This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cranney, A. Articles by Guyatt, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cranney, A. Articles by Guyatt, G.

Meta-Analyses of Therapies for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

The availability of new therapeutic agents has made clinical decision-making in osteoporosis more complex. Because individual clinicians cannot systematically collect and assimilate all the evidence bearing on the efficacy of osteoporosis therapies, they require summaries for evidence-based decision-making. Systematic reviews using rigorous methods provide an unbiased, comprehensive summary of the available evidence, and meta-analysis provides the most precise possible estimate of the treatment effect. The articles in this series represent systematic reviews of a number of osteoporosis therapies: calcium and vitamin D, the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, and calcitonin. We used state-of-the-art methodology to provide the most clear and accurate characterization of the effectiveness of these therapies. These include explicit eligibility criteria; a comprehensive search; validity assessment that focused on concealment of randomization, blinding, and completeness of follow-up; and sophisticated analytic methods. In addition, two or more reviewers made independent, reproducible decisions regarding study inclusion and assessments of study validity. Only alendronate and risedronate reduced the risk of both nonvertebral and vertebral fractures. Other agents that reduced vertebral fracture included raloxifene, etidronate, vitamin D, and calcitonin. Clinicians should consider these results when selecting antiosteoporosis therapies for postmenopausal women.

I. Systematic Reviews of Randomized Trials in Osteoporosis: Introduction and Methodology

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gordon Guyatt, McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1200 Main Street West, Room 2C12, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail: guyatt{at}McMaster.ca

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.J. Hosking, P. Geusens, and R. Rizzoli Osteoporosis therapy: an example of putting evidence-based medicine into clinical practice QJM, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 403 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Bjarnason, A. S. Chan, S. M. Ott, S. L. Ruggiero, B. Mehrotra, H. G. Bone, and A. C. Santora Ten Years of Alendronate Treatment for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women N. Engl. J. Med., July 8, 2004; 351(2): 190 - 192. [Full Text] [PDF]