. Lan, M. E. Rabaglia, D. M. Harlan, B. A. Peculis, A. D. Attie, and A. Shalev Increased Insulin Translation from an Insulin Splice-Variant Overexpressed in Diabetes, Obesity, and Insulin Resistance Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 794 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Huang, J. Zhang, L. Lu, L. Yin, M. Xu, Y. Wang, Z. Zhou, and J. Sha Cloning and expression of a novel CREB mRNA splice variant in human testis Reproduction, December 1, 2004; 128(6): 775 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Hanoux, H. Bouraima, H. Mittre, C. Feral, and A. Benhaim Differential Regulation of Two 3' End Variants of P450 Aromatase Transcripts and of a New Truncated Aromatase Protein in Rabbit Preovulatory Granulosa Cells Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4790 - 4798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zhu, R. A. Hasman, K. M. Young, N. L. Kedersha, and H. Lou U1 snRNP-Dependent Function of TIAR in the Regulation of Alternative RNA Processing of the Human Calcitonin/CGRP Pre-mRNA Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(17): 5959 - 5971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gromoll, J. Wistuba, N. Terwort, M. Godmann, T. Muller, and M. Simoni A New Subclass of the Luteinizing Hormone/Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor Lacking Exon 10 Messenger RNA in the New World Monkey (Platyrrhini) Lineage Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Shalev, P. J. Blair, S. C. Hoffmann, B. Hirshberg, B. A. Peculis, and D. M. Harlan A Proinsulin Gene Splice Variant with Increased Translation Efficiency Is Expressed in Human Pancreatic Islets Endocrinology, July 1, 2002; 143(7): 2541 - 2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. Leo, S. Y. Hsu, and A. J. W. Hsueh Hormonal Genomics Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2002; 23(3): 369 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lou, H. Articles by Gagel, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lou, H. Articles by Gagel, R. F.