help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sealfon, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sealfon, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, R. P.
Endocrine Reviews 18 (2): 180-205
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society

Molecular Mechanisms of Ligand Interaction with the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor

Stuart C. Sealfon, Harel Weinstein and Robert P. Millar

Fishberg Research Center in Neurobiology (S.C.S.), Departments of Neurology (S.C.S.), Physiology and Biophysics (H.W.), and Pharmacology (H. W.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029; and Medical Research Council Regulatory Peptides Unit (R.P.M.), Departments of Chemical Pathology (R.P.M.) and Medicine (R.P.M.), University of Cape Town Medical School, Observatory 7925, South Africa


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 

I. Introduction
II. Amino Acid Sequences of GnRH Receptors
A. GnRH receptor cDNAs
B. General structural features
C. Covalent modifications
D. Gene structure
III. Structure-Activity Relations of GnRH Peptides
A. Overview
B. Comparative structures and activities of vertebrate GnRHs
C. Roles of individual amino acids in GnRH activity at the mammalian receptor
D. Conclusions from peptide structure-activity data
IV. Structure and Conformation of GnRH and Its Analogs
A. Early studies of GnRH conformation
B. Integrated computational and experimental studies
C. Exploration of the entire conformation space of GnRH analogs
V. Functional Structure of the Receptor and Ligand-Receptor Complex
A. Extracellular domains
B. Helix domains
C. Intracellular loop domains
D. Computational modeling of three-dimensional receptor structure
VI. Conclusions


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 

GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING hormone plays a central role in the biology of reproduction (1), and synthetic GnRH analogs have proven valuable in the treatment of a wide variety of endocrinological and nonendocrinological disorders (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). The decapeptide GnRH is generated in neurons of the medial basal hypothalamus through enzymatic processing of a larger precursor. Released in a pulsatile manner into the portal circulation, GnRH interacts with high-affinity receptors on the gonadotropes in the anterior pituitary, leading to the biosynthesis and release of the gonadotropins LH and FSH. The pulse-timing and concentration levels of GnRH are critical for the maintainence of gonadal steroidogenesis and for normal reproductive function.

Chronic, high concentration agonist stimulation of the pituitary GnRH receptors induce regulatory changes that lead to gonadal hypoactivity. This paradoxical suppression of gonadal function in response to pharmacological levels of agonist is the basis for the utility of GnRH analogs in the treatment of gonadal-steroid sensitive tumors, such as prostate cancer.

The GnRH receptor has been an unabatedly intense and productive subject of research for several decades because of its dual significance both for understanding reproductive biology and for developing medical therapies. The landmark elucidation of the primary sequence of GnRH by the laboratories of Schally (11) and Guillemin (12) inaugurated the field. Previous reviews have documented the subsequent evolution of research into GnRH and its receptors over the intervening decades. The complex regulation of the mammalian receptor, which is critical both for normal reproduction and for therapeutic response to analogs, has been studied in many species (reviewed in Refs. 13–15). The various signal transduction pathways used by the receptor have been investigated (reviewed in Refs. 15–20). Several thousand GnRH analogs have been synthesized and characterized (reviewed in Ref.21) and the amino acid and cDNA sequences for GnRHs have been determined from many vertebrates (reviewed in Refs. 22 and 23).

GnRH receptor clones have recently been isolated. These clones provide the tools and impetus for recent progress in studies of the structure-activity of the receptor-ligand complex (24). The availability of the primary amino acid sequences and cDNAs has made possible the study of the molecular mechanism of action of GnRH and its analogs through receptor mutagenesis and computational modeling of the receptor and peptide (e.g. see Refs. 51 and 174). Thus, the structure-activity of GnRH and its analogs can now begin to be placed in the context of the receptor itself. The present review aims to summarize such work on the structure-activity relations and computational modeling of GnRH analogs and of the receptor. Recent developments will be emphasized, with earlier studies presented in illustrative rather than comprehensive fashion.


    II. Amino Acid Sequences of GnRH Receptors
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 
A. GnRH receptor cDNAs
The cDNA sequence of the mouse GnRH receptor was the first determined. The receptor cDNA was cloned by three groups using the murine gonadotrope cell line, {alpha}T3–1 cells (25), as a source of RNA. Efficient heterologous expression of the mammalian GnRH receptor in oocytes using {alpha}T3–1 RNA suggested that this cell line would be a suitable source for cloning the receptor (26). The first clone was isolated using a PCR-based homology cloning strategy (27). Mouse GnRH receptor clones were also identified using Xenopus oocyte (28) and mammalian cell line (29) expression cloning. After the elucidation of the mouse receptor sequence, the homologous pituitary cDNAs were identified in five additional mammalian species and one nonmammalian vertebrate: human (30, 31), rat (29, 32, 33), sheep (34, 35), cow (36), pig (37), and catfish (38). An alignment of the cloned GnRH receptor sequences is shown in Fig. 1Go. The predicted amino acid sequence for the GnRH receptors is more than 85% conserved overall in the six mammalian species reported and is nearly identical within the putative transmembrane domains.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of cloned GnRH receptors. The putative transmembrane domains are indicated. m, Murine; r, rat; h, human; o, ovine; b, bovine; P, pig; cf, catfish. The helix boundaries were determined by sequence comparison, using the helix ends proposed by Donnelly et al. (233) for the human ß2-adrenergic receptor. The consensus sequence reflects the mammalian sequences only. The junctions between exons in the murine and human receptors are indicated by **.

 
The cow, sheep, and human receptors are 328 amino acids long, while the mouse and rat receptors are 327 amino acids, due to the absence of a residue in the second extracellular domain. According to the consensus-numbering scheme used in this review, this residue is Lys4.77(191) in the human receptor and Glu4.77(191) in the three receptors of ungulates cloned to date. (For a description of the consensus-numbering scheme used in this review, see Fig. 3Go or Ref. 39.) The catfish receptor is 370 amino acids in length and is notable for having a 49-amino acid cytoplasmic carboxy terminus domain not present in the mammalian receptors (38). GnRH receptor cDNAs were also isolated from human breast and ovarian tumors (40) and from rat gonads (41). The sequences obtained from these extrapituitary sources were identical to the pituitary GnRH receptor cDNAs of the corresponding species.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Helical net representation of the human GnRH receptor. The known glycosylation site is marked, and certain key functional residues are numbered. To allow for the generalization of findings in the GnRH receptor to other GPCRs, we utilize a consensus numbering scheme that has been described elsewhere (39) and is used in the NIH GPCR mutation database available via World Wide Web at http://mgddk1.niddk.nih.gov:8000/MutationAnalysis.html (237). In this system, the most conserved residue in a particular TMD (e.g. helix 3) is designated by the index 50. Thus the conserved Arg at the cytoplasmic side of helix 3 is numbered 3.50. The other residues are numbered in relation to the conserved residue. For example, the Lys in TMD 3 is denoted as Lys3.32(121). The reference residue in each helix is indicated by bold type.

 
B. General structural features
Analysis of the primary sequence identifies the GnRH receptor as a member of the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. Three distinct families of G protein-coupled receptors have been identified by molecular cloning. The three classes are: the metabotropic glutamate receptors (42, 43), the secretin-calcitonin-PTH class (44, 45, 46, 47, 48), and the large rhodopsin-like GPCR superfamily (49, 50), of which the GnRH receptor proved to be a member. Sequences of the members of the three classes of G-protein coupled receptors, when analyzed for hydrophobicity, all contain seven putative transmembrane domains (see Fig. 1Go). However, the three classes do not share any discernible sequence homology. Included within the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors are the opsins, G protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptors (adrenergic, serotonergic, dopaminergic, muscarinic acetylcholine, etc.), glycoprotein hormone receptors (FSH, LH/CG, and TSH), and a variety of peptide receptors (49, 50).

A given receptor can be identified as belonging to the rhodopsin-like GPCR family by the presence of certain amino acid motifs conserved within the transmembrane helix domains (TMD), a pattern of conservation that has also facilitated the cloning of a large number of these receptors (see Fig. 2Go). Variations in the pattern of conservation in the GnRH receptor in comparison with other rhodopsin-like GPCRs has proven valuable in elucidating the functional and structural roles of some of these side chains (51) (see Figs. 2Go, and 3Go and below).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Alignment of the TMD domains of the human GnRH receptor primary sequence with the human NK1 receptor (234), ß2 adrenergic receptor (235), and rhodopsin (236) sequences. Some residues conserved among most GPCRs are marked.

 
The identification of the GnRH receptor as a member of the GPCR superfamily is consistent with previous studies of guanyl-nucleotide modulation of binding and coupling, which suggested that the GnRH receptor interacts with a G protein (52, 53). Recent studies with {alpha}T3–1 cells have demonstrated that the G protein involved in coupling to phospholipase C in this cell line is pertussis-toxin insensitive, being Gq and/or G11 (54, 55).

A representation of the putative topology of the human GnRH receptor sequence is presented in Fig. 3Go. The receptor is composed of a single polypeptide chain. Hydrophobicity analysis of the receptor’s primary sequence confirms the presence of seven hydrophobic stretches corresponding to putative transmembrane helical domains, with an extracellular amino terminus and an intracellular carboxy terminus. Direct structural information is available for only two heptahelical membrane proteins. The structure of bacteriorhodopsin, which has little if any sequence similarity with the mammalian receptor proteins (see Ref.56), has been elucidated at 3.5 Å resolution by cryo-electron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals (57). Using the same approach, a 9-Å projection map of bovine rhodopsin, shown in Fig. 4Go (58), and a 6-Å projection map of frog rhodopsin (59) have been obtained. The maps of rhodopsin are consistent with the presence of seven transmembrane domains, as had been predicted from primary sequence analysis. The transmembrane domains of all GPCRs are believed to be {alpha}-helical and arranged around a hydrophilic core in a manner similar to the rhodopsin map (39).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Projection density map of bovine rhodopsin at 9 Å resolution. [Reprinted with permission from G. F. Schertler et al.: Nature 362:770–772, 1993 (58). ©1993 Macmillan Magazines, Limited]

 
Several features conserved among GPCRs are altered in the mammalian GnRH receptors. The mammalian GnRH receptor is the only rhodpsin-like GPCR identified to date that lacks the entire intracellular C-terminal domain. Also unique in the GnRH receptor is the presences of an Asn at the position of a conserved Asp residue in other GPCRs. The GnRH receptor also has unusual substitutions at loci that are highly conserved, such as the modification of the more common DRY sequence of the proximal second intracellular domain to DRS and the substitution of Asp for Asn in the TMD 7 consensus NPXXY motif. Notably, most of these unique features are not conserved in the nonmammalian catfish GnRH receptor sequence (see Fig. 1Go). Mutation of DRS to DRY in the mammalian receptor was reported to cause only a small increase in agonist affinity with no discernible change in signal transduction (60). The other unique features of the mammalian receptors seem to have functional significance and will be discussed below in light of recent experimental results.

C. Covalent modifications
1. Glycosylation. Most GPCRs have consensus glycosylation sites, and several receptors have been found to be glycosylated at these sites (61, 62, 63). Biochemical studies of the GnRH receptor have suggested that it is a sialic acid residue-containing glycoprotein (64, 65). The cow, sheep, pig, and human receptor sequences contain two potential sites for N-linked glycosylation (N-X-S/T), one in the amino terminus and one in the first extracellular domain (see Figs. 1Go and 3Go). The rodent species contain an additional potential glycosylation site in the amino terminus. The glycosylation at these sites of the mouse GnRH receptor was investigated by site-directed mutagenesis and photoaffinity labeling (66). Mutation of Asn1.01(4) or Asn1.15(18) in the N-terminal domain to Gln caused a lower apparent molecular weight in gel electrophoresis, whereas mutation of Asn2.65(102) in the putative first extracellular loop did not affect mobility. Whereas the ligand-binding affinities of the amino terminus domain mutants were unchanged, these receptors were expressed in transfected cells at a lower level than the wild type receptor. These results suggest that only the amino-terminal domain sites are glycosylated and that the glycosylation contributes to the level of receptor expression, consistent with earlier studies in which sialidase and tunicamycin were reported to decrease the level of receptor expression but not to alter affinity (65). The mutagenesis studies do not support an earlier suggestion, based on studying the effects of periodate on binding, that glycosylation contributes to high affinity binding (66). The receptor levels of glycosylation-deficient mutants show similar decreases in both membrane preparations and in whole cell assays (67). Thus, in contrast to the ß-adrenergic receptor, for which glycosylation is required for proper transport of the receptor to the cell surface (62), in the case of the GnRH receptor the observed decrease in receptor number does not appear to represent altered receptor transport.

The possibility that differential glycosylation contributes to the differing level of expression observed with transfection of the mouse and human receptor has been examined by introducing a second glycosylation site into the human receptor sequence, thereby recreating the pattern of sites found in the mouse. The second site was found to be glycosylated, and its presence increased the level of receptor expression (68). These studies indicate that the glycosylation of the GnRH receptor does not contribute to receptor affinity but does improve the level of receptor expression, possibly by decreasing the rate of receptor degradation.

2. Phosphorylation sites. Many intracellular serine and threonine residues are within phosphorylation consensus sequences, and phosphorylation could be involved in modulating receptor responsiveness or intracellular trafficking. While desensitization of the GnRH-induced responses in pituitary cells has been observed, it is not clear whether this occurs at the level of the receptor (for review see Refs. 13–15). Of note, however, a lack of rapid receptor-mediated desensitization of the GnRH receptor has been reported in {alpha}T3–1 cells and in transfected cells (69, 70, 71).

3. Disulfide bridges. Most GPCRs contain single conserved cysteines in the first and second extracellular loops that may form a disulfide bond to stabilize the structure of the functional protein. Mutation of these conserved cysteine residues disrupts the function of rhodopsin, muscarinic, ß-adrenergic, and TRH receptors, suggesting that this disulfide bond is required for proper receptor folding (72, 73, 74, 75, 76). Experiments using site-directed mutagenesis and photoaffinity cross-linking support the presence of two extracellular disulfide bridges in the GnRH receptor. The presence of a conserved cystine bridge between C3.25(114)-C5.23(196) was demonstrated in the mouse receptor, and evidence for a second disulfide bond between C1.11(14)-C5.27(200) has been obtained for the human receptor (J. Davidson, personal communication).

D. Gene structure
The chromosomal locations of the mouse, sheep, and human genes have been reported. The human gene was assigned to chromosome 4 by PCR analysis of somatic hybrid cell lines (77, 78) and to the 4q13.1–4q21.1 region using cell hybrid mapping panels (79). Using chromosomal in situ hybridization, three groups have reported the gene localization at band 4q13.2–13.3 (78, 80, 81) and one group at band 4q21.2 (82). Mapping the gene relative to 4q microsatellite markers in GnRH receptor YAC clones supports the 4q13.2–13.3 assignment (80). The mouse gene has also been mapped by linkage analysis to within 1.2 ± 1.2 centimorgans of the chromosome 5 marker Pmv-11 (79), and the sheep gene has been localized near the FecB locus of chromosome 6 (83).

The structures of the mouse and human GnRH receptor genes have been investigated. In contrast to the genes of many GPCRs, which are intronless and are believed to have arisen by retroposition (84), the GnRH receptor contains introns within the coding region. The mouse gene is composed of at least three exons spanning more than 22 kb (85). The open reading frame is distributed among the three exons, which encode amino acids 1–174, 175–247, and 248–327, respectively (see Fig. 1Go for location of exon junctions). Variant transcripts of the mouse receptor that are generated by alternative splicing and do not encode functional receptors have been isolated from {alpha}T3–1 cells (85). The alternative transcripts found all include exon 1 but lack either exon 2 or 3. The alternative transcripts form a minority of the cDNAs isolated from an {alpha}T3–1 cell library, and the biological function of the proteins encoded by these cDNAs is not known. The human gene is also distributed over three exons that span 18.9 kb (77, 86). The amino acid locations of introns 1 and 2 are homologous to their positions in the mouse receptor gene. Intron I is located between amino acids 174–175 in the putative TMD 4 domain, and intron 2 is located between amino acids 248–249. Exon 2 is three nucleotides longer in the human gene in comparison with the mouse, reflecting the presence of an additional amino acid (Lys4.77(191)) in the second extracellular loop of the human receptor (see Fig. 1Go). Southern blot analysis is consistent with the presence of a single gene in the mouse (85), rat (85), and human (77) genomes.

Fan et al. (86) have mapped the 5'- and 3'-flanking regions of the human receptor gene. Multiple initiation sites and multiple polyadenylation signals are present. Five consensus TATA sequences distributed over 669 bases are present in the 5'-flanking region. Primer extension analysis using human brain RNA indicates the utilization of several initiation sites. The longest extension was confirmed by PCR and represents a transcript with 1393 bp of 5'-untranslated sequence. A putative cAMP response element is found at -1490, a putative glucocorticoid/progesterone response element is located at -92, and consensus binding sites for several transcription factors are present. At the 3'-end of the gene, five polyadenylation signals are found, distributed over 800 bp. In the largest possible transcript, the 3'-untranslated sequence is 3.1 kb in length. Thus the exons of the human gene identified appear to account for the largest ~5-kb transcript identified on Northern blot analysis (31).

The 5'-flanking region of the mouse gene has been investigated by Albarracin and co-workers (87). In contrast to the human gene, the mouse gene appears to have a smaller 5'-untranslated segment. The major initiation site is found 62 bases upstream of the translation initiation site. Also in contrast to the human gene, the 5'-sequence of the mouse gene lacks TATA sequences. Preliminary studies on the regulation of a 1.2-kb fragment of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse gene have been reported (87).


    III. Structure-Activity Relations of GnRH Peptides
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Overview
A prerequisite for a meaningful investigation of ligand-receptor interactions is an understanding of the roles of ligand residues involved in receptor binding and in agonist activation of the receptor. This knowledge base for GnRH may be gleaned from the large number of structure-activity studies on synthetic GnRH analogs and on the 11 naturally occurring GnRH structural variants and their synthetic chimeras. The structural features of GnRH agonist and antagonist analogs were comprehensively reviewed a decade ago (21), and a number of more specialized reviews on antagonists and structural constraints have subsequently appeared (88, 89, 90, 91). The structure-activity relations of naturally occurring vertebrate GnRHs have been extensively reviewed (23, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99). However, these reviews do not attempt to specifically and systematically analyze the roles of each of the individual amino acids in GnRH. The comprehensive review of Karten and Rivier (21) addressed the substitutions that produced superactive agonists and antagonists, whereas the reviews on comparative activities of vertebrate GnRHs focused on the contributions of substitutions in positions 5, 7, and 8. In this section we shall attempt to synthesize these diverse sources of information into a more complete review of the roles of the constituent amino acids of GnRH.

Several thousand GnRH analogs have been synthesized to date, and information on their activities potentially provides a very large data base for the purpose of identifying functional residues in GnRH. However, interpretation is complicated by a number of factors:

1. Frequently, multiple substitutions have been incorporated simultaneously in single GnRH analogs, often without a systematic approach due to the large number of combinatorials involved.

2. Even the effects of single-amino acid substitutions may be difficult to interpret. A single substitution may alter affinity and agonist activity via modification of a side chain that interacts with the binding pocket and/or by altering the conformation of the peptide and thus affecting the presentation of other peptide moieties that interact with the receptor. Substitutions that have a conformational effect cannot be differentiated through structure-activity data alone from those that eliminate receptor contact sites. Any substitution may establish new contacts with the receptor and disturb the normal contacts by altering the families of conformations of the peptide. This difficulty in the interpretation of structure-activity data would be obviated by achieving a more complete understanding of the conformational effects of substitutions and by the analysis of ligand-receptor interactions in a structural context. Progress toward predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on peptide conformation is described in the next section, whereas the development of three-dimensional models of receptor molecules is discussed in Section V.

3. While substitutions of residues that produce antagonists may remove a contact interaction, they most likely establish new compensatory contact sites, presumably with different sites in the receptor, to retain high-affinity binding.

4. For much of the available data, the activities of analogs cannot be rigorously compared because they have been tested in different assay systems (see Ref. 100 for review). The most commonly employed assays have been in vivo bioassays (e.g. inhibition of ovulation) in which activity is a composite of pharmacokinetics of absorption from the injection site, association with lipophilic compartments (e.g. fat and cell membranes), binding to plasma proteins, degradation, metabolic clearance (including renal clearance), receptor binding affinity, and efficacy. Ideally, comparative data on binding affinity and signal transduction (e.g. second messenger generation) are required. However, as these data are available for relatively few analogs, in adjudging the effects of single-amino acid substitutions we have relied extensively on in vivo data, particularly from early studies. It has been necessary, therefore, to consider possible pharmacodynamic contributions to the activity of the analogs when making inferences about receptor binding and receptor activation based on data obtained from in vivo bioassays (see below).

Even the direct measure of analog affinity in receptor-binding assays may yield misleading results. These assays are usually conducted on membrane preparations (which expose all receptors), as opposed to whole cells, and employ conditions (buffers, pH, temperature, etc.) optimized to give maximal binding. These nonphysiological conditions may affect the binding of a substituted analog or mutated receptor differently than physiological conditions. The radiolabeled GnRH analogs used in binding assays mostly rely on incorporating 125I into Tyr5 of GnRH analogs that have a D-amino acid in position 6. This incorporation of the large electron-withdrawing iodine atom considerably alters the properties of the ligand. Since a large, bulky side chain is allowable when a D-amino acid substitutes for Gly6 in the superactive analogs (see below), we have attempted to overcome this problem by substituting the Tyr5 with His (as in the active chicken GnRH II) and incorporating D-Tyr in position 6 (101). This analog has a higher affinity and increased total binding.

A feature of ligand-receptor complexing is that receptor interaction (affinity) and capacity of the bound ligand to activate the receptor (efficacy) are separable phenomena. Thus particular residues of GnRH are more critical for agonist activity (e.g. His2, Trp3), and others are critical for ligand binding (e.g. Pro9). Various models have been proposed to explain the differing contributions of ligand substituents to affinity and efficacy (102). In the "conformational induction" model, agonists bind to an inactive receptor state and induce the receptor to assume an altered active state that leads to coupling with G proteins. In the "conformational selection" model, the receptor spontaneously fluctuates between inactive and active conformers, and agonists have a higher affinity for the active state whereas antagonists (or inverse agonists) have a higher affinity for the inactive state. Consequently, agonist binding causes the concentration of active receptor to increase by mass action, and inverse agonists have the opposite effect. The separate effects of ligand substitutions on affinity and efficacy can be interpreted within either model. In the case of the induction model, some receptor interaction sites are critical for ligand docking, whereas others are critical for inducing a change in the receptor. In the selection model, some receptor contact sites are accessible in both active and inactive states and thus contribute to affinity, whereas other contact sites are accessible or properly positioned for agonist complexing only when the receptor assumes an activated state. In the following sections, the term "activity" will be used to refer to data derived from functional assays, usually LH release. When radioligand binding data are available, the term "affinity" will be employed.

With the preceding caveats in mind, it is nevertheless possible and useful to review the extant data. When evaluated in concert with studies of the receptor-binding pocket and of analog conformation (reviewed in subsequent sections), the data on the structure-activity of analogs provide insight toward elucidating the interactions in the ligand-receptor complex. For this reason, we present here some indications of the roles of the individual constituent amino acids of GnRH in receptor binding and activation.

B. Comparative structures and activities of vertebrate GnRHs
Identification of the GnRHs present in more than 70 species (for review see Refs. 22, 23, 92–99, and 103–105) has demonstrated that two or more forms of GnRH are present in most vertebrate species and in a protochordate, the tunicate (22, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116) (Fig. 5Go). One form is represented by mammalian GnRH and its nonmammalian counterparts, which have a predominant function as hypophysiotropic peptides regulating the pituitary. The second form of GnRH, first identified in chicken brain (His5Trp7Tyr8GnRH), is the most ubiquitous form in vertebrates, and most species have this form along with one or two other GnRHs. As His5Trp7Tyr8GnRH is present in fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, referring to this peptide as "chicken GnRH II" is confusing. We propose that it be designated "GnRH II." The original mammalian GnRH is then "GnRH I." Specific chemical identification may be accomplished by designating the variable amino acids 5–8. Thus chicken GnRH I, salmon GnRH, and catfish GnRH would be YGLQ GnRH, YGWL GnRH, and HGLN GnRH, respectively.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Amino acid sequences of naturally occurring vertebrate and protochordate GnRHs. The conserved NH2- and COOH-terminal domains are boxed. Only Gly6 is conserved among the higher vertebrates in the central domain.

 
The similarity in organization of genes encoding the different GnRHs indicates that the GnRHs arose from a common ancestral gene (see Ref.23) for review). The distribution of GnRH II in the extrahypothalamic central nervous system and peripheral nervous system suggests a neuromodulatory role for the peptide. The most thoroughly documented effect of GnRH II is the inhibition of K+ channels in the bullfrog sympathetic ganglion (117). The presence of GnRH II in bullfrog and Xenopus sympathetic ganglia was recently demonstrated (118). Using PCR, GnRH receptor sequences have been obtained from fish, amphibian, and reptile (B. Blackman, Y.-M. Sun, N. Illing, J. Hapgood, E. Rumbak and R. P. Millar, unpublished). Multiple GnRH receptors are present in these species, suggesting that the duplication of the GnRH gene was accompanied by a coordinated structural evolution of the cognate receptors.

All natural GnRH peptides isolated to date are highly conserved with respect to their length, to the NH2-terminal domain (residues pGlu-His-Trp-Ser), and to the COOH-terminal domain (Pro-Gly.NH2), suggesting that these domains are functionally essential. However, residue conservation does not invariably imply functional signficance. For example, Ser4 is highly conserved and yet can be substituted with the retention of high activity at the mammalian receptor (see below). Among vertebrate GnRHs, position 8 is most variable, and positions 5 and 7 are highly variable (Fig. 5Go). Position 6 is invariably Gly in the higher vertebrates but varies considerably in the lamprey and tunicate GnRHs. No variation in GnRH sequence is found among mammalian GnRHs.

The comparative activities of the GnRH variants in vertebrates provide insight into structure-activity relations. In mammals, mammalian GnRH is highly active at low doses while the other vertebrate GnRHs, with the exception of GnRH II, have poor activity (binding affinity or EC50 and/or maximal gonadotropin release) (107, 110, 119, 120, 121) (Fig. 6Go). Since the single residue that distinguishes mammalian GnRH from all of the other vertebrate GnRH structural variants is Arg8 (Fig. 5Go), this residue was identified as being critical for high-affinity binding to the mammalian receptor. However, the substantial activity of GnRH II (20–30%) (120, 121, 122, 123) suggests that the loss of activity when substituting a neutral amino acid for Arg8 can be overcome by the simultaneous substitution of His in position 5 and Trp in position 7.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Comparative LH releasing activities of chimeras of vertebrate GnRHs in sheep and chicken pituitary cells. [Derived from Ref. 121.]

 
In contrast with the limited activity of most nonmammalian GnRHs at the mammalian receptor, all of the vertebrate GnRHs (with the exception of lamprey GnRHs, which have an acidic residue in position 6) have similar high activities in all of the nonmammalian vertebrates tested (107, 119, 120, 121, 124, 125). Thus, the nonmammalian vertebrate receptors are promiscuous in interacting well with most of the vertebrate GnRHs, whereas the mammalian pituitary GnRH receptor is selective for mammalian GnRH [(see reviews (23, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98)].

Differences in the pharmacology of the GnRH receptors in vertebrate species are illustrated in studies with certain mammalian GnRH antagonist analogs that are pure antagonists in mammals but exhibit agonist activity in chicken (126) and goldfish (127) gonadotropes. Intriguingly, some antagonists stimulate gonadotropin secretion while others release GH in the goldfish (127). It is apparent, therefore, that the structural requirements of GnRH receptors for activation by ligands are variable among vertebrates. Differences, albeit more subtle, between mammalian GnRH receptors in agonist and antagonist binding have also been noted (30, 31, 35, 51, 128).

The studies on GnRH chimeras have also revealed effects of amino acid substitutions on agonist efficacy at the mammalian GnRH receptor by comparing relative potencies of the chimeric analogs in stimulating LH release from sheep pituitary cells and in binding to sheep pituitary GnRH receptors (Fig. 7Go) (121). These data showed that Arg8 substitution by neutral amino acids in mammalian GnRH resulted in a low binding potency but relatively higher LH-releasing potency (ratios of 10–150). In contrast, Tyr5 substitution by His enhanced binding potency but reduced LH-releasing potency (ratios of 0.14–0.2). Thus, once bound, analogs with a neutral amino acid in position 8 are more efficient at activating the receptor. On the other hand, His5 enhances binding, but reduces efficacy. The role of specific amino acids in affinity and activation of the mammalian receptor will be addressed in the subsequent section.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. LH stimulation and receptor binding of vertebrate GnRHs in sheep gonadotropes. [Derived from Ref. 121.]

 
C. Roles of individual amino acids in GnRH activity at the mammalian receptor
The contributions of individual amino acids to GnRH receptor binding and activation may be explored by the systematic substitution of single amino acids. Although a considerable body of research was conducted along these lines in the early 1970s (e.g. see Ref.129), this approach has not been revisited with the advent of specific binding assays and more recently with expressed cloned GnRH receptors.

The conservation of the NH2- and COOH-terminal sequences of GnRH through vertebrate evolution and the conclusion that these domains are critically important for receptor binding and activation are substantiated by extensive structure-activity data. Indeed, cognizance of the evolutionary constraints on acceptable structures could have obviated much of the endeavor to produce agonist and antagonist analogs through empirical approaches. It is now clear that both the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains are involved in receptor binding while the NH2-terminal domain plays the major role in receptor activation (see reviews in Refs. 10 and 21). Although the lack of conservation of amino acids 5–8 suggests that these residues are not critical for ligand activity, this is not entirely so, as Arg8 is important for high-affinity binding to the mammalian receptor (see below). This central domain is thus a determinant of receptor selectivity. The role of individual amino acids will be considered within these designated NH2-terminal, central, and COOH-terminal domains.

1. The NH2-terminal domain (pGlu-His-Trp-Ser).
pGlu1. The essential requirement of pGlu was first noted with the loss of activity of native purified GnRH when treated with pyroglutamyl aminopeptidase and confirmed by a series of substitutions in this position. While Leu1, Gly1, Pro1, Gln1 and (O=)Thr1-substituted analogs were essentially inactive in in vivo bioassays (129, 130, 131, 132), several acylated Gly1 analogs (formyl, acetyl, and propionyl) had low but significant activity (~1%), indicating that the -CO-NHCHCO- group is the minimal structure required for activity (131). The cyclic (O=) Ser1 structure (130), which resembles the pGlu structure, and D-pGlu (133) both had about 5% activity, suggesting that a change in conformation in the NH2 terminus is not completely detrimental (134). Although a specific role for pGlu in binding and/or activation of the receptor has not been revealed by these early studies, the subsequent universal substitution of pGlu in GnRH antagonists (see reviews in Refs. 10, 21, and 88–91) identifies this residue as important in receptor activation.

His2.
His2 of GnRH is a good candidate for interaction with the receptor (134). The imidazole ring of histidine has a number of features appropriate for participation in enzyme actions and also in hormone interactions with receptors. These include its aromatic character, hydrogen-bonding capacity, and acid-base properties. The very low activities of Ser-, Ile-, Leu-, Gln-, Gly-, Thr-, Ala-, Lys-, and Arg-substituted analogs (129, 130, 135) and substantial activity of Phe2 GnRH (1–7%) (130, 135, 136), 3-Me His2 (1%) (129), and Trp2 (40%) (137) demonstrate the need for aromaticity and possibly the imidazole moiety. The lack of activity of Gln2 GnRH indicates that the role of His2 does not involve {epsilon}-position hydrogen-bonding because, were that the case, Gln would be a suitable substitute. The high activity of Trp2 GnRH has been confirmed by examining binding to the human GnRH receptor expressed in COS-1 cells (138). On the other hand, the acid-base and hydrogen-donor and hydrogen-acceptor capability of His can be modified with reasonable retention of activity, as demonstrated by I-Nim-His2 (6%) (139) and ß-pyrazolyl-3-alanine (19%) (140), although the latter is a much weaker base. A major breakthrough in understanding the function of His2 evolved from the observations that the Gly2 was a partial agonist and the des-His2 analog was an antagonist (141). Bulky hydrophobics (e.g. D-4-Cl-Phe) have subsequently become the hallmark of substitutions of His2 in GnRH antagonists (for review see Refs. 10, 21, and 88–91). It is therefore likely that His2 plays a role in GnRH interaction with the receptor, which leads to signal propagation and G protein activation. The nature of this interaction appears to demand an element of aromaticity and may be enhanced by basicity/H-bonding capability. Mutagenesis studies identify Lys3.32(121) in the receptor as a possible site of interaction with His2 (142) (see Section V).

Trp3.
Trp3 is clearly a critical residue in GnRH. Trp2 His3 GnRH and Des-Trp3 GnRH were inactive (143). Substitution with nonaromatic amino acids (e.g. Gly, Leu, and Ala) gives rise to very low activity (129, 143, 144, 145), whereas some activity is present with Tyr (0.1%), as well as Phe (0.5%) substitution, and this is increased substantially in pentamethyl-Phe GnRH (30–70%) (129, 143). Notably, the latter residue resembles Trp in its ability to form {pi}-{pi} complexes with aromatic molecules (134). The introduction of an electron-withdrawing fluorine atom of similar atomic radius in position 5 of Trp3 leads to a marked reduction in activity (6%), presumably due to reorienting the dipole and forming hydrogen bonds itself so that an aromatic interaction does not occur (145). The role of an aromatic side chain in this position is further emphasized by the natural substitution of Tyr for Trp3 in lamprey GnRH I (Fig. 5Go). Even 2-napthyl-Ala substitution results in 50% activity (129). Since D-Trp3 GnRH has poor gonadotropin-releasing activity (133) but has been commonly incorporated in antagonists, it is possible that Trp3 plays a role in receptor activation. The altered stereochemistry evidently has a critical effect on agonistic activity. The role of Trp3 in receptor activation is further suggested by an early study demonstrating antagonist activity of Leu3 GnRH (145) and recent work showing that incorporation of NMe in the amino acid in position 3 converts the peptide to an antagonist (146).

Ser4.
The last of the conserved residues in the NH2-terminal domain, Ser4, can be substituted with a number of amino acids (Ala, Thr, Gln, NMeSer) with reasonable retention of activity (10–20%) (129, 130, 132, 143), yet this is the most conserved residue in the empirically generated analogs. Because substitution with larger amino acids such as Ser (But) and Leu is very detrimental (129), it appears that spatial constraints are paramount. Recent work has shown that constraint of the peptide bond with NMe does not decrease activity (146, 147) unlike most other positions in GnRH. The conclusion from early studies that large side chains are not tolerated is supported by the recent observation that biotinylated Ser4 GnRH is inactive (148).

2. The COOH-terminal domain (Pro-Gly·NH2).
Pro9. The conservation of Pro9 in the natural GnRHs and the expected conformational limitations imposed by Pro on the peptide chain suggest that substitution would not be readily tolerated. Sarcosine9 GnRH and Ala9 GnRH had low activity (<1%) while N-Me-Gly9 had 10% activity (129, 132). The exchange of amino acids 8 and 9 (Pro8 Arg9 GnRH) also results in very low activity (129). The discovery that Pro9 may be hydroxylated in fetal brain and decreases activity to 10% (149) underlines the importance of this conserved residue and suggests that this may be a regulatory mechanism.

Gly-amide10.
Removal of the amide to yield the free acid of GnRH results in very low activity (150). This has recently been confirmed for the human GnRH receptor expressed in COS-1 cells (67). Replacement of the Gly-NH2 moiety with Ala resulted in a mild reduction in activity (10%) (130), and a similar reduction was observed with Gly-NMe2 (14%) (132). On the other hand, substitution of Gly-NH2 with alkylamides maintained (methylamide and ethanolamide) or increased activity up to 600% (propylamide and ethylamide) (150, 151) whereas substitution with larger amides (pyrolidineamide and morpholineamide) (150) or D-amino acids (129) decreased activity. The incorporation of electron-withdrawing fluorine atoms into the ethylamide (2,2,2-trifluoroethylamide) further enhanced activity to about 900% (151). These findings suggest that the terminal Gly-NH2 is not essential for activity and that small, uncharged moieties are acceptable at the COOH terminus. Larger groups are inhibitory, possibly by sterically hindering ligand access to the binding site. The findings also suggested that the total chain length might have an important role in the binding of GnRH to its receptor (150, 151). Recent mutagenesis of a receptor site (N2.65(102)->A) has demonstrated a much greater decrease in binding affinity of Gly-NH2 ligands than N-ethylamide ligands (152) (see Section V).

3. The central nonconserved domain (Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg).
Try5. In accordance with the lack of conservation of Tyr5 in vertebrate GnRHs, substitution in this position is well tolerated. The 44–64% activity of Phe5 (143, 153) demonstrated that the hydroxyl group is not required. Interestingly this substitution has yet to be found in naturally occurring GnRHs, although it would require only one base change. Substitution of the hydroxyl group of tyrosine resulted in activities of 37% (amino), 24% (methoxy), and 5% (nitro) (154). NMe Tyr substitution, which has been proposed to constrain the peptide backbone and to eliminate one of two postulated H bonds with Arg8 in a ß-II turn conformation, led to a reduction in binding affinity to 10–20% (155) Interestingly, mono-iodo-Tyr-GnRH (129) and mono-chloro-Tyr-GnRH (130) had activities of 30–80% and 10%, respectively, while di-iodo-Tyr5 GnRH and di-chloro-Tyr GnRH were devoid of LH-releasing activity (129, 130). His5 GnRH has very high binding affinity for mammalian GnRH receptors (121). These findings demonstrate that the hydroxyl group of Tyr5 is not required, and that simply an aromatic side chain (Trp, Phe, or His) is adequate for high LH-releasing activity. The findings suggest that Tyr5 contributes only to receptor binding and does not play a role in the process of receptor activation. However, substitution of Tyr5 with His, as in GnRH II, results in an analog with high receptor potency (aromaticity maintained) but reduced LH release (partial agonism; (121). Partial agonism is also observed with His5 D-Trp6 GnRH and in His5 D-Tyr6 GnRH and Arg5 D-Tyr6 GnRH (R. P. Millar, unpublished). However, when Arg8 is substituted by Tyr in analogs with His or Arg in position 5, efficacy is restored. Thus the motif His5/Arg5-Xxx-Xxx-Arg8 produces compounds with high binding but diminished receptor activation, indicating that the Tyr5 does play a role, albeit possibly indirect, in receptor activation in the mammalian ligand-receptor complex.

Gly6.
Gly6 is conserved in all vertebrates except the ancient jawless lamprey and is also absent in the tunicate GnRHs (Fig. 5Go). The presence of this small residue in this position allows for flexibility and the assumption of the postulated ß-II-type bend and the preferred conformation for receptor binding (see below and Section IV). This bend would be energetically unfavorable in analogs with larger L-amino acid substitutions for Gly6, and Ile, Val, and Ala analogs were found to have low activity (132, 137). However, the folded conformation is favored by the stereochemistry of D-amino acid substitutions (10, 21, 88, 89, 90, 91, 137). The proposal of a ß-II-type bend for the active conformation of GnRH was first proposed by Monahan et al. (137) after demonstrating that D-Ala6 substitution increased activity to about 400%. This seminal work led to the exploration of numerous substitutions with D-amino acids in this position (see reviews in Refs. 10, 21, and 88–91). In general, substitution with D-amino acids having bulky hydrophobic side chains, particularly aromatics, was most effective (10, 21), and this has been confirmed in numerous binding studies using pituitary membranes and, more recently, with receptors expressed in COS-1 cells. A correlation between hydrophobicity (HPLC retention time) of the D-amino acid and potency has been noted (100). It appears that there is a large "allowable space" facing away from the NH2- and COOH-domains which interacts with the receptor, and this will accommodate the D-amino acids with large side groups (147). In addition to further favoring the ß-II-type conformation, the large side chains of the D-amino acids may interact with nearby residues in the receptor, thereby enhancing the binding affinity. These potential alternative interactions probably account for species differences and are likely to be prevalent in GnRH antagonists with numerous unusual side chains, often aromatic. These features must be taken into account when analyzing the effects of mutagenesis of receptor residues on the binding of these analogs.

Leu7.
The comparative studies of activities of vertebrate GnRHs indicate that substitutions of Leu7 with uncharged L-amino acids with varying size side chains are generally well tolerated. This supposition is confirmed by the demonstration that Val, Ile, Nle, Ser, ethoxycarbonyl-Lys, butoxycarbonal-Lys, and Boc-Lys all had high activities (16–45%) (129, 130) while Ala and Gly had lower (3–6%) activities (129, 130). Potential disruption of conformation by D-amino acid D-Leu (133) or Pro (129) substitution resulted in very low activities as did substitution with basic residues (Lys, Arg) (see Ref.129). Tolerance of the large, bulky substitution of Trp for Leu7 was recently demonstrated by the high LH-releasing activity (110% in sheep pituitary cells) and receptor binding (37% for sheep and 230% for rat) for this analog (121, 122). The original proposal of a type-II ß turn conformation of GnRH also envisaged a hydrogen bond between the C=0 of Ser and NH of Leu. However, substitution of Leu7 with N-Me-Leu, which would eliminate this H bond, did not reduce activity (155a).

Arg8.
Comparative activities of vertebrate GnRHs had indicated that Arg8 is required for high-affinity binding to mammalian receptors (91, 105, 119, 120, 121). A number of early studies had shown that D-Arg, Gln, Leu, Orn, His, diaminobutyryl, and Cit substitution for Arg8 results in a substantial decline in activity (1–6%) while homoArg, Narg, and Lys retained good activity (10–20%) (92, 119, 129, 130, 133, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161). A systematic study on the LH-releasing activities from sheep pituitary cells of Gln-, Ser-, Tyr-, Phe-, Glu-, His-, Leu-, Lys-, Ile-, and Trp-substituted analogs confirms the requirement of a basic amino acid in position 8 for high activity (92, 93). Since receptor-binding is correlated with LH-releasing activity in all position 8-substituted analogs studied, it appears that the role of Arg8 may be in receptor binding. However, as noted above, analogs with neutral amino acid substitutions display improved efficacy. Two hypotheses may be invoked to explain the basis of the higher affinities of Arg8-containing GnRHs. An ionic interaction of Arg8 with one or more negatively charged residues, either an amino acid side-chain (162) or a polysaccharide sialic acid residue (163) in the receptor, were proposed. An alternative or additional possibility was that the side chain of Arg8 affects the structure of the ligand, stabilizing the active conformation of GnRH by hydrogen bonding with the side chains of His2 and Tyr5 (159, 160). Low pK values were measured for His2 and Tyr5 in GnRH, and it was suggested that the more acidic nature of these amino acid side chains was due to their proximity to the cationic side chain of Arg8 (160). GnRH analogs with neutral substitutions, Gln and {omega}-nitro-Arg (159), in position 8, exhibited normal pK values for His2 and Tyr5 and extended titration ranges. These results were interpreted as indicating a decreased interaction of the His2 and Tyr5 side chains with the neutral substituents in position 8 (161). The decreased side-chain interaction was proposed to decrease stabilization of the bioactive conformation and thus cause the lower bioactivity in the neutral GnRH analogs. Based on these findings, a folded conformation of GnRH was proposed (159, 160) similar to models of GnRH that were based on energy minimization and database sequence comparison (137, 164, 165, 166, 167).

The role of Arg8 in determining the preferred conformation of GnRH and in receptor interaction is explored in detail in the following sections. In recent mutagenesis studies, an acidic amino acid residue in extracellular loop III was shown to convey specificity for Arg8 such that mutation to an isosteric amide resulted in the loss of the preferential binding of Arg8 GnRH compared with GnRH with a neutral amino acid in this position (see Section V). The requirement for Arg in position 8 and the acidic residue in the receptor is obviated if the GnRH structure is constrained by incorporation of a D-amino acid in position 6 (see Section V). A recent reexploration of the role of Arg8 in antagonists concluded that this residue may be significant for receptor binding (168) while the demonstration in another study that (Orn(2,4-NAPS0)8 GnRH cross-linked with the receptor (169) was interpreted to support the proposal that Arg8 interacts with receptor moieties.

D. Conclusions from peptide structure-activity data
We have attempted to identify individual residues in GnRH that are involved in receptor binding and receptor activation, as this information is critical in undertaking receptor mutagenesis studies directed at defining ligand contact sites. Although thousands of GnRH analogs have been synthesized and biologically characterized, the complexity of most analogs and the predominance of in vivo testing have complicated the task of clearly identifying the roles of individual amino acids in ligand conformation and in receptor binding and activation. Although a more controlled and systematic examination of the functions of GnRH residues using expressed cloned receptors has begun (see Section V), relatively few analogs have been studied to date. Nevertheless it is possible to generate working hypotheses about ligand requirements of the mammalian pituitary GnRH receptor for binding and activation (Fig. 8Go). The following generalizations may be proffered:



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Schematic of GnRH summarizing functional properties of individual amino acid residues.

 
1. It is evident that no single residue is crucial for GnRH activity.

2. The NH2- and COOH-terminal domains are the most important in receptor binding and activation.

3. Although both domains are involved in receptor binding, residues in the NH2-terminal domain are predominantly responsible for receptor activation.

4. The only residues for which good evidence exists for a role in receptor activation are His2 and Trp3, but pGlu1 may also be involved.

5. Substitution of residues outside of the NH2-terminal domain can affect receptor activation, possibly through effects on the conformation that change the presentation of activating residues, or through restrictions in dynamic ligand conformation changes that occur on binding to the receptor.

6. Nonconserved residues of the central domain are less critical, but Arg8 is required for high-affinity binding to the mammalian receptor. However, the requirement for Arg8 may be obviated in conformationally constrained analogs with D-amino acids in position 6, and also when His5 is present as in chicken GnRH II.

7. The achiral Gly or D-amino acids are required in position 6, presumably to allow assumption of the folded active conformation.

8. Nonmammalian GnRH receptors have different requirements for the nonconserved residues in the central domain. Examples include the lack of requirement for a basic residue in position 8 and the nonacceptance of His5 substitution when Arg8 is present. Nonmammalian GnRH receptors also tend to be less dependent on conformational constraint, and D-amino acid substitution may not enhance activity to the same degree as in mammalian receptors.


    IV. Structure and Conformation of GnRH and Its Analogs
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Early studies of GnRH conformation
The structure-activity data reviewed in the previous section provide important hypotheses about the role of specific groups in GnRH binding and receptor activation. However, it is becoming increasingly likely that the elucidation of structure-activity relations for GnRH, and of the molecular basis for agonist and antagonist properties at the GnRH receptor, will not be possible at the level of the ligands alone (170). To understand the action of GnRH and its congeners from a structural perspective, it may become necessary to gain an understanding of the structural and dynamic properties of the ligands, as well as of the ligand/receptor complexes. Such insights are sought from experimental explorations of structure-function relations, as well as with novel computational methods that focus on the structural properties of both the receptor and the ligands.

The inherent flexibility of the hormone decapeptide makes it likely that interactions with various sites in the receptor-binding pocket will affect the conformation of any GnRH analog and reduce the ability to define a single "biologically relevant" conformation for the isolated peptide. Moreover, the pharmacophoric patterns of different peptides depend on the specific residues available for interaction with the various receptor sites, even if their conformations are the same. Consequently, the structural determinants for action on the GnRH receptor will have to be sought from a comprehensive characterization of all the conformations accessible to the peptides under given conditions of temperature and environment, i.e. the conformational space of these peptides, as well as of the three-dimensional pattern of the pharmaco-phoric elements that their amino acids present to the receptor. If the ability to adopt certain conformations determines the receptor activity of peptides with similar pharmacophoric elements, then differences in their conformational spaces can reveal the conformations required for receptor interactions. The conformational properties of the most active peptides can thus serve to define the spatial and dynamic requirements for optimal interaction with the receptor. A useful ranking of structure-activity characteristics can be constructed on this basis, provided that peptides with pharmacologically distinct activities such as agonism and antagonism are differentiated. For these reasons, it is not realistic to expect a full understanding to emerge entirely from structure-activity data obtained from probing the activities of various synthetic analogs without specific analysis of their conformational properties. Rather, the mechanistic insights are more likely to emerge when the powerful approaches offered by current experimental and computational methods for conformational analysis (for reviews see Refs. 171 and 172; also Refs. 166, 173, and 174) are applied to the exploration of peptide structure and design.

Pioneering efforts were undertaken to achieve such a comprehensive exploration of the conformation of GnRH and its active analogs by computational methods (164, 165, 175). The impetus for such studies continues to be the assumption that if the peptide conformation recognized by the receptor (i.e. the bioactive conformation) corresponds to the most abundant form of the peptide in solution, then the peptide will have high affinity for the receptor. Because the most abundant conformers in solution are those corresponding to the lowest free energy, the computational approaches concentrated on the calculation of the conformational energies of the peptides. The early studies (164, 165, 175) identified low-energy conformations of GnRH that were considered to occur also in solution, although it was not possible at the time to account for the effects of aqueous solvation. In spite of the significant limitations of the methods for energy-based evaluation of peptide conformations (for a review of methods see Ref.176) that were available at the time for studies of peptide molecules of the size of GnRH, the early studies identified the central characteristic of the bioactive conformation of GnRH, the ß-bend involving the Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg in positions 5–8 (see Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. View of hinged conformer of GnRH obtained using empirical energy calculations. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from F. A. Momany: J Am Chem Soc 98:2990–2996 (165). ©1976 American Chemical Society.]

 
B. Integrated computational and experimental studies
Subsequently, the most incisive studies of structure-activity relationships used in the design of GnRH analogs combined the computational conformational studies with a variety of experimental (mostly spectroscopic) approaches to characterize the structural features of the peptides (for illustrations and reviews see Refs. 177–179). Such studies often took advantage of cyclization as a means of restricting the conformational freedom of the peptide molecules to reduce the complexity of the problem. The initial inferences from conformational analysis of GnRH that residues Tyr5-to-Arg8 may form a ß-type turn supported the efforts to produce cyclic analogs in the search of high-affinity ligands for the GnRH receptor. Much attention was devoted to the conformational properties of these cyclic analogs in computational studies. It was quickly recognized that, even in these cyclic analogs, the intramolecular motions were complex, and conformational variability persisted. The overall conformational properties of the cyclic analogs were found to be generally in good agreement with the results from energy-based calculations and with the information on the structure and dynamics of the analogs obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (173, 179). The points of agreement include the all-trans nature of the peptide bonds in the major conformational families of the analogs and the ß-type turn structure between residues 4–8 (177) (Fig. 10Go). However, the computational simulations of molecular conformation and dynamics indicated the large variability in the structural options of the uncyclized 1–3 fragment, as well as the fact that several different conformations with equivalent energies and geometrical features compatible with the NMR data, can be adopted even by the constrained dicyclic compound (177).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Schematic representation of dicyclic GnRH analog studied using two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics simulation. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from R. J. Bienstock et al.: J Med Chem 36:3265–3273, 1993 (177).]

 
The insights from computational studies were confirmed by results from NMR spectroscopy (e.g. Refs. 177–179 and references therein), but uncertainty persisted with respect to the exact location of the ß-type turn and to the spatial orientation of the side chains assumed to be involved in affinity-determining interactions with receptor sites (180). Thus, cyclo(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) analogs were compared with 4–9 and 4–10 bridged analogs (170) and more recently with the dicyclic analogs (4–10; 5–8) designed to incorporate the conformational constraints of both classes of cyclic analogs (177). It is quite clear from these studies that the multiple conformational forms exist even for the most constrained analogs (170, 178) and that these analogs must be studied with detailed conformational approaches. To be most useful, such conformational studies must not only identify the lowest energy conformations, but must be able to provide reliable information on the probability distribution of the various conformational families, i.e. their relative abundance in solution (174, 181).

Early attempts to decompose the structural determinants for activity of cyclized GnRH analogs into contributions from the length of the bridge and the orientation of certain functional groups (e.g. amide bonds considered to be involved in direct interactions with receptor sites) were not successful (170). A main reason is the residual flexibility of the cyclized GnRH analogs, which lose only a portion of their conformational freedom. This insight (e.g. see Refs. 170 and 178) led to the suggestion that a complete structural characterization, rather than the mere identification of minimal energy conformations, will be necessary for both linear and cyclic analogs (170).

C. Exploration of the entire conformation space of GnRH analogs
The results from experimental and computational studies of the structure and conformation of GnRH analogs emphasize the importance of a complete exploration of the conformational space of the peptides (176). Whether the analogs are conformationally constrained or linear, the complete structural characterization is necessary before a reliable consensus on the structural features most important for receptor interaction can be reached (174). Current methods (174, 181) make possible such extensive explorations of both the conformational and dynamic properties of the peptides, offering the ability to explore the entire conformational space of decapeptides such as GnRH and its analogs (174). Specifically, the application of a recently developed technique of Conformational Memories (182) to the study of GnRH conformational properties illustrates the first complete exploration of the entire conformational space of the peptide using a method of simulation that includes a satisfactory model for the aqueous solvent.

The novel method overcomes some of the shortcomings of modern molecular dynamics approaches to the study of the peptide hormone: although the molecular dynamics techniques are useful for their ability to describe the molecular motions of the peptide in short time scales, they are unable to explore all the conformational states of the peptide in solution, and hence are not able to characterize their relative abundance. In contrast, the Conformational Memories method utilizes a two-stage process of computation to map, and then characterize, the conformational space of a flexible molecule (174). In the first, exploratory stage, repeated runs of the Monte Carlo method (183) combined with simulated annealing (184) are carried out to map the entire conformational space of a flexible molecule by heating it to very high temperatures and cooling it slowly to body temperature. Once the Conformational Memories are established, the method proceeds to a new Monte Carlo search of the conformations of the peptide, performed at 310K and sampling only from the populated regions. Because only about 50% of the torsional space of the 35 bonds of GnRH is populated at 310K, the two-tiered approach reduces by many orders of magnitude the conformational space that must be explored in this second phase (174). The configurations sampled from the Conformational Memory can be any part of the populated space of dihedral angles defining the conformations of the peptide. Consequently, the notion of a barrier restricting access to any part of the conformational space is eliminated in this procedure without approximations.

1. Conformational families of GnRH. In the application of the conformational memories approach to GnRH, the second step of the procedure involved 500,000 steps (174). Structures of the peptide obtained from the run were clustered in conformational families, resulting in the five basic structures depicted in Fig. 11Go. Notably, families of conformations having a ß-turn between residues 5–8 occur in GnRH with a frequency of approximately 70%. A distribution showing a superimposition of 70 of these structures is illustrated in Fig. 12Go; the ß-type turn common to all the structures in this family is clearly evident. In contrast, families that have an extended backbone occur with a frequency of about 5%. The distribution of side-chain orientations of Arg8 in all conformational families was found to be wider than that of any other residues in GnRH.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Backbone trace of representative members of the conformational families of GnRH obtained from Conformational Memories.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Superimposition of structures that make up the major conformational family of GnRH obtained from Conformational Memories. GnRH is colored in purple, with Arg8 colored in red. The ß-turn common to all structures is evident.

 
2. Conformational families of Lys8-GnRH. The conformational properties of the Lys8 analog of GnRH that served to explore the role of Arg8 in the receptor interactions of GnRH (21, 121) were compared with the conformational profile of GnRH. In contrast to the wild type hormone, the major conformational family of the Lys8-GnRH congener was found to have an extended backbone, while the ß-turn conformation exists as a very minor family (174). A backbone trace of a representative of each family is shown in Fig. 11Go. The family of conformations with an extended backbone has an abundance of more than 70%, while the ß-type turn conformation of Lys8-GnRH, which is virtually identical to the major conformational family of the GnRH, has a probability of only about 3%. A distribution of the members of the predominant Lys8-GnRH family superimposed upon each other is shown in Fig. 13Go, with the entire molecule shown in red, except for Lys8, which is colored green. Because Lys8-GnRH is a low affinity agonist for the GnRH receptor, adoption of a large population of ß-type turn conformation appears to be a key requirement for hormone-receptor recognition. This inference agrees with earlier proposals in the literature (e.g. see Ref.173) and is supported by results from additional Conformational Memories simulations on the structural characterization of eight other GnRH analogs that exhibit different distributions between the ß-turn like structures and the fully extended conformations of the backbone (F. Guarnieri, S. C. Sealfon, and H. Weinstein, unpublished).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. A distribution of the members of the predominant Lys8-GnRH family superimposed upon each other is shown. Note the straightened backbone structure in comparison with the bent GnRH structure shown in Fig. 12Go.

 
To test the key inference regarding a direct correlation between the abundance in solution of the ß-type turn structure and the GnRH receptor affinity, the most populated conformational family of GnRH obtained from Conformational Memories was compared with a structurally constrained cyclic decapeptide GnRH analog (185) in which residues 6 and 7 were shown from NMR data to form a type II' ß-turn and residues 1 and 2 formed a type II ß-turn, a weak hydrogen bond was identified between the Arg8-NH and the Tyr5-CO, and a stronger hydrogen bond was observed between the D-Trp3-NH and the ß-Ala10-CO. All computationally derived structures were found to superimpose on the cyclic analog with a very small root mean square deviation (0.6–0.8 Å) in the region of residues 5–10 (174). However, the structures were found to diverge between the N terminus and residue 4, indicating the flexibility of that region.

Thus, the results of the first conformational study capable of overcoming energy barriers efficiently and achieving a complete sampling of the conformational space of GnRH support a relation between the ß-turn structure identified as the major conformational family of GnRH in solution and high affinity for the GnRH receptor. These inferences support the results from the earlier investigations of conformationally restricted GnRH analogs (164, 173, 178) and provide unbiased support for this mechanistic hypothesis based on a complete exploration of the conformational space of the peptide hormone itself and its unconstrained congeners. Because the method seems to have produced the lowest energy conformers reported for GnRH (174) from a full exploration that is economical and practical, its continued application to the study of structure-function relations of GnRH analogs should produce important mechanistic insights and powerful guides for ligand design.


    V. Functional Structure of the Receptor and Ligand-Receptor Complex
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 
A. Extracellular domains
A driving force of investigations into the structure of the GnRH receptor and its interaction with GnRH is the anticipation that this information will provide the basis for the rational design of novel analogs. To understand the structure-activity properties and conformational family perturbations of the various GnRH analogs, insight into the "binding pocket" for GnRH must be obtained and the precise sites of interaction of receptor and ligand determined. As the direct structural data available on GPCRs are limited to low resolution cryoelectron microscopy of rhodopsin (58) (Fig. 4Go), studies of the binding pocket have relied on indirect approaches, particularly the study of the functional effects of site-directed mutagenesis and the construction of computational three-dimensional molecular models of the ligand-receptor complexes. Through these approaches, a view of the receptor and its mode of ligand binding is emerging. Side chains required for high-affinity binding of peptide ligands have been identified in both the extracellular and transmembrane domains, and specific helix-helix proximities within the receptor have been determined.

As described above, the basic Arg8 of GnRH is critical for high-affinity agonist activity at the mammalian receptor. Substitutions at Arg8 [as in Chicken I GnRH (Gln8GnRH)] cause a marked reduction in the affinity of binding to the mammalian receptor (119, 121). Based on cation competition experiments, Hazum (162) originally suggested that the Arg8 of GnRH may interact with carboxylic groups on the receptor (162). The possibility that Arg8 of GnRH forms an ionic interaction with an acidic residue of the GnRH receptor was investigated by site-directed mutagenesis (186). The chicken GnRH receptor shows little discrimination between Arg8-GnRH (mammalian GnRH) and Gln8-GnRH (chicken I GnRH). All acidic residues on the receptor were mutated to their isosteric amine, and a mutant that failed to discriminate between Arg8-GnRH and Gln8-GnRH was sought. One mutant receptor was identified, Glu7.32(301)-Gln, which had decreased affinity for mammalian GnRH in comparison with the wild type receptor. The affinity of this mutant for Gln8- GnRH and for other GnRH analogs with an uncharged residue in the eight position, however, was relatively unchanged or improved (see Fig. 14Go). Most significant is the marked increase in activity of Glu8-GnRH in the mutant. These results support a role for the Glu7.32(301) residue, located in the third extracellular domain, in conferring the preference of the mammalian receptor for Arg8 GnRH. A GnRH analog that is conformationally restricted by having a D-amino acid in position 6 (D-Trp6,Pro9-NHEt)GnRH and its Gln8 congener (D-Trp6,Gln8,Pro9-NHEt)GnRH have more similar affinities for both the wild type and Gln7.32(301) mutant receptors. Thus conformationally restricted analogs do not seem to require Arg in position 8, suggesting that the role of Glu7.32(301) in the receptor is to help induce or select the optimum conformation of the ligand for high-affinity interaction.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 14. GnRH and Gln8-GnRH ligand binding and phosphoinositol hydrolysis in COS-1 cells transfected with wild-type GnRH receptor and Gln7.32(301) GnRH receptor. Binding of 125I-[D-Ala6,N-Me-Leu7,Pro9NEt]GnRH in the presence of various concentrations of GnRH ({circ}, •) and [Gln8]-GnRH (•,{blacktriangledown}) to membranes from wild-type (broken line) or mutant (unbroken line) receptors. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from C. A. Flanagan et al.: J Biol Chem 269:22636–22641, 1994 (186).]

 
A critical role of Asn2.65(102), located at the extracellular surface of TMD 2, for high-affinity interactions with some GnRH analogs has been identified (152). Mutation of this site to Ala caused a 2- to 3-order of magnitude loss of potency for GnRH and analogs with the naturally occuring glycinamide (NH-CH2-CO-NH2) C terminus in stimulating hydrolysis of phosphoinositides. However, this mutation had much less effect on the potency of ethylamide (NH-CH2-CH3)-modified C-terminal agonists. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the carbonyl of glycinamide analogs forms a hydrogen bond with this locus.

B. Helix domains
The receptors for the biogenic amine neurotransmitters all contain an Asp at a homologous location in TMD 3. Mutagenesis studies on several of these receptors suggest that the Asp anionic side chain serves as a counterion required for high-affinity interaction with the cationic head group of the ligand (187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193). All cloned GnRH receptors have a lysine at the corresponding 3.32 position (Fig. 1Go). The role of Lys3.32(121) in ligand binding and activation of the human receptor was studied by introducing a series of mutations at this position (142). Substitution of Arg at this position preserved high affinity agonist binding, whereas Gln at this position reduced agonist binding to below the limit of detection. Leu and Asp at this locus abolished both binding and detectable signal transduction. The EC50 of concentration-response curves for coupling to phosphatidyl inositol hydrolysis obtained with the Gln3.32(121) receptor was more than 3 orders of magnitude higher than that obtained for the wild-type receptor (see Fig. 15Go). Receptor inactivation studies confirmed that this increase in EC50 represented a large decrease in agonist affinity. In contrast, an antagonist had comparable high affinities for the wild type, Arg121, and Gln121 mutants. This study indicated that a charge-strengthened hydrogen-bond donor is required at this locus for high-affinity agonist binding, but not for high-affinity antagonist binding. Based on the available structure-activity data of GnRH analogs, His2 in the ligand is a potential candidate for interaction with this locus (see Section III). Although the Lys3.32(121) in the GnRH receptor appears to serve a function analogous to Asp3.32 in the neurotransmitter receptors, this correspondence does not extend to all peptide GPCRs. The corresponding position of the mouse TRH receptor, Gln3.32(105), appears to make only a modest contribution to ligand affinity (194). In contrast, two other TMD 3 side chains in that receptor, Tyr3.33(106) and Asn3.37(110), have been identified as major determinants of agonist affinity (194). Thus, while the side chain at the 3.32 locus is not a critical determinant of affinity in all receptors, the local properties of this region of TMD 3 seem generally important for ligand-receptor interaction (195).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 15. GnRH-stimulated phosphoinositol hydrolysis in COS-1 cells expression Lys3.32(121) mutant receptors. Vector {blacksquare}; Leu3.32(121)-receptor {square}; Gln3.32(121)-receptor {blacktriangleup}; Arg3.32(121)-receptor •; wild-type receptor {circ}. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from W. Zhou et al.: J Biol Chem 270:18853–18857, 1995 (142).]

 
Mutagenesis studies have also indicated the importance of Asp2.61(98) in high-affinity interactions of certain agonists. Mutation of this locus to Glu caused a large increase in the EC50 for GnRH but had little affect on the EC50 for [Trp2]-GnRH (195a). This dependence of the effect of mutation at the 2.61(98) locus on the identity of the residue in the second position of GnRH is consistent with an interaction between His2 of GnRH and the side chain at the 2.61(98) locus of the receptor.

As noted above (see Section II.B), an unusual feature of the GnRH receptor, observed in all mammalian species, is the presence of Asn2.50(87) in the second putative transmembrane helix at the location of a highly conserved Asp in the GPCR family, and of Asp7.49(318) in the putative seventh transmembrane helix where nearly all other GPCRs have Asn (see Fig. 2Go). This apparent interchange of conserved residues in the native receptor raised the possibility that these residues interact. This possibility was investigated by expressing mutant receptors in which each residue was replaced by the other or both residues were exchanged (51). The results showed that the Asp2.50(87) mutant had no detectable binding. The double mutant Asp2.50(87) Asn7.49(318), which recreates the arrangement found in other GPCRs, regained high-affinity agonist and antagonist binding (see Fig. 16Go). The restoration of binding by a second reciprocal mutation indicates that these two specific residues in TMD 2 and TMD 7 are adjacent in space (Fig. 17Go) and provides an empirical basis for refining the structural parameters in the model of the receptor’s transmembrane helix bundle (see below). Cook and co-workers (196) reported that the interchange mutation in the rat GnRH receptor did not show ligand binding. However, these investigators have subsequently confirmed that this construct is functional (K. Eidne, personal communication), and two other groups have confirmed the results with the mouse receptor (K. Catt, personal communication and Ref.197).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 16. Receptor binding in COS-1 cells transfected with wild-type (left) and Asp2.50(87)Asn7.49(318) reciprocal-mutant (right) receptor constructs. Top panel shows competition binding of GnRH peptides with 125I-labeled GnRH agonist (125I-[D-Ala6,N-Me-Leu7,Pro9NEt]GnRH; GnRH-A). Bottom panel shows competition binding of GnRH peptides with 125I-labeled GnRH antagonist ([Ac-D4-Cl-Phe1, 2-D-Trp3-D-Lys6-D-Ala10-NH2]GnRH; Antagonist 26). GnRH-A, {circ}; antagonist 26, •; Gln8-GnRH, {blacktriangledown}; GnRH, {triangleup}. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from W. Zhou et al.: Mol Pharmacol 45:165–170, 1994 (51).]

 


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 17. Molecular modeling of the GnRH receptor. View parallel to the membrane of a partial GnRH receptor model showing spatial proximity of Asn2.50(87) and Asp7.49(318) [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from W. Zhou et al.: Mol Pharmacol 45:165–170, 1994 (51).]

 
The relationship of the same two postions in TMD 2 and TMD 7 has also been tested in the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, which has the more typical arrangement of amino acids at the two loci (198). A related role of the two positions was also confirmed In the 5-HT2A receptor. However, the pattern of residues that are functionally tolerated at the two positions differed in the GnRH and serotonin receptors. Whereas in the GnRH receptor the TMD 2 Asp/TMD 7 Asp receptor was not functional, in the 5-HT receptor this construct was well coupled. The (TMD 2/TMD 7) Asn/Asn GnRH receptor was functional, whereas the Asn/Asn 5-HT receptor had no detectable coupling. Thus, in both receptors a functional and spatial relationship of these two side chains is supported by the demonstration of a function-restoring interchange mutation. However, the differences in the residues that are functionally tolerated at each position most likely reflect differences in the microenvironment of the two receptors caused by differences in receptor loci other than at these two positions. One group has reported that the CCKB receptor has wild-type function with an Asp at both positions and has reduced coupling with an Asn at each position (199). However, their conclusion that the two positions do not interact is uncertain, especially as the effects of an interchange mutation were not reported.

C. Intracellular loop domains
Mutagenesis, chimera, and deletion studies indicate that the intracellular domains of GPCRs are involved in mediating G protein coupling. Particularly important domains are the membrane-proximal segments of the third intracellular loop, the second intracellular loop, and the membrane-proximal segment of the carboxy-terminal domain (for review see Refs. 49, 50, and 200). The second intracellular loop domains of the mouse and human receptors have been investigated by site-directed mutagenesis (60, 201). The GnRH receptor has a Ser at position 3.51(140), a locus where most receptors have the Tyr of the Asp-Arg-Tyr ("DRY") motif. Mutation of this locus to the consensus Tyr by Arora and co-workers (60) caused an increase in agonist affinity and in rates of internalization in comparison to the wild-type receptor. Mutation of the second intracellular loop Leu3.58(147) to Ala or Asp was found to impair receptor coupling and internalization.

A specific conformational structure of this loop domain appears to be required for efficient G protein coupling. Mutation of Arg3.56(145) to Pro has been found to disrupt significantly the efficiency of coupling to signal transduction (201). This mutation introduces a Pro-Pro motif that disrupts most known secondary structure. We have performed computational simulations and protein database searches with the the wild-type and Pro-Pro mutant receptor loop segment sequences. By comparing the structures accessible to the loop segments in the wild-type and mutant receptors, the conformations likely to be preferred for G protein coupling have been identified. We find by incorporating these results into the computational model of the receptor that an association of the second intracellular loop with other loop domains may be required for efficient receptor coupling (F. Guarnieri, L. Chi, V. Rodic, L. Ballesteros, H. Weinstein, and S. C. Sealfon, unpublished data).

One feature of the mammalian GnRH receptor, unique among the several hundred GPCRs cloned to date, is the complete absence of an intracellular C-terminal domain. In most rhodopsin-family GPCRs, this domain contains a cysteine that has been shown to be palmitoylated in several receptors (202, 203, 204, 205). This domain also contains sites involved in phosphorylation-mediated regulation and desensitization of several GPCRs (206, 207). In the TRH receptor, for example, agonist-induced receptor internalization requires specific domains in the C terminus (208). Truncation or mutation of specific C-terminal domains has been reported to diminish agonist-mediated internalization of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (209) and the angiotensin receptor (210, 211), and to diminish desensitization of the LH receptor (212) (see, however, Ref.213), the substance P receptor (214), the neurokinin receptor (215), and the {alpha}-1B-adrenergic receptor (216). Nonetheless, it is likely that the functional role of the carboxyl terminus domain is not identical in different GPCRs. For example, truncation of the ß-adrenergic receptor was reported not to affect sequestration (217), and truncation of the FSH receptor was found not to alter desensitization (218). While the ultimate response elicited after GnRH receptor stimulation (e.g. LH release) undergoes desensitization (reviewed in Refs. 13–15), it has not been demonstrated that this desensization occurs at the level of the receptor. In view of the role of the missing carboxyl-terminal domain in desensitization of a number of receptors, it is interesting to note that minimal rapid desensitization of the phosphoinositol response mediated by the endogenous {alpha}T3–1 GnRH receptor or the cloned GnRH receptor expressed in several cell lines has been observed (69, 70, 71).

D. Computational modeling of three-dimensional receptor structure
Inferences from the probing of the GnRH receptor with biochemical approaches, mutagenesis, and biophysical considerations, as described above, have validated its initial structural classification as a member of the family of rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Although no direct structural information at atomic resolution is available for any GPCR, strong inferences about structural characteristics of the transmembrane portion of the GnRH receptor rest on the projection map of the electron density of bovine rhodopsin (Fig. 4Go) and the results of extensive probing of the other members of the rhodopsin-like GPCR family. The extension of these inferences to the GnRH receptor is based on the extensive and pervasive sequence homologies and identities of specific motifs observed among the various rhodopsin-like receptors that include the GnRH receptors. Such sequence comparisons are used to identify the likely determinants for the structural commonalty expressed in the template of protein families, such as the seven loop-connected transmembrane helix bundles of the GPCRs (39, 219).

It has been shown that such sequence comparisons are useful in the characterization of structural properties and can also serve to identify the basis for the different functional properties of receptor proteins, e.g. those that determine ligand binding as well as the response of the GPCR to the actions of a large variety of ligands (for a review see Ref.39). Not surprisingly, sequence alignments of the rhodopsin-family GPCRs are often the first steps in the modeling process of probing structure-function relations of these proteins, and in the construction of three-dimensional molecular models of specific receptors (39). The basic assumptions underlying the extraction of structural information about GPCRs from a set of aligned sequences are that they all share a structural framework, and that highly conserved residues can be considered essential for the structural and/or functional integrity of the receptor. Sequence sites observed to have a lower degree of conservation are considered to play a lesser role in determining the structure and/or function of the GPCR. The criteria guiding the construction of a sequence alignment of GPCRs have been reviewed, together with the conceptual and practical limitations of the sole use of sequence alignments for the prediction and construction of three-dimensional molecular models of GPCRs (39).

Using a complex array of interrelated criteria after a set of well defined methods for the construction and computational probing of such models (39), a three-dimensional model of the transmembrane helix bundle of the GnRH receptor has been developed (51) (Fig. 18Go). Specific criteria in the construction of this model included the structural inferences derived from the analysis of sequence conservation patterns (220, 221), the physico-chemical properties of conserved and partially conserved residues (219, 222), and specific protein motifs such as Pro-kinks (223, 224, 225), the projection map of rhodopsin (58, 219), and experimental results. The predicted helix boundaries take into account the role of Arg and Lys residues at the membrane-cytoplasm interface, where these residues belong, as described (39), to the transmembrane helix acting as an anchor to the membrane through ionic pairs with phospholipid head-groups (224). The model is consistent with the overall template of rhodopsin-family GPCRs (39), including the proposed interactions between helix 2 and 7 (51, 198), the mutual orientation of TMDs 1 and 7 (226), the counter-clockwise connectivity of the TMD domains when viewed from the extracellular side (227, 228), as well as the detailed deployment of sites in the interior of the TMD bundle and in the extracellular loops that have been suggested by experiments to contribute to the ligand-binding pocket. As illustrated by model-based investigations of structure-function relations of other GPCRs, both in the family of neurotransmitter receptors (195, 229) and in peptide receptors (194, 230, 231, 232), the discrete molecular models of the GnRH receptor should provide key insight into mechanisms of receptor specificity and activation (e.g. see Refs. 51, 142, 195, and 198).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 18. Three-dimensional model of the transmembrane portion of the GnRH receptor, viewed from the extracellular side. [Reprinted with permission of the publisher from W. Zhou et al.: Mol Pharmacol 45:165–170, 1994 (5).]

 
Using this model (51) as a starting point and incorporating the available experimental work on peptide conformation and ligand interaction sites, as reviewed in the preceding sections, a schematic that accomodates the computational and experimental data can be generated (Fig. 19Go). The computational model of GnRH is based on the predominant conformer observed in conformational family simultations of the peptide (174), and the ligand positioning reflects the following assumptions derived from experimentation: 1) Arg8 of GnRH is in proximity to Asp7.32(302) (186); 2) the C terminus glycinamide of GnRH may interact with Asn2.65(102) (152); 3) His2 of GnRH may interact with Lys3.31(121) (142) and/or Asp2.61(980 (195a) of the receptor.



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 19. Three-dimensional computational model of the GnRH receptor transmembrane helix bundle and GnRH. GnRH is shown in yellow except for His2 (red) and Arg8 (blue). The transmembrane domains of the receptor are highlighted with a green ribbon.

 
As illustrated in this review, the present model is undergoing continual evolution to reflect new experimental and computational data. Significant issues that are under study include the need to define the lipid-aqueous interface computationally, to incorporate models of the loop domains, and to predict receptor rearrangements that accompany ligand-complexing. The present iteration of the model GnRH-GnRH receptor complex serves to represent current experimental and computational insight into the molecular details of the ligand-receptor complex and to guide the design of ongoing experimentation.


    VI. Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 
The cloning of the mammalian GnRH receptors prompts an explanation of the abundant structure/activity data on GnRH analogs in terms of the specific interactions occurring in the ligand-receptor complex. Achieving this understanding requires a definition of the molecular organization of the receptor in terms of helix-helix proximities and the nature of the side chains that contribute to ligand selectivity and receptor conformational change. Through experiments based on evolutionary and computational considerations, much information about the properties of the receptor and its interaction with GnRH congeners is emerging and is being incorporated into computational molecular models of the ligands and receptor. Testing hypotheses that emerge from such studies and computational constructs by cross-validation of data obtained through molecular biological, pharmacological, and computational simulation approaches is leading to an understanding of receptor function by a characterization of the molecular events underlying the interaction with GnRH and its congeneric ligands.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Colleen Flanagan for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to: Stuart C. Sealfon, M.D., Fishberg Center for Neurobiology Research, Box 1065, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, New York 10029.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Amino Acid Sequences...
 III. Structure-Activity...
 IV. Structure and Conformation...
 V. Functional Structure of...
 VI. Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Fink G 1988 Gonadotropin secretion and its control. In: Knobil E, Neill J (eds) The Phsyiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, pp 1349–1377
  2. Gordon K, Hodgen GD 1992 Evolving role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Trends Endocrinol Metab 3:259–263[Medline]
  3. Barbieri RL 1992 Clinical applications of GnRH and its analogues. Trends Endocrinol Metab 3:30–34
  4. Casper RF 1991 Clinical uses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues. Can Med Assoc J 144:153–158[Abstract]
  5. Conn PM, Crowley Jr WF 1991 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its analogues. N Engl J Med 324:93–103[Medline]
  6. Conn PM, Crowley Jr WF 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its analogs. Annu Rev Med 45:391–405[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Moghissi KS 1992 Clinical applications of gonadotropin-releasing hormones in reproductive disorders. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:125–140[Medline]
  8. Filicori M 1994 Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists. A guide to use and selection. Drugs 48:41–58[Medline]
  9. Emons G, Schally AV 1994 The use of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in gynaecological cancers. Hum Reprod 9:1364–1379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Millar RP, King JA, Davidson JS, Milton RC 1987 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-diversity of functions and clinical applications. S Afr Med J 72:748–755[Medline]
  11. Matsuo H, Baba Y, Nair RMG, Arimura A, Schally AV 1971 Structure of the porcine LH- and FSH-releasing hormone. I. The proposed amino acid sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 43:1334–1339[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Burgus R, Butcher M, Amoss M, Ling N, Monahan M, Rivier J, Fellows R, Blackwell R, Vale W, Guillemin R 1972 Primary structure of ovine hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (LRF). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:278–282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Clayton RN, Catt KJ 1981 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: characterization, physiological regulation, and relationship to reproductive function. Endocr Rev 2:186–209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hazum E, Conn PM 1988 Molecular mechanism of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) action. I. The GnRH receptor. Endocr Rev 9:379–386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Conn PM, Janovick JA, Stanislaus D, Kuphal D, Jennes L 1995 Molecular and cellular bases of gonadotropin-releasing hormone action in the pituitary and central nervous system. Vitam Horm 50:151–214[Medline]
  16. Huckle WR, Conn PM 1988 Molecular mechanism of gonadotropin releasing hormone action. II. The effector system. Endocr Rev 9:387–395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Naor Z 1990 Signal transduction mechanisms of Ca2+ mobilizing hormones: the case of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocr Rev 11:326–353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Stojilkovic SS, Reinhart J, Catt KJ 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: structure and signal transduction pathways. Endocr Rev 15:462–499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ 1995 Novel aspects of GnRH-induced intracellular signaling and secretion in pituitary gonadotrophs. J Neuroendocrinol 7:739–757[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ 1995 Expression and signal transduction pathways of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors. Recent Prog Horm Res 50:161–205
  21. Karten MJ, Rivier JE 1986 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog design. Structure-function studies toward the development of agonist and antagonists: rationale and perspective. Endocr Rev 7:44–66[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sherwood N, Eiden L, Brownstein M, Spiess J, Rivier J, Vale W 1983 Characterization of a teleost gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2794–2798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. King JA, Millar RP 1995 Evolutionary aspects of gonadotropin-releasing-hormone and its receptor. Cell Mol Neurobiol 15:5–23[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Sealfon SC, Millar RP 1995 Functional domains of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Cell Mol Neurobiol 15:25–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Windle JJ, Weiner RI, Mellon PL 1990 Cell lines of the pituitary gonadotrope lineage derived by targeted oncogenesis in transgenic mice. Mol Endocrinol 4:597–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sealfon SC, Gillo B, Mundamattom S, Mellon PL, Windle JJ, Landau E, Roberts JL 1990 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor expression in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Endocrinol 4:119–124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tsutsumi M, Zhou W, Millar RP, Mellon PL, Roberts JL, Flanagan CA, Dong K, Gillo B, Sealfon SC 1992 Cloning and functional expression of a mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 6:1163–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Reinhart J, Mertz LM, Catt KJ 1992 Molecular cloning and expression of cDNA encoding the murine gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 267:21281–21284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Perrin MH, Bilezikjian LM, Hoeger C, Donaldson CJ, Rivier J, Haas Y, Vale WW 1993 Molecular and functional characterization of GnRH receptors cloned from rat pituitary and a mouse pituitary tumor cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 191:1139–1144[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Kakar SS, Musgrove LC, Devor DC, Sellers JC, Neill JD 1992 Cloning, sequencing, and expression of human gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:289–295[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Chi L, Zhou W, Prikhozhan A, Flanagan C, Davidson JS, Golembo M, Illing N, Millar RP, Sealfon SC 1993 Cloning and characterization of the human GnRH receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 91:R1–R6
  32. Eidne KA, Sellar RE, Couper G, Anderson L, Taylor PL 1992 Molecular cloning and characterisation of the rat pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 90:R5–R9
  33. Kaiser UB, Zhao D, Cardona GR, Chin WW 1992 Isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding the rat pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:1645–1652[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Brooks J, Taylor PL, Saunders PT, Eidne KA, Struthers WJ, McNeilly AS 1993 Cloning and sequencing of the sheep pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor and changes in expression of its mRNA during the estrous cycle. Mol Cell Endocrinol 94:R23–R27
  35. Illing N, Jacobs GF, Becker II, Flanagan CA, Davidson JS, Eales A, Zhou W, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 1993 Comparative sequence analysis and functional characterization of the cloned sheep gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor reveal differences in primary structure and ligand specificity among mammalian receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 196:745–751[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Kakar SS, Rahe CH, Neill JD 1993 Molecular cloning, sequencing, and characterizing the bovine receptor for gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). Domest Anim Endocrinol 10:335–342[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Weesner GD, Matteri RL 1994 Rapid communication: nucleotide sequence of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor cDNA in the pig pituitary. J Anim Sci 72:1911[Medline]
  38. Tensen C, Okuzawa K, Blomenroehr M, Rebers F, Leurs R, Bogerd J, Schulz R, Goos H 1997 Distinct efficacies for two endogenous ligands on a single cognate gonadoliberin receptor. Eur J Biochem 243:134–140[Medline]
  39. Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H 1995 Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci 25:366–428[CrossRef]
  40. Kakar SS, Grizzle WE, Neill JD 1994 The nucleotide sequences of human GnRH receptors in breast and ovarian tumors are identical with that found in pituitary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 106:145–149[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Moumni M, Kottler ML, Counis R 1994 Nucleotide sequence analysis of mRNAs predicts that rat pituitary and gonadal gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor proteins have identical primary structure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200:1359–1366[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Tanabe Y, Masu M, Ishii T, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S 1992 A family of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuron 8:169–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Pin JP, Duvoisin R 1995 The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions. Neuropharmacology 34:1–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Lin HY, Harris TL, Flannery MS, Aruffo A, Kaji EH, Gorn A, Kolakowski Jr LF, Lodish HF, Goldring SR 1991 Expression cloning of an adenylate cyclase-coupled calcitonin receptor. Science 254:1022–1024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ishihara T, Nakamura S, Kaziro Y, Takahashi T, Takahashi K, Nagata S 1991 Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding the secretin receptor. EMBO J 10:1635–1641[Medline]
  46. Abou-Samra AB, Juppner H, Force T, Freeman MW, Kong XF, Schipani E, Urena P, Richards J, Bonventre JV, Potts Jr J, Kronenberg HM, Segre GV 1992 Expression cloning of a common receptor for parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide from rat osteoblast-like cells: a single receptor stimulates intracellular accumulation of both cAMP and inositol trisphosphates and increases intracellular free calcium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2732–2736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Chen R, Lewis KA, Perrin MH, Vale WW 1993 Expression cloning of a human corticotropin-releasing-factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8967–8971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Juppner H 1994 Molecular cloning and characterization of a parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor: a member of an ancient family of G protein-coupled receptors. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 3:371–378[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Probst WC, Snyder LA, Schuster DI, Brosius J, Sealfon SC 1992 Sequence alignment of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. DNA Cell Biol 11:1–20[Medline]
  50. Strader CD, Fong TM, Graziano MP, Tota MR 1995 The family of G-protein-coupled receptors. FASEB J 9:745–754[Abstract]
  51. Zhou W, Flanagan C, Ballesteros JA, Konvicka K, Davidson JS, Weinstein H, Millar RP, Sealfon SC 1994 A reciprocal mutation supports helix 2 and helix 7 proximity in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Mol Pharmacol 45:165–170[Abstract]
  52. Perrin MH, Haas Y, Porter J, Rivier J, Vale W 1989 The gonadotropin-releasing hormone pituitary receptor interacts with a guanosine triphosphate-binding protein: differential effects of guanyl nucleotides on agonist and antagonist binding. Endocrinology 124:798–804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Limor R, Schvartz I, Hazum E, Ayalon D, Naor Z 1989 Effect of guanine nucleotides on stimulus secretion coupling mechanism in permeabilized pituitary cells: relationship to gonadotropin releasing hormone action. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159:209–215[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Hsieh K-P, Martin TFJ 1992 Thyrotropin-releasing hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors activate phospholipase C by coupling to the guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins Gq and G11. Mol Endocrinol 6:1673–1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Anderson L, Hoyland J, Mason WT, Eidne KA 1992 Characterization of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in single alphaT3–1 pituitary gonadotroph cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 86:167–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Pardo L, Ballesteros JA, Osman R, Weinstein H 1992 On the use of the transmembrane domain of bacteriorhodopsin as a template for modeling the three-dimensional structure of guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4009–4012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Grigorieff N, Ceska TA, Downing KH, Baldwin JM, Henderson R 1996 Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol 259:393–421[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Schertler GF, Villa C, Henderson R 1993 Projection structure of rhodopsin. Nature 362:770–772[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Schertler GFX, Hargrave PA 1995 Projection structure of frog rhodopsin in two crystal forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11578–11582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Arora KK, Sakai A, Catt KJ 1995 Effects of second intracellular loop mutations on signal transduction and internalization of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 270:22820–22825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Hargrave PA 1977 The amino-terminus tryptic peptide of bovine rhodopsin. A glycopeptide containing two sites of oligosaccaride attachment. Biochim Biophys Acta 492:83–94[Medline]
  62. Rands E, Candelore MR, Cheung AH, Hill WS, Strader CD, Dixon RAF 1990 Mutational analysis of ß-adrenergic receptor glycosylation. J Biol Chem 265:10759–10764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Fishburn CS, Elazar Z, Fuchs S 1995 Differential glycosylation and intracellular trafficking for the long and short isoforms of the D2 dopamine receptor. J Biol Chem 270:29819–29824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Hazum E 1982 GnRH-receptor of rat pituitary is a glycoprotein: differential effect of neuraminidase and lectins on agonists and antagonists binding. Mol Cell Endocrinol 26:217–222[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Schvartz I, Hazum E 1985 Tunicamycin and neuraminidase effects of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone binding and LH release from rat pituitary cells in culture. Endocrinology 116:2341–2346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Keinan D, Hazum E 1985 Mapping of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor binding site. Biochemistry 17:7728–7732
  67. Davidson JS, Flanagan CA, Zhou W, Becker II, Elario R, Emeran W, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 1995 Identification of N-glycosylation sites in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor: role in receptor expression but not ligand binding. Mol Cell Endocrinol 107:241–245[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Davidson JS, Flanagan CA, Davies PD, Hapgood J, Myburgh D, Elario R, Millar RP, Forrest-Owen W, McArdle CA 1996 Incorporation of an additional glycosylation site enhances expression of functional human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Endocrine 4:207–212
  69. McArdle CA, Forrest-Owen W, Willars G, Davidson J, Poch A, Kratzmeier M 1995 Desensitization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone action in the gonadotrope-derived alpha T3–1 cell line. Endocrinology 136:4864–4871[Abstract]
  70. Davidson JS, Wakefield IK, Millar RP 1994 Absence of rapid desensitization of the mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Biochem J 300:299–302
  71. Anderson L, McGregor A, Cook JV, Chilvers E, Eidne KA 1995 Rapid desensitization of GnRH-stimulated intracellular signalling events in alpha T3–1 and HEK-293 cells expressing the GnRH receptor. Endocrinology 136:5228–5231[Abstract]
  72. Dixon RA, Sigal LS, Candelore MR, Register RB, Rands E, Strader CD 1987 Structural features required for ligand binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor. EMBO J 6:3269–3275[Medline]
  73. Karnik SS, Sakmann JP, Chen HB, Khorana HG 1988 Cysteine residues 110 and 187 are essential for the formation of correct structure in bovine rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8459–8463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Fraser CM 1989 Site-directed mutagenesis of ß-adrenergic receptors: identification of conserved cysteine residues that independently affect ligand binding and receptor activation. J Biol Chem 264:9266–9270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Savarese TM, Wang CD, Fraser CM 1992 Site-directed mutagenesis of the rat m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Role of conserved cysteines in receptor function. J Biol Chem 267:11439–11448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Perlman JH, Wang W, Nussenzveig DR, Gershengorn MC 1995 A disulfide bond between conserved extracellular cysteines in the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor is critical for binding. J Biol Chem 270:24682–24685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Fan NC, Jeung EB, Peng C, Olofsson JI, Krisinger J, Leung PC 1994 The human gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor gene: cloning, genomic organization and chromosomal assignment. Mol Cell Endocrinol 103:R1–R6
  78. Kakar SS, Neill JD 1995 The human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene (GnRHR) maps to chromosome band 4q13. Cytogenet Cell Genet 70:211–214[Medline]
  79. Kaiser UB, Dushkin H, Altherr MR, Beier DR, Chin WW 1994 Chromosomal localization of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene to human chromosome 4q13.1-q21.1 and mouse chromosome 5. Genomics 20:506–508[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. Kottler ML, Lorenzo F, Bergametti F, Commercon P, Souchier C, Counis R 1995 Subregional mapping of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) gene to 4q between the markers D4S392 and D4S409. Hum Genet 96:477–480[Medline]
  81. Morrison N, Sellar RE, Boyd E, Eidne KA, Connor JM 1994 Assignment of the gene encoding the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor to 4q13.2–13.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 93:714–715[Medline]
  82. Leung PC, Squire J, Peng C, Fan N, Hayden MR, Olofsson JI 1995 Mapping of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor gene to human chromosome 4q21.2 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mamm Genome 6:309–310
  83. Montgomery GW, Penty JM, Lord EA, Brooks J, McNeilly AS 1995 The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor maps to sheep chromosome 6 outside of the region of the FecB locus. Mamm Genome 6:436–438[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Brosius J 1991 Retroposons–seeds of evolution. Science 251:753[Free Full Text]
  85. Zhou W, Sealfon SC 1994 Structure of the mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene: variant transcripts generated by alternative processing. DNA Cell Biol 13:605–614[Medline]
  86. Fan NC, Peng C, Krisinger J, Leung PC 1995 The human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene: complete structure including multiple promoters, transcription initiation sites, and polyadenylation signals. Mol Cell Endocrinol 107:R1–R8
  87. Albarracin CT, Kaiser UB, Chin WW 1994 Isolation and characterization of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene. Endocrinology 135:2300–2306[Abstract]
  88. Rivier J, Gicrasch L, Rizo J, Koerhe SC, Hagler A, Porter J, Corrigan A, Vale W, Rivier C 1992 Probing the GnRH receptor with linear and cyclic analogs. In: Yanaihara N (ed) Peptide Chemistry. Escom., Leiden, pp 313–317
  89. Rivier J 1993 Novel antagonists of GnRH: a compendium of their physicochemical properties activities relative potencies, efficacy in humans. In: Lunenfeld B, Insler V (eds) GnRH Analogues: The State of the Art. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, pp 13–26
  90. Rivier JE, Jiang G, Porter J, Hoeger CA, Craig AG, Corrigan A, Vale W, Rivier CL 1995 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists: novel members of the azaline B family. J Med Chem 38:2649–2662[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Janecka A, Janecka T, Bowers C, Folkers K 1994 The structural features of effective antagonists of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone. Amino Acids 6:111–130[CrossRef]
  92. Millar RP, King JA 1984 Structure-activity relations of LH-RH in birds. J Exp Zool 232:425–430[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Millar RP, King JA 1987 Structural and functional evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Int Rev Cytol 106:149–182[Medline]
  94. King JA, Millar RP 1987 Phylogenetic diversity of LHRH. In: Vickery BH, Nestor JJ (eds) LHRH and Its Analogs Contraceptive and Therapeutic Applications. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, U.K., pp 53–73
  95. Millar RP, King JA 1988 Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone: multiple usage of a peptide. News Physiol Sci 3:49–53[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. King JA, Millar RP 1990 Genealogy of the GnRH family. In: Epple A, Scanes CG, Stetson MH (eds) Progress in Comparative Endocrinology. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 54–59
  97. King JA, Millar RP 1992 Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Trends Endocrinol Metab 3:339–346[CrossRef][Medline]
  98. Millar RP, King J A 1994 Plasticity, conservation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone structure, function. In: Davey KG, Peter RE, Tobe SS (eds) Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology. National Research Council of Canada, pp 129–136
  99. King JA, Millar RP 1995 Evolutionary aspects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor. Cell Mol Neurobiol 15:5–23
  100. Hahn DW, McGuire JL, Vale W, Rivier J 1984 Biological assays utilized to characterize LHRH, its analogs. In: Vickery BN, Nestor JJ, Hafez ESE (eds) LHRH, Its Analogs. MTP Press, Lancaster, p 49
  101. Millar RP, Davidson J, Flanagan C, Wakefield I 1995 Ligand binding and second-messenger assays for cloned Gq/G11-coupled neuropeptide receptors: the GnRH receptor. Methods Neurosci 25:145–162
  102. Kenakin T 1995 Agonist-receptor efficacy I: mechanisms of efficacy and receptor promiscuity. Trends Pharmacol Sci 16:188–192[CrossRef][Medline]
  103. Sherwood N 1987 The GnRH family of peptides. Trends Neurosci 10:129–132
  104. Sherwood NM, Lovejoy DA 1989 The origin of the mammalian form of GnRH in primitive fishes. Fish Physiol Biochem 7:85–93
  105. Muske LE 1993 Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems. Brain Behav Evol 42:215–230[Medline]
  106. King JA, Millar RP 1979 Heterogeneity of vertebrate luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Science 206:67–69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  107. King JA, Millar RP 1982 Structure of chicken hypothalamic LHRH I. structural determination on partially purified material. J Biol Chem 257:10722–10728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. King JA, Millar RP 1982 Structure of chicken hypothalamic LHRH II. isolation and characterization. J Biol Chem 257:10729–10732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  109. Miyamoto K, Hasegawa Y, Igarashi M, Chino N, Sakakibara S, Kangawa K, Matsuo H 1983 Evidence that chicken hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone is (Gln8)-LH-RH. Life Sci 32:1341–1347[CrossRef][Medline]
  110. Miyamato K, Hasegawa Y, Nomura M, Igarashi M, Kangawa K, Matsuo H 1984 Identification of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone in chicken hypothalamus: evidence that gonadotropin secretion is probably controlled by two distinct gonadotropin-releasing hoermones in avian species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3874–3878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  111. Sherwood NM, Sower SA, Marshak DR, Fraser BA, Brownstein MJ 1986 Primary structure of gonadotropin-releasing hormone from lamprey brain. J Biol Chem 261:4812–4819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. Sower SA, Chiang YC, Lovas S, Conlon JM 1993 Primary structure and biological activity of a third gonadotropin-releasing hormone from lamprey brain. Endocrinology 132:1125–1131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Ngamvongchon S, Lovejoy DA, Fischer WH, Craig AG, Nahornisk CS, Peter RE, Rivier JE, Sherwood NM 1992 Primary structure of two forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, one distinct and one conserved, from catfish brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 3:17–22
  114. Lovejoy DA, Fischer WH, Ngamvongchon S, Craig AG, Nahorniak CS, Peter RE, Rivier JE, Sherwood NM 1992 Distinct sequence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in dogfish brain provides insight into GnRH evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:6373–6377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  115. Powell JF, Zohar Y, Elizur A, Park M, Fischer WH, Craig AG, Rivier JE, Lovejoy DA, Sherwood NM 1994 Three forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone characterized from brains of one species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:12081–12085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. Sherwood NM The origin and evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Program of the 77th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Washington, DC, 1995, p 21
  117. Jones SW 1987 Chicken II luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone inhibits the M-current of bullfrog sympathetic neurons. Neurosci Lett 80:180–184[CrossRef][Medline]
  118. Millar R, Illing N, Hapgood J, Rumbad E, Flanagan C, Davidson J, Balckman B, Sun Y, Sealfon SC, Weinstein H, Konvicka K, Guarnieri F, King J Co-ordinated structural evolution of GnRHs and their receptors–insights from comparative studies. Proceedings of the Asian Oceanic Society for Comparative Endocrinology, Sydney, 1996, pp 13–17
  119. Millar RP, King JA 1983 Synthesis, luteinizing hormone-releasing activity, and receptor binding of chicken hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 113:1364–1369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  120. Millar RP, Milton RC, Follett BK, King JA 1986 Receptor binding and gonadotropin-releasing activity of a novel chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone ([His5, Trp7, Tyr8]GnRH) and a D-Arg6 analog. Endocrinology 119:224–231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  121. Millar RP, Flanagan CA, Milton RCL, King JA 1989 Chimeric analogues of vertebrate gonadotropin-releasing hormones comprising substitutions of the variant amino acids in positions 5,7, and 8. J Biol Chem 264:21007–21013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  122. Folkers K, Bowers CY, Tang PF, Kubota M 1986 Decapeptides as effective agonists from L-amino acids biologically equivalent to the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1070–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  123. Lovejoy DA, Corrigan AZ, Nahorniak CS, Perrin MH, Porter J, Kaiser R, Miller C, Pantoja D, Craig AG, Peter RE, Vale WW, Rivier JE, Sherwood NM 1995 Structural modifications of non-mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) isoforms: design of novel GnRH analogues. Regul Pept 60:99–115[CrossRef][Medline]
  124. Habibi HR, Peter RE, Nahorniak CS, DeMilton RC, Millar RP 1992 Activity of vertebrate gonadotropin-releasing hormones and analogs with variant amino acid residues in positions 5, 7 and 8 in the goldfish pituitary. Regul Pept 37:271–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  125. Licht P, Porter D, Millar RP 1987 Specificity of amphibian and reptilian pituitaries for various forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormones in vitro. Gen Comp Endocrinol 66:248–255[CrossRef][Medline]
  126. Jacobs GFM, Flanagan CA, Roeske RW, Millar RP 1995 Agonist activity of mammalin GnRH antagonists in chicken gondotropes reflect differences in vertebrate GnRH receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 108:107–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  127. Murthy CK, Nahorniak CS, Rivier JE, Peter RE 1993 In vitro characterization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in goldfish, Carassius auratus. Endocrinology 133:1633–1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  128. Wormald PJ, Eidne KA, Millar RP 1985 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in human pituitary: ligand structural requirements, molecular size, and cationic effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 61:1190–1194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  129. Sandow J, Konig W, Geiger R, Uhman R, Von Rechenberg W 1978 Structure-activity relationships in the LH-RH molecule. In: Crighton DB, Haynes NB, Foxcroft GR, Lamming GE (eds) Control of Ovulation. Buttersworths, London, pp 47–70
  130. Fujino M, Kobayashi S, Obayashi M, Fukuda T, Shinagawa S 1972 Synthesis and biological activities of analogs of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 49:698–705[CrossRef][Medline]
  131. Okada T, Kitamura K, Baba Y, Arimura A, Schally AV 1973 Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs lacking N-terminal pGLU ring structure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 53:1180–1186[CrossRef][Medline]
  132. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV 1973 Effect of simple amino acid replacements on the biological activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. J Med Chem 16:1140–1143[CrossRef][Medline]
  133. Hirotsu Y, Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV 1974 Stereoisomers of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 59:277–282[CrossRef][Medline]
  134. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV 1975 Structure-activity relationship of LH, FSH releasing hormone. In: Marks N, Rodnight R (eds) Research Methods in Neurochemistry. Plenum, New York, pp 393–404
  135. Yanaihara N, Tsuji K, Yanihara C, Hashimoto T, Kaneko T, Oka H, Aminura A, Schally AV 1973 Synthesis and biological activities of analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) substituted in position 1 or 2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 51:165–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  136. Grant GF, Vale W 1994 Hypothalamic control of anterior pituitary hormone secretion-characterized hypothalamic-hypophysiotropic peptides. In: James VHT, Mastini L (eds) Current Topics in Experimental Endocrinology. Academic Press, New York, vol 2:38–62
  137. Monahan MW, Amoss MS, Anderson HA, Vale W 1973 Synthetic analogs of the hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing factor with increased agonist or antagonist properties. Biochemistry 12:4616–4620[CrossRef][Medline]
  138. Rodic V, Flanagan C, Millar R, Konvicka K, Weinstein H, Sealfon SC 1996 Role of Asp2.61(98) in agonist complexing with the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25:1302
  139. Rivier J, Monahan M, Vale W, Grant G, Amoss M, Blackwell R, Guillemin R, Burgus R 1972 Solid-phase peptide synthesis on a benzhydrylamine resin of LRF (luteinizing hormone releasing factor) and analogues, including antagonists. Chimia 26:300–303
  140. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Hirotsu Y, Schally AV 1974 Synthesis and biological properties of (2-L-beta-(pyrazolyl-3)alanine)-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. J Med Chem 17:140–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  141. Vale W, Grant G, Rivier J, Monahan M, Amoss M, Blackwell R, Burgus R, Guillemin R 1972 Synthetic polypeptide antagonists of the hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing factor. Science 176:933–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  142. Zhou W, Rodic V, Kitanovic S, Flanagan CA, Chi L, Weinstein H, Maayani S, Millar RP, Sealfon SC 1995 A locus of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor that differentiates agonist and antagonist binding sites. J Biol Chem 270:18853–18857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  143. Yanaihara N, Hashimoto T, Yanaihara C, Tsuji K, Kenmochi Y, Ashizawa F, Kaneko T, Oka H, Arimura A, Schally AV 1973 Synthesis and biological evaluation of analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 52:64–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  144. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV, Vilchez-Martinez JA, Debeljuk L, Carter WH, Arimura A 1974 Stimulatory and inhibitory analogs of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone. Biochemistry 13:323–326[CrossRef][Medline]
  145. Vilchez-Martinez LA, Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV, Arimura A 1975 Anti-luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing activity of several analogues of LH-releasing hormone. Fertil Steril 26:554–559[Medline]
  146. Haviv F, Fitzpatrick TD, Swenson RE, Nichols CJ, Mort NA, Bush EN, Diaz G, Bammert G, Nguyen A, Rhutasel NS, Nellons HN, Hoffman DJ, Johnson ES, Greer J 1993 Effect of N-methyl substitution of the peptide bonds in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists. J Med Chem 36:363–369[CrossRef][Medline]
  147. Konig W, Sandow J, Geiger R 1975 Peptides: chemistry structure and biology. In: Walker R, Meienhofer J (eds) Proceedings of the 4th American Peptide Symposium. Ann Arbor Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 883–888
  148. Miller BT, Collins TJ, Nagle GT, Kurosky A 1992 The occurrence of O-acylation during biotinylation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and analogs. Evidence for a reactive serine. J Biol Chem 267:5060–5069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  149. Gautron J-P, Palton E, Bauer K, Dordon C 1991(Hydroxyprolinea) luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: a novel peptide in mammalian and frog hypothalamus. Neurochem Int 2:221–235
  150. Fujino M, Kobayashi S, Obayashi M, Shinagawa S, Fukuda T 1972 Structure-activity relationships in the C-terminal part of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone(LH-RH). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 49:863–869[CrossRef][Medline]
  151. Coy DH, Vilchez-Martinez JA, Coy EJ, Nishi N, Arimura A, Schally AV 1975 Polyfluoroalkylamine derivatives of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Biochemistry 14:1848–1851[CrossRef][Medline]
  152. Davidson JS, McArdle CA, Davies P, Elario R, Flanagan CA, Millar RP 1996 Asn102 of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor is a critical determinant of potency for agonists containing C-terminal glycinamide. J Biol Chem 271:15510–15514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  153. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Schally AV 1973 Analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone containing derivatives of phenylalanine in place of tyrosine. J Med Chem 16:827–829[CrossRef][Medline]
  154. Coy DH, Vilchez-Martinez JA, Coy EJ, Arimura A, Schally AV 1973 A peptide inhibitor of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 37:331–333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  155. Haviv F, Fitzpatrick TD, Nichols CJ, Swenson RE, Mort NA, Bush EN, Diaz G, Nguyen AT, Holst MR, Cybulski VA, Leal JA, Bammert G, Rhutasel NS, Dodge PW, Johnson ES, Cannon JB, Knittle J, Greer J 1993 The effect of NMeTyr5 substitution in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists. J Med Chem 36:928–933[CrossRef][Medline]
  156. Ling N, Vale W 1975 Analogs of luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LRF): synthesis and biological activity of [N*-Me)Leu7]LRF and [D-Ala6,N*-Me)-Leu7]LRF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 63:801–806[CrossRef][Medline]
  157. Chang JK, Sievertsson H, Currie BL, Bogentoft C, Folkers K, Bowers CY 1972 Synthesis of the luteinizing-releasing hormone of the hypothalamus and the 8-lysine analog. J Med Chem 15:623–627[CrossRef][Medline]
  158. Yanaihara N, Yanaihara C, Hashimoto T, Kenmochi Y, Kaneko T, Oka H, Saito S, Schally AV, Arimura A 1972 Syntheses and LH- and FSH-RH activities of LH-RH analogs substituted at position 8. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 49:1280–1291[CrossRef][Medline]
  159. Yabe Y, Kitamura K, Miura C, Baba Y 1974 Analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone with modification in position 8. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 22:2557–2564[Medline]
  160. Shinitzky M, Hazum E, Fridkin M 1976 Structure-activity relationships of luliberin substituted at position 8. Biochim Biophys Acta 453:553–557[Medline]
  161. Shinitzky M, Fridkin M 1976 Structural features of luliberin (luteinising hormone-releasing factor) inferred from fluorescence measurements. Biochim Biophys Acta 434:137–143[Medline]
  162. Milton RCdL, King JA, Badminton MN, Tobler CJ, Lindsey GG, Fridkin M, Millar RP 1983 Comparative structure-activity studies on mammalian Arg8 LH-RH and Gln8 LH-RH by fluorimetric titration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 111:1082–1088[CrossRef][Medline]
  163. Hazum E 1987 Binding properties of solubilized gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor: role of carboxylic groups. Biochemistry 26:7011–7014[CrossRef][Medline]
  164. Keinan D, Hazum E 1985 Mapping the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor binding site. Biochemistry 24:7728–7732[CrossRef][Medline]
  165. Momany FA 1976 Conformational energy analysis of the molecule, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. 2. Tetrapeptide and decapeptide analogues. J Am Chem Soc 98:2996–3000[CrossRef][Medline]
  166. Momany FA 1976 Conformational energy analysis of the molecule, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. 1. Native decapeptide. J Am Chem Soc 98:2990–2996[CrossRef][Medline]
  167. Gupta HM, Talwar GP, Salunke DM 1993 A novel computer modeling approach to the structures of small bioactive peptides: the structure of gonadotropin releasing hormone. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 16:48–56[CrossRef][Medline]
  168. Struthers RS, Rivier J, Hagler AT 1985 Molecular dynamics and minimum energy conformations of GnRH and analogs. A methodology for computer-aided drug design. Ann NY Acad Sci 439:81–96[CrossRef][Medline]
  169. Janecka A, Ljungqvist A, Bowers C, Folkers K 1991 Superiority of an antagonist of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone with emphasis on arginine in position 8, named Argtide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 180:374–379[CrossRef][Medline]
  170. Nikolics K, Szonyi E, Ramachandran J 1989 Photoaffinity labeling of pituitary GnRH receptors: significance of the position of the photolabel on the ligand. Biochemistry 27:1425–1432
  171. Rivier J, Kupryszewski G, Varga J, Porter J, Rivier C, Perrin M, Hagler A, Struthers S, Corrigan A, Vale W 1988 Design of potent cyclic gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists. J Med Chem 31:677–682[CrossRef][Medline]
  172. Hruby VJ (ed) 1985 Conformation in biology, drug design. In: The Peptides: Analysis Synthesis Biology. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, vol 7
  173. Nikiforovich GV 1994 Computational molecular modeling in peptide drug design. Int J Pept Protein Res 44:513–531[Medline]
  174. Struthers RS, Tanaka G, Koerber SC, Solmajer T, Baniak EL 1990 Design of biologically active, conformationally constrained GnRH antagonists. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 8:295–304[CrossRef][Medline]
  175. Guarnieri F, Weinstein H 1996 Conformational memories and the exploration of biologically relevant peptide conformations: an illustration for the gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J Am Chem Soc 118:5580–5589[CrossRef]
  176. Momany FA 1978 Conformational analysis of the molecule luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. 3. Analogue inhibitors and antagonists. J Med Chem 21:63–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  177. Zimmerman SS 1985 Theoretical methods in the analysis of peptide conformation. Conformation in biology, drug design. In: Hruby (ed) The Peptides. Academic Press, New York, vol 7:165–212
  178. Bienstock RJ, Rizo J, Koerber SC, Rivier JE, Hagler AT, Gierasch LM 1993 Conformational analysis of a highly potent dicyclic gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist by nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics. J Med Chem 36:3265–3273[CrossRef][Medline]
  179. Paul PK, Dauber-Osguthorpe P, Campbell MM, Osguthorpe DJ 1989 A novel beta-turn location in an LHRH antagonist: a combined conformational search and molecular dynamics study. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165:1051–1058[CrossRef][Medline]
  180. Marshall GR 1992 Three-dimensional structure of peptide-protein complexes: implications for recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2:904–919[CrossRef]
  181. Sprecher RF, Momany FA 1979 On the conformation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, nuclear Overhauser observations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 87:72–77[CrossRef][Medline]
  182. Hagler AT 1985 Theoretical simulation of conformation energetics and dynamics of peptides. Conformation in biology and drug design. In: Hruby VJ (ed) The Peptides. Academic Press, New York, vol:213–299
  183. Guarnieri F, Wilson SR 1995 Conformational memories and a simulated annealing program that learns. Application to LTB4. J Comput Chem 16:648–653[CrossRef]
  184. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E 1953 Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092[CrossRef]
  185. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP 1983 Simulated annealing. Science 220:671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  186. Baniak E, Rivier JE, Struthers RS, Hagler AT, Gierasch LM 1987 Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis and conformational characterization of a cyclic decapeptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Biochemistry 26:2642–2656[CrossRef][Medline]
  187. Flanagan CA, Becker II, Davidson JS, Wakefield IK, Zhou W, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 1994 Glutamate 301 of the mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor confers specificity for arginine 8 of mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J Biol Chem 269:22636–22641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  188. Ho BY, Karschin A, Branchek T, Davidson N, Lester HA 1992 The role of conserved aspartate and serine residues in ligand binding and in function of the 5-HT1A receptor: a site-directed mutation study. FEBS Lett 312:259–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  189. Wang CD, Buck MA, Fraser CM 1991 Site-directed mutagenesis of alpha2A-adrenergic receptors: identification of amino acids involved in ligand binding and receptor activation by agonists. Mol Pharmacol 40:168–179[Abstract]
  190. Wang C-D, Gallaher TK, Shih JC 1993 Site directed mutagenesis of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptor: identification of amino acids necessary for ligand binding and receptor activation. Mol Pharmacol 43:931–940[Abstract]
  191. Strader CD, Sigal IS, Candelore MR, Rands E, Hill WS, Dixon RAF 1988 Conserved aspartate residues 79 and 113 of the ß-adrenergic receptor have different roles in receptor function. J Biol Chem 263:10267–10271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  192. Mansour A, Meng F, Meador WJ, Taylor LP, Civelli O, Akil H 1992 Site-directed mutagenesis of the human dopamine D2 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 227:205–214[CrossRef][Medline]
  193. Gantz I, DelValle J, Wang L, Tashiro T, Munzert G, Guo YJ, Konda Y, Yamada T 1992 Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine H2 receptor. J Biol Chem 267:20840–20843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  194. Fraser CM, Wang CD, Robinson DA, Gocayne JD, Venter JC 1989 Site-directed mutagenesis of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: conserved aspartic acids play important roles in receptor function. Mol Pharmacol 36:840–847[Abstract]
  195. Perlman JH, Laakkonen L, Osman R, Gershengorn MC 1994 A model of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor binding pocket. Evidence for a second direct interaction between transmembrane helix 3 and TRH. J Biol Chem 269:23383–23386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  196. Almaula N, Ebersole BJ, Zhang D, Weinstein H, Sealfon SC 1996 Mapping the binding site pocket of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptor: Ser3.36(159) provides a second interaction site for the protonated amine of serotonin but not of LSD or bufotenin. J Biol Chem 271:14672–14675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  197. Rodic V, Flanagan C, Millar R, Konvicka K, Weinstein H, Sealfon SC 1996. Role of Asp2.61(198) in agonist complexing with the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Soc Neurosci Abstr 22:1302
  198. Cook JV, Faccenda E, Anderson L, Couper GG, Eidne KA, Taylor PL 1993 Effects of Asn87 and Asp318 mutations on ligand binding and signal transduction in the rat GnRH receptor. J Endocrinol 139:R1–R4
  199. Awara WM, Guo C-H, Conn PM 1996 Effects of Asn318 and Asp87Asn318 mutations on signal transduction by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor and receptor regulation. Endocrinology 137:655–662[Abstract]
  200. Sealfon SC, Chi L, Ebersole B, Rodic V, Zhang D, Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H 1995 Related contribution of specific helix 2 and 7 residues to conformational activation of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. J Biol Chem 370:16683–16688
  201. Jagerschmidt A, Guillaume N, Goudreau N, Maigret B, Roques BP 1995 Mutation of Asp100 in the second transmembrane domain of the cholecystokinin B receptor increases antagonist binding and reduces signal transduction. Mol Pharmacol 48:783–789[Abstract]
  202. Dohlman HG, Thorner J, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1991 Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 60:653–688[CrossRef][Medline]
  203. Chi L, Davidson JS, Zhou W, Millar RP, Sealfon SC Mutations of the second intracellular loop domain of the GnRH receptor. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, 1994, Anaheim, CA (Abstract 159)
  204. Ovchinnikov YA, Abdulaev NG, Bogachuk AS 1988 Two adjacent cysteine residues in the C-terminal cytoplasmic fragment of bovine rhodopsin are palmitylated. FEBS Lett 230:1–5[CrossRef][Medline]
  205. O’Dowd BF, Hnatowich M, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Bouvier M 1989 Palmitoylation of the human B2-adrenergic receptor. Mutation of Cys341 in the carboxyl tail leads to an uncoupled nonpalmitoylated form of the receptor. J Biol Chem 264:7564–7569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  206. Ng GY, George SR, Zastawny RL, Caron M, Bouvier M, Dennis M, O’Dowd BF 1993 Human serotonin1B receptor expression in Sf9 cells: phosphorylation, palmitoylation, and adenylyl cyclase inhibition. Biochemistry 32:11727–11733[CrossRef][Medline]
  207. Zhu H, Wang H, Ascoli M 1995 The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor is palmitoylated at intracellular cysteine residues. Mol Endocrinol 9:141–150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  208. Sibley DR, Benovic JL, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1987 Regulation of transmembrane signaling by receptor phosphorylation. Cell 48:913–922[CrossRef][Medline]
  209. Leeb-Lundberg LMF, Cotecchia S, DeBlasi A, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1987 Regulation of adrenergic receptor function by phosphorylation. I. Agonist-promoted desensitization and phosphorylation of {alpha}1-adrenergic receptors coupled to inositol phospholipid metabolism in DDT1 MR-2 smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 262:3098–3105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  210. Nussenzveig DR, Heinflink M, Gershengorn MC 1993 Agonist-stimulated internalization of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor is dependent on two domains in the receptor carboxyl terminus. J Biol Chem 268:2389–2392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  211. Benya RV, Fathi Z, Battey JF, Jensen RT 1993 Serines and threonines in the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor carboxyl terminus mediate internalization. J Biol Chem 268:20285–20290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  212. Hunyady L, Bor M, Balla T, Catt KJ 1994 Identification of a cytoplasmic Ser-Thr-Leu motif that determines agonist-induced internalization of the AT1 angiotensin receptor. J Biol Chem 269:31378–31382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  213. Thomas WG, Baker KM, Motel TJ, Thekkumkara TJ 1995 Angiotensin II receptor endocytosis involves two distinct regions of the cytoplasmic tail. A role for residues on the hydrophobic face of a putative amphipathic helix. J Biol Chem 270:22153–22159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  214. Sanchez-Yague J, Rodriguez MC, Segaloff DL, Ascoli M 1992 Truncation of the cytoplasmic tail of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor prevents agonist-induced uncoupling. J Biol Chem 267:7217–7220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  215. Zhu X, Gudermann T, Birnbaumer M, Birnbaumer L 1993 A luteinizing hormone receptor with a severely truncated cytoplasmic tail (LHR-ct628) desensitizes to the same degree as the full-length receptor. J Biol Chem 268:1723–1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  216. Sasakawa N, Sharif M, Hanley MR 1994 Attenuation of agonist-induced desensitization of the rat substance P receptor by progressive truncation of the C-terminus. FEBS Lett 347:181–184[CrossRef][Medline]
  217. Alblas J, van Etten I, Khanum A, Moolenaar WH 1995 C-terminal truncation of the neurokinin-2 receptor causes enhanced and sustained agonist-induced signaling. Role of receptor phosphorylation in signal attenuation. J Biol Chem 270:8944–8951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  218. Lattion AL, Diviani D, Cotecchia S 1994 Truncation of the receptor carboxyl terminus impairs agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem 269:22887–22893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  219. Strader CD, Sigal IS, Blake AD, Cheung AH, Register RB, Rands E, Zemcik BA, Canderlore MR, Dixon RAF 1987 The carboxyl terminus of the hamster beta-adrenergic receptor expressed in mouse L cells is not required for receptor sequestration. Cell 49:855–863[CrossRef][Medline]
  220. Hipkin RW, Liu XB, Ascoli M 1995 Truncation of the C-terminal tail of the follitropin receptor does not impair the agonist- or phorbol ester-induced receptor phosphorylation and uncoupling. J Biol Chem 270:26683–26689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  221. Baldwin JM 1993 The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J 12:1693–703[Medline]
  222. Lesk AM, Boswell DR 1992 Homology modelling: inferences from tables of aligned sequences. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2:242–247[CrossRef]
  223. Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Blundell TL, Saunders J 1989 An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G-protein coupled receptors. FEBS Lett 251:109–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  224. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwilliger TC 1984 The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:140–144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  225. Williams KA, Deber CM 1991 Proline residues in transmembrane helices: structural or dynamic role? Biochemistry 30:8919–8923[CrossRef][Medline]
  226. Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H 1992 Analysis and refinement of criteria for predicting the structure and relative orientations of transmembranal helical domains. Biophys J 62:107–109
  227. Sankararamakrishnan R, Vishveshwara S 1992 Geometry of proline-containing alpha-helices in proteins. Int J Pept Protein Res 39:356–363[Medline]
  228. Liu J, Schoneberg T, Rhee M, Wess J 1995 Mutational analysis of the relative orientation of transmembrane helices I and VII in G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 270:19532–19539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  229. Hwa J, Graham RM, Perex DM 1996 Chimeras of {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor subtypes identify critical residues that modulate active state isomerization. J Biol Chem 271:7956–7964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  230. Thirstrup K, Elling CE, Hjorth SA, Schwartz TW 1996 Construction of a high affinity zinc switch in the {kappa}-opioid receptor. J Biol Chem 271:7875–7878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  231. Almaula N, Ebersole BJ, Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H, Sealfon SC 1996 Contribution of a helix 5 locus to selectivity of hallucinogenic and non-hallucingenic ligands for the human 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors: direct and indirect effects on ligand affinity mediated by the same locus. Mol Pharmacol 50:34–42[Abstract]
  232. Bhogal N, Donnelly D, Findlay JB 1994 The ligand binding site of the neurokinin 2 receptor. Site-directed mutagenesis and identification of neurokinin A binding residues in the human neurokinin 2 receptor. J Biol Chem 269:27269–27274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  233. Perlman JH, Thaw CN, Laakkonen L, Bowers CY, Osman R, Gershengorn MC 1994 Hydrogen bonding interaction of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) with transmembrane tyrosine 106 of the TRH receptor. J Biol Chem 269:1610–1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  234. Perlman JH, Nussenzveig DR, Osmasn R, Gershengorn MC 1992 Thyrotropin-releasing hormone binding to the mouse pituitary receptor does not involve ionic interactions. A model for neutral peptide binding to G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 267:24413–24417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  235. Donnelly D, Findlay JB, Blundell TL 1994 The evolution and structure of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors. Receptors Channels 2:61–78[Medline]
  236. Takeda Y, Chou KB, Takeda J, Sachais BS, Krause JE 1991 Molecular cloning, structural characterization and functional expression of the human substance P receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 179:1232–1240[CrossRef][Medline]
  237. Kobilka BK, Dixon RAF, Frielle T, Dohlman HG, Bolanowski MA, Sigal IS, Yang-feng TL, Francke U, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1987 cDNA for the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor: a protein with multiple membrane-spanning domains and encoded by a gene whose chromosomal location is shared with that of the receptor for platelet-derived growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:46–50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  238. Nathans J, Hogness DS 1984 Isolation and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding human rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4851–4855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  239. van Rhee AM, Jacobson KA 1996 Molecular architecture of G protein-coupled receptors. Drug Dev Res 37:1–38



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Dobkin-Bekman, M. Naidich, L. Rahamim, F. Przedecki, T. Almog, S. Lim, P. Melamed, P. Liu, T. Wohland, Z. Yao, et al.
A Preformed Signaling Complex Mediates GnRH-Activated ERK Phosphorylation of Paxillin and FAK at Focal Adhesions in L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 23(11): 1850 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Matsuda, K. Tsutsumi, T. Kanematsu, K. Fukami, Y. Terada, T. Takenawa, K. I. Nakayama, and M. Hirata
Involvement of Phospholipase C-Related Inactive Protein in the Mouse Reproductive System Through the Regulation of Gonadotropin Levels
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2009; 81(4): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y.-M. Chan, A. de Guillebon, M. Lang-Muritano, L. Plummer, F. Cerrato, S. Tsiaras, A. Gaspert, H. B. Lavoie, C.-H. Wu, W. F. Crowley Jr., et al.
GNRH1 mutations in patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
PNAS, July 14, 2009; 106(28): 11703 - 11708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
N. T Joseph, K. Morgan, R. Sellar, D. McBride, R. P Millar, and I. C Dunn
The chicken type III GnRH receptor homologue is predominantly expressed in the pituitary, and exhibits similar ligand selectivity to the type I receptor
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2009; 202(1): 179 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K.-H. Jeong, J. C. Gill, V. Nose, A. F. Parlow, R. S. Carroll, and U. B. Kaiser
Expression of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor-Simian Virus 40 T-Antigen Transgene Has Sex-Specific Effects on the Reproductive Axis
Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3383 - 3391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H.-M. Wu, J.-C. Cheng, H.-S. Wang, H.-Y. Huang, C. D. MacCalman, and P. C.K. Leung
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Type II Induces Apoptosis of Human Endometrial Cancer Cells by Activating GADD45{alpha}
Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 69(10): 4202 - 4208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. F. Canosa, N. Stacey, and R. E. Peter
Changes in brain mRNA levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide, and somatostatin during ovulatory luteinizing hormone and growth hormone surges in goldfish
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): R1815 - R1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Tello, S. Wu, J. E. Rivier, and N. M. Sherwood
Four functional GnRH receptors in zebrafish: analysis of structure, signaling, synteny and phylogeny
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 48(5): 570 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P.-S. Tsai and L. Zhang
The Emergence and Loss of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Protostomes: Orthology, Phylogeny, Structure, and Function
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2008; 79(5): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I.-S. Hong, A. P. Cheung, and P. C. K. Leung
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormones I and II Induce Apoptosis in Human Granulosa Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3179 - 3185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. I. Kavanaugh, M. Nozaki, and S. A. Sower
Origins of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) in Vertebrates: Identification of a Novel GnRH in a Basal Vertebrate, the Sea Lamprey
Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 3860 - 3869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Lopez de Maturana, A. J. Pawson, Z.-L. Lu, L. Davidson, S. Maudsley, K. Morgan, S. P. Langdon, and R. P. Millar
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analog Structural Determinants of Selectivity for Inhibition of Cell Growth: Support for the Concept of Ligand-Induced Selective Signaling
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1711 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. LaFevre-Bernt, S. Wu, and X. Lin
Recombinant, refolded tetrameric p53 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-p53 slow proliferation and induce apoptosis in p53-deficient cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1420 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Pawson, E. Faccenda, S. Maudsley, Z.-L. Lu, Z. Naor, and R. P. Millar
Mammalian Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Undergo Slow, Constitutive, Agonist-Independent Internalization
Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1415 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. J. Stewart, R. Sellar, D. J. Wilson, R. P. Millar, and Z.-L. Lu
Identification of a Novel Ligand Binding Residue Arg38(1.35) in the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8): 737 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. M. Conn, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, J. Ito, and J. A. Janovick
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Trafficking in Health and Disease: Lessons Learned to Prepare for Therapeutic Mutant Rescue in Vivo
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 225 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z.-L. Lu, M. Coetsee, C. D. White, and R. P. Millar
Structural Determinants for Ligand-Receptor Conformational Selection in a Peptide G Protein-coupled Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17921 - 17929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. C.K. Leung and J.-H. Choi
Endocrine signaling in ovarian surface epithelium and cancer
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 143 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
E. L. Baldwin, I. N. Wegorzewska, M. Flora, and T. J. Wu
Regulation of Type II Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH-II) Gene Expression by the Processed Peptide of LHRH-I, LHRH-(1-5) in Endometrial Cells
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2007; 232(1): 146 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Mamputha, Z.-l. Lu, R. W. Roeske, R. P. Millar, A. A. Katz, and C. A. Flanagan
Conserved Amino Acid Residues that Are Important for Ligand Binding in the Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Are Required for High Potency of GnRH II at the Type II GnRH Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 21(1): 281 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Morgan, R. Sellar, A. J. Pawson, Z.-L. Lu, and R. P. Millar
Bovine and Ovine Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-II Ligand Precursors and Type II GnRH Receptor Genes Are Functionally Inactivated
Endocrinology, November 1, 2006; 147(11): 5041 - 5051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Antelli, L. Baldazzi, A. Balsamo, P. Pirazzoli, A. Nicoletti, M. Gennari, and A. Cicognani
Two novel GnRHR gene mutations in two siblings with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
M R Silver and S A Sower
Functional characterization and kinetic studies of an ancestral lamprey GnRH-III selective type II GnRH receptor from the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus.
J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 36(3): 601 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Navratil, T. A. Farmerie, J. Bogerd, T. M. Nett, and C. M. Clay
Differential Impact of Intracellular Carboxyl Terminal Domains on Lipid Raft Localization of the Murine Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 788 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
K.-Y. Kim, K.-C. Choi, N. Auersperg, and P. C K Leung
Mechanism of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-I and -II-induced cell growth inhibition in ovarian cancer cells: role of the GnRH-I receptor and protein kinase C pathway.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2006; 13(1): 211 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Caunt, A. R. Finch, K. R. Sedgley, L. Oakley, L. M. Luttrell, and C. A. McArdle
Arrestin-mediated ERK Activation by Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors: RECEPTOR-SPECIFIC ACTIVATION MECHANISMS AND COMPARTMENTALIZATION
J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2701 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. K. Barnett, T. M. Bunnell, R. P. Millar, and D. H. Abbott
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone II Stimulates Female Sexual Behavior in Marmoset Monkeys
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. E. Ratcliffe, H. M. Fraser, R. Sellar, J. Rivier, and R. P. Millar
Bifunctional Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist-Progesterone Analogs with Increased Efficacy and Duration of Action
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 571 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. E. Barran, R. W. Roeske, A. J. Pawson, R. Sellar, M. T. Bowers, K. Morgan, Z.-L. Lu, M. Tsuda, T. Kusakabe, and R. P. Millar
Evolution of Constrained Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Ligand Conformation and Receptor Selectivity
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38569 - 38575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. R Gunthert, C. Grundker, A. Olota, J. Lasche, N. Eicke, and G. Emons
Analogs of GnRH-I and GnRH-II inhibit epidermal growth factor-induced signal transduction and resensitize resistant human breast cancer cells to 4OH-tamoxifen
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 153(4): 613 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Tello, J. E. Rivier, and N. M. Sherwood
Tunicate Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Peptides Selectively Activate Ciona intestinalis GnRH Receptors and the Green Monkey Type II GnRH Receptor
Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 4061 - 4073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Shacham, M. N. Cheifetz, M. Fridkin, A. J. Pawson, R. P. Millar, and Z. Naor
Identification of Ser153 in ICL2 of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor as a Phosphorylation-independent Site for Inhibition of Gq Coupling
J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 28981 - 28988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
J. N Hislop, C. J Caunt, K. R Sedgley, E. Kelly, S. Mundell, L. D Green, and C. A McArdle
Internalization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors (GnRHRs): does arrestin binding to the C-terminal tail target GnRHRs for dynamin-dependent internalization?
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 35(1): 177 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. R. Silver, N. V. Nucci, A. R. Root, K. L. Reed, and S. A. Sower
Cloning and Characterization of a Functional Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor with a Lengthy Carboxy-Terminal Tail from an Ancestral Vertebrate, the Sea Lamprey
Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3351 - 3361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
J H Li, F Sicard, M A Salam, M Baek, J LePrince, H Vaudry, K Kim, H B Kwon, and J Y Seong
Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a type-I neurotensin receptor (NTR) and a novel NTR from the bullfrog brain
J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 793 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Pawson, S. Maudsley, K. Morgan, L. Davidson, Z. Naor, and R. P. Millar
Inhibition of Human Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor (GnRHR) Function by Expression of a Human Type II GnRHR Gene Fragment
Endocrinology, June 1, 2005; 146(6): 2639 - 2649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. J. Pask, H. Kanasaki, U. B. Kaiser, P. M. Conn, J. A. Janovick, D. W. Stockton, D. L. Hess, M. J. Justice, and R. R. Behringer
A Novel Mouse Model of Hypogonadotrophic Hypogonadism: N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosourea-Induced Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene Mutation
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 19(4): 972 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. K. Cheng and P. C. K. Leung
Molecular Biology of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-I, GnRH-II, and Their Receptors in Humans
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 283 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. H. Li, H. Choe, A. F. Wang, K. Maiti, C. Wang, A. Salam, S. Y. Chun, W.-K. Lee, K. Kim, H. B. Kwon, et al.
Extracellular Loop 3 (EL3) and EL3-Proximal Transmembrane Helix 7 of the Mammalian Type I and Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptors Determine Differential Ligand Selectivity to GnRH-I and GnRH-II
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1099 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. J. Gregory, C. T. Lacza, A. A. Detz, S. Xu, L. A. Petrillo, and U. B. Kaiser
Synergy between Activin A and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Transcriptional Activation of the Rat Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-{beta} Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 19(1): 237 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Rose, P. Froment, V. Perrot, M. J. Quon, D. LeRoith, and J. Dupont
The Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone Inhibits the Anti-apoptotic Activity of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 in Pituitary {alpha}T3 Cells by Protein Kinase C{alpha}-mediated Negative Regulation of Akt
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52500 - 52516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. J. Reinhart, Q. Xie, X.-J. Liu, Y.-F. Zhu, J. Fan, C. Chen, and R. S. Struthers
Species Selectivity of Nonpeptide Antagonists of the Gonadotropinreleasing Hormone Receptor Is Determined by Residues in Extracellular Loops II and III and the Amino Terminus
J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34115 - 34122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. J. Caunt, J. N. Hislop, E. Kelly, A.-L. Matharu, L. D. Green, K. R. Sedgley, A. R. Finch, and C. A. McArdle
Regulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors by Protein Kinase C: Inside Out Signalling and Evidence for Multiple Active Conformations
Endocrinology, August 1, 2004; 145(8): 3594 - 3602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Bonfil, D. Chuderland, S. Kraus, D. Shahbazian, I. Friedberg, R. Seger, and Z. Naor
Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, Jun N-Terminal Kinase, p38, and c-Src Are Involved in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Stimulated Activity of the Glycoprotein Hormone Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta}-Subunit Promoter
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2228 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. M. Gault, K. Morgan, A. J. Pawson, R. P. Millar, and G. A. Lincoln
Sheep Exhibit Novel Variations in the Organization of the Mammalian Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2362 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Gonzalez-Martinez, T. Madigou, E. Mananos, J. M. Cerda-Reverter, S. Zanuy, O. Kah, and J. A. Munoz-Cueto
Cloning and Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in the Brain and Pituitary of the European Sea Bass: An In Situ Hybridization Study
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1380 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. P. Millar, Z.-L. Lu, A. J. Pawson, C. A. Flanagan, K. Morgan, and S. R. Maudsley
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 235 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. R. Finch, L. Green, J. N. Hislop, E. Kelly, and C. A. McArdle
Signaling and Antiproliferative Effects of Type I and II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1823 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Ulloa-Aguirre, J. A. Janovick, A. Leanos-Miranda, and P. M. Conn
Misrouted cell surface GnRH receptors as a disease aetiology for congenital isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2004; 10(2): 177 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. G. Romanelli, T. Barni, M. Maggi, M. Luconi, P. Failli, A. Pezzatini, E. Pelo, F. Torricelli, C. Crescioli, P. Ferruzzi, et al.
Expression and Function of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor in Human Olfactory GnRH-secreting Neurons: AN AUTOCRINE GnRH LOOP UNDERLIES NEURONAL MIGRATION
J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 117 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. Wang, O. Yun, K. Maiti, D. Y. Oh, K. K. Kim, C. H. Chae, C. J. Lee, J. Y. Seong, and H. B. Kwon
Position of Pro and Ser near Glu7.32 in the Extracellular Loop 3 of Mammalian and Nonmammalian Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptors Is a Critical Determinant for Differential Ligand Selectivity for Mammalian GnRH and Chicken GnRH-II
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2004; 18(1): 105 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Liu, D. A. Austin, and N. J. G. Webster
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Desensitized L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cells Are Refractory to Acute Protein Kinase C, Cyclic AMP, and Calcium-Dependent Signaling
Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4354 - 4365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Okada, A. Murota-Kawano, S. S. Kakar, and S. J. Winters
Evidence that Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) II Stimulates Luteinizing Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion from Monkey Pituitary Cultures by Activating the GnRH I Receptor
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1356 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Pawson, S. R. Maudsley, J. Lopes, A. A. Katz, Y.-M. Sun, J. S. Davidson, and R. P. Millar
Multiple Determinants for Rapid Agonist-Induced Internalization of a Nonmammalian Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor: A Putative Palmitoylation Site and Threonine Doublet within the Carboxyl-Terminal Tail Are Critical
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3860 - 3871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Navratil, S. P. Bliss, K. A. Berghorn, J. M. Haughian, T. A. Farmerie, J. K. Graham, C. M. Clay, and M. S. Roberson
Constitutive Localization of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor to Low Density Membrane Microdomains Is Necessary for GnRH Signaling to ERK
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 31593 - 31602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. Fromme, P. Eftekhari, M. van Regenmortel, J. Hoebeke, A. Katz, and R. Millar
A Novel Retro-Inverso Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Immunogen Elicits Antibodies That Neutralize the Activity of Native GnRH
Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 3262 - 3269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Karges, W. Karges, M. Mine, L. Ludwig, R. Kuhne, E. Milgrom, and N. de Roux
Mutation Ala171Thr Stabilizes the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Its Inactive Conformation, Causing Familial Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1873 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. D. Dixit, R. Sridaran, M. A. Edmonsond, D. Taub, and W. E. Thompson
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Attenuates Pregnancy-Associated Thymic Involution and Modulates the Expression of Antiproliferative Gene Product Prohibitin
Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1496 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Morgan, D. Conklin, A. J. Pawson, R. Sellar, T. R. Ott, and R. P. Millar
A Transcriptionally Active Human Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene Homolog Overlaps Two Genes in the Antisense Orientation on Chromosome 1q.12
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 423 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Y. Seong, L. Wang, D. Y. Oh, O. Yun, K. Maiti, J. H. Li, J. M. Soh, H. S. Choi, K. Kim, H. Vaudry, et al.
Ala/Thr201 in Extracellular Loop 2 and Leu/Phe290 in Transmembrane Domain 6 of Type 1 Frog Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Confer Differential Ligand Sensitivity and Signal Transduction
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 454 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Harris, D. Chuderland, D. Bonfil, S. Kraus, R. Seger, and Z. Naor
Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and c-Src, But Not Jun N-Terminal Kinase, Are Involved in Basal and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Stimulated Activity of the Glycoprotein Hormone {alpha}-Subunit Promoter
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 612 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Terasawa
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone II: Is this Neuropeptide Important for Mammalian Reproduction?
Endocrinology, January 1, 2003; 144(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Prioleau, I. Visiers, B. J. Ebersole, H. Weinstein, and S. C. Sealfon
Conserved Helix 7 Tyrosine Acts as a Multistate Conformational Switch in the 5HT2C Receptor. IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL "LOCKED-ON" PHENOTYPE AND DOUBLE REVERTANT MUTATIONS
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36577 - 36584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. D. G. Pfleger, J. Bogerd, and R. P. Millar
Conformational Constraint of Mammalian, Chicken, and Salmon GnRHs, But Not GnRH II, Enhances Binding at Mammalian and Nonmammalian Receptors: Evidence for Preconfiguration of GnRH II
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2002; 16(9): 2155 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. F. G. Silveira, P. M. Stewart, M. Thomas, D. A. Clark, P. M. G. Bouloux, and G. S. MacColl
Novel Homozygous Splice Acceptor Site GnRH Receptor (GnRHR) Mutation: Human GnRHR "Knockout"
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2973 - 2977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Maya-Nunez, J. A. Janovick, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, D. Soderlund, P. M. Conn, and J. P. Mendez
Molecular Basis of Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism: Restoration of Mutant (E90K) GnRH Receptor Function by a Deletion at a Distant Site
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2144 - 2149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Ott, B. E. Troskie, R. W. Roeske, N. Illing, C. A. Flanagan, and R. P. Millar
Two Mutations in Extracellular Loop 2 of the Human GnRH Receptor Convert an Antagonist to an Agonist
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2002; 16(5): 1079 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Grove-Strawser, S. A. Sower, P. M. Ronsheim, J. B. Connolly, C. G. Bourn, and B. S. Rubin
Guinea Pig GnRH: Localization and Physiological Activity Reveal That It, Not Mammalian GnRH, Is the Major Neuroendocrine Form in Guinea Pigs
Endocrinology, May 1, 2002; 143(5): 1602 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Castro-Fernandez, J. A. Janovick, S. P. Brothers, R. A. Fisher, T. H. Ji, and P. M. Conn
Regulation of RGS3 and RGS10 Palmitoylation by GnRH
Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1310 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Pati and H. R. Habibi
Involvement of Protein Kinase C and Arachidonic Acid Pathways in the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Regulation of Oocyte Meiosis and Follicular Steroidogenesis in the Goldfish Ovary
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 813 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. J. Fromme, A. A. Katz, R. W. Roeske, R. P. Millar, and C. A. Flanagan
Role of Aspartate7.32(302) of the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Stabilizing a High-Affinity Ligand Conformation
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2001; 60(6): 1280 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. M. Everest, J. N. Hislop, T. Harding, J. B. Uney, A. Flynn, R. P. Millar, and C. A. McArdle
Signaling and Antiproliferative Effects Mediated by GnRH Receptors After Expression in Breast Cancer Cells Using Recombinant Adenovirus
Endocrinology, November 1, 2001; 142(11): 4663 - 4672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. N. Hislop, H. M. Everest, A. Flynn, T. Harding, J. B. Uney, B. E. Troskie, R. P. Millar, and C. A. McArdle
Differential Internalization of Mammalian and Non-mammalian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors. UNCOUPLING OF DYNAMIN-DEPENDENT INTERNALIZATION FROM MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39685 - 39694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Wang, D. Y. Oh, J. Bogerd, H. S. Choi, R. S. Ahn, J. Y. Seong, and H. B. Kwon
Inhibitory Activity of Alternative Splice Variants of the Bullfrog GnRH Receptor-3 on Wild-Type Receptor Signaling
Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 4015 - 4025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Van Goor, Y.-X. Li, and S. S. Stojilkovic
Paradoxical Role of Large-Conductance Calcium-Activated K+ (BK) Channels in Controlling Action Potential-Driven Ca2+ Entry in Anterior Pituitary Cells
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 5902 - 5915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Millar, S. Lowe, D. Conklin, A. Pawson, S. Maudsley, B. Troskie, T. Ott, M. Millar, G. Lincoln, R. Sellar, et al.
A novel mammalian receptor for the evolutionarily conserved type II GnRH
PNAS, August 1, 2001; (2001) 141048498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. D. Horvat, D. A. Roess, S. E. Nelson, B. G. Barisas, and C. M. Clay
Binding of Agonist but Not Antagonist Leads to Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer between Intrinsically Fluorescent Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2001; 15(5): 695 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K. W. Cheon, H.-S. Lee, I. S. Parhar, and I. S. Kang
Expression of the second isoform of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH-II) in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Wang, J. Bogerd, H. S. Choi, J. Y. Seong, J. M. Soh, S. Y. Chun, M. Blomenröhr, B. E. Troskie, R. P. Millar, W. H. Yu, et al.
Three distinct types of GnRH receptor characterized in the bullfrog
PNAS, December 14, 2000; (2000) 11508498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. N. Hislop, M. T. Madziva, H. M. Everest, T. Harding, J. B. Uney, G. B. Willars, R. P. Millar, B. E. Troskie, J. S. Davidson, and C. A. McArdle
Desensitization and Internalization of Human and XenopusGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Expressed in {{alpha}}T4 Pituitary Cells Using Recombinant Adenovirus
Endocrinology, December 1, 2000; 141(12): 4564 - 4575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Madigou, E. Mañanos-Sanchez, S. Hulshof, I. Anglade, S. Zanuy, and O. Kah
Cloning, Tissue Distribution, and Central Expression of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in the Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1857 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Sosnowski, P. L. Mellon, and M. A. Lawson
Activation of Translation in Pituitary Gonadotrope Cells by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2000; 14(11): 1811 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. H. Hoffmann, T. t. Laak, R. Kühne, H. Reiländer, and T. Beckers
Residues within Transmembrane Helices 2 and 5 of the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Contribute to Agonist and Antagonist Binding
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2000; 14(7): 1099 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
F. E. M. Rebers, P. T. Bosma, W. van Dijk, H. J. T. Goos, and R. W. Schulz
GnRH stimulates LH release directly via inositol phosphate and indirectly via cAMP in African catfish
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): R1572 - R1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Cui, R. G. Smith, G. R. Mount, J.-L. Lo, J. Yu, T. F. Walsh, S. B. Singh, R. J. DeVita, M. T. Goulet, J. M. Schaeffer, et al.
Identification of Phe313 of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor as a Site Critical for the Binding of Nonpeptide GnRH Antagonists
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2000; 14(5): 671 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. E. Troskie, J. P. Hapgood, R. P. Millar, and N. Illing
Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Cloning, Gene Expression, and Ligand Selectivity of a Novel Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Expressed in the Pituitary and Midbrain of Xenopus laevis
Endocrinology, May 1, 2000; 141(5): 1764 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Carolsfeld, J. F. F. Powell, M. Park, W. H. Fischer, A. G. Craig, J. P. Chang, J. E. Rivier, and N. M. Sherwood
Primary Structure and Function of Three Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormones, Including a Novel Form, from an Ancient Teleost, Herring
Endocrinology, February 1, 2000; 141(2): 505 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-O. Chung, Q. Yang, K. J. Catt, and K. K. Arora
Expression and Function of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor Are Dependent on a Conserved Apolar Amino Acid in the Third Intracellular Loop
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 1999; 274(50): 35756 - 35762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Blomenröhr, A. Heding, R. Sellar, R. Leurs, J. Bogerd, K. A. Eidne, and G. B. Willars
Pivotal Role for the Cytoplasmic Carboxyl-Terminal Tail of a Nonmammalian Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Cell Surface Expression, Ligand Binding, and Receptor Phosphorylation and Internalization
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 1999; 56(6): 1229 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. A. Flanagan, W. Zhou, L. Chi, T. Yuen, V. Rodic, D. Robertson, M. Johnson, P. Holland, R. P. Millar, H. Weinstein, et al.
The Functional Microdomain in Transmembrane Helices 2 and 7 Regulates Expression, Activation, and Coupling Pathways of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 1999; 274(41): 28880 - 28886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. P. Pralong, F. Gomez, E. Castillo, S. Cotecchia, L. Abuin, M. L. Aubert, L. Portmann, and R. C. Gaillard
Complete Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Associated with a Novel Inactivating Mutation of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3811 - 3816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. K. Arora, H.-O. Chung, and K. J. Catt
Influence of a Species-Specific Extracellular Amino Acid on Expression and Function of the Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 1999; 13(6): 890 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. D. Neill, L. C. Musgrove, L. W. Duck, and J. C. Sellers
High Efficiency Method for Gene Transfer in Normal Pituitary Gonadotropes: Adenoviral-Mediated Expression of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Suppresses Luteinizing Hormone Secretion
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2562 - 2569.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Illing, B. E. Troskie, C. S. Nahorniak, J. P. Hapgood, R. E. Peter, and R. P. Millar
Two gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor subtypes with distinct ligand selectivity and differential distribution in brain and pituitary in the goldfish (Carassius auratus)
PNAS, March 2, 1999; 96(5): 2526 - 2531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Nelson, R. D. Horvat, J. Malvey, D. A. Roess, B. G. Barisas, and C. M. Clay
Characterization of an Intrinsically Fluorescent Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor and Effects of Ligand Binding on Receptor Lateral Diffusion
Endocrinology, February 1, 1999; 140(2): 950 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Lin and P. M. Conn
Transcriptional Activation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Gene by GnRH: Involvement of Multiple Signal Transduction Pathways
Endocrinology, January 1, 1999; 140(1): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
X. Lin, J. A. Janovick, and P. M. Conn
Mutations at the Consensus Phosphorylation Sites in the Third Intracellular Loop of the Rat Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor: Effects on Receptor Ligand Binding and Signal Transduction
Biol Reprod, December 1, 1998; 59(6): 1470 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. K. Arora, L. Z. Krsmanovic, N. Mores, H. O'Farrell, and K. J. Catt
Mediation of Cyclic AMP Signaling by the First Intracellular Loop of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., October 2, 1998; 273(40): 25581 - 25586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sealfon, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sealfon, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, R. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals