| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| II. Synthesis and Secretion of Progesterone |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The release of progesterone from the corpus luteum is influenced by a number of hormones. Primary among these is LH, the activity of which is mediated via its intracellular effects on cAMP (10, 11). FSH, PRL, prostaglandins, and ß-adrenergic agents also play a role in the control of progesterone secretion (9). Intermediates such as activin, which is stimulated by FSH and inhibits progesterone secretion by granulosa cells, and follistatin, which is synthesized by granulosa cells and is able to bind activin, contribute to a complex pattern of regulation of progesterone secretion. At the time of implantation of the blastocyst in the rat uterus, increased progesterone synthesis is accompanied by induction of ovarian follistatin gene expression, which appears to help in maintaining progesterone secretion (12). However, it is not clear whether follistatin is induced by progesterone to prevent local inhibition of progesterone effects by activin in the uterus or whether follistatin prevents down-regulation of progesterone secretion from the corpus luteum.
Once released, progesterone is carried in the blood by transcortin (corticosteroid-binding globulin) in many species including humans. In the uterine fluid of the rabbit, between days 3 and 12 of pregnancy, an additional progesterone carrier, uteroglobin, is present. Uteroglobin has a postulated role in protection of the embryo during pregnancy (discussed in Section IV), by mechanisms that are still not clear (13, 14). A specific progesterone binding plasma protein has also been described in the pregnant guinea pig, which has significantly higher affinity for progesterone than corticosteroid binding globulin (15, 16) and is strongly induced from days 15 to 20 of pregnancy, remaining elevated until parturition at approximately day 65 (17). During this time it represents the major progesterone-binding protein in the guinea pig and is specifically synthesized by the placenta (17, 18). Synthesis of this protein appears to be under progesterone control since ovariectomy of pregnant animals, or parturition, causes a fall in progesterone binding protein levels concomitant with decreased progesterone levels (19).
| III. The Progesterone Receptor |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Although both PR A and PR B bind progestins and interact with PREs, there is increasing evidence that they are functionally different. In transfection studies the two proteins have different abilities to activate progestin responsive promoters; these differences are promoter- and cell-specific (31, 32, 33, 34), suggesting that cellular responsiveness to progestins may be modulated via alterations in the ratio of PR A and B expression. While PR B tends to be a stronger activator of target genes, PR A can act as a dominant repressor of PR B (33, 34), suggesting that high PR A expression may result in reduced progestin responsiveness and that PR A and PR B may thus be, respectively, an activator and repressor of progestin action. The repressor role of PR A extends beyond that on PR B, as PR A has been shown to diminish the response of other hormone receptors such as the androgen, glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, and estrogen receptors to their appropriate ligands (35, 36, 37).
There are interspecies differences in the relative expression of PR A and B in normal tissues. Approximately equimolar expression of PR A and B is observed in chick oviduct (38) and human uterus (39), and a similar ratio of expression is seen in cultured human breast cancer cells (25). In the rodent, PR A expression predominates over PR B in a ratio of 3:1 (40, 41). Alterations in the ratio of PR forms in the chick oviduct during late winter, or in aged nonlaying animals, results in a measurable decrease in PR functional activity (42, 43). In human breast tumors, the ratio of expression of PR A and B proteins differs markedly between patients (44). The biological importance of these different ratios of PR expression has not been extensively explored. Little is known of whether relative PR A and B expression is modulated in vivo, although in PR-positive breast cancer cells in culture PR B is preferentially stimulated by estradiol, resulting in a significant decrease in PR A to B ratio (45). Given the functional differences between the two PR proteins demonstrated in vitro, this suggests that the relative expression of PR A and B may influence cellular responsiveness to progesterone.
A. PR expression and regulation
PR expression has been described in tissues known to be
progesterone responsive such as the uterus [mammalian endometrium
(46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51) and myometrium (51, 52)]; the ovary [luteinizing granulosa
cells and corpus luteum (53), preovulatory granulosa cells (54)]; and
the chick oviduct (24) and bursa of Fabricius (55). Specific progestin
binding has been described in other reproductive tissues such as testes
(56) and vaginal tissue (57). PR has been described in normal and
neoplastic breast (58, 59, 60, 61), and in the brain, in the pituitary,
ventromedial hypothalamus, and preoptic areas (62, 63). PR has also
been described in other tissues where the action of progesterone is
less well defined, including vascular endothelium (64) and rat thymus
(65). Specific progestin binding has been detected in rabbit lung (66),
rat pancreatic islets (67), and human osteoblast-like cells (68). A
summary of the tissues and cell types in which PR has been detected is
shown in Table 2
.
|
| IV. Progesterone Regulation of Gene Expression in the Uterus, Ovary, and Chick Oviduct |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-fucosidase, and type II
cAMP-dependent kinase. Secreted proteins include enzymes for protein,
carbohydrate and prostaglandin metabolism, hydrolases, phosphatases,
prostaglandins, plasminogen activator, and PRL (8).
A. Progesterone effects on proliferation and decidualization in the
uterus during the menstrual cycle
Changes in proliferative activities of the glandular epithelium
and stromal elements of the human endometrium can be correlated
directly with circulating levels of estrogen and progesterone (5), with
estrogen stimulating proliferation and progesterone opposing the
effects of estrogen and causing inhibition of proliferation. Potential
mechanisms through which progesterone opposes estrogen action during
the menstrual cycle and maintains the balance between the cyclical
influences of estrogen and progesterone are discussed in Section
VIII. The estrogen-stimulated follicular phase of the cycle is
associated with high proliferative activity in both the epithelial and
stromal cells (81). This is followed by a decline in proliferation in
the first half of the progesterone-dominated luteal phase of the cycle.
In the late luteal phase, while proliferative activity remains low in
the epithelium, a second peak of proliferation, consistent with
decidual changes, is seen in the stromal elements, associated with high
serum levels of progesterone and presumably mediated by the continued
expression of PR in those cells (48, 49, 51).
Specificity of the proliferative effects of progesterone in decidualization may be due in part to cell type-specific expression and regulation of growth factor receptors and their peptide ligands. Heparin binding epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like growth factor mRNA is specifically induced by progestins in uterine stromal cells (and is a mitogen in these cells) but, in contrast, is repressed by progesterone treatment in luminal and glandular epithelium (82).
PRL is likely to be involved in decidualization. PRL is secreted by both the endometrial stroma (83) and myometrium (84) during the normal cycle in the human and appears to be under the control of progesterone. Synthesis of PRL by the stroma is greatest during the mid- to late luteal phase (83) and can be induced, in vitro, in follicular phase endometrial tissue by treatment with progesterone (85). Furthermore, progesterone treatment of both follicular and luteal phase tissue explants results in PRL induction, which coincides with early morphological changes resembling the decidualization of cells during early pregnancy (86). The progesterone-mediated increase in PRL secretion from stromal cells is the result of increased PRL mRNA expression and is additive to the stimulatory effects of estrogen and relaxin (87). In contrast, progesterone inhibits PRL mRNA transcription by myometrial cells (84).
Progesterone may influence uterine proliferation and differentiation during the menstrual cycle by regulation of proteases or matrix proteins. Progestins suppress expression of stromelysins in endometrial stromal cells and induce transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) in these cells, resulting in down-regulation of matrilysin expression in endometrial epithelium in stromal-epithelial cocultures (88, 89). Thrombospondin-1, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that is expressed in vascular endothelium and inhibits angiogenesis, is induced by progestins in endometrial stromal cells (90). Furthermore, expression of thrombospondin-1 in endometrial stroma in vivo is correlated with stage of the menstrual cycle, with strongest expression seen in the luteal phase, suggesting that progesterone-mediated induction of thrombospondin-1 influences cyclical regulation of vascular formation and differentiation in this tissue.
B. Progesterone regulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)
pathways in the endometrium
The inhibitory effects of progesterone on estrogen-mediated cell
proliferation in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle may be
mediated by opposition of estrogen action, as discussed in
Section VII, but modulation of growth factor pathways may
also play a role. The proliferative effects of IGFs are specifically
controlled by progesterone, principally through regulation of
IGF-binding protein I (IGFBP-I). In humans, IGFBP-I is expressed in a
cyclical fashion in endometrial stromal cells, with the highest
expression seen in the mid- to late luteal phase (91). IGFBP-I may act
in a paracrine fashion to prevent epithelial cell proliferation during
the late luteal phase, since progestins increase IGFBP-I secretion from
endometrial stromal cells both in vitro (92) and in
vivo (93). It is postulated that by binding to IGF-I, IGFBP-I
prevents binding of the growth factor to its receptor, resulting in
decreased cellular responsiveness to IGF-I (91, 94). Progesterone and
IGFBP-I may also form an autocrine loop controlling stromal cell
proliferation at the end of the luteal phase, since IGFBP-I treatment
blocks the proliferative effects of both IGF-I and progestins on
stromal cells in culture (95). Alternatively, it has been postulated
that IGFBP-I may play a role in tissue remodeling toward the end of the
cycle, by binding
5ß1-integrin, a specific cellular receptor for
the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin, and thus altering cell
motility (96, 97).
C. Control of ovulation
The presence of PR in most follicular cell types and in the corpus
luteum of the human ovary (98) suggests that the process of ovulation
is regulated by progesterone, an interpretation confirmed by studies on
PR null mice, which fail to ovulate despite the presence of mature
preovulatory follicles (1). Relaxin is increased in the endometrium of
nonpregnant women during mid to late secretory phase and is postulated
to be progesterone-dependent (99). Studies with rat granulosa cells in
culture suggest that the increase in relaxin may facilitate follicle
rupture by increasing the secretion of plasminogen activator,
collagenase, proteoglycanase, and ß-glucuronidase (100). This
suggestion is supported by reports in mice that treatment with
epostane, which inhibits 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, resulting
in decreased serum progesterone levels, inhibits the activities of
serine proteases, kallikrein, and plasminogen activator and suppresses
ovulation (101). Treatment with progesterone relieves the suppression,
just as treatment with the antiprogestin RU 38486 suppresses ovulation
(102), an inhibition associated with decreased protease activity (103),
implying that progesterone is responsible for their induction.
The formation of the corpus luteum represents a distinct intraovarian process and appears to be progesterone-dependent. Expression of PR is induced by LH in granulosa cells of mature preovulatory follicles (104), and PR is detectable in the primate corpus luteum despite high local progesterone concentrations (53, 105). Granulosa cells from mature preovulatory follicles of PR null mice show an inability to luteinize correctly despite prolonged exposure to gonadotropins (1).
D. Implantation, uterine proliferation, and early pregnancy
Progesterone has a major role in the endometrium in preparation
for implantation of a fertilized ovum, and in many species a decrease
in circulating progesterone at the time of fertilization is sufficient
to delay implantation (106). Progesterone is important in promoting and
maintaining implantation through effects on both the maternal uterus
and on the developing blastocyst. Progesterone facilitates implantation
by stimulating the synthesis of enzymes responsible for lysis of the
zona pellucida. However, while progesterone is known to be essential
for implantation to occur, lysis of the zona is not the crucial step in
this process, suggesting that other essential progesterone-mediated
events are yet to be described in the initiation of implantation (106).
PRL plays a role in implantation, and this is supported by recent
observations that female mice that are PRL receptor null have complete
failure of embryonic implantation, leading to sterility (107).
The induction of uterine cell proliferation in early pregnancy may be
mediated by locally produced growth factors, many of which are under
progesterone control. Furthermore, cell type-specific expression of
growth factor receptors controls cellular sensitivity to the
autocrine/paracrine effects of growth factors. Progesterone induction
of growth factor secretion from the luminal and glandular epithelium in
the mouse endometrium promotes proliferation of the EGF
receptor-positive blastocyst trophectoderm to facilitate implantation
(108). In early pregnancy, EGF receptor mRNA is also induced in the
stroma of the maternal uterus by progesterone, but not in the luminal
or glandular epithelium (108). It has been suggested that the
hemopoietic growth factor, colony stimulating factor-I, exerts a
paracrine influence on the growth and differentiation of the placental
trophoblast, and its secretion from the luminal and glandular
epithelium in the mouse is regulated by estrogen and progesterone
(109). In the first 2 days of pregnancy in the mouse, IGF-I is secreted
from the luminal and glandular epithelium of the uterus under estrogen
stimulation and may contribute to effects on the blastocyst. After this
time, secretion from the epithelium declines and significantly greater
synthesis and secretion of IGF-I by the stroma are induced by
progesterone, resulting in increased proliferation and enlargement of
the uterus (110). It is postulated that increased growth factor
receptor expression in the stroma mediates the effects of EGF, TGF
,
and heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor from the epithelium and
IGF-I from the stroma, resulting in tissue-specific stimulation of
proliferation.
The molecular mechanisms of progesterone action during pregnancy have
been studied intensively in the rabbit uterus. In particular,
uteroglobin, which is transcriptionally regulated by progesterone, has
been well characterized at both the cellular and molecular levels.
Uteroglobin is expressed between days 3 and 12 of pregnancy in the
rabbit uterus. It is a dimer of two identical 8-kDa subunits and
incorporates two FeII ions into its normal structure. Although it shows
acid phosphatase activity, its primary role has been suggested to be
the binding and transport of progesterone and its metabolite
5-
-pregnane-3,20-dione, which protects the blastocyst from the high
levels of circulating progesterone required for maintenance of
pregnancy (13). Alternatively, it has been hypothesized that
uteroglobin may protect the embryo from maternal immune and
inflammatory response during implantation by contributing to the
inhibition of phospholipase A2 activitya key point in the regulation
of these response pathways (14).
Expression of uteroglobin is almost exclusively confined to the rabbit uterus, the exception being the lung where its expression is constitutive and is not regulated by progesterone (13). The uteroglobin gene is encoded by three exons (111), and progesterone regulation of the gene is mediated via binding of PR to specific regulatory elements in the 5'-flanking region of the gene 2 to 3 kb upstream of the start of transcription (112). Other progesterone-stimulated proteins are also postulated to bind the uteroglobin gene in positions more proximal to the promoter and to function as trans-acting factors in progesterone regulation of the gene (113). The binding of these proteins may be a mechanism by which the strict tissue specificity of uteroglobin expression is maintained (114). Protein binding to the regulatory region of the uteroglobin gene is also modulated by other pregnancy-associated proteins. PRL, acting through its receptor, augments progesterone effects by increasing protein binding to the uteroglobin promoter (115). Uteroglobin is expressed only in the rabbit, although when transgenically expressed in the mouse, the uteroglobin promoter is specifically regulated by progesterone in the uterus (116). A homolog of uteroglobin, the Clara cell 10-kDa protein (CC10), has been described in the human. However, it is expressed primarily in the lung, and the 5'-flanking regions of the gene, which correspond to the PREs described in rabbit uteroglobin, are only partially conserved, resulting in a lack of progesterone responsiveness (117).
E. Myometrial contractility
Progesterone suppresses myometrial contractility during pregnancy,
and a number of mechanisms exist whereby this may be mediated,
including progesterone effects on intracellular calcium concentration,
and levels of prostaglandins, relaxin, and oxytocin. Increases in free
intracellular calcium, if unopposed, lead to myometrial contraction.
Induction and secretion of calcitonin, a peptide hormone involved in
calcium homeostasis, are postulated to lower free calcium levels in the
uterus, thereby preventing contraction (118). In the rat uterus,
expression of calcitonin is induced in glandular epithelial cells
during early pregnancy. This effect can also be achieved by
progesterone treatment after estrogen priming, suggesting that
progesterone is primarily responsible (118). It is also postulated that
suppression of gene expression of the calcium transporter calbindin-D9k
prevents increases in intracellular calcium and therefore contributes
to prevention of myometrial contraction. Calbindin-D9k mRNA expression
in the pregnant rat uterus decreases significantly with increasing
endogenous progesterone levels, and this decrease can be blocked by the
antagonist RU 38486, suggesting that the effect is PR-mediated (119).
Furthermore, calbindin-D9k levels in rat uterus are lowest during the
progesterone- dominated diestrus phase of the cycle, and estrogen
induction of calbindin-D9k mRNA can be blocked by the progesterone
agonist R5020 (120).
Progesterone inhibits prostaglandin synthesis and activity in the
pregnant sheep and therefore decreases myometrial contractility. This
inhibition is mediated by a number of pathways that include blocking
prostaglandin action, decreasing prostaglandin synthesis, and
increasing its rate of inactivation. Progesterone is thought to
stimulate prostaglandin 15-dehydrogenase, which catalyzes prostaglandin
oxidation and results in inactivation (121). Progesterone opposes the
effects of prostaglandins in the human uterus, during pregnancy, and in
the luteal phase of the cycle by decreasing the levels of
prostaglandins F2
and E in the endometrium. Furthermore, estrogen
stimulation of prostaglandin F2
expression in the luteal phase of
the cycle in the human endometrium is inhibited by progesterone (122).
A fall in progesterone levels at the end of pregnancy is associated
with increased prostaglandin synthase activity and prostaglandin F2
production, leading to parturition (121). The antiprogestin RU 38486
antagonizes all the actions of progesterone on prostaglandin synthesis
and catabolism and stimulates prostaglandin production, resulting in
its abortifacient effect (123).
Prostaglandin effects are mediated by prostaglandin receptors and
indirectly via oxytocin receptors, proteins that are also regulated by
steroid hormones. Oxytocin receptors are decreased by progesterone in
uteri of ovariectomized ewes (124). Oxytocin receptor levels are also
inhibited in the human uterus by blocking PGF2
production;
conversely, PGF2
induction of luteolysis results in decreased plasma
progesterone and a parallel increase of oxytocin receptors (125).
Angiotensin II receptors are increased in the rabbit uterus by estrogen
priming, resulting in increased contractile sensitivity. This effect is
blocked by progesterone treatment, and progesterone alone markedly
decreases angiotensin II receptor expression (126). Similarly, atrial
natriuretic factor receptors are decreased by progesterone in the rat
myometrium during pregnancy, resulting in refractoriness to the
tocolytic effects of atrial natriuretic factor on the uterus. It has
been postulated that this is mediated by abrogation of estrogen
induction of these receptors (127).
During pregnancy the adrenergic system is involved in myometrial quietening. Progesterone increases transcription of ß-adrenergic receptors in myometrium from late pregnant rats, resulting in increased sensitivity to adrenergic agents (128). Relaxin is also important in inhibiting spontaneous or prostaglandin-induced myometrial contraction, contributing to the maintenance of implantation and early pregnancy by increasing the collagen framework and distensibility of the uterus (106). The corpus luteum, placenta, and decidua are major relaxin-containing tissues during pregnancy, and progesterone has been shown to be responsible for maintaining relaxin levels (99).
In summary, progesterone has diverse roles in the uterus and ovary at
every stage of reproductive function (Table 1
). Modulation of cyclical
proliferation during the menstrual cycle, regulation of ovulation,
stromal growth and decidual formation, promotion and maintenance of
implantation, uterine growth, and prevention of myometrial
contractility are all dependent upon specific gene regulation by
progesterone. It is apparent that transcriptional regulation by
progesterone is central to cell-specific growth regulation and involves
the coordination of growth factors and their receptors in a complicated
array of autocrine and paracrine effects. Similarly, the local signals
controlling prostaglandin effects on myometrial contraction involve
gene regulation by progesterone at many distinct levels, from
regulation of oxytocin signaling to control of prostaglandin synthesis
and promotion of calcium homeostasis. Current understanding of the
involvement of progesterone in these processes is fragmentary, and the
interrelationships between the many regulatory steps largely remain to
be described.
F. Chick oviduct
In the chick oviduct, progesterone induces the synthesis of
egg-white proteins, including ovalbumin, conalbumin, lysozyme, and
ovomucoid, and it is postulated that induction is mediated by binding
of PR to the genes encoding these proteins (129). Hormonal induction of
ovalbumin, in particular, has been well described in this system, and
its cDNA was one of the first to be fully sequenced (130, 131). The
ovalbumin gene 5'-flanking region contains several PR-binding regions,
as well as regions that are postulated to bind other proteins and thus
influence progesterone and estrogen regulation of the gene (129, 132, 133). Two regions within the ovalbumin 5'-flanking sequences mediate
induction of a reporter gene by progesterone in transfection studies
(31, 134). Estrogen is also able to activate transcription through
these regions (31, 135) and in some cells acts additively with
progesterone-bound PR A, but not PR B, to induce ovalbumin gene
transcription (31). It is not clear whether PR and ER act through
overlapping or distinct motifs in these regions. Estrogen action on the
proximal steroid-responsive region of the ovalbumin gene involves
interaction of the fos-jun complex with this region (136). It has been
reported that progestins down-regulate c-jun transcription in
estrogen-withdrawn chick oviduct (137), although the implications of
this regulation for estrogen control of ovalbumin expression have not
been explored.
| V. Progesterone Action in the Breast |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In comparison with the uterus, there is less known of the mechanisms through which progesterone exerts its effect in the breast, primarily because of the difficulty of obtaining normal breast tissue and the relative paucity of models of progesterone action in the normal breast. Breast cancer cells have been used extensively as models to examine the role of growth factors and growth factor receptors in mediating progesterone effects. However, the limitation of studying progesterone regulation of gene expression in malignant cells, often derived from metastatic lesions, is the difficulty in extrapolating results to the normal breast. An illustration of this is the difference in progesterone effects on the PRL receptor in breast cancer cells and normal mammary gland. In T-47D and MCF-7 cells, progestins increase PRL receptor levels (139), whereas in the normal mammary gland of pseudopregnant rabbits, progestins antagonize PRL induction of PRL receptors (140). Another example is the demonstrated decrease in PR associated with exposure to progestins in breast cancer cells (141, 142, 143), which contrasts with the persistence of PR in the breast in the luteal phase of the cycle (75, 76, 77, 78).
A. Effect of progesterone on proliferation of the normal
breast
In addition to the developmental role of progesterone in
formation of lobular-alveolar structures, there is an increasing body
of in vivo evidence that supports a role for progesterone in
the induction of cyclical proliferation in the breast. A number of
studies have examined the effects of cyclical hormonal changes during
the menstrual cycle on DNA synthesis in normal breast epithelium, and
there is general agreement between studies that an increase in DNA
synthesis is seen in the late luteal phase of the natural cycle
(144, 145, 146, 147, 148). The increase in DNA synthesis is consistent with the
observation of a cyclical increase in the number of epithelial mitoses,
which peaks toward the end of the luteal phase and is followed by an
increase in apoptotic activity (149, 150). These in vivo
data are further supported by the observation that high circulating
progesterone levels during pregnancy are responsible for inducing
marked lobular-alveolar development of the breast in preparation for
lactation (151).
In contrast to this, a recent study examined proliferation in breast tissue from patients who had received percutaneous estrogen and progesterone administration to the breast before surgery (152). Epithelial mitoses and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen were lowest in progesterone-treated samples, compared with both untreated controls and those receiving estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone (152). However, these data should be interpreted with caution: while this is clearly an in vivo study, the duration of hormone administration, the percutaneous route of administration, and the levels of hormones applied were likely to result in tissue levels of hormones different from those found during the menstrual cycle, with attendant difficulty in extension of these effects on proliferative parameters to those observed in the breast during natural cycles.
In vitro studies of the involvement of progesterone in
breast epithelial proliferation have produced inconsistent results
(Table 3
and 5 . Although estrogen consistently increases
proliferation of normal breast epithelium in vitro, the
progesterone effects either alone or combined with estrogen have been
variable. Progesterone has been found to increase DNA synthesis in
normal mammary epithelium in organ culture (153). However, progesterone
either decreases, or has no effect on, the proliferation of normal
breast epithelium explanted into nude mice (154, 155). Gompel et
al (156), who examined the effects of estrogen and the progestin
R5020 on the growth of cultured normal breast epithelial cells, found
that estrogen and progesterone had opposing effects, estrogen
increasing and progesterone decreasing cell proliferation.
|
B. Progesterone regulation of genes associated with cell cycle
progression
Insights into the mechanisms underlying proliferative effects of
progesterone in the breast have been obtained from studying the effects
of progestins on the cell cycle, primarily in breast cancer cells in
culture. A transient increase in cell cycle progression is seen in
PR-positive T-47D breast cancer cells after administration of
progesterone, which is correlated with a short-lived induction of genes
associated with cell cycle progression (157, 158, 159). This can be
demonstrated by progestin treatment of cells that have been growth
arrested in G1 phase by serum deprivation and then released by
treatment with insulin, which is a strong mitogen in these cells. Under
these conditions, the cells are stimulated into a single round of
synchronized progression through the cell cycle, an effect accompanied
by transient increases in expression of cell cycle-regulatory genes,
such as cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases, and of protooncogenes
associated with proliferative activity, such as c-myc and
c-fos (158, 159). The progestin induction of cell cycle
progression reflects an increased rate of progression of cells already
in transit through the cycle, rather than increased numbers of cells
entering S phase. Furthermore, while progestins potentiate the
insulin-mediated increase in cyclin D1 mRNA levels, the timing of the
cyclin D1 induction remains the same as seen with insulin alone (159).
Therefore, although the increases in cyclin D1 and c-myc
expression resulting from progestin treatment can be blocked by RU
38468, demonstrating that the progestin effects are PR-mediated, it is
unlikely that cell cycle genes are direct targets of progesterone
action. The temporal relationship between progestin regulation of cell
cycle progression and expression of cell cycle genes is summarized
schematically in Fig. 2
.
|
C. Progesterone regulation of growth factors and growth factor
receptors in the breast
Growth factors and growth factor receptors have been proposed as
candidate mediators of progesterone effects on cell proliferation. EGF
mRNA (161) and EGF receptor protein (162) and mRNA (163) are elevated
by progestins in T-47D breast cancer cells. Progestins also increase
expression of TGF
mRNA and modestly decrease that of TGFß in T-47D
breast cancer cells (164). The effect is time- and dose-dependent and
can be inhibited by RU 38486. The implications of these effects were at
first unclear, since it is believed that EGF and TGF
stimulate and
TGFß inhibits the growth of breast epithelial cells, and yet
progesterone inhibits T-47D cell growth. However, more recent data
suggest that progestins have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on
breast cancer cell growth (158), and that increased growth factor
expression may be associated with the transient growth stimulation of
these cells by progestins, before growth inhibition. It has also been
suggested that overexpression of EGF and TGF
may represent one
mechanism by which breast cancer cells acquire progestin resistance, as
the development of resistance by a subline of T-47D-5 cells coincided
with elevated levels of these factors (165). The above data must be
interpreted with caution as in many cases regulation of mRNA expression
only has been demonstrated, and increased mRNA levels may not
necessarily lead to increased concentrations of biologically active
signal or receptor. It is also noteworthy that the timing of the
modulation in growth factor and growth factor receptor levels is not
consistent with these factors having a primary role in mediating
progesterone actions on cell proliferation: the increased expression of
growth factors and their receptors occurs after the changes in cell
cycle gene expression and is not associated closely with the increase
in S phase distribution. The timing of growth factor gene regulation by
progestins is summarized schematically in Fig. 2
.
Progesterone also increases insulin receptor expression in both T-47D cells (166) and the subline T-47Dco (167). Although progesterone alone inhibits growth of these cells, cotreatment with progestin and insulin resulted in a synergistic induction of T-47D cell growth, suggesting that the progesterone-mediated increase in insulin receptor expression may result in greater sensitivity to the mitogenic effects of insulin (166, 168). This is consistent with the ability of progestins to potentiate insulin effects on synchronously growing breast cancer cell cultures (159). These effects have been postulated to have negative implications for the therapeutic use of progestins, since growth-stimulatory effects may be seen in breast tumors that express elevated levels of insulin receptors and IGF receptors.
In contrast to the effects of progestins on EGF and insulin receptor pathways, which are postulated to lead to increased cell proliferation, progestins are generally believed to inhibit the mitogenic effects of IGFs in breast cancer cells. This is in keeping with the observations in the uterus (see Section IV) and may be a mechanism through which progesterone-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation in breast cancer cells takes place. However, while in the uterus IGFBP1 is likely to be involved in progesterone modulation of IGF action, in breast cancer cells IGFBP1 is not widely expressed (169, 170). Nevertheless, if IGFBP1 is expressed, it has been postulated to inhibit the mitogenic effects of IGF-I in breast tumors (171, 172), similar to its action in the endometrium. Progestin inhibition of the mitogenic effects of IGFs in breast cancer cells is likely to occur by modulation of IGF receptor concentrations. While breast cancer cells express type I IGF receptors, few express IGF-I; in vivo this is thought to be contributed by surrounding stromal cells, producing a paracrine mitogenic effect on tumor growth (173). Progestins decrease expression of IGF receptors in T-47D cells and increase IGF-II, which produces a further down-regulation of IGF receptor (168, 174).
In summary, although there is evidence in support of a role for progesterone in cell proliferation in the breast, the underlying mechanisms are not clear, and the lack of appropriate models has slowed progress in this area. Much of the data on mechanisms of progestin action in the breast are derived from studies on breast cancer cells in culture: although these provide important information, the validity of extending this information to the normal breast has yet to be fully tested. Modulation of the cell cycle is associated with progesterone effects on cell proliferation: it remains to be determined whether direct PR involvement or, more likely, some other progesterone-regulated factor or factors underlies these effects. Furthermore, while progestins increase the expression of EGF and its receptor, the timing of these effects argues against their having a causative role in mediating progestin effects on cell proliferation. However, although the role of EGF pathways in mediating progesterone effects are unclear, progestins have been shown consistently to inhibit the mitogenic activity of the IGF pathways in both breast and uterus.
D. Markers of progestin action in the breast
Genes that are independently regulated by progestins in the
mammary gland and, therefore, may act as markers of progestin
responsiveness have been sought for their potential therapeutic or
prognostic value in breast cancer. Two such candidate genes are those
encoding the enzymes fatty acid synthetase and alkaline phosphatase.
Tissue-unspecific isoforms of alkaline phosphatase are detectable in the normal breast and breast milk and are induced by progestins in rat endometrial cells (175). In contrast, placental-type alkaline phosphatase activity is induced by estrogen but not progestins in the Ishikawa endometrial carcinoma cell line (176). Di Lorenzo and co-workers (177, 178) reported that tissue-unspecific alkaline phosphatase activity was induced by progestins in T47D breast cancer cells, and that this induction was accompanied by the acquisition of a differentiated, secretory phenotype. The increase in activity was due to increased expression of alkaline phosphatase mRNA, resulting in new alkaline phosphatase protein synthesis (178) rather than increased activity of existing enzyme. The progestin induction of alkaline phosphatase activity has not been characterized in vivo, and the physiological significance of its activity, the type of isoforms expressed in breast tumors, and the clinical significance of alkaline phosphatase activity in breast cancer remain to be determined.
Fatty acid synthetase was cloned from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line by a subtractive hybridization strategy designed to detect progestin-regulated genes (179). It was subsequently shown (180) that the fatty acid synthetase protein had also been identified previously by [35S]methionine labeling as a progestin-responsive protein in both MCF-7 and T-47D breast cancer cells (181). Progestins rapidly induce fatty acid synthetase both transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally, with an increase in gene transcription detectable as early as 15 min after hormone treatment, and a concomitant stabilization of mRNA (182). Furthermore, the progestin antagonist RU 38486 decreased basal transcription, stabilized existing mRNA, and blocked progestin induction of fatty acid synthetase, demonstrating that the effect was PR-mediated. Fatty acid synthetase catalyzes the conversion of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into fatty acid, and its induction in breast cancer cells is accompanied by increased lipid synthesis and the accumulation of lipid droplets (183). The enzyme is postulated to be a marker of differentiation and progestin responsiveness in breast cancer (184). As in the case of alkaline phosphatase, the clinical significance of fatty acid synthetase expression in breast cancer remains to be demonstrated. Studies have revealed that fatty acid synthetase mRNA levels in breast cancer tissues, measured by in situ hybridization, are not correlated to ER or PR levels or to node involvement. However, the enzyme may act as a marker of proliferation in benign mastopathies, since its expression is higher in cysts and lobules than in ducts (184).
E. Progesterone effects on lactation
In the normal breast, progesterone acts synergistically with
estrogen and PRL during pregnancy to prepare for lactation by promoting
lobuloalveolar development (185). Progesterone also acts as an anti-PRL
by preventing the synthesis of milk proteins in mid- to late pregnancy
(7) and by inhibiting PRL secretion in women expressing abnormally high
circulating PRL (186). In pseudopregnant rabbits, progesterone
antagonizes PRL induction of PRL receptors (140). A sudden fall in
circulating progesterone accompanies parturition and is associated with
a concurrent increase in PRL secretion and the onset of lactation.
-Lactalbumin, part of the lactose synthetase complex, is involved in
lactogenesis after parturition and is induced by PRL, insulin, and
glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoid induction of
-lactalbumin synthesis
is specifically blocked by progestins in midpregnant rat mammary gland
explants (187). The progesterone effect is seen at low concentrations,
suggesting that it is PR-mediated. Several putative
glucocorticoid/progesterone response elements have been identified in
the
-lactalbumin gene (188), and PR is postulated to compete with GR
for binding of these elements, resulting in antagonism of
glucocorticoid effects (187, 189). cAMP levels are increased by
progesterone during pregnancy and are also able to block hormonal
stimulation of
-lactalbumin (138). In the final days of pregnancy
and during lactation,
-lactalbumin synthesis increases significantly
and is insensitive to induction by glucocorticoids or suppression by
progestins (190). In the mouse, the lack of effect of progesterone on
-lactalbumin during lactation is attributed to a specific
suppression of PR expression, which is refractory to stimulation by
exogenous estrogen (191). However, this does not explain the observed
loss of
-lactalbumin suppression during late pregnancy, when PR
remains high (190). Another major milk protein, ß-casein, is also
under progesterone control. ß-Casein mRNA expression is blocked by
progesterone during pregnancy (192), presumably through the binding of
pregnancy-specific factors to the casein gene promoter (193). This
repressor effect is lost upon parturition, and ß-casein mRNA
expression is greatly increased during lactation.
In summary, studies of the physiological actions of progesterone in the
breast have been focused primarily on the roles of this hormone in cell
proliferation and milk protein regulation (Table 1
). While the
involvement of progesterone in the regulation of some milk protein
genes has been defined and there are data in vitro
describing genes likely to be implicated in control of cell
proliferation, on the whole the molecular action of progesterone
in vivo in the breast is poorly understood, there are few
experimental models of normal breast physiology available, and genes
that are direct targets of progesterone action have not been described
in the normal breast in vivo.
| VI. Progesterone Effects in the Brain |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanisms by which progesterone acts in the brain are not fully
defined; however, progesterone is known to affect the expression of a
number of proteins. Progesterone stimulates
-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) signaling pathways in specific areas of the brain.
Progesterone-mediated increases in GABAA receptor binding
sites in a number of regions of the brain, including some areas where
PR expression is low or absent, are postulated to contribute to
stimulation of lordosis behavior in rats and hamsters, suppression of
aggressive behavior, and induction of the release of GnRH (200, 201, 202).
Part of this effect may be mediated by direct interaction between
5
-reduced progesterone metabolites and GABAA receptor
complexes in PR-negative regions of the brain (Refs. 202 and 203 and
references therein) as well as by PR in areas such as the hypothalamus.
Sequential estrogen and progesterone treatment, but not estrogen alone,
potentiates oxytocin induction of norepinephrine release from the
ventromedial hypothalamus (204), which in turn mediates
hormone-dependent sexual behavior via noradrenergic projections.
Progesterone and estrogen may also regulate behavior by affecting
synthesis of POMC, the precursor of ß-endorphin, in the ventromedial
hypothalamus; estrogen down-regulates the synthesis of this peptide,
and preliminary data suggest that progesterone prevents this
down-regulation (205). ß-Endorphin decreases pituitary secretion of
LH and FSH. Adenylate cyclase activity and cAMP levels are rapidly
increased (206) and serotonin turnover is down-regulated (207) by
progesterone in the ventromedial hypothalamus-preoptic area in rats,
and both are implicated in increased sexual receptivity.
Progesterone also affects gene expression in areas of the brain not involved in sexual behavior. PR is detectable in the cortex, hypothalamus, and pituitary within the first few days of postnatal life in rats and in the cortex may play a role in early learning patterns (63). Furthermore, progesterone treatment increases ß-adrenergic receptors in the rat cortex, postulated to be involved in modulation of emotional activity (208). A recent report suggested that the rat PR isoforms have different functions in different areas of the brain. The study found that PR A is more highly expressed in the hypothalamus-preoptic area, whereas PR B predominates in the cortex (209). Rat PR A and B have been demonstrated in vitro to be differently inducible by estrogen (210, 211), suggesting that hormone regulation of PR expression may differ between the hypothalamus and cortex.
In summary, progesterone regulates signals in the brain involving sexually responsive behavior. The most well defined aspect of progesterone effects on this process are PR-mediated effects in the hypothalamus and preoptic area. Progesterone effects in the brain may also be mediated by nonclassic mechanisms of action such as direct interaction of progesterone metabolites with other receptors, such as GABAA receptors. Furthermore, the relative expression of PR A and B may be important in determining progesterone effects in specific sites in the brain.
| VII. Progesterone Effects on Bone |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Progesterone may have a role in bone matrix regulation, via its effect on metalloproteinases. As mentioned earlier, progestins regulate proteinase activity in the uterus, suppressing expression of stromelysins in endometrial stromal cells and inducing TGFß, resulting in down-regulation of matrilysin expression in the endometrial epithelium component of stromal-epithelial cocultures (88, 89). The demonstration that a sequence contained in the 5'-flanking region of the mouse gene encoding the bone matrix protein, osteonectin, can act as a PRE in vitro suggests that progestins may also regulate this protein in vivo (215).
It has been suggested that progesterone regulation of bone remodeling may also be indirectly facilitated by the ability of progesterone to act as a ligand for the glucocorticoid receptor. Glucocorticoids have been implicated in the process of bone loss through their ability to block 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D-induced osteocalcin synthesis (216) and to prevent attachment of osteoblasts to matrix proteins, including osteonectin, possibly through down-regulation of ß1-integrin and other cell surface attachment factors (217). Glucocorticoids also increase bone sialoprotein mRNA levels in rat osteosarcoma cells, an effect that can be blocked by 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D and has been postulated to contribute to acceleration in maturation of preosteoblasts and ultimately to contribute to bone loss (218). Progesterone has been postulated to antagonize glucocorticoid-mediated effects in bone, resulting in abrogation of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss (219).
In summary, although the data are preliminary at this stage, progesterone appears to modulate bone remodeling, resulting in protection against bone loss. This effect appears to be mediated by PR expression in osteoblasts, as well as through binding to glucocorticoid receptor and perhaps reducing the influence of glucocorticoids.
| VIII. Antiestrogen Action of Progesterone |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Inhibition of ER expression
The mechanism of progesterone action on ER was initially
elucidated in the mammalian uterus. Uterine ER levels were decreased by
administration of progesterone to estrogen-treated rats (220).
Progesterone also antagonized estrogen induction of ER in the rat
myometrium and in whole rat uterus (221, 222). Furthermore,
administration of a synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate,
to women undergoing curettage during the follicular phase of the
menstrual cycle resulted in decreased endometrial ER levels (223). A
decrease in ER in hamster decidual cells, due to progesterone-mediated
shortening of the ER protein half-life, suggested direct
destabilization of ER by progestins (224). The progesterone-mediated
decrease in ER protein has been shown more recently in breast cancer
cells to result from decreased cellular ER mRNA levels (225), likely to
reflect decreased transcription of the ER gene, since the effect was
seen rapidly without shortening of the ER mRNA half-life (226).
B. Progesterone inhibition of the molecular action of ER
As well as directly reducing ER concentration, progesterone
opposes ER-mediated gene-regulatory events, although the molecular
mechanisms of this antagonism are not clear. In terms of this effect,
the best defined model is the regulation of PR itself. Progestins
inhibit and estrogens stimulate rabbit PR gene expression through the
same region in the rabbit PR promoter (29), although this effect is
mediated without binding of PR to this region, suggesting that PR may
sequester transcription factors that are essential for estrogen action
(227). By contrast, progesterone and estrogen effects on human PR
appear to be distinct, since estrogen primarily regulates the PR B
promoter (45), whereas progestins regulate both PR isoforms in breast
cancer cells.
Other recent demonstrations that PR can inhibit transcriptional activation by ER of estrogen-responsive promoters without binding to DNA support the view that PR may act by sequestering transcription factors required for ER activity (36, 37, 228, 229). However, the repressive effects of progesterone appear to be promoter- and cell-specific, and there is considerable variability between reports. McDonnell and Goldman (36) reported that PR A but not PR B, in the presence of either progesterone or antiprogestins, lessened the ability of estrogen to induce an estrogen-responsive reporter when the two constructs were transfected into CV-1 or HS578T cells, but not HepG2 cells. PR A had similar antiestrogenic effects on endogenous ER activation of a minimal estrogen-responsive reporter in MCF-7 breast cancer cells in the presence of RU 38486 (37). However, when the estrogen-responsive region of the pS2 gene was used as a reporter in MCF-7 cells, PR B and not PR A repressed activation of the reporter by estrogen (229). The reason for this variability is not yet known, but it is possible that specific accessory proteins involved in transcriptional activation by ER and PR differ between cell types or are expressed at different concentrations, resulting in variable effects. PR A has been demonstrated to have similar repressive effects on other members of the nuclear receptor family, including those for androgens, mineralocorticoids, and glucocorticoids (35, 36, 37), although the physiological significance of this observation remains to be determined.
| IX. Summary and Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The molecular mechanisms of progesterone action have been described only for a small number of well defined target genes, examples being the uteroglobin and ovalbumin genes, which have been studied in detail. However, progesterone is clearly involved in the regulation of a considerable number of genes about which little is known. Furthermore, the distinction between direct and indirect targets of progesterone action in cellular processes is largely yet to be made. By separating gene-regulatory events, which are central to the physiological effects of progesterone, from the secondary consequences of progesterone action, it may be possible to define the determinants of response to progesterone in normal and malignant cells.
| X. Future Directions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
More information is needed on the significance of PR A and PR B expression. While PR involvement in regulating a host of physiological events has been described, there is little known of the individual roles of the PR proteins PR A and PR B in mediating these effects. While in vitro work suggests that these proteins have different functions and that PR A may be a repressor of PR B in particular, and more generally of other members of the nuclear receptor family, there are no data on the relative activities of PR A and B in vivo. Furthermore, it is not known whether PR A and B are expressed in all target tissues, and within target tissues whether cells express one or both of these proteins. The relative expression of the two PR proteins has not been examined to date in most tissues of the reproductive system. Addressing these questions, which rely on single cell analysis, poses significant technical challenges that will necessitate continued development and refinement of immunohistochemical, in situ, and other methodologies.
The mechanism of PR action may also depend on an array of other proteins, such as the recently described nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Nuclear receptors interact with coregulatory proteins, which may function as intermediates in transcription (230). If they play a role in the transcriptional activity of PR, it is likely that they will be expressed in progesterone target tissues, although this has yet to be described. The role of coregulatory proteins in progesterone action needs further investigation to clarify whether progesterone regulates coregulatory protein expression and whether tissue levels of coregulatory proteins play a role in modulation of progesterone action.
Progesterone has both proliferative and differentiating actions, and identification of genes whose transcription is directly modulated by progesterone is an essential first step in understanding progesterone effects on these complex processes. The number of described genes that are directly modulated by progesterone is small, and many of the effects of progesterone described in this review are likely to be indirect consequences of the action of as yet undescribed gene products. New information on genes directly regulated by progesterone is urgently required, and techniques such as differential display PCR and similar approaches by which to identify progesterone-regulated transcripts, despite their limitations, are likely to yield important new knowledge in the near future.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research
Council (NHMRC) of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, and
the Westmead Hospital Research Institute. J. D. Graham was an
NHMRC Dora Lush Biomedical Research Scholar and is now an NHMRC C.
J. Martin Fellow. ![]()
2 Present address: Division of Endocrinology, University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center, Campus Box B151, 4200 East Ninth Avenue,
Denver, Colorado 80262. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-dihydroprogesterone binding, and
nuclear receptors. J Steroid Biochem 9:419427[CrossRef][Medline]
, epidermal
growth factor receptor, c-fos, and c-myc genes.
Mol Cell Biol 11:50325043
and transforming growth factor ß
messenger ribonucleic acid abundance in T-47D human breast cancer
cells. Mol Endocrinol 3:611617
-lactalbumin synthesis and
secretion. J Steroid Biochem 23:901905[CrossRef][Medline]
-lactalbumin and chicken lysozyme genes.
Nature 308:377380[CrossRef][Medline]
-Lactalbumin production by rat mammary gland: prepartum emergence of
resistance to glucocorticoids and progestins. Mol Cell Endocrinol 58:183189[CrossRef][Medline]
-aminobutyric acid) receptor
activity. Eur J Pharmacol 103:165168[CrossRef][Medline]
-aminobutyric acid type A receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:37693773This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. X. Chen, J. Bogerd, A. Garcia-Lopez, H. de Jonge, P. P. de Waal, W. S. Hong, and R. W. Schulz Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of a Zebrafish Nuclear Progesterone Receptor Biol Reprod, January 1, 2010; 82(1): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Hanna, S. C.J. Daly, Y. Pang, I. Anglade, O. Kah, P. Thomas, and Y. Zhu Characterization and Expression of the Nuclear Progestin Receptor in Zebrafish Gonads and Brain Biol Reprod, January 1, 2010; 82(1): 112 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Guo, X. O. Zhu, X. T. Ni, Z. Yang, L. Myatt, and K. Sun Expression of Progesterone Receptor A form and Its Role in the Interaction of Progesterone with Cortisol on Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Amnionic Fibroblasts J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2009; 94(12): 5085 - 5092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. DEL PILAR CARRERA, M. J. RAMIREZ-EXPOSITO, M. J. GARCIA, M. D. MAYAS, and J. M. MARTINEZ-MARTOS Ovarian Renin--Angiotensin System-regulating Aminopeptidases Are Involved in Progesterone Overproduction in Rats with Mammary Tumours Induced by N-Methyl Nitrosourea Anticancer Res, November 1, 2009; 29(11): 4633 - 4637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Maria, S. Divari, M. Goria, E. Bollo, F. T. Cannizzo, M. Olivero, G. Barbarino, and B. Biolatti 17{beta}-oestradiol-induced gene expression in cattle prostate: biomarkers to detect illegal use of growth promoters Vet Rec., April 11, 2009; 164(15): 459 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Fleisch, Y.C. Chou, R. D. Cardiff, A. Asaithambi, and G. Shyamala Overexpression of progesterone receptor A isoform in mice leads to endometrial hyperproliferation, hyperplasia and atypia Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 15(4): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. MOE, A. B. VEREIDE, A. ORBO, and G. SAGER High Concentrations of Progesterone and Mifepristone Mutually Reinforce Cell Cycle Retardation and Induction of Apoptosis Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1053 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Friberg and A. Wolk Long-term Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Endometrial Cancer Incidence: A Prospective Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 355 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Magklara and C. L. Smith A Composite Intronic Element Directs Dynamic Binding of the Progesterone Receptor and GATA-2 Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 23(1): 61 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gellersen, M.S. Fernandes, and J.J. Brosens Non-genomic progesterone actions in female reproduction Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 119 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Aghajanova, A. Hamilton, J. Kwintkiewicz, K.C. Vo, and L.C. Giudice Steroidogenic Enzyme and Key Decidualization Marker Dysregulation in Endometrial Stromal Cells from Women with Versus Without Endometriosis Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 105 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buse, M. Zoller, and E. Van Esch The Macaque Ovary, with Special Reference to the Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Toxicol Pathol, December 1, 2008; 36(7_suppl): 24S - 66S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Samalecos and B. Gellersen Systematic Expression Analysis and Antibody Screening Do Not Support the Existence of Naturally Occurring Progesterone Receptor (PR)-C, PR-M, or Other Truncated PR Isoforms Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5872 - 5887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Peiro, M. Merchan, M. A. Santacreu, M. J. Argente, M. L. Garcia, J. M. Folch, and A. Blasco Identification of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Progesterone Receptor Gene and Its Association With Reproductive Traits in Rabbits Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1699 - 1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Shynlova, P. Tsui, A. Dorogin, and S. J. Lye Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (CCL-2) Integrates Mechanical and Endocrine Signals That Mediate Term and Preterm Labor J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1470 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. de Cremoux, D. Rosenberg, J. Goussard, C. Bremont-Weil, F. Tissier, C. Tran-Perennou, L. Groussin, X. Bertagna, J. Bertherat, and M.-L. Raffin-Sanson Expression of progesterone and estradiol receptors in normal adrenal cortex, adrenocortical tumors, and primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2008; 15(2): 465 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Horwitz, W. W. Dye, J. C. Harrell, P. Kabos, and C. A. Sartorius Rare steroid receptor-negative basal-like tumorigenic cells in luminal subtype human breast cancer xenografts PNAS, April 15, 2008; 105(15): 5774 - 5779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Goodwin, S. J. Green, C. M. Moinpour, J. D. Bearden III, J. K. Giguere, C. S. Jiang, S. M. Lippman, S. Martino, and K. S. Albain Phase III Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Two Doses of Megestrol Acetate as Treatment for Menopausal Symptoms in Women With Breast Cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study 9626 J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1650 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Lulu Fu, J. E. Girling, and P. A. W. Rogers Expression of Fox Head Protein 1 in Human Eutopic Endometrium and Endometriosis Reproductive Sciences, March 1, 2008; 15(3): 243 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Yoshimura, T Sumida, S Liu, A Onishi, S Shintani, P-Y Desprez, and H Hamakawa Growth inhibition of human salivary gland tumor cells by introduction of progesterone (Pg) receptor and Pg treatment Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 1107 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hiremath, J. P. Lydon, and P. Cowin The pattern of {beta}-catenin responsiveness within the mammary gland is regulated by progesterone receptor Development, October 15, 2007; 134(20): 3703 - 3712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Birrell, L. M. Butler, J. M. Harris, G. Buchanan, and W. D. Tilley Disruption of androgen receptor signaling by synthetic progestins may increase risk of developing breast cancer FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2285 - 2293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A Wood, J. E Fata, K. L M Watson, and R. Khokha Circulating hormones and estrous stage predict cellular and stromal remodeling in murine uterus Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1035 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Madauss, E. T. Grygielko, S.-J. Deng, A. C. Sulpizio, T. B. Stanley, C. Wu, S. A. Short, S. K. Thompson, E. L. Stewart, N. J. Laping, et al. A Structural and in Vitro Characterization of Asoprisnil: A Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 21(5): 1066 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shatnawi, T. Tran, and M. Ratnam R5020 and RU486 Act as Progesterone Receptor Agonists to Enhance Sp1/Sp4-Dependent Gene Transcription by an Indirect Mechanism Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2007; 21(3): 635 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Friberg, C. S. Mantzoros, and A. Wolk Diabetes and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 276 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhou, N. Deeb, C. M. Evock-Clover, A. D. Mitchell, C. M. Ashwell, and S. J. Lamont Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis to Identify Chromosomal Regions Affecting Phenotypic Traits in the Chicken. III. Skeletal Integrity Poult. Sci., February 1, 2007; 86(2): 255 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Faivre and C. A. Lange Progesterone Receptors Upregulate Wnt-1 To Induce Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation and c-Src-Dependent Sustained Activation of Erk1/2 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Breast Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2007; 27(2): 466 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, J. D. Graham, A. R. Hanson, P. A. Mote, A. Gompel, L. L. Scurr, N. Gava, A. de Fazio, and C. L. Clarke Focal Subnuclear Distribution of Progesterone Receptor Is Ligand Dependent and Associated with Transcriptional Activity Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 21(1): 14 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Marriott, K. R. McGann-Gramling, B. Hauss-Wegrzyniak, L. C. Sheldahl, R. A. Shapiro, D. M. Dorsa, and G. L. Wenk Brain Infusion of Lipopolysaccharide Increases Uterine Growth as a Function of Estrogen Replacement Regimen: Suppression of Uterine Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} by Constant, But Not Pulsed, Estrogen Replacement Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 232 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krietsch, M. S. Fernandes, J. Kero, R. Losel, M. Heyens, E. W.-F. Lam, I. Huhtaniemi, J. J. Brosens, and B. Gellersen Human Homologs of the Putative G Protein-Coupled Membrane Progestin Receptors (mPR{alpha}, {beta}, and {gamma}) Localize to the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Are Not Activated by Progesterone Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3146 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Mote, R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, N. Gava, A. deFazio, B. Mulac-Jericevic, O. M. Conneely, and C. L. Clarke Overlapping and Distinct Expression of Progesterone Receptors A and B in Mouse Uterus and Mammary Gland during the Estrous Cycle Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5503 - 5512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Friberg, C. S. Mantzoros, and A. Wolk Physical Activity and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2136 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Gizard, R. Robillard, B. Gross, O. Barbier, F. Revillion, J.-P. Peyrat, G. Torpier, D. W. Hum, and B. Staels TReP-132 Is a Novel Progesterone Receptor Coactivator Required for the Inhibition of Breast Cancer Cell Growth and Enhancement of Differentiation by Progesterone Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2006; 26(20): 7632 - 7644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-m. Yie, R. Xiao, and C. L. Librach Progesterone regulates HLA-G gene expression through a novel progesterone response element Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2538 - 2544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shao, E. Egecioglu, B. Weijdegard, K. Ljungstrom, C. Ling, J. Fernandez-Rodriguez, and H. Billig Developmental and hormonal regulation of progesterone receptor A-form expression in female mouse lung in vivo: interaction with glucocorticoid receptors. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 857 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Pei, C. G Bellows, Y. Jia, and J. N M Heersche Effect of age on progesterone receptor expression, and osteoprogenitor proliferation and differentiation in female rat vertebral cell populations. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 190(2): 261 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shao, B. Weijdegard, K. Ljungstrom, A. Friberg, C. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Fernandez-Rodriguez, E. Egecioglu, E. Rung, et al. Nuclear progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in mouse fallopian tube and uterus: implications for expression, regulation, and cellular function Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2006; 291(1): E59 - E72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Doring, O. Shynlova, P. Tsui, D. Eckardt, U. Janssen-Bienhold, F. Hofmann, S. Feil, R. Feil, S. J. Lye, and K. Willecke Ablation of connexin43 in uterine smooth muscle cells of the mouse causes delayed parturition J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2006; 119(9): 1715 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Shi, K. Y. Arai, W. Jin, Q. Weng, G. Watanabe, A. K. Suzuki, and K. Taya Expression of Nerve Growth Factor and Its Receptors NTRK1 and TNFRSF1B Is Regulated by Estrogen and Progesterone in the Uteri of Golden Hamsters Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 850 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Taylor, P. C. McParland, D. J. Taylor, and S. C. Bell The Progesterone Receptor in Human Term Amniochorion and Placenta Is Isoform C Endocrinology, February 1, 2006; 147(2): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Sartorius, D. M.E. Harvell, T. Shen, and K. B. Horwitz Progestins Initiate a Luminal to Myoepithelial Switch in Estrogen-Dependent Human Breast Tumors without Altering Growth Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9779 - 9788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Graham, M. L. Yager, H. D. Hill, K. Byth, G. M. O'Neill, and C. L. Clarke Altered Progesterone Receptor Isoform Expression Remodels Progestin Responsiveness of Breast Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 19(11): 2713 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Lee and O. D. Sherwood The Effects of Blocking the Actions of Estrogen and Progesterone on the Rates of Proliferation and Apoptosis of Cervical Epithelial and Stromal Cells During the Second Half of Pregnancy in Rats Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 790 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J. Kim, O.L. Buzzio, S. Li, and Z. Lu Role of FOXO1A in the Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 in Human Endometrial Cells: Interaction with Progesterone Receptor Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 833 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A.R. Doi, M. Al-Zaid, P. A. Towers, C. J. Scott, and K. A.S. Al-Shoumer Irregular cycles and steroid hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2402 - 2408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W C. Duncan, E. Gay, and J. A Maybin The effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin on the expression of progesterone receptors in human luteal cells in vivo and in vitro Reproduction, July 1, 2005; 130(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakamoto, H. Okada, T. Nakajima, A. Ikuta, K. Yasuda, and H. Kanzaki Progesterone induces the fibulin-1 expression in human endometrial stromal cells Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1447 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fritah, C. Saucier, J. Mester, G. Redeuilh, and M. Sabbah p21WAF1/CIP1 Selectively Controls the Transcriptional Activity of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2419 - 2430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Sukjumlong, A-M Dalin, L Sahlin, and E Persson Immunohistochemical studies on the progesterone receptor (PR) in the sow uterus during the oestrous cycle and in inseminated sows at oestrus and early pregnancy Reproduction, March 1, 2005; 129(3): 349 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kato, M. Pinto, A. Carvajal, N. Espinoza, C. Monso, A. Sadarangani, M. Villalon, J. J. Brosens, J. O. White, J. K. Richer, et al. Progesterone Increases Tissue Factor Gene Expression, Procoagulant Activity, and Invasion in the Breast Cancer Cell Line ZR-75-1 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1181 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cheng, Y. Li, Y. Omoto, Y. Wang, T. Berg, M. Nord, P. Vihko, M. Warner, Y.-S. Piao, and J.-A. Gustafsson Differential Regulation of Estrogen Receptor (ER){alpha} and ER{beta} in Primate Mammary Gland J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 435 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dai, L. Albitar, T. Nguyen, L. L. Laidler, M. Singh, and K. K. Leslie A therapeutic model for advanced endometrial cancer: Systemic progestin in combination with local adenoviral-mediated progesterone receptor expression Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2005; 4(1): 169 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ashby and J. Odum Gene Expression Changes in the Immature Rat Uterus: Effects of Uterotrophic and Sub-Uterotrophic Doses of Bisphenol A Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2004; 82(2): 458 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sumida, Y. Itahana, H. Hamakawa, and P.-Y. Desprez Reduction of Human Metastatic Breast Cancer Cell Aggressiveness on Introduction of Either Form A or B of the Progesterone Receptor and Then Treatment with Progestins Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 7886 - 7892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Ji, C. Aoyama, Y.-D. Nien, P. I. Liu, P. K. Chen, L. Chang, F. Z. Stanczyk, and A. Stolz Selective Loss of AKR1C1 and AKR1C2 in Breast Cancer and Their Potential Effect on Progesterone Signaling Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7610 - 7617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rylander-Rudqvist, S. Wedren, G. Jonasdottir, S. Ahlberg, E. Weiderpass, I. Persson, and M. Ingelman-Sundberg Cytochrome P450 1B1 Gene Polymorphisms and Postmenopausal Endometrial Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2004; 13(9): 1515 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gava, C. L. Clarke, K. Byth, R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, and A. deFazio Expression of Progesterone Receptors A and B in the Mouse Ovary during the Estrous Cycle Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3487 - 3494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Somboonporn and S. R. Davis Testosterone Effects on the Breast: Implications for Testosterone Therapy for Women Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 374 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Blois, R. Joachim, J. Kandil, R. Margni, M. Tometten, B. F. Klapp, and P. C. Arck Depletion of CD8+ Cells Abolishes the Pregnancy Protective Effect of Progesterone Substitution with Dydrogesterone in Mice by Altering the Th1/Th2 Cytokine Profile J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 5893 - 5899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Gonzalez-Flores, C. Guerra-Araiza, M. Cerbon, I. Camacho-Arroyo, and A. M. Etgen The 26S Proteasome Participates in the Sequential Inhibition of Estrous Behavior Induced by Progesterone in Rats Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2328 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Shynlova, J. A. Mitchell, A. Tsampalieros, B. L. Langille, and S. J. Lye Progesterone and Gravidity Differentially Regulate Expression of Extracellular Matrix Components in the Pregnant Rat Myometrium Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 986 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cheng, Z. Weihua, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Inaugural Article: Estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ER{beta} in proliferation in the rodent mammary gland PNAS, March 16, 2004; 101(11): 3739 - 3746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, A. deFazio, P. A. Mote, and C. L. Clarke Subnuclear Distribution of Progesterone Receptors A and B in Normal and Malignant Endometrium J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1429 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. L. Leo, C. Guo, C. T. Woon, S. E. Aw, and V. C. L. Lin Glucocorticoid and Mineralocorticoid Cross-Talk with Progesterone Receptor to Induce Focal Adhesion and Growth Inhibition in Breast Cancer Cells Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1314 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Sereepapong, P. Chotnopparatpattara, S. Taneepanichskul, R. Markham, P. Russell, and I. S. Fraser Endometrial progesterone and estrogen receptors and bleeding disturbances in depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shao, F.-P. Zhang, E. Rung, J. J. Palvimo, I. Huhtaniemi, and H. Billig Inhibition of Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier-1 Expression by Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Stimulation is Linked to Induction of Progesterone Receptor during Ovulation in Mouse Granulosa Cells Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 384 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Thackray, D. O. Toft, and S. K. Nordeen Novel Activation Step Required for Transcriptional Competence of Progesterone Receptor on Chromatin Templates Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2003; 17(12): 2543 - 2553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. L. Lin, C. T. Woon, S. E. Aw, and C. Guo Distinct Molecular Pathways Mediate Progesterone-Induced Growth Inhibition And Focal Adhesion Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5650 - 5657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fahnenstich, A. Nandy, K. Milde-Langosch, T. Schneider-Merck, N. Walther, and B. Gellersen Promyelocytic leukaemia zinc finger protein (PLZF) is a glucocorticoid- and progesterone-induced transcription factor in human endometrial stromal cells and myometrial smooth muscle cells Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 9(10): 611 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mulac-Jericevic, J. P. Lydon, F. J. DeMayo, and O. M. Conneely Defective mammary gland morphogenesis in mice lacking the progesterone receptor B isoform PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9744 - 9749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Crescioli, M. Maggi, G. B. Vannelli, P. Ferruzzi, S. Granchi, R. Mancina, M. Muratori, G. Forti, M. Serio, and M. Luconi Expression of Functional Estrogen Receptors in Human Fetal Male External Genitalia J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1815 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui, P. Zhang, W. Deng, S. Oesterreich, Y. Lu, G. B. Mills, and A. V. Lee Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Inhibits Progesterone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer Cells via the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway: Progesterone Receptor as a Potential Indicator of Growth Factor Activity in Breast Cancer Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2003; 17(4): 575 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shao, E. Markstrom, P. A. Friberg, M. Johansson, and H. Billig Expression of Progesterone Receptor (PR) A and B Isoforms in Mouse Granulosa Cells: Stage-Dependent PR-Mediated Regulation of Apoptosis and Cell Proliferation Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Baird, C. R. Weinberg, D. R. McConnaughey, and A. J. Wilcox Rescue of the Corpus Luteum in Human Pregnancy Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 448 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wan and S. K. Nordeen Overlapping but Distinct Profiles of Gene Expression Elicited by Glucocorticoids and Progestins Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2003; 58(1): 199 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Smid-Koopman, L. J. Blok, L. C. M. Kuhne,, C. W. Burger, T. J. M. Helmerhorst, A. O. Brinkman, and F. J. Huikeshoven Distinct Functional Differences of Human Progesterone Receptors A and B on Gene Expression and Growth Regulation in Two Endometrial Carcinoma Cell Lines Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2003; 10(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Ahola, T. Manninen, N. Alkio, and T. Ylikomi G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 Is Critical for a Progestin-Induced Growth Inhibition in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Endocrinology, September 1, 2002; 143(9): 3376 - 3384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Newcomb, L. Titus-Ernstoff, K. M. Egan, A. Trentham-Dietz, J. A. Baron, B. E. Storer, W. C. Willett, and M. J. Stampfer Postmenopausal Estrogen and Progestin Use in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2002; 11(7): 593 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wan and S. K. Nordeen Overlapping but Distinct Gene Regulation Profiles by Glucocorticoids and Progestins in Human Breast Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2002; 16(6): 1204 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Spurdle, J. L. Hopper, X. Chen, M. R. E. McCredie, G. G. Giles, D. J. Venter, M. C. Southey, and G. Chenevix-Trench The Progesterone Receptor Exon 4 Val660Leu G/T Polymorphism and Risk of Breast Cancer in Australian Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2002; 11(5): 439 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.L. Swan, M.C. Agostini, P.M. Bartlewski, V. Feyles, R.J. Urban, and P.J. Chedrese Effects of Progestins on Progesterone Synthesis in a Stable Porcine Granulosa Cell Line: Control of Transcriptional Activity of the Cytochrome P450 Side-Chain Cleavage Gene Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Chen, N. S. Weiss, P. Newcomb, W. Barlow, and E. White Hormone Replacement Therapy in Relation to Breast Cancer JAMA, February 13, 2002; 287(6): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dai, D. M. Wolf, E. S. Litman, M. J. White, and K. K. Leslie Progesterone Inhibits Human Endometrial Cancer Cell Growth and Invasiveness: Down-Regulation of Cellular Adhesion Molecules through Progesterone B Receptors Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(3): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rodriguez-Sallaberry, F. A. Simmen, and R. C.M. Simmen Polyamine- and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I-Mediated Proliferation of Porcine Uterine Endometrial Cells: A Potential Role for Spermidine/Spermine N1-Acetyltransferase During Peri-Implantation Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Arnett-Mansfield, A. deFazio, G. V. Wain, R. C. Jaworski, K. Byth, P. A. Mote, and C. L. Clarke Relative Expression of Progesterone Receptors A and B in Endometrioid Cancers of the Endometrium Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 61(11): 4576 - 4582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wan, K. K. Coxe, V. G. Thackray, P. R. Housley, and S. K. Nordeen Separable Features of the Ligand-Binding Domain Determine the Differential Subcellular Localization and Ligand-Binding Specificity of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2001; 15(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kurita, K.-j. Lee, P. T.K. Saunders, P. S. Cooke, J. A. Taylor, D. B. Lubahn, C. Zhao, S. Mäkelä, J.-A. Gustafsson, R. Dahiya, et al. Regulation of Progesterone Receptors and Decidualization in Uterine Stroma of the Estrogen Receptor-{{alpha}} Knockout Mouse Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 272 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mayerhofer, S. Fritz, R. Grünert, S. L. Sanders, D. M. Duffy, S. R. Ojeda, and R. L. Stouffer D1-Receptor, DARPP-32, and PP-1 in the Primate Corpus Luteum and Luteinized Granulosa Cells: Evidence for Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 by Dopamine and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4750 - 4757. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okada, T. Nakajima, M. Sanezumi, A. Ikuta, K. Yasuda, and H. Kanzaki Progesterone Enhances Interleukin-15 Production in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells in Vitro J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4765 - 4770. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Danilovich, P. S. Babu, W. Xing, M. Gerdes, H. Krishnamurthy, and M. R. Sairam Estrogen Deficiency, Obesity, and Skeletal Abnormalities in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Knockout (FORKO) Female Mice Endocrinology, November 1, 2000; 141(11): 4295 - 4308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Runic, F. Schatz, L. Wan, R. Demopoulos, G. Krikun, and C. J. Lockwood Effects of Norplant on Endometrial Tissue Factor Expression and Blood Vessel Structure J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2000; 85(10): 3853 - 3859. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Skinner, T. G. Harris, and N. P. Evans Duration and Amplitude of the Luteal Phase Progesterone Increment Times the Estradiol-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Ewes Biol Reprod, October 1, 2000; 63(4): 1135 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mulac-Jericevic, R. A. Mullinax, F. J. DeMayo, J. P. Lydon, and O. M. Conneely Subgroup of Reproductive Functions of Progesterone Mediated by Progesterone Receptor-B Isoform Science, September 8, 2000; 289(5485): 1751 - 1754. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Smith, R. G. Wolford, T. B. ONeill, and G. L. Hager Characterization of Transiently and Constitutively Expressed Progesterone Receptors: Evidence for Two Functional States Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2000; 14(7): 956 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. O'Connor, L. G. Davis, S. R. Frame, and J. C. Cook Evaluation of a Tier I Screening Battery for Detecting Endocrine-Active Compounds (EACs) Using the Positive Controls Testosterone, Coumestrol, Progesterone, and RU486 Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2000; 54(2): 338 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kurita, K.-j. Lee, P. S. Cooke, J. A. Taylor, D. B. Lubahn, and G. R. Cunha Paracrine Regulation of Epithelial Progesterone Receptor by Estradiol in the Mouse Female Reproductive Tract Biol Reprod, April 1, 2000; 62(4): 821 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. C.-L. Lin, E. H. Ng, S. E. Aw, M. G.-K. Tan, E. H.-L. Ng, and B. H. Bay Progesterone Induces Focal Adhesion in Breast Cancer Cells MDA-MB-231 Transfected with Progesterone Receptor Complementary DNA Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2000; 14(3): 348 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |