help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manolagas, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manolagas, S. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Osteoporosis
Endocrine Reviews 21 (2): 115-137
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society

Birth and Death of Bone Cells: Basic Regulatory Mechanisms and Implications for the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Osteoporosis1

Stavros C. Manolagas

Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Center for Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
The adult skeleton regenerates by temporary cellular structures that comprise teams of juxtaposed osteoclasts and osteoblasts and replace periodically old bone with new. A considerable body of evidence accumulated during the last decade has shown that the rate of genesis of these two highly specialized cell types, as well as the prevalence of their apoptosis, is essential for the maintenance of bone homeostasis; and that common metabolic bone disorders such as osteoporosis result largely from a derangement in the birth or death of these cells. The purpose of this article is 3-fold: 1) to review the role and the molecular mechanism of action of regulatory molecules, such as cytokines and hormones, in osteoclast and osteoblast birth and apoptosis; 2) to review the evidence for the contribution of changes in bone cell birth or death to the pathogenesis of the most common forms of osteoporosis; and 3) to highlight the implications of bone cell birth and death for a better understanding of the mechanism of action and efficacy of present and future pharmacotherapeutic agents for osteoporosis.

I. Introduction
II. Physiological Bone Regeneration
A. Remodeling by the basic multicellular unit (BMU)
III. Osteoblastogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis
A. Growth factors and their antagonists
B. Cytokines
C. Systemic hormones
D. Adhesion molecules
IV. Reciprocal Relationship Between Osteoblastogenesis and Adipogenesis
V. Serial and Parallel Models of Osteoblast and Osteoclast Development
VI. Function of the Mature Cells
A. Osteoblasts
B. Osteocytes
C. Lining cells
D. Osteoclasts
VII. Death of Bone Cells by Apoptosis
VIII. Regulation of Bone Cell Proliferation and Activity
IX. Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis
A. Sex steroid deficiency
B. Senescence
C. Glucocorticoid excess
X. Pharmacotherapeutic Implications of Osteoblast and Osteocyte Apoptosis
A. Intermittent PTH administration
B. Bisphosphonates and calcitonin
C. Novel pharmacotherapeutic strategies
XI. Summary and Conclusions


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
And Athena lavished a marvelous splendor on the prince so that all the people gazed in wonder as he came forward. The elders making way as he took his father’s seat. The first to speak was an old lord, Aegyptius, stooped with age, who knew the world by heart.

Homer, the Odyssey: translation by Robert Fagles

LOSS OF height (stooping), Dowager’s hump, and kyphosis are some of the most visible signs of old age in humans. The primary reason for these involutional changes is a progressive loss of bone mass that affects the axial (primarily trabecular) as well as the appendicular (primarily cortical) skeleton. Loss of bone mass, along with microarchitectural deterioration of the skeleton, leads to enhanced bone fragility and increased fractures—the bone disease known as osteoporosis (1 ). Both men and women start losing bone in their 40s. However, women experience a rapid phase of loss during the first 5–10 yr after menopause, due to the loss of estrogen (2 ). In men this phase is obscure, since there is only a slow and progressive decline in sex steroid production; hence, the loss of bone in men is linear and slower (3 ). In addition to losing bone faster at the early postmenopausal years, women also accumulate less skeletal mass than men during growth, particularly in puberty, resulting in smaller bones with thinner cortices and smaller diameter. Consequently, the incidence of bone fractures is 2- to 3-fold higher in women as compared with men (4 ).

In addition to sex steroid deficiency and the aging process itself, loss of bone mass is accentuated when several other conditions are present. The most common are chronic glucocorticoid excess (5 ), particularly its iatrogenic form, hyperthyroidism as well as inappropriately high T4 replacement, alcoholism, prolonged immobilization, gastrointestinal disorders, hypercalciuria, some types of malignancy, and cigarette smoking (6 ).

Bone loss and eventually fractures are the hallmarks of osteoporosis, regardless of the underlying cause or causes. The bone loss associated with normal aging in women has been divided into two phases: one that is due to menopause and one that is due to aging and affects men as well (7 8 ). In elderly women these two phases eventually overlap, making it difficult to distinguish the effect of sex steroid deficiency from the effect of the aging process itself. The effect of the aging process itself is also frequently obscured because of secondary hyperparathyroidism (9 ), resulting from impaired calcium absorption from the intestine with advancing age (>75 yr old). The bone loss that is due to glucocorticoid excess shares several features with the bone loss due to senescence, but also has unique features of its own. Nonetheless, as is the case with the other types of bone loss, the heterogeneity of the underlying conditions, some of which (e.g., postmenopausal state, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.) independently contribute to skeletal deterioration, can distort the clinical and histological picture (10 ). Irrespective of the overlap, it is important to recognize that the pathogenetic mechanisms are quite distinct in the various forms of osteoporosis and that sex hormone deficiency and aging have independent effects.

During the last few years, there have been significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for the bone loss associated with sex steroid deficiency, old age, and glucocorticoid excess. All these conditions do not cause loss of bone mass by turning on a completely new process. Instead, they cause a derangement in the normal process of bone regeneration. Therefore, to understand the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and rationalize its treatment, one must first appreciate the basic principles of physiological bone regeneration.


    II. Physiological Bone Regeneration
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
The skeleton is a highly specialized and dynamic organ that undergoes continuous regeneration. It consists of highly specialized cells, mineralized and unmineralized connective tissue matrix, and spaces that include the bone marrow cavity, vascular canals, canaliculi, and lacunae. During development and growth, the skeleton is sculpted to achieve its shape and size by the removal of bone from one site and deposition at a different one; this process is called modeling. Once the skeleton has reached maturity, regeneration continues in the form of a periodic replacement of old bone with new at the same location (11 ). This process is called remodeling and is responsible for the complete regeneration of the adult skeleton every 10 yr. The purpose of remodeling in the adult skeleton is not entirely clear, although in bones that are load bearing, remodeling most likely serves to repair fatigue damage and to prevent excessive aging and its consequences. Hence, the most likely purpose of bone remodeling is to prevent accumulation of old bone. Remodeling, with positive balance, does occur in the growing skeleton as well. Its purpose, quite different from those proposed for the adult skeleton, is to expand the marrow cavity while increasing trabecular thickness (12 ).

A. Remodeling by the basic multicellular unit (BMU)
Removal of bone (resorption) is the task of osteoclasts. Formation of new bone is the task of osteoblasts. Bone resorption and bone formation, however, are not separate, independently regulated processes. In the uninjured adult skeleton, all osteoclasts and osteoblasts belong to a unique temporary structure, known as a basic multicellular unit or BMU (13 ). Although during modeling one cannot distinguish anatomical units analogous to BMU per se, sculpting of the growing skeleton requires spatial and temporal orchestration of the destination of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, albeit with different rules and coordinates to those operating in the BMU of the remodeling skeleton. The BMU, approximately 1–2 mm long and 0.2–0.4 mm wide, comprises a team of osteoclasts in the front, a team of osteoblasts in the rear, a central vascular capillary, a nerve supply, and associated connective tissue (13 ). In healthy human adults, 3–4 million BMUs are initiated per year and about 1 million are operating at any moment (Table 1Go). Each BMU begins at a particular place and time (origination) and advances toward a target, which is a region of bone in need of replacement, and for a variable distance beyond its target (progression) and eventually comes to rest (termination) (10 ). In cortical bone, the BMU travels through the bone, excavating and replacing a tunnel. In cancellous bone, the BMU moves across the trabecular surface, excavating and replacing a trench. In both situations, the cellular components of the BMUs maintain a well orchestrated spatial and temporal relationship with each other. Osteoclasts adhere to bone and subsequently remove it by acidification and proteolytic digestion. As the BMU advances, osteoclasts leave the resorption site and osteoblasts move in to cover the excavated area and begin the process of new bone formation by secreting osteoid, which is eventually mineralized into new bone.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Vital statistics of adult bone remodeling1

 
The lifespan of the BMU is 6–9 months; much longer than the lifespan of its executive cells (Table 1Go). Therefore, continuous supply of new osteoclasts and osteoblasts from their respective progenitors in the bone marrow is essential for the origination of BMUs and their progression on the bone surface. Consequently, the balance between the supply of new cells and their lifespan are key determinants of the number of either cell type in the BMU and the work performed by each type of cells and are critical for the maintenance of bone homeostasis.


    III. Osteoblastogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Both osteoblasts and osteoclasts are derived from precursors originating in the bone marrow. The precursors of osteoblasts are multipotent mesenchymal stem cells, which also give rise to bone marrow stromal cells, chondrocytes, muscle cells, and adipocytes (14 15 16 ), whereas the precursors of osteoclasts are hematopoietic cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage (17 18 ). Long before these cells could be cultured, the existence of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells was suspected (19 ), based on the evidence that fibroblastic colonies formed in cultures of adherent bone marrow cells can differentiate, under the appropriate stimuli, into each of the above mentioned cells; these progenitors were named colony forming unit fibroblasts (CFU-F). When CFU-F are cultured in the presence of ß-glycerophosphate and ascorbic acid, the majority of the colonies form a mineralized bone nodule; these bone-forming colonies are known as CFU-osteoblast (CFU-OB) (16 ). Osteoblast progenitors may originate not only from stromal mesenchymal progenitors of the marrow, but also pericytes — mesenchymal cells adherent to the endothelial layer of vessels (20 ). Whereas osteoclast precursors reach bone from the circulation, osteoblast precursors most likely reach bone by migration of progenitors from neighboring connective tissues.

The development and differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are controlled by growth factors and cytokines produced in the bone marrow microenvironment as well as adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Several systemic hormones as well as mechanical signals also exert potent effects on osteoclast and osteoblast development and differentiation. Although many details remain to be established concerning the operation of this network, a few themes have emerged (21 ). First, several of the growth factors and cytokines control each other’s production in a cascade fashion and, in some instances, form positive and negative feedback loops. Second, there is extensive functional redundancy among them. Third, some of the same factors are capable of influencing the differentiation of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Fourth, systemic hormones influence the process of osteoblast and osteoclast formation via their ability to control the production and/or action of local mediators.

A. Growth factors and their antagonists
The only factors capable of initiating osteoblastogenesis from uncommitted progenitors are bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (22 ). BMPs have been long implicated in skeletal development during embryonic life and fracture healing. More recently, it has become apparent that BMPs, and in particular BMP-2 and –4, also initiate the commitment of mesenchymal precursors of the adult bone marrow to the osteoblastic lineage (23 ). BMPs stimulate the transcription of the gene encoding an osteoblast-specific transcription factor, known as osteoblast specific factor 2 (Osf2) or core binding factor a1 (Cbfa1), hereafter referred to as Cbfa1 (24 ). In turn, Cbfa1 activates osteoblast-specific genes such as osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, type I collagen, and osteocalcin. The importance of Cbfa1 for osteoblasts has been highlighted by the evidence that knockout of the Cbfa1 gene in mice prevents osteoblast development (25 26 ). In addition to Cbfa1, BMP-4 induces a homeobox-containing gene, distal-less 5(Dlx5), which also seems to act as a transcription factor, probably as a heterodimer with another homeobox-containing protein (Msx2). Like Cbfa1, Dlx5 regulates the expression of osteoblast-specific genes such as osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase, as well as mineralization (27 28 29 ). Other factors such as transforming growth factor ß (TGFß), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), and members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family can all stimulate osteoblast differentiation (30 31 ). However, whereas TGFß, PDGF, FGF, and IGFs are able to influence the replication and differentiation of committed osteoblast progenitors toward the osteoblastic lineage, they cannot induce osteoblast differentiation from uncommitted progenitor cells.

In addition to growth factors, bone cells produce proteins that modulate the activity of growth factors either by binding to them and thereby preventing interaction with their receptors, by competing for the same receptors, or by promoting the activity of a particular factor. For example, osteoblasts produce several IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Of these, IGFBP-4 binds to IGF and blocks its action, whereas IGFBP-5 promotes the stimulatory effects of IGF on osteoblasts (30 ). During the last few years, several proteins able to antagonize BMP action have also been discovered. Of them, noggin, chordin, and cerberus were initially found in the Spemann organizer of the Xenopus embryo and shown to be essential for neuronal or head development (32 33 34 35 ). Noggin and chordin inhibit the action of BMPs by binding directly and with high affinity with the latter proteins (36 37 ). Such binding is highly specific for BMP-2 and 4, as noggin binds BMP-7 with very low affinity and does not bind TGFß or IGF-I. Addition of human recombinant noggin to bone marrow cell cultures from normal adult mice inhibits not only osteoblast, but also osteoclast, formation, and these effects can be reversed by exogenous BMP-2 (23 ). Consistent with this evidence, BMP-2 and -4 and BMP-2/4 receptor transcripts and proteins are found in bone marrow cultures and in bone marrow-derived stromal/osteoblastic cell lines, as well as in murine adult whole bone. Noggin expression has also been documented in all these cell preparations. These findings indicate that BMP-2 and -4 are expressed in the bone marrow in postnatal life and serve to maintain the continuous supply of osteoblasts.

B. Cytokines
Since the early stages of hematopoiesis and osteoclastogenesis proceed along identical pathways, it is not surprising that a large group of cytokines and colony-stimulating factors that are involved in hematopoiesis also affect osteoclast development (38 ). This group includes the interleukins IL-1, IL-3, IL-6, IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM), ciliary neurotropic factor (CNTF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), M-CSF, and c-kit ligand. As opposed to the above mentioned cytokines that stimulate osteoclast development, IL-4, IL-10, IL-18, and interferon-{gamma} inhibit osteoclast development. In the case of IL-18 the effect is mediated through GM-CSF (39 ).

IL-6 has attracted particular attention because of evidence that it plays a pathogenetic role in several disease states characterized by accelerated bone remodeling and excessive focal or systemic bone resorption (40 ). IL-6 is produced at high levels by cells of the stromal/osteoblastic lineage in response to stimulation by a variety of other cytokines and growth factors such as IL-1, TNF, TGFß, PDGF, and IGF-II (41 42 43 ). Binding of IL-6 or other members of the same cytokine family (IL-11, LIF, OSM) to cytokine-specific cell surface receptors (in the case of IL-6, the IL-6R{alpha}) causes recruitment and homo- or heterodimerization of the signal transducing protein gp130, which is then tyrosine phosphorylated by members of the Janus family of tyrosine kinases (JAKs) (44 ). This event results in tyrosine phosphorylation of several downstream signaling molecules, including members of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family of transcription factors (45 46 ). Phosphorylated STATs, in turn, undergo homo- and heterodimerization and translocate to the nucleus where they activate cytokine- responsive gene transcription (47 ). The {alpha}-subunit of the IL-6 receptor also exists in a soluble form (sIL-6R), but unlike most soluble cytokine receptors, it functions as an agonist by binding to IL-6 and then interacting with membrane-associated gp130 to stimulate JAK/STAT signaling (44 ). On the other hand, the soluble form of gp130 blocks IL-6 action (48 ).

Alone or in concert with other agents, IL-6 stimulates osteoclastogenesis and promotes bone resorption. The cells that mediate the actions of the IL-6 type cytokines on osteoclast formation appear to be the stromal/osteoblastic cells, as stimulation of IL-6R{alpha} expression on these cells allows them to support osteoclast formation in response to IL-6 (49 ). These findings indicate that the osteoclastogenic property of IL-6 depends not only on its ability to act directly on hematopoietic osteoclast progenitors, but also on the activation of gp130 signaling in the stromal/osteoblastic cells that provide essential support for osteoclast formation. STAT3 activation in stromal/osteoblastic cells is essential for gp130-mediated osteoclast formation (50 ). Despite the effects of IL-6 on osteoclastogenesis in experimental in vitro systems, IL-6 is not required for osteoclastogenesis in vivo under normal physiological conditions. In fact, osteoclast formation is unaffected in sex steroid-replete mice treated with a neutralizing anti-IL-6 antibody, or in IL-6-deficient mice (51 52 ). The most likely explanation for this is that the {alpha}-subunit of the IL-6 receptor in bone is a limiting factor, and that both a change in the receptor and the cytokine are required for the IL-6- mediated increased osteoclastogenesis, seen in pathological states.

IL-6 type cytokines are capable of influencing the differentiation of osteoblasts as well. Thus, receptors for these cytokines are expressed on a variety of stromal/osteoblastic cells, and ligand binding induces progression toward a more mature osteoblast phenotype, characterized by increased alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin expression, and a concomitant decrease in proliferation (53 54 ). Moreover, IL-6 type cytokines stimulate the development of osteoblasts from noncommitted embryonic fibroblasts obtained from 12-day-old murine fetuses (55 ). Consistent with the in vitro evidence, several in vivo studies have demonstrated increased bone formation in transgenic mice overexpressing OSM or LIF (56 57 ).

TGFß is another example of a factor affecting both bone formation and bone resorption (58 ). Thus, in addition to its ability to stimulate osteoblast differentiation, TGFß increases bone resorption by stimulating osteoclast formation. Injection of TGFß into the subcutaneous tissue that overlies the calvaria of adult mice causes increased bone resorption accompanied by the development of unusually large osteoclasts, as well as increased bone formation. The effects of TGFß might be mediated by other cytokines involved in osteoclastogenesis as TGFß can stimulate their production. Mice lacking the TGFß1 gene due to targeted disruption exhibit excessive production of inflammatory cells, suggesting that this growth factor normally operates to suppress hematopoiesis (59 ).

C. Systemic hormones
The two principal hormones of the calcium homeostatic system, namely PTH and l,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3], are potent stimulators of osteoclast formation (17 60 ). The ability of these hormones to stimulate osteoclast development and to regulate calcium absorption and excretion from the intestine and kidney, respectively, are the key elements of extracellular calcium homeostasis. Calcitonin, the third of the classical bone-regulating hormones, inhibits osteoclast development and activity and promotes osteoclast apoptosis. Although the antiresorptive properties of calcitonin have been exploited in the management of bone diseases with increased resorption, the role of this hormone in bone physiology in humans, if any, remains questionable (61 62 63 ). PTH, PTH-related peptide, and 1,25-(OH)2D3 stimulate the production of IL-6 and IL-11 by stromal/osteoblastic cells (49 64 65 66 ). Several other hormones, including estrogen, androgen, glucocorticoids, and T4, exert potent regulatory influences on the development of osteoclasts and osteoblasts by regulating the production and/or action of several cytokines (21 64 67 68 69 ).

D. Adhesion molecules
In addition to autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signals, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions are also required for the development of osteoclasts and osteoblasts (70 71 72 ). Such interactions are mediated by proteins expressed on the surface of these cells and are responsible for contact between osteoclast precursors with stromal/osteoblastic cells and facilitation of the action of paracrine factors anchored to the surface of cells that are required for bone cell development. Adhesion molecules are also involved in the migration of osteoblast and osteoclast progenitors from the bone marrow to sites of bone remodeling as well as the cellular polarization of osteoclasts and the initiation and cessation of osteoclastic bone resorption. More important, for the purpose of this review, adhesion molecules play a role in the control of osteoblast and osteoclast development and apoptosis (73 74 75 76 77 ).

The list of adhesion molecules that influence bone cell development and function includes the integrins, particularly {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}2ß1, selectins, and cadherins, as well as a family of transmembrane proteins containing a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain (ADAMS). Each of these proteins recognizes distinct ligands. For example, some integrins recognize a specific amino acid sequence (RGD) present in collagen, fibronectin, osteopontin, thrombospondin, bone sialoprotein, and vitronectin (78 ).


