| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pathophysiology, University of Berne, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our knowledge of the biological characteristics of bisphosphonates dates back 30 yr. The first report was done by the authors group and published in 1968 (5). The concept was derived from our earlier studies on inorganic pyrophosphate. We had found that plasma and urine contained compounds that inhibit calcium phosphate precipitation and that part of this inhibitory activity was due to inorganic pyrophosphate, a compound that had not been described previously in the scientific literature (6). Pyrophosphate was then shown to impair in vitro the formation and dissolution of calcium phosphate crystals. This effect was therefore similar to that on calcium carbonate and, for this reason, had been used in washing powders. Since pyrophosphate was able to inhibit ectopic calcification in vivo, it was suggested that it might act as a physiological regulator of calcification and perhaps also of decalcification in vivo, its local concentration being determined by the activity of local pyrophosphatases (7).
Because of its failure to act when given orally and its rapid hydrolysis when given parenterally, pyrophosphate was used therapeutically only in scintigraphy and against dental calculus. This prompted us to search for analogs that showed similar physicochemical activity but resisted enzymatic hydrolysis and, therefore, would not be degraded metabolically. The bisphosphonates fulfilled these conditions.
This review will deal with the mechanisms of action of these compounds. In vitro results, as well as results both in animals and humans, will be integrated in an attempt to deduce the current state of the art. Various reviews have been published recently on bisphosphonates and may be consulted also for information on other aspects (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Since the literature in this field is plentiful, selective citation was necessary. Priority is given to papers dealing with the mechanisms of action. Since many papers often deal with the same finding, in most cases only the first ones are quoted. Subsequent papers are quoted only if they convey new knowledge.
| II. Chemistry |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| III. Effects in Vivo |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Inhibition of calcification
The first rationale for the search for analogs of polyphosphates
was to find compounds that would inhibit the formation of calcium
phosphate salts without being destroyed by enzymes, therefore making
them useful in treating diseases with ectopic mineralization. One
possible application was to administer the compounds systemically in
diseases such as atherosclerosis; another application was as an
addition to toothpastes to fight against dental calculus.
1. Ectopic mineralization and ossification.
a. In animals.
Bisphosphonates can efficiently inhibit ectopic
calcification in vivo. Thus, among others, they prevent
experimentally induced calcification of many soft tissues when given
both parenterally and orally (15, 16). In contrast to pyrophosphate,
which acts only when given parenterally, they are also active when
administered orally. They decrease not only mineral deposits but also
the accumulation of cholesterol, elastin, and collagen in the arteries
(17, 18).
Bisphosphonates can also inhibit the calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves. Thus, etidronate administered subcutaneously inhibits the calcification of aortic valves implanted subcutaneously in rats (19). The bisphosphonate is also active when it is released locally from various matrices (20, 21). Certain results suggest that the bisphosphonates can be bound covalently to the valves (22). These results open an interesting field of application in heart surgery.
Bisphosphonates also decrease the formation of experimental urinary stones (23). Unfortunately, the dose has to be such that normal mineralization is impaired, as well.
As originally hypothesized, topical administration can lead to a decreased formation of dental calculus (24). This effect is currently used to prevent tartar formation in humans by the addition of bisphosphonates to toothpastes.
Finally, certain bisphosphonates also inhibit ectopic ossification when given systemically (25) or locally (26). It appears that the process is mainly an impairment of the calcification process because the deposition of matrix is not impaired, at least in the beginning.
b. In humans.
One of the bisphosphonates, etidronate, has been
used in humans to prevent ectopic calcification and ossification.
Unfortunately, with respect to calcification, the results so far have
been disappointing. In conditions such as scleroderma, dermatomyositis,
and calcinosis universalis, results are inconclusive (27). In
urolithiasis, the dose that might be effective is such that normal
mineralization is inhibited (28). Better effects are seen with topical
applications to prevent dental calculus (29, 30), and toothpastes
containing bisphosphonates are marketed in some countries. More
published reports are available in ectopic ossification, especially
fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (31), and ossification after
spinal cord injury, cranial trauma, and especially after total hip
replacement (32, 33). However, the efficacy of etidronate has still
not been proven beyond a doubt, although the results are promising
(34).
2. Normal mineralization. The results cited above raised the hope that bisphosphonates might indeed be used clinically to inhibit various types of calcifications. Unfortunately, however, when administered in doses approximating those that inhibit soft tissue calcification, bisphosphonates can impair the mineralization of normal calcified tissues such as bone and cartilage (35, 36, 37) and, when given in higher amounts, also dentine (38), enamel (39, 40), and cementum (41). In the latter case, their administration can lead to a reduction of the extraction force.
While the different compounds vary greatly in their activity in bone resorption, they do not vary greatly in the inhibition of mineralization. For most species the effective daily dose is on the order of 520 mg of compound phosphorus per kg, administered parenterally. Interestingly, clodronate inhibits normal mineralization to a lesser degree than etidronate. The inhibition is eventually reversed after discontinuation of the drug (37). The inhibition of mineralization can lead to impaired fracture healing (42).
Since the inhibition is not corrected by 1,25-(OH)2D3 or 24,25-(OH)2D3 (43), it shows that the defect is not due to a decrease in this hormone. The decrease in calcitriol, which is sometimes observed when large amounts of etidronate are given (44, 45), and which is accompanied by a decrease in intestinal calcium absorption (46), is most probably secondary to the inhibition of mineralization. The decrease represents a homeostatic mechanism that adapts intestinal calcium absorption to the needs of the organism to maintain calcium homeostasis (47). When bisphosphonates are given in amounts small enough to decrease bone resorption without inhibiting mineralization, an increase in both plasma calcitriol and intestinal calcium absorption is observed (48).
Bisphosphonates also inhibit calcification of bone in humans when given in larger amounts (49, 50, 51, 52) (see Section VI).
The propensity to inhibit the calcification of normal bone has hampered the therapeutic use of bisphosphonates in ectopic calcification.
B. Inhibition of bone resorption
Bisphosphonates can be very powerful inhibitors of bone
resorption, their potency varying according to their structure. This
was shown in vitro in cell and organ culture, as well as
in vivo in both animals and humans. The effect is present in
normal animals as well as in experimental conditions in which
resorption is increased. Similarly, bone resorption is decreased in
normal individuals as well as in patients afflicted with a series of
conditions accompanied by increased bone resorption, such as Pagets
disease, tumoral osteolysis, hyperparathyroidism, and osteoporosis.
1. Effects in vivo. Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption both in intact animals and in those with experimentally increased resorption.
a. Intact animals.
In growing intact rats, the bisphosphonates
block the degradation of both bone and cartilage, thus arresting the
remodeling of the metaphysis, which becomes club-shaped and
radiologically denser than normal (36). This is similar to observations
in animals with congenital osteopetrosis (53). These various changes
are all secondary to the inhibition of bone resorption. This effect is
used as a model with which to study the potency of new compounds (54).
The inhibition of endogenous bone resorption has also been documented by 45Ca kinetic studies (55, 56) and by markers of bone resorption (55). The effect occurs within 2448 h (57) and is therefore slower than that of calcitonin.
In view of the accumulation of the bisphosphonates in bone, it is of great clinical interest that the inhibition of bone resorption reaches a certain steady level even when the compounds are given continuously (58). This level depends on the administered dose. This has also been described in humans (59). These results show that there is no accumulation of effect with time and suggest that the bisphosphonate buried in the bone is inactive, at least as long as it remains buried there. They also show that, at the therapeutic dosage, there is no danger of a continuous decrease in bone turnover in the long run, coupled with an increase in bone fragility, as seen in osteopetrosis.
The decrease in resorption is accompanied by an increase in calcium balance (55, 56) and in mineral content of bone. This is possible because of an increase in intestinal absorption of calcium (55, 56) consequent to an elevation of 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D. This increased balance is the reason for administering these compounds to humans suffering from osteoporosis. However, the increase is smaller than predicted, considering the dramatic decreases in bone resorption and bone formation (55, 56), possibly due to the so-called "coupling" between formation and resorption. This will be discussed in a later section.
Similar results are found in humans. Bisphosphonates decrease both resorption and formation, as described in numerous studies (for reviews, see Refs. 12 and 14).
b. Animals with experimentally increased resorption including
osteoporosis.
Bisphosphonates can also prevent experimentally
induced increases in bone resorption. They impair resorption induced by
agents such as PTH (60, 61), 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D, and
retinoids. The effect on retinoid-induced hypercalcaemia has been used
to develop a powerful and rapid screening assay for new compounds (62).
The bisphosphonates are also effective in preventing bone destruction in a number of disease models.
i. Osteoporosis. Many osteoporosis models have been investigated, including sciatic nerve section [which was the first model investigated (63)], spinal cord section, hypokinesis, ovariectomy (64, 65), orchidectomy (66), heparin, lactation (67), low calcium diet, and corticosteroids (68). All bisphosphonates investigated, i.e., alendronate, clodronate, etidronate, ibandronate, incadronate, olpadronate, pami-dronate, risedronate, tiludronate, and YH 529, have been effective.
Bisphosphonates also decrease bone loss and actually increase bone mineral density in humans with postmenopausal osteoporosis (69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74) and corticosteroid-induced bone loss (75). Alendronate and tiludronate also prevent bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women (76, 77).
The effect of bisphosphonates upon the mechanical properties of the skeleton has been addressed only recently. This issue is important since longlasting, strong inhibition of bone resorption can lead to increased bone fragility and, therefore, to fractures caused by an inability to replace old bone by young bone and to repair microcracks. Such an effect of bisphosphonates is present when very large amounts of bisphosphonates are administered to animals. Thus, mice given such a treatment from birth develop a radiological and morphological bone appearance similar to that seen in congenital osteopetrosis (53). Dogs develop an increase in fractures if given very large amounts of etidronate or clodronate over a year (37). In contrast, doses of risedronate 5 and 20 times the anticipated clinical dose did not induce any increase in microdamage of the bones of dogs, despite the fact that the activation frequency, an index of bone turnover, was decreased between 53% and 94% (78).
It is now clear that, if not given in excess, bisphosphonates improve biomechanical properties both in normal animals and in experimental models of osteoporosis. This is the case with alendronate, clodronate, etidronate, incadronate, neridronate, olpadronate, pamidronate, tiludronate, and YH 529. This effect is seen in various animals such as the rat, the chick, and the baboon (65, 79, 80, 81, 82). Note, however, that the effect is more ambiguous with etidronate, since at higher doses it is obscured by an inhibition of mineralization.
Recent human data show that alendronate actually decreases the incidence of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (72, 83). However, it will always be prudent to administer a dose that does not induce too profound an inhibition of turnover. In treating osteoporosis, the general aim is to attain levels that correspond to those observed before the menopause. This is obtained, for example, with 10 mg daily of alendronate (59).
ii. Tumor bone disease. Bisphosphonates partially or entirely correct the increase in bone resorption in experimental tumor bone disease. Etidronate and clodronate inhibit the bone resorption induced by supernatants of tumor cultures in vitro (84, 85). In vivo, various bisphosphonates partially correct the hypercalcemia induced in rats by subcutaneously implanted Walker 256 carcinomas (86, 87) or Leydig tumors (88). For calciuria, the effect is generally more pronounced than for calcemia. This is explained by the fact that hypercalcaemia is often due to the systemic production of PTH-related peptide, which increases both bone resorption and tubular reabsorption of calcium (89), with bisphosphonates acting only on the former. Bone resorption secondary to actual tumor invasion is also retarded, as shown by numerous models using different tumor cells. The bisphosphonates shown to be active were, among others, clodronate, etidronate, incadronate, pamidronate, and risedronate (for review see Ref.90). Of great clinical interest is the fact that not only osseous metastases but also tumor burden is decreased, at least with risedronate (91). On the other hand, an increase in the burden has been described with a different bisphosphonate and another type of cell (92). The mechanism of the decrease in tumor burden is still debated. The decrease may be due to the diminished release of growth factors that are present in bone matrix and may stimulate tumor cell growth during bone resorption (93). Another possibility would be less space in bone, which might prevent the tumor cells from developing.
In humans, bisphosphonates inhibit tumor-induced bone resorption, correct hypercalcemia, reduce pain, prevent development of new osteolytic lesions, prevent the occurrence of fractures and, consequently, improve the quality of life (94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99). They are now the treatment of choice in hypercalcemia of malignancy.
iii. Periodontal disease. Another interesting future use is in alveolar bone resorption. Bisphosphonates have been shown to decrease the bone destruction in various animal models (100, 101, 102).
2. Effects in organ and cell culture. Bisphosphonates block bone resorption induced by various means in organ culture (60, 61, 103, 104). For many years it was not possible to obtain a good correlation between the results obtained in vitro and those found in vivo. Recently, however, such a correlation was obtained using the mouse calvaria system (105).
An inhibition can also be found when the effect of isolated osteoclasts on various mineralized matrices is investigated in vitro (106, 107, 108). Under bisphosphonate treatment, the osteoclasts form fewer erosion cavities, which are of smaller size. However, only certain models show the same sequence of potency as that found in vivo (109).
3. Potency of various bisphosphonates on bone resorption. One
of the aims of bisphosphonate research has been to develop compounds
with a more powerful antiresorptive activity but without a higher
inhibition of mineralization. This is possible since the activity of
bisphosphonates on bone resorption varies greatly from compound to
compound. Compounds have now been developed that are 5,00010,000
times more powerful than etidronate in inhibiting bone resorption. The
gradation of potency evaluated in the rat corresponds quite well with
that found in humans (Table 1
).
|
Until recently it was thought that only geminal compounds
(i.e., compounds with only one carbon between the two P
atoms) were effective. In 1995 it was reported that longer chain
compounds could be made effective both on the inhibition of
calcification in vitro and in vivo, as well as on
bone resorption, if a keto group in the
-positions near the
phosphoric functions was added (115). Again, as for the
bisphosphonates, the chain length is important. These
bisacylphosphonates might be of interest in the future.
C. Effects on bone formation
Until recently, bisphosphonates were considered not to affect bone
formation directly but to increase bone balance merely by inhibiting
bone resorption. However, new results suggest that this may not be
entirely true. Morphological data on the basic structural unit suggest
a possible increase in formation in the bone multicellular unit (BMU),
implying that some stimulating effect on bone formation might be
present (see Section IV.B.1.) (65, 116, 117).
It is noteworthy that incadronate administered at toxic doses orally for 13 weeks was found to produce intramembranous intramedullary bone formation (118). No explanation has yet been found for this unique phenomenon.
At the cellular level bisphosphonates have been shown to increase in vitro the proliferation of osteoblasts (119, 120) and cartilage cells (121), as well as the biosynthesis of collagen and osteocalcin by bone cells (119, 122, 123) and proteoglycans by cartilage cells (124). The effect on collagen may be partially due to impaired intracellular collagenolysis (125). Alendronate can increase colony formation of osteoblasts (119) and the formation of mineralized nodules in human cell cultures in vitro, a phenomenon that is accompanied by an increased formation of basic fibroblast growth factor (126). It has been suggested that some of these effects may be mediated through protein-tyrosine phosphatases (120).
Thus it is possible that bisphosphonates could, under certain circumstances, also act by increasing bone formation. This possibility, although far from being established, is of enough potential interest to deserve a thorough investigation.
D. Effects on noncalcified tissues
Bisphosphonates also have some effects in vivo that are
not necessarily related to the effects on bone. Often, however, these
effects occur after very large doses, so that any relevance to
pharmacological doses is doubtful. The effects on the immune system are
discussed in Section IV.B.5.b. Of possible clinical interest
is an increase in plasma high-density lipoproteins. This, and the fact
that bisphosphonates and phosphonosulfonates linked to an isoprene
chain are potent inhibitors of squalene synthase and hence
cholesterol-lowering agents in animals (127) may open some interesting
new therapeutic applications for these drugs.
A clinically important effect, the mechanism of which is not yet understood, is their influence on mucosa. It has been known for a long time that bisphosphonates can induce gastrointestinal disturbances (128). These appeared to be more pronounced for the aminobisphosphonates. It is now known that pamidronate (129), as well as alendronate (130), can, when given orally, induce serious adverse esophageal effects such as esophagitis, erosions, and ulcerations.
| IV. Mechanisms of Action |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The physicochemical effects of most of the bisphosphonates are very similar to those of pyrophosphate. Thus, they inhibit the formation and aggregation of calcium phosphate crystals from clear solutions, even at very low concentrations (15), block the transformation of amorphous calcium phosphate into hydroxyapatite (133, 134), and delay the aggregation of apatite crystals (135).
Bisphosphonates also delay the dissolution of calcium phosphate crystals (60, 61, 136). This effect was one of the reasons for investigating the action of these compounds on bone resorption in vivo. While they indeed proved to be good inhibitors of bone resorption, the mechanism is now thought not to be physicochemical but rather biological.
All of these effects appear to be related to the marked affinity of these compounds for the surface of solid-phase calcium phosphate where they bind onto the calcium by chemisorption (137), presumably chiefly at screw dislocations and kink sites of growth, and then act as a crystal poison on both growth and dissolution. The binding can be of two types (138, 139): bidentate or tridentate. In bidentate binding, an oxygen atom from each phosphonate group binds onto a calcium of the hydroxyapatite. Clodronate is an example of this type of binding. Most of the bisphosphonates that are now used clinically are tridentate. They bind at a third location, such as the oxygen of a hydroxyl group on the central carbon. This tridentate binding displays a better binding strength, which explains why clodronate is relatively less bound. A nitrogen atom can take the place of the hydroxyl group, as in incadronate. There is a positive relation between the binding of various bisphosphonates and their inhibitory effect on crystallization (131), giving strong support to the theory that the inhibition of mineralization in vivo is due to a physicochemical mechanism.
To date, there is no indication that the bisphosphonates are incorporated into the crystal lattice of hydroxyapatite. They are, however, incorporated into the bone because the crystals, along with bisphosphonate, on their surface become trapped by new crystals formed on top of them.
Bisphosphonates also inhibit the formation (23, 140) and the aggregation (141) of calcium oxalate crystals. These effects on calcium phosphate and oxalate crystal formation raised the hope that bisphosphonates might be used to prevent urinary lithiasis. This proved not to be possible since the dose necessary to inhibit crystallization in urine also induces an inhibition of normal mineralization, leading to the development of osteomalacia (28).
While these results point to a physicochemical mechanism in the inhibition of calcification, an effect on matrix formation cannot be totally excluded. When etidronate is given in doses that produce mineralization defects, changes in glycosaminoglycan synthesis are seen in teeth (142) and growth plate cartilage (143). Furthermore, collagen synthesis seems to be effected in dentine (38, 144, 145) and heterotopic bone (25, 146). These changes, as well as those observed in arteries (17, 18), could be a consequence of the inhibition of mineralization. However, it is interesting that changes are seen also in nonmineralized tissues such as articular cartilage (147).
B. Bone resorption
First of all, it must be stressed that, while the effects on
calcification are probably explained by a physicochemical mechanism on
the crystals, this is not the case for bone resorption. The inhibition
of bone resorption can actually be explained largely, if not entirely,
by cellular mechanisms. The latter can be considered at three levels:
tissue, cellular, and molecular. The effect may be directly on the
osteoclasts and may be mediated, at least partially, by other cells
such as osteoblastic lineage cells and macrophages.
1. Physical chemistry. The earliest hypothesis for the action of bisphosphonates on bone proposed physicochemical effects on mineral dissolution. Bisphosphonates, like pyrophosphate, do indeed inhibit mineral dissolution (7, 60, 61, 136). However, the concentrations of bisphosphonates required to inhibit bone resorption with the newer, more potent compounds are so low that they are unlikely to have a significant impact on mineral dissolution. Moreover, structure/activity studies on a large array of compounds showed no correlation between the inhibition of mineral dissolution in vitro and the pharmacological activity on bone resorption in vitro (131) or in vivo (110). It is therefore accepted by most investigators that the effect on bone resorption is essentially cellular.
2. Tissue level. At this level, the action of the active bisphosphonates appears to be the same for all, i.e., a reduction in bone turnover. This is shown by a decrease in both bone resorption and bone formation, as assessed in animals as and humans by calcium-45 kinetics (55, 56), biochemical markers (59), and morphology (36, 65, 116, 117).
Under normal conditions, destroyed bone is replaced by bone formation. In adults this occurs mostly at the sites of remodeling in both the trabeculae and the cortex. The morphological dynamic unit of the turnover is the BMU. The remodeling process in this unit starts with the erosion of a certain amount of bone through osteoclasts on the surface of the trabeculae, as well as on the surface or the interior of the cortex. The resorption follows a linear path, forming a canal within the cortex and a trench on the surface. The destruction is followed by a refilling of the excavation by the osteoblasts within a tight temporal sequence. This explains why every decrease in resorption is accompanied by a secondary decrease in formation, since there is less need for a bone defect to be replenished. The final morphological entity is called the bone structural unit (BSU). It corresponds to an osteon within the cortex and has of late been termed a hemiosteon when it is at the surface of the bone (148). The total bone resorption and formation will therefore depend upon the number of BMUs present at any time which, in turn, will depend upon both the number of BMUs formed and the length of time they are active (for reviews, see Refs. 148150).
Under normal conditions, the amount of bone formed in each BMU equals the amount destroyed, so that the balance is zero. In osteoporosis, however, a greater amount of bone is resorbed than formed, leading to a negative balance. Thus, while a change in turnover has no influence on the total calcium balance in normal people, there is a local negative bone balance in osteoporosis because more bone is destroyed than formed. Therefore, in this disease a decrease in turnover per se will slow down the total bone loss. This is why a high turnover after menopause, when such imbalance is present, is a good indicator for bone loss and the occurrence of osteoporosis in the future. This is also why all inhibitors of turnover, including bisphosphonates, will diminish bone loss in osteoporosis. In the case of bisphosphonates, it is probably the main mode of action in all types of osteoporosis. However, it must be stressed that there are conditions in which an increase in bone turnover is not necessarily accompanied by a negative balance. The growing animal is an obvious example, as well as certain cases of Pagets disease in humans.
In addition, the bisphosphonates also act at the individual BMU level by decreasing the depth of the resorption site (65, 116, 117). Since the amount of new bone formed in the BMU is not decreased, but possibly even increased (65, 116, 117), the local and consequently the whole body bone balance will be less negative or might even be positive.
The effect both on the general turnover and the local balance will lead to less trabecular thinning, a decreased number of trabecular perforations, a decreased reduction in connectivity (151), and a smaller erosion of the cortex, thus slowing down the decrease in bone strength and the occurrence of fractures.
Of crucial importance in the final effect is the behavior of the formation. As mentioned above, the total amount of bone formed is decreased because of the decrease in turnover, as shown by calcium45 kinetics, biochemical markers such as serum alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, and by a reduction in the bone formation surface assessed morphologically (55, 65, 116, 117). This reduction reflects reduced remodeling only. There is no evidence for reduced osteoblastic activity at individual bone formation sites, as judged by the amount of bone produced per unit time. On the contrary, the amount of bone formed at each individual basic structural unit (BSU), as measured by the thickness of the newly formed bone, is, if anything, increased (65, 116, 117). This effect is modest and needs to be confirmed. If present, however, such an effect could not be detected by any current technique measuring total bone formation in the body, such as biomechanical markers, since it would be obscured by the decrease in remodeling.
It is now generally accepted that bisphosphonates can lead to a
positive calcium and bone balance, both in animals (55, 56) and in
humans (69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 152). There are several explanations for this gain. One
is inherent to bone turnover. Therefore, a decrease in bone resorption
is not immediately followed by the diminution of formation, so that a
temporary increase in balance through a reduction in the so-called
remodeling space occurs. The second explanation is that, after the
decrease in turnover, the new BSU formed will be remodeled later than
it would be normally. It therefore has more time to finish the lengthy
process of mineralization. This will lead to a higher calcium content
and, therefore, a higher bone mineral density and content. However, it
will not lead to an increase in actual bone mass, a fact that is often
forgotten. Third, if the decrease in resorption depth at individual
remodeling sites is not matched by a decrease in formation in the
individual BMU, which seems to be the case, the local bone balance in
the BMU will be positive. The last possibility is an increase in the
amount formed at the level of the BMU (Fig. 3
).
|
Another question has been whether bisphosphonates could display an additive effect together with another inhibitor of bone resorption. One report suggests this to be the case with estrogen in humans (159).
3. Cellular level. There is now general agreement that the final target of bisphosphonate action is the osteoclast. Four mechanisms appear to be involved: 1) inhibition of osteoclast recruitment; 2) inhibition of osteoclastic adhesion; 3) shortening of the life span of osteoclasts; and 4) inhibition of osteoclast activity. The first three mechanisms will lead to a decrease in the number of osteoclasts, which is observed in humans and often, although not always, in animals. All four effects could be due either to a direct action on the osteoclast or its precursors or indirectly through action on cells that modulate the osteoclast.
1. Several bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast differentiation in various culture systems of both cells (160) and bones (104, 112). Bisphosphonates are also powerful inhibitors of macrophage proliferation, cells that are of the same lineage as osteoclasts (161). In the hemopoietic series, the effect appears to be specific, or at least specially pronounced, for the mononuclear phagocyte lineage (162). Furthermore, the potency rank of bisphosphonates, when assessed in vitro, correlates with effects in vivo only when systems are used that detect osteoclast recruitment and not activity alone (104, 112). Some experiments suggest that the effect occurs at the terminal step of the differentiation process (163). Other recent results (109, 164) also support the effect on differentiation. Thus, a correlation between the number of osteoclasts and osteoclastic cavity formation, on one hand, and the effect in vivo, on the other hand, occurs only if other cells, probably osteoblasts but not osteoclasts, are exposed to the bisphosphonates (see SectionIV.B.5.a). Finally, when a system involving osteoclast differentiation is used (104, 112), the dose necessary to inhibit resorption is low only for aminobisphosphonates, but not for etidronate and clodronate, which are less powerful inhibitors of resorption. This suggests that two mechanisms may be operating, one on osteoclast recruitment and one with a direct effect on osteoclast activity.
2. The second possibility would be a decreased osteoclastic adhesion to the mineralized matrix. Whether this takes place is still uncertain since the results are ambiguous. One recent study reports such an effect (165). However, there is now excellent evidence that bisphosphonates can inhibit the adhesion of some cells, mainly tumor cells, in vitro (166).
3. The third possibility is a shortening of the lifespan of the osteoclast. It has been proposed that this might be due to a toxic effect, but the results were obtained at very high concentrations. Recently it was reported that bisphosphonates induce osteoclast programmed cell death (apoptosis), both in vitro and in vivo, and both in normal mice and in mice with increased bone resorption (167). The ranking of effectiveness of clodronate, pamidronate, and risedronate was the same as seen in vivo. The effect was not due to toxic cell death. Whether this is a direct effect on osteoclasts, or an indirect one through the effect on other cells, is not known. A similar effect occurs in macrophage-like cells in vitro and is nitric oxide independent (168).
4. The last possibility is an inhibition of osteoclast activity after the bisphosphonate has been taken up by the osteoclasts. Indeed, several facts suggest that the inhibition of recruitment is not the only mode of action of bisphosphonates in vivo. Thus, after bisphosphonate administration, the number of multinucleated osteoclasts on the bone surface often increases initially, despite a reduced bone resorption (36, 169, 170); however, the cells appear inactive (36). It is only later, after chronic administration, that the osteoclast number decreases. The cause for the initial increase is unknown. One possibility is that it could reflect a stimulation of osteoclast formation to compensate for the decrease in osteoclast activity.
A direct effect on the osteoclasts is supported by the finding that, under bisphosphonates, osteoclasts can show changes in morphology both in vitro (107, 170) and in vivo (36, 132, 169). These include changes in the cytoskeleton, especially actin (107, 171, 172) and vinculin (172), and the ruffled border (132, 169, 173). One study (171) showed that the morphological changes occurred only when the cells were actively resorbing the calcified matrix, or if the bisphosphonate was injected into the cells. No changes occurred when the osteoclasts were not active, showing that they have to be taken up with the resorbed mineral. As mentioned earlier, bisphosphonates inhibit the formation of resorption cavities by isolated osteoclasts deposited on calcified matrices in vitro (106, 107, 108). A direct action on osteoclasts is also supported by the fact that, under certain conditions, bisphosphonates can enter cells (174), particularly those of the macrophage lineage. The concentration of the bisphosphonate can also attain very high values under the osteoclasts, probably 100 µM or more, partly because they deposit preferentially under these cells (173, 175) and are then released from the mineral at the acid pH prevailing at this location.
4. Molecular level. The events leading to either osteoclast inactivation or diminished osteoclast formation by bisphosphonates have not yet been fully elucidated. It may be worth introducing this section by reiterating some general facts.
The circulating levels of pharmacologically active bis-phosphonates are usually extremely low. This implies that uniform circulating levels are not necessary for continu-ous activity. This is supported by the fact that a single administration of these compounds can lead to a sustained inhibition of bone resorption which, e.g., in patients with Pagets disease, can last over years. This suggests either that some cells are affected over a long time or, more likely, that the bisphosphonate taken up by the bone is released in very low amounts over time at areas of high turnover, thus affecting resorption locally. The latter would explain the high efficacy of these compounds in diseases with focal resorption, such as Pagets disease or metastases.
The other interesting fact is the low concentrations necessary for activity, which suggests either some sort of "receptor" or some cellular binding site, which induces a cellular transduction mechanism. Until now no such active receptor or binding site has been identified. However, the fact that osteoblasts exposed for only 5 min to very low concentrations of bisphosphonates are being stimulated into augmenting the release of an osteoblast recruitment inhibitor (100, 154) speaks in favor of their presence as a linking site. Since bisphosphonates enter the cell via fluid pinocytosis or adsorptive pinocytosis, the latter could be within the cell and might be an enzyme, a pump, or some other intracellular protein involved in the signaling cascade.
It has long been known that bisphosphonates decrease acid production of various cells (121) and of calvaria (176). In 1990, it was reported that bisphosphonates decrease the proton accumulation and the protein synthesis by osteoclasts in vitro (177). More recently, bisphosphonates were shown to decrease the extrusion of acid through a sodium-independent mechanism by true osteoclasts (178). Possibly part of this effect is due to the decrease of the proton transport by the vacuolar-type proton ATPase, which is inhibited by tiludronate, but surprisingly not by other bisphosphonates (179). However, until now no correlation between the effect in vitro on acid production and in vivo on bone resorption was evident. Some bisphosphonates, such as pamidronate or long-chain bisphosphonates, actually increase lactic acid production, possibly due to a toxic action (110, 180).
Various bisphosphonates, especially clodronate, inhibit lysosomal enzymes in vitro (181), in cultured calvaria (176, 182), or in vivo (180). Certain bisphosphonates, such as clodronate and etidronate, also inhibit prostaglandin synthesis by bone cells or calvaria, both in vitro and in vivo (183, 184). Since prostaglandins are involved in bone resorption, this inhibition may play a role in the resorption process.
Some data indicate that still other mechanisms may come into play. Thus, both in osteoporosis and in Pagets disease, bisphosphonates induce a decrease in urinary cross-links. This reflects the decrease in bone resorption. Surprisingly, in opposition to what occurs with estrogens, the effect is almost solely on peptide-bound collagen cross-links and not on free cross-links (185). This suggests that the bisphosphonates might influence the degradation process of collagen.
In view of the homology between pyrophosphate and
bisphosphonates, various enzymes involving pyrophosphate or ATP have
been examined. Phosphatases and pyrophosphatases were influenced only
at relatively high concentrations (181, 186) or not influenced at all
(187). However, PTP
, a protein-tyrosine phosphatase present in
osteoclasts, is inhibited in vitro by alendronate with an
IC50 of only 3 µM, while etidronate is active
at 2 µM (187). Another protein-tyrosine phosphatase,
PTP
, which is present both in osteoclasts and osteoblasts, is also
inhibited by alendronate and etidronate with an IC50 of 0.5
µM and 0.2 µM, respectively (120). Other
protein-tyrosine phosphatases such as CD45 are also inhibited. These
effects might be relevant since protein-tyrosine phosphorylation is
important in the signal transduction pathways that control cell growth,
differentiation, and activity. Furthermore, not only the
bisphosphonates but also orthovanadate and phenylarsine oxide inhibit
PTPs at very low concentrations and inhibit the formation of
osteoclasts in vitro (187). Unfortunately, the potency to
inhibit the PTPs of various bisphosphonates tested so far has no
relationship to their pharmacological potency, since alendronate is
about 1000 times more effective than etidronate on bone resorption
in vivo, while their potency in vitro was of
similar magnitude.
It was shown recently that various bisphosphonates, excluding clodronate, inhibit posttranslational modification of proteins, including the GTP-binding protein Ras, with farnesyl or geranylgeranyl isoprenoid groups in J774 macrophages. Furthermore, alendronate-induced apoptosis could be prevented in these cells by farnesylpyrophosphate or geranylgeranylpyrophosphate (M. J. Rogers, S. P. Luckman, F. P. Coxon, and R. G. G. Russell, submitted). This suggests that at least some bisphosphonates cause apoptosis through a mechanism involving prenylation of proteins. Whether this is true for osteoclasts must still be proven.
Another interesting observation is that both macrophage-like cells and
human MG63 osteosarcoma cells metabolize primary clodronate to a
nonhydrolysable ATP analog, adenosine
5'-(ß,
-dichloromethylene)triphosphate (189). This is not the case
for other bisphosphonates. It has been suggested, therefore, that
clodronate might act through this mechanism to induce apoptosis and
necrotic cell death and therefore to inhibit bone resorption.
One of the conclusions based on the various biochemical results is that no single individual mechanism shows a good correlation with the potency in vivo when different bisphosphonates of various potencies are investigated. This suggests that, if any of the above mechanisms is relevant for bone resorption, it is not relevant for all bisphosphonates.
The various cellular modes of action are summarized in Table 2
.
|
a. Osteoblast-lineage cells.
It is now generally accepted that
cells of osteoblastic lineage control the recruitment and activity of
osteoclasts under physiological and pathological conditions. This
control was proposed to be due to the production of an as yet unknown
activity, generated by osteoblast-lineage cells, and modulating bone
resorption (190), and this modulation was thought to be an activation
of resorption (191, 192, 193, 194).
It has been shown that bisphosphonates may also act through the modulation of the osteoclast-osteoblast interrelation. It has been known for quite some time that, when assessed in vitro, various bisphosphonates can inhibit the destruction of the mineralized matrix, but that all those tested have a similar activity despite the fact that in vivo their antiresorbing effect varies from 1 to 1000 (107). This result suggests that the conditions created did not represent those operating in vivo. It was then discovered that this lack of correlation is only present when the bisphosphonates are added to the mineral before the osteoclasts, but not when the cell population containing the osteoclasts added to the matrix are treated for a time as short as 5 min, at concentrations as low as 10-11 M, before allowing them to adhere to the ivory (109). When doing this, five different bisphosphonates with potencies ranging from 1 to 10,000 showed a stringent correlation between the results in vitro and in vivo (109). Therefore, the best conditions are not when the bisphosphonates are on the mineral, as a direct effect on osteoclasts would imply, but when they are in contact with the cells.
This effect appears to be due to the osteoblasts present in the unpurified osteoclastic cell population. Thus, pretreating pure osteoblastic cell populations for 5 min with the bisphosphonates alendronate and ibandronate, and then coculturing the osteoblasts with the osteoclasts, prevented the usual increase in resorption (109). In contrast, adding osteoblastic cells to osteoclasts pretreated with the bisphosphonate had no effect. This result is supported by previous findings that, when assayed in a coculture of bone and osteoclast precursors, the bisphosphonates do not act directly on the precursors, but need the presence of a cell in the bone (104).
The inhibitory effect is not due to a decrease in the osteoclast-stimulating activity, but to the synthesis by the osteoblasts into the culture medium of an inhibitor of osteoclastic resorption. The latter is labile to heat and proteinase and has a molecular mass of approximately 34 kDa (164). The inhibitor has not been characterized, so that it is not possible to speculate as to what family it belongs.
The resorption cavities are reduced parallel to the reduction of the
number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive multi- and
mononuclear cells, which are thought to be osteoclasts and their
precursors. In contrast, the mean area resorbed by cavity remains
unchanged, suggesting that the inhibitor affects osteoclast formation
but not osteoclast activity (164). Other cells such as fibroblasts and
preosteoblasts do not produce such an inhibitor. The question of which
cells of the osteoblastic lineage are able to mediate this effect has
not yet been answered. Recently, it has been postulated that lining
cells play a role in the osteoblast-osteoclast relation (195) (Fig. 4
).
|
b. Cells of the mononuclear phagocyte and immune systems.
The
other possible candidates are the cells of the mononuclear phagocyte
system and of the immune system. Since they produce a variety of
bone-resorbing cytokines, it is possible that they may play a role in
the cascade involved in the inhibition of bone resorption induced by a
bisphosphonate.
There are numerous reports on the effect of bisphosphonates on these cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Unfortunately, these studies are often performed with high concentrations, so that the described effects might be secondary only to a toxic action. Low concentrations often give an effect contrary to that of higher concentrations, which might also reflect toxicity. Thus it is not possible at this time to state whether or not they are implied in the inhibition of bone resorption by bisphosphonates.
i. In vitro. It seems clear that the cells of the mononuclear phagocytic lineage are specially sensitive to bisphosphonates since other marrow populations are either much less or not at all influenced, at least in vitro (161, 162). The multiplication (161, 162) as well as the activity (199, 200) are both decreased. In addition, bisphosphonates have been reported to depress accessory function of monocytes (111), inhibit the action of mitogens on mononuclear function and on the lymphoblastic response (201), influence the effect of antilymphocyte serum on T lymphocytes (202), and inhibit migratory activities of macrophages (200). They also inhibit the proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by various means. It has been suggested that this effect is mediated by the antigen-presenting cells (203).
With respect to cytokine production, clodronate inhibits
lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and tumor
necrosis factor-
(TNF
) production by a macrophage-like cell line
(RAW 264) (204, 205). Alendronate inhibits, in a dose-dependent
fashion, the production of these three cytokines by activated human
monocytes (203). Pamidronate, however, increases the production of IL-6
(205). Clodronate and pamidronate, but not alendronate, also decrease
the production of nitric oxide and the expression of inducible nitric
oxide synthase in the RAW 264 cells (206). When clodronate is
encapsulated into liposomes, its effect is increased while that of
pamidronate is decreased.
ii. In vivo. The following effects on the immune system have been described: decrease in the formation of antibody-secreting cells and impaired delayed and immediate hypersensitivity (207); inhibition of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (208); atrophy of the thymus (209); disappearance of certain thymus-dependent macrophages (210); disappearance of natural killer cells (211); and diminished response of the T lymphocytes to mitogens (209) in newborn mice. All these effects were obtained at very high dosages, some of which led to an osteopetrotic condition, so that the relevance to what occurs with clinical regimens is far from being proven. Indeed, none of these effects have been seen in humans.
The sensitivity of macrophages to bisphosphonates, especially to clodronate, has been made use of to selectively destroy macrophages in vivo. Thus, if bisphosphonates are administered encapsulated in liposomes, they are taken up by the macrophages mostly in the spleen and the liver, and the macrophages are then destroyed within 2 days (212). This technique has been used to study repopulating kinetics of macrophages and the role of macrophages in the organism.
An effect on macrophages, or possibly on other cells, might be
the explanation for the acute phase response in humans. Thus, some
patients who receive an amino-bisphosphonate intravenously for the
first time show a transient pyrexia of 12 degrees C, sometimes more,
accompanied by flu-like symptoms (111, 213). This episode is
accompanied by a decrease in peripheral lymphocytes, especially the
CD3+ T cells (214), an increase in C-reactive protein, and a decrease
in serum zinc. Interestingly, this reaction occurs only once in a
lifetime, even if the treatment is discontinued and restarted later.
This raises the possibility, among others, that a specific cell
population involved in the development of the acute phase reaction is
influenced over longer periods. Recently, the pyrexia was shown to be
accompanied by an increase in circulating IL-6 bioactivity (215).
Furthermore, olpadronate but not clodronate stimulated the release
in vitro of IL-6 from fetal mouse explants. In addition
to IL-6, TNF
is also increased in the blood after treatment with
pamidronate but not clodronate (216). The effect is not seen with
etidronate, clodronate, or tiludronate. It is not known why only
compounds that are potent inhibitors of bone resorption and contain a
nitrogen atom in their structure show this effect.
Of clinical interest is that some bisphosphonates, including etidronate, clodronate, tiludronate, risedronate, and zole-dronate, inhibit local bone and cartilage resorption, preserve the joint architecture, and decrease the inflammatory reaction in experimental arthritis induced by Freunds adjuvant, carrageenin and, to a smaller extent, collagen (217, 218, 219, 220, 221). The effect on the joints is especially pronounced when the bisphosphonates are encapsulated in liposomes (222, 223). The fact that not only bone resorption, but also the inflammatory reaction in the joint and in the paw itself, is diminished (223, 224) suggests that mechanisms other than those in bone, possibly involving the mononuclear phagocyte system, are operating. These results open the exciting possibility of using bisphosphonates in inflammatory arthritis, given either systemically or locally, possibly encapsulated in liposomes.
c. Tumor cells.
As described in Section
III.B.1.b.ii, bisphosphonates inhibit the bone resorption
induced by various tumors both in animals (84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 91, 94) and in
humans (96, 97, 98, 99, 225, 226, 227). This is generally explained by the
inhibition of bone resorption. The inhibited development of metastases
can have various causes. One is that, since less bone has been
destroyed, the place for tumoral expansion is limited. Another
explanation is that, as a consequence to a decrease in bone resorption,
the release of matrix or osteoclastic cytokines that would stimulate
the multiplication of tumor cells may be decreased (91). In contrast,
the bisphosphonates do not seem to inhibit directly the multiplication
of tumor cells. Furthermore, there is now excellent evidence that
bisphosphonates can inhibit the adhesion of tumor cells in
vitro (166). The effect is specific for mineralized matrices,
and the potency of various bisphosphonates is well correlated with the
potency to inhibit bone resorption in vivo. It might
explain in part the bisphosphonate-induced decrease in the development
of tumor burden in animals (91).
C. Other effects
A great number of other cellular or biochemical effects have been
described. They are confusing and can sometimes go in opposite
directions with different compounds, or even with the same compound at
different concentrations. With one or two exceptions, there is no
indication that they are involved in bone resorption, and those most
likely to play a role in the inhibition of bone resorption have been
described earlier in this article. These other effects include the
following: increase of fatty acid oxidation (228) and amino acid
oxidation (180); stimulation of the citric acid cycle (180); increase
in cellular content of glycogen (229); increase in production of
alkaline phosphatase (230); inhibition of the
1,25-(OH)2D3-induced production of osteocalcin
in vivo (231); contradictory effects on cAMP production
(232, 233); decrease or increase in cellular multiplication (121, 234);
inhibition of DNA polymerase (235); and inhibition of amoebal
phosphofructokinase (236). A few results point to an effect on cellular
calcium handling, e.g., reduced release of calcium from
kidney mitochondria in vitro (237) and increase in calcium
of mitochondria in vivo (238); inhibition in
vitro of calcium-induced contraction of smooth muscle, possibly
through inhibition of intracellular Ca mobilization and influx of
extracellular Ca (239); protection of the kidney from ischemic damage,
possibly by preventing intracellular Ca accumulation (240). Considering
this, it is interesting that nongeminal bisphosphonates act in a manner
similar to Ca channel blockers (241). Finally, squalene synthase is
inhibited (127).
It is interesting that bisphosphonates inhibit the growth of the slime mold amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, and that some of them can form nonhydrolyzable methylene analogs of ATP (242, 243). The effect on growth of these organisms is of interest because of the presence of a remarkable correlation with a great number of different bisphosphonates between the effects found on this system using the growth of a slime mold and the bone resorption in vivo (244, 245). It suggests that this system might give us further insight in what occurs in bone resorption, which is supported by the fact that human cells can also perform such a transformation (189).
| V. Pharmacokinetics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nevertheless, the bisphosphonates have a very low bioavailability, from a few percent for clodronate, etidronate, and tiludronate, which are given in larger amounts, to below 1% for the newer ones, which are given in low quantities. This is partly explained by their low lipophilicity, which hampers transcellular transport, and their high negative charge, which hampers paracellular transport. Furthermore, they are probably partly in an insoluble form in the gut, due to chelation to calcium. It is thought that the absorption in the intestine follows mainly a paracellular route (246). The latter is under the influence of calcium, which tightens the junctional complex. This explains why the administration of EDTA, a strong calcium chelator, increases the absorption of bisphosphonate (247) and why high doses of bisphosphonates, which also chelate calcium, will lead to an increase in their own absorption (248). Why a higher intestinal pH increases absorption while orange juice and coffee decrease it (249) is not known.
Some uncertainty still exists as to the state of bisphosphonates in the circulation. They are indeed only partially ultrafilterable in aqueous solutions as well as in plasma (250), possibly because of the formation of polynuclear aggregate complexes (251, 252, 253). In plasma they are bound to proteins, whereby this binding varies between compounds and between animals (254). The binding is pH and calcium dependent, whereby calcium and increasing pH augment it (255). There are also displacers of the binding in the plasma of, for instance, the dog (254). The role this binding could have on the action and the pharmacokinetics of bisphosphonates has never been investigated despite the fact that it may be conspicuous. For example, the assumption that bisphosphonates are not actively secreted in the kidney is probably wrong. Indeed, most renal studies were not corrected for the binding so that the filtered load was overestimated. If a correction is done, the results point to a secretory mechanism (256, 257).
Once in the blood, bisphosphonates disappear very rapidly, mostly to bone (258). This might be explained by the fact that they are characterized by a rapid and strong binding to the hydroxyapatite crystals (137). The rate of entry into bone is very fast, similar to that of calcium and phosphate. It has been calculated that the bone clearance is compatible with a complete extraction from the skeleton after the first passage (258), so that skeletal uptake might be determined above all by the vascularization of the bone. Consequently, soft tissues are exposed to these compounds for only short periods, explaining their bone-specific effects and their low toxicity.
The various bisphosphonates display some differences in their affinity for the hydroxyapatite surface. This reflects itself in the binding of bisphosphonates to bone in vivo. Thus, at least 50% of most of the hydroxylbisphosphonates distribute themselves to bone (259), whereas in the case of clodronate (260, 261) it is only about 2040%. Their preferred location in the skeleton is bone with a high turnover, namely trabecular bone.
The binding of polyphosphates and bisphosphonates to calcified tissues is the basis for the use of these compounds as skeletal markers in nuclear medicine when linked to 99mtechnetium. However, it is important to note that the handling of the technetium-labeled compounds is not identical with that of the bisphosphonates (262), so that caution must be given in extrapolating data from one to the other.
It was generally thought that the bisphosphonates deposit in those locations within the bone where new bone is formed. Recently, however, they were found to deposit under the osteoclasts as well (173). The distribution of the amount deposited at bone formation and bone resorption sites depends upon the amount of bisphosphonate administered (263). When small amounts are given, they deposit mostly under the osteoclasts while larger amounts go to both bone-forming and bone-resorbing sites. This would explain the results with 99mtechnetium-labeled compounds, thought to go to formation sites, since larger amounts are usually injected. However, the fact that the erosion locations seen in multiple myeloma do not take up any visible radioactive 99mtechnetium-labeled bisphosphonates has not yet been explained.
The fact that bisphosphonates are targeted to bone may be used in the future to administer drugs to the skeleton. Initial results with methotrexate in rats are encouraging (264).
Usually bisphosphonates do not deposit in soft tissues. However, some of them, especially pamidronate, can at times deposit in other organs such as the stomach (265), liver, and spleen (266, 267, 268), the deposition being proportionally greater when large amounts of compounds are given. Part of this extraosseous deposition appears to be due to the formation of complexes with iron (hemolysis) and calcium because of too high and too rapid an intravenous injection. The insoluble aggregate is then phagocytized by the macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system. Thus, results obtained with large amounts of labeled compounds given rapidly intravenously must be interpreted with caution. The danger of too rapid an infusion of large amounts of bisphosphonate exists also in humans where this procedure has led to renal failure (269) because of the formation of insoluble calcium aggregates in the blood.
Once the bisphosphonates are buried in the skeleton, they will be released only when the bone is destroyed in the course of the turnover. The skeletal half-life of various bisphosphonates is between 3 months and 1 yr for mice and rats (266, 267, 268) and is much longer, sometimes more than 10 yr, for humans (270).
The bisphosphonates are not metabolized in vivo. This is due to the stability of their P-C-P bond to heat and most chemical reagents, as well as to their resistance to hydrolysis by the enzymes found in the body. To date, all the bisphosphonates investigated were excreted unaltered. However, it is quite possible in the future that some compounds will be metabolized in their side chain, especially in the gut, so that it cannot be generally stated that bisphosphonates are not metabolized in vivo.
| VI. Animal Toxicology and Human Adverse Events |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acute toxicity is mostly due to hypocalcemia, which is induced by the formation of complexes or aggregates with calcium, leading to a decrease in ionized calcium.
The nonacute, nonskeletal toxicity is usually manifested, as is the case with many phosphates and polyphosphate, first in the kidney (271, 272). This occurs, however, only at doses substantially larger than those administered in humans. At still higher doses, other organs can show cellular alterations. The mechanisms leading to these changes are not known. In the skeleton and in teeth an inhibition of normal mineralization occurs, as mentioned earlier, usually at parenteral doses of approximately 10 mg/kg daily (35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41). As discussed earlier, this inhibition is explained by a physicochemical impairment of crystal growth. Large doses of bisphosphonates can inhibit mineralization to such a level, which by itself can lead to an increased fragility and fractures (37). Finally, very large doses of bisphosphonates can lead to fetal abnormality of the skeleton and the kidney (273).
B. Human adverse events
As in animals, studies in humans have revealed only a few
significant adverse events. Caution must be taken with all intravenous
administrations of large amounts of bisphosphonates since rapid
injection has led to renal failure (269), probably because the
bisphosphonate is forming a solid phase in the blood, which is then
retained in the kidney. No such events have occurred since care is
taken to administer all bisphosphonates in large amounts by slow
infusion in plenty of fluids.
The oral administration of bisphosphonates, especially those with a primary amine, can be accompanied by esophageal and gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, dyspepsia, vomiting, gastric pain, and diarrhea, and sometimes even ulceration (129, 130, 274). These adverse events have decreased since patients began ingesting the drug with adequate water and without reclining after its intake to minimize esophageal reflux.
As seen in animals, etidronate, when given at daily oral doses of 400800 mg, can produce an inhibition of normal skeletal mineralization, leading to a clinical and histological picture of osteomalacia. This condition regresses after discontinuation of therapy (31, 49, 50). Similar results have been seen with pamidronate in Pagets disease when given intravenously at doses equal to or higher than 180 mg per year (51, 52).
The last commonly seen effect, which has been mentioned earlier in this
paper, is observed after intravenous administration of more potent
bisphosphonates containing a nitrogen atom. This is not observed with
etidronate, clodronate, or tiludronate. After intravenous
administration, a transient pyrexia of usually 12°C, sometimes
more, accompanied by flu-like symptoms, may occur. It is maximal within
2448 h and disappears after approximately 3 days, in spite of
continued treatment. It is usually observed only once, even if
treatment is continued and restarted later (213). The mechanism of
these changes, which resemble an acute phase response, seems to involve
the stimulation of macrophages to release IL-6 and TNF
(215, 216),
both of which increase in plasma.
Most of the other adverse events are seen only occasionally, and it is not certain to what extent they are actually related to the drugs.
| VII. Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current clinical applications for the inhibition of bone resorption are Pagets disease, tumor bone disease, and osteoporosis. Future applications could be, among others, Sudecks atrophy, fibrous dysplasia, loosening of bone implants, and alveolar resorption. As to their property of inhibiting calcification, only etidronate is currently used with variable success for ectopic calcification and ossification.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: alternative
splicing and inhibition by bisphosphonates. J Bone Miner Res 11:535543[Medline]
-dichloromethylene)triphosphate, by mammalian cells
in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 12:13581367
secretion from RAW 264 cells in
vitro. Pharmacol Res 12:916922
levels after bisphosphonate treatment in vitro and in
patients with malignancy. Bone 18:133139[Medline]
-methylenetriphosphate) and diadenosine
5',5'''-P1,P4-(P2,P3-methylenetetraphosphate).
Biochemistry 27:18971901[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. SPIZZO, A. SEEBER, and M. MITTERER Routine Use of Pamidronate in NSCLC Patients with Bone Metastasis: Results from a Retrospective Analysis Anticancer Res, December 1, 2009; 29(12): 5245 - 5249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Gebara and H. Moubayed Risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients taking bisphosphonates Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2009; 66(17): 1541 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Panaroni, R. Gioia, A. Lupi, R. Besio, S. A. Goldstein, J. Kreider, S. Leikin, J. C. Vera, E. L. Mertz, E. Perilli, et al. In utero transplantation of adult bone marrow decreases perinatal lethality and rescues the bone phenotype in the knockin murine model for classical, dominant osteogenesis imperfecta Blood, July 9, 2009; 114(2): 459 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Villa-Bellosta and V. Sorribas Phosphonoformic Acid Prevents Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification by Inhibiting Calcium-Phosphate Deposition Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 761 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. LUMACHI, A. BRUNELLO, A. ROMA, and U. BASSO Cancer-induced Hypercalcemia Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1551 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. TANAKA, H. KAWASHIMA, K. OHNISHI, K. MATSUMURA, R. YOSHIMURA, M. MATSUYAMA, K. KURATSUKURI, and T. NAKATANI Indirect Antitumor Effects of Bisphosphonates on Prostatic LNCaP Cells Co-cultured with Bone Cells Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1089 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Toussaint, G. J. Elder, and P. G. Kerr Bisphosphonates in Chronic Kidney Disease; Balancing Potential Benefits and Adverse Effects on Bone and Soft Tissue Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 4(1): 221 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Ottewell, H. Monkkonen, M. Jones, D. V. Lefley, R. E. Coleman, and I. Holen Antitumor Effects of Doxorubicin Followed by Zoledronic Acid in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, August 20, 2008; 100(16): 1167 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Walji, A K Chan, and D R Peake Common acute oncological emergencies: diagnosis, investigation and management Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2008; 84(994): 418 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Dodson, N. S. Raje, P. A. Caruso, and A. E. Rosenberg Case 9-2008 -- A 65-Year-Old Woman with a Nonhealing Ulcer of the Jaw N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 2008; 358(12): 1283 - 1291. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Tauchmanova, A. Colao, G. Lombardi, B. Rotoli, and C. Selleri REVIEW: Bone Loss and Its Management in Long-Term Survivors from Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4536 - 4545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hacchou, T. Uematsu, O. Ueda, Y. Usui, S. Uematsu, M. Takahashi, T. Uchihashi, Y. Kawazoe, T. Shiba, S. Kurihara, et al. Inorganic Polyphosphate: a Possible Stimulant of Bone Formation Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 2007; 86(9): 893 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Virkki, J. Biber, H. Murer, and I. C. Forster Phosphate transporters: a tale of two solute carrier families Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): F643 - F654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Cahill, D. Wenkert, S. A. Perlman, A. Steele, S. P. Coburn, W. H. McAlister, S. Mumm, and M. P. Whyte Infantile Hypophosphatasia: Transplantation Therapy Trial Using Bone Fragments and Cultured Osteoblasts J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 2923 - 2930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ravera, L. V. Virkki, H. Murer, and I. C. Forster Deciphering PiT transport kinetics and substrate specificity using electrophysiology and flux measurements Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): C606 - C620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Kaijzel, G. van der Pluijm, and C. W.G.M. Lowik Whole-Body Optical Imaging in Animal Models to Assess Cancer Development and Progression Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3490 - 3497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Favus Diabetes and the Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 817 - 818. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Chiandussi, M Biasotto, F Dore, F Cavalli, M. Cova, and R Di Lenarda Clinical and diagnostic imaging of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 236 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Massa, V. Bradaschia-Correa, and V. E. Arana-Chavez Immunocytochemical Study of Amelogenin Deposition during the Early Odontogenesis of Molars in Alendronate-treated Newborn Rats J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2006; 54(6): 713 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Halfdanarson, W. J. Hogan, and T. J. Moynihan Oncologic Emergencies: Diagnosis and Treatment Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 835 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-B. Woo, J. W. Hellstein, and J. R. Kalmar Systematic Review: Bisphosphonates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaws Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2006; 144(10): 753 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Caraglia, D. Santini, M. Marra, B. Vincenzi, G. Tonini, and A. Budillon Emerging anti-cancer molecular mechanisms of aminobisphosphonates. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2006; 13(1): 7 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Bevilacqua, L J Dominguez, S Rosini, and M Barbagallo Bisphosphonates and atherosclerosis: why? Lupus, September 1, 2005; 14(9): 773 - 779. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Ward, A. E. Denker, A. Porras, S. Shugarts, W. Kline, R. Travers, C. Mao, F. Rauch, A. Maes, P. Larson, et al. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Alendronate 35- and 70-Milligram Tablets in Children and Adolescents with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type I J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4051 - 4056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A Licata Discovery, Clinical Development, and Therapeutic Uses of Bisphosphonates Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2005; 39(4): 668 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. V. Odvina, J. E. Zerwekh, D. S. Rao, N. Maalouf, F. A. Gottschalk, and C. Y. C. Pak Severely Suppressed Bone Turnover: A Potential Complication of Alendronate Therapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1294 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Stewart Hypercalcemia Associated with Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., January 27, 2005; 352(4): 373 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mori, N. Shimizu, M. Dallas, M. Niewolna, B. Story, P. J. Williams, G. R. Mundy, and T. Yoneda Anti-{alpha}4 integrin antibody suppresses the development of multiple myeloma and associated osteoclastic osteolysis Blood, October 1, 2004; 104(7): 2149 - 2154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lipton, A. Colombo-Berra, R. M. Bukowski, L. Rosen, M. Zheng, and G. Urbanowitz Skeletal Complications in Patients with Bone Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma and Therapeutic Benefits of Zoledronic Acid Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6397S - 6403S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Barrett, E. Worth, F. Bauss, and S. Epstein Ibandronate: A Clinical Pharmacological and Pharmacokinetic Update J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 44(9): 951 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hiraga, P. J. Williams, A. Ueda, D. Tamura, and T. Yoneda Zoledronic Acid Inhibits Visceral Metastases in the 4T1/luc Mouse Breast Cancer Model Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4559 - 4567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rizzoli Bisphosphonates and reduction of skeletal events in patients with bone metastatic breast cancer Ann. Onc., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 700 - 701. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Danenberg, G. Golomb, A. Groothuis, J. Gao, H. Epstein, R. V. Swaminathan, P. Seifert, and E. R. Edelman Liposomal Alendronate Inhibits Systemic Innate Immunity and Reduces In-Stent Neointimal Hyperplasia in Rabbits Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2798 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakamura, N. Udagawa, S. Matsuura, M. Mogi, H. Nakamura, H. Horiuchi, N. Saito, B. Y. Hiraoka, Y. Kobayashi, K. Takaoka, et al. Osteoprotegerin Regulates Bone Formation through a Coupling Mechanism with Bone Resorption Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5441 - 5449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Alvarez, M. Westmore, R. J. S. Galvin, C. L. Clapp, E. L. Considine, S. J. Smith, K. Keyes, P. W. Iversen, D. M. Delafuente, S. Sulaimon, et al. Properties of Bisphosphonates in the 13762 Rat Mammary Carcinoma Model of Tumor-Induced Bone Resorption Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 9(15): 5705 - 5713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bezzi, M. Hasmim, G. Bieler, O. Dormond, and C. Ruegg Zoledronate Sensitizes Endothelial Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Programmed Cell Death: EVIDENCE FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF SUSTAINED ACTIVATION OF FOCAL ADHESION KINASE AND PROTEIN KINASE B/Akt J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43603 - 43614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coco, D. Glicklich, M. C. Faugere, L. Burris, I. Bognar, P. Durkin, V. Tellis, S. Greenstein, R. Schechner, K. Figueroa, et al. Prevention of Bone Loss in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Intravenous Pamidronate J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2669 - 2676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zeitlin, F. Rauch, H. Plotkin, and F. H. Glorieux Height and Weight Development During Four Years of Therapy With Cyclical Intravenous Pamidronate in Children and Adolescents With Osteogenesis Imperfecta Types I, III, and IV Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1030 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rauch, H. Plotkin, R. Travers, L. Zeitlin, and F. H. Glorieux Osteogenesis Imperfecta Types I, III, and IV: Effect of Pamidronate Therapy on Bone and Mineral Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 986 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Berenson, B. E. Hillner, R. A. Kyle, K. Anderson, A. Lipton, G. C. Yee, and J. S. Biermann American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Role of Bisphosphonates in Multiple Myeloma J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2002; 20(17): 3719 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Johnell, W. H. Scheele, Y. Lu, J.-Y. Reginster, A. G. Need, and E. Seeman Additive Effects of Raloxifene and Alendronate on Bone Density and Biochemical Markers of Bone Remodeling in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2002; 87(3): 985 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Marcus, M. Wong, H. Heath III, and J. L. Stock Antiresorptive Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Comparison of Study Designs and Outcomes in Large Clinical Trials with Fracture as an Endpoint Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2002; 23(1): 16 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Price, J. R. Buckley, and M. K. Williamson The Amino Bisphosphonate Ibandronate Prevents Vitamin D Toxicity and Inhibits Vitamin D-Induced Calcification of Arteries, Cartilage, Lungs and Kidneys in Rats J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 2910 - 2915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Price, H. H. June, J. R. Buckley, and M. K. Williamson Osteoprotegerin Inhibits Artery Calcification Induced by Warfarin and by Vitamin D Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2001; 21(10): 1610 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis DTB, September 1, 2001; 39(9): 68 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Lange, R. E.B. Ketchum, and R. B. Croteau Isoprenoid Biosynthesis. Metabolite Profiling of Peppermint Oil Gland Secretory Cells and Application to Herbicide Target Analysis Plant Physiology, September 1, 2001; 127(1): 305 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Ali, F. J. Esteva, G. Hortobagyi, H. Harvey, J. Seaman, R. Knight, L. Costa, and A. Lipton Safety and Efficacy of Bisphosphonates Beyond 24 Months in Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2001; 19(14): 3434 - 3437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Biermasz, N. A. T. Hamdy, Y. J. H. Janssen, and F. Roelfsema Additional Beneficial Effects of Alendronate in Growth Hormone (GH)-Deficient Adults with Osteoporosis Receiving Long-Term Recombinant Human GH Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 3079 - 3085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Price, S. A. Faus, and M. K. Williamson Bisphosphonates Alendronate and Ibandronate Inhibit Artery Calcification at Doses Comparable to Those That Inhibit Bone Resorption Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2001; 21(5): 817 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Reinholz, B. Getz, L. Pederson, E. S. Sanders, M. Subramaniam, J. N. Ingle, and T. C. Spelsberg Bisphosphonates Directly Regulate Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Gene Expression in Human Osteoblasts Cancer Res., November 1, 2000; 60(21): 6001 - 6007. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Nierman and J. I. Mechanick Biochemical Response to Treatment of Bone Hyperresorption in Chronically Critically Ill Patients Chest, September 1, 2000; 118(3): 761 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hunziker, T. Wronski, and S.C. Miller Mandibular Bone Formation Rates in Aged Ovariectomized Rats Treated with Anti-resorptive Agents Alone and in Combination with Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2000; 79(6): 1431 - 1438. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Plotkin, F. Rauch, N. J. Bishop, K. Montpetit, J. Ruck-Gibis, R. Travers, and F. H. Glorieux Pamidronate Treatment of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children under 3 Years of Age J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2000; 85(5): 1846 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Manolagas Birth and Death of Bone Cells: Basic Regulatory Mechanisms and Implications for the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Osteoporosis Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2000; 21(2): 115 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ravn, S. R. Weiss, J. A. Rodriguez-Portales, M. R. McClung, R. D. Wasnich, N. L. Gilchrist, P. Sambrook, I. Fogelman, D. Krupa, A. J. Yates, et al. Alendronate in Early Postmenopausal Women: Effects on Bone Mass during Long-Term Treatment and after Withdrawal J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2000; 85(4): 1492 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Hillner, J. N. Ingle, J. R. Berenson, N. A. Janjan, K. S. Albain, A. Lipton, G. Yee, J. S. Biermann, R. T. Chlebowski, and D. G. Pfister American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline on the Role of Bisphosphonates in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 13, 2000; 18(6): 1378 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ravn, M. Bidstrup, R. D. Wasnich, J. W. Davis, M. R. McClung, A. Balske, C. Coupland, O. Sahota, A. Kaur, M. Daley, et al. Alendronate and Estrogen-Progestin in the Long-Term Prevention of Bone Loss: Four-Year Results from the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Ann Intern Med, December 21, 1999; 131(12): 935 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Reszka, J. M. Halasy-Nagy, P. J. Masarachia, and G. A. Rodan Bisphosphonates Act Directly on the Osteoclast to Induce Caspase Cleavage of Mst1 Kinase during Apoptosis. A LINK BETWEEN INHIBITION OF THE MEVALONATE PATHWAY AND REGULATION OF AN APOPTOSIS-PROMOTING KINASE J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 34967 - 34973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Benford, J. C. Frith, S. Auriola, J. Mönkkönen, and M. J. Rogers Farnesol and Geranylgeraniol Prevent Activation of Caspases by Aminobisphosphonates: Biochemical Evidence for Two Distinct Pharmacological Classes of Bisphosphonate Drugs Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1999; 56(1): 131 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |