help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajaram, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajaram, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, S.
Endocrine Reviews 18 (6): 801-831
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Proteins in Serum and Other Biological Fluids: Regulation and Functions1

Sujatha Rajaram, David J. Baylink and Subburaman Mohan

Mineral Metabolism Laboratory (D.J.B., S.M.), Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Administration Medical Center, Department of Nutrition (S.R.), School of Public Health, Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry, and Physiology, School of Medicine (D.J.B., S.M), Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92357


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 

I. Introduction
II. Characteristics of the IGFBPs
III. Target Cell Actions of the IGFBPs
A. To modulate IGF actions
B. To facilitate storage of IGFs in extracellular matrices
C. To exert IGF-independent effects
IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in Biological Fluids
A. Serum
B. Milk
C. Urine
D. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
E. Follicular fluid
F. Amniotic fluid
G. Lymph
H. Seminal fluid
I. Other biological fluids
V. Assays for Circulating Levels of IGFBP
A. Western ligand blotting
B. Western immunoblotting
C. RIA
D. Immunoradiometric assay (IRMA)
VI. Relative Distribution of IGFBPs in Serum
VII. Regulation of Serum IGFBPs
A. Physiological conditions
B. Development and aging
C. Hormonal effects: mechanisms
D. Pathological conditions
VIII. IGFBP Proteases in Circulation
A. Proteases under normal conditions
B. Pregnancy-associated proteases
C. Proteases under catabolic and disease states
IX. Endocrine Functions of IGFBPs in Serum
A. To prevent insulin-like effects
B. To increase the half-lives of IGFs
C. To control the transport of IGFs from the vascular space
X. Conclusions


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
THE insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are growth-promoting peptides that share significant structural homology with insulin. However, unlike insulin, IGFs circulate in plasma complexed to a family of structurally related binding proteins. These are called IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Although the existence of IGFBPs in circulation was suspected more than three decades ago, it was not until the mid 1980s to early 1990s that the six known IGFBPs2 were cloned and sequenced (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ). Early studies (8 9 10 11 12 ) in which human plasma was fractionated according to molecular size by gel filtration chromatography indicated that the IGFs migrated in high molecular weight fractions. Subsequently, Burgi et al. (12 ) and Hintz and Liu (13 ) demonstrated that the high molecular weight fractions containing the nonsuppressible insulin-like activity (NSILA) could be dissociated into smaller molecular mass fractions (5–10 kDa) under acidic conditions. These data suggested that the NSILA or somatomedin peptides were originally complexed with larger carrier proteins in plasma.

In subsequent studies, Zapf et al. (14 ) incubated plasma with radiolabeled IGF and detected the somatomedin activity at 40 kDa. This binding was highly specific for the IGFs with no competition from insulin, suggesting the presence of specific high-affinity binding proteins for the IGFs. Furthermore, Kaufmann et al. (15 ) showed that the half-life of 125I-labeled NSILA was reduced when excess unlabeled NSILA was injected into normal rats, suggesting that NSILA is bound to carrier proteins. The binding of NSILAs to the carrier proteins in serum provided a possible explanation for the absence of insulin-like effects of endogenous NSILA in vivo.

The discovery of the six different binding proteins currently known to exist did not occur all at the same time (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 ). The first three IGFBPs were purified in the mid-1980s. The association of [125I]IGF in rat serum initially with a small molecular binding protein complex and a shift to a larger complex after a few minutes confirmed the presence of two binding proteins (14 ). The first was a major binding protein in serum identified to be a GH-regulated acid-labile 150- to 200-kDa complex eventually designated as IGF+IGFBP-3+acid labile subunit (ALS) complex. The second was a GH-independent 50 kDa acid-stable protein (2 17 ). Later it was shown that this 50-kDa small molecular binding protein consisted of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, three additional binding proteins, IGFBPs 4 through 6, were isolated and characterized. All six binding proteins share ~35% sequence identity with each other. Several excellent reviews on the structure, molecular and cellular aspects, and biological actions of these binding proteins are available (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ) and therefore will not be the focus of this review. The recent development of specific assays for measurement of various IGFBPs in circulation and in other biological fluids has led to significant new information on serum regulation of IGFBPs and their functions. The main focus of this review is to present the data regarding the characterization of the IGF-IGFBP complexes in serum and other biological fluids and to evaluate their regulation and functions.


    II. Characteristics of the IGFBPs
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
First, a brief review of the general characteristics of the IGFBPs will provide the background information necessary to evaluate the functions of IGFBPs in serum and other biological fluids. For detailed information on this topic, several excellent reviews are available (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ). IGFBPs are produced by a variety of biological tissues and found in various biological fluids (18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ). Although all six known IGFBPs belong to the same gene family, several features distinguish these IGFBPs from each other. The general characteristics of the six known IGFBPs are summarized in Table 1Go. IGFBP-1, a nonglycosylated protein of 30 kDa, was first isolated from mid-term amniotic fluid (20 ). This binding protein shares sequence identity with the placental protein 12 (19 26 ), which is synthesized by endometrium and decidua. It is present in the amniotic fluid in concentrations 100–500 times higher than in serum. IGFBP-2, originally isolated from rat liver (BRL)-3A cell line (27 ), is a nonglycosylated protein of 31–36 kDa and is found in significant amounts both in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (1 ). The major form of binding protein present in human circulation is IGFBP-3; its molecular mass ranges from 38 kDa to 43 kDa depending on the number of sites glycosylated (28 ). In circulation, this glycoprotein is associated with an IGF molecule and an 80-kDa acid-labile subunit (ALS) to form a 150- to 200-kDa complex (2 29 30 ). This complex consists of IGFBP-3 and IGF-I + IGF-II in an equimolar ratio, suggesting that most of the IGFBP-3 in serum is likely to be saturated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. General characteristics of the human IGFBPs

 
IGFBP-4, a nonglycosylated protein of 25 kDa and 32–36 kDa, was first isolated from medium conditioned by human osteosarcoma TE-89 cells (31 ) and from adult rat serum (32 ). Subsequently this nonglycosylated protein was isolated from a variety of cell types from different animal species and from human adult serum (1 3 ). IGFBP-5 was first purified from adult rat serum, from human bone extract, and from medium conditioned by the U-2OS human osteosarcoma cell line as 29- and 23-kDa fragments (33 34 35 ). This binding protein was later purified as a 31-kDa fragment from the conditioned medium of T98G human glioblastoma cells (36 ) and a 22-kDa fragment from human cerebrospinal fluid (18 ). IGFBP-6 was purified as a 34-kDa fragment (37 ) from human cerebrospinal fluid and from transformed human fibroblast cell cultures (38 ).

Although the IGFBPs differ in their structure and binding specificity, it is not clear whether these differences contribute to functional differences among the various IGFBPs. For example, it is not known whether there is any functional significance for glycosylation of the IGFBPs and why some of the IGFBPs bind IGF-II with preferential affinity (39 40 ) compared with IGF-I. Interestingly, none of the IGFBPs bind IGF-I with preferential affinity. In any case, the differences in structure (glycosylation, number of cysteine, RGD sequence), binding affinity, and tissue-specific expression are consistent with the general idea that different IGFBPs have discrete functions. Based on the findings that extracellular fluids of certain tissues (described in Section IV) are enriched with specific IGFBPs and that tissues surrounding the body fluid express the same IGFBPs in high abundance (41 42 ), it is speculated that the IGFBPs may function locally to regulate IGF actions. However, there is no experimental data to demonstrate that this is in fact true.


    III. Target Cell Actions of the IGFBPs
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
The main focus of this review is to present the data on the characterization of the IGF/IGFBP complexes in serum. However, at this time, we felt that a brief description of the target cell actions of IGFBPs would be beneficial to the reader to get a perspective as to the overall functions of these binding proteins in serum and other biological fluids. An earlier review by Jones and Clemmons (4 ) describes in detail the biological functions of individual binding proteins in various target cells. A summary of our current understanding of the biological actions of various IGFBPs is discussed below.

A. To modulate IGF actions
Studies in a number of laboratories including ours have shown that IGFBPs are capable of modulating IGF-induced cell proliferation both in a positive and negative manner (3 4 43 44 45 ). Several IGFBPs, including IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-6, inhibit IGF action by binding to IGFs and preventing the binding of IGFs to IGF receptors (3 4 ). In contrast to the phosphorylated IGFBP-1 that inhibits IGF actions, the nonphosphorylated form of IGFBP-1 potentiates the effect of IGF-I on DNA synthesis in porcine smooth muscle cells (4 ). Coincubation of human fibroblasts with IGF and IGFBP-3 showed an inhibitory effect while preincubation with IGF had growth-potentiating effect (43 ). It was suggested that binding of IGFBP-3 to the cell surface reduces its affinity for IGF-I and results in a potentiating effect (44 ). In contrast to other IGFBPs, IGFBP-5 is stimulatory for a variety of cell types (45 46 47 48 ).

Thus, the different binding proteins may modulate IGF action differently, and the same binding protein can have an IGF-inhibiting or potentiating role under different conditions. The factors that determine these differences include IGFBP phosphorylation, IGFBP proteolysis, and IGFBP cell surface association, among others. These variables may modulate IGF action in target tissues by altering the binding affinity of the IGFBPs to IGFs.

B. To facilitate storage of IGFs in extracellular matrices
Another important role of IGFBPs may be to help in the storage of IGFs in the extracellular matrices of certain tissues. In this regard, Jones et al. (45 ) provided evidence for fixation of IGFs via IGFBP-5 binding to extracellular matrix proteins. We found evidence that IGFBP-5 may help fix IGFs in bone since the complex of IGFBP-5 and IGFs, but not IGFs alone, bind to hydroxyapatite (34 49 ). In terms of the significance of fixation of IGFs in extracellular matrices such as bone, it is speculated that the stored IGFs may be released during the osteoclastic bone resorption phase of bone remodeling to stimulate nearby osteoblasts during the bone formation phase of remodeling (50 ). Similarly, IGFs stored in extracellular matrices of soft tissues may have a role in wound healing.

C. To exert IGF-independent effects
Recent evidence suggests that some of the IGFBPs may mediate their effects on target cells by an IGF-independent pathway. This concept has evolved from a number of experimental studies, including the study by Jones et al., which found that IGFBP-1 stimulated smooth muscle cell migration by an IGF-independent mechanism involving integrin receptors (51 ). IGFBP-3 has been shown to inhibit proliferation of breast and prostate cancer cells by a cellular signaling pathway independent of IGFs (52 53 ). In addition, Rajah et al. (54 ) have recently shown that IGFBP-3 induces apoptosis of the p53-negative prostate cancer cell line, PC3, through a novel pathway independent of either p53 or the IGF-IGF receptor-mediated cell survival pathway. Consistent with the idea that IGFBP-3 may have IGF-independent effects on certain types of cells, two recent reports have provided evidence for nuclear localization of IGFBP-3 (55 56 ). The significance of this finding is not clear. However, this exciting finding may clarify the direct intrinsic actions of some of the IGFBPs on cells. We and others have found evidence that IGFBP-5 may promote cell proliferation in osteoblasts, possibly through putative cell surface-binding sites (46 47 ). Although studies from a number of laboratories support the possibility that IGFBPs may have IGF-independent effects in certain cell types, further experimental evidence is needed to verify this mode of IGFBP action.

Thus, the explosion of IGFBP research during the past several years has provided evidence that IGFBPs may have both IGF-dependent and IGF-independent actions. Based on the complexity of IGFBP functions, it is clear that we cannot fully appreciate the significance of changes in IGFBP levels in serum and local body fluids until we know more about the functions of these IGFBPs.


    IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in Biological Fluids
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Serum
As mentioned above, the major pool of IGFs circulate in human serum as 150- to 200-kDa complexes (28 57 58 59 ). In addition to the large molecular mass complex, two other pools of IGFs exist in serum, the free and the 50-kDa IGF pool. Hardouin et al. (60 ) were the first to characterize the different IGFBPs present in adult human serum. These authors found evidence for the presence of five different molecular forms of IGFBPs in human serum and showed that the various IGFBPs were distributed in two complexes in the serum, the 150- to 200-kDa complex primarily containing the GH-dependent IGFBP-3 (61 62 ) and the 50-kDa complex consisting of other forms of IGFBPs (1 ).

Figure 1Go shows the relative distribution of various IGF pools in human serum. In circulation, about 75–80% of the IGFs are complexed to IGFBP-3 and the acid labile {alpha}-subunit to form the 150- to 200-kDa complex (57 59 63 ). This is possible because under normal conditions, the total IGFs and IGFBP-3 in serum are in equimolar concentrations (63 ). A smaller percentage (20–25%) of the IGFs are associated with low molecular mass IGFBPs (57 ). Less than 1% are found in the free form in circulation (64 65 ).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relative distribution of various IGF pools in human serum. The distribution of IGFs between the 50-kDa, 150-kDa, and the free pool, as determined before and during continuous subcutaneous infusion of 30 mg/day of rhIGF-I in healthy men (82).

 
Studies by Baxter, Martin, and colleagues (28 58 ) and Guler et al. (57 ) to identify the constituents of the 150- to 200-kDa complex led to the purification of two components of the complex from human serum: an acid-stable glycoprotein of 38–43 kDa (IGFBP-3) with IGF-binding activity and an acid-labile glycoprotein of 85 kDa that does not bind to the IGFs (Fig. 2Go). Subsequently, the reconstitution of the 150- to 200-kDa complex was achieved by using purified acid-labile subunit (ALS or {alpha}-subunit), IGFBP-3 (ß-subunit), and IGF-I or IGF-II ({delta}-subunit). The role of ALS appears to be to increase the molecular mass of the IGF+IGFBP-3 complex so that the access of the circulating IGF to the extracellular fluid and thus to the various tissues is limited (57 58 ).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Proposed model of the forms in which IGFs circulate in human serum. The 150-kDa complex consists of 7.5 kDa IGF-I or IGF-II plus 38–43 kDa IGFBP-3 and a 80- to 90-kDa non-IGF-binding acid-labile component called ALS. The 50-kDa complex consists of IGF-I or IGF-II bound to one of the remaining five IGFBPs.

 
Baxter and co-workers (66 67 68 69 ) have shown that the affinity constant for the formation of IGF-IGFBP-3 complex (2–3 x 10-10 M) is considerably higher than the affinity of the ALS for the IGF-IGFBP-3 heterodimer (5 x 10-8 M). They have demonstrated that human IGFBP-3 injected into normal rats is distributed within a few minutes between a 50-kDa and a 150- to 200-kDa complex. ALS circulates in its free form 2- to 3-fold molar excess (30 ) with respect to its ternary complex and hence is readily available for complex formation. However, since very little unbound IGF-I is present, some other source for IGF must be available for ternary complex formation to occur. It is suggested that there may be a rapid exchange between IGF-I associated with the small molecular mass binding protein complex (50 kDa) and the 150- to 200-kDa complex. There is also the possibility that the IGF-I may be associated with the cell surface or lining capillaries and dissociated by the high-affinity IGFBP-3 (59 ). The stabilization of IGFs occurs when it binds to the IGFBP-3 and then forms a complex with ALS (59 ). In IGF-deficient animals, either with diabetes (66 ) or GH deficiency (GHD) (70 ), ternary complex formation is impaired, but restored to normal after IGF is injected along with IGFBP-3. Based on these data, Baxter (58 ) proposed that ALS association with IGFBP-3 requires the presence of IGFs.

The question of whether ALS can form a binary complex with IGFBP-3 in the absence of the IGF ligand is controversial at this time based on recent reports by Barreca and colleagues (71 72 73 ) and Lee et al. (74 ). Barreca et al. (71 ) demonstrated that incubation of recombinant human IGFBP-3 and ALS resulted in the appearance of a 150- to 200-kDa complex in the absence as well as in the presence of IGF. They also showed that ALS binding to IGFBP-3 increased the affinity of IGFBP-3 to IGF-I, possibly by inducing conformational changes in IGFBP-3. Based on these results, the authors speculate that ALS may play an important role in regulating the affinity of IGFBP-3 to IGF-I, thus regulating the levels of free IGFs. In addition, Yang et al. (75 ) observed that [125I]IGF-II readily bound to the 150-kDa fraction of adult rat serum to sites with a higher affinity for IGF-II than IGF-I. In subsequent studies, Lee and Rechler (76 ) demonstrated two different IGFBP-3 complexes in the 150- to 200-kDa fraction of the adult rat serum, one with similar affinity for IGF-I and -II and the other with greater affinity for IGF-II (77 ). The latter complex is formed from proteolytically nicked IGFBP-3 that is present in the native serum before acidification. The proteolytic cleavage in IGFBP-3 decreases the affinity of the IGFBP-3-ALS for IGF-I and increases the binding of IGF-II. Similar proteolytic nicking of IGFBP-3 occurs during human pregnancy, changing the binding specificity for IGFs (78 ). In contrast to these results, Baxter and co-workers (79 ) demonstrated that proteolyzed IGFBP-3 from maternal serum can bind to IGFs and form a ternary complex with ALS with normal affinity. Thus, they speculated that the altered binding affinity of the IGFBP-3 fragment during Western ligand blotting is an artifact resulting from breakage of a labile peptide bond after prolonged acidification or exposure to SDS.

If human IGFBP-3 must first bind to IGF-I before it can form the ternary complex, then the amount of IGF-I associated with the 150- to 200-kDa complex in rats injected with hIGFBP-3 should be twice that of normal rats. However, Lee et al. (74 ) did not observe an increase in the mobilized IGF and thus concluded that IGFBP-3 and ALS can form a binary complex independent of IGF both in vivo (80 ) and in vitro (71 76 ). Thus the question of whether IGF is required for the formation of a complex between IGFBP-3 and ALS remains controversial. One possibility is that there may be two IGFBP-3 pools, one with a higher binding affinity for ALS after first binding to IGF, and the second, which binds ALS even in the absence of IGF but with lower affinity. With differences in binding affinities, the functional roles of ternary complexes of ALS+IGFBP-3+IGF and binary complex of ALS+IGFBP-3 may also be different. Future studies are required to elucidate the extent to which IGFBP-3 forms a binary complex with ALS and if so, whether these binary complexes play a physiological role in modulating the actions of IGF.

One of the proposed functions of plasma IGFBPs is to increase the half-life of IGFs in circulation. When IGF-I and IGF-II are injected into normal rats, they bind to IGFBP-3, increasing their stability and half-life to 4 h compared to 20 min in hypophysectomized rats (81 ). Guler et al. (57 ) determined the half-lives of free and IGFBP-bound [125I]IGF-I and -II after bolus injection of the tracers in two normal adults. Apparent half-lives of [125I]IGF-I and -II in each of the three IGF serum pools (150 to 200 kDa, 50 kDa, and free IGF), calculated from the respective disappearance rates of the tracer, are shown in Fig. 3Go. These results demonstrate that the 150- to 200-kDa complex is responsible for the relatively long half-life of IGFs and that the 50-kDa and the free IGF pool have a rapid turnover and account for most of the daily IGF production (82 ). Another important role of IGFBP binding to IGF is in modulating IGF action. The ternary complex does not permeate the capillary endothelial barrier, but the smaller IGF-IGFBP complexes can easily do so and facilitate tissue-specific IGF action (3 4 57 59 ). On the other hand, the endocrine actions of IGFs bound to IGFBP-3 may be achieved by specific proteolytic enzymes that dissociate the ALS+IGFBP-3+IGF complex, and it is suggested that this may increase the bioavailability of IGFs. An additional mechanism altering IGF bioavailability has been proposed by Yamamoto and Murphy (83 ). They identified the presence of a protease in rat serum that cleaves IGF-I into des(1 2 3 )IGF-I. Since this form dissociates from the binding proteins easily, it may serve to increase IGF bioavailablity. The role of proteases in modulating IGF bioavailability is discussed in detail in Sections VIII and IX.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Apparent half-lives of various IGF pools in human serum. Apparent half-lives of [125I]IGF-I and [125I]IGF-II in each of the three IGF serum pools (free, 50-kDa, and 150-kDa) were calculated from the respective disappearance rates of the tracer after intravenous bolus injection (82). Values are mean estimations from two healthy men.

 
Different forms of IGFBPs have been identified in a variety of biological tissues other than serum. Although their exact source and role are not clearly known in many of these systems, if the production of these binding proteins is tissue-specific, it could imply a local paracrine or autocrine role for IGFBPs in regulating IGF-I and -II actions. The binding proteins identified in the other biological fluids are discussed in the section below.

B. Milk
Human milk contains IGFBP-1, -2, and -3 (84 ), the functions of which remain unclear. In addition, IGFBP-4 has been identified in rat, porcine, and bovine milk (85 86 ). As with serum, IGFBP-3 is the major binding protein of IGFs in milk. Although maternal serum is the source of rat milk IGFBP-3 (21 ), the 150- to 200-kDa complex is not translocated from serum into milk. It is suggested that IGFBP-3 may enter milk from circulation in the free form or complexed to IGF-I. On the other hand, IGFBP-2 and -4 are produced locally by the mammary gland as shown by expression of their respective mRNA in the mammary tissue (21 ). IGFBP-1 in human milk (87 ) parallels the level of IGF-I in that immediately after birth, both milk IGF-I and IGFBP-1 decline. The exact role of IGFBPs in milk remains to be explored, but it is possible that they protect against the degradation of milk IGF-I or that they modulate the local mitogenic activity of the IGFs.

C. Urine
IGFBP-1, -2, and -3 have been detected in healthy adult urine by Western ligand blot analysis (25 ), and the concentration is approximately 3 orders of magnitude less than that in serum (88 ). Previously, IGFBP-2 was shown to be the predominant form in dialyzed adult urine, but when urine is not dialyzed, IGFBP-3 is the major binding protein (88 ). The reason for this discrepancy is not known. It appears that urinary IGFBP-3 originates mainly from the kidney and/or the urinary tract and (89 ), unlike the serum, is not found as a 150- to 200-kDa complex in the urine. Quantification by RIA show that urinary IGFBP-3 is age dependent, with an increase at approximately age 9–11 yr that corresponds to the pubertal rise in serum IGFBP-3 and is followed by a decline until it plateaus at approximately age 26 yr (89 ). Although the antiserum used in the RIA recognizes both intact and proteolyzed fragments of IGFBP-3, there is no evidence for the presence of urinary protease in normal individuals from age 4–45 yr (25 89 ). It is suggested that urinary IGFBPs may have diagnostic utility, but this has not been established.

D. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
Although several different binding proteins have been identified in human CSF, IGFBP-2 is the major form present (22 ). The CSF contains high concentrations of IGF-II (90 ), which binds IGFBP-2 with 10- to- 20-fold greater affinity than IGF-I (91 ). Also purified from the CSF is IGFBP-6, which is present at slightly lower concentrations in the CSF than serum (92 ), but also has a preferential affinity for IGF-II over IGF-I. Both IGFBP-3 and -5 have been identified in the CSF at lower concentrations than IGFBP-2 and -6. It is suggested that the IGFBPs found in the CSF may be synthesized locally by glial cells and neurons and not derived from plasma by crossing the blood-brain barrier (93 ). A 30-kDa IGFBP, corresponding to IGFBP-2, was demonstrated in rat CSF (94 ). By analogy with other transport proteins synthesized by the choroid plexus, it is suggested that this IGFBP may facilitate the secretion of IGF-II to the CSF and modulate its biological action at distant sites within the brain (94 ). In a number of disease states related to the central nervous system (CNS) (95 96 ), changes in IGFBP concentrations have been documented, suggesting a possible diagnostic utility for the measurement of these binding proteins. Thus IGFBPs are thought to modulate the biological actions of IGFs (39 94 97 ) including a possible regulatory role in growth and differentiation of the CNS. However, the mechanisms remain to be investigated.

E. Follicular fluid
IGFBPs 1–4 (41 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ) were identified by Western ligand blotting in human follicular fluid, suggesting that the regulation of IGF action in the ovary is probably under the control of regulatory binding proteins (98 ). In women with normal menstrual cycles, after ovulation, progesterone stimulates the endometrium to release IGFBP-1 (105 ), which mediates the cell differentiation effects of IGF-I on the endometrium. IGFBP-1 is synthesized by granulosa cells and is secreted into the follicular fluid (101 103 106 107 108 109 ), where the concentration is 4- to 5 times higher than that found in the serum (110 ). The preovulatory rise in serum IGFBP-1 is not regulated by insulin or ingestion of a meal, nor is it associated with diurnal variation (111 ). This implies that during the preovulatory phase, IGFBP-1 detected in serum is primarily of follicular origin. IGFBP-1 is thought to inhibit the biological activity of free IGF on androgen-producing theca cells, since that might lead to atresia and anovulation (112 ).

Changes in the various IGFBPs during atresia and follicular growth have been reported. The levels of IGFBP-2 and -4 are higher in atretic follicles (99 113 ) compared with healthy developing follicles of serum, suggesting a role for them in inducing atresia. A decrease in proteolytic activity degrading IGFBP-3 and an increase in IGFBP-2, -4, and -5 protease were observed during follicular growth in ovine follicular fluid, and an increase in IGFBP-3 protease and a decrease in IGFBP-4 and -5 protease were observed during atresia (100 101 114 115 ). These observations suggest that changes in intrafollicular IGFBP proteolytic activity could be responsible in part for the changes in IGFBP levels seen during growth and atresia (114 ). Since the expression of various IGFBPs is altered during follicular development and atresia, it is speculated that the changes in IGFBP levels may regulate follicular growth by modulating the local IGF bioavailability.

F. Amniotic fluid
The binding protein isolated from amniotic fluid (AFBP) is a small molecular mass binding protein that is both heat and acid stable (42 116 ) and was later identified to be the same as IGFBP-1. It is the major IGFBP in the amniotic fluid and is present in concentrations 100–500 times higher than that found in the serum (117 ). During pregnancy, a surge in the concentration of amniotic fluid IGFBP-1 reflects its local production in decidual tissues (42 118 ). The amniotic fluid IGFBP-1 contributes to the increase in serum IGFBP-1 levels during the second trimester of pregnancy (117 ). IGFBP-1 is twice as high in preterm amniotic fluid as in term amniotic fluid, suggesting a role for this binding protein in growth and development.

Immunoreactive IGFBP-3 is present in amniotic fluid but at a much lower concentration than that in serum. Western ligand blot analysis of amniotic fluid failed to reveal evidence for the presence of IGFBP-3 in amniotic fluid. This could be due to the presence of IGFBP-3 protease capable of degrading intact IGFBP-3 into fragments that do not bind [125I]IGF tracer. Consistent with this interpretation, incubation of amniotic fluid with radiolabeled IGFBP revealed the presence of a protease(s) specific for IGFBP-3, -4, and -5 (119 ). These proteases alter the binding affinity of the IGFs for their binding proteins and thereby could modulate the bioactivity of IGFs (119 ). The role of IGFBP-6 in the amniotic fluid is not yet known, although the levels present are similar to those seen in serum (92 ).

G. Lymph
The concentration of both IGFs and IGFBPs in lymph are lower than that found in serum (120 121 ). Using gel filtration chromatography, it was shown that the IGFBPs present in lymph eluted in the 40- to 50-kDa size range. The finding that little IGF activity eluted as a 150- to 200-kDa complex from lymph is consistent with the fact that the IGF+IGFBP-3 complex does not cross the capillary endothelial barrier. IGFBP-2 is believed to be one of the major binding proteins in the lymph tissue and may originate from both the serum and surrounding local tissues (3 ).

H. Seminal fluid
IGFBP-1-like immunoreactivity was detected in human seminal plasma (122 ), with levels similar to those found in human adult serum. Intact IGFBP-3 could not be detected in seminal fluid by Western ligand blot analysis, but Western immunoblot analysis using IGFBP-3 antiserum revealed the presence of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 fragments (122 ). Since the amounts and ratio of these binding proteins do not correlate with those present in the serum, it is likely that the source of these proteins are specific to the cell population within the local tissues, such as Sertoli cells. Human seminal plasma also contains intact IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4, while IGFBP-3 is present in the fragmented form (123 124 125 126 ). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has proteolytic activity for not only IGFBP-3, but also for IGFBPs -4 and -5. In addition to the PSA protease, an IGFBP-5-specific protease has been identified in seminal plasma (125 126 127 ). Since IGFBP proteolytic activities in seminal fluid from normal volunteers, vasectomized patients, or patients with idiopathic azoospermia were not significantly different, the role of IGFBPs and IGFBP proteases in the male reproductive system and male infertility remains to be established.

I. Other biological fluids
The presence of IGFBPs 1 through 4 has been detected in interstitial fluid obtained from human skin blisters caused by high negative pressure in healthy volunteers (128 ). The IGFBP-3 concentration was lower than that present in the circulation and was due to increased IGFBP-3 protease activity. Several IGFBPs have been identified in vitreous and aqueous humors (129 ), but the predominant serum carrier protein IGFBP-3 was not detected in these fluids. This may be due to the presence of increased amounts of IGFBP-3 protease activity in vitreous and aqueous humors (129 ). Vitreous humor from diabetics had a higher amount of IGFBP-3 proteolytic fragment compared with healthy controls, suggesting that the rate of IGFBP-3 proteolysis is different in vitreous humor of normal and diabetic individuals. Western ligand blotting and immunoprecipitation of normal synovial fluid revealed the presence of IGFBPs 1 through 4, with levels higher in synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (130 ) compared with controls. These findings suggest that understanding the normal IGF/IGFBP axis in physiological states and the alterations that occur in pathological conditions may provide clues to our understanding of the pathophysiology of different disease states.

Although the enrichment of certain biological fluids with one or more IGFBPs, together with the increased expression of the same IGFBP in the local tissues surrounding the body fluid (Table 2Go), suggests that these IGFBPs may function locally to regulate IGF actions, more work is required to understand the specific role of these binding proteins in modulating IGF action in various biological fluids.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Distribution of IGFBPs in biological fluids

 

    V. Assays for Circulating Levels of IGFBP
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Western ligand blotting
Western ligand blotting, originally developed by Hossenlopp et al. (131 ), has been used extensively in detecting the different IGFBPs in biological samples. This technique involves transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose after separation by SDS-PAGE, hybridization with radioligand tracer, and, ultimately, autoradiography. Although not very quantitative or specific, this technique allows for identification of the IGFBPs differing in molecular mass by as little as 1 kDa. Western ligand blotting gives a measurement of the intact IGFBP (5 25 ) since the IGFBP proteolytic fragments do not bind IGFs or bind with reduced affinity. Although Western ligand blotting can be used to quantitate certain IGFBPs with more accuracy than others, this assay is not highly quantitative for many of the IGFBPs for the following reasons: First, the transfer of the IGFBPs during electroblotting technique is not always complete and may vary for different IGFBPs (132 ). Second, the sensitivity of detection is different for the various IGFBPs. For example, IGFBP-6 at lower concentrations could not be detected by Western ligand blotting (133 134 ). The reason for the poor detection of IGFBP-6 by ligand blotting may be due to either incorrect folding of IGFBP-6 after transfer to nitrocellulose or the close proximity of the epitopes for the IGF ligand and nitrocellulose in IGFBP-6, which could hinder nitrocellulose-bound IGFBP-6 when binding to IGF tracer (134 ). Third, it is difficult to accurately quantify certain IGFBPs (e.g., IGFBP-5) by ligand blotting since the molecular masses of glycosylated and nonglycosylated forms of several IGFBPs are too similar for proper separation (3 ). Despite the above problems, Western ligand blotting has been widely used by researchers in the IGF field and has proved to be an invaluable tool for detection and characterization of the molecular size of the various IGFBPs present in biological fluids.

B. Western immunoblotting
Antibodies specific for a IGFBP can be used to quantitate IGFBPs in a conventional Western immunoblotting, after size separation by SDS-PAGE. Western immunoblotting can be improved by optimizing protein transfer, antibody binding, and detection systems (e.g., chemiluminescence). In general, immunoblot analysis using polyclonal antiserum usually detects both intact and fragmented forms of the IGFBPs (25 ). For example, when pregnancy sera were analyzed using the Western ligand blot technique (25 135 ), there was no evidence of IGFBP-3, while both immunoblot and RIA detected the presence of fragmented IGFBP-3 that arose from protease activity. In subsequent studies, Baxter and co-workers (79 ) demonstrated that the proteolyzed IGFBP-3 fragment from maternal serum can bind IGF with normal affinity and that the lack of detection by Western ligand blot analysis is an analytical artifact resulting from using [125I]IGF-I for binding. Another example of the usefulness of the immunoblot assay was shown in diabetics. Patients with untreated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) showed lower levels of IGFBP-3 compared with healthy controls (136 137 ). While the Western ligand blot could only detect the intact fragment, immunoblot assay was able to show a decrease in intact IGFBP-3 and also an increase in fragmented IGFBP-3 compared with controls. This finding led to subsequent investigation of proteolytic activity in these patients. IGFBP-3 protease activity was found to be higher in the serum of untreated IDDM patients compared with age-matched controls (137 ). The usefulness of Western immunoblotting in the identification of IGFBP fragments has fostered studies on characterization of IGFBP proteases in a variety of biological fluids.

C. RIA
One of the major problems with Western ligand blot and Western immunoblot analysis was the lack of precision, which was overcome by the development of RIA (92 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ). At present RIAs for IGFBP-1, -2, and -3 are commercially available. Recent success in purifying IGFBPs from a variety of sources to homogeneity and recombinant expression of various IGFBPs has led to the development of specific antibodies suitable for establishment of RIAs for accurate measurement of the various IGFBPs. These RIAs have already provided important new information on the physiological and hormonal regulation of the various IGFBPs. The RIAs for the various IGFBPs do not require an extraction procedure as in the case of the IGFs since endogenous IGFs do not interfere with the assay (138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ). Thus, the various biological fluids can be assayed directly for IGFBPs. The majority of IGFBP RIAs thus far developed utilize polyclonal antiserum, which reacts with both intact and fragment forms of IGFBPs. Although measurement of both intact and fragmented forms of IGFBPs may provide useful information in various clinical settings, one of the disadvantages with the use of polyclonal antisera is that the antisera developed in various laboratories may recognize different fragments. This could lead to inconsistent quantitative results using antisera that recognize dissimilar epitopes for similar biological samples. For example, it is known that serum from children with end-stage renal disease contains increased amounts of fragmented forms of various IGFBPs (145 146 ). The quantitative measurements of various IGFBPs in serum from children with end-stage renal disease may depend on whether a particular antiserum used for measurement of a given IGFBP recognizes only selected fragments or all of the forms of that particular IGFBP.

D. Immunoradiometric assay
The immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) is a noncompetitive assay in which the IGFBP to be measured is "sandwiched" between two antibodies. The first antibody, which needs to be specific, is immobilized to the inside wall of the tubes. The second antibody is used as a capture antibody (radiolabeled or enzyme conjugated). Since the two antibodies used for IRMA are typically developed against amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal ends of the molecule, the advantage of this assay is that it is often more specific than RIA (147 148 ) and more likely to measure the intact molecule. The disadvantage with IRMA is that it may not reflect production rate as well as RIA since the analyte measured may be degraded during storage or during experimental conditions, resulting in artifactually lower values than that actually present. At present, IRMA is commercially available only for IGFBP-3.


    VI. Relative Distribution of IGFBPs in Serum
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
With the development of improved RIAs and validation techniques for the various IGFBPs, it is now possible to measure the concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-II, and their binding proteins in the circulation (Fig. 4Go). IGFBP-3 is the predominant form present in serum with levels more than 10-fold higher than the other IGFBPs (59 149 ). The concentration of the small molecular mass binding proteins are found in increasing order (IGFBP-4 > IGFBP-5 > IGFBP-2 > IGFBP-6 > IGFBP-1) in human serum (92 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 149 150 ). There is a 50% molar excess of IGFBPs over IGFs in serum, which implies that a very small percentage of the IGFs remain in the free form. Since the antisera used for measurement of various IGFBPs recognize both intact and fragment forms of IGFBPs, the relative abundance of intact forms of various IGFBPs in adult human serum is not known at this time.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Concentrations of IGFs and IGFBPs in adult human serum. IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-5 values were determined in the author’s laboratory. Data for IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-6 were compiled from published literature. Values are mean ± SD.[Reproduced with permission from S. Mohan and D. J. Baylink: J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3817–3820, 1996 (149). © The Endocrine Society.]

 
Although approximately 75% of IGFs are bound to GH-dependent IGFBP-3, the relative contribution of non-GH-dependent small molecular mass IGFBPs to the IGF binding capacity (the remaining 25% of IGFs) in serum is not known. If each of the five non-GH-dependent IGFBPs contribute equally to the IGF-binding capacity of serum, one would expect all of the IGFBPs to correlate positively with serum IGF-I and IGF-II levels. Examination of correlation (Table 3Go) between IGFs and various IGFBPs reveal that only IGFBP-5, in addition to IGFBP-3, showed positive correlation with IGF concentration in normal adult human serum (142 ). In contrast, serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels showed negative correlation while IGFBP-4 levels did not correlate with IGF concentration. These data suggest that different mechanisms may regulate the amounts of various IGFBPs in serum.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Correlation between IGFs and IGFBPs in normal human serum

 
Of the two IGFs, the concentration of IGF-II is about 3-fold greater than that of IGF-I in adult human serum (151 152 ). The mechanisms that could contribute to the observed differences in the serum level of IGF-II vs. IGF-I include differences in production rate as well as MCR. The daily production rate of IGF-II may be higher than that of IGF-I since the amount of IGF-II produced by several cell types in culture exceeds IGF-I production by 1 order of magnitude (153 154 155 156 ). It appears, however, that the production rate could only contribute to a small extent since Guler et al. (82 ) showed that the IGF-II production rate (13 mg/day) was only slightly higher than that of IGF-I (10 mg/day) in healthy men.

Regarding the MCR, it is known that IGFBPs play a major role in extending the half-life of IGFs in the circulation (see Section IX). In this regard, the half-life of IGF-II in serum may be longer than that of IGF-I since human serum contains IGFBPs with selective affinity for IGF-II over IGF-I (1 3 ). For example, human IGFBP-6 has 50- to 100-fold higher affinity for IGF-II over IGF-I. IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5 have slightly higher affinity for IGF-II than IGF-I. In addition, Lee and Rechler (76 ) showed that the 150- to 200-kDa protein complexes in the rat serum have higher affinity for IGF-II than IGF-I. They propose that these 150- to 200-kDa complexes in the adult rat serum contain proteolytically nicked IGFBP-3 and ALS that bind to IGF-II preferentially. Based on these data, it is speculated that the presence of IGFBPs with higher affinity for IGF-II over IGF-I could contribute to a greater half-life of IGF-II over IGF-I. This explains some of the observed differences in the greater abundance of IGF-II vs. IGF-I in human serum. However, it appears likely that the differences in IGF-binding affinity of IGFBPs is not the only mechanism that contributes to the greater abundance of IGF-II over IGF-I, since 75% of IGF-II is bound to IGFBP-3 in the form of ternary complex and the intact IGFBP-3 binds IGF-I and IGF-II with similar affinity (3 ).

Indeed, inasmuch as the differences in production rate and IGFBP affinities to IGFs cannot account for the observed differences in the serum levels of IGF-I and IGF-II, it would seem that some aspect of metabolic clearance, such as the degradation rate, is higher for IGF-I than for IGF-II, thereby contributing to the lower level of serum IGF-I compared with IGF-II in adults. Based on the above analysis, it seems reasonable to conclude that three mechanisms may contribute to the greater serum level of IGF-II than IGF-I in humans: 1) greater production rate of IGF-II than IGF-I; 2) the preferential binding of minor IGFBPs for IGF-II as compared with IGF-I; and 3) a lower degradation rate of IGF-II than IGF-I (the latter two mechanisms would lead to a greater MCR for IGF-I than IGF-II).

If we assume that the actions of IGF-I and IGF-II are similar (i.e., both act via the Type I IGF receptor), then the structural differences between IGF-I and IGF-II would serve some other mechanism than functional activity. This raises the possibility that the differential structure of the two IGFs could lead to differences in MCR. Accordingly, we can speculate that serum contains two pools of reserve IGFs — a smaller IGF-I pool, which is rapidly turning over, and a larger IGF-II pool, which is slowly turning over. If so, the differential structure of the IGFs may produce differential three-dimensional structures with the IGFBPs and, therefore, could lead to a lower proteolysis rate of IGF-II than IGF-I. In this regard, recent studies have shown that exogenous addition of IGF-II to cell-free conditioned medium derived from a number of cell types, including human osteoblasts and fibroblasts, increases the rate of IGFBP-4 proteolysis (157 158 159 160 ). Since IGFBP-4 proteolysis is not induced by the addition of insulin, des(1 2 3 )IGF-I, or des(1 2 3 4 5 6 )IGF-II, all of which bind IGFBP-4 with extremely low affinity, it is speculated that the binding of IGF-II to IGFBP-4 may alter the conformation of the protein and enhance the susceptibility of IGFBP-4 to proteolytic degradation (159 ). Although these data are consistent with the possibility that the binding of ligand to binding protein may result in altered proteolysis of the ligand and/or the binding protein due to conformation changes, further studies are needed to establish whether or not there are, in fact, different MCRs for the serum IGF-I pool and the serum IGF-II pool. If this proved to be the case, this would open the possibility that the two reserve serum IGF pools provide a metabolic advantage to maintain overall body economy in the face of dramatic changes in functional demands, such as during growth, pregnancy, and starvation. Regardless of whether or not this concept has merit, the findings that IGF-II circulates in greater abundance than IGF-I in human serum, and that IGF-II is produced by several adult tissues in large amounts, are consistent with an important role for IGF-II in human physiology.

The finding that IGFBP-3 is the most abundant IGFBP present in adult human serum does not necessarily mean that the production rate of IGFBP-3 is more than that of other IGFBPs. In this regard, the higher abundance of IGFBP-3 in serum may be due to the fact that the half-life of IGFBP-3 is considerably longer (15–20 h) since it is bound to the 80- to 85-kDa ALS. In contrast, the half-lives of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 have been estimated to be on the order of 1–2 h (161 ), which suggests that these binding proteins must be produced at a higher rate than that of IGFBP-3 to achieve similar serum levels based on the differences in their half-lives. Thus, it is essential to understand not only the regulation of IGFBP-3 and other IGFBPs in serum, but it is also necessary to know the regulation of different IGFBPs in various extracellular body fluids since the relative levels of these IGFBPs and their corresponding proteases in local body fluids may play a role in regulating the local actions of IGFs depending on the needs of local tissues.


    VII. Regulation of Serum IGFBPs
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Characteristics of the...
 III. Target Cell Actions...
 IV. IGF-IGFBP Complexes in...
 V. Assays for Circulating...
 VI. Relative Distribution of...
 VII. Regulation of Serum...
 VIII. IGFBP Proteases in...
 IX. Endocrine Functions of...
 X. Conclusions
 References
 
If IGFBPs in serum play an important role in regulating the actions of IGFs (see Section IX), then the levels of various IGFBPs should be regulated during various physiological and pathological conditions. Recent studies demonstrate that IGFBPs are regulated during exercise, surgery, pregnancy, and aging and that hormones modulate the levels of one or more IGFBPs in serum and other biological fluids (see below).

A. Physiological conditions
1. Diurnal variation. Plasma IGFBP-1 values are subject to diurnal variation with the levels reaching the lowest during the afternoon and midnight, and highest in the morning (61 ). In circulation, IGFBP-1 has a free IGF-binding site, suggesting that it is unsaturated in contrast to GH-dependent IGFBP-3, which is normally saturated. It appears that the increase in IGFBP-1 during the morning hours coincides with an increase in IGF-I level, thus reducing insulin-like activity (20 ). However, this is independent of both IGF and GH (61 ). In contrast to IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and -3 are more stable and do not exhibit diurnal variation nor are they subject to postprandial changes (143 144 ). Diurnal variations have not yet been studied for IGFBPs 4–6.

2. Nutrition. Nutritional regulation of IGFBP-1, -2, and -3 has been discussed briefly in a recent review by Thissen et al. (162 ), but little is known regarding the nutritional regulation of IGFBP-4, -5, and -6 (163 164 ). The metabolic state of an individual is reflected by insulin level, which influences the circulating concentration of IGFBP-1. Insulin-dependent diabetic patients have higher serum IGFBP-1 levels than nondiabetic controls (136 165 ). Further, acute steady state hyperinsulinemia reduces the serum IGFBP-1 concentration to values that are 40–70% lower than baseline values in normal individuals and also in diabetic and insulinoma patients (166 ), suggesting that insulin is involved in the regulation of serum IGFBP-1 levels (167 ). Serum IGFBP-1 levels fluctuate acutely in response to dietary food intake, with a marked increase (3- to 4-fold higher than baseline) after an overnight fast (168 ) or long-term dietary restriction (169 ), and a decline immediately after a meal. This decline in serum IGFBP-1 may be attributed to the direct effect of insulin or insulin-induced changes in glucose transport.

The effect of calorie and protein restriction on the concentrations of the serum IGFBPs is different for adults and children. A 50% calorie reduction for 6 days increased IGFBP-1 levels in healthy adults but not in children. Levels returned to normal after refeeding (170 171 ). The differences in these responses were not due to differences in insulin secretion, since both adults and children had a significant decline in fasting C peptide levels. Although insulin is the major regulator of IGFBP-1 concentration (165 172 173 ), this study showed that IGFBP-1 changes in children may not be linked to changes in insulin secretion.

Long-term dietary deprivation decreases plasma IGF-I and IGFBP-1 and may modify the tissue response to IGF by increasing IGF receptor synthesis (174 ). Another interesting finding is the role of glucagon as a stimulator of plasma IGFBP-1 independent of insulin levels (175 ). This is evident in healthy subjects, patients with GHD, and IDDM patients who have increased levels of IGFBP-1 when glucagon is administered in spite of an increase in plasma glucose and insulin levels. Based on these data, it is speculated that the nutritional regulation of serum IGFBP-1 level is complex and may be dependent on changes in the level of hormones such as insulin and glucagon, in addition to metabolic changes.

The serum IGFBP-2 level is more stable than IGFBP-1 level and is not influenced by postprandial changes (141 ). However, serum IGFBP-2 increased markedly in both adults and children on protein restriction (170 ). Similar observations have been made in patients with anorexia nervosa (171 ), chronic protein-calorie malnutrition (170 ), and in prolonged fasting that lasted more than 1 week (172 ). This increase in serum IGFBP-2 follows a cellular increase in the expression of the IGFBP-2 mRNA in rat liver (174 176 ). Although protein refeeding normalized the serum IGFBP-2 levels of undernourished children, high-protein intake is required to achieve complete normalization (177 ). Thus, nutrition-induced changes in serum IGFBP-2 level appear to be the direct effect of dietary protein on IGFBP-2 expression in liver.

Serum IGFBP-3 levels declined slightly but significantly with calorie restriction in both children and adults (170 ), but protein restriction caused a decrease in IGFBP-3 only in adults. However, this was normalized after protein refeeding (177 ). Although serum IGFBP-3 levels are regulated by IGF-I and GH under normal conditions (140 ), the decrease seen in undernourished children is more likely due to the presence of IGFBP-3-specific protease levels (177 ). The presence of similar proteolytic activity accompanying a low IGFBP-3 level is seen in other catabolic states (135 178 ), pregnancy (135 179 ), and in postsurgical patients (180 ). Age appears to influence changes observed in IGFBPs as a result of dietary modification. The response to calorie restriction among children and adults differs more so than during protein restriction, which may be due, in part, to an overestimation of the energy requirements for children (169 ).

Weight loss or long-term moderate energy restriction does not alter IGFBP-3 (181 ). Serum IGFBP-3 was not influenced by a very low calorie diet (VLCD) consumed by normal and obese subjects, while IGFBP-1 increased markedly in controls on VLCD and not in obese subjects (182 ). The increase in IGFBP-1 is suggested to inhibit the IGF-I feedback regulation of GH secretion, while a similar response is absent in obese individuals. Thus, GH secretion is increased in normal subjects on VLCD, but this response is abolished in obese individuals. The impaired GH secretion in obese subjects resulted in a lowered IGF/IGFBP-3 molar ratio, but this was reversed after weight loss by these subjects (183 ). Thus, changes in serum levels of IGFBPs induced by VLCD appear to be different between normal and obese subjects.

Based on the observations that serum levels of IGFBPs change depending on the nutritional status, two general conclusions can be made: 1) serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels are regulated differently than IGFBP-3 by nutrition, and 2) the decrease in serum IGFBP-3 with corresponding increases in serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels during malnutrition would decrease the half-lives of IGFs but tend to increase the transport of IGFs across the vascular endothelium and thereby could modulate the bioavailability of IGFs to target tissues (see Section IX). Further studies are needed to determine whether nutrition regulates IGF action by altering the ratio of IGFs bound to the 150- to 200-kDa and 50-kDa complexes.

3. Exercise. Exercise increased IGF-I and IGF-II in human adults (184 185 ) with the degree of response influenced by the intensity of exercise (186 ). This increase in IGF level in serum appears to be GH independent, since the increase in serum IGF-I occurred earlier than the increase in serum GH. In addition, GH secretion increased only in high-intensity exercise while IGF increased under both low and high intensities. Circulating IGF-I levels are also influenced differently by different types of exercise. Weight-bearing exercise caused no change in the IGF system (186 187 ), while endurance-type exercise induced significant increases in serum IGF-I level (185 ). Exercise is also accompanied by changes in some of the IGFBPs (increase in IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3) with or without changes in IGFs, with an overall change in the IGF to IGFBP ratio.

Prolonged exercise increased the need for plasma glucose because of depleted muscle glycogen or increased hepatic glucose output. Prolonged exercise increased serum IGFBP-1 (188 189 ), and this was inversely related to serum insulin and IGF-I levels (188 ). This raised the possibility that serum insulin was the main regulator of IGFBP-1 in circulation during exercise. However, another study (189 ) showed that serum IGFBP-1 increased in response to prolonged exercise even when normal plasma glucose and insulin levels were maintained, suggesting that factors other than insulin levels, e.g., muscle glycogen, may be involved in the regulation of serum IGFBP-1 during exercise.

Increased serum IGFBP-3 levels have been reported in adults after exercise (184 190 ). This increase paralleled an increase in IGFBP-3 proteolytic activity. It is speculated that the proteolysis was induced by activation of calcium-dependent protease (191 ) and might be responsible for the IGF-induced anabolic effect of exercise on muscle tissue. These changes in the IGF system components are observed immediately after exercise and are of short duration (<1 h). It is not known at this time whether the alterations in the IGF system components in circulation play a role in mediating the anabolic effects of physical activity or whether the exercise-associated changes in circulating levels of IGFs and IGFBPs reflect processes that occur in the exercising tissue itself (191 ).

4. Glucocorticoid. Glucocorticoids inhibit somatic growth in humans in part by suppressing GH secretion and IGF activity. When dexamethasone was administered to healthy male volunteers, it suppressed IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels while increasing IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels (192 193 ). The mean IGF bioactivity was reduced by 60% over the sampling period (192 ). This decrease in bioactivity could be due to the induction of serum inhibitors, alteration in IGFBP activity, and/or alteration in secretory profiles of GH. Recently it was shown that the negative effects exerted by glucocorticoid on bone formation may be mediated, in part, via changes in endocrine and local action of IGFs (194 ). In this study, the reduction in bone formation after glucocorticoid therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients was accompanied by a decrease in stimulatory IGF system components including IGFBP-3. Whether or not other stimulatory and inhibitory IGFBPs are also affected remains to be determined.

B. Development and aging
1. Fetal and neonatal development. It is possible that IGFBPs play a major role in regulating the mitogenic and differentiation-promoting effects of IGFs in fetal tissues. IGFBPs 1 to 6 are expressed in the different organ systems of the developing fetus (12–16 weeks) as shown by Northern blot analyses (195 196 ). Of the IGFBPs seen in the serum of a human fetus, IGFBPs 1, -2, and -3 originate predominantly from the liver, while only small amounts of IGFBPs 4, -5, and -6 are expressed in the liver. IGFBP-5 mRNA was detected in several cell types during early postimplantation stages of the developing rat, suggesting that IGFBP-5 has a role in the development of different organ systems (197 ). These binding proteins either cause inhibitory or stimulatory effects on IGF action, depending on the amount of IGFs bound to each of the IGFBPs and the pattern of distribution of these binding proteins in the various fetal tissues.

In order for optimal fetal growth, a constant interaction between the maternal host and the developing embryo/fetus is required. The presence of IGFs, IGFBPs, and fragments of IGFBP-3 in human extraembryonic cavities provide support for maternal-fetal exchange of IGF system components (115 ). It is suggested that the altered affinities of the proteolyzed IGFBP-3 for IGF-II in extraembryonic cavities may play a role in regulating the bioavailability of IGF-II in the chorion and/or the amnion (115 ). However, the role of IGFBP-3 protease in modulating IGF bioavailability remains controversial.

There is also a developmental switch during transition from fetal to neonatal life in the IGFBPs present in circulation. In a fetus of less than 27 weeks of gestation, serum contains IGFBP-1, while cord serum contains mainly IGFBP-3 (198 ). The level of IGFBP-1 is higher in the fetal and cord blood than in adult plasma. In normal weight fetuses, the IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-1 concentration in serum is 15% and 50% of maternal serum levels, respectively (199 ). Low cord serum IGFBP-1 and elevated IGFBP-3 concentrations were reported in large-for-gestational age fetuses at term birth (200 ). Since these infants also had elevated cord serum insulin levels, it was suggested that the changes in IGFBP-1 were mediated by insulin, mainly by directing greater delivery of the IGF/IGFBP complex to the target tissue, resulting in the accelerated growth as seen in large-for-gestational age fetuses. IGFBP-3 levels increase significantly during the last trimester of intrauterine life. This is supported by a study (201 ) that showed an increase in serum IGFBP-3 in preterm infants from birth (3 months preterm) to 2 months past appropriate term age. Thus IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 are the predominant binding proteins during fetal life, but they decline during the early neonatal period, with IGFBP-3 becoming the predominant binding protein.

In intrauterine growth-retarded (IUGR) fetuses, there is a marked elevation in cord serum IGFBP-1 and -2 compared with normal fetuses (199 200 202 ). Giudice et al. (200 ) showed that serum IGFBP-3 levels were decreased in IUGR fetuses, but this is in contrast to the results of Lassarre et al. (203 ), who showed that fetal cord serum had higher IGFBP-3 than normal cord serum. Typically, serum IGFBP-3 declines in cord serum due to a specific protease that degrades this protein to increase the amount of IGFs available for stimulation of growth in the target tissues. Thus, in fetal circulation, the increased availability of IGF is due to a molar excess of IGF-I and -II, an increase in IGFBP-2, and a decrease in the ternary IGFBP-3 complex formation. It is therefore speculated that IGFBP-3 protease is less likely to play a significant role in fetal serum in contrast to maternal or neonatal serum (204 ).

During fetal life, not only is the total plasma IGFBP-3 lower than in the adult circulation, but the amounts of IGF-I and IGF-II bound to this binding protein are also low compared with amounts of IGFs bound to IGFBP-3 in adults. IGF-I levels are depressed in infants with IUGR, suggesting that IGFs play a significant role in promoting growth. However, the majority of IGFs are bound to IGFBP-3 as a 50-kDa ALS-independent complex in infant serum, which is capable of crossing the endothelial barrier, thus increasing the bioavailability of the IGFs (203 ). The role of IGFBP-4 in neonatal development has not yet been explored, but given the inhibitory effect of IGFBP-4 on IGF action, it is possible that serum IGFBP-4 levels are higher in children with slow growth compared with normally growing children (205 ). However, future studies need to confirm these speculations.

2. Puberty. Although low at birth, the serum IGFBP-3 concentration rapidly increases during the first years of infancy (206 207 208 ), reaches a peak at puberty (207 ), and declines during adulthood (208 ). Girls have higher serum IGFBP-3 levels than boys of comparable age throughout childhood, and levels peak a year earlier than boys during puberty (207 208 ). In addition, IGFBP-3 increases with the increasing stage of pubertal maturation. Both the height and body mass index of an individual correlates positively with IGFBP-3 levels independent of age, sex, and pubertal stage. The molar ratio between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 is increased during puberty, suggesting that more biologically active IGF is available in the free form during the pubertal growth spurt. Serum levels of IGFBP-2 show marked age-dependence with high levels at birth and senescence and low levels during puberty (144 ). Serum IGFBP-1 declines progressively with age, with the lowest concentration observed during puberty (207 208 ). The height variability seen among pubertal children correlates with the concentration of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, with lower values in short stature children and higher values in tall children (209 ). Also, in patients with acromegaly and those with high serum GH levels, circulating IGFBP-3 and IGF-I are increased. Under normal physiological conditions, most of the serum IGFs are bound to IGFBP-3, with an approximate 1:1 molar ratio of total IGF (IGF-I + IGF-II) and IGFBP-3 (60 63 ). However, this ratio seems to vary with developmental age, with a greater increase in circulating IGF-I than IGFBP-3 during puberty (208 ). Changes in serum concentrations of the various IGFBPs during puberty (Table 4Go) have been proposed to play a role in inducing the growth spurt during puberty.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Changes in IGF system component levels in serum during puberty and aging

 
Changes in the IGF system components may also mediate the increase in bone size associated with puberty (210 ). An up-regulation in the IGF system as measured by an increase in serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-5 was reported in 65 girls belonging to Tanner stages (TS) II-IV. The increase in skeletal width occurred between TS II and III, the same time when the IGF system was up-regulated, suggesting a role for the IGFs and their binding proteins in skeletal growth. The role of GH vs. sex steroid hormones in mediating these changes in the IGF system components needs to be explored.

3. Pregnancy. Several changes in the IGF system occur in maternal and fetal circulation during pregnancy, suggesting an important role for the IGF system components in producing the anabolic effects on maternal and fetal tissues. Both serum IGFBP-1 and -2 are found in the maternal serum during the initial weeks of gestation. However, serum IGFBP-2 levels are lower toward the latter part of gestation due to the presence of IGFBP-2-specific protease (179 ). Serum IGFBP-1 levels are higher during early gestation and plateaus from