    IV. Reciprocal Relationship Between Osteoblastogenesis and Adipogenesis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
The cells that comprise the bone marrow stroma can serve several diverse functions including support of hematopoiesis and osteoclastogenesis, fat accumulation, and bone formation (79 ). This functional adaptation is apparently accomplished by the plasticity of some of the stem cell progeny as exemplified by the ability of stromal cells to convert between the osteoblast and adipocyte phenotype. Thus, a stromal cell type known as the Westen-Bainton cell exhibits PTH receptors and high alkaline phosphatase activity and gives rise to osteoblasts during fetal development and in hyperparathyroidism. On the other hand, when marrow hematopoietic activity is reduced using chemotherapeutic agents, these cells convert into adipocytes and can support myeloid cell production (80 81 82 83 84 ). Further, adipocytes isolated by limiting dilution from cultures of rabbit bone marrow can form bone in diffusion chamber implants (85 ). Conversely, addition of certain fatty acids to cultures of osteoblastic cells causes them to differentiate into adipocyte-like cells (86 ).

It is likely that interconversion of stromal cells among phenotypes, as well as commitment to a particular lineage with suppression of alternative phenotypes, is governed by specific transcription factors. Indeed, Cbfa1 is required for commitment of mesenchymal progenitors to the osteoblast lineage. Mice that are deficient in this factor lack osteoblasts and mineralized bone matrix (26 ); and expression of Cbfa1 in fibroblastic cells induces transcription of osteoblast- specific genes (24 ). On the other hand, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein {alpha} (C/EBP{alpha}), C/EBPß, and C/EBP{delta}, as well as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor {gamma}1 (PPAR{gamma}1) and PPAR{gamma}2 orchestrate adipocyte differentiation (87 88 89 90 ). Introduction of C/EBP{alpha} in fibroblastic cells induces adipocyte differentiation (91 92 ), and transfection of fibroblastic cells with PPAR{gamma}2 and subsequent activation with an appropriate ligand causes the development of adipocytes (93 ).

Using clonal cell lines isolated from the murine bone marrow, it has been demonstrated that PPAR{gamma}2 can convert stromal cells from a plastic osteoblastic phenotype that reversibly expresses adipocyte characteristics to terminally differentiated adipocytes. Moreover, PPAR{gamma}2 suppresses the expression of Cbfa1 and thereby osteoblast-specific genes (94 ). Similar to the inhibitory effect of PPAR{gamma}2 on the osteoblast phenotype, the combination of PPAR{gamma} and C/EBP{alpha} suppresses the muscle cell phenotype when transfected into G8 myoblastic cells (95 ). Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that PPAR{gamma}2 plays a hierarchically dominant role in the determination of the fate of mesenchymal progenitors, due to its ability to inhibit the expression of other lineage-specific transcription factors. Studies with a clonal cell line (2T3) suggest that BMP-2 induces osteoblast or adipocyte differentiation in mesenchymal precursors, depending on whether the BMP receptor type IA or IB is activated. Therefore, BMP receptors may also play a critical role in both the specification and reciprocal differentiation of osteoblast and adipocyte progenitors (96 ).


    V. Serial and Parallel Models of Osteoblast and Osteoclast Development
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Even though millions of small packets of bone are constantly remodeled, bone mass is preserved thanks to a remarkably tight balance between the amount of bone resorbed and formed during each cycle of remodeling. In any established BMU, bone resorption and formation are happening at the same time; new osteoblasts assemble only at sites where osteoclasts have recently completed resorption, a phenomenon referred to as coupling, and formation begins to occur while resorption advances. The end result is a new packet of bone, either a cylindrical osteon or Haversian system, or a plate-like hemiosteon, that has replaced the older bone that was removed (97 ).

As the BMU advances, cells are successively recruited at each new cross-sectional location. Osteoblasts do not arrive until the osteoclasts have moved on. However, during the longitudinal progression of the BMU as a whole, new osteoclasts and new osteoblasts are needed simultaneously, although not at the same location. Two models of osteoblast recruitment, a serial and a parallel (Fig. 1Go), can explain the distinction between the cross-sectional and longitudinal events during BMU progression (38 ). According to the serial model, factors released from resorbed bone or the local increase in mechanical strain resulting from bone resorption, stimulate osteoblast precursor cell proliferation and differentiation (98 99 100 ). According to the parallel model, osteoblast and osteoclast precursor proliferation and differentiation occur concurrently in response to whatever signal conveys the need for initiation of new BMUs, and whatever hormone prolongs their progression (10 38 ). With either model, new osteoblasts must be directed to the right location.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serial and parallel models of osteoblast and osteoclast development. For explanation, please see text. PreOC, Preosteoclast; GF, growth factors released from the matrix of resorbed bone; preOB, osteoblast progenitors. The expressions of RANK ligand and RANK on preosteoblasts and preosteoclasts, respectively, are depicted to indicate their critical contribution in osteoclastogenesis and thereby the dependency of osteoclastogenesis on preosteoblastic cells.

 
Concurrent osteoblast and osteoclast production makes teleological sense as at least one of the means of maintaining a balance between bone formation and resorption under normal conditions. In support of the existence of a parallel pathway of osteoblast and osteoclast formation, it is well established that osteoclasts cannot be formed in vitro unless appropriate stromal cells, analogous to the bone marrow stromal cells that support hematopoiesis, are present to provide essential support. The precise phenotype of the cells that support osteoclast development remains unknown, but they are clearly related to both the osteoblast and the bone marrow stromal/adipocytic lineages (101 102 103 104 ). Interestingly, bone marrow-derived cells with both osteoblastic and adipogenic characteristics support the formation of osteoclasts, but marrow-derived cells that exhibit a purely osteoblastic or adipocytic phenotype do not (94 ). More to the point, noggin, a BMP antagonist, blocks not only osteoblastogenesis but also osteoclastogenesis in murine bone marrow cultures, indicating that commitment of mesenchymal progenitors to the osteoblastic lineage is prerequisite for osteoclastogenesis (23 ). This evidence suggests that the early less differentiated progeny of common mesenchymal progenitors of the osteoblastic and adipocytic lineage can support osteoclast development, but more differentiated cells that have committed to either the osteoblast or the adipocyte pathway lose this property. It is possible, but as yet untested, that the cells that provide support for osteoclast development are a distinct progeny of mesenchymal progenitors, which displays permanently a phenotype with mixed adipocytic/osteoblastic characteristics, but never progresses to a terminally differentiated osteoblast or adipocyte. For convenience and lack of a better term, the cells that support osteoclast development are frequently referred to as stromal/osteoblastic to indicate their similarities to both bone marrow stromal cells and osteoblasts.

In full agreement with the in vitro evidence for the dependency of osteoclast development on support by cells related to osteoblasts, mice lacking osteoblasts due to Cbfa1 deficiency also lack osteoclasts (26 ). In addition, marrow cells from SAMP6 mice, a strain with defective osteoblastogenesis, exhibit decreased osteoclastogenesis (105 ) and do not exhibit the expected increase in osteoclastogenesis nor do they lose bone after loss of sex steroids (106 ).

The molecular mechanism of the dependency of osteoclastogenesis on cells of the mesenchymal lineage has been elucidated during the last 2 yr with the discovery of three proteins involved in the TNF signaling pathway (reviewed in Ref. 107 ). Two of these proteins are membrane-bound cytokine-like molecules: the receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) (RANK) and the RANK-ligand. Other names used in the literature for RANK are osteoprotegerin ligand (OPG-L) and TRANCE. RANK is expressed in hematopoietic osteoclast progenitors, while RANK-ligand is expressed in committed preosteoblastic cells and T lymphocytes (108 109 110 ). RANK-ligand binds to RANK with high affinity. This interaction is essential and, together with M-CSF, sufficient for osteoclastogenesis. 1,25-(OH)2D3, PTH, PTHrP, gp130 activating cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-11), and IL-1 induce the expression of the RANK-ligand in stromal/osteoblastic cells (50 107 ). Osteoprotegerin (OPG), the third of the three proteins, unlike the other two, is a secreted disulfide-linked dimeric glycoprotein. A hydrophobic leader peptide and three and one-half TNF receptor-like cysteine-rich pseudorepeats characterize the amino terminus of this protein. Unlike other members of the TNF receptor family, OPG does not posses a transmembrane domain. OPG has very potent inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo (111 ). Consistent with an important role of OPG in the regulation of osteoclast formation, OPG transgenic mice develop osteopetrosis, whereas OPG knockout mice exhibit severe osteoporosis (112 ). The antiosteoclastogenic property of OPG is due to its ability to act as a decoy by binding to RANK-ligand and blocking the RANK-ligand/RANK interaction. In addition to skeletal metabolism, the RANK/RANK-ligand/OPG circuit may regulate several other biological systems. Indeed, OPG is produced by many tissues other than bone, including skin, liver, stomach, intestine, lung, heart, kidney, and placenta as well as hematopoietic and immune organs. Consistent with this, mice deficient in RANK-ligand completely lacked lymph nodes as well as osteoclasts (113 ). Moreover, OPG is also a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) to which it binds with high affinity and inhibits TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in lymphocytes (114 ) and also regulates antigen presentation and T cell activation (115 ).

Osteoblastic cells and T lymphocytes, the two cell types that express high levels of RANK-ligand, are also the two cell types that express high levels of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 (24 ). More intriguingly, both the murine and human RANK-ligand genes contain two functional Cbfa1 sites, and mutation of these sites abrogates the transcriptional activity of the RANK-ligand gene promoter (116 ). Therefore, the cell-specific expression of RANK-ligand in cells of the stromal/osteoblastic lineage and concurrent differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts might be dictated, at least in part, by interaction between an osteoblast-specific transcription factor and RANK-ligand. BMP 2 and -4 stimulate Cbfa1 expression. Based on these lines of evidence, it has been postulated that the molecular underpinnings of the control of the rate of bone regeneration and the concurrent production of osteoclasts and osteoblasts could well be a BMP->Cbfa1->RANK-ligand gene expression cascade in cells of the bone marrow stromal/osteoblastic lineage (117 118 ). According to this hypothesis, BMPs may provide the tonic baseline control of both processes, and thereby the rate of bone remodeling, upon which other inputs (e.g., biomechanical, hormonal, etc.) operate.

Studies with transgenic and knockout animal models as well as models with spontaneous genetic mutations have identified at least three transcription factors that are required for osteoclast differentiation: PU-1, fos, and NF-{kappa}b. A review of the precise role of these factors is beyond the scope of this article, but the reader is referred to a recent excellent review of the topic (119 ).


    VI. Function of the Mature Cells
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
A. Osteoblasts
The fully differentiated osteoblasts produce and secrete proteins that constitute the bone matrix (120 ). The matrix is subsequently mineralized under the control of the same cells. A major product of the bone-forming osteoblast is type I collagen. This polymeric protein is initially secreted in the form of a precursor, which contains peptide extensions at both the amino-terminal and carboxyl ends of the molecule. The propeptides are proteolytically removed. Further extracellular processing results in mature three-chained type I collagen molecules, which then assemble themselves into a collagen fibril. Individual collagen molecules become interconnected by the formation of pyridinoline cross-links, which are unique to bone. Bone-forming osteoblasts synthesize a number of other proteins that are incorporated into the bone matrix, including osteocalcin and osteonectin, which constitute 40% to 50% of the noncollagenous proteins of bone. Mice deficient in osteocalcin develop a phenotype marked by higher bone mass and improved bone quality, suggesting that osteocalcin functions normally to limit bone formation without compromising mineralization (121 ). Conversely, mice deficient in osteonectin exhibit decreased osteoclast and osteoblast numbers and bone remodeling and profound osteopenia, suggesting that, under normal conditions, this protein may play a role in the birth or survival of these cells (122 ). Other osteoblast-derived proteins include glycosaminoglycans, which are attached to one of two small core proteins: PGI (or biglycan) and decorin; the latter has been implicated in the regulation of collagen fibrillogenesis. A number of other minor proteins such as osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, fibronectin, vitronectin, and thrombospondin serve as attachment factors that interact with integrins.

In addition to being the cells that produce the osteoid matrix, mature osteoblasts are essential for its mineralization, the process of deposition of hydroxyapatite (123 124 ). Osteoblasts are thought to regulate the local concentrations of calcium and phosphate in such a way as to promote the formation of hydroxyapatite. In view of the highly ordered, well aligned, collagen fibrils complexed with the noncollagenous proteins formed by the osteoblast in lamellar bone, it is likely that mineralization proceeds in association with, and perhaps governed by, the heteropolymeric matrix fibrils themselves. Osteoblasts express relatively high amounts of alkaline phosphatase, which is anchored to the external surface of the plasma membrane. Alkaline phosphatase has been long thought to play a role in bone mineralization. Consistent with this, deficiency of alkaline phosphatase due to genetic defects leads to hypophosphatasia, a condition characterized by defective bone mineralization (125 ). However, the precise mechanism of mineralization and the exact role of alkaline phosphatase in this process remain unclear. Bone mineralization lags behind matrix production and, in remodeling sites in the adult bone, occurs at a distance of 8–10 µm from the osteoblast. Matrix synthesis determines the volume of bone but not its density. Mineralization of the matrix increases the density of bone by displacing water, but does not alter its volume.

B. Osteocytes
Some osteoblasts are eventually buried within lacunae of mineralized matrix. These cells are termed osteocytes and are characterized by a striking stellate morphology, reminiscent of the dendritic network of the nervous system (126 127 ). Osteocytes are the most abundant cell type in bone: there are 10 times as many osteocytes as osteoblasts. Osteocytes are regularly spaced throughout the mineralized matrix and communicate with each other and with cells on the bone surface via multiple extensions of their plasma membrane that run along the canaliculi; osteoblasts, in turn, communicate with cells of the bone marrow stroma which extend cellular projections onto endothelial cells inside the sinusoids. Thus, a syncytium extends from the entombed osteocytes all the way to the vessel wall (128 ) (Fig. 2Go). As a consequence, the strategic location of osteocytes makes them excellent candidates for mechanosensory cells able to detect the need for bone augmentation or reduction during functional adaptation of the skeleton, and the need for repair of microdamage, and in both cases to transmit signals leading to the appropriate response; albeit this remains hypothetical (129 ). Osteocytes evidently sense changes in interstitial fluid flow through canaliculi (produced by mechanical forces) and detect changes in the levels of hormones, such as estrogen and glucocorticoids, that influence their survival and that circulate in the same fluid (130 131 132 ). Therefore, disruption of the osteocyte network is likely to increase bone fragility.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Functional syncytium comprising osteocytes, osteoblasts, bone marrow stromal cells, and endothelial cells. [Adapted from G. Marotti and reproduced with the permission of the Editor of Journal of Clinical Investigation 104:1363–1374, 1999 (219 ).

 
C. Lining cells
The surface of normal quiescent bone (i.e., bone that is not undergoing remodeling) is covered by a 1–2-µm thick layer of unmineralized collagen matrix on top of which there is a layer of flat and elongated cells. These cells are called lining cells and are descendents of osteoblasts (13 ). Conversion of osteoblasts to lining cells represents one of the fates of osteoblasts that have completed their bone forming function; another being entombment into the matrix as osteocytes. Osteoclasts cannot attach to the unmineralized collagenous layer that covers the surface of normal bone. Therefore, other cells, perhaps the lining cells, secrete collagenase, which removes this matrix before osteoclasts can attach to bone. It has been proposed that targeting of osteoclast precursors to a specific location on bone depends on a "homing" signal given by lining cells; and that lining cells are instructed to do so by osteocytes, the only bone cells that can sense the need for remodeling at a specific time and place (133 ).

D. Osteoclasts
Mature osteoclasts are usually large (50 to 100 µm diameter) multinucleated cells with abundant mitochondria, numerous lysosomes, and free ribosomes. Their most remarkable morphological feature is the ruffled border, a complex system of finger-shaped projections of the membrane, the function of which is to mediate the resorption of the calcified bone matrix (17 123 ). This structure is completely surrounded by another specialized area, called the clear zone. The cytoplasm in the clear zone area has a uniform appearance and contains bundles of actin-like filaments. The clear zone delineates the area of attachment of the osteoclast to the bone surface and seals off a distinct area of the bone surface that lies immediately underneath the osteoclast and which eventually will be excavated. The ability of the clear zone to seal off this area of bone surface allows the formation of a microenvironment suitable for the operation of the resorptive apparatus.

The mineral component of the matrix is dissolved in the acidic environment of the resorption site, which is created by the action of an ATP-driven proton pump (the so-called vacuolar H+-ATPase) located in the ruffled border membrane. The protein components of the matrix, mainly collagen, are degraded by matrix metalloproteinases, and ca-thepsins K, B, and L are secreted by the osteoclast into the area of bone resorption (134 ). The degraded bone matrix components are endocytosed along the ruffled border within the resorption lacunae and then transcytosed to the membrane area opposite the bone, where they are released (135 136 ). Another feature of osteoclasts is the presence of high amounts of the phosphohydrolase enzyme, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAPase). This feature is commonly used for the detection of osteoclasts in bone specimens (137 ). Mice deficient in TRAPase exhibit a mild osteopetrotic phenotype (due to an intrinsic defect of osteoclastic resorptive activity) and defective mineralization of the cartilage in developing bones (138 ).


    VII. Death of Bone Cells by Apoptosis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
The average lifespan of human osteoclasts is about 2 weeks, while the average lifespan of osteoblasts is 3 months (Table 1Go). After osteoclasts have eroded to a particular distance, either from the central axis in cortical bone or to a particular depth from the surface in cancellous bone, they die and are quickly removed by phagocytes (139 ). The majority (65%) of the osteoblasts that originally assembled at the remodeling site also die (140 ). The remaining are converted to lining cells that cover quiescent bone surfaces or are entombed within the mineralized matrix as osteocytes (Fig. 3AGo). Both osteoclasts and osteoblasts die by apoptosis, or programmed cell death, a process common to several regenerating tissues (141 ). As in other tissues, bone cells undergoing apoptosis are recognized by condensation of chromatin, the degradation of DNA into oligonucleosome-sized fragments, and the formation of plasma and nuclear membrane blebs (Fig. 4Go). Eventually the cell breaks apart to form so-called apoptotic bodies. Osteoblast apoptosis explains the fact that 50–70% of the osteoblasts initially present at the remodeling site of human bone cannot be accounted for after enumeration of lining cells and osteocytes (142 ). Moreover, the frequency of osteoblast apoptosis in vivo is such that changes in its timing and extent could have a significant impact in the number of osteoblasts present at the site of bone formation (130 ). Osteocytes are long-lived but not immortal cells; some die by apoptosis (132 143 144 ). Osteocyte apoptosis could be of importance to the origination and/or progression of the BMU. Indeed, osteocytes are the only cells in bone that can sense the need for remodeling at a specific time and place. Moreover, osteocytes are in direct physical contact with lining cells on the bone surface, and targeting of osteoclast precursors to a specific location on bone depends on a "homing" signal given by lining cells (133 ).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Osteoblast apoptosis and its implications. A, The average life span of a matrix forming osteoblast (~200 h in the mouse) is indicated by the continuous line. The process of apoptosis represents only a small fraction of this time period. The alternative two fates of osteoblasts are to become lining cells or osteocytes. The fraction of osteoblasts that undergo apoptosis in vivo (fApoptosis) can be estimated from a bone biopsy specimen. The duration of the apoptosis phase that can be observed in the specimen (tApop) depends on the sensitivity of the detection method. For example, in the case of the TUNEL technique (without CuSO4 enhancement), the TUNEL-labeled phase of apoptosis is estimated to be approximately 2 h. In a steady state, the fraction of cells at a particular stage is the same as the corresponding fraction of time spent in that stage. Assuming an apoptosis detection time of 2 h and a 200-h life span, a prevalence of TUNEL positive osteoblasts in the biopsy of 0.005 indicates that half of the osteoblasts die by apoptosis. B, A change in the timing and extent of osteoblast apoptosis (fApoptosis) from 50% to zero should increase the number of osteoblasts present at the site of bone formation and thereby the work output, i.e., the amount of bone formed by a given team of matrix-forming osteoblasts. It will also lead to an increase in the density of osteocyte apoptosis, as illustrated by the example shown.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Two osteoblasts undergoing apoptosis in a section of murine cancellous bone (TUNEL staining with toluidine blue counterstain, x630). Apoptotic osteoblasts (shown in brown) are adjacent to an intact osteoblast (shown in blue), on the surface of a trabecula occupying the right lower portion of the picture in which two intact (blue stained) osteocytes are also seen. Apoptotic osteoblasts display nuclear condensation and fragmentation. [Photomicrograph provided by Robert S. Weinstein, M.D., University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.]

 
The same growth factors and cytokines that stimulate osteoclast and osteoblast development can also influence their apoptosis. For example, TGFß promotes osteoclast apoptosis while it inhibits osteoblast apoptosis. IL-6 type cytokines have antiapoptotic effects on animal and human osteoblastic cells (and at least in vitro they antagonize proapoptotic effects of glucocorticoids) as well as on osteoclasts and their progenitors (54 140 145 146 ).


    VIII. Regulation of Bone Cell Proliferation and Activity
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
A large body of literature suggests that growth factors, cytokines, hormones, and drugs regulate the proliferation of committed cells or the biosynthetic and functional activity of the differentiated osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Hence, in addition to cell number, alterations in the functional activity of individual cells, i.e., cell vigor, may contribute to changes in the rate of bone resorption and formation. However, because of the inherent difficulty in demonstrating changes in individual cell vigor in vivo, the vast majority of such literature and its conclusions rely heavily, if not exclusively, on in vitro experimentation. A detailed discussion of this work is beyond the scope of this review, and the reader is referred to other articles (30 147 148 149 150 151 ). Nonetheless, some general aspects merit discussion here, as they are important for putting the significance of birth rate and apoptosis into a broader perspective.

In regenerating tissues, the initial commitment of a stem cell progeny is followed by amplification with several or many rounds of cell division. In most tissues, division of stem cells is infrequent, and almost all of the divisions that produce the final population of differentiated cells occur in the so-called transit compartment (152 ). This notion is obscured by the frequent practice of showing linear diagrams representing the transition from one cell type to another and ignoring completely the amplification during the transition. In general, terminally differentiated cells do not divide, and an osteoblast, defined as a cell making bone matrix, and osteoclast, as a cell resorbing bone, are in this category. Therefore, the in vivo relevance of much of the in vitro evidence on the regulation of osteoblastic or osteoclastic cell proliferation, using established cell lines or primary cultures of isolated cells, must be largely confined to changes in this transit compartment. Irrespective of whether a given regulatory factor, be that a cytokine or a hormone, influences the initial commitment of a stem cell, or the subsequent amplification of its progeny, or both, the end result is a change in the rate of production and therefore the number of cells available for the execution of the biological task. For the sake of simplicity, the terms birth, rate of birth, osteoblastogenesis, or osteoclastogenesis, as used in this article, implicitly combine commitment and amplification.

The in vivo relevance of numerous reports of in vitro observations of changes in the biosynthetic activity of osteoblastic cells, e.g., changes in the level of expression of osteocalcin or alkaline phosphatase in response to a given agent, is also a matter of conjecture. Most likely, given the nature of commonly used in vitro cell models which, by and large, represent preterminally differentiated cells, such observations might be more relevant to postcommitment differentiation events, than to altered activity of the fully differentiated cell. Moreover, even if some agents can alter the function of terminally differentiated cells in short-term cultures in vitro, heretofore there is no evidence that short-term change in the rate of collagen production or bone matrix digestion, for example, are ultimately translated into differences in the amounts of bone matrix formed or resorbed.

In the bone literature there is considerable ambiguity when using the term "activation." It is important that one distinguishes between activation as a switch from an off state to an on state, and activation as modulation of activity of an already active cell. Morphological evidence summarized elsewhere does not support the notion that completely inactive osteoclasts are waiting for a stimulus to make them active (117 ). However, this evidence does not address the issue of whether there are variations in the rate of bone matrix dissolution by individual osteoclasts after they started work.

Studies with the widely used bone slice pit bioassay have shown that several regulatory factors can cause a decrease or increase in the resorptive ability of individual osteoclasts (153 154 155 ). However, it is not clear to what extent these observations reflect a change in cell vigor as opposed to a change in the precariously short lifespan of osteoclasts in vitro. In estrogen deficiency, individual osteoclasts are seemingly more "active" as they dig deeper resorption cavities often leading to trabecular perforation, but it has been convincingly argued that this is due to delayed apoptosis (133 ). In Paget’s disease osteoclasts are certainly far more aggressive than normal, perhaps as a result of their uniquely large size and number of nuclei (156 ). Today, the most compelling evidence in support of the notion that the vigor of individual osteoclasts may not always be maximal comes from in vitro as well as in vivo experiments with soluble RANK-ligand (157 ). Specifically, it has been found that RANK-ligand acts on mature rat osteoclasts in vitro to stimulate more frequent cycles of resorption and induce rearrangements of the cytoskeleton. Moreover, intravenous administration of RANK-ligand to mice elevates the circulating concentration of ionized calcium within 1 h. RANK-ligand has potent antiapoptotic effects on cultured osteoclasts (Ref. 158 and William Boyle, personal communication). Therefore, definitive conclusions regarding RANK-ligand’s ability to modulate osteoclast vigor will have to await dissection of the contribution of its effects on osteoclast survival in vivo. Similar to osteoclasts, the bone-forming ability of osteoblasts may not be always maximal, as suggested by the evidence that PTH can rapidly enhance bone formation when administered by subcutaneous injections to rats (159 ).

To conclude this section, it is intuitive that the amount of bone resorbed or formed by a team of osteoclasts and osteoblasts should be a function of the total cell number as well as the vigor of individual cells. However, whereas cell number can be quantified on bone sections from animals and humans with conventional histomorphometric techniques, quantification of individual cell vigor cannot. This situation makes it difficult to judge at present whether cell vigor is or is not a critical component in the pathogenesis of abnormal skeletal regeneration in common acquired metabolic bone diseases such as postmenopausal, senile, or steroid-induced osteoporosis. For this reason and space limitations, changes in bone cell vigor or other potential mechanisms of osteoporosis resulting from changes in extraskeletal tissues, for example altered calcium absorption or excretion, will not be discussed in the following section. This also reflects the author’s intention to focus on the dynamics of bone cell number, rather than a dismissal of other mechanisms.


    IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
From the brief discussion of the principles of physiological bone regeneration and the role of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the process, it is obvious that the rate of supply of new osteoblasts and osteoclasts and the timing of the death of these cells by apoptosis are critical determinants of the initiation of new BMUs and/or extension or shortening of the lifetime of existing ones. Recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the various forms of osteoporosis have confirmed this truism by revealing that over- or undersupply of these cells relative to the need for remodeling are the fundamental problems in all these conditions (160 ) (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cellular changes and their culprits in the three most common causes of bone loss

 
A. Sex steroid deficiency
The mechanism of action of sex steroids on the skeleton is not fully understood. At menopause (or after castration in men), the rate of bone remodeling increases precipitously. This fact may be explained by evidence, derived primarily from studies in mice, that loss of sex steroids up-regulates the formation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the marrow by up-regulating the production and action of cytokines that are responsible for osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis (21 161 162 ). Indeed, both estrogen and androgen suppress the production of IL-6, as well as the expression of the two subunits of the IL-6 receptor, IL-6R{alpha} and gp130, in cells of the bone marrow stromal/osteoblastic lineage (40 163 ). Suppression of IL-6 production by estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as raloxifene, does not require direct binding of the estrogen receptor to DNA. Instead, it is due to protein-protein interaction between the estrogen receptor and transcription factors such as NF-Kß and C/EBP. This mechanism provides a model that best fits current understanding of the molecular pharmacology of estrogen and SERMs (164 ). Consistent with the suppressive effect of sex steroids on IL-6 and its receptor, several, albeit not all, studies have shown that the level of expression of IL-6, as well as IL-6R{alpha} and gp130, is elevated in estrogen-deficient mice and rats as well as in humans, in the bone marrow and in the peripheral blood (165 166 167 168 ). Furthermore, neutralization of IL-6 with antibodies or knockout of the IL-6 gene in mice prevents the expected cellular changes in the marrow and in trabecular bone sections and protects the mice from bone loss after loss of sex steroids (51 67 ). Consistent with its pathogenetic role in the bone loss caused by loss of sex steroids, IL-6 seems to play a similar role in several other conditions associated with increased bone resorption as evidenced by increased local or systemic production of IL-6 and the IL-6 receptor in patients with multiple myeloma, Paget’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, Gorham-Stout or disappearing bone disease, hyperthyroidism, primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as McCune Albright Syndrome (66 68 169 170 171 172 173 174 ).

In line with the fact that loss of sex steroids increases the rate of bone remodeling, in addition to up-regulating osteoclastogenesis, loss of sex steroids increases the number of osteoblast progenitors in the murine bone marrow. These changes are temporally associated with increased bone formation and parallel the increased osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption (175 ). As IL-6 type cytokines can stimulate osteoblast development and differentiation (54 55 146 ), increased sensitivity to IL-6 and other members of this cytokine’s family may account also for the increased osteoblast formation that follows the loss of gonadal function. In view of the fact that mesenchymal cell differentiation and osteoclastogenesis are tightly linked, stimulation of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward the osteoblastic lineage after sex steroid loss may be the first event that ensues after the hormonal change, and increased osteoclastogenesis and bone loss might be downstream consequences of this change (106 ).

In addition to IL-6, estrogen also suppress TNF and M-CSF (176 177 ), and estrogen loss may increase the sensitivity of osteoclasts to IL-1 by increasing the ratio of the IL-1RI over the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-RII) (178 ). As in the case of IL-6, the effects of estrogen on TNF and M-CSF are mediated via protein-protein interactions between the estrogen receptor and other transcription factors. In agreement with the evidence that IL-1 and TNF play a role in the bone loss caused by loss of estrogen, administration of IL-1RA and/or a TNF soluble receptor ameliorates the bone loss caused by ovariectomy in rats and mice (179 180 181 ). Because of the interdependent nature of the production of IL-1, IL-6, and TNF, a significant increase in one of them may amplify, in a cascade fashion, the effect of the others (161 ). Interestingly, recent in vitro studies with human osteoblastic cells indicate that OPG production is stimulated by estrogen, suggesting that this cytokine may also play an important role in the antiosteoclastogenic (antiresorptive) action of estrogen on bone (182 ).

Increased remodeling, resulting from up-regulation of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, alone can cause a transient acceleration of bone mineral loss because bone resorption is faster than bone formation, and new bone is less dense than older bone. However, in addition to increased bone remodeling, loss of sex steroids leads to a qualitative abnormality: osteoclasts erode deeper than normal cavities (133 183 ). In this manner, sex steroid deficiency leads to the removal of some cancellous elements entirely; the remainder are more widely separated and less well connected. An equivalent amount of cancellous bone distributed as widely separated, disconnected, thick trabeculae is biomechanically less competent than when arranged as more numerous, connected, thin trabeculae. Concurrent loss of cortical bone occurs by enlargement and coalescence of subendocortical spaces, a process due to deeper penetration of endocortical osteoclasts.

This deeper erosion can be now explained by evidence that estrogen acts on mature osteoclasts to promote their apoptosis; consequently, loss of estrogen leads to prolongation of the lifespan of osteoclasts (133 ). Specifically, estrogen promotes osteoclast apoptosis in vitro and in vivo by 2- to 3-fold, an effect seemingly mediated by TGFß (139 ). In direct contrast to their proapoptotic effects on osteoclasts, estrogen (as well as androgen) exerts antiapoptotic effects on osteoblasts and osteocytes; consequently, loss of estrogen or androgen leads to shorter lifespan of osteoblasts and osteocytes (184 ). Extension of the working life of the bone-resorbing cells and simultaneous shortening of the working life of the bone-forming cells, can explain the imbalance between bone resorption and formation that ensues after loss of sex steroids. Furthermore, the increase in osteocyte apoptosis could further weaken the skeleton by impairment of the osteocyte-canalicular mechanosensory network. The increase in bone remodeling that occurs with estrogen deficiency would partly replace some of the nonviable osteocytes in cancellous bone, but cortical apoptotic osteocytes might accumulate because of their anatomic isolation from scavenger cells and the need for extensive degradation to small molecules to dispose of the osteocytes through the narrow canaliculi. Hence, the accumulation of apoptotic osteocytes caused by loss of estrogen, or glucocorticoid excess (130 ), could increase bone fragility even before significant loss of bone mass, because of the impaired detection of microdamage and repair of substandard bone.

In conclusion, the increased rate of bone remodeling in estrogen deficiency may be due to increased production of both osteoclasts and osteoblasts, and the imbalance between bone resorption and formation is due to an extension of the working lifespan of the osteoclast and shortening of the working lifespan of the osteoblast. Moreover, a delay of osteoclast apoptosis seems responsible for the deeper resorption cavities and thereby the trabecular perforation associated with estrogen deficiency.

Clinical observations of decreased bone mass in a male with mutant estrogen receptor (185 ), and increased bone mass after treatment with estrogen in two males with P-450 aromatase deficiency (186 187 ), have raised the possibility that estrogen derived by peripheral aromatization of androgens is critical for the maintenance of bone mass in men as well as in women (188 ). However, in all three cases, the decreased bone mass in young males with estrogen deficiency in the face of androgen sufficiency could be due to failure in achieving peak bone mass from defects occurring during development or growth, not to loss of bone mass, as it is the case with common forms of osteoporosis. In addition, individuals with complete androgen insensitivity, due to mutations in the androgen receptor gene on the X chromosome and increased testosterone and estrogen production, have decreased bone mass, in spite of the elevated estrogen levels (189 ). Moreover, androgens, including nonaromatizable ones, have identical effects to those of estrogen on the biosynthetic activity and the birth as well as the death of bone cells in vitro and in vivo, at least in rodents (67 106 190 ). It is therefore more likely that both estrogen and androgen are important for the maintenance of bone mass in the adult male skeleton.

B. Senescence
The amount of bone formed during each remodeling cycle decreases with age in both sexes. This is indicated by a consistent histological feature of the osteopenia that occurs during aging, namely a decrease in wall thickness, especially in trabecular bone (191 192 193 ). Wall thickness is a measure of the amount of bone formed in a remodeling packet of cells and is determined by the number or activity of osteoblasts at the remodeling site.

Studies measuring bone turnover by histomorphometry (194 ), or indirectly by circulating markers (195 196 197 ), have suggested that in aging women, even in extreme old age, bone turnover is most likely increased by secondary hyperparathyroidism or by the continuing effect of estrogen deficiency. Increased turnover and reduced wall thickness are not inconsistent, as the former is the result of increased activation frequency, and the decreased wall thickness—an index of decreased bone formation by osteoblasts—in senescence is local and relative to the demand created by resorption.

Changes in the birth of bone cells in the bone marrow provide a mechanistic explanation for the contribution of senescence to bone loss, independently from sex steroid deficiency. Specifically, using SAMP6 mice, a murine model of age-related osteopenia (but sufficient in sex steroids and with intact reproductive function), a tight association among reduced number of osteoblast progenitors, decreased bone formation, and decreased bone mass has been established (105 ). Decreased osteoblastogenesis with advancing age has been confirmed in the human bone marrow (198 199 ). Importantly, the decrease in osteoblastogenesis is accompanied by increased adipogenesis and myelopoiesis, as well as decreased osteoclastogenesis, the latter most likely caused by a reduction in the stromal/osteoblastic cells that support osteoclast formation (105 200 ). This suggests that in aging there must be changes in the expression of genes that favor the differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells toward adipocytes at the expense of osteoblasts. The evidence that PPAR{gamma}2 induces the terminal differentiation of marrow cells with both osteoblastic and adipocytic characteristics to adipocytes, and simultaneously suppresses Cbfa1 expression and terminal differentiation to osteoblasts (94 ), raises the possibility that increased expression of PPAR{gamma}2 or its ligands, e.g., PGJ2, may be some of the culprits responsible for the reciprocal change between adipogenesis and osteoblastogenesis with advancing age (Table 2Go).

Uptake of oxidized low-density lipoproteins (LDL) play an important role in foam cell formation and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Two of the major components of oxidized LDL, 9-hydroxy-9,11-octadecadienoic acid (HODE) and 13-HODE, are endogenous ligands and activators of PPAR{gamma} (201 ), and PPAR{gamma} promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL (202 ). Taken together with these findings, the evidence that activated PPAR{gamma}2 promotes adipocyte differentiation at the expense of osteoblastogenesis in the bone marrow by suppressing Cbfa1 (94 ) suggests a mechanistic link among dietary fat/lipoproteins, bone marrow stromal cell differentiation, osteoporosis, and atherogenesis. In support of the existence of such a link, activation of PPAR{gamma} by thiazolidinediones or oxidatively modified LDL inhibits osteoblastogenesis of bone marrow-derived stromal cells in vitro (94 203 204 ). Moreover, high fatty acid content in rabbit serum or high fat diet of mice for 4 months decreases osteogenic cell differentiation in ex vivo bone marrow cell cultures (86 204 ). These new advances may explain clinical observations that atherosclerosis and osteoporosis coexist (205 206 ).

Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) analysis of osteopenia-associated loci using closely related mouse strains have mapped five loci to regions of chromosomes 2, 7, 11, and 16 (207 ). Association of these same loci with bone mineral density has been reproduced in crosses of different recombinant-inbred mouse strains (208 209 ). Such recurrent appearance of QTL, especially in crosses involving distantly related strains, implies that polymorphism at these loci may be favored by evolution and might underlie variation in peak bone density among humans. Intriguingly, of the more than 12 genes affecting bone homeostasis that were localized near these QTLs, 2 are prostaglandin synthases, a third is the BMP-2/4 antagonist noggin, a fourth is the proapoptotic protein bax, and the fifth is IL-11. Hence, the transcription factor PPAR{gamma}2 and its ligand, PGJ2, noggin, and IL-11 are potentially responsible for the decreased osteoblastogenesis with advancing age. This contention is supported by the evidence that the reciprocal relationship between decreased osteoblastogenesis and increased adipogenesis in the SAMP6 mouse may be explained by a change in the expression of PPAR{gamma} or its ligands in early mesenchymal progenitors; that BMP-2/4, in balance with noggin, may determine the tonic baseline control of the rate of osteoblastogenesis; and that IL-11 is a potent inhibitor of adipogenesis, which stimulates osteoblast differentiation and the expression of which is reduced in SAMP6 mice. In addition to these factors, growth factors such as IGFs have also been implicated in the bone loss associated with senescence (210 211 ). Irrespective of the identity of the precise mediator, the reciprocal change between adipogenesis and osteoblastogenesis can explain the association of decreased relative bone formation and the resulting osteopenia with the increased adiposity of the marrow seen with advancing age in animals and humans (105 142 212 213 214 215 ).

C. Glucocorticoid excess
The cardinal histological features of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis are decreased bone formation rate, decreased wall thickness of trabeculae (a strong indication of decreased work output by osteoblasts), and in situ death of portions of bone. Increased bone resorption, decreased osteoblast proliferation and biosynthetic activity, and sex-steroid deficiency, as well as hyperparathyroidism resulting from decreased intestinal calcium absorption and hypercalciuria due to defective vitamin D metabolism, have all been proposed as mechanisms for the loss of bone that ensues with glucocorticoid excess (216 ).

The decreased bone formation and osteonecrosis can now be explained by evidence that glucocorticoid excess has a suppressive effect on osteoblastogenesis in the bone marrow and also promotes the apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes (118 ). Indeed, mice receiving glucocorticoids for 4 weeks, a period equivalent to ~3–4 yr in humans, exhibit decreased bone mineral density associated with a decrease in the number of osteoblast, as well as osteoclast, progenitors in the bone marrow and a dramatic reduction in cancellous bone area and in trabecular width compared with placebo controls. These changes are associated with a significant reduction in osteoid area and a decrease in the rates of mineral apposition and bone formation. More strikingly, glucocorticoid administration to mice causes a 3-fold increase in the prevalence of osteoblast apoptosis in vertebrae and induced apoptosis in 28% of the osteocytes in metaphyseal cortical bone. Nevertheless, even though there is a significant correlation between the severity of the bone loss and the extent of reduction in bone formation, some of the bone loss may be due to an early increase in bone resorption as evidenced by an early increase in osteoclast perimeter of vertebral cancellous bone after 7 days of steroid treatment. In vivo studies with mice from this author’s group show that at this early time point (7 days after glucocorticoid administration) osteoclastogenesis in ex vivo bone marrow cultures is decreased by half, while the number of osteoclasts in bone sections doubles (Robert Weinstein, personal communication), suggesting that an early effect of glucocorticoid excess might be increased osteoclast survival. In vitro studies by others, on the other hand, have shown that glucocorticoids inhibit OPG and concurrently stimulate the expression of RANK-ligand in human osteoblastic, primary, and immortalized bone marrow stromal cells (217 ). Taken together, these lines of evidence suggest that the initial rapid phase of bone loss with glucocorticoid treatment could be due to an extension of the lifespan of preexisting osteoclasts, mediated by RANK- ligand (117 ).

The same histomorphometric changes that have been found in mice after a 4-week treatment with steroids have been confirmed in biopsies from patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Moreover, as in mice, an increase in osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis is found in human biopsies. Compared with osteoblast apoptosis, apoptotic osteocytes are far more prevalent, at least in metaphyseal cortices, probably because of the anatomical isolation of osteocytes from scavenger cells. Consistent with these findings, glucocorticoids promote osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis in vitro (218 219 ). Decreased production of osteoclasts can explain the reduction in bone turnover with chronic glucocorticoid excess, whereas decreased production and apoptosis of osteoblasts can explain the decline in bone formation and trabecular width. Accumulation of apoptotic osteocytes may also explain the so-called "osteonecrosis," also known as aseptic or avascular necrosis, another manifestation of steroid-induced osteoporosis that causes collapse of the femoral head in as many as 25% of patients (220 ). This contention is supported by evidence that whole femoral heads obtained from patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis exhibit abundant apoptotic osteocytes adjacent to the subchondral fracture crescent (221 ). Glucocorticoid-induced osteocyte apoptosis, a cumulative and unrepairable defect, could uniquely disrupt the proposed mechanosensory role of the osteocyte network and thus promote collapse of the femoral head.

At this time, the mediators of the cellular changes caused by glucocorticoid excess are only a matter of conjecture. Nonetheless, glucocorticoids directly suppress BMP-2 and Cbfa1-2—two critical factors for osteoblastogenesis—and may also decrease the production of IGFs while they stimulate the transcriptional activity of PPAR{gamma}2 (222 223 224 225 ) (Table 2Go).


    X. Pharmacotherapeutic Implications of Osteoblast and Osteocyte Apoptosis
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), various bisphosphonates (e.g., alendronate), the SERM raloxifene, calcitonin, and sodium fluoride, as well as calcium and vitamin D, are approved modalities for the prevention and treatment of bone loss, irrespective of its cause. Decreased osteoclast progenitor development and/or decreased osteoclast recruitment and promotion of apoptosis of mature osteoclasts leading to a slowing of the rate of bone remodeling are thought to be the main mechanisms of the so-called "antiresorptive" agents estrogen, bisphosphonates, SERMs, and calcitonin. Sodium fluoride has anabolic properties, but its therapeutic range is very narrow. Calcium and vitamin D are rarely sufficient on their own, but they are considered a very useful supplementation in any regimen for osteoporosis.

A. Intermittent PTH administration
The ideal therapy for osteoporosis, especially in elderly patients who already have advanced bone loss, would be an anabolic agent that will increase bone mass by rebuilding bone. It is well established that daily injections of low doses of PTH—an agent better known for its role in calcium homeostasis—increases bone mass in animals and humans (226 227 228 229 230 231 ) as does the PTH-related protein (PTHrP), the only other known ligand of the PTH receptor (232 ). Indeed, although constant, high levels of PTH cause increased bone resorption and osteitis fibrosa cystica, low and intermittent doses of PTH, too small to affect serum calcium concentrations, promote bone formation and increase bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip. This so-called anabolic effect can be now explained by evidence that PTH increases the life span of mature osteoblasts in vivo by reducing the prevalence of their apoptosis from 1.7–2.2% to as little as 0.1–0.4% rather than by affecting the generation of new osteoblasts (218 ). The antiapoptotic effect of PTH in mice was sufficient to account for the increase in bone mass and was confirmed in vitro using rodent and human osteoblasts and osteocytes. Like PTH, PGE inhibits periosteal cell apoptosis via cAMP-dependent stimulation of sphingosine kinase (233 ). Interestingly, whereas PTH inhibits apoptosis in cells overexpressing Gs, an activator of adenylate cyclase, PTH stimulates apoptosis via G protein-coupled receptors in cells overexpressing Gq (an activator of JNK and calcium signaling), suggesting that the antiapoptotic effects of PTH are mediated by signals transduced through the Gs pathway (234 ).

Osteocytes in the newly made lamellar cancellous bone in the mice receiving daily PTH injections were closer together and more numerous than those found in the animals receiving vehicle alone (218 ). The closely spaced, more numerous osteocytes are the predictable consequence of protecting osteoblasts from apoptosis (Fig. 3BGo). The antiapoptotic effect of PTH on osteoblasts as well as osteocytes has been confirmed in vitro using primary bone cell cultures and established cell lines. Elucidation of this mechanism provides for the first time proof that inhibition of osteoblast apoptosis may represent a novel therapeutic strategy for augmenting bone mass. Be that as it may, several alternative mechanisms, including activation of lining cells, have been proposed, and they may also contribute to the anabolic effect of PTH (235 236 237 ). Nonetheless, lining cells cover at least 3 times more surface than osteoblasts. Therefore, conversion of lining cells to bone-forming osteoblasts alone would be insufficient to cover the increased cancellous bone area observed in rats and to account for the expanded bone perimeter and the increased osteocyte number and density observed with PTH treatment in mice (218 ).

Daily subcutaneous injections of PTH are safe and effective in the treatment of patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (230 ). The elucidation of the importance of osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis in the mechanism of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and the elucidation of the importance of preventing apoptosis in the anabolic effects of PTH on bone, readily explain how PTH can be such an effective therapy in this condition. Hence, PTH and perhaps future PTH mimetics represent, for the first time, pathophysiology-based, i.e., rational as opposed to empirical, pharmacotherapies for osteopenias, in particular, those in which osteoblast progenitor formation is suppressed. In any case, future studies to assess the antifracture efficacy of these compounds will be needed before their effectiveness for the management of osteoporosis can be established.

B. Bisphosphonates and calcitonin
Bisphosphonates, stable analogs of pyrophosphate, and calcitonin are potent inhibitors of bone resorption and effective therapies for the management of osteoporosis and other diseases characterized by bone loss (238 239 ). The main mechanism of the antiresorptive actions of these agents is decreased development of osteoclast progenitors, decreased osteoclast recruitment, and promotion of apoptosis of mature osteoclasts leading to a slowing rate of bone remodeling (133 240 241 242 ). Nonetheless, the antifracture efficacy of these agents is disproportional to their effect on bone mass (243 ), suggesting an additional effect on bone strength unrelated to effects on bone resorption. Moreover, long-term treatment of human and nonhuman primates with bisphosphonates has been shown to increase wall thickness, an index of increased osteoblast numbers or activity (244 245 246 ), raising the possibility that they may not only inhibit bone resorption, but may also have a positive effect on bone formation. An explanation for this evidence is now provided by studies demonstrating that bisphosphonates such as etidronate, alendronate, pamidronate, olpadronate, or amino-olpadronate (IG9402, a bisphosphonate that lacks antiresorptive activity), as well as calcitonin have antiapoptotic effects on osteoblasts and osteocytes (219 ). These effects are associated with a rapid increase in the phosphorylated fraction of extracellular regulated signal kinases (ERKs) and are blocked by specific inhibitors of ERK activation. In agreement with the in vitro results, alendronate abolishes the increase in the prevalence of vertebral, cancellous bone osteocyte and osteoblasts apoptosis induced by administration of prednisolone in mice. These findings raise for the first time the possibility that increased survival of osteoblasts and osteocytes may both contribute to the efficacy of bisphosphonates and calcitonin in the management of disease states due to loss of bone.

If both "antiresorptive" and "anabolic" agents [e.g., intermittent PTH] prevent osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis, why is increased formation so much more apparent in the case of the "anabolic" agents? The discussion of physiological bone regeneration in the beginning of this review article provides an answer. Bone formation occurs only on sites of previous osteoclastic bone resorption, i.e., on sites undergoing remodeling. Each remodeling cycle is a transaction that, once consummated, is irrevocable. Therefore, agents with antiapoptotic properties that do not have antiresorptive/antiremodeling properties, i.e., they do not decrease the number of remodeling units, are expected to rebuild more bone and therefore increase the overall bone mass, because of the greater number of profitable transactions. Hence, by decreasing the prevalence of osteoblast apoptosis, agents with pure antiapoptotic properties, such as intermittent PTH, can expand the pool of mature osteoblasts at sites of new bone formation and allow these cells more time to make bone, to a much greater degree than the antiresorptive agents that also slow remodeling. However, in the case of either class of agents, upholding the osteocyte-canalicular network by preventing osteocyte apoptosis, should contribute to antifracture efficacy, over and above that resulting from their effects on bone mass (Fig. 5Go). Therefore, the distinction between antiresorptive and anabolic agents may be more apparent than real when it comes to antifracture efficacy.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Hypothetical model of the implications of the effects of antiresorp- tive (i.e., antiremodeling) vs. non-anti-resorptive agents on prolonging the life span of mature osteoblasts and osteocytes. For explanation, please see text.

 
C. Novel pharmacotherapeutic strategies
Based on the understanding of the role of growth factors on osteoblast development, proliferation, and differentiation, several of them (e.g., GH, the insulin-like growth factors I and II, TGFß, BMPs, and FGF) have been advocated as potential future therapeutic agents for the management of bone loss (247 248 ). However, with the exception of BMPs, which may be of value in local augmentation of bone mass and acceleration of fracture healing, none of them has been shown to be efficacious (let alone safe or convenient and practical) for the management of common metabolic bone disorders such as osteoporosis. The recent elucidation of the mechanism of the anabolic effects of PTH, and specifically the demonstration of increased work output of a cell population by suppressing apoptosis to augment tissue mass, points to an entirely new avenue for future drug discovery. Indeed, in addition to PTH and PTH mimetics, which by virtue of their peptidic nature carry the inconvenience of daily injections, one can for the first time envisage nonpeptide inhibitors of proapoptotic pathways in osteoblasts and osteocytes as therapeutic agents for osteopenias and especially those in which osteoblast progenitors are low, such as age-related and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

As discussed in Section VIII in this review, estrogen and androgen deficiency increase osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis in humans, rats, and mice; and these changes have been shown to be reversed by replacement therapy, at least in mice (132 144 184 190 ). In full agreement with these in vivo observations, 17ß-estradiol inhibits osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis in vitro. The antiapoptotic effect of 17ß-estradiol on osteoblasts and osteocytes require the presence of the estrogen receptor-{alpha} or -ß (249 ). Nonetheless, unlike the classical mechanism of estrogen receptor action that involves direct or indirect interaction with the transcriptional apparatus, the estrogen receptor-dependent antiapoptotic effect of 17ß-estradiol is due to rapid (within 5 min) phosphorylation of ERKs (250 ). Moreover, the antiapoptotic effect of 17ß-estradiol can be reproduced by 17{alpha}-estradiol, a compound thought of as an inactive analog of 17ß-estradiol, as well as a membrane-impermeable conjugate of 17ß-estradiol with BSA (17ßE2-BSA). Numerous effects of estrogen have been observed over the last few years in a variety of cell types, including osteoblasts, the rapidity of which makes a genomic mechanism of action unlikely (251 252 253 254 255 256 ). Many of these rapid actions have been attributed to the ability of estrogen to act at the cell membrane on a membrane-associated estrogen receptor (257 258 259 260 ). The antiapoptotic effects of estrogen on osteoblasts and osteocytes fall into this category of "nongenomic" actions. Based on this, the term "activators of non-genomic estrogen-like signaling" (ANGELS), has been coined for compounds that mimic the nongenomic effects of estrogen, but have reduced classical estrogenic actions (261 ). A paradigm of such agents is the synthetic compound estratriene-3-ol, which has decreased transcriptional activity as compared with 17ß-estradiol (262 263 ), is a potent neuroprotective compound (264 265 266 ), and does exhibit potent antiapoptotic effects on osteoblasts and osteocytes in vitro. In support of the hypothesis that ANGELS can be used as a novel, advantageous mode of therapy for the augmentation of bone mass and/or fracture prevention in diseases characterized by low bone mass and increased fragility, preliminary evidence indicates that estratriene-3-ol increases BMD and bone strength in both estrogen-replete and estrogen-deficient mice (261 ). In view of this preclinical finding and the evidence that androgen (190 ), as well as estrogen, have antiapoptotic effects on osteoblasts and osteocytes, one is encouraged to think that estrogenic, androgenic, or even nonsteroidal compounds that can activate antiapoptotic, but not antiremodeling, signals on osteoblasts and osteocytes, are candidates for future osteoporosis treatments that, unlike existing ones that prevent or retard bone loss, may augment bone mass.


    XI. Summary and Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
In 1995, it was proposed that "changes in the numbers of bone cells, rather than changes in the activity of individual cells, form the pathogenetic basis of osteoporosis"; and that "excessive osteoclastogenesis and inadequate osteoblastogenesis are responsible for the mismatch between the formation and resorption of bone in postmenopausal and age-related osteopenia" (21 ). Since then, this paradigm shift of thinking has led to important new discoveries that, along with several other independent breakthroughs, refine the concept of "cell number" and broaden its relevance to the physiology and pathophysiology of bone at large. Moreover, these discoveries provide a new landscape for critical reevaluation of our current thinking about therapeutic strategies for bone diseases. Indeed, it is now clear that bone cells must be continually replaced, and the number present depends not only on their birth rate, which reflects the frequency of cell division of the appropriate precursor cell, but also on the life span, which most likely reflects the timing of death by apoptosis. The process of replacement of osteoblasts and osteoclasts is tightly coordinated and orchestrated at the early progenitor level. Changes in the birth rate and/or apoptosis of bone cells may account for previously unexplained bone diseases, such as the osteoporosis caused by sex steroid deficiency, old age, and glucocorticoid excess. Moreover, attenuation of the rate of apoptosis of osteoblastic cells may be a key mechanism for the effects of anabolic agents, such as PTH. Proof of the principle that the work performed by a cell population can be increased by suppression of apoptosis provides clues for the development of novel pharmacotherapeutic strategies for pathological conditions such as osteoporosis in which tissue mass diminution has compromised functional integrity. Nevertheless, changes in cell birth and death, as well as other mechanisms including changes in bone cell activity, need to be investigated in humans more extensively before definitive conclusions on the pathogenesis of the various causes of bone loss and the development of osteoporosis can be reached.


    Acknowledgments
 
The author is grateful to A. Michael Parfitt, Robert L. Jilka, Robert S. Weinstein, Teresita Bellido, Charles A. O’Brien, Robert S. Reis, Paula Roberson, Beata Lecka-Czernik, Etsuko Abe, Donald L. Bodenner, and Stavroula Kousteni for many insightful discussions, sharing of ideas, and contribution of research findings during the preparation of the manuscript; and to Tonya Smith for secretarial assistance.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to: Stavros C. Manolagas, M.D., Ph.D., Center for Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Diseases, Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Arkansas Medical School, 4301 West Markam Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 USA.

1 Research from the author’s laboratory described in this review was supported by the NIH (P01-AG13918, R01-AR43003), the Department of Veterans Affairs (merit grant and a research enhancement award program, REAP), and the 1999 Allied Signal Award for Research on Aging. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Physiological Bone...
 III. Osteoblastogenesis and...
 IV. Reciprocal Relationship...
 V. Serial and Parallel...
 VI. Function of the...
 VII. Death of Bone...
 VIII. Regulation of Bone...
 IX. Pathogenesis Of Osteoporosis
 X. Pharmacotherapeutic...
 XI. Summary and Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Riggs BL, Melton III LJ 1986 Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686[Medline]
  2. Lindsay R 1988 Sex steroids in the pathogenesis and prevention of osteoporosis. In: Riggs BL (ed) Osteoporosis: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management. Raven Press, New York, pp 333–358
  3. Melton III LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL 1998 Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915–1923[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Orwoll ES, Klein RF 1995 Osteoporosis in men. Endocr Rev 16:87–116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Reid IR 1998 Glucocorticoid effects on bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1860–1862[Free Full Text]
  6. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Black D, Vogt TM 1995 Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332:767–773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Riggs BL, Melton III LJ 1983 Evidence for two distinct syndromes of involutional osteoporosis. Am J Med 75:899–901[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Parfitt AM 1992 The two-stage concept of bone loss revisited. Triangle 31:99–110
  9. Silverberg SJ, Fitzpatrick LA, Bilezikian JP 1995 Hyperparathyroidism. In: Becker KL (ed) Principles and Practice of Endocrinology and Metabolism. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 512–519
  10. Parfitt AM 1996 Skeletal heterogeneity and the purposes of bone remodeling: Implications for the understanding of osteoporosis. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 315–329
  11. Frost HM 1973 Bone Remodeling and Its Relationship to Metabolic Bone Disease. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, MA
  12. Parfitt AM, Rauch F, Travers R, Glorieux F 1999 A new model of cancellous bone growth. J Bone Miner Res S206 (Abstract)
  13. Parfitt AM 1994 Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 55:273–286[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Latsinik NV, Panasyuk AF, Keiliss-Borok IV 1974 Stromal cells responsible for transferring the microenvironment of the hemopoietic tissues. Cloning in vitro and retransplantation in vivo. Transplantation 17:331–340[Medline]
  15. Owen M 1985 Lineage of osteogenic cells and their relationship to the stromal system. In: Peck WA (ed) Bone and Mineral Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 3:1–25
  16. Triffitt JT 1996 The stem cell of the osteoblast. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 39–50
  17. Roodman GD 1996 Advances in bone biology: the osteoclast. Endocr Rev 17:308–332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Suda T, Takahashi N, Martin TJ 1992 Modulation of osteoclast differentiation. Endocr Rev 13:66–80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR 1999 Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284:143–147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schor AM, Canfield AE, Sutton AB, Arciniegas E, Allen TD 1995 Pericyte differentiation. Clin Orthop 313:81–91
  21. Manolagas SC, Jilka RL 1995 Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling—emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 332:305–311[Free Full Text]
  22. Rosen V, Cox K, Hattersley G 1996 Bone morphogenetic proteins. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 661–671
  23. Abe E, Yamamoto M, Taguchi Y, Lecka-Czernik B, Economides AN, Stahl N, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC 2000 Essential requirement of BMPs 2/4 for both osteoblast and osteoclast formation in bone marrow cultures from adult mice: antagonism by noggin. J Bone Miner Res 15:663–673[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G 1997 Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 89:747–754[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Gao YH, Shinki T, Yuasa T, Kataoka-Enomoto H, Komori T, Suda T, Yamaguchi A 1998 Potential role of Cbfa1, an essential transcriptional factor for osteoblast differentiation, in osteoclastogenesis: regulation of mRNA expression of osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 252:697–702[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, Shimizu Y, Bronson RT, Gao Y-H, Inada M, Sato M, Okamoto R, Kitamura Y, Yoshiki S, Kishimoto T 1997 Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89:755–764[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ryoo HM, Hoffmann HM, Beumer T, Frenkel B, Towler DA, Stein GS, Stein JL, Van Wijnen AJ, Lian JB 1997 Stage-specific expression of Dlx-5 during osteoblast differentiation: involvement in regulation of osteocalcin gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 11:1681–1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Newberry EP, Latifi T, Towler DA 1998 Reciprocal regulation of osteocalcin transcription by the homeodomain proteins Msx2 and Dlx5. Biochemistry 37:16360–16368[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Miyama K, Yamada G, Yamamoto TS, Takagi C, Miyado K, Sakai M, Ueno N, Shibuya H 1999 A BMP-inducible gene, dlx5, regulates osteoblast differentiation and mesoderm induction. Dev Biol 208:123–133[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Canalis E 1996 Skeletal Growth Factors. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 261–279
  31. Bonewald LF, Dallas SL 1994 Role of active and latent transforming growth factor ß in bone formation. J Cell Biochem 55:350–357[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Piccolo S, Sasai Y, Lu B, De Robertis EM 1996 Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell 86:589–598[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Holley SA, Neul JL, Attisano L, Wrana JL, Sasai Y, O’Connor MB, De Robertis EM, Ferguson EL 1996 The Xenopus dorsalizing factor noggin ventralizes Drosophila embryos by preventing DPP from activating its receptor. Cell 86:607–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Valenzuela DM, Economides AN, Rojas E, Lamb TM, Nunez L, Jones P, Ip NY, Espinosa III R, Brannan CI, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Beau MML, Harland RM, Yancopoulos GD 1995 Identification of mammalian noggin and its expression in the adult nervous system. J Neurosci 15:6077–6084[Abstract]
  35. Bouwmeester T, Kim S, Sasai Y, Lu B, De Robertis EM 1996 Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer. Nature 382:595–601[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Zimmerman LB, De Jesús-Escobar JM, Harland RM 1996 The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4. Cell 86:599–606[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Re’em-Kalma Y, Lamb T, Frank D 1995 Competition between noggin and bone morphogenic protein 4 activities may regulate dorsalization during Xenopus development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:12141–12145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Manolagas SC, Jilka RL, Bellido T, O’Brien CA, Parfitt AM 1996 Interleukin-6-type cytokines and their receptors. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 701–713
  39. Udagawa N, Horwood NJ, Elliott J, Mackay A, Owens J, Okamura H, Kurimoto M, Chambers TJ, Martin TJ, Gillespie MT 1997 Interleukin-18 (interferon-{gamma}-inducing factor) is produced by osteoblasts and acts via granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and not via interferon-{gamma} to inhibit osteoclast formation. J Exp Med 185:1005–1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Manolagas SC 1998 The role of IL-6 type cytokines and their receptors in bone. Ann NY Acad Sci 840:194–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Girasole G, Jilka RL, Passeri G, Boswell S, Boder G, Williams DC, Manolagas SC 1992 17ß-Estradiol inhibits interleukin-6 production by bone marrow-derived stromal cells and osteoblasts in vitro: a potential mechanism for the antiosteoporotic effect of estrogens. J Clin Invest 89:883–891
  42. Franchimont N, Canalis E 1995 Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates the synthesis of interleukin-6 in cells of the osteoblast lineage. Endocrinology 136:5469–5475[Abstract]
  43. Franchimont N, Durant D, Rydziel S, Canalis E 1999 Platelet-derived growth factor induces interleukin-6 transcription in osteoblasts through the activator protein-1 complex and activating transcription factor-2. J Biol Chem 274:6783–6789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD 1993 The alphas, betas, and kinases of cytokine receptor complexes. Cell 74:587–590[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Stahl N, Boulton TG, Farruggella T, Ip NY, Davis S, Witthuhn BA, Quelle FW, Silvennoinen O, Barbieri G, Pellegrini S, Ihle JN, Yancopoulos GD 1994 Association and activation of Jak-Tyk kinases by CNTF-LIF- OSM-IL-6 ß receptor components. Science 263:92–95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Boulton TG, Stahl N, Yancopoulos D 1994 Ciliary neurotrophic factor/leukemia inhibitory factor/interleukin 6/oncostatin M family of cytokines induces tyrosine phosphorylation of a common set of proteins overlapping those induced by other cytokines and growth factors. J Biol Chem 269:11648–11655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Darnell Jr JE 1997 STATs and gene regulation. Science 277:1630–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Narazaki M, Yasukawa K, Saito T, Ohsugi Y, Fukui H, Koishihara Y, Yancopoulos GD, Taga T, Kishimoto T 1993 Soluble forms of the interleukin-6 signal-transducing receptor component gp130 in human serum possessing a potential to inhibit signals through membrane-anchored gp130. Blood 82:1120–1126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Katagiri T, Tamura T, Wada S, Findlay DM, Martin TJ, Hirota H, Tada T, Kishimoto T, Suda T 1995 Interleukin (IL)-6 induction of osteoclast differentiation depends on IL-6 receptors expressed on osteoblastic cells but not on osteoclast progenitors. J Exp Med 182:1461–1468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. O’Brien CA, Gubrij I, Lin S-C, Saylors RL, Manolagas SC 1999 STAT3 activation in stromal/osteoblastic cells is required for induction of the receptor activator of NF-kB ligand and stimulation of osteoclastogenesis by gp130-utilizing cytokines or interleukin-1 but not 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or parathyroid hormone. J Biol Chem 274:19301–19308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Jilka RL, Hangoc G, Girasole G, Passeri G, Williams DC, Abrams JS, Boyce B, Broxmeyer H, Manolagas SC 1992 Increased osteoclast development after estrogen loss: mediation by interleukin-6. Science 257:88–91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Poli V, Balena R, Fattori E, Markatos A, Yamamoto A, Tanaka H, Ciliberto G, Rodan GA, Costantini F 1994 Interleukin-6 deficient mice are protected from bone loss caused by estrogen depletion. EMBO J 13:1189–1196[Medline]
  53. Bellido T, Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Borba V, Yancopoulos GD, Manolagas SC 1996 Detection of receptors for interleukin-6, interleukin-11, leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, and ciliary neurotrophic factor in bone marrow stromal/osteoblastic cells. J Clin Invest 97:431–437[Medline]
  54. Bellido T, Borba VZ, Roberson P, Manolagas SC 1997 Activation of the Janus kinase/STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) signal transduction pathway by interleukin-6-type cytokines promotes osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology 138:3666–3676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Taguchi Y, Yamamoto M, Yamate T, Lin SC, Mocharla H, DeTogni P, Nakayama N, Boyce BF, Abe E, Manolagas SC 1998 Interleukin-6-type cytokines stimulate mesenchymal progenitor differentiation toward the osteoblastic lineage. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 110:559–574[Medline]
  56. Malik N, Haugen HS, Modrell B, Shoyab M, Clegg CH 1995 Developmental abnormalities in mice transgenic for bovine oncostatin M. Mol Cell Biol 15:2349–2358[Abstract]
  57. Ware CB, Horowitz MC, Renshaw BR, Hunt JS, Liggitt D, Koblar SA, Gliniak BC, McKenna HJ, Papayannopoulou T, Thoma B 1995 Targeted disruption of the low-affinity leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene causes placental, skeletal, neural and metabolic defects and results in perinatal death. Development 121:1283–1299[Abstract]
  58. Bonewald L 1996 Transforming growth factor-ß. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz L, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 647–659
  59. Kulkarni AB, Karlsson S 1993 Transforming growth factor-ß1 knockout mice: a mutation in one cytokine gene causes a dramatic inflammatory disease. Am J Pathol 143:3–9[Medline]
  60. Suda T, Udagawa N, Takahashi N 1996 Cells of bone: osteoclast generation. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz L, Rodan GA (eds) Principals of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 87–102
  61. Rico H, Hernandez ER, Revilla M, Gómez-Castresana F 1992 Salmon calcitonin reduces vertebral fracture rate in postmenopausal crush fracture syndrome. Bone Miner 16:131–138[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Ikegame M, Rakopoulos M, Zhou H, Houssami S, Martin TJ, Moseley JM, Findlay DM 1995 Calcitonin receptor isoforms in mouse and rat osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res 10:59–65[Medline]
  63. Martin TJ, Udagawa N 1998 Hormonal regulation of osteoclast function. Trends Endocrinol Metab 9:6–12[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Girasole G, Passeri G, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC 1994 Interleukin-11: a new cytokine critical for osteoclast development. J Clin Invest 93:1516–1524
  65. Greenfield EM, Shaw SM, Gornik SA, Banks MA 1995 Adenyl cyclase and interleukin 6 are downstream effectors of parathyroid hormone resulting in stimulation of bone resorption. J Clin Invest 96:1238–1244
  66. Grey A, Mitnick MA, Masiukiewicz U, Sun BH, Rudikoff S, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC, Insogna K 1999 A role of interleukin-6 in parathyroid hormone-induced bone resorption in vivo. Endocrinology 140:4683–4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Bellido T, Jilka RL, Boyce BF, Girasole G, Broxmeyer H, Dalrymple SA, Murray R, Manolagas SC 1995 Regulation of interleukin-6, osteoclastogenesis and bone mass by androgens: the role of the androgen receptor. J Clin Invest 95:2886–2895
  68. Lakatos P, Foldes J, Horvath C, Kiss L, Tatrai A, Takacs I, Tarjan G, Stern PH 1997 Serum interleukin-6 and bone metabolism in patients with thyroid function disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:78–81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Ray A, LaForge KS, Sehgal PB 1990 On the mechanism for efficient repression of the interleukin-6 promoter by glucocorticoids: Enhancer, TATA box, and RNA start site (Inr motif) occlusion. Mol Cell Biol 10:5736–5746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Grzesik WJ, Gehron Robey P 1994 Bone matrix RGD glycoproteins: immunolocalization and interaction with human primary osteoblastic bone cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 9:487–496[Medline]
  71. Rodan GA 1995 Osteopontin overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 760:1–5
  72. Horton MA, Townsend P, Nesbitt S 1996 Cell surface attachment molecules in bone. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 217–230
  73. Yamate T, Mocharla H, Taguchi Y, Igietseme JU, Manolagas SC, Abe E 1997 Osteopontin expression by osteoclast and osteoblast progenitors in the murine bone marrow: demonstration of its requirement for osteoclastogenesis and its increase after ovariectomy. Endocrinology 138:3047–3055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Takeuchi Y, Suzawa M, Kikuchi T, Nishida E, Fujita T, Matsumoto T 1997 Differentiation and transforming growth factor-ß receptor down-regulation by collagen-{alpha}2ß1 integrin interaction is mediated by focal adhesion kinase and its downstream signals in murine osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 272:29309–29316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Zhao W, Krane S 1998 Inability of collagenase to cleave type I collagen in vivo is associated with osteocyte apoptosis. Bone 23:S185 (Abstract)
  76. Globus RK, Doty SB, Lull JC, Holmuhamedov E, Humphries MJ, Damsky CH 1998 Fibronectin is a survival factor for differentiated osteoblasts. J Cell Sci 111:1385–1393[Abstract]
  77. Xiao G, Wang D, Benson MD, Karsenty G, Franceschi RT 1998 Role of the alpha2-integrin in osteoblast-specific gene expression and activation of the osf2 transcription factor. J Biol Chem 273:32988–32994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Ross FP, Chappel J, Alvarez JI, Sander D, Butler WT, Farach-Carson MC, Mintz KA, Robey PG, Teitelbaum SL, Cheresh DA 1993 Interactions between the bone matrix proteins osteopontin and bone sialoprotein and the osteoclast integrin {alpha}vß3 potentiate bone resorption. J Biol Chem 268:9901–9907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Owen M, Friedenstein AJ 1988 Stromal stem cells: marrow- derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found Symp 136:42–60[Medline]
  80. Westen H, Bainton DF 1979 Association of alkaline-phosphatase-positive reticulum cell in bone marrow with granulocyte precursors. J Exp Med 150:919–937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Weiss L 1988 Bone marrow. In: Weiss L (ed) Cell and Tissue Biology. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 469–478
  82. Bianco P, Costantini M, Dearden LC, Bonucci E 1988 Alkaline phosphatase positive precursors of adipocytes in the human bone marrow. Br J Haematol 68:401–403[Medline]
  83. Rouleau MF, Mitchell J, Goltzman D 1988 In vivo distribution of parathyroid hormone receptors in bone: evidence that a predominant osseous target cell is not the mature osteoblast. Endocrinology 123:187–192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Bianco P, Bradbeer JN, Riminucci M, Boyde A 1993 Marrow stromal (Western-Bainton) cells: identification, morphometry, confocal imaging and changes in disease. Bone 14:315–320[Medline]
  85. Bennett JH, Joyner CJ, Triffitt JT, Owen ME 1991 Adipocytic cells cultured from marrow have osteogenic potential. J Cell Sci 99: 131–139
  86. Diascro Jr DD, Vogel RL, Johnson TE, Witherup KM, Pitzenberger SM, Rutledge SJ, Prescott DJ, Rodan GA, Schmidt A 1998 High fatty acid content in rabbit serum is responsible for the differentiation of osteoblasts into adipocyte-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 13:96–106[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Yeh WC, Cao Z, Classon M, McKnight SL 1995 Cascade regulation of terminal adipocyte differentiation by three members of the C/EBP family of leucine zipper proteins. Genes Dev 9:168–181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Spiegelman BM, Flier JS 1996 Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture. Cell 87:377–389[CrossRef][Medline]
  89. Wu Z, Bucher NL, Farmer SR 1996 Induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes is mediated by C/EBPß, C/EBP{delta}, and glucocorticoids. Mol Cell Biol 16:4128–4136[Abstract]
  90. Shao D, Lazar MA 1997 Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor {gamma}, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein {alpha}, and cell cycle status regulate the commitment to adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 272:21473–21478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Samuelsson L, Stromberg K, Vikman K, Bjursell G, Enerback S 1991 The CCAAT/enhancer binding protein and its role in adipocyte differentiation: evidence for direct involvement in terminal adipocyte development. EMBO J 10:3787–3793[Medline]
  92. Freytag SO, Paielli DL, Gilbert JD 1994 Ectopic expression of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein {alpha} promotes the adipogenic program in a variety of mouse fibroblastic cells. Genes Dev 8:1654–1663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM 1994 Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR {gamma} 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79:1147–1156[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Lecka-Czernik B, Gubrij I, Moerman E, Kajkenova O, Lipschitz D, Manolagas S, Jilka RL 1999 Inhibition of Osf2/Cbfa1 expression and terminal osteoblast differentiation by PPAR {gamma}2. J Cell Biochem 74:357–371[CrossRef][Medline]
  95. Hu E, Tontonoz P, Spiegelman BM 1995 Transdifferentiation of myoblasts by the adipogenic transcription factors PPAR {gamma} and C/EBP {alpha}. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9856–9860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Chen D, Ji X, Harris MA, Feng JQ, Karsenty G, Celeste AJ, Rosen V, Mundy GR, Harris SE 1998 Differential roles for bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptor type IB and IA in differentiation and specification of mesenchymal precursor cells to osteoblast and adipocyte lineages. J Cell Biol 142:295–305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  97. Ott SM 1996 Theoretical and methodological approach. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA pp 231–241
  98. Mohan S, Baylink DJ 1991 The role of IGF-1 in the coupling of bone formation to resorption. In: Spencer EM (ed) Modern Concepts of Insulin-Like Growth Factors. Elsevier, New York, pp 169–184
  99. Bonewald LF, Wakefield L, Oreffo ROC, Escobedo A, Twardzik DR, Mundy GR 1991 Latent forms of transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) derived from bone cultures: identification of a naturally occurring 100-kDa complex with similarity to recombinant latent TGFß. Mol Endocrinol 5:741–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  100. Rodan GA 1996 Coupling of bone resorption and formation during bone remodeling. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 289–299
  101. Corral DA, Amling M, Priemel M, Loyer E, Fuchs S, Ducy P, Baron R, Karsenty G 1998 Dissociation between bone resorption and bone formation in osteopenic transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13835–13840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T, Sasaki T, Yamaguchi A, Kodama H, Martin TJ, Suda T 1989 The bone marrow-derived stromal cell lines MC3T3–G2/PA6 and ST2 support osteoclast-like cell differentiation in cocultures with mouse spleen cells. Endocrinology 125:1805–1813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  103. Dorheim MA, Sullivan M, Dandapani V, Wu X, Hudson J, Segarini PR, Rosen DM, Aulthouse AL, Gimble JM 1993 Osteoblastic gene expression during adipogenesis in hematopoietic supporting murine bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Physiol 154:317–328[CrossRef][Medline]
  104. Kelly KA, Tanaka S, Baron R, Gimble JM 1998 Murine bone marrow stromally derived BMS2 adipocytes support differentiation and function of osteoclast-like cells in vitro. Endocrinology 139:2092–2101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Takahashi K, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC 1996 Linkage of decreased bone mass with impaired osteoblastogenesis in a murine model of accelerated senescence. J Clin Invest 97:1732–1740[Medline]
  106. Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC 1997 The effects of androgen deficiency on murine bone remodeling and bone mineral density are mediated via cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Endocrinology 138:4013–4021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  107. Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ 1999 Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev 20:345–357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. Anderson DM, Maraskovsky E, Billingsley WL, Dougall WC, Tometsko ME, Roux ER, Teepe MC, DuBose RF, Cosman D, Galibert L 1997 A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature 390: 175–179
  109. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ 1998 Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  110. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Yamaguchi K, Kinoshaki M, Mochizuki S, Tomoyasu A, Yano K, Goto M, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Suda T 1998 Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3597–3602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, Luthy R, Nguyen HQ, Wooden S, Bennett L, Boone T, Shimamoto G, DeRose M, Elliott R, Colombero A, Tan HL, Trail G, Sullivan J, Davy E, Bucay N, Renshaw-Gegg L, Hughes TM, Hill D, Pattison W, Campbell P, Boyle WJ 1997 Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89:309–319[CrossRef][Medline]
  112. Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, Morony S, Tarpley J, Capparelli C, Scully S, Tan HL, Xu WL, Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Simonet WS 1998 Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev 12:1260–1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, Tan HL, Timms E, Capparelli C, Morony S, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Van G, Itie A, Khoo W, Wakeham A, Dunstan CR, Lacey DL, Mak TW, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM 1999 OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 397:315–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  114. Degli-Esposti M 1999 To die or not to die–the quest of the TRAIL receptors. J Leukoc Biol 65:535–542[Abstract]
  115. Emery JG, McDonnell P, Burke MB, Deen KC, Lyn S, Silverman C, Dul E, Appelbaum ER, Eichman C, DiPrinzio R, Dodds RA, James IE, Rosenberg M, Lee JC, Young PR 1998 Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem 273:14363–14367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. O’Brien CA, Farrar N, Manolagas SC 1998 Identification of an OSF-2 binding site in the murine RANKL/OPGL gene promoter: a potential link between osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Bone 23:S149 (Abstract)
  117. Manolagas SC 1999 Cell number vs. cell vigor–what really matters to a regenerating skeleton? Endocrinology 140:4377–4381[Free Full Text]
  118. Manolagas SC, Weinstein RS 1999 New developments in the pathogenesis and treatment of steroid-induced osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 14:1061–1066[CrossRef][Medline]
  119. Reddy SV, Roodman GD 1998 Control of osteoclast differentiation. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 8:1–17[Medline]
  120. Robey PG, Boskey AL 1995 The biochemistry of bone. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Bilezikian JP, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, New York, pp 95–183
  121. Ducy P, Desbois C, Boyce B, Pinero G, Story B, Dunstan C, Smith E, Bonadio J, Goldstein S, Gundberg C, Bradley A, Karsenty G 1996 Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice. Nature 382:448–452[CrossRef][Medline]
  122. Delany A, Amling M, Priemel M, Delling G, Howe C, Baron R, Canalis E 1998 Osteonectin-null mice develop severe osteopenia. Bone 23:S199 (Abstract)
  123. Boskey AL 1998 Biomineralization: conflicts, challenges, and opportunities. J Cell Biochem Suppl 30–31:83–91
  124. Boskey AL 1996 Matrix proteins and mineralization: an overview. Connect Tissue Res 35:357–363[Medline]
  125. Whyte MP 1994 Hypophosphatasia and the role of alkaline phosphatase in skeletal mineralization. Endocr Rev 15:439–461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  126. Marotti G, Cane V, Palazzini S, Palumbo C 1990 Structure-function relationships in the osteocyte. Ital J Miner Electro Metab 4:93–106
  127. Nijweide PJ, Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J, van der Pluijm G 1996 The Osteocyte. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 115–126
  128. Marotti G 1996 The structure of bone tissues and the cellular control of their deposition. Ital J Anat Embryol 101:25–79[Medline]
  129. Aarden EM, Burger EH, Nijweide PJ 1994 Function of osteocytes in bone. J Cell Biochem 55:287–299[CrossRef][Medline]
  130. Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC 1998 Inhibition of osteoblastogenesis and promotion of apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes by glucocorticoids: potential mechanisms of their deleterious effects on bone. J Clin Invest 102:274–282[Medline]
  131. Tomkinson A, Gevers EF, Wit JM, Reeve J, Noble BS 1998 The role of estrogen in the control of rat osteocyte apoptosis. J Bone Miner Res 13:1243–1250[CrossRef][Medline]
  132. Tomkinson A, Reeve J, Shaw RW, Noble BS 1997 The death of osteocytes via apoptosis accompanies estrogen withdrawal in human bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3128–3135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  133. Parfitt AM, Mundy GR, Roodman GD, Hughes DE, Boyce BF 1996 A new model for the regulation of bone resorption, with particular reference to the effects of bisphosphonates. J Bone Miner Res 11:150–159[Medline]
  134. Bossard MJ, Tomaszek TA, Thompson SK, Amegadzie BY, Hanning CR, Jones C, Kurdyla JT, McNulty DE, Drake FH, Gowen M, Levy MA 1996 Proteolytic activity of human osteoclast cathepsin K—expression, purification, activation, and substrate identification. J Biol Chem 271:12517–12524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Nesbitt SA, Horton MA 1997 Trafficking of matrix collagens through bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Science 276:266–269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  136. Salo J, Lehenkari P, Mulari M, Metsikkö K, Väänänen HK 1997 Removal of osteoclast bone resorption products by transcytosis. Science 276:270–273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T, Tanaka H, Sasaki T, Nishihara T, Koga T, Martin TJ, Suda T 1990 Origin of osteoclasts: mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenvironment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:7260–7264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  138. Hayman AR, Jones SJ, Boyde A, Foster D, Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Evans MJ, Cox TM 1996 Mice lacking tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (Acp 5) have disrupted endochondral ossification and mild osteopetrosis. Development 122:3151–3162[Abstract]
  139. Hughes DE, Dai A, Tiffee JC, Li HH, Mundy GR, Boyce BF 1996 Estrogen promotes apoptosis of murine osteoclasts mediated by TGF-ß. Nat Med 2:1132–1136[CrossRef][Medline]
  140. Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC 1998 Osteoblast programmed cell death (apoptosis): modulation by growth factors and cytokines. J Bone Miner Res 13:793–802[CrossRef][Medline]
  141. Steller H 1995 Mechanisms and genes of cellular suicide. Science 267:1445–1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Parfitt AM 1990 Bone-forming cells in clinical conditions. In: Hall BK (ed) Bone. The Osteoblast and Osteocyte. Telford Press and CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, vol 1:351–429
  143. Frost HM 1960 In vivo osteocyte death. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 42:138–143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  144. Noble BS, Stevens H, Loveridge N, Reeve J 1997 Identification of apoptotic changes in osteocytes in normal and pathological human bone. Bone 20:273–282[Medline]
  145. Hughes DE, Boyce BF 1997 Apoptosis in bone physiology and disease. Mol Pathol 50:132–137[Free Full Text]
  146. Bellido T, O’Brien CA, Roberson PK, Manolagas SC 1998 Transcriptional activation of the p21WAF1,CIP1,SDI1 gene by interleukin-6 type cytokines—a prerequisite for their pro-differentiating and anti-apoptotic effects on human osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 273:21137–21144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  147. Quarles LD, Siddhanti SR 1996 Guanine nucleotide binding- protein coupled signaling pathway regulation of osteoblast-mediated bone formation (editorial). J Bone Miner Res 11:1375–1383[Medline]
  148. Teitelbaum SL, Tondravi MM, Ross FP 1996 Osteoclast biology. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 61–94
  149. Suda T, Nakamura I, Jimi E, Takahashi N 1997 Regulation of osteoclast function. J Bone Miner Res 12:869–879[CrossRef][Medline]
  150. Lian JB, Stein GS, Stein JL, Van Wijnen AJ 1998 Osteocalcin gene promoter: unlocking the secrets for regulation of osteoblast growth and differentiation. J Cell Biochem Suppl 30–31:62–72
  151. Greenfield EM, Bi Y, Miyauchi A 1999 Regulation of osteoclast activity. Life Sci 65:1087–1102[CrossRef][Medline]
  152. Lajtha L 1983 Stem cell concepts. In: Potten CS (ed) Stem Cells— Their Identification and Characterisation. Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 1–11
  153. Chambers TJ, Magnus CJ 1982 Calcitonin alters behavior of isolated osteoclasts. J Pathol 136:27–39[CrossRef][Medline]
  154. Fuller K, Wong B, Fox S, Choi Y, Chambers TJ 1998 TRANCE is necessary and sufficient for osteoblast-mediated activation of bone resorption in osteoclasts. J Exp Med 188:997–1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Wani MR, Fuller K, Kim NS, Choi Y, Chambers T 1999 Prostaglandin E2 cooperates with TRANCE in osteoclast induction from hemopoietic precursors: synergistic activation of differentiation, cell spreading, and fusion. Endocrinology 140:1927–1935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  156. Reid IR, Nicholson GC, Weinstein RS, Hosking DJ, Cundy T, Kotowicz MA, Murphy WAJ, Yeap S, Dufresne S, Lombardi A, Musliner TA, Thompson DE, Yates AJ 1996 Biochemical and radiologic improvement in Paget’s disease of bone treated with alendronate: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Med 101:341–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  157. Burgess TL, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Ring BD, Van G, Capparelli C, Kelley M, Hsu HL, Boyle WJ, Dunstan CR, Hu S, Lacey DL 1999 The ligand for osteoprotegerin (OPGL) directly activates mature osteoclasts. J Cell Biol 145:527–538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  158. Lean J, Matsuo K, Wong B, Wagner EF, Choi Y, Chambers T 1999 Infection with TRANCE-expressing retrovirus for the generation of osteoclastic cell lines. Bone 23:S165 (Abstract)
  159. Dobnig H, Turner RT 1997 The effects of programmed administration of human parathyroid hormone fragment (1–34) on bone histomorphometry and serum chemistry in rats. Endocrinology 138:4607–4612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  160. Manolagas SC 1998 Cellular and molecular mechanisms of osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res 10:182–190
  161. Jilka RL 1998 Cytokines, bone remodeling, and estrogen deficiency: a 1998 update. Bone 23:75–81[Medline]
  162. Pacifici R 1998 Cytokines, estrogen, and postmenopausal osteoporosis—the second decade. Endocrinology 139:2659–2661[Free Full Text]
  163. Lin SC, Yamate T, Taguchi Y, Borba VZ, Girasole G, O’Brien CA, Bellido T, Abe E, Manolagas SC 1997 Regulation of the gp80 and gp130 subunits of the IL-6 receptor by sex steroids in the murine bone marrow. J Clin Invest 100:1980–1990[Medline]
  164. McDonnell DP, Norris JD 1997 Analysis of the molecular pharmacology of estrogen receptor agonists and antagonists provides insights into the mechanism of action of estrogen in bone. Osteoporos Int 7 Suppl 1:S29–S34
  165. Miyaura C, Kusano K, Masuzawa T, Chaki O, Onoe Y, Aoyagi M, Sasaki T, Tamura T, Koishihara Y, Ohsugi Y, Suda T 1995 Endogenous bone-resorbing factors in estrogen deficiency: cooperative effects of IL-1 and IL-6. J Bone Miner Res 10:1365–1373[Medline]
  166. Bismar H, Diel I, Ziegler R, Pfeilschifter J 1995 Increased cytokine secretion by human bone marrow cells after menopause or discontinuation of estrogen replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3351–3355[Abstract]
  167. Cheleuitte D, Mizuno S, Glowacki J 1998 In vitro secretion of cytokines by human bone marrow: effects of age and estrogen status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2043–2051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  168. Kassem M, Khosla S, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL 1996 Cytokine production in the bone marrow microenvironment: failure to demonstrate estrogen regulation in early postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:513–518[Abstract]
  169. Roodman GD, Kurihara N, Ohsaki Y, Kukita A, Hosking D, Demulder A, Smith JF, Singer FR 1992 Interleukin 6. A potential autocrine/paracrine factor in Paget’s disease of bone. J Clin Invest 89:46–52
  170. Klein B, Wijdenes J, Zhang X-G, Jourdan M, Boiron J-M, Brochier J, Liautard J, Merlin M, Clement C, Morel-Fournier B, Lu Z-Y, Mannoni P, Sany J, Bataille R 1991 Murine anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody therapy for a patient with plasma cell leukemia. Blood 78:1198–1204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  171. Kotake S, Sato K, Kim KJ, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Nakamura I, Yamaguchi A, Kishimoto T, Suda T, Kashiwazaki S 1996 Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptors in the synovial fluids from rheumatoid arthritis patients are responsible for osteoclast-like cell formation. J Bone Miner Res 11:88–95[Medline]
  172. Takayanagi H, Juji T, Miyazaki T, Iizuka H, Takahashi T, Isshiki M, Okada M, Tanaka Y, Koshihara Y, Oda H, Kurokawa T, Nakamura K, Tanaka S 1999 Suppression of arthritic bone destruction by adenovirus-mediated csk gene transfer to synoviocytes and osteoclasts. J Clin Invest 104:137–146[Medline]
  173. Siddiqi A, Monson JP, Wood DF, Besser GM, Burrin JM 1999 Serum cytokines in thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 435–439
  174. Yamamoto T, Ozono K, Kasayama S, Yoh K, Hiroshima K, Takagi M, Matsumoto S, Michigami T, Yamaoka K, Kishimoto T, Okada S 1996 Increased IL-6 production by cells isolated from the fibrous bone dysplasia tissues in patients with McCune-Albright syndrome. J Clin Invest 98:30–35[Medline]
  175. Jilka RL, Takahashi K, Munshi M, Williams DC, Roberson PK, Manolagas SC 1998 Loss of estrogen upregulates osteoblastogenesis in the murine bone marrow: evidence for autonomy from factors released during bone resorption. J Clin Invest 101:1942–1950[Medline]
  176. Srivastava S, Neale WM, Kimble RB, Rizzo M, Zahner M, Milbrandt J, Patrick RF, Pacifici R 1998 Estrogen blocks M-CSF gene expression and osteoclast formation by regulating phosphorylation of egr-1 and its interaction with Sp-1. J Clin Invest 102:1850–1859[Medline]
  177. Srivastava S, Weitzmann MN, Cenci S, Ross FP, Adler S, Pacifici R 1999 Estrogen decreases TNF gene expression by blocking JNK activity and the resulting production of c-Jun and JunD. J Clin Invest 104:503–513[Medline]
  178. Sunyer T, Lewis J, Collin-Osdoby P, Osdoby P 1999 Estrogen’s bone-protective effects may involve differential IL-1 receptor regulation in human osteoclast-like cells. J Clin Invest 103:1409–1418[Medline]
  179. Kimble RB, Matayoshi AB, Vannice JL, Kung VT, Williams C, Pacifici R 1995 Simultaneous block of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor is required to completely prevent bone loss in the early postovariectomy period. Endocrinology 136:3054–3061[Abstract]
  180. Kitazawa R, Kimble RB, Vannice JL, Kung VT, Pacifici R 1994 Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and tumor necrosis factor binding protein decrease osteoclast formation and bone resorption in ovariectomized mice. J Clin Invest 94:2397–2406
  181. Ammann P, Rizzoli R, Bonjour JP, Bourrin S, Meyer JM, Vassalli P, Garcia I 1997 Transgenic mice expressing soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor are protected against bone loss caused by estrogen deficiency. J Clin Invest 99:1699–1703[Medline]
  182. Hofbauer LC, Khosla S, Dunstan CR, Lacey DL, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL 1999 Estrogen stimulates gene expression and protein production of osteoprotegerin in human osteoblastic cells. Endocrinology 140:4367–4370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  183. Eriksen EF, Langdahl B, Vesterby A, Rungby J, Kassem M 1999 Hormone replacement therapy prevents osteoclastic hyperactivity: a histomorphometric study in early postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 14:1217–1221[CrossRef][Medline]
  184. Manolagas SC, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Bodenner DL 1999 Opposite effects of estrogen on the life span of osteoblasts/osteocytes vs. osteoclasts in vivo and in vitro: an explanation of the imbalance between formation and resorption in estrogen deficiency. J Bone Miner Res 14:S169 (Abstract)
  185. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, Takahashi H, Cohen RM, Specker B, Williams TC, Lubahn DB, Korach KS 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med 331:1056–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  186. Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, Faustini-Fustini M, Serpente S, Boyd J, Korach KS, Simpson ER 1997 Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med 337:91–95[Free Full Text]
  187. Bilezikian JP, Morishima A, Bell J, Grumbach MM 1998 Increased bone mass as a result of estrogen therapy in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med 339:599–603[Free Full Text]
  188. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton III LJ 1998 Unitary model of osteoporosis revisited. J Bone Miner Res 13:1954–1955[CrossRef][Medline]
  189. Schwartz BD, Zhu YS, Cordero J, Imperato-McGinley J 5{alpha}- Reductase deficiency and complete androgen insenstitivity: natural models to suggest a direct role for androgens on bone density in men. Program of the 81st Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Diego, CA, 1999, p 93 (Abstract)
  190. Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Chambers TM, Crawford JA, Swain FL, Han L, Manolagas SC 1999 Like estrogen, androgen exert potent and direct anti-apoptotic effects on osteoblasts and osteocytes in vivo and in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 14:S451 (Abstract)
  191. Lips P, Courpron P, Meunier PJ 1978 Mean wall thickness of trabecular bone packets in the human iliac crest: changes with age. Calcif Tissue Res 26:13–17[CrossRef][Medline]
  192. Parfitt AM, Villanueva AR, Foldes J, Rao DS 1995 Relations between histologic indices of bone formation: implications for the pathogenesis of spinal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 10:466–473[Medline]
  193. Parfitt AM, Han ZH, Palnitkar S, Rao DS, Shih MS, Nelson D 1997 Effects of ethnicity and age or menopause on osteoblast function, bone mineralization, and osteoid accumulation in iliac bone. J Bone Miner Res 12:1864–1873[CrossRef][Medline]
  194. Eastell R, Delmas PD, Hodgson SF, Eriksen EF, Mann KG, Riggs BL 1988 Bone formation rate in older normal women: concurrent assessment with bone histomorphometry, calcium kinetics, and biochemical markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:741–748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  195. Melton LJ, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL 1997 Relationship of bone turnover to bone density and fractures. J Bone Miner Res 12:1083–1091[CrossRef][Medline]
  196. Garnero P, Hausherr E, Chapuy MC, Marcelli C, Grandjean H, Muller C, Cormier C, Breart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD 1996 Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1531–1538[Medline]
  197. Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD 1996 Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 11:337–349[Medline]
  198. D’ippolito G, Schiller PC, Ricordi C, Roos BA, Howard GA 1999 Age-related osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal stem cells from human vertebral bone marrow. J Bone Miner Res 14:1115–1122[CrossRef][Medline]
  199. Mueller S, Glowacki J 1999 The effect of age on the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res 14:S354 (Abstract)
  200. Kajkenova O, Lecka-Czernik B, Gubrij I, Hauser SP, Takahashi K, Parfitt AM, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC, Lipschitz DA 1997 Increased adipogenesis and myelopoiesis in the bone marrow of SAMP6, a murine model of defective osteoblastogenesis and low turnover osteopenia. J Bone Miner Res 12:1772–1779[CrossRef][Medline]
  201. Nagy L, Tontonoz P, Alvarez JG, Chen H, Evans RM 1998 Oxidized LDL regulates macrophage gene expression through ligand activation of PPAR{gamma}. Cell 93:229–240[CrossRef][Medline]
  202. Tontonoz P, Nagy L, Alvarez JG, Thomazy VA, Evans RM 1998 PPAR{gamma} promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL. Cell 93:241–252[CrossRef][Medline]
  203. Nuttall ME, Patton AJ, Olivera DL, Nadeau DP, Gowen M 1998 Human trabecular bone cells are able to express both osteoblastic and adipocytic phenotype: implications for osteopenic disorders. J Bone Miner Res 13:371–382[CrossRef][Medline]
  204. Parhami F, Jackson SM, Tintut Y, Le V, Balucan JP, Territo M, Demer LL 1999 Atherogenic diet and minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibit osteogenic and promote adipogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res 14:2067–2078[CrossRef][Medline]
  205. Banks LM, Lees B, MacSweeney JE, Stevenson JC 1994 Effect of degenerative spinal and aortic calcification on bone density measurements in post-menopausal women: links between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease? Eur J Clin Invest 24:813–817[Medline]
  206. Laroche M, Pouilles JM, Ribot C, Bendayan P, Bernard J, Boccalon H, Mazzaferro S 1994 Comparison of the bone mineral content of the lower limbs in men with ischaemic atherosclerotic disease. Clin Rheumatol 13:611–614[CrossRef][Medline]
  207. Shmookler Reis RJ, Benes H, McClure T, Zheng W, Weinstein RS, Shelton R, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC 1999 Genetic mapping of loci conferring osteopenia using closely-related mouse strains. J Bone Miner Res 14:S141 (Abstract)
  208. Klein RF, Mitchell SR, Phillips TJ, Belknap JK, Orwoll ES 1998 Quantitative trait loci affecting peak bone mineral density in mice. J Bone Miner Res 13:1648–1656[CrossRef][Medline]
  209. Shimizu M, Higuchi K, Bennett B, Xia C, Tsuboyama T, Kasai S, Chiba T, Fujisawa H, Kogishi K, Kitado H, Kimoto M, Takeda N, Matsushita M, Okumura H, Serikawa T, Nakamura T, Johnson TE, Hosokawa M 1999 Identification of peak bone mass QTL in a spontaneously osteoporotic mouse strain. Mamm Genome 10:81–87[CrossRef][Medline]
  210. Mohan S, Baylink DJ 1997 Serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5 levels in aging and age- associated diseases. Endocrine 7:87–91[Medline]
  211. Rajaram S, Baylink DJ, Mohan S 1997 Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in serum and other biological fluids: regulation and functions. Endocr Rev 18:801–831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  212. Rozman C, Feliu E, Berga L, Reverter JC, Climent C, Ferran MJ 1989 Age-related variations of fat tissue fraction in normal human bone marrow depend both on size and number of adipocytes: a stereological study. Exp Hematol 17:34–37[Medline]
  213. Gimble JM, Robinson CE, Wu X, Kelley KA 1996 The function of adipocytes in the bone marrow stroma: an update. Bone 19:421–428[Medline]
  214. Tavassoli M 1989 Fatty involution of marrow and the role of adipose tissue in hemopoiesis. In: Tavassoli M (ed) Handbook of the Hematopoietic Microenvironment. Humana Press, Clifton, NJ, pp 157–187
  215. Kajkenova O, Gubrij I, Hauser SP, Takahashi K, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC, Lipschitz DA 1995 Increased hematopoiesis accompanies reduced osteoblastogenesis in the senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM-P/6). J Bone Miner Res 10[Suppl 1]:S431 (Abstract)
  216. Fitzpatrick LA 1994 Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. In: Marcus R (ed) Osteoporosis. Blackwell Science, Boston, pp 202–226
  217. Hofbauer LC, Gori F, Riggs BL, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Spelsberg TC, Khosla S 1999 Stimulation of osteoprotegerin ligand and inhibition of osteoprotegerin production by glucocorticoids in human osteoblastic lineage cells: potential paracrine mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Endocrinology 140:4382–4389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  218. Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Roberson P, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC 1999 Increased bone formation by prevention of osteoblast apoptosis with PTH. J Clin Invest 104:439–446[Medline]
  219. Plotkin L, Weinstein RS, Parfitt AM, Roberson PK, Manolagas SC, Bellido T 1999 Prevention of osteocyte and osteoblasts apoptosis by bisphosphonates and calcitonin. J Clin Invest 104:1363–1374[Medline]
  220. Mankin HJ 1992 Nontraumatic necrosis of bone (osteonecrosis). N Engl J Med 326:1473–1479[Medline]
  221. Weinstein RS, Nicholas RW, Kirchner JR, Crawford JA, Skinner RA, Swain FL, Manolagas SC 1998 Anatomic juxtaposition of apoptotic osteocytes and avascular necrosis in femurs from patients with glucocorticoid-excess. Bone 23:S461 (Abstract)
  222. Chang DJ, Ji C, Kim KK, Casinghino S, McCarthy TL, Centrella M 1998 Reduction in transforming growth factor beta receptor I expression and transcription factor CBFa1 on bone cells by glucocorticoid. J Biol Chem 273:4892–4896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  223. Centrella M, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Casinghino SR, McCarthy TL 1997 Opposing effects by glucocorticoid and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in fetal rat bone cell cultures. J Cell Biochem 67:528–540[CrossRef][Medline]
  224. Canalis E 1998 Inhibitory actions of glucocorticoids on skeletal growth. Is local insulin-like growth factor I to blame? Endocrinology 139:3041–3042[Free Full Text]
  225. Shi XM, Chang ZJ, Blair HC, McDonald JM, Cao X 1998 Glucocorticoids induce adipogenesis of stromal cells by transcriptionally activating PPARy2. Bone 23:S454 (Abstract)
  226. Dempster DW, Cosman F, Parisien M, Shen V 1993 Anabolic actions of parathyroid hormone on bone. Endocr Rev 14:690–709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  227. Tam CS, Heersche JNM, Murray TM, Parsons JA 1982 Parathyroid hormone stimulates the bone apposition rate independently of its resorptive action: differential effects of intermittent and continuous administration. Endocrinology 110:506–512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  228. Reeve J, Meunier PJ, Parsons JA, Bernat M, Bijvoet OL, Courpron P, Edouard C, Klenerman L, Neer RM, Renier JC, Slovik D, Vismans FJ, Potts JTJ 1980 Anabolic effect of human parathyroid hormone fragment on trabecular bone in involutional osteoporosis: a multicentre trial. Br Med J 280:1340–1344
  229. Finkelstein JS, Klibanski A, Arnold AL, Toth TL, Hornstein MD, Neer RM 1998 Prevention of estrogen deficiency-related bone loss with human parathyroid hormone-(1–34): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 280:1067–1073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  230. Lane NE, Sanchez S, Modin GW, Genant HK, Pierini E, Arnaud C 1998 Parathyroid hormone treatment can reverse corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 102:1627–1633[Medline]
  231. Reeve J, Hesp R, Williams D, Hulme P, Klenerman L, Zanelli JM, Darby AJ, Tregear GW, Parsons JA 1976 Anabolic effect of low doses of a fragment of human parathyroid hormone on the skeleton in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet 1:1035–1038[Medline]
  232. Stewart AF 1996 PTHrP(1–36) as a skeletal anabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. Bone 19:303–306[Medline]
  233. Machwate M, Rodan SB, Rodan GA, Harada SI 1998 Sphingosine kinase mediates cyclic AMP suppression of apoptosis in rat periosteal cells. Mol Pharmacol 54:70–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Turner PR, Bencsik M, Malecz N, Christakos S, Nissenson RA 1998 Apoptosis mediated by the PTH/PTHrP receptor: role of JNK and calcium signaling pathways. Bone 23:S155 (Abstract)
  235. Leaffer D, Sweeney M, Kellerman LA, Avnur Z, Krstenansky JL, Vickery BH, Caulfield JP 1995 Modulation of osteogenic cell ultrastructure by RS-23581, an analog of human parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related peptide-(1–34), and bovine PTH-(1–34). Endocrinology 136:3624–3631[Abstract]
  236. Dobnig H, Turner RT 1995 Evidence that intermittent treatment with parathyroid hormone increases bone formation in adult rats by activation of bone lining cells. Endocrinology 136:3632–3638[Abstract]
  237. Hock JM 1999 Stemming bone loss by suppressing apoptosis. J Clin Invest 104:371–373[Medline]
  238. Papapoulos SE 1996 Bisphosphonates: pharmacology and use in the treatment of osteoporosis. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 1209–1234
  239. Azria M, Avioli LV 1996 Calcitonin. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 1083–1097
  240. Hughes DE, Wright KR, Uy HL, Sasaki A, Yoneda T, Roodman GD, Mundy GR, Boyce BF 1995 Bisphosphonates promote apoptosis in murine osteoclasts in vitro and in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 10:1478–1487[Medline]
  241. Fisher JE, Rogers MJ, Halasy JM, Luckman SP, Hughes DE, Masarachia PJ, Wesolowski G, Russell RGG, Rodan GA, Reszka AA 1999 Alendronate mechanism of action: geranylgeraniol, an intermediate in the mevalonate pathway, prevents inhibition of osteoclast formation, bone resorption, and kinase activation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:133–138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  242. Fleisch H 1998 Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. Endocr Rev 19:80–100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  243. Cummings S, Black D, Vogt TM 1996 Changes in BMD substantially underestimate the anti-fracture effects of alendronate and other antiresorptive drugs. J Bone Miner Res 11:S102 (Abstract)
  244. Chavassieux PM, Arlot ME, Reda C, Wei L, Yates AJ, Meunier PJ 1997 Histomorphometric assessment of the long-term effects of alendronate on bone quality and remodeling in patients with osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 100:1475–1480[Medline]
  245. Balena R, Toolan BC, Shea M, Markatos A, Myers ER, Lee SC, Opas EE, Seedor JG, Klein H, Frankenfield D, Quartuccio H, Fioravanti C, Clair J, Brown E, Hayes WC, Rodan GA 1993 The effects of 2-year treatment with the aminobisphosphonate alendronate on bone metabolism, bone histomorphometry, and bone strength in ovariectomized nonhuman primates. J Clin Invest 92:2577–2586
  246. Storm T, Steiniche T, Thamsborg G, Melsen F 1993 Changes in bone histomorphometry after long-term treatment with intermittent, cyclic etidronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 8:199–208[Medline]
  247. Mohan S, Baylink D 1996 Therapeutic potential of TGF-beta, BMP, and FGF in the treatment of bone loss. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of Bone Biology, pp 1111–1123
  248. Rosen C, Wuster C 1996 Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 1313–1333
  249. Bodenner DL, Yamamoto M, Kozlowski M, Manolagas SC 1999 Essential requirement of the estrogen receptor alpha or beta for (non-genomic) anti-apoptotic effects of estrogen. J Bone Miner Res 14:S227 (Abstract)
  250. Bellido T, Plotkin LI, Han L, Manolagas SC 1999 Estrogen inhibit apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes through rapid (non-genomic) activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). J Bone Miner Res 14:S342 (Abstract)
  251. Lieberherr M, Grosse B, Kachkache M, Balsan S 1993 Cell signaling and estrogens in female rat osteoblasts: a possible involvement of unconventional nonnuclear receptors. J Bone Miner Res 8:1365–1376[Medline]
  252. Endoh H, Sasaki H, Maruyama K, Takeyama K, Waga I, Shimizu T, Kato S, Kawashima H 1997 Rapid activation of MAP kinase by estrogen in the bone cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 235:99–102[CrossRef][Medline]
  253. Aronica SM, Kraus WL, Katzenellenbogen BS 1994 Estrogen action via the cAMP signaling pathway: stimulation of adenylate cyclase and cAMP-regulated gene transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8517–8521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  254. McEwen BS, Alves SE 1999 Estrogen actions in the central nervous system. Endocr Rev 20:279–307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  255. Chen Z, Yuhanna IS, Galcheva-Gargova Z, Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME, Shaul PW 1999 Estrogen receptor alpha mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen. J Clin Invest 103:401–406[Medline]
  256. Castoria G, Barone MV, Di Domenico M, Bilancio A, Ametrano D, Migliaccio A, Auricchio F 1999 Non-transcriptional action of oestradiol and progestin triggers DNA synthesis. EMBO J 18:2500–2510[CrossRef][Medline]
  257. Pietras RJ, Szego CM 1977 Specific binding sites for oestrogen at the outer surfaces of isolated endometrial cells. Nature 265:69–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  258. Pappas TC, Gametchu B, Watson CS 1995 Membrane estrogen receptors identified by multiple antibody labeling and impeded-ligand binding. FASEB J 9:404–410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  259. Razandi M, Pedram A, Greene GL, Levin ER 1999 Cell membrane and nuclear estrogen receptors (ERs) originate from a single transcript: Studies of ER{alpha} and ERß expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Endocrinol 13:307–319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  260. Norfleet AM, Thomas ML, Gametchu B, Watson CS 1999 Estrogen receptor-alpha detected on the plasma membrane of aldehyde- fixed GH3/B6/F10 rat pituitary tumor cells by enzyme-linked immunocytochemistry. Endocrinology 140:3805–3814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  261. Manolagas SC, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Bodenner DL, Jilka RL, Parfitt AM 1999 Activators of non-genomic estrogen-like signalling (ANGELS): a novel class of small molecules with bone anabolic properties. J Bone Miner Res 14:S180 (Abstract)
  262. VanderKuur JA, Hafner MS, Christman JK, Brooks SC 1993 Effects of estradiol-17ß analogues on activation of estrogen response element regulated chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression. Biochemistry 32:7016–7021[CrossRef][Medline]
  263. Christman JK, Nehls S, Polin L, Brooks SC 1995 Relationship between estrogen structure and conformational changes in estrogen receptor/DNA complexes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 54: 201–210
  264. Green PS, Gridley KE, Simpkins JW 1998 Nuclear estrogen receptor-independent neuroprotection by estratrienes: a novel interaction with glutathione. Neuroscience 84:7–10[CrossRef][Medline]
  265. Green PS, Gordon K, Simpkins JW 1997 Phenolic A ring requirement for the neuroprotective effects of steroids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 63:229–235[CrossRef][Medline]
  266. Shi J, Zhang YQ, Simpkins JW 1997 Effects of 17ß-estradiol on glucose transporter 1 expression and endothelial cell survival following focal ischemia in the rats. Exp Brain Res 117:200–206[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. L. Brandi
Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality
Rheumatology, October 1, 2009; 48(suppl_4): iv3 - iv8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
N. A. T. Hamdy
Strontium ranelate improves bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis
Rheumatology, October 1, 2009; 48(suppl_4): iv9 - iv13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
N. Carrillo-Lopez, P. Roman-Garcia, A. Rodriguez-Rebollar, J. L. Fernandez-Martin, M. Naves-Diaz, and J. B. Cannata-Andia
Indirect Regulation of PTH by Estrogens May Require FGF23
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 2009 - 2017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Luo, W. Zhou, X. Zhou, D. Li, J. Weng, Z. Yi, S. G. Cho, C. Li, T. Yi, X. Wu, et al.
Regulation of bone formation and remodeling by G-protein-coupled receptor 48
Development, August 15, 2009; 136(16): 2747 - 2756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
L. E. Lanyon, T. Sugiyama, and J. S. Price
Regulation of Bone Mass: Local Control or Systemic Influence or Both?
IBMS BoneKEy, June 1, 2009; 6(6): 218 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Galli, Q. Fu, W. Wang, B. R. Olsen, S. C. Manolagas, R. L. Jilka, and C. A. O'Brien
Commitment to the Osteoblast Lineage Is Not Required for RANKL Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., May 8, 2009; 284(19): 12654 - 12662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
R. K. Rude, F. R. Singer, and H. E. Gruber
Skeletal and Hormonal Effects of Magnesium Deficiency
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2009; 28(2): 131 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J.-H. Chen, C. Y. Y. Yip, E. D. Sone, and C. A. Simmons
Identification and Characterization of Aortic Valve Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells with Robust Osteogenic Calcification Potential
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2009; 174(3): 1109 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. Armstrong, A. Pereverzev, S. J. Dixon, and S. M. Sims
Activation of P2X7 receptors causes isoform-specific translocation of protein kinase C in osteoclasts
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2009; 122(1): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Behl, M. Siqueira, J. Ortiz, J. Li, T. Desta, D. Faibish, and D. T. Graves
Activation of the Acquired Immune Response Reduces Coupled Bone Formation in Response to a Periodontal Pathogen
J. Immunol., December 15, 2008; 181(12): 8711 - 8718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Ogita, M. T. Rached, E. Dworakowski, John. P. Bilezikian, and S. Kousteni
Differentiation and Proliferation of Periosteal Osteoblast Progenitors Are Differentially Regulated by Estrogens and Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone Administration
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5713 - 5723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
M. Di Rocco, F. Giona, F. Carubbi, S. Linari, F. Minichilli, R. O. Brady, G. Mariani, and M. D. Cappellini
A new severity score index for phenotypic classification and evaluation of responses to treatment in type I Gaucher disease
Haematologica, August 1, 2008; 93(8): 1211 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S E Papapoulos and R C Schimmer
Changes in bone remodelling and antifracture efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy: implications from clinical studies with ibandronate
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2008; 84(992): 307 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. D. Nerenz, M. L. Martowicz, and J. W. Pike
An Enhancer 20 Kilobases Upstream of the Human Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand Gene Mediates Dominant Activation by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1044 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Dufour, X. Holy, and P. J. Marie
Transforming growth factor-{beta} prevents osteoblast apoptosis induced by skeletal unloading via PI3K/Akt, Bcl-2, and phospho-Bad signaling
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2008; 294(4): E794 - E801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. Sneve, N. Emaus, R. M. Joakimsen, and R. Jorde
The association between serum parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density, and the impact of smoking: the Tromso Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 401 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J. Tam, V. Trembovler, V. Di Marzo, S. Petrosino, G. Leo, A. Alexandrovich, E. Regev, N. Casap, A. Shteyer, C. Ledent, et al.
The cannabinoid CB1 receptor regulates bone formation by modulating adrenergic signaling
FASEB J, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Horsch, H. de Wet, M. M. Schuurmans, F. Allie-Reid, A. C. B. Cato, J. Cunningham, J. M. Burrin, F. S. Hough, and P. A. Hulley
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase 1/Dual Specificity Phosphatase 1 Mediates Glucocorticoid Inhibition of Osteoblast Proliferation
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2929 - 2940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Vega, N. M. Maalouf, and K. Sakhaee
The Role of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B (RANK)/RANK Ligand/Osteoprotegerin: Clinical Implications
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4514 - 4521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M M Conradie, H de Wet, D D R Kotze, J M Burrin, F S Hough, and P A Hulley
Vanadate prevents glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of osteoblasts in vitro and osteocytes in vivo
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 195(2): 229 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. C. Manolagas and M. Almeida
Gone with the Wnts: {beta}-Catenin, T-Cell Factor, Forkhead Box O, and Oxidative Stress in Age-Dependent Diseases of Bone, Lipid, and Glucose Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 21(11): 2605 - 2614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Almeida, L. Han, M. Martin-Millan, L. I. Plotkin, S. A. Stewart, P. K. Roberson, S. Kousteni, C. A. O'Brien, T. Bellido, A. M. Parfitt, et al.
Skeletal Involution by Age-associated Oxidative Stress and Its Acceleration by Loss of Sex Steroids
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27285 - 27297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Almeida, L. Han, M. Martin-Millan, C. A. O'Brien, and S. C. Manolagas
Oxidative Stress Antagonizes Wnt Signaling in Osteoblast Precursors by Diverting beta-Catenin from T Cell Factor- to Forkhead Box O-mediated Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27298 - 27305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
S. B. Goodman, W. Jiranek, E. Petrow, and A. W. Yasko
The Effects of Medications on Bone
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2007; 15(8): 450 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S E Papapoulos and R C Schimmer
Changes in bone remodelling and antifracture efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy: implications from clinical studies with ibandronate
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2007; 66(7): 853 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Sharma, A. Bronisz, R. Hu, K. Patel, K. C. Mansky, S. Sif, and M. C. Ostrowski
MITF and PU.1 Recruit p38 MAPK and NFATc1 to Target Genes during Osteoclast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15921 - 15929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M. Ishijima, K. Tsuji, S. R Rittling, T. Yamashita, H. Kurosawa, D. T Denhardt, A. Nifuji, Y. Ezura, and M. Noda
Osteopontin is required for mechanical stress-dependent signals to bone marrow cells
J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 193(2): 235 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. J. Xian
Roles of Epidermal Growth Factor Family in the Regulation of Postnatal Somatic Growth
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2007; 28(3): 284 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. Chavassieux, E. Seeman, and P. D. Delmas
Insights into Material and Structural Basis of Bone Fragility from Diseases Associated with Fractures: How Determinants of the Biomechanical Properties of Bone Are Compromised by Disease
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 151 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. S. Perrien, N. S. Akel, P. K. Edwards, A. A. Carver, M. S. Bendre, F. L. Swain, R. A. Skinner, W. R. Hogue, K. M. Nicks, T. M. Pierson, et al.
Inhibin A Is an Endocrine Stimulator of Bone Mass and Strength
Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1654 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J.-R. Chen, R. L. Haley, M. Hidestrand, K. Shankar, X. Liu, C. K. Lumpkin, P. M. Simpson, T. M. Badger, and M. J. J. Ronis
Estradiol Protects against Ethanol-Induced Bone Loss by Inhibiting Up-Regulation of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand in Osteoblasts
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1182 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. R. Weisinger, R. G. Carlini, E. Rojas, and E. Bellorin-Font
Bone Disease after Renal Transplantation
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 1(6): 1300 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Kim, M. Yamazaki, L. A. Zella, N. K. Shevde, and J. W. Pike
Activation of Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Ligand Gene Expression by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Is Mediated through Multiple Long-Range Enhancers.
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6469 - 6486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Grassi, X. Fan, J. Rahnert, M. N. Weitzmann, R. Pacifici, M. S. Nanes, and J. Rubin
Bone Re/Modeling Is More Dynamic in the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase(-/-) Mouse
Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4392 - 4399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. J. Allison, P. Baldock, A. Sainsbury, R. Enriquez, N. J. Lee, E.-J. D. Lin, M. Klugman, M. During, J. A. Eisman, M. Li, et al.
Conditional Deletion of Hypothalamic Y2 Receptors Reverts Gonadectomy-induced Bone Loss in Adult Mice
J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 23436 - 23444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. M. Rahman, A. Bhattacharya, and G. Fernandes
Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits osteoclast differentiation of RAW264.7 cells by modulating RANKL signaling
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1739 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
U.H. Lerner
Bone Remodeling in Post-menopausal Osteoporosis
Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2006; 85(7): 584 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Seeman and P. D. Delmas
Bone quality--the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility.
N. Engl. J. Med., May 25, 2006; 354(21): 2250 - 2261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. S. Perrien, S. J. Achenbach, S. E. Bledsoe, B. Walser, L. J. Suva, S. Khosla, and D. Gaddy
Bone Turnover across the Menopause Transition: Correlations with Inhibins and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1848 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Almeida, L. Han, C. A. O'Brien, S. Kousteni, and S. C. Manolagas
Classical Genotropic Versus Kinase-Initiated Regulation of Gene Transcription by the Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1986 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Phadke, R. R. Mercer, J. F. Harms, Y. Jia, A. R. Frost, J. L. Jewell, K. M. Bussard, S. Nelson, C. Moore, J. C. Kappes, et al.
Kinetics of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cell Trafficking in Bone
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1431 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
S. C. Manolagas
Choreography from the Tomb: An Emerging Role of Dying Osteocytes in the Purposeful, and Perhaps Not So Purposeful, Targeting of Bone Remodeling
IBMS BoneKEy, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 5 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Ha, J.-H. Lee, H.-N. Kim, H.-M. Kim, H. B. Kwak, S. Lee, H.-H. Kim, and Z. H. Lee
{alpha}-Lipoic Acid Inhibits Inflammatory Bone Resorption by Suppressing Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Liu, S. Wang, S. Wei, L. Sun, and X. Feng
Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B (RANK) Cytoplasmic Motif, 369PFQEP373, Plays a Predominant Role in Osteoclast Survival in Part by Activating Akt/PKB and Its Downstream Effector AFX/FOXO4
J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 43064 - 43072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Young, N. Mikhalkevich, Y. Yan, D. Chen, and W.-p. Zheng
Differential Regulation of Osteoblast Activity by Th Cell Subsets Mediated by Parathyroid Hormone and IFN-{gamma}
J. Immunol., December 15, 2005; 175(12): 8287 - 8295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Bellido, A. A. Ali, I. Gubrij, L. I. Plotkin, Q. Fu, C. A. O'Brien, S. C. Manolagas, and R. L. Jilka
Chronic Elevation of Parathyroid Hormone in Mice Reduces Expression of Sclerostin by Osteocytes: A Novel Mechanism for Hormonal Control of Osteoblastogenesis
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4577 - 4583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Bajayo, I. Goshen, S. Feldman, V. Csernus, K. Iverfeldt, E. Shohami, R. Yirmiya, and I. Bab
Central IL-1 receptor signaling regulates bone growth and mass
PNAS, September 6, 2005; 102(36): 12956 - 12961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Gazzerro, V. Deregowski, S. Vaira, and E. Canalis
Overexpression of Twisted Gastrulation Inhibits Bone Morphogenetic Protein Action and Prevents Osteoblast Cell Differentiation in Vitro
Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 3875 - 3882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. I. Plotkin, I. Mathov, J. I. Aguirre, A. M. Parfitt, S. C. Manolagas, and T. Bellido
Mechanical stimulation prevents osteocyte apoptosis: requirement of integrins, Src kinases, and ERKs
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): C633 - C643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. P Shrader and K. R Ragucci
Parathyroid Hormone (1-84) and Treatment of Osteoporosis
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2005; 39(9): 1511 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Wu, E.-Y. Ahn, M. A. McKenna, H. Yeo, and J. M. McDonald
Fas Binding to Calmodulin Regulates Apoptosis in Osteoclasts
J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29964 - 29970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Y. Han, N. K. Lee, K. H. Kim, I. W. Jang, M. Yim, J. H. Kim, W. J. Lee, and S. Y. Lee
Transcriptional induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in osteoclast precursors is involved in RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis
Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1240 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
D. Karasik, S. Demissie, L. A. Cupples, and D. P. Kiel
Disentangling the Genetic Determinants of Human Aging: Biological Age as an Alternative to the Use of Survival Measures
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2005; 60(5): 574 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. E. Broker, F. A.E. Kruyt, and G. Giaccone
Cell Death Independent of Caspases: A Review
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3155 - 3162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Vertino, C. M. Bula, J.-R. Chen, M. Almeida, L. Han, T. Bellido, S. Kousteni, A. W. Norman, and S. C. Manolagas
Nongenotropic, Anti-Apoptotic Signaling of 1{alpha},25(OH)2-Vitamin D3 and Analogs through the Ligand Binding Domain of the Vitamin D Receptor in Osteoblasts and Osteocytes: MEDIATION BY Src, PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-, AND JNK KINASES
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 14130 - 14137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y. M. Alkhiary, L. C. Gerstenfeld, E. Krall, M. Westmore, M. Sato, B. H. Mitlak, and T. A. Einhorn
Enhancement of Experimental Fracture-Healing by Systemic Administration of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone (PTH 1-34)
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2005; 87(4): 731 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Schneider, L. M. Kalikin, A. C. Mattos, E. T. Keller, M. J. Allen, K. J. Pienta, and L. K. McCauley
Bone Turnover Mediates Preferential Localization of Prostate Cancer in the Skeleton
Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1727 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. Fontana, J. L. Shew, J. O. Holloszy, and D. T. Villareal
Low Bone Mass in Subjects on a Long-term Raw Vegetarian Diet
Arch Intern Med, March 28, 2005; 165(6): 684 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. Kaabeche, H. Guenou, D. Bouvard, N. Didelot, A. Listrat, and P. J. Marie
Cbl-mediated ubiquitination of {alpha}5 integrin subunit mediates fibronectin-dependent osteoblast detachment and apoptosis induced by FGFR2 activation
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2005; 118(6): 1223 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Zhao, F. P. Ross, and S. L. Teitelbaum
Unoccupied {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Regulates Osteoclast Apoptosis by Transmitting a Positive Death Signal
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 771 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Ohishi, Y. Matsumura, D. Aki, R. Mashima, K. Taniguchi, T. Kobayashi, T. Kukita, Y. Iwamoto, and A. Yoshimura
Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling-1 and -3 Regulate Osteoclastogenesis in the Presence of Inflammatory Cytokines
J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 3024 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-R. Chen, L. I. Plotkin, J. I. Aguirre, L. Han, R. L. Jilka, S. Kousteni, T. Bellido, and S. C. Manolagas
Transient Versus Sustained Phosphorylation and Nuclear Accumulation of ERKs Underlie Anti-Versus Pro-apoptotic Effects of Estrogens
J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4632 - 4638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, A. D. Rogol, J. C. Lovejoy, M. Sheffield-Moore, N. Mauras, and C. Y. Bowers
Endocrine Control of Body Composition in Infancy, Childhood, and Puberty
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2005; 26(1): 114 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Matsumoto, M. Kogawa, S. Wada, H. Takayanagi, M. Tsujimoto, S. Katayama, K. Hisatake, and Y. Nogi
Essential Role of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in Cathepsin K Gene Expression during Osteoclastogenesis through Association of NFATc1 and PU.1
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45969 - 45979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S P Conway, B Oldroyd, A Morton, J G Truscott, and D G Peckham
Effect of oral bisphosphonates on bone mineral density and body composition in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study
Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 699 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. W. Goderie-Plomp, M. van der Klift, W. de Ronde, A. Hofman, F. H. de Jong, and H. A. P. Pols
Endogenous Sex Hormones, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and the Risk of Incident Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Men and Women: The Rotterdam Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3261 - 3269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Stossi, D. H. Barnett, J. Frasor, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Transcriptional Profiling of Estrogen-Regulated Gene Expression via Estrogen Receptor (ER) {alpha} or ER{beta} in Human Osteosarcoma Cells: Distinct and Common Target Genes for These Receptors
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3473 - 3486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
D. Vanderschueren, L. Vandenput, S. Boonen, M. K. Lindberg, R. Bouillon, and C. Ohlsson
Androgens and Bone
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 389 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
R. Gruber, B. Kandler, C. Jindra, G. Watzak, and G. Watzek
Dental Pulp Fibroblasts Contain Target Cells for Lysophosphatidic Acid
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2004; 83(6): 491 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
O. Gluck and G. Colice
Recognizing and Treating Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Pulmonary Diseases
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1859 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
P. V. N. Bodine, W. Zhao, Y. P. Kharode, F. J. Bex, A.-J. Lambert, M. B. Goad, T. Gaur, G. S. Stein, J. B. Lian, and B. S. Komm
The Wnt Antagonist Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein-1 Is a Negative Regulator of Trabecular Bone Formation in Adult Mice
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2004; 18(5): 1222 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Usui, Y. Yoshida, K. Tsuji, K. Oikawa, K. Miyazono, I. Ishikawa, T. Yamamoto, A. Nifuji, and M. Noda
Tob deficiency superenhances osteoblastic activity after ovariectomy to block estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis
PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6653 - 6658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. S. Weinstein, D. Jia, C. C. Powers, S. A. Stewart, R. L. Jilka, A. M. Parfitt, and S. C. Manolagas
The Skeletal Effects of Glucocorticoid Excess Override Those of Orchidectomy in Mice
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1980 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Yaccoby, M. J. Wezeman, A. Henderson, M. Cottler-Fox, Q. Yi, B. Barlogie, and J. Epstein
Cancer and the Microenvironment: Myeloma-Osteoclast Interactions as a Model
Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2016 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
D. Karasik, M. T. Hannan, L. A. Cupples, D. T. Felson, and D. P. Kiel
Genetic Contribution to Biological Aging: The Framingham Study
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2004; 59(3): B218 - B226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Evio, A. Tiitinen, K. Laitinen, O. Ylikorkala, and M. J. Valimaki
Effects of Alendronate and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Alone and in Combination, on Bone Mass and Markers of Bone Turnover in Elderly Women with Osteoporosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 626 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Hay, J. Lemonnier, O. Fromigue, H. Guenou, and P. J. Marie
Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor IB Signaling Mediates Apoptosis Independently of Differentiation in Osteoblastic Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1650 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. E. Vegni, C. Corradini, G. Privitera, T. Sugiyama, H. Tanaka, S. Kawai, P. D. Miller, K. E. Fuller, D. M. Black, J. Bilezikian, et al.
Effects of Parathyroid Hormone and Alendronate Alone or in Combination in Osteoporosis
N. Engl. J. Med., January 8, 2004; 350(2): 189 - 192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Barera, S. Beccio, M. C. Proverbio, and S. Mora
Longitudinal changes in bone metabolism and bone mineral content in children with celiac disease during consumption of a gluten-free diet
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2004; 79(1): 148 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Wu, M. A. McKenna, X. Feng, T. R. Nagy, and J. M. McDonald
Osteoclast Apoptosis: The Role of Fas in Vivo and in Vitro
Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5545 - 5555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. N. VanHouten and J. J. Wysolmerski
Low Estrogen and High Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide Levels Contribute to Accelerated Bone Resorption and Bone Loss in Lactating Mice
Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5521 - 5529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Nakayamada, Y. Okada, K. Saito, M. Tamura, and Y. Tanaka
{beta}1 Integrin/Focal Adhesion Kinase-mediated Signaling Induces Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 and Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Ligand on Osteoblasts and Osteoclast Maturation
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45368 - 45374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. Seeman
Invited Review: Pathogenesis of osteoporosis
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2142 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Passeri, G. Pini, L. Troiano, R. Vescovini, P. Sansoni, M. Passeri, P. Gueresi, R. Delsignore, M. Pedrazzoni, and C. Franceschi
Low Vitamin D Status, High Bone Turnover, and Bone Fractures in Centenarians
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5109 - 5115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Van den Berghe, D. Van Roosbroeck, P. Vanhove, P. J. Wouters, L. De Pourcq, and R. Bouillon
Bone Turnover in Prolonged Critical Illness: Effect of Vitamin D
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4623 - 4632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
S. S. Budden and M. E. Gunness
Possible Mechanisms of Osteopenia in Rett Syndrome: Bone Histomorphometric Studies
J Child Neurol, October 1, 2003; 18(10): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Elefteriou, S. Takeda, X. Liu, D. Armstrong, and G. Karsenty
Monosodium Glutamate-Sensitive Hypothalamic Neurons Contribute to the Control of Bone Mass
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3842 - 3847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Kim, T. Koga, M. Isobe, B. E. Kern, T. Yokochi, Y. E. Chin, G. Karsenty, T. Taniguchi, and H. Takayanagi
Stat1 functions as a cytoplasmic attenuator of Runx2 in the transcriptional program of osteoblast differentiation
Genes & Dev., August 15, 2003; 17(16): 1979 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. A. McHugh, H. M. Vercesi, R. W. Egan, and J. A. Hey
Receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand arrests bone growth and promotes cortical bone resorption in growing rats
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2003; 95(2): 672 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Enomoto, S. Shiojiri, K. Hoshi, T. Furuichi, R. Fukuyama, C. A. Yoshida, N. Kanatani, R. Nakamura, A. Mizuno, A. Zanma, et al.
Induction of Osteoclast Differentiation by Runx2 through Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand (RANKL) and Osteoprotegerin Regulation and Partial Rescue of Osteoclastogenesis in Runx2-/- Mice by RANKL Transgene
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23971 - 23977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. M. Delany, I. Kalajzic, A. D. Bradshaw, E. H. Sage, and E. Canalis
Osteonectin-Null Mutation Compromises Osteoblast Formation, Maturation, and Survival
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2588 - 2596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. S. Ahuja, S. Zhao, T. Bellido, L. I. Plotkin, F. Jimenez, and L. F. Bonewald
CD40 Ligand Blocks Apoptosis Induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}, Glucocorticoids, and Etoposide in Osteoblasts and the Osteocyte-Like Cell Line Murine Long Bone Osteocyte-Y4
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1761 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Hu, E. Chan, S. X. Wang, and B. Li
Activation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Required for Osteoblast Differentiation
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 2068 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
B. H. Ascott-Evans, N. Guanabens, S. Kivinen, B. G. A. Stuckey, C. H. Magaril, K. Vandormael, B. Stych, and M. E. Melton
Alendronate Prevents Loss of Bone Density Associated With Discontinuation of Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2003; 163(7): 789 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Cuzzocrea, E. Mazzon, L. Dugo, T. Genovese, R. Di Paola, Z. Ruggeri, E. Vegeto, A. P. Caputi, F. A. J. Van de Loo, D. Puzzolo, et al.
Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Mediates Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Mice
Endocrinology, March 1, 2003; 144(3): 1098 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
S. Yakar and C. J. Rosen
From Mouse to Man: Redefining the Role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in the Acquisition of Bone Mass
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2003; 228(3): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Engelbrecht, H. de Wet, K. Horsch, C. R. Langeveldt, F. S. Hough, and P. A. Hulley
Glucocorticoids Induce Rapid Up-Regulation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-1 and Dephosphorylation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and Impair Proliferation in Human and Mouse Osteoblast Cell Lines
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 412 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. L. Ferrari, L. Ahn-Luong, P. Garnero, S. E. Humphries, and S. L. Greenspan
Two Promoter Polymorphisms Regulating Interleukin-6 Gene Expression Are Associated with Circulating Levels of C-Reactive Protein and Markers of Bone Resorption in Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Takeuchi, S. Watanabe, G. Ishii, S. Takeda, K. Nakayama, S. Fukumoto, Y. Kaneta, D. Inoue, T. Matsumoto, K. Harigaya, et al.
Interleukin-11 as a Stimulatory Factor for Bone Formation Prevents Bone Loss with Advancing Age in Mice
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 49011 - 49018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Grey, Q. Chen, K. Callon, X. Xu, I. R. Reid, and J. Cornish
The Phospholipids Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Lysophosphatidic Acid Prevent Apoptosis in Osteoblastic Cells via a Signaling Pathway Involving Gi Proteins and Phosphatidylinositol-3 Kinase
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4755 - 4763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manolagas, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manolagas, S. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Osteoporosis


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals