help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couse, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Couse, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.
Endocrine Reviews 20 (3): 358-417
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society

Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?

John F. Couse and Kenneth S. Korach

Receptor Biology Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 

I. Introduction—A Historical Perspective
II. Estrogen Receptors (ER)
A. Gene and mRNA structure
B. Mechanism of ER action
C. Generation of the estrogen receptor null mice
III. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes of the Female
A. Uterus
B. Vagina
C. Oviduct
D. Ovary
IV. Mammary Gland
A. {alpha}ERKO phenotype
B. ßERKO phenotype
C. ER{alpha} and oncogene-induced tumorigenesis: Wnt-1/{alpha}ERKO mice
V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes of the Male
A. Testicular function and spermatogenesis
B. Accessory sex organs
VI. Neuroendocrine System
A. Hypothalamic-pituitary axis
B. Behavior
VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral Tissues
A. Skeletal system
B. Cardiovascular system
C. Adipogenesis
VIII. Comparison with Human Disease and Models of Deficient Estrogen Action
A. Ovarian carcinogenesis
B. Chronic anovulation
C. ER{alpha} and aromatase deficiency
IX. Summary


    I. Introduction—A Historical Perspective
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
"ONE OF the challenging problems confronting biological scientists has been the manner in which hormones serve as regulators of biochemical processes in tissues of higher animals" [E. V. Jensen and E. R DeSombre, 1973 (1).]

At the time of the above statement, the laboratories of Elwood Jensen and Jack Gorski had spent 10 yr providing experimental evidence to support the concept of an intracellular "receptor" protein for steroid hormones. Their combined work had even led to a proposed model by which the interactions of the receptor and the steroid were involved in mediating the cellular effects of the hormone (1). The first of these receptors to be characterized was for the female sex hormone, 17ß-estradiol (E2) (2, 3). Since this time, similar receptors for testosterone, progesterone, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormone, vitamin-D3, and retinoids have been discovered and now form a portion of a large family of nuclear hormone receptors (4). Although significant strides have been made since, Jensen’s introductory statement in a review published more than 25 yr ago is still contemporary with the current research goals toward understanding the growing family of nuclear receptors. This is not to say that little progress has been made, which is quite to the contrary, but rather to state that although advances in technology and molecular biology have allowed for extensive insight, there is still a great deal to be learned as we move into the next century.

Our current understanding of the various roles of the steroid, thyroid, and retinoid hormones in development and normal physiology and the mechanisms by which these actions are mediated is due, in large part, to the generation of a series of reagents and tools over the past 40 yr. The first of these was the synthesis and use of tritium-labeled E2 with high specific activity, allowing for the first reports of the detection and simple characterization of an estrogen-binding component, or "estrophilin" (1, 3, 5). This protein exhibited a binding affinity for estradiol that was several fold higher compared with the other gonadal steroids and was found only in tissues previously shown to respond to estradiol in terms of growth and increased RNA synthesis (1, 3). These studies described the uptake and concentration of radiolabeled estradiol by a specific protein unique to the cells of the uterus, vagina, and pituitary and thereby disputed the current thought that estrogen action required enzymatic metabolism of the hormone (2, 3, 6). Thus, the concept of a hormone receptor protein in target tissues was initiated. Autoradiographic studies with radiolabeled ligand further demonstrated the strong association of estradiol with the nuclei of cells lining the rat uterus within 4 h after injection (7). These studies were significantly advanced by pharmacological approaches with early nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists, the first being the triphenylethylene, MER-25 (2), followed soon after by a series of similar compounds, e.g., clomiphene, nafoxidine, CI-628, and tamoxifen (1, 8). These reagents were previously known to inhibit the uterotropic effects of estradiol in a dose-dependent manner but, more importantly, were later shown to block estradiol uptake and binding in target tissues. Still, at this time the exact role that the hormone-receptor complex played in the final manifestation of the hormonal effects remained unclear. It was suggested that the receptor may simply fulfill a "transport" role to move the steroid hormone from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of the cell (1). Nonetheless, from these early studies, the definition of an estrogen target tissue now included not only the exhibition of a measurable response to the natural hormone (E2) but also one that possessed detectable levels of the estrogen receptor (ER).

Much of the early characterization of the ER relied on the use of sucrose gradient analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic cell fractions under varied salt concentrations (3). This procedure, along with gel electrophoresis and filtration using radiolabeled estradiol, allowed for the generation of semipure fractions of the estradiol-binding protein. These preparations led to the generation of antisera specific to the ER protein, another notable step in receptor research (9). The later development of monoclonal antibodies to the ER and the immunohistochemical techniques that soon followed provided evidence of the predominantly nuclear localization of the receptor protein in target cells (10, 11). The late 1970s brought numerous reports of the tissue distribution and localization of the ER in humans and laboratory animals, confirming much of the findings of earlier steroid autoradiography studies (7, 11). The antibodies were also used to further purify large amounts of the ER from target tissues, allowing for more detailed studies of the receptor structure and function.

The 1980s witnessed the cloning and sequencing of the cDNAs for several of the steroid hormone receptors, which proved to be a seminal step toward understanding their mechanisms of action. The first cDNA to be cloned for a member of the nuclear receptor family was that for the human glucocorticoid receptor (12), followed soon after with the description of the human ER cDNA (13, 14). Since this time, the cDNAs encoding several other members of the nuclear receptor family have been described (4). The current list of isolated ER cDNAs includes those for the chicken (15), mouse (16), rat (17), Xenopus laevis (18), and rainbow trout (19). Sequence analysis of the various receptor cDNAs demonstrated a high degree of similarity and led to their inclusion in a superfamily of nuclear receptors possessing a defined motif of functional domains (4).

A vital contribution from the cloning of the nuclear receptor cDNAs was the ability to express the receptor proteins in in vitro mammalian (20) or yeast (21) cell systems. These techniques, as well as cell-free in vitro transcription (22), allowed detailed characterizations of the different functional domains of the receptor. Recombinant DNA methodologies provided for the construction of receptor cDNAs possessing precise truncations, deletions, point mutations, or additional sequences. These powerful techniques led to the in vitro expression of chimeric and mutant receptors and great advances in the dissection and mapping of the specific domains and distinct residues critical to receptor function (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). The late 1980s witnessed multiple descriptions of naturally occurring variants and mutations of several of the nuclear receptor transcripts (26), including the ER (27, 28, 29). Their identification and functional characterization have led to further insight into the mechanisms of action of specific domains of the receptor proteins as well as the receptors as a whole. Furthermore, the detection of these nuclear receptor transcript variants in vivo has allowed speculation concerning their possible roles in alternate or abnormal hormonal signaling in normal and neoplastic tissues (27).

By the 1990s, it was evident that the members of the steroid/thyroid hormone superfamily of receptors were intracellular proteins that functioned in the nucleus to regulate transcription of target genes. This growing family of receptors now includes those for the sex and adrenal steroids, thyroid hormones, retinoids, vitamin D3, and eicosinoids (reviewed in Refs. 4, 30). The inclusion of nuclear receptor-like proteins with no known ligand, termed orphan receptors, such as those for the chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter (COUP), and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), has expanded the family to now include approximately 150 distinct proteins (30).

Our knowledge of the expression patterns and mechanism of action of the nuclear receptors has led to a greater appreciation of their involvement in normal physiology and disease. The current decade has witnessed several advances in our understanding of the molecular biology and overall physiological role of these proteins. Especially significant to these efforts has been the discovery and/or development of three distinct aspects. The first of these was the discovery of coregulators, a second group of nuclear proteins that further modulate the actions of unoccupied as well as ligand (agonist or antagonist)-bound receptors (reviewed in Ref. 31). The continued characterization of the coregulator proteins has provided some insight toward the long sought explanations for the cell- and tissue-specific mixed agonist/antagonist activity of certain ligands (31). The second of these advances was the generation of crystal structures for the ligand-binding domains of the retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} (32), retinoic X receptor-{alpha} (33), thyroid receptor-{alpha} (34), and ER{alpha} (35, 36). These new data continue to allow for the description of the long speculated conformational changes that result in the receptor after binding of the natural ligand, and how these changes may differ from those induced by natural or synthetic agonists and antagonists.

The third development of great impact in this decade has been the use of gene-targeting technology and transgenic techniques to disrupt the genes encoding several members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. This methodology has allowed for the generation of transgenic mice that lack a functional gene for a specific receptor, as well as germline passage of this mutation. Hormone resistance due to naturally occurring mutations in the genes encoding the receptors for androgen (37, 38), glucocorticoids (39), and thyroid hormones (40) had already been described in humans and laboratory animals and thereby provided great insight into the role of these hormones in development and normal physiology. However, similar mutations had not yet been reported for other members of the superfamily of nuclear receptors. The impact of the gene-targeting technique is evident in the generation of several "knockout" mice for the nuclear receptors, including mice lacking multiple forms of the retinoic acid receptors (41, 42, 43), the progesterone receptor (44), the vitamin D3 receptor (45), the ERs (46, 47), and the coregulator protein, steroid receptor coactivator-1 (48). If nothing else, the naturally occurring mutants combined with the generation of the knockout models, have confirmed the basic hypotheses put forth almost 30 yr ago, i.e., that the receptor proteins found to tightly and specifically bind a hormone within a tissue are indeed critical for mediating the biological effect of the hormone within the target cell (1).

This review will discuss one such advance originating from the gene-targeting boom that occurred in the 1990s, the ER knockout mice. The broad content of this review is a reflection of the current state of research in the expanding field of estrogen action, as illustrated by the discovery of a second ER, the ERß. A large extent of the discussion will focus on the mice lacking the classical ER, the ER{alpha} knockout mice ({alpha}ERKO). The reasons for this are 2-fold: 1) the {alpha}ERKO mouse has been available for more than 6 yr, compared with less than 1 yr for the ßERKO, and therefore has been more thoroughly studied and characterized; 2) the phenotypes of the {alpha}ERKO mice appear to be more broad in nature compared with those of the less well studied ßERKO mice, although continued research may lessen this disparity. The extent to which the ERKO models have been used in various fields of biological research is illustrated in Table 1GoGo. This review will discuss the phenotypes of the ERKO mice and the multiple ways in which these models continue to influence the field of estrogen research. Foremost, several of the hypotheses of estrogen and ER action put forth from the efforts of numerous investigators over the years were confirmed by our observations in the ERKO. Furthermore, certain phenotypes have introduced unforeseen critical roles of estrogen in some physiological systems, such as in male fertility. Later years have witnessed the use of the {alpha}ERKO as a research tool to investigate specific biochemical pathways and neoplasia in the absence of estrogen action. Where applicable, we will contrast the phenotypes of the two ERKO models, as well as compare the relevant phenotypes of knockout models for other hormone signaling systems. And finally, we will discuss how these models compare with the few cases of insufficient estrogen synthesis and the single reported case of estrogen insensitivity in humans. Before we continue, however, we wish to take this opportunity to establish consistency in the abbreviations used to refer to the ER-knockout (ERKO) mice in the literature. Although the terms ER{alpha}KO and ERßKO have appeared in previous reports from our own as well as other laboratories, we propose that the abbreviations used above and throughout the remainder of this review, i.e., {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO, be the consensus abbreviations used hereafter to refer to the two models.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Published reports involving the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO models and the ER{alpha}-deficient human

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1A. continued

 

    II. Estrogen Receptors
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
A. Gene and mRNA structure
For several years it was thought that only a single form of the nuclear ER existed. However, in 1996, multiple laboratories independently reported the discovery of a second type of ER in the rat (49), mouse (50), and human (51). This newly discovered receptor was termed ERß, resulting in the classical ER being referred to as ER{alpha}. The two receptors are not isoforms of each other, but rather distinct proteins encoded by separate genes located on different chromosomes. As a result of this discovery, we now know that the ER shares a phenomenon of multiple forms previously described for other members of the nuclear hormone superfamily, including the receptors for thyroid hormone, retinoids, mineralocorticoids, and progesterone (26, 30). A detailed description of the structure and mechanism of action of the ERs is beyond the scope of this review, and therefore only a brief discussion of the relevant points will appear here. For more detailed descriptions of the mechanism of steroid receptor-regulated gene transcription, readers are encouraged to seek several recent reviews (52, 53, 54, 55).

Transcription of the mouse ER{alpha} gene in vivo predominantly results in a single transcript of approximately 6.3 kb transcribed from 9 exons. This transcript encodes a protein of 599 amino acids with an approximate molecular mass of 66 kDa (16). The human ER{alpha} is slightly shorter at 595 amino acids but exhibits a similar molecular mass (13, 14). Whereas the human ER{alpha} gene has been mapped to chromosome 6 (56), the mouse ER{alpha} gene is located on chromosome 10 (57). The existence of multiple promoter and regulatory regions in the 5'-untranslated sequences of the human and rat ER{alpha} have been described, but only a single open reading frame appears to exist (58, 59, 60). Numerous reports have described the discovery and characterization of naturally occurring variants and mutations of the ER{alpha} mRNA in normal as well as neoplastic tissues of several species (reviewed in Refs. 27, 28, 61). Although the existence of true protein products of these ER{alpha} mRNA variants in vivo remains controversial, their transactivational activities in in vitro cell culture systems have been intensely described and have furthered our understanding of the functional domains of the receptor (27, 61).

Initial studies indicated that the rodent ERß was composed of 485 amino acids and an estimated molecular mass of 54 kDa and therefore was slightly smaller than the ER{alpha} (49, 50, 62). The majority of this difference in size between the two ERs was due to a significantly shorter N' terminus in the deduced ERß protein. Unlike the ER{alpha} gene, Northern blot analyses of ovarian RNA from both the rat and mouse indicates the presence of multiple ERß transcripts (50, 63, 64). Furthermore, open reading frames initiating up-stream from those originally described have now been discovered in the mouse, rat, bovine, and human ERß mRNA (65, 66, 67, 68, 69). These studies have also provided evidence to support that the upstream start codons are the likely initiation sites of translation and therefore suggest the possibility of an ERß protein of 527–530 amino acids and a calculated molecular mass of approximately 60 kDa (65, 66, 67, 69). However, convincing Western blots from tissue extracts to indicate the true in vivo molecular mass of the ERß have remained difficult to produce with the antibody preparations currently available. Similar to ER{alpha}, a number of variants of the ERß mRNA have already been described. These include a conserved insertion of 18 amino acids in a C'-terminal region of the ERß in the rat (70, 71), human, and mouse (72), the deletion of one or more exons in these same species (70, 72, 73), and various isoforms in the extreme C'-terminus of the human ERß (68).

B. Mechanism of ER action
The ERs are classified as class I members of the superfamily of nuclear hormone receptors, defined as a ligand-inducible transcription factor (30). Early studies indicated the ER was cytoplasmic and became localized to the nucleus only upon ligand binding, providing the basis of the initial "two-step mechanism" of hormone action (1, 3). However, it is now accepted that the ER is a predominantly nuclear protein regardless of whether or not it is complexed with ligand (74). The inactive ER exists in a complex consisting of several heat-shock and other proteins that appear to disassociate upon ligand binding, resulting in a "transformation" of the receptor to an active state (75). With continued research, the two-step mechanism model has evolved to state that upon binding of estradiol, or an estrogenic ligand, the transformed receptors form dimers that tightly associate with specific consensus DNA sequences, consisting of 15-bp inverted palindromes in the regulatory regions of target genes (52, 74, 75, 76). This complex then interacts with basal transcription factors, coregulator proteins, and other transcription factors to ultimately regulate transcription of the target gene (52, 55, 76). However, in recent years, pathways of gene activation by the steroid receptors that deviate from this classical model have been described. These include gene activation by ligand-bound steroid receptors without evidence of direct DNA binding, but rather via interaction with other DNA-bound transcription factors, such as an AP-1 complex (77, 78). In addition, ligand-independent activation of the receptor through pathways that alter the activity of cellular kinases and phosphatases has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo (reviewed in Ref. 55). The discovery of these pathways strongly supports the great importance of the ER and its ability to possibly provide diverse physiological functions even in the absence of ligand.

The ER{alpha} and ERß proteins are composed of six functional domains, labeled A–F, a signature characteristic of members of the superfamily of steroid/thyroid hormone nuclear receptors (Fig. 1Go). The N'-terminal A/B domain is the least conserved among all members and demonstrates only 17% identity between the human ER{alpha} and ERß (64). In contrast, the C domain is the most highly conserved among the different members of the family. It possesses two zinc fingers forming a helix-loop-helix motif and primarily functions in tightly binding the receptor to the DNA hormone response elements. The sequences encoding the two zinc fingers possess 97% homology between the ER{alpha} and ERß genes and are located in separate exons (exons 3 and 4) in each (50, 64, 79). The E domain, or ligand-binding domain, confers ligand specificity to the receptor and is moderately conserved among the members of the superfamily. The ER{alpha} and ERß proteins possess 60% conservation of the residues in the E domain; however, each binds estradiol with nearly equal affinity and exhibits a very similar binding profile for a large number of natural and synthetic ligands (80). The D domain possesses signals for nuclear localization of the receptor and exhibits approximately 30% identity between the two human forms of ER (64). The C'-terminal F domain is unique to the ER among the nuclear receptors for the gonadal and adrenal hormones (6) but is not well conserved among the ERs of different species nor between the ER{alpha} and ERß, which share approximately 18% homology (64). Studies using forms of the ER{alpha} missing the C' terminus have indicated a role for the F domain in modulating transactivational activity of the ER{alpha} when complexed with mixed agonist/antagonist ligands, possibly via influencing coregulatory function and/or dimerization of the receptor (81, 82).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Drawing of the mouse ER proteins, cDNAs, and genes as well as the targeting scheme employed to generate the ERKO mice via homologous recombination. Shown are the common functional domains of the ER{alpha} and ERß receptor proteins, indicating the residues involved in DNA and ligand binding. The common structure of the cDNAs and genomic genes for the ERs is illustrated, indicating the exon sequences that encode the functional domains of the receptor. Generation of the {alpha}ERKO mouse involved the targeted insertion of a 1.8-kb NEO sequence into exon 2 of the ER{alpha} gene such that the translational reading frame (indicated by the direction of the arrow) of the genes was the same (see Ref. 46). Generation of the ßERKO mouse involved a similar scheme, in which a 1.8-kb NEO sequence was inserted into exon 3 of the ERß gene; however, in this case the NEO gene is in the reverse orientation (see Ref. 47). The schematic drawing of the genomic DNA was adapted from that of the human ER{alpha} gene (Ref. 79). Drawing is not to scale.

 
There are also functional domains that span those boundaries described above. Residues involved in the dimerization of the receptors are located in the second zinc finger of the C domain as well as in the major dimerization surface in the E domain (83, 84). Furthermore, two domains critical to the transactivational function of the ER are the AF-1 in the N' terminus and AF-2 in the C' terminus. These two domains may function independently or interact during the process of transactivation, depending on the cell type, target promoter, and the presence and/or type of ligand (52). The AF-2 domain is critical to the ligand-dependent transactivational activity of the receptor and may be involved in the recruitment of coregulator proteins, whereas the AF-1 is thought to be a region of site-specific phosphorylation involved in ligand-independent activity of the receptor (reviewed in Refs. 31, 52). Recent studies have also suggested the presence of a third domain, AF-2a, within the ligand-binding domain of the human ER{alpha} (85).

The discovery of the ERß has introduced a new level of complexity to the current model as well. To date, there exist no data indicating a physiological response solely mediated by ERß. In contrast, the {alpha}ERKO mouse has confirmed the requirement for ER{alpha} in mediating several actions of estradiol, as will be discussed in this review. Nevertheless, in vitro experiments from several laboratories have indicated the possibility of cooperative activity between the two receptors, acting in the form of heterodimers (50, 62, 65, 86). These studies generally report a tendency of ER{alpha} to form homodimers whereas ERß prefers to heterodimerize with ER{alpha}. However, Giguere et al. report (87) that the heterodimer is the preferred state when both mouse ERs are present. The transactivational activity of the heterodimer when assayed in in vitro mammalian cell transfection assays appears to lie between that of the more active ER{alpha} homodimer and the less active ERß homodimer (50, 62, 86). A major consideration when evaluating the possible physiological functions of an ER{alpha}/ERß heterodimer is evidence of coexpression of the two receptors in the same cell, which has not yet been definitively reported (88). To this end, studies and reagents are only now becoming available to directly assess this question.

Several functional characteristics of the two ERs are similar. The residues critical to function of the AF-2 domain appear to be identical in the mouse ER{alpha} and ERß (87). Tremblay et al. (50, 89) demonstrated that a tyrosine residue critical to the function of the AF-2 domain was conserved in both the ER{alpha} and ERß and that mutation of this amino acid resulted in similar constitutive, ligand-independent transactivational activity in both receptors. In contrast, the N'-terminal AF-1 domain shows no significant regions of similarity between the two ERs (87). However, a potential activation site of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP)-kinase pathway previously shown for ER{alpha} is present and active in the ERß (50, 89). Additionally, when acting on a basal promoter linked to a consensus estrogen response element, both ER{alpha} and ERß were able to recruit the coactivator SRC-1 and were equally susceptible to inhibition by the antiestrogens raloxifene, ICI 164,384, and EM-800 (50).

However, as studies continue, distinct differences at the molecular level and in the transactivational capacities between ER{alpha} and ERß have been described. Two separate studies have demonstrated the specificity of the agonist activity of 4-hydroxytamoxifen to be unique to ER{alpha}, although this appears to be highly dependent on the cell and promoter context as well as experimental design (50, 90). Furthermore, Paech et al. (91) reported that when interacting with DNA-bound AP-1 transcription factors, the in vitro transactivational activity of estrogen agonists and antagonists was quite different depending on which form of ER was present. Whereas antagonists, such as raloxifene, tamoxifen, and ICI 164,384, were able to block the stimulatory activity of the ER{alpha}/AP-1 complex, these same compounds acted as potent agonists when bound to an ERß/AP-1 complex (91). Further experimental support for the existence of distinct structural and functional differences between ER{alpha} and ERß was recently provided by Sun et al., who showed that certain nonsteroidal ligands were receptor selective in their binding and agonist/antagonist activities (92).

Perhaps the most significant disparity lies in the tissue distribution of the two receptors. Studies employing the techniques of RT-PCR and/or ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) have indicated that ER{alpha} mRNA is predominant in the uterus, mammary gland, testis, pituitary, liver, kidney, heart, and skeletal muscle, whereas ERß transcripts are significantly expressed in the ovary and prostate (Fig. 2Go) (63, 80, 93, 94). These same studies have indicated relatively equal levels of mRNA for the two receptors in the epididymis, thyroid, adrenals, bone, and various regions of the brain (80, 93, 95, 96, 97). However, as more studies are reported, several discrepancies in the expression patterns of ER{alpha} and ERß among different species are becoming apparent (80, 93, 96). For example, whereas ERß mRNA is easily detectable in the pituitary of the rat (70, 98, 99), human (100), and rhesus monkey (96), levels in the pituitary of the mouse appear low to undetectable (93). A similar difference in expression is apparent in the mammary gland, in which normal and neoplastic human tissue and cell lines express detectable ERß mRNA (64, 68, 73, 101, 102), although the mammary gland of the mouse appears to predominantly express ER{alpha} (93). Furthermore, even in those tissues expressing both ERs, there is often a distinct expression pattern within the heterogeneous cell types composing the tissue. In the ovary, ERß is apparently localized to the granulosa cells of maturing follicles, whereas ER{alpha} is detectable in the surrounding thecal cells (69, 103, 104). In the prostate of the rat, expression of ER{alpha} and ERß is detectable in the stroma and epithelium, respectively, but does not appear to be colocalized in any portion of the tissue (49). However, through the combined use of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, Shughrue et al. (88) have demonstrated colocalization of ER{alpha} and ERß to select regions of the rat forebrain.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RT-PCR for ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in various tissues of the wild-type mouse. RT-PCR was carried out on 0.5 µg of total RNA pooled from adult wild-type mice using primers specific for the mouse ER{alpha} and ERß transcripts (see Refs. 93 and 123). Equal amounts of the individual RT-PCR reactions were then fractionated on an agarose gel. Note the broad tissue distribution of ER{alpha} mRNA, whereas ERß transcripts are primarily expressed in the ovary, hypothalamus, lung, and male reproductive tract. RT-PCR for ß-actin was carried out as a positive control. (-RT) indicates a negative control, i.e., PCR on total ovarian RNA minus reverse transcriptase, indicating the specificity of the ER primers for cDNAs generated by the reverse transcriptase enzyme.

 
C. Generation of the ER null mice
The field of estrogen action has been and continues to be a dynamic one with broadening scope. Although estradiol is often called the female sex steroid, the list of tissues and organs in which estrogen actions appear to be critical to physiological function continues to expand, in both sexes. The crucial actions of estradiol in the female reproductive tract, breast, and hypothalamic-pituitary axis have been well described. However, we now know of significant functions fulfilled by estrogens in male reproduction. Furthermore, the effects of estrogens in the physiology, maintenance, and overall health of the cardiovascular, central nervous, bone, immune, skin, and adipogenesis systems have been an area of continued research. And finally, the role that estrogen and normal and variant ERs may play in carcinogenesis, especially in the breast and female reproductive tract, continues to receive great attention.

The rationale for generating mice that possess no functional ER is multifaceted, but in its most simple terms, was founded on the classical ablation experiments of the early part of this century. In 1900, Knauer (105) described the ability of ovarian grafts to prevent uterine atrophy in the castrated guinea pig. Five years later, Marshall and Jolly (106) described the capacity of ovarian extracts to induce estrus when administered to ovariectomized dogs. Similar protocols were later elegantly employed by Jost (107) to substantiate the endocrine function of the testis and the importance of testosterone in sex determination. These studies were critical to establishing the following basic criteria required to verify an endocrine role for a particular organ or tissue: 1) removal or destruction of the synthesizing organ should result in predictable symptoms presumed to be related to the absence of the hormone; 2) administration of material prepared from the removed organ should relieve these symptoms; and 3) the hormone should be present in and extractable from both the organ and blood (108). In the spirit of these earlier studies, the later part of this century has witnessed the marriage of two relatively new methodologies to introduce a modern version of the ablation experiment. The combination of in vitro culture of mouse embryonic stem cells and targeted homologous recombination has generated a tool that allows for the precise disruption or knockout of a particular gene of study and the passage of this mutation to offspring. Although one can debate whether this new technique is more or less invasive than the previous surgical methods, it is obvious that the classic "ablation" experiment has been elevated to a molecular level. The function of a specific hormone can now be studied rather than the function of a whole endocrine organ that may produce multiple secretions. Furthermore, this new technology allows for the study of a particular cellular component, such as a receptor, that is intrinsic to one or more tissues. Such studies were previously impossible or relied on the use of chemical antagonists, which introduced their own inherent limitations. Additionally, gene targeting provides for in vivo methods to study the roles of a particular receptor throughout the life of the animal, including the early development stages. The current tools that allow for the generation of transgenic mice have already made significant contributions to our knowledge of particular genes, especially those involved in development and reproduction (reviewed in Refs. 109, 110).

At the time the ERKO mouse was envisioned, the ER{alpha} was the only form of ER known to exist. Furthermore, there were no reports of ER mutations in normal tissue that resulted in estrogen insensitivity in humans or laboratory animals. This was in contrast to the descriptions of syndromes of receptor-based insensitivity to androgens (37, 38) and thyroid hormones (40). Therefore, investigators were inclined to conclude that mutations that resulted in insufficient estrogen synthesis or resistance to the hormone at the level of the target organ were lethal at the earliest developmental stages (111, 112). This view was strengthened by reports of the detection of ER{alpha} mRNA in both human (113) and mouse (114) oocytes as well as in mouse blastocysts (115). Accordingly, the concept of generating a mouse devoid of ER{alpha} was initially met with skepticism but was pursued as a collaborative effort between our laboratory and that of Dr. Oliver Smithies of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. If disruption of the mouse ER{alpha} gene did prove lethal, a model to study the precise time and locations of critical ER-mediated actions during early development would be available. However, providing the animal was viable, an in vivo model of estrogen insensitivity would now be accessible for continued study. Six years after the initial description of the {alpha}ERKO mouse, we now take for granted that disruption of the ER{alpha} gene proved not to be lethal, but rather the animal develops normally and exhibits a life span comparable to its wild-type litter mates (46). However, as will be elaborated in detail in this review, the adult {alpha}ERKO mice exhibit several abnormalities and deficiencies, most notable of which are the phenotypic syndromes that result in infertility in both sexes. Since this time, additional discoveries have been made to enhance the utility of the {alpha}ERKO model. Soon after the generation of the {alpha}ERKO mouse, Smith et al. (116) reported the first and only known case of clinical estrogen insensitivity due to an inactivating mutation of the ER{alpha} gene in a human patient. Later came multiple descriptions of aromatase and subsequent estradiol deficiency in humans (117, 118, 119, 120). And finally, a second collaborative effort resulted in the successful generation of the ßERKO mice, which also survive to adulthood and exhibit phenotypes unique from those of the {alpha}ERKO (47). However, splicing variants of the disrupted genes that may encode for receptors with decreased functional activity have been detected in small amounts in each of the respective ERKO models (as discussed below) and therefore complicate the interpretation of the nonlethality of the gene targeting. Nonetheless, we now know that a loss of full function of any one of the two ERs is neither lethal nor detrimental to embryonic and fetal development in both mice and humans. Perhaps the survival of the ERKO mice, the aromatase-deficient humans, and the ER{alpha}-deficient male will prompt a renewed effort among clinicians to suspect and investigate the possibility of estrogen insufficiency or resistance in patients not responding to conventional therapies.

The ERKO mice provide broad and multiple advantages to the research efforts toward understanding the function and mechanism of estogen action. Much of what is known about estrogen action was inferred from in vivo studies involving castration or the administration of ER antagonists or inhibitors of estradiol synthesis. These findings have been complemented by the vast knowledge gained from in vitro cell culture studies, employing chimeric and mutant versions of the ER, varied cell types, multiple combinations of promoter-reporter gene constructs, as well as synthetic agonists and antagonists. However, there are distinct disadvantages to these experimental schemes. Studies using aromatase inhibitors and/or estrogen antagonists are complicated by several factors, including variability of the compound to block the action of the natural hormone or enzyme. The effectiveness of various antagonists is highly dependent upon the animal model, the tissue or cell of study, the bioavailability of the compound at different target tissues, and the class of antiestrogen used (8). This dilemma is further complicated by the discovery of the ERß, since no known ER-selective agonists or antagonists have been characterized at an in vivo level. The limitations of in vitro cell culture experimental approaches are obvious and mostly based on their finite application to the whole animal. Therefore, the ERKO models provide a unique tool to investigate the role of the ER in the context of the whole animal, and equally important, during the complete life span of the animal. At their most fundamental level, the ERKO mice address the role of the ER in the development and normal physiology of all organ systems, as well as in carcinogenesis, toxicity, and aging. Furthermore, unlike the "castrate" model in which several hormones are removed from the system, the ERKO mice retain the capability to synthesize the gonadal steroids, including the natural ER ligand, estradiol. Therefore, the biochemical functions of estradiol and the ER can be investigated in the presence of presumably intact pathways for the other gonadal hormones. The presence of estrogens in the absence of ER also provides for the possibility of discovering pathways of estrogen action that are independent of nuclear ER, or mediated via previously unknown forms of the receptor. Additionally, although the majority of in vitro studies indicate that ER{alpha} and ERß may have redundant functions, their differences in tissue distribution and response to certain ligands indicate the presence of distinct roles fulfilled by each. The fact that the {alpha}ERKO mice exhibit an unaltered pattern of ERß mRNA expression strengthens the usefulness of this model to dissect these potential ERß-mediated actions (93, 121). Finally, consistent with those criteria discussed earlier for establishing an endocrine function to an organ, the ERKO animals now provide a null background available for transgenic reintroduction of the ER of other species, mutated ERs, or targeted ER expression to a specific tissue or cell type.

A detailed description of the targeting scheme employed to disrupt the mouse ER{alpha} gene can be found in the initial description of the {alpha}ERKO mice (46). As shown in Fig. 1Go, a 1.8-kb insert possessing the gene for neomycin (neo) resistance under the control of the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter and including a PGK-polyadenylation signal was inserted into a NotI site in exon 2 of an ER{alpha} gene fragment subcloned from a genomic library of 129/J mouse DNA. The targeting insert was placed in a replacement {Omega} type targeting vector (122) with the appropriate ER{alpha} gene-flanking sequences. Upon successful targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells (129/J), the neo insert is placed approximately 270 bp downstream of the ER{alpha} translation start site and thereby inhibits proper expression of the ER{alpha} gene. Since this was the current state of the technology, no portion of the ER{alpha} gene was removed during the targeting event. Standard protocols of clone selection and blastocyst (C57BL/6J) injection were used to generate chimeric mice possessing the disrupted gene, some of which demonstrated germ-line transmission of the mutation when bred with wild-type mates (122). Southern blot and PCR analysis of genomic DNA from mice of all three genotypes indicated the correct targeting of the ER{alpha} gene and the absence of any heterologous recombination in other regions of the genome. Inbreeding of mice heterozygous for the ER{alpha} disruption resulted in a Mendelian distribution of all three genotypes as well as a balanced sex ratio, indicating that the ER{alpha} is not critical to sex determination at the level of the external genitalia (46).

The generation of mice homozygous for a disruption of the ERß gene was similar to that described above for the {alpha}ERKO and can be found in detail in the initial description (47). A genomic clone that spanned a 15-kb region possessing the first three exons of the mouse ERß gene was selected from a 129/SvJ mouse library. A replacement {Omega} type targeting construct was generated to include 5' and 3' homologous sequences of 1.3 and 7.4 kb, respectively (Fig. 1Go). A PGK promoter-regulated neo gene was inserted in the reverse orientation into a PstI site in exon 3 of the ERß clone. Therefore, correct targeting resulted in disruption of the sequences coding for the first zinc finger of the ERß protein, a domain critical to normal function of the receptor. Chimeric and heterozygous offspring were generated as described above for the {alpha}ERKO mice. Once again, mice possessing the targeted disruption of the ERß gene were identified by diagnostic Southern blotting and PCR of genomic DNA. As with the {alpha}ERKO, inbreeding of mice heterozygous for the disruption yielded a Mendelian distribution of all three genotypes as well as a balanced sex ratio (47).

In both knockout models, RT-PCR on RNA from target tissues indicated the presence of multiple splicing variants of the respective ER transcripts (47, 123). In neither case has wild-type-like mRNA transcribed from the disrupted receptor gene been detected. The greater proportion of the variants detected in each ERKO model possessed frame shifts that would result in a severely truncated or mutated ER if translated. However, in the {alpha}ERKO, a single-splice variant capable of encoding a mutant ER{alpha} protein with significantly decreased transactivational capacity in vitro was detected at very low levels (123). A similar ERß splice variant, in which the reading frame was preserved although coding sequences were removed, was detected in ovaries of the ßERKO mice. This single variant, if translated, would encode a mutant ERß lacking the first zinc finger and therefore would be unlikely to transactivate due to an inability to tightly associate with the chromatin structure within the regulatory regions of target genes.

This is not the first report of targeted insertions resulting in aberrant splicing of a disrupted gene. Mice possessing a targeted disruption of the transforming growth factor-{alpha} gene produce a transcript in which the entire exon possessing the disrupting insert is accurately removed via the conventional donor and acceptor splice sites, preserving the normal reading frame of the gene (124). Studies in three different human genes have demonstrated that point mutations resulting in a premature stop codon can lead to complete excision of the exon possessing the mutation (125, 126). Furthermore, Reed and Maniatis (127) used artificial deletions and insertions within exons of genes that normally display alternative splicing to demonstrate that the proximity of the acceptor and donor splicing sequences to one another plays a role in splicing mechanisms. It is possible that insertion of sequences as large as those used in the ERKO mice may disrupt the spatial requirements necessary for proper mRNA splicing. Therefore, the above studies, along with our experiences, are relevant to the practice of targeting genes by insertion of a large disrupting sequence possessing internal stop codons.

1. Interpretation of phenotypes in receptor null mice. The use of methodologies to target and disrupt individual genes has created numerous models available for study (reviewed in Refs. 109, 110, 128). Furthermore, this impact has been felt in several facets of the biological sciences. Although it may be initially thought that a particular gene plays no role in the physiology of certain animal systems, such as reproduction or behavior, disruption of the gene and the subsequent phenotypes often prove otherwise. Therefore, transgenic and knockout technologies have spawned a number of collaborative efforts between investigators of varied disciplines that may have never occurred.

An issue that has become apparent from the numerous gene disruption studies and interdisciplinary collaborative efforts is a collection of caveats to be considered when evaluating phenotypical data from a knockout model. These have arisen mostly from the behavioral sciences (reviewed in Refs. 129, 130), but have expanding application to all areas of study provided by transgenic animals. The first of these caveats is one that may be most relevant to the steroid receptor mutant models, i.e., when studying the target tissue of an adult receptor-knockout mouse, one must realize the tissue passed through all the stages of development and "organization" in the absence of the respective receptor. Therefore, this tissue, and in essence the whole animal, cannot be assumed to be truly identical to the wild type in all aspects except for the absence of the targeted gene product. Any genetic redundancies or compensatory mechanisms that took place during development cannot be readily detected or accounted for during most experiments. Therefore, the lack of a phenotype does not necessarily discount the function of the disrupted gene in the physiology being studied. Additionally, it is difficult to distinguish between an organizational vs. activational basis for an observed deficit in a particular physiology when studying the adult mutant. For example, observed resistance to a hormone due to alterations downstream of the function of the disrupted gene may be apparent during adulthood, but may have been imprinted during development.

Other caveats of interpreting data from receptor null mice are founded in the methods used to generate and maintain a line of knockout mice. The standard protocol for generating a knockout mouse involves the incorporation of embryonic stem cells of a 129 strain of mice that carry the desired mutation into the blastocyst of a C57BL/6 strain. The resulting chimeric animals are then often back-crossed to the C57BL/6 strain once again until mice homozygous for the disruption are acquired. Therefore, early generations of knockout mice are composed of a somewhat chimeric genome, especially in the chromosomal regions closest to the targeted locus. This is of special importance in behavioral studies in light of the known variations in the sexual behavior of different strains of mice (131). However, most relevant to the ERKO, significant variations in estrogen responsiveness of the female reproductive tract among the different strains of mice are also known to exist (132, 133). A recent report by Roper et al. (134) has further defined the genetic basis for the variations that exist in the effects of estradiol on classical uterine parameters in mice. These limitations can be overcome to some degree by increasing experimental sample sizes and including parental strains as a control group in all experiments (135). In addition, the various models of hormone and steroid receptor deficiency that are now available no longer make necessary the complete interpretation of data from any one model. Therefore the data from these models, when interpreted as a whole, should prove invaluable to elucidating the roles of the different sex steroid receptors in both development and adult physiology.


    III. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes of the Female
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
The most well characterized estrogen target tissues are those of the mammalian female reproductive tract, comprised of the ovaries, oviducts, uterus, cervix, and vagina. Reproductive capabilities in the female are dependent on the sequential processes of differentiation during the embryonic and prenatal periods and the maturation of these tissues during puberty. Differentiation of the fetal gonads to ovaries results from a lack of the Y chromosome, and therefore the testis-determining genes, and the presence of putative, yet unidentified, autosomal ovary-determining genes (111). The ductal organs of the tract subsequently result from differentiation of the fetal ambisexual precursor, the Müllerian ducts, due to the lack of testicular hormones. Early studies indicated that the female reproductive tract is the default phenotypical sex and will differentiate and develop normally in the absence of ovaries and adrenal glands (107, 136). Therefore, it appears that estrogens are not required for differentiation and initial development of the female reproductive tract, whereas testosterone is critical to differentiation of the male genitalia. This conclusion has been reconfirmed by the male-to-female sex reversal observed in male mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the gene encoding SF-1, a transcription factor that regulates the steroid hydroxylases in steroidogenic cells (137, 138). Despite an inability to synthesize steroids and a complete lack of gonads, all SF-1 knockout mice develop female internal genitalia, regardless of genetic sex (137). It is therefore not surprising that the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO female mice exhibit a properly differentiated female reproductive tract possessing the constituent structures (46, 47). However, estrogen insensitivity has severely disrupted sexual maturation of the whole reproductive tract in the {alpha}ERKO female and ovarian function in the ßERKO female. The consequences of ER gene disruption on the individual components of the female reproductive tract is the topic of this portion of the review.

Before we continue, we believe it is necessary to briefly reiterate those studies carried out to verify successful targeting of the ER{alpha} gene in the {alpha}ERKO. This discussion is appropriate for this portion of the review because the majority of these experiments were performed on uterine tissue. To determine the effectiveness of the gene targeting, Western blots of adult {alpha}ERKO uterine nuclear and cytosolic extracts were probed with the H222 antibodies, a rat monoclonal antibody specific to the ligand-binding domain of the human ER{alpha} (10). Our studies, as well as those of others, have demonstrated that this antibody possesses high cross-reactivity to the mouse ER{alpha} (139, 140, 141). These assays detected no wild-type ER{alpha} or any other immunoreactive fragments unique to the {alpha}ERKO uterus. Similar results were obtained when blots were probed with the rabbit antiserum ER-21, directed toward the 21 amino-terminal residues of the rat ER{alpha} (141). However, binding assays using 3H-E2 on {alpha}ERKO uterine extracts indicated the presence of high-affinity binding of the hormone at levels approximately 3–9% of the wild type (123). In agreement with these data, sucrose gradient analysis with 3H-E2 on low-salt cytosol extracts from {alpha}ERKO uteri indicated a binding factor with an 8S sedimentation value, similar to that of the wild-type ER{alpha} (123). The discovery of the ERß, reported approximately 3 yr after the generation of the {alpha}ERKO, prompted a renewed assessment of this {alpha}ERKO estrogen-binding data in several publications. Unfortunately, in a number of these reports, the original datum discussed above is not evaluated in full, and the authors elude to ERß as the likely binding source in the {alpha}ERKO uteri. Certainly at the time of the initial characterization, concern over the residual level of binding in the {alpha}ERKO uteri was often mixed with the wonder of possibly discovering an unknown ER. However, during these studies we also demonstrated that when the H222 antibodies were included in the sucrose gradient assays, the estradiol binding peak in the {alpha}ERKO uterine extract was shifted accordingly (123). The H222 antibodies have been shown by us, as well as by other laboratories, to be ER{alpha} specific and unable to recognize ERß by Western blot analysis or immunohistochemistry (142). As described earlier in this review, our RT-PCR analysis on mRNA from {alpha}ERKO uteri demonstrated the presence of a splicing variant of the disrupted ER{alpha} gene that could encode a mutant ER{alpha} possessing both the ability to bind estradiol as well the H222 epitope (123). Furthermore, we have recently shown that ERß mRNA is undetectable in the uteri of adult wild-type as well as {alpha}ERKO mice when assayed by ribonuclease protection assay (93). Therefore, we believe that relatively conclusive data have been generated to indicate that the estradiol-binding factor present in {alpha}ERKO uteri is most likely not ERß.

A. Uterus
1. Uterine phenotype and estrogen insensitivity. The ER has been detected by steroid autoradiography and immunohistochemical methods in the ductal structures of the rodent female reproductive tract during several stages of development, including the late fetal and neonatal stages through puberty and adulthood (reviewed in Refs. 112, 143). Several reports describe the initial appearance of ER immunoreactivity in the developing uterus as early as fetal day 15 (112, 143). ER immunoreactivity was first detectable in mesenchymal cells, whereas induction in the epithelial cells occurs during the late fetal stages and increases significantly during the neonatal period (112, 143). The fully developed uterus is composed of many heterogeneous cell types comprising three major anatomical compartments, the outer myometrium, endometrial stroma, and luminal/glandular epithelium. In the immature CD-1 mouse, ER{alpha} immunoreactivity is easily detectable in the stroma on day 1 and continues to rise to a maximal level on day 10, whereas the appearance of epithelial ER{alpha} is delayed and reaches a peak around day 16 (144). Other reports indicate variations in the exact timing of the appearance of ER{alpha} among different strains and species, most likely reflecting temporal deviations in development (112, 143).

The presence of an intact estrogen-signaling system appears to coincide with the appearance of ER{alpha}. In several species, estrogen treatment of fetal and neonatal females results in the stimulation of increased uterine levels of nucleic acid (136, 145), protein synthesis (146), ornithine decarboxylase (147), progesterone receptor (148), and cellular proliferation (145, 149, 150). However, a full biological response to estradiol in terms of maximum increases in uterine weight is not possible in the neonatal uterus, and can be observed only after the animal approaches weaning age (146). Furthermore, significant differences in the uterine response to estradiol between the neonate and sexually mature rodent are known (151). For example, estrogen stimulates cellular proliferation in all tissues of the immature uterus, whereas this response becomes limited to the epithelial compartment during adulthood (151, 152). Therefore, sexual maturation of the uterus is not simply marked by the presence of ER{alpha}, but rather the acquisition of the capacity to undergo the correct synchronized phases of proliferation and differentiation elicited by the ovary-derived sex steroids.

As shown in Fig. 3Go, the uteri of both adult {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO females possess all three definitive uterine compartments, the myometrium, endometrial stroma, and epithelium. However, in the {alpha}ERKO, each is hypoplastic and results in whole uterine weights that are approximately half that recorded for wild-type littermates (46). In contrast, the uteri of adult ßERKO females appear normal and able to undergo the cyclic changes associated with the ovarian steroid hormones (47). Therefore, perinatal development of the female reproductive tract in the mouse appears to be independent of ER{alpha} and ERß actions. However, estrogen responsiveness and subsequent sexual maturity in the uterus has been ablated by disruption of the ER{alpha} gene. The {alpha}ERKO endometrial stoma is characterized by a less organized structure and hypotrophy, with a sparse distribution of uterine glands compared with that of the wild type (153). Luminal and glandular epithelial cells in the {alpha}ERKO uterus most often appear healthy, but are consistently cuboidal and lack the normal "estrogenized" morphology of a tall columnar shape and basally located nucleus (Fig. 3Go). This phenotype is interesting in light of the increased levels of estradiol found in the serum of adult {alpha}ERKO females (Table 2Go). However, Lindzey et al. (154) demonstrated that the concurrently elevated ovary-derived androgens in the {alpha}ERKO female (Table 2Go) do provide for some maintenance of uterine weight, which can be further reduced upon ovariectomy. We recently reported that ERß mRNA is barely detectable in the adult mouse uterus, including those from {alpha}ERKO mice (93), making it unlikely that ERß could provide a compensatory role in the {alpha}ERKO uterus. Numerous immunohistochemical studies for ER{alpha} and the apparent loss of estrogen sensitivity in the {alpha}ERKO uterus indicate that the classical ER{alpha} is the predominant form responsible for mediating estrogen actions in the mouse uterus.



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Histology of uterine and vaginal tissue of wild-type, {alpha}ERKO, and ßERKO females. Cross-sections of uterine tissue from (a) wild-type, (b) {alpha}ERKO, and (c) ßERKO adult females illustrating the presence of all three anatomical tissue compartments in the uteri of the wild-type and ERKO mice (33x; inset, 132x). The representative wild-type uterine section illustrates a normal myometrium (My), endometrial stroma (St), and epithelium (Ep) (inset). The representative {alpha}ERKO uterine section illustrates the characteristic hypoplasia of each compartment, a slightly disorganized endometrial stroma, and a lack of estrogenization of the luminal and glandular epithelium (inset). Note the dramatically smaller diameter of the {alpha}ERKO uterus, as indicated by the ability to fit the whole transverse section of the tissue in the field of view. The representative ßERKO uterine section is indistinguishable from that of the wild-type, including the presence of estrogen-stimulated luminal epithelium (inset). Below are cross-sections of vaginal tissue from representative (d) wild-type, (e) {alpha}ERKO, and (f) ßERKO female mice (66x). The representative wild-type vaginal section illustrates a normal stroma (St) and hypertrophied epithelium (Ep) showing estrogen-induced stratification and cornification. In contrast, these estrogen actions are lacking in the {alpha}ERKO vagina. Once again, the tissue of the ßERKO is indistinguishable from the wild-type control. Scale bar = 1 µm.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Serum hormone levels in adult wild-type and {alpha}ERKO mice

 
The response of the ovariectomized rodent uterus to estradiol has been well documented and is often described as biphasic, with the initial phase consisting of effects that become apparent within the first 6 h of a single estrogen treatment (reviewed in Ref. 155). These include metabolic responses in the form of increased water imbibition, vascular permeability and hyperemia, prostaglandin release, glucose metabolism, and eosinophil infiltration (155). A series of biosynthetic responses are also characteristic of the first phase and include increased RNA polymerase and chromatin activity, lipid and protein synthesis, and increased glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (155). As several of the above processes continue, they are accompanied by dramatic increases in RNA and DNA synthesis, mitosis, and cellular hyperplasia and hypertrophy that peak 24–72 h after exposure (155). Initial studies suggested that this biphasic pattern may be the result of at least two types of acceptor sites for estradiol-receptor complexes in the uterus (156). However, the uteri of {alpha}ERKO females fail to exhibit components of both phases after estrogen treatment, providing strong evidence for the requirement of ER{alpha} in the full response (46, 123). In brief, when treated with 40 µg E2 or diethylstilbestrol (DES) per kg body weight for three consecutive days, wild-type mice exhibited the expected 3- to 4-fold increase in uterine wet weight, whereas no such response was observed in the uteri of {alpha}ERKO mice (46, 157). It should be noted that this pharmacological dose of estrogen is well beyond that required to achieve a maximum response in the wild-type rodent. Nonetheless, estrogen-treated {alpha}ERKO uteri exhibited no apparent components of the initial phase of estrogen effects, including water imbibition and hyperemia. Histological analysis and [3H]thymidine incorporation assays indicated a lack of significant cellular proliferation and DNA synthesis in uteri from the estrogen-treated {alpha}ERKO mice (123, 153). Interestingly, although the heterozygous females possess approximately one-half the normal complement of ER{alpha}, their uterine response to estrogens is equal to that of the wild-type females. In a similar study, wild-type and {alpha}ERKO mice treated with hydroxy-tamoxifen (1 mg/kg) produced comparable results (157), eliciting the expected estrogenic response in the wild-type and having no effect on the {alpha}ERKO uterus. These studies thereby confirm that the estrogen agonist activity of hydroxy-tamoxifen, which is somewhat unique to the mouse uterus (8), is mediated via the ER{alpha} pathway.

The mitogenic and stimulatory action of estradiol in the uterus is a complex process involving increased RNA polymerase and ribosomal activity (158), resulting in the regulation of a plethora of genes. It is well accepted that the ligand-bound ER complex is not directly involved in the mediation of all responses elicited by estrogens in the uterus, but rather serves as a stimulus for a cascade of signaling pathways that act to amplify the estrogen action. However, certain genes appear to be directly regulated by the ER{alpha}-estradiol complex and possess functional estrogen-responsive elements within their regulatory regions. Two such examples are the genes encoding the progesterone receptor (PR) (159, 160) and the secretory protein, lactoferrin (161). In fact, the regulation of the uterine PR and lactoferrin genes have often been used as assays for the estrogenic activity of experimental compounds. Therefore, with a similar intent, we used these estrogen markers to attest for estrogen insensitivity in the uteri of the {alpha}ERKO mouse. A single dose of estradiol, known to be effective in inducing the PR and lactoferrin genes within 24 h in uteri of wild-type mice, produced no such up-regulation in the uteri of the {alpha}ERKO mice, confirming the need for a direct action of the ER{alpha} in this mechanism (123). Interestingly, a recent report by Tibbetts et al. (162) demonstrated that the estrogen-stimulated increases in PR are localized to the stromal and myometrial compartments, whereas the increases in lactoferrin are isolated to the luminal and glandular epithelium in the mouse uterus. Therefore, disruption of the ER{alpha} gene has resulted in estrogen insensitivity in all three anatomical compartments of the uterus. However, it must be noted that constitutive levels of PR and lactoferrin mRNA are present in the {alpha}ERKO uteri, suggesting that these genes are also under the influence of pathways independent of ER{alpha}. A testimony to the complexity of estrogen action in the uterus is the finding that while estradiol up-regulates PR expression in the myometrium and stroma, it simultaneously abolishes PR levels in the luminal epithelium (162). This would indicate an inhibitory role of the estradiol-ER{alpha} complex on PR expression in this portion of the uterus. Speculating that this pathway may therefore be lacking in the {alpha}ERKO uterus, an investigation as to the source of the PR mRNA in the {alpha}ERKO uteri is warranted.

2. Changes in growth factor functions. A component of the cascade of events that lead to the obvious changes in the physiology of the adult uterus after estrogen exposure are the auto- and paracrine actions of polypeptide growth factors. Several members of the epidermal growth factor family have been suggested as possible mediators of estrogen-induced mitogenesis in the uterus. This hypothesis is based on experiments demonstrating that estradiol up-regulates the uterine levels of epidermal growth factor and its receptor (EGF, EGF-R) (163, 164), transforming growth factor-{alpha} (165), and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1) (166). Furthermore, mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the EGF-R gene exhibit a hypoplastic uterus that is significantly reduced in size (167), similar to that of the {alpha}ERKO. Experimental data indicate that treatment of ovariectomized wild-type mice with EGF mimics the early effects of estradiol and DES in terms of inducing modified cell morphology and increases in the levels of ER, DNA synthesis, phosphatidylinositol turnover, PR, and lactoferrin in the uterus (168, 169, 170). Further studies have illustrated that cotreatment with anti-EGF antibodies was able to attenuate the uterine response to estradiol, presumably due to inactivation of the EGF-signaling pathway (168). In turn, cotreatment with the estrogen antagonist ICI-164,384 was able to reduce the uterine response to EGF (169). These in vivo studies suggest a cross-talk mechanism between the EGF and ligand-independent ER- signaling pathways. The results of the animal studies have been supported by numerous in vitro experiments demonstrating ligand-independent activation of the nuclear signaling pathway of the ER{alpha}, possibly via altering the phosphorylation pattern of the ER{alpha} (reviewed in Ref. 55). The culmination of these and several other studies has led to the proposed model in which the mitogenic actions of estradiol in the rodent uterus appear to be at least partially mediated by EGF; however, in turn the mitogenic effects of EGF require the presence of ER{alpha}.

Therefore, the {alpha}ERKO female provides an excellent in vivo model to study this cross-talk between the ER{alpha}- and EGF-signaling systems in the uterus. The uteri of {alpha}ERKO females possess wild-type levels of functional EGF and EGF-R (170). Nonetheless, the mitogenic actions and induction of estrogen-responsive genes elicited by EGF in the wild-type uterus have been ablated in the {alpha}ERKO, confirming the interaction of these two signaling systems (170). However, not all EGF responses are lacking in the uteri of {alpha}ERKO females, as this same study demonstrated that the mechanisms for EGF-mediated up-regulation of the c-fos gene remained intact (170). These studies have thereby confirmed the need for functional ER{alpha} for the mitogenic actions of EGF in the uterus.

Cunha et al. has extended the use of the {alpha}ERKO mouse to investigate the intersecting roles of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen stimulation and growth factors in the uterus through a series of tissue recombination experiments. The observation of estrogenic effects in wild-type uterine epithelial cells that are apparently lacking ER{alpha} has prompted numerous investigations to illustrate a role for paracrine factors secreted by the underlying ER{alpha}-positive stromal compartment, and thereby mediating the epithelial response (143). These studies have been advanced by methods that provide for the delicate construction of tissue recombinants, in which uterine stoma and epithelium are enzymatically disassociated and recombined with similar tissue from uteri from animals of different treatments or models to ultimately regenerate a chimeric stromal-epithelial unit (reviewed in Ref. 143). These tissue recombinants are implanted under the kidney capsule of ovariectomized nude mice, which are then acutely treated with estrogen agonists or antagonists. Later removal of the recombinant grafts allows for the evaluation of certain end points of estrogen action in each portion of the recombinant. Cooke et al. (171) described experiments in which wild-type (ER{alpha}+) uterine stroma were recombined with {alpha}ERKO (ER{alpha}-) uterine epithelium and vice versa. The results of these studies illustrate that proliferation of the epithelial portion of the recombinant was possible only when ER{alpha}+ stroma were present and did not require ER{alpha} in the epithelium (171). Interestingly, similar recombinant experiments using tissue from the EGF-R knockout mice illustrated that the estrogen-signaling pathways required for stimulation of the stroma and subsequent induction of epithelial growth are intact in the absence of EGF-R (167). Aside from the proliferative effects of estradiol, previous studies suggested that estrogen stimulation of secretory products from uterine epithelium, e.g., lactoferrin, is directly mediated by the epithelial ER{alpha} (140, 162). However, Buchanan et al. (172) recently employed tissue recombinants similar to those described to demonstrate that both stomal and epithelial ER{alpha} are required for estrogen induction of the uterine epithelial secretory products, lactoferrin and complement component C3. Therefore, estrogen-induced proliferation of the uterine epithelium requires the presence of ER{alpha} in the stromal compartment only, whereas induction of certain epithelial secretory products is dependent on the presence of ER{alpha} in both uterine compartments.

3. Maintenance of selective estrogen actions in the {alpha}ERKO uterus. A distinct advantage of null receptor models, whether naturally existing or experimentally generated via molecular methodologies, is their use as an in vivo tool for discerning alternate pathways of hormone action. Recent studies by the Lubahn laboratory have indicated the preservation of a distinct estrogen-signaling pathway in the {alpha}ERKO uterus (173, 174). Das et al. (173) reported that two consecutive treatments (over a period of 12 h) with the catecholestrogen, 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OH-E2) at 10 µg/kg body weight resulted in significant increases in water imbibition in the uteri of ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO mice. Induction of lactoferrin mRNA in the uterine epithelium of wild-type mice was 97- and 85-fold after treatment with 10 µg/kg body weight estradiol or 4-OH-E2, respectively (173). In contrast, only the 4-OH-E2 was active in the {alpha}ERKO uterus, resulting in a 60-fold increase in lactoferrin mRNA levels compared with a 1.4-fold induction by estradiol (173). A similar, yet more modest, response was reported in the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO uteri after treatment with the xenoestrogens, kepone (15 mg/kg body weight) (173) and methoxychlor (15 mg/kg body weight) (174).

Most interesting was the lack of inhibition of this response by the pure estrogen antagonist, ICI-182,780, in both the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO mice, indicating the possibility of a non-ER{alpha}-mediated signaling pathway for certain compounds exhibiting estrogenic activity. Additionally, the nature of the timing and type of lactoferrin response elicited by the 4-OH-E2 and xenoestrogens in the {alpha}ERKO is quite distinct from that of the original descriptions by Teng et al. (175) concerning estrogen regulation of this gene in the mouse uterus. Given the knowledge of the low-to-absent expression of ERß in the uterus and the ability of the ICI compounds to antagonize ERß signaling in vitro, it is not likely that this receptor is involved in this phenomenon. The catecholestrogens are naturally synthesized and proposed to play a role in steroid regulation of the hypothalamus and pituitary (176, 177), ovarian function (178), and embryo implantation (179). Furthermore, the discovery of local synthesis of these estrogens in mammary tissue has led to implications of their involvement in breast cancer (180). Therefore, further investigation into the alternate mechanisms by which these compounds may activate nuclear processes is needed.

4. Maintenance of progesterone action in the {alpha}ERKO uterus. Like estradiol, ovarian derived progesterone, is an integral steroid hormone in the physiology and function of the uterus. The PR has been localized to cells composing all three anatomical compartments of the uterus and exhibits varied levels in each during the stages of the estrous cycle (reviewed in Ref. 181). The PR also exists in two forms, PRA and PRB, which differ only in the length of the N' terminus. In contrast to the ER, PRA and PRB are encoded by a single gene but transcribed from two distinct promoters in both the rat (160) and human (159).

As previously discussed, the PR gene is strongly regulated by the estradiol-ER{alpha} complex. This is evidenced by in vitro and in vivo studies showing inhibition of estrogen stimulation of the PR gene with antiestrogens as well as the presence of a single imperfect estrogen-response element in the proximal region of the PR gene promoter (160). However, in vitro assays indicate that both the proximal as well as a distal promoter appear to be at least partially ER{alpha} dependent and may also involve ligand-independent pathways of ER{alpha} action for full expression (160, 182). The lack of estradiol-induced increases in PR mRNA levels in the {alpha}ERKO uterus confirms a regulatory dependence of the PR gene on ER{alpha} action (123). Therefore, it was hypothesized that disruption of the ER{alpha} gene may subsequently result in abnormally low levels of PR in the {alpha}ERKO uterus, and thereby render this tissue refractory to progesterone as well. However, Northern blot and ribonuclease protection assays have indicated basal levels of PR mRNA in the {alpha}ERKO uterus that are equal to those in wild-type, although estrogen-stimulated increases in these levels are absent (123). Binding assays with a radiolabeled progestin indicate levels of PR protein in the {alpha}ERKO uteri are present but reduced to approximately 60% of that in wild type (183). A notable finding was the greater proportion of PR found to be tightly associated with the nuclei of cells from the {alpha}ERKO uteri ({approx}25%), compared with the wild type ({approx}5%) (183). It is possible that a lack of ER{alpha} has resulted in a more plentiful pool of available coregulator proteins, allowing the PR present in the {alpha}ERKO uterus to maintain a more "active" state. Western blots indicate no difference in the relative levels of PRA and PRB between the two genotypes, with PRA consistently present in greater amounts in both (183). Therefore, a loss of ER{alpha} action in the uterus has led neither to a complete loss of PR nor to altered and preferential transcription from one of the two PR gene promoters.

Curtis et al. (183) carried out a series of studies demonstrating the preservation of PR-mediated progesterone actions in the {alpha}ERKO uteri. Stimulation of the genes encoding amphiregulin (184) and calcitonin (185) in the rodent uterus has been shown to be an early and late response to progesterone, respectively. A treatment regimen of progesterone shown to be effective in inducing these two genes in the ovariectomized wild-type uterus was equally effective in the uteri of ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO females (183). Furthermore, the documented ability of estradiol to inhibit the progesterone induction of the amphiregulin gene was absent in the {alpha}ERKO (183). These studies indicate that a sufficient level of PR and an active progesterone signaling pathway are present in the uteri of {alpha}ERKO mice.

A well known physiological role for progesterone is the preparation of the uterine endometrium for the forthcoming pregnancy. Implantation of the embryo is a complex process that requires a high degree of synchronicity between the blastocyst and the hormone-induced changes of the uterine endometrium (reviewed in Ref. 186). In general, ovarian synthesis of estradiol, which peaks at ovulation, serves to "prime" the uterus by eliciting increased differentiation and proliferation of the luminal and glandular epithelium, and the induction of significant increases in PR in the endometrial stroma and myometrium (162, 186). Subsequent increases in progesterone released from the ovarian corpora lutea then cause decidualization, a complex process involving massive proliferation and differentiation of the endometrial stroma along with localized increases in vascular permeability and edema (186). This process involves the synthesis of specific hormones, such as PRL, cytokines, prostaglandins, extracellular matrix components, and various enzymes within the uterine tissues (186). The result is a remarkable swelling of the uterine stroma thought to be necessary for implantation by forcing the uterus to close down on the blastocyst (186). The final stage of apposition in the mouse is the grasping of the blastocyst and ultimate attachment to the uterine wall, a process thought to be dependent on the secondary rises in ovarian derived estradiol (186). Therefore, preparation of the uterus for blastocyst implantation is dependent on the multifunctional and sometimes opposing effects of estradiol and progesterone.

A laboratory model for the decidualization process has been generated for several species and generally involves exogenous steroidal treatments designed to mimic those of the ovarian cycle, coupled with a mechanical stimulus or trauma of the uterine lining to simulate implantation (186, 187). In brief, ovariectomized mice are treated with estradiol (100 ng) for 3 consecutive days, followed by 2 days of no treatment. The animals are then administered progesterone (1 mg) and a reduced dose of estradiol (7 ng) for 8 consecutive days, with mechanical stimulation of the uterus taking place on the third day. Using this treatment scheme and the progesterone receptor-knockout (PRKO) model, Lydon et al. (44) demonstrated the absolute dependence of the decidualization process on progesterone action and the PR by reporting the complete lack of decidualization in the PRKO mice. However, Curtis et al. (183) demonstrated that a progesterone-induced decidual response is possible in the {alpha}ERKO uterus, despite its inability to respond to the estradiol priming meant to mimic estrus. Most interesting were investigations indicating that although the uterine decidualization in the wild type was dependent on estradiol, as evidenced by its inhibition with ICI-182,780, progesterone alone was sufficient to induce decidualization in the {alpha}ERKO uterus (183).

The reasons for the apparent loss of estrogen dependence for successful decidualization in the {alpha}ERKO uterus can only be speculated upon at this time. One role of estrogen in uterine decidualization is thought to be the induction of significant increases in PR in the endometrial stroma (186). This is supported by recent immunohistochemical studies by Tibbetts et al. (162) demonstrating strong up-regulation of stromal PR and simultaneous down-regulation of epithelial PR in the mouse uterus after 4 days of estradiol treatment. In light of the puzzling results indicating the PR in the {alpha}ERKO uterus is strongly associated with the nucleus, and therefore possibly in a more "active" state, the ER{alpha}-independent decidualization observed in the {alpha}ERKO uterus may be due to an enhanced ability to respond to progesterone. However, a release of suprabasal levels of estradiol during the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle is synchronized with the time of implantation and thought to be critical to enhancing and maximizing the uterine decidualization process (186). Nonetheless, the deciduomas induced in the {alpha}ERKO females are neither reduced in size nor appear less complex or differentiated than those observed in the wild type (183). It is also possible that a lack of ER{alpha} during development as well as adulthood has resulted in a uterus with a heightened tendency toward decidualization, caused by to the altered expression of other gene products. The complexity of the decidual process is illustrated by the several models that lack the ability to exhibit uterine decidualization, such as mice lacking leukemia-inhibitory factor (188), prostaglandin synthase-2 (189), and Hoxa-10 (190). Furthermore, a process thought to be critical to implantation is the acquired ability of portions of the uterine epithelium to self-destruct and become detached from the uterine wall, possibly clearing a route by which the underlying swelling endometrium can breach and provide a site for implantation (186, 191). Histological analysis of {alpha}ERKO uteri indicates a uterine epithelium that may be less healthy and more often exhibits sloughing compared with wild-type uteri. It is therefore possible that the inherently impaired luminal epithelium of the {alpha}ERKO female has resulted in a lowering of the threshold required to induce decidualization.

B. Vagina
The fully developed adult vagina serves as both a copulatory receptacle and a birth canal in the female and may be divided into two distinct sections, the upper vagina and lower vagina. The cranial end of the upper vagina is attached to the cervix and is derived from the Müllerian ducts during differentiation of the female tract (143). The lower vagina, which connects the tract to the vulva and external genitalia, is differentiated from the urogenital sinus (143). As shown in Fig. 3Go, the wild-type vagina is a highly sensitive estrogen target tissue, composed of an inner mucosal layer of stroma and overlying epithelia, a middle layer of muscularis, and an outer sheath of connective tissue. Detectable levels of ER{alpha} are present in both the stromal and epithelial compartments making up the mucosa of the duct (7). Estradiol exposure during the ovarian cycle induces a series of effects in the vaginal mucosa that are often used to estimate serum gonadal hormone levels and approximate the current stage in the estrous cycle (107). These changes in the mucosa include cytodifferentiation of the stromal cells and a rapid proliferation and differentiation of the epithelial cells, resulting in a stratified and cornified epithelial layer closest to the lumen (192). This process also involves the estrogen stimulation of a series of keratins (193, 194). As shown in Fig. 3Go, despite the chronically elevated levels of estradiol in the serum of {alpha}ERKO females, histological analysis consistently indicates a complete lack of vaginal estrogenization. A similar effect on the vaginal mucosa has been produced in mice (195, 196) and rats (197) after prolonged ovariectomy or treatments with the antiestrogens, ZM-189,154, EM-800, and tamoxifen. Administration of exogenous estradiol, DES, or hydroxytamoxifen to {alpha}ERKO mice results in no discernible vaginal response (153). In contrast, the vaginal mucosa of the ßERKO female appears to undergo the normal cyclic changes associated with ovarian steroidogenesis (Fig. 3Go) (47), strongly indicating that this is an ER{alpha}-mediated process.

Buchanan et al. (198) have used the stromal-epithelial tissue recombinant scheme described above for uterine tissue to dissect the contributions of the different tissue compartments in the estradiol response of vaginal tissue as well. As in the uterus, these studies demonstrated that stromal ER{alpha}, but not epithelial ER{alpha}, are required for estradiol-induced epithelial proliferation in the mouse vagina (198). Similar to the observations in the uterine recombinants, both vaginal stromal and epithelial ER{alpha} were required for estradiol-induced stratification and cornification of the epithelium, including the induction of the gene for the secretory protein cytokeratin 10 (198). All recombinations involving tissue from the {alpha}ERKO vagina became atrophied, even in the presence of estradiol (198).

C. Oviduct
The mouse oviduct is a coiled tubular organ connecting the uterus to the ovarian bursa and derived from the Müllerian duct during fetal development of the female reproductive tract (143). It functions as a route for passage of sperm to the ovulated oocyte and the subsequently fertilized blastocyst to the uterus. In the CD-1 mouse, ER{alpha} immunoreactivity is easily detectable in both the stroma and the epithelium of the oviduct as early as day 2 of life (144). The levels of ER{alpha} immunoreactivity in the epithelium continue to rise and plateau at approximately day 15 and remain high throughout adulthood (144). Furthermore, Newbold et al. (199, 200) described the high degree of sensitivity of the fetal and neonatal oviduct to the detrimental effects of developmental DES exposure. During adulthood, the levels of ER{alpha} in the oviductal epithelium fluctuate during the ovarian cycle, reaching peak levels during the proliferative phase (201). The ovarian sex hormones found in high concentrations in the oviductal fluid are thought to play a role in ovum and zygote transport through the oviduct (201). However, studies using ovariectomized laboratory animals have produced conflicting results in terms of what this role may be, depending on the animal model and hormone dosing regimen used (202). Despite the apparent ontogeny of ER{alpha} in the developing and adult mouse oviduct, no gross phenotypes in the oviduct of {alpha}ERKO females have been observed. Similar to the uterus, the epithelium of the {alpha}ERKO oviduct usually appears healthy yet unstimulated, despite the chronically high levels of serum estradiol. Due to the inability of the {alpha}ERKO to ovulate, possible defects in the transport functions of the oviduct are not easily studied. Assays for ERß mRNA in the mouse oviduct detect little if any ERß transcripts. Accordingly, in ßERKO females there appears to be no obvious defects in the structure and function of the oviduct that impede fertility.

D. Ovary
In most mammals, differentiation of the bipotential fetal gonad to an ovary in the genotypic female occurs later in gestation than differentiation of the testis in the male (111). The factors involved in development and differentiation of the ovary are not well understood, although the process does not appear to be dependent on the presence of primordial germ cells (111). The appearance of follicles and the onset of estrogen synthesis in the fetal gonad may be the first indication of differentiation to an ovary, although the secreted estrogens do not appear to be critical to development of the ductal structures of the female reproductive tract. Still, fetal ovarian estradiol may play a role in development of the ovary itself, as evidenced by the complete lack of ovaries in SF-1 knockout mice (137, 138). Furthermore, a recent study has demonstrated immunohistochemical detection of ER{alpha} and ERß in the neonatal rat ovary (103). Interestingly, a lack of ER{alpha} or ERß during development appears to have no gross effect on ovarian differentiation, since individual knockouts of both respective receptors possess normal ovaries at birth and during prenatal development (47, 142). A study of ovarian development in a double-knockout lacking both forms of ER will therefore prove interesting in the future. Still, distinct ovarian phenotypes become apparent in the adult {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO females, resulting in infertility and subfertility in each, respectively (46, 47).

1. Review of the physiology and function of the ovary. A brief description of ovarian morphology is necessary for a discussion of phenotypes that result from a lack of ER. The ovary may be conveniently divided into three broad functional units: the follicles, corpora lutea, and interstitial/stromal compartment (203, 204). All three possess the capacity to synthesize hormonal factors, especially steroids, in response to gonadotropins secreted from the anterior pituitary. The maturing follicle is a relatively ellipsoidal unit that can be further divided into three main cell types: the outermost thecal cells, which surround a single or multiple layers of granulosa cells, and together act to encase the germ cell (oocyte) at the approximate core. The overall size of the follicle and the number of cells composing the thecal and granulosa cell compartments are dependent on the stage of maturation (204). The corpora lutea are clearly defined and vascularized structures formed from the terminally differentiated thecal and granulosa cells that remain after ovulation (203). And finally, the interstitial and stromal tissue is composed of undifferentiated cells that may eventually be recruited for the thecal or granulosa units as well as dedifferentiated thecal and granulosa cells from past atretic follicles or regressed corpora lutea. This compartment also functions as the matrix within which the follicles are suspended (203).

Ovarian function is often divided into two separate phases. The follicular phase refers to the period of follicle maturation and increased estradiol synthesis that leads up to and terminates with ovulation of the ovum. Ovulation marks the beginning of the luteal stage in which the developing corpora lutea secrete large amounts of progesterone as well as estradiol to allow for successful implantation of the blastocysts in the uterus. During the follicular stage of the ovarian cycle, the follicles may be categorized based on size, responsiveness to gonadotropins, and steroidogenic capabilities. These stages are most commonly referred to as the primordial, primary, secondary, tertiary or antral, atretic, and mature Graafian follicle (204). The primordial, or nongrowing follicles, are the most prevalent stage in the ovary at any one time and provide the pool from which follicles will be selected for maturation. These follicles consist of an oocyte arrested at the diplotene stage of the first meiotic division, surrounded by a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells (204). Commencement of the follicular phase of the ovarian cycle involves the recruitment of primordial follicles to form the assembly of primary growing follicles to be prepared for ultimate ovulation. The factors required for this recruitment are not well understood. Henceforth, each stage is characterized by dramatic changes in the structure and functional capabilities of the follicle, which have been well characterized in several reviews (204, 205, 206, 207, 208). As the follicle progresses toward the secondary stage, rapid proliferation of the granulosa cells results in the formation of several concentric layers surrounding the oocyte (204). By this stage, stromal cells have differentiated to produce a defined stratum of thecal cells that encapsulate the granulosa cell/oocyte unit. A basement membrane acts to separate the heavily vascularized thecal layers from the granulosa cells and ovum. Since capillaries do not penetrate the basement membrane, the granulosa/oocyte compartment depends on the passive movement of hormonal factors through this extracellular structure (204). Oocyte and follicular growth are linear up to the tertiary stage, at which time the ooctye appears to reach a maximum size, while the follicle as a unit continues to enlarge. The tertiary follicle is characterized by a hypertrophied thecal layer, multiple layers of granulosa cells, and the appearance of an antrum, a space that separates the granulosa cells from the ooctye/cumulus complex. The process of follicular selection for ovulation, although not well understood, appears to occur at this stage of folliculogenesis, when several secondary-tertiary follicles will divert toward a pathway of atresia. Still under the influence of gonadotropins, the "selected" follicles will continue to enlarge, mostly due to increases in antrum size, to eventually reach the Graafian, or ovulatory stage. Follicular rupture and ovulation occur in response to a surge in gonadotropin levels, at which time cellular proliferation is ceased, and the remaining cells of the follicle terminally differentiate to form the corpus luteum (209).

In consonance with its gametogenic function, the ovary fulfills a critical role as an endocrine organ, serving as the principal source of sex steroids in the female. Therefore, a normal functioning ovary is an essential prerequisite to the function and maintenance of the reproductive tract, mammary gland, and behavior of the female. The research efforts of several investigators during the past decades have generated the well accepted "two-cell, two-gonadotropin" model of ovarian estradiol synthesis. This model and the investigations leading to its description have been discussed in great detail in several recent reviews and therefore will be only summarized here (204, 206, 210). The two steroid-producing components of the maturing follicle are the thecal and granulosa cells, which predominantly produce androgens and estrogens, respectively (210). Ample evidence exists to indicate that thecal cells possess the full complement of steroidogenic enzymes necessary for estradiol synthesis. In contrast, estradiol synthesis by the granulosa cells is dependent on thecal-derived androgens as substrates for aromatization. The amount and activity of the expressed steroidogenic enzymes within the two cell types vary depending on the follicular stage, and thereby determine the predominant steroid being produced. The cell-specific and temporal actions of the gonadotropins, LH and FSH, regulate the type and activity of the steroidogenic enzymes expressed within the granulosa and the thecal cells. The model states that LH acting via the constituitively expressed LH receptor on the cell surface of thecal cells stimulates the synthesis of androgens (androstenedione) in the growing follicle. This requires the initial conversion of cholesterol stores to pregnenolone by the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) and is thought to be a rate-limiting step in thecal cell steroidogenesis (204). Still within the thecum, pregnenolone is converted to progesterone and then to androstenedione via the enzymatic actions of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17–20 lyase (P45017{alpha}), respectively (204, 206, 210). Regulation by LH has been shown to occur at both the transcriptional and translational levels for the P450scc and P45017{alpha} genes (206). Granulosa cells lack expression of the P45017{alpha} enzymes required to produce androgens, the precursor of estradiol, and therefore are dependent on the passage of the thecal-derived androgens through the basement membrane and into the granulosa compartment. This cellular cooperation provides the basis of the two-cell portion of the model. The second gonadotropin, FSH, acts solely upon the granulosa cells to stimulate the enzymatic conversion of the androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol, via P450-aromatase (P450arom), and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, respectively (204, 206, 210). The estradiol is then released into the follicular fluid, whereupon the bulk passes back through the basement membrane and enters the circulation. Upon ovulation, the luteal phase begins with luteinization of the follicle and differentiation of the remaining granulosa and thecal cells to form the corpus luteum. The relative amounts and activities of the steroidogenic enzymes are altered once again and shift toward synthesis of large amounts of progesterone.

Recent data have challenged the "two-cell" model to incorporate the descriptions of a role for the oocyte in regulating granulosa cell steroidogenesis. Elegant in vitro experiments involving the surgical removal of the oocyte from isolated growing follicles have demonstrated the existence of an ooctye-secreted factor that is able to inhibit granulosa cell estradiol and progesterone synthesis (211, 212, 213).

2. Review of intraovarian estrogen actions. In 1940, both Pencharz (214) and Williams (215) independently reported a direct and specific ability of estradiol or DES to induce significant increases in ovarian weight in the hypophysectomized rat. These same seminal studies also described the synergistic effect of estradiol on gonadotropin-stimulated increases in ovarian weight (214, 215). Since then, numerous intraovarian effects of large amounts of locally synthesized estrogens have been described and postulated to be essential to normal follicular development and ovarian function. In granulosa cells of the growing follicle, estrogen has been reported to increase the levels of its own receptor (216), as well as induce DNA synthesis and proliferation (205, 217, 218, 219, 220), increase the number and size of intercellular gap junctions (221), stimulate synthesis of IGF-I (222), and attenuate apoptosis and follicular atresia (223, 224). Estradiol is also known to augment the actions of FSH on granulosa cells, resulting in the maintenance of FSH-receptor levels (218, 225, 226, 227) and the acquisition of LH-receptor (218, 228, 229, 230, 231), an event critical to successful ovulation.

Ultimately, the actions of estradiol act to enhance follicular responsiveness to gonadotropins and thereby result in increased aromatase activity and further estrogen synthesis (231, 232). Therefore, normal ovarian function appears to be dependent on a multitude of auto- and paracrine actions of estradiol that act in concert with the gonadotropins secreted from the anterior pituitary to provide for successful folliculogenesis and steroid production. Nonetheless, immunohistochemical detection and characterization of ER in the different ovarian compartments have proven difficult, although studies employing binding assays with radiolabeled ligands report the presence of ER in ovarian granulosa cells of the rat (216, 233, 234, 235), mouse (236), rabbit (236), and pig (235).

The discovery of the ERß and its reportedly high mRNA levels in the ovary (49, 63, 93) reinforces the need for thorough immunohistochemical studies for the two distinct ERs in the ovary. Reports of localization of ER{alpha} and ERß transcripts in the rat ovary by in situ hybridization indicate the presence of low levels of ER{alpha} mRNA with no specific pattern (63), whereas ERß mRNA is easily detectable and predominantly localized to the granulosa cells of growing follicles (49, 63). Sar and Welsch (103) recently described immunohistochemical studies with ER{alpha}- and ERß-specific antibodies, reporting that ERß immunoreactivity is indeed highly expressed in and localized to the granulosa cells of growing follicles, whereas ER{alpha} staining appears limited to the interstitial/thecal cells in the rat ovary. Similar findings of immunohistochemical localization of the ERß to the ovarian granulosa cells were reported in the rat by Hiroi et al. (104) and in the cow by Rosenfeld et al. (69). Brandenberger et al. (94) reported the RT-PCR detection of ER{alpha} and ERß transcripts in normal and neoplastic human ovary and ovarian cell lines. This study further described the presence of easily detectable levels of ERß mRNA and very low levels of ER{alpha} mRNA in the granulosa cells, whereas the opposite was found in a cell-line derived from the ovarian outer surface epithelium (94). Misao et al. (237) also used RT-PCR to detect ER{alpha} and ERß transcripts in human corpus luteum. Both Misao et al. (237) and Byers et al. (63) demonstrated a down-regulation of ERß mRNA during luteinization of the follicle and the differentiation of the corpus luteum in the human and rat, respectively. Interestingly, a report by Iwai et al., before the knowledge of ERß, described the detection of ER{alpha} immunoreactivity in the granulosa cells of the rabbit ovary (238), possibly illustrating another variation in the expression pattern of the two ERs among different species. Nonetheless, ER{alpha} and ERß are present in the adult rodent ovary. Therefore, disruption of the genes encoding these receptors may be expected to result in distinct ovarian phenotypes. In addition, the dissimilar expression patterns for ER{alpha} and ERß among the functional units of the follicle suggest that compensatory mechanisms fulfilled by the remaining functional gene in each respective ERKO may not be possible in the ovary.

3. {alpha}ERKO ovary. The ovary of the neonatal and prepubertal {alpha}ERKO female does not exhibit any gross differences when compared with those of wild-type littermates (142). The mature {alpha}ERKO ovary possesses a normal complement of primordial follicles, indicating no defects in germ cell generation or migration to the gonad during fetal development. However, at the commencement of sexual maturity, it becomes apparent that the {alpha}ERKO female is anovulatory and exhibits a distinct ovarian phenotype of enlarged, hemorrhagic, and cystic follicles as shown in Fig. 4Go. These cystic structures often accumulate in the ovary, making the gonad appear grossly as a bundle of dark grapes, a signature phenotype of the {alpha}ERKO female. However, growing follicles in the tertiary and pre- to small antral stage are present in the mature {alpha}ERKO ovary, indicating that ER{alpha} is not required for the recruitment of primordial follicles and the initial stages of the follicular phase. This is in contrast to the described phenotypes of mice possessing a mutation of the steel (Sl/Slt) locus (239), or a targeted disruption of the genes encoding growth differentiation factor-9 (240), or the vitamin D receptor (45), all of which exhibit phenotypes of follicular arrest at very early stages. The growing and cystic follicles in the {alpha}ERKO are often characterized by a hypertrophied thecum, indicating stimulation by LH. Induction of thecal cell function by the chronically elevated serum LH is illustrated by the similarly elevated levels of serum androgens exhibited in the adult {alpha}ERKO female (Table 2Go). Histological analysis of ovaries from numerous {alpha}ERKO females has revealed no corpora lutea, indicating an inability of the follicles to spontaneously ovulate and differentiate. Anovulation in the adult {alpha}ERKO could not be rescued even after appropriate stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins (142), strongly indicating that infertility in the {alpha}ERKO female is due in large degree to alterations in the hormonal milieu and ovarian responsiveness.



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Histology of a representative adult wild-type and {alpha}ERKO ovary. Shown are ovarian cross-sections from wild-type (a) and {alpha}ERKO (b) females at low magnification (13.2x). Note the presence of follicles at both the follicular and luteal (corpora lutea; CL) stages of the ovarian cycle in the wild-type ovary, whereas the {alpha}ERKO ovary is characterized by the presence of large, hemorrhagic, and cystic follicles, a sparse number of follicles at the early stages of proliferation, and a lack of corpora lutea. Panels c–d illustrate {alpha}ERKO ovarian tissue at high power magnification (132x): c, a healthy secondary follicle showing a normal oocyte and nucleolus; d, interface of two cystic follicles, demonstrating the heterogeneity in the number of granulosa cells that line the cysts, e.g., the left cyst has a single layer, whereas the right cyst has several layers of granulosa cells (indicated by arrows); e, hypertrophied thecal cells lining a hemorrhagic cyst in an {alpha}ERKO ovary. Scale bar = 0.5 µm.

 
A phenotype of anovulation and follicular arrest is also observed in the ovaries of other murine models of gene disruption. The ovaries of mice lacking the actions of FSH, either due to targeted disruption of the gene for the FSHß-subunit (241) or the FSH-receptor (242), exhibit follicles that grow up to but not beyond the preantral stage. Therefore, FSH action is critical to completion of the follicular phase of the ovarian cycle. However, {alpha}ERKO female mice possess serum FSH levels within the normal range (Table 2Go) and actually show elevated levels of FSH-receptor mRNA in the ovary (142). Furthermore, since FSH signaling has been proposed to be a critical factor in estradiol synthesis (243, 244), the extremely elevated levels of serum estradiol in the {alpha}ERKO female indicate that this pathway is intact in the granulosa cells. Interestingly, neither report of mice lacking FSH action mention any significant differences in ovarian estradiol synthesis but describe a much smaller and thinner uterus in the female (241, 242). It is possible that the estradiol present in these models lacking FSH action is synthesized by the ovarian thecum. Alternatively, the presence of compensatory mechanisms that have allowed for granulosa cell aromatase activity that is independent of FSH stimulation must also be considered. Progression of the follicle to the more mature antral stage is also arrested in mice after targeted disruption of the gene for IGF-I (245), cyclin-D2 (246), connexin-37 (247), activin type II receptor (248), and superoxide dismutase 1 (249), although low serum gonadotropin levels are thought to be the cause of this phenotype in the latter two models.

Therefore, a definitive cause of the {alpha}ERKO ovarian phenotype, in addition to the loss of ER{alpha} action, was not obvious. In fact, some facets of ovarian physiology thought to be dependent on estrogen action, such as the attenuation of apoptosis and the induction of LH receptors in granulosa cells of antral follicles, were apparently preserved in the follicles of the {alpha}ERKO ovary. Follicular atresia in the ovary is a hormonally controlled process that is critical to oocyte selection. Although the factors that trigger atresia are not well understood, it is characterized by apoptosis of the granulosa cells of the follicle (reviewed in Refs. 223, 224). Estradiol has been shown to be one of the many factors reported to protect the follicle from becoming atretic (250). Furthermore, androgens reportedly accelerate the process, and it may be an altered estrogen/androgen synthesis ratio in the follicle that leads to atresia (250). However, despite elevated androgen production, the presence of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA, and a lack of ER{alpha} action in the mature {alpha}ERKO ovary, an inordinate amount of apoptosis is not observed in the follicles (142). Estradiol has also been shown to facilitate the FSH induction of LH receptors in the granulosa cells of the mature ovulatory follicle in both in vivo (225, 231, 252) and in vitro experiments (229, 230). Nonetheless, the granulosa cells of the growing follicles, in addition to the enlarged cysts in the {alpha}ERKO ovary, possess significant levels of LH receptor mRNA when assayed by in situ hybridization (142). The most plausible explanation for these observations is that these estrogen actions are mediated by ERß, which has been shown to be expressed in a normal pattern in the granulosa cells of the {alpha}ERKO ovary, and concomitant with the expression of LH receptor (93, 142).

Therefore, with data suggesting that disruption of the ER{alpha} gene did not result in an ovary completely refractory to estrogen, other aspects of ovarian physiology must be considered as possible factors in the etiology of the {alpha}ERKO ovarian phenotype. As previously discussed, ovarian function is tightly controlled by pituitary gonadotropins (see Section III.D.1). In turn, gonadotropin synthesis and secretion from the anterior pituitary are at least partially regulated by gonadal steroids acting via classical feedback mechanisms in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (reviewed in Ref. 251). Indeed, disruption of the ER{alpha} gene has resulted in significant phenotypes in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the {alpha}ERKO female (see Section VI.A). Most notable is the increased and chronic secretion of LH in the {alpha}ERKO female that results in levels that are 4–7 times that found in wild-type females (Table 2Go) (252). As discussed above, synchronized increases in serum FSH and LH levels are critical to follicular maturation and ultimate ovulation in the ovary. However, it has been proposed that the follicular requirements for LH are finite, and the presence of abnormally high levels may force maturing follicles to either prematurely luteinize or become atretic (253).

Therefore, the {alpha}ERKO ovarian phenotype is likely caused by the chronic exposure to abnormally high levels of LH. Support for this hypothesis can be drawn from a number of studies. Investigations involving prolonged treatment with antiestrogens over a period of at least 28 days have produced an ovarian phenotype in both mice (195, 196) and rats (197) that is similar to that of the {alpha}ERKO. Of course, interpretation of these studies is complicated by the ability of the antiestrogens to inhibit both ERs as well as estrogen action in both the ovary and hypothalamic-pituitary axis. However, these studies reported that the "{alpha}ERKO" phenotype of enlarged cystic follicles was produced only after prolonged treatments with those antiestrogens that possessed the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and concurrently produce serum LH levels that were several fold higher than controls. Therefore, whereas the estrogen antagonists ZM-189,154 (197) and EM-800 (195, 196) produced chronically elevated LH levels and an ovarian phenotype strikingly similar to that of the {alpha}ERKO, tamoxifen did neither (195, 196, 197). More definitively, Risma et al. (254, 255) report that targeted transgenic overexpression of the LHß-subunit in the mouse that results in a 15-fold increase in serum LH levels produces females that are anovulatory and exhibit an ovarian phenotype almost indistinguishable from that of the adult {alpha}ERKO female.

Therefore, the similarity in the ovarian phenotypes described in the above studies, in which the models presumably possessed normal levels of ovarian ER{alpha}, combined with our observations in the {alpha}ERKO, strongly indicate that the ER{alpha} is not directly involved in the development of ovarian cysts due to hypergonadotropism. However, there are descriptions of at least two models in which serum LH is chronically elevated, yet do not manifest an ovarian phenotype similar to the {alpha}ERKO or those induced by antiestrogens or transgenics as described above. Female mice that are homozygous for a targeted disruption of the FSHß-subunit gene exhibit an approximate 5-fold increase in serum LH but do not show indications of enlarged cystic follicles in the ovary (241), indicating a role for FSH in this process as well. Bogovich (256) has provided supporting evidence by demonstrating that FSH is required along with prolonged exposure to LH (in the form of human CG) to induce follicular cysts in the rat. A likely role for FSH is the induction of LH receptor in the granulosa cells of the maturing follicles, thereby rendering the follicle responsive to the increased levels of LH. Another contrasting knockout model is that of the P450arom gene (ArKO), in which the homozygous females possess significantly elevated serum LH and FSH levels but lack the capacity to synthesize estradiol (257). Although folliculogenesis is arrested at an antral stage in the ArKO ovary, no {alpha}ERKO-like cystic structures are reported (257). Therefore, assuming that a lack of estradiol synthesis would disrupt ligand-dependent activity of the ERß in the granulosa cells, the lack of ovarian cysts in the ArKO indicate an intraovarian role for estradiol in this phenotype. Therefore, although the {alpha}ERKO phenoytpe may be triggered by hyperstimulation of the follicles by LH, it is likely influenced by both FSH and ERß actions in the granulosa cells as well. Current studies utilizing prolonged treatment of {alpha}ERKO females with a GnRH antagonist to reduce serum gonadotropins are being carried out to further define the etiology of the ovarian phenotype (J. F. Couse, D. O. Bunch, J. Lindzey, D. W. Schomberg, and K. S. Korach, manuscript in preparation).

Since the {alpha}ERKO ovarian phenotype develops and worsens only after sexual maturity, we have began studies to characterize ovarian function in the immature {alpha}ERKO female (J. F. Couse, D. O. Bunch, J. Lindzey, D. W. Schomberg, and K. S. Korach, manuscript in preparation). Although superovulation with exogenous gonadotropins was not successful in eliciting ovulation in the older {alpha}ERKO females, immature ({approx}28 days) females do respond and produce viable oocytes that can be collected from the oviduct. However, the average number of oocytes collected from superovulated {alpha}ERKO females is significantly less than that yielded from age-matched superovulated wild-type and heterozygous females. Therefore, intraovarian ER{alpha} action does not appear to be essential to ovulation when stimulated with exogenous gonadotropins.

4. ßERKO ovary. As discussed above, the {alpha}ERKO has provided a number of indications to suggest that intraovarian ER{alpha} action is not critical to ovarian function. Furthermore, several presumed functions of estradiol in ovarian granulosa cells appear to be preserved in the {alpha}ERKO, such as the attenuation of apoptosis and the induction of LH receptors. Based on the reported localization of ERß mRNA (49, 50, 63) and protein (69, 103, 104) to the granulosa cells of growing follicles, as well as the maintenance of a normal expression pattern for ERß in the {alpha}ERKO ovary (93, 142), it is likely that the newly discovered ER is the predominant mediator of estrogen action in the follicle. In the rat ovary, ERß is easily detectable by immunohistochemistry and exhibits an almost ubiquitous expression pattern within the granulosa cells of follicles ranging from the primary up to the ovulatory or Graafian stage (69, 103, 104). Byers et al. (63) demonstrated that ERß mRNA levels remain relatively constant during the follicular stage of the ovarian cycle but are rapidly decreased after the gonadotropin surge-induced luteinization of the granulosa cells. Interestingly, in 1975, Richards (216) reported a similar profile for high-affinity [3H]-E2 binding in the granulosa cells of the rat ovary, showing increased binding levels as follicles matured followed by marked decrease after luteinization. Because the affinities of the two ERs for estradiol do not significantly differ, it was not possible at that time to realize that the receptor being detected in the ovary was distinctly different (i.e., ERß) from that which was being concurrently described in the uterus (i.e., ER{alpha}).

As stated previously, female mice homozygous for the targeted disruption of the ERß gene possess no gross aberrant phenotypes as neonates or during adulthood (47). However, during a continuous mating study of 8 weeks in which sexually mature wild-type or ßERKO females were housed with a known fertile wild-type male, a significant deficit in fertility in the ßERKO became obvious. As shown in Table 3Go, ßERKO females produced substantially fewer litters as well as significantly less numbers of pups per litter when compared with their wild-type littermates (47). Whereas the average litter size among wild-type females was 8.8 (±2.5) pups per litter, this number was reduced to 3.1 (±1.8) in ßERKO females (Table 3Go) (47). Furthermore, two of the tested ßERKO females yielded no litters, despite the observation of seminal plugs on multiple occasions, suggesting that abnormal sexual behavior was not a cause for the infertility. Gross analysis of the uteri from the ßERKO females used in this study demonstrated no indication of embryo resorption during gestation. Therefore, the observed subfertility in the ßERKO females did not appear to be due to uterine dysfunction that results in premature termination of pregnancy. However, a possible defect in embryo implantation due to a lack of ERß could not be assessed in these studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Fertility and superovulation data in the ßERKO female mice

 
The nature of the subfertility in the ßERKO female described above strongly suggested an ovarian phenotype. Gross analysis of ovaries from ßERKO females indicated no distinct differences in size or morphology when compared with those of wild-type females. As shown in Fig. 5Go, histological analysis of ovaries from sexually mature ßERKO females illustrated the presence of a relatively normal interstitial compartment and follicles at various stages of the follicular cycle, ranging from primordial and primary to those with a clearly defined antrum, all possessing the expected thecal shell. Therefore, as demonstrated for ER{alpha} by the {alpha}ERKO, ERß does not appear to be essential for the establishment of germ cell number or ovarian development. Several of the speculated intraovarian roles of estrogen were discussed previously and include a proposed critical role in proliferation of the granulosa cells in the maturing follicle (217, 218, 219, 220, 231). However, the multiple large follicles present in the ßERKO ovaries indicate no marked differences in granulosa cell number. Furthermore, serum estradiol levels in adult ßERKO females do not appear to differ from age-matched wild-type females, at 24.2 (±3.3) and 30.5 (±2.8) pg/ml, respectively. Biological evidence of estradiol synthesis in the ßERKO ovary is also illustrated by the apparently normal uterus and vagina, which exhibit the proper cyclic changes in morphology of a sexually mature wild-type mouse. Nonetheless, there were indications of an increased number of early atretic follicles and a sparse presence of corpora lutea in the ßERKO ovary when compared with the wild-type (47), suggesting that the observed subfertility in the ßERKO may be due to a reduction in completed folliculogenesis.



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Histology of representative adult wild-type and ßERKO ovary. Shown are ovarian cross-sections from adult wild-type (a) and ßERKO (c) females and those from immature wild-type (b) and ßERKO (d) females after superovulation treatment at low power magnification (13.2x). Note the presence of follicles at various stages of the follicular phase in both the wild-type (a) and ßERKO (c) ovaries from the adult females, illustrating relatively little observable difference between the two genotypes. However, upon superovulation, a distinct phenotype becomes apparent in the ßERKO. Comparison of the superovulated wild-type (b) with the similarly treated ßERKO (d), indicates the presence of multiple corpora lutea (CL) in the wild-type whereas only two CL are obvious in the ßERKO. Most notable are the multiple numbers of unruptured ovulatory follicles present in the superovulated ßERKO ovary (indicated by arrows). High-power magnification (132x) of the adult ßERKO ovary illustrates follicles at progressive stages of maturation (e) and a healthy tertiary follicle showing an oocyte with nucleolus (f). High-power magnification (132x) of the superovulated immature ßERKO ovary illustrates a typical unruptured ovulatory follicle possessing several layers of granulosa cells and a centrally located oocyte (g), and a corpora lutea (h) indicating the successful luteinization and terminal differentiation of the follicle that occurs after ovulation. [Panels a–d reproduced with permission from Ref. 47.] Scale bar = 1 µm.

 
A phenotype of compromised follicular maturation that more often terminates in atresia rather than ovulation, as described in the ßERKO female, is similar to that reported in a number of other mutant mice. As previously discussed, arrested folliculogenesis is described in knockout mice for other genes known to be expressed in granulosa cells, including the gene for FSH-receptor (242), P450arom (ArKO) (257), IGF-I (245), and connexin-37 (247). It is therefore possible that a loss of ERß action has also resulted in alterations in the expression and/or function of one or more of these gene products. However, the normal serum estradiol levels and the appearance of estrogenic effects in the reproductive tract of ßERKO females suggest that induction of the P450arom gene by FSH in the granulosa cells appears intact. However, investigation of the expression of the above as well as other granulosa cell components is required to determine the cause of the ovulatory phenotype of the ßERKO female.

To gain further insight into the ovarian phenotype of the ßERKO female, immature knockout and wild-type mice were stimulated to ovulate by administration of superphysiological levels of gonadotropins (PMSG and hCG) (47). After several independent trials, it became obvious that the ovulatory capacity of the ßERKO female was dramatically reduced, yielding an average of 6 (±1.5) oocytes per female vs. 33 (±4.8) and 52 (±5.7) oocytes per female in the wild-type and heterozygous animals, respectively (Table 3Go) (47). Additionally, the cumulus mass that surrounded the ovulated follicles from the ßERKO females was consistently composed of a decreased number of cells and a lessened integrity when compared with ova yielded from wild-type controls. Most interesting was the histology of the ovaries from the superovulated ßERKO females, which indicated the presence of numerous preovulatory but unruptured follicles (Fig. 5Go). It therefore appeared that the follicles of the ßERKO ovary were able to respond to the proliferative effects of PMSG in terms of increased size and antrum formation. However, a severe deficit in the response to the gonadotropin surge (hCG), required to induce luteinization and rupture of the follicle, was obvious in the ßERKO. A small number of the selected follicles were able to be expelled, as evidenced by the presence of ova in the oviduct and of corpora lutea in the corresponding ßERKO ovary. Therefore, a lack of ERß resulted in a drastic reduction in ovulatory capacity, yet with incomplete penetrance. Until {alpha}ERKO females are treated and tested in a similar manner to the ßERKO studies described, it will be difficult to determine the precise role for each ER in the ovary.

The observation of numerous unruptured Graafian follicles in the ovaries of superovulated ßERKO females is strikingly similar to the phenotype reported for mice possessing a targeted disruption of the cyclin-D2 gene (246). Cyclin-D2 is a positive regulator of cell cycle progression that is highly expressed in granulosa cells (reviewed in Ref. 258). Robker and Richards (259) demonstrated strong up-regulation of the cyclin-D2 gene by estradiol in rat granulosa cells and suggested that this protein may be a downstream mediator of the synergistic actions of FSH and estradiol that result in increased granulosa cell numbers in the maturing follicle. The dramatic increases in cyclin-D2 induced by estradiol are evident in vivo at both the mRNA and protein levels in the rat. Furthermore, assays on primary granulosa cell cultures from the rat indicate that estradiol stimulation of the cyclin-D2 gene can be inhibited by the estrogen antagonist, ICI-164,384, strongly suggesting that it is an ER-mediated process (259). Therefore, given that ERß is the predominant form of ER in the granulosa cells, disruption of the ERß gene may likely result in significant deficits in cyclin-D2 expression in the granulosa cells of the growing follicles in the ßERKO female. However, FSH is also able to stimulate increases in cyclin-D2, although the temporal pattern of regulation by FSH is distinct from that elicited by estradiol (259). Nonetheless, it is possible that FSH action in the follicles of the ßERKO ovary have provided for some degree of cyclin-D2 expression and thereby may explain the incomplete penetrance of the ßERKO ovarian phenotype.

The ßERKO ovarian phenotype that becomes apparent after superovulation is also similar to that reported for knockout models of the genes for the PR (PRKO) (44) and prostaglandin synthase-2 (189). The dramatic increases in both PR (260) and prostaglandin synthase-2 (261) in the granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle shortly after the gonadotropin surge have been well documented. Furthermore, the lack of follicular rupture in the respective knockout models supports a critical role for each of these components in ovulation (reviewed in Ref. 262). Lydon et al. (44) reported infertility in the PRKO and a consistent inability of superphysiological doses of hCG to induce follicular rupture. Although regulation of the PR gene is strongly influenced by estradiol in the uterus (see Section III.A), sufficient evidence exists to indicate that this may not be the case in the ovary. For example, although the wild-type ovary possesses extremely high intraovarian levels of estradiol and the presence of ERß, levels of PR mRNA and protein remain at a modest basal level in granulosa cells of the pre- and antral follicle (260). However, within 4–6 h after the gonadotropin surge, transcription of the PR gene has peaked at levels several fold that before the surge, only to return to near-basal levels within 20 h (260). The mechanism of this strong and transient induction of the PR gene by LH is known to include significant increases in intracellular cAMP, but may also involve phosphorylation of ERß and/or a coactivator, which then combine to act in a synergistic nature (262). Therefore, the elevation in PR levels in the granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle that is critical to follicular rupture may be attenuated in the ßERKO ovary.

Another possibility for a lack of spontaneous ovulation in the ßERKO female may be not intaovarian in nature, but rather due to altered gonadotropin synthesis and secretion from the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. The sex steroids play an important role as a positive regulator of the preovulatory surge (reviewed in Refs. 263, 264). Although the exact mechanism of action by which estrogens may be involved is not well defined, studies have shown that estradiol can induce GnRH release from the hypothalamus as well as cause increases in the level of GnRH receptors in the anterior pituitary (263). The ER{alpha} may be the predominant form of ER in the pituitary of the adult female mouse (93); however, both ER{alpha} and ERß have been detected in various regions of the hypothalamus (88, 97, 265). Preliminary data in the ßERKO female indicate that tonic levels of serum LH are within the normal range. However, a lack of hypothalamic ERß may have reduced the potential for positive regulation by estradiol in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and thereby may result in a reduction in the frequency and/or amplitude of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. Nonetheless, the results of the superovulation studies described above, in which an artificial bolus of gonadotropin is administered to induce ovulation, indicate a severe phenotype that can be localized to the ovary of the ßERKO female.


    IV. Mammary Gland
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
In mammals, the mammary gland is essentially undeveloped at birth and does not undergo full growth until the completion of puberty and, in fact, remains undifferentiated until pregnancy and lactation. Development of the mammary gland may be divided into five distinct stages: embryonic and fetal, prepubertal, pubertal, sexually mature adult, and pregnancy/lactation (reviewed in Ref. 266). The influential factors involved at each stage differ in both type and magnitude. Although the developmental factors involved during the embryonic and fetal stages of the female mammary gland are poorly understood, estrogen action does not appear to be essential (266). However, studies have shown that the fetal and neonatal mammary gland of rodents is responsive to the gonadal steroids, although distinct strain differences are evident (reviewed in Ref. 267). In male rodents, all or portions of the fetal glandular structure are destroyed via the "masculinization" effects of testicular androgens, an effect that can be reproduced in males by prenatal exposure to testosterone (267). Aberrant exposure of the neonatal female mouse to estradiol, testosterone, 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone, or PRL has been reported to result in an apparent increased sensitivity of the gland to mammotrophic hormones during adulthood, leading to varied degrees of excessive ductal growth and differentiation (267, 269). The later four stages of mammary gland development occur after birth and terminate in a gland capable of milk production. These stages are strongly regulated by the endogenous ovarian steroid hormones and are characterized by massive growth of the glandular ducts that emanate from the nipple until they have progressed through the fat pad composing the bulk of the breast. Upon pregnancy and the onset of lactation, the gland undergoes dramatic differentiation to produce milk- secreting structures, termed alveoli, throughout the ductal network. Therefore, since the majority of mammary gland growth and differentiation occurs after birth, this tissue provides a unique tool within which the interactions of gonadal and peptide hormone systems may be studied.

A. {alpha}ERKO phenotype
The mammary gland of an adult wild-type female mouse consists of a network of epithelial ducts originating from the nipple and forming a tree-like structure. The growth of the epithelial ducts begins during prepubertal development and continues during puberty until the branches of the gland have reached the limits of the fat pad (266). This ductal elongation is via cap cell proliferation at the terminal end buds of the individual ducts, as they maintain close contact with the stromal fat pad through which they are progressing. Studies using ovariectomized models have indicated that estradiol and GH, locally mediated as IGF-I, are required for the development of this ductal structure (266, 268). The mammary glands of adult {alpha}ERKO female mice exhibit a phenotype similar to the glands of a newborn female, confirming the need for ER{alpha}-mediated estradiol actions for ductal growth (269). However, the {alpha}ERKO gland does possess the component structures necessary for mammary gland development, i.e., the epithelial and stromal portions, connective tissue, and a small rudimentary ductal tree. Therefore, embryonic and fetal development of the mammary gland in the mouse occurs independently of ER{alpha} actions. However, this may be strain dependent, since studies in the C57BL mice, the background strain of the {alpha}ERKO, have also reported little effect of neonatal steroid exposure on the mammary gland (267). Nonetheless, despite apparently unaltered GH levels and the existence of significantly elevated levels of serum estradiol, the mammary gland of the {alpha}ERKO female has lost the capacity to commence the pre- and postpubertal stages of growth.

Estradiol has been shown to directly stimulate the formation of terminal end buds and stimulate cellular proliferation of the mammary ductal epithelium (270). Furthermore, this physiological effect can be inhibited by antiestrogens (271), indicating a receptor-mediated pathway of estrogen action. Although ER has been detected in both the ductal epithelial cells as well as the stromal tissue of the mammary gland (270, 272), the mechanism by which estrogens directly regulate growth remain unclear. The lack of ER in the outermost proliferating cap cells of the terminal end buds suggests that the effects of estradiol may be indirect and may involve the regulation of cell cycle genes and/or paracrine-acting peptide growth factors and their cognate receptors (270). Both EGF and transforming growth factor-{alpha} are thought to be critical to proper mammary growth and development and are at least partially regulated by estradiol via the ER (273, 274, 275). Support for a role of estradiol-induced growth factor activity is provided by the study of Xie et al. (276), in which transgenic mice overexpressing a dominant-negative form of the EGF-R exhibited an attenuated response to EGF action in the mammary gland in vivo. The virgin transgenic mice of this study exhibited severe deficits in ductal growth and branching in the mammary gland, which were overcome only with pregnancy, when ovarian steroids increased endogenous EGF expression several fold that found in virgin females (276). Further evidence comes from Ankrapp et al., who recently reported that estradiol-releasing pellets implanted into the mammary fat pad of ovariectomized mice result in significantly increased levels of EGF and PR and induce terminal end bud formation in the gland (277). However, implantation of EGF-releasing pellets induced similar increases in PR and terminal end bud formation, suggesting that EGF may mediate the mitogenic actions of estradiol (277). Therefore, this study demonstrated a scenario of ER{alpha}-EGF cross-talk similar to that previously described in the uterus (see Section III.A.2). In brief, treatment of mice with pellets releasing both EGF and the antiestrogen ICI-182,780 exhibited inhibition of the mitogenic effects of the growth factor; in turn, an anti-EGF antibody was able to neutralize the growth effects induced by an implanted estradiol-releasing pellet (277). Therefore, as was confirmed in the uterus through the use of the {alpha}ERKO mice, EGF is also able to mimic the mitogenic effects of estradiol in the mammary gland, but once again appears to require the presence of functional ER{alpha} to complete this mechanism.

It is well known that the mammary fat pad serves not only as a matrix, but also provides biochemical signals and/or factors necessary for normal ductal growth (reviewed in Ref. 266). In the study by Ankrapp et al. (277) described above, it was found that the greatest induction of EGF by estradiol occurred in the stromal compartment of the gland. Confirmation of a requirement for ER{alpha} in the glandular stroma and the likely involvement of paracrine growth factors in estrogen regulation of mammary gland growth has been demonstrated by Cunha et al. using the tissue recombinant methodology described previously (see Section III.A.2). Tissue recombinations of mammary fat pad and epithelium from wild-type and {alpha}ERKO females were constructed and grafted under the kidney capsule of athymic nude mice for 4 weeks (278). Extensive ductal growth was observed only in recombinants involving wild-type (i.e., ER+) stroma, including those composed of {alpha}ERKO ductal epithelium (278). However, {alpha}ERKO (ER{alpha}-) stroma was unable to induce growth in the overlying ductal epithelium from either genotype (278). The authors therefore concluded that stromal ER{alpha} is essential to the mitogenic actions of estradiol in the mammary epithelium, a conclusion also reached from similar studies in the uterine and vaginal tissue. In light of these data produced by Ankrapp et al. (277) and Cunha et al. (278), current studies to determine whether the underdeveloped {alpha}ERKO mammary gland may be rescued by exogenous treatment with growth factors will prove interesting.

Complete maturation of the mammary gland during pregnancy involves further ductal growth, extensive branching, and differentiation of the lobuloalveolar structures along the ducts, the hallmark of the lactating gland (266). These alveoli provide for milk production and will eventually fill the remaining spaces of the fat pad. This stage of mammary gland development is thought to require the combined actions of estrogen, progesterone, and PRL (266). The need for progesterone action in lobuloalveolar development was confirmed by studies of the PRKO mouse, which exhibited a normal pubertal ductal structure but was completely refractory to the induction of lobuloalveolar development after progesterone treatment (44). A similar phenotype is observed in the female PRL-receptor knockout (PRLR-/-) mice, which possess a normal virgin mammary gland as an adult, but a severe deficit in lobuloalveolar development and lactation after pregnancy (279). Interestingly, because the homozygous PRL-receptor (PRLR-/-) knockout females like others are infertile, this mammary gland phenotype was first detected in the heterozygous (PRLR+/-) females (279). Furthermore, the defects in lactation in the PRLR+/- mice were lessened after multiple pregnancies, due to the compensatory actions of other pregnancy-associated mammotrophic hormones that accumulated with each pregnancy (279).

Due to the documented ability of the estradiol-ER{alpha} complex to increase PR expression in various tissues, including the mammary gland (280), a loss of ER{alpha} action may also result in a loss of PR-mediated progesterone functions. Although progesterone actions in the mammary gland were once thought to be strictly differentiative and may actually oppose the proliferative effects of estrogens, recent work has suggested that progesterone may also act as a mitogen in the breast (reviewed in Ref. 181). This is best illustrated by the less extensive ductal arborization of the mammary gland, as well as the lack of alveolar structures, in the PRKO mice (44). Furthermore, in vitro studies have indicated that PR-mediated progesterone actions can regulate the transcription of genes for cell cycle-related proteins, growth factors, and growth factor receptors (181). Therefore, the lack of ductal growth and differentiation in the {alpha}ERKO mammary gland may be largely due to a lack of physiologically sufficient PR and subsequent progesterone action. As shown in Table 2Go, the average serum progesterone levels in adult female {alpha}ERKOs are 4.0 (±1.1) ng/ml vs. 2.3 (±0.6) ng/ml in wild-type and are therefore within the normal range of cycling wild-type females (123). Preliminary analysis by ribonuclease protection assay indicates that the mammary glands of adult virgin {alpha}ERKO females possess slightly detectable levels of PR mRNA, but exhibit no increased regulation when treated with estrogen. Furthermore, current studies in our laboratory indicate that prolonged progesterone treatment of adult {alpha}ERKO females results in the formation of terminal end buds and differentiation in the mammary gland, indicating that the lack of progesterone action caused by disruption of the ER{alpha} gene can be partially overcome with treatment of superphysiological levels of exogenous progesterone.

A similar secondary effect of targeted disruption of the ER{alpha} gene on the mammary gland may involve a lack of PRL stimulation. PRL is primarily secreted from the anterior pituitary, although local synthesis in the mammary epithelium has also been described (279). This peptide hormone plays a critical role in mammary gland physiology, especially in the induction of lobuloalveolar structures and milk production, as evidenced in the phenotype of the PRLR+/- mice (reviewed in Ref. 279). However, the synthesis and secretion of PRL from the anterior pituitary are strongly regulated by estradiol and ER{alpha} (281). Confirmation of the regulatory action of ER{alpha} on the PRL gene is provided by the {alpha}ERKO females, which exhibit a 20-fold decrease in PRL mRNA in the anterior pituitary (282) and a 5-fold decrease in serum PRL levels (Table 2Go) (see Section VI.A.4). Therefore, given the significant role of PRL in the differentiation to a lactating mammary gland, it is likely that the phenotype described in the {alpha}ERKO female is also at least partly due to a lack of PRL stimulation. Support for this hypothesis is provided by current studies in which elevated serum PRL levels are achieved in the {alpha}ERKO female via wild-type pituitary transplants placed under the kidney capsule and have resulted in significant ductal growth and differentiation in the {alpha}ERKO host mammary gland (W. P. Bocchinfuso, J. Lindzey, S. W. Curtis, J. E. Clark, P. H. Myers, and K. S. Korach, in preparation). However, preliminary analysis indicates that this partial rescue of the {alpha}ERKO mammary gland by the PRL secreting wild-type pituitary graft does not occur in an ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO host female, indicating a requirement for ovarian derived factors as well. Nonetheless, the {alpha}ERKO mammary gland appears to possess the intrinsic tissue components necessary for pubertal development and pregnancy-induced maturation, but fails to develop because of the loss of multiple stimuli that are downstream of ER{alpha} action.

B. ßERKO phenotype
Unlike the dramatic underdevelopment observed in the mammary gland of the {alpha}ERKO, no such phenotype is observed in adult ßERKO females. Virgin ßERKO females of 4–5 months of age exhibit mammary glands that possess a normal ductal structure that fills the entire fat pad and are indistinguishable from those of age-matched wild-type females. This phenotype agrees with our description of minor amounts of ERß mRNA in the adult mouse mammary gland, whereas ER{alpha} transcripts are easily detectable (Fig. 2Go) (93). Furthermore, mammary glands from pregnant and nursing ßERKO females appear to have undergone normal differentiation and exhibit the lobuloalveolar structures required for lactation. Although litter sizes of the ßERKO females were reduced during the mating study described above, no marked abnormalities in nursing were observed. Therefore, the combined data from the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO models indicate that ER{alpha} is the predominant receptor required to mediate the actions of estrogen in the mammary gland of the mouse.

C. ER{alpha} and oncogene-induced tumorigenesis: Wnt-1/{alpha}ERKO mice
Several lines of evidence indicate that breast cancer in humans is strongly correlated with the extent of lifetime exposure to estrogen. Most notably, breast cancer almost exclusively occurs in females and is never seen before puberty but rather only after several years into the reproductive life span (283, 284). Furthermore, an increased length of a woman’s reproductive years, i.e., early menarche and late menopause, has been associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer (284), whereas women who have experienced premature menopause due to natural causes or castration appear to be at a much lower risk (283). Furthermore, studies have indicated that women who circulate higher levels of active estrogens may also be at greater risk of developing breast cancer (283). In apparent contrast, early pregnancy tends to provide a protective effect, although it is obviously associated with an increased level of steroid hormone exposure. In addition, several years of research have indicated little positive correlation with the risk of breast cancer and prolonged use of contraceptive pills composed of synthetic estrogens and progestins, although this issue remains controversial (reviewed in Refs. 285, 286). Still, a large portion of chemotherapeutics for breast cancer are aimed at either blocking estrogen action or reducing estrogen levels (283). Therefore, although an association between estrogen action and breast cancer is apparent, it involves less understood yet critical mechanisms, including the periodicity and cyclicity of hormone exposure as well as the sensitivity of the end organ (283). This is further complicated by the influence that environmental exposures, geography, diet, body weight, and genetics also play in individual risk of developing breast cancer (283).

Numerous studies have been carried out concerning the levels of ER and PR in neoplastic breast tissue and the prognostic value that these parameters may provide (reviewed in Refs. 287, 288, 289, 290, 291). Reports indicate that more than 70% of primary breast tumors are ER{alpha}-positive and exhibit estrogen-dependent growth (291). However, the most malignant mammary tumors are often ER{alpha}-negative and exhibit estrogen-independent aggressive growth, but are thought to progress from a once ER{alpha}-positive cell population (287). In addition, the role of local aromatase activity and estrogen production in breast cancer is receiving increased attention (reviewed in Ref. 292). Added complexity is introduced by the detection and description of numerous variants of the ER{alpha} transcript in breast cancer tissues, although their possible role in the etiology of the disease remains speculative (reviewed in Refs. 28, 293). Recent reports also described the detection of ERß transcripts in multiple immortalized human breast cancer cell lines, normal human breast tissue, and human breast tumors (64, 73, 101, 102, 294). Vladusic et al. (73) also characterized an ERß mRNA variant detected in normal as well as malignant human breast tissue (73).

It is clear from the severely underdeveloped mammary gland of the {alpha}ERKO that estradiol acting via the ER{alpha} is a potent mitogen in the breast. To gain insight into the potential role of ER{alpha} in the induction and promotion of mammary gland carcinogenesis, we crossed the {alpha}ERKO mice with the MMTV-Wnt-1 mice, a transgenic line that is highly susceptible to mammary adenocarcinoma. The family of Wnt genes encode a series of secretory glycoproteins that act in auto- and paracrine pathways to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation (reviewed in Ref. 295). The MMTV-Wnt-1 mice possess a transgene designed for targeted overexpression of the Wnt-1 protooncogene in the mammary gland and exhibit a nearly 100% and 15% incidence of mammary hyperplasia and lobuloalveolar adenocarcinoma by 1 yr of age in females and males, respectively (295, 296). Therefore, breeding of the two transgenic lines allowed for the generation of animals that possessed the Wnt-1 transgene on either a wild-type or {alpha}ERKO background and thereby allowed for the assessment of the role of ER{alpha} in the initiation and promotion of protooncogene-induced mammary tumors (297).

At 6 months of age, virgin wild-type Wnt-1 females exhibit extensive hyperplasia of the ductal epithelium and aberrant lobuloalveolar development that occupies the entire fat pad. This was the expected phenotype based on that described previously in the original line of Wnt-1 females derived from a different mouse strain (296). Interestingly, a similar phenotype of lobuloalveolar hyperplasia was observed in the rudimentary duct of the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 females, although the extent of ductal growth was much reduced compared with that seen in the wild-type (269). Nonetheless, the rudimentary ductal structure previously described in the {alpha}ERKO female was obviously induced to proliferate by the presence of ectopic Wnt-1 expression. However, comparison of mammary glands from a series of age-matched animals indicated that the ductal growth observed in the mammary gland of a 6-month-old {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 female remained confined to the nipple region and approximated that seen in a 2.5-month-old wild-type-Wnt-1 female, illustrating a significant delay in the proliferation of the {alpha}ERKO epithelium (269). Interestingly, the mammary hyperplasia in the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 females did not markedly progress into the inguinal fat pad, but rather remained confined to the area of the nipple. Therefore, although the lobuloalveolar phenotype characteristic of Wnt-1 overexpression was evident, ductal elongation did not occur in the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 female, indicating that the hyperplastic action of ectopic Wnt-1 expression cannot substitute for ER{alpha}-mediated terminal end bud formation and ductal morphogenesis (297). In the males, Wnt-1-induced epithelial hyperplasia was obvious in both the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO animals as well, but no distinct difference in growth rates between the two genotypes was evident (269).

The incidence of lobuloalveolar carcinoma in the Wnt-1 mice mirrored the observations described above for the epithelial hyperplasia. Wild-type-Wnt-1 and heterozygous-ER{alpha}/Wnt-1 females developed mammary tumors at a rapid rate, reaching an incidence of 50% by 6 months of age (297). Ectopic expression of the Wnt-1 gene was also able to induce tumorigenesis in the {alpha}ERKO females and therefore did not require the presence of functional ER{alpha} (297). However, a 50% incidence in tumors in the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 females was not observed until 12 months of age, twice the time required for the wild-type-Wnt-1 colony (269). Ribonuclease protection assays indicated that the level of Wnt-1 transgene expression was relatively equal in the two ER{alpha} genotypes. Prepubertal ovariectomy had no effect on the overall incidence of tumors in either genotype, although it resulted in a delayed incidence of palpable tumors in both, i.e., wild-type-Wnt-1 at 50% at 10.5 momths and a further delay in the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 at 50% at 15 months (269). Therefore, ovarian factors clearly accelerated the growth rate of the Wnt-1-induced adenocarcinoma in both the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO females. However, multiple pregnancies had no significant effect on the time of tumor onset in the wild-type-Wnt-1 females (269).

These studies indicate that ER{alpha} signaling is not involved in the induction of hyperplasia and tumorigenesis in the mammary gland that results from overexpression of the Wnt-1 protooncogene, but indeed plays a promotional role in these phenotypes. Similar findings of a promotional role for the ER{alpha} in uterine carcinogenesis were reported in transgenic mice that overexpressed an ER{alpha} gene (298). A possible explanation for the observed tumor latency may be drawn from an inherent difference between the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO mammary glands, i.e., because the {alpha}ERKO-Wnt-1 glands possess a reduced amount of ductal morphogenesis and proliferating epithelia due to the lack of ER{alpha}, the number of cells most susceptible to neoplastic transformation may be decreased (297). Interestingly, the growth rates of the ductal hyperplasia and ultimate adenocarcinomas were also significantly reduced when the animals were ovariectomized, even in those lacking functional ER{alpha}. A possible explanation for this finding may be that ovarian estradiol is acting via non-ER{alpha}-mediated pathways, suggesting a possible role for ERß. However, in contrast to reports in other species, ERß mRNA remains difficult to detect by standard assays in the mouse mammary gland, including the glands of the {alpha}ERKO (93) and Wnt-1 females (297). Furthermore, ovariectomy also results in the loss of other gonadal hormones in addition to estrogen.

Remarkably, overexpression of the Wnt-1 gene in the {alpha}ERKO mammary gland resulted in significant increases in PR mRNA levels compared with the low basal levels detected in control {alpha}ERKO glands, when assayed by ribonuclease protection assay (297). Recently, Shyamala et al. (299) showed that misregulation of the PR gene resulting in increased levels of PRA through transgenic methodologies may be tumorigenic in the mammary gland. Therefore, the ability of Wnt-1 to compensate for the reduced PR levels generated by the loss of ER{alpha} action may provide a pathway by which the role of ER{alpha} in tumor induction and promotion may be overridden. In addition, if the PR pathway was involved in the promotion of the Wnt-1 lobuloalveolar carcinomas, ovariectomy would be expected to result in a delay in their growth.

In summary, the {alpha}ERKO/Wnt-1 mouse model has demonstrated that artificially induced hyperplasia and tumorigenesis of the mammary gland can take place in the absence of ER{alpha} signaling. These findings have potential importance in understanding the etiology of human breast cancer by illustrating that oncogenic induction of mammary neoplasia can occur in an ER{alpha}-negative tissue. Extending these observations further may indicate that hormone-independent breast tumors can originate from a cell population lacking ER{alpha} as well as those that are ER{alpha} positive. The characterization of mice produced from crosses of other overexpressing transgenic models, e.g., neu, with the {alpha}ERKO are currently being carried out in a fashion similar to those studies described above.


    V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes of the Male
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
More than 40 yr ago, Jost employed a series of classical organ ablation studies to demonstrate that development of the male reproductive system was dependent on the secretion of testosterone and the peptide, anti-Müllerian hormone, by the fetal testes (107). We now know that development of the undifferentiated fetal gonad to a testis is determined by the presence of testis-determining factors or genes localized to the Y chromosome, e.g., the SRY gene (300). Testosterone produced from the Leydig cells of the fetal testes is crucial to the survival of the Wolffian duct, the primordial structure of the male reproductive tract, and its differentiation into the male reproductive structures (143, 192). In turn, secretion of anti-Müllerian hormone from the Sertoli cells of the fetal testis induces regression of the primordial female reproductive structures in the developing fetus (143, 192). Differentiation of the epididymis, ductus deferens, and seminal vesicle from the Wolffian duct is stimulated by testosterone, whereas development of the lower structures, the prostate, bulbourethral glands, urethra, scrotum, and penis, is primarily influenced by the more potent testosterone metabolite, 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (143). The importance of androgen action in the development of the male reproductive tract is evident by the feminized phenotype that results in human males with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (cAIS), caused by a naturally occurring mutation that results in the lack of functional AR. The phenotypes of the cAIS human male and the analogous testicular feminized male (Tfm) rodent are characterized by the complete absence of either male or female internal reproductive structures except for the presence of inguinal testes (37, 301). External genitalia in the cAIS human and Tfm mouse are indistinguishable from the normal wild-type female, but a short and often blunt-ended vagina is present (37, 301). During puberty and the later stages of sexual maturation in the male, virulization of the external genitalia is dependent on the actions of DHT (143, 302). This is illustrated in human males lacking sufficient 5{alpha}-reductase activity and DHT synthesis, who exhibit normal internal reproductive structures and testosterone levels but severely undervirulized external structures (reviewed in Ref. 37). Once again, the critical role of androgens in the development of the male reproductive tract was reiterated by the complete lack of gonadal development in mice homozygous for a disruption of the gene encoding SF-1 (137, 138). Therefore, androgen action is critical to the development and function of the tissues of the male reproductive tract from fetal stages through adulthood, whereas a defined role for estrogen remains unclear.

Although there is no apparent role for estrogen action in the development of the male reproductive tract, studies have reported significant effects of early exposure to estrogen agonists and/or antagonists on the adult male reproductive system. However, it was generally concluded that such effects were caused by estrogen actions at the hypothalamic-pituitary level that ultimately resulted in decreased stimulation of the testis and reduced androgen production (303, 304). Still, a series of studies by McLachlan et al. demonstrated that perinatal exposure to the synthetic estrogen, DES, results in an assortment of apparently direct defects in the murine male reproductive tract, including undescended testes, epididymal cysts, aberrant expression of estrogen-inducible genes, adenocarcinoma, and sterility (305, 306, 307, 308). However, these studies indicated a toxic effect of developmental exposure to pharmacological levels of estrogens rather than a required physiological function of estrogen in the male reproductive tract. Investigators have reported the detection of ER by steroid autoradiography (309, 310) and immunohistochemistry (112) in the testes and accessory tissues of the male tract, even as early as day 16 of gestation in the mouse. In addition, the newly described ERß also appears in varied amounts in the testis, epididymis, and prostate of the rodent (93, 121, 311, 312, 313, 314) and rhesus monkey (96). Hence, these studies suggest the presence of a functional estrogen- signaling system in the male reproductive tract and further demonstrate the direct detrimental effects that may occur when this system is aberrantly activated.

A. Testicular function and spermatogenesis
A defined role of ER and estrogen action in the function and maintenance of the male reproductive tissues remained elusive until the generation of the {alpha}ERKO mice. As expected in the presence of a functional androgen-signaling system, the reproductive tract of the {alpha}ERKO male mouse undergoes apparently normal prenatal development to produce internal and external structures that are indistinguishable from wild-type littermates. However, at approximately 20 weeks of age, significant decreases in the weight of the testis and epididymis/vas deferens are observed, whereas the seminal vesicle/coagulating glands and prostate appear normal in size (315, 316). As shown in Table 2Go, circulating gonadotropins in mature {alpha}ERKO males include levels of FSH within the wild-type range, whereas LH is slightly elevated (315, 317). In accordance with the increased LH secretion are observations of Leydig cell hyperplasia in the testis (121) and serum testosterone levels of approximately 2-fold in the {alpha}ERKO male compared with age-matched wild-type males (Table 2Go) (315, 317). Therefore, the decreased weights reported for the accessory organs of the male reproductive tract are not a secondary effect of any phenotype in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, but rather a direct result of the loss of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen action within these tissues.

One of the most striking initial observations in the {alpha}ERKO was complete infertility in the males when tested in a continuous mating study with wild-type, known-fertile females (315). No difference in fertility was observed in the heterozygous {alpha}ERKO males (315). Although the etiology of such infertility was unclear, initial experiments in which {alpha}ERKO males were placed in a mating environment with hormone-primed wild-type females resulted in significantly fewer copulatory plugs, indicating a severe deficit in normal sexual behavior (315, 318). Further investigations have demonstrated that infertility in the {alpha}ERKO male is due to pleiotropic effects resulting from disruption of the ER{alpha} gene. In addition to a lack of normal sexual behavior, {alpha}ERKO male mice exhibit significantly lower sperm counts that further diminish with age compared with their wild-type and heterozygous litter mates (315). This is compounded by defects in the function of those sperm that are produced in the testis of the {alpha}ERKO male, including obvious deficits in motility and a complete inability to fertilize wild-type oocytes in an in vitro assay (315).

The testes of the {alpha}ERKO male are slightly smaller than wild-type but do develop normally and possess the usual complement of seminferous tubules surrounded by interstitial tissue and Leydig cells (Figs. 6Go and 7Go). Stimulation of the Leydig cells by LH and subsequent androgen synthesis in the {alpha}ERKO testes appears sufficient as mentioned earlier. However, a report by Hutson et al. (316) indicated a greater incidence of retraction of the testes into the abdomen and a smaller yet more muscular cremaster sac in {alpha}ERKO males compared with wild-type counterparts. This anomaly was noticed only after excision and fixation of the urogenital system and was not observable upon external examination of the animals. Interestingly, this is one of the few phenotypes of the {alpha}ERKO that has also been observed in the heterozygous littermates as well (316). This same laboratory had earlier employed the Tfm mouse, a naturally occurring androgen-resistant mutant, to produce strong evidence in support of a biphasic model of testicular descent in which androgens are critical to the second step of testis migration, i.e., from the internal inguinal ring to the scrotum via action on the genito-inguinal ligament (or gubernaculum) (319). Previous studies had shown that exposure of fetal male mice to exogenous estrogens resulted in a failure in testicular descent, although it was concluded that this was probably an indirect effect due to inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and anti-Müllerian hormone (319). However, the significant incidence of undescended or retracted testes in the {alpha}ERKO strongly suggests a previously unrecognized and possibly direct role for the ER{alpha} in development of the male reproductive tract.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Testes and seminal vesicle/coagulating gland weights in the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO males. Mean total testes weights (A) and seminal vesicle/coagulating gland weights (presented as % body weight) of age-matched wild-type and {alpha}ERKO males from 4–22 months of age. Sample number in each group was >=9. Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance is indicated as follows (t test, wild-type vs. {alpha}ERKO, unequal variance): *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Histology of representative adult {alpha}ERKO testis. a, Longitudinal section of a testis and portions of the epididymis from an adult {alpha}ERKO mouse (79 days old). The cranial portion of the testis and part of the caput epididymis (Cp Ep) are in the upper portion of the panel, and the caudal pole of the testis and cauda epididymis (Ca Ep) are in the lower portion. As indicated, the rete testis (RT) is conspicuously dilated. The seminiferous tubules in the caudal pole of the testis have a thin seminiferous epithelium and a considerably dilated lumen (as indicated by the solid arrows), spermatogenesis is disrupted, and fluid is present in the interstitium surrounding these tubules. However, in the seminiferous tubules in the cranial pole of the testis, the seminiferous epithelium is thicker, the lumen is smaller, spermatogenesis is ongoing, and the tubules are closely situated. [Reproduced with permission from E. M. Eddy et al.: Endocrinology 137:4796–4805, 1996 (315 ). © The Endocrine Society.] b, High-power magnification (132x) of seminiferous tubules from an adult {alpha}ERKO male (110 days old) illustrating an apparently normal seminiferous tubule possessing an epithelium (SE) composed of Sertoli cells and spermatogonia (open arrows), juxtaposed with a tubule possessing a severely dilated lumen and a thinning seminiferous epithelium (solid arrow) with little active spermatogenesis occurring. Leydig cells (LC) are present in the interstitial space.

 
Spermatogenesis, the production of free spermatozoa, is the primary function of the testes. Similar to the process of gametogenesis in the females described earlier, spermatogenesis is an equally complex process involving several different cell types and hormone actions. This is reiterated by the severely impaired spermatogenesis observed in naturally occurring inactivating mutations of the AR gene (38, 301), as well as in a number of knockout mouse models (reviewed in Ref. 110), e.g., those for the genes encoding Hsp70–2 (320), CREM (321, 322), DAZLA (323), and HR6B (324). Although FSH was previously thought to be essential to spermatogenesis, mice possessing targeted disruptions for the FSHß-subunit gene (241) or the FSH receptor gene (242) are fertile and show only minor detriments in testicular and sperm function.

Estradiol has been thought to play only a minor role if any in sperm production, although Sertoli cells lining the seminferous tubules produce estradiol (325) and express detectable levels of ER (326). Therefore, it was surprising to observe severe impairments in spermatogenesis at multiple levels in the {alpha}ERKO male. At 8 wk, the earliest age studied, {alpha}ERKO males possess epididymal sperm counts that are approximately 55% of that found in wild-type littermates (315). This value continues to decrease with age, with {alpha}ERKO males possessing approximately 13% of wild-type sperm counts at 16 wk of age (315). Furthermore, the epididymal sperm collected from the {alpha}ERKO males are characterized by significantly decreased levels of motility and increased incidence of sperm heads separated from the flagellum (315). Even those sperm that possessed normal structure and motility were unable to fertilize wild-type oocytes in an in vitro fertilization assay (315). Therefore, despite levels of circulating gonadotropins and androgen within the normal range, disruption of the ER{alpha} gene has resulted in severe impairments in both spermatogenesis and sperm function.

As shown in Fig. 7Go, histological analysis of testes from sexually mature {alpha}ERKO males indicated significant atrophy of the seminiferous epithelium and severe dilation of the tubule lumen. At 10–20 days of age, no morphological difference in the testis was apparent when comparing the {alpha}ERKO with wild-type. However, a distinct morphological phenotype becomes obvious by 40 days of age and progresses to produce a completely atrophied testis by 150 days in the {alpha}ERKO male (315). Accordingly, sperm counts decrease as the testicular phenotype worsens, although immunohistochemical detection of Hsp70–2, a germ cell-specific protein, was possible even in the most severely disrupted tubules (315).

Further characterization of testes from mature {alpha}ERKO males indicated a prominent rete testis that is dilated and protrudes into the interior of the organ as well as severely dilated efferent ductules (Fig. 7Go) (315, 327). The rete testes are composed of a network of intercommunicating channels located in the posterior-cranial portion of the testes and serve as a pathway by which suspended spermatozoa can pass from the testis to the epididymis. Connecting the rete testis to the epididymis are the efferent ducts, a series of multiple channels thought to play a significant role in reabsorption of much of the testicular fluid, and therefore act to also concentrate the sperm (303). Steroid autoradiography has indicated that the efferent ducts of the mouse possess the highest concentration of ER compared with any other region of the excurrent duct system (309). This expression pattern is evident in the mouse as early as neonatal day 3 (310). Immunohistochemical and RNA analyses have shown that ER{alpha} is the predominant form of ER in the efferent ducts and the cranial portion of the epididymis (311, 328), although ERß mRNA is also detectable (121, 311).

Previous studies employing surgical ligation of the efferent ductules reported a severe dilation of the seminiferous tubules similar to that observed in the {alpha}ERKO male (329, 330). Based on the similarity of phenotypes, it became clear that the testicular anomaly observed in the mature {alpha}ERKO male may be the result of a severe imbalance in the fluid equilibrium. However, was it due to hypersecretion of fluid from the testis or insufficient reabsorption of fluid by the epithelial cells lining the efferent ducts, or possibly a combination of both? Using surgical techniques to inhibit fluid transport at different points in the excurrent duct system, Hess et al. (327) demonstrated that the reabsorption abilities of the efferent ductules in the {alpha}ERKO male were lacking and, in fact, the secretory activity is actually reduced in the {alpha}ERKO testis. Further characterization indicated a reduction or often a complete lack of endocytotic vesicles and organelles common to fluid uptake in the epithelial cells lining the {alpha}ERKO efferent ducts (327). This study was the first report of a direct ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen function in the male reproductive tract. Interestingly, however, was the inability of the pure antiestrogen, ICI-182,780, to produce a similar phenotype in wild-type ductal fragments in in vitro experiments (327). Although the antagonist was able to cause some loss of fluid absorption in the wild-type ductal fragment, the resulting phenotype was not nearly as extreme as that observed in the {alpha}ERKO tissue fragments (327). The authors proposed that perhaps ERß was possibly mediating an agonistic effect of the ICI-182,780 and thereby may explain the lack of full corroboration with the in vivo {alpha}ERKO phenotype (327). This hypothesis was based on the work of Paech et al. (91), which demonstrated that estrogen antagonists, including ICI-164,384, may function as an agonist when interacting with AP-1 complexes in vitro. We, as well as others, have since shown that ERß mRNA expression in the {alpha}ERKO male reproductive tract is not altered, although its function remains unclear (93, 121). However, the preservation of ERß expression in the {alpha}ERKO strongly indicates that the reabsorption functions of the efferent ducts are indeed dependent on the presence of functional ER{alpha}. This view is strengthened by the lack of a similar testicular phenotype in ßERKO male mice observed at ages as old as 14 months (47).

Interestingly, the luminal swelling, loss of germinal epithelium, and atrophy in the seminiferous tubules of the {alpha}ERKO testes appeared to commence at the caudal portion of the organ and progress toward the cranial region as the animal aged (Fig. 7Go) (315). This is thought to be due to a gradual increases in testicular pressure leading to restricted blood flow as the phenotype in the rete testis worsens and fluid accumulates within the encapsulated organ (315). The result of such decreased circulation is likely to become initially manifested in the less vascularized caudal region of the testis and eventually advance to affect the whole gonad.

Despite the severe testicular phenotype that occurs in the {alpha}ERKO male with age, younger males do produce viable sperm. However, the motility and fertilization abilities of epididymal sperm collected from {alpha}ERKO males are severely compromised. ER (326) as well as P450arom (331) have been reported in Sertoli cells and germ cells of the testis, respectively. Therefore, a loss of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen action in the Sertoli cell may alter sperm function. It is also known that spermatozoa entering the epididymis are unable to fertilize, and undergo a critically active maturation process as they pass through the epididymal cords (303). Estradiol treatment of adult male mice has been reported to increase the rate at which spermatozoa pass through the epididymis (332). Furthermore, expression of ER{alpha} in the mouse epididymis appears to be highest in the caput epididymis, where sperm first enter after exiting the testis (309). Reports of ERß expression in the epididymis indicate an opposite distribution, i.e. highest levels are found in the cauda epididymis, in both the rat (311) and mouse (121). This pattern of epididymal ERß expression is preserved in the {alpha}ERKO male (121). Nonetheless, normal fertility in the ßERKO male indicates that any actions of estrogen required for sperm maturation and fertilization capacity appear dependent on the presence of ER{alpha}.

The varied phenotypes leading to infertility in the {alpha}ERKO male have provided great insight into the role that ER{alpha} plays in the development and function of the male reproductive tract. The importance of functional ER{alpha} is reiterated by the lack of phenotypes and apparent full fertility in the ßERKO male mice. It is certainly possible that there are overlapping functions of the two ERs and that compensatory mechanisms have reduced the observed phenotypes compared with those that might result if both ERs were lacking. The speculated phenotype of a double ER knockout, i.e., {alpha}ßERKO, might be similar to that reported in males homozygous for a disruption of the P450arom gene (ArKO), and therefore lacking the capabilities to synthesize estradiol. However, intriguing inconsistencies are apparent when comparing the phenotypes of the {alpha}ERKO male with those of the ArKO. For example, the male ArKO mice exhibit no defects in fertility, at least at the younger ages examined (257). The testicular weight in adult ArKO males is within the normal range, and histology indicates normal testicular development with no indication of a phenotype similar to that of the {alpha}ERKO males (257). The possible existence of currently unknown ligands able to stimulate the ER pathways required for function of the male reproductive tract and therefore altering the phenotype in the ArKO must be considered. It is also possible that much of the actions of ER{alpha} in the male reproductive tract, as inferred from the {alpha}ERKO, may be ligand independent. Such a phenomenon may explain the findings of Hess et al. (327), in which an estrogen antagonist was unable to completely induce an {alpha}ERKO phenotype in the ligated wild-type efferent duct segments in vitro. Since the testicular phenotype in the {alpha}ERKO becomes more severe with age, it is possible that a similar, yet even further, delay in the manifestation of this anomaly may exist when the ligand is removed; however, there are currently no reports on older ArKO males.

B. Accessory sex organs
Certain accessory organs of the male reproductive tract that have not been already discussed, namely the prostate, bulbourethral glands, coagulating gland, and seminal vesicles, warrant mention. These glands have no known specific function other than to secrete components necessary to the volume of seminal plasma. All four tissues are dependent on androgen stimulation for growth and maintenance (reviewed in Ref. 333). However, ER has been detected in each during various stages of development in the rat (310). Furthermore, the prostate in various species appears to express significant mRNA levels for ERß as well as ER{alpha} (93, 96, 311, 313). A series of studies by the Prins laboratory have described the toxic effects of neonatal DES exposure on the morphology and biochemistry of the rat prostate, including the regulation of AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß (314, 334, 335, 336). Nonetheless, no obvious abnormalities in the development of these glands have been observed in either the {alpha}ERKO or ßERKO mice (47, 315). However, categorical studies of these tissues have not been carried out to date on older animals of either model. One observation in {alpha}ERKO males is a significant increase in weight of the seminal vesicle/coagulating gland that becomes more apparent with age, as shown in Fig. 6Go. This phenotype is most likely the result of continued stimulation of this tissue by the elevated levels of serum androgen that exist in the {alpha}ERKO (Table 2Go).


    VI. Neuroendocrine System
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
The mammalian brain and pituitary are clearly target organs of steroid hormone action. Several studies have demonstrated a wide distribution of receptors for all three sex steroid hormones throughout the different regions of the brain (reviewed in Refs. 337, 338) as well as in the heterogeneous cell types of the pituitary (reviewed in Ref. 339). The regulatory actions of the gonadal steroid and peptide hormones on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis have been characterized in a number of laboratory models and may be the most well understood area among a growing list of hypothesized actions of steroids in the central nervous system. In contrast, changes in sensorimotor, cognitive, and emotional functions that occur in many women during periods of peak steroid secretion in the ovarian cycle remain less well understood (340, 341). More recently, estrogen action has received great attention as a possible influential factor in several nonreproductive-related brain functions, including learning and memory, cognitive function, and pain sensitivity, as well as in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s (reviewed in Ref. 342).

Several reviews over the past 20 yr have thoroughly documented the known actions of steroid hormones in the central nervous system (see Refs. 337, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348). Sexual dimorphism has been described in multiple regions of the central nervous system (reviewed in Ref. 343). Analogous to the reproductive tract, the neuroendocrine system undergoes a process of sexual differentiation and maturation that is heavily influenced by the steroid receptor-signaling pathways. Briefly, sexual maturation of the neuroendocrine system may be defined as the acquisition of pituitary responsiveness to hypothalamic factors and ovarian steroids and the onset of steroid-induced sexual behavior. In turn, differentiation of the neuroendocrine system is demonstrated by the unique ability of the female hypothalamus to induce an LH surge in response to a rise in serum estradiol (346, 348). The "organizational" or differentiating effects of perinatal steroids are permanent and manifested as measurable structural changes or as subtle fixations in the system’s sensitivity to the "activational" effects of steroids during adulthood (343).

Studies have indicated that the imprinting mechanisms controlled by the sex steroids in the brain are likely via multiple pathways, including the regulation of cell death, neuronal growth, and synaptogenesis (343, 347, 349). These effects are generally considered to be genomic events mediated via the nuclear receptor pathways (337). Indeed, the nuclear receptors for estrogen, androgen, and progesterone all have been detected in various amounts in the fetal, neonatal, and adult brain of several species (88, 337, 343, 350, 351). Furthermore, the discovery of the ERß has introduced a new level of complexity to the neuroendocrine system as it relates to estrogen action. Recent studies have demonstrated an expression pattern for the ERß in the rat brain that is as broad as that for ER{alpha} as reviewed in Refs. 351, 352 . Studies in the primate have reported similar findings (96, 354). Of particular relevance are the descriptions by Shughrue et al. (88) of colocalization of ER{alpha} immunoreactivity and ERß mRNA in certain regions of the rat brain, including the medial nucleus of the amygdala and the periventricular preoptic nucleus. Therefore, with preliminary studies indicating distinct tissue localization of the two ERs in the reproductive tract, the brain may be the ideal tissue for the study of possible transactivational actions of ER{alpha}/ERß heterodimers. It is important to reiterate that studies have indicated a normal expression pattern for the ERß gene in the hypothalamus of the {alpha}ERKO mouse (93, 352).

Aside from the receptor-mediated genomic actions of sex steroids that have been so well characterized, the possibility of nongenomic effects of gonadal hormones and their metabolites has also received increased attention. A number of rapid responses to gonadal steroids in various tissues have been reported and are believed to occur too soon after steroid exposure to be mediated by the classical mechanism of hormone nuclear receptors; therefore, they have been termed as being "nongenomic" (reviewed in Refs. 347, 355, 356, 357, 358). These include the rapid activation of membrane calcium channels by progesterone in the maturing oocyte and spermatozoa, by estrogens in myometrial cells, and by androgens in rat osteoblast cells (347, 355, 356). Descriptions of similar nongenomic effects of steroids in the neuroendocrine system include rapid increases in cAMP levels in neurons, modulation of the GABA-GABAA receptor function, release of GnRH and dopmamine from nerve terminals, modulation of oxytocin receptors, and the release of PRL from GH3/B6 pituitary cells (343, 356, 357). Supportive experimental findings indicate the presence of membrane steroid receptors, including those for estradiol, in various cell types (359, 360, 361). Evidence that a membrane ER is structurally similar to the nuclear ER{alpha} was provided by Pappas et al. (362) in which multiple ER{alpha}-specific antibodies were shown to detect and localize ER{alpha} immunoreactivity in the cell membrane. Furthermore, Blaustein describes findings of extranuclear ER{alpha} immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm, dendritic processes, and axon terminals of neurons and suggests an active role for these receptors in neurotransmitter release (reviewed in Ref. 338). Recently, Razandi et al. (363) reported the detection of membrane ER{alpha} and ERß receptors in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with an expression vector of the respective receptor cDNA, indicating that the membrane and nuclear forms of each ER originate from the same transcript and exhibit similar affinities for estradiol. These studies further demonstrated that the membrane-bound ERs were G protein linked and able to elicit a variety of signal transduction events, including the induction of cell proliferation (363). In contrast, Gu et al. (364) recently employed the {alpha}ERKO mouse to illustrate that the documented rapid action of estradiol on kainate-induced currents in the hippocampus occurs in the absence of a functional ER{alpha} gene, nor does ICI-182,780 have an inhibitory effect, suggesting that ERß is not involved as well. Therefore, the putative membrane receptor involved in mediating the neuronal effect of estradiol in the hippocampus described by Gu et al. appears to be distinct from the intracellular nuclear form of the ER as well as that described by Razandi et al. (363). Regardless, the ultimate function of the nongenomic signaling pathways of the gonadal steroids in the proper organization and function of the mammalian brain remains unclear. Therefore, the ERKO mutant mice provide an excellent model to not only study the role of the nuclear receptors, but also further the investigations of steroid hormone actions that may be nuclear receptor independent.

A comprehensive review of the neuroendocrine system is beyond the scope of this discussion and has been reviewed in detail elsewhere (337, 347). However, as was expected, distinct phenotypes in the neuroendocrine system have become evident in mice after disruption of the ER{alpha} gene. The ultimate consequences of the lack of ER{alpha} action in the neuroendocrine system are manifested in the ovary of the {alpha}ERKO female and as severe deficits in sexual and field behavior in both sexes of the {alpha}ERKO mice. Due to the relatively short time in which the ßERKO model has been available for study, no detailed characterizations of possible phenotypes in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of this model have been carried out. Therefore, this section of the review will concentrate on what is currently known about the {alpha}ERKO, but will attempt to shed light on the possible distinct roles of both ERs based on the limited observations of the ßERKO.

A. Hypothalamic-pituitary axis
The hypothalamus may be thought of as the interface between the central nervous system and the endocrine system, i.e., the pituitary. The anatomical location of the hypothalamus, forming the base of the brain and residing just above the pituitary, is conducive to a function of translating neuronal signals from the brain into humoral factors that stimulate the appropriate actions in the anterior pituitary (365). The two components are connected by the hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal system, within which blood flows predominantly from the hypothalamus to the anterior pituitary, carrying the appropriate hormonal factors (365). These hormones act as releasing or inhibiting factors to control the secretory activity of the pituitary. In contrast, the posterior pituitary is connected directly to the hypothalamus via neurons passing through the pituitary stalk and functions as a storage organ for the hypothalamic hormones, oxytocin and vasopressin.

The anterior pituitary is composed of at least five distinct cell types, all derived from a common primordium, which have been categorized by the particular peptide hormone they produce and secrete. These cell types are as follows, with the secretory hormone in parentheses: gonadotrophs (FSH and LH), corticotrophs (ACTH), thyrotrophs (TSH), somatotrophs (GH), and lactotrophs (PRL). Early studies employing steroid autoradiography demonstrated estrogen binding to varied degrees throughout the different cells of the anterior pituitary, although discrepancies among species are evident (reviewed in Ref. 339). These studies have been followed by those using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, indicating that the majority of estradiol binding in the anterior pituitary is due to the expression of ER{alpha} (366, 367). In most species described, gonadotrophs and lactotrophs exhibit the greatest level of ER{alpha} followed by lower and varied levels of localization to the other cell types (339). Furthermore, Shupnik et al. (29, 368) have described in the rat pituitary a number of ER{alpha} mRNA isoforms characterized by the removal of single or multiple exons as well as 5'-sequences that exhibit little homology to the full-length wild-type ER{alpha}. Although a distinct function for these ER{alpha} isoforms has not yet been determined, their transcription as well as that of the full-length wild-type ER{alpha} gene appears to be regulated by ovarian steroids (368, 369). Further complexity has been introduced by several recent descriptions of the presence of ERß mRNA in the anterior pituitary of the human (100), monkey (96), and rat (70, 98, 99). Wilson et al. (98) report that ERß mRNA levels were easily detectable in the pituitary of the 15-day-old rat, exceeding the levels of ER{alpha} mRNA. These levels decreased in the adult, whereupon a distinct sex difference became evident in which the anterior pituitary of the female expressed much higher levels of ERß mRNA (98). Still, previous studies employing radiolabeled ligand do not corroborate this difference in the rat anterior pituitary between the sexes at the level of estradiol binding (370, 371). Furthermore, there are contrasting reports concerning the cellular localization of the ERß transcripts in the rat anterior pituitary. Mitchner et al. (99) reported varied levels of ERß mRNA throughout the different cell types of the anterior pituitary. In contrast, Wilson et al. (98) describe the detection of both ERß and ER{alpha} mRNAs in the gonadotrophs, whereas the lactotrophs appear to possess ER{alpha} only. Nonetheless, as previously mentioned, we find low to undetectable levels of ERß mRNA in the pituitary of the adult mouse, including that of the {alpha}ERKO (93). However, in light of the above studies described in the prepubertal rat, which indicate a possible developmental role for the ERß, similar assays in the mouse are warranted.

Although the rate of gonadotropin secretion from the anterior pituitary is directly modulated by the hypothalamus, the level of circulating sex steroids is the most important physiological determinant of serum gonadotropin levels in animals and humans (reviewed in Ref. 251). The positive and negative regulatory loops of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis have been reviewed in detail and will be summarized briefly here (251, 362, 372). In short, the hypothalamus stimulates the synthesis and subsequent secretion of the gonadotropins into the circulatory system, which then act to induce gametogenesis and steroidogenesis in the gonads. The functional gonadotropins, FSH and LH, are composed of dimers of the common {alpha}-glycoprotein subunit ({alpha}GSU), with a distinct ß-subunit that confers specificity to the hormone, i.e., active FSH consists of a FSH-ß (FSHß)/{alpha}GSU dimer, whereas LH consists of a LH-ß (LHß)/{alpha}GSU dimer (373). Hypothalamic stimulation of the anterior pituitary is via the release of GnRH, a deca-peptide that functions to positively regulate the synthesis and secretion of the gonadotropins from the anterior pituitary (365). A reciprocal hypothalamic factor that may act to inhibit pituitary secretion of gonadotropins has not yet been found. Hypothalamic secretion of GnRH is not tonic but rather in the form of pulses, driven by a poorly understood oscillating pulse generator (374, 375). The pulsatile stimulation of the anterior pituitary by GnRH thereby results in pulsatile gonadotropin release, which has been shown to be necessary for gonadal function and reproductive success (374, 375). Gonadotropin stimulation of the gonads subsequently results in gametogenesis and the synthesis of gonadal steroid and peptide hormones, which then feed back to the hypothalamus and pituitary to regulate FSH and LH secretion (251). However, differences in the system of feedback loops are apparent between the sexes. While there exists a tonic system to maintain a constant level of gonadotropins in both sexes, the female has been endowed with the ability to produce a surge of gonadotropin secretion to produce transient levels of hormone that are several fold higher than the tonic level (365). This massive gonadotropin surge provides for the reproductive cycle in the female and is critical to ovulation.

1. Female-negative gonadotropin regulation. There is ample experimental evidence in several species that estradiol can suppress the secretion of gonadotropins from the anterior pituitary (reviewed in Refs. 251, 372, 373, 376, 377). Ovariectomy of the female rodent is known to result in significant elevations in serum FSH and LH that can be returned to intact levels with physiological treatments of estradiol (376, 378, 379). The effects of ovariectomy are mirrored in the gonadotrophs of the anterior pituitary, which exhibit equally elevated mRNA levels for the gonadotropin subunit genes (373, 376). Studies in the female rat indicate that by 21 days post ovariectomy, LHß mRNA levels rise to as high as 20-fold, whereas the increases in FSHß and {alpha}GSU mRNA levels plateau at 4- to 5-fold (373). Daily treatments with estradiol will return the gonadotropin subunit mRNAs to the pregonadectomy levels within 7 days in the rat (373, 376).

The ability of estradiol to maintain a tonic level of gonadotropins via regulation of both the expression of the gonadtropin subunit genes and the ultimate secretion of the peptide hormones is well accepted. However, the precise site at which the steroid exerts this effect has been difficult to ascertain. This is partly due to the fact that the ER has been detected in both the hypothalamic regions controlling pituitary function as well as the anterior pituitary itself, as previously discussed. Although there is evidence to support a direct effect of estradiol on both components of the neuroendocrine axis, it is believed that the hypothalamus may be the primary site of action in the negative feedback actions (reviewed in Refs. 251, 372, 373, 376). In the laboratory animal, it is believed that castration principally results in an increased frequency of GnRH pulses and therefore increased tonic levels of gonadotropins, both of which can be restored to normal with exogenous estradiol replacement (373, 380, 381, 382, 383).

Numerous studies have produced data to indicate that estrogen regulation of hypothalamic GnRH secretion may be the predominant pathway by which transcription of the gonadotropin subunit genes and gonadotropin secretion is maintained (373, 376). The most prominent include the characterization of transgenic mice that possess, within the anterior pituitary, a measurable reporter gene under the regulation of a gonadotropin subunit gene promoter, including the promotor of the human {alpha}GSU gene (384), the rat {alpha}GSU gene (385), and the bovine LHß gene (386). As expected, ovariectomy of the transgenic females resulted in increased transcription and activity of the transgene reporter gene. Keri et al. (386) illustrated that estradiol was able to reduce the postovariectomy rise in transcription of the reporter gene despite the lack of detectable DNA binding of the ER{alpha} to the gonadotropin promoter sequences of the construct. Furthermore, the postovariectomy rise in promoter activity could be prevented by administration of a GnRH antagonist to the transgenic animal, thereby inhibiting GnRH action at the gonadotrope. Therefore, a loss of estradiol action via ovariectomy appeared to result in increased GnRH release from the hypothalamus, which in turn stimulated increased transcription of the reporter constructs. However, the possibility of estradiol actions at the level of the gonadotrope that may directly effect gene transcription or alter GnRH responsiveness can not be ruled out.

Regardless of the precise site at which estrogens negatively regulate gonadotropin expression and release, genetic disruption of the ER{alpha} gene was expected to have effects in the female hypothalamic-pituitary axis that mimic ovariectomy. Northern blot analysis of RNA from pituitaries of intact wild-type and {alpha}ERKO females indicates this to be true. Scully et al. (282) demonstrated that in the {alpha}ERKO female, the levels of the {alpha}GSU transcript are elevated 4-fold, whereas FSHß and LHß mRNAs are as high as 7-fold compared with wild-type. Ovariectomy in wild-type female littermates produced elevated gonadotropin subunit mRNAs that approximated the levels observed in the intact {alpha}ERKO, indicating that the effects of an acute loss of estrogen action are similar to those produced by a hereditary loss of ER{alpha} (282). Therefore, despite the fact that the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the {alpha}ERKO female is chronically exposed to elevated levels of estradiol, the significantly increased level of all three gonadotropin subunit transcripts resemble those of an ovariectomized female. These data provide strong support for a critical role of ER{alpha}, rather than ERß, in the negative regulation of transcription of the gonadotropin subunit genes. However, at this time, studies of the {alpha}ERKO have not provided data to further elucidate the precise mechanism or site at which a loss in ER{alpha} action has resulted in this effect.

Although the transcript levels of both the LHß, FSHß, and {alpha}GSU are significantly elevated in the {alpha}ERKO pituitary, this effect does not extend to the serum levels of the gonadotropins. Whereas serum LH is elevated 4- to 7-fold in the adult {alpha}ERKO female, levels of FSH appear to be within the normal range (Table 2Go) (252). A similar effect is reported in the PRKO female mice, although the serum LH levels in this mutant female are not nearly as elevated as those in the {alpha}ERKO female (387). In addition, ovariectomy in the PRKO female results in a further elevation of serum LH (387), most likely due to the loss of serum estrogens. This effect is not observed in the {alpha}ERKO female (252), indicating that estradiol is the predominant steroid hormone maintaining tonic levels of LH in the female.

As shown in Table 2Go, the serum gonadotropin levels in the {alpha}ERKO female indicate that only LH is significantly elevated, whereas FSH is within the wild-type range. This is in contrast to the levels of FSHß mRNA in the anterior pituitary of the {alpha}ERKO, which are elevated 7-fold and equal to those exhibited by an ovariectomized wild-type female. Furthermore, assays of pituitary homogenates from intact {alpha}ERKO females for FSH protein indicate levels within the wild-type range, suggesting that the divergence between gene expression and serum levels for FSH does not appear to be due to a decreased secretory rate of the hormone but rather at the level of translation. This is in contrast to the ArKO female mouse, in which serum levels of both gonadotropins are reportedly elevated 3-fold compared with the wild-type (257).

There are a number of possible explanations for this observation in the {alpha}ERKO female. Whereas estradiol treatment of ovariectomized rats has been reported to completely block the expected increases in LHß mRNA and LH secretion, it appears to be only partially effective in reducing transcription of the FSHß gene and secretion of FSH (376). It is now known that FSHß gene expression and FSH secretion is selectively regulated in a positive or negative nature by the peptides activin and inhibin, respectively (reviewed in Ref. 388). This is illustrated in the knockout mouse model of the activin receptor type II gene, which exhibits suppressed FSH levels in the adult of both sexes, supporting a role for activin in the positive regulation of FSH secretion (248). Although it is believed that the reciprocal effects of the activin/inhibin peptides are mediated at the level of the anterior pituitary, the precise mechanisms of action remain unclear. Inhibin has been shown to alter the levels of GnRH receptor (389) and decrease FSHß mRNA levels (390, 391, 392), as well as inhibit translation of FSHß mRNA (391, 393). Activin appears to utilize similar mechanisms to exert opposite effects on FSHß mRNA transcription and translation and ultimate secretion of the hormone (394, 395). Therefore, the normal levels of FSH in the pituitary and serum of female {alpha}ERKO mice may indicate that disruption of the ER{alpha} gene has no effect on the pattern of activin and inhibin secretion. This is supported by the apparent negative regulation of FSHß at the translational level in the {alpha}ERKO female, suggesting the presence of an active inhibin-signaling pathway. Further support is provided by studies indicating that ovariectomy of the {alpha}ERKO female, and therefore a loss of ovarian inhibin secretion, results in elevated levels of serum FSH similar to those seen in ovariectomized wild types (252). Estradiol replacement was partially effective in reducing the serum FSH in the ovariectomized wild-type but completely ineffective in the ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO (252). These studies provide for at least two conclusions: 1) the partial effectiveness of estradiol in reducing serum FSH levels in the wild-type was likely via functional ER{alpha} in the hypothalamus that may complement the actions of inhibin in the intact female; and 2) ovarian factors other than estradiol, most likely inhibin, are maintaining normal serum FSH levels in the {alpha}ERKO female, possibly by mechanisms that override the loss of ER{alpha} action. It is also possible that both activin and inhibin synthesis and secretion may be altered in the {alpha}ERKO female, but do not result in a net difference in serum FSH levels. Future investigations to determine the serum levels of the activin/inhibin subunit peptides and their functional dimers in the {alpha}ERKO female are warranted.

Another possible explanation for the selective increase in serum LH in the {alpha}ERKO female may be that a lack of ER{alpha} action has resulted in aberrations in the GnRH pulse frequency and amplitude that are more conducive to LH secretion from the anterior pituitary. Normal levels of {alpha}GSU transcripts can be maintained with constant GnRH stimulation of the anterior pituitary (376). However, normal expression of both gonadotropin ß-subunit genes and gonadotropin secretion requires pulsatile stimulation from the hypothalamus, and each responds differently depending on the amplitude and frequency of GnRH stimulation (373, 376). Varied expression of the GnRH receptor on the cell surface of the gonadotrophs also varies with the level of hypothalamic stimulation (396). This mechanism, by which the level GnRH receptors can be differentially regulated and thereby modify the gonadotropin responsiveness to GnRH, has been proposed to be a key element in the differential regulation of the two different gonadotropins by the same releasing hormone (397). Studies in the rat have revealed that more rapid GnRH pulses (15–60 min) favor the secretion of LH, whereas slower pulses (120 min) allow for secretion of FSH (251, 376). Positive regulation of LH synthesis and secretion is also more sensitive to the amplitude of GnRH stimulation (251, 376). Therefore, a loss of ER{alpha} action during development and maturation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis may have resulted in a pattern of GnRH secretion that favors the translation and secretion of LH rather than FSH. The influence that ERß may have, including a possible compensatory role in the {alpha}ERKO hypothalamus, remains to be evaluated.

2. Female-positive gonadotropin regulation. In addition to maintaining tonic levels of serum gonadotropins, estradiol also plays a central role in the preovulatory gonadotropin surge mode in the female (reviewed in Refs. 263, 264, 377). Differentiation of the neuroendocrine system results in the development of mechanisms necessary to produce a dramatic preovulatory rise in serum gonadotropins in response to the positive feedback of ovarian steroids. In the rodent, developmental differentiation of this pathway in the neuroendocrine system is unique to the female (365). The surge in serum LH and FSH is the hallmark of the female cycle and is critical to ovulation as well as the synchronized induction of appropriate sexual behavior and, therefore, is vital to the female ovarian cycle and fertility.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that estradiol is required for the preovulatory gonadotropin surge, and that the timing and dose of estradiol exposure may be the most critical parameters (reviewed in Ref. 377). As with the negative regulatory effects of estradiol, the precise site of action for the sex steroids during the preovulatory gonadotropin surge also remains unclear. However, it is believed to be the result of the combined effects of external and internal cues transduced from the brain and the positive feedback of gonadal hormones that provide for a synchronized pattern of GnRH secretion upon an anterior pituitary that has been rendered transiently hypersensitive to the releasing hormone (reviewed in Ref. 377). In the monkey, destruction of the neurons involved in GnRH production can be overcome with pulsatile administration of exogenous GnRH, whereupon a gonadotropin surge can be produced with exogenous estradiol, indicating the pituitary as the predominant factor in the surge (398). However, this is not possible in the rodent, apparently due to a greater level of interdependency among the components of the neuroendocrine axis (365).

Therefore, although the rises in ovarian estrogen secretion are critical to the generation of a gonadotropin surge, the pathways involved are poorly understood. A number of mechanisms involving direct actions of estrogen in the brain have been proposed and recently reviewed (264). However, it is unlikely that the actions of estrogen are via direct interaction with GnRH neurons since these processes appear to be devoid of ER (264). Therefore, the actions of estradiol appear to result in indirect stimulation of the hypothalamic neurons that synthesize and release GnRH. Possible mechanisms include steroid interaction with receptor-positive monoaminergic and opoid neurons that may mediate the ultimate effects to GnRH neurons, possibly via modifications in the levels of catacholamines, glutamate, {gamma}-aminobutyric acid, neuropeptide Y, ß-endorphins, and galanin (reviewed in Refs. 263, 264). At the level of the anterior pituitary, the preovulatory increases in estradiol may act in concert with GnRH to enhance gonadotrope sensitivity to the forthcoming rise in releasing hormone by increasing the levels of GnRH receptor (263, 377). Furthermore, the 5'-flanking region of the rat LHß gene has been shown to possess an imperfect estrogen-responsive element that is able to bind ER{alpha} and confer estrogen responsiveness to a chimeric promoter-reporter gene construct in vitro (399). Therefore, the estradiol-ER{alpha} complex may also act to directly increase LHß mRNA levels before the LH surge (251).

Attempts to elicit an LH surge in the ovariectomized model with acute estradiol treatments have been reported to be only partially effective, indicating that ovarian factors other than estradiol are also required for a full physiological response (reviewed in Ref. 263). It is now known that the actions of progesterone and the PR are also a necessary component in the induction of the gonadotropin surge (reviewed in Ref. 263). The role of progesterone and PR in facilitating the preovulatory surge may be to induce a rapid release of GnRH from the hypothalamus, as well as possibly mediate a decrease in ER levels in the anterior pituitary, thereby possibly counteracting the inhibitory effects of estradiol (263). Although the precise mechanism of action may be unclear, the complete lack of a preovulatory surge in intact PRKO female mice provides strong support for the requirement of this steroid receptor (387).

A cooperative role between the estrogen- and progestrone-signaling pathways in the induction of the preovulatory surge may include the ability of estradiol to stimulate increased PR levels in both the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary, thereby increasing the sensitivity of these tissues to progesterone (400, 401). Shughrue et al. have shown that estradiol-induced increases in PR expression in the preoptic nucleus are possible in the {alpha}ERKO female (Fig. 8Go) and suggest that this may be a compensatory action of ERß (400). These same studies demonstrated that the preoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus in intact {alpha}ERKO females possessed a significantly greater level of PR mRNA when compared with wild-types, perhaps due to chronic stimulation of ERß by the elevated serum estradiol (400). Evidence to support this hypothesis is the apparent decrease in the level of PR transcripts observed after ovariectomy in the {alpha}ERKO, which can be returned to intact levels 6 h after a single treatment with estradiol (Fig. 8Go) (400).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. In situ hybridization for progesterone receptor (PR) mRNA in female WT and {alpha}ERKO hypothalamus. A, PR mRNA was detected in the medial preoptic nucleus of wild-type (a) and {alpha}ERKO females (b) 5 days afer ovariectomy. Also shown is the increased detection of PR mRNA in ovariectomized wild-type (c) and {alpha}ERKO (d) females 6 h after treatment with 5 µg of estradiol. Asterisks indicate the third ventricle. B, Quantitative analysis of the hybridization signal shown in panel A. Note the dramatic increase in PR hybridization signal when ovariectomized (OVX) wild-type mice were treated with estradiol (E2). Similarly, the hybridization signal seen in intact {alpha}ERKO females is attenuated by ovariectomy, but augmented to intact levels when ovariectomized females were treated with estradiol. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001. [Reproduced with permission from P. J. Shughrue et al.: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:11008–11012, 1997 (400 ). © National Academy of Sciences, USA]

 
The preoptic area of the hypothalamus, more specifically, the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of the preoptic region (AVPV), is thought to play a critical role in transducing the gonadotropin surge via interactions with the GnRH neurons. Unlike most sexually dimorphic nuclei, the AVPV is actually larger and composed of a greater number of dopaminergic neurons in the female compared with the male (402). In male rodents, this region is rendered inoperative by the actions of testosterone during differentiation (365), an effect that can be reproduced in females with neonatal testosterone or estradiol exposure (403, 404). Therefore, masculinization of this portion of the brain involves the destruction of a large portion of these neurons and is believed to be due to local aromatization of testosterone to estradiol and subsequent activation of ER-mediated pathways (405). In support of this hypothesis, Simerly et al. (405) reported that the AVPV region of {alpha}ERKO males possess a population of dopaminergic neurons more characteristic of a wild-type female, confirming a critical role of ER{alpha} in this differentiation process. Furthermore, the numbers of dopaminergic neurons in the female {alpha}ERKO are only slightly reduced when compared with wild-type, indicating a morphologically normal AVPV region (405). Therefore, with the {alpha}ERKO female exhibiting an apparent preservation of estrogen-induced increases in hypothalamic PR and a wild-type-like female phenotype in the AVPV region, it is conceivable that the hypothalamic mechanisms required for induction of the preovulatory surge may be intact.

3. Males: gonadotropin regulation. Because of the more prominent role of testosterone in the male, certain issues specific to the male hypothalamic-pituitary axis are worthy of discussion. Of course, lower aromatase activity in the testis results in circulating levels of estradiol in the male that do not approach those observed in the intact cycling female. Therefore, it would be expected that distinct mechanisms of steroid feedback and regulation of gonadotropin synthesis and secretion from the hypothalamic-pituitary axis have evolved in males, presumably one likely to be more dependent on testosterone. This difference is thought to occur at the level of the hypothalamus since the anterior pituitary generally exhibits no sexual differentiation (365) and possesses receptors for all sex steroids (339).

A critical role of testosterone and AR-mediated actions in the negative regulation of gonadotropin secretion in the male is illustrated by the elevated serum LH levels in Tfm mice (301) and in humans with androgen insensitivity syndromes (38). As in the female, transcription of the gonadotropin subunit genes is significantly elevated after castration in the male, although peak levels are reached much earlier (~7 days) (373). Furthermore, FSHß mRNA levels appear to return to precastration levels by 28 days, whereas the levels of LHß and {alpha}GSU transcripts remain elevated (373). Estradiol is equally effective as testosterone in reducing serum LH levels that result after castration in the male (reviewed in Ref. 373). These data, along with the documented presence of P450arom activity (reviewed in Refs. 406, 407) and wide distribution of ER in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis support a role for locally synthesized estradiol and ER action in male gonadotropin synthesis and/or secretion (88, 339). Furthermore, adult male ArKO mice exhibit elevated levels of serum LH despite possessing significantly high circulating testosterone (257). Therefore, the roles of estradiol and testosterone often appear overlapping as well as distinct, making obvious the complexity of the steroid-feedback mechanisms that exist in the male.

Any specific role the ER{alpha} may play in the regulation of gonadotropin synthesis and secretion in the male would be expected to become apparent in the {alpha}ERKO. Adult {alpha}ERKO males exhibit levels of hypothalamic GnRH, pituitary FSHß mRNA, and serum FSH that are within the normal range when compared with wild-type littermates (Table 2Go) (317). The normal levels of FSHß mRNA in the pituitary of {alpha}ERKO males are in stark contrast to the significantly elevated levels found in the female {alpha}ERKO mice (282). This contrast between the sexes may reflect differences in the inhibin/activin levels or may represent a definitive sexual differentiation in the transcriptional regulation of the FSHß gene in the mouse, indicating that androgens are the primary acting steroids in the male. However, although not as extreme as those found in the {alpha}ERKO female, pituitary LHß mRNA and serum LH levels are increased 2-fold in the adult {alpha}ERKO male (Table 2Go) (317).

In a series of experiments, Lindzey et al. (317) demonstrated that castration results in the expected elevated levels of serum LH in the wild-type, and a further increase in the already elevated LH levels in {alpha}ERKO males. The rise in serum LH that occurs upon castration even in the {alpha}ERKO male suggests that either estradiol-ERß or androgen-mediated mechanisms are maintaining the lower LH levels in the intact animal. Once again however, the mouse pituitary (including the {alpha}ERKO) appears to possess very little if any ERß mRNA (93), although ERß is expressed normally in the hypothalamic regions in the {alpha}ERKO (93, 352). Estradiol treatment of castrated animals over a period of 3 weeks reduced the serum LH levels to normal in the wild-type males, whereas no effect was observed in the {alpha}ERKO, indicating a requirement for ER{alpha} in this process (317). Although treatments of similar castrated males with testosterone was completely effective in producing an inhibitory effect on LH release in the wild-types, it was only partially effective in the {alpha}ERKO (317). The authors therefore concluded that the ability of testosterone to fully restore normal levels of LH in the sera of castrate wild-type males but only partially in the {alpha}ERKO males suggests that local aromatization of testosterone to estradiol and subsequent activation of ER{alpha}-mediated pathways act to enhance the negative feedback effects of androgens in the male hypothalamic-pituitary axis (317). However, the inability of testosterone to completely suppress the serum LH in the {alpha}ERKO male may be related to the dosage used in these studies. Strong evidence of AR-dependent regulation of LH secretion in the male {alpha}ERKO is found in preliminary experiments in which treatment with an antiandrogen (flutamide) increased serum LH by 3- to 10-fold in wild-type and {alpha}ERKO males, respectively. This suggests that {alpha}ERKO males have come to rely entirely on AR-mediated actions to regulate LH secretion, whereas the ER{alpha} continues to play a role in the wild-type.

In these same studies, Lindzey et al. (317) illustrated that prolonged treatment with DHT, the more potent and nonaromatizable androgen, resulted in no reduction in the castrate levels of serum LH in wild-type but was partially effective in the {alpha}ERKO male. However, the DHT was effective in restoring hypothalamic GnRH content levels to normal in castrate males of both genotypes (317). Therefore, the enhanced effect of DHT in negatively affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary regulation of serum LH, including the inhibition of hypothalamic GnRH release, remains a puzzling phenomenom unique to the {alpha}ERKO male. It is possible that a lack of ER{alpha} action during development resulted in a "re-organization" of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in the {alpha}ERKO male, and thereby somehow allowed for an increased sensitivity to androgens (317). Further studies in the {alpha}ERKO as well as the ßERKO males may help elucidate these unexpected results.

4. PRL regulation. PRL possesses more biological actions than all of the other anterior pituitary hormones combined. A recent review by Bole-Feysot et al. (279) thoroughly covered the current knowledge of the diverse actions of PRL, including its functions as a hormone, growth factor, neurotransmitter, and immunoregulator. A reflection of the multiple functions of PRL is the equally broad distribution of PRL-binding sites throughout the many physiological systems in vertebrates (279). The well known effects of PRL in reproduction include a critical role in the differentiation and function of the lactating mammary gland, as a luteotrophic hormone in the function of the corpus luteum and thereby as a promotor of blastocyst implantation, and an overall enhancement of the physiological functions in the tissues of the male reproductive tract (279). Nonreproductive roles of PRL include an involvement in osmoregulation; promotion of growth, development, and differentiation in several tissues; enhancement of metabolic activities in the brain, liver, pancreas, and adrenals; and various actions in immunoregulation (279).

It has long been known that estradiol is a critical hormone in the regulation of PRL synthesis and secretion from the lactotrophs in the anterior pituitary. Estradiol has also been shown to stimulate lactotroph cell growth (reviewed in Ref. 281) and has been implicated as a possible factor in the promotion of PRL-secreting tumors in humans (reviewed in Ref. 339). Furthermore, the lactotrophs of several species have been shown to possess significant levels of ER{alpha}, strongly suggesting that the actions of estradiol are receptor-mediated (reviewed in Ref. 339). As discussed above, recent descriptions have indicated the presence of ERß in the lactotrophs of the rat anterior pituitary, although contrasting reports exist, possibly due to strain variations. Whereas Wilson et al. (98) describe the presence of only ER{alpha} in lactotrophs, Mitchner et al. (99) report variable levels of ERß mRNA throughout the various cell types of the rat anterior pituitary. Shupnik et al. (100) have also reported the detection of ERß transcripts in human PRL-secreting tumors. Once again, we find only low to undetectable levels of ERß mRNA in the pituitary of the adult mouse, including the {alpha}ERKO (93).

The upstream regulatory sequences of the rat PRL gene have been found to possess an estrogen-responsive element that binds ER{alpha} and functions synergistically with the pituitary-specific factor, Pit-1, to promote expression (281, 408, 409). The required function of the ER{alpha} in the positive regulation of the PRL gene is nicely illustrated in the {alpha}ERKO mouse. The {alpha}ERKO females exhibit a 20-fold decrease in PRL mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary, whereas the {alpha}ERKO males exhibit a 10-fold decrease when each is compared with sex-matched wild-type controls (282). Although not as drastic, this reduction in the expression of the PRL gene is mirrored in the serum levels of the hormone in the {alpha}ERKO female, which possess an approximate 5-fold reduction in serum PRL (Table 2Go). Therefore, given the plethora of roles in which PRL is involved, it is likely that several of the phenotypes observed in the {alpha}ERKO mice may be due to a direct loss of or simply enhanced by the concurrent decrease in PRL signaling.

Interestingly, the extremely low levels of PRL mRNA in the anterior pituitary of the {alpha}ERKO female are even significantly less than that observed 14 days after ovariectomy in the wild-type (282). Therefore, the loss of ER{alpha} during development and differentiation of the lactotrophs in the anterior pituitary has resulted in a phenotype that is more severe than that induced by postpubertal ovariectomy, possibly due to a decrease in lactotroph cell number. It has been proposed that the lactotroph and somatotroph cell types of the adult anterior pituitary may be derived from a common cell that expresses both the genes for GH and PRL during development (reviewed in Ref. 410). The factors that may be involved in the terminal differentiation of this stem cell into a distinct cell type secreting only one of the respective hormones remain elusive. Because the appearance of the ER and the ontogeny of PRL expression appear to coincide in the developing pituitary, estrogen action has been proposed as a possible factor (410, 411, 412). However, a defect in the cell lineage of the lactotrophs that may be expected due to a loss of ER{alpha} action was not apparent in the {alpha}ERKO, as immunostaining for both PRL and GH localized expression of the genes to distinct cell types (282).

Furthermore, estrogen has also been shown to stimulate proliferation of the lactotrophs and PRL-secreting cell lines (reviewed in Ref. 339). Therefore, since the marked difference in PRL mRNA levels observed between the {alpha}ERKO female and the ovariectomized wild-type is not apparently due to a defect in the differentiation of the lactotrophs, it may possibly be due to a decreased number of lactotrophs in the anterior pituitary of the {alpha}ERKO. Scully et al. (282) provided evidence against this hypothesis, by once again employing immunohistochemical staining to illustrate only a modest decrease in lactotroph cells in the anterior pituitary of the {alpha}ERKO mice. Therefore, ER{alpha} action does not appear to be required for either differentiation or proliferation of the lactotrophs in the mouse anterior pituitary. However, a recent report by Chun et al. (413) has illustrated a distinct contrast in the level of occupied ER required to elicit proliferation and that required for PRL synthesis in PR1 cells, a PRL-secreting cell line. Whereas approximately 50% of the cellular pool of ER was required to be complexed with estradiol for half-maximal stimulation of the PRL gene, only 0.1% was required to induce cellular proliferation (413). These results suggest that the mechanisms required for estrogen-induced lactotroph proliferation are hypersensitive in this cell line compared with the mechanisms involved in regulation of the PRL gene (413). Therefore, it is possible that the small amount of the active ER{alpha} splicing variant known to be present in the {alpha}ERKO (see Section II.C.) has allowed for sufficient estrogen signaling and lactotroph proliferation during develpment, resulting in the apparent lack of a somewhat expected phenotype of decreased lactotroph cell number in the pituitary of {alpha}ERKO mice.

B. Behavior
There are obvious effects of the gonadal steroids on sexual behavior in vertebrates; however, a more defined knowledge of these actions has become evident from a series of classical experimental schemes. These laboratory studies often relied on perinatal castration and/or developmental exposure to exogenous steroids followed by studies of the activational abilities of the different steroids during adulthood. The majority of such investigations have been carried out in the rat, but similar results have been described in other species (345, 414). Breifly, studies on sexual behavior in the rat have shown that 1) castration on the day of birth results in a feminized adult male that exhibits a female pattern of behavioral responses when treated with estradiol and progesterone, and 2) neonatal testosterone or estradiol treatment of a female results in a masculinized adult that exhibits a male-like pattern of behaviors and is refractory to estradiol and progesterone (131, 337). The culmination of the data collected from such experimental schemes has led to the conclusion that testosterone secreted from the perinatal testes during a critical developmental window results in permanent changes in the hypothalamic nuclei of the brain that mediate male sexual behavior. However, the data indicating that developmental exposure to estradiol results in an adult phenotype that is similar to that elicited by testosterone suggest that many of the masculinizing effects of perinatal testosterone may be via local aromatization of the hormone to estradiol and subsequent activation of the ER signaling pathway (reviewed in Refs. 406, 407). In addition, estradiol is also necessary for normal development of the female brain, although in lower amounts (131). Therefore, sex steroid-mediated sexual differentiation of the various regions of the brain that are critical to behavior relies not only on the nature of the steroid ligand, but also on the dose and timing of exposure (348).

Before the availability of the {alpha}ERKO mouse, McCarthy et al. (415) employed an elaborate technique of infusing anti-ER{alpha} oligodeoxynucleotides into the neonatal rat hypothalamus to elucidate a direct role for ER{alpha} in the sexual differentiation of the female brain. This experimental scheme was based on the hypothesis that the presence of specific ER{alpha} antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in the hypothalamus would interfere with proper expression of the ER{alpha} gene during a critical period of differentiation (415). The experimental groups included neonatal rats treated with testosterone plus or minus the infusion of the ER{alpha} antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. As adults, those females infused with the ER{alpha} antisense oligodeoxynucleotides exhibited more female sexual behavior compared with those treated with androgen alone. The investigators thereby concluded that the reduced ER{alpha} expression protected the infused female rats from the masculinizing effects of testosterone exposure (415), providing strong evidence that local aromatization and subsequent estradiol activation of the ER{alpha} pathway plays a primary role in the masculinization of the rat brain. However, the experimental scheme of McCarthy et al. does not allow for a direct comparison with the {alpha}ERKO female, due to the caveats discussed (see Section II.C.1). It is important to recognize that the {alpha}ERKO are deficient in ER{alpha} throughout development, whereas McCarthy’s scheme produced a lack of ER{alpha} action that was only transient and most likely not as complete.

The use of technologies to target individual genes has created numerous models available for studies in the behavioral sciences. A recent review by Nelson and Young (128) summarized and compared the behavioral or lack of behavioral phenotypes in a select 50 murine knockout models. Due to the lack of any grossly apparent behavioral phenotypes in the ßERKO mice, only those studies concerning the {alpha}ERKO will be discussed here.

1. {alpha}ERKO female. The dependence of female sexual behavior on the synchronized fluctuations in estradiol and progesterone that occur during the ovarian cycle have been described in detail (reviewed in Ref. 416). In the rodent, circulating estrogens continue to rise as ovulation approaches, eventually leading to the gonadotropin surge that not only triggers the release of the oocyte from the ovary but also a marked increase in serum progesterone. This dramatic rise in circulating progesterone is required for an optimal display of the lordosis posture, a measurable response required for successful copulation (416). The gonadotropin surge from the hypothalamic-pituitary axis is due to the postive-feedback actions of estradiol. The development of this pathway in the rodent is unique to the female as a result of sexual differentiation of the neurons in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of the preoptic area that serve to regulate hypothalamic function (264, 365, 405). As discussed above, feminization of the brain involves the actions of estradiol during fetal and neonatal development that may rely heavily on the dose and time of exposure. Therefore, knockout models for ER{alpha} and ERß, as well as the PR, have and will continue to serve as invaluable resources for dissecting the role of each receptor-signaling system in female sexual behavior.

In general, evaluation of the aberrant sexual behaviors of the {alpha}ERKO female must consider not only the absence of ER{alpha} signaling, but also the elevated levels of serum testosterone that exist in the adult female (Table 2Go). Despite the presence of the hormones presumably required for sexual behavior, intact adult {alpha}ERKO females exhibit behavior that resembles that of a male in terms of parental, aggressive, and sexual activities (417, 418). When placed in the presence of a stud male, {alpha}ERKO females display a complete lack of sexual receptivity, measured as prelordotic behavior and a lordosis posture (418). In fact, intact {alpha}ERKO females were often treated as intruders and attacked by the stud male (417). However, similar studies using ovariectomized females indicate that this behavior of the stud male was most likely elicited by the significantly elevated levels of circulating testosterone in the {alpha}ERKO female (418, 426). These same studies, employing ovariectomized females coupled with steroid replacement of varied combinations, illustrated a complete resistance to estradiol (418, 419) and a minimal effect of progesterone in inducing a lordosis response in the {alpha}ERKO female (418).

Although the above studies have indicated a prominent role for ER{alpha} in sexual behavior in the mouse, the precise pathways disrupted by a lack of ER{alpha} remain unclear. Not surprisingly, the PRKO female mice also exhibit a lack of normal sexual behavior and are unable to produce a lordosis posture even when treated with doses of either estradiol and/or progesterone (44). However, this same study reported an inability of estradiol alone to induce lordosis but rather a requirement for both estradiol and progesterone in wild-type females (44). This is in contrast to the capacity of estradiol to solely induce lordosis in the wild-type controls employed by Rissman et al. (419) and may be a reflection of the differences in background strain and/or experimental design employed in the two studies.

The {alpha}ERKO and PRKO models nicely illustrate a requirement for both estradiol and progesterone action for a full lordotic response. As early as 1939, estrogen exposure before progesterone treatment was found to be required for a full display of sexual behavior in the rat (420). As in the uterus, the expression and induction of PR in certain regions of the brain is under estrogen regulation. Studies have indicated that estradiol elicits detectable increases in PR in the hypothalamus, strongly suggesting that this estrogen-action is required for ultimate progesterone-induced sexual behaviors (346, 421, 422). Therefore, disruption of the ER{alpha} gene may be expected to cause abnormally low levels of PR expression in those areas of the brain that mediate female sexual behavior and therefore may explain the lack of such behavior in the {alpha}ERKO mouse. However, two separate reports have described the ability of estradiol to induce increases in PR transcripts in the forebrain of the {alpha}ERKO female mouse, including regions of the preoptic area (400) (Fig. 8Go) arcuate nucleus, caudal ventromedial hypothalamus, and posterodorsal medial hypothalamus (423). However, the extent of estrogen-induced increases in hypothalamic PR in the {alpha}ERKO female is slightly attenuated compared with that observed in similarly treated wild-type mice (400, 423). It is possible that this observed estrogen action in the {alpha}ERKO female is either mediated by a splicing variant of the disrupted ER{alpha} gene or by ERß. Regardless, the level of estrogen-induced PR in the {alpha}ERKO female does not appear to allow for a response to progesterone that is sufficient to elicit sexual behavior. These data support the conclusion that normal expression of female sex behavior requires the sequential activation of the ER{alpha}- and PR-signaling pathways.

Significant deficits in parental behavior and a greater tendency toward infanticide is also observed in {alpha}ERKO females compared with wild-type littermates (418). These phenotypes do not dramatically differ between intact and ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO females; however, levels of infanticide were reduced in tests carried out after a prolonged post-gonadectomy period (65 days) (418). The {alpha}ERKO female exhibits aggressive behaviors that are significantly elevated compared with the wild-type female littermates, and in stark contrast to the dramatically reduced aggressive behavior displayed by the {alpha}ERKO male (to be discussed below) (418). Remarkably, acute treatment of ovariectomized females with estradiol resulted in the expected reduction in aggressive behavior in both the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO females (418). Previous studies have shown that whereas both testosterone and estradiol can elicit aggressive behaviors in the castrated male mouse, only testosterone is effective in the ovariectomized female mouse (424, 425). These studies, in combination with the findings in the {alpha}ERKO, indicate that differentiation as well as activation of aggressive behaviors in the female mouse are testosterone dependent. However, the preserved ability of estradiol to reduce aggression in the ovariectomized {alpha}ERKO female is puzzling and may indicate an ERß-mediated pathway.

The elevated levels of infanticide and aggressive behavior exhibited by the {alpha}ERKO females may be contributed to by the elevated levels of testosterone secreted by the acyclic ovary (Table 2Go). As discussed earlier, experimental evidence suggests that disruption of the ER{alpha} gene has resulted in a hypothalamic-pituitary axis with an enhanced capacity to respond to androgens in the {alpha}ERKO male. In support of this possibility, Ogawa et al. (418, 426) reported their preliminary finding of increased androgen receptor levels in the brain of the {alpha}ERKO female as early as 12 days of age.

2. {alpha}ERKO male. Given the apparent role of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen actions in the masculinization of the brain, it was expected that the {alpha}ERKO males would exhibit a female-like behavioral phenotype. Surprisingly, however, Ogawa et al. (318) observed that a lack of hypothalamic ER{alpha} during development has little effect on the sexual behavior of the intact {alpha}ERKO male in terms of mounting and sexual attraction toward wild-type females. In contrast, Wersinger et al. (427) report that tests of male sexual behavior carried out in a neutral arena, as opposed to the male’s home cage as done in the study of Ogawa et al., demonstrates that the number of mounting attempts exhibited by the {alpha}ERKO males is reduced. Interestingly, the studies of Ogawa et al. illustrated that {alpha}ERKO males, however, exhibit an almost complete lack of intromission and ejaculation, even though the number and frequency of mounts were similar to those of wild-type males (318). Furthermore, treatment of castrated males with estradiol or the nonaromatizable androgen, DHT, resulted in no differences in sexual behavior compared with the findings in the intact {alpha}ERKO males (428). These results differ from those described by Ono et al. (429) and Olsen (131) in the androgen-insensitive Tfm mouse, which exhibits no male-like sexual behavior including a lack of mounting as well as intromission and ejaculation. However, the {alpha}ERKO and Tfm males are similar in terms of exhibiting complete insensitivity to the effects of both estradiol and testosterone as behavioral activators during adulthood.

The {alpha}ERKO male behavioral phenotype described above is obviously a contributing factor to the infertility that results after disruption of the ER{alpha} gene. The culmination of the studies indicate that a discrete component of sexual behavior in the male mouse, i.e., consummatory activity, is dependent on the actions of ER{alpha}, whereas testosterone or possibly ERß-mediated estradiol actions may regulate motivational aspects (428). Although reports of categorical studies on sexual behavior are not available, both the ßERKO (47) and ArKO (257) male mice appear to be fertile and able to sire multiple litters, suggesting a minor role for ERß in sexual behavior. The possibility of compensatory mechanisms mediated by ER{alpha} in the ßERKO cannot be ruled out. It is interesting, however, that the ArKO males, presumably lacking physiological levels of estradiol throughout life, show no obvious deficits in sexual behavior that result in infertility (257). It might be expected, given the apparent need of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen actions illustrated by the {alpha}ERKO, that the ArKO male would display a similar phenotype. Perhaps, exposure to maternal steroid hormones during gestation in the ArKO mouse has allowed for the proper "organization" of the neuronal circuitry regulating sexual behavior. More detailed studies may elucidate subtle behavioral phenotypes that exist in both the ßERKO and ArKO models and will help further define the precise role that estradiol and testosterone play in the regulation of sexual behavior.

A dichotomy similar to that observed for the elements of male sexual behavior in the {alpha}ERKO is observed when behavioral assays for aggression and parental instincts are considered. Intact {alpha}ERKO males demonstrate a relatively normal pattern of parental behavior as measured by levels of infanticide when placed in the presence of newborn pups (428). However, despite the fact that {alpha}ERKO males possess serum testosterone levels that exceed the norm by as much as 2-fold and show no reduction in the levels of AR (430) or ERß (93, 352) in the brain, they consistently exhibit a significant deficit in all male aggression indices tested (428, 430). Therefore, as in the case of certain components of sexual behavior, ER{alpha}-mediated actions appear critical to the development and/or activation of aggressive behaviors, whereas parental instincts appear to be independent of ER{alpha} action (428).


    VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral Tissues
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
The ER and the estrogen-signaling pathway have been described in several peripheral organ systems (reviewed in Ref. 431). A discussion of the phenotypes that may occur in each of these after disruption of either of the ER genes is beyond the scope of this review. Therefore, we have chosen to focus on three areas, all of which have received great attention as sites of estrogen action that are critical to human health. These are the bone, cardiovascular system, and adipogenesis. Furthermore, studies toward specifically defining a role that ER may play in mediating the actions of estrogen in each of these systems have begun to employ the {alpha}ERKO, and eventually the ßERKO.

A. Skeletal system
The link between the onset of osteoporosis and the decreasing estrogen levels associated with menopause has been realized since the report of Albright et al. in 1941 (432). Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy is currently the most commonly prescribed drug treatment in the United States (433, 434). In most patients, the increased risks associated with long-term estrogen replacement therapy, such as breast and endometrial cancer, are strongly overshadowed by the well established reduction in the risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture (433). Bone is a dynamic tissue that is constantly being resorbed to serve as a mineral source for the body and remodeled to replace this reservoir as well as maintain skeletal strength. Osteoporosis is a defined pathology characterized by a loss in bone mass and strength and is believed to be due to a disruption in the equilibrium between bone resorption and formation (435). Current evidence supports the hypothesis that excess bone resorption occurs in the postmenopausal years, acting to strip the bone of mass and further remove the foundation upon which new bone may be formed (435). Several therapies are known to reduce the postmenopausal increases in bone resorption, including the intake of calcium and vitamin D, calcitonin, bisphosphates, and estrogens (435). The obvious beneficial effects of estrogen replacement therapy have evoked an intense research effort for bone-specific estrogen agonists that lack the potentially harmful side effects in the breast and reproductive tissues. Ironically, the currently available "selective ER modulators" or SERMs, as these drugs have come to be termed, have been selected from the pool of nonsteroidal estrogen antagonists (reviewed in Refs. 8, 434, 436).

For several years it was believed that the effects of estrogens on bone physiology were indirect, inferred from the inability to detect ER within bone and bone cell cultures. However, in 1988, Komm et al. (437) and Eriksen et al. (438) simultaneously reported the detection of high-affinity, competable estradiol binding, ER{alpha} mRNA, and the induction of estrogen-responsive genes in cultured rat and human osteoblast-like cells, the bone-forming cell. We have reported similar findings, including the inhibition of estradiol transactivational activity with antiestrogens, in two separate osteoblast-like cell lines from the rat (439). Oursler et al. (440) have since demonstrated ER{alpha} and estrogenic activity in cultured avian osteoclasts, the bone-resorbing cell type, including estrogen induction of the genes for c-fos and c-jun.Using in situ RT-PCR analysis, Hoyland et al. (441) demonstrated the presence of ER{alpha} mRNA in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in bone grafts from human females. Immunocytochemical methods have also been used to demonstrate the presence of ER{alpha} in multiple bone cell lines (442). Recently, Bodine et al. (443) reported significant increases in the levels of ER{alpha} transcripts during dexamethasone-induced differentiation of rat osteoblasts in vitro. Therefore, there is adequate experimental evidence to support the presence of a direct ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen-signaling pathway in bone.

The discovery of the ERß introduced renewed vigor in the search for SERMs, allowing for the greater possibility of finding a receptor-selective agonist. The distinct expression pattern of the two ERs among various tissues has further enhanced the possibility of finding tissue-specific SERMs. Several recent studies have reported the detection of ERß in bone cells. Onoe et al. (444) employed RT-PCR to demonstrate the presence of both ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in immortalized as well as primary osteoblast cell cultures from the rat. Similar to reports of ER{alpha}, both Onoe et al. (444) and Arts et al. (95) report significant increases in ERß mRNA levels during in vitro dexamethasone-induced differentiation of osteoblasts derived from the rat and human, respectively. Therefore, the generation of mice lacking ER{alpha} or ERß will once again prove invaluable in delineating the roles of the two receptors in bone physiology.

The majority of animal studies concerning the role of estrogens in bone morphology and metabolism have been carried out in the rat (reviewed in Ref. 445). Ovariectomy in the rodent results in increased bone turnover similar to that seen in postmenopausal women; however, the mechanisms of action may differ between the species (445). The effects of ovariectomy in the rat include decreases in bone mineral density, cancellous bone area, and bone strength, whereas increases are observed in radial and longitudinal growth, osteoblast and osteoclast activity, and overall rates of bone turnover (445). Estrogen replacement, including those compounds with mixed agonist/antagonist activity, has been shown to reverse several of the effects induced by ovariectomy (445). However, the extent and direction of the changes induced by ovariectomy, as well as the protection provided by estrogen replacement, vary depending on the bone parameter, sex, and type of bone being evaluated, e.g., femur, tibia, calvaria, or vertebrae (445). Interestingly, a study of the androgen-resistant Tfm rat describes a bone phenotype similar to a wild-type female, i.e., shorter and thinner femurs, indicating that androgen action may also be critical to longitudinal and radial bone growth in the male rat (446). However, endogenous gonadal estrogens were able to maintain a normal cancellous bone mass in the Tfm rat (446). It is noteworthy that the first description of a human case of estrogen insensitivity due to a spontaneous mutation of the ER{alpha} gene exhibits severe osteoporosis as well as significant increases in longitudinal growth of bones (see Section VIII.C) (116).

Unfortunately, few studies of the effects of steroids on bone physiology have been carried out in the mouse. Analysis of femoral bone length in {alpha}ERKO mice indicates a significant decrease in length and diameter in females and a slight decrease in males, when compared with age- and sex-matched wild-type controls (447). However, measurements of bone density and mineral content indicate the opposite effect, i.e., {alpha}ERKO males exhibited significant decreases throughout the femur (448), whereas the {alpha}ERKO females demonstrate just slight and localized decreases (447). In agreement with the ovariectomized rat model, {alpha}ERKO female mice exhibit increased bone resorption-remodeling rates (448). However, the decreased femur length observed in the {alpha}ERKO is in contrast to that reported in the ovariectomized rat and the ER{alpha}-deficient human male. Interestingly, a series of studies by Migliaccio et al. (449, 450) illustrated that prenatal and neonatal exposure to the synthetic estrogen, DES, also results in significantly shorter femur lengths as well as increased cortical bone thickness and increased trabecular bone at the epiphysis of the femur during adulthood in female mice. Therefore, it appears that in the mouse, aberrant estrogen exposure during development or a hereditary loss of ER{alpha} action leads to decreased longitudinal bone growth, contrasting experimental schemes resulting in a similar phenotype.

These data indicate that pathways other than ER{alpha} may mediate the negative regulatory effects of estradiol on bone growth, suggesting a possible role for ERß. Longitudinal bone growth is a poorly understood process that depends on chondrocyte activity, including proliferation, hypertrophy, and the secretion of extracellular matrix at the growth plate (445). Estrogen is thought to slow this process by reducing the recruitment, proliferation, and synthetic activity of chondrocytes, thereby resulting in a maturation of the epiphyseal plate and inhibition of further longitudinal growth (445). The detection of both ER{alpha} (451) and ERß (452) in human epiphyseal chondrocytes has recently been described. Therefore, it is possible that ERß, in the context of significantly elevated levels of estradiol, results in an inhibition of long bone growth in the {alpha}ERKO mouse. It is also possible that the significantly elevated levels of serum androgens in the {alpha}ERKO female may be playing an influential role. This may also be true in the {alpha}ERKO male, which exhibit slightly shorter femur lengths in the context of only a 2-fold increase in serum androgens. The possibility that a loss of ER{alpha} during bone development results in abnormal genomic imprinting and increased ERß and/or AR levels as a compensatory mechanism must also be considered.

B. Cardiovascular system
Since the early part of this century, a remarkable gender-related contrast in the risk of cardiovascular disease has been known. Although women generally possess a greater incidence of the multiple risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease when compared with men, e.g., obesity, diabetes, elevated blood pressure, and plasma cholesterol, epidemiological studies continue to indicate their relative risk of developing this disease is significantly lower (453, 454). It is now believed that the protective factor against cardiovascular disease in females is their inherently increased exposure to estrogens (reviewed in Refs. 433, 454). The protective effects of estrogens have been documented in a number of epidemiological studies documenting the reduced rate of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy (433, 454). This correlation between the administration of estradiol and a reduced risk of vascular disease has been reproduced in laboratory animal studies involving several different species (454).

The possible mechanisms by which estrogens reduce vascular disease remain unclear but are likely to include positive modifications of a number of physiological parameters that are believed to impinge upon the development of cardiovascular pathlogy (reviewed in Ref. 454). Most notable of these is the ability of estrogen replacement therapy to significantly lower total cholesterol, with a profound effect on levels of the more damaging low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) (454). Hypercholesterolemia is strongly associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. The ability of estrogen therapy to reduce total cholesterol levels is believed to account for a large portion of the cardiovascular protective effects of the hormone (433, 454). Lundeen et al. (455) reported that the significant decreases in serum cholesterol are specific to estrogen action in the ovariectomized rat, whereas other gonadal steroids tested had little effect. Furthermore, cotreatment with the antagonist, ICI-182,780, was shown to inhibit the cholesterol-lowering effects of estrogens, strongly indicating that this is a receptor-mediated effect (455). One possible site at which the actions of estradiol may converge with the pathways of cholesterol metabolism is via the up-regulation of the apo E protein and the apolipoprotein (apo) B/E LDL receptor within and on the cell surface of hepatocytes, respectively (454). During hydrolysis of triglycerides in the circulation, the apo E protein is integrated into the apo B-LDL complexes and thereby functions as a ligand for the hepatocyte apo B/E LDL receptor (454). When the apo E-containing LDL complex is bound by the apo B/E LDL receptor on the cell surface of hepatocytes, the complex is internalized, thereby providing for a means of clearing LDL from the blood (454). The importance of the apo E protein in maintaining serum cholesterol levels and providing protection against vascular disease is evident from studies in transgenic mice that either overexpress the protein or possess a targeted disruption of the apo E gene. Transgenic mice in which an apo E gene is overexpressed are significantly protected from atherosclerosis (456), whereas the apo E knockout is highly susceptible to the vascular disease (457).

Therefore, much of the cholesterol-lowering ability of estradiol is thought to be due to increased clearance of LDL from the circulation via the mechanism described above (454). Regulation of the apo E gene by estradiol has been demonstrated in the rat (458, 459). Furthermore, Srivastava et al. (460) recently reported that hepatic levels of apo E mRNA are similar in wild-type and {alpha}ERKO male littermates, although a slight decrease in serum levels of the protein was observed in the {alpha}ERKO. However, 6 days of estradiol exposure (via implantation of a 3 µg E2/g body weight/day pellet) elicited an almost 2-fold increase in serum apo E levels in the wild-type compared with a 1.2-fold increase in the {alpha}ERKO (460). Therefore, these data provide evidence that ER{alpha}, acting at the level of translation, is required to mediate the estradiol up-regulation of apo E expression in mice (460).

In addition to the favorable effects of estrogens on the lipid profile, it is now believed the steroid may also play a beneficial function directly at the level of the vasculature. The proposed mechanisms of estrogen action on the vasculature include modulations of vascular adhesion molecules, chemoattractants, vasodilators (e.g., nitric oxide), vasoconstrictors (e.g., endothelin-1), as well as possibly acting as an antioxidant (reviewed in Refs. 454, 461). Several of the effects of estrogens, as well as other steroid hormones, on blood vessel physiology have been proposed to be nongenomic and independent of the classical nuclear activational pathway of steroid receptors (reviewed in Ref. 355). However, ER has been detected in both the endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the vasculature in several species, suggesting a role for receptor-mediated actions as well (reviewed in Refs. 431, 454, 462). Furthermore, a recent study reported that the level of ER in atherosclerotic plaques from human coronary arteries was reduced compared with levels found in nonlesioned sections (463). Studies have indicated the presence of ERß in the vasculature as well. Analysis by ribonuclease protection assay for ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in the mouse indicate only detectable levels of ER{alpha} transcripts in the aorta (93). However, Iafrati et al. (464) report the detection of ERß transcripts by RT-PCR in mouse aorta and blood vessels, including those of the {alpha}ERKO. The apparent contrast in ERß detection between these two reports in the {alpha}ERKO vasculature is most likely due to differences in the sensitivity of the techniques used, since ERß mRNA was detected only by the more sensitive RT-PCR method. This is likely a reflection of the low levels of this receptor compared with ER{alpha}. In the rat aorta, Petersen et al. (70) described the detection of full-length and variant ERß mRNA by RT-PCR. Recent reports also describe the detection of ERß transcripts by RT-PCR in aortic smooth muscle cells and coronary artery (465), aorta, and cardiac muscle (96) from monkey. An intriguing report of the tissue distribution for ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in human vasculature was that of Tschugguel et al., which described the presence of ER{alpha} mRNA only in cultures from larger blood vessels, i.e., aorta and pulmonary artery, whereas ERß transcripts were predominant in cultures from the endothelium of smaller vessels, such as those from the uterus (466). Therefore, with the apparent variations that exist in the distribution of the two forms of ER in the vasculature, depending on the species and possibly even the vessel of study, the ERKO mice provide a unique tool to discern the direct role that ER{alpha} and/or ERß may play on vascular biology.

One of the initial studies of the vasculature in the ERKO mice was that by Rubanyi et al. (467) in which the level of the vasodilator, nitric oxide, was characterized in the aortic rings of the {alpha}ERKO male. This study demonstrated that the male C57BL/6J mice, the background strain of the {alpha}ERKO, possess a significantly greater amount of ER in the aorta than female littermates, when quantified by radiolabeled E2 binding (467). Furthermore, the basal levels of endothelial-derived nitric oxide were also found to be significantly higher in the male tissue compared with female, suggesting that the level of ER, rather than the amount of ligand, may be the most critical parameter in modulating endothelial nitric oxide production (467). In agreement with this hypothesis was the observation of significantly reduced basal nitric oxide levels in aortic tissue from male {alpha}ERKO mice (467). However, the levels of stimulated vasodilatation achieved after treatment with acetylcholine to induce endogenous nitric oxide release or nitroglycerin, a nitric oxide donor, did not differ between the sexes or ER{alpha} genotypes (467). Therefore, it appeared that only the ability to synthesize basal nitric oxide levels was altered by ER{alpha} gene disruption, whereas the capability of the vasculature to respond to the vasodilator effects of nitric oxide were not altered (467). Interestingly, the susceptibility to hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerosis in this strain of mice is in direct correlation with the level of ER detected, i.e., male C57BL/6J mice appear less likely to develop the vascular disease than female counterparts (468). Therefore, it may be speculated that the {alpha}ERKO mice possess an inherent susceptibility to vascular disease as well. These data also indicate that a contributing factor to the protective effects of estrogen action on the vasculature may be caused by a convergence of the estrogen and nitric oxide systems and may, in fact, be due to ligand-independent ER{alpha} actions.

In contrast to the above description of a measurable vascular defect in the {alpha}ERKO mice, Mendelsohn et al. (464) demonstrated no apparent difference in the response between wild-type and {alpha}ERKO female mice in a carotid vascular injury model. This model involves the monitoring of endothelial and smooth muscle cell growth and proliferation that is spontaneously elicited in carotid arteries after artificial endothelial denudation (469). This response has been shown to be inhibited by estradiol, suggesting a mechanism by which estrogens may protect the vessel from atherosclerosis (462). Removal of estrogen action via ovariectomy in wild-type and {alpha}ERKO mice resulted in similar levels of endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation 2 weeks after carotid injury, as measured both morphometrically as well as with BrdU incorporation (464). However, daily estradiol treatments commencing 1 week before injury and continued for the 2 weeks after were able to inhibit the cellular proliferation to similar levels in both the wild-type and {alpha}ERKO animals (464). Therefore, the "protective" effect of estradiol illustrated by this model system appears to be independent of ER{alpha} action and may possibly be mediated by ERß. Similar studies in the ßERKO mice are currently underway and will prove interesting in this regard.

Estrogens may also exert direct effects at the level of the heart and have been proposed to play an important role in cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling after myocardial infarction (462, 470). In a recent report, Grohé et al. (471) described the presence of both ER{alpha} and ERß as well as the P450arom enzyme in cardiac myocytes cultured from neonatal rats. This same study demonstrated that androgen-induced up-regulation of ER{alpha} was evident in cardiac myocytes derived from female rats, whereas ERß levels were unaffected and remained stable in the cells from both sexes (471). Furthermore, estrogens may modulate cardiac contractility via regulation of Ca2+ channel activity. Previous studies have indicated that estrogen may reduce Ca2+ channel activity in several tissues; however, demonstrative studies in the heart usually involved superphysiological doses and therefore remain an issue of controversy (355, 472). However, Johnson et al. (472) demonstrated an increased number of L-type Ca2+ channels in {alpha}ERKO male heart, presumably due to a hereditary loss of ER{alpha}. Whole hearts from {alpha}ERKO males exhibited an approximate 46% increase in the number of L-type Ca2+ channels and a corresponding delay in cardiac repolarization when compared with those from wild-type (472). Therefore, estradiol ER{alpha}-mediated actions appear to modulate cardiac contractility via regulation of the number of calcium channels, possibly providing another function to complement the protective effects of estrogens in the cardiovascular system.

C. Adipogenesis
A role for gonadal steroid action in adipogenesis and adipocyte function has been realized for some time (473). This is evidenced by the well known gender differences that exist in the distribution of white adipose tissue in humans. Whereas men tend to accumulate fat stores in the thoracic and abdominal regions, accumulations in women are found in the upper portions of the arms and legs. Furthermore, obese woman that also exhibit androgen excess demonstrate a male pattern of fat distribution, termed android adiposity (474). Supporting evidence for a functional relationship between the gonadal and adipogenesis systems is also provided by the direct correlation that exists between nutrition, body mass, and fat content with the onset of menarche in young females (475). In addition, white adipose tissue serves not only as an energy reservoir, but is also a site of steroid storage and metabolism that can supplement gonadal and adrenal synthesis and thereby influence the overall endocrine milieu (292, 473).

The roles of several members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily in adipogenesis have been intensely researched, especially the glucocorticoid receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, retinoic acid receptor, and the thyroid receptor (reviewed in Ref. 473). There is little research data concerning any direct role that ER may play in adipocyte function and distribution, but it is well known that ovariectomy results in increased fat stores and body weight in females of some strains of rodents (197, 476, 477). This effect can be prevented with estrogen replacement as well as reproduced with prolonged antiestrogen treatments in intact females (197, 476, 477). Interestingly, a similar increased body weight is observed in {alpha}ERKO females of the C57/BL background. Gross observations upon necropsy of adult {alpha}ERKO females indicate an obvious increase in the amount of white adipose fat in the pads of the mammary gland and those lining the lateral-ventral portions of the body cavity. As early as 4 months of age, {alpha}ERKO females exhibit an increased body weight compared with female wild-type littermates, at 28.7 g (±0.91) vs. 23.3 g (±0.43), respectively. This difference in body weight between wild-type and {alpha}ERKO females increases at 8 months of age, at which time the average weight of {alpha}ERKO females exceeds that of age-matched wild-types by almost 35% (t test; P < 0.01). However, by 12 months of age, increases in the body weight of wild-type females appear to decrease the gap between the two genotypes.

The fact that the increased fat stores in the {alpha}ERKO female are similar to those observed in the classical ovariectomized model indicate that a loss of ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen action may alter metabolism and adipocyte physiology. Fisher et al. (257) reported a similar phenotype in the ArKO female mice, in which the weight of the gonadal and mammary fat pads were increased by 50–80%. In both {alpha}ERKO and ArKO females, serum testosterone levels are substantially elevated but do not appear to have a lessening effect on fat pad weight (257). Furthermore, there are no reports of increased body weight in the androgen-resistant Tfm mice (478), indicating that androgen action may play a lesser role than estrogen in fat storage. It is unknown at this time whether a phenotype similar to the {alpha}ERKO and ArKO mice may also exist in the ßERKO mice. However, sexually mature ßERKO mice of both sexes exhibit no significant differences in body weight and appear to possess a relatively normal distribution of white adipose tissue in the peritoneum at the ages examined.

Although the above evidence strongly supports a role for ER{alpha}-mediated estrogen action in adipocyte physiology, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Adipose tissue has been shown to possess ER{alpha} (479, 480, 486, 487, 488) and the enzymes necessary for estradiol synthesis (292, 480). Recent studies have also indicated that the gonadal sex steroids can alter the activity of lipoprotein lipase, a critical enzyme in adipocyte growth and fat storage (474). Interestingly, Lubahn et al. (481) reported that {alpha}ERKO female mice fed a diet enriched with the phytoestrogen, genistein, exhibited a reduced body weight compared with {alpha}ERKO females fed the control diet. This may indicate a non-ER{alpha}-mediated yet estrogenic action of genistein, a naturally occurring isoflavone shown to possess hormone-like actions in mammalian cells that are devoid of ER (482). Therefore, the ER{alpha}-independent actions of genistein, such as the inhibition of protein tyrosine kinases and influence on growth factor action, complicate the interpretation of the above study in terms of defining a role for ER{alpha} in fat stores.


    VIII. Comparison with Human Disease and Models of Deficient Estrogen Action
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
A. Ovarian carcinogenesis
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancers and accounts for 5% of all cancer deaths in Western countries (483). However, the etiology of ovarian carcinoma is complicated by paradoxes similar to those concerning breast cancer, i.e., although risk is significantly reduced with each pregnancy, the use of oral steroid contraceptives also appears to reduce the risk (483). Approximately 80–90% of human ovarian cancers are derived from the ovarian surface epithelium (484), a portion of the ovary known to be rich in ER{alpha} expression. Although the causal factors remain unclear, evidence indicates that incessant ovulation, resulting in constant rupture and estrogen-mediated repair of the surface epithelium, increases the probability of spontaneous genetic abnormalities that may lead to tumorigenesis (483, 484). The exact role that estrogen and the ER may play in the induction and promotion of ovarian carcinoma remains unclear (reviewed in Refs. 483, 484, 485). A number of immortalized cell lines have been generated and characterized from human ovarian tumors and exhibit varied levels and responses to estrogen agonists and antagonists (reviewed in Ref. 484). Brandenberger et al. (94) recently reported the detection of ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in the human ovary, ovarian tumors, and ovarian tumor cell lines. Their findings include the description of ERß mRNA predominantly in the granulosa cells of normal ovaries and a marked reduction in the levels of ERß transcripts in ovarian carcinomas (94). In contrast, a cell line derived from a human ovarian surface epithelium and several human ovarian carcinomas were reported to express high levels of ER{alpha} mRNA (94). As mentioned previously, ovarian tumors are most often derived from the outer surface epithelium, whereas granulosa cell-derived carcinoma in humans is rare. Interestingly, we observe an approximately 40% incidence of granulosa/thecal cell tumors of the ovary in {alpha}ERKO females between the ages of 15–20 months. No such ovarian tumors have been observed in the wild-type or heterozygous littermates of the {alpha}ERKO. A similar incidence and type of spontaneous tumor is reported in transgenic mice possessing significantly elevated levels of LH caused by overexpression of the LHß subunit gene (254, 255). Therefore, hypergonadotropin stimulation appears to play a significant role in the etiology of this type of ovarian tumor in the mouse. The similarities in the incidence and type of tumor observed between the {alpha}ERKO and bLHß-CTP mouse indicate that ER{alpha} probably plays a minor role. Preliminary analysis in tumor samples for the {alpha}ERKO females indicates normal to elevated levels of ERß expression. Therefore, elevated gonadotropins and estradiol may result in chronic induction of the granulosa cells to proliferate and is the likely stimulus for the ovarian tumors observed in both transgenic models. Future investigations to determine the incidence of tumors in the ßERKO ovary will prove useful in further elucidating the etiology of this neoplasia.

B. Chronic anovulation
Targeted gene disruption of the ER genes has resulted in partial and complete anovulation in the ßERKO and {alpha}ERKO females, respectively. In the clinical setting, chronic anovulation is often categorized by the presence or lack of estrogen synthesis (204). Chronic anovulation in the absence of estrogen is diagnosed in women who experience little to no menstrual bleeding after progesterone withdrawal and is most often associated with hypogonadotropism resulting from impaired function of the hypothalamic GnRH neurons or disorders of the pituitary (204). Chronic anovulation in the presence of estrogen synthesis can be caused by several different functional abnormalities, such as Cushing’s syndrome, hyper/hypothyroidism, adrenal hyperplasia, and ovarian tumors (204). However, the majority of cases of anovulation in the presence of estrogen are associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), a heterogeneous series of clinical and endocrine abnormalities thought to be due to inappropriate steroid feedback regulation of the hypothalamic pituitary axis (reviewed in 204, 486, 487). Although the ovaries of both the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO females synthesize estradiol, the inherent insensitivity of certain target tissues to the hormone may render effects similar to those of insufficient estrogen synthesis and therefore may offer some analogy to the human syndrome. The primary defect resulting in inefficient ovulation in the ßERKO appears to be due to defects directly within the ovarian tissue, more precisely, an inability to appropriately respond to estradiol in the granulosa cells of maturing follicles. However, until further studies are carried out, an impaired ability to produce an adequate gonadotropin surge must also be considered as a possible contributory factor to the decreased ovulatory rates observed in the ßERKO. Still, the reduced number of ovulations observed in the ßERKO even after stimulation with exogenous gonadotropin suggests the presence of a significant defect within the ovary.

Although an analogy of the ßERKO ovarian phenotype with a human pathology may be obscure at this point, the ovarian phenotype of the {alpha}ERKO is strikingly similar to that of PCOS patients. The most common pathological symptoms of PCOS include anovulation, hirsutism, and the presence of bilateral enlarged, white, smooth, and sclerotic ovaries with a thickened outer capsule (204, 486, 487). Internal characterization of the ovaries of a PCOS patient most often indicates the presence of follicles at various stages of atresia, a strikingly hypertrophied thecal/stromal compartment, and the observation of rare or absent corpora lutea (204). The follicles presented usually possess a reduced number of granulosa cells and little aromatase activity (204). Biochemical findings are most often characterized by elevated serum androgen and LH levels, whereas progesterone and FSH levels remain low to normal (204, 486, 487). However, there appear to be wide variations in the extent and occurrence of each of these symptoms, illustrated by the diagnosis of PCOS in women with apparently normal LH levels and no menstrual abnormalities, indicating there is likely more than one etiological factor involved in this syndrome (204, 487).

The onset of PCOS most often coincides with menarche in young females, suggesting the existence of endocrine abnormalities even before puberty (204, 486). The first clinical indications are dysfunctional and/or unpredictable uterine bleeding or oligo/amenorrhea (204, 486). This is often accompanied by a high incidence of hirsutism (male-pattern hair growth) in 70–90% of PCOS females, determined to be due to increased serum androgens (204, 486). However, the causal agents that lead to increased circulating steroids and the initiation of PCOS remain unclear, although a strong familial component is believed to be involved (204, 488). Franks et al. (489) have proposed that the primary cause of PCOS is ovarian in nature and that endocrine abnormalities are secondary. Others have provided evidence to indicate that inappropriate steroid feedback at the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, resulting in increased frequency and amplitude of LH pulses, results in hyperstimulation of an otherwise normal ovary (204, 486). The initiation of the abnormal steroid signaling to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis may stem from extragonadal conversion of elevated circulating androgens to estrone and estradiol (204, 486, 487). The source of the initial increases in androgen that may trigger PCOS remain unclear and may be ovarian or adrenal in nature (487). Regardless, extraglandular aromatase activity in the adipose tissue is believed to result in the initial acyclic increases in estrogens that lead to the ovarian syndrome (204, 486). Obesity is reported in 40% of PCOS patients and is thought to be a contributory factor in the adipose tissue-derived estrogen production (204, 486). The abnormally high levels of estradiol then feed back to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in a positive fashion, resulting in chronically elevated LH levels (204, 486). Increased secretion of LH leads to hypertrophy of the ovarian thecum, a hallmark of the PCOS ovary, and further increases in androgen production (204, 486). Therefore, once initiated, it is thought that ovarian-derived androgens, followed by extraglandular conversion to estrogens, act to self-perpetuate the syndrome. Treatment of PCOS patients with a GnRH antagonist has proven to reduce circulating androgen and subsequent estrogen levels, indicating the ovary as the primary source of the androgen (204, 486). Furthermore, women with PCOS can be induced to ovulate with administration of FSH, suggesting that the primary defect is extragonadal in nature (204).

The similarities of the {alpha}ERKO ovarian phenotype and those associated with PCOS are worth noting. However, the initial stimulus of abnormal feedback to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis that leads to the phenotype may be different in the human and {alpha}ERKO mouse. As described above in the human female, it is believed that extragonadal synthesis of estrogens results in acyclic positive regulation of LH secretion by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. In contrast, the {alpha}ERKO ovary is the principal source of both androgen and estradiol, and acyclic increases in serum LH are primarily due to a lack of negative feedback at the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. However, preliminary studies in the {alpha}ERKO female have indicated that the signaling pathways for positive regulation of the LH secretion may be intact and therefore may also contribute to the increased gonadotropin levels observed. Therefore, although the means by which the elevated levels of LH are achieved in human PCOS and the {alpha}ERKO female mouse may differ, some features of the ovarian phenotypes are similar. Certain morphological abnormalities in the ovaries are comparable, i.e., polycystic follicles with reduced numbers of granulosa cells, hypertrophied thecal and stromal tissue, and the absence of corpora lutea, although the {alpha}ERKO ovary does not exhibit the thickened outer capsule seen in PCOS patients. It is possible that encapsulation of the polycystic ovary in the human is an ER{alpha}-mediated event and therefore not possible in the {alpha}ERKO. However, the LH-overexpressing bLHß-CTP mice, which possess a functional ER{alpha} gene as well as several characteristics associated with PCOS, also do not demonstrate this phenotype (254, 255). Several of the endocrine parameters associated with human PCOS are also observed in the {alpha}ERKO, especially the presence of elevated serum androgens and LH. Although the observation of hirsutism caused by elevated serum androgens is not possible in mice, analogous biological manifestations of elevated androgen levels are exhibited in the {alpha}ERKO female, including masculinized preputial (clitoral) glands and a thickened dermis. Furthermore, obesity is reported in a large proportion of PCOS patients and is thought to be a contributory factor in the extragonadal conversion of androgens to estrogens. As described above (Section VII.C), adult {alpha}ERKO females significantly outweigh their age-matched wild-type littermates because of excessive white adipose tissue. Interestingly, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are often reported in PCOS patients and thought to contribute to further androgen synthesis in the ovarian thecum (204, 487). Taylor and Lubahn (490) reported an abnormal glucose tolerance test in {alpha}ERKO females that could be corrected with ovariectomy, suggesting PCOS-like insulin resistance. Therefore, the similarities of the endocrine abnormalities and ovarian phenotypes in the {alpha}ERKO and bLHß-CTP mice with those of human PCOS patients provide support that the cause may be extragonadal in nature, and possibly due to elevated LH in the presence of normal FSH. Although the initial cause of the abnormally high LH levels in {alpha}ERKO females may differ from that postulated in the PCOS patient, the resulting effects on the ovary are similar and may allow the {alpha}ERKO to be a useful experimental model in future investigations of this human disease.

C. ER{alpha} and aromatase deficiency
The first and only reported case of estrogen insensitivity in a human is that of Smith et al. (116) in which a male (46, XY) was determined to be homozygous for a single-point mutation in exon 2 of the ER{alpha} gene that resulted in a premature stop codon. Similar reports of human estrogen deficiency were also lacking in the clinical literature until recently. However, five cases of aromatase deficiency and therefore a lack of estrogen synthesis have been reported in both human males (119, 120) and females (117, 118, 120, 491). Therefore, the existence of humans that exhibit insufficient estrogen action due to either a lack of functional receptor or hormone, along with the successful generation of the ER null mice, suggests that estrogen is not essential to embryonic and fetal development in mammals. However, like the ER null mice, a distinct syndrome of phenotypes is apparent in both sexes of humans lacking in estradiol or ER.

All three reports of females homozygous for inactivating mutations in the P450arom gene describe pseudohermaphroditism, i.e., 46XX genotype, the presence of internal female reproductive structures but ambiguous external genitalia (117, 120, 491). This phenotype is due to the lack of aromatase activity in the fetus and placental unit during gestation, leading to the accumulation of androgens, which in turn elicit masculinizing effects on the fetus (117, 120, 491). A similar phenotype of ambiguous external genitalia was described in an infant in which placental aromatase deficiency was determined, although enzyme activity in the fetus was not evaluated at the time of the report (118). In the two cases of a complete lack of aromatase, the mother also exhibited virilization during pregnancy (120, 491), whereas a traceable level of placental aromatase activity appeared to inhibit this symptom in the case of Conte et al. (117). In all three cases, development of the internal structures of the female reproductive tract did not appear to be altered by a lack of estrogen action (117, 120, 491), although a compensatory role fulfilled by maternal estrogens cannot be ruled out. Serum levels of androgen, androgen precursors, FSH, and LH were elevated in the P450arom-deficient patients as early as infancy (117, 491) and continued to be elevated as the females approached puberty (117, 120). At 12–14 yr of age, secondary development of the breasts, a pubertal growth spurt, and menarche were all absent, but virilization of the external genitalia was reported (117, 120). In all three cases, hyperstimulation of the ovary and the development of multifollicular cysts was illustrated, even as early as 2 yr of age (117, 120, 491). The ovarian pathology exhibited was similar to that observed in the {alpha}ERKO females and was compatible with a diagnosis of PCOS (120). Therefore, intraovarian estrogen action does not appear to play a role in the development of the multifollicular ovarian cysts in humans. Estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy alleviated the above phenotypes, resulting in normal gonadotropin and androgen levels, regression of the ovarian cysts, and in the two pubertal patients reported, the onset of breast development, a growth spurt, and menarche (117, 120, 491).

The clinical syndromes exhibited by the two reported human male cases of aromatase deficiency (119, 120) and the single known human case of an inactivating mutation of the ER{alpha} gene (116) are strikingly similar. All three patients exhibited a normal onset of puberty and no gender-identity disorders, as well as normal external genitalia and prostate size (116, 119, 120). The patient lacking functional ER{alpha} exhibited a testicular volume and sperm density within the norm for men of his age (116). A normal testicular volume was also reported in the P450arom-deficient patient of Morishima et al. (120). However, Carani et al. (119) reported small testis and severe oligozoospermia and infertility in the other male lacking aromatase, although the presence of similar findings in a brother with a normal P450arom gene suggested other possible familial factors for this finding. Serum levels of androgens, FSH, and LH were all consistently elevated in the P450arom-deficient males (119, 120), as well as estrone and estradiol in the ER{alpha}-deficient male (116). Estrogen replacement therapy resulted in the return of androgen and gonadotropin levels to the normal range in the P450arom-deficient males. However, similar estrogen therapy induced no such changes in the ER{alpha}-deficient male (116). In fact, estrogen replacement therapy in the ER{alpha}-deficient male achieved circulating levels of the steroid that exceeded the norm by nearly 5-fold, yet no alleviation of the above pathologies or side effects were observed, such as impotence and gynecomastia (116). Alterations in the cardiovascular system have been reported recently in the ER{alpha}-deficient male, including dysfunctions in vasodilation (492) and premature coronary artery disease (493).

The most overt phenotypes in all patients lacking sufficient estrogen action involved the skeleton. Females homozygous for mutations of the P450arom gene displayed a delay in bone age, a significant decrease in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, and absence of the pubertal growth spurt (117, 491). Both the ER{alpha}-deficient male and the two males lacking aromatase were evaluated as adults and exhibited strikingly similar skeletal phenotypes. All three were characterized by tall stature (>95th percentile) with continued slow linear growth, a low upper/lower body segment ratio (<0.88, vs. 0.96, average for men), unfused epiphyses, bone age of 14–15 yr, and decreased bone density (116, 119, 120). Epiphyseal closure and increases in bone mineral density were observed after estrogen replacement therapy in the P450arom-deficient patients (119, 120). However, as with the phenotypes described above in the ER{alpha}-deficient male, exogenous estrogen treatments resulted in no changes in bone physiology (116). Therefore, although it was once believed that estrogens were the major sex steroid influencing bone physiology in females and androgen fulfilled similar roles in the male, the phenotypes described above strongly indicate that estrogen action is critical to the pubertal growth spurt, bone mineralization, and epiphyseal maturation in both males and females.


    IX. Summary
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 
All scientific investigations begin with distinct objectives: first is the hypothesis upon which studies are undertaken to disprove, and second is the overall aim of obtaining further information, from which future and more precise hypotheses may be drawn. Studies focusing on the generation and use of gene-targeted animal models also apply these goals and may be loosely categorized into sequential phases that become apparent as the use of the model progresses. Initial studies of knockout models often focus on the plausibility of the model based on prior knowledge and whether the generation of an animal lacking the particular gene will prove lethal or not. Upon the successful generation of a knockout, confirmatory studies are undertaken to corroborate previously established hypotheses of the function of the disrupted gene product. As these studies continue, observations of unpredicted phenotypes or, more likely, the lack of a phenotype that was expected based on models put forth from past investigations are noted. Often the surprising phenotype is due to the loss of a gene product that is downstream from the functions of the disrupted gene, whereas the lack of an expected phenotype may be due to compensatory roles filled by alternate mechanisms. As the descriptive studies of the knockout continue, use of the model is often shifted to the role as a unique research reagent, to be used in studies that 1) were not previously possible in a wild-type model; 2) aimed at finding related proteins or pathways whose existence or functions were previously masked; or 3) the subsequent effects of the gene disruption on related physiological and biochemical systems.

The {alpha}ERKO mice continue to satisfy the confirmatory role of a knockout quite well. As summarized in Table 4Go, the phenotypes observed in the {alpha}ERKO due to estrogen insensitivity have definitively illustrated several roles that were previously believed to be dependent on functional ER{alpha}, including 1) the proliferative and differentiative actions critical to the function of the adult female reproductive tract and mammary gland; 2) as an obligatory component in growth factor signaling in the uterus and mammary gland; 3) as the principal steroid involved in negative regulation of gonadotropin gene transcription and LH levels in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis; 4) as a positive regulator of PR expression in several tissues; 5) in the positive regulation of PRL synthesis and secretion from the pituitary; 6) as a promotional factor in oncogene-induced mammary neoplasia; and 7) as a crucial component in the differentiation and activation of several behaviors in both the female and male.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Summary of reported phenotypes in the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO mice

 
The list of unpredictable phenotypes in the {alpha}ERKO must begin with the observation that generation of an animal lacking a functional ER{alpha} gene was successful and produced animals of both sexes that exhibit a life span comparable to wild-type. The successful generation of ßERKO mice suggests that this receptor is also not essential to survival and was most likely not a compensatory factor in the survival of the {alpha}ERKO. In support of this is our recent successful generation of double knockout, or {alpha}ßERKO mice of both sexes. The precise defects in certain components of male reproduction, including the production of abnormal sperm and the loss of intromission and ejaculatory responses that were observed in the {alpha}ERKO, were quite surprising. In turn, certain estrogen pathways in the {alpha}ERKO female appear intact or unaffected, such as the ability of the uterus to successfully exhibit a progesterone-induced decidualization response, and the possible maintenance of an LH surge system in the hypothalamus. Furthermore, it is apparent that several of the {alpha}ERKO phenotypes may be aggravated by the downstream attenuation of progesterone and PRL action or even enhanced by increased androgen sensitivity, including those observed in the mammary gland, gonads, bone, and behavior. In addition, disruption of the ER{alpha} gene may have unmasked estrogen-signaling systems that were not easily detectable in the wild-type, such as 1) the apparent estrogen actions of the 4-OH-E2 in the {alpha}ERKO uterus that are independent of ER{alpha} and ERß; 2) the ability of estrogen to induce increased levels of hypothalamic PR in the {alpha}ERKO female; 3) estradiol-induced potentiation of select neurons of the hippocampus; and 4) the protective effects of estrogen in the carotid vascular injury model. Finally, the concurrent descriptions of human mutations resulting in a lack of estrogen action due to a loss in ligand or functional receptor have illustrated the utility of the ER null mice as a model system to further understand the pathologies that result.

Therefore, the {alpha}ERKO mice have illustrated the several ways in which data collected from a knockout model can quickly contribute to the current knowledge concerning the function of a particular gene. However, it is worth noting the distinct differences in thought that occurred during the generation of the {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO models. At the time the work was initiated to generate the {alpha}ERKO mice, much was known about the many roles of estrogen and the ER; therefore, several educated predictions of the possible phenotypes were possible and have since been confirmed, rejected, or reevaluated. However, the conception of the ßERKO mice occurred only 2 yr after the discovery of the ERß. Because little was known about the function and role that the ERß might play, it was difficult to make sound predictions. Therefore, the {alpha}ERKO mice have played a significant role in confirming many of the roles thought to be fulfilled by estrogen, whereas the ßERKO mice have and will continue to provide primary insight into the functions of the ERß. The generation of both models, as well as a forthcoming description of the {alpha}ßERKO, will prove invaluable in elucidating the precise roles fulfilled by each ER, as well as any possible cooperative roles the two receptors might play within the same tissue or even within the same cell.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to several individuals for their dedication, effort, and insight that has made the work described above possible: first and foremost, our original collaborators in the generation of the ERKO mice, Dr. Oliver Smithies for his efforts leading to the generation of both ERKO models; Dr. Dennis Lubahn for the {alpha}ERKO; and Drs. John Krege, Jeff Hodges, and Jan-Åke Gustafsson and laboratory for the ßERKO. The authors are exceptionally indebted to Sylvia Curtis, Todd Washburn, Dr. Jonathan Lindzey, Dr. Wayne Bocchinfuso, Mariana Yates, Linwood Koonce, James Clarke, Page Myers, Dr. Motohiko Taki, and Dr. Sean Kimbro for their efforts and dedication. We would also like to thank our several collaborators, Drs. Ralph Cooper, Richard DiAugustine, E. Mitch Eddy, Thomas Golding, Paul Kincaide, Diane Klotz, Michael Mendolsohn, Robert Moss, Jeffrey Moyer, Sonoko Ogawa, Donald Pfaff, Gabor Rubanyi, David Schomberg, Allen Silverstone, and Harold Varmus. We would also like to acknowledge Drs. Paul Shughrue and Istvan Merchenthaler for the contribution of Fig. 8Go.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to: Dr. Kenneth S. Korach, Receptor Biology Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, MD B3–02, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 USA.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction—A...
 II. Estrogen Receptors
 III. Reproductive Tract...
 IV. Mammary Gland
 V. Reproductive Tract Phenotypes...
 VI. Neuroendocrine System
 VII. Phenotypes in Peripheral...
 VIII. Comparison with Human...
 IX. Summary
 References
 

  1. Jensen EV, DeSombre ER 1973 Estrogen-receptor interaction. Science 182:126–134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jensen EV, Jacobson HI 1962 Basic guides to the mechanism of estrogen action. Recent Prog Horm Res 18:387–414
  3. Toft D, Gorski J 1966 A receptor molecule for estrogens: isolation from the rat uterus and preliminary characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 55:1574–1581[Free Full Text]
  4. Evans RM 1988 The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 240:889–895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jensen EV, Jacobson HI 1960 Fate of steroidal estrogen in target tissues. In: Pincus G, Vollmer EP (eds) Biological Activities of Steroids in Relation to Cancer. Academic Press, New York, pp 161–174
  6. Jensen EV 1996 Steroid hormones, receptors, and antagonists. Ann NY Acad Sci 784:1–17[Medline]
  7. Stumpf W, Sar M 1976 Autoradiographic localization of estrogen, androgen, progestin, and glucocorticoid in "target tissues" and "non-target" tissues. In: Pasqualini JR (ed) Receptors and Mechanism of action of Steroid Hormones. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 41–84
  8. MacGregor JI, Jordan VC 1998 Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action. Pharmacol Rev 50:151–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Greene GL, Closs LE, Fleming H, DeSombre ER, Jensen EV 1977 Antibodies to estrogen receptor: immunochemical similarity of estrophilin from various mammalian species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3681–3685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Greene GL, Fitch FW, Jensen EV 1980 Monoclonal antibodies to estrophilin: probes for the study of estrogen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:157–161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. King WJ, Greene GL 1984 Monoclonal antibodies localize oestrogen receptor in the nuclei of target cells. Nature 307:745–747[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hollenberg SM, Weinberger C, Ong ES, Cerelli G, Oro A, Lebo R, Thompson EB, Rosenfeld MG, Evans RM 1985 Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature 318:635–641[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Walter P, Green S, Greene G, Krust A, Bornert JM, Jeltsch JM, Staub A, Jensen E, Scrace G, Waterfield M, Chambon P 1985 Cloning of the human estrogen receptor cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:7889–7893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Green S, Walter P, Kumar V, Krust A, Bornert JM, Argos P, Chambon P 1986 Human oestrogen receptor cDNA: sequence, expression and homology to v-erb-A. Nature 320:134–139[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Krust A, Green S, Argos P, Kumar V, Walter P, Bornert JM, Chambon P 1986 The chicken oestrogen receptor sequence: homology with v-erbA and the human oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors. EMBO J 5:891–897[Medline]
  16. White R, Lees JA, Needham M, Ham J, Parker M 1987 Structural organization and expression of the mouse estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 1:735–744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Koike S, Sakai M, Muramatsu M 1987 Molecular cloning and characterization of rat estrogen receptor cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 15:2499–2513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Weiler IJ, Lew D, Shapiro DJ 1987 The Xenopus laevis estrogen receptor: sequence homology with human and avian receptors and identification of multiple estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acids. Mol Endocrinol 1:355–362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pakdel F, Le Guellec C, Vaillant C, Le Roux MG, Valotaire Y 1989 Identification and estrogen induction of two estrogen receptors (ER) messenger ribonucleic acids in the rainbow trout liver: sequence homology with other ERs. Mol Endocrinol 3:44–51[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kumar V, Chambon P 1988 The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer. Cell 55:145–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Metzger D, White JH, Chambon P 1988 The human oestrogen receptor functions in yeast. Nature 334:31–36[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lees JA, Fawell SE, Parker MG 1989 Identification of two transactivation domains in the mouse oestrogen receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 17:5477–5488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kumar V, Green S, Stack G, Berry M, Jin JR, Chambon P 1987 Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor. Cell 51:941–951[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Metzger D, Ali S, Bornert JM, Chambon P 1995 Characterization of the amino-terminal transcriptional activation function of the human estrogen receptor in animal and yeast cells. J Biol Chem 270:9535–9542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Danielian PS, White R, Lees JA, Parker MG 1992 Identification of a conserved region required for hormone dependent transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors [published erratum appears in EMBO J 1992 Jun;11(6):2366]. EMBO J 11:1025–1033[Medline]
  26. Keightley MC 1998 Steroid receptor isoforms: exception or rule? Mol Cell Endocrinol 137:1–5[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Murphy LC, Dotzlaw H, Leygue E, Douglas D, Coutts A, Watson PH 1997 Estrogen receptor variants and mutations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 62:363–372[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Miksicek RJ 1994 Steroid receptor variants and their potential role in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 5:369–379[Medline]
  29. Friend KE, Ang LW, Shupnik MA 1995 Estrogen regulates the expression of several different estrogen receptor mRNA isoforms in rat pituitary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4367–4371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schutz G, Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P, Evans RM 1995 The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 83:835–839[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Shibata H, Spencer TE, Onate SA, Jenster G, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1997 Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/thyroid receptor action. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:141–164
  32. Renaud JP, Rochel N, Ruff M, Vivat V, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H, Moras D 1995 Crystal structure of the RAR-{gamma} ligand-binding domain bound to all-trans retinoic acid. Nature 378:681–689[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Bourguet W, Ruff M, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H, Moras D 1995 Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the human nuclear receptor RXR-{alpha}. Nature 375:377–382[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wagner RL, Apriletti JW, McGrath ME, West BL, Baxter JD, Fletterick RJ 1995 A structural role for hormone in the thyroid hormone receptor. Nature 378:690–697[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Brzozowski AM, Pike AC, Dauter Z, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstrom O, Ohman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson JÅ, Carlquist M 1997 Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389:753–758[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Shiau AK, Barstad D, Loria PM, Cheng L, Kushner PJ, Agard DA, Greene GL 1998 The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 95:927–937[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Patterson MN, McPhaul MJ, Hughes IA 1994 Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 8:379–404[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Wilson JD 1992 Syndromes of androgen resistance. Biol Reprod 46:168–173[Abstract]
  39. Brandon DD, Markwick AJ, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL 1989 Glucocorticoid resistance in humans and nonhuman primates. Cancer Res 49:2203s–2213s
  40. Chatterjee VKK, Beck-Peccoz P 1994 Thyroid hormone resistance. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 8:267–283[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Lohnes D, Kastner P, Dierich A, Mark M, LeMeur M, Chambon P 1993 Function of retinoic acid receptor-{gamma} in the mouse. Cell 73:643–658[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Mendelsohn C, Lohnes D, Decimo D, Lufkin T, LeMeur M, Chambon P, Mark M 1994 Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (II). Multiple abnormalities at various stages of organogenesis in RAR double mutants. Development 120:2749–2771[Abstract]
  43. Lohnes D, Mark M, Mendelsohn C, Dolle P, Dierich A, Gorry P, Gansmuller A, Chambon P 1994 Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (I). Craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities in RAR double mutants. Development 120:2723–2748[Abstract]
  44. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery Jr CA, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O’Malley BW 1995 Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 9:2266–2278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, Takeda S, Sekine K, Yoshihara Y, Kawakami T, Arioka K, Sato H, Uchiyama Y, Masushige S, Fukamizu A, Matsumoto T, Kato S 1997 Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exhibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning. Nat Genet 16:391–396[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O 1993 Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11162–11166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, Enmark E, Warner M, Mahler JF, Sar M, Korach KS, Gustafsson JÅ, Smithies O 1998 Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor-ß. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15677–15682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Xu J, Qiu Y, DeMayo FJ, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1998 Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science 279:1922–1925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Kuiper GG, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JÅ 1996 Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5925–5930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Tremblay GB, Tremblay A, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Labrie F, Giguere V 1997 Cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional analysis of the murine estrogen receptor-ß. Mol Endocrinol 11:353–365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Mosselman S, Polman J, Dijkema R 1996 ERß: identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett 392:49–53[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. White R, Parker MG 1998 Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone action. Endocr Relat Cancer 5:1–14[Abstract]
  53. Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS 1996 Nuclear hormone receptors: ligand-activated regulators of transcription and diverse cell responses. Chem Biol 3:529–536[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Katzenellenbogen JA, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS 1996 Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology: interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119–131[Free Full Text]
  55. Weigel NL, Zhang Y 1998 Ligand-independent activation of steroid hormone receptors. J Mol Med 76:469–479[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Menasce LP, White GR, Harrison CJ, Boyle JM 1993 Localization of the estrogen receptor locus (ESR) to chromosome 6q25.1 by FISH and a simple post-FISH banding technique. Genomics 17:263–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Sluyser M, Rijkers AW, de Goeij CC, Parker M, Hilkens J 1988 Assignment of estradiol receptor gene to mouse chromosome 10. J Steroid Biochem 31:757–761[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Keaveney M, Klug J, Gannon F 1992 Sequence analysis of the 5' flanking region of the human estrogen receptor gene [published erratum appears in DNA Seq 1992;3(3):201]. DNA Seq 2:347–358[Medline]
  59. Grandien K, Berkenstam A, Gustafsson JÅ 1997 The estrogen receptor gene: promoter organization and expression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29:1343–1369[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Fasco MJ 1998 Estrogen receptor mRNA splice variants produced from the distal and proximal promoter transcripts. Mol Cell Endocrinol 138:51–59[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Sluyser M 1995 Mutations in the estrogen receptor gene. Hum Mutat 6:97–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Pettersson K, Grandien K, Kuiper GG, Gustafsson JÅ 1997 Mouse estrogen receptor-ß forms estrogen response element-binding heterodimers with estrogen receptor-{alpha}. Mol Endocrinol 11:1486–1496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Byers M, Kuiper GG, Gustafsson JÅ, Park-Sarge OK 1997 Estrogen receptor-ß mRNA expression in rat ovary: down-regulation by gonadotropins. Mol Endocrinol 11:172–182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Grandien K, Lagercrantz S, Lagercrantz J, Fried G, Nordenskjold M, Gustafsson JÅ 1997 Human estrogen receptor ß-gene structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:4258–4265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Hiroi H, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M 1998 The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor-ß (hERß) and its heterodimerization with ER {alpha} in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 243:122–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Bhat RA, Harnish DC, Stevis PE, Lyttle CR, Komm BS 1998 A novel human estrogen receptor-ß: identification and functional analysis of additional N-terminal amino acids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 67:233–240[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Leygue E, Dotzlaw H, Lu B, Glor C, Watson PH, Murphy LC 1998 Estrogen receptor-ß: mine is longer than yours? [letter]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3754–3755[Free Full Text]
  68. Moore JT, McKee DD, Slentz-Kesler K, Moore LB, Jones SA, Horne EL, Su JL, Kliewer SA, Lehmann JM, Willson TM 1998 Cloning and characterization of human estrogen receptor-ß isoforms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 247:75–78[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Rosenfeld CS, Yuan X, Manikkam M, Calder MD, Garverick HA, Lubahn DB 1999 Cloning, sequencing, and localization of bovine estrogen receptor-ß within the ovarian follicle. Biol Reprod 60:691–697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Petersen DN, Tkalcevic GT, Koza-Taylor PH, Turi TG, Brown TA 1998 Identification of estrogen receptor-ß2, a functional variant of estrogen receptor-ß expressed in normal rat tissues. Endocrinology 139:1082–1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Chu S, Fuller PJ 1997 Identification of a splice variant of the rat estrogen receptor-ß gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 132:195–199[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Lu B, Leygue E, Dotzlaw H, Murphy LJ, Murphy LC, Watson PH 1998 Estrogen receptor-ß mRNA variants in human and murine tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 138:199–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Vladusic EA, Hornby AE, Guerra-Vladusic FK, Lupu R 1998 Expression of estrogen receptor-ß messenger RNA variant in breast cancer. Cancer Res 58:210–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Parker MG 1995 Structure and function of estrogen receptors. Vitam Horm 51:267–287[Medline]
  75. Jensen EV 1991 Overview of the nuclear receptor family. In: Parker MG (ed) Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Molecular Mechanisms, Cellular Functions, Clinical Abnormalities. Academic Press, London, pp 1–13
  76. Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1994 Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu Rev Biochem 63:451–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  77. Webb P, Lopez GN, Uht RM, Kushner PJ 1995 Tamoxifen activation of the estrogen receptor/AP-1 pathway: potential origin for the cell-specific estrogen-like effects of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 9:443–456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Sukovich DA, Mukherjee R, Benfield PA 1994 A novel, cell-type-specific mechanism for estrogen receptor-mediated gene activation in the absence of an estrogen-responsive element. Mol Cell Biol 14:7134–7143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Ponglikitmongkol M, Green S, Chambon P 1988 Genomic organization of the human oestrogen receptor gene. EMBO J 7:3385–3388[Medline]
  80. Kuiper GG, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Haggblad J, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JÅ 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors-{alpha} and -ß. Endocrinology 138:863–870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Montano MM, Muller V, Trobaugh A, Katzenellenbogen BS 1995 The carboxy-terminal F domain of the human estrogen receptor: role in the transcriptional activity of the receptor and the effectiveness of antiestrogens as estrogen antagonists. Mol Endocrinol 9:814–825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Peters GA, Khan SA 1999 Estrogen receptor domains E and F: role in dimerization and interaction with coactivator RIP-140. Mol Endocrinol 13:286–296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Picard D, Kumar V, Chambon P, Yamamoto KR 1990 Signal transduction by steroid hormones: nuclear localization is differentially regulated in estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors. Cell Regul 1:291–299[Medline]
  84. Ylikomi T, Bocquel MT, Berry M, Gronemeyer H, Chambon P 1992 Cooperation of proto-signals for nuclear accumulation of estrogen and progesterone receptors. EMBO J 11:3681–3694[Medline]
  85. Norris JD, Fan D, Kerner SA, McDonnell DP 1997 Identification of a third autonomous activation domain within the human estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:747–754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Cowley SM, Hoare S, Mosselman S, Parker MG 1997 Estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß form heterodimers on DNA. J Biol Chem 272:19858–19862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Giguere V, Tremblay A, Tremblay GB 1998 Estrogen receptor-ß: re-evaluation of estrogen and antiestrogen signaling. Steroids 63:335–339[CrossRef][Medline]
  88. Shughrue PJ, Scrimo PJ, Merchenthaler I 1998 Evidence for the colocalization of estrogen receptor-ß mRNA and estrogen receptor-{alpha} immunoreactivity in neurons of the rat forebrain. Endocrinology 139:5267–5270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Tremblay GB, Tremblay A, Labrie F, Giguere V 1998 Ligand-independent activation of the estrogen receptors-{alpha} and -ß by mutations of a conserved tyrosine can be abolished by antiestrogens. Cancer Res 58:877–881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Watanabe T, Inoue S, Ogawa S, Ishii Y, Hiroi H, Ikeda K, Orimo A, Muramatsu M 1997 Agonistic effect of tamoxifen is dependent on cell type, ERE-promoter context, and estrogen receptor subtype: functional difference between estrogen receptors-{alpha} and -ß. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 236:140–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GG, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J, Kushner PJ, Scanlan TS 1997 Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß at AP1 sites. Science 277:1508–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Sun J, Meyers MJ, Fink BE, Rajendran R, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS 1999 Novel ligands that function as selective estrogens or antiestrogens for estrogen receptor-{alpha} or estrogen receptor-ß. Endocrinology 140:800–804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Couse JF, Lindzey J, Grandien K, Gustafsson JÅ, Korach KS 1997 Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) and estrogen receptor-ß (ERß) messenger ribonucleic acid in the wild-type and ER{alpha}- knockout mouse. Endocrinology 138:4613–4621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  94. Brandenberger AW, Tee MK, Jaffe RB 1998 Estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) and -ß (ERß) mRNAs in normal ovary, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and ovarian cancer cell lines: down-regulation of ER-ß in neoplastic tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1025–1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  95. Arts J, Kuiper GG, Janssen JM, Gustafsson JÅ, Lowik CW, Pols HA, van Leeuwen JP 1997 Differential expression of estrogen receptors-{alpha} and -ß mRNA during differentiation of human osteoblast SV-HFO cells. Endocrinology 138:5067–5070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Pau CY, Pau KY, Spies HG 1998 Putative estrogen receptor-ß and -{alpha} mRNA expression in male and female rhesus macaques. Mol Cell Endocrinol 146:59–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  97. Shughrue PJ, Komm B, Merchenthaler I 1996 The distribution of estrogen receptor-ß mRNA in the rat hypothalamus. Steroids 61:678–681[CrossRef][Medline]
  98. Wilson ME, Price Jr RH, Handa RJ 1998 Estrogen receptor-ß messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the pituitary gland. Endocrinology 139:5151–5156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  99. Mitchner NA, Garlick C, Ben-Jonathan N 1998 Cellular distribution and gene regulation of estrogen receptors-{alpha} and -ß in the rat pituitary gland. Endocrinology 139:3976–3983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  100. Shupnik MA, Pitt LK, Soh AY, Anderson A, Lopes MB, Laws Jr ER 1998 Selective expression of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß isoforms in human pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3965–3972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Dotzlaw H, Leygue E, Watson PH, Murphy LC 1997 Expression of estrogen receptor-ß in human breast tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2371–2374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Dotzlaw H, Leygue E, Watson PH, Murphy LC 1999 Estrogen receptor-ß messenger RNA expression in human breast tumor biopsies: relationship to steroid receptor status and regulation by progestins. Cancer Res 59:529–532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  103. Sar M, Welsch F 1999 Differential expression of estrogen receptor-ß and estrogen receptor-{alpha} in the rat ovary. Endocrinology 140:963–971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. Hiroi H, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Goto W, Orimo A, Momoeda M, Tsutsumi O, Taketani Y, Muramatsu M 1999 Differential immunolocalization of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß in rat ovary and uterus. J Mol Endocrinol 22:37–44[Abstract]
  105. Knauer E 1900 Die ovarientransplantation. Arch Gynakol 60:322–376[CrossRef]
  106. Marshall FHA, Jolly WA 1905 Contributions to the physiology of mammalian reproduction. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 198:99–142
  107. Jost A 1970 General outline about reproductive physiology and its developmental background. In: Gibian H, Plotz EJ (eds) Mammalian Reproduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 4–32
  108. Keeton WT, Gould JL 1986 Biological Science. WW Norton & Company, New York, p 410
  109. Camper SA, Saunders TL, Kendall SK, Keri RA, Seasholtz AF, Gordon DF, Birkmeier TS, Keegan CE, Karolyi IJ, Roller ML, Burrows HL, Samuelson LC 1995 Implementing transgenic and embryonic stem cell technology to study gene expression, cell-cell interactions and gene function. Biol Reprod 52:246–257[Abstract]
  110. Nishimori K, Matzuk MM 1996 Transgenic mice in the analysis of reproductive development and function. Rev Reprod 1:203–212[Abstract]
  111. George FW, Wilson JD 1988 Sex determination and differentiation. In: Knobil E, Neil JD, Ewing LL, Greenwald GS, Markert CL, Pfaff DW (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, pp 3–26
  112. Greco TL, Duello TM, Gorski J 1993 Estrogen receptors, estradiol, and diethylstilbestrol in early development: the mouse as a model for the study of estrogen receptors and estrogen sensitivity in embryonic development of male and female reproductive tracts. Endocr Rev 14:59–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Wu TC, Wang L, Wan YJ 1993 Detection of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in human oocytes and cumulus-oocyte complexes using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril 59:54–59[Medline]
  114. Wu TC, Wang L, Wan YJ 1992 Expression of estrogen receptor gene in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 33:407–412[CrossRef][Medline]
  115. Hou Q, Gorski J 1993 Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor genes are expressed differentially in mouse embryos during preimplantation development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:9460–9464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, Takahashi H, Cohen RM, Specker B, Williams TC, Lubahn DB, Korach KS 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1995 Jan 12;332(2):131]. N Engl J Med 331:1056–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. Conte FA, Grumbach MM, Ito Y, Fisher CR, Simpson ER 1994 A syndrome of female pseudohermaphroditism, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, and multicystic ovaries associated with missense mutations in the gene encoding aromatase (P450arom). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1287–1292[Abstract]
  118. Shozu M, Akasofu K, Harada T, Kubota Y 1991 A new cause of female pseudohermaphroditism: placental aromatase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:560–566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  119. Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, Faustini-Fustini M, Serpente S, Boyd J, Korach KS, Simpson ER 1997 Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med 337:91–95[Free Full Text]
  120. Morishima A, Grumbach MM, Simpson ER, Fisher C, Qin K 1995 Aromatase deficiency in male and female siblings caused by a novel mutation and the physiological role of estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3689–3698[Abstract]
  121. Rosenfeld CS, Ganjam VK, Taylor JA, Yuan X, Stiehr JR, Hardy MP, Lubahn DB 1998 Transcription and translation of estrogen receptor-ß in the male reproductive tract of estrogen receptor-{alpha} knock-out and wild-type mice. Endocrinology 139:2982–2987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  122. Bronson SK, Smithies O 1994 Altering mice by homologous recombination using embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 269:27155–27158[Free Full Text]
  123. Couse JF, Curtis SW, Washburn TF, Lindzey J, Golding TS, Lubahn DB, Smithies O, Korach KS 1995 Analysis of transcription and estrogen insensitivity in the female mouse after targeted disruption of the estrogen receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 9:1441–1454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  124. Luetteke NC, Qiu TH, Peiffer RL, Oliver P, Smithies O, Lee DC 1993 TGF{alpha} deficiency results in hair follicle and eye abnormalities in targeted and waved-1 mice. Cell 73:263–278[CrossRef][Medline]
  125. Dietz HC, Valle D, Francomano CA, Kendzior Jr RJ, Pyeritz RE, Cutting GR 1993 The skipping of constitutive exons in vivo induced by nonsense mutations. Science 259:680–683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  126. Wakamatsu N, Kobayashi H, Miyatake T, Tsuji S 1992 A novel exon mutation in the human ß-hexosaminidase ß subunit gene affects 3' splice site selection. J Biol Chem 267:2406–2413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  127. Reed R, Maniatis T 1986 A role for exon sequences and splice-site proximity in splice-site selection. Cell 46:681–690[CrossRef][Medline]
  128. Nelson RJ, Young KA 1998 Behavior in mice with targeted disruption of single genes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:453–462[CrossRef][Medline]
  129. Crawley JN, Paylor R 1997 A proposed test battery and constellations of specific behavioral paradigms to investigate the behavioral phenotypes of transgenic and knockout mice. Horm Behav 31:197–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  130. Gerlai R 1996 Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype? [published erratum appears in Trends Neurosci 1996 Jul;19(7):271]. Trends Neurosci 19:177–181[CrossRef][Medline]
  131. Olsen KL 1992 Genetic influences on sexual behavior differentiation. In: Gerall AA, Moltz H, Ward IL (eds) Sexual Differentiation. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–40
  132. Greenman DL, Dooley K, Breeden CR 1977 Strain differences in the response of the mouse to diethylstilbestrol. J Toxicol Environ Health 3:589–597[Medline]
  133. Greenman DL, Delongchamp RR 1979 Variability of response to diethylstilbestrol: a comparison of inbred with hybrid mice. J Toxicol Environ Health 5:131–143[Medline]
  134. Roper RJ, Griffith JS, Lyttle CR, Doerge RW, McNabb AW, Broadbent RE, Teuscher C 1999 Interacting quantitative trait loci control phenotypic variation in murine estradiol-regulated responses. Endocrinology 140:556–561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Mani SK, Blaustein JD, O’Malley BW 1997 Progesterone receptor function from a behavioral perspective. Horm Behav 31:244–255[CrossRef][Medline]
  136. Ogasawara Y, Okamoto S, Kitamura Y, Matsumoto K 1983 Proliferative pattern of uterine cells from birth to adulthood in intact, neonatally castrated, and/or adrenalectomized mice, assayed by incorporation of [125I]iododeoxyuridine. Endocrinology 113:582–587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL 1994 A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell 77:481–490[CrossRef][Medline]
  138. Parker KL 1998 The roles of steroidogenic factor 1 in endocrine development and function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 145:15–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  139. Horigome T, Ogata F, Golding TS, Korach KS 1988 Estradiol-stimulated proteolytic cleavage of the estrogen receptor in mouse uterus. Endocrinology 123:2540–2548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  140. Yamashita S, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA, Korach KS 1990 The role of the estrogen receptor in uterine epithelial proliferation and cytodifferentiation in neonatal mice. Endocrinology 127:2456–2463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  141. Blaustein JD 1992 Cytoplasmic estrogen receptors in rat brain: immunocytochemical evidence using three antibodies with distinct epitopes. Endocrinology 131:1336–1342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Schomberg DW, Couse JF, Mukherykee A, Lubahn DB, Sar M, Mayo KE, Korach KS 1999 Targeted disruption of the estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) gene in female mice: characterization of ovarian reponses and phenotype in the adult. Endocrinology 140:2733–2744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  143. Cuhna GR, Cooke PS, Bigsby R, Brody JR 1991 Ontogeny of sex steroid receptors in mammals. In: Parker MG (ed) Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Molecular Mechanisms, Cellular Functions, Clinical Abnormalities. Academic Press, London, pp 235–268
  144. Yamashita S, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA, Korach KS 1989 Developmental pattern of estrogen receptor expression in female mouse genital tracts. Endocrinology 125:2888–2896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  145. Pasqualini JR, Sumida C 1986 Ontogeny of steroid receptors in the reproductive system. Int Rev Cytol 101:275–324[Medline